WEBVTT - Week 10 Express Recap

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal Hell that for me.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm a man. I've heard so many players say, well

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 2>for a day? Edith state is that? Whoo whoo?

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And then and tie? All right, Dan, A little bit

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of a different show today.

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a great I'm having a great time, Ty, Yes,

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 2>it's a different show. You can if you're watching this

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube, eventually you can see that we are on

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the run. We are. We're in an anonymous Hilton Garden

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Inn somewhere in Michigan. But this is great, Ty. We're

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 2>starting a new life together. We need to find ladies. Okay,

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 2>what are we doing? We're talking week ten.

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 3>We're talking week ten. So, for those of you who

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 3>have paid any attention to what we've been doing over

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 3>the last couple of weeks, we have been teasing this weekend.

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>We are doing this from parts of known i e.

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Somewhere near Ann Arbor, somewhere near the Detroit Airport. At present,

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 3>we do not have strong enough internet to do our

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 3>normal midnight stream. Though we tried, it was just not

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 3>going to happen. So a last we're recording this on

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 3>an iPhone. We've got a portable recording set up here,

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 3>and we will do our best to get this out

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 3>as soon as possible. So apologies to those of you

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 3>who are out there who listened for the midnight live

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 3>stream or waiting for the midnight live show.

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>It's still a show, still show, still a show. It's

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 2>in audio form and in video form. The timing's a

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 2>little bit different. We could have been partying with the

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 2>youths in ann Arbor, but we got cheap pizza, a

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 2>hotel room game still going for you, for you, this

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 2>is what we do for the Verbowl.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so yeah, this I think goes without saying that

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 3>it will not be a normal show, though we paid

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 3>attention to and though we have a pretty good sense

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 3>for the themes of the day. Dan, Yes, we didn't

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 3>get to watch our normal amount of college football, so

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 3>still like decent amount, decent amount, but I think just

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 3>to preserve like honesty, this is a show about honesty

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 3>first and foremost true, we're going to make sure that

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>this is not the normal show and more of just

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 3>a express reaction version to what we saw. I think

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 3>have a pretty good sense for what happened in the

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 3>early block and the mid afternoon block, it's just the

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 3>night games that are going on right now. And you know,

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 3>because we were in the press box for a good

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 3>chunk of the day, brag much.

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, such a cool thing.

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 3>We did not get to watch our normal amount of football.

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 3>So we'll get to dood alerts, we'll get to reverbs,

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 3>we'll get to all the normal bits. On the Tuesday

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 3>spillover episode, we'll use that as sort of a second

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 3>recap episode. But as for today, today is about what

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 3>we kind of took in here, what we saw around

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 3>college football skin tight Saturday.

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 2>I had a nice little week pick in time. I'm

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 2>not gonna lie. I don't know what's going to happen

0:02:57.840 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 2>with all the night games, and this is going to

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 2>be a specially weird to listen to after the fact,

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 2>where you're like, well, South Carolina's pretty impressive and then

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>they lose by thirty, right, But there is something fun

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 2>about being in the moment with this, and it's a

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 2>great opportunity for anybody listening to say, yeah, you probably

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 2>didn't watch a ton of Syracuse Virginia Tech. Here's what

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 2>happened to file away for next week.

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's exactly right, So make sure you hit fall

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 3>make sure you hit subscribe, make sure you vote in

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Overballer Top twelve poll. By the way, I've opened it

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 3>up to everybody who signs up for our Patreon, so

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 3>it's not just people with the paid tiers. If you

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 3>go to overbawlers dot com, there's a free tier. Yes,

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 3>if you don't feel like paying, we get it.

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>It's cool.

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 3>But this week, this week only, you're gonna have the

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to vote in Overballer Top twelve pole. That's going

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 3>to drop bright and early on Sunday morning. So let's

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 3>get more people in the tent, get more opinions out there.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with Penn State, Ohio State. Let's Penn sat

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Ohiose State.

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 3>We were roaming tailgates today doing our best to try

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 3>and find televisions. We watched the fourth quarter of the game,

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 3>or chunk of the fourth quarter of this game from

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 3>our seats up in the press box. Your final score

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 3>was twenty two thirteen Ohio State. It was not a

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 3>game dominated by defair by offense, excuse me, much more

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 3>so by defense. At one point in the game, I

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 3>turned to you when we were watching and we compared

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the team box scores and the team stat lines right,

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 3>and they look shockingly similar. So this was very similar,

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 3>frustratingly so to other Ohio State Penn State games that

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 3>we have seen. I can speak to it from the

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Penn State perspective right to the extent that we watched

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 3>this game, we're able to take it in. What did

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 3>you get from what you saw out of Ohio State? So,

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 3>Ohio State seemed to make a lot very difficult for

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Penn State. Defensively, it seemed like they were overwhelming Penn

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 3>State's offensive line a good amount, obviously highlighted by the

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 3>defensive stand first second, third, fourth and goal, probably highlighted

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 3>by Penn State's decision to run it straight up the

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 3>gut first second, third down before attempting to throw it

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 3>into a real solid amount of traffic out of the

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 3>shotgun on fourth and goal.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 2>But from Ohio State, it felt like they were generating

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 2>even though they weren't finishing drives, even though they weren't

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 2>hitting a number of downfield passes like they have earlier

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 2>on in the season, which of course they weren't. It's

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 2>the Penn State defense right right that they were finding

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 2>ways to get Brandon Innis. Jeremiah Smith Quinn, Shawn Judkins,

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of wiggle room, a little bit of space,

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 2>whether it was play design, whether it was reading what

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 2>the defense was giving to them. And Will Howard was

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 2>very sloppy early on. Will Howard was giving the defense.

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he gave Penn State its only touchdown in

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 3>this game on the first drive of the game for

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Ohio State. It jumped a slant, took it to the house.

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 3>It was up to Penn State was up ten to

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 3>nothing before we even knew what happened. But it was

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 3>from that point forward that Ohio State started to kind

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 3>of assert itself a little bit more. And you know,

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 3>you can speak to what they did on offense, but

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 3>what they did on defense I think was especially impressive.

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 3>Penn State had two drives inside the five yard line,

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 3>came away with zero points.

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 3>They scored exactly your favorite stat, zero offensive touchdowns.

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Just had to those two field goals.

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 2>And really, this is the second year of scoring zero

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 2>offensive touchdowns. It was twenty nine seconds down two scores

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 2>last year that got in the end zone.

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think the bigger theme for me was

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 3>just the way that Ohio State bullied Penn State really

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 3>on both sides, you know what I mean. We had

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 3>some questions about the left side of the Ohio State line, rightfully,

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 3>so there were some newer guys that were starting on

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 3>that side, or less experienced guys at a minimum, and

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 3>the fact that they had as much success as they did,

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 3>I think as an offensive line unit was pretty impressive.

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:49.679
<v Speaker 3>Quinchawn Judkins close to one hundred yards rushing yep, Trevion

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Henderson over fifty yards rushing like fifty four yards. Will

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Howard did not have an eye popping stat line with

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 3>respect to what he did on the ground, but he

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 3>did have two really big third down conversion late in

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 3>the game that extended their drive and essentially put the

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 3>game on ice. So it felt like, to your point,

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 3>it came together late for them in some respect on offense,

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 3>but ultimately that it was enough to put the game

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 3>on ice. The Penn State side of this, I think

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 3>is really frustrating. I agree, yeah, because.

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 2>It feels like the same game every year. It does

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 2>look so okay, it's the same game every year, zoom

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 2>out for a moment. We talked a little bit about

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Penn State not recently finding the next I guess would

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 2>be Parker Washington would be the last guy in this respect.

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 2>They found the tight ends. We talked about not finding

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 2>the receivers. Penn State is not finding the quarterbacks and

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 2>offensive coordinators and offensive lineman at the same time. Right,

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 2>there is something I think Andy Kotilnik is probably really good.

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Is he you have four plays to get in the

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 2>end zone from the three yard line. Good early returns

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 2>are no not for Penn State, not good enough. And

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>so maybe it's an execution thing. It wasn't a createivity

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 2>thing to me. Well, he wasn't creative enough there.

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 3>It seemed there were several drives in this game where

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 3>I thought they were going to go all trick play

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 3>all the time.

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Right, whether it's using Tyler Warren, whether it's using creative sets,

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 3>whether I mean, you name it, I mean they it

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 3>felt like they were empty in the clip against Ohio State.

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>With respect to.

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Creativity, creativity is not the issue. It's scoring points.

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So Drew Owler's injured, he's playing on kind of

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 2>one leg or one knee or whatever.

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Look good, Look pretty good.

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 2>What was scrambling early for key first downs? And it's

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 2>different after playing you know, three and a half quarters

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 2>against Ohio State. Your body wears down, I assume, so

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I think my body would wear down. So to me,

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 2>the thing with Penn State is everything looked like they

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 2>had to scratch and claw. Not everything. Eighty five percent

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 2>of their successful plays seem like tight windows had to

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 2>break three tackles to get to seven yards. Right, Everything

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 2>seemed a little bit easier. Maybe it's because they had

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 2>better skill position Ohio State, but the Penn State scratch

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 2>and claw element to me was a little bit disappointing

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 2>that it's another year of this.

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Look, Ben Jones, our friend who writes about Penn State,

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 3>has been on the show. He threw this one out

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 3>on Twitter. He says, in the last two Ohio State games,

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Penn State has thrown the ball sixty three times and

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 3>completed thirteen of those passes, just thirteen of those passes

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 3>to wide receivers.

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Quote.

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 3>You can point to a ton of other things, but

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 3>the wide out play and development simply hasn't been good enough.

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 3>This is not a trade secret at point. We know

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 3>this about Penn State, and I think the frustration was

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 3>palpable in the immediate aftermath of this game. Zach Saiko,

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 3>who does the locked on Hitney Lyons podcast shout out

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 3>to him. He tweeted out, still in shock from what

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 3>I witnessed postgame for Penn State versus Ohio State. The

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 3>student section bowed the team as they lined up for

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 3>the alma mater. Then half the team walked into the

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 3>tunnel before the song was over. So the team feeling it,

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 3>the crowd feeling it. It sucks to kind of lay

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 3>that on the player. Obviously, there is frustration abound. James

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Franklin took on some of that in his postgame press conference, saying,

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, he's got to own he's got to look

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 3>in the mirror. It's entirely on him that type of thing. Look,

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we've heard this a million times. He's

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 3>one to ten against Ohio State at this point. So

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 3>there's got to be a lot of splain in this

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 3>week as for where they go from here and how

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 3>they can try and take a step forward.

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>This is still a playoff team. I think for the

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>most part, this is a playoff team.

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Technically yes, technically yes.

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it was all that inspiring or

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 3>performance though, and that's probably the bigger question. Can they

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 3>get into the playoff with an eleven to one record.

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 3>They're not going to make the Big Ten title at

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 3>this game at this rate. Can they make the playoff? Yeah,

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 3>they can't make the playoff. I think it's probably they

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 3>will make the playoff. What they do when they get there,

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Can they be a serious contender based on what we

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 3>saw in this game?

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>The answer is a definitive no.

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Well here, here's the other thing too. If you're going

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 2>to look at the other side of this coin, it's

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State has a decent too, I think good shot

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 2>at winning the Big Ten. Penn State is a score

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 2>worse than Ohio State in this moment. Without putting the

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 2>ball in on offense that you simulate the tame one

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred times, Penn State's probably scoring an offensive touchdown a

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 2>number of those times. So you're saying a down, if

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 2>not horrendous, all things considered, offensive performance from Penn State

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 2>has them in a position to beat a probable excellent team.

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 2>A You really have to squint to see the silver

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 2>lining if you're a Penn State fan. But there's that.

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess, well, there is that, and I just.

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 3>I think the thing the other thing that makes is frustrating,

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 3>separate from the fact that all of these games feel

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 3>the same. If I were in the home studio, I'd

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 3>be yelling about this.

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Right. They had their chances, Dan.

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 2>They had that's the opportunity thing.

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they had their chances. This was like they did

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 3>not play well on offense. Ohio State certainly got the

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 3>best of them on offense, but they have plenty of chances.

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 3>They had plenty of chances to get into the game

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 3>to straight up win this game because their defense. All

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 3>things considered, you hold Ohio State to twenty points, that

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 3>should be good.

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Enough for it, and a good offense.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 2>You put the pressure on Will Howard like they put

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 2>pressure on him right, and that you're getting in his

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 2>head early with that pick six, and you are. You're

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 2>doing plenty to win this game. The Penn State defense wise,

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 2>like Ohio State had plays. Of course, they're going to

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 2>make plays against everybody, but there is something like even

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>the threat of a big play receiver opens things up

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 2>against the defense as good as Ohio States can be.

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 2>And when you don't have the like gravitational safeties peaking

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 2>over here, it just it gives drew Our allor less

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 2>to work with. It gives the running backs less to

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>work with It gives codel Nicky less to work with

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 2>Cotil Nicky. And there's that glaring issue right now that

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 2>if each of those offensive position units is, you know,

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 2>the part of the a slice of the offensive pie,

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 2>they're missing a pretty significant slice.

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>It's very frustrating.

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 3>And I saw a lot of people who commented in

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 3>response to some of our tweets we send out the

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 3>nightly tweet on Saturdays, asking I'm a Penn State fan

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 3>and this is how I'm feeling. And there are a

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 3>couple of people who chimed in and said that this

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 3>should be it for Franklin. I don't know if I

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 3>necessarily agree with that. Right the perspective is getting a

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 3>little bit easier to justify, though, Well, you.

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 2>Just if you're selling hope when you're one and ten

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 2>against what you perceive to be the most consistently difficult

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 2>team in your conference, and you look at your standard

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 2>as conference championship level, but you've lost ten of eleven

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 2>at this point, you know, James Franklin is probably not

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 2>going to often start winning this game.

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 3>It's incredibly frustrating. It is a good road win for

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Ohio State, excellent, a really good road win. It doesn't

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 3>always need to be pretty. They found a way to

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 3>get it done, so kudos to them.

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 2>It does need to be at night, conversation for another day.

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 3>Conversation for another day. May we could talk about that

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 3>on Tuesday. Sure, Game Day was not shy about the

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 3>innu window saw that why the game needs to be

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 3>at night or should be at night. The Penn State

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 3>student body certainly was not shy about expressing its dismay

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 3>over the decision by Fox to make this the big

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 3>noon game.

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it sucks.

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it should have been at night. But that

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 3>being said, I don't know if the game's any different

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 3>if it's at night.

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Likely not right.

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 3>We've got ten previous games of data to show us

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 3>that this game would probably have ended up exactly the

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 3>same way. Agree, what else stood out to you? We

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 3>had a couple things go down. It was a drama

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 3>fill day, it really was. We had obviously the game

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 3>we were at Oregon Michigan. We had two teams in

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 3>the Big twelve lose Big Twelve teams, Yeah, Kansas State

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 3>and Iowa State, which is certainly going to shake up

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 3>that conference race.

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe how we think about it's.

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:57.359
<v Speaker 2>Good for Colorado.

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 3>I believe really good for Colorado. How those teams kind

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 3>of factor into the larger national discussion. We had some

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 3>interesting bits here in the SEC. The Georgia game, I

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 3>think left some questions about where they stand in the

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 3>pecking order. They won by fourteen over Florida, but Carson

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Beck had a really rough go of things. DJ Lagway

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 3>went down for Florida. I saw that it was a

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 3>situation truly on the Florida side. I think they lost

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 3>four guys, three of which were defensive backs in this

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 3>football game, so it was a war of attrition in

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 3>one sense. Georgia gets the w But now with some

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 3>of their games coming up, I think it's fair to

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 3>ask questions about what happens to them next. As we

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 3>are recording this much earlier than usual, Texas A and

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 3>m tennessee both on the ropes. We will not be

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 3>covering that because we cannot.

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Cover Do you have a current score for me?

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I could pull up the current scores as we're going

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>through this, And.

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 2>By the way, just while you're pulling them up, adds

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 2>an interesting wrinkle to the Bill Napier month and a

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 2>half ahead of us, because the narrative of the story

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 2>was like, he's got to look pretty good to like,

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 2>very good in this stretch of impossible games that Florida

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 2>has coming up. Now, DJ likeway, it looks like he's

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 2>out for the year. Significant hamstring injury. That was the

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 2>initial By the way, sometimes you might hear planes flying overhead,

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 2>like yeah, like we're playing in the nineteen ninety three US

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Open in Queens. Yeah, this is the true Stefan Edberg

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 2>of the college football podcasting world right here. That Billy

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Napier has to win games, that Billy Napier has to

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 2>look good, that BILLI Napier has to prove that Florida

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 2>is heading in an impressive direction. Aiden Gardner is not

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the per Gardner. Aiden Warner? Is that the name I'm

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 2>warning for? Yeah, Aiden Warner is not the person to

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 2>steer that chip. Right, This was so like, what do

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 2>you do if you're a Florida decision maker? How do

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 2>you judge Billy Napier against results without DJ Lagway or

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Graham Mertz. Does it buy him time or does give

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 2>you an excuse?

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, Yeah, I mean it depends how you

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 3>feel about billion Aper, right exactly in that administration at

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 3>one point when they brought in Aiden Warner. I turned

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 3>to you and I said, what do we know about

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 3>this guy? And he said, well, he's a Yale transfer

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 3>and I said, high football IQ, yeah, and he said

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 3>he didn't play.

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>He did not play.

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>It just a high regular IQ.

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 3>And to be honest with you, they had to go

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 3>at this one even late. But he threw a really

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 3>bad pick on a drive where I think Florida needed

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 3>to go down the field and try and tie this

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 3>one up. Your final score was thirty four to twenty

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 3>in favor of Georgia at the end of the day.

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Carson Beck threw multiple player interceptible passes. There were on

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 2>multiple occasions he threw passes that could have been intercepted

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 2>by multiple people.

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>The way I.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Jotted it down on the note sheet was his first

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 3>two interceptions were underthrown into at least double coverage. Truly,

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 3>both were into at least double coverage. The third was

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 3>a pick I believe in the third quarter. Early in

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 3>the third ye hit where he got hit and it

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 3>was sort of tipped and it just was a wounded

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 3>duck that was able to jump up and grab. So

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 3>I give credit to Florida's defense for what they did

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 3>in that game. You know, this was a much moreligne

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 3>unit coming into the season. They clearly took it seriously

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 3>trying to reboot things, and it felt like they were

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 3>getting pressure on Carson back.

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>It felt like they were able to obviously.

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Change the game with turnovers at least in the first half,

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 3>with defensive backs being in the right place at the

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 3>right time.

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Totally.

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 3>If nothing more, if you're a Florida fan, one of

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 3>the things you take away from this is the fact

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 3>that they look pretty good I think on defense against

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 3>a at a minimum, pretty good offense with Georgia, right,

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean that is a sign things are improving.

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but how much can you say like we improved

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 2>in a losing injured effort, Like it's just a hard

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 2>sales job. It's not BILLI Napier's fault. I don't think

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 2>that both Graham Hertz and DJ like Waar are hurt.

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 2>But I guess you could point to offensive line issues.

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 2>I guess you. I don't know. It just seems like

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 2>they're just a team with bad luck. They're a team

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 2>with full on bad luck. And I don't know how

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 2>you judge. I can judge Georgia a little bit because

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Georgia seemed to be positioning themselves as an improving team

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 2>even after disappointing performances against you know, teams like Kentucky

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 2>even Mississippi State, but then look strong to excellent against Texas,

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 2>look all over the place, including terrible early against Alabama

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 2>that Florida was an opportunity as a double digit two

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 2>touchdown plus favorite to say, Okay, we've settled into this groove.

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 2>There was This was a grooveless experience from Georgia football.

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 2>And so they're definitively decent. Good but not where they've been.

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 2>Where do we rank Georgia. I don't know, man. They

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 2>won their clunker, which we have to give them credit for.

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 3>We had this debate on the car or in the

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 3>car on the way over here. I think it's Oregon,

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Ohio State one, two.

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, who's three?

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you put.

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Georgia three to you give them benefit of the doubt,

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 3>you put Miami three. Miami has continue to win. They

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 3>put up fifty some odd points today despite the fact

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 3>they gave up thirty one to Duke.

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 2>And not just thirty one to Duke. They gave They

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 2>went on like a tear of mediocrity in the middle

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 2>of this game against Duke. But yes they they won

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 2>and finished strong.

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, you get you get to this point now

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 3>where we start talking about rankings, where it's like, where

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 3>do we put Texas? If Tennessee is truly on the ropes,

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 3>where does we put where do we put Tennessee? Suddenly

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 3>a team like A BYU is one that thankfully was

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 3>on by this week, But does BYU get a nod

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 3>up there? Clemson is also another team that's on the ropes.

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I didn't even mention the ACC. We can talk about

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 3>them in a little bit, but you know, some I

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 3>think further kind of stratification, if you will, in the ACC.

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 3>As the Pit SMU game's going on right now, I'm

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 3>confident saying at point in time, right now that we're

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 3>recording this, ask him he's gonna win that game. They're

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 3>up twenty eight points at halftime, right so, I mean

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 3>we are starting to get some of the intel. I

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 3>think that we need to try and break these teams down. Meanwhile,

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:07.239
<v Speaker 3>Notre Dame, also on buy probably stands to benefit more

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 3>than anybody. Yes, it will not help them if A

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 3>and M loses. Nonetheless, they are in the top ten,

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 3>they're not going to be penalized for not playing a game.

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 3>And if there are teams in front of them where

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 3>there are questions emerging about them, or if they, frankly

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 3>they've got an easier schedule than those teams in front

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 3>of them, they're going to find themselves in a position

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 3>where they can just keep gradually moving up.

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Look, you have to apply the same principles and standards

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 2>to everybody, even as schedules are wildly different. And that

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 2>is I don't know, take the three best teams. Each

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 2>of these teams has played, which varies dramatically. How did

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 2>that team play in those games? And then you take

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 2>road games against conference opponents, how do they look in

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 2>those games? And if you are looking at any of

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 2>these teams and saying they haven't played well on the road,

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 2>they haven't played well against quality teams, but they're winning games,

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 2>knock them down if they're And I like not style

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 2>for the sake of style, but generally speaking, Notre Dame

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 2>has won by a lot of points. Generally speaking, Indiana,

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 2>who has not played a tough schedule at all, has

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 2>won by a lot of points. They have performed like

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 2>an excellent team should be like they have performed against

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 2>their schedule better than BYU has performed against its schedule.

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 2>And so that's something I hold dearly in my chest.

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 2>So that's that's how you can more broadly apply the

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 2>same standards. But yeah, how you play on the road,

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 2>how you play against the best teams, the quote unquote

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 2>best teams, which is also subjective, And I think that's

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 2>how you That's how, at least initially you have to apply.

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't matter until early December, it does not, No,

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 2>but at least we can start shaping this a little bit.

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned the Big twelve thing earlier, yeap, as I

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 3>often say, the Big twelve is now also on a blender.

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Iowa State loss today. Oh, to be clear, Arizona is

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 3>fully blended the smoothie. The Arizona smoothie is ready for

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>everybody to consume. Everybody can't consume. You CF beat them

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 3>into a pulp today. Man, just an absolute massacre. I

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 3>don't have my soundboard. That would be everybody got murdered

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 3>sound right there. But I was State lost that game

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 3>to Texas Tech. Taj Brooks. Taj Brooks will be a

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 3>dude when we do our due to works sitement on Tuesday,

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 3>he runs it in on a direct snap, ran it

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 3>around the right tackle into the end zone. They end

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 3>up winning twenty three to twenty two. And in the

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 3>KSE State game, Houston, of all teams, scored fourteen points

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 3>in the fourth quarter to knock off Case State to

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 3>give them their second conference laws at present, who've.

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Been looking vulnerable by the way Case State against both

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Kansas and Colorado on the ropes.

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.479
<v Speaker 3>The writing was on the wall, and frankly it was

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 3>on the wall for Iowa State as well. Absolutely all right,

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 3>So we have seen this coming. We've kind of warned

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 3>about it, regardless of who we picked and when we

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 3>picked them. It's if you've been paying attention, you have

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 3>seen that some of these games have been closer than

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 3>you'd expect. So where are we stand right now in

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the Big twelve is actually quite interesting. Again, BYU stood,

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 3>I think to benefit the most from this week because

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 3>they didn't play, I didn't have anything to worry about.

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 3>They've got Utah coming up in a rivalry game. I

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 3>don't know how much we think of Utah, but I believe.

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a road game.

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 3>It's still rivalry. Rivalries can get weird. So that's one

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 3>to kind of take and put aside for another day.

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 3>But you've now got this combination of teams that are vying,

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 3>I think for that number two slot in the Big twelve,

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 3>one of which is still Liillwa State, which only has

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 3>one conference loss, Kansas State, Texas Tech, Cincinnati, Arizona State,

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 3>who won Big TCU. Like all of these, here a

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 3>bunch of teams that have two losses in the conference.

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 3>But sitting there also with one loss is a Little

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Old Colorado.

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Little Old Colorado, right, because Nebraska's out of conference, right,

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 2>Little Old Colorado, and they don't own the tiebreaker against

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 2>k State, but otherwise are clean.

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Otherwise I believe they stand to benefit a lot from

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 3>just winning out. Oh yeah, this was one of the

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 3>circumstances that we talked through on our Tuesday episode.

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>They needed Iowa State to lose check and they need

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>to win out. We'll see tbchcheck number two.

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 3>And then it would be helpful at this point in

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 3>time if Case State beat Iowa State in the Farm

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Again game, just to leave no doubt, right. But if

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 3>all of those things occur, there's a pretty good chance

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 3>that Colorado is getting through that Big twelve title game

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 3>to play against BYU.

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 2>But also it's the Big Twelve. So as soon as

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>you think a team is well positioned, or as soon

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 2>as you think a team is dead to rights, Houston, TCU, whoever.

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 2>I came into this conference season thinking, yeah, Utah is

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 2>probably in good shape, Arizona's going to be very difficult

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 2>to deal with, Colorado's.

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>A wild card.

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 2>And then Houston comes out and lays big old eggs

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 2>they're back. Yeah, they are the undead, right, Like Kansas

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 2>looked pretty bad now they look at least Kansas looks dangerous,

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 2>right that they can put a lot of fear into

0:25:57.640 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 2>a lot of teams. We'll see what happens. We'll see

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 2>what that actually means. Means Utah has completely fallen off,

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 2>we're to say, but kind of not in terms of

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 2>greatness or difficulties. ASU and Cincinnati have kind of just

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 2>sort of like been what they've been. They've sort of

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 2>chugged along, you know what they are SU six and two.

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma State goes to this conference's championship game last year

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 2>and remained winless in this conference thus far. So I

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 2>guess you can count on Oklahoma State on some level.

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 2>This year, they've been consistently disappointing well.

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 3>And then there's also the case of Texas Tech. Yes,

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Texas Tech lost back to back games not so long

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 3>ago to both Arizona and Baylor.

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>The Baylor game was you know.

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 2>But also lost to Washington State, opened up giving up

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 2>fifty to Abilene Christian.

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, two conference losses, three overall, and as it goes

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 3>for them the remainder of the season, They've got a

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 3>game against Colorado which could end up being rather significant.

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Agree, They've got a game on the road at.

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Oklahoma State, which suddenly looks a lot more winnable hm.

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 3>And they come back home to close things out against

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 3>West Virginia, which also feels like a winnable game. Maybe

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 3>not with West Virginia's proclivity to run the foot.

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Where's that game? As long as West Virginia is away

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 2>from it's in Lubbock, ok So.

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean Texas Tech is another team that I don't

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 3>think we could turn a blind eye to just because Look,

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 3>they went on the road and they beat Iowa State.

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good win.

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 3>They're just really tough to try and engage and feel

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 3>confident about week in a week out. But I think

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 3>that almost applies to this point to every team in

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 3>the Big twe and.

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Then BYU from the Rafters, BYU Colorado as we all.

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Predicted, as as we all predicted, And then I guess

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 3>the other kind of angle this week is what's going

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 3>on in the ACC. So at time of recording, hopefully this.

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Won't be stale.

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what do we have with about nine minutes left

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 3>in the fourth quarter? They'll Clemson has the ball and

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.959
<v Speaker 3>is driving at about midfield and plus territory. Louisville currently

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 3>leads twenty six to seven.

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot to come back from.

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 3>It's a lot to come back from for U and

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 3>I talked about this earlier. What started as a pickleball

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 3>effort from Kate clubneck.

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's let's cover our bases here. React to Clemson coming

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 2>back and winning this game.

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Incredible win.

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 3>Should be a top ten team, definitely cementing its spot

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 3>as one of the top two teams in the ACC.

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 2>They were down twenty six to seven with nine minutes left,

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and I don't want to bore you with the details

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.239
<v Speaker 2>of how they came back to win this game, but

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 2>holy hell, how dramatic and impressive was that obviously a

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.199
<v Speaker 2>clunker of a performance the first three quarters plus. But

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 2>this is what good teams do.

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Tie.

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 2>They come back and they find ways to win. Okay,

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 2>en scene, Now let's go through. Louisville pulls this out cleanly.

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Louisville pulls this one out cleanly first off. A great

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>win for Louisville. Que go on the road to Death

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Valley and win that game.

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Tyler Schuck has not really won that big game

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 2>and finally is able to sort of plant his flag.

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Had a beautiful rushing touchdown earlier in this game where

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 3>he sort of dove into the Superman's summersault, which is

0:28:55.360 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 3>pretty pretty awesome. Clemson losing this game gives them two

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 3>losses on the season. Lost the game Week one in

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 3>resounding fashion. Together one way, this would be their first

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 3>in the ACC, so they would still obviously be in it,

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:15.479
<v Speaker 3>but by virtue of Miami winning, by virtue of I

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 3>believe SMU pulling away from Pitt, that would mean that

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 3>SMU and Miami are on a collision course. Now for

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 3>this ACC title game, the rest of the way for

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 3>SMU is pretty clean. By comparison, It is the easiest

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 3>slate for the remainder of the season that I think

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 3>you're going to find the ACC. If you're an SMU fan,

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I feel pretty good about that. What this does is

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 3>it paves the way for those two teams to meet

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 3>play for the ACC title game. It opens up the

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 3>possibility that SMU could find a way to win the

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 3>ACC in its first year in the conference, if not

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 3>making into the playoff. I think it makes things really

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 3>interesting with respect to these playoff rankings that they're going

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 3>to release of all times election on Election Day at

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 3>night correct before the ballots close, which no one will

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 3>pay attention to, I'm sure, but where they put a

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 3>team like an SMU maybe not the toughest schedule throughout

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 3>the season, but at some point you got to take

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 3>notice that they are playing really really solid football.

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, that they beat Louisville, who possibly just beat Clemson Clemson.

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 3>So I mean, I think where I'm at with Clemson

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 3>is they're going to need to get back to blowing

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 3>teams out, and I'm not sure they can do what

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 3>they did in the first half of their schedule moving forward, because,

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 3>as we said on the preview episode, back half of

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the schedule gets harder for Clemson, not talking like they're

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 3>playing Georgia every week, but we're talking about playing top

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty caliber teams, fringe top twenty teams a couple times

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 3>over now throughout the month of November, close out the

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 3>season against South Carolina.

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina is probably on the verge of being Texas.

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Ay now, it's a good South Carolina team, just as

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 3>an example, not a conference game.

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Not a conference game.

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 3>But that is more of the case I think for

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 3>the remainder of the season for the clech So it's

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 3>for them to work their way back into kind of

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:07.479
<v Speaker 3>that national conversation. It's a different calculation than I think

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 3>we saw in the beginning part of the year.

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, they're on the road that sometimes some of these

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 2>big twelve teams in contention are, which is they might

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 2>not look great, they might not be highly rated as

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 2>an at large playoff team. Just when you're conferencing, you

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 2>get in as a top four seed, right, That's where

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Clemson is right now, and you neglect it to make

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 2>to make another sort of mention with the ACC and

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 2>that is Miami is happily undefeated, but they downloaded Hinge

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 2>and they're swiping on some l's right, They're searching for

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 2>an hell. They haven't really found that match yet, but

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 2>between the Cal and Virginia Tech and Louisville and now

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Duke games, they're on the prowl for a loss.

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 3>By the way, Camboard had one of the worst interceptions

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 3>we've ever seen.

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and some of the best plays, which is I

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 2>guess the cam Ward experience.

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>It is a dichotomy that is Camboard.

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 2>It is he is so casual at times impressively so.

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Xavier Rostreppo was casually excellent with regularity. There's a lot

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 2>to love about where this Miami team is in terms

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 2>of scoring points, pulling out games whatever. Miami's got some

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 2>work to clean up in terms of giving up the

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 2>havoc plays like defenses are getting after them a little

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 2>bit too much. If I'm a Miami fan, I'm a

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 2>little bit concerned about the sacks and the tackles for

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 2>lost that kind of thing. A little bit concerned about

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 2>cam Ward just going ice cold for stretches. I'm a

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 2>little bit concerned about a team like Duke not a

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 2>great offense. This is not a powerful, high powered whatever offense.

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 2>They rattled off like a twenty eight to three run.

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I believe in the middle of this game.

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Miami gave up over four hundred yards but forced four turnovers. Again,

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 3>it's like cam Ward but on defense, right there's sliping'.

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 3>There is a little bit of the good, a little

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 3>bit of the bad. Yes, it's sort of the ink

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 3>blot tests. You see what you want to see with Miami.

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 3>They won fifty three to thirty one over Duke to

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 3>remain unbeaten on the season, to remain unbeaten in conference.

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Why don't we wind this down here please, I'm going

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 3>to do some quick word association with you.

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 2>And we haven't even talked to Michigan Oorgan yet.

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>We haven't even talked Michigan Oorgan. We're going to start.

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 3>We're going to close things out with that game, okay,

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 3>but just to make our way around college football here

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 3>very quickly. Okay, I'll give you a couple of games

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:26.959
<v Speaker 3>and just give me your initial reaction.

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, there's an airbus flying overhead right now, as Yvonne

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Lendel closes out the third set.

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Syracuse thirty eight Virginia Tech thirty one in overtime?

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 2>What do I think about? What do I know about

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 2>this game?

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>What are you? What's your reaction to that score.

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Awesome for Sarahcuse for coming back and pulling out a

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 2>tough game after losing the way they did. For the

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 2>way they did against pitt tough Virginia Tech team. Obviously,

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 2>no starting quarterback, no starting running back, no.

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Starting quarterback, no starting running back. The game was in

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 3>their grasp and they gagged it away.

0:33:57.720 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, literally fell out of their hands.

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and QS is now six and two bowligible, So

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 3>good for them.

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, here one of the for animal.

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Another reaction, Give me your reaction to Minnesota twenty five

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Illinois seventeen.

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>It's about right.

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 2>It feels right, doesn't It sort of about right? Max

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Brosmer wasn't accomplishing much downfield from what I could see

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 2>in this game, which I was just sort of switching

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 2>back and forth to.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing.

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Minnesota's one four straight. They've covered five straight, which

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 3>is important for the purpose at betting. Yeah, there were

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 3>two fumbles in this game for Luke Altmeyer, one of

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 3>which was a very critical fumble came inside the last

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 3>minute as Illinois was driving in the red zone to

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 3>potentially score the game time touchdown. So it was I'm

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 3>not gonna say it was there for Illinois, but there

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 3>were opportunities there.

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Good for Minnesota, the Utah of the Big ten, maybe

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 2>Indiana forty seven, Michigan State ten old Utah of the

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Big Ten. Indiana's a war machine. They go down ten

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 2>to nothing, ten to three, something like that, and they

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 2>ripped off forty seven straight. They're incredible. Curtis work had

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 2>a slow ish start in the first drive or two

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 2>and then it was nothing but pain from Michigan State.

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 2>They couldn't run the ball at all against Indiana. The

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 2>offense gets all the attention and maybe rightfully so on

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:11.399
<v Speaker 2>a certain level for Indiana, but defense has been playing. Again.

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 2>These are not huge opponents. They have played a mediocre

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 2>schedule at best, but they are doing to that mediocre

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 2>schedule what an excellent team should be doing. They don't

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 2>play single digit games. No, this was nowhere near a game.

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Pretty quickly you.

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 3>See f fifty six Arizona twelve man, rest in peace.

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 3>You're down on Zona.

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 2>I just it's a new way to lose, an embarrassing fashion.

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 2>And like I was one of those people after I

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 2>think it was Northern Arizona Week two where there was

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 2>they're just not moving the ball. There's just so many mistakes.

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 2>You're like, you know what, it's week two working out

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 2>the kinks. Maybe they didn't take this team seriously. I

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:51.800
<v Speaker 2>don't know. Something is off with this team. They've already

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 2>made a change at play caller. The defense is a

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 2>mess at times, as we saw today against what third

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 2>string quarterback.

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Basically this is the all time case of the backup

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 3>being better than the starter, but it actually goes a

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 3>level deeper. Is the backup to the backup better than

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 3>the starter? Because listen, that not only applies to the offense.

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 1>With quarterback Ryan.

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 3>Rizzick miss five passes through for three ninety four and

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 3>three touchdowns, fire their defensive coordinator. Yeah, believe new play

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 3>caller on offense, Like they have changed a lot here

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 3>midstream r J Harvey went off to RJ Harvey had

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 3>like one hundred and eighty four yards and a bunch touchdowns. So,

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean this has been a roller coaster rider for you,

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 3>a UCF fan. A couple more here and then we're

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 3>going to close out with Oregon, Michigan, Ole Miss sixty three,

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 3>Arkansas thirty one.

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 2>There's always that team that doesn't actually play in the

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 2>huge game or the huge games but you kind of

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:52.799
<v Speaker 2>know belongs in that space. And the best of all

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:56.839
<v Speaker 2>Miss is, from what I can tell from AFAR, as

0:36:56.960 --> 0:37:00.839
<v Speaker 2>dangerous as most, if not every team. The problem is

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 2>that's eighty three percent of the time for Ole Miss.

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not every week.

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 3>The problem is the Penn State thing. Yeah, it's the

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Penn State thing where you know the team's got talent

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 3>obviously very very good. Can they get to that next level?

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 3>This might be And we talked there's another thing we

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 3>talked about in the car. Might be the best team

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 3>that does not make the playoffs, right, and it might

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 3>not even be close. Sixty three to thirty one against Arkansas.

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 3>Arkansas's a plucky team. Jackson Dart by the way, had

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 3>a school record five hundred and fifteen passing yards tied

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 3>to school record with six touchdowns at this game. Ole

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 3>Miss on the whole had six hundred and ninety four

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 3>yards of offense against.

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Against so totally decent Arkansas team.

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Against totally decent Arkansas team in Fayetteville, Yes, in Faithville, Yeah, Oregon, Michigan.

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 3>We were at this game. We sat in the press

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 3>box for this game. Thirty eight to seventeen was your

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:54.240
<v Speaker 3>final at one point. It seemed as if the points

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 3>spread was not going to hit.

0:37:58.520 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 3>A little bit of a backdoor cover for the Michigan Wolverines.

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 3>Oregon had the ball late, they were down inside the

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 3>five yard line. They decided they were going to score

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 3>the touchdown. Totally unnecessary touchdown. They could have taken the

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 3>knee with twenty five seconds left. Pack Yes, they did

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 3>get it into the end engine, so they win by

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty one.

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 2>I didn't say this out loud because I didn't want

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 2>to curse it or want it to happen or whatever.

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 2>A little bit of the like Mario crystal ball, you

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 2>can just kneel it and leave with a win in

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:27.359
<v Speaker 2>like a close It wasn't a close game, but in

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of a weird ending of a game that Oregon

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 2>went pretty cold in the second half offensively, or at

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 2>least in the third quarter. They took our business thirty

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 2>eight to seventeen. If we kind of forget the rhythms

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 2>of this game is going to look better, maybe even

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 2>a lot better than thirty one seventeen. Thirty one to

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 2>seventeen could have the you know the feel of kind

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 2>of back and forth, and Oregon scores late thirty eight

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:49.240
<v Speaker 2>to seventeen is like, hyeah, I beat them by three touchdowns.

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 3>Here's what I'll say about this game. It felt like

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 3>this one was going to be over at halftime.

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, twenty eight ten at halftime.

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Twenty eight ten at halftime.

0:38:56.040 --> 0:39:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Oregon ripped off twenty one in the second quarter. After halftime,

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Michigan did a pretty good job bottling him up.

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 2>Oregon scored right before and got the ball back. Yeah. Yeah,

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 2>they were to dominate the middle eight but didn't.

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:11.439
<v Speaker 1>It felt as if that game was over.

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 3>But the way that Michigan rebounded, specifically on defense, I

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:18.479
<v Speaker 3>thought was impressive. I also thought Davis Warren looked pretty good.

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't have his final stat line in front of me.

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if he is striking the fear of

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 3>God into a good defense right all things consider, given

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 3>where they started and where I think they're at now,

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Davis Warren has definitely been a success story. He threw

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 3>some nice throws in the red zone for touchdown passes.

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 1>He didn't he hit.

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 3>You knows how to hit Colston Lovelin very much might

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 3>be the only thing he knows how to do in

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:45.479
<v Speaker 3>the passing game, but that definitely gives them a little

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 3>bit of a flare on that offense that we have

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 3>not seen before. What I do not get is why

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 3>they continue to use alex Orgy in the manner that

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:54.359
<v Speaker 3>they are, because it is so telegraphed he's not going

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 3>to throw the ball. There was that play in the

0:39:57.080 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 3>fourth quarter on a big fourth down. They're trying to

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 3>get back in this thing. They need to score a touchdown.

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 3>Instead of bringing Davis Warren into try and throw another

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 3>touchdown pass, which he had done very nicely earlier in

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 3>the game, they bring in alex Orgie. They try a

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 3>gadget play where it's homage Morgan throwing to alex Orgi.

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 2>It's yeah, it's a throwback. Yes, it was a pitch

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:23.479
<v Speaker 2>to Samaje Morgan, a backwards pass, alex Orgy going out

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 2>mateo Oui Anglla staying with him. The defensive end, the

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 2>edge rusher for Oregon. It not being there.

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 3>If you're going to bring the backup quarterback in, yeah,

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 3>if you want to throw the ball, what like, shouldn't

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 3>the quarterback be the one throwing the ball? Sometimes it works,

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 3>but in that moment, it just felt like it felt

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 3>like an unnecessary Well, there's.

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Just no threat of a dropback situation on fourth and goal.

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 2>With alex Orgi, there's no threat of that telegraphed.

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 3>And so I think, if I'm a Michigan fan, that's

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:54.720
<v Speaker 3>what I'm most frustrated with. The quarterback thing was always

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 3>going to be weird. Now you lose Jack Tuttle, that's unfortunate. Yes,

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 3>these are the guys that you're rolling with. Now the

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:01.799
<v Speaker 3>rest of the year, you're rolling with Davis Warren, you're

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 3>rolling with alex Orgie. I think the balance they had

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 3>a week ago is pretty good. Right this week, I

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 3>don't know if there was much of a balance at all,

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:10.479
<v Speaker 3>because we knew what was going to happen.

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Every time alex Orgie came in. He was gonna run

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the football.

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 2>He threw one ball away, He threw one away at Yah,

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 2>threw one away.

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>He did have a nice run he did down the

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:18.800
<v Speaker 1>left sideline.

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I was keeping track and it's like one

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:23.799
<v Speaker 3>out of every seven times he gets the ball. You

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 3>get like a decent size game, and those don't seem

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 3>like good odds, especially when you're in a high leverage

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 3>moment late in the game. You need a touchdown and

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 3>try and get back into the game.

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, and when you find yourself on second and eight

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 2>second and nine second and eleven when he comes in

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 2>on first down and you're just behind the sticks with

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Alex Orgie more often than not, and it was I

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:48.280
<v Speaker 2>don't think it makes a difference, honestly. Like the number

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of plays that Davis Warren was able to make was impressive.

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 2>It was basically to one guy between the twenties or

0:41:56.120 --> 0:41:57.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, for the first eighty yards of the field

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 2>in Colston Lovelin, which was great. If you could make

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:03.360
<v Speaker 2>it work, that's great. Found a couple guys in the

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:06.320
<v Speaker 2>end zone, great. He was very good in short yardage,

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 2>goal line situations. This was not a team that I mean,

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 2>it's not a team that's built to separate itself from

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:16.879
<v Speaker 2>decent teams, let alone beat decent teams at this point

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 2>in the season, given their quarterback situation, the rhythms for

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Oregon were impressive. Evan Stewart definitely dropped that touchdown pass.

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 2>The Big Ten definitely should have reviewed it. The Big

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Ten kind of screwed Oregon over in that Ohio State game,

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of screwed Michigan over in this game. Probably made

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 2>a difference in the Ohio State game probably would not

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 2>have made the difference. In this game. Oregon ran strongly.

0:42:38.960 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 2>They suffered. You know, their best receiver went down in

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Tesed Johnson early on. I think he's gonna be out

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:44.839
<v Speaker 2>for a long stretch of time. We'll see if that

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 2>comes to bite Organ on some level. He's Dylan Gabriel

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 2>safety blanket. But Oregon had a complete performance when it

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 2>seemed like the pocket was breaking down. Dylan Gabriel.

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in a complicated place to play, In.

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:58.479
<v Speaker 2>A complicated place to play. Crowd was into this game.

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Michigan was able to get some stuff. It was Dylan

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Garbriel is able to succeed downfield.

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 3>In a year in college football where it feels like

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:08.400
<v Speaker 3>there is a lot of uncertainty abound. Right this is

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 3>the best team in college football, if nothing more than

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:10.760
<v Speaker 3>the most consistent.

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Right now, They're they're the hinds ward as Bain blows

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 2>up the field in Yeah dark is it dark Knight?

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Dark Knight?

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:23.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no dark Knight rises, yes, So yeah, it's it's

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:27.359
<v Speaker 2>very nice that if Oregon is having longer stretches beat

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 2>against Indiana, be it against Michigan State, be it against

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Michigan today as we record this, that they're winning this

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 2>by three touchdowns, that they're winning not clunkers but semi

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 2>stalled games by multiple scores. So look, this is any

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 2>other results you want to rattle through. Just like to

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 2>tip your cap to anybody anything particular. AB won a game,

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 2>UA B won a game. We could tip our cap

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:52.840
<v Speaker 2>to U. C.

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>L Ay.

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 3>We will have more to discuss on that game as

0:43:56.520 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 3>we get a little bit deeper into the Bailey looked

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 3>pretty good against Stanford. Yeah, absolutely had a nice day

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 3>for NC State. Only missed two throws, so kudos to him.

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 3>Omar and Hampton had a huge day for North Carolina.

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:14.479
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to dunk too much on Florida State,

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:16.920
<v Speaker 3>but just not a good performance for them. They gave

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 3>up seven sacks and ten tackles for loss from a

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 3>UNC defense.

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 1>That is, let's be honest, not the show.

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 2>It's prett blow average. By the way, speaking of elite losers,

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:25.800
<v Speaker 2>what did you freeze?

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you freeze?

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Lost to Vandy and diego Pavia again again.

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Seventeen to seven, and you know, shout out Asu mentioned

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:36.839
<v Speaker 3>Asu before, Yeah, ESU winning forty two to twenty one.

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Sam Levitt really nice game over Oklahoma State. So look,

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 3>we're almost out of battery juice here. Okay, I don't

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:46.319
<v Speaker 3>want to lose this audio again. Thanks for bearing with us.

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate your patience. We will be back on Tuesday

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 3>with a more complete preview of the things that we

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:55.320
<v Speaker 3>did not discuss here as we have a chance to

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 3>kind of sit and process all this information. Please make

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 3>sure he hit follow, Please make sure he hits subscribe.

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Apologies for the video being outlaid. Apologies if the audio

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:06.319
<v Speaker 3>sounds a little bit different, but we're kind of back

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 3>to our roots.

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna make sure it sounds good. Come back to

0:45:08.600 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 2>our roots.

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Just kind of going with the flow.

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, baby, help, we've got a plane. We got a

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:14.839
<v Speaker 2>plane maybe a little bit.

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 1>We have a little bit of a plane coming in.

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. For that guy over there, Dan Rubenc for myself,

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Tie Hildebrand, as always, staytes like piece