WEBVTT - Interview Only w/ Jon Slavet - Can A Moderate Republican Win California’s Governor Race

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Todcast is brought to you

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first bake from

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>frozen subscription box for sour dough breads, artisonal pastries, and

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>fresh pastas, plus all the items conveniently baked in twenty

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>five minutes or less. Unlike many store brought options, Wild

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Grain uses some simple ingredients you can pronounce and a

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>slow fermentation process that can be a lot easier on

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>your belly, little gut health there right, and richer in

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>nutrients antioxidants. There's also no preservatives and no shortcuts. The

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Wild Grain boxes are fully customizable. In addition to their

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>variety box, they have a gluten free box, a vegan box,

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>and a new protein box. I will tell you I

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>have done the gluten free box. I have done it

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a second time. I have also used the code, the

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>todcast code. If you use the promo code toodcast at checkout,

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you get thirty dollars off. I've already used it as

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a gift to somebody else who loves this bread. It

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is hard to find good gluten free bread. It is fantastic.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>They give you step by step instructions. I really dig this.

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>There is nothing like having an artesian bakery in your

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>freezer to chase away the winter chill. Now is the

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>best time to stay in and enjoy some comforting homemade

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>meals with Wildgrain. I obviously highly recommend it. It is

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 1>worth giving Wildgrain to try. Right now, Wildgrain is offering

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>my listeners thirty dollars off your first box plus free

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>croissants for life. Come on when you go to wildgrain

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash podcast to start your subscription today. That's

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty dollars off your first box and free croissants for

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>life when you visit wildgrain dot com slash podcast, or

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>simply use the promo code podcast at checkout. This is

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a sponsor I absolutely embrace, so use that code. So

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I've been covering politics now, going back to nineteen ninety two.

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 2>More elusive.

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Things to find in American politics is a calif Moderate

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and I say that part of it is the system.

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Arnold Schwarzenegger tried to create a system that would then

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>incentivize the Center to be the governing force of California politics.

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, center depends on where you sit. Those from

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>outside of California may look at a Gavenuwommer in Nancy

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi and say they're liberal. Those that live in San

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Francisco would say they're centrist, So some of it is

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes perspective. My guest today is John Slavitt, and he

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>intrigues me because he's trying to do what arguably nobody

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>other than Arnold Schwarzenegger has been able to do, which

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:42.279
<v Speaker 1>is essentially owned the center lane in a California gubernatorial

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>race and pull this off. We have seen many attempt

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and he also has a background in Silicon Valley. This

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is also in theory should be a strength and in

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>practice in the past has been a bit of a

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>hurdle himself. So I'm very intrigued why I invited him

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast, because I think the California governor's race

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is so wide open, and I think we still don't

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>know all the candidates that are going to be running,

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>filing deadline still a couple months away. But John Slavit

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is a I think he described himself at one point

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a lifelong Democrat now becoming a Republican, but really trying

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to see if there is a center lane to straddle.

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.399
<v Speaker 2>So let's have that conversation. John, Welcome to the podcast.

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Chuck. Nice to see you.

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>So let me start Well, first of all, let me

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>just start with why are you doing this? Why politics?

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>And when was the first time you ever thought you'd

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>get into politics?

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, first time I ever thought i'd get into politics

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 3>and really seriously decided to run a few months ago.

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 3>I've been interested in politics. I've been a student of politics.

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 3>I've been a bit of a political and news junkie

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 3>for a long long time. I started my career actually

0:03:55.880 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 3>in media. I came to California at Third Right Sorry Scene,

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 3>which was sort of an early tech meeta company. Well

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 3>it was. I didn't work for see Ed, but I

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 3>worked for a company that joint ventured with them, so

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 3>you got it partially right. I worked for the founder

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 3>of the entertainment a guy named Yarroman used to be

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 3>Lee Masters. He was the former CEO of NPR before

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 3>the current CEO. So I came out to California to

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 3>work for the founders of Wired magazine nineteen ninety five,

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 3>prior to the Internet actually being a thing. So interested

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.119
<v Speaker 3>in politics, interested in media for a long long time.

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 3>But I'd say that becoming a civic entrepreneur, which I've

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 3>done the last year with my own podcast really gave

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 3>me access to people in the state, Republicans, Democrats, independence activists.

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I've had journalists like you on my podcast,

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 3>to Alex Michaelson that really got me underneath the issues

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 3>out in the state, traveling the state every week and

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 3>talking about what ails the state, and my passion initially

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 3>was to create a forum to have serious conversations about

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 3>problem solution in California. I'd say it was death by

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 3>a thousand cuts to decide to run, because you know,

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 3>it's it's a fraught time to actually run for something.

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 3>It's it's crazy, it's dangerous on multiple levels and difficult, and.

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Its reputationally damaging to you even even no matter if

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you do everything correctly.

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 2>And that's not.

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Fair, but it's just the way Paul could be. It's

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>becomes so huge holistic.

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I have my eyes wide open, but I'd say

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 3>that it was death by a thousand cuts, Chuck. There

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 3>wasn't one thing. It was many things. And in California,

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 3>I think the challenge, like many states, is civic engagement, right,

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 3>just the number of people who actually care. I think

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 3>in California right now, unfortunately, there are more people who

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 3>care about national politics, and some of those fights, you know,

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 3>the Newsom Trump fight, right, so much energy, but it

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 3>doesn't actually have anything to do with what's ailing the state.

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 3>And then people care about some of their local stuff.

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 3>But the reality is what happens at the state level

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 3>has a bigger impact on people's lives than anything else.

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 2>It's true in every state.

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'll tell you an example of sort of that

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>frustration you're expressing about the lack of interest in state civics.

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.239
<v Speaker 1>I was when I first started as political director at NBC.

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I was and even before then, when I was at

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the Hotline, I was really excited about getting to know

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>all the political reporters at all the NBC local affiliates

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>just around the country, and I thought, boy, what a

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>powerful I had my own thought of what this could be.

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>And then you come to find out there are like

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>there were like ten local news stations in the country

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that bother to have a full time political reporter, let

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>alone a political producer, And in fact, I believe there

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>was only one in the state of California. And Kevin

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Riggs I think was his name at KCRA in Sacramento

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>was sort of a Soccermano being the state capital, that

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>would make sense. But I remember, you know, you've got

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you got my buddy Colin Conan Nolan down in LA

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>who you know, and you you brought up like Michaelson.

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>But it is shocking to me the and this is

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>look we have. Local media is now in a different

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>place because of the whole media disruption, But even before

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of media disruption of legacy media in general and

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>linear television, there was always a lack of interest in

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>local in state politics in California.

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 2>It's always been nationalized.

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't know if that was because of how

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>poorly we on the East Coast report on the West coast.

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've never understood that. But how long have

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you lived in California and how long have you experienced that?

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Well? Actually, I was going to say, we've got the

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 3>California Post about about to launch, right New York Posts

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>California Post.

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so an East Coast news. You know, I'm

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 2>not I'm skeptic.

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Look, I'm skeptical that it's going to help teach people

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>about what's happening in California. I think it's just going

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to be page six for California. But we'll find out, right, well.

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 3>We'll find out. I think I think that maybe it

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 3>instigates some good trouble to borrow a phrase, and we

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 3>need more good trouble in California. I've been here thirty years,

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 3>so I moved here to follow, you know, my California dream. Sure,

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 3>as I mentioned, to work for the founders of Wired magazine.

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I've worked in three different sectors in California.

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 3>Uh and and had five kids along the way. And

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 3>to answer your question in terms of just California, do

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 3>people care? You know, why isn't more California state coverage

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 3>a thing? I think it's becoming more of a thing.

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 3>And I think that if I look at my own

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 3>podcast upwards, if half our audience is outside of California

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 3>and depends on the episode, so there's just a ton

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 3>of interest in California, as you know, from outside California

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 3>looking in. If we could replicate that with the passion

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 3>and interest of people inside CALIFORNI we want to get

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 3>involved to change the state will do great. But I

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 3>think it's actually happening. I think that Ashley Zavala, who

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 3>is an amazing local reporter and Sacramento is becoming iconic

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 3>for actually pressing elected officials to get to the bottom

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 3>of issues. For instance, the California State Capital. You may

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 3>be familiar with this boondoggle that's happened where there's a

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 3>renovation project going on in the state capitol. So elected

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 3>officials is going to have a better home to work in,

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 3>which is fine. It was supposed to cost a few

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 3>hundred million. Now apparently it's over a billion and two

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 3>thousand people under NDA on the projects of people are

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 3>actually can't muffle to actually talk about it. So there's

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 3>a ton to talk about. In California. We have the

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 3>most interesting opportunity and interesting people and it's a shame

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 3>there's not more coverage.

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Can pet peeve of.

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>You brought up NDAs and Donald Trump does this in

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:55.959
<v Speaker 1>the federal government level.

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 2>You just brought it up there.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>If taxpayer dollars are involved, the NDA should be illegal.

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't understand. I mean, I just think

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it should pure and simple. If the if you are

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>getting compensated by federal tax any taxpayer, state or federal

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>right the government, you.

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Shouldn't be able to hide an audit from the public

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 2>in any form.

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, you bring up a good point. There's there's an

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 3>assemblyman named Joe Patterson who's in the California State Assembly,

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 3>who I had in my podcast a while ago, and

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 3>he actually is the number one, I guess instigator for transparency,

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 3>and he created legislation to ban the use of NDAs

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 3>with elected officials in California when they're you know, discussing

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 3>debating important issues for the state. Knewso signed it to

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 3>his credit. So there is some movement for transparency in California.

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 3>But it's not retroactive. It's not like it's un sealing

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 3>every NDA sign.

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh look, I get that, and I understand. Look, you've

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>been in business. You know that you can't have every

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>meeting in public in the sometimes you need to have.

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Space to make a decision. But eventually there.

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Should be available to the public, right, Like I think

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you can agree, Okay, you know within a year, it

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>should be public within you know, a reasonable period of time.

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I understand the need for some discretion, not secrecy, discretion,

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>but like I assume common sense that actually create better

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>legislation on that.

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 3>I'll say one other thing on this, and then I'm

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 3>sure you're going to go lots of places that you

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 3>want to go in this conversation. But I've said a

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 3>few times now since I announced for governor that I

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 3>would do the major negotiations with third parties with lights

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 3>on and cameras rolling. I think that there should be

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 3>much more transparency on the major discussions that the governor

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 3>and team have with counterparties. One of the biggest examples

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 3>is with the very powerful unions in California that exert

0:11:55.720 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 3>such huge influence. You know, public sector unions in California.

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 3>They raise about a billion dollars in dues and they're

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 3>donating three hundred million dollars in California annually to buy, sell,

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 3>and trade politicians. And mostly what they've done is cow

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Democrats who are so afraid to oppose them, you know,

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 3>in legislation. And so I would actually have these counterparties

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 3>across the table, put my priorities on the table and

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 3>show it.

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Let me let's talk about your political evolution, because you

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about yourself as a lifelong Democrat. You say you've

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>never voted for Donald Trump. Now you want his endorsement.

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 1>What has he done now that has convinced you? Do

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you think it was a mistake that you didn't vote

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>for him the first three times.

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, let me say this, you're correct and what you

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 3>said so far. You know, Republicans in California have been

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 3>very cute about the Trump endorsement. I think Steve Hilton

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 3>and Chad Bianco, the other two serious Republicans in the

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 3>race who we can talk about, they've said different things

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.959
<v Speaker 3>about endorsed by Trump. I think Chad Bianca said, well,

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 3>I accept it in private, so that's all just weird cuteness. Yeah,

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 3>President of the United States wants to endorse the Republican running.

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 3>You accept the endorsement, But I think it's unlikely Trump

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.199
<v Speaker 3>endorses me because I'm the only Republican who's going to

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 3>call balls and strikes about where I agree and disagree.

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 3>And we can get into that. But if Trump endorsed me,

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 3>it would be because he endorses where I agree and

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 3>where I have very independent minded ideas that may be

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 3>at odds with his ideas.

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I had Steve Klubeck on here about nine

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>months ago before he dropped that, and while while your

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>personalities might be different, he was sort of preaching the

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>same thing.

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, and he had his own way. Yeah, he had

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 2>his own way.

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, and I get this with Trump, right,

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>there's always parts of Trump You're like, you know, he

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know how to build something, but he was correct

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to knock something down, right, Like I've always thought that,

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, Trump, the disruptor is the necessity, but he

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>may himself not have any good answers on what to

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>put in after you've done the disruption, right, And I

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's always been I think that's the struggle that

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>change agents, whether they're on the left or the right,

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>who want to take some of Trump right, but but

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>not be associated with all of Trump. That is that

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of where your head is.

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 3>At, Well take some of Trump, Listen. I think we

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 3>have to focus on policy. So I mean, for instance, uh,

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, there are there are many areas on policy

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 3>where I agree, but I think I have a much better.

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh like what is tell me what he's doing and style?

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, listen, I'm gonna I'm going to use a California

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 3>frame here, Chuck, because I'm running in California. Should I'm

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 3>not gonna. I'm not gonna, you know, go global and

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 3>judge every single and going on.

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I don't think the governor of California

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>needs to have a position on NATO right now.

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, I agree. I mean, listen, there are lots

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 3>of policies that will positively impact California that people may

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 3>not know about. So, for instance, under Trump, HUD actually

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 3>came out with a radical new policy on homelessness and

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 3>funding for homelessness. This is a national policy, but will

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 3>dramatically impact California in a positive way. I think since

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 3>they announced it, they've kind of pulled it back and

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 3>are tweaking it, but just on homelessness. As you know,

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 3>as everyone knows, we lead the nation to homelessness. Twenty

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 3>five percent of the nation's homeless, one hundred and ninety

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 3>thousand of our brothers and sisters basically living and dying

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 3>on the street. It's a total moral tragedy. And what

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 3>HUD said under Trump is that they're going to totally

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 3>flip the script on the way that funding for homelessness

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 3>is granted to states. To date, the way it's been done,

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 3>and this is a part of democratic ideology. In many

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 3>states and also in California, funding for homeless blessness has

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 3>been targeted at what's called permanent housing. Permanent housing is

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 3>generally a affordable housing unit in an apartment building. The

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 3>problem is in California that takes ten years to build

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 3>and cost a million dollars. We can get into why

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 3>it's insane. The Trump administration flipped that and said, listen,

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 3>instead of eighty percent of the money going to long

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 3>term permanent housing, eighty percent of the money should go

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 3>to temporary housing. And I want to give credit to

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Mayor Matt Mahon, who's a Democrat moderate in San Jose,

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 3>who I really like because he's actually working with Dignity Moves,

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 3>the founder of which is an advisor to me. Dignity

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Moves is the number one organization in California deploying the

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 3>tiny home communities. And you've probably seen these in various states,

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 3>and other states have done this really well, particularly Texas

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 3>in Houston and Austin. But essentially, you get a crane

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 3>and you drop in a small unit that locks from

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 3>the inside, and you do one hundred and one hundred and

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 3>fifty these on a site. Usually the land is donated

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 3>by a wealthy landowner who can get a tax right

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 3>off for leasing that land to the city for a

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 3>dollar a year, can write off the taxes, and then

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 3>you bring in the services that are needed in that

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 3>site at mental health, services, security, et cetera, and you

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 3>triage people who actually can live in a tiny home

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 3>versus need the mental health system, which unfortunately is more

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 3>than half of our homeless in California. And the reason

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 3>that that is opposed by what I would call the

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 3>homeless industrial complex in California is the set of incentives

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 3>for the structures and then nonprofits in California to serve

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 3>that population are very much oriented to building long term

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 3>permanent housing. But what we need is to get people

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 3>off the street tomorrow, chuck. Because in California, day one,

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 3>a homeless person seventeen percent or mentally ill. By day thirty,

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 3>thirty five percent or mentally ill because they have to

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 3>get on a drug to stay awake, to not get

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 3>raped or robbed or beaten or stolen from. So that's

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.719
<v Speaker 3>an example where Trump has it completely right. He just

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 3>came out with another policy on real estate that I

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 3>really agree with what's kind of progressive, which is to

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 3>ban the huge funds from buying up all the single

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 3>family homes. That's another example. You know, there are many

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 3>others I think that I think that being generally pro

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 3>business is a good thing. And in California. California has

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 3>an inferiority complex about being pro business.

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>by Quints and I love me some Quints. New Year,

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>colder days. This is the moment your winter wardrobe really

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>has to deliver. If you're craving a winter reset, start

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>with pieces truly made to last season after season. Quint

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>springs together premium materials, thoughtful design, and enduring quality so

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you stay warm, look sharp, and fill your best all season.

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Law Quin's everything you need. Men's Mongolian cashmere sweaters.

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 2>I have one.

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, really into it. They have wool coats, leather,

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and swayed outerwear that actually hold up to daily wear

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and still look good. Their outerwear is especially impressive. Think

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>down jackets, wool coats, and Italian leather outerwear that keep

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you warm when it's actually cold. Each piece made from

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>premium materials, Quince delivers the same quality as luxury brands

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>at a fraction of the price. The result is classic

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.479
<v Speaker 1>styles you'll love that hold up year after year. You

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>know me, I love me my quarter zips. Quinn says

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>quite a few of them. They're great, They're both light

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and warm. There's nothing harder than business casual.

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Right, you get these things?

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>What can I wear? What can you wear a meeting?

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>What do you wear on a zoom? I have to

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>say it's as if Quinn sort of says, hey, look,

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got the modern sort of working wardrobe ready for you,

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>clothing that looks stylish, looks good, but is actually practical

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and isn't going to break the bank. So refresher winter

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 1>war rope with quints go to quins dot com slash

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>chuck for free shipping on your order and three hundred

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and sixty five day returns. And it's also available in Canada.

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>That's qui nce dot com, slash chuck, free shipping and

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and sixty five day returns quints dot com

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>slash chuck. So let me ask you about that, because

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>I vacillate about California myself, and I sort of I

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>would align myself with the times. It feels overly bureaucratic

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>at times, and at the end of the day though

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it's still the best. It seems to be a great

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 1>place to build a business, still seems a great place

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>to find a workforce. So you've been a very successful entrepreneur.

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you think you could have been as successful in

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>another state was there was California. You've you've had all

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>your success in California. You know the state must be

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>doing something right. What are they doing right that you

0:20:57.680 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 1>think has helped you succeed?

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 3>That's a great question. Well, I did do it in California,

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 3>so I can't speak to whether I could have done

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 3>it anywhere else. I mean, I've done it in California.

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 3>I have California to thank for lots of things, including

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 3>my kids and you know, my professional life. So I'm

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 3>hugely grateful to California, and despite all of our problems,

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't live anywhere else. You know. I think anyone

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 3>who says, though that they've not considered moving out of

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 3>the state is lying, because even I have, everyone has.

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 3>But you know, I want to make my life here

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 3>and help turn the state around. So I'm staying to

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 3>your point. I made an analogy the other day that

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 3>that sunshine is to California like old spices to many

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 3>men's under arms. It's basically just it's covered up all

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 3>the bad.

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I think if deltorizes everything else is what you're saying.

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, if we had. If we had the year

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 3>round weather of Seattle in Portland, we would have lost

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 3>half our people. So so yes, people love living here.

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 3>We have an amazing climate, we have I think the

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 3>most talented people, industry, geography, to we have all of it.

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a great university system.

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>A great use I mean for both the system right

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>for by the way, I think sometimes the UC system

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is a bit overrated. I say this versus the cal State.

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>You know that aspect. I mean that is affordable first gen.

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's an impressive state university system as well well.

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 3>And we have we have Pat Brown to thank for

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these things, you know, Jerry's dad, who

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 3>was I think, by all accounts a great, great governor,

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 3>and I would give that praise. But here's the problem. Shock.

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 3>I think when you work in the tech sector or

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 3>certain aspects of the real estate sector, like I did,

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 3>you have great advantages because because you're not in tech,

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 3>for an instance, we don't suffer in tech from a

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of the regulations that impact other real world because you're.

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Still I mean, you're still a youthful industry. In that

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of exemptions given to the tech

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>industry by the state legislature right for years in order

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to help the tech inducess.

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, quite unfettered, and mostly for good reasons. And if

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 3>you've got people in capital, you know you can you

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 3>know you can thrive. Having said that, there are many

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 3>tech companies that are moving out of California for different reasons.

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 3>But here's the thing. California is a tale of two worlds.

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 3>If you have money and you work in certain industries,

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 3>you're doing great. But if you are working poor, working class,

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 3>middle class, the people we need to focus on you

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 3>are hurting in California. And if you look.

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 1>You're describing, you just describe the economy for the entire country.

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is the current. This is why everybody,

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>this is why the polling shows that people hate this

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>economy because it does feel as if the halves are

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>surviving and in some cases thriving, but they have not

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to have like there's no rung on the ladder to

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>even grab right now.

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's very tough. And again speaking for California, if

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 3>you look at all the metrics that matter, I mean,

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 3>despite the fact that we've got sunshine, Hollywood beaches and

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.479
<v Speaker 3>you can you know, you can go skiing, you know,

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 3>in the morning one day and being on the beach

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 3>in the afternoon on the same day. In California, again,

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 3>if you're in the seventy three percent of people in

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 3>the middle working class that think the state's going in

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 3>the wrong direction, which is what our polling shows and

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.959
<v Speaker 3>is just sort of common sense, the reason is, and

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 3>it's in the headlines every day because California is in

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 3>the bottom of every metric that matters, despite the fact

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 3>that we're the world's fourth largest economy. So if I

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 3>hear another person in California who's elected say that we're

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 3>the fourth largest economy, my head's going to explode. Because

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 3>education outcomes number one in poverty, number one in homelessness,

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 3>number one in energy costs, number one in housing costs.

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 3>There are reasons why, chuck, which we can get into.

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 3>So it's really a tale of two world worlds in California.

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's talk about that. What you're an advocate

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of the flat tax.

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 3>How do not, actually, I've not actually advocated for a

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 3>flat tax?

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>You haven't, Okay, how would you describe your advocation of

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a It sounds like a flatter tax is what you're

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>looking for.

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, I've not Actually, I've not actually spoken about tax

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 3>policy overtly yet. But my view is that if you

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 3>look at California, you know, we've got the highest marginal

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 3>rate in the country at thirteen point three percent. And the

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 3>reality is that in California, half of our people work

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 3>for small to medium sized companies. The national average a

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 3>little bit bigger, California a little little smaller because we

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 3>have such what such huge companies operating out of California

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 3>as well, it sort of reduces the average. But half

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 3>of our people work in small businesses, and small businesses

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 3>of the engine of that you know, middle class upward mobility, uh,

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 3>and small businesses that are over taxed and overregulated can't

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 3>can't grow. That's the story of California right now. So

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I think that we need a tax holiday for small

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 3>businesses for several years. Well I'm not going to put

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 3>out the specifics now we're thinking about it, but I

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 3>think I think if you are a small business under

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 3>one hundred people, again, for which employ fifty percent of

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 3>California residents, I think we should dramatically reduce your taxes

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 3>over the next few years to get things moving again.

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Where do you find Look, I'm.

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:03.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, the the Gray Davis's governorship sort of imploded

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in part because of this massive deficit at the time

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>that had happened, and you know, obviously Enrun was a

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>part of it as well, but there was this budget

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>deficit that seemed impossible to fix in some ways. That

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>was Arnold Schwarzenegger's entire goal was to try to figure

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>out how to fix this. And then Jerry Brown sort of,

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, became sort of more of a centrist compared

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of his party, and that happened. Where

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>do you find the revenue that is going to be

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>lost because being the fourth largest state, that's a huge

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>budget and it is not easy to balance.

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, listen, here are the facts. When Newsom was

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 3>elected seven years ago, the budget for the state of

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 3>California annually, annually lose two hundred billion dollars. Today, at

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 3>sixty percent higher, it's three hundred and twenty two billion dollars.

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>That all co Is that all since COVID How much

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of that through sort of COVID North.

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 3>It's been it's been a it's been a steady increase

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 3>year after year. Chuck, it's not it's not been sort

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 3>of a one year massive pickup. So we've grown sixty

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:20.479
<v Speaker 3>percent in our state budget since since twenty nineteen, and

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 3>we're worse off for it. So, you know, I think

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 3>that the story of California is that more money doesn't

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 3>mean less problems. It's actually been more money, more problems.

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 3>That that's a line from a great, great song too.

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 3>So so where do we find Where do we find

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 3>the money? Listen, there are so many projects, chuck, and

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 3>I'll throw out a few that are bad ideas that

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 3>we should stop doing. And there are a whole set

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 3>of taxes that as governor I would also put the

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 3>kebaj on. So here are a couple of the bad ideas.

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 3>The train to Nowhere, the pejorative for the high speed

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 3>rail project that was really kicked off, you know, sort

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 3>of Newsome has has really promoted. We've spent sixteen billion dollars,

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 3>We've not laid any track. The project is now budget

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and thirty five billion dollars started it I

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 3>think thirty forty billion dollars and is a complete boondoggle.

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, by the time that project would come to fruition,

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 3>we'll have flying taxis. Let me ask you that should

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 3>there should it be one example.

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I agree that that boom, that thing has just been.

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 3>There are many other there's been.

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 1>In a perfect world, Is there high speed rail from

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>laed to San Francisco.

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 3>In a perfect world? In a perfect world, Chuck, I'm

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 3>not sure I can speak to a perfect world. All right?

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>How about in your version of California after two terms,

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>would you like to create the conditions that would allow

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>for it to happen? Or is it just something that

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>government can't afford to do these days?

0:29:55.480 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 3>I think I think that twenty twenty seven January firefighting.

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean twenty twenty seven January, it's a full court

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 3>press to just stabilize California. Stabilize the budget, stop the bleeding,

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 3>a series of executive orders, and work with the legislature

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 3>to work off of a affordability emergency and enact policies

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 3>to actually bring down costs on energy, on gas, on housing,

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 3>a whole range of things that we can talk about.

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 3>I think for twenty forty seven, I think California needs

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 3>a strategic plan to actually lead in a bunch of areas,

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 3>including energy, infrastructure, including a plan for water because we're

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 3>hopefully grow as a population, including growth for technology, and

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 3>doing all the things to restore the dream for the

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 3>next generation of kids who are basically moving out of California.

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 3>The high speed rail project is not in the top

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 3>few for me.

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I got you, how are there enough of these projects

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that you think you can save a significant you know

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times these projects. I've done this a

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>long time and I'm not trying to pick on you. You

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>can have some high profile projects, but they actually don't

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>add up to it isn't enough money to do some

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of the cuts that you're going to want to do.

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's enough money there in project cuts

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to pull this off?

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think I think there's enough if you look

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 3>at several areas and it's not. It's not just one.

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you look at the number one line

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 3>item in the California budget, not surprisingly is healthcare. Okay,

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 3>so it's about one hundred and sixty billion dollars. I mean,

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 3>it's larger than the annual budget of the City of

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 3>New York. Okay, the next line item.

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Remember, General Motors is a healthcare company that makes cars. Right,

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>this is health The cost of health care is a

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>is a problem on every level of government or business.

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 2>It's the largest right.

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Just like our federal government is a is a healthcare

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 3>organization with an army. So California is not that different.

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 3>One hundred and sixty billion on healthcare. It's estimated by

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 3>the federal government. And this is not just you know,

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 3>this is well before Trump that Medicare fraud is at

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 3>least ten to fifteen percent. Okay, So we suffer from

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 3>that in California as well. So out of that one

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 3>hundred and sixty billion, thirty billion of which comes from

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 3>the California State General Fund, one hundred and thirty billion

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 3>of which comes from the Feds. There's a huge amount

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 3>of fraud which we should get to the bottom of.

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 3>I know that this is a common talking point, but

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:38.719
<v Speaker 3>it's a it's a real issa fraud an abuse.

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>My friend, I've heard waste, fraud and abuse as a phrase.

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure phrase going back to New Cambridge.

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Of course, of course, and it's a real.

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton in fairness they would say right of and

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>advocated it, of.

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Course, And it's real. And with AI, with all of

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 3>the huge some of the risk of AI, we have

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 3>a real opportunity to sick the right models on our

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 3>state budget and really get to the bottom of what's

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 3>going on. And actually I'm going to be putting out

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 3>some policy and some suggestions on exactly how we do that.

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 3>So I think healthcare is a big area. We've mentioned

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 3>the trained and nowhere. The train to nowhere right now

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 3>is about one hundred and twenty billion over the next

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.959
<v Speaker 3>fifteen years. Because we've spent We've spent sixteen it's going

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 3>to cost over one hundred and thirty It's a huge

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 3>amount of money. It's ten to fifteen billion a year.

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 3>The next area is climate taxes chuck, So it's called

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 3>cap and invest Now in California, cap and trade is

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 3>what it used to be called. Most citizens don't understand

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 3>what it means. It's been about thirty three billion in

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 3>taxes on California residents over the last number of years.

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 3>And so the way it works is, if you produced

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 3>energy in California, you get taxed. So if you emit right,

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 3>carbon emissions get taxed in California uniquely. So if you

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 3>produce electricity, you refine petroleum, for gas, you name it.

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Those taxes end up getting passed along to the consumer.

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 3>So the energy producers have to have to mark up

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 3>their prices to the California customer, they don't eat it.

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 3>They mark it up just like it's like a tariff.

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 3>And so in California, our average gas if you're at

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 3>ninety one unleaded, if you drive a gas powered car,

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 3>you're paying five dollars. If you're lucky, maybe five to

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 3>fifty six dollars in a ritzy town. If you're in

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 3>eighty nine unleaded, you're paying four four fifty. Right, my

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 3>mom in Boston pays to eighty nine and north of Boston,

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.720
<v Speaker 3>and so that dollar and a half extra is pure tax.

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 3>And we also have a custom fuel mix, two seasons

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 3>of a custom fuel mix that our refiners have to refine,

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 3>which is state impost. Northern State does this check. None

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 3>of the other forty nine states have a custom fuel mix.

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 3>So all of these things, they're taxes and they get

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 3>imposed on our citizens and we can and those there

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 3>are many examples. We've also, Chuck, we've added fifty thousand

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 3>full time workers in California over the News administration. So

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 3>we started at about two hundred and ten thousand. Now

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 3>we're about two hundred and sixty thousand full time workers

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 3>in California, not including contractors. We're spending huge amounts of

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.839
<v Speaker 3>money on people in the keyboard economy when we have

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 3>technology that can help do the work. I'm not saying

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I would mass fire people, okay, but when people come

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 3>to the point where they're going to leave the workforce

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 3>or not performing, we shouldn't backfill that role. We should

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 3>actually start reducing the size of the state government. It's insane.

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about your political identity. Why aren't you running

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>as an independent? You've not really made a case to

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>me that you're a Republican. And I don't mean that

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>as a pejorative or anything, but sort of where today's

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Republican look for good or for bad. Both parties to

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:17.439
<v Speaker 1>me are defined more by their bases to a large

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>majority of people than they are by their differences.

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:21.879
<v Speaker 2>Right, I grew up in a world.

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I think one of our problems is that there's no

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>we don't have ideological diversity within the two parties like

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>we did when you and I were growing up. There

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 1>were conservative Democrats, liberal Democrats, there were liberal Republicans and

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>conservative Republicans. You know, let me ask the social questions,

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>because ultimately that has been the distinguishing characteristic of the

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>California Republican over the years, sort of a low tax,

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, fiscal conservative, but social liberal.

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Is that how you would.

0:36:51.400 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Describe yourself, I'd say that I'm a radical moderate marriage

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm quoting. I'm quoting Dan Schneur when I said.

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 2>I love that. I know Dan a little bit.

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I was once kind of uh, somebody called me a

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:11.959
<v Speaker 1>radical centrist and I said thank you, and they didn't

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:16.399
<v Speaker 1>mean it as a as a compliment. But where are

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you on the on the sort of those you know,

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>those those sure, those those key social issues that you know,

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 1>for some people become non starters, right guns, abortion, same

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>sex marriage.

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's see same sex marriage. People should marry who

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 3>they love. I mean, I think that's uh. I think

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 3>we're way beyond that.

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 2>I hope.

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 3>And actually, in my experience, Chuck, the Republicans that I meet,

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 3>and I actually went to my first two state conventions

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 3>March in September. I had never gone to a convention

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:50.359
<v Speaker 3>of any party, and the people I met were very

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 3>accepting of of people gay, straight, It doesn't matter. Listen

0:37:55.680 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 3>on the subject of abortion, you know, deeply personal and

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 3>moral issue. I have very strong, personally held beliefs, but

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 3>we have settled law in California which which I would

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 3>strongly support. Women have reproductive freedom in California. I would

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 3>support that because it's the law. Uh. And I have

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 3>many friends in the pro life community who have very

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 3>strong convictions. What the governor in California can do on

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.280
<v Speaker 3>that subject is focus on where we can all agree,

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 3>which is which I think is parental notification if a child,

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, under each child is pregnant, counseling and support

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 3>for healthy outcomes, safe pregnancy, adoption, if if if a

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:43.240
<v Speaker 3>kid is you know can be led down that path.

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:47.760
<v Speaker 3>But I support women's rights under the law. In terms

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 3>of guns, I'm a gun owner. I sport shoot. I

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 3>support Second Amendment rights. I think that California has these

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Rickst gun laws on the books and they are enforced.

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 3>I know that as a gun owner going through the

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 3>process of owning and training, and you thik.

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Their good laws. Would you get rid of any of them?

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you comfortable with what's on the books?

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Uh? I think that's an area where the majority of

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Californians support the laws that are on the books.

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:23.799
<v Speaker 2>You worded that very much like the politician John Well.

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it's I think it's I have I have

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 3>personal beliefs, but as an elected official, you've got it.

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:31.720
<v Speaker 3>You've got you you sorry, right hand, you take another.

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:32.759
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate that.

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I always remind people were in a representative democracy, right

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately that was the design that our founders had,

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, and there's a fine line, and

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you, you know, can you is there

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 1>an issue where you would go against the majority in

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>your state?

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 3>And is any issue? Yeah, an issue where I'd go

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 3>against the majority of my state. Well, listen, I'll give

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 3>you one. It's very present and just happened Prop fifty.

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 3>So participating, Yeah, Prop fifty past overwhelming. I was sixty

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 3>five percent. So when Prop fifty was bubbling, I came

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 3>out very strongly against it on my podcast as a

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 3>no on fifty, meaning against the Jerry manderin just permit me,

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 3>I'll speak for one minute on this. We actually did

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 3>a documentary called the Big Rig, and we put that

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 3>out on State of Gold and I interviewed, I sat

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 3>down with twenty different leaders across the state, experts and

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 3>redistricting and politicians, you name it. And it was a

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 3>classic example of what to me was a power grab

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 3>in the name of fighting Trump, and I opposed what

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 3>happened in Texas. You know, some Republicans say, oh, well,

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Texas is different to me de facto, when the majority

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 3>party bludgeons the minority party to death, it's bad Texas

0:40:56.880 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 3>started then California. By the way, the Democrats that were

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 3>pro Prop fifty raised one hundred and twenty million dollars,

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 3>spent a little bit more than the majority of it,

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 3>but have that money in the coffers to do what

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 3>they want to do for the next campaign. And we

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 3>spawned all kinds of bad behavior across the country. Thankfully,

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 3>there are some Republican legislators, legislatures and leaders resisting doing

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 3>that as well. I think it's bad for democracy. And

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:29.280
<v Speaker 3>so that's an example where I came out and made

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 3>my case, which is counter to what most people in

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 3>California think. But how will democrats feel when Republicans take

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 3>control of the state, which will happen at some point

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 3>in California, hopefully soon. How will Republicans treat Democrats in California?

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 3>And I think we should be a shining beacon of

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 3>a constitutional, functioning democracy in California, not a hack job.

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Having good life insurance is incredibly important. I know from

0:41:56.920 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 1>personal experience. I was sixteen when my father passed away.

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have any money. He didn't leave us in

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the best shape. My mother single mother, now widow, myself

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 1>sixteen trying to figure out how am I going to

0:42:08.760 --> 0:42:11.879
<v Speaker 1>pay for college and lo and behold. My dad had

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 1>one life insurance policy that we found wasn't a lot,

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>but it was important at the time, and it's why

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I was able to go to college. Little did he

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>know how important that would be in that moment. Well,

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>guess what. That's why I am here to tell you

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>about Etho's life. They can provide you with peace of

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>mind knowing your family is protected even if the worst

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>comes to pass. Ethos is an online platform that makes

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>getting life insurance fast and easy, all designed to protect

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>your family's future in minutes, not months. There's no complicated

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 1>process and it's one hundred percent online. There's no medical

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>exam require you just answer a few health questions online.

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 1>You can get a quote in as little as ten minutes,

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and you can get same day coverage without ever leaving

0:42:56.760 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>your home. You can get up to three million dollars

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 1>in coverage, and some policies start as low as two

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars a day that would be billed monthly. As of

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>March twenty twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>one no medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:15.919
<v Speaker 1>your family with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:20.280
<v Speaker 1>quoted ethos dot com slash chuck. So again, that's Ethos

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary, and the

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>rates themselves may vary as well, but trust me, life

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 1>insurance is something you should really think about, especially if

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got a growing family. I was one of those

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't understand. I understood the political decision.

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 2>That California Democrats.

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Made, Okay, I understood the political argument. The problem I

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>had is, I, if you believe voters are being disenfranchised

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 1>in Texas, why is the answer to disenfranchised voters in

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>another state?

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:52.759
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 2>The principle of it sort of bothered me.

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And I understand that everything you know, unfortunately too much

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of politics as a zero sum game to people. Right,

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, so and so wins, then we lose, we lose,

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we win, then they lose, and it's like, you know,

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 1>the law of unattended consequences always bite you always bite

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you in the you know where.

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:13.439
<v Speaker 3>But let me ask you a question. Because you ask

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 3>me why I'm not independent, I want to answer the

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 3>question directly because it's a really good question. There actually

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:22.239
<v Speaker 3>is an independent running named Ethan Penner, who's a good,

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:26.799
<v Speaker 3>smart guy and got some interesting ideas. Just there's no

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 3>independent party, Chuck, there's no independent.

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Party, Arnold Schwarzenegger. Look, the beauty of the top two.

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Let me answer, though, was to make it so you

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to join a party.

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:39.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, well, okay, but that's not the reality. I think.

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that people organize around parties still in America,

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 3>and they organize around two parties. And I think it's

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:49.320
<v Speaker 3>a long way off before we have an independent party

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 3>in California or in the nation. And there's a lot

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 3>of things that need to happen right to set the

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 3>stage for that. We have a lot of things to

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 3>sort out, Chuck, don't we and our body politic before

0:44:57.320 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 3>that can happen. But for me, I'm an old school Republican.

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 3>I describe myself more as a Reagan Republican, which is

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 3>looking at government very skeptically and what is the role

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 3>of government, What can government really be good at? Is

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:16.320
<v Speaker 3>an orientation around freedom and property rights. It's a respect

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:20.320
<v Speaker 3>for business being a prime engine of opportunity creation in society.

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 3>It's those kinds of things. And I think if you

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 3>look in California at where the better ideas are for

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 3>turning the state around, it's more on the Republican side

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 3>than the Democrat side. And again, I'm not in this

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:38.359
<v Speaker 3>to bash Democrats. Most of my family or Democrats, they've

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 3>all come out saying, John, how could you? How could

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 3>you be a Republican? Trump? Trump? Trump? And what I

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 3>tell them is put Trump aside. California's problems are not

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:51.840
<v Speaker 3>because of Trump. This is an own goal in California.

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 3>So I'm a Republican really based on policy and philosophy.

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about though, the result of Prop fifty.

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I actually didn't think it was going to be the

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>blowout at first, right, and then you saw I said,

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>oh boy, this turned into a Trump referendum.

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Right. And the minute it turned into a Trump referendum,

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 2>it was over. Sure.

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just look, I'm just being honest with you. Campaign

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six in a blue state. You know, I

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 1>don't see the path for any I say this. I

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know how a Republican wins statewide in this political

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 1>environment with Donald Trump and the White House.

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Why am I wrong?

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, we'll see. I understand that skepticism. I think it's

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:33.879
<v Speaker 3>it's warranted, to be honest, and the truth is that

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:37.280
<v Speaker 3>the Republican Party in California historically, in the recent history,

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:40.840
<v Speaker 3>has not done itself the favors, you know, running on

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 3>certain cultural issues versus running on policy, running.

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 2>By the identity crisis.

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Right like, Arnold Schwarzenegger is the most successful Republican governor

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 1>arguably since Ronald Reagan. And good luck finding a Republican

0:46:54.160 --> 0:46:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that wants to emulate Arnold Schwarzenegger these days.

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, because people have gone to their corners. And

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 3>to be honest, though I love Arnold, I mean I

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:04.440
<v Speaker 3>love him as a guy, but there are certain policies

0:47:04.480 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 3>that have led us in the wrong direction. I mentioned

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 3>the climate regime is his policy, right, Well, he's the

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:12.840
<v Speaker 3>one who you know. I think he figured out early

0:47:12.880 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 3>on he wanted to be known as a climate governor.

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 3>And I don't think there's anything wrong with that. We

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:20.880
<v Speaker 3>have the best environmental laws on the books of any state.

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 3>We should enforce them. The environmental movement started here in

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:25.840
<v Speaker 3>the seventies. That was a good thing. The problem is

0:47:25.880 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 3>it was perverted and hijacked in law to facto to

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 3>block a lot of good things, a lot of growth

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 3>and housing and energy production that we need while we

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 3>figure out how to protect the environment. So I think

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 3>it kind of got perverted unintentionally. But you ask, how

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:49.240
<v Speaker 3>do you win? You know, they're credible polls chuck from

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 3>from mid to late last year that showed that half

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:53.880
<v Speaker 3>of the state would vote for the right kind of

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Republican I.

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Believe, and people always it's that I can always get

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:01.239
<v Speaker 1>you that poll result. Some people want to always want

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:03.759
<v Speaker 1>to come across as reasonable, but you know they do

0:48:03.840 --> 0:48:06.440
<v Speaker 1>end up voting the same way that they vote seventy

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:07.279
<v Speaker 1>five percent of the time.

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, we'll see. I think. I think in California it's

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 3>darkest before the dawn. I think that if you my

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 3>grammar research, we had lots of pulling the grammar research

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:23.279
<v Speaker 3>is so much frustration, so much disaffection. Yeah, and I

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:25.399
<v Speaker 3>think the way this is going to game out on

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 3>the left or on the Democratic side, I really think

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:32.919
<v Speaker 3>the energy is more further left. I think it's more

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 3>in the Katie Porter wing than than others, right, and

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:37.799
<v Speaker 3>there're different characters.

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know where you go. I mean, it's

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:40.319
<v Speaker 2>funny you bring that up.

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 1>If Rick Caruso gets in this race, and I think

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people assume w'k Cruso is getting in

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 1>this race. He's the former Republican now running as a Democrat.

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:53.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well so he's a very successful guy. Love his

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:58.399
<v Speaker 3>real estate projects as a consumer. But Chuck, that game

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:02.800
<v Speaker 3>has been played in California before we had we had,

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, someone named Whitman, we had someone named Huffington.

0:49:07.239 --> 0:49:10.759
<v Speaker 3>We've had billionaires. That's not me. I mean, I get

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:12.799
<v Speaker 3>up early in the morning and I change diapers, and

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:15.239
<v Speaker 3>I do dishes and I drive kids to school. And yes,

0:49:15.280 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 3>I've been successful, but I live in a nice neighborhood

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:22.240
<v Speaker 3>in a fairly regular house. And I'm not that guy.

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm in the world. Okay. I don't think a

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:31.320
<v Speaker 3>billionaire buys his or her way into the election in California.

0:49:31.360 --> 0:49:34.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that's the California style, the California.

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:36.319
<v Speaker 2>Way it worked, asked ALCHECKI.

0:49:37.000 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 3>And there's Alcheckie. Yeah, there there's Alcheckie, who was actually

0:49:41.680 --> 0:49:43.840
<v Speaker 3>a friend of my dad's funny enough way back in

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 3>the day.

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:44.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:49:44.920 --> 0:49:47.400
<v Speaker 3>But here's the thing I think that I think to

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 3>your point, if you look at the Emerson polls, which

0:49:49.560 --> 0:49:53.879
<v Speaker 3>are most often quoted and cited in California, last one

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:56.640
<v Speaker 3>showed thirty one percent undecided, the one before that forty

0:49:56.680 --> 0:50:00.759
<v Speaker 3>four percent undecided, it's wide open. It's complete wide open,

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:03.759
<v Speaker 3>and I think people want something different. A lot of

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:08.880
<v Speaker 3>the Democrats are how did I put this politely, been

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:10.320
<v Speaker 3>in politics a long time.

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, careers, yeah, no, no, no, no.

0:50:12.239 --> 0:50:15.960
<v Speaker 3>And the two Republicans who are running. I like them

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 3>both as men. I like Steve and I like Chad.

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:20.399
<v Speaker 3>I've had them on my podcast, spen all the time

0:50:20.400 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 3>with them. They're good men. I don't think either has

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 3>the right background to turn the state around.

0:50:25.480 --> 0:50:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's I want to close with Silicon Valley, and it

0:50:32.520 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 1>goes to what I think is going to be a

0:50:34.560 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 1>struggle for you if you win, which is, on one hand,

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you want to make it easier to do

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:43.239
<v Speaker 1>business in California. On the other hand, I think there's

0:50:43.280 --> 0:50:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who think the tech companies have

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:54.080
<v Speaker 1>too much free ring right, and that actually, you know,

0:50:54.160 --> 0:50:56.520
<v Speaker 1>while generally there might be too much red tape for

0:50:56.560 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the average person starting a small to mid size business.

0:51:00.080 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I could argue there's not enough red tape and the

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:06.120
<v Speaker 1>enough guardrails with Silicon Valley given look at what social

0:51:06.120 --> 0:51:09.920
<v Speaker 1>media did to society and now there's very few guardrails

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:15.200
<v Speaker 1>on AI. I struggle with this because I want to

0:51:15.239 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 1>see advancement and I also see, well, you can't trust

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:21.960
<v Speaker 1>them without some sort of minder there. Where are you

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on do you think Silicon Valley has been regulated enough?

0:51:27.120 --> 0:51:31.879
<v Speaker 3>Well? I think that California.

0:51:31.320 --> 0:51:32.799
<v Speaker 2>Gave away my bias there on that one.

0:51:33.200 --> 0:51:35.439
<v Speaker 1>I did, and it's part of it is to sort

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:37.479
<v Speaker 1>of spark a conversation for what it's worth.

0:51:37.480 --> 0:51:38.960
<v Speaker 2>But it is.

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:41.319
<v Speaker 1>And I think I'm not alone here, right there's people

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that think there's too much regulation and big tech has

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:44.760
<v Speaker 1>too much power.

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, big tech is also a huge driver for innovation, employment,

0:51:50.120 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 3>wealth building, and God help us, and we need to

0:51:53.760 --> 0:51:56.480
<v Speaker 3>keep that in California. There's a lot of movement outside

0:51:56.520 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 3>of California. You can listen, you can run a tech

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 3>company from anywhere in the world. You can run it

0:52:03.120 --> 0:52:05.440
<v Speaker 3>from the mountains, you can run it from the beach,

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:08.440
<v Speaker 3>you can run it from anywhere. So California needs to

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 3>remain the most welcoming and the most positive place for

0:52:13.800 --> 0:52:16.280
<v Speaker 3>tech companies of all sizes to want to do business.

0:52:16.520 --> 0:52:19.480
<v Speaker 3>If you look at the AI business, Chuck, one of

0:52:19.480 --> 0:52:22.360
<v Speaker 3>the singular reasons that Dan Lurie has been able to

0:52:23.080 --> 0:52:25.960
<v Speaker 3>tell a comeback story in San Francisco is because of AI,

0:52:26.719 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 3>because of the employment, because of the leases that have

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:32.719
<v Speaker 3>been signed in downtown to bring human beings back into

0:52:32.719 --> 0:52:35.439
<v Speaker 3>the city to actually be a part of the tech base.

0:52:35.520 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 3>So God bless AI and God blessed the tech industry.

0:52:39.080 --> 0:52:43.279
<v Speaker 3>California has passed AI legislation. California has been one of

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 3>the states to pioneer passing legislation that provides some guardrails

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:49.800
<v Speaker 3>to AI that the rest of the nation is actually modeling.

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Of course, Trump now is threatening to have federal legislation

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:56.120
<v Speaker 3>that stomps down all of this regulation. We've got to

0:52:56.120 --> 0:53:00.120
<v Speaker 3>find a happy medium. I do think they're legitimate concerns

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:04.160
<v Speaker 3>on on you know, for human beings and for kids

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:08.719
<v Speaker 3>about technology and AI. But here's where I generally rest, Chuck,

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 3>and I'll use the analogy of the big gulp in Bloomberg.

0:53:12.080 --> 0:53:14.319
<v Speaker 3>You remember the Yeah, you remember that.

0:53:15.239 --> 0:53:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I allow that it's the Trump Health secretary that seems

0:53:18.160 --> 0:53:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to be anti big Gulp these days.

0:53:20.040 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm sort of like left his right right.

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 3>And I love that part. I love that part of

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:28.919
<v Speaker 3>rfk's agenda. I love getting rid of the red dye

0:53:29.040 --> 0:53:31.760
<v Speaker 3>number eight, and I love copying more of what Europe

0:53:31.840 --> 0:53:33.480
<v Speaker 3>does in a good way when it comes to our

0:53:33.800 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 3>supply chain for food. I also believe in science, okay,

0:53:38.600 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 3>and and and and and you know, in the right vaccine.

0:53:42.640 --> 0:53:45.920
<v Speaker 3>So so I think there's a balance, Chuck. But I

0:53:45.960 --> 0:53:49.239
<v Speaker 3>am I am an anti nanny state guy. I do

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 3>not believe that the government should be telling the private

0:53:54.160 --> 0:53:57.440
<v Speaker 3>sector and individual people how to do what they do

0:53:57.560 --> 0:54:00.000
<v Speaker 3>in general. But yes, some basic guardrails.

0:54:01.680 --> 0:54:02.279
<v Speaker 2>So let me.

0:54:02.320 --> 0:54:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just let me throwing out there banning social media

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:05.799
<v Speaker 1>for under sixteen year olds.

0:54:05.800 --> 0:54:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Would you sign that legislation?

0:54:08.080 --> 0:54:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, listen, Australia did it. I think it's a joke

0:54:12.440 --> 0:54:16.400
<v Speaker 3>because there are so many workarounds to get around that.

0:54:16.440 --> 0:54:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Life So I think, to facto it's a joke. You

0:54:19.160 --> 0:54:21.840
<v Speaker 3>can waive that kind of law round say you're doing something.

0:54:22.400 --> 0:54:24.359
<v Speaker 3>At the end of the day, Chuck, it comes down

0:54:24.360 --> 0:54:28.320
<v Speaker 3>to are parents involved in their kids' lives? So, for instance,

0:54:29.600 --> 0:54:34.239
<v Speaker 3>my kids didn't have phones until they were thirteen, and

0:54:34.280 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 3>the reason they got it is because they were taking

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:39.720
<v Speaker 3>the train to school and needed a way to communicate. Okay,

0:54:39.560 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 3>they but all their friends had phones starting at god

0:54:42.560 --> 0:54:45.799
<v Speaker 3>knows what it. So I think parents need to get

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 3>involved with their kids and parent them, and that's really

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:52.640
<v Speaker 3>where we should we should focus, as opposed to the

0:54:52.680 --> 0:54:55.920
<v Speaker 3>government telling parents or children when to have technology.

0:54:56.320 --> 0:54:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, I hear you there, but we did put a

0:54:58.239 --> 0:55:02.200
<v Speaker 1>age limit on smoking, and if we've decided this is bad,

0:55:02.719 --> 0:55:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we think this is bad for mental health of young brains,

0:55:07.400 --> 0:55:11.839
<v Speaker 1>and so it is. Is there any movement for you

0:55:11.920 --> 0:55:12.160
<v Speaker 1>on that?

0:55:12.239 --> 0:55:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Again, here's the thing these A pack of cigarettes, okay,

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:20.880
<v Speaker 3>is readily accessible for any kid who can get someone

0:55:20.880 --> 0:55:23.440
<v Speaker 3>to sneak it and buy it. And whatever number of bucks,

0:55:23.480 --> 0:55:25.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't buy cigarettes. I'm not sure what they cost

0:55:25.360 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 3>per pack these days. A piece of technology that we're

0:55:29.160 --> 0:55:31.960
<v Speaker 3>talking about, an Apple watch or a phone, is a

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:35.440
<v Speaker 3>considered purchase for the vast majority of people in California.

0:55:36.120 --> 0:55:38.319
<v Speaker 3>So it's not like kids are running around at a

0:55:38.360 --> 0:55:41.319
<v Speaker 3>young age buying these technologies and putting them in their

0:55:41.360 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 3>palm or on their wrists. So I really think it

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:46.240
<v Speaker 3>comes down to parents being smart and involved.

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Would you ban them in public schools?

0:55:50.000 --> 0:55:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think I don't believe in universal bands like this.

0:55:54.800 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a good idea, though. What certain school

0:55:56.960 --> 0:55:59.840
<v Speaker 3>districts have started to do is say that you cannot

0:55:59.880 --> 0:56:03.720
<v Speaker 3>have have your phone, uh, you know, in your hand

0:56:04.719 --> 0:56:05.759
<v Speaker 3>or you know.

0:56:05.920 --> 0:56:08.360
<v Speaker 1>In my kids' school had pouches at the beginning of

0:56:08.400 --> 0:56:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the class and you put your phone in your pouch

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and you weren't until you know, and then you sat

0:56:13.600 --> 0:56:14.160
<v Speaker 1>down right.

0:56:14.200 --> 0:56:16.640
<v Speaker 3>It's like it's like it's what government officials do befo

0:56:16.640 --> 0:56:17.800
<v Speaker 3>they go into a secure site.

0:56:17.840 --> 0:56:18.960
<v Speaker 2>So Skiff exactly.

0:56:19.000 --> 0:56:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I think these kinds of ideas are good. I think

0:56:21.520 --> 0:56:25.520
<v Speaker 3>they they should be locally determined. I don't believe in

0:56:25.560 --> 0:56:30.800
<v Speaker 3>the State of California imposing things like that on school

0:56:30.880 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 3>districts or kids or parents.

0:56:33.680 --> 0:56:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Let me get you out of here on this. There's

0:56:35.239 --> 0:56:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a wealth tax coming on the ballot. Huh, there certainly is.

0:56:39.239 --> 0:56:42.759
<v Speaker 1>I imagine it. I know where you stand on this.

0:56:46.080 --> 0:56:49.160
<v Speaker 1>It's probably going to be popular. So how do you

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:51.080
<v Speaker 1>convince somebody who says, yeah, but you know what, you

0:56:51.080 --> 0:56:52.160
<v Speaker 1>don't pay enough taxes.

0:56:52.239 --> 0:56:54.120
<v Speaker 2>You guys have all the loopholes you have this or that.

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:57.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's tough being a defender of the quote wealthy

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:00.560
<v Speaker 1>on this right, we know the pitchforks have been sharpened,

0:57:01.040 --> 0:57:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and the pitchforks are in both parties you and have.

0:57:03.239 --> 0:57:05.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is not a just on.

0:57:05.200 --> 0:57:05.799
<v Speaker 2>The left thing.

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:09.360
<v Speaker 1>These this is this is the most interesting divide in

0:57:09.400 --> 0:57:11.840
<v Speaker 1>America I think is this is this a bit of

0:57:11.840 --> 0:57:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the on the socioeconomic front. Make the case to a

0:57:15.640 --> 0:57:18.320
<v Speaker 1>working class person that the wealth tax is a bad idea.

0:57:18.720 --> 0:57:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm against all new taxes, and in California, including

0:57:23.440 --> 0:57:27.520
<v Speaker 3>this this this billionaire tax in California, which I know

0:57:27.600 --> 0:57:30.400
<v Speaker 3>this happens in other states, huck. There is a hidden

0:57:30.480 --> 0:57:35.480
<v Speaker 3>system of what are called special funds. So a county

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:39.320
<v Speaker 3>or the state will say, hey, we have a huge need,

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:44.200
<v Speaker 3>for example, a big beautiful bill cut healthcare spending. We

0:57:44.240 --> 0:57:47.480
<v Speaker 3>want to initiate a new tax, a sales tax. It's

0:57:47.520 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 3>a tenth of a percent. You're not going to notice it.

0:57:50.040 --> 0:57:53.880
<v Speaker 3>It's going to it's gonna accrue the county five hundred

0:57:53.960 --> 0:57:56.440
<v Speaker 3>million dollars over the next four years, and we're going

0:57:56.480 --> 0:57:59.160
<v Speaker 3>to use that money to pay for healthcare. What happens

0:57:59.680 --> 0:58:03.520
<v Speaker 3>that money is raised and it is shifted into the

0:58:03.640 --> 0:58:05.800
<v Speaker 3>general fund of the county or the state to be

0:58:05.840 --> 0:58:09.720
<v Speaker 3>spent on anything. Chuck, this is the bait and switch

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:13.400
<v Speaker 3>that happens with taxpayers, and we're already over taxed. This

0:58:13.640 --> 0:58:18.440
<v Speaker 3>is like a slippery slope. It's lots of other ideas

0:58:18.440 --> 0:58:21.400
<v Speaker 3>of taking more money from taxpayers giving it to government

0:58:21.440 --> 0:58:24.920
<v Speaker 3>to spend on dumb shit or stuff that doesn't work.

0:58:26.200 --> 0:58:27.200
<v Speaker 3>That's my argument.

0:58:29.520 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 1>If you get elected, you know you're going to be

0:58:31.080 --> 0:58:35.280
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a democratic legislature, perhaps a super majority. But

0:58:35.320 --> 0:58:37.360
<v Speaker 1>then again, if you get elected, I probably mean so,

0:58:37.480 --> 0:58:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't a super majority. I think this is assuming

0:58:40.840 --> 0:58:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you make it into the top two. It's tough to

0:58:45.600 --> 0:58:46.840
<v Speaker 1>be bipartisan these days.

0:58:46.840 --> 0:58:47.520
<v Speaker 2>How would you do it?

0:58:48.400 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I'll give a quick anecdote from Willie Brown,

0:58:52.280 --> 0:58:55.720
<v Speaker 3>who I sat down with from my podcast last July.

0:58:55.920 --> 0:58:57.880
<v Speaker 3>This is prior to commute.

0:58:58.760 --> 0:59:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Nobody more fun to talk to. I think he's all

0:59:00.800 --> 0:59:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the five. I think he's one of the five most

0:59:04.800 --> 0:59:08.200
<v Speaker 1>accomplished politicians in the twentieth century.

0:59:08.400 --> 0:59:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, maybe right.

0:59:09.120 --> 0:59:11.280
<v Speaker 1>The fact that he stayed Speaker of the House with

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the party change tell me another leader that could pull

0:59:14.720 --> 0:59:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that off.

0:59:15.160 --> 0:59:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Well. Actually, he told the story that when he was

0:59:17.160 --> 0:59:21.160
<v Speaker 3>elected speaker, more Republicans voted him in than Democrats, which

0:59:21.160 --> 0:59:23.720
<v Speaker 3>you may know because you're such a student of politics.

0:59:23.720 --> 0:59:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Such a great story. A movie should be made about it.

0:59:25.600 --> 0:59:26.800
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, it's a great story.

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:29.520
<v Speaker 3>And there are plenty of areas of disagreement I might

0:59:29.560 --> 0:59:34.840
<v Speaker 3>have with Willie Brown down in policies in California. But

0:59:35.040 --> 0:59:41.200
<v Speaker 3>I asked him, what's the biggest lesson you learned when

0:59:41.240 --> 0:59:44.960
<v Speaker 3>you were a mayor or the speaker? And he tugged

0:59:44.960 --> 0:59:48.400
<v Speaker 3>his ear and he said, I listened, and he said,

0:59:48.920 --> 0:59:51.320
<v Speaker 3>I was just as likely to have dinner into Larry,

0:59:51.360 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 3>which is, you know, farm country here in California. As

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:56.560
<v Speaker 3>I was San Francisco, I spent time with people. I

0:59:56.640 --> 0:59:59.320
<v Speaker 3>formed relationships with people, and I cut deals with people.

1:00:00.040 --> 1:00:04.040
<v Speaker 3>And to quote Jerry Brown, who I have plenty of

1:00:04.120 --> 1:00:06.200
<v Speaker 3>policy disagreements with, he said, you know, if you want

1:00:06.240 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 3>to make a canu goo straight, sometimes you paddle on

1:00:08.440 --> 1:00:10.640
<v Speaker 3>the left and sometimes you paddle on the right. Okay,

1:00:10.640 --> 1:00:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm quoting two Democrats. What I would say is that

1:00:14.560 --> 1:00:17.520
<v Speaker 3>you got to be practical, you got to cut deals,

1:00:18.000 --> 1:00:21.480
<v Speaker 3>but sometimes you stand on principle. Sometimes you use executive order,

1:00:21.560 --> 1:00:24.440
<v Speaker 3>sometimes you use the bully pulpit, sometimes you negotiate. But

1:00:24.480 --> 1:00:26.760
<v Speaker 3>we've got to do it together, Chuck. There's only one way.

1:00:27.640 --> 1:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think we're all trying to figure out if

1:00:29.120 --> 1:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>pragmatism isn't it is allowed anymore in our politics, to

1:00:34.720 --> 1:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>say that it gets punished by the political basis, that's

1:00:37.480 --> 1:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>for sure.

1:00:38.040 --> 1:00:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Hey, John, it's good to get to know you.

1:00:39.320 --> 1:00:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate Thank you very much, Chuck,