Speaker 1: All right, thanks gootch on an hour two Sean Hennity Show,
Speaker 1: toll free on numbers eight hundred and ninety four one Sean,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program. Well,
Speaker 1: it looks like the congenital liar Adam Schiff really needed
Speaker 1: that pardoner. Joe Biden gave him unconditional pardon at the
Speaker 1: end of his administration for more than a few reasons.
Speaker 1: We reported last week that in fact, he's being investigated
Speaker 1: by the Department of Justice over whether or not he
Speaker 1: was claiming while being a California representative, if he lied
Speaker 1: on loan applications and falsely claimed that his main residence
Speaker 1: was in Maryland, and maybe perhaps even according to one report,
Speaker 1: suggesting that he was claiming the same thing out in
Speaker 1: California at the same time, in other words, to get
Speaker 1: more favorable loan terms with the federal government. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: would get a lot of people in trouble. But we
Speaker 1: have other news here.
Speaker 2: There was and this.
Speaker 1: Story is pretty mind blowing. It was, and John Solomon,
Speaker 1: who broke the story, will join us in a moment.
Speaker 1: Investigative reporter founder editor in chief chose Thethnews dot Com
Speaker 1: how a democratic whistleblower repeatedly warned the FBI democratic whistleblower,
Speaker 1: I mean this person was there well over a decade that,
Speaker 1: beginning in twenty seventeen, the congenital liar Adam Schiff had
Speaker 1: authorized leaking classified information, all in an effort to smear
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Now by every objective measure, we'll get Greg
Speaker 1: Jarrett to take on it as well. That seems to
Speaker 1: me that that could very likely be a violation of
Speaker 1: the Espionage Act. Now, other news that John has broken
Speaker 1: from earlier today, we find out that unearthed emails part
Speaker 1: of a Foyer request show the Biden administration agencies scrapped
Speaker 1: a plan for Joe Biden to visit a vessel at
Speaker 1: an event because it would have required that then President
Speaker 1: Joe Biden would have to take too many steps, which
Speaker 1: means they knew that he was in a significant not
Speaker 1: only cognitive decline, but a significant physical decline as well.
Speaker 1: All part of the strategy going back to twenty nineteen
Speaker 1: when we first pointed all of this out to the
Speaker 1: American people, and everybody you know, was even up until
Speaker 1: twenty twenty three, they were calling him cheap fake twenty
Speaker 1: twenty four, twenty twenty four cheap fake videos anyway the
Speaker 1: Foyer request by the Protect the Public Trust obtained by
Speaker 1: Fox News Digital. Biden was set to visit a national
Speaker 1: security multi mission vessel while touring a shipyard in Philadelphia
Speaker 1: in July of twenty three, and according to the emails,
Speaker 1: that visit to that vessel was scrapped because of quote
Speaker 1: how many steps were involved to get him on that
Speaker 1: ship and he wasn't in good enough shape to take it,
Speaker 1: as determined by the people around him. Now we're discovering
Speaker 1: a New York Times piece. I'll take you back in time.
Speaker 1: What did they report that Joe Biden set down criteria
Speaker 1: and standards for commutations and pardons with every indication that
Speaker 1: he did not make every approval himself. And then the
Speaker 1: question still remains, and hopefully the House Oversight Committee will
Speaker 1: get to the bottom of this, and that is who
Speaker 1: decided and who made the authorization to use the auto
Speaker 1: pen and did Joe Biden even have a clue of
Speaker 1: who is getting a commutation and a pardon?
Speaker 2: Anyway?
Speaker 1: Here to help us sort through all of this, we
Speaker 1: have Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst, New York Times
Speaker 1: bestselling author, John Solomon, editor and chief founder, chief investigative
Speaker 1: reporter justinnews dot com.
Speaker 2: John, we start with you.
Speaker 1: Let's start with the issue of Adam Shift. This is
Speaker 1: a big story and actually this is going to be
Speaker 1: a big week. You have a lot of breaking news
Speaker 1: coming out this week.
Speaker 3: Yeah, listen. I think for the last few years, we've
Speaker 3: known that the false narrative of Russia collusion couldn't have
Speaker 3: been carried out if there weren't legacy news media that
Speaker 3: every day took leaks in often selective leaks, in little
Speaker 3: fragments of intelligence and tried to put them out there
Speaker 3: without a full complete reporting on them. And what we
Speaker 3: now see is we have some sense of who the
Speaker 3: FBI suspected was leaking, and one of those is Adam Shift,
Speaker 3: the ranking then the ranking member on House Intelligence later
Speaker 3: to become its chairman, and then now a California Senator.
Speaker 3: One of his own staff or someone who had served
Speaker 3: on the House Intelligence Committee for twelve years. He was
Speaker 3: a person who had great credibility and longevity with the
Speaker 3: House Intelligence Committee. Came forward four times between twenty seventeen
Speaker 3: and twenty twenty two. Somewhere in that process he gets
Speaker 3: let go by Shift's staff, but He says, I personally
Speaker 3: witnessed in a meeting where Adam Shiff approved the leaking
Speaker 3: of classified information, and I was told don't worry about it,
Speaker 3: even though I thought it was illegal, unethical, in treasonous,
Speaker 3: because Shiff would simply claim that he was protected by
Speaker 3: the debate and speech cause the independent separation of powers
Speaker 3: cause of the constant. And so he goes forward. He
Speaker 3: tells the FBI about this, The FBI starts building some timelines.
Speaker 3: You can see certain things that Adam Schiff does that
Speaker 3: matches up what the source tells him. But at the
Speaker 3: end of the day, it was nowhere for two reasons. One,
Speaker 3: the House Intelligence Committee Democrats staff wouldn't allow itself to
Speaker 3: be interviewed to see if other people who attended the
Speaker 3: meeting or believe this happened. And then the US Attorney
Speaker 3: just basically lets it go and so you know, and
Speaker 3: then years later the Inspector General the Justice Department takes
Speaker 3: a look at and so they just didn't put much
Speaker 3: credence into it. Pretty amazing stuff for a sitting member,
Speaker 3: a member of the Gang of Eight. Remember, when you're
Speaker 3: the ranking member of House Intelligence, you get the most
Speaker 3: sensitive information shared to Congress, the Speaker, the Minority leader,
Speaker 3: the House Intelligence ranking and majority members get these really
Speaker 3: private briefings, and there was good reason to be concerned
Speaker 3: about Adam Shift's loyalty to keeping that information secret. And
Speaker 3: it took us eight years to find that out.
Speaker 2: Greg Jarrett, let's get your take on all of this.
Speaker 1: And we also have to remember he got this this
Speaker 1: pardon on Joe Biden's way out the door. So I
Speaker 1: would imagine that on a whole host of issues that
Speaker 1: Adam Schiff has probably protected from prosecution.
Speaker 2: Am I wrong?
Speaker 4: Well, the parton deals only with his role on the
Speaker 4: J six Committee and nothing else but leaking classified documents,
Speaker 4: as John has laid it out. And you know, again,
Speaker 4: hats off to John for great investigative reporting. The leaking
Speaker 4: classified documents. It's an obvious crime under the Espionaja Act
Speaker 4: eighteen USC. Seven ninety eight. It doesn't matter if you
Speaker 4: are a member of Congress or on the Intelligence Committee,
Speaker 4: or even if you're Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who
Speaker 4: mishandled classified emails. You know, a whole lot of others
Speaker 4: have been prosecuted for less CIA Director David Treys, for example,
Speaker 4: And according to this whistleblower. Schiff knew he was committing
Speaker 4: felonies because Schiff admitted to his staff that he was
Speaker 4: protected by the speech and Debate Clause, which is totally untrue.
Speaker 4: He never read it, obviously, because that cause specifically excludes
Speaker 4: both treason and any felony crime. It also excludes non
Speaker 4: official acts, which is leaking. So the question becomes why
Speaker 4: wasn't Schiff arrested and charged when the FBI first learned
Speaker 4: about it in twenty seventeen. Well, Okham's raiser, you know.
Speaker 4: The correct answer is usually the most obvious. He was
Speaker 4: being protected by FBI Director Christopher Ray in a succession
Speaker 4: of Attorneys General Jeff Session, Rod Rosenstein, Bill Barr, and
Speaker 4: Merrick Garling, none of whom wanted to do the right
Speaker 4: thing and enforce the rule of law, probably for political reasons.
Speaker 4: The problem now, of course, is the statue of limitations,
Speaker 4: which is five years from the act of leaking classified
Speaker 4: information or the last act in a conspiracy to leak,
Speaker 4: And at this point we don't know the exact dates
Speaker 4: of when he leaked. If Shift continued to leak and
Speaker 4: conspired to cover it up, which is obstruction of justice,
Speaker 4: the clock arguably starts ticking upon the discovery of deliberately
Speaker 4: concealed evidence. So you know, we don't know the dates,
Speaker 4: as I said before, but you can bet your bottom
Speaker 4: dollar that both the FBI and the Department of Justice
Speaker 4: are closely examining it with an eye to potential prosecution.
Speaker 1: What do you think, I mean, if it is a conspiracy,
Speaker 1: I mean, where do you think that goes? John Solomon?
Speaker 1: More and more information keeps coming out. I mean between
Speaker 1: Tulci Gabbard her declassification and John Ratcliffe and his declassification,
Speaker 1: Cash Battel and all that he is now doing in
Speaker 1: terms of the grand conspiracy investigation, which by the way,
Speaker 1: I think is warranted. I've gone through chapter and verse
Speaker 1: and one detail after another. You know, the entire Russia
Speaker 1: Russia Russia thing was a hoax from the get go
Speaker 1: in the beginning. Then I can make an argument that
Speaker 1: many of the same actors and players were involved in
Speaker 1: hiding from the public the authenticity of the very real
Speaker 1: laptop a laptop of zero Experience Hunter when they had
Speaker 1: verified its authenticity of March of twenty twenty. Then they
Speaker 1: prebunk it with social media, knowing that it's going to
Speaker 1: be dropped by Rudy Giuliani's then attorney, Robert Costello, and
Speaker 1: then not confirming specific questions by social media executive like
Speaker 1: Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey on Twitter at the time.
Speaker 1: When I asked, is this what you were warning us about?
Speaker 1: They knew the answer, they wouldn't tell them.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Listen, there is one provision eighteen USC. Seven ninety
Speaker 3: eight where that actually does state that if someone knowingly
Speaker 3: and willfully disclosed a classified information, you can extend the
Speaker 3: statute eliminations to tenures. Since these leaks occurred between seventeen
Speaker 3: and eighteen, though we don't know the right dates, there
Speaker 3: is a possibility that with new evidence, you could go
Speaker 3: back and look at these league cases and do a prosecution.
Speaker 3: It's actually under the Internal Security Act is seldom use law,
Speaker 3: but it does carry a ten year statue. But with
Speaker 3: the exception of that, I think the conspiracy case is
Speaker 3: the only way that the Justice Department can build criminal
Speaker 3: cases at this late date, and it would look at
Speaker 3: everything from lies in twenty three in testimony that was
Speaker 3: given in twenty three all the way back to the
Speaker 3: original clearing of Hillary and the concocting of the Russia
Speaker 3: collusion case, and I think when you see that pattern,
Speaker 3: they may be able to convince the grand jury somewhere
Speaker 3: in Middle America that the pattern of Washern's repeat, which
Speaker 3: is Democrat has a legal problem. Hillary Clinton with her server,
Speaker 3: Joe Biden with his Hunter Biden foreign money schemes, Joe
Speaker 3: Biden with his classified documents. They pivot immediately to protect
Speaker 3: the Democrat, don't let them face consequences, and try to
Speaker 3: project a similar scandal on Donald Trump runs a collusion
Speaker 3: in sixteen Ukraine, impeachment in twenty nineteen, classified documents, mar
Speaker 3: A Lago raid twenty twenty two. So if that is
Speaker 3: viewed as one ongoing conspiracy to abuse government powers and
Speaker 3: violate civil liberties of Americans, maybe the Justice Department can
Speaker 3: bring some indictments.
Speaker 2: Hi, Quick break, Welcome back.
Speaker 1: More with John Solomon and Greg Jarrett on the other side,
Speaker 1: and also your calls coming up later will also we'll
Speaker 1: look at the president's action and.
Speaker 5: The left wants to silence Handity.
Speaker 2: Don't let it happen.
Speaker 1: Make the commitment now three hours every day at three pm.
Speaker 4: This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: All right, how many times have you told someone if
Speaker 1: it ain't broke, don't fix it now. That's great advice
Speaker 1: for most things, but not so much for your cell phone.
Speaker 2: Look.
Speaker 1: Likely, over time, the battery will fade, the processor can
Speaker 1: keep up, and maybe it's even fallen in the toilet
Speaker 1: one too many times. Unfortunately, thanks to pure Talk, your
Speaker 1: cell phone is something you can replace without feeling guilty.
Speaker 1: When you switch to pure talk this month, they're going
Speaker 1: to give you a Samsung Galaxy eight thirty six for
Speaker 1: free with a thirty five dollars qualifying plan just thirty
Speaker 1: five bucks a month for talk and text and data
Speaker 1: and a free Samsung phone with scratch resistant gorilla glass
Speaker 1: and a battery that lasts all day. It's all on
Speaker 1: america Most dependable five G network. Look, supporting companies like
Speaker 1: Puretalk is a good thing. To switch. It as simple
Speaker 1: as fast. It is easy. You dial pound two to
Speaker 1: fifty say the keyword save now to get your free
Speaker 1: phone today. That's pound two to fifty keywords save now.
Speaker 1: Make the switch to my wireless company, a veteran owned company,
Speaker 1: America's wireless company, pure Talk. All right, we continue with
Speaker 1: investigative reporter founder editor in chief justinews dot com John Solomon,
Speaker 1: Hawk's News legal analyst, best selling author Greg jaredder with us.
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett, do you see this actually coming to fruition?
Speaker 1: And here's the thing so many people feel, and a
Speaker 1: lot of people in this audience feel that over the years,
Speaker 1: they they that all this evidence has existed and that
Speaker 1: we get to the precipice only to never get to justice.
Speaker 2: Is this going to be different this time?
Speaker 4: Well, it is because you have dramatically different people in
Speaker 4: charge of the Department of Justice and the FBI who
Speaker 4: were determined to expose the truth and to prosecute those
Speaker 4: who violated the law. And you know, these recently declassified
Speaker 4: documents showed quite clearly how Barack Obama and his White House,
Speaker 4: Hillary Clinton, and the people in our campaign, top people
Speaker 4: in the intelligence community all criminally conspired to frame Trump.
Speaker 4: They peddled knowingly phony information, a lot of it they
Speaker 4: peddled to the government that's defrauding the government, and then
Speaker 4: they altered intelligence to support their bogus narrative, abuse of power.
Speaker 4: And the most obvious grand jury targets I think would
Speaker 4: be Brennan Clapper and coming. But I think you can
Speaker 4: expect Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton to receive grand jury subpoenas,
Speaker 4: and you can expect a lineup of whistleblowers who are
Speaker 4: prepared to implicate them and others who were involved in
Speaker 4: the conspiracy to defraud the government, deprivation of rights under
Speaker 4: color of law, and obstruction of justice and what turned
Speaker 4: out to be a very elaborate cover up that I
Speaker 4: think extends to the lawfair indictments, as John mentioned, brought
Speaker 4: by Special counsel Jack Smith, mar a Lago ray and
Speaker 4: a continuing cover up. So I actually am optimistic that
Speaker 4: the people involved in this grand criminal conspiracy may actually
Speaker 4: be held accountable in courts of law.
Speaker 1: What else is coming this week, John Solomon, we got
Speaker 1: about twenty seconds.
Speaker 3: Yeah, listen, you're going to find out that the FBI
Speaker 3: concluded numerous legacy media stories that cemented the fake RUSS
Speaker 3: reclusion story contained classified intelligence. They had good suspects, They
Speaker 3: never rounded anybody up, but they did get an amazing
Speaker 3: admission about James Comby. You're gonna get to see that tonight.
Speaker 1: Ooh, I'm interested in this one. All right, that's tonight
Speaker 1: nine Eastern Hannity on Fox News. Anyway, We appreciate you,
Speaker 1: John Solomon, Thanks for being with us, Greg Jarrett, you're
Speaker 1: going to stick around. We're going to talk about the
Speaker 1: National Guard and federalization that's going on in DC and
Speaker 1: the left wings crazy reaction. All right, So there's a
Speaker 1: lot to get to involving the legality, if you will,
Speaker 1: as it relates to Donald Trump National Guard. And I
Speaker 1: want to be very clear upront, because the corrupt state
Speaker 1: run legacy media mob is plat out doing what they
Speaker 1: always do, and that's lying to you. The President invoke
Speaker 1: what's called Section seven forty of the District of Columbia
Speaker 1: Home Rule Act, which would place the city's metropolitan police
Speaker 1: department under direct federal control. The President also will put
Speaker 1: National Guard troops in place in an effort to combat crime.
Speaker 2: Went through these numbers yesterday.
Speaker 1: If you look at the homicide rate capital cities around
Speaker 1: the world, by far, Washington, d C is the worst,
Speaker 1: forty one per hundred thousand people. The next closest would
Speaker 1: be Uruguay sixteen point one per one hundred thousand people.
Speaker 1: Baghdad is you know, more than almost three times safer
Speaker 1: than Washington, d C. Fifteen point two per one hundred
Speaker 1: thousand in terms of their homicide rate. Again, DC's forty
Speaker 1: one per hundred thousand. Panama City, Panama fourteen point three,
Speaker 1: Brazil thirteen, Costa Rica thirteen, Bogata, Colombia eleven, Bolivia ten
Speaker 1: point seven, Mexico City, Mexico, eight, Lima, Peru seven, Ethiopia six,
Speaker 1: Buenos Aires, Argentina five point five, Estonia, Kenya, Havana, Cuba
Speaker 1: is four per hundred thousand. Washington, DC a wopping forty one.
Speaker 2: I mean, and.
Speaker 1: What's really spectacular about this? When you listen to the
Speaker 1: left wing media, they have been pushing a talking point
Speaker 1: and when I heard it, I said, well, that can
Speaker 1: possibly be right, And my gut was right based on
Speaker 1: the Washington Free Beacon. Today they have an article out
Speaker 1: that says, is DC crime at a thirty year low?
Speaker 1: Mainstream media outlet cite police data to say yes, without noting, oh,
Speaker 1: I mean there's context and texture and information that I'm providing.
Speaker 2: What a shock.
Speaker 1: I wonder why the state run legacy media mob is
Speaker 1: officially dead without noting that a commander is currently on
Speaker 1: leave for allegedly falsifying the data. The DC Fraternal Order
Speaker 1: of Police chairman said in July that the Metropolitan Police
Speaker 1: leaders are have been pressuring officers to falsify data artificially
Speaker 1: deflate crime statistics. And Political reported Monday that crime in
Speaker 1: Washington has hit a thirty year low last year, despite
Speaker 1: the President declaring a public safety emergency in the district,
Speaker 1: and PR says the same thing. Oh, the President ordered
Speaker 1: a federal intervention despite the fact that violent crime plunged
Speaker 1: to a thirty year low.
Speaker 2: It goes on and on, but every one of.
Speaker 1: These publications based their stories on data collected by the
Speaker 1: Metropolitan Police Department, which the Biden administration touted just before
Speaker 1: leaving office. Total crime violent crime for twenty twenty four
Speaker 1: the District of Columbia's down thirty five percent from twenty
Speaker 1: twenty three, the lowest had spent in thirty years. Then,
Speaker 1: the Metropolitan Police Department in July suspended at police commander
Speaker 1: for allegedly manipulating crime numbers in his reports. According to
Speaker 1: the DC Fraternal Order of Police chairman, who old NBC
Speaker 1: four in Washington, d C that officials often pressure officers
Speaker 1: to falsify statistics in order to make the city seem faster.
Speaker 1: With that knowledge that, of course, the mainstream media is
Speaker 1: selectively not telling their audiences, which by the way, shouldn't
Speaker 1: shock anybody. We welcome to the program. Fox News legal analyst,
Speaker 1: New York Times bestselling author Greg Jarrett stays with us
Speaker 1: and William Jacobson, Cornell Law professor. All right, so let's
Speaker 1: talk about, first of all, the manipulation of numbers. Let's
Speaker 1: talk about the comparisons. Greg Jarrett will start with you,
Speaker 1: and the legality of what President Trump is doing here
Speaker 1: and the way the media has covered it. And you know,
Speaker 1: we have the worst capital city in terms of the
Speaker 1: homicide rate in the entire world. And you why would
Speaker 1: the left in this country be so adamant against protecting
Speaker 1: innocent people they're protecting themselves.
Speaker 4: Is run by far left politicians, city Council of the mayor,
Speaker 4: so they cook the books to try to fool you
Speaker 4: into thinking, oh, it's everything's fine in dandy in Washington, DC.
Speaker 4: Anybody who has spent time there knows that is absolutely untrue.
Speaker 4: And you know, the worst of it is the carjackings.
Speaker 4: You know that more than half of those are committed
Speaker 4: by minors sixty percent or fifteen and sixteen years old,
Speaker 4: as young as twelve, guns are involved seventy two percent
Speaker 4: of the time. And you know, local authorities refuse to
Speaker 4: prosecute them as adults, and no wonder. There have been
Speaker 4: more than a thousand carjackings in the last three years,
Speaker 4: some of which include terrible beatings and shootings, a congressman
Speaker 4: carjacked at gunpoint and FBI agent carjacked. But you know
Speaker 4: the local prosecutor there, he's called the DC Attorney General.
Speaker 4: He did dismisses it all by saying, and I'm quoting
Speaker 4: your kids or kids as if it's okay. It's not okay.
Speaker 4: The solution is simple. DC is basically a ward of
Speaker 4: the federal government that gives the President ample authority to
Speaker 4: do what he's doing. Under the Home Rule Act, he
Speaker 4: can seize control of the Metropolitan Police Department on an
Speaker 4: emergency basis. For a more sustain takeover, he would need
Speaker 4: the permission of Congress, but I suspect he'd get it
Speaker 4: because those people live in fear working at the nation's capital.
Speaker 1: You know this is not the only place. Now, I'll
Speaker 1: give you the full quote, Bill Jacobson, and welcome back
Speaker 1: to the program. I'm good to have you back, The
Speaker 1: DC Police union chief said quote to evade public scrutiny.
Speaker 1: Metropolitan Police Department leadership is deliberately falsifying crime data, creating
Speaker 1: the false narrative of reduced crime while communities are suffering.
Speaker 1: DC is not the only large, democratic run city where
Speaker 1: major crimes are being under reported. If you go back
Speaker 1: to Chicago Magazine and a few years back, Chicago Magazine
Speaker 1: found dozens of crimes, including serious felonies, robberies, burglaries, assaults,
Speaker 1: and even worse than that classified or downgraded to risk
Speaker 1: slap offenses or made to vanish all together. In New
Speaker 1: York City, we had an NYPD transit commander accused of
Speaker 1: quote faking New York City subway crime statistics. So this
Speaker 1: seems to be the general practice is to put your
Speaker 1: head in the sand and lie. A DC councilman who's
Speaker 1: been charged with taking bribes doesn't like Trump's anti crime crackdown.
Speaker 1: That's not a big surprise. And one ABC News anchor
Speaker 1: revealed that she was mugged in DC by a half
Speaker 1: naked vagrant, Kyra Phillips, And I'm like, oh, okay, why
Speaker 1: wouldn't they want law and order? Why wouldn't they want
Speaker 1: safety and security? Why wouldn't you want a stronger police presence?
Speaker 1: If you have the number one it's the number one
Speaker 1: capital of any country in terms of the homicide rate worldwide.
Speaker 1: Why would you not want to protect innocent people?
Speaker 5: Well, you know, I think it's a political outlook. It's
Speaker 5: something you know, Democrats, Socialists of America. It's that sort
Speaker 5: of outlook. It's you know, sores back district attorneys now
Speaker 5: looks that views cracking down on crime as somehow an offense,
Speaker 5: not the offense on which you're cracking down. So that's
Speaker 5: really the issue. It's a political outlet outlook. It's all
Speaker 5: motivated by that. Of course, there's also a twinge to
Speaker 5: it nowadays of Trump derangement syndrome. But it's baffling. Why
Speaker 5: would democrats not want people protected in a Democrat city.
Speaker 5: It makes no sense. So it's got to be ideological.
Speaker 5: They just do not like law enforcement and they would
Speaker 5: rather have people get mugged and carjacked then crack down.
Speaker 1: All right, quick break, We'll come right back more with
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett William Jacobson, Cornell Law professor on the other side. Also,
Speaker 1: your calls coming up eight hundred and ninety four one.
Speaker 1: Shawn is on number as we continue this Tuesday. How
Speaker 1: does this sound Sean Hennity for our president. Stay tuned,
Speaker 1: mar d Jails all right, coming out.
Speaker 2: All right.
Speaker 1: We continue now the President now saying that enough is
Speaker 1: enough in Washington, d C. And it may be coming
Speaker 1: to a high crime city near you. And we continue
Speaker 1: talking about the issue involving Washington, DC and the president's
Speaker 1: announcement yesterday. You heard Janine Piro yesterday Greg Jarrett talk
Speaker 1: about these young punks. They're fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, even as
Speaker 1: high as seventeen years old, and she cannot charge them
Speaker 1: with murder if they shoot somebody or attempted murder. And
Speaker 1: then you know, she talked about a case for a
Speaker 1: young kid, you know, tries to kill somebody, goes before
Speaker 1: a judge, gets sentenced and gets a lecture about released
Speaker 1: on I guess their own recognizance, and told that they
Speaker 1: need to go to college. How does that keep anybody safe?
Speaker 1: And what happens when these people go out and attack
Speaker 1: other innocent.
Speaker 4: People, Well, they're what the politicians in local government and
Speaker 4: the capital are doing is incentivizing criminality. And the solution
Speaker 4: is so simple and obvious. When minors act as adults
Speaker 4: by committing serious crimes, they need to be treated as adults.
Speaker 4: And that means lowering the age for prosecution. Currently, under
Speaker 4: DC law, fifteen year olds can only be prosecuted with
Speaker 4: a judge's permission, and that almost never occurs, mostly because
Speaker 4: the local prosecutor, the DC Attorney General, refuses to pursue
Speaker 4: those cases. Even sixteen and seventeen year olds are seldom
Speaker 4: charged as adults. So you know, the DC City Council
Speaker 4: will never change the laws because they're notoriously soft on crime.
Speaker 4: So you know, the only recourse is for the President
Speaker 4: to step in and Congress and as I say, in
Speaker 4: a DC is a ward of the federal government, answerable
Speaker 4: to the federal government itself, mostly to Congress, but the
Speaker 4: President as well. And he can order National Guard troops
Speaker 4: in there. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals already ruled he
Speaker 4: had the authority to federalize California's National Guard troops in LA.
Speaker 4: He can do the same thing in New York, in Chicago,
Speaker 4: he can do it in Washington, d C.
Speaker 2: Well, pretty amazing.
Speaker 1: But you know, we also learned a lot, I think
Speaker 1: William Jacobson when we watched the Joint Session speech of
Speaker 1: President Trump, and in that speech, the President recognized the
Speaker 1: family of Lake and Riley.
Speaker 2: In that speech, the.
Speaker 1: President recognized the mother of Joscelyn Nungary, that little twelve
Speaker 1: year old girl that was brutally raped and murdered in
Speaker 1: Texas in Houston, and not one Democrat would even applaud
Speaker 1: or stand up or recognize these mothers that lost their
Speaker 1: children because of unvetted Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Alejandro Mayorcis
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants that they allowed into the country. Meanwhile, they
Speaker 1: were telling us for four years the border was closed
Speaker 1: and the border was secure.
Speaker 2: I say they have blood on their hands.
Speaker 5: Well, I think that the border security, which is tightly
Speaker 5: correlated to crime in the cities, I think that's such
Speaker 5: a winning issue for Republicans. There's overwhelming popular support, including
Speaker 5: among many Democrats, if not most Democrats, who do not
Speaker 5: want open borders and do not want crime in their cities.
Speaker 5: So it's a total winning issue, and I think it
Speaker 5: was one of the issues that propelled Trump to victory.
Speaker 5: There were many issues, but that was one of them.
Speaker 5: I mean, people do not want Venezuelan crime gangs, you know,
Speaker 5: taking over apartment buildings in our cities. They do not
Speaker 5: want the gangs running, you know, sections of town and
Speaker 5: so it's a total winning issue. It's really baffling how
Speaker 5: the Democrats have become so ideologically driven that they will
Speaker 5: get on the wrong side of an eighty twenty issue
Speaker 5: every time, and they think that just by you know,
Speaker 5: yelling about Trump, they're going to win with that. But
Speaker 5: I think it's a total winning Republican issue. I hope
Speaker 5: they don't let up. I hope they continue the law
Speaker 5: enforcement push. I do agree that it's very likely we're
Speaker 5: going to see the National Guard being called out in
Speaker 5: other cities, maybe New York. Also if Mandamu wins and
Speaker 5: it's something that Trump, it's a winning issue Trump because
Speaker 5: people weren't safety above everything else.
Speaker 2: You agree with that, Greg, Jared, we'll give you the
Speaker 2: last word.
Speaker 4: Yea, the bill is totally right on that subject. I
Speaker 4: you know, it used to be the Democrats cared about
Speaker 4: law and order. I mean it was Joe Biden in
Speaker 4: the US Senate that beafed up, you know, penalties for crimes,
Speaker 4: and they've Democrats have done a total one eighty And
Speaker 4: how they came to that I really find mystifying.
Speaker 1: Bill Jacobson, Thank you, Greg Jared. We've always appreciate you
Speaker 1: being with us