WEBVTT - Surveillance: ECB's Challenge With Trichet

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast and I'm Tom Keane.

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Daily we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. Has

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the rally been justified? Ivan find set joining us now

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Tigers Financial Partner's Chief investment Officer. Ivan. Has the rally

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>been justified by fundamentals? Well, I mean there's two issues,

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and the main issue is there's no place else to

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>put your money, and it's the powerful results have been

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>driven by the incredible efforts of FED Chairman Pal. I

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>think FED Chairman Pal single handedly saved the world. I

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>mean he acted swiftly and decisively in March, pumping tremendous

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>amounts of liquidity into the financial markets, which in turn

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>caused other central bankers around the world to do the same.

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's been the powerful driver of the

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>recovery and the fact that, look, I believe in the

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>resiliency and the of the and the detestinal fortitude of

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the human spirit that we will come back. We've come

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>back from many bad situations, and innovation has led this recovery,

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's been led by the tech stocks which have

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>empowered the ability to make this shift to support a

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>remote and dispersed workforce as an example. Okay, I get

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that UM and it all makes sense. That narrative makes sense.

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 1>And then you see things like Tesla where they do

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a stock split and their shares go infinitely higher. They

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>go up by twelve even though you're basically just changing

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a five dollar bill into five ones, which shouldn't, all

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>things being equal, make a stock more valuable. You see

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a similar type of move in Apple. What gives I

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>mean are these signs of froth? Well, I mean there's

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>always pockets of unique focus if you will, I think

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple deserves its valuation. I mean, we have a tremendous

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>catalyst coming up in the launch of the five G

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>enabled iPhone twelves. That will kick off a tremendous supercycle

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>because many have been waiting to upgrade to the high

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>speed five G enabled phones and there's going to be

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a huge pent up demand as the average iPhone in

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:26.239
<v Speaker 1>service today is over five years old. So that will

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>drive a um a new upgrade cycle in Apple phones.

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Along with their Apple's focus on increasing their services revenue

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and offering more and more services entertainment, gaming, payment, shopping,

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.119
<v Speaker 1>UM that will enable them to further monetize this over

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>one and a half billion installed iPhone user base. All right,

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So Ivan, you know, when I was in business school,

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>when we were talking about and learning about markets, one

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of the things I learned was you need to have breath.

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>You need if you want to have a healthy market,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you need to have a breath across a wide swath

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of stocks and sectors. We are absolutely, absolutely not seeing

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that in this market. How concerned are you about that

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the lack of breath in this market? Well,

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that is correct. I mean it has been a very

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>narrowly driven rally, primarily by tech stocks. But um technology

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 1>drives our economy forward. I mean, so it's not unusual

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that they have been leading the market and increasingly becoming

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a dominant part of the economy. So two things are

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. I mean, the market is forward looking,

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and it is predicting that we will see this broadening out,

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that it will will see um improvements in the industrial sector,

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in the consumer sector, which we are seeing. There is

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a positive cadence of economic data that shows the manufacturing

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>sector is improving. There's gradual improvement in consumer sentiments, so

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the consumer's outlook is improving. Retail is improving, restaurants where

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>they can. So you saw huge jumps in retail sales

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>when stores opened. You saw a huge jump and people

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>going to restaurants when they could when westaurants started to

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>open with outdoor dining. So there is pent up demand

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and I will I think you will see this broadening out.

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>The other thing driving the market is optimism that we

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>will get a vaccine, hopefully at least available by the

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. We have three companies scheduled to

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>go into three partnerships scheduled to go into trials sometime

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in October. So that is the one thing, the one

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that will get us over the pandemic is a vaccine.

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And if we can get UH some type of approval

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the year and ramp up production

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning of the next year, we will see

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous recovery and the market will have correctly predicted

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>the turnaround. All right, So I have an outside of

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the fang plus stocks, the six seven names that have

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>really been driving this market. Where do you see some

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>opportunity here if we're able to look towards the other side,

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>perhaps some time I've and you will see a bounce

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>back in the auto stocks. And looking at Tesla and

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the optimism over the electric car, General Motors is a

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>tremendous play. Mary Barrett says she wants to have twenty

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles on the market by three not that far off.

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Also the valuation I mean there. She even was asked

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the question, would you spin off this electric vehicle division

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>at some point unlock value? She said, nothing's off the table.

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>So General Motors will become a incredible electric vehicle play. Um.

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the depressed retailers, some of the

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>depressed restaurants, and the cruise industry. I mean these stocks

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>were decimated by no fault of their own. The cruise

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>industry in January was looking at a record year and

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>was decimated. And they are doing everything possible to put

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in place the ability to safely sail when they get

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity when they are allowed to start to sail again.

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean a company like Norwegian, which is my number

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>one pick in the cruise industry. So there are a

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of depressed box So I still like a lot

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of the tech s docs, including a video with their

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>announcement yesterday of their new high speed graphic cards. Other

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>favorite chip players in the five G rollout are Quelcom

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>and Skywork Solutions and Corvo Skyworks in Corvera, both Apple

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Key Apple suppliers. So the five G rollout is a

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>powerful investing theme. The recovery of the consumer sector will

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>be a powerful investing theme, and I believe it will

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>recover and recover very strongly. Just really twenty seconds, how

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>high the valuation of Amazon get It's now one point

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>seven five trillion dollars. What's the peak in your view? Well,

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I have been recommending Amazon for sometime. It's on our

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>focus list in our focus Opportunity portfolio. I don't really

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>use price targets, but Amazon, I mean, they're just incredibly

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>efficient in their delivery and fulfillment and logistics processes that

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>they do support a lot of retail. They continue they

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>are the biggest cloud infrastructure supplier, which service provider, which

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>has enabled the remote workforce and the distributed workforce. They're

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>getting into healthcare. They just announced. There wasn't twenty seconds Ivan,

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll have you back. We'll talk about Amazon. I will

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you this. It is something that you're not alone

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of people saying they can see a

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>path lower, but they're not willing to sell their Amazon shares.

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Ivan find Set, Thanks for retting a good sport and

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks for being with us. Really appreciate it. This is

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the story of the day, by risk, period, full stop.

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>The Fed has your back. Maybe Washington d C Will

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>get your back as well. We will find out, and

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, let's find out with Steve Chivron, Federated Herme's

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager. Steve. We have heard from person after person

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>who has come on this show and said, by risk,

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that is the result right now from the Federal Reserve

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that has your back from the idea that we probably

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>are entering a growth phase after the absolute decimation of

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the labor market earlier this year. Do you agree? Yeah. Look,

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the story behind the markets is sent a

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>simple I think we've exited recession and we're entering the

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>next recovery, which will lead to the next expansion um.

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think the reason why we've been able to

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>get to hide so quickly is because there's three stats

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that explain it. Incomes her up seven and

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a half percent versus last year. Mortgage foreclosures are down

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>from three quarters of a percent to two thirds of it.

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And while we did have two hundred bankruptcies in the

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>second quarter, that's roughly one fourth of what we were

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>doing on a quarterly basis in the Great Financial Crisis.

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So both Congress and the Federal Reserve have protected capital.

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>They protected capital in this in this kind of downturn,

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and the consumer and businesses are better positioned then you

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>would expect them to be, given the severity of the

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>economic contraction that we had. Steve, what won't you buy

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>right now? What won't I buy? Well? Look, I think

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>you know piling into a treasury bond right here is

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>probably not the smartest thing you know between fifty and

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>seventy basis points. I think you know more importantly, and

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I am talking a little bit my own book here,

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't buy a whole bunch of ETFs. I

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want to own everything right now. I think that

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of companies that are not going

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to do well coming out of this, and it's incumbent

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>upon investors to be able to sort through industries and

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>pick the winners and avoid the losers. I think that

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the key theme here. All right, Well, Steve, you know,

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the issues you talked about some of the

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>positive economic developments, But the fact is a lot of

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that was driven by the fiscal stimulus, putting money into

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>people's hands, into consumers hands, into small and midsized businesses hands. Uh.

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And of course the FETE is there with the backstop

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the fet You know, this stimulus is starting to wear out.

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>How critical is it that we get new stimulus to

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>continue to support the economy. Yeah, I think it's important.

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't I wouldn't say it's critical. Um.

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, look, when you've done such a good job

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of supporting the economy thus far, it's kind of dumb

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to fumble the ball in the red zone here, right.

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're probably one fiscal package away from getting

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>yourself to towards a vaccine. But if you looked at

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the personal income number that came out earlier this week,

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>what you saw was that while the impact of stimulus

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.599
<v Speaker 1>has has waned a little bit, you have seen a

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>pick up in compensation from from from work, and so

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, look, the economy is healing, it's getting better.

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It's starting to become self sustaining. But there's enough uncertainty

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that anything one more bill probably makes sense. So it'd

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>be nice to see Congress, you know, get their acting

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>gear here and and get something done, all right, Steve. So,

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 1>as we think about the equity markets, the theme obviously

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>has been the you know that the handful of tech

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>stocks to fang plus docks and driving in the market.

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>When does value get its uh time in the limelight?

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>If ever? Yeah, I think people are maybe misreading the

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>narrow breath of the market. Narrow breath in the market

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the cycle is very rasome. Right.

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>If every company's hit their fifty two week high and

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>there's only two or three that are left that are

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>pushing you higher, that is a sign of exhaustion. What

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>we have here, though, is the companies that did the

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>best during the recession have led us out and the

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>other companies haven't participated yet. And we think that's really

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a sign of dry powder. And so as this recovery

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>continues to take hold, as we do get closer to

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>some kind of treatment vaccine type protocol, and we think

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to see other companies, some of which

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>your value are going to start to participate in a

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>much bigger way as the economic recovery intensifies here, and

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>so we think that we're on the verge of that.

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>We think you can play it in the value space.

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>We also think you can play a similar theme in

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>small caps, and we think you really don't want to

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>be massively underweight international because those international industries have so

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>much more value than than than the US do in

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of the sector composition. For NAZAC stocks are up

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>more than two hundred and twenty percent so far this year. Yesterday,

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>Zoom Video community patians rose more than forty one day.

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 1>That was the rally. Some people saying that the justification

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>for this is that the low yields make everything cheap.

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that the story? I think that's part of it. Look,

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, equity market multiples are are related

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to bond yields, and particularly corporate bond yields, and if

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you look at where the corporate bond yield is to

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>be double a, it would suggest that the SMP could

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>trade upwards of a high twenties or even low thirties multiple,

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>which has never been the case before. I think that's

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>part of it. But I think the bigger story here

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>as well is that we're in the middle of a

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>digital revolution, and what this pandemic has not slowed that revolution,

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it's accelerated it. You saw it in the Salesforce earnings.

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Company after company are looking to upgrade their tech, understanding

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that that's going to be a bigger part of the

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>way that they do business. And so I think you've

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 1>got this very interesting combination of this digital industrial revolution

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 1>occurring at a time when you know, bond yields are

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>so low um and the world has a scarcity of growth,

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and it exists in the US. It exists in US

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>tech stocks, and so if you want access to that growth,

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.319
<v Speaker 1>there's a high price for it. So Steve are Robin

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Hood is right? I mean, are they on the right paths?

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Just buy everything that they say, Look, a stock splits

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>as good of a reason as any to buy a stock.

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>They're winning. Look, I think when you think about Robin Hood,

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the first thing we have to remember, especially those of

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>us that are quote unquote professional investors, is everyone deserves

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the right to have access to the market. Um, there

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be folks there that maybe don't have as

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>much history and experience with the market. That's why you know,

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>media like yours exist help them understand that. I think ultimately,

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>what companies are realizing is that if there is a

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.239
<v Speaker 1>retail demand, if they can make their shares more attractive

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>or more accessible to those retail investors, they're gonna get

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>rewarded because those retail investors want access to some of

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.599
<v Speaker 1>these companies. There will be some names that end in

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>tears for folks because there's gonna be some hype trades.

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, I think anytime

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>there's more interest in the public markets and the com

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>pounding returns, that's a good thing. It's our job as

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>an investment industry to help make sure that those people

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>have the tools and information to make the best decisions

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that they can. All Right, Steve, If I'm brave enough

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to look to the other side of this pandemic and

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>I see an economic recovery in the next twelve months

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>really accelerating, what are some of the beaten down sectors

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>actually be looking at. Am I brave enough to go

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>into financials for example? Yeah? Look, I think if you

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>think that economic growth is going to improve, then you

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>should expect, you know, long bonds to move up a

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit, not not anything you know that would be scary,

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and that would be beneficial to banks. Again, we come

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>back to small caps, and we think small caps were

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>three reasons their cyclical So as you get a cyclical

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>improvement in the economy, they're gonna they're gonna benefit from that,

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>much like value stocks. But in addition, fifty of their

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>debt is variable rate bank debt, so low rates forever

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>are really going to benefit them. And then finally in

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a year, in the first year following a recession bottom

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>small caps tend to outperform large by about We think

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be your your kind of play on octane

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>here in terms of a cyclical recovery plan on oct

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and I like that. Steve Chevron and from Federated Hervey's

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, because everyone who talks about the

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>economic recovery says it will hinge on the trajectory of

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the virus. The trajectory of the virus is unclear. It

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>is unsuspecting. It can pop up when you least suspected,

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>even in places like New Zealand, which seemed to have

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>gotten it under control. Doctor Deborah Fuller joining us now

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>University of Washington School of Medicine, Microbiology Professor Dr Fuller.

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Where are we in this? Some people talk about going

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>back to school, that it's going to be a disaster.

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Other people say it's fine. Kids are not vectors of

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>this particular virus. What's your take. Yeah, so we're a

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a phase where you know, we're we understand

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>how to you know, potentially reduced transmission through you know,

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>wearing a mask and practicing um, you know, hand washing

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and and the like. UM. But I'm not so sure

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the public is actually you know following

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>through um correctly in all those practices. And I think

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that's where you know, sometimes you're seeing some schools opening

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>up and saying, hey, we've implement all these practices, and

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>then they see you know, high spike uh in induction rate. Uh.

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, unless you know people are hundred percent compliant

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>with all of the you know, the rules, UM, that

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>virus is going to take an opportunity and transmit. So

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's very difficult, uh, you know, in

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the absence of a vaccine, uh, to get everybody to collectively, um,

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, work as a team together, wear their masks,

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>wash your hands, you know, uh, and uh, you know,

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>follow the safe distancing practices that have been recommended. If

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they do that, we could probably safely open schools. And

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that's just you know, get people to cooperate. Dr Fuller,

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>There's so many unknowns, at least from my vantage point.

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>You see a compliant Can people pack in a subway

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>cars if they have masks on? Can people go to

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>outdoor dining and sit not exactly six feet away from

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>each other but take their masks off to eat as

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>long as they are outside? Are these things all safe?

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Or are we already engaging in practices that will necessarily

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>spread the virus as we start to become less socially

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>distant and try to get back to normal. Yeah, there's

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>no guarantee you know that all these practices will you know,

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>if you implement them together. And we're talking about you know,

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>both the six feet distancing and the wearing of the

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>mask and the hand washing. Um. But there is you know,

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>evidence out there that it can reduce transmissions significantly. So

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean that, say, some virus still won't transmit.

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>But the you know, the way viruses work is they uh,

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the more people that get infected. Then that

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>makes more people that can infect others. So if you

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>can reduce the number of transmission events to very low levels,

0:17:55.520 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, people can go about their business much, um,

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, more effectively, and you can start to see, uh,

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the incidences of transmission decline. That's what you saw in

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the other countries like uh New Zealand where

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>they just implemented these safe practices and you quickly saw uh,

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the that sort of you know, rate

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of transmission rate go down to almost zero. So it

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>is possible. It's just uh it's and it's not guarantee,

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's you know, better than what we have right now.

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, professor, let's switch gears a little bit to

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. That's a discussion I think everybody wants to have.

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's looking forward towards a vaccine. We know that there

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>are approximately a dozen entities out there that are working

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>aggressively on a vaccine or various stages. Give us your

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>read of the landscape. I feel like I need a

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.239
<v Speaker 1>scorecard to keep track of all these entities out there,

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>whether their universities or pharmaceutical companies, are biotech companies, companies.

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Give us your sense of where we are and maybe

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a sense of timing. Yeah, so this is actually we're

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>enchering a very siding phase for vaccine development. Right now.

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>There are I think about seven candidate vaccines that have

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>entered into phase three clinical trials, and that's a stage

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>where we're actually testing efficacy of the vaccine as well

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.719
<v Speaker 1>as continuing to test its safety. Is going in tens

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of people where some people will get up

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>placebo and other people get the vaccine, and then it's

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>just really a waiting time game where it really the

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 1>viruses control of the timeline right now. What they're going

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to do is wait and see, you know, until a

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>certain number of people become infected, and uh then they

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>take uh, you know, they open up, take the blinders off,

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>because they're blinded to you know, who belongs to what group,

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to determine are all the people who

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>became infector of the majority of them in the placebo

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 1>group and none of them in the vaccine group. And

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>if that's the case, then they can then go to

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 1>licensure and start to manufacture and distribute the saccine. For you. So,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we have seven of them is very promising.

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>That means that these vaccines have passed you know, high

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>marks high uh uh marks for safety as well as

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>demonstrating the kind of ImmunoGen a season that you're going

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to meet in an effective vaccine. So this is exciting. Uh.

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And so we're at in a sense, the final phase

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're perhaps maybe only months away from seeing the

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>first vaccine license for for human use. Professor Health, how

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>sure can we be about the safety of these um

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>vaccines because you know it usually it takes years and

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>years of testing, and it seems like we're going to

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>get a potentially a vaccine within a year year and

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 1>a half from the beginning of all this, and that

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>calls into question safety. How do you think about that? Yeah,

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean the the years and years has to do

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>with how the process has changed, you know, in the

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>events of this pandemic. And the years is because the

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>phase one, two, and three are done sequentially normally with

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic, they are being done in an old were

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>laughing fashion, So all of the safety tests are still

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>being done. Uh, nothing is being skipped. So by the

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>time we have a vaccine that complete Space three successfully

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and shown to be effective and safe, we can be

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>confident that it has gone through all of the checkmarks

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that are absolutely required, um, you know, right now to

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>license a vaccine for public use. So Dr Fuller, you

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.719
<v Speaker 1>would be fine getting one of the first vaccines if

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>it came out. Yeah, I wish I could, you know,

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 1>but I you know, what you have to be aware

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of is that when these vaccines start coming out, they're

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to be billions of doses suddenly available for

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>anybody to take. It's likely going to have to go

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>into first responders and health care workers and the like.

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh and so it could be for some of us

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>months even after the vaccines have been released for public use,

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>before we're eligible to start to you know, show up

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in line to actually receive them. You know that said

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is I've I've said many times I think that it's

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>going to take multiple vaccines to really be able to

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>tamp down this pandemic. And you're gonna see we have

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>seven in phase three. You're gonna see hopefully at least

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>half a dozen, maybe five or six over the course

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of the next six months. You know, it's my hope

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>that they get license for human use. Deborah Fuller, University

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>of Washington School of Medicine microbiology professor, Thank you so

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>much for bringing us the facts here as we try

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to look for some sort of vaccine. The economy has

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>been the housing market, which has really struck me at

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a time of so much job loss and so much

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>pain that we talk about in the consumer sector, the

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>idea that you've seen incredible resilience and bidding wars and

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>suburban areas for houses, lumber prices tripling in just a

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>few months. Joining us, Andrew Holland Horst City Group Global

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Markets chief you as economist, Andrew, what do you make

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of the housing rally? It's just incredible what's happened in housing.

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think we've had a more optimistic outlook

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>on what the reopening, recovery rebound was going to look like,

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and the data keeps coming in for housing and it

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>just keeps being stronger than expected. We saw it earlier

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>with mortgage applications that have moved to multi year highs

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and really stayed there. But now you're starting to see

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>that come through in sales and starts really just across

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the board. So so an incredible surgeon housing activity, Andrew,

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>yesterday are Bloomberg colleagues put out a story saying that

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve had bought nearly a trillion dollars of

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>mortgage bonds over the past couple of months, that they've

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:33.479
<v Speaker 1>been one of the hugest buyers of this sector, pushing

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>down rates, solidifying this market. How much has the housing gains?

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>How much have the housing gains really resulted directly from

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>FED intervention here? Some FED policy is so important. And

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>when we look at the U S economy, of the

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>sector that's probably most immediately sensitive to the FED and

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>two interest rates is the housing sector. Um, so I

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's really mostly about rates coming down. You've got

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>lower tenure yields that led mortgage rates to move lower. Um. Yes,

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>they're purchasing mortgage fac securities as well, which is keeping

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>those spreads compressed. So Um. You can't understate the importance

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>of the of the FT or you can't overstate the

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>importance of the FED in the housing market right now.

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Andrew, we had some ADP employment numbers out today, Uh,

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, weaker than expected. Here. We are seeing some

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>approven in the labor market, but maybe losing a little

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 1>bit of steam here, and that's so critical for the

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>U S. Economy overall, what's your view of the labor market? So,

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I think again it's another area where we've been continuously

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 1>surprised to the upside with jobs reports. And I'd be

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit careful with the ADP number on the

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>economy is just moving so quickly that it's been difficult

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 1>for ADP to kind of keep up with what we're

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the official statistics that will get out on Friday. UM.

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>So we still think that that that number can look

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>more positive, UM. But but really important to see this

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>re hiring continue, UM. That's been supporting incomes UM, even

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>with a very high unemployment rate. So, you know, we'd

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>like to get back closer to normal. It's obviously a

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>long road, but but so far, the you know, the

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:06.959
<v Speaker 1>last few months have been a positive story, all right,

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>So how critical is it that Congress follows through with

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>another round of what I'm gonna call a significant piece

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of fiscal stimulus. The first, the last round, the third round,

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>if you will. The three trillion dollars was done on

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>generally a bipartisan basis, but it looks like politics is

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>creeping back into this round. Yeah, So I think everybody

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>thinks it would be a good idea to have more

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus here. I think that's on both sides of

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.439
<v Speaker 1>the aisle. I think most economists agree. The FED clearly agrees.

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:36.959
<v Speaker 1>We've heard that from a number of FED speakers. UM.

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>You do want to put it in context, though, that

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 1>we've had a very significant fiscal stimulus already. UM. And

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>if you look at what's happened with the income support

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that you've had, really the government coming in and substituting

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>for incomes that were lost um due to the results

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic. UM. You see that incomes have been supported.

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Consumption of course was lower because a lot of avenues

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>for consumption were just closed down. And so it means

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>that the economy came through this period of four savings.

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Individual households have saved about a trillion above what they

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>normally would have saved. UM. So now you have things

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 1>like unemployment benefits that are expiring. That's certainly not a

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 1>good thing for the economy. We'd like to see those restored. Um.

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 1>But even if they're not, I think you do have

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of savings coming before it. So, so certainly

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a better story if we can get that next leg

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of fiscal policy Um, But you know, can this, you know,

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>consumption rebound continue even if you don't get the next

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>leg of fiscal stimulus. I think, at least for the

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 1>next few months, that story probably still stays intact. I

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>get more concerned as I look out to Q four

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 1>into one. I'm going back to the labor market. This

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is still a deeply depressed labor market that still needs

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>more help. Andrew All and Horst of City Group speaking

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>with us. Andrew, I'm a little uncomfortable as we talk

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>about this for a variety of reasons. We're talking about

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the incredible boom and housing, We're talking about the incredible

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>boom and equities. We're talking about an unemployment rate above

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>ten percent with some permanent losses coming in, job losses,

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>job cuts, particularly at the lower income level. This all

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 1>just goes into the story of the widening gap between

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the rich and the poor, the people who can buy houses,

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>who can buy stocks, and those who can't and have

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>just been laid off. Andrew, what is the structural challenge?

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>What is the economic result of this widening divide. Yeah,

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a real issue for the U. S economy, and

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly those inequalities have been exacerbated by the crisis that

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>we've come through, and that's where you know, I'm encouraged

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to see the Federal Reserve, for instance, changing their framework

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>talking about pushing the unemployment rate even lower so that

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we can start to bring some of those workers back

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>into the economy. Um. I think that's what was happening

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>as we got down to a three and a half

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>percent unemployment rate. Again, this this is a long road.

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone is saying that, you know, this

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to be easy to get back to something

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>like a three and a half percent unemployment rate, but

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>but you really do want to get back down to

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>those very low rates of unemployment to bring a more

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>inclusive this into hiring into the labor market. Unfortunately, that's

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>where we were, that's not where we are now, and

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what monetary and fiscal are trying to

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>get us back to. Meanwhile, talking about getting back to

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>today is back to school, and you see a lot

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of people taking their kids off to their first day,

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>first date. Perhaps since March and Andrew, I do wonder

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>what the effect is on the younger cohort. I was

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at data that showed that the sixteen to twenty

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 1>five year demographic had an unemployment rate of more than

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>eighteen percent versus that ten point two percent average. That

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>they've been absolutely pummeled. Those entry level jobs have just evaporated.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>What's the longer term economic effect of that? Yeah, So

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that that that's part of why you want to try

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to cure the problems in the labor market as quickly

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>as possible. We saw this after two thousand and eight,

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>where you had students coming out of high school, students

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>coming out of college trying to get that first job

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and finding that that first job just wasn't available. Um.

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's probably even more the case with this down

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>turn um again because we've seen those entry level jobs

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>go away on, those lower wage jobs go away, um.

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's a potential avenue for a permanent structural scarring

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>on the economy. And that's what you're really trying to avoid.

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we we all know that the situation um

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is bad in terms of a high unemployment rate right now.

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>But what you want to do with policy is try

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.239
<v Speaker 1>to limit the amount of time that we spend at

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>these levels um, so that you can get those individuals

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that we were just talking about back into jobs integrated

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>back into the labor market, because if you have an

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>extended period where you're not in the labor market, that

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>means that human capital is not being built. That means

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that that attachment between workers and firms is being lost.

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So really important to try to get that back intact

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as possible. So, Andrew, what are the good

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>folks at City Group thinking about the economy the GDP

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>number really through the back half of this year into

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>next year. Give us a sense of kind of how

0:29:55.720 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you think the recovery might look. Yeah, so it's looking

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>like every bit as bad as the contraction was in

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Q two, the rebound in Q three, it's not going

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to completely make up for that, but we're going to

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>have this kind of very elevated annualized growth number for

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>for Q three. And you know, just like in Q two,

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we spent a lot of time talking about this negative

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent growth is an annualized number, so you're essentially

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>multiplying the contraction by four. And also this is some

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>things that are transitory. Is there some things that are

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>transitory that are going to be reversed and that reverse

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>will coming Q three. You should also be careful with

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the Q three number. UM. But now I'll tell you

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that Q three number looks like it's gonna be probably

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>closer to thirty percent than twenty percent annualized. And when

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have first done our forecast, we thought

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's more like twenty. Again, you're growing from very

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>low levels. I want to I want to emphasize that

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>this is just trying to get back to kind of

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a more normal level of activity. UM. But it still

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>looks like a very powerful growth rate in the third quarter.

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>How about twenty one. Is there going to be meaningful

0:30:58.160 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>growth in twenty one? And how much of that growth

0:30:59.880 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is dependent upon stimulus? Yeah, I think we can continue

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to grow in one. But but that is where you

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>start thinking more about stimulus. Like I said, there's a

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of kind of stimulus that that was done. We

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>had the stimulus checks, we have the enhanced unemployment insurance UM.

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that will carry us through probably at least

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Q three, if not the rest of the year. As

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we get into one, UM, that's when you really would

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like to see another leg for for stimulus UM, where

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to see more help for unemployed workers. You know,

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>people who are unemployed through no fault of their own. Um,

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to see, um, other forms of spending, things

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>like infrastructure that have a high multiplier. I mean, those

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>are probably things that you can think about after the election.

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Andrew holl And Harst of a city group, thank you

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>so much. Whether it's your strength or dollar weakness. So

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>let's get that sort of that with Rich. He's a

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>former ECB president. He always makes our shows. But are

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>who are delighted that Mr Trich joins us this morning? Rich.

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of talk about whether the euro is

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>just too high. I don't know at what point it

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>becomes problematic, but there was a warning start from the

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>CB Chief Economists saying like, look, this could mess with

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy, does it? Yes? I think. I think, of

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>course that it is a very very important element to

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>consider the U who went up Vitor and many other

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>currencies by around twelve percent or go certain period of time,

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Europe and New Area does not need that,

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of course, taking into account the difficulty of the present situation,

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the difficulty of the recovery, and also the fact that

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>in comparison with the US, we have a growth and

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the catching up process after and in time of pandemic,

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>which which takes time, and we are not in the

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>best situation possible. So I would say, begger than I

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>never policy is never appropriate. And I am a little

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>bit hurt. Not by the FED itself because the language

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of the FED is very, very prudent and cautious in

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.719
<v Speaker 1>terms of exchange rate, but from time to time the

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>executive branch in the US, he's talking down the door,

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>which is absolutely unappropriate. Obviously, there is no place for

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a begger than I never policy in a situation where

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>we are, and I hope that they will be as

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>responsible as possible. I'm speaking of the executive branch of

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States. But Mr, what is the level that

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>starts becoming really uncomfortable for euro No, I will not

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>pronounce any level, any level, say that plus is a

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 1>big change in my process and myself. We're commenting such move,

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I qualify themselves as modeled myself, I remember, which created

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>some emotion, But I really think that what we did

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is can stability and certainly not talking down the main currency,

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>which is the dollar, which is not at all appropuli

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that already sent. And you were very clear in your

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>comments MS, but you know from here given the FED policy,

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>will dollar actually weaken even without that rhetoric from the

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>executive that you're talking about, Well, I must confess I

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>expect the first to the extent that there is a

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>dimension of the exchange rate which is associated with the

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>recent decision of the Fed. I think it was totally

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>overdone by the market. I mean, the FED only said

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we will if if we do not get out of

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the present situation, will continue to have an accommodating policy.

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>But the accommodating policy of the Fed doesn't mean negative

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, And in yourb you have negative interest rates.

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So the fundamentals are below all the noise that we

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.879
<v Speaker 1>are hearing. In my opinion, there is a very good

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>case for certainly not changing the dollar you position based

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>on the recent decision of the Fed. I don't think

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:13.320
<v Speaker 1>there is really a case for that, and I'm sure

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that the market will realize that there is no case

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>by that. Well, Mr Trichet, it's Kelly in New York.

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>A stronger currency can be a hindrance for inflation, and

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.919
<v Speaker 1>already data show this. Yesterday, consumer prices in the Euro

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Area falling for the first time in four years. How

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>big of a problem does that create? For the e

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>c B. Well, the problem of the CB is more

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:38.359
<v Speaker 1>or lit the same as I would say in all

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.879
<v Speaker 1>major supplements. Of course we have inflation, which is much

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to know. That inflation which is much to creates two problems.

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:51.839
<v Speaker 1>One problem is that we have risk of method realization

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 1>of deflation, and of course this is an ultimate risk

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that we must avoid. And second, of course it go

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.439
<v Speaker 1>alls for very low interest rates, which themselves have their

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>own doorbacks, particularly if you are in a in a

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>time when you need more accommodating policies. So, all taken

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 1>into account, it is the situation of major sample banks.

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>D CD has to cope with that situation, and it

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that it does it as well as possible.

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say, my successor is doing as well as possible,

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and the governing Council is doing as well as possible.

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>But the situation is demanding. And then the little why

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 1>precisely we don't need at all change in the overall

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:43.439
<v Speaker 1>condition that would be conducive to less growth and less

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>activity in Europe? Right, Mr Tiha. Given the FEDS move

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>last week, this move towards average inflation targeting, does that

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 1>add some pressure for the easy V to follow the

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>FEDS blueprint on that front. Well, post of all the

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 1>review I started in January in Europe and it will

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>take a little time. I would say that seen from

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the European perspective, the idea of judging on the average inflation,

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the meeting the objective is something which is natural in Europe. Myself,

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember going to various capitals, including Berlin for instance.

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>In my time, I was claiming that we were up

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 1>to our responsibility when we were delivering more or less

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>one average since the setting up of the Euros. So

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 1>it was natural in Europe to reason on an average basis. Uh.

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And I would say that also the fact is in Europe,

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in principle, we consider the headline inflation as the inflation

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that you must looked at because it's the inflation that

0:37:56.600 --> 0:38:00.360
<v Speaker 1>our own fellow citizens are seeing. The code in plation

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is a different concept which is not seen by the

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>general public. So of course, if you are following headline inflation,

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>it goes up and down, up and down, and you

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>have necessarily some kind of averaging to operate. But all

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 1>that being said, we will see what the e c

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>B will do. What reassures me in a way in

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>what has been decided in the US is that the

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>two percent reference was not abandoned. You remember some academics

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 1>were recommending to go down to one percent or even

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 1>zero percent. Others were saying four percent is much better.

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm very happy with the two percent, which is, by

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, the reference in the US, in Japan, in

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the UK, and in the e c B, which is

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the first, by the way to mention the two percent

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:54.399
<v Speaker 1>as a very very important reference. So the fact that

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 1>all central banks, including I have to say, in many

0:38:57.560 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>respects Bank of China, have this kind of reference in

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>mind is in my opinion, helpful in terms of global

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:12.399
<v Speaker 1>final fruits stability, global monitory stability. Um, when you look

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>at the spectrum of deflation. We started in lockdown looking

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 1>at all this stimulus and thinking it could lead to

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>very strong inflation, maybe even rampant inflation is the risk.

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Now you know deflationary holds and actually you're becoming a

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>lot more like Japan. Well, again, what we know in

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:37.280
<v Speaker 1>all advanced economies is that Japan was very much ahead

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 1>of the other major economies. But but we all are

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 1>in that situation which has very well summed up by

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 1>j Power recently namely, first we have a good potential

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>which is significantly lower than before. Second, we have a

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.839
<v Speaker 1>really interest with its equivably interest withates that are much

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>lower than before. A Third, we have inflation which remains

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>extremely low and abnormally low for all reasons, and particularly

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the two reasons I mentioned the materialization of potential, depression

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of a risk, and the two low interest nominal interest

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>rates that are I would say engineered by that situation.

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>So that is the situation in all advanced economy and

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>its calls of cooks for getting out of that situation.

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>The supplements are doing all what they can, in my opinion,

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>even being much bolder than what was foreseen. And in

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:41.879
<v Speaker 1>particular the e CP with the pandemic Emergency Purchase Program

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 1>proved the capacity to react to extraorly difficult situation. But

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the problem is to find the pandemic at

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the present moment. As soon as we have thought successfully

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>against the pandemic, we will have the problem that we

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>had before the pandemic, and the problem we had before

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic other problem that we just summed up, so

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we will see exactly how to get out. In my opinion,

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we will get out of that situation, but with the

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>help of other partners. The central banks alone cannot change

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the growth potential. They cannot change the heal neutral interest

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>rates or equitably interest rates, and that that is the

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 1>responsibility of other partners. And of course we have the

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 1>main problem of the Philips curves, and there I could

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 1>delaborate on that if if we have time. Mrs. We

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 1>were talking about inflation, we talked about of course the

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:44.800
<v Speaker 1>euro strength, and we started by talking us about the

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Philips curve. I mean, if you look at what the

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Phillips curve has told us so far, this is the

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>economic concepts that basically states that inslation and unemployment have

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a stable and inverse relationship. How will that change because

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of the crisis. Looks like it changed dramatically since the crisis, obviously,

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and the turning point is around Liman bothers and and

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 1>a few years after Liman bobbles. So we are now

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>in a situation where the philipskirt looks totally flat and

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 1>in major advanced economies, clearly, even with full employment, you

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have the inflation pick up that you would normally expect.

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>And that of course is a major problem because it

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:39.280
<v Speaker 1>impacts the full body of the Centle Bank monetary policy.

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Of course, in all those countries, and we were speaking

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of that a moment ago. Of course, it's probably due

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 1>to a number of factors, and academia has worked a

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>lot on that. Globalization, new technologies. But I would insist myself,

0:42:56.160 --> 0:43:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I would stress that in most countries, the bargaining power

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:06.239
<v Speaker 1>of labor has diminished. That's obvious, and that is of

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 1>course mainly economic problem, of course, but also a social

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>political problem. And I'm speaking of those countries that have

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>full employment. In countries that are not at full employment,

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, it's not appropriate it to suggest that we

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>should elevate the wages and salaries, because because then then

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it is not in line with the idea to have

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 1>full employment. But in those countries like Japan, like the

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>US before the pandemic, like Germany, the Netherlands before the pandemic,

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and other countries Switzerland and so forth, it's abnormally, my opinion,

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is very abnormal that the very weak bargaining power of

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>labor calls for uniquely because to augment miserable and calls

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>for a nominal evolution of wages and salaries to be

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that flat. And I expect that it will change. It

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>must change, It will have to change, because again, it's

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:10.920
<v Speaker 1>not only an ego problem. It's also a social economic problem,

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and we see that on the social political dimension it

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is more than more a major problem. So I am

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 1>confident that we will solve that problem progressively. But we

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>are just in the middle of this problement. Pandemic is

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:34.320
<v Speaker 1>even a graviating of course, this situation, because it creates

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a new element to privilege. If I may the job

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:45.919
<v Speaker 1>instead of asking for more, which is accelarists increases great

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Mr trichet coming out of this pandemic. Let's talk about

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:53.280
<v Speaker 1>other changes. Has the function of monetary policy completely changed?

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 1>All of these exceptional monetary policy is now going to

0:44:56.080 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>have to become semi permanent. Well, it's clear now that

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we have. But it was true before the pandemic, and

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>before the pandemic, it was true that the new normal

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>was very different from the previous normal. It was true

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that we had certainty to take into account the extraordinary

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:19.840
<v Speaker 1>capacity of the sample banks to be extraoraly accommodating in

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:24.920
<v Speaker 1>utilizing a lot of various tools. That's obvious in my opinion.

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 1>My opinion has always been in any case the compass

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:34.799
<v Speaker 1>that we have is price stability. Price stability as a

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>primary mandate, and speaking of what for the rogan santle back.

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 1>But let's not forget. Once you attain price stability, or

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we are in the present situation where the problem is

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to go up to the level of the objective, then

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you can accompany all other policies of the European Union.

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:58.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the treaty. The treaty says very very clearly

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 1>without placidas to price stability, the ciddled banking system, the

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 1>ECB accompanies all the other policies of the of the

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Opian Union name system on that. Because from time to

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>time we are called to say, well, in the US,

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 1>they have two objectives in the in your there is

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 1>only one objective. There is one objective of the game.

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:24.759
<v Speaker 1>The mention is in the treaty that when this subjective

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is attained to be obtained, then you have to accompany

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:34.319
<v Speaker 1>the other. I would say, dam of the policies. LEI,

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us today as always

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:40.240
<v Speaker 1>makes us wiser on monetary policy. Janctric they're the former

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:44.000
<v Speaker 1>easily president. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:46:49.480 --> 0:46:53.800
<v Speaker 1>whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:57.799
<v Speaker 1>Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:46:58.239 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio