WEBVTT - Tech News: Roku Goes Kaput

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you? This is the tech

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>news for Thursday, January twenty twenty two. And uh, if

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you are a Roku user, you may have experienced a

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>loss in service last night, that being Wednesday, January nineteenth,

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in case you missed when I had just said the date.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Apparently something on the back end uh in technical terms,

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.919
<v Speaker 1>done messed up as several owners of Roku streaming devices

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and Roku television's saw their devices freeze or get caught

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in a reboot loop. People took to Twitter to express

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>their frustration as their respective idiot boxes appeared to waive

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the white flag. Idiot boxes or what some hoity toity

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>folks in the nineteen fifties used as a slang for television's. Apparently,

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>some users weren't even able to use non Roku services

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on their Roku televisions, including stuff like video game consoles,

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>media players like DVD and blue ray, set top boxes,

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>or cable boxes, so the television was just defunct. Roku

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>was able to restore services later that night. But it's

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>another reminder that a lot of the technology we seek

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>out today relies heavily on a back end somewhere else,

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and when something goes wrong in the back end, our

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>tech stops working, which is kind of like what happens

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to me when my back end starts to act up.

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But that's probably t m I. Anyway, When we think

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of this, along with stuff like the one outage of

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a large part of Amazon Web Services, we really see

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>how vulnerable some of our technology is to failure, and

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it's beyond our control. We can't do anything about it.

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>We have to wait for someone else to fix something

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else. Now, all that being said, most of the

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>time our technology works just fine because most of the

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>companies running those back end systems are spending a lot

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of resources building out redundancy to minimize the chances of outages.

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, outages are just bad for business, So this

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>makes sense now. The outages still occasionally happen, but they

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't been too frequent, and in most cases companies have

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>been able to resolve the issues within a few hours.

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So while I think it's good to reflect on how

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>much of our tech relies on centralized systems that are

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>beyond our control. It's good to be aware of that.

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't go so far as to say we're headed

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>toward catastrophe because of that model. Also, the specifics of

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>what actually went raw with Roku, as at least as

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I record this uh, haven't been disclosed. Roku hasn't said

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>what happened as I record this episode. I'm sure by

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the time this goes live will know more. The International

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Committee of the Red Cross has been hit with a

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>cyber attack. More specifically, a firm based in Switzerland that

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>provides data storage services to the Red Cross was the

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>actual target. The Red Cross has yet to name what

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that firm is, which I think is an incredible courtesy

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to the company. The hackers gained access to personal information

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of more than half a million people in the process,

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and that includes people who are in truly dire situations,

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>like people who are separated from their families in the

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>wake of a natural disaster or military conflict. In other words,

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>people who have already lost an incredible amount like in

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>some cases everything but their lives now have had their

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>data compromised through this attack. At the time of recording,

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't have information on who was responsible for the

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>attack nor what their intentions were in the first place.

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>The Red Cross says that ransomware was not a factor.

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>The Red Cross released a statement saying the organization is

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>committed to contacting affected individuals and informed them of potential

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>risks they face as a consequence of this breach. So

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>do you remember on Tuesday when we had that breaking

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>news at the time anyway, that Microsoft was showing out

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>more than sixty eight billion dollars in cold hard cash

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to purchase the video game company Activision Blizzard. If you

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't listen to that episode and you've somehow avoided that news,

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 1>well surprise anyway. Microsoft has released a press statement that

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>said the acquisition would repel the company into third place

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in the largest video game companies by revenue category, behind

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Sony Intencent. And then Bloomberg reported that Sony's stock price

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 1>fell on Wednesday. That represents some twenty billion dollars of

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>market value, which is a big old yawlsa. Now, I

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>am no financial expert by any stretch of the imagination,

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>but I have a gut feeling that this drop in

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>value is strictly temporary and largely reactionary. I've seen some

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>analysts suggest that Microsoft will turn some franchises like the

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>popular Call of Duty series, which is one of Activision

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Blizzards big titles, that Microsoft will turn that into Xbox

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and PC exclusive titles, or at least they will contain

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of content that's exclusive to those platforms and

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>won't be allowed on other platforms, and that this could

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in turn really hurt Sony because you know, PlayStation owners

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have access to that content. It will give them

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>an incentive to switch platforms. But then, you know, I

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>hear these arguments, but Sony has long leveraged exclusive content

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>on its consoles, either with exclusive titles where the only

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>place you can play those titles is on a PlayStation,

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>or with exclusive levels or other content like That's been

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>part and parcel of sony strategy for years, and in fact,

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>it's done that way more frequently than Microsoft. Now that

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Microsoft wouldn't have loved to do the same thing,

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>they just didn't have the same opportunities in many cases.

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>And so far, at least, Microsoft is sending out the

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>message that they don't intend to limit the platforms upon

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>which games are appearing, so that seems to be saying

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to suddenly turn off these titles for PlayStation. Uh.

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that that message could just have the unspoken

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>for now, you know at the end of it. Um,

0:06:55.600 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's also possible. In fact, Pole at

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft had have said as much that the company really

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>just wants to get a version of Xbox game Pass

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>on PlayStation, which would be a heck of a thing.

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's a subscription based service that lets

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>people you know, access different video games for a monthly

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>fee instead of buying titles individually. And of course, titles

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>can disappear from the service after a while, kind of

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>like how some content can appear on Netflix and then

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>suddenly be inaccessible. Cough that Mitchell and web look cough anyway, Um,

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it would be really interesting to see if Microsoft could

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>get game Pass onto PlayStation. It would be away for

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft to make money off of a competitor's platform. That

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>would be incredible. Um. But I suspect at any rate

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that we're gonna see Sony's market value recover before too long.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, this acquisition isn't even scheduled to close until

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>sometime in Microsoft's twenty three fiscal year. Now, I should

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>point out that that fiscal year actually starts July one

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of this year two. Uh. Microsoft fiscal year goes from

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>July one to June each year, so fiscal year two

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>will end June and fiscal year twenty twenty three will

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>start July one, two. Because fiscal years and calendar years

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>frequently don't line up. I mean, it's different for every company,

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>but it is not unusual to see a company have

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>its fiscal year that is significantly offset from the calendar year. Now.

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the things some folks have commented on with

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>these Microsoft acquisitions, not just in gaming but in other

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>fields as well, is that the company has hiking up

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>its bridges to wade on into the metaverse competitive landscape,

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>as nebulous and vague as that is. Meanwhile, Ken Kutaragi,

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>who invented the PlayStation, a former Sony executive, has expressed

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>some skepticism about the metaverse concept, saying I can't see

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the point of doing it, and y'all know me. Y'all

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>know I side with Kutaragi on this one, but I

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>also admit that my lack of enthusiasm about the metaverse

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>could totally be because I have blinders on and I'm

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>just not seeing the big picture. Uh. That's I totally

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>confess that could be the case. I don't see it,

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean that there's not something to be seen. Uh.

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there's a lot of stuff out there that

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>gains a lot of traction that just baffles me, and

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it proves to me that I'm one of those folks

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>who gets more and more out of touch as I

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>get older. It's that's I'm aware of it, and I

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>cannot stop it because I see stuff go popular and

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I don't get it. But this isn't about

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>me anyway. Kudaragi like in the metaverse, which people will,

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, presumably inhabit virtual spaces and be represented by

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>an avatar to stand in for their physical buddy. He

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>compared that to anonymous message board sites. Kutaragi appeared to

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>be saying that, you know, it's just a technological way

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to pretend to be someone who you are not. And

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>when you put it that way, I can actually totally

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>see how the metaverse could potentially get super popular because

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we've already seen social networking sites flourish as people use

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>those sites to create an image of their own lives

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that isn't necessarily a reflection of reality. You know, it's

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of a presentation of their idealized life, and it's

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>leaving out all the messy stuff and all the mundane stuff. Um.

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, so many Instagrammers out there have kind of

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>cultivated this aura of being special and constantly blessed with

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>good fortune, you know, taking photos of themselves and exotic

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>locations with like expensive surroundings and you know, in great lighting,

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and they look perfect, and they're using filters to make

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>them look even more perfect. It's become, you know, a

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>whole trope. And in fact, it's also a concern for

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>folks who worry about young kids, especially girls and young women,

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>who might experience mental health problems as they encounter this

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 1>presentation of a seemingly perfect life and they're comparing their

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>own lives negatively to that fake really example, So yeah,

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>in that respect, I could see how the metaverse could

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>take off, right where everyone says, finally I can present

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 1>to the world a version of myself that I wish

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I were, as opposed to this sack of meeting bones

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 1>that I am. And meanwhile, I'm sitting here thinking like

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay being a sack of meeting bones. I'll just

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll be a grumpy hermit in the ldite forest. I

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>suppose uh, because this is not a selling point for me.

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 1>But um yeah, that seems to be what Kutaragi is saying.

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>I could be reading way too much into that. I

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I admit I got a lot of baggage when it

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>comes to the concept of the metaverse. Okay, we've got

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>lots of other stories to cover, but before we get

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to those, let's take a quick break. So before the break,

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were talking about the metaverse, and of

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>course we're not done yet, because that is the topic

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in early two. I sure hope by the end of

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>this year people aren't talking about as much, but I

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>think that might be a hope in vain. But PC

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Gamer and several other outlets have reported that meta slash

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Facebook holds a bunch of patents that may point toward

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>how the company will leverage certain technologies uh and the

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>metaverse to make truckloads more money, mainly through advertising. So

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>those patents include a lot of stuff about haptic feedback

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and tracking user movement, so a lot of stuff about

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.959
<v Speaker 1>how a user will interact with a virtual environment. How

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that virtual environment will be able to detect act what

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the users doing and thus render it so that it

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 1>makes sense within the virtual environment. And beyond that, it's

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>supposed to, you know, kind of help the virtual environment

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>understand why where someone is looking. And you can see

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>why that would be important, right because it needs to

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>present to the viewer an appropriate image. If I'm you know,

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>standing around and I'm turning my head left and right,

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>well the virtual environment better reflect that or else it's

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be a terrible experience, probably make me sick,

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'll never want to do it again. But some

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of the tech that is covered by the patents includes

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>eye tracking stuff, so that the system running the show

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>knows not just where your head is pointed, but exactly

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>what you're looking at, like what are you looking at

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>within your field of view? Not just you know where

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you're pointed to. And there are a lot of legit

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>reasons to want that tech in a virtual environment. For one, thing,

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that can really teach developers what people are focusing on,

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>which can lead to improvements behind the scenes. You know,

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you can look at those analytics and say, all right, well,

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>what's working and what's not working. Maybe developers have created

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>something really cool in that virtual environment, but it's being overlooked.

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not getting any attention. And it's not that the

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 1>thing they created was bad, it's just for whatever reason,

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the way it's positioned or whatever, is not getting people's attention.

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So maybe that means developers should either not dedicate their

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>resources to building out similar stuff in the virtual world,

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that it would just be a waste of time, or

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe it would let them know that, hey, we need

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to do something different with this asset because it could

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>have an impact. It's just not having an impact here.

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>So those are like legit reasons to use eye tracking.

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>But of course another major application of eye tracking tech

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is to figure out where you might best serve ads

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to inhabitants in the metaverse. You might say, where are

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>people looking a lot, Let's make sure we put ads

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>where people are looking, because then we can use the data,

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the eye tracking data, and go to advertisers and say, look,

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>if you put an ad up in this spot in

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse, x number of people are guaranteed to see

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it every month, and thus we can charge bookoos of

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>money for you to have an ad place there and

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>This kind of makes me think of films like Minority Report.

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>They're little sequences in Minority Report where we see people

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>encounter digital ads all around them as they're just navigating

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>through their day. And I can see this tech being

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>used for stuff like augmented reality headsets, not just virtual reality,

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>which you know, depending on the application of augmented reality,

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>using eye tracking tech could be really cool and useful.

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>But I suspect a lot of focus no pun intended,

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll be on how to monetize the capabilities, and uh,

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, companies like Meta already kind of know what

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at anyway, right, So yeah, this this definitely

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds creepy because the idea of them analyzing where you're

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>looking sounds really invasive. But let me let you in

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>on a little secret because based on your browsing habits

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and how much time you spend on social networks, MENA

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>already knows what you're looking at. Really, they already know

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>what you're interested in. Um, they already know what you're

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>not interested in based upon your behaviors. Like that kind

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of data can be analyzed and they know how to

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>target you specifically. The browsing data and habits give pretty

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>much all the information needed, so the eye tracking thing

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>just becomes a more overt way of doing that and

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>provides a more precise way of implementing ads. But let

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>me tell you the creepy surveillance stuff that's already out

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>there that exists. That is the Facebook of today, and

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't need eye tracking software too or hardware to

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>make that happen. Happy Thursday, y'all. On Monday this week,

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>hackers compromised a cryptocurrency trading platform called crypto dot com

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and they were able to make off with around thirty

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>four million dollars worth of cryptocurrency. That is a heck

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of a bank heist. The company recently copped to the

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>hack in a blog post, and it had halted withdrawals

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>for about fourteen hours for all users and send on

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a message that essentially said, hey, y'all, it's tot's okay.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Your money is safe. But for four three customers that

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really the case, at least not temporarily, because it

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>was their accounts that got hit and the hackers were

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>able to drain some of those accounts. Crypto dot Com

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>forced all users to reset their two factor authentication methods

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>so that they can access to their accounts. I've talked

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>about two factor authentication lots of times in the past

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>for those who are not really familiar with what that means.

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>It means you need you need two different ways of

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>authenticating who you are in order to access something, and

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it falls into different buckets. And typically we think of

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>those buckets as being something you possess, like say your phone, uh,

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>something you know like a password, and something you are

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>like biometric data that's related to some unique physical feature

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that you have, and that you need to provide one

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 1>from one of those from at least two categories for

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to be able to access whatever it is. So commonly

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>this is something where it's like your password and then

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you get a text message on your phone with like

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a six digit key, and it's only when you provide

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>both of those pieces of information that you can gain

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>access to your account. To factor authentication or multi factor

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>authentication is very smart. You want to use it, if

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it's available, you want it turned on. I know it

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:03.199
<v Speaker 1>can be a half soul, but it is superior to

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>just relying on a single factor. However, as interesting as

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 1>it is that you know crypto dot Com told all

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>its users you need to reset your two factor authentication.

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>It appears that the hackers were able to access those

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 1>four three accounts without using two factor authentication in the

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>first place. So I don't know all the details about

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the hack, but if that's the case, if the hackers

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>were getting access to stuff and they weren't having to

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>use two factor authentication, that's kind of like saying, hey,

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know your house was robbed the other night,

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>so we've replaced all the locks on your front door,

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and it turns out that the thieves came in through

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 1>the window. Like, Okay, well, I'm glad the door is

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>more secure. But if that's not how the the information

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>or in this case, the money was accessed, then that's

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>not really a solution. However, to the company's credit, it

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>did cover the losses experienced by each of those four accounts.

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>It restored the money in whatever cryptocurrency form it was

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>in to all FOE accounts, presumably under crypto dot COM's

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>own expense, and the hackers are reportedly in the middle

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of using various crypto apps to launder the money they've stolen.

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>What a world. Okay, we're gonna take another quick break

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>when we come back we're gonna have a butt load

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of Google news as well some other stuff. Okay, time

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to transition into the Google heavy portion of the news

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>for today. First up, Alphabet CEO Sandar Pichai, along with

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple CEO Tim Cook have reportedly been making the rounds

0:20:55.400 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 1>with lawmakers in the US, arranging private phone calls to

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>talk with senators about stuff. And you might wonder why, Well,

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>it's because of a piece of proposed legislation called the

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:13.719
<v Speaker 1>American Innovation and Choice Online Act that could potentially really

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>shake things up for some big tech companies like Apple

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>and Google and Amazon. Part of that act focuses on

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the practice of a company promoting its own products over

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>competitors in the company's various marketplaces. So let's stick with Google.

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So this would mean that Google would not be allowed

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to give its own products and services a promotional advantage

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in Google ads on Google platforms like Search. Apple wouldn't

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to do the same thing with Apple products

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and services on Apple platforms, And of course Amazon has

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>been dingd for this multiple times, with the company being

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>accused of promoting its own products over that of competitors

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Amazon marketplace. So if this legislation were to pass,

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that would be a huge threat to the current business

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>models that these big tech companies rely upon. It's one

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of the big ways these companies become so gargantuan in

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>the first place, and competitors say the practice is you know,

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 1>completely unfair, and even if the competitor were to offer

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a superior product at a superior price, they are at

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a promotional disadvantage. Whether the tech CEOs are making headway

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>with the senators, that's hard to say. I mean, money talks,

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>especially in politics, So it's entirely possible that you know,

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>these CEOs are persuading enough lawmakers to oppose or amend

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>the legislation to the point that it doesn't really do

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>anything um And of course, again this is proposed legislation.

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not like it's been voted on yet. But there's

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely a growing resentment toward big tech from multiple sectors,

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>including the common populace, and it has been growing for

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>some time now. So there might be some pressure from

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>constituents for some of these senators to kind of stick

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to their guns and pass the legislation. We'll have to

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>wait and see if that comes to pass. In other

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Google news, the company is reportedly establishing a new business unit.

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>This one focuses on blockchain and distributed computing and data

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>storage technologies like future ones. And this is according to Bloomberg,

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>which published that the the outlet had received a leaked

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.719
<v Speaker 1>email from within the company revealing the fact that they

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>have established this blockchain business unit. Now, does this mean

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that Google is going to launch its own cryptocurrency in

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>the future, or that maybe, you know, Android users or

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Chrome users are going to be flooded with ads for

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Google and f t s. I don't know. I hope not,

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>but I can't say for certain. But it is at

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>least an early indicator that Google is experimenting with more

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>technologies associated with stuff like the concept of Web three

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and the metaverse. Google has already obviously been working with

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>virtual reality and augmented reality applications. I mean, Google Glass

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>was a very early a R commercial product, had a

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>very limited commercial run, but it was something like that.

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 1>So Google certainly has been dipping its toe in various

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>disciplines that are converging towards this metaverse concept. And I'm

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking this might be just sort of a way for

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Google to stay involved in the game. I don't see

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Google as a company that's going to lead the way

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>in that space. But I also see it as a

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>company that doesn't want to find itself completely left out.

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Google has a dominant position, some might call it a

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>monopolistic position when it comes to certain things like like

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>search and ad revenue or add ad services um and

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure the company is thinking, well, we want to

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>future proof that. We don't want to make sure. We

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that the next stage of the Web,

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be, doesn't cut us out of it.

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I see this as. I don't see

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it necessarily as an indication that we're going to, you know,

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>see a Google version of crypto anytime soon, although that

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>could happen, I just I'm not seeing it right now.

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>And for a long time, Google has offered a service

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>in its g Suite product that gives you the chance

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to create a custom domain built on top of Google,

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and that gives you a lot of different options, including

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you can have a Gmail address that isn't a Gmail address,

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is Gmail, but the domain like it

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>could be a custom one. Like I could have a

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Gmail address that has the domain Jonathan Strickland is awesome

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com instead of Gmail dot com. Not that I

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>have an account with that domain, but I could if

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to, and if it were available anyway. From

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the moment the Google offered that service up through two

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twelve, there was a free basic version of

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the product, so you could enroll, you could get that

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>custom domain. You didn't have to spend any money, and

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>it was the bare bones version, but it existed, and uh,

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>if you ponied up the cash, then you could get

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>access to other extra features. Yeah, that basic service was

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>free of charge. But then in two thousand twelve, Google

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>stopped offering it for free, but it also allowed those

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>who had established a free account to keep using it. Now,

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a decade later, the company has made the decision to

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>come to each one of those users who still has

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>an established free account and have for years, and now

0:26:55.960 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Google is going to say you must pay tribute. We

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>will burn your domain to the ground and so salt

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>into the earth. Okay, not not that, but it's the

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>gist of what they're saying. So for the folks who

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>did get in early, while those free days are coming

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to an end, and then they will have to either

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 1>pay or they will see their accounts suspended starting on

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>May first. Anyone with a free account but who has

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>billing information attached to their Google account will then be

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>upgraded quote unquote to the paid service automatically, which is

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>fun times and starting in July, those accounts will start

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to get billed every month for continued use of the service.

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>If an account does not have billing information attached to it,

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>and if the user hasn't you know, updated their account

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>to have billing infoe attached by July one, their account

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 1>will be suspended. This is a pretty tough pill to swallow.

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>To have a free service suddenly switch up on you

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>like that. That's never fun. On a slightly more fun note,

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Google has launched a beta program in South Korea, Taiwan,

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and Hong Kong, and people in those regions can get

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>beta access to a Google Play Games app on Windows eleven.

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Google had previously committed to bringing Android games to Windows

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>eleven back in December, and when does eleven includes an

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Android app layer that's supposed to make this seamless. There's

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>been some use of Google apps onto Windows platforms in

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the past, but this is supposed to make it really work. Uh.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 1>At first, I was like, this doesn't interest me, And

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>then I thought, hum, if I have some Windows eleven machines,

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that means I could play Marvel Puzzle Quest on a

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>PC and have my progress SYNCD across all devices. And

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I started to come around to it because that's actually

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the only Android game I currently have installed on my phone.

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>And I know I people will tell me that's not

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>even a good one. I don't care. I play it

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty much every day. Um Google has said it will

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>expand this to other regions throughout two but it has

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>yet to release a timeline for that rollout. Amazon is

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>continuing to build on its presence in the brick and

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>mortar world. The company had already opened up a few

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of its famous grocery stores, as well as purchased the

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Whole Foods chain, and I had a couple of brick

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and mortar bookstores. Now. Amazon has announced that it will

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>open a clothing store in Glendale, California, later this year

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>called Amazon Style, and the store will cover clothing from

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a number of different designers at different price points, everything

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>from budget to high level designers, and the company says

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that the stores will incorporate technology on a pretty fundamental

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>level and customers will interact with that technology using their smartphones.

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>So Amazon says it will reserve floor space to display items,

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so there won't be any racks of clothes there. Instead,

0:29:56.240 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you'll see an example of an outfit and uh way

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to scan that outfit presumably, so use your phone, you

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>scan the outfit, and then you can use the app

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to select you know, the size you want, the color

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you want, the style you want of whatever it is,

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and have it sent to a fitting room or even

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to a pickup counter um anyway, then you could go

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to the fitting room and try on the items. And

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in the fitting rooms they're gonna have touch screens where

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>let's say you get in there and you try something on,

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know, you want to get those pleather

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>chaps you see on the show floor, and you have

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>some sent to the fing room, and you go back

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>there and you say, yeah, these are just a little

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>too loose. They don't give them took us the own

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>f I was hoping for, And you could use the

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>touch screen to request a smaller size of pleather chaps

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to be sent to the fitting room, so you can

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>really get that lift that you wanted. You might wonder

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>why I picked pleather chaps so back in Oh, I

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know, more than twenty years ago, I was in

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a play where I had to wear pleather chaps. So

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just one of those things pops up in your

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>head every now and then. Anyway, Uh. Amazon also plans

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to use its palm scanning technology that's used in other

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>stores to link customer accounts to specific customers, so you could,

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, pick out the stuff that you want to

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>go to the pickup counter, scan your palm, and you

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>would automatically have the price of your purchases deducted from

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>your account. Now, as someone who hates to shop for

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>clothing at all, none of this appeals to me, but

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I could easily imagine it being excited to folks who aren't,

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, a grumpy chaps like myself. Twitch, another Amazon property,

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>published an open letter from the company's Vice president of

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Global Trust and Safety, Angela Hessian, to lay out how

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the platform has recently been tackling issues of abuse on Twitch,

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and one of the measures was that Twitch deleted millions

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of automated butts in order to curtail what are called

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>hate raids. Now, if you're not familiar with Twitch, you

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>might not be aware of raids in general. Twitch is

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a live streaming platform mainly geared towards video games, but

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>there are other types of content on Twitch as well,

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and raids don't necessarily have to be negative. In fact,

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a raid can be really uplifting and awesome. So essentially,

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a raid is when someone directs their audience to another streamer.

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>So you might have like popular streamers who have thousands

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of people watching at a time, and sometimes

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>they like to do this to give kind of like

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a crazy short term boost to lesser known or sometimes

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>outright obscure streamers who are on the platform. So you

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>could have someone who's really influential on Twitch come across

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a person that they like, but that person has very

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>few viewers of their own, and then the popular person

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>will say, hey, let's go show them some love and

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>open up a link to that other, you know person's

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>stream and send floods of enthusiastic fans to go and

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, show some love. Well. I hate raid is

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously a much nastier beast as the name implies. This

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is when a streamer gets hit with a flood of

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>abusive accounts hurling awful trash and chat and generally just

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>being terrible people. And of course the you know, the

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>people who are disproportionately the target of these kinds of

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>attacks tend to be, you know, people of color, or

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>people who are in the l g B t Q

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>plus community, or women, those tend to be the most

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>frequent targets of this kind of abuse. So Twitch has

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>deleted millions of bots that were essentially programmed to just

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>spread misery and abuse, which I think is definitely a

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>step in the right direction. Now, it's upsetting that anyone

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>would go to the trouble to set a bot loose

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>with this kind of intent in the first place. But

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>those are much deeper social problems that I don't expect

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a company like Twitch to solve because it can't. But

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>seeing Twitch try to mitigate the you know, implementation of

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that problem is a good thing. Not that the problem

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to go away or even necessarily get better.

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>People who are determined to be hateful and nasty and

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>harmful will always find ways to do that. Now, hopefully

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Twitch can make that hard enough and frustrating enough that

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>most evil trolls out there won't stick it out to

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>see it through. Uh, I mean, come on, there are

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:35.799
<v Speaker 1>better things for you to do with your time than

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>try to torture someone else. And finally, in news that

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>for me falls into the I'll believe it when I

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>see it category, the young Company Space Entertainment Enterprise or

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:52.359
<v Speaker 1>c s E has announced plans that will build and

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>operate a space station module that will include a content

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>studio as well as a sports arena by December of

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. Now SEE is the company that's working with

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Tom Cruise on an upcoming space movie with scenes that

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>will actually be shot in space, because apparently that will

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>add authenticity to something, and and apparently Tom Cruise won't

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:23.879
<v Speaker 1>be satisfied with, you know, the crazy stuff he's done

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>in order to make a movie in the past. He

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>has to top it every time, so instead of hanging

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.280
<v Speaker 1>outside an airplane, he has to go into space. Anyway,

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.320
<v Speaker 1>this is all going to be part of axioms space

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 1>station modules. Those, in turn will be connected to the

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>International Space Station on a temporary basis. Axiom secured permission

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 1>from NASA back in to build out modules for the

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I s S that will have a private commercial purpose,

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and the eventual plan is that the Axiom modules will

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:56.839
<v Speaker 1>detach from the International Space station, and then Axiom will

0:35:56.880 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>have its own space station, its own independence station down

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the line when it's time to sunset the old International

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Space Station, which is well pasted its expiration date its

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>original expiration date anyway for some of the modules. But

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's been an operation for quite some time

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and expected to continue for the next few years at least. Now.

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm being way too pessimistic here. It's entirely possible

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that we will see this module dedicated to content creation

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and uh space sports by the end of I don't

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>know what kind of space sports. I do know they

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>will definitely be the kind I'll never be able to do,

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>for lots of reasons, among which are my lack of

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>athletic ability and my suspicion that going up there would

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.320
<v Speaker 1>cost more than I will ever make in my lifetime.

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 1>More fun times, but it is kind of cool. And

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what, it's Axiom that's actually building out this module,

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>which I think is going to be called C one.

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And because axioms already in the process of building out modules,

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and these are inflatable modules as well, um they they

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>use air to hold a firm shape in space. Because

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of that, it's it's actually not maybe that far fetched

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to think that it will be ready by It just

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>seems like an incredibly aggressive plan. But then these plans

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>could have been in the works for ages and we're

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 1>just now being let in on it. Um. I just

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>whenever anything involves space, I automatically think any deadline you

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>hear is more of a suggestion. Other evidence to point

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to that the James Webb Space Telescope, which was supposed

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to launch like more than twenty years ago, I think,

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And finally did um always good to put an asterisk

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 1>next to those dates. That's it for the news for Thursday,

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>January two. If you have suggestions for topics I should

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>cover on tech Stuff, feel free to reach out to

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>be on Twitter. The handle for the show is text

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Stuff H s W and I'll talk to you again

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>really soon Y. Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production.

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit the i

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.