WEBVTT - Frisky Business: Olivia Nuzzi, Ryan Lizza, and Journalistic Ethics

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:16.044
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin.

0:00:26.364 --> 0:00:29.684
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making better decisions.

0:00:29.804 --> 0:00:32.004
<v Speaker 2>I'm Maria Kannakova and I'm Nate Silver.

0:00:32.844 --> 0:00:36.924
<v Speaker 3>Today on the show, we have an interesting heiring of topics.

0:00:36.964 --> 0:00:41.564
<v Speaker 3>We're going to talk about the a disease of holiday travel, planes,

0:00:41.604 --> 0:00:44.084
<v Speaker 3>trays and automobiles. I'm a big plain guy. It turns

0:00:44.084 --> 0:00:47.524
<v Speaker 3>out Maria a little more skeptical. And then speaking of disease,

0:00:49.044 --> 0:00:52.204
<v Speaker 3>the journalist Olivia Nitzi was accused by fellow double z

0:00:52.444 --> 0:00:57.644
<v Speaker 3>Ryan Lizza, her ex fiancee, of various crimes against journalism.

0:00:57.724 --> 0:01:00.124
<v Speaker 3>We will discuss those in an entertaining fashion.

0:01:00.324 --> 0:01:04.124
<v Speaker 2>Yes, some journalistic ethics coming right up. But first, yeah,

0:01:04.244 --> 0:01:08.364
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about Thanksgiving travel as everyone plans their travel

0:01:08.444 --> 0:01:17.524
<v Speaker 2>for the holidays are coming up. Ny you traveled by plane.

0:01:17.684 --> 0:01:23.004
<v Speaker 2>You went to Kansas City, and I had Thanksgiving in Boston,

0:01:23.044 --> 0:01:26.044
<v Speaker 2>where I'm from with my family. So I had all

0:01:26.084 --> 0:01:28.764
<v Speaker 2>sorts of options, and you know what, I actually thought

0:01:28.804 --> 0:01:32.724
<v Speaker 2>about all of them, because, as we talked about last year,

0:01:32.764 --> 0:01:35.644
<v Speaker 2>around this time, it can be really really tricky to

0:01:35.844 --> 0:01:40.604
<v Speaker 2>optimize holiday travel. So going to Boston is something that

0:01:40.604 --> 0:01:42.844
<v Speaker 2>you would think is super easy, right, Boston and New

0:01:42.924 --> 0:01:45.284
<v Speaker 2>York like what three and a half hours, four hours,

0:01:45.324 --> 0:01:49.564
<v Speaker 2>like pretty pretty close. Unfortunately, that's really not the case.

0:01:50.084 --> 0:01:52.444
<v Speaker 2>So you have a few options, right. You can drive,

0:01:52.684 --> 0:01:56.284
<v Speaker 2>so that involves a lot of risk reward trade offs

0:01:56.764 --> 0:02:01.084
<v Speaker 2>car rental and traffic. You can fly obviously, whether you

0:02:01.124 --> 0:02:03.284
<v Speaker 2>can be delayed. We know that there have been a

0:02:03.324 --> 0:02:06.404
<v Speaker 2>lot of issues with flights in the last few months,

0:02:06.684 --> 0:02:09.604
<v Speaker 2>so that's the issue there, and train seems to be

0:02:09.604 --> 0:02:13.644
<v Speaker 2>the safest option. However, my last train ride to Boston,

0:02:13.724 --> 0:02:18.604
<v Speaker 2>Nate took seven and a half hours because within half

0:02:18.644 --> 0:02:21.764
<v Speaker 2>an hour of leaving Penn Station, New York, we hit

0:02:21.844 --> 0:02:24.524
<v Speaker 2>something and then the train couldn't go above like forty

0:02:24.524 --> 0:02:26.204
<v Speaker 2>five miles an hour for the rest of the trip.

0:02:26.764 --> 0:02:28.564
<v Speaker 2>But they didn't tell us that. They just kept saying

0:02:28.564 --> 0:02:30.884
<v Speaker 2>that we'd be making up the time, and we never did.

0:02:31.244 --> 0:02:34.244
<v Speaker 2>And you want to guess how much two train tickets

0:02:34.284 --> 0:02:37.964
<v Speaker 2>were to Boston for Thanksgiving weekend? I bought these back

0:02:38.004 --> 0:02:41.324
<v Speaker 2>in September. Luckily about refundable ones, and I did get refunded.

0:02:42.004 --> 0:02:46.204
<v Speaker 2>Think about think about holiday travel Thanksgiving this weekend? How

0:02:46.244 --> 0:02:48.684
<v Speaker 2>much just normal as seloitics, I.

0:02:48.724 --> 0:02:52.004
<v Speaker 4>Say, like seven hundred dollars one way or something.

0:02:53.324 --> 0:02:54.284
<v Speaker 1>You're very close.

0:02:54.364 --> 0:03:01.484
<v Speaker 2>So for two people, the tickets were seventeen hundred dollars together,

0:03:02.284 --> 0:03:07.724
<v Speaker 2>and that is just absolutely ludicrous, right, So you have

0:03:07.924 --> 0:03:09.084
<v Speaker 2>all of these different things.

0:03:09.484 --> 0:03:09.804
<v Speaker 4>Pay it.

0:03:11.364 --> 0:03:13.564
<v Speaker 2>I did, but I did it as a backup, so

0:03:13.564 --> 0:03:17.564
<v Speaker 2>it's yes, it was so.

0:03:17.884 --> 0:03:18.644
<v Speaker 4>They can charge it.

0:03:18.684 --> 0:03:21.564
<v Speaker 2>They're doing it because they can, and they do it

0:03:21.604 --> 0:03:25.684
<v Speaker 2>because they know that there is really no viable good options.

0:03:25.724 --> 0:03:27.764
<v Speaker 2>So we also had a car rental, which, by the way,

0:03:27.884 --> 0:03:30.084
<v Speaker 2>was like a fraction of the cost. Right the car

0:03:30.124 --> 0:03:33.044
<v Speaker 2>rental for five days was like five hundred dollars something

0:03:33.084 --> 0:03:37.364
<v Speaker 2>like that. Not an insignificant amount of money, but like, fine,

0:03:37.404 --> 0:03:39.444
<v Speaker 2>you know you're renting a car four or five days.

0:03:39.764 --> 0:03:42.764
<v Speaker 2>Now the car rental, though you have your own issues

0:03:42.804 --> 0:03:45.444
<v Speaker 2>one will you actually have a car. I don't know

0:03:45.444 --> 0:03:47.844
<v Speaker 2>if we've talked about this on the show, but rental

0:03:47.844 --> 0:03:50.524
<v Speaker 2>cars are really weird when it comes to reservations. You

0:03:50.564 --> 0:03:53.444
<v Speaker 2>make a reservation, but unlike a restaurant where you make

0:03:53.444 --> 0:03:56.124
<v Speaker 2>a reservation and there's a table waiting for you, you can

0:03:56.124 --> 0:03:58.964
<v Speaker 2>make a rental car reservation. You get there and there

0:03:59.004 --> 0:04:01.444
<v Speaker 2>ain't any cars and they say, yeah, sorry, we don't

0:04:01.484 --> 0:04:03.684
<v Speaker 2>have any cars left right now, but you can wait

0:04:03.844 --> 0:04:05.404
<v Speaker 2>I've had to wait for around.

0:04:05.164 --> 0:04:09.764
<v Speaker 3>Four capitalist economy. Do you want price fixing, I'd be

0:04:09.764 --> 0:04:11.044
<v Speaker 3>most capitalists don't like that.

0:04:11.804 --> 0:04:13.244
<v Speaker 1>No, no, but like what they think.

0:04:13.324 --> 0:04:16.604
<v Speaker 3>So we were booking tickets to Michigan to see my

0:04:16.724 --> 0:04:22.444
<v Speaker 3>family for Christmas, and yeah, from New York in coach,

0:04:22.924 --> 0:04:25.004
<v Speaker 3>it's like nine hundred bucks or something, right, and like

0:04:26.084 --> 0:04:29.644
<v Speaker 3>they figured out that, like when you have people who

0:04:29.644 --> 0:04:31.844
<v Speaker 3>are desperate to get home for something, right, you can

0:04:31.924 --> 0:04:33.644
<v Speaker 3>charge a lot of money and those lights will be full.

0:04:33.964 --> 0:04:38.324
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, absolutely, an Asella knows that it has kind

0:04:38.324 --> 0:04:42.204
<v Speaker 2>of this cornered market because weather in New England can

0:04:42.244 --> 0:04:44.124
<v Speaker 2>be really bad, right, and if you need to be

0:04:44.204 --> 0:04:46.164
<v Speaker 2>home for Thanksgiving. So we had flights as well, which

0:04:46.164 --> 0:04:47.884
<v Speaker 2>were much cheaper. By the way, we had a you

0:04:47.924 --> 0:04:52.244
<v Speaker 2>know Delta shuttle reserved which you can cancel anytime, which

0:04:52.284 --> 0:04:55.044
<v Speaker 2>were you know, half the price of the trade. But

0:04:55.684 --> 0:04:59.244
<v Speaker 2>you also have the notion of like what if it snows, right,

0:04:59.444 --> 0:05:01.284
<v Speaker 2>what if the weather's bat what if I get stuck

0:05:01.324 --> 0:05:04.604
<v Speaker 2>on either side cars? You have a lot of control,

0:05:04.684 --> 0:05:07.164
<v Speaker 2>And we had a great smooth trip there, but it

0:05:07.164 --> 0:05:09.364
<v Speaker 2>took us seven hours to get back and I was

0:05:09.524 --> 0:05:12.764
<v Speaker 2>actually wondering, you know, as we were driving. Obviously there

0:05:13.324 --> 0:05:15.244
<v Speaker 2>is a factor of just more people on the road.

0:05:15.484 --> 0:05:17.244
<v Speaker 2>But I wonder if there are more accidents around the

0:05:17.284 --> 0:05:19.484
<v Speaker 2>holidays because there are more bad drivers on the roads

0:05:19.484 --> 0:05:22.284
<v Speaker 2>who don't usually drive, but who rent cars for this occasion.

0:05:22.324 --> 0:05:25.804
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they're doing. I'm assuming that that's.

0:05:26.724 --> 0:05:31.084
<v Speaker 3>You have this amateur hour issue with everything. Right on

0:05:31.124 --> 0:05:34.044
<v Speaker 3>the train there's someone with an order amount of luggage.

0:05:34.124 --> 0:05:38.724
<v Speaker 3>And at the airport, right, they're fucking kids everywhere, right,

0:05:38.804 --> 0:05:39.524
<v Speaker 3>they slow.

0:05:39.404 --> 0:05:40.724
<v Speaker 4>Things down the scarity line.

0:05:42.004 --> 0:05:45.284
<v Speaker 3>Look, the answer is that from New York to DC,

0:05:45.764 --> 0:05:48.564
<v Speaker 3>you take the train, New York to Boston, you fly.

0:05:50.244 --> 0:05:52.004
<v Speaker 4>You won't know why you fly, Maria a couple of reasons.

0:05:52.004 --> 0:05:52.684
<v Speaker 1>Why do you find it?

0:05:52.924 --> 0:05:55.684
<v Speaker 3>First of all, just look at the way that the

0:05:55.804 --> 0:05:58.964
<v Speaker 3>Eastern Seaboard works. Right, We're actually pretty close here in

0:05:59.004 --> 0:06:01.844
<v Speaker 3>New York as the crow files to Boston.

0:06:02.044 --> 0:06:04.084
<v Speaker 4>Right, You've got a.

0:06:04.044 --> 0:06:09.404
<v Speaker 3>Loop all the way around through fucking New Britain, Conneticut

0:06:09.564 --> 0:06:11.844
<v Speaker 3>and New Canaan, Connecticut and all these places. It's like

0:06:11.884 --> 0:06:15.844
<v Speaker 3>not even really optimize the train track, right, but like

0:06:15.884 --> 0:06:19.004
<v Speaker 3>you better like go if you have to, fucking Providence

0:06:19.044 --> 0:06:19.764
<v Speaker 3>and stuff like that.

0:06:19.844 --> 0:06:22.204
<v Speaker 2>Right, It is true. It is true. It is not

0:06:22.404 --> 0:06:25.044
<v Speaker 2>very efficient. You follow the coastline, and the coastline is

0:06:25.164 --> 0:06:26.364
<v Speaker 2>very loopy, so the.

0:06:26.324 --> 0:06:29.564
<v Speaker 3>Flight in the air is like literally about thirty or

0:06:29.564 --> 0:06:32.844
<v Speaker 3>forty minutes from New York to Boston, right, So that

0:06:32.884 --> 0:06:33.724
<v Speaker 3>comes apairical question.

0:06:33.764 --> 0:06:34.764
<v Speaker 4>By the way, not thinking about.

0:06:34.564 --> 0:06:38.484
<v Speaker 3>Boston, Boston, I'm not a big Boston guy, but I

0:06:38.524 --> 0:06:42.484
<v Speaker 3>will say the most underrated airport in the country is

0:06:42.484 --> 0:06:45.764
<v Speaker 3>Boston Logan Airport. It's absolutely you go through that big

0:06:45.764 --> 0:06:48.004
<v Speaker 3>dig and things like that, right, yeah.

0:06:47.884 --> 0:06:50.044
<v Speaker 2>No, and it actually it makes a huge difference. I

0:06:50.084 --> 0:06:52.524
<v Speaker 2>love Logan now and Logan is now a new airport.

0:06:52.564 --> 0:06:55.324
<v Speaker 2>There's actually you can go to Legal Seafood and Logan.

0:06:55.844 --> 0:06:57.044
<v Speaker 2>You can get clam Showder.

0:06:57.204 --> 0:07:00.324
<v Speaker 3>Some clam Showder have a Samuel Adam. The ship sponsors

0:07:00.364 --> 0:07:03.364
<v Speaker 3>have a Samuel Adams logger. Depending on the time of day.

0:07:03.524 --> 0:07:07.004
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely can now it's you know, you're you're absolutely right

0:07:07.044 --> 0:07:09.884
<v Speaker 2>that when you're thinking about just the time and the

0:07:10.044 --> 0:07:14.364
<v Speaker 2>chances of like the maximization of time, I totally agree

0:07:14.404 --> 0:07:16.364
<v Speaker 2>that the plane is a way to go. The reason

0:07:16.364 --> 0:07:19.204
<v Speaker 2>why I don't always fly is because i've been so

0:07:19.644 --> 0:07:21.844
<v Speaker 2>when I go to Boston, it's always around the holidays,

0:07:21.924 --> 0:07:27.284
<v Speaker 2>right Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's times when New England weather

0:07:27.364 --> 0:07:30.124
<v Speaker 2>can be very unpredictable. And that's so when you're doing

0:07:30.124 --> 0:07:33.164
<v Speaker 2>this calculus, obviously you have, as with any decision, you

0:07:33.244 --> 0:07:36.404
<v Speaker 2>have a bunch of different variables. Right, you have the time,

0:07:36.484 --> 0:07:40.044
<v Speaker 2>which is huge like maximizing time. You have cost obviously,

0:07:40.044 --> 0:07:42.604
<v Speaker 2>which is important, but you also have what are what

0:07:42.684 --> 0:07:45.404
<v Speaker 2>is the risk that I'm going to get there when

0:07:45.404 --> 0:07:48.844
<v Speaker 2>I need to get there right versus not? And with

0:07:49.044 --> 0:07:51.364
<v Speaker 2>the with the plane, you know, with the Delta shuttle,

0:07:51.404 --> 0:07:53.724
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of the most efficient way to get

0:07:53.884 --> 0:07:58.284
<v Speaker 2>to Boston. I have had canceled flights and delayed flights

0:07:58.324 --> 0:08:02.164
<v Speaker 2>not infrequently because the weather gets really shitty this time

0:08:02.204 --> 0:08:04.964
<v Speaker 2>of year. So that I think is the major risk.

0:08:05.404 --> 0:08:07.804
<v Speaker 2>Like let's assume the price is the same with everything,

0:08:08.124 --> 0:08:11.364
<v Speaker 2>but still when it comes to airport travel, you also

0:08:11.404 --> 0:08:13.404
<v Speaker 2>have to budget the time of how do I get

0:08:13.404 --> 0:08:15.124
<v Speaker 2>to the airport? When do I get to the airport?

0:08:15.204 --> 0:08:18.124
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, people people are a little phobic about their little

0:08:18.204 --> 0:08:20.844
<v Speaker 3>nitty about some of the airport stuff.

0:08:21.244 --> 0:08:22.444
<v Speaker 4>I hope our listeners know.

0:08:22.404 --> 0:08:27.444
<v Speaker 3>What nitty means, right, your risk averse and neurotic. It's

0:08:27.444 --> 0:08:31.684
<v Speaker 3>a poker term for someone who like folds too much? Right, oh,

0:08:31.804 --> 0:08:34.204
<v Speaker 3>or just kind of you know Alan Kessler, if you

0:08:34.244 --> 0:08:37.684
<v Speaker 3>know Alan Kessler and the poker Seine's a knit for example.

0:08:38.044 --> 0:08:40.844
<v Speaker 2>That was very inside baseball. But I love it, Natam

0:08:40.884 --> 0:08:42.204
<v Speaker 2>here for you don't.

0:08:42.004 --> 0:08:44.044
<v Speaker 3>Need there's actually a silver bolt in my Newslayer. There's like,

0:08:44.084 --> 0:08:46.124
<v Speaker 3>when do you get to the airport calculator? People are

0:08:46.244 --> 0:08:49.444
<v Speaker 3>very nitty about airports stuff, right. The fact is you

0:08:49.444 --> 0:08:51.804
<v Speaker 3>can cut it pretty close if you want. You know,

0:08:52.364 --> 0:08:56.204
<v Speaker 3>the surveillance state has probably rubbed us savol our, privacy

0:08:56.204 --> 0:09:00.364
<v Speaker 3>and dignity. However, it does lead to substantially faster lines

0:09:00.404 --> 0:09:04.084
<v Speaker 3>at the TSA check in, so realizes the benefit from that.

0:09:05.844 --> 0:09:08.524
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a silver lining. You get through security faster.

0:09:08.724 --> 0:09:10.484
<v Speaker 2>Sure, you gave up all your privacy.

0:09:11.004 --> 0:09:14.124
<v Speaker 4>Yes, look it's a trade off. But like also like

0:09:14.524 --> 0:09:17.924
<v Speaker 4>when you have those weather delays, the amcracks often aren't

0:09:18.004 --> 0:09:19.524
<v Speaker 4>much better.

0:09:20.204 --> 0:09:22.804
<v Speaker 2>This is true, but they do get there right end

0:09:22.804 --> 0:09:24.884
<v Speaker 2>of the day. It was just, you know, a choice

0:09:24.884 --> 0:09:28.204
<v Speaker 2>between bad alternatives. But we both made it. We both

0:09:28.244 --> 0:09:32.244
<v Speaker 2>made it. Back Nate, when our listeners try to maximize

0:09:32.244 --> 0:09:36.324
<v Speaker 2>their holiday travel for you know, the upcoming holidays and

0:09:36.404 --> 0:09:39.324
<v Speaker 2>for future years, Obviously some of what we talked about

0:09:39.364 --> 0:09:41.244
<v Speaker 2>is New England specific, but I think a lot of

0:09:41.244 --> 0:09:44.444
<v Speaker 2>it is advice that you can kind of take no

0:09:44.484 --> 0:09:47.764
<v Speaker 2>matter where your traveling, which is obviously, look at the time,

0:09:48.204 --> 0:09:50.804
<v Speaker 2>look at the cost, look at your risk of actually

0:09:50.804 --> 0:09:53.604
<v Speaker 2>getting there versus getting stuck, and how important it is

0:09:53.644 --> 0:09:55.484
<v Speaker 2>to you to get there at a specific time, at

0:09:55.484 --> 0:09:57.724
<v Speaker 2>a specific day, Because if you can afford to be

0:09:57.804 --> 0:10:00.444
<v Speaker 2>delayed a little bit, then that's it. That's a totally

0:10:00.444 --> 0:10:03.004
<v Speaker 2>different story. And what you pointed out, Nate, I think

0:10:03.044 --> 0:10:05.324
<v Speaker 2>is also important, which is you don't have to be

0:10:05.364 --> 0:10:06.444
<v Speaker 2>that nitty these are all right.

0:10:06.524 --> 0:10:09.364
<v Speaker 4>People miss this a lot when they are calculating their.

0:10:10.004 --> 0:10:14.284
<v Speaker 3>Flight or travel options. Right, how critical? How much and

0:10:14.324 --> 0:10:15.204
<v Speaker 3>critical is it.

0:10:15.124 --> 0:10:18.484
<v Speaker 4>For you to be late or on time? I should say, right.

0:10:18.524 --> 0:10:21.844
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a really important question that people really do

0:10:21.884 --> 0:10:23.884
<v Speaker 2>not ask themselves often enough. They're like, oh, I don't

0:10:23.884 --> 0:10:26.204
<v Speaker 2>want to be late, but how like how close are

0:10:26.284 --> 0:10:27.324
<v Speaker 2>you pushing your travel?

0:10:27.524 --> 0:10:27.684
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:10:27.724 --> 0:10:29.404
<v Speaker 2>Like, if you need to be there by Thursday and

0:10:29.444 --> 0:10:32.404
<v Speaker 2>you're traveling on Wednesday, right, Like you have a little

0:10:32.444 --> 0:10:36.924
<v Speaker 2>bit of a window of flexibility if you're traveling Thursday morning. Obviously, Yeah, okay,

0:10:37.084 --> 0:10:40.204
<v Speaker 2>you're fucked, you're delayed. So it's one of these things

0:10:40.244 --> 0:10:41.644
<v Speaker 2>where you do need to.

0:10:41.564 --> 0:10:42.084
<v Speaker 1>Figure it out.

0:10:42.404 --> 0:10:46.324
<v Speaker 2>There's a cascade of obligations, and how important your delay

0:10:46.404 --> 0:10:48.844
<v Speaker 2>is changes depending on what you're doing.

0:10:49.764 --> 0:10:50.644
<v Speaker 1>The one other.

0:10:50.444 --> 0:10:52.924
<v Speaker 2>Piece of advice I will give to our listeners is

0:10:53.484 --> 0:10:55.684
<v Speaker 2>if you are in the airport they have over sold

0:10:55.684 --> 0:10:58.884
<v Speaker 2>the flight and they are asking for volunteers, and you

0:10:58.964 --> 0:11:02.524
<v Speaker 2>are actually in a position to volunteer, do not accept

0:11:02.604 --> 0:11:06.364
<v Speaker 2>their offer because they will be willing to up it

0:11:07.044 --> 0:11:09.844
<v Speaker 2>to a pretty significant amount, and if no one takes

0:11:09.844 --> 0:11:12.284
<v Speaker 2>it within the first like ten minutes, they start panicking.

0:11:12.524 --> 0:11:14.844
<v Speaker 2>So then you can, like if they're offering five hundred dollars,

0:11:15.084 --> 0:11:16.764
<v Speaker 2>walk up to them and be like, I'll do it

0:11:16.764 --> 0:11:19.404
<v Speaker 2>for fifteen hundred and first class tickets or whatever it is,

0:11:20.164 --> 0:11:22.364
<v Speaker 2>and they'll they'll say yes most of the time. So

0:11:22.404 --> 0:11:24.604
<v Speaker 2>that's just a little travel hack for when your plans

0:11:24.684 --> 0:11:26.044
<v Speaker 2>are a little bit flexible.

0:11:26.124 --> 0:11:28.524
<v Speaker 3>Applying me is it like a prisoner's dilemma? Though, like that,

0:11:28.684 --> 0:11:30.764
<v Speaker 3>like I will undercut you. So we're saying that like

0:11:31.724 --> 0:11:35.884
<v Speaker 3>passengers should collude, should collude to demand more?

0:11:36.484 --> 0:11:37.084
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we wave.

0:11:37.164 --> 0:11:41.684
<v Speaker 4>The airline was like, fuck you, you're all grounded. Motherfuckers. You're grounding,

0:11:41.724 --> 0:11:43.284
<v Speaker 4>You're making us pay too much.

0:11:43.364 --> 0:11:45.924
<v Speaker 2>This is this is something that an airline may do.

0:11:47.164 --> 0:11:51.164
<v Speaker 4>But but yeah, it makes this issue. I can be

0:11:51.244 --> 0:11:51.644
<v Speaker 4>taken off.

0:11:52.764 --> 0:11:54.444
<v Speaker 2>This is true, This is true. The game theory of

0:11:54.484 --> 0:11:55.924
<v Speaker 2>this can get complicated.

0:12:04.484 --> 0:12:17.244
<v Speaker 5>And we'll be right back after this break, Nate.

0:12:17.404 --> 0:12:22.164
<v Speaker 2>Let's let's get down and dirty and talk some even

0:12:22.164 --> 0:12:25.324
<v Speaker 2>more inside baseball, inside New York but not just New

0:12:25.404 --> 0:12:30.204
<v Speaker 2>York DC, inside media and inside the political just realm

0:12:30.284 --> 0:12:36.524
<v Speaker 2>of political reporting drama with the scandal the right, is

0:12:36.564 --> 0:12:40.684
<v Speaker 2>there an US there around Olivia Nutzi, Ryan Lizza, lots

0:12:40.724 --> 0:12:44.204
<v Speaker 2>of people Rfkjune, you are lots of people implicated, Nate.

0:12:44.244 --> 0:12:46.324
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to give a little breakdown for our

0:12:46.364 --> 0:12:48.364
<v Speaker 2>listeners who might not be aware of everything, or do

0:12:48.364 --> 0:12:48.964
<v Speaker 2>you want me to do it?

0:12:49.004 --> 0:12:51.164
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? You want to take turns? I don't know.

0:12:51.204 --> 0:12:54.444
<v Speaker 2>Maria all right, Well, I can give you a little

0:12:54.524 --> 0:12:57.604
<v Speaker 2>bit of background, which is that Olivia Nutzi was a

0:12:57.604 --> 0:13:01.444
<v Speaker 2>star political reporter at New York Magazine who was known

0:13:01.564 --> 0:13:05.124
<v Speaker 2>for her voice, for her access, for her scoops, and

0:13:05.204 --> 0:13:11.364
<v Speaker 2>her scoops involved great interviews with people like Mark Sanford

0:13:11.564 --> 0:13:17.684
<v Speaker 2>and RFK Junior. She became engaged to Ryan Liza, who

0:13:17.844 --> 0:13:21.764
<v Speaker 2>used to be a New Yorker writer. He was fired

0:13:21.804 --> 0:13:26.124
<v Speaker 2>from The New Yorker for alleged sexual misconduct I guess,

0:13:27.244 --> 0:13:31.324
<v Speaker 2>and he was engaged to Olivia Nutzi. Then it turned

0:13:31.364 --> 0:13:36.724
<v Speaker 2>out that Olivia was having we don't know, it's still

0:13:36.804 --> 0:13:39.204
<v Speaker 2>unclear if it was ever physical or emotional anyway, and

0:13:39.204 --> 0:13:42.964
<v Speaker 2>improper relationship with one of her subjects while she was

0:13:43.004 --> 0:13:49.604
<v Speaker 2>covering the elections RFK Junior and she and Ryan Lizza

0:13:50.004 --> 0:13:53.884
<v Speaker 2>split up. She was dismissed from New York magazine. She

0:13:54.364 --> 0:13:57.364
<v Speaker 2>apparently then immediately started working on a book, which has

0:13:57.484 --> 0:14:00.684
<v Speaker 2>just come out. She was hired by Vanity Fair, and

0:14:00.924 --> 0:14:04.564
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Lizza himself launched a series of sub stack posts

0:14:04.604 --> 0:14:09.524
<v Speaker 2>where he revealed that her alleged improprieties when it came

0:14:09.524 --> 0:14:14.804
<v Speaker 2>to political reporting went far beyond RFK Junior, including an

0:14:14.844 --> 0:14:19.124
<v Speaker 2>actual physical affair with one of her other subjects, Mark Sandford.

0:14:19.164 --> 0:14:22.364
<v Speaker 2>And I'm assuming that there will be more revelations because

0:14:22.404 --> 0:14:25.524
<v Speaker 2>all of this stuff keeps coming out on a almost

0:14:25.604 --> 0:14:31.684
<v Speaker 2>daily He's trying to maximize engagement with a serialized, paywalled

0:14:31.924 --> 0:14:35.204
<v Speaker 2>sub stack, and apparently it's working. I think he had

0:14:35.244 --> 0:14:37.724
<v Speaker 2>like almost eight hundred thousand reads of one of his

0:14:37.804 --> 0:14:40.924
<v Speaker 2>sub stacks something like that, which is huge numbers.

0:14:41.764 --> 0:14:42.244
<v Speaker 4>It's very good.

0:14:42.284 --> 0:14:43.324
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's good, it's good.

0:14:43.964 --> 0:14:46.204
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, so that's what's happening right now. And the

0:14:46.244 --> 0:14:48.924
<v Speaker 2>reason why, by the way, this matters to more than

0:14:49.004 --> 0:14:52.164
<v Speaker 2>New York Media DC media and Ryan is in DC,

0:14:52.404 --> 0:14:56.364
<v Speaker 2>Olivia is on the West Coast is because it touches

0:14:56.404 --> 0:14:59.764
<v Speaker 2>on issues of journalistic ethics, which we talked about last

0:14:59.764 --> 0:15:02.404
<v Speaker 2>week in a very different context on this show, and

0:15:02.844 --> 0:15:05.444
<v Speaker 2>ethics when it comes to political reporting, when it comes

0:15:05.484 --> 0:15:09.684
<v Speaker 2>to access, when it comes to kind of just how

0:15:09.804 --> 0:15:12.884
<v Speaker 2>close you want to be to the people that you're

0:15:12.924 --> 0:15:16.764
<v Speaker 2>writing about. And this comes up not just with sexual impropriety,

0:15:17.124 --> 0:15:19.524
<v Speaker 2>but with you know, people who are really friendly with

0:15:20.004 --> 0:15:22.764
<v Speaker 2>you know, Silicon Valley tycoons and write about them, right, Like,

0:15:22.804 --> 0:15:25.244
<v Speaker 2>this is a question that comes up very very frequently

0:15:25.844 --> 0:15:31.284
<v Speaker 2>outside of this you know, sexual scandal that is titillating audiences.

0:15:31.324 --> 0:15:33.364
<v Speaker 2>So there are much broader questions here.

0:15:34.564 --> 0:15:36.684
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Olivia Nutsi is a kind of.

0:15:38.684 --> 0:15:41.724
<v Speaker 3>Kind of character that if like Aaron Sorkin wrote a

0:15:41.764 --> 0:15:43.964
<v Speaker 3>movie about journalism, which I guess he did, he'd insert

0:15:43.964 --> 0:15:49.444
<v Speaker 3>her in there and people would accuse him of being Yeah, misogynist. Yes,

0:15:49.484 --> 0:15:52.884
<v Speaker 3>I mean so she she got her start working as

0:15:52.884 --> 0:15:54.844
<v Speaker 3>like an intern for the Anthony Wiener.

0:15:57.284 --> 0:16:00.084
<v Speaker 2>You can you cannot be if not only would people

0:16:00.164 --> 0:16:03.204
<v Speaker 2>accuse Sorkin of being a misogynists, but they'd accused him

0:16:03.244 --> 0:16:05.484
<v Speaker 2>of being two on the nose right with this story,

0:16:05.844 --> 0:16:11.484
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm just the irony of her starting with Anthony

0:16:11.484 --> 0:16:12.644
<v Speaker 2>Waider is just hilarious.

0:16:12.644 --> 0:16:14.564
<v Speaker 1>Please continue now.

0:16:14.644 --> 0:16:16.764
<v Speaker 3>But her shtick has always kind of been like an

0:16:16.804 --> 0:16:22.444
<v Speaker 3>access pedler or like kind of a gossip pedler, right,

0:16:22.484 --> 0:16:25.964
<v Speaker 3>Like it's always an architect that's existed within journalism, right,

0:16:26.084 --> 0:16:31.524
<v Speaker 3>And in some ways it's kind of a throwback almost, right,

0:16:31.564 --> 0:16:35.924
<v Speaker 3>whereas like today, like journalists tend to be pretty you know,

0:16:36.204 --> 0:16:38.644
<v Speaker 3>self serious and things like that, which is good overall.

0:16:38.644 --> 0:16:40.604
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think the ethics in the industry have improved,

0:16:40.644 --> 0:16:44.444
<v Speaker 3>and I you know, look, I am criticized journalists, but

0:16:44.444 --> 0:16:46.284
<v Speaker 3>I will defend the profession. You are kind of like

0:16:46.324 --> 0:16:50.284
<v Speaker 3>writing the first draft of history, and in real time, right,

0:16:50.764 --> 0:16:56.484
<v Speaker 3>you will get criticized by bipartisan idiots no matter what

0:16:56.804 --> 0:17:00.964
<v Speaker 3>you say, potentially, But she's definitely on this side where like, Okay,

0:17:01.044 --> 0:17:04.444
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna bend if you rules to gain more access,

0:17:04.564 --> 0:17:07.444
<v Speaker 3>right and like, and Lissa kind of accused her too,

0:17:08.844 --> 0:17:14.404
<v Speaker 3>you know, help being our FK junior with pr in essence, right.

0:17:14.884 --> 0:17:17.884
<v Speaker 2>The accusation, by the way, let's let's just put a

0:17:17.924 --> 0:17:21.164
<v Speaker 2>finer point on it for people who aren't following along,

0:17:21.204 --> 0:17:25.764
<v Speaker 2>because this is important. Ryan Lizza says that she allegedly

0:17:26.524 --> 0:17:32.564
<v Speaker 2>would ask him and other sources about basically about opposition

0:17:32.924 --> 0:17:35.844
<v Speaker 2>research that they had on RFK Junior, and that she

0:17:35.884 --> 0:17:38.964
<v Speaker 2>would then feed that information back to him, So she

0:17:39.084 --> 0:17:41.564
<v Speaker 2>was basically being a double agent in a sense.

0:17:41.964 --> 0:17:43.524
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Look, journalists believe it or not.

0:17:43.564 --> 0:17:47.404
<v Speaker 3>Despite the broad distress that people in society have of journalists, right,

0:17:48.204 --> 0:17:50.644
<v Speaker 3>you know, they operate in the position of substantial trust. Right,

0:17:50.644 --> 0:17:54.284
<v Speaker 3>people disclose things and they wouldn't disclose to anybody else,

0:17:54.404 --> 0:17:58.524
<v Speaker 3>just taste taking the journalists like word for it. So yeah,

0:17:58.644 --> 0:18:02.284
<v Speaker 3>as someone in the industry, then anytimes like this undermine's

0:18:02.364 --> 0:18:06.644
<v Speaker 3>credibility of future sources, than then we should be pissed.

0:18:06.484 --> 0:18:07.084
<v Speaker 4>About it, right.

0:18:07.124 --> 0:18:11.244
<v Speaker 3>You know, one of the things accused Nancy of is

0:18:11.284 --> 0:18:16.444
<v Speaker 3>like taking a source set is off the record and

0:18:16.684 --> 0:18:19.764
<v Speaker 3>reporting it as though it's on background. People may or

0:18:19.764 --> 0:18:21.804
<v Speaker 3>we not care about the distinction on background means that

0:18:22.324 --> 0:18:23.804
<v Speaker 3>you can use what I have, but don't attribute it

0:18:23.804 --> 0:18:26.404
<v Speaker 3>to me. Off the record means note, you can't use it.

0:18:27.244 --> 0:18:29.804
<v Speaker 3>You can confirm it with another source, right, but like,

0:18:29.844 --> 0:18:33.684
<v Speaker 3>you can't use this at all without my permission. And

0:18:33.764 --> 0:18:36.724
<v Speaker 3>so you know, that's as far as like journalistic sins go.

0:18:36.804 --> 0:18:40.004
<v Speaker 3>That's like what's I don't know what's the more serious

0:18:40.044 --> 0:18:41.364
<v Speaker 3>kind of sin in the Catholic Church?

0:18:41.404 --> 0:18:41.724
<v Speaker 4>Do you know?

0:18:42.364 --> 0:18:42.684
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:18:42.724 --> 0:18:44.844
<v Speaker 2>I don't know which sins are the most I have

0:18:45.084 --> 0:18:49.364
<v Speaker 2>Dante's circles of Hell we can talk about, you.

0:18:49.324 --> 0:18:53.204
<v Speaker 4>Know, where the the worst then or like or the outer.

0:18:54.124 --> 0:18:56.524
<v Speaker 2>The the ennery, the further down you go. It's a

0:18:56.684 --> 0:18:59.044
<v Speaker 2>you're descending, so that the furthest.

0:18:58.804 --> 0:19:03.484
<v Speaker 3>Is this is a couple of levels in to hell,

0:19:03.724 --> 0:19:07.124
<v Speaker 3>right like it's it's it's bad. Mostly should bow up

0:19:07.124 --> 0:19:08.924
<v Speaker 3>in your face because people shouldn't trust you to give

0:19:08.964 --> 0:19:10.044
<v Speaker 3>you anything off the record.

0:19:10.284 --> 0:19:11.524
<v Speaker 4>And all. By the way, one of the people.

0:19:11.364 --> 0:19:12.964
<v Speaker 3>Don't realize is like people say, well, why would you

0:19:12.964 --> 0:19:16.244
<v Speaker 3>even have a conversation if it's off the record?

0:19:16.324 --> 0:19:16.484
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:19:16.524 --> 0:19:18.964
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, first of all, sometimes it's the only

0:19:19.164 --> 0:19:21.484
<v Speaker 3>condition under which a source would talk to a journalist

0:19:21.564 --> 0:19:24.044
<v Speaker 3>at all. You know, sometimes they would love to hear

0:19:24.084 --> 0:19:25.524
<v Speaker 3>the story, report it, but they have to be care

0:19:25.524 --> 0:19:27.604
<v Speaker 3>about being their name on it, so they provide useful

0:19:27.644 --> 0:19:32.404
<v Speaker 3>information sometimes, so you're surprised they might agree to go

0:19:32.644 --> 0:19:35.524
<v Speaker 3>let you put things on the record later on if

0:19:35.524 --> 0:19:37.684
<v Speaker 3>they come to trust you and it's persuasive, right, So

0:19:37.684 --> 0:19:39.684
<v Speaker 3>there's lots of reasons we're doing this kind.

0:19:39.604 --> 0:19:40.404
<v Speaker 4>Of thing potentially.

0:19:40.404 --> 0:19:40.964
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely.

0:19:41.004 --> 0:19:44.204
<v Speaker 2>I actually, you know, in the reporting I'm doing right

0:19:44.244 --> 0:19:46.524
<v Speaker 2>now for my book on cheating, I have a lot

0:19:46.564 --> 0:19:48.484
<v Speaker 2>of people who are willing to tell me things off

0:19:48.484 --> 0:19:51.364
<v Speaker 2>the record, but don't even want it on background because

0:19:51.444 --> 0:19:54.564
<v Speaker 2>there are you know, they don't want the repercussions, right,

0:19:54.644 --> 0:19:57.004
<v Speaker 2>and for some of the things, and this was true

0:19:57.084 --> 0:19:59.604
<v Speaker 2>when I wrote about con artists, they are also nefarious

0:19:59.644 --> 0:20:02.164
<v Speaker 2>elements at work right where people can be afraid for

0:20:02.204 --> 0:20:04.284
<v Speaker 2>their safety, like they just don't think it's worth it.

0:20:04.804 --> 0:20:07.084
<v Speaker 2>They don't want to kind of they just don't want

0:20:07.084 --> 0:20:09.884
<v Speaker 2>to get involved, right, But they do want to talk

0:20:09.924 --> 0:20:12.844
<v Speaker 2>to you a little bit by like confirming that yes,

0:20:12.924 --> 0:20:16.284
<v Speaker 2>this happened, or venting that yes I got cheated or

0:20:16.364 --> 0:20:18.844
<v Speaker 2>you know this kind of this this took place. But

0:20:18.884 --> 0:20:20.964
<v Speaker 2>there's kind of a limit to what they're willing to say,

0:20:21.084 --> 0:20:22.964
<v Speaker 2>and I'm more than happy to talk to people off

0:20:22.964 --> 0:20:25.204
<v Speaker 2>the record, right like, because then you at least get

0:20:25.204 --> 0:20:27.044
<v Speaker 2>the outlines of the story and you can start trying

0:20:27.084 --> 0:20:30.204
<v Speaker 2>to pull on other strings, and you know the story exists,

0:20:30.284 --> 0:20:32.804
<v Speaker 2>and you have, you know, a source that will kind

0:20:32.804 --> 0:20:36.044
<v Speaker 2>of potentially be helpful in the future. So I think

0:20:36.044 --> 0:20:38.244
<v Speaker 2>there are lots of reasons why you would talk off

0:20:38.244 --> 0:20:40.004
<v Speaker 2>the record. And the reason, by the way, that people

0:20:40.004 --> 0:20:41.884
<v Speaker 2>are willing to talk to me, Nate, is because I've

0:20:41.924 --> 0:20:44.324
<v Speaker 2>never burned a source, right Like, if you talk to

0:20:44.364 --> 0:20:46.804
<v Speaker 2>me off the record, it's going to be off the record.

0:20:47.164 --> 0:20:49.404
<v Speaker 2>If I tell you that I'm not going to use it,

0:20:49.444 --> 0:20:52.044
<v Speaker 2>I will not use it. And I think that that's

0:20:52.124 --> 0:20:57.564
<v Speaker 2>so important because especially, you know, reputation is hugely important

0:20:57.604 --> 0:21:01.124
<v Speaker 2>in journalism, but especially now with so many different you know,

0:21:02.364 --> 0:21:05.564
<v Speaker 2>attacks on the journalistic profession and distrust of the media.

0:21:05.564 --> 0:21:08.804
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just integrity is incredibly important, right People

0:21:08.884 --> 0:21:10.844
<v Speaker 2>need to be able to trust you, and people need

0:21:10.884 --> 0:21:13.044
<v Speaker 2>to be able to trust your reporting. And so that's

0:21:13.124 --> 0:21:14.924
<v Speaker 2>kind of the other part of it, right It's both

0:21:14.964 --> 0:21:17.844
<v Speaker 2>the it's both the fact that you burn sources, but

0:21:17.924 --> 0:21:22.044
<v Speaker 2>also can I trust your reporting? If your interests are

0:21:22.044 --> 0:21:25.204
<v Speaker 2>not to the kind of readers and to the story,

0:21:25.204 --> 0:21:28.404
<v Speaker 2>but to protecting someone promoting someone. If you say that

0:21:28.444 --> 0:21:31.564
<v Speaker 2>you're actually reporting a story about someone, but you're doing

0:21:31.604 --> 0:21:36.124
<v Speaker 2>pr right, Like, that's very different because you're you're not

0:21:36.204 --> 0:21:41.844
<v Speaker 2>disclosing your true motives. You're not disclosing your conflicts of interest,

0:21:42.044 --> 0:21:44.204
<v Speaker 2>which we're always asked about, Nate, I'm sure you are

0:21:44.244 --> 0:21:46.924
<v Speaker 2>as well. Whenever you write about anything, you know, you're

0:21:46.964 --> 0:21:49.324
<v Speaker 2>asked like, do you have any conflict of interest when

0:21:49.724 --> 0:21:50.484
<v Speaker 2>you're writing about this?

0:21:50.604 --> 0:21:50.724
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:21:50.804 --> 0:21:53.524
<v Speaker 2>Like, do you have any reason why you're not going

0:21:53.564 --> 0:21:56.604
<v Speaker 2>to be an objective source on this? If I am

0:21:56.924 --> 0:21:59.684
<v Speaker 2>you know, if I'm sleeping with someone yet it's a

0:21:59.724 --> 0:22:02.204
<v Speaker 2>conflict of interest. If I'm in love with them, that's

0:22:02.204 --> 0:22:05.244
<v Speaker 2>also probably a conflict of interest. And obviously if I'm

0:22:05.244 --> 0:22:08.444
<v Speaker 2>getting paid by them, like, they're endless conflicts of interest,

0:22:08.484 --> 0:22:09.324
<v Speaker 2>but you have to disclose.

0:22:09.644 --> 0:22:12.804
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, look, I mean, you know, like I think maybe

0:22:12.804 --> 0:22:15.684
<v Speaker 3>also have like a conservative on this, right, Like, you know,

0:22:15.724 --> 0:22:19.324
<v Speaker 3>I think the biggest problem with journalists today is that

0:22:19.564 --> 0:22:22.404
<v Speaker 3>there can be a lot of group think. I think,

0:22:22.484 --> 0:22:25.084
<v Speaker 3>especially kind of in the pre i know, kind of

0:22:25.084 --> 0:22:28.724
<v Speaker 3>the peak wokeness era, that group think often leaned pretty

0:22:28.724 --> 0:22:32.484
<v Speaker 3>far toward left or liberal tropes, especially on kind of

0:22:32.524 --> 0:22:35.484
<v Speaker 3>like cultural issues, right, Like you know an age where

0:22:35.564 --> 0:22:38.604
<v Speaker 3>journalist are little bit more mercenary kind of in a

0:22:38.644 --> 0:22:42.124
<v Speaker 3>figurative sense, I think is is okay, right, It's like

0:22:42.204 --> 0:22:43.964
<v Speaker 3>I buy by a certain set of rules, but if

0:22:44.004 --> 0:22:48.604
<v Speaker 3>you don't buy by those rules, then yeah, that's that's

0:22:48.644 --> 0:22:50.324
<v Speaker 3>that's pretty bad, right. I you know, I think in

0:22:50.364 --> 0:22:54.724
<v Speaker 3>practice it's like not why so many Americans distrust journalists? Right?

0:22:54.724 --> 0:22:55.404
<v Speaker 4>I think in.

0:22:55.364 --> 0:22:59.004
<v Speaker 3>General it's like a like, I think journalism has fucked

0:22:59.084 --> 0:23:03.404
<v Speaker 3>up in a lot of ways, right, But also they're

0:23:03.484 --> 0:23:07.004
<v Speaker 3>accused of always carrying water for politicians of different kinds.

0:23:07.004 --> 0:23:09.324
<v Speaker 3>We can debate like how could it is or not right,

0:23:09.484 --> 0:23:11.724
<v Speaker 3>But it's like it's a difficult it's a difficult job.

0:23:12.324 --> 0:23:14.404
<v Speaker 2>It is a difficult job. And when it comes to

0:23:14.444 --> 0:23:17.244
<v Speaker 2>powerful people, right, it doesn't have to be politicians. It

0:23:17.324 --> 0:23:20.284
<v Speaker 2>can be you know, titans of industry, tech moguls, it

0:23:20.284 --> 0:23:21.524
<v Speaker 2>doesn't it doesn't really matter.

0:23:21.724 --> 0:23:23.364
<v Speaker 1>But people who wield a lot of power.

0:23:24.604 --> 0:23:28.444
<v Speaker 2>You have to kind of walk a line between being

0:23:28.724 --> 0:23:31.244
<v Speaker 2>you know, a good journalist and having access to them.

0:23:32.004 --> 0:23:34.004
<v Speaker 2>And there are the journalists who say, yeah, you know,

0:23:34.044 --> 0:23:36.404
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to ask, you know, as many hardball

0:23:36.564 --> 0:23:39.444
<v Speaker 2>questions because I want to be able to get these

0:23:39.444 --> 0:23:42.004
<v Speaker 2>interviews in the future. And if I become known as someone,

0:23:42.364 --> 0:23:44.684
<v Speaker 2>you know who eviscerates people, I'm not going to the

0:23:44.764 --> 0:23:47.644
<v Speaker 2>counterpart to that is that there are all these brilliant

0:23:47.884 --> 0:23:51.124
<v Speaker 2>journalists who ask hardball questions and who still get access.

0:23:51.444 --> 0:23:51.644
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:23:51.884 --> 0:23:55.284
<v Speaker 2>So it's not an either or situation. It just depends

0:23:55.324 --> 0:23:57.444
<v Speaker 2>on how good you are and how talented you are.

0:23:57.604 --> 0:23:58.284
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know, so.

0:23:58.404 --> 0:24:02.844
<v Speaker 3>One extreme right is like Michael Wolfe is a journalist

0:24:02.924 --> 0:24:08.284
<v Speaker 3>who was advising Jeffrey Epstein on PR strategy, Right, I

0:24:08.284 --> 0:24:09.404
<v Speaker 3>think that's fucking insane.

0:24:10.404 --> 0:24:13.644
<v Speaker 4>But Michael Wolfe is somebody.

0:24:13.684 --> 0:24:17.164
<v Speaker 3>Who I don't think would ever tell you that he's

0:24:17.204 --> 0:24:21.844
<v Speaker 3>totally above board, right, he'd say that I'm an access peddler,

0:24:22.084 --> 0:24:25.244
<v Speaker 3>right in that sense, I'm telling you what I am, right,

0:24:25.284 --> 0:24:28.484
<v Speaker 3>I'm transparent about it, and but I wanted to get

0:24:28.484 --> 0:24:30.644
<v Speaker 3>scoops of information that, like other people.

0:24:30.484 --> 0:24:35.444
<v Speaker 4>Might might not write. You know. That's the more extreme

0:24:35.524 --> 0:24:36.444
<v Speaker 4>form of it, right, you know.

0:24:36.484 --> 0:24:39.604
<v Speaker 3>The one that I think is more above board and

0:24:39.684 --> 0:24:41.684
<v Speaker 3>someone who deeply has my respect is like, you know,

0:24:41.924 --> 0:24:45.844
<v Speaker 3>Maggie Haberman of the New York Times, who has covered

0:24:45.884 --> 0:24:48.284
<v Speaker 3>Trump for years and years and years, going back to

0:24:48.324 --> 0:24:50.524
<v Speaker 3>like the New York City Beat for the Daily she

0:24:50.684 --> 0:24:52.564
<v Speaker 3>used to work out and things like that, right, and

0:24:52.684 --> 0:24:55.164
<v Speaker 3>like that's a little more complicated, right, if you cultivate

0:24:56.084 --> 0:24:59.524
<v Speaker 3>a relationship. I mean sometimes you know, it's also just

0:24:59.604 --> 0:25:02.804
<v Speaker 3>by the way in like a lower six context, like

0:25:02.844 --> 0:25:06.444
<v Speaker 3>sports media for instance, where like sometimes you might have

0:25:07.604 --> 0:25:10.684
<v Speaker 3>what are sometimes called like beat sweeteners.

0:25:10.764 --> 0:25:11.764
<v Speaker 4>Right, Like maybe.

0:25:11.484 --> 0:25:16.644
<v Speaker 3>The the general manager is trying to send a message

0:25:16.684 --> 0:25:19.084
<v Speaker 3>to like one of his players, right, and the journalist

0:25:19.204 --> 0:25:22.484
<v Speaker 3>kind of reports the story that like you know, so

0:25:22.564 --> 0:25:23.964
<v Speaker 3>and so's on the outs, or so and so is

0:25:24.004 --> 0:25:25.844
<v Speaker 3>being considered being traded, right, and you're kind of it's

0:25:25.884 --> 0:25:28.244
<v Speaker 3>you know, you're laundering a pr message kind of coded

0:25:28.244 --> 0:25:30.764
<v Speaker 3>as journalism or things like that, right in exchange for

0:25:30.924 --> 0:25:36.004
<v Speaker 3>like getting like the scoop later on, Right when there's

0:25:36.004 --> 0:25:37.564
<v Speaker 3>a big trade, you're the first to know it.

0:25:37.644 --> 0:25:39.724
<v Speaker 4>Right when someone gets fired, you're the first to know it.

0:25:39.764 --> 0:25:41.004
<v Speaker 3>If you have a source who doesn't give a lot

0:25:41.004 --> 0:25:43.124
<v Speaker 3>of interviews to principles, and you get that interview, so

0:25:43.124 --> 0:25:47.204
<v Speaker 3>it can be like a little bit transactional but but

0:25:47.444 --> 0:25:50.484
<v Speaker 3>you know, the transparency is a big part of it.

0:25:50.564 --> 0:25:52.164
<v Speaker 3>When you have your own newsletter, it's easier to be

0:25:52.204 --> 0:25:54.204
<v Speaker 3>transparent say okay, I do this and that and the other,

0:25:54.284 --> 0:25:56.124
<v Speaker 3>and here's what I believe and here.

0:25:55.964 --> 0:25:56.684
<v Speaker 4>Are my rules.

0:25:57.404 --> 0:26:02.084
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I think journalists are probably more ethical than

0:26:03.124 --> 0:26:06.724
<v Speaker 3>they've ever been about kind of the journalism handbook rules, right.

0:26:06.724 --> 0:26:10.044
<v Speaker 4>I think they're also by it. And some of that

0:26:10.084 --> 0:26:11.524
<v Speaker 4>bias comes from the fact.

0:26:11.364 --> 0:26:16.284
<v Speaker 3>That like that there are fewer and fewer traditional journalists

0:26:16.284 --> 0:26:20.244
<v Speaker 3>that like you're kind of selecting for people who you know,

0:26:20.284 --> 0:26:21.724
<v Speaker 3>it's not you know, if you go back and like

0:26:21.724 --> 0:26:24.364
<v Speaker 3>look at journalists from like the nineteen eighties or something, right,

0:26:24.644 --> 0:26:27.564
<v Speaker 3>it was kind of almost like a working class profession.

0:26:27.724 --> 0:26:29.724
<v Speaker 3>Right now, it's like exclusively kind of like the ranks

0:26:29.764 --> 0:26:32.404
<v Speaker 3>of like the college educated, in part because, like, you know,

0:26:33.924 --> 0:26:35.444
<v Speaker 3>it's a tough career.

0:26:36.564 --> 0:26:37.844
<v Speaker 4>Starting out at.

0:26:37.724 --> 0:26:40.404
<v Speaker 3>Least, it's such tough career after that unless you become

0:26:41.084 --> 0:26:43.444
<v Speaker 3>a real star, in which case there is some money

0:26:43.524 --> 0:26:45.564
<v Speaker 3>or real money. Right, So you kind of have to

0:26:45.564 --> 0:26:47.924
<v Speaker 3>be from like almost like a privileged background to like

0:26:48.604 --> 0:26:50.884
<v Speaker 3>to tolerate, you know, living in a big city and

0:26:51.364 --> 0:26:56.804
<v Speaker 3>and having these kind of low incomes often early in life.

0:26:57.044 --> 0:26:58.244
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is interesting.

0:26:58.644 --> 0:27:02.244
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Nate, if you've ever read Robert Carrow's

0:27:02.284 --> 0:27:06.444
<v Speaker 2>memoirs of how he got into journalism. But you know,

0:27:06.524 --> 0:27:09.404
<v Speaker 2>there's a very funny story how his kind of first

0:27:10.644 --> 0:27:15.004
<v Speaker 2>big job he was hired as a joke because the

0:27:15.204 --> 0:27:19.564
<v Speaker 2>editor would never hire anyone from like an Ivy league

0:27:19.564 --> 0:27:22.684
<v Speaker 2>background or who was well educated, because he, you know,

0:27:22.764 --> 0:27:25.324
<v Speaker 2>he had this kind of notion that, like, to be

0:27:25.364 --> 0:27:27.284
<v Speaker 2>a good journalist you had to be able to kind

0:27:27.324 --> 0:27:29.964
<v Speaker 2>of get your feet on the ground, work hard, kind

0:27:29.964 --> 0:27:33.724
<v Speaker 2>of get your hands dirty, like those boys from like

0:27:33.964 --> 0:27:37.484
<v Speaker 2>well educated families couldn't hack it. And Robert Carroll went

0:27:37.484 --> 0:27:43.044
<v Speaker 2>to Princeton, and while this editor was on vacation, his

0:27:43.164 --> 0:27:46.124
<v Speaker 2>staff decided to play a practical joke on him and

0:27:46.244 --> 0:27:50.164
<v Speaker 2>hired Caro, his Princeton graduate, who like he would never

0:27:50.244 --> 0:27:54.244
<v Speaker 2>have hired otherwise. And obviously Caro became a superstar and

0:27:54.524 --> 0:27:57.724
<v Speaker 2>is probably one of the most respected names in journalism

0:27:57.804 --> 0:28:00.684
<v Speaker 2>by the way, Nate, someone who has also kind of

0:28:00.724 --> 0:28:04.564
<v Speaker 2>traded on access to be able to kind of craft

0:28:04.644 --> 0:28:08.164
<v Speaker 2>these stories that no one else could get, like the

0:28:08.244 --> 0:28:11.284
<v Speaker 2>guy was able to get access to Robert Moses, right,

0:28:11.364 --> 0:28:14.604
<v Speaker 2>that nobody could gain access to. And believe me, he

0:28:14.644 --> 0:28:19.284
<v Speaker 2>did not paint a very sympathetic portrait at the end

0:28:19.324 --> 0:28:22.364
<v Speaker 2>of the day in The Power Broker, which was, you know,

0:28:22.484 --> 0:28:26.684
<v Speaker 2>kind of this absolute feat of journalism. But Moses gave

0:28:26.764 --> 0:28:29.284
<v Speaker 2>him access for a long time. And the reason I

0:28:29.324 --> 0:28:33.324
<v Speaker 2>love this story Caro couldn't get to Moses originally, right

0:28:33.364 --> 0:28:35.884
<v Speaker 2>because Moses wouldn't you know, Moses knew what was good

0:28:35.884 --> 0:28:37.684
<v Speaker 2>for him and did want to talk to him, And

0:28:37.764 --> 0:28:40.524
<v Speaker 2>so Caro just drew circles of like, who you know,

0:28:40.564 --> 0:28:43.644
<v Speaker 2>who can I get to because Moses would say, like,

0:28:44.164 --> 0:28:45.964
<v Speaker 2>you know, no one in my family can talk to you,

0:28:46.004 --> 0:28:48.044
<v Speaker 2>Like he would basically prevent people from talking to him.

0:28:48.204 --> 0:28:50.324
<v Speaker 2>And so Caro like went out and out and out

0:28:50.404 --> 0:28:52.364
<v Speaker 2>and finally got people who'd talk to him. And then

0:28:52.604 --> 0:28:54.844
<v Speaker 2>once some people talk to him, more people talk to him.

0:28:54.884 --> 0:28:57.124
<v Speaker 2>And then eventually Moses was like, shit, all these people

0:28:57.204 --> 0:29:00.444
<v Speaker 2>are talking to him, I better talk to him, and uh.

0:29:01.004 --> 0:29:04.484
<v Speaker 2>And that's how you do it, right, Like that's good journalism,

0:29:04.524 --> 0:29:07.444
<v Speaker 2>not saying like I'll you know, I'll treat you nicely

0:29:07.564 --> 0:29:09.244
<v Speaker 2>and I'll i'll poet a Rosie Pilch.

0:29:09.644 --> 0:29:09.844
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:29:10.124 --> 0:29:13.844
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, look, obviously one technique you can use is saying, well,

0:29:14.684 --> 0:29:17.164
<v Speaker 3>I've talked to all the other principles for the story, right,

0:29:17.444 --> 0:29:19.164
<v Speaker 3>and so you know, I want to make sure that

0:29:19.324 --> 0:29:23.164
<v Speaker 3>your viewpoint is adequately represented. Can I at the very

0:29:23.244 --> 0:29:25.804
<v Speaker 3>least run these things by you kind of thing?

0:29:25.884 --> 0:29:26.084
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:29:26.244 --> 0:29:29.404
<v Speaker 3>You know, I have definitely experienced things where like if

0:29:29.444 --> 0:29:33.084
<v Speaker 3>you don't talk to a journalist, it feels like your

0:29:33.084 --> 0:29:35.084
<v Speaker 3>treatment can be worse, right, Like I don't know if

0:29:35.084 --> 0:29:38.884
<v Speaker 3>it's quite like retaliation or things like that, right, but

0:29:38.924 --> 0:29:40.884
<v Speaker 3>they might have a little bit of a chip on

0:29:40.924 --> 0:29:41.764
<v Speaker 3>their shoulder, you know.

0:29:41.804 --> 0:29:42.724
<v Speaker 4>On the other hand, like.

0:29:44.284 --> 0:29:48.364
<v Speaker 3>You know, like journalists can very much cherry pick stories,

0:29:48.404 --> 0:29:52.044
<v Speaker 3>and if you give them twenty minutes worth of an interview, right,

0:29:52.164 --> 0:29:55.364
<v Speaker 3>then you know, maybe one or two quotes will appear

0:29:55.844 --> 0:29:56.364
<v Speaker 3>in the story.

0:29:56.444 --> 0:29:56.564
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:29:56.604 --> 0:29:59.764
<v Speaker 3>So I'm actually pretty guarded about like which journalists I

0:29:59.804 --> 0:30:01.564
<v Speaker 3>talk to you on the record or off the record, right,

0:30:01.844 --> 0:30:04.244
<v Speaker 3>because I'm like, Okay, say what you want and if

0:30:04.284 --> 0:30:05.804
<v Speaker 3>you're full of shit, and I'll blast you on my

0:30:05.804 --> 0:30:08.764
<v Speaker 3>substack or on Twitter. Right, if you do a good job,

0:30:08.764 --> 0:30:11.044
<v Speaker 3>then I'll link to it and complement the story, right,

0:30:12.764 --> 0:30:14.844
<v Speaker 3>you know. Look, one other thing that helps Nutsy to

0:30:14.884 --> 0:30:20.004
<v Speaker 3>bring this story back a little bit, because most journalists

0:30:20.684 --> 0:30:24.924
<v Speaker 3>do lean liberal, democratic, progressive left, whatever you want.

0:30:24.804 --> 0:30:25.164
<v Speaker 4>To call it.

0:30:25.404 --> 0:30:29.564
<v Speaker 3>If you're someone who is seen as as friendly enough

0:30:29.644 --> 0:30:33.004
<v Speaker 3>towards non liberals, whether in the form of RFK Junior

0:30:33.564 --> 0:30:36.884
<v Speaker 3>or the kind of Trump Maga clan, right, that presents

0:30:36.924 --> 0:30:41.084
<v Speaker 3>a comparative advantage potentially, Right, It's like, you're gonna have

0:30:41.124 --> 0:30:43.564
<v Speaker 3>access to these people and like and kind of how

0:30:43.684 --> 0:30:45.524
<v Speaker 3>much you're I mean, one thing about this too, is

0:30:45.564 --> 0:30:50.284
<v Speaker 3>like how much you're kind of like pantomiming being in

0:30:50.484 --> 0:30:54.844
<v Speaker 3>with this kind of rebellious I guess maga crowd versus it,

0:30:55.004 --> 0:30:57.844
<v Speaker 3>you know, pantomiming versus being real. I mean sometimes people

0:30:57.924 --> 0:31:02.004
<v Speaker 3>kind of trade on that ambiguity a little bit, right, Like,

0:31:02.084 --> 0:31:06.764
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, Trump has taken some very funny lines, right.

0:31:06.844 --> 0:31:07.044
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:31:08.724 --> 0:31:10.964
<v Speaker 3>Pete Haggson, you know, was the Fox News and if

0:31:10.964 --> 0:31:13.364
<v Speaker 3>you call him a journalist exactly. Now he's the Secretary

0:31:13.444 --> 0:31:20.764
<v Speaker 3>of War apparently committing alleged, allegedly committing some war crimes

0:31:20.804 --> 0:31:25.244
<v Speaker 3>on these yeah, you know, drugs, you see allegedly you know,

0:31:25.724 --> 0:31:28.764
<v Speaker 3>you know, I don't know why you wouldn't trust a

0:31:28.804 --> 0:31:32.364
<v Speaker 3>former Fox News correspondent with a drinking problem.

0:31:31.964 --> 0:31:38.204
<v Speaker 4>But allegedly allegedly allegedly Pushkin lawyers. But yeah, so the

0:31:38.244 --> 0:31:39.484
<v Speaker 4>lines can be can be blurry?

0:31:40.804 --> 0:31:49.764
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, they absolutely can And we'll be back right

0:31:49.804 --> 0:31:50.124
<v Speaker 1>after this.

0:32:01.124 --> 0:32:04.204
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that we've been careful about in

0:32:04.244 --> 0:32:07.364
<v Speaker 2>this conversation, but I'm just gonna call it out now,

0:32:08.404 --> 0:32:11.564
<v Speaker 2>is that, you know, we've focused on kind of these

0:32:11.724 --> 0:32:16.324
<v Speaker 2>broader issues as opposed to like the sexualization of this

0:32:16.484 --> 0:32:20.804
<v Speaker 2>of the thing right where like she allegedly slept with

0:32:22.964 --> 0:32:29.804
<v Speaker 2>Sandford Mark Sandford according to Liza and you know, sent

0:32:30.564 --> 0:32:34.204
<v Speaker 2>sexts and all of these things to RFK Junior. And

0:32:34.404 --> 0:32:37.564
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's actually, like, as a female, that

0:32:37.644 --> 0:32:40.244
<v Speaker 2>really pisses me off because they are all these tropes

0:32:40.684 --> 0:32:44.684
<v Speaker 2>right in media that oh, like she who'd you sleep

0:32:44.724 --> 0:32:46.884
<v Speaker 2>with to get to where you are? And like, you know,

0:32:47.004 --> 0:32:50.124
<v Speaker 2>so I hate when people actually do that because it's

0:32:50.164 --> 0:32:52.844
<v Speaker 2>so rare, Like I don't actually think that you know this,

0:32:52.844 --> 0:32:56.924
<v Speaker 2>this does not happen. And by the way, Olivia over,

0:32:57.804 --> 0:32:59.724
<v Speaker 2>I think this was like a decade ago when A

0:32:59.884 --> 0:33:02.804
<v Speaker 2>House of Cards was on air. If you remember, this

0:33:02.924 --> 0:33:07.764
<v Speaker 2>was a show with Kevin Spacey also who then disappeared

0:33:07.804 --> 0:33:11.404
<v Speaker 2>and was written off the show after sexual misconduct allegations

0:33:11.764 --> 0:33:14.324
<v Speaker 2>came out about him, but there was a plotline I

0:33:14.324 --> 0:33:17.524
<v Speaker 2>believe this was the first season where he ended up,

0:33:17.764 --> 0:33:20.964
<v Speaker 2>you know, sleeping with a journalist. They had a mutually

0:33:20.964 --> 0:33:25.444
<v Speaker 2>beneficial relationship, and Olivia Knutsy tweeted out a photograph of

0:33:25.444 --> 0:33:28.884
<v Speaker 2>this journalist and said, why does Hollywood think female reporters

0:33:28.924 --> 0:33:31.484
<v Speaker 2>sleep with their sources? And this is a tweet that

0:33:31.524 --> 0:33:35.164
<v Speaker 2>people then you know, dredged up in the last month

0:33:35.244 --> 0:33:38.244
<v Speaker 2>being like, hey, Olivia, you know this is this is

0:33:38.324 --> 0:33:41.244
<v Speaker 2>very interesting, and so I just I do want to

0:33:41.324 --> 0:33:43.444
<v Speaker 2>kind of point out that this in this particular case,

0:33:43.764 --> 0:33:46.844
<v Speaker 2>like even more lines were crossed and as a woman,

0:33:47.004 --> 0:33:51.164
<v Speaker 2>like it really just it really upsets me. But the

0:33:51.484 --> 0:33:53.644
<v Speaker 2>heart of the story doesn't have anything to do with that.

0:33:53.804 --> 0:33:56.004
<v Speaker 2>And I think that there was a lot of impropriety

0:33:56.004 --> 0:33:59.604
<v Speaker 2>even before we talk about the sexual impropriety, and there

0:33:59.604 --> 0:34:02.604
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have to be anything sexual when with all of

0:34:02.644 --> 0:34:04.884
<v Speaker 2>the things that we've been talking about, right with how

0:34:04.924 --> 0:34:08.964
<v Speaker 2>you pedal access, how you walk that ethical line, and

0:34:08.964 --> 0:34:11.644
<v Speaker 2>whether or not you're transparent about it, right because you

0:34:11.684 --> 0:34:14.884
<v Speaker 2>can absolutely report about people you're friends with if you say, hey,

0:34:15.044 --> 0:34:17.244
<v Speaker 2>you know, like I'm writing a piece about Nate Silver.

0:34:17.364 --> 0:34:20.284
<v Speaker 2>We're co hosts of a podcast and we're friends, right,

0:34:20.324 --> 0:34:22.724
<v Speaker 2>and we've known each other for years. So those are

0:34:22.764 --> 0:34:26.324
<v Speaker 2>all my disclaimers, and here's our interview, right, Like, that's

0:34:26.404 --> 0:34:31.324
<v Speaker 2>perfectly okay. I've interviewed you, you've interviewed me. Like, that's cool, right,

0:34:32.084 --> 0:34:34.484
<v Speaker 2>as long as but if I said I've never spoken

0:34:34.484 --> 0:34:37.084
<v Speaker 2>to Nate in my life, like this is a completely

0:34:37.124 --> 0:34:40.564
<v Speaker 2>professional thing, right, and I'm going to give you an

0:34:40.684 --> 0:34:46.204
<v Speaker 2>the unvarnished truth behind the Silver bulletin, then then that's

0:34:46.204 --> 0:34:49.044
<v Speaker 2>a little bit disingenuous, right, a lot bit disingenuous.

0:34:49.244 --> 0:34:54.444
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how much sleeping around there is between

0:34:54.524 --> 0:34:56.884
<v Speaker 3>journalists and sources in the industry. I mean I would

0:34:56.884 --> 0:35:02.524
<v Speaker 3>I my default would be to say it's not that common, right,

0:35:02.524 --> 0:35:04.484
<v Speaker 3>but I've never been on like a beat, right, Like,

0:35:04.524 --> 0:35:09.684
<v Speaker 3>if you're going out and reporting on the campaign trail, right,

0:35:11.684 --> 0:35:15.604
<v Speaker 3>there's probably some hanky panky there among reporters, certainly, Right,

0:35:15.644 --> 0:35:19.244
<v Speaker 3>you're kind of in this just say Stockholm syndrome situation, right,

0:35:19.244 --> 0:35:21.764
<v Speaker 3>but you know you can treat me are in Iowa

0:35:21.804 --> 0:35:24.284
<v Speaker 3>and New Hampshire for months at a time. They're younger

0:35:24.284 --> 0:35:26.564
<v Speaker 3>people that are kind of younger campaign staffers, but not

0:35:26.964 --> 0:35:30.684
<v Speaker 3>with the not with the principles of the story, not

0:35:30.764 --> 0:35:36.124
<v Speaker 3>with the RFK Juniors and Mark Sanford's and yeah, but look,

0:35:36.244 --> 0:35:37.884
<v Speaker 3>I mean there's like too much of a fucking like

0:35:39.084 --> 0:35:43.724
<v Speaker 3>digital fripprint now too, you know what I mean. But

0:35:43.884 --> 0:35:46.124
<v Speaker 3>some people live for the drama, you know, some people

0:35:46.244 --> 0:35:50.244
<v Speaker 3>love to get discovered, Like I imagine that, like Olivia

0:35:50.284 --> 0:35:53.844
<v Speaker 3>Nutci is not like not terribly unhappy right now.

0:35:54.084 --> 0:35:55.604
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, she has a plus your job at

0:35:55.684 --> 0:35:58.484
<v Speaker 2>Vanity Fair job, right.

0:35:58.364 --> 0:36:00.924
<v Speaker 4>But she'll start, ah, she'll start a sub stuck.

0:36:02.124 --> 0:36:03.604
<v Speaker 1>And people will subscribe to it.

0:36:05.084 --> 0:36:09.724
<v Speaker 3>Did you'd read RFK juniors erotic poetry? I did you

0:36:09.844 --> 0:36:11.724
<v Speaker 3>to not give us some one star rating? So we're

0:36:11.724 --> 0:36:12.404
<v Speaker 3>not going to be there for I.

0:36:12.444 --> 0:36:19.404
<v Speaker 2>Repeat, I unfortunately read the poetry, and I'm sorry that

0:36:19.484 --> 0:36:21.724
<v Speaker 2>I did, because I can't te It's one of those

0:36:21.764 --> 0:36:24.404
<v Speaker 2>things that once you read, you can't unread, Like once

0:36:24.404 --> 0:36:26.444
<v Speaker 2>you see something, you can't unsee it, and sometimes you

0:36:26.524 --> 0:36:29.964
<v Speaker 2>just wish you could. It's now in my brain. But yes,

0:36:30.124 --> 0:36:35.244
<v Speaker 2>so this this whole thing, you know is is problematic

0:36:35.324 --> 0:36:38.404
<v Speaker 2>on a lot of levels. And by the way, though, Nate,

0:36:38.444 --> 0:36:41.164
<v Speaker 2>I think it shows that We're in a very different

0:36:41.244 --> 0:36:44.524
<v Speaker 2>journalistic era than we were like even five years ago.

0:36:44.604 --> 0:36:47.524
<v Speaker 2>The fact that you know, people are like, oh, like

0:36:47.564 --> 0:36:49.844
<v Speaker 2>Olivia was canceled, No, she wasn't, Like she got let

0:36:49.924 --> 0:36:51.684
<v Speaker 2>go from New York Magazine. Now she has a best

0:36:51.684 --> 0:36:55.604
<v Speaker 2>selling book and you know is at Vanity Fair. So like,

0:36:56.204 --> 0:37:01.244
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're there. There's a very interesting standard being

0:37:01.324 --> 0:37:03.844
<v Speaker 2>used here, and I'm very curious to see if she's

0:37:03.884 --> 0:37:05.364
<v Speaker 2>going to hold on to her job and if not,

0:37:05.444 --> 0:37:08.284
<v Speaker 2>what's going to be next, Because I do think that

0:37:08.404 --> 0:37:11.524
<v Speaker 2>we are living at a time where journalistic ethics are

0:37:11.564 --> 0:37:16.924
<v Speaker 2>incredibly important, and being someone who people can look down

0:37:16.924 --> 0:37:19.404
<v Speaker 2>and say, Okay, this is someone who is ethical. I

0:37:19.444 --> 0:37:22.204
<v Speaker 2>can trust what they say. I can trust talking to

0:37:22.244 --> 0:37:25.284
<v Speaker 2>them right that they're not going to misrepresent me, They're

0:37:25.324 --> 0:37:27.564
<v Speaker 2>not going to quote me out of context, They're not

0:37:27.604 --> 0:37:30.964
<v Speaker 2>going to do something underhanded. I think that that currency

0:37:30.964 --> 0:37:34.644
<v Speaker 2>has always been important, but it's it's even more important

0:37:34.684 --> 0:37:37.124
<v Speaker 2>right now when it's hard to kind of trust your

0:37:37.124 --> 0:37:40.204
<v Speaker 2>eyes and ears. And so I hope that the media

0:37:40.364 --> 0:37:43.124
<v Speaker 2>and that I hope that everyone behaves accordingly. And I

0:37:43.164 --> 0:37:45.764
<v Speaker 2>do think that for the most part, journalists do behave accordingly.

0:37:47.244 --> 0:37:48.684
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, look I mean she might have.

0:37:48.724 --> 0:37:50.524
<v Speaker 3>I was going to say, you know, look in an

0:37:50.524 --> 0:37:53.444
<v Speaker 3>earlier era then should be it's going to say black ball,

0:37:53.484 --> 0:37:55.044
<v Speaker 3>but like, I don't think it's really blackball. And like

0:37:55.084 --> 0:37:56.484
<v Speaker 3>the you know, if I were working with the New

0:37:56.524 --> 0:37:59.484
<v Speaker 3>York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal or

0:37:59.644 --> 0:38:02.044
<v Speaker 3>the or the even the New York Post or whatever, right,

0:38:02.164 --> 0:38:05.284
<v Speaker 3>I would I would not hire her. There're too many

0:38:05.684 --> 0:38:07.924
<v Speaker 3>check her things on the resume now by far right,

0:38:08.604 --> 0:38:10.284
<v Speaker 3>but you know, they don't keep as much as they

0:38:10.284 --> 0:38:13.084
<v Speaker 3>once did. You know, I do wonder somebody who kind

0:38:13.084 --> 0:38:18.804
<v Speaker 3>of like who relies on access and juicy, gossipy tidbits.

0:38:18.884 --> 0:38:19.004
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:38:20.644 --> 0:38:24.404
<v Speaker 3>You know, sometimes the writing and the thinking isn't interesting

0:38:24.524 --> 0:38:25.484
<v Speaker 3>enough on its own.

0:38:25.764 --> 0:38:27.484
<v Speaker 4>People don't seem to have. Like she wrote a memoir,

0:38:27.524 --> 0:38:29.284
<v Speaker 4>people don't seem to like the writing and that memoir.

0:38:29.884 --> 0:38:32.044
<v Speaker 2>I didn't read the memoir, but I did read Olivia

0:38:32.084 --> 0:38:36.604
<v Speaker 2>Nuncy's excerpt in Vanity Fair and it was unreadable. Just

0:38:36.644 --> 0:38:38.844
<v Speaker 2>the writing was very, very bad, and it was very

0:38:38.884 --> 0:38:41.164
<v Speaker 2>hard oftentimes for me to follow what was going on.

0:38:41.604 --> 0:38:43.884
<v Speaker 2>I think her writing in New York Magazine, she had

0:38:44.124 --> 0:38:48.524
<v Speaker 2>great writing there, and maybe it's her, Maybe it's her editors. Because,

0:38:48.604 --> 0:38:50.684
<v Speaker 2>by the way, as we wrap up, shout out to

0:38:50.724 --> 0:38:54.484
<v Speaker 2>good editors everywhere. You can make writings so much better.

0:38:54.764 --> 0:38:57.804
<v Speaker 2>You know, this is why, this is why the good

0:38:57.884 --> 0:39:00.724
<v Speaker 2>outlets are good, right, They hire very good people who

0:39:00.804 --> 0:39:04.684
<v Speaker 2>can make your writing shine. On that note, I think

0:39:05.404 --> 0:39:10.324
<v Speaker 2>this will not be a political slash journalist stick scandal

0:39:10.364 --> 0:39:12.844
<v Speaker 2>podcasts going forward, but I do think that this was

0:39:12.884 --> 0:39:15.124
<v Speaker 2>important to cover. You never know, you never know yet,

0:39:15.204 --> 0:39:17.404
<v Speaker 2>maybe you know, if this is our most popular episode today,

0:39:17.444 --> 0:39:19.524
<v Speaker 2>maybe we're just going to do a whole pivot. But

0:39:19.604 --> 0:39:24.204
<v Speaker 2>it does cover a lot of really interesting questions that

0:39:24.324 --> 0:39:27.844
<v Speaker 2>are Risky Business adjacent and you know, important things that

0:39:27.924 --> 0:39:30.764
<v Speaker 2>Nate and I both have to ask ourselves and deal

0:39:30.804 --> 0:39:31.644
<v Speaker 2>with all the time.

0:39:31.764 --> 0:39:36.404
<v Speaker 3>If you if you followed my advice and you're flying

0:39:36.764 --> 0:39:39.604
<v Speaker 3>to Boston, you're already there, you already have the descent.

0:39:39.644 --> 0:39:42.404
<v Speaker 3>They're telling you put your laptop away, right, and so

0:39:42.444 --> 0:39:43.964
<v Speaker 3>we should probably we should probably get going.

0:39:44.764 --> 0:39:46.084
<v Speaker 1>All right, sounds good.

0:39:51.124 --> 0:39:52.884
<v Speaker 2>Let us know what you think of the show. Reach

0:39:52.924 --> 0:39:56.724
<v Speaker 2>out to us at Risky Business at pushkin dot fm.

0:39:56.844 --> 0:40:00.404
<v Speaker 2>Risky Business is hosted by me Maria Kanakova.

0:39:59.644 --> 0:40:02.404
<v Speaker 4>And by me Nate Silver. The show was a cool

0:40:02.404 --> 0:40:06.404
<v Speaker 4>production of Pushing Industries and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced

0:40:06.404 --> 0:40:10.764
<v Speaker 4>by Isaac Carter. Our associate producer is Sonya girl Lydia,

0:40:10.844 --> 0:40:13.764
<v Speaker 4>Jean Kott and Daphne Chen are our editors, and our

0:40:13.764 --> 0:40:17.564
<v Speaker 4>executive producer is Jacob Goldstein. Mixing by Sarah Bruger.

0:40:18.164 --> 0:40:20.404
<v Speaker 2>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:40:20.404 --> 0:40:23.084
<v Speaker 2>so other people can find us too, But once again,

0:40:23.204 --> 0:40:25.004
<v Speaker 2>only if you like us. We don't want those bad

0:40:25.044 --> 0:40:27.204
<v Speaker 2>reviews out there. Thanks for tuning in.