WEBVTT - Slow Decline

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Col Zone Media. Nicholas Young was at work on the

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>morning of August third, twenty sixteen, when federal agents showed

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>up to arrest him. He appeared before a judge a

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>few hours later, shackled but still wearing his department issued

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>uniform pants. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority had already

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>issued a public statement announcing that he'd been fired, but

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the reporters in the room all took note of the pants.

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Young had just become the first police officer in

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>the United States to be arrested for a federal terrorism offense.

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>As he was being processed into federal custody, FBI agents

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>were searching his home, his truck, the backpack he'd been

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>carrying at the time of the arrest, and his worklocker

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>number forty five at the Metro Transit Police Department District

0:00:55.200 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>two substation. Box after box of evidence was carried out

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of his townhouse in northern Virginia. Agents collected nineteen firearms,

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>eighteen thousand rounds of ammunition, seventy pieces of body armor,

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and sixty bladed weapons ranging from daggers to swords, But

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>they also seized another kind of evidence. Nazi paraphernalia, a

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>framed portrait of Hitler, a Nazi flag, a tie tack

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in the shape of an SS lightning bolt. On his

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>hard drive, they found photos of a dinner party he'd hosted.

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>All of the guests were wearing Nazi SS uniforms. The

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>agent's photographed, inventoried, and packed away dozens of pieces of

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>evidence that could be used to show that Nicholas Young

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>was a Nazi, but that wasn't what he was charged with.

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>He was in prison for supporting ISIS, and there's a very

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>good argument to be made that he didn't really do

0:01:55.040 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>anything at all. I'm Molly Conger in this. It's weird,

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>little guys. This is a story where nothing happens, no

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>one really did anything. A lot of the key players

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in this story don't even actually exist. The only crime

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Young stands convicted of is a single count of

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>providing material support to a foreign terrorist organization.

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 2>But he's never met a real terrorist.

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>There's no evidence at all that Nicholas Young ever had

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>contact of any kind with an actual member of ISIS

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 1>or al Qaida. He sort of knew a guy who

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>was recruiting fra al Shabab, but even the undercover agent

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>investigating them both said Young had nothing to do with that.

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>The only member of isis Nicholas Young, ever thought he

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>knew was a confidential human source on the FBI payroll,

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and after years of prodding and encouragement, he sent this

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>friend two hundred and forty five dollars worth of gift

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>cards to the Google Play app store.

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 2>That's all.

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I made a note of this case in my messy

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 1>collection of odds and ends years ago. Buried somewhere in

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 1>this indecipherable mass of text, I wrote Nazi cop joins

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>isis question mark and paste it in a couple of links,

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>something to come back to later. I guess it's impossible

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to say now what I was thinking when I wrote

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>most of the things in my little notes app, but

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm almost positive I first came across this case while

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I was just browsing.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I like to see what's out there.

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I'll just waste a few hours punching in keywords

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to search through federal court filings, and I think in

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>this case the key word was fry Corps. One of

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the exhibits in this case is a photograph of Nicholas

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Young's truck parked in his driveway, and in the photograph

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>he can see his vanity license plate, which read FRII Karp.

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>If you've never driven through Virginia. Vanity plates are hugely

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>popular here. Almost everybody has one. We have more than

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>any other state. I think it's because they're really cheap here.

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>They only charged I think ten dollars a year to

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>put a personalized tag on your car, and it's fifty

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>or seventy dollars in a lot of other states, and

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Young chose to pay ten dollars a year to

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>drive around northern Virginia advertising his affinity for the Fry Corps.

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a term for the collection of loosely affiliated nationalists

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 1>paramilitary groups that formed in Germany after World War One.

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>They weren't Nazis technically, since there was no Nazi Party yet,

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>but many leaders in the Free Corps would go on

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to join the Nazi Party, guys like Ernst Rome, Heinrich

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Himmler and Rudolph Hess. They were the shock troops for

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>what was to come, carrying out acts of extra judicial

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>violence against left wing movements in Germany in the years

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>after the First World War, and the kind of guy

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>who romanticizes the idea of joining a nationalist street gang

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to beat up leftists is the kind of guy I'm

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>interested to know more about, especially if that guy is

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a cop. So that's how he ended up in my notebook.

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>But like I said, his fondness for Nazi memorabilia has

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing at all to do with how he got arrested.

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 2>So I made my note and I forgot about it.

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>As interesting as I found all of these exhibits related

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to his collection of Nazi paraphernalia, there's a very important

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>question to be asked here. Why was a jury allowed

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to see them. We'll get back to that in.

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 2>A minute, but first I should.

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Explain how this came ended up in front of a

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>jury at all. The Federal Bureau of Investigation spent six

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>years on this case, kind of. They spent six years

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>trying to connect Nicholas Young to something anything. His first

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>contact with an FBI agent was in September of twenty ten,

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and back in the fall of twenty ten, the agents

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>were casting a wide net. They were interviewing scores of

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>people who'd known a man named Zachary Chesser. Chesster was

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>arrested earlier that summer, for threatening Trey Parker.

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>And Matt Stone.

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that Trey Parker and that Matt Stone, the creators

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>of South Park. Chesster had taken an interest in Islam

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>after graduating from high school in two thousand and eight,

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and he soon got involved with Revolution Muslim, a website

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>run by two American Muslim converts that pumped out ro

0:06:54.800 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>al Kaita propaganda for an English speaking audience. Plooed guilty

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty quickly in October of twenty ten, and he was

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>eventually sentenced to twenty five years in prison. But the

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>court record in Young's case is pretty vague on the

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>subject of Zachary Chessar. Intentionally so the prosecutor often refers

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to Chesser as a friend of Young's, but in reality

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they were barely passing acquaintances.

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 2>But this was the global War on Terror.

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And a twenty year old white boy had threatened the

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>creators of a cartoon over depictions of Muhammad, so a

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of doors were getting knocked. When agents finally spoke

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to Nicholas Young two months after Chessar's arrest, he seemed

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>shocked by the charges and said if he'd had any

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>idea Chesser was planning something violent, he would have reported it.

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>There's no indication in the record that this conversation was

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>alarming or suspicious. Nicholas Young barely knew Zachary Chesser.

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 2>And he was a cop.

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>But now Nicholas Young had an FBI file in a

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>counter terrorism investigation. So three months later, in December of

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty ten, Young was attending a friend's wedding. At the reception,

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a man introduced himself to Young as Khalil and struck

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>up a conversation. Khalil worked for the FBI. He later

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>testified that he'd attended the wedding to try to get

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>close to another man, a man named sale al Barmawi.

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>The record is again very vague when it comes to

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>why al Barmawi was the subject of this undercover operation,

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and he's never been arrested or charged with the crime,

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't look like he lives in the United

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>States anymore. But in two thousand and eight, al Barmawi

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>was a member of the Muslim Student Association at George

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Mason University, so he may have crossed paths with Zachary

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Chessar during that single semester that Chesser was enrolled. There After,

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Khalil met Young, though he kept in touch for about

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a year and a half. The undercover maintained a friendship

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>with Young, meeting for dinner, watching movies at his house,

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 1>going for.

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Walks, and just chatting.

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>The prosecution emphasized that Young was hanging out in radical

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>circles and he had dangerous friends, pointing specifically to a

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>man named Amine al Khalifi, who was later arrested for

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction. Alarming, right,

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>But the government is less forthcoming about the fact that

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it was the undercover who introduced Young to al Khalifi,

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that el Khalifi was only arrested after

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>he was provided with a fake gun and a fake

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>bomb by the FBI agents who drove him to Washington,

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>d c. And dropped him off to carry out the

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>suicide attack they'd planned. I want to get one thing

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>out of the way here. I'm not defending Nicholas Young,

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly not defending ISIS. ISIS doesn't actually even come into

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the story. There's no real ISIS here. And when it

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>comes to Nicholas Young, oh, he's a police officer with

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a house full of Hitler posters. You know, I'm not

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>on his side here. That should be obvious, and I'm

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>not denying that he made some alarming statements throughout the

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>course of the investigation. In one conversation with the undercover,

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>he was furious about the way that the FBI had

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>approached his friends and family when they were asking questions

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>about whether he knew Zachary Chesser. He allegedly fantasized about

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>finding out where the female agent lived so he could

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>kidnap and torture her. That's a very scary thing to say.

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>But when the undercover submitted his report about that conversation

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>in March of twenty eleven, he wrote that he didn't

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>think Young was serious. In other conversations with the undercover,

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Young admitted to torturing animals as a child. He talked

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>about how much he hated the FBI and said that

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>he believed it was possible to sneak weapons into the

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>federal courthouse undetected, and he was paranoid who was always

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about using phones and taking the batteries out of

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>his phone when he wasn't using it. He said he

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>was stockpiling weapons, and he hinted that any cop who

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>tried to search his house would run into problems. But again,

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>all of these conversations took place in twenty eleven. The

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>undercover submitted the reports, but nothing rose to the level

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of a prosecutable crime. He was talking a lot of shit,

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>but he owned those guns legally, and he didn't do anything.

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not my preferred dinner conversation, but legally speaking, fantasizing

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>about jihad at the chilis in Alexandria, Virginia isn't terrorism.

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>He did travel to Libya twice in twenty eleven to

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>provide aid to anti Gaddaffi rebel forces during the Libyan

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Civil War. He had a bumper sticker on his truck

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that said Libyan Civil War VET Siege of Misrata, And

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>he really was in miss Rada in April and May

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of twenty eleven during some of the most brutal fighting there.

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>On re entry into the United States after that trip,

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>he told the ICE agent who interviewed him at the

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>airport that he'd had to cut his trip short, returning

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>home ten days earlier than he'd planned because things had

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>gotten too dangerous there. He returned to Libya a second

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>time later that year, and he made no secret of

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>either trip. Both times he was interviewed by a federal

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>agent at the airport on his way home. When he

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>was interviewed by the FBI after his second trip to Libya,

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>they attempted to recruit him as a paid informant, and

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>he declined.

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Again. It doesn't look like.

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>He broke any laws here, at least not in the

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 1>United States laws. I don't know what Libya's position on

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the situation might be, but the FBI was still investigating him.

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>If they'd found any evidence that he joined a terrorist

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>organization in Libya, they would have brought it up a trial.

0:12:58.679 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Again.

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying I'm super comfortable

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>with the idea of American cops packing their own body

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>armor to fly off to some civil war halfway around

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the world. But the United States government didn't see fit

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to charge him with anything in twenty eleven or twenty twelve,

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>or twenty thirteen, or twenty fourteen or twenty fifteen. In

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve, the undercover who'd been hanging out with Young

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>since twenty ten moved on. One of the other men

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that he'd gotten close to was more interesting to the government,

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>so the agent's focus shifted. Young was interviewed once more

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>by the FBI later in twenty twelve when he was

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>crossing the Canadian border after visiting a woman he'd been

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>romantically involved with, but other than that, the investigation was dormant.

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Two years passed before the FBI sent Nicholas Young a

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>new friend, a confidential human source who called himself Mo.

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Young met with Moe twenty times in twenty fourteen.

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 2>They were close. They didn't just talk about jihad.

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>They talked about work, about dating, about Young's struggle to

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>overcome the depression he'd fallen into after his father's death

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and seven. He thought they were friends

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>when they talked about ISIS. It was Mo who brought

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it up. In several conversations. Young even tried to cool

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>his friend's enthusiasm for the group, telling him he didn't

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>need to join ISIS, and he warned him to be

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>cautious about what he posted online and who he talked

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to about things like this. To be fair, Young did

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>eventually offer some advice about how to travel overseas without

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>arousing suspicion, and he agreed to help Mo with his

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>cover story by sending him a text that would corroborate

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the lie that he was going on vacation in Turkey.

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Young believed that his friend was going to Syria, and

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>before Moe pretended to leave for Syria, the pair used

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>computers at a FedEx store to set up special email

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>addresses that they could use to communicate during the trip.

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Young went to the FedEx store several times over the

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>next year and a half to send and receive emails.

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>In December of twenty fifteen, over a year after Mo

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>pretended to leave for Syria, FBI agents came to Young's

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>house twice to ask him if he knew anything about.

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Mo, and he did lie.

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>He told agents that he'd had no contact with Mo

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>since he left for Turkey in late twenty fourteen, and

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>he had no way of getting in touch with him.

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>He then emailed Mo to tell him that the FBI

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>was asking about him, and that right there, that is

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a crime. It is a crime to lie to an

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>FBI agent about a material fact relevant to a criminal investigation,

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>even if it's a fake criminal investigation. Moe wasn't real,

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>but Young didn't know that. In those interviews, he was

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>consciously obstructing what he believed to be a real investigation,

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>but that wasn't really enough to pull the trigger on

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>an indictment. They needed him to do something, something they

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>could take to a grand jury. In July of twenty sixteen,

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>an undercover agent posing as MO reached out to Young again.

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>He said, Isis needed gift cards. They needed someone in

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the West to buy gift cards and then send them

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the codes on the back, and they needed those gift

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>cards because that's what they used to set up the

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>messaging accounts that they used to communicate with supporters in

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the West. MO said they'd had guys in the UK

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>who'd been buying the gift cards, but they stopped sending

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the codes. Young wrote back, why were the brothers in

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>UK told to stop?

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Inshallah?

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>More codes will come your way many sting operations and

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>setups in this area. He didn't agree to do it

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>right away. He was cordial, he was inquisitive. He hoped

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>things would work out for the beast, for his friend,

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but he wasn't willing to do it. That same week,

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>two FBI agents working on the case were texting each other.

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>The first agent wrote, let's hope he goes one more

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>step further and his colleague replied just one more step,

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 1>to which the first agent responded one huge step with

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>four exclamation points, and the second agent wrote one small

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>step for US, one giant leap for slow decline, slow decline.

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they would just write SD. That was Nicholas Young's

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>code name. They'd been calling him that for years. In

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the summer of twenty sixteen, six years into their investigation,

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>they were frustrated he was too cautious, too slow, too

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>unwilling to take a next step. They decided to ratchet

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>up the pressure. They sent him more and more emails

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>from MO about the importance of the work he was

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>doing over there.

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 2>MO told him horror.

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Stories about bombings and what was being done to Muslim children.

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And as they're goading Young into taking action behind the scenes,

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>one agent commented that they'd just hit the case with

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a defibrillator. After a few days of this convincing, Young

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>drove to a best Buy in Fairfax, Virginia, and he

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>bought a handful of Google Play gift cards. Finally, in

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>July twenty eighth, twenty sixteen, Nicholas Young sent a text

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>containing twenty two sixteen digit codes, each one from the

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>back of a Google play gift card redeemable for ten

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen dollars. The total value was two hundred and

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>forty five dollars. The best Buy receipt was still in

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>his backpack when he was arrested a few days later.

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So he didn't do it right. I mean he did it.

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>He bought the gift cards. And when he bought the

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>gift cards, he really did believe their purpose was to

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>allow ISIS to set up messaging accounts to communicate with

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>prospective fighters in the West. That's what Moe told him

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>they were for. There was no coded language. There's no

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>room for misunderstanding here. Most said they were for ISIS,

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So technically yes, that is material support for terrorism. He

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't deny that he bought the gift cards or that

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>he texted the codes to Mow. That's not in dispute.

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>The real drama in this case is the unhinged trial

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>strategy pursued by the government. Remember I said at the

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>top of the episode that I was surprised to see

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>that the jury had been shown so much evidence of

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Young's collection of Nazi memorabilia. It was his fondness

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>for Hitler that first brought this case to my attention,

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately that part of his life had nothing to

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.719
<v Speaker 1>do with this case. So how did it wind up

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in the record at all? If you're not someone who

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>spends a lot of time sitting in a courtroom, you

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 1>might not be asking yourself that. After all, why wouldn't

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>a jury get to see all the weird shit they

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>found in this guy's house? Isn't everything the cops found

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in their evidence? I know I'm about to tell you

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that the judge in this case was asked that question

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>and he decided the answer was yes. But typically the

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>answer to that question is no. Pictures of this guy's

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Nazi themed dinner party in two thousand and seven are

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>very interesting to me, but they don't actually tell a

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 1>jury anything meaningful about whether or not he knowingly financed

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>terrorism in twenty six sixteen. Not to get boring about it,

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but this is a pretty textbook example of something that

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>fails to satisfy the only two federal rules of evidence

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that I could name for you off the top of

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>my head. It's both irrelevant and highly prejudicial. Relevance is

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>easy to explain. That's rule four oh one, and it

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>reads evidence is relevant if a it has a tendency

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.679
<v Speaker 1>to make a fact more or less probable than it

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>would be without the evidence, and b the fact is

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of consequence in determining the action. That's pretty straightforward. It

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>does just what it says on the tin. You know,

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>does seeing this piece of evidence tell you anything about

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the facts at issue in this case? Does knowing he

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>had a Nazi tattoo on his neck give you any

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>valuable information about the gift cards? It really doesn't easy enough.

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm always telling you I didn't go to

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>law school, but Rule four h three and its state

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>court equivalents are something I hear argument about in I

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>think every case I've ever sat through. Quote the court

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>outweighed by a danger of one or more of the

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>following unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading a jury, undue delay,

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. So sometimes evidence

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that gets excluded is relevant. It passes the relevance test,

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it would help a jury make a determination about the facts,

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>but it's inflammatory, it's prejudicial. Its probative value, so whether

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>or not it tells you anything is outweighed by the

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>prejudicial impact it would have. There's information to be learned

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>from it, but there's a real likelihood that it could,

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, make the jury too emotional to be fair

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and impartial. Sometimes that means that a jury won't see

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly graphic crime scene or autopsy photos because those would

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>upset them without meaningfully adding to their understanding of the case.

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>In a lot of cases where I hear this argued,

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>it's usually because the defense doesn't want the jury to

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>be told about their client's affiliation with a hate group.

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>They might file emotion ahead of time, asking the court

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to prohibit any mention of it, or prohibit the introduction

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of evidence that a defendant who did something like assault

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a black person or vandalize a synagogue. They might not

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>want evidence introduced that they have a swastika tattoo or something.

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>The idea is that you don't want the prosecutor to

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to flood the jury with a bunch of

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>images that will leave them thinking, damn, this is a

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>really bad guy and he needs to be punished. The

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>jury is supposed to decide if the state has proved

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the elements of the case. The jury decides did this

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 1>person do this crime not. Is this defendant a good person. So,

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>even if the evidence might contribute a little bit to

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 1>their understanding of the facts of the case, it may

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>be that this evidence is more likely to sway the

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>jury into making a decision for the wrong reasons. And,

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, most of the time I hear this argued,

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the jury should have gotten to hear it.

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>They deserve to hear about the racist shit this guy's

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>getting up to in his extra curriculars.

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>One example that comes to mind right away is during

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit against the organizers of the Unite the Right rally,

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the judge ruled that it was unfairly prejudicial to introduce

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>evidence about one of the organizer's past. There was plenty

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of evidence about statements leading up to, during, and immediately

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>after the rally, but in a case involving a racially

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>motivated violent conspiracy, the judge felt it was unfairly pres

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>judicial to tell the jury that one of the defendants

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>had previously been convicted of something you could fairly call

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a racially motivated violent conspiracy, specifically that he'd want stolen

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>machine guns from the army and given them to the

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>clan so they could start a race war. So I

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>was under the impression that the bar was pretty high

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>for this kind of thing. So as I'm picking through

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the filings in the Nicolas Young case, it seemed very

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>weird to me that they were able to convince a

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>judge to let them show the jury so many pictures

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of Hitler. What does Hitler have to do with Jihad?

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Why would pictures of his Nazi tattoos help a jury

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 1>decide if he was guilty of buying a gift card

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>for Isis. Unfortunately for you, the answer is another boring

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>bit of legalese. The defense wanted to argue that this

0:25:55.600 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>was a case of entrapment. That word doesn't mean when

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you think it means. I can promise you, unless you

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>practice criminal law, I can almost guarantee you that whatever

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you think entrapment means is not what a judge thinks

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it means. An undercover cop doesn't have to tell you

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>they're a cop, even if you ask. They can lie

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:26.239
<v Speaker 1>to you about anything and everything. Undercovers and informants can

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>do illegal stuff with you. It can even be entirely

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>their idea. They can buy you the gun, put it

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in your hand, and drive you to the crime scene.

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Almost every scenario you can think of for an undercover

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>cop is so outrageously over the top. Complicit in the

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 1>planning and execution of a crime isn't entrapment.

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 2>It does happen.

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>It's rare, but it is technically possible to succeed in

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>arguing that you're not guilty of a crime because an

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 1>agent of the state induced you to do it. It

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>can work, but it's never worked in a terrorism case.

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>According to an article in the Journal of Criminal Law

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and Criminology, I read the whole paper twice before I

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>realized I know the author, and I probably could have

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>just asked him nicely to explain it to me in

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>smaller words. But that's my punishment for getting all my

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>writing down in the middle of the night. Of the

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of terrorism cases brought by the DJ in the

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>first decade after nine to eleven, Thomas Frampton wrote quote

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in the popular press, the improbability of such plots has

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>generated skepticism. Several authors have suggested that the FBI, in

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>its zeal to demonstrate tangible success in the fight against terrorism,

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>has been improperly manufacturing nonexistent terrorist schemes. The FBI is

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>catching guys who almost did something they were never going

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to do. But despite the fact that almost all of

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the terrorism related prosecutions in the United States are based

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on sting operations where the would be terrorist was induced, coached,

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and aided every step of the way by a copper informant,

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>no one has ever prevailed in court by asserting an

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>entrapment defense. So what is entrapment? In order to successfully

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 1>argue entrapment, you have to show that a state actor,

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>so a copper, a paid informant, induced you to commit

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the crime, and that you lacked the predisposition to have

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>done it on your own. The first part's easy. The

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>informant and the undercover agent coaxed him into it.

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 2>It was their idea. They begged and pleaded.

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>They spent years insinuating themselves into his life. They got

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>close to him. The agents were having private conversations behind

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the scenes about how to push him over the edge

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to actually commit a crime. They were essentially saying to

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>each other, this guy isn't going to break the law

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>unless we make him. But the second prong of the

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>test is slippery. Sure, maybe the government talked you into

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>committing the crime. But you wouldn't have actually done it

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>unless you were predisposed to doing things like that. Right,

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>If you weren't the kind of person who had a

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>natural predisposition to commit this crime, you wouldn't have This

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>crime is obviously in your nature. For this part of

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the test, there are some courts that use what's called

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>an objective test, asking the question would this have worked

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>on a reasonable person? But most courts, including the federal courts,

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>use a subjective standard. So the question becomes, was this

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>particular defendant predisposed to committing this crime? Now? I read

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of papers, but if you ask me, this

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is the law saying does the defendant have bad vibes?

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And the answer, it turns out, is always yeah. Determining

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>whether someone is predisposed towards crime is alarmingly vibes based.

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not just a question of your criminal history. You know,

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>have you done something like this before? Have you even

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>tried to do something like this before? No. It opens

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>up the door for an exploration of your character, and

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that's something that's normally very much off limits in a

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>criminal trial. As Prampton wrote, quote, the defense is unusual

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>because it makes a searching inquiry into the defendant's character

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>or criminal propensities the centerpiece of the criminal trial. This

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>stands in marked contrast to the traditional focus of Anglo

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>American criminal jurisprudence, which generally spurns such evidence as irrelevant

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to the central issue of moral blameworthiness for a particular

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>volitional criminal act. In a twenty fourteen report, Human Rights

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Watch suggests that it may not even be possible for

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>an entrapment defense to work in a terrorism case. The

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>nature of the argument requires the jury to make a

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>determination about the defendant's character. They're not deciding if the

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime. They're

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>deciding if this is an innocent person.

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>This character inquiry makes it exceptionally difficult for a defendant

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to succeed in raising the entrapment defense, particularly in the

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>terrorism context, where inflammatory stereotypes and highly charged characterizations of

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Islam and foreigners often prevail. And that is how we

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>ended up with dozens of exacts its demonstrating that Nicholas

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Young loved Hitler. Young's attorneys tried to keep this evidence

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>out at emotions hearing. Assistant US Attorney Gordon Kromberg argued

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that quote, the Nazi stuff in this case is very

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>much related to the.

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Isis stuff.

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>The Nazi stuff is related to the Isis stuff. A

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>great deal of ink was spilled on the subject in

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>motions back and forth. But I'm not convinced by Kromberg's argument,

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>nor that of the expert witness he put on the

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>stand to explain it to the jury at trial. I'm

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>not saying that there's no conversation to be had about

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the curious phenomenon of cross pollination within online communities of

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>right wing accelerationists and Salafi jihadists. I'd intended to devote

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a little more time to exploring that in this episode,

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's a longer conversation for another day.

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>There's been some interesting writing in just the last five

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:09.719
<v Speaker 1>years on the nature of this trend within some fringe

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>online spaces of melding the narrative and esthetics of neo

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Nazism and Islamic extremism. The trend itself isn't necessarily new,

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>but all of the scholarship I can find is fairly recent.

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>But it is out there, and we've already talked in

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>passing about several examples of this phenomenon. Remember Brandon Russell,

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the founder of Adam Woffen. Back in twenty eighteen, he

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:39.479
<v Speaker 1>was sharing a house in Florida with three other members

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of his neo Nazi terrorist organization when one of them,

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Devon Arthur's, murdered the other two. Arthur's had recently converted

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to Islam. And remember Ethan Melzer, the young Army private

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>who communicated classified troop movements to someone that he thought

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was in Al Qaida because he thought a little had

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>would help kick off the kind of worldwide violence necessary

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>for the race war envisioned by his particular brand of

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 1>neo Nazism. And in a more general sense, it's not

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 1>even all that rare to see your average neo Nazi

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>terror enthusiasts talking about things like white Shariah or white Jihad,

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>borrowing the language and symbolism, or drawing inspiration from groups

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>like al Qaeda or ISIS, And in a broad sense,

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they do have things in common. On the extreme end

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:39.359
<v Speaker 1>of both of these ideologies, you have misogyny, homophobia, anti semitism,

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:43.879
<v Speaker 1>glorification of violence. Think about terogram, where you have the

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>idolization of the mass shooters that they call saints, these

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>people who have killed and died for the cause. What

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is that if not a martyr. White supremacists have been

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>calling for RAHOA for decades. That's a shortened form of

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the phrase racial holy war.

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 2>So you can kind of see.

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Where the edges of these things could bleed together a

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:12.919
<v Speaker 1>little bit. It's an interesting topic to explore, and there's

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 1>not a clear cut answer here about how sincere any

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>particular actor is. What's a meme, what's a recruitment tactic,

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>what's trolling? What's just equal opportunity, love of violence? It's

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>all over the map, and it's evolving. I'll pop a

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:33.760
<v Speaker 1>few links in the show notes to a few papers

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>on the topic that I thought were interesting. But I'm

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>going to come back to this when I've had some

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>time to do a little more reading. So I'm not

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>saying there's no basis for an argument that Nicholas Young's

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>interest in Nazi memorabilia could potentially be relevant to his

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>material support of ISIS. There is room here for a

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:58.760
<v Speaker 1>conversation about some interplay between his belief in these ideologies.

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>But I am saying that I thought about it. I

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:05.760
<v Speaker 1>considered the facts of the case that are on the record.

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I read a pretty significant chunk of the extant literature

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>on syncretic extremism, and I gotta say I think they

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 1>violated the civil rights of this Hitler enthusiast. I take

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>no pleasure in telling you that Nicholas Young is an

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>extremely unsympathetic individual. No one is more upset than I

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>am that I have to tell you that. I don't

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:31.280
<v Speaker 1>think they were fair to the cop with the Nazi tattoos,

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and he say some pretty wild stuff about jihad.

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 2>To those informants.

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think it was proper to present these

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>two things as reinforcing evidence of one another in a

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>criminal trial. Again, I'm not even saying there's no possibility

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>that these things were intertwined for him, but that's not

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>what they put on the record. This evidence was produced

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to counter the entrapment defense. It was produced to show predisposition.

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>The entire purpose was to show the jury that this

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is a bad guy who believes bad things, so he

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 1>probably does bad things.

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:33.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's not how it's supposed to work. For this case.

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Dovid Gartenstein Ross was hired by the prosecution to

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>prepare a report on quote the relationship between affinity for

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Nazism and inclination to support militant Islamic groups. The first

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 1>ten pages of the report are I guess they're supposed

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to be a resume, but it's in narrative form. It's

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>not the traditional CV that's submitted to the court when

0:37:57.640 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you offer up an expert. And then what follows is

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>just a loosely connected series of largely unsubstantiated statements and anecdotes,

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and it all somehow adds up to the conclusion that

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Nazis and Isis both hate Jewish people, thus making them

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>ideologically similar in such a significant way that it would

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>be common and expected for someone to drift from one

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>worldview into the other. And he ends with the bold

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:31.280
<v Speaker 1>pronouncement that quote, I conclude that evidence in individual's affinity

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>for Nazism is related to the question of whether that

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 1>individual is predisposed to supporting militant Islamist groups. This report

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>was written shortly after the case was filed back in

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen, and at that time there was no meaningful

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 1>existing scholarship on this phenomenon. He cites none. It doesn't exist.

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 1>The academic writing produced on the topic in the last

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:03.280
<v Speaker 1>few years does recognize the existence of this ideological soup

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>that exists at the far fringes, But most of the

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>authors I've read seem to agree that it's not common,

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 1>it's not universal, and it's not well documented enough to

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>make a conclusion like that. When you read a study,

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you should look into how it came to be written,

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>who wrote it, what's their background, what did they study,

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>where did they work, did someone pay for it?

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 2>What else have they written? Is there any publicly.

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Available evidence about their beliefs or their motivations. You can't

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>always answer all of these questions, and god willing, the

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>answers are usually pretty mundane. In this case, the report

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 1>was paid for by the government. Doctor grtnstein Ross was

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>paid sixteen thousand dollars for his work on the case.

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>That in itself isn't unusual or cause for concern. You

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:00.319
<v Speaker 1>often see it presented that way in a trial. You know,

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the opposing council insinuating that the expert is only saying

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>what they've been paid to say. But it's not weird

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to pay an expert for their time, and serving as

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>an expert witness can be a significant time commitment. So

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 1>question answered not a huge red plaque. His background appears

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:23.879
<v Speaker 1>to be in Islamic extremism, both as a past participant

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and a current researcher. After dabbling briefly in Islamic extremism,

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>he went to work in a nonprofit called the Investigative

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Project on Terrorism. The IPT is one of the leading

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>purveyors of pseudo academic Islamophobia, and it's cited as an

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>example of groups with quote thinly veiled political motives typically

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 1>infused with poor scholarship and extremely selective reporting in a

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen issue of Critical Studies on Terrorism. After a

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 1>brief stint there, doctor Grtnstein Ross moved on to the

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Foundation for Defense of Democrat, where he's been since two

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven. The FDD claims to have been founded

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>in the aftermath of nine to eleven to address the

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>global threat of terrorism, but the original incorporation paperwork shows

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.879
<v Speaker 1>that it was founded in April of two thousand and one,

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:21.760
<v Speaker 1>several months before nine to eleven, and the original stated

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>purpose of the organization was providing quote education meant to

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:31.800
<v Speaker 1>enhance Israel's image in North America. They revised that mission

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>statement after nine to eleven, and they've sought to distance

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.720
<v Speaker 1>themselves from their original mission as a pro Israel lobbying group,

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>but public disclosures of their lobbying expenditures show a disproportionate

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:48.240
<v Speaker 1>interest in pro Israel and anti Iran measures. A founding

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 1>board member and a primary donor to FDD is Trump

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Megadnor and former Home Depot CEO Bernie Marcus. And. After

0:41:56.800 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump's win in twenty sixteen, several analysts of the Foundation left,

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.839
<v Speaker 1>claiming the organization was limiting criticism of Trump in their analysis.

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:09.719
<v Speaker 1>The Foundation for Defense of Democracies has been called an

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:14.320
<v Speaker 1>anti Muslim fringe group by Duke University sociologist Christopher Bale.

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Farid Hafez, a political scientist at Salzburg University, identified FDD

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 1>as a key player in what he calls a transatlantic

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>network of Islamophobia. Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Colin Powell, has accused the Foundation of knowingly peddling falsehoods

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:35.439
<v Speaker 1>to push for war with Iran. The progressive think tank

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Institute for Policy Studies has noted that while the organization

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is quote an ardent critic of terrorism, it has not

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:46.919
<v Speaker 1>criticized actions taken by Israel against Palestinians that arguably fall

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>into this category, and for what it's worth, Iran's Ministry

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of Foreign Affairs has designated the Foundation as a foreign

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:57.839
<v Speaker 1>terrorist organization. So I guess two can play at that game.

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And the prosecutor who put this expert on the stand

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.359
<v Speaker 1>is no stranger to accusations of Islamophobia of his own.

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Gordon Kromberg has been called a loose cannon by legal

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 1>ethicists and has been accused of personal animus against Muslim defendants.

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.920
<v Speaker 1>When the subject of a grand jury subpoena requested a

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 1>postponement until after Ramadan.

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.359
<v Speaker 2>Kromberg called it quote part of the.

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Attempted Islamization of the American justice system. According to a

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 1>complaint from that individual's attorney, Kromberg quote became agitated in

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the court room and said, quote, they can kill each

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 1>other during Ramadan, they can testify before a grand jury.

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>When Ahmed Abu Ali, a United States citizen, was arrested

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and tortured in Saudi Arabia, the man's lawyer asked Kromberg

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>if his client might be returned to the United States

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to face pending charges here, and Kromberg reportedly said, quote,

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:05.359
<v Speaker 1>He's no good for us here. He has no fingernails left,

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:08.840
<v Speaker 1>though he denies making light of the fact that Ali

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 1>was being tortured. In another case of an American accused

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:18.279
<v Speaker 1>of supporting a foreign terrorist organization, Kromberg explicitly instructed the

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 1>jury to disregard testimony offered by Muslim witnesses because their

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>religion teaches that it is acceptable to lie to non believers.

0:44:29.040 --> 0:44:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Law professor Wadis Said told The Intercept in twenty twenty

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>one that Kromberg has a history of provocative stances and quote.

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>The positions that he has taken are quite tendentious and

0:44:40.040 --> 0:44:42.760
<v Speaker 1>even vindictive in terms of his mindset toward the person

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>he's targeting.

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:46.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm not so naive.

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>As to think it's unusual for a prosecutor to exaggerate

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>for dramatic effect, But I just think it's important to

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:56.840
<v Speaker 1>evaluate the source of a fantastic claim. So when a

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 1>man stands in front of a jury and says that

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of gift cards should send a man to

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>prison for fifteen years, you should take a minute to

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:09.160
<v Speaker 1>check out his track record. Perhaps the most egregious bit

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of evidence offered at trial was an honest to god lie,

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, showing them all the Hitler stuff. That was real.

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 1>That was real evidence. He really did have those things

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in his home. I just don't think it was appropriate

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to use them as evidence in this case. But throughout

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the case, Kromberg claimed that Nicholas Young had attended a

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:32.840
<v Speaker 1>neo Nazi rally in two thousand and one, and in

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a later article published by doctor Gartnstein Ross in the

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Journal of Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, he suggests that

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 1>this is evidence that Young actually converted to Islam in

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven, six years later because of his

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>interest in Nazism, as evidence by his attendance at this

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Neo Nazi rally. The problem is that didn't happen. A

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 1>former classmate test In two thousand and one. They were

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>both taking a course on European racism taught by Professor

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Gillette at George Mason University. As part of a

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 1>class project. The two students attended a dinner hosted by

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a neo Nazi group where British fascist Mark Catterill would

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 1>be speaking. Their professor arranged for them to attend and

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>even interviewed Catterall after his speech. Mark Catterall was living

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia at the time. Running a group called the

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>American Friends of the British National Party, and the dinner

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 1>was organized by the neo Nazi group National Alliance. And

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:39.279
<v Speaker 1>here's a weird little guy's Easter egg. I think that

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 1>this was one of those weekly dinners that was hosted

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:44.880
<v Speaker 1>by Sam Francis at a Thai restaurant in northern Virginia,

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:48.279
<v Speaker 1>those dinners that a Ron Paul Staffer was outed as

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>occasionally attending, but characterizing a school project, one that had

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>been signed off on by their history professor as evidence

0:46:58.080 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that the defendant had a history of attending Nazi rallies,

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:04.200
<v Speaker 1>which in turn shows that he's predisposed to trying to

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:12.360
<v Speaker 1>fund isis that's outrageous. Like I said, Nicholas Young is

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:16.319
<v Speaker 1>not a sympathetic character. He's definitely a weird little guy.

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:20.879
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of salacious details about his interests

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that were, in my opinion, improperly presented to the jury

0:47:26.480 --> 0:47:29.799
<v Speaker 1>under other circumstances. It's the kind of stuff I would

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>expect to see in a case where a guy really

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 1>did try to do some kind of terrorism, the kind

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of terrorism I write about. But they charged him for

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:45.360
<v Speaker 1>buying some gift cards, which he did do sure, but

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:50.400
<v Speaker 1>only after a six year investigation involving hundreds of man hours,

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a team of handlers, a two year relationship with an

0:47:53.520 --> 0:47:57.000
<v Speaker 1>undercover agent, another two year relationship with a paid informant,

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>an active encouragement to commit the crime in question. Throughout

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the case, the prosecution implied that Young had committed a

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 1>wide variety of other crimes. In one filing, it's implied

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that he had bomb making materials, but none were presented

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 1>as evidence and he wasn't charged with it. There are

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:22.880
<v Speaker 1>repeated assertions that he's been illegally purchasing steroids online and

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>having them shipped from overseas. They even claim to have

0:48:26.120 --> 0:48:28.319
<v Speaker 1>found illegal steroids in his home on the day of

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the arrest. He's accused of plotting to smuggle guns into

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a courthouse, of plotting to kidnap an FBI agent, of

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>joining a terrorist organization in Libya, but it wasn't charged

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 1>with any of that. Did they think they couldn't prove

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 1>those things? Were they padding out the allegations to make

0:48:45.200 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the underlying case look more serious?

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Who knows? In the end, they.

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Relied on an anti terrorism statute that is notoriously abused

0:48:56.120 --> 0:49:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in sting operations that target Muslim Americans. This former FBI

0:49:00.880 --> 0:49:04.879
<v Speaker 1>agent Mike Jerman wrote in his recent book Policing White Supremacy,

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the material support for Terrorism statute is quote used in

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:16.640
<v Speaker 1>FBI sting operations that manufacture terrorism threats to produce statistical accomplishments,

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:24.759
<v Speaker 1>so law enforcement resources are disproportionately allocated to combating foreign terrorism,

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 1>which then results in agents being quote pressured to demonstrate

0:49:29.640 --> 0:49:37.320
<v Speaker 1>their success even if no genuine plots exist. This is

0:49:37.360 --> 0:49:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a question I keep running into on the show. What

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is terrorism? Whose crimes matter to us more importantly, whose

0:49:48.200 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 1>crimes matter to the government. What kinds of violence are unacceptable?

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 1>What kinds of violence are allowed? What message is being

0:49:59.560 --> 0:50:03.400
<v Speaker 1>communi in the decisions that they make about who, how,

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and when to prosecute and for what. Despite a twenty

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:12.359
<v Speaker 1>seventeen report from the United States Government Accountability Office which

0:50:12.640 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 1>showed that right wing extremists are responsible for three times

0:50:16.800 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the number of domestic attacks as compared to Islamic extremists,

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't use the same words.

0:50:22.480 --> 0:50:24.520
<v Speaker 2>To talk about these things.

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:28.760
<v Speaker 1>When Dylan Roof murdered nine people at a Bible study

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:32.839
<v Speaker 1>at a Manual African Methodist Episcopal church in Charleston, South

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Carolina FBI Director James Comey said, quote, terrorism is an

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:43.200
<v Speaker 1>act of violence to try to influence a public body

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 1>or citizenry.

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:46.360
<v Speaker 2>So it's more of a political act.

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 1>And again, based on what I know so far, I

0:50:50.440 --> 0:50:56.560
<v Speaker 1>don't see it as a political act, not a political act.

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Roof was very clear about his motivations. He had

0:51:02.760 --> 0:51:08.439
<v Speaker 1>a manifesto. He intentionally left people alive so they could

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 1>tell the story of what happened in that Bible study.

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 1>He was trying to incite a race war, a civil

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:18.040
<v Speaker 1>war once again ignited in South Carolina, and fought over

0:51:18.080 --> 0:51:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the right of black people to exist freely in the

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 1>United States. That feels very political to me, but that's

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:30.680
<v Speaker 1>not how we talk about it. As Bruce Hoffman wrote

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in his book God's Guns and Sedition, terrorism as it

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is currently defined in American law treats domestic terror and

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 1>foreign terror very differently, and in the book he refers

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to this case directly, noting that Young was sentenced to

0:51:46.120 --> 0:51:50.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years in prison. The average sentence for this charge

0:51:50.320 --> 0:51:54.280
<v Speaker 1>providing material support to a foreign terrorist organization is thirteen

0:51:54.320 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 1>point five years. Domestic terrorism, on the other hand, often

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:05.239
<v Speaker 1>results in significantly shorter sentences, even in cases where we've

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:08.120
<v Speaker 1>used the word, even in cases where the crime is

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 1>much more serious. I mean, first of all, you can't

0:52:11.640 --> 0:52:15.359
<v Speaker 1>even get charged with an equivalent offense. You are free

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to materially support organizations that absolutely should be called a

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:24.200
<v Speaker 1>domestic terrorist organization without consequence. That's allowed. You can't send

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a ten dollars gift card to ISIS, but you can

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 1>give everything you own to Adam Woffin. Hoffmann lists several

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:36.120
<v Speaker 1>contrasting examples. So Brendan Russell, the founder of Adam Woffin,

0:52:36.560 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 1>was arrested in twenty eighteen after officers found his bomb

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:43.920
<v Speaker 1>making workshop while they were investigating the double homicide committed

0:52:43.920 --> 0:52:48.000
<v Speaker 1>inside his home by his roommate. Russell was released in

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one after serving most of a three year sentence,

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and he immediately got back to work planning another active

0:52:55.280 --> 0:52:56.840
<v Speaker 1>domestic terrorism.

0:52:57.600 --> 0:52:58.800
<v Speaker 2>He was convicted.

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Earlier this year for cons firing to take out the

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:05.560
<v Speaker 1>power grid in Maryland, three years for a garage full

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of bomb making materials and full knowledge that he was

0:53:09.200 --> 0:53:14.320
<v Speaker 1>going to reoffend, but fifteen years for some gift cards.

0:53:16.239 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Writing about the legal.

0:53:17.400 --> 0:53:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Double standard of defining terrorism, Australian criminologist Helen Taylor wrote

0:53:22.160 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that quote, the asymmetric use of the terrorism label entrenches

0:53:27.200 --> 0:53:31.319
<v Speaker 1>fear of the other. That is, because we only talk

0:53:31.360 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>about terrorism when we mean Islamic extremist terrorism, we come

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to associate Islam with terrorism. This has obvious negative consequences

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 1>for Muslims. Of course, the last twenty five years have

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 1>been an unending litany of civil rights violations, but it

0:53:50.960 --> 0:53:56.280
<v Speaker 1>also prevents us from appropriately addressing any other form of terrorism.

0:53:57.040 --> 0:54:00.560
<v Speaker 1>The inability to recognize terror when it is something other

0:54:00.640 --> 0:54:03.879
<v Speaker 1>than Post nine to eleven hysteria leads to right wing

0:54:03.960 --> 0:54:10.520
<v Speaker 1>extremist violence being deprioritized. Terrorism investigations are thorough. I mean,

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:15.640
<v Speaker 1>think about Zachary Chesser, right, the FBI spent six years

0:54:16.000 --> 0:54:19.600
<v Speaker 1>investigating a man that he spoke to twice over a

0:54:19.719 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 1>year before he made an online threat against the creators

0:54:22.560 --> 0:54:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of a cartoon. But right wing extremist violence, because we

0:54:27.880 --> 0:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>can't call it terrorism, is quickly relegated to lone wolf territory,

0:54:32.960 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's little attention page of the environment that radicalized

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the perpetrator or potential sources of support and encouragement within

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:45.319
<v Speaker 1>his network. If the government put even ten percent of

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that energy into investigating and prosecuting far right extremists. They'd

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:54.520
<v Speaker 1>be drowning in prosecutions. It would not take six years

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to catch your average American neo Nazi agreeing to engage

0:54:57.600 --> 0:54:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in a terrorist act.

0:55:00.480 --> 0:55:04.680
<v Speaker 2>But is that useful? I mean, ultimately, I think the.

0:55:04.600 --> 0:55:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Word itself is dangerous territory. In the twenty four years

0:55:08.880 --> 0:55:13.400
<v Speaker 1>since nine to eleven, the word terrorism has largely served

0:55:13.400 --> 0:55:17.800
<v Speaker 1>as a tool for increasing state surveillance or systematically violating

0:55:17.800 --> 0:55:23.240
<v Speaker 1>civil rights and engorging law enforcement budgets, and it hasn't

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:26.879
<v Speaker 1>made a safer But if we're going to use that word,

0:55:27.520 --> 0:55:30.520
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to have that framework, we need to

0:55:30.560 --> 0:55:34.279
<v Speaker 1>think about what we mean when we say it. As

0:55:34.320 --> 0:55:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Taylor writes, quote, labeling an act as terrorism serves as

0:55:38.880 --> 0:55:43.600
<v Speaker 1>an official statement about the severity of the crime. It's

0:55:43.640 --> 0:55:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a legal framework, sure, but it's a statement about what matters.

0:55:49.360 --> 0:55:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's no grand theory of change that I can

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:55.839
<v Speaker 1>offer you here. Giving the government more tools for prosecution

0:55:56.640 --> 0:56:00.800
<v Speaker 1>probably won't really help. They're already making ideal, logical choices

0:56:00.800 --> 0:56:04.719
<v Speaker 1>about how to use the tools they have. I guess

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the only real takeaway from this story is that no

0:56:08.160 --> 0:56:11.760
<v Speaker 1>one is ever going to text you demanding the codes

0:56:11.800 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 1>off the back of a gift card for any legitimate reason.

0:56:16.480 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Usually it's a scammer.

0:56:17.719 --> 0:56:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Pretending to be the irs to scare your grandma into

0:56:20.320 --> 0:56:26.080
<v Speaker 1>emptying her savings account. But sometimes it's an FBI agent

0:56:26.600 --> 0:56:45.439
<v Speaker 1>pretending to be your friend. Who joined isis? Weird Little

0:56:45.480 --> 0:56:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Guys is a production of Cool Zone Media and iHeartRadio.

0:56:48.120 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 1>It's researched, written and recorded by me, Molly Hunger. Our

0:56:51.520 --> 0:56:54.839
<v Speaker 1>executive producers are Sophie Leuchtermann and Robert Evans. The show

0:56:54.880 --> 0:56:57.319
<v Speaker 1>is edited by the wildly talent of Gry Gigan. The

0:56:57.320 --> 0:57:00.000
<v Speaker 1>theme music was composed by Brad Diggert. You can email

0:57:00.160 --> 0:57:02.200
<v Speaker 1>me at Weird Little Guys podcast at gmail dot com.

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I will definitely read it, but I probably.

0:57:03.800 --> 0:57:04.399
<v Speaker 2>Won't to answer it.

0:57:04.400 --> 0:57:07.600
<v Speaker 1>It's nothing personal. You can exchange conspiracy theories about the

0:57:07.600 --> 0:57:09.800
<v Speaker 1>show with other listeners on the Weird Little Guys subreddit.

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Just don't post anything that's going to make you one

0:57:12.880 --> 0:57:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of my Weird Little Guys