WEBVTT - Rerun: It's All Relative

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey therein

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>an executive producer with iHeartRadio, and how the tech are you.

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>We have an episode that originally published on July first,

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. It's called It's All Relative And when I

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 1>was a kid, I was convinced that Einstein's theories were

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>these super complicated explanations of the universe that really had

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>no real intersection with my daily life. But as it

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>turns out, without an understanding of relativity, a lot of

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the technology we rely upon wouldn't work properly. And it's

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>fascinating stuff. Hope you enjoy. The hertz unit refers to

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the number of repeated phenomena over the course of a second.

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So well, imagine that you're dribbling a basketball, so that

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball goes from your hand to the ground back

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>up to your hand once per second. Well, you could

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>describe your dribbling as being one hurts in frequency one

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 1>full cycle per second, up down, up. Now, if you

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>dribbled twice as fast, so that the ball went up, down,

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>up two full times per second, then it would be

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>two hurts. Well, we can describe lots of stuff with

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the unit hurts. We use it to describe sounds, in

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>which case we're talking about the frequency at which stuff vibrates.

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Typical human hearing spans a range of frequencies that at

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the low end is at twenty hurts. That represents the

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>lowest pitches of sounds. You get to go those deep

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>bass notes. That's around the twenty hurts of area, and

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>then it goes all the way up to twenty kill

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a hurts or twenty thousand hurts. That represents the very

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>highest pitches that people can typically hear, and those frequencies

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>correlate to how quickly stuff is vibrating back and forth. Now,

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to us hearing things, we usually mean

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about the vibrations and fluctuation and air pressure,

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and those fluctuations and air pressure interact with our ear drums.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>But we can use hurts to talk about all sorts

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, including the processor speed of a CPU. In

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that case, we're really talking about the number of clock

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>cycles per second, So you get it. This is a

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>description of the frequency of the number of times a

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>certain thing happens like within a second. And I also

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>explained that we measure the rate at which we can

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>send data using the term bits. A bit is a

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>basic unit of digital information, and when we talk about computers,

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about bits in the form of a zero

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>or a one binary information, just like your basic two

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>way physical switch has two positions off or on. So

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>if you hear a term like kill a bit, that

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>means one thousand bits, and a megabit is one million bits,

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and a gigabit would be one billion bits. Likewise, megabits

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>per second tells us how many million bits can move

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>from one point to another per second over that connection.

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you've got a one hundred megabit per second connection,

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>theoretically it would mean that up to one hundred million

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>bits can transfer across that communication channel per second, though

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not how it works out most of the time,

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>but that's a matter for a different episode. I didn't

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>mention that this is different from something like megabytes. So

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a byte is a unit that consists of eight bits.

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>And this gets confusing because we often describe stuff like

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>file sizes in terms of bytes, but transfer speeds in

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of bits. So let's say that you do have

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that one hundred megabits per second download speed, and you

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>want to download a one hundred megabyte file, well, that

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>means it's not going to take one second. It's going

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to take eight seconds to download the file, because a

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>megabyte is eight times larger than a megabit. And actually

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>even that is a little bit misleading because in computer

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>memory terms, we typically look at units of memory based

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>on powers of two rather than powers of ten. So

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>instead of a kilobyte being one thousand bytes, it's actually

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>one thy twenty four bytes. And there's no standardization in

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry, so sometimes people will say a kilobyte

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>and they mean one thousand bytes. Sometimes they'll say killobyte

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and they mean one thy twenty four bytes, and you

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>will want to tear your hair out, and then you'll

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>look like I do, I'm bald if you didn't know.

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>But this episode isn't about the peculiarities of our naming

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.359
<v Speaker 1>conventions and the computer information age. Instead, I wanted to

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>tackle something else that affects everything really, but in particular,

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>we really had to suss it out in order to

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>make certain types of satellites work properly, and this is

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the concept of relativity. So in this episode, we're really

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>going to learn why an understanding of relativity is important

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>if we want our certain satellite technologies to work, and

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it serves as a great reminder that technology is only

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>really possible through an understanding of science. You can think

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of tech as the physical manifestation of our understanding of

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>scientific principles, and that means if we were wrong in

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of science, the technology shouldn't really work. So

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in a way, you can think of technology that works

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>as evidence that the scientific method is a darn good formula.

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Since we're talking about relativity, it means we're going to

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>be talking about a real Einstein today. His name was Einstein,

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>which is convenient. But before we get to Einstein, we

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>have Galileo Galileo Galileo figure Ro. Wait No, I'm sorry,

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>wait that's Bohemian Rhapsody. I meant Galileo Galilei. This. Galileo

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>made an observation that if you've got two observers moving

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>at a constant speed and direction, so they're moving at

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the same velocity, they will get the same results for

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>any experiment that involves moving stuff around a mechanical experiment.

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>This is easier to understand if we use an example,

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 1>and I like one that my colleague Robert Lamb used

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>when he wrote about relativity for HowStuffWorks dot com back

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>in the day. He used an example of a train

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and a scientific ping pong ball. All right, so imagine

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you've got a scientist who's standing in the middle of

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>an aisle on a moving train, and the train is

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>moving at a steady speed in a straight line, so

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>there are no active forces of acceleration going on here. Remember,

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>acceleration describes a force that involves a change in velocity,

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 1>so that either means a change in direction or a

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>change in speed, or both. But in this case constant

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>speed constant direction. Robert used nice round numbers in his examples,

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>so he suggested that the train is moving at one

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred miles per hour. Well it's not round. If we

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>go to the metric system, that would be one hundred

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and sixty one kilometers per hour. If the train stays

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>steady to the scientist, it will feel as if that

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>scientist is actually just standing still, just anywhere, and we're

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>conveniently ignoring an emotion that would happen due to irregularities

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>with the train's wheels or the train tracks or anything

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>like that. And if this is hard for you to imagine,

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>just think about how you feel when you're standing still

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>or sitting still or laying down here on Earth. We

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>know the Earth is moving through space. It is a

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>body in motion, but when we are still relative to

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the Earth itself, we don't feel that motion. Assuming there's

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>not some other weird event going on, like an earthquake,

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>which is something separate. But back to our hypothetical train,

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the scientist tosses the ping pong ball down the aisle. Now,

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>from the scientist's perspective, this ping pong ball will travel

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>at whatever speed they threw it at. Robert actually suggests

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a relatively gentle toss of five miles per hour or

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>eight kilometers per hour. The ping pong ball would bounce

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>down the aisle, just as it would if the scientists

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>were to toss the ball on a train that isn't

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>moving at all, or on just flat ground. However, let's

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>say we have a second observer who's not on the train.

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>They're standing off to the side, and they can see

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>through the train. To this person, it will appear as

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>if the ping pong ball is moving very fast. Indeed,

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>relative to this stationary observer, the ping pong ball will

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>appear to move at the speed at which it was

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>thrown in addition to the speed of the train itself.

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>So if we take the two figures, we would get

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 1>one hundred five miles per hour or one hundred and

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine per hour. This is called a Galilean transformation. Alternatively,

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>if the scientists were throwing the ping pong ball in

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the opposite direction of the train's travel, so they're facing

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>toward the back of the train, it would appear to

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>this second observer the ping pong ball was moving at

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a slightly slower speed than the overall train was, whereas

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to the scientist on board, the ping pong ball would

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>still be traveling at that five mile per hour speed.

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is where the term relativity comes into play.

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>The effects observed are relative to the perspective of the observer.

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>It's all based on the reference frame of that observer.

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>If you're on the train, then you're just looking at

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a ping pong ball bouncing at a relatively slow speed

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>down the aisle. If you're not on the train, the

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>ping pong ball is moving quite fast, so it's all relative.

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Isaac Newton would follow along and say, yeah, mate, this

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>all tracks. I don't know why he talked like that.

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>In his Laws of Motion, Newton stated that these laws

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of motion should hold in an inertial frame as well

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>as reference frame that was moving at a constant velocity

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>relative to the inertial frame. An inertial frame, by the way,

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is just a frame of reference in which there are

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>zero net forces acting upon it, so that there are

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>no forces of acceleration in play. So in our example,

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the train that we talked about, that would be our

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>inertial frame. All of this is fairly intuitive, but then

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we get to something really tricky. Einstein would establish that

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light in a vacuum is the fastest

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>speed in our universe. Nothing can go faster than that.

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>But hey, what if you're on a train that's traveling

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 1>one hundred miles per hour and you're facing forward, you're

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>facing the direction of travel, and then you have a

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>flashlight and you turn on the flashlight. Well, doesn't that

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>mean you should perform a Galileean transformation on this and

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>say the light from that flashlight in your hands is

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>actually traveling at the normal speed of light on board

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the train. But also get that boost of the trains travel,

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>so it should be the speed of light plus one

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred miles per hour. Doesn't that make sense? While according

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to actual experiments performed before Einstein would come around to

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>explain things, the answer was Nope, doesn't look like it

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>works that way. Scientists Edward Morley and Albert A. Michelson

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>created an experiment to measure the speed of light back

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen eighty seven, and actually they were looking for

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>something else. They were looking for evidence of a hypothetical

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>substance called luminiferous ether. Say why, all right, we'll stick

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>with me, because in a way this does make sense. Okay,

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So on Earth we see waves traveling through a medium, right,

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Like if you look out in the ocean, you can

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>see actual waves in the water, and the water is

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a physical medium through which these waves travel. Sound can't

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>travel in space because space is effect actively a vacuum.

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>The particles that are in space are so far apart

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>from one another that there's no way for the vibration

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of one particle to come into contact and affect another particle.

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>So sound can't travel. Sound travels through the propagation of

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>vibrational waves. And if your stuff isn't in contact with

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>each other, there's no way for them to have that

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>wave propagate. So there has to be some sort of

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>medium like air or solid surfaces or something in order

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for sound travel. Well, if that's the case, said the

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>folks of the time, then stuff like light must need

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>some sort of medium to travel through, right. I mean

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>sound has to have something. Light must have something too.

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Light can definitely travel through space. I mean, that's how

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we can see anything, because light from the Sun travels

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>through space to hit the Earth. So the light has

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to be moving through some sort of medium we cannot

0:12:55.240 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 1>observe directly. This hypothetical medium was the aforementioned maniferous ether.

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But assuming this ether existed at all, it had to

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>be pretty darn special because we can't feel it, we

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>can't detect it, it creates no observable effects, So if

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it were real, it had to be unlike pretty much

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>anything else we had discovered up to that point. Now,

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>let's assume that the universe is filled with this ether stuff.

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>The question rises, how the heck does the ether interact

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>with all the physical stuff that's in the universe, the

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>actual matter and also energy. After all, the bodies in

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>space like stars, planets, moons and all that other stuff.

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>All of that is moving, none of it is standing still,

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and if it is moving, it would presumably disturb this

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>ether medium, right. I mean, if you move your hand

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>through a pool of water, you are disturbing that water.

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>You're making currents and eddies. So it was thought that

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the motion of all these elements in space would disturb

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the ether in some way, and hypothetically there would be

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>some sort of ether wind. But if there were a wind,

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>then presumably the speed of light would be affected depending

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>upon the wind's direction in relation to the light's direction.

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So think of a really windy day in the real world.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're walking against a very very tough wind, like

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a gale force wind, you have to power through it

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep moving forward. Now, if you're walking with the wind,

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>like the wind is to your back and pushing you,

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>then you get a big boost. Well, the same thing

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>should be happening with light if ether wind were real,

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and so Mickelson and Morley devised a gadget that would

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>split light into two beams, directing those beams down different paths,

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>using mirrors in different directions, and seeing if those two

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>beams of light would hit an eyepiece at different times.

0:14:56.680 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>The thought being well, one of these directions would theoretically

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>be in the same direction as the ether wind, and

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>one would be at a cross direction of ether wind,

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>So we should see a difference in the amount of

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>time it takes for the light from this one source

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that's been split into two to arrive at an eyepiece.

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>But that's not what they found. They observed no such effect.

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>So if there were such a thing as ether, the

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff wasn't giving either a boost or a drag on

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>light itself. No matter what. The light was traveling at

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a constant speed, which turned out to be approximately one

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred eighty six thousand miles per second or around three

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand kilometers per second. Now that flew in the

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>face of classic Newtonian physics clearly. With the example of

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the ping pong ball and the train, the ping pong

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>ball has to be traveling faster than the train it's on.

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that just makes sense. If you were standing

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>on the top of the very front of the train

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you threw the ping pong ball, and we

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>ignore stuff like wind resistant, the ping pong ball would

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>land ahead of the train, So it has to be

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>going faster. So what the heck was so special about

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>light and what was going on? Well, this was one

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of the great mysteries that Albert Einstein set his mind

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to unraveling, and it formed the basis of one of

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>his great theories of relativity. And this would be the

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>theory of special relativity, which poses that the laws of

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>physics are in the same in all inertial frames of references.

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And that means the speed of light will be the

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>same for all observers, regardless of their relative perspectives. It

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter the context. The speed of light is the

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>speed of light. Now, there's an implication to this theory

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that really got people scratching their heads. If the speed

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of light is absolutely constant, that would mean that stuff

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like distance and time are not. And as a heck

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of a brain teaser, when we come back, we'll explore

0:16:54.520 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>this more. Let's imagine that you live half a mile

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>away from a lovely park, and it's a half mile

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>away in the morning, it's a half mile away. At night,

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a half mile away. On a Tuesday, it's a

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>half mile away. On a Saturday. Half a mile is

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>half a mile, right, it's a reliable constant in our lives.

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>If it weren't, we could never give directions to anywhere

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>because all the measurements and landmarks would change all the time,

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and our world wouldn't make sense the way it does

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>to us now. So in our individual experiences, in our

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>day to day lives, stuff like distance seems pretty darn

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>reliable and fixed. So how dare Einstein come along with

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>this theory of special relativity at nineteen oh five and say, well, yeah,

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>but see, the speed of light is really the true constant,

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and for that to work, time and distance or space,

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>in other word, words, must be somewhat mutable. Einstein positive

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that there is no absolute frame of reference in our universe,

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.679
<v Speaker 1>which means there is no place in the universe that

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>is totally stationary. Everything is moving, which means all motion

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>is relative. You can't really talk about moving except in

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.959
<v Speaker 1>reference to some other moving thing. So even as we

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>sit still and try to meditate, we do so on

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>a planet that is hurtling through space. We are in motion.

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>We're all moving through space and time, and we all

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>have a frame of reference, and each frame of reference

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>is just as legitimate as every other frame of reference,

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>or I guess you could say, if everybody's super, nobody is.

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess I've watched The Incredibles too many times. Well, anyway,

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 1>this particular nineteen oh five theory is called special relativity

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>because Einstein's explanation only covered special cases, that being when

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>two inertial frames are in constant motion with regard to

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>one another, and there can be no acceleration, so the

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>motion had to be in a straight line at a

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>constant speed. A change in direction or speed would be

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>an acceleration, and to cover those instances we would have

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to wait a decade for Einstein to work out his

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>theory of general relativity. We'll get to that, but we've

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>got a lot more to say about special relativity. So

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Einstein was taking a different approach to the results of

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the experiments done by people like Michelson and Morley. The

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>scientific world at large was essentially saying, well, this can't

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>be right. These results can't be right. There must be

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>something wrong with the experiment or the equipment, because we're

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>sure this theory is correct and that ether is there.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Einstein was taking a totally different perspective. He was saying,

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>if we assume the experiments are producing accurate results, then

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it stands to reason that the prevailing theory is flawed

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and we have to figure out what the real explanation is.

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is one of those important points in science.

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>It's that if your results in your experiment don't meet

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>your hypothesis, it's very possible that your hypothesis is wrong.

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Now you need to do multiple experiments to find out

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>and to test your equipment make sure there's not any

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>errors there that could be causing the issues. But it

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>does mean that you need to re examine that hypothesis,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and at this time the scientific community wasn't really doing that,

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>so Einstein did away with the ether. His explanation suggested

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that our observable universe has four dimensions, not that there

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>can only be four dimensions, but rather there are four

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>dimensions we can detect and observe, and these would be up, down, left, right, forward, backward,

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and then the fourth dimension, which is time. Collectively, those

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>three dimensions are space. The fourth dimension is time, and

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we get the space time continuum, this intrinsic relationship between

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>space and time or space time continuum, which also gives

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>us dozens of Star Trek episodes that would use it

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 1>as shorthand, for things are about to get really weird.

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Einstein positive that the speed of light is measured as

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>constant in all frames of reference. And let's think for

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>a second. What we mean by speed. Speed is a

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>description of how much distance can be covered per unit

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of time. So a speed of one hundred miles per

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>hour means that in one hour's time we will cover

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 1>a distance of one hundred miles. That's very obvious. But

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>if the speed of light is constant for all frames

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of reference, regardless of how those frames are moving relative

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to each other, that must mean something about space and

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>or time is a little wonky. And let's think about

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>our train experiment again. If you are aboard a train

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>moving at a move one hundred miles per hour in

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a straight line, and you toss a ping pong ball

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 1>straight up in the air, well, it's gonna go straight

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>up and come right back down to your hand in

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a nice vertical line. From an outside observer who isn't

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 1>on the train, it would look a little differently. You

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>would throw the ball up at one point relative to

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>this outside observer, and the ball would appear to move

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>not just vertically, but horizontally before coming back down. Now,

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 1>if we repeat this experiment but we use light, we

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>really see how it gets confusing. Okay, so now you're

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 1>on a train, but it's going really fast, like let's say,

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>half the speed of light. But the speed and direction

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>are constant. So you're on this train. You don't feel

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>any acceleration forces because you're moving at a constant speed

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and in a constant direction, so your velocity remains the same.

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, if there were no windows on the train,

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't even be able to tell that the train

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>was moving at all. So let's say you've got a

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 1>laser pointer and you've got a mirror on the ceiling

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of the train and a foton detector on the floor

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 1>of the train. You shoot the laser up at the mirror,

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it reflects off the mirror, and then it comes back

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>down and hits the detector on the floor, and it

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>registers how long it took the light to travel from

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>your laser pointer to hit the detector. And to you,

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the laser makes a vertical line. All that makes sense, right,

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine that, But for our outside observer who's

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>not on the train, it would appear as though the

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>laser were actually traveling at a diagonal up to that mirror,

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and then a diagonal back down toward the detector. So

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.679
<v Speaker 1>for one observer, the one on the train, we have

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a straight line. It's vertical up down. For the second

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>observer off the train, we have an angled path, sort

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of like how a billiard ball can hit the side

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of a pool table and bounce off at an angle.

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But this creates an apparent paradox. The path viewed by

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you on the train is a straight line, and by

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>definition that is the shortest distance between two points. The

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>path observed by the person who is not on the

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>train is an angled line, and by definition that has

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to be longer. The speed of light is constant in

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>both cases, but the distance is different between the two

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>points of reference. And because speed is distance divided by time,

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>if the distance is different, the time must also be

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>different between those two points of reference. Crazy This brings

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>us to the concept of time dilation. It also, by

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, can affect distance. The faster an object gets,

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the more squished it gets. So if you had this

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>train and you were to get up to near the

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>speed of light, the train to an outside observer would

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>appear to be shorter than it normally would be to

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>anyone inside the train, the dimensions would remain exactly the same.

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>You would not suddenly see a shorter train. It wouldn't

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>be like you were in that compressor scene in Star Wars.

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.239
<v Speaker 1>The train would appear to be normal only from an

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>outside observer who is not traveling at that speed, when

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it appeared that the train itself was getting squished shorter. Likewise,

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the faster something goes with respect to some other point

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of reference that's important, the more quickly time appears to

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>pass for those at the other point of reference. Or alternatively,

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 1>the more slowly time seems to pass for the fast

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>moving thing from the frame of reference of the person

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>who's not moving fast. This gets really clunky. I know,

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it gets confusing. So let's talk about space travels some more,

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>because examples actually make this way easier to explain. All right,

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you've built a spaceship and this spaceship

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>can go wicked fast, like eighty percent of the speed

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of light, and you're gonna go on a year long

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>jaunt out in space, and your best friend is hanging

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 1>back on Earth. Now we now have our two frames

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of reference. We have the spaceship, and then we have

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the person on Earth. So let's ignore accelerative forces for

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>the moment because we're gonna have to just focus on

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>special relativity. We'll get to general relativity in a moment.

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.880
<v Speaker 1>So you're in your spaceship. You're zooming around at eighty

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>percent the speed of light, and for you, time is

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>passing normally. The seconds feel like seconds, minutes feel like minutes,

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 1>hours feel like hours, et cetera. And you're on there

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>for a full year. Back on Earth, time is passing normally.

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>For your best friend who's just hanging out on Earth,

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>they feel their seconds pass like seconds. They're minutes passing minutes,

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and so on. However, when we look at the two

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of you in reference to one another, something unusual happens.

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>So to your best friend on Earth, it looks like

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>time is passing very slowly for you aboard your spaceship.

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>To you on your spaceship, it looks like time is

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>passing super fast for your friend back on Earth. So

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 1>when you do get back to Earth a year later

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>than the two of you enter the same point of reference,

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>things are weird. From your perspective, you've only aged a

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>year because you spend a year aboard your SPA ship,

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>but a little more than a year and a half

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>has passed on Earth while you were gone. Your calendars

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't line up anymore. The faster you go relative to

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 1>your frame of reference, the more pronounced the time dilation. Now,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I do want to be clear about this, it's not

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 1>really correct to say that as speed increases time slows down.

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>You have to always relay this in terms of having

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>another frame of reference, because within a single frame of reference,

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>time just passes normally. There's no difference. By the way,

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>This is also why star dates in the Star Trek

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>universe don't make a whole lot of sense. They tried

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to retroactively make it make sense. But keeping time when

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you're on a ship that can travel at the speed

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of light or in the case of Star Trek, magically

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>going faster than the speed of light and we won't

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 1>even get into warp speed at all, is crazy. But

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>being able to use that and somehow relate it to

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>making sense on time passing on planets or space stations

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. That's a huge mess. But it's also outside

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of our episode, so we'll just leave it at that.

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't notice the effects of special relativity in most

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of our day to day lives, because we are not

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>traveling fast enough relative to each other for it to

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.479
<v Speaker 1>be a real factor most of the time. But it

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>does get even more weird. Were it possible to build

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a spaceship that could travel at the speed of light,

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>and you were to take this sort of trip to

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>an outside observer, time would appear to stop for you

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>aboard your spaceship. Now if assuming this was even possible,

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you would still experience time in your own frame of

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>reference as per normal, but your friend back on Earth

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>would see that it looked like you were frozen in time. However,

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a moot point. Matter cannot travel at the

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>speed of light, so it's more of a thought experiment anyway. However,

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we can actually detect time dilation with extremely accurate time

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>measurement device like atomic clocks. In fact, we've done it

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in experiments. Scientists have synchronized two atomic clocks, and these

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>atomic clocks keep incredibly accurate time down to a matter

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of nanoseconds, and a nanosecond is one billionth of a second,

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So one clock was kept stationary, you know, relatively speaking,

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>here on Earth. The other traveled aboard a high speed aircraft,

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and at the end of the experiment they compared the

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>two clocks against each other, and the one that was

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>aboard the aircraft had measured less time than the one

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that stayed on the ground on Earth. Less time passed

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>on that aircraft relative to the amount of time passing

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. It wasn't just that one clock was

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>moving more slowly than the other. Literally less time was

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>passing in reference to the other point of from the

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>perspective of the other point of reference, that is, the

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>difference was right in line with Einstein's calculations. Now, as

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, this ends up being an important point when

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we get to satellites. But we can't just jump on

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that yet. We do need to take into consideration general relativity. So,

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>as i mentioned, special relativity only looks at frames of

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.479
<v Speaker 1>reference that are in a constant and consistent motion with

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>regard to one another. There could be no change in

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>direction or speed because that introduces accelerative forces and that

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>changes things. So to take acceleration into account. Einstein proposed

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>his theory of general relativity ten years after his theory

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of special relativity, so this would be nineteen fifteen For

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>those who are keeping track, This theory would incorporate the

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>force of gravity into Einstein's work, which means factoring in acceleration.

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>So in this theory, Einstein introduced the equivalence principle, which

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>says that gravity pulling in one direction is equivalent to

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>acceleration in another direction. So we can actually experience this.

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to remember and imagine. Imagine getting on an

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>elevator and it's going up, and as it goes up,

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you feel that sense of increased gravity pulling down on

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you as the elevator accelerates. When the elevator is going down,

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you feel a sense of decreased gravity as the elevator

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>accelerates downward. So gravity and acceleration are equivalent, which means

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that it can also affect our measurements of space and time.

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Einstein hypothesized that gravity was warping space time itself. Take

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>something that's really massive, like a huge dense star, that

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>would warp space time around it through its gravity, and

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>we can even observe this scientifically, scientists have measured light

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that has curved around massive stars. This is called gravitational lensing.

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Now here's another thing that gets a bit confusing. The

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>effects of gravity on time mean that time passes differently

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>for objects in orbit when taken in reference to time

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>passing on Earth itself, time pass this is faster in

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>orbit than it does on Earth. Now, again, this is

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a frame of reference thing, because if you were on

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a spaceship in orbit, your experience of time would feel

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly the way it does when you are on Earth.

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>It's only when we look at this from two frames

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of reference that we see how it doesn't match up.

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>So what does this all mean for satellites. Well, it

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>means that satellites in orbit have a couple of different

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>relativistic effects going on. In our frame of reference here

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>on Earth, satellites are traveling faster than we are to

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>maintain orbit, which means that if we compare the passing

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of time in each frame of reference, time would pass

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>faster for us than for the satellite. However, due to

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the gravitational effect on space time, we also know that

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>something in orbit will have time pass faster for that

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>thing than we would experience here on Earth. So it's

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of the effect of special relativity in a way,

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and the effects of special relie relativity and general relativity

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>don't actually cancel each other out, which means ultimately that

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>time on a satellite and time down here on Earth

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>are not syncd up with reference to one another. And

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>for some types of satellites that's a problem. I'll explain

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>more after we take this quick break to understand why

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>relativity is important with certain satellites, let's talk about the

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Global Positioning System or GPS. Now, this is the satellite

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>system that provides data back to Earth that makes it

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>possible to get precise coordinates using a GPS receiver. So

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>how does that work? Well, here on Earth, you could

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>get a very imprecise idea of your general coordinates through

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a trilateration using signals from cell phone towers. This works

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>on a fairly simple principle. So we know that the

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>radio signals sent to and from cell phones travel at

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>essentially the speed of light. So if a cell phone

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>tower broadcasts out a short command that just requests your

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>phone to respond back with a quick response a ping.

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 1>In other words, the amount of time it would take

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>for the ping to reach the cell tower could be

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>used to work backward and figure out how far away

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the phone is from that cell phone tower. Because you

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>know the speed of travel, right is the speed of light,

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>so you also know how much time it took. That

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>means you can work backward to figure out the distance

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>between those two points. However, that's just a distance, there's

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 1>no direction there. Now, if you did this with multiple

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>cell towers, the collective data from those towers could be

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>used to get a rough estimate of where the phone is.

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's imagine we've got a map, and on that

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>map we've got three cell towers A, B, and C.

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:58.479
<v Speaker 1>You can see exactly where each one is. And let's

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.399
<v Speaker 1>say that you've got a phone that located somewhere within

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the broadcast range of those three cell towers. Each tower

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>sends a ping to your phone, Your phone responds with

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a ping back, and you are given the amount of

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:15.959
<v Speaker 1>distance between your phone and each of those three towers. Well,

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Tower a's result says that you are a mile away

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>from Tower A, so you actually have to draw a

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>full circle around Tower A to represent all the possible

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:30.799
<v Speaker 1>points you could be that are one mile away from

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Tower A, So you're drawing a mile radius around Tower A.

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Tower B responds that you're within one point five miles

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of Tower B, so you have to draw a circle

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 1>around Tower B to represent all the points where you

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>could be that are a mile and a half away

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>from it. Now, the circle from tower B in the

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 1>circle from Tower A should intersect each other at two points,

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 1>but that means you could be at either of those

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>two points. Right, you could be at either overlap, so

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>you don't have enough information yet. By coordinating with tower C,

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and let's say that one tells you you're within two miles,

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you can draw a third circle, and the point where

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:12.800
<v Speaker 1>all three circles would meet would be your general location.

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not incredibly precise, but it does give you an

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>idea of where you are. The GPS constellation of satellites

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:23.279
<v Speaker 1>does something similar, only we have to think of this

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of three dimensional space rather than a two

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>dimensional map. So a satellite sends out a high frequency,

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>low power radio signal and receivers pick that signal up.

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>The receiver, let's say it's your smartphone, doesn't have to

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>send data back up to the satellite, which is good

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>because i'd be an enormous drain on your smartphone's power.

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>So really it's just listening for these signals. Now, the

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 1>receiver and satellite both run the same digital pattern relative

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to a specific time stamp. It's easy if we think

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of this as midnight. So let's say that midnight hits

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and and this particular digital pattern starts both on the

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 1>satellite and the receiver, so they're both running the exact

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>same pattern. The satellite beams out a signal carrying this

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 1>digital pattern. The satellite is far away, so it takes

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a little time, you know, not much, but a little

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>time for that signal to get to your receiver. And

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the lag between the pattern that's playing on your receiver

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:25.399
<v Speaker 1>and the signal of that same pattern coming in from

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the satellite tells the receiver how far away it is

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>from that particular satellite, because again we know that the

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 1>signal is moving at the speed of the transmission itself,

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's the speed of light, and that's a constant.

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So now the receiver knows how far away it is

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>from that one satellite. And because the orbits of these

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>satellites are predictable, the receiver has a record of where

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>that satellite should be relative to your surface. Occasionally we

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>have to tweak that record because stuff like gravity can

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 1>pull a satellite slightly out of position over time, so

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 1>that actually is something that has to be a rest

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>on occasion. Now, this receiver will do this with at

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>least four satellites the Y four and not three, and

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I gave the three cell phone tower examples. Well, it's

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:16.760
<v Speaker 1>because the clocks on satellites and the clock that's running

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>on the device that the receiver is built into may

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>not be and really aren't truly synchronized. And the intersection

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of for spheres of distance like these four spheres representing

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:32.879
<v Speaker 1>the various ranges that these satellites are finding themselves in

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>with regard to this receiver can only intersect at one point.

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 1>That's the only place they could all intersect. So if

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a GPS receiver's clock is not matching up to the

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 1>clocks on the satellites, there will be no intersection at all.

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And the receiver will say, well, I can't find an intersection,

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:53.760
<v Speaker 1>so that I know that means my clock is off

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 1>from all the other clocks, and it will then adjust

0:38:57.280 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 1>its own clock to be an alignment so that the

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>or spheres have a point of intersection and that is

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 1>your location on Earth. Now, in order for our receivers

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do this, the accuracy of the

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 1>atomic clocks aboard those GPS satellites has to be accurate

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>within twenty to thirty nanoseconds. And remember a nanosecond is

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>one billionth of a second. That is an astounding level

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of accuracy. And because these satellites are in motion and

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they are also affected by Earth's gravity, they are subject

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to the effects of special and general relativity, and this

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>means we actually have to make calculations to take that

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 1>into account. Now, according to special relativity and the relative

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>speeds of satellites to a fixed point on the surface

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 1>of the Earth, we would expect the atomic clock aboard

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 1>that satellite to register seven fewer microseconds per day than

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 1>a clock on Earth because these satellites are moving through

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:02.320
<v Speaker 1>space faster than we are, relatively speaking, so that means

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 1>from our frame of reference, time is passing more slowly

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 1>on that satellite than it does here on Earth. Ah.

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>But general relativity comes into play too, and general relativity

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 1>tells us that the Earth's gravity warps space time around

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>our planet. And one of general relativity's predictions is that

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 1>a clock closer to a massive object, so like a

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>clock here on Earth, will tick more slowly than a

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>clock that is further out from that same massive object.

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 1>So the closer the clock is to the massive object,

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the less time it will experience it will measure compared

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to a clock that's further away, which is crazy, right.

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So taking only general relativity into account, we would see

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that a clock aboard one of these satellites would register

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>more time having passed on that satellite than a clock

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 1>here on Earth, meaning for our frame of reference, time

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 1>is actually passing faster on those satellites than it does

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 1>here for us. This would come out to about forty

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>five microseconds a day, meaning that at the end of

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>day one, the clock aboard that satellite would be ahead

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of a clock here on Earth by forty five microseconds,

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and this would continue day after day, with the gap

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>growing wider every single day. Now, when we bring both

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 1>special and general relativity together into consideration, we see that

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>they don't just cancel each other out right, because we've

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 1>got that seven microsecond lag due to special relativity, but

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we have the forty five microsecond surge due to general relativity.

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>So in the end, we're looking at a thirty eight

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>microsecond difference per day between a clock on a satellite

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and a clock here on Earth. The clocks on the

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:57.439
<v Speaker 1>satellites will get ahead of similar clocks here on Earth

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>by thirty eight microseconds every single day. And while a

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 1>microsecond is a very small amount of time, I mean

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking at a level that we don't typically experience.

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 1>We don't think of time in microseconds for our day

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to day lives. However, thirty eight microseconds is equal to

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight thousand nanoseconds, and if you're looking for an

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>accuracy of around twenty to thirty nanoseconds, this becomes an

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>enormous problem if we don't take it into account. And

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this brings us back round to something I mentioned at

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the top of the show. We know that Einstein was

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>right about relativity because we have to account for it

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 1>with technology like GPS. If we didn't take it into account,

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 1>if we didn't factor in the effects of relativity, our

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>GPS wouldn't work for very long at all. Our technology

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:50.359
<v Speaker 1>proves that the science is real, or else the tech

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 1>would fail at what it needs to do now. In general,

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a great lesson to take home. There

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of voices out there that call science

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 1>into questions, and some of them are more outlandish than others,

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a person who's passionately and sincerely arguing that the Earth

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:10.320
<v Speaker 1>is flat seems pretty far out there for me, because

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:13.279
<v Speaker 1>so much of our technology we've built upon and we

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 1>rely upon wouldn't work if that were true. Even if

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you can't experience something directly, such as having a meaningful

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 1>experience of time dilation, a ton of the stuff we

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:29.360
<v Speaker 1>do experience on a day to day basis is affected

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>by this stuff, and it proves the existence and also

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of having the scientific method. Now I'll give

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a little side note on GPS to kind of wrap

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>this up. The original GPS configuration came out of a

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>United States Department a defense project. The original purpose was

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to provide positioning information for government and military, but specifically

0:43:51.120 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States and its allies, and for that reason,

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the US government wished to restrict access to this technology.

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>The general line of thought was that it be better

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 1>if the US didn't allow tech that could, you know,

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>give precise coordinates for stuff like military bases or the

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 1>position of various military units to people who didn't belong

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to those divisions. So, as a matter of national security,

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the US guarded this technology civilian receivers. So if you

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>went out and you bought a GPS receiver, you could

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:27.400
<v Speaker 1>get public GPS signals, but the United States was purposefully

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 1>instituting a policy called selective availability, which was an intentional

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:38.359
<v Speaker 1>degradation of public GPS signals. They were introducing errors on

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>purpose so that GPS receivers couldn't get an accurate location.

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 1>It limited accuracy to around fifty meters horizontally and one

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred meters vertically, and effectively that meant that you wouldn't

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 1>really know your precise coordinates. You certainly couldn't use a

0:44:55.680 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 1>GPS receiver as a turn by turn directions tool because

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't even necessarily show up on the right street.

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:05.920
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't know if you were approaching your turn or

0:45:05.920 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>if you had already passed it. It was it was

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 1>not practical for that. It was only in the year

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, when US President Bill Clinton directed the government

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:19.399
<v Speaker 1>to end selective availability, that civilian GPS receivers could actually

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>get accurate data. And that's what made the modern GPS

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>receivers and stuff like our phones possible. So before two thousand,

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 1>GPS receivers didn't work very well for the average person,

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:33.799
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't because the technology was bad, or that

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the science was wrong it worked that way, or if

0:45:36.920 --> 0:45:40.319
<v Speaker 1>you prefer it, it didn't work properly on purpose. And

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:43.839
<v Speaker 1>that wraps up this episode about relativity and why it's

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:46.880
<v Speaker 1>important with technology, and it's not just satellite tech, but

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a big one, and it also ends up being

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a big thorn in the side for science fiction authors

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 1>who want to write about interstellar travel at faster than

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 1>light speeds, because you have to start finding alternative X

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>nations for how that's possible, because we've come up against

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 1>these limits that Einstein predicted, and so far his predictions

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 1>have held true. So in order to travel faster than

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light, you do have to create something

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:17.440
<v Speaker 1>like warp drive, which theoretically warps space around you. So

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:22.240
<v Speaker 1>rather than traveling faster than light, you're decreasing the distance

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 1>between your point of origin and your destination. It would

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>be kind of like taking a map of the United

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 1>States and saying I'm going to travel from Atlanta to

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles, from one coast to the other, but instead

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of drawing a line from Atlanta to LA you just

0:46:37.760 --> 0:46:40.239
<v Speaker 1>fold the map so that the two dots are next

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to each other, and then you draw a line that way.

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:45.399
<v Speaker 1>That's how warp speed is supposed to work, because it's

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the only way you can get around the fact that

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't really go faster than the speed of light.

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 1>But that's a topic for another show. If you guys

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:56.439
<v Speaker 1>have suggestions for future topics I should tackle, please let

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:59.320
<v Speaker 1>me know. Send me a message on Twitter. The handle

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:04.399
<v Speaker 1>is text hsw and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.