WEBVTT - Apple's Vision Pro For Sale and Ford Cuts EV Workforce

0:00:01.639 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hide and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 3>I met Ludlow in San Francisco. Caroline hides off this week.

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up from the program. Apple's

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Vision Pro is officially for sale. We'll discuss early demand

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 3>for the pricey product and why big names like Spotify,

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Netflix in YouTube are snubbing the device, plus Forward announcing

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 3>plans for production cuts the f one to fifty lightning

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 3>electric truck. More on a weakening demand picture for evs

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 3>and the fourteen hundred employees impacted by that pullback, and

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Amazon's one point four billion dollar deal for i robot

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 3>is expected to be blocked by the e use antitrust watchdog,

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 3>sending shares of the rumber maker plunging. All that and

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 3>so much more. Happy Friday. It is the end of

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 3>a shortened week because of the US holiday. This is

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 3>what financial markets look like in the technology context. And

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 3>as that one hundred upper percentage point, let's be honest.

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 3>The big story, the single name of the week has

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 3>been Apple. Catalysts are both the upside and the downside.

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 3>On a five day basis, we are up two point

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 3>four percent and we're headed for our second consecutive weeks

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 3>of gains. Remember, one big catalyst was Bank of America's

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 3>upgrade to buy with some enthusiasm about what Vision Pro

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 3>does on the hardware and services side of the top line.

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 3>For Apple, you can now place a pre order for

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 3>a Vision Pro. But if you go on the website,

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 3>you'll notice one thing. The date of delivery is getting

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 3>pushed back further and further. We have the perfect voice,

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's chief correspondent, Mark German with us. Now, let's start

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 3>with the data we see in real time. If you

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 3>try to orso a vision Pro, right now, what do

0:01:58.840 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 3>you see?

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Ed, thanks so much for having me us always.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 4>The Vision Pro went on sale for pre order this

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 4>morning five am Pacific time, and right now, if you're

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 4>going to place a new order, it's likely if you're

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 4>doing it for an online delivery, not to come until

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 4>mid March. You're seeing between March eighth and March fifteenth,

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 4>for all three storage capacities two hundred and fifty six gigs,

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 4>half a terabyte, and a terabyte. Now, if you're trying

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 4>to do in store pickup. The first day of availability

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 4>is also booked up, but depending on the sizing of

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 4>the headset that you need, you do a face scan

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 4>when you order it, and it gives you a custom size.

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 4>There's about twenty five different sizes. You may be able

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 4>to get pick up in the first couple of days availability,

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 4>but for the most part, if you're doing a delivery

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 4>to your home, you're not gonna be able to get

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 4>one deep into March.

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 3>I think that you know, we're using the delivery date

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 3>as a kind of proxy for early demand, and the

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 3>vision pro is going to be initially a pro like

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 3>high price, point, small volume, niche product. But it does

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 3>seem like there is demand there.

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 4>You agree with that people are quite excited about this product.

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 4>There is absolutely demand. Now, it's unclear exactly what the

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 4>slips mean, right. It could be a combination of demand,

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 4>a combination of supply, a combination of both. You could

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 4>be seeing really low demand but really really low supply.

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 4>So it's not entirely clear what it means. But based

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 4>on what I'm seeing on X when I'm seeing on

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 4>other social media platforms, the usual suspects, so to speak,

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 4>The early adopters in the Apple community are all over

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 4>this thing. I ordered one personally, as you know, I

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 4>have a deep interest in Apple products. So it's people

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 4>sort of in my category early adopters, big time Apple fans,

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 4>people that really want to learn more about the company,

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 4>that are buying misting for now, and I imagine once

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 4>some tech enthusiasts start trying it in an Apple detail

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 4>store storing on February second, they'll get about a twenty

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 4>twenty five minute demo. You'll see sales go up as well.

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 4>On that opening weekend. They'll have some inventory for non

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 4>pre orders, but the company itself, they're expecting a pretty

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 4>strong opening couple of weeks, but for sales to taper

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 4>from there, which is what you would expect from a

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 4>new major product category at this price. The people who

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 4>want to buy this thing have been wanting to buy

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 4>it for months now, since it was introduced in June,

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 4>so they're going to get their orders in early and

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 4>then it's really going to take price cuts in new

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 4>generations of this product to really expand market share for

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 4>Apple and the VR space and make it a real

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 4>revenue maker.

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 3>Right. It follows the format of the iPhone right, you

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 3>have Vision Pro, but I guess we're waiting on the

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Vision Songs Pro at a later date. The newsflow this

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 3>week has been astonishing when it comes to Apple, and

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 3>in the context of Vision Pro, we did a lot

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 3>of reporting about the developers or content creators that are

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 3>choosing not to make a Vision Pro specific application. Tell

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 3>us those names and what we've learned.

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, someone deeply involved in development of the product told

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 4>me it's going to be the applications that make or

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 4>break this product. And right now you're seeing some of

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 4>the top tier platforms designing to not participate. I'll give

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 4>you three names.

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Netflix, YouTube, and Spotify.

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 4>Spotify is interesting, but you can use that through the web,

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 4>and it's a music streaming service. And who really knows

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 4>or cares, to be honest, if this is going to

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 4>be a great platform for music listening. But Apple's really

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 4>positioning this as a video and a movie watching device.

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 4>And if you're not going to have YouTube or Netflix

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 4>applications on here, that's a real drawback now. So they

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 4>certainly have Max Disney plus Peacock.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>ESPN, NBA, you name it.

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 4>But the two biggest streaming services in the world, right,

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 4>YouTube and Netflix not being on there is a real omission,

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 4>and it's potentially a problem for Apple out of the gate. Now,

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 4>I have some theories as to why they're not participating.

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 4>I think both are taking a wait and see approach.

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 4>In the case of Netflix, maybe they don't want to

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 4>prop up a rival in streaming who has Apple tv Plus.

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 4>But at some point you may see enough people tell

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 4>YouTube and Netflix they don't want to use their services anymore.

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 4>If you're not on the Apple Vision pro, then they'll

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 4>have to get on there. But I think that's going

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 4>to take a while. They're okay to lose one thousand users,

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 4>but if you start seeing tens of thousands of people

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 4>saying we're not going to subscribe anymore over this, they'll

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 4>have to make a change. But of course that's going

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 4>to take many many months, if not longer.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Mark. The final story I want to touch on is

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 3>in the context of the European Union. But if you're

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 3>an iPhone user and you go into a store or

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 3>grab some food, you can pay by tapping your iPhone

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 3>on the receiver. And what Apple seems to be doing

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 3>now in the context of regulatory action, is opening up

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 3>that technology to some of its competitors explain that one.

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's interesting. So this morning, you know, the European Union,

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 4>so that Apple had agreed to open up the NFC

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 4>chip to third party payment serve. So right now, that

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 4>tap to pay feature you described ed only could work

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 4>with Apple Pay Apple service if you're a third party,

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 4>if you're a Chase, if you're an Amex, you can't

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 4>integrate your own tap to pay service using that hardware

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 4>component through your application. Now Apple sit there agreeing to

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 4>open that up to change that. It's funny because on

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 4>March seventh, they're going to be doing that anyways. Right

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 4>March seventh is when the Digital Markets Actor.

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 3>EO kicks in.

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 4>That is a requirement of the DMA to open up

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 4>things like NFC, to open up the app sort of

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 4>third party billing services.

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, so Apple.

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Basically said they're going to be doing something that they're already

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 4>planning to do in two months anyway, So not necessarily

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 4>a womin here for Apple. You know, there is a

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 4>scenario where they might lose a little royalty on Apple

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Pay because of this, but if it continues to fend

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 4>off regulators and avoid multi billion dollar fines, that certainly

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 4>is a positive for the company.

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Apple up eight ten percent in the session, up

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 3>two percent on the week, And I highly recommend that

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 3>you subscribe to Marks and Us there to power on

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 3>because you summarize all that on a weekly basis. Bloomberg's

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Mark German, chief correspondent, turn into some breaking news just

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 3>out on the Bloomberg terminal open. AI CEO Sam Altman

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 3>is seeking billions of dollars specifically in an effort to

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 3>secure supply for AI chips. It is part of a

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 3>broader initiative that we're reporting here in Bloomberg myself and colleagues,

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 3>including Dina Bass, that the aim is to set up

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 3>a series of fabs globally plants or factories with specific

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 3>dedication to capacity for these AI chips. Let's get right

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 3>to Bloomberg's Dina Bass, one of the co bylines with

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 3>me on this story. And Dina, you know, we've done

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot of reporting on this kind of initiative. We

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 3>know that Sam Outman was looking at chips, but actually

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 3>what's new here is the focus on capacity future capacity.

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 5>Yes, that's right.

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 6>So in the kind of week of the exam of

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 6>an ouster, we you know, add you and a couple

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 6>of other reporters reported this chip initiative, but I think

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 6>the belief or assumption was that what open ai would

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 6>be doing here similar to what Microsoft is doing, is

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 6>similar to what Google does, is similar to what aws

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 6>that Aprontat does, which is design their own artificial intelligence chips.

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 6>In reality, what we hear from our sources is that

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 6>we're often trying to address is the chip shortage, that

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 6>there's not enough fabrication capacity to make enough chips.

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 5>Now that's been.

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Going on for a while.

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 5>But what open ai in m Altman want.

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 6>Will address is actually not the current shortage. It's you

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 6>know what our sources tell us at Veltman fears that

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 6>there will be a significant shortage a couple of beers

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 6>out from now. So when we come to the end

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 6>of the decade, if artificial intelligence is as pervasive as

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 6>s m Altman thinks it will be, if you remember,

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 6>he's very focused on heading towards AGI artificial general intelligence,

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 6>then there will simply not be in his view, enough

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 6>processors for what he thinks is going to go on

0:09:58.440 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 6>at that point.

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 3>There are still many questions about how mechanically this would work. Right,

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 3>you know what I'm hearing you're hearing is that there's

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 3>all these talks with all kinds of investors to raise

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 3>a huge sum of money, tens and tens of billions

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 3>of dollars. But in reality, it's not just as simple

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 3>as saying, Okay, great, we've got the funds, let's build

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 3>a load of chip factories wherever we want. You know,

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 3>the market is dominated by TSMC, Samsung and a hopeful

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 3>newcomer and Intel. What do we know about what's on

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 3>the table here in terms of the proposed way this

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:33.319
<v Speaker 3>would work.

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So what we're.

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 6>Hearing is an otment is now on the stage of,

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 6>as you see, putting together sort of a group of partners.

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 6>So some of that is the capital the investors who

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 6>is going to fund all of this, and some of

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 6>that is talking to the existing chep fab companies. We're

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 6>not you know, we're not hearing that open AI wants to,

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, start learning how to pour concrete or anything

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 6>like that. This is a really complicated business with really

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 6>just about three competitors in it, and you know, it

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 6>takes a ton of expertise to do. So what we're

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 6>hearing is that the idea would be to work with

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 6>the people that know how to do this, but again

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 6>to figure out a way to dramatically expand the capacity

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 6>so that five years from now the industry doesn't find

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 6>that it's not in a position to produce what's necessary

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 6>an arm to view.

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 3>I just want to relate to our audience that open Ai, Intel, SoftBank, TSMC, Microsoft,

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 3>and G forty two, which is a firm that we

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 3>had reported in the past wanted to give Sam Outman

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 3>money for this, did not respond to Bloomboat requests to

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 3>comment or decline to comment. Samsung in particular, just a

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 3>key name in the fab space, didn't respond to our

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 3>request for comment. But the takeaway that I have is

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 3>that forget what happened with Sam Outman's short departure from

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 3>open Ai and then return He's able to go out

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 3>there and talk to people, raise money, and come up

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 3>with these big plans, which, let's be honest, this is

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 3>a bold move in the context of how chip manufacturing

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 3>actually works.

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 6>Right, absolutely, And he was obviously in Daubos this week,

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 6>so we will see if anything comes out of any

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 6>meetings there as he tries to protect together some sort

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 6>of consortium behind this. You mentioned Microsoft, you know we

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 6>have reported previously have reported again today that Often has

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 6>help talks with Microsoft about this idea and that the

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 6>software giant remains interested, you know, potentially in being being

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.719
<v Speaker 6>a part of it. Again, they declined to comment as well, but.

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 5>You know what we're reporting.

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 6>In what we're reporting, you see Sam trying to put

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 6>together the pieces of what he would need to do this,

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 6>to put together financial backing. As we mentioned in the story,

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 6>they're also been talking with soft Bank and to put

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 6>together the expertise around Chippan manufacturing. And as you said,

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 6>this is a this is a much more dramatic initiative,

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 6>and there's various forecasts for the AI chip field. You know,

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 6>there are some people who feel that there will might

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 6>be enough, and there are some people that feel that

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 6>the industry is on a trajectory to increase the number

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 6>of AI chips that are manufactured.

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 7>That will be just fine, And the reality is that

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 7>will will be fun right, And all I was saying

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 7>is that what we're reporting, the reality of is that

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 7>it's the world's leading AI company trying to have a

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 7>more direct control over its supply chain.

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 3>For one of a better summary, Bloombostina Bass great to

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 3>work with you on this story. Thanks for joining the show. Now,

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 3>another story that we're tracking is Forward. It says it's

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 3>going to reduce the number of workers that are making

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 3>its F one fifty lightning truck, and that is due

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:44.599
<v Speaker 3>to demand for electric vehicles weakening. About fourteen hundred employees

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 3>will be impacted that work on the assembly lines for

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 3>F one to fifty lightning. I want to bring in

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 3>my friend and colleague, Keith Norton out of Detroit, and Keith,

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 3>you know this is directly linked to what we already knew.

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 3>The F one fifty lightning production this year will be

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 3>half what for previously estimated. But just explain mechanics of

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 3>how they're carrying that out.

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So they are, as you said, eliminating fourteen hundred

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 8>people at the foin fifty lightning plant. Interestingly, and seven

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 8>hundred of them will move over to an internal combustion

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 8>engine plant here in Detroit that builds the Ford Bronco

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 8>suv and Ranger pickup truck because those traditional gas fueled

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 8>vehicles are selling very well. So they're adding a third

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 8>crew to that plant while going down to one shift

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 8>at the lightning plant. It really does reflect on this

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 8>weakening demand that we're seeing for electric vehicles. Sales of

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 8>electric vehicles are still up, but their growth has slowed dramatically.

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 8>UBS sees their growth at about eleven percent.

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>In the US this year.

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 8>Last year, electric vehicle sales grew by forty seven percent.

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 3>And therein is the story, right Keith, that you know

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 3>they're saying they're still demand globally, it's just even less

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 3>than are already load exptions. And at the same time,

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 3>we've got to make sure we build enough of our

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 3>popular combustion engine cars. Tell us that the summary of

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 3>the EV story with Forward, all I see is lightning,

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 3>and all I see is Marqi, n Okay transit. What

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 3>are their bigger picture plans from this point? You and

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 3>I did a lot of reporting on that historically, but

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 3>things kind of seem a bit stale.

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So what they have is their first Gen EV

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 8>vehicles out there, which you know arrived, as you recall

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 8>ed with a lot of fanfare, but they've really slowed.

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 8>They've also cut production of the Mustang Maqui. There's incentives

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 8>on that. Now they're really talking up their next Gen

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 8>EV vehicles, which will be ground up electric vehicles with

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 8>all kinds of digital capabilities that are, you know, to

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 8>be discovered by consumers, but they promised they'll be very exciting,

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 8>but those are still a ways away twenty twenty five,

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty six, and that's one of the reasons uvs

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 8>actually cut forward week to hold from buy. They feel

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 8>like the payoff fund forwards EV strategy is going to

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 8>take longer than expected.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, Bloomber's Keith Norton on the Auto beat, Adam Detroit.

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 3>It's great to catch up. Thanks for joining the program.

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 3>They're coming up here on Bloomberg Technology, and all European

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 3>commercial crew is on its way to the International Space Station,

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 3>the first time that all the seats are occupied by Europeans.

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna have those details coming up next. I'm also

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 3>taking a look at shares of AMD. We're currently up

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 3>three and a half percent in the session. AMD pushing

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 3>fresh record highs and what's so interesting about it is

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 3>its outperformance relative to Nvidia. They closed a record high Thursday.

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 3>The momentum in that stock continues. It's a twelve percent

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 3>gain on the week. And this is a name that

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 3>in the next couple of weeks reports earnings. What are

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 3>we looking for? I three hundred x the AI accelerator.

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 3>What do we want to know? How many of them

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 3>are they really selling in the real world. But investors

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 3>seem really bullish around this name as one of the

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 3>picks and shovels, as Karro calls it in the AI space.

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology three two one significant bid for power.

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 3>They're on the way SpaceX rocket blasting off yesterday carrying

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 3>the first all European commercial crew to the International Space Station.

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 3>It's a landmark mission for europe space industry, which frankly

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 3>has been struggling to get off the ground due to

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 3>a number of delays on the launch system side. I

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 3>want to bring in Bloomberg Space correspondent Lauren Grush. You know,

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 3>this is kind of business is normal for SpaceX, for Axiom,

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 3>It's an important moment with an all europe And crew

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 3>and for commercial spaceflight also important. Just give us the

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 3>basics of this mission.

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 9>Sure, So this is actually the third mission for Axiom Space,

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 9>which is a company based in Houston hoping to build

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 9>their own private space stations in the future, and basically

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 9>these missions that they've been doing with SpaceX. They held

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 9>a contract to do a number of these missions to

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 9>the International Space Station. They're a bit like practice missions

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 9>pre cruiser missions to an Axiom has its own private

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 9>space station orbit which it's hoping to launch this decade,

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 9>So this is giving them kind of a dress rehearsal

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 9>for when they send humans to their own station one day.

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 3>What you said is really interesting. I kind of see

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 3>the mission as as more evidence or momentum of the

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 3>public sector space agencies handing over to the private sector

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 3>to get this done. And you know that I love

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 3>the numbers, right, SpaceX charges like what fifty five million

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 3>dollars a seat to carry people up. And then the

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 3>idea is that Axiom wants to be like the travel operator,

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, the broker, the middle man. Is Is that

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 3>a good summary?

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 9>That's essentially what's happening with these axiomissions. And then eventually,

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 9>you know, they'll move to their own space station. But yes,

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 9>the idea is to eventually transfer kind of the or

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 9>give the keys over to the commercial space industry. You know,

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 9>right now the main destination for astronauts in lower orbit

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 9>is the International Space Station, which is overseen by NASA.

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 9>But you know, eventually the space station will have to

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 9>come down. It's destined to stay up until the end

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 9>of the decade, but the idea is eventually private space

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 9>stations will take over what the International Space Station has

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 9>provided for astronauts, and Axiom Space hopes to be one

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 9>of those companies to take over the reins when the

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 9>space station has to eventually come to its end.

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Lauren, real quick. I know you cannot be in two

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 3>places at once, but while we speak, there's a key

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 3>lunar mission being carried out by Japan Space Agency. Just

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 3>give us a quick summary of what's happening above our heads.

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 9>Yes, so, this morning Japan attempted to land its first

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 9>probe on the service of the Moon, and we.

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 5>Were kind of left in a.

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 9>State of ambiguity when they said that it landed, but

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 9>they could not confirm the status of the lander. I

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 9>believe we just got confirmation that it did indeed land.

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 9>They secured a signal, but are not sure if it's

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 9>generating power with its solar panels, which is not necessarily

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 9>a good sign. I believe there is a press conference

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 9>going on as we speak, so maybe we can get

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 9>more details once I sign off.

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Here from Planet Earth. For all views on space, Bloomberg's

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Louren Brush it's great to have you on the program.

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Next week, the story is all about earnings and into

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 3>that valuations are high and expectations are high. How does

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 3>AI God, that's a lot, isn't it factor in to

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 3>that equation? Next week in the newsflow too clear, movers

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 3>I wrote out down twenty seven percent. Amazon is hired

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 3>by half a percentage point. Bloomberg reporting that according to sources,

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 3>the EU will move to block the one point four

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar acquisition by Amazon of I Robot because they

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.479
<v Speaker 3>have not offered remedies and they've not addressed the EUS

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 3>concerns with arguments. And what's interesting about this. Ten days

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 3>ago the EU Competition Chief, Margaret a vest There joined

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 3>me here in this studio, and at that time we

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 3>knew that Amazon had not offered remedies, and she said,

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 3>very simply, we need to understand them, what their arguments are.

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Have listened to this.

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:32.719
<v Speaker 10>In any merger, it is so that if we have concerns,

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 10>it is for the businesses either to address these concerns

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 10>by debunking them or by addressing them by coming up

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 10>with remedies that will solve the problem. And if a

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 10>company say we will not come.

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Up with remedies.

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 10>Well, then, of course we expect that they have good

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:54.719
<v Speaker 10>arguments that our concerns should not be sustained. And we

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 10>are still in the process of assessing our concerns compared

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 10>to a situation where we do not have a remedy

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 10>to the concerns that we have have drawn up.

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 3>So that was the EU Competition Commissioner ten days ago

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 3>talking to me about this Amazon I Robot deal, saying

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 3>we don't have remedies, so we need good arguments on

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 3>why this deal should proceed. I want to bring in

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg to Mark Bergen out of London and Mark what

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 3>do we know? Because it seems like Amazon did not

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 3>have good arguments, and it also seems like the issue

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 3>here is that some kind of meeting has taken place.

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.959
<v Speaker 3>Our understanding, according to sources, is that there was a

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 3>meeting between EU officials and there was a meeting between

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Amazon representatives and the had been informed that the EU

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 3>intens to blot that deal. I think we're having some

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 3>issues or reporter will go back to it later on.

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 3>I want to stick with m and A and acquisitions. Valsoft,

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 3>the Montreal based company specializing in acquiring and growing vertical

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 3>software Businesses announce the closing of a one hundred and

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 3>seventy million dollar funding. Investors include Co two and Viking

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Until I'd Save also CEO Sam Yusif and my good

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 3>friend Bling Vaccinali Bassak join us now and Sonali. I'm

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 3>gonna let you take it away in a second. But Sam,

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 3>this is an unusual financial transaction, so you're raising money,

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 3>but the investors are basically handing it over to you

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 3>so you can go shopping.

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 11>Yes, basically, we thanks love for having me on first, Sonali,

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 11>it's a pleasure to be here.

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Basically, we're at.

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 11>A point where we twenty twenty two and twenty twenty

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 11>three were very good years for MNY with interest rates

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 11>going up, uncertainty around the economy.

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>For a cerin acquire like us, it was a good environment.

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 11>We deployed the capital, did really well, and we went

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 11>out to the market to you know, get additional funding

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 11>to execute on our pipeline.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And we had.

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 11>Option to raise money through equity, but we had this

0:23:55.520 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 11>offer from Kristuan Viking that involved you know, hybrid type

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 11>of arrangement where they give us money and there's a

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 11>payment in kind rather than cash.

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Interest allowing us.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 11>To preserve maximum liquidity to execute our pipeline and diminish

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 11>the dilution. Given that we had such a clear way

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 11>to allocate the capital, we decided to go with something

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 11>like that because we could increase the value of the

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 11>company and create more shareholder value that way and delay

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 11>a little bit the equity financing.

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 12>Sam tell us about the process here, because there are

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.719
<v Speaker 12>a lot of questions about crossover investor big hedge funds

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 12>in the venture capital space. How hard was it to

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 12>raise money at this point in time and why did

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 12>you go to Viking in CO two.

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, Viking was already an investor in the company.

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>They bought.

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 11>Fifteen percent or so equity stake back in twenty twenty

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 11>two and twenty three, and then they chose to participate

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 11>in this funding, backing us to do more what we've

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 11>been doing. Could Sue has this new crossover fund that

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 11>suited our needs perfectly? For us, It wasn't hard to

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 11>raise equity. I think there's a big divergence that's happening

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 11>in the market between you know, speculative growth and sort

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 11>of quality. Valsov's business model is around mission critical software

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 11>and the serial acquisition of these small to mid size companies.

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>The market is consolidating, and.

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 11>Valsov has been able to build a global platform to

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 11>be a significant player that consolidation. The market participants appreciated

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 11>that and wanted to be part of it.

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 12>Sam, what about the valuations you're seeing in the market.

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 12>Presumably they're still falling, So how are the pricing mechanisms

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 12>behind what you're buying assets for.

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 11>So what we saw happening in the market is around

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 11>the twenty twenty two you know, mid twenty twenty two

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 11>and all of twenty twenty three.

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>It was a good market for us.

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 11>So we're like a value is the buyer we're looking at,

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 11>you know, buying things that.

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>We feel could be a creative to our shareholders.

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 11>So with interest rates going up, private equity being a

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 11>little bit more cautious, the private equity portacoles doing a

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 11>little less deals, there was an exceptional environment for us

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 11>because we are cash buyers. We do deals on unlevered basis,

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 11>and we saw our record pipeline and that continues for now.

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 11>But you could see, you know, like with the rally

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 11>that's been happening in the markets, we're starting to see

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 11>a little bit more competition than we saw over the

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 11>course of twenty twenty three.

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 12>What about the potential to go public? If you think

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 12>about your own path moving forward and the rivals around you,

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 12>the potential things that you could buy. Are the public

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 12>markets attractive or are people preferring private ends.

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 11>I think for for a company like ours, the market

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 11>will be would be reactive like the private market interests

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 11>and indication of that, and I think we we it

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 11>would be our plans to execute on an IPO potentially

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 11>in the next you know, twenty four months or so,

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 11>if the opportunity.

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 3>Comes sam in the market, but also in your operations.

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 3>I got to ask, how's AI factored into all of this?

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, of course it's the jury remains out.

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 11>I mean there's there's I was reading about this this

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 11>new Star by Shamat Palapatilla the eighty twenty where they're

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 11>promising to build eighty percent of the futures at ninety.

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Percent less of the cost. Our feeling is we deal

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in vertical.

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 11>Market software, so the integrations in a specific industry are

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 11>very difficult to replicate and give us a barrier of entry,

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 11>like we haven't seen any meaningful impag We haven't seen

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 11>any impact at all other than the fact that it's

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 11>enabled us to offer more to our customers.

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>For a similar price, and so far.

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 11>It's given us some efficiency in terms of we support

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 11>our customers.

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>There's efficiency around that.

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 11>We've seen the productivity of our developers who up significantly

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.719
<v Speaker 11>and that's accelerating. The jury remains out. I think it's

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 11>still not clear, but you could see a world or

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 11>or software companies become more efficient, and you could also

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 11>see a world where software companies could become a little

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 11>bit more commodity, especially more horizontal companies.

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Also CEO sam Yusef and bloomd octionality. That's thanks to

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 3>you both. Some breaking news crossing the bloom Bag terminal

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 3>within Google deep Mind. Some of its key scientists are

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 3>in talks to leave and start a new AI startup.

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloom Bag also reporting that those scientists are well looking

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 3>at fundraising in some big numbers are involved. Let's bring

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 3>in Bloomberg smart Bergen who is out in London. Mark,

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 3>you led some of the reporting on this. What do

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 3>we know?

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 13>We don't know a great deal, but we do note

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 13>that the names are involved are two key long term

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 13>scientists at deep Mind, which is like being long long

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 13>considered probably the most leading AI research.

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 14>Lab in the world. They're based in Paris, where there's

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 14>a lot of activity around French AI. We saw the

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 14>miestrel ai, the Open AI competitor that came up last

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 14>year and it's now worth two billion. This is a round,

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 14>we've heard, an initial funding round potentially they're in talks

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 14>with investors at two hundred million euros, which is a

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 14>huge amount even for generative AI. But these are researchers

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 14>that two of them at least, that have had multiple experience.

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 14>One of them was involved with the Alpha Go paper,

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 14>if everyone remembers that from twenty sixteen, where deep Mind

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 14>built that algorithm that was the first to ever master

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 14>the game of Go, and it was the seminal work

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 14>in the field.

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 3>All right, Bluebo's Mark Bergen, who is one of the

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 3>team add in Europe and here in San Francisco reporting

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 3>out that story. And to your point, two hundred million euros,

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean Mistrel's debut fundraising round was just north of

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 3>one hundred million US dollars. These are big sums for

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 3>a two person act that we've seen a lot of

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 3>activity around in recent months. Thank you very much. Now,

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 3>coming up here on Bloomberg Technology. We continue talking about

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 3>all things tech M and A in twenty twenty four

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 3>with Masha Butcher from day one Ventures. My goodness, as

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Friday's go, there is a lot going on. That conversation

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 3>is coming up next. This is Bloomberg Technology. After the

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Adobe Figma deal was called off, where do we stand

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 3>in M and A and particularly in looking ahead to

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four? Delighted to say we're going to talk

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 3>about that with Masha Butcher in today's VC Spotlight. She

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 3>is the general partner and founder of Day one Ventures,

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 3>an early stage VC firm but with lots of asset

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 3>under management. At Masha, we got obsessed in September about

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 3>a very short lived IPO window, and then we kind

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 3>of lamented that a lot of deals got shut down.

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 3>If you're a vented catalyst with a portfolio of maturing companies,

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 3>what are your options in twenty twenty four? What do

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 3>you advise them to pursue?

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 15>I think, first of all, Pigama's banner was the most

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 15>interesting and most of important companies of our time. That's

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 15>creating a tone of value for freelancers and for early

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 15>stage entrepreneurs and for people, and this deal being call of.

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 5>Meant a lot.

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 15>I think first of all, it meant for later stage

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 15>investments that looking to invest in later stage and right

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 15>now that investors realize, as you had a deal and

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 15>there is someone who wanted to acquire your portfolio companies

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 15>and ready to pay sizeable amount for this opportunity, it

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 15>might not go through because some.

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 5>Of the regulator might not let this deal to go through.

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 15>This is first and I do think it will lead

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 15>to decreased the amount of investments in later stage. I

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 15>think for early stage it would also mean a lot.

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 15>If this deal went through, it would have been seven

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 15>billion dollars of fresh capital that it would go back

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 15>to vcs, to some of.

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 5>The early investors in Cligma.

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 15>So it's seven billion dollars that would have gone to

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 15>top tier funds and some other funds that have invested

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 15>in Figma earlier that they could reinvest in other opportunities

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 15>and right now they wouldn't be able to do so.

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 5>And I think it's.

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 15>Also influency early stage in different directions. Right now, everyone

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 15>understand if you invest in a company in a very

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 15>early stage at five to ten billion viediation like our

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 15>fund does you do still can have very good and

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:05.479
<v Speaker 15>sizable returns because you have secondary opportunity. You could still

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 15>make a lot of money. If your company has an

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 15>advanced billion, it doesn't have to grow as far as

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 15>twenty billions. So I do think mid term it will

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 15>increase competition on early stage, on the stage where we're operating.

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 3>The AI case study is very interesting because if you

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 3>look at early private market investor enthusiasm and take some

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 3>examples like healthcare or biotech, those types of companies do

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 3>seem right for acquisition for mature or long standing publicly

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 3>traded healthcare companies, right that they could be a destination

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 3>for it. For a smaller firm with a microfocus.

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think AI is very exciting.

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 15>I personally think that they are is the only way

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 15>for us to solve some of the most pressing problems

0:33:56.200 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 15>that's related to climate change, that related to some horrible

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 15>disease like cancer, and it's really there one of the

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 15>very few ways in the world to increase equality and

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 15>to give economic opportunities to let us develop places and

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:15.399
<v Speaker 15>less develops part of the population. But I do at

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 15>the same time, if UAI company, culturally you're so different

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 15>and you operate so differently compared to the rest of

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 15>economy is that I don't think it's a good past

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 15>way for any progressive air company to be acquired by

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 15>old school big public companies invite for in any other field.

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 15>So I actually do think we will be in the

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 15>world when AI companies will be bigger than their old

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 15>school companies that's not AI companies. And I do think

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 15>that in a few years from now, I wouldn't honestly

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 15>tell you which company would be bigger Open AI, Microsoft,

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 15>I actually need to work thinking that it would be

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 15>Open AI. And we can use this analogy when we

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 15>think about any other A companies.

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Musha, what is twenty twenty five all look like for you?

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, where are you going to be focused in

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 3>writing checks? Thematically or geographically?

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 15>I'm really focused on humans my entire career from two perspectives.

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:14.439
<v Speaker 15>On the one hand, I think there's like only one

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 15>topic right now that's as exciting for me as AI,

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 15>and this is future of human And I think there

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 15>very different things that falls into this bucket.

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 5>That can have to do with longevity and health.

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 15>It has to do with future of reproduction, it has

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:32.760
<v Speaker 15>to do with mental health.

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 5>I do want to explore.

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:37.439
<v Speaker 15>What it is future of human and I do think

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 15>there are different new leaders like Brian Johnson that pushing

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 15>the boundaries of what's possible. And I do think Brian

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 15>himself creating a burse for so called blueprint economy when

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 15>people will organize the.

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 5>Entire lifestyle around that.

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 15>I do like to say that future of consumer is longevity,

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 15>because I think you can get too healthy and you

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 15>can't get too happy.

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 5>And more and more people finding out about.

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 15>The opportunity to improve their house, to improve their mental health.

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.479
<v Speaker 5>To improve their relationships. So I think future of human

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 5>is really interesting. And I'm kind of investors that.

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 15>Invest very early, and I invest in founders, and I

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 15>keep being excited about meeting new founders, which is different from.

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 5>Anyone else and can change the world.

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 15>I think tech founders and tech entrepreneurs are the ones

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:30.240
<v Speaker 15>that will drive the biggest change for humanity and definitely

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 15>change for the better. And I'm very hopeful to meet

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 15>new companies and find out what are the other crazy

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 15>things that I come up with that will change the

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 15>world that we live in right now with such a

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 15>big spid.

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Day one Benchres general partner and founder Marsha Bulcher. Great

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 3>to have you on the program and good to catch up.

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. Now we're also going to stick with AI

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 3>for the rest of the program. Okay. Ai powered wearables

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 3>are taking on smartphones, a new crop of pins, monocles,

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 3>smart sunglasses. We're all coming to market and are trying

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:05.880
<v Speaker 3>to challenge the dominance posed by traditional smartphone. I want

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 3>to bring in Bloomberg's Sharing Gafari, who's been writing about

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 3>this in her newsletter. I must say at CES this

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 3>was the thing. AI is real. It's in these devices.

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 3>What have you been writing about? That's right.

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:22.439
<v Speaker 16>I think we're seeing the most hype and excitement around

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 16>AI wearables since perhaps ten years ago when Google Glass

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 16>first came out. You know, people are really trying to

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 16>capitalize on the rapid advancements that have been made on

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 16>the software side with Jenai and bring that into hardware.

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 3>A part of this story is a bet that human

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 3>beings change how they interact in terms of communication. Right.

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Humane is what we're showing on the screen. Now, we've

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 3>had the CEO on the show, but it's going to

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 3>be different from having something physically in your hands. Seems

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 3>to be the main takeaway.

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 16>Correct The idea is for a lot of these devices.

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 16>They're not aiming to miss necessarily completely replace the smartphone

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 16>right out, but try to be a supplement to it,

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 16>kind of like how we have an Apple Watch, so

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:09.720
<v Speaker 16>humane is a pin that you can attach to your clothing.

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 16>There are monocles that you can add to your glasses.

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 16>Meta has its smart ray bands, and then of course

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 16>we're seeing Apple's Vision Pro, which is a lot more

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 16>heavy duty, and you know, it seems like it's being

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 16>pitched very much in an enterprise fashion as well, coming

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 16>out next week.

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 3>And a few monocle the monocle three hundred dollars from

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Brilliant Labs, aipowder. It makes me think about that emoji,

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 3>which you know, I'll post it on X after this,

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 3>but we have fifteen seconds. Which of all those things

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 3>are you most inclined to use?

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 16>You know, for me, it's the classic sunglasses.

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 17>Actually, on a recent trip to Hawaii, I crushed my

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 17>normal analog glasses and I had to use Meta's ray

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 17>band testers that I had for fun, and they kind of,

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 17>you know, we're sort of seamless because they looked like again,

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:00.800
<v Speaker 17>regular shades. I didn't look strained if I was walking

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 17>around in public wearing them. So for me, something that's

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:08.240
<v Speaker 17>sleek and designed well and looks normal is what I about.

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Them, all right, Bloomberg Shrien Gafari check out her newsletter,

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:12.319
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much. That does it for this edition

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 3>of Bloomberg Technology. Check out the pod. By the way,

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 3>new Time starts next week. This is Bloomberg Technology.