WEBVTT - What Should Colleges Do about ChatGPT?

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:28.804
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:28.844 --> 0:00:31.404
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanigogo.

0:00:31.244 --> 0:00:32.204
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Nate Silver.

0:00:32.724 --> 0:00:36.244
<v Speaker 1>So today on the show, Nate, we're gonna first revisit

0:00:36.684 --> 0:00:40.324
<v Speaker 1>our predictions about the conclave. They were wrong, as was

0:00:40.364 --> 0:00:44.164
<v Speaker 1>basically everyone else's, and then talk a little Coker and

0:00:44.244 --> 0:00:45.764
<v Speaker 1>my recent trip to Monte Carlo.

0:00:46.484 --> 0:00:48.404
<v Speaker 2>And I'll try to slip in a few New York

0:00:48.444 --> 0:00:51.564
<v Speaker 2>Knicks references you may notice on the show. But we'll

0:00:51.564 --> 0:00:55.404
<v Speaker 2>also talk about the rampant use of chat GPT to

0:00:55.604 --> 0:00:58.844
<v Speaker 2>cheat on college campuses, inspired by a recent article in

0:00:58.884 --> 0:01:02.804
<v Speaker 2>New York Magazine.

0:01:07.044 --> 0:01:12.004
<v Speaker 1>So with that, Nate, let's dive in. I'm so sorry

0:01:12.084 --> 0:01:16.284
<v Speaker 1>that Pizza Bala did not end up becoming pope. That

0:01:16.284 --> 0:01:20.284
<v Speaker 1>would have been fun. However, pizza is definitely on everyone's

0:01:20.324 --> 0:01:24.164
<v Speaker 1>minds because the pope is from Chicago, and we all

0:01:24.204 --> 0:01:27.364
<v Speaker 1>know that Chicago is famous for its deep dish pizza.

0:01:27.484 --> 0:01:29.124
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Nate, the last time we had a meal

0:01:29.164 --> 0:01:30.804
<v Speaker 1>together was over Chicago style people.

0:01:30.884 --> 0:01:32.644
<v Speaker 2>You know, the last time we talked about Chicago, you

0:01:32.684 --> 0:01:35.724
<v Speaker 2>actually encouraged me to get peaquads pizza, which I know

0:01:35.844 --> 0:01:38.604
<v Speaker 2>and love and like, I had the whole it was

0:01:38.644 --> 0:01:42.244
<v Speaker 2>a lunch sized pizza. Right. I have not had that

0:01:42.404 --> 0:01:46.964
<v Speaker 2>accumulation of like that much dairy, I don't think in years.

0:01:47.044 --> 0:01:49.644
<v Speaker 2>Pick Quads is amazing. You should visit it.

0:01:49.724 --> 0:01:54.844
<v Speaker 1>This podcast is sponsored by Peaquad's Pizza use our affiliate length.

0:01:55.084 --> 0:01:59.244
<v Speaker 2>I'm just kidding, No, I found this very interesting because, like,

0:01:59.284 --> 0:02:03.084
<v Speaker 2>I lived in Chicago. The guy's a Chicago White Sox fan.

0:02:03.124 --> 0:02:05.604
<v Speaker 2>He's a Villanova a basketball fan, and attended Villanova, has

0:02:05.604 --> 0:02:08.244
<v Speaker 2>a mathematics degree. So it's like, you know, neither of

0:02:08.324 --> 0:02:10.204
<v Speaker 2>us are Catholic. We're not going to shock you with that,

0:02:10.324 --> 0:02:13.684
<v Speaker 2>I don't think, but like, it's very strange to have

0:02:13.724 --> 0:02:18.564
<v Speaker 2>a pope that's kind of like memeable and relatable to Americans.

0:02:20.124 --> 0:02:24.164
<v Speaker 2>And this was not well predicted at prediction markets. He

0:02:24.204 --> 0:02:28.164
<v Speaker 2>had had around a one percent chance of becoming the pope.

0:02:28.164 --> 0:02:31.004
<v Speaker 2>If you look at various shortlists and long lists published

0:02:31.004 --> 0:02:34.124
<v Speaker 2>by various userganizations. You know, the New York Times mentions

0:02:34.204 --> 0:02:36.604
<v Speaker 2>him in like the twentieth paragraph. The Washington Post doesn't

0:02:36.604 --> 0:02:39.324
<v Speaker 2>mention him at all, for example, and yet he won,

0:02:40.884 --> 0:02:43.284
<v Speaker 2>I believe after just the second day of the conclave.

0:02:43.324 --> 0:02:44.484
<v Speaker 2>Do you know how many ballots there.

0:02:44.364 --> 0:02:47.724
<v Speaker 1>Were we don't, but it was just over twenty four hours,

0:02:47.724 --> 0:02:50.324
<v Speaker 1>so it could not have been more than four ballots.

0:02:50.684 --> 0:02:53.284
<v Speaker 1>That would have been I think the maximum given the

0:02:53.324 --> 0:02:56.284
<v Speaker 1>amount of time, if I remember correctly about how the

0:02:56.284 --> 0:02:57.364
<v Speaker 1>ballot process works.

0:02:57.484 --> 0:03:00.644
<v Speaker 2>So once this decision came quickly, markets assumed that one

0:03:00.684 --> 0:03:02.324
<v Speaker 2>of the front runners is going to win, right, which

0:03:02.324 --> 0:03:06.004
<v Speaker 2>is a dynamic we had talked about on the program beforehand,

0:03:07.244 --> 0:03:09.284
<v Speaker 2>and that was you know, maybe he was a front runner,

0:03:09.324 --> 0:03:10.964
<v Speaker 2>but nobody knew it. So I think it was a

0:03:10.964 --> 0:03:15.804
<v Speaker 2>pretty big failure of both the conventional wisdom and crediction

0:03:15.964 --> 0:03:18.604
<v Speaker 2>markets right where. I guess the conclave is pretty good

0:03:18.644 --> 0:03:21.444
<v Speaker 2>at keeping secrets, maybe more than like, you know, than

0:03:21.444 --> 0:03:24.924
<v Speaker 2>the United States Congresses for example. There weren't a lot

0:03:24.964 --> 0:03:27.164
<v Speaker 2>of leaks, and I think it reflects the kind of

0:03:27.244 --> 0:03:31.404
<v Speaker 2>changing global climate toward the United States, right. You know.

0:03:31.524 --> 0:03:33.244
<v Speaker 2>One of the few outlets that did it in an

0:03:33.404 --> 0:03:34.964
<v Speaker 2>article about him was Axios, and they're like, well, this

0:03:34.964 --> 0:03:37.404
<v Speaker 2>would never happen because the Catholic Church doesn't want to

0:03:37.444 --> 0:03:39.844
<v Speaker 2>give the US government more influence, or the United States

0:03:39.884 --> 0:03:41.924
<v Speaker 2>and not the government, I guess, more influence. It's like, well,

0:03:41.924 --> 0:03:43.764
<v Speaker 2>what do they want to influence the United States, right,

0:03:43.764 --> 0:03:47.604
<v Speaker 2>and have some counterweight to President Trump. You know what's

0:03:47.604 --> 0:03:49.964
<v Speaker 2>a good counterweight, you know, probably not the Speaker of

0:03:50.004 --> 0:03:52.244
<v Speaker 2>the House. Maybe the pope is like the only person

0:03:52.324 --> 0:03:56.364
<v Speaker 2>who can be like on a stage as a counterweight.

0:03:56.444 --> 0:04:00.564
<v Speaker 2>And you know, Greemost had had an active Twitter account too, right,

0:04:00.604 --> 0:04:03.764
<v Speaker 2>He had criticized mostly through retweets, not things he wrote himself,

0:04:04.324 --> 0:04:09.244
<v Speaker 2>criticized JD. Vance criticized the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia

0:04:09.564 --> 0:04:13.324
<v Speaker 2>Marilyn Man who was accidentally sent to an l Salador

0:04:13.404 --> 0:04:17.644
<v Speaker 2>in prison. And so it's making a.

0:04:17.604 --> 0:04:21.244
<v Speaker 1>Statement, Yeah, And I think that I think that we

0:04:21.364 --> 0:04:26.924
<v Speaker 1>see that psychologically something happened here and also something that

0:04:27.284 --> 0:04:28.844
<v Speaker 1>you and I have talked about night that you write

0:04:28.884 --> 0:04:33.484
<v Speaker 1>about in terms of kind of how betting and prediction

0:04:33.564 --> 0:04:36.364
<v Speaker 1>markets work. So the first part of the psychology part,

0:04:36.404 --> 0:04:40.244
<v Speaker 1>I think people had kind of bad priors, right, and

0:04:40.484 --> 0:04:45.164
<v Speaker 1>let kind of their biases in an historical precedent influence

0:04:45.284 --> 0:04:48.164
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit too much, saying oh, you know, well,

0:04:48.604 --> 0:04:52.364
<v Speaker 1>an American could never be pope and you can't have

0:04:52.404 --> 0:04:56.244
<v Speaker 1>that sort of blanket statement rights, that's a bias where

0:04:56.764 --> 0:05:01.804
<v Speaker 1>you are you're actually kind of anchoring yourself to a

0:05:01.924 --> 0:05:05.324
<v Speaker 1>really incorrect starting point, which gets into my second point

0:05:05.324 --> 0:05:07.884
<v Speaker 1>that you've written about, which is that this is not

0:05:08.044 --> 0:05:12.124
<v Speaker 1>an event where we have tons of data and statistics. Right,

0:05:12.164 --> 0:05:14.844
<v Speaker 1>this isn't the super Bowl that happens every single year.

0:05:15.284 --> 0:05:17.724
<v Speaker 1>Like the last time that we had a papal election

0:05:17.844 --> 0:05:21.004
<v Speaker 1>was what twelve years ago? And you know, there have

0:05:21.484 --> 0:05:24.644
<v Speaker 1>been decades where there haven't where there hasn't been one,

0:05:24.964 --> 0:05:28.364
<v Speaker 1>and the world changes and different things change, and people

0:05:28.404 --> 0:05:32.444
<v Speaker 1>don't know much about what happens inside the Vatican and

0:05:32.484 --> 0:05:35.084
<v Speaker 1>all of that, and yet we think, right, we're a

0:05:35.124 --> 0:05:38.284
<v Speaker 1>little bit overconfident in thinking that we know more than

0:05:38.324 --> 0:05:40.724
<v Speaker 1>we do and that we have more data than we do.

0:05:40.924 --> 0:05:45.604
<v Speaker 1>It's always incredibly incredibly risky to make predictions based on incomplete,

0:05:45.684 --> 0:05:46.484
<v Speaker 1>faulty data.

0:05:46.604 --> 0:05:50.124
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and look, prediction markets can accentuate that when people

0:05:50.124 --> 0:05:53.164
<v Speaker 2>are like, well they're pretty smart, someone must do something right,

0:05:53.204 --> 0:05:56.764
<v Speaker 2>and they are smart in many circumstances. Right, In general,

0:05:56.964 --> 0:06:00.804
<v Speaker 2>there is in markets various kinds of a long shot bias,

0:06:00.924 --> 0:06:03.404
<v Speaker 2>meaning people are actually a little bit under confident relative

0:06:03.444 --> 0:06:05.724
<v Speaker 2>to the favorite usually prevailing. But if you have no

0:06:05.804 --> 0:06:09.604
<v Speaker 2>information to go off, right, you know, there are what

0:06:09.684 --> 0:06:12.724
<v Speaker 2>a two hundred and fifty one cardinals in the College

0:06:12.844 --> 0:06:18.244
<v Speaker 2>of Cardinals. Right. You know, technically speaking, any baptized Catholic

0:06:18.324 --> 0:06:21.204
<v Speaker 2>male is eligible to become pope. Right. I'm not saying

0:06:21.244 --> 0:06:22.804
<v Speaker 2>you just want to spin a wheel one in two

0:06:22.884 --> 0:06:28.244
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty one or whatever. But but you know,

0:06:28.444 --> 0:06:30.844
<v Speaker 2>especially after the white smoke came out and people like, oh,

0:06:30.884 --> 0:06:33.684
<v Speaker 2>now we know for sure, right, this is a case

0:06:33.724 --> 0:06:36.964
<v Speaker 2>where the conditions were not in place for prediction markets

0:06:37.004 --> 0:06:38.364
<v Speaker 2>to be particularly wise.

0:06:39.044 --> 0:06:42.284
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you actually you write on the edge a

0:06:42.324 --> 0:06:46.044
<v Speaker 1>little bit about how prediction markets and sports betting falters

0:06:46.084 --> 0:06:48.444
<v Speaker 1>and certain events where there's dumb money as well, right,

0:06:48.484 --> 0:06:52.044
<v Speaker 1>where there's a proliferation of people who don't know as

0:06:52.084 --> 0:06:54.284
<v Speaker 1>much about it that some events are much easier to

0:06:54.324 --> 0:06:58.404
<v Speaker 1>bet on than others, just depending on who the betters are.

0:06:58.564 --> 0:07:00.884
<v Speaker 1>And I think from a psychological standpoint, you also get

0:07:00.884 --> 0:07:04.684
<v Speaker 1>into these groups think echo chambers, where you start amplifying

0:07:04.804 --> 0:07:08.044
<v Speaker 1>things that are already kind of front runners, et cetera,

0:07:08.124 --> 0:07:11.884
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Not for any good reason, right, but oh well,

0:07:11.884 --> 0:07:14.244
<v Speaker 1>because he said so, I guess I think so. And

0:07:14.284 --> 0:07:16.604
<v Speaker 1>then on and on it goes. It's like those psych

0:07:16.684 --> 0:07:19.564
<v Speaker 1>studies right where there's a number of statistic that's been

0:07:19.604 --> 0:07:22.284
<v Speaker 1>cited thousands of times, and then you actually try to

0:07:22.364 --> 0:07:24.764
<v Speaker 1>unravel it and figure out, way, where did we get this?

0:07:24.844 --> 0:07:27.164
<v Speaker 1>And you find the study from nineteen sixty four that

0:07:27.284 --> 0:07:29.644
<v Speaker 1>was based on twelve people, and that's where the number

0:07:29.684 --> 0:07:31.844
<v Speaker 1>came from, and you're like, whoa, whoa, whoa. This number

0:07:31.884 --> 0:07:35.884
<v Speaker 1>that has now become gospel is actually incredibly suspect. That

0:07:35.924 --> 0:07:38.484
<v Speaker 1>has happened to me so many times where I've actually

0:07:38.524 --> 0:07:40.804
<v Speaker 1>tried to kind of retrace the steps of how it happens.

0:07:41.044 --> 0:07:43.444
<v Speaker 1>But especially with social media and kind of the way

0:07:43.484 --> 0:07:46.684
<v Speaker 1>information spreads these days, it's very easy to create those effects.

0:07:47.204 --> 0:07:49.604
<v Speaker 2>And if you actually make sports bets, especially I'm betting

0:07:49.644 --> 0:07:53.324
<v Speaker 2>the NBA playoffs a little bit go Nix, by the way,

0:07:54.124 --> 0:07:57.324
<v Speaker 2>you'll sometimes see lines where you're like, this doesn't make

0:07:57.364 --> 0:08:00.884
<v Speaker 2>any sense, right, So somebody must know something, or the

0:08:00.964 --> 0:08:05.484
<v Speaker 2>market must be accounting for some psychological factor or some

0:08:05.684 --> 0:08:11.364
<v Speaker 2>injury that like I'm not accounting for, right, And if

0:08:11.364 --> 0:08:13.604
<v Speaker 2>that were always true, then you could say, Okay, even

0:08:13.644 --> 0:08:16.124
<v Speaker 2>though my model says that Nick's have a forty percent chance,

0:08:16.604 --> 0:08:18.244
<v Speaker 2>the market applug, you just have a twenty percent chance.

0:08:18.244 --> 0:08:20.004
<v Speaker 2>So maybe the twenty percent actually of the good bet here,

0:08:20.044 --> 0:08:22.044
<v Speaker 2>and if you're making our sports bets, you learn that

0:08:22.084 --> 0:08:24.724
<v Speaker 2>it's not predictable when the market knows something and when

0:08:24.724 --> 0:08:27.604
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't. Obviously, markets are tough to beat in general,

0:08:27.684 --> 0:08:29.644
<v Speaker 2>but sometimes it is full of shit, right and many

0:08:29.684 --> 0:08:33.364
<v Speaker 2>times it's not, And you're the one feeling embarrassed after all.

0:08:33.404 --> 0:08:36.084
<v Speaker 2>Instead you say, boy, you know Vegas is so smart,

0:08:36.124 --> 0:08:37.684
<v Speaker 2>but like it's not always smart? Right if it was

0:08:37.724 --> 0:08:42.404
<v Speaker 2>always smart? Yeah, piggyback off it and you kind of can't.

0:08:42.804 --> 0:08:45.284
<v Speaker 1>Dude, I have a question for you, what you know

0:08:45.444 --> 0:08:47.844
<v Speaker 1>if if you were to say, okay, there's a skill

0:08:47.884 --> 0:08:50.204
<v Speaker 1>set and maybe the answer is no to figuring out

0:08:50.244 --> 0:08:52.524
<v Speaker 1>other than what we've already talked about, right events that

0:08:52.564 --> 0:08:55.524
<v Speaker 1>happen frequently, versus not to figuring out, Okay, these are

0:08:55.564 --> 0:08:58.564
<v Speaker 1>things that prediction markets are probably smarter on and these

0:08:58.564 --> 0:09:00.804
<v Speaker 1>are where they're not right. Is there is there a

0:09:00.804 --> 0:09:03.124
<v Speaker 1>way that you think about that, like how to figure

0:09:03.124 --> 0:09:05.324
<v Speaker 1>out you know what, I shouldn't be listening to the

0:09:05.684 --> 0:09:08.844
<v Speaker 1>experts in this particular case, I shouldn't be listening to

0:09:08.844 --> 0:09:11.164
<v Speaker 1>the markets particular case, because I think that's actually a

0:09:11.204 --> 0:09:12.124
<v Speaker 1>really interesting question.

0:09:12.444 --> 0:09:14.524
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you've touched on some of this, right, Like,

0:09:14.684 --> 0:09:18.924
<v Speaker 2>you know, question one is how much domain knowledge does

0:09:18.964 --> 0:09:21.924
<v Speaker 2>the average trader have? I mean, the average person's betting

0:09:22.364 --> 0:09:25.724
<v Speaker 2>on the NBA of the NFL probably knows more about

0:09:25.724 --> 0:09:28.084
<v Speaker 2>the NBA and the NFL, And the average person betting

0:09:28.124 --> 0:09:30.484
<v Speaker 2>at polymarket on the identity of the pope knows about

0:09:30.484 --> 0:09:32.364
<v Speaker 2>the Catholic church. Frankly, I don't think the kind of

0:09:32.644 --> 0:09:35.244
<v Speaker 2>church following personality type overlaps much with the you know,

0:09:35.324 --> 0:09:40.844
<v Speaker 2>crypto adjacent prediction market startup betting type person Right. Next

0:09:40.924 --> 0:09:44.764
<v Speaker 2>is is there are there institutional investors professional class of

0:09:44.764 --> 0:09:48.844
<v Speaker 2>investors who are who are sucking up the week money

0:09:48.844 --> 0:09:50.164
<v Speaker 2>to make the market balance?

0:09:50.284 --> 0:09:50.444
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:09:50.604 --> 0:09:57.044
<v Speaker 2>Or you know, so for example for elections, investment banks

0:09:57.084 --> 0:10:00.724
<v Speaker 2>and hedge funds and rich gamblers like all our betting

0:10:01.324 --> 0:10:04.084
<v Speaker 2>serious money, there's a professional class. Certainly that's true for

0:10:05.044 --> 0:10:07.924
<v Speaker 2>the Super Bowl or anything like that. Right. Again, the

0:10:07.964 --> 0:10:11.604
<v Speaker 2>pope doesn't probably have action geopolitical consequences in the same way,

0:10:11.644 --> 0:10:13.964
<v Speaker 2>so he probably don't have that. Right. Is it a

0:10:14.004 --> 0:10:16.484
<v Speaker 2>repeated thing where people can calibrate their models? Is it

0:10:16.524 --> 0:10:21.564
<v Speaker 2>even mathematically modelable by anything beyond like very naive methods?

0:10:21.644 --> 0:10:21.764
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:10:21.804 --> 0:10:23.564
<v Speaker 2>And I mean, you know, models are hard for a

0:10:23.604 --> 0:10:26.604
<v Speaker 2>lot of things, but that puts like some bumpers on

0:10:26.684 --> 0:10:30.284
<v Speaker 2>how far unmored a prediction can get right. And so

0:10:30.324 --> 0:10:34.044
<v Speaker 2>all these boxes are not checked for papal predictions, whereas

0:10:34.044 --> 0:10:36.444
<v Speaker 2>they might be forbidding in the playoffs in the NBA.

0:10:36.844 --> 0:10:39.084
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. And by the way,

0:10:39.124 --> 0:10:43.844
<v Speaker 1>I saw someone was writing about kind of did anyone

0:10:43.844 --> 0:10:46.524
<v Speaker 1>predict this? And there was one publication that actually had

0:10:46.604 --> 0:10:49.764
<v Speaker 1>Robert Privost as one of the top contenders, and it

0:10:49.804 --> 0:10:52.484
<v Speaker 1>was a Catholic like it was a niche Catholic publication,

0:10:52.604 --> 0:10:54.724
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember which one it was. Didn't have them

0:10:54.764 --> 0:10:57.164
<v Speaker 1>as the front runner, but it at least mentioned his name.

0:10:57.404 --> 0:10:59.524
<v Speaker 1>You and I, by the way, didn't even mention his name. Right,

0:10:59.564 --> 0:11:01.524
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't on our radar because he wasn't on the

0:11:01.604 --> 0:11:06.084
<v Speaker 1>radar of any of the sources that we actually well.

0:11:06.284 --> 0:11:08.524
<v Speaker 2>If anything, you think there might be a bias for

0:11:08.524 --> 0:11:10.764
<v Speaker 2>we're saying, oh, there's just cogo guy might become pope, right,

0:11:10.764 --> 0:11:14.124
<v Speaker 2>you think there might be more coverage and moves might be,

0:11:14.164 --> 0:11:15.684
<v Speaker 2>Oh you got to short him, They're gonna, you know,

0:11:15.764 --> 0:11:18.964
<v Speaker 2>not pick an American guy. But I he just kind

0:11:18.964 --> 0:11:23.404
<v Speaker 2>of didn't really enter the conversation very much, except you know,

0:11:23.444 --> 0:11:25.004
<v Speaker 2>I did be done a see article, you know for

0:11:25.044 --> 0:11:27.404
<v Speaker 2>like a Catholic source. They kind of said, oh, it's

0:11:27.404 --> 0:11:29.924
<v Speaker 2>interesting that people are betting on the pope. We're not

0:11:29.964 --> 0:11:32.124
<v Speaker 2>sure how we feel about that as Catholics, but they're

0:11:32.164 --> 0:11:35.324
<v Speaker 2>way over confident because nobody knows anything right and that

0:11:35.364 --> 0:11:36.204
<v Speaker 2>proved to be prescient.

0:11:37.004 --> 0:11:41.284
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, all right, so so let's let's see how

0:11:41.324 --> 0:11:44.244
<v Speaker 1>he ends up doing and let's see how how this

0:11:44.324 --> 0:11:45.284
<v Speaker 1>all ends up going.

0:11:45.604 --> 0:11:51.884
<v Speaker 2>So America is winning, Maria. Uh the Knicks are winning.

0:11:52.884 --> 0:11:56.564
<v Speaker 1>Which makes it I'm doubly happy because as an ex Bostonian,

0:11:56.724 --> 0:11:59.964
<v Speaker 1>I hate Boston sports fans. Really, they just suck, and

0:12:00.044 --> 0:12:03.324
<v Speaker 1>so I'm i anti sweat the Celtics, and as a

0:12:03.364 --> 0:12:07.524
<v Speaker 1>New Yorker, I'm pro next. So I'm just I'm deliriously happy.

0:12:07.684 --> 0:12:10.364
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually interested in the outcome of these games today.

0:12:11.444 --> 0:12:14.044
<v Speaker 2>But you're winning too, So tell me about, uh our

0:12:14.084 --> 0:12:17.244
<v Speaker 2>telling me and the audience about this win you had

0:12:17.244 --> 0:12:17.964
<v Speaker 2>in Monte Carlo.

0:12:18.764 --> 0:12:22.684
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I just came back from EPT Monte Carlo,

0:12:22.764 --> 0:12:25.924
<v Speaker 1>which is the Poker Stars signature stop on the European

0:12:26.004 --> 0:12:29.084
<v Speaker 1>Poker Tour. Beautiful venuinate. I hope you come next year.

0:12:30.444 --> 0:12:33.804
<v Speaker 1>But I had not been having a good trip at all.

0:12:34.764 --> 0:12:36.844
<v Speaker 1>I've never cashed in the main event there. I still

0:12:36.884 --> 0:12:39.284
<v Speaker 1>did not cash in the main event, ended up playing

0:12:39.284 --> 0:12:42.324
<v Speaker 1>a twenty five K, did not cash in that. When

0:12:42.404 --> 0:12:45.364
<v Speaker 1>you don't cash those big events, it doesn't feel good,

0:12:46.044 --> 0:12:49.964
<v Speaker 1>and just was running horribly right. I kept getting two

0:12:50.004 --> 0:12:52.124
<v Speaker 1>out at three out and four outed. For our non

0:12:52.644 --> 0:12:57.204
<v Speaker 1>poker playing fans, that means, you know, improbable combinations of

0:12:57.244 --> 0:12:59.684
<v Speaker 1>cards kept getting there against me, and so I was

0:12:59.764 --> 0:13:03.684
<v Speaker 1>just very discouraged. And I ended up winning the final event,

0:13:04.524 --> 0:13:07.884
<v Speaker 1>which was a really really nice way to end the trip.

0:13:08.364 --> 0:13:12.044
<v Speaker 1>And the final that was actually a turbo structure, which

0:13:12.244 --> 0:13:15.644
<v Speaker 1>is very different from kind of your standard tournament. It

0:13:15.724 --> 0:13:19.884
<v Speaker 1>means that the blind levels aren't increasing quite quickly, and

0:13:19.924 --> 0:13:23.964
<v Speaker 1>so your strategy actually has to change a little bit, because, yes,

0:13:24.044 --> 0:13:26.444
<v Speaker 1>you might start with two hundred big blinds, and whereas

0:13:26.644 --> 0:13:28.484
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a normal tournament you might have that

0:13:28.684 --> 0:13:33.084
<v Speaker 1>for forty minutes, half an hour, an hour, whatever it is.

0:13:33.444 --> 0:13:37.684
<v Speaker 1>Here like suddenly, if you don't do stuff in twenty minutes,

0:13:37.724 --> 0:13:40.084
<v Speaker 1>you look and you have thirty big blinds left, right,

0:13:40.084 --> 0:13:44.124
<v Speaker 1>Because the blind structure is moving so quickly. It's such

0:13:44.164 --> 0:13:47.484
<v Speaker 1>a dynamic tournament, and so in situations like this, you

0:13:47.604 --> 0:13:50.164
<v Speaker 1>need to be first of all, more aggressive, right. You

0:13:50.284 --> 0:13:52.364
<v Speaker 1>need to play. You can't just sit around waiting for

0:13:52.404 --> 0:13:55.324
<v Speaker 1>good hands, because otherwise you will blind out. This is

0:13:55.364 --> 0:13:58.284
<v Speaker 1>one of those cases where doing nothing is doing something,

0:13:58.564 --> 0:14:01.364
<v Speaker 1>and it's not a good thing, and you have to

0:14:01.404 --> 0:14:06.804
<v Speaker 1>actually be a little bit different with the hand combinations

0:14:06.844 --> 0:14:09.964
<v Speaker 1>that you choose to play because very quickly, this is

0:14:10.004 --> 0:14:12.964
<v Speaker 1>not deep stacked poker, this is short stacked poker. So

0:14:13.004 --> 0:14:15.204
<v Speaker 1>the value of hands changes. So you need to play

0:14:15.244 --> 0:14:19.324
<v Speaker 1>high card hands much more, low suited connectors much less,

0:14:19.724 --> 0:14:23.044
<v Speaker 1>because you'll get into situations where people are going to

0:14:23.044 --> 0:14:26.204
<v Speaker 1>get very short, especially people who didn't play correctly right

0:14:26.244 --> 0:14:28.764
<v Speaker 1>and who now find themselves with very few chips, and

0:14:28.844 --> 0:14:31.124
<v Speaker 1>they're going to shove on you, which means they're going

0:14:31.124 --> 0:14:32.964
<v Speaker 1>to put all their chips in the middle. And you

0:14:33.124 --> 0:14:36.244
<v Speaker 1>have to know that in advance and know how you're

0:14:36.244 --> 0:14:38.684
<v Speaker 1>going to respond and be in a situation where you

0:14:38.804 --> 0:14:42.044
<v Speaker 1>can have a hand that can call those shoves, because

0:14:42.084 --> 0:14:44.044
<v Speaker 1>otherwise you're also going to bleed chips right if you

0:14:44.124 --> 0:14:47.284
<v Speaker 1>open too much and then keep folding when people are

0:14:47.284 --> 0:14:51.164
<v Speaker 1>aggressive against you, and so it's a slightly different mindset,

0:14:51.484 --> 0:14:53.444
<v Speaker 1>and it does require I think a lot of preparation

0:14:53.724 --> 0:14:55.804
<v Speaker 1>ahead of time because you don't have much time to think.

0:14:56.284 --> 0:14:58.204
<v Speaker 1>You just need to know your range as well. You

0:14:58.244 --> 0:14:59.604
<v Speaker 1>need to know your cards well, you need to know

0:14:59.644 --> 0:15:02.124
<v Speaker 1>your response as well. We had a ten second shot

0:15:02.164 --> 0:15:04.684
<v Speaker 1>clock in this tournament, so you had ten seconds to

0:15:04.684 --> 0:15:07.644
<v Speaker 1>make every single decision, no matter what street you were on.

0:15:07.924 --> 0:15:09.884
<v Speaker 1>And we had a few time banks, and each of

0:15:09.884 --> 0:15:12.244
<v Speaker 1>those time banks and it was ten seconds. So it's

0:15:12.284 --> 0:15:15.364
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of beautiful. It's a very it's fun because

0:15:15.524 --> 0:15:19.964
<v Speaker 1>it's so dynamic and so much happens, but there's also

0:15:19.964 --> 0:15:21.964
<v Speaker 1>an element of luck when you get into a fast

0:15:21.964 --> 0:15:22.724
<v Speaker 1>structure like that.

0:15:23.044 --> 0:15:26.884
<v Speaker 2>This is a one day tournament or yes, okay, yeah, Look.

0:15:26.884 --> 0:15:28.404
<v Speaker 2>The other thing that's tricky about these events I want

0:15:28.404 --> 0:15:32.164
<v Speaker 2>to ask you about is like, Okay, typically if you

0:15:32.244 --> 0:15:34.404
<v Speaker 2>have a big tournament series, you're toward the end of

0:15:34.444 --> 0:15:37.684
<v Speaker 2>the series and you have these turbos for people that

0:15:38.124 --> 0:15:40.364
<v Speaker 2>you know have busted out of the big events they're

0:15:40.364 --> 0:15:44.604
<v Speaker 2>hoping to play. There's also typically a lot of tilt, right,

0:15:44.764 --> 0:15:47.324
<v Speaker 2>people are trying to place very high to make up

0:15:47.364 --> 0:15:50.324
<v Speaker 2>for their entry fees. Right, we're getting the plane and

0:15:50.364 --> 0:15:54.564
<v Speaker 2>go home. So how do you balance that? I mean, again,

0:15:54.724 --> 0:15:56.324
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying you have tilt. You can tell us

0:15:56.324 --> 0:15:58.044
<v Speaker 2>about that if you do right. I'm saying the fact

0:15:58.044 --> 0:16:04.084
<v Speaker 2>that like people are maybe calling down lighter and bluffing

0:16:04.324 --> 0:16:06.124
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more. At the same time, with a

0:16:06.164 --> 0:16:09.604
<v Speaker 2>turbo structure, you do need to widen your rain, which

0:16:09.644 --> 0:16:12.084
<v Speaker 2>is quite a bit, right, So how do you how

0:16:12.124 --> 0:16:12.844
<v Speaker 2>did you manage that?

0:16:13.884 --> 0:16:16.604
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you have to widen your ranges, but also

0:16:17.484 --> 0:16:23.364
<v Speaker 1>widen them correctly, so I you know, raggedy aces go

0:16:23.564 --> 0:16:26.684
<v Speaker 1>up in value, et cetera, so you need to kind

0:16:26.724 --> 0:16:31.164
<v Speaker 1>of know also what hands people will be undervaluing. So

0:16:31.204 --> 0:16:34.444
<v Speaker 1>I got quite lucky early on where I ended up.

0:16:34.564 --> 0:16:38.644
<v Speaker 1>Someone opened and I called a pocket pair. I call it,

0:16:38.684 --> 0:16:40.604
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was a pair of deuces, a tiny

0:16:40.644 --> 0:16:44.404
<v Speaker 1>pocket paar and someone else called and the flop came

0:16:44.444 --> 0:16:46.364
<v Speaker 1>with a deuce in it, which means that I had

0:16:46.364 --> 0:16:48.844
<v Speaker 1>flopped a set. But there was also an ace, and

0:16:49.004 --> 0:16:51.684
<v Speaker 1>there was one guy who was clearly very tilted. Because

0:16:51.724 --> 0:16:55.244
<v Speaker 1>this for older French gentleman who just wanted chips right,

0:16:55.324 --> 0:16:58.084
<v Speaker 1>he clearly just was frustrated. This was very early on

0:16:58.164 --> 0:17:00.764
<v Speaker 1>in the tournament, so we still had a lot of

0:17:00.844 --> 0:17:03.844
<v Speaker 1>chips and no one had busted out yet, right, like

0:17:03.884 --> 0:17:06.004
<v Speaker 1>this is how early we are. I think we're level one,

0:17:06.564 --> 0:17:11.164
<v Speaker 1>maybe level two. And you could tell that like he

0:17:11.324 --> 0:17:13.964
<v Speaker 1>just like he had been playing every hand, like he

0:17:14.084 --> 0:17:17.484
<v Speaker 1>just really wanted chips, and so he bet, I raised,

0:17:17.524 --> 0:17:22.124
<v Speaker 1>he called, and anyway, he ended up losing right and

0:17:22.644 --> 0:17:24.764
<v Speaker 1>busting and was the first player to bust out of

0:17:24.764 --> 0:17:26.844
<v Speaker 1>the tournament to me. And he had like I don't

0:17:26.844 --> 0:17:30.244
<v Speaker 1>even remember, it was like ace three off suit, right,

0:17:30.444 --> 0:17:32.444
<v Speaker 1>he didn't even have a good ace. It was a

0:17:32.444 --> 0:17:35.084
<v Speaker 1>shitty ace, but he just didn't believe me, and I

0:17:35.084 --> 0:17:37.644
<v Speaker 1>think he was tired of people picking on him. And

0:17:37.724 --> 0:17:40.644
<v Speaker 1>he was definitely tilting. And I've played with him before,

0:17:40.724 --> 0:17:42.964
<v Speaker 1>like he's not that bad of a player, but it

0:17:43.004 --> 0:17:45.004
<v Speaker 1>was just an awful play and he just gave me

0:17:45.044 --> 0:17:48.284
<v Speaker 1>all his chips, which was a great start obviously to

0:17:48.324 --> 0:17:50.564
<v Speaker 1>the to the tournament. But I think that you need

0:17:50.604 --> 0:17:54.204
<v Speaker 1>to look for spots like that and be willing to

0:17:54.444 --> 0:17:58.684
<v Speaker 1>kind of take full advantage of them. So like, for instance,

0:17:58.884 --> 0:18:00.764
<v Speaker 1>some people would say, oh, you know, don't get greedy

0:18:00.764 --> 0:18:02.724
<v Speaker 1>on the river, don't go all in because he's not

0:18:02.764 --> 0:18:05.564
<v Speaker 1>gonna call I was like, no, actually he will. You know,

0:18:06.204 --> 0:18:10.924
<v Speaker 1>do get greedy because in those in those spots, you're

0:18:10.924 --> 0:18:14.484
<v Speaker 1>going to get lucky against people who are just done

0:18:14.644 --> 0:18:16.524
<v Speaker 1>right and they don't want you to bully them. And

0:18:16.564 --> 0:18:20.484
<v Speaker 1>so especially because I'm female, that dynamic is very strong.

0:18:20.524 --> 0:18:22.364
<v Speaker 1>People don't want me to bully them.

0:18:23.604 --> 0:18:27.564
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Look, and to the older frenchmen out there, I'd say,

0:18:27.764 --> 0:18:30.364
<v Speaker 2>you know, we understand that you're not always going to

0:18:30.364 --> 0:18:32.564
<v Speaker 2>play your A game and when you're tired in a

0:18:32.564 --> 0:18:35.204
<v Speaker 2>long series, even the B game can be asking a

0:18:35.204 --> 0:18:38.924
<v Speaker 2>lot avoiding the f game right where you you know, look,

0:18:39.604 --> 0:18:41.244
<v Speaker 2>I'll be honest, right, you know, I think I know

0:18:41.284 --> 0:18:42.764
<v Speaker 2>my range is pretty well in a lot of spots, and

0:18:42.804 --> 0:18:45.724
<v Speaker 2>I'll know when I can like loosen up just slightly,

0:18:45.844 --> 0:18:47.524
<v Speaker 2>you know, be a little bit more aggressive. You can

0:18:47.524 --> 0:18:51.604
<v Speaker 2>bluff sometimes, but like the multi street desperate call downs

0:18:52.844 --> 0:18:58.404
<v Speaker 2>are like the most easy way to like literally burn money.

0:18:58.444 --> 0:19:00.844
<v Speaker 1>And you know, by that stage in the in the

0:19:00.884 --> 0:19:02.644
<v Speaker 1>tournament series, when it is kind of one of the

0:19:02.724 --> 0:19:05.404
<v Speaker 1>last events this happened to be the last event, but

0:19:05.524 --> 0:19:07.284
<v Speaker 1>when it is kind of one of the last events,

0:19:07.284 --> 0:19:09.644
<v Speaker 1>people are tired and a lot of people are playing

0:19:09.644 --> 0:19:12.524
<v Speaker 1>their C game their D game, and if you're one

0:19:12.564 --> 0:19:15.044
<v Speaker 1>of the people who's not and who can actually take

0:19:15.044 --> 0:19:17.164
<v Speaker 1>advantage of that, I think that can be a huge

0:19:17.204 --> 0:19:20.044
<v Speaker 1>advantage if you're willing to be aggressive in the right

0:19:20.084 --> 0:19:22.404
<v Speaker 1>spots and also don't have ego and willing to fold

0:19:22.684 --> 0:19:25.724
<v Speaker 1>right in the right spots. So like be willing. I

0:19:26.044 --> 0:19:27.964
<v Speaker 1>did this as well to kind of throw your cards

0:19:27.964 --> 0:19:31.364
<v Speaker 1>away in a heartbeat. So I had a few very

0:19:31.364 --> 0:19:34.404
<v Speaker 1>successful bluffs that got through, and then I got very

0:19:34.484 --> 0:19:37.444
<v Speaker 1>lucky at the final table. When we got to the

0:19:37.444 --> 0:19:41.724
<v Speaker 1>final table, I had a good amount of chips, but

0:19:41.804 --> 0:19:44.004
<v Speaker 1>the chip leader, so the person with the most chips

0:19:44.084 --> 0:19:47.844
<v Speaker 1>was to my immediate left, and we got into a

0:19:47.844 --> 0:19:51.244
<v Speaker 1>big hand. So this was it's not good ICM. So

0:19:51.564 --> 0:19:53.604
<v Speaker 1>ICM is we've talked about this on the show. It's

0:19:53.644 --> 0:19:57.004
<v Speaker 1>the independent chip model. So basically, you know when they're

0:19:57.044 --> 0:19:59.884
<v Speaker 1>big pay jumps and when you're down to the final table,

0:20:00.604 --> 0:20:03.124
<v Speaker 1>you don't really want to tangle with the chip leader

0:20:03.124 --> 0:20:05.044
<v Speaker 1>when there are lots of people who are shorter than you,

0:20:05.084 --> 0:20:09.124
<v Speaker 1>because you could be committing ICM suicide. But in this

0:20:09.404 --> 0:20:12.924
<v Speaker 1>particular case, someone had opened, someone else had flatted, and

0:20:13.044 --> 0:20:16.164
<v Speaker 1>I had pocket jacks and like thirty big blinds something

0:20:16.204 --> 0:20:18.844
<v Speaker 1>like that, and so I jammed right because there was

0:20:18.924 --> 0:20:21.924
<v Speaker 1>dead money in the pot and I had you know,

0:20:22.204 --> 0:20:25.004
<v Speaker 1>I had a very strong hand, and I didn't want

0:20:25.044 --> 0:20:27.444
<v Speaker 1>that many people in the in the pot because pocket

0:20:27.564 --> 0:20:30.124
<v Speaker 1>jacks are a strong hand. But you don't want it

0:20:30.284 --> 0:20:33.604
<v Speaker 1>five way pot with pocket jacks because you know, Ace

0:20:33.724 --> 0:20:35.964
<v Speaker 1>King queen. There are lots of things that can happen.

0:20:36.524 --> 0:20:40.084
<v Speaker 1>And then the chip leader rejammed over me and I

0:20:40.124 --> 0:20:43.044
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh no, right, that's the one person that

0:20:43.084 --> 0:20:46.684
<v Speaker 1>you want to fold, and he had Ace King and

0:20:46.724 --> 0:20:49.444
<v Speaker 1>I ended up holding and winning that race, and so

0:20:49.604 --> 0:20:51.884
<v Speaker 1>he was still in, but that put me into the

0:20:51.964 --> 0:20:55.644
<v Speaker 1>chip lead and that's huge, right that hand.

0:20:55.444 --> 0:20:57.324
<v Speaker 2>You're praying for the ace King there. You're not going

0:20:57.404 --> 0:20:59.844
<v Speaker 2>to see pocket tens. I don't think or anything anything.

0:20:59.884 --> 0:21:02.124
<v Speaker 1>No, no, I'm praying for the ace King once he

0:21:02.404 --> 0:21:04.844
<v Speaker 1>once he went all in, I was like, oh no,

0:21:05.244 --> 0:21:07.804
<v Speaker 1>I am going to be out and whatever it is,

0:21:07.844 --> 0:21:13.324
<v Speaker 1>you know, eighth place and I that would have been horrible,

0:21:13.404 --> 0:21:16.444
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, the Ace King is the best case scenario.

0:21:16.964 --> 0:21:21.284
<v Speaker 1>And luckily my handheld. So I think that that's those

0:21:21.324 --> 0:21:23.684
<v Speaker 1>spots like you have to get lucky right, and I

0:21:23.804 --> 0:21:25.844
<v Speaker 1>was technically a little bit ahead. But it's really a

0:21:25.884 --> 0:21:28.724
<v Speaker 1>flip when you have a pocket pair against ace King.

0:21:29.484 --> 0:21:30.404
<v Speaker 2>So how much did you win?

0:21:31.364 --> 0:21:33.084
<v Speaker 1>So I didn't you know, it wasn't it. It wasn't

0:21:33.084 --> 0:21:37.324
<v Speaker 1>a huge win. It was around twenty thousand, so not

0:21:37.444 --> 0:21:39.884
<v Speaker 1>definitely not one of my you know, biggest scores, but

0:21:39.964 --> 0:21:41.404
<v Speaker 1>it was a small buy in and it was a

0:21:41.484 --> 0:21:46.124
<v Speaker 1>really nice way to uh to end the end the week. Well,

0:21:46.124 --> 0:21:50.404
<v Speaker 1>congratulations Maria, Thank you so much, Nate, And yeah, I

0:21:50.484 --> 0:21:53.644
<v Speaker 1>look forward to uh playing with you in the world

0:21:53.724 --> 0:21:55.644
<v Speaker 1>series that's coming up in just a few weeks.

0:21:55.804 --> 0:21:59.644
<v Speaker 2>It's shockingly soon. I mean I'm not playing until like

0:21:59.684 --> 0:22:01.244
<v Speaker 2>the second or third week of the series.

0:22:01.364 --> 0:22:03.404
<v Speaker 1>There am I Neither am I? But I hope that

0:22:03.444 --> 0:22:05.524
<v Speaker 1>I hope that we both win all of our flips,

0:22:05.804 --> 0:22:08.324
<v Speaker 1>or at least most of our flips, that we run

0:22:08.364 --> 0:22:12.444
<v Speaker 1>better than music a less. Yeah, let's take a quick

0:22:12.444 --> 0:22:15.244
<v Speaker 1>break and then let's talk a little bit about chat GPT.

0:22:30.484 --> 0:22:30.724
<v Speaker 2>Nate.

0:22:30.924 --> 0:22:34.444
<v Speaker 1>So, there was a big piece in New York magazine

0:22:34.484 --> 0:22:37.964
<v Speaker 1>last week about cheating on college campuses and chat GPT,

0:22:38.444 --> 0:22:41.364
<v Speaker 1>and I know that you are writing about this for

0:22:41.724 --> 0:22:45.204
<v Speaker 1>your Substack Silver bulletin. So do you want to just

0:22:46.044 --> 0:22:49.204
<v Speaker 1>set the scene a little bit and tell us kind

0:22:49.204 --> 0:22:50.804
<v Speaker 1>of about some of the concerns here.

0:22:52.244 --> 0:22:55.644
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, look, if you have any friends who

0:22:55.644 --> 0:22:57.924
<v Speaker 2>are college professors of any kind, they'll probably tell you

0:22:57.964 --> 0:23:01.644
<v Speaker 2>the same concerns, right, which is that, you know, a

0:23:01.764 --> 0:23:05.644
<v Speaker 2>lot of classes rely on a model where students have

0:23:06.084 --> 0:23:08.044
<v Speaker 2>homework they can do at home. And for a long time,

0:23:08.044 --> 0:23:09.964
<v Speaker 2>obviously you can, you know, you can go on the

0:23:09.964 --> 0:23:12.604
<v Speaker 2>internet and look up information that way. There have always

0:23:12.644 --> 0:23:17.044
<v Speaker 2>been services that would offer to do your homework for you.

0:23:17.124 --> 0:23:21.164
<v Speaker 2>Right there are you know, ancient and modern versions of

0:23:21.244 --> 0:23:24.404
<v Speaker 2>cliffs notes and things like that, if you uh, you know,

0:23:24.484 --> 0:23:26.644
<v Speaker 2>the line between working with a friend on a problem

0:23:26.804 --> 0:23:30.044
<v Speaker 2>set and copying your friend's answers has always been blurry,

0:23:30.084 --> 0:23:33.484
<v Speaker 2>I think, but like but now chat chipetem makes it

0:23:33.764 --> 0:23:40.484
<v Speaker 2>very very tempting to cheat, and especially for like written essays,

0:23:40.484 --> 0:23:44.164
<v Speaker 2>but also you know problem sets for economic classes and

0:23:44.204 --> 0:23:46.204
<v Speaker 2>things like that, and and so yeah, I tried to

0:23:46.244 --> 0:23:50.044
<v Speaker 2>actually I imagine that I had given myself an assignment.

0:23:50.404 --> 0:23:55.484
<v Speaker 2>You know, the philosopher Michelle Fuco. Of course, French guy

0:23:55.844 --> 0:24:00.204
<v Speaker 2>weird into s and m into lots of stuff ball

0:24:00.364 --> 0:24:03.644
<v Speaker 2>you know, but like very famous philosopher. My whole mo

0:24:03.884 --> 0:24:08.244
<v Speaker 2>in college was to always mention, always named up Fuco right,

0:24:08.244 --> 0:24:09.964
<v Speaker 2>And every time I named up put then I would

0:24:09.964 --> 0:24:12.164
<v Speaker 2>get at least an a minus on the paper. Right,

0:24:12.164 --> 0:24:15.484
<v Speaker 2>But like I gave myself an assignment to compare the

0:24:15.524 --> 0:24:19.164
<v Speaker 2>concept of the panopticon, which is this all seeing prison

0:24:19.204 --> 0:24:21.524
<v Speaker 2>where there's like a guard tower in the center. Right,

0:24:21.684 --> 0:24:24.324
<v Speaker 2>it was Bentham's idea who co wrote a lot about

0:24:24.364 --> 0:24:27.684
<v Speaker 2>this is a metaphor for modern surveillance states. And to say,

0:24:27.684 --> 0:24:30.724
<v Speaker 2>how does this apply to like modern day China? Right,

0:24:30.764 --> 0:24:34.524
<v Speaker 2>it seems like the kind of prompt that a student

0:24:34.644 --> 0:24:37.404
<v Speaker 2>might be asked in a class about China or a

0:24:37.444 --> 0:24:40.684
<v Speaker 2>class about pukou or whatever else. Right, And like, you know,

0:24:40.764 --> 0:24:44.884
<v Speaker 2>first of all, if you ask chat ChiPT to cheat

0:24:44.924 --> 0:24:47.644
<v Speaker 2>for you, it doesn't push back at all, Right, and

0:24:47.724 --> 0:24:49.564
<v Speaker 2>you can say things, can you like, please remove any

0:24:49.604 --> 0:24:52.484
<v Speaker 2>traces of this is GPT, you know, please make the

0:24:52.604 --> 0:24:55.124
<v Speaker 2>essay a little reugh around the margin, but have one

0:24:55.204 --> 0:24:56.644
<v Speaker 2>or two good points of insight.

0:24:56.724 --> 0:24:56.884
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:24:57.004 --> 0:24:59.924
<v Speaker 2>At one point in the version I eventually ended up with, Right,

0:24:59.964 --> 0:25:02.124
<v Speaker 2>it's like, you know, my Chinese friend, so it made

0:25:02.244 --> 0:25:05.404
<v Speaker 2>up a fake Chinese friend to testify to a point

0:25:05.724 --> 0:25:10.364
<v Speaker 2>that it was making, and I have no idea da

0:25:10.804 --> 0:25:14.044
<v Speaker 2>quite how detectable this would be. But you know, but

0:25:14.084 --> 0:25:16.244
<v Speaker 2>the students can kind of take that as an intermediate

0:25:16.284 --> 0:25:19.084
<v Speaker 2>point and then remove further traces of it. But anyway,

0:25:19.124 --> 0:25:22.324
<v Speaker 2>it's it's very hard to have an assignment now that

0:25:22.404 --> 0:25:25.244
<v Speaker 2>you can confidently predict was not written by chat GPD,

0:25:25.364 --> 0:25:29.604
<v Speaker 2>any type of written homework assignment that's not kind of

0:25:29.644 --> 0:25:34.564
<v Speaker 2>done with active supervision, and the article is very gloomy.

0:25:34.644 --> 0:25:38.324
<v Speaker 2>A lot of students are pretty open about their cheating

0:25:38.324 --> 0:25:40.124
<v Speaker 2>and say, hey, this is great, right now, I can

0:25:40.164 --> 0:25:42.764
<v Speaker 2>save a lot of time. Right. A lot of professors

0:25:42.804 --> 0:25:45.804
<v Speaker 2>are very despairing of it. Right, you know, you were

0:25:45.804 --> 0:25:48.124
<v Speaker 2>in an era where because it's hard to prove, like

0:25:48.164 --> 0:25:52.204
<v Speaker 2>you might be ninety percent sure that a student cheated,

0:25:52.564 --> 0:25:55.204
<v Speaker 2>but ninety percent is probably not good enough to flunk

0:25:55.284 --> 0:25:58.404
<v Speaker 2>similar to kick them out of college or things like that.

0:25:58.484 --> 0:26:01.564
<v Speaker 2>But like I will say to me, it seems like

0:26:01.604 --> 0:26:04.724
<v Speaker 2>there are some methods that you could use to prevent this,

0:26:04.884 --> 0:26:07.004
<v Speaker 2>which require more work. So you know, you know, when

0:26:07.004 --> 0:26:09.004
<v Speaker 2>I went, I took my junior year abroad at one

0:26:09.124 --> 0:26:12.164
<v Speaker 2>school economics in the UKSES, and you just take one

0:26:12.204 --> 0:26:14.404
<v Speaker 2>big exam at the end of the year and that's

0:26:14.404 --> 0:26:16.604
<v Speaker 2>your whole grand and that's in person. Back then, we

0:26:16.724 --> 0:26:19.564
<v Speaker 2>use notebooks. I'm sure you can use you know, iPads

0:26:19.644 --> 0:26:22.564
<v Speaker 2>or something like that now, right, but that's quite hard

0:26:22.644 --> 0:26:24.324
<v Speaker 2>to cheat. If you want. Students have the internet. You

0:26:24.324 --> 0:26:25.764
<v Speaker 2>could say you can have the Internet, but we're monitoring

0:26:25.764 --> 0:26:28.564
<v Speaker 2>you're internet access, right and so, like if you use chatchipt,

0:26:28.764 --> 0:26:32.884
<v Speaker 2>we will know, right. Or you can say, okay, well

0:26:32.884 --> 0:26:35.324
<v Speaker 2>we're going to have you submit a paper and I'm

0:26:35.324 --> 0:26:39.284
<v Speaker 2>going to have a fifteen minute conversation with you about

0:26:39.284 --> 0:26:41.964
<v Speaker 2>the paper. I imagine it'd be hard to fake your

0:26:42.124 --> 0:26:44.804
<v Speaker 2>way through even like five or ten minutes if you

0:26:44.844 --> 0:26:46.844
<v Speaker 2>really didn't know the subject matter at all, if you're

0:26:46.844 --> 0:26:50.404
<v Speaker 2>being quizzed about your own paper, right and so, But

0:26:50.444 --> 0:26:52.204
<v Speaker 2>professors don't seem to want to do it in anyway.

0:26:52.204 --> 0:26:54.764
<v Speaker 2>What are your thoughts here, Maria, Yeah.

0:26:54.524 --> 0:26:57.164
<v Speaker 1>Well I have I have a number of thoughts. First

0:26:57.164 --> 0:26:59.804
<v Speaker 1>of all, I mean, obviously you know students have been

0:26:59.924 --> 0:27:03.204
<v Speaker 1>cheating for a long time, and that you were saying

0:27:03.284 --> 0:27:05.884
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent isn't enough. And I will actually go further

0:27:06.044 --> 0:27:09.004
<v Speaker 1>and say one hundred percent isn't enough to fail someone

0:27:09.164 --> 0:27:13.044
<v Speaker 1>off times. So when I was when I was teaching

0:27:13.844 --> 0:27:17.204
<v Speaker 1>back in my grad school days, I had a student

0:27:17.924 --> 0:27:22.524
<v Speaker 1>hand in a paper that just looked suspicious, and it

0:27:22.564 --> 0:27:25.284
<v Speaker 1>was a word document that was kind of scrolling down

0:27:25.324 --> 0:27:28.524
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, my, you know, the cursor

0:27:28.644 --> 0:27:31.684
<v Speaker 1>changes to kind of a you know, the way that

0:27:31.684 --> 0:27:34.724
<v Speaker 1>the cursor changes when there's a hyperlink. And so he

0:27:34.844 --> 0:27:38.484
<v Speaker 1>had copied and pasted directly from Wikipedia, and he had

0:27:38.524 --> 0:27:42.484
<v Speaker 1>removed the visual hyperlink, but he hadn't actually removed the hyperlink,

0:27:42.644 --> 0:27:45.164
<v Speaker 1>so I could actually click on the text to get

0:27:45.204 --> 0:27:48.764
<v Speaker 1>to the Wikipedia article. And I was like, wow, right,

0:27:49.324 --> 0:27:52.484
<v Speaker 1>like that that is uh, that is like the people

0:27:52.524 --> 0:27:56.044
<v Speaker 1>who these days hand in essays that start with as

0:27:56.084 --> 0:28:01.404
<v Speaker 1>an ai I And I brought this, you know, to

0:28:01.484 --> 0:28:06.084
<v Speaker 1>the department and said, you know this, this kid cheated.

0:28:06.364 --> 0:28:08.004
<v Speaker 1>I want to fail him. And they didn't let me

0:28:08.364 --> 0:28:11.404
<v Speaker 1>because they said that, you know, there were parent issues

0:28:11.444 --> 0:28:13.124
<v Speaker 1>and all these things. And I was allowed to give

0:28:13.204 --> 0:28:15.084
<v Speaker 1>him a D minus, but I could not give him

0:28:15.084 --> 0:28:18.524
<v Speaker 1>an F because that's not how Columbia did things. And

0:28:18.604 --> 0:28:20.484
<v Speaker 1>it was very disparaiting to me. Right. It was one

0:28:20.484 --> 0:28:22.804
<v Speaker 1>of the things that one of the reasons there were

0:28:22.844 --> 0:28:24.764
<v Speaker 1>lots of reasons I didn't want to go into academia,

0:28:24.804 --> 0:28:26.764
<v Speaker 1>but I was like, fuck this, right, like, you need

0:28:26.804 --> 0:28:29.964
<v Speaker 1>to have consequences for cheating, so that it has happened

0:28:30.004 --> 0:28:33.244
<v Speaker 1>for a long time and it's obviously only getting worse.

0:28:33.484 --> 0:28:37.244
<v Speaker 1>But I completely agree with you, Nate, that you should

0:28:37.404 --> 0:28:41.644
<v Speaker 1>change in response to this, how you grade and how

0:28:41.684 --> 0:28:45.604
<v Speaker 1>you create assignments. When I went even kind of as

0:28:45.764 --> 0:28:49.924
<v Speaker 1>an undergrad, we had so many in class exams right

0:28:49.924 --> 0:28:52.844
<v Speaker 1>where you had to write essays in class. And then

0:28:52.844 --> 0:28:54.804
<v Speaker 1>when I was a grad student, we had oral exams

0:28:55.164 --> 0:28:58.364
<v Speaker 1>where you know, as part of your degree you have

0:28:58.404 --> 0:29:02.004
<v Speaker 1>to pass orals where you are interviews. It's very stressful

0:29:02.004 --> 0:29:04.324
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people. Right. There are people who

0:29:04.404 --> 0:29:07.124
<v Speaker 1>ask you questions. When you defend your dissertation. You have

0:29:07.164 --> 0:29:11.204
<v Speaker 1>an entire committee, right who's pepper you with questions about

0:29:11.244 --> 0:29:13.964
<v Speaker 1>your work and about your research. And if you're not

0:29:14.044 --> 0:29:16.084
<v Speaker 1>the one who knows the data and who knows what

0:29:16.124 --> 0:29:18.484
<v Speaker 1>you did, then you're going to get screwed, right, You're

0:29:18.524 --> 0:29:20.684
<v Speaker 1>not going to pass. And people have failed, by the way,

0:29:20.764 --> 0:29:25.764
<v Speaker 1>different dissertation defenses. People have failed oral exams. People you know,

0:29:25.844 --> 0:29:28.604
<v Speaker 1>fail these types of assessments all the time, and so

0:29:28.684 --> 0:29:31.164
<v Speaker 1>I think what we need if we want to actually

0:29:31.524 --> 0:29:34.004
<v Speaker 1>first of all, like what's the point of higher education?

0:29:34.084 --> 0:29:37.204
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you know, to create critical thinkers and

0:29:37.244 --> 0:29:41.244
<v Speaker 1>people who actually are educated human beings and have well

0:29:41.324 --> 0:29:44.564
<v Speaker 1>rounded who know about you know, history and all of

0:29:44.604 --> 0:29:46.964
<v Speaker 1>these different things. How do you make sure that they're

0:29:47.004 --> 0:29:50.604
<v Speaker 1>actually learning what? You change the You change the way

0:29:50.644 --> 0:29:53.884
<v Speaker 1>that you that you have your class. You change the

0:29:53.924 --> 0:29:57.924
<v Speaker 1>incentives right so that they can't cheat their way through it,

0:29:58.084 --> 0:29:59.684
<v Speaker 1>because it's not going to go away. It's only going

0:29:59.764 --> 0:30:02.764
<v Speaker 1>to get worse. And so you can't just pretend that

0:30:02.844 --> 0:30:05.644
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't happen. And you can't rely on cheating detection

0:30:05.804 --> 0:30:08.644
<v Speaker 1>software because it doesn't matter anyway. Instead, you need to

0:30:08.724 --> 0:30:13.364
<v Speaker 1>kind of create an environment where your students learn and

0:30:13.404 --> 0:30:15.844
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you know, are motivated to learn, right,

0:30:16.004 --> 0:30:19.244
<v Speaker 1>So make it worth their while, like make them understand

0:30:19.284 --> 0:30:22.804
<v Speaker 1>why this is important. One of the students, Nay, in

0:30:22.844 --> 0:30:26.124
<v Speaker 1>that New York magpiece. He first he got into Harvard,

0:30:26.164 --> 0:30:28.884
<v Speaker 1>then he said they rescinded his admission and he ended

0:30:28.964 --> 0:30:33.044
<v Speaker 1>up transferring to Columbia and was kicked out within a

0:30:33.124 --> 0:30:36.684
<v Speaker 1>year because he cheated on everything and he openly admitted

0:30:36.724 --> 0:30:41.044
<v Speaker 1>it and created cheating software and said, well, I don't care, Like,

0:30:41.844 --> 0:30:43.924
<v Speaker 1>I don't care about actually any of this. The only

0:30:43.964 --> 0:30:45.364
<v Speaker 1>reason I want to go to a good school is

0:30:45.404 --> 0:30:47.364
<v Speaker 1>to meet my future spouse and co founder.

0:30:48.444 --> 0:30:52.164
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, I mean students learn from well, anyone learns from,

0:30:52.204 --> 0:30:54.724
<v Speaker 2>like to Terrence, right that if you do see a

0:30:54.764 --> 0:30:57.884
<v Speaker 2>student who was kicked out of college for cheating, then

0:30:58.084 --> 0:31:00.964
<v Speaker 2>as going to have a much bigger deterrent effect. Right,

0:31:01.004 --> 0:31:02.764
<v Speaker 2>But like, yeah, look, I mean I was going to say,

0:31:03.364 --> 0:31:06.124
<v Speaker 2>you know, is the purpose of higher education really learning?

0:31:06.164 --> 0:31:10.204
<v Speaker 2>Because you can obviously take a much more cynical approach, right,

0:31:10.204 --> 0:31:14.084
<v Speaker 2>which is that it's a factory to produce degrees and

0:31:14.164 --> 0:31:17.084
<v Speaker 2>to kind of, you know, make a lot of money

0:31:17.164 --> 0:31:20.684
<v Speaker 2>running these very expensive institutions that have now very large

0:31:20.804 --> 0:31:24.324
<v Speaker 2>non academic stabs. A lot of the time that the

0:31:24.404 --> 0:31:28.044
<v Speaker 2>kids are coddle, that there is a ton of great inflation,

0:31:29.324 --> 0:31:33.484
<v Speaker 2>that during the pandemic, that colleges were so concerned about

0:31:33.524 --> 0:31:37.244
<v Speaker 2>angering highly neurotic moms and dads and maybe professors to

0:31:37.244 --> 0:31:41.684
<v Speaker 2>some extent, right, and so they're totally undermining the educational experience, right,

0:31:41.724 --> 0:31:44.604
<v Speaker 2>But like, it doesn't stop the factory from like churning

0:31:44.604 --> 0:31:47.404
<v Speaker 2>out degrees, even if classes are easier and easier to gain,

0:31:47.524 --> 0:31:50.444
<v Speaker 2>and so, yeah, I don't know. I also think that

0:31:50.564 --> 0:31:53.844
<v Speaker 2>like you wind up with students in a kind of

0:31:54.044 --> 0:31:57.964
<v Speaker 2>prisoner's dilemma type situation where it's a really pretty rational

0:31:58.084 --> 0:32:02.084
<v Speaker 2>to cheat if everyone else is cheating and it can't

0:32:02.124 --> 0:32:04.444
<v Speaker 2>really be detected. And by the way, like I think that,

0:32:04.604 --> 0:32:07.084
<v Speaker 2>you know, when I write essays for Silver Bulletin, then

0:32:07.244 --> 0:32:11.844
<v Speaker 2>I ask chech GPT question, right, I will run my

0:32:11.924 --> 0:32:13.604
<v Speaker 2>copy through j just P and say do you correct

0:32:13.604 --> 0:32:18.284
<v Speaker 2>any typos or errors? Right? And things like that. Right,

0:32:18.764 --> 0:32:20.684
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it all flag errors that are fake because I

0:32:20.684 --> 0:32:23.644
<v Speaker 2>can't believe how dumb things are. It's like we can't

0:32:23.644 --> 0:32:25.924
<v Speaker 2>really have one hundred and third percent tariff on China, right.

0:32:25.964 --> 0:32:29.244
<v Speaker 2>People might take that exaggeration seriously, Nate, So you have

0:32:29.284 --> 0:32:31.044
<v Speaker 2>to remove that from your estley. I'm like, no, things

0:32:31.044 --> 0:32:34.764
<v Speaker 2>are really that dumb. But like so and working with

0:32:34.884 --> 0:32:36.764
<v Speaker 2>AI is important. I mean, it's kind of intrude to

0:32:36.804 --> 0:32:40.324
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'll stay that like interpersonal skills become more

0:32:41.044 --> 0:32:44.244
<v Speaker 2>important in a world where CHECHPD do is kind of

0:32:44.244 --> 0:32:48.804
<v Speaker 2>like the cognitive tasks easier. It's probably more about sales, right,

0:32:48.804 --> 0:32:50.524
<v Speaker 2>who are you going to hire to be the nice

0:32:50.564 --> 0:32:52.364
<v Speaker 2>person to brought you the services that you could probably

0:32:52.404 --> 0:32:55.604
<v Speaker 2>do yourself with chet GPT, your group assignments and things.

0:32:55.764 --> 0:32:59.364
<v Speaker 2>People feel charmed by humans. So but yeah, I think

0:32:59.364 --> 0:33:02.924
<v Speaker 2>colleges are on the way to being less relevant and

0:33:02.964 --> 0:33:06.404
<v Speaker 2>that they seem not to have particularly much urgency for

0:33:06.684 --> 0:33:09.724
<v Speaker 2>This is kind of lame. But like I said, if

0:33:09.804 --> 0:33:11.644
<v Speaker 2>you were a student, would you use chet cheapet if

0:33:11.684 --> 0:33:13.284
<v Speaker 2>you Let's say you let me set this up for you. Right,

0:33:13.844 --> 0:33:15.844
<v Speaker 2>Let's say you know for a fact that eighty percent

0:33:15.844 --> 0:33:19.484
<v Speaker 2>of the students in your class are using chat cheapt.

0:33:19.564 --> 0:33:21.724
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to make a sympathetic set of facts. Right,

0:33:22.444 --> 0:33:26.444
<v Speaker 2>Let's say you don't think the class is well taught,

0:33:26.604 --> 0:33:30.124
<v Speaker 2>and so you don't think you're really getting that much

0:33:30.444 --> 0:33:32.404
<v Speaker 2>out of it. Let's even say that you kind of

0:33:32.444 --> 0:33:36.364
<v Speaker 2>done half the reading and so you're kind of using

0:33:36.444 --> 0:33:39.924
<v Speaker 2>cheapt chechpeeding way. It's like clearly over the line, but

0:33:39.964 --> 0:33:43.644
<v Speaker 2>you're adding some original inputs and insight yourself. But it

0:33:43.684 --> 0:33:46.764
<v Speaker 2>goes against the nominal recommendations of the professor. Would you

0:33:46.884 --> 0:33:49.044
<v Speaker 2>cheat in that circumstance or use chec ChiPT or not?

0:33:50.684 --> 0:33:53.604
<v Speaker 1>I would like to think no, because I never I

0:33:53.684 --> 0:33:57.404
<v Speaker 1>was someone who could have always took that pretty seriously.

0:33:58.044 --> 0:34:01.724
<v Speaker 1>And for me, like my incentives were like most of

0:34:01.724 --> 0:34:04.284
<v Speaker 1>my classes I was really interested in, Like I wanted

0:34:04.324 --> 0:34:06.684
<v Speaker 1>to learn, right, Like I went to a school that

0:34:06.804 --> 0:34:10.124
<v Speaker 1>I thought would teach me things that I realized. You know,

0:34:10.164 --> 0:34:14.124
<v Speaker 1>I sound like a very you know, uh do ie

0:34:14.684 --> 0:34:18.284
<v Speaker 1>bushy tailed student, but like to me, that was that

0:34:18.404 --> 0:34:21.044
<v Speaker 1>was the whole point. Like I wanted to read these books.

0:34:21.364 --> 0:34:24.124
<v Speaker 1>I want to think through you know, I wanted to

0:34:24.204 --> 0:34:28.204
<v Speaker 1>be kind of a better, you know, a better person,

0:34:29.004 --> 0:34:33.724
<v Speaker 1>someone who who has that knowledge, you know. I wanted

0:34:33.764 --> 0:34:36.004
<v Speaker 1>to kind of have it in my head, like if

0:34:36.004 --> 0:34:39.324
<v Speaker 1>you're on a desert island right with no CHATPT and

0:34:39.364 --> 0:34:41.604
<v Speaker 1>you just have kind of the stuff that's in your head.

0:34:42.084 --> 0:34:46.204
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to kind of have good things in there.

0:34:46.284 --> 0:34:49.364
<v Speaker 1>And so I never I mean I never even like

0:34:49.724 --> 0:34:52.004
<v Speaker 1>gray Zone cheated when I was in college, Like I

0:34:52.044 --> 0:34:56.204
<v Speaker 1>didn't collaborate on assignments. I didn't do anything like that.

0:34:56.204 --> 0:34:59.084
<v Speaker 1>That said, like I never told on anyone either, right,

0:34:59.244 --> 0:35:02.444
<v Speaker 1>Like I was not someone who would be like Nate

0:35:02.564 --> 0:35:05.964
<v Speaker 1>use chat GPT, right, Like, if you want to use

0:35:06.044 --> 0:35:08.884
<v Speaker 1>chat rept, fine, but even if everyone was using it,

0:35:08.924 --> 0:35:14.004
<v Speaker 1>like I I think I wouldn't I wouldn't feel right

0:35:14.204 --> 0:35:18.124
<v Speaker 1>about myself if the teacher actually said, do not use

0:35:18.284 --> 0:35:21.244
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT. And like I said, for most of the

0:35:21.284 --> 0:35:23.844
<v Speaker 1>classes I took, a huge chunk of the grade was

0:35:23.964 --> 0:35:29.004
<v Speaker 1>in class, in class, exams and assignments, and so that

0:35:29.164 --> 0:35:31.804
<v Speaker 1>was something where you know, chat GPT wouldn't be helpful.

0:35:32.004 --> 0:35:34.244
<v Speaker 1>But I also I wanted to be a writer, Nate, like,

0:35:34.644 --> 0:35:36.724
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to learn how to write well, and I

0:35:36.804 --> 0:35:38.924
<v Speaker 1>wanted one of the reasons that I wanted to go

0:35:38.964 --> 0:35:41.364
<v Speaker 1>to Harvard was to study with very specific writers. I

0:35:41.404 --> 0:35:44.804
<v Speaker 1>wanted their feedback on my writing. It would just completely

0:35:44.844 --> 0:35:47.364
<v Speaker 1>defeat the purpose, right if I took a fiction writing

0:35:47.404 --> 0:35:50.484
<v Speaker 1>seminar and had chat GPT write my short story, Like,

0:35:51.124 --> 0:35:53.004
<v Speaker 1>what am I even doing? Well?

0:35:53.004 --> 0:35:55.004
<v Speaker 2>What if you sound stupid? What if it's a let's

0:35:55.044 --> 0:35:59.204
<v Speaker 2>say that you're taking a physics class and it's part

0:35:59.244 --> 0:36:01.604
<v Speaker 2>of a requirement for some hard sciences, right, and the

0:36:01.644 --> 0:36:07.964
<v Speaker 2>professor is unintelligible and boring, and these assignments are unnecessarily

0:36:08.804 --> 0:36:12.644
<v Speaker 2>hard for students who are not going into the science concentration. Right.

0:36:14.084 --> 0:36:17.244
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I think that I can see using chat

0:36:17.244 --> 0:36:20.684
<v Speaker 1>GPT to help me explain to help explain stuff, right,

0:36:21.084 --> 0:36:24.444
<v Speaker 1>use other aids outside of class to try to get

0:36:24.644 --> 0:36:27.044
<v Speaker 1>to try to get oriented and try to figure it out.

0:36:27.364 --> 0:36:29.964
<v Speaker 1>But I would still, I think, do my own final

0:36:30.004 --> 0:36:32.604
<v Speaker 1>assignment in the end, like there was one class. This

0:36:32.764 --> 0:36:36.604
<v Speaker 1>is one of my biggest regrets, and so I don't

0:36:36.604 --> 0:36:38.844
<v Speaker 1>want students to have regrets like this. One of my

0:36:38.884 --> 0:36:43.844
<v Speaker 1>biggest regrets from undergrad was I took this course AX ten,

0:36:43.964 --> 0:36:48.004
<v Speaker 1>which was you know, your introductory economics class my senior year,

0:36:48.044 --> 0:36:50.964
<v Speaker 1>because I needed it as a requirement, and I took

0:36:50.964 --> 0:36:55.444
<v Speaker 1>a pass fail because I could write and I didn't.

0:36:55.524 --> 0:36:57.284
<v Speaker 1>At that point, I thought that I didn't really care

0:36:57.284 --> 0:37:00.364
<v Speaker 1>about economics, want to know any of this. And it

0:37:00.404 --> 0:37:01.964
<v Speaker 1>was really early in the morning. I think it was

0:37:02.004 --> 0:37:04.764
<v Speaker 1>like at nine am or something, you know, a time

0:37:04.804 --> 0:37:07.524
<v Speaker 1>that was just ungodly for me even today, but as

0:37:07.564 --> 0:37:10.684
<v Speaker 1>a college student like, no, no way, And so I

0:37:10.764 --> 0:37:14.484
<v Speaker 1>ended up skipping a ton of lectures and almost fail

0:37:14.564 --> 0:37:17.324
<v Speaker 1>the class. I really regret that because, first of all,

0:37:17.404 --> 0:37:22.164
<v Speaker 1>the class was taught by legendary professor, and the speakers

0:37:22.204 --> 0:37:25.124
<v Speaker 1>we had in that class were insane, right, We had

0:37:25.204 --> 0:37:28.204
<v Speaker 1>like secretaries of State, We had the things that I

0:37:28.364 --> 0:37:31.164
<v Speaker 1>missed right now, when I look at our syllabus, I'm like,

0:37:31.724 --> 0:37:32.484
<v Speaker 1>what an idiot?

0:37:32.604 --> 0:37:32.764
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:37:32.804 --> 0:37:35.924
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could go back in time and actually

0:37:36.404 --> 0:37:39.924
<v Speaker 1>learn this information. So the one time where like I

0:37:40.004 --> 0:37:43.524
<v Speaker 1>obviously wasn't cheating or using chat gibta, I almost failed,

0:37:43.524 --> 0:37:45.564
<v Speaker 1>for God's sake, the one time I tried to like

0:37:45.964 --> 0:37:48.044
<v Speaker 1>glide through a class because I didn't think it was

0:37:48.044 --> 0:37:52.284
<v Speaker 1>irrelevant or interesting. I really really regret it because I

0:37:52.324 --> 0:37:55.364
<v Speaker 1>realized now just how relevant and interesting it was and

0:37:55.404 --> 0:37:58.444
<v Speaker 1>how much I missed. So kind of looking back at

0:37:58.524 --> 0:38:01.044
<v Speaker 1>college me, I want to shake myself and say, hey,

0:38:01.444 --> 0:38:03.804
<v Speaker 1>you know, take advantage of this. There is not going

0:38:03.844 --> 0:38:06.644
<v Speaker 1>to be another time where you get like an hour

0:38:07.164 --> 0:38:09.364
<v Speaker 1>one on one with Larry Summers to ask him quite

0:38:09.724 --> 0:38:11.684
<v Speaker 1>about the economy.

0:38:11.724 --> 0:38:14.724
<v Speaker 2>You know. I asked my Twitter followers did they cheat

0:38:14.764 --> 0:38:18.004
<v Speaker 2>even a little tiny bit in college? And it was

0:38:18.044 --> 0:38:22.724
<v Speaker 2>almost exactly fifty fifty yes and no, which means on

0:38:22.764 --> 0:38:26.564
<v Speaker 2>the show, if you are avowing Maria never to have

0:38:26.764 --> 0:38:31.524
<v Speaker 2>even a tiny bit cheated, does that imply that I

0:38:31.604 --> 0:38:32.644
<v Speaker 2>therefore did cheat.

0:38:34.684 --> 0:38:37.004
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't. I wouldn't say that. I would say that

0:38:37.084 --> 0:38:38.004
<v Speaker 1>you probably did not.

0:38:38.764 --> 0:38:41.324
<v Speaker 2>I think I did. I think this counts. So I

0:38:42.684 --> 0:38:47.844
<v Speaker 2>was in an econometrics class, and ironically, econometrics is like

0:38:47.884 --> 0:38:50.524
<v Speaker 2>actually pretty relevant to my day to day work now, right,

0:38:50.964 --> 0:38:55.444
<v Speaker 2>But the class was taught terribly. The professor was a

0:38:55.444 --> 0:38:58.724
<v Speaker 2>good scholar who was very disengaged in University of Chicago

0:38:59.004 --> 0:39:02.964
<v Speaker 2>was maybe more tolerant of that than they should have been, right,

0:39:03.044 --> 0:39:05.204
<v Speaker 2>and you know, my very good friend, I mean, I would,

0:39:05.324 --> 0:39:08.324
<v Speaker 2>you know, ask to copy off a couple of those

0:39:08.364 --> 0:39:11.564
<v Speaker 2>problem sets with his mission sometimes? Right, that's cheating, isn't it,

0:39:12.364 --> 0:39:14.604
<v Speaker 2>I think, Solia, Yeah, it's funny because like if you're

0:39:14.604 --> 0:39:17.004
<v Speaker 2>doing the homework together, it's probably not. But like I

0:39:17.004 --> 0:39:19.204
<v Speaker 2>think it's cheating. And I don't regret it because the

0:39:19.204 --> 0:39:23.924
<v Speaker 2>class sucked and and still most of the grades based on

0:39:23.924 --> 0:39:26.204
<v Speaker 2>on the end of the year, right you still, I mean,

0:39:26.284 --> 0:39:29.324
<v Speaker 2>you know, so if I fucked myself over, then that's fine,

0:39:29.364 --> 0:39:31.564
<v Speaker 2>But I don't I think that was a rational decision.

0:39:32.204 --> 0:39:34.004
<v Speaker 1>You know what, now that you say that, I realized

0:39:34.044 --> 0:39:35.284
<v Speaker 1>that I did cheat.

0:39:35.564 --> 0:39:36.044
<v Speaker 2>There you go.

0:39:36.164 --> 0:39:39.964
<v Speaker 1>If in school, so when I was in eighth grade,

0:39:40.684 --> 0:39:46.404
<v Speaker 1>I had this science teacher who liked to basically we

0:39:46.444 --> 0:39:49.444
<v Speaker 1>had our science curriculum and then he also taught birds

0:39:49.524 --> 0:39:53.724
<v Speaker 1>and stars, so basically we would get pop quizzes all

0:39:53.724 --> 0:39:56.604
<v Speaker 1>the time where he would play bird calls and we'd

0:39:56.644 --> 0:39:59.444
<v Speaker 1>have to say what bird it was. However, as part

0:39:59.564 --> 0:40:03.724
<v Speaker 1>of the bird stuff, he would give us these basically

0:40:03.804 --> 0:40:08.804
<v Speaker 1>you know, like coloring book sketches of birds, and we

0:40:09.044 --> 0:40:12.924
<v Speaker 1>had color them in for homework and we were graded

0:40:13.124 --> 0:40:15.644
<v Speaker 1>on how well we colored them in. And I was like,

0:40:15.764 --> 0:40:19.524
<v Speaker 1>this is bullshit. I have zero artistic ability, like I

0:40:19.564 --> 0:40:22.684
<v Speaker 1>hate you know, I can't draw, stick figure, I can't color.

0:40:22.844 --> 0:40:25.124
<v Speaker 1>I was like, this has nothing to do with science, right,

0:40:25.164 --> 0:40:27.324
<v Speaker 1>this has nothing to do with what I'm learning. This

0:40:27.404 --> 0:40:30.244
<v Speaker 1>is insane. And my sister is a beautiful artist. So

0:40:30.844 --> 0:40:34.324
<v Speaker 1>she actually, first of all, I had she had taken

0:40:34.324 --> 0:40:36.684
<v Speaker 1>the class, you know, six years before I did, so

0:40:36.724 --> 0:40:39.564
<v Speaker 1>she gave me her birds to like help me figure

0:40:39.564 --> 0:40:41.684
<v Speaker 1>out how to how to color them in, and then

0:40:41.724 --> 0:40:43.684
<v Speaker 1>when she had time, she would color them for me.

0:40:44.004 --> 0:40:46.404
<v Speaker 1>And then I had another friend who was who loved drawing,

0:40:46.684 --> 0:40:48.724
<v Speaker 1>and she would color my birds for me. And I

0:40:48.764 --> 0:40:52.604
<v Speaker 1>hardly ever did my bird coloring in myself because I

0:40:52.644 --> 0:40:53.364
<v Speaker 1>just thought it was the.

0:40:53.324 --> 0:40:55.724
<v Speaker 2>Most too cheaters mister business here.

0:40:56.204 --> 0:40:58.524
<v Speaker 1>So now that you now that I think about it,

0:40:58.924 --> 0:41:03.044
<v Speaker 1>that was that was definitely problem not above board, but

0:41:03.164 --> 0:41:05.724
<v Speaker 1>it was just because I made the decision that this

0:41:05.844 --> 0:41:08.324
<v Speaker 1>was an incredibly bad use of my time. And I

0:41:08.364 --> 0:41:10.644
<v Speaker 1>stand by that just like thank you. I have no regrets.

0:41:10.964 --> 0:41:13.564
<v Speaker 1>I do not care that I don't know how to

0:41:14.884 --> 0:41:19.844
<v Speaker 1>color in a downy woodpecker or whatever. It was toughted mouse.

0:41:22.324 --> 0:41:36.884
<v Speaker 2>And we'll be right back after this break. I mean,

0:41:36.924 --> 0:41:42.284
<v Speaker 2>there's an argument against assigned homework in general, and do

0:41:42.324 --> 0:41:44.684
<v Speaker 2>the readings you can participate in class right and or

0:41:44.764 --> 0:41:47.324
<v Speaker 2>past your final at the end of the year. Right.

0:41:47.444 --> 0:41:51.524
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm actually I'm actually very sympathetic to the no

0:41:51.684 --> 0:41:56.324
<v Speaker 1>homework type of thing because you know, if you, I

0:41:56.364 --> 0:42:01.564
<v Speaker 1>think homework often incentivizes cheating, right when people feel like

0:42:01.564 --> 0:42:03.924
<v Speaker 1>like the homework assignment is stupid or dumb, or you

0:42:03.964 --> 0:42:06.484
<v Speaker 1>have too much of it, like there the incentives for

0:42:07.004 --> 0:42:11.444
<v Speaker 1>homework are not often the correct incentives. And when you

0:42:11.484 --> 0:42:13.804
<v Speaker 1>have those exams so I had, I took a lot

0:42:13.804 --> 0:42:16.924
<v Speaker 1>of seminars where class participation was a huge part in it, right,

0:42:17.004 --> 0:42:19.044
<v Speaker 1>and if you are one of the people who did

0:42:19.044 --> 0:42:21.444
<v Speaker 1>not do the reading that week, it becomes very clear

0:42:22.564 --> 0:42:26.684
<v Speaker 1>pretty or pretty soon in the discussion that, like you,

0:42:27.124 --> 0:42:30.764
<v Speaker 1>you are not adding much value and that like this

0:42:30.964 --> 0:42:34.564
<v Speaker 1>was just this is a week that you were mentally

0:42:34.604 --> 0:42:37.284
<v Speaker 1>not there. And if the purpose of learning is to

0:42:37.364 --> 0:42:42.724
<v Speaker 1>create individuals who have deeper knowledge, critical thinking abilities, kind

0:42:42.724 --> 0:42:48.244
<v Speaker 1>of the ability to synthesize information, to analyze information, the

0:42:48.284 --> 0:42:52.364
<v Speaker 1>types of skills that we want right in our citizens,

0:42:52.404 --> 0:42:56.404
<v Speaker 1>I would hope then homework assignments are much worse at

0:42:56.444 --> 0:42:58.884
<v Speaker 1>assessing those than your ability to kind of have a

0:42:58.884 --> 0:43:02.124
<v Speaker 1>class discussion, your ability to kind of think through things

0:43:02.204 --> 0:43:04.444
<v Speaker 1>and reason through things. So I think that we need

0:43:04.484 --> 0:43:07.084
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how do you kind of create an

0:43:07.204 --> 0:43:11.164
<v Speaker 1>education system that incentivizes the sorts of thinking and behaviors

0:43:11.524 --> 0:43:13.564
<v Speaker 1>that you want your students to emerge with.

0:43:13.964 --> 0:43:16.804
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, I think you know maybe as solicials, you

0:43:16.804 --> 0:43:21.684
<v Speaker 2>actually need more actual classroom hours. Right. I had a

0:43:21.684 --> 0:43:24.924
<v Speaker 2>friend who used to work at Amazon, and the culture

0:43:24.964 --> 0:43:27.244
<v Speaker 2>there is that if there's a meeting where there's a

0:43:27.284 --> 0:43:31.404
<v Speaker 2>briefing to read, right, they assume that you did not

0:43:31.764 --> 0:43:34.284
<v Speaker 2>take the time out to read that briefing, right, So like,

0:43:34.564 --> 0:43:37.004
<v Speaker 2>take twelve minutes now and read this briefing and then

0:43:37.004 --> 0:43:38.364
<v Speaker 2>we'll talk about it, right, And it's like kind of

0:43:38.404 --> 0:43:40.364
<v Speaker 2>a part of the meeting, you know, obviously, like I'm

0:43:40.364 --> 0:43:43.764
<v Speaker 2>a big fan of reading in general, but maybe it

0:43:43.764 --> 0:43:45.364
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have to be as Zidak to like prove that

0:43:45.404 --> 0:43:47.004
<v Speaker 2>you read this, Like no, I mean, look, can you

0:43:47.004 --> 0:43:49.924
<v Speaker 2>hold intelligent discussion in class? And then I don't know.

0:43:50.004 --> 0:43:52.004
<v Speaker 2>People always talk about the EDU cases of students who

0:43:52.044 --> 0:43:56.564
<v Speaker 2>are introverted or neurodiversient or English is a second language,

0:43:56.604 --> 0:43:59.804
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, it sucks, but life isn't always fairer, you

0:43:59.844 --> 0:44:04.364
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean? And if colleges become less effective

0:44:04.404 --> 0:44:09.164
<v Speaker 2>at differentiating which students were more effective and when we're

0:44:09.164 --> 0:44:10.844
<v Speaker 2>on it, I mean, you know, then the whole signal

0:44:10.844 --> 0:44:14.764
<v Speaker 2>becomes less valuable and college degrees become worth less, particularly

0:44:14.844 --> 0:44:17.844
<v Speaker 2>the most elite degrees. Right, all of a sudden's just

0:44:17.884 --> 0:44:21.004
<v Speaker 2>now basically like a signal that four years ago you

0:44:21.004 --> 0:44:25.044
<v Speaker 2>were considered a talented student by an emissions committee. Right, yep,

0:44:25.244 --> 0:44:26.324
<v Speaker 2>I completely agree with you.

0:44:26.644 --> 0:44:29.284
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is a very very urgent question

0:44:29.844 --> 0:44:32.124
<v Speaker 1>and one that has huge implications for the future of

0:44:32.164 --> 0:44:35.204
<v Speaker 1>our society, right, because what kind of adults are we

0:44:35.244 --> 0:44:38.564
<v Speaker 1>creating with? What kinds of skills, what kinds of ability,

0:44:38.844 --> 0:44:42.924
<v Speaker 1>what kinds of actual background and knowledge? I think these

0:44:42.964 --> 0:44:45.964
<v Speaker 1>are really important questions we do not want to be

0:44:46.004 --> 0:44:49.964
<v Speaker 1>creating a functionally illiterate society, which is what's going to happen.

0:44:50.004 --> 0:44:53.004
<v Speaker 1>By the way, if you don't actually do any learning

0:44:53.124 --> 0:44:56.764
<v Speaker 1>and instead outsource everything all the time and using.

0:44:56.564 --> 0:44:59.604
<v Speaker 2>Chat, GPT or other LM's other AI tools, well, is

0:44:59.644 --> 0:45:02.244
<v Speaker 2>actually a pretty important life skill. I can imagine some

0:45:02.284 --> 0:45:06.204
<v Speaker 2>assignments where and say yes, we not only you know, allow,

0:45:06.404 --> 0:45:09.324
<v Speaker 2>but maybe encourage you for this particular assignment to do

0:45:09.524 --> 0:45:11.244
<v Speaker 2>this right. And so I mean the other irony I

0:45:11.244 --> 0:45:13.364
<v Speaker 2>think this is becoming true and more and more domains

0:45:13.404 --> 0:45:16.404
<v Speaker 2>evolving AI is that like, if you are pretty smart,

0:45:17.004 --> 0:45:19.644
<v Speaker 2>then your productivity is enhanced by the AI, Whereas if

0:45:19.644 --> 0:45:22.244
<v Speaker 2>you don't know what you're doing then and maybe you

0:45:22.284 --> 0:45:24.404
<v Speaker 2>can kind of fake your way through it up to

0:45:24.484 --> 0:45:27.324
<v Speaker 2>a point, but you may be more fooled by the hallucinations,

0:45:27.484 --> 0:45:30.764
<v Speaker 2>You may be susceptible to misinformation, you may just not

0:45:30.804 --> 0:45:32.604
<v Speaker 2>have any retention for the things that you're having it

0:45:32.684 --> 0:45:35.284
<v Speaker 2>do right. And so, like, you know, if I were

0:45:35.364 --> 0:45:38.324
<v Speaker 2>using chat schipt to write a paper or I could

0:45:39.484 --> 0:45:40.724
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I think I can write better than

0:45:40.764 --> 0:45:42.644
<v Speaker 2>chet chip Bet by a long shot still, but like,

0:45:42.764 --> 0:45:44.404
<v Speaker 2>but I could figure out ways if I were allowed

0:45:44.444 --> 0:45:47.324
<v Speaker 2>to that to make my work to summarize long reading

0:45:47.484 --> 0:45:52.684
<v Speaker 2>like that seems like a potentially legitimate use for a student. Right,

0:45:53.044 --> 0:45:55.924
<v Speaker 2>here's this very long reading that you have to pay

0:45:56.004 --> 0:45:59.564
<v Speaker 2>way too much for the fucking textbook anyway, Right, can

0:45:59.644 --> 0:46:04.044
<v Speaker 2>you extract the important parts from this? And guess what

0:46:04.044 --> 0:46:05.644
<v Speaker 2>you can do if you're Chinese, Nat, and now you

0:46:05.684 --> 0:46:08.804
<v Speaker 2>can have it translate to Chinese. Right, you can up

0:46:08.884 --> 0:46:12.524
<v Speaker 2>and down the world level of complexity. Right, you can

0:46:12.564 --> 0:46:15.364
<v Speaker 2>say this point might seem obvious to you. Can you

0:46:15.404 --> 0:46:18.204
<v Speaker 2>explain this point another way? Right? So, like, you know,

0:46:18.364 --> 0:46:21.404
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of ways that llm's II tools

0:46:21.444 --> 0:46:23.644
<v Speaker 2>could be quite helpful for the educational process. But I

0:46:23.684 --> 0:46:26.884
<v Speaker 2>just think academia is moving too slow. You know, the

0:46:26.884 --> 0:46:30.444
<v Speaker 2>opportunity costs of four years in college given how the

0:46:30.444 --> 0:46:32.484
<v Speaker 2>world is changing. I mean, there's a cohort of students

0:46:32.524 --> 0:46:33.964
<v Speaker 2>for which it might not be the right decision.

0:46:34.844 --> 0:46:37.204
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with that, and I do think that

0:46:37.244 --> 0:46:40.964
<v Speaker 1>academia needs to just wake up to what's happening and

0:46:41.244 --> 0:46:49.244
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to stay relevant. Risky Business is hosted

0:46:49.284 --> 0:46:51.644
<v Speaker 1>by me Maria Kanakova.

0:46:50.964 --> 0:46:53.324
<v Speaker 2>And by me Nate Silver. The show is a co

0:46:53.404 --> 0:46:57.484
<v Speaker 2>production of Pushkin Industries, and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced

0:46:57.524 --> 0:47:01.284
<v Speaker 2>by Isabelle Carter. Our associate producer is Sonya Gerwitz. Sally

0:47:01.324 --> 0:47:04.324
<v Speaker 2>Helm is our editor, and our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein.

0:47:04.844 --> 0:47:06.044
<v Speaker 2>Mixing by Sarah Bruger.

0:47:06.444 --> 0:47:08.844
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:47:08.844 --> 0:47:11.204
<v Speaker 1>to other people can find us too. Thanks so much

0:47:11.244 --> 0:47:11.764
<v Speaker 1>for tuning in.