WEBVTT - Should you raise your goals over time?

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Before Breakfast, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Good Morning. This is Laura. Welcome to the Before Breakfast podcast.

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Today's tip is to know when it's smart to make

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>your goals more challenging and when you're best off keeping

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>them simple. Both are sometimes wise, but in general I

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>think the latter is more often the case than the former.

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking of this when I got a letter

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>from a Before Breakfast listener who had been setting daily

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>fitness goals on his phone recently. He wrote, my phone

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>asked me to change my daily fitness goals because I

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>had been meeting them fairly frequently. This got me thinking,

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is it better for someone to set goals that are

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>right on the cusp of being attainable and being accepting

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of falling a little short from time to time, or

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to set goals that should be achievable and celebrate even

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>more are when you exceed those goals. It's a good question,

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's no universal right answer. I think that the

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>answer varies depending on what you're trying to do. For instance,

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>many people pursue personal records or prs and races, and

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the whole point of a PR is that once you

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>set a PR, you have to go faster to set

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>a new one. If you're recovering from an illness or injury,

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it might make sense to raise your goals over time,

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>because something that was difficult at the beginning might be

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>really easy in a few weeks or months, and so

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>it might make sense to push yourself since you know

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that the future will be so different from the present.

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>That said, I'm a much bigger fan of what I

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>call process goals than outcome goals. Outcome goals are things

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>like running a sub two hour half marathon, are getting

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>an A in a class, or signing up a certain

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>number of new clients for bank accounts. It's not that

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>there's anything wrong with these goals per se. It's that

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>some factor are out of your control, which can be discouraging,

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>and in certain situations, outcome goals can also skew people's incentives.

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>An A in a class is not a good in

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>its own right. It's just a letter on a piece

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>of paper. What matters is that it represents the accumulation

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of knowledge. But when the A becomes a good in

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>its own right, people become tempted to cheat. Think of

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:30.399
<v Speaker 1>school systems fudging test scores. Likewise, you can bring new

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>clients to a bank by offering a great product and

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>great customer service. Or you can invent new accounts out

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of whole cloth and hope no one notices before the

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>bonus checks get cashed. I think we've all read the

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>headlines about that story. Process goals, on the other hand,

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>are goods in their own right. These are habits by

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>another name, and they do tend to lead to the

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>desired outcomes over time. But even if you don't meet

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a specific outcome, you're probably better off than would be otherwise.

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>A process goal is something like my running streak, running

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>every day for at least a mile. Or if we

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>think of our academic example, rather than aiming to get

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>an A in a class, you set a goal to

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>study for at least five hours a week, And rather

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>than focus on how many new clients you land, you

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>set a goal to ask existing clients to refer people

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to you every time you have a positive interaction. By

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>their nature, process goals tend not to benefit from raising

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>them over time. The point is to just keep doing

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>them again and again and again. By keeping them relatively simple,

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we keep them in our lives, even when it would

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>be easier not to Most days I run a lot

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>more than one mile, and I'm always happy when I do.

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But by keeping the mile as my goal, I don't

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>feel any resistance to it, and I don't feel like

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a failure. On the days when I can't run much

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>more in a mile, I just keep going. So in general,

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>my thought is that unless you're really gunning for something

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>big and you're excited about a more challenging goal, it's

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>best to keep the goals simple and doable. Our listener

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is probably better off aiming for five thousand steps a

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 1>day and exceeding this regularly, but still feeling good on

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the days when he's tired or on a plane for

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>ten hours and he only hits five thousand steps, then

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>following his fitness apps directive to change his goals. Daily

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>success is motivational failure, generally, isn't. I prefer to celebrate

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>what goes right now. I know that goals are a

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>big deal in productivity circles, so I'm happy to get

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>notes from people telling me why I'm wrong and challenging

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>goals that involve a big risk of failure are the

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>way to go. You can let me know what you

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>think at before breakfast podcast at I hurt media dot com.

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, this is Laura. Thanks for listening and

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>here's to making the most of our time. Hey, everybody,

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear from you. You can send me

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>your tips, your questions, or anything else. Just connect with

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram at Before Breakfast pod

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that's B the number four, then Breakfast p o D.

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>You can also shoot me an email at Before Breakfast

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>podcast at I heeart media dot com. That Before Breakfast

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is spelled out with all the letters. Thanks so much,

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I look forward to staying in touch. Before Breakfast is

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts from

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio, visit the I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:05:50.720 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. What Won't