WEBVTT - Fantasy Draft Rankings, Tiers and Strategy (EP. 765)

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to everybody to Fantasy pros. This is the Fantasy

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Podcast.

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 2>It is me Joey p.

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>JOPI is a Pia with me as always is the Welsh,

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and today we're gonna take a look at some of

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the early ranks and tiers. We're gonna go through the

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 1>first round, second round where Welsh and I might differ.

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 1>We spent a lot of time recently doing some deep

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>dives and some deeper players, but now we're gonna talk

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>about some of the big boys who are at the

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>top of drafts and help you kind of choose because

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that is how you are building your teams. There aren't

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 1>wrong answers necessarily, but maybe there's answers with different opinions here,

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna give you opinions as we always do

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>here in the program. We're also gonna talk about our

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>top ten starting pitchers or there any difference is there,

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.919
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna use a little bit of dissenting opinions

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>between Welsh and myself to see which players some of

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:51.959
<v Speaker 1>us are a little higher on than the other and

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>vice versa. And Welsh, you look like your fresh off

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the golf course. I'd ask you what your handicap is.

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>But we've been friends for a very long time, so

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I know of your men many deficits, But seriously, would

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you shoot today?

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one hundred and seventy four thousand. No, I'm not

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 2>a very good golf I'm tall, and I've been told

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I need custom clubs, so I can't hit. Wow.

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 3>I can hit irons, but I can't hit a driver.

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>So it was like mini golf, a nightmare for you

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>where you show up to the MILLI golf, No that

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you can No.

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 2>I can put, I can hit irons, but I can't

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 2>do anything else. So I'm pretty cool to be with

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 2>that like top golf, but anything else I'm not going

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>to be super great with. By the way, I just

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 2>want to point something out as cool as Fantasy pros is.

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 2>I have been working here full time for you know,

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 2>almost two months, but I've been here for a couple

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 2>of years. Every single day I learn about something else cool,

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>a new tool. I don't want to like placate this stuff. Hey,

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 2>we're going to tell you about the cool tools why

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 2>you should use them.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Everybody tools. No, we don't get that. We just use it.

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Sham wayoo put your draft on it.

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 2>But my my, Like, I didn't know about a tool

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 2>that we're going to use today which is essentially going

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 2>to turn Joe and I into like a Mortal Kombat

0:01:58.520 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>or like, you know, a street fighter, Like are you

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>like we're gonna put our ranks up against each I

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 2>guess it would be this way like that, there's a

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 2>dissenting tool where we literally, sorry, I had to find

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the right.

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 1>To do it. It's hard for us to look at each other.

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 2>But yes, yeah, that actually would be a great we

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 2>should do like the shot of.

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>The Why don't we do that like Rocky? We just yeah, yeah,

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, there's your freeze. I'm sure that was someone

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast by the way. I'm sure people love that on

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the audio only version of the show just now.

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 2>But I had no idea about this tool and what

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna do. And this is what we did. We

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 2>literally were able to click the dissenting tool on Fantasy Pros.

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.519
<v Speaker 2>We clicked Joe's and mine, and it tells us where

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 2>our biggest differences are. We also can do it against

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>ECR if you want. Here's a cool thing that you

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 2>can do even if you're not a ranker, go in.

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you really dig Joe's ranks. Hey, our buddy Scott

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Bogman fourth in accuracy in draft rankings. We just found

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 2>out Mike Mayor as well. Well. Guess what you can

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 2>go in You can click their name and see where

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 2>they're different against me, Joe or ECR. You can play

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 2>around with it. It's a cool tool that we're gonna

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 2>add for our big Old Rankings Tiers episode that I'm

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 2>very excited that we're doing, especially because it's like it's

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of like it's a battle.

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>It's battle. It's a friendly battle. It's a friendly battle.

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like a game of golf. It's a friendly battle,

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.679
<v Speaker 1>and afterwards we all go out for cocktails at the

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>at the lounge. But dissenting opinions is something I use

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 1>all the time for the NFL shows when I'm building

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>them to see like where Deepro and Erickson are different

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>from each other and things. We were doing some of

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>those rank shows, but for baseball, I was like, hey, Walsh,

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I have you used the sending opinions for baseball? He's like,

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>what are you talking about? I said, oh, yeah, we

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>got it for baseball too, and it is very useful.

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>And shout out to Scott Bogman number four overall. You

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>just recently did the mock Draft show with him a

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of days ago. That's on the YouTube channel. Go

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>back and watch that. So pay attention with Bogman saying

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>he was fourth overall last year in the ranks, that

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>he just came out beat me. You were twelfth, You

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>were excellent. Mike Maher was fifth. I don't want to

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>like pump him up too much, but I was twenty third,

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm a disgrace to myself and others. Where's Kelly?

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see where the penguin ended up. I gotta

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>find that. But in the meantime, while we're looking for that,

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>before we get to the tiers and whatnot, don't forget

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you have a chance to win some free stuff here.

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Jazz Chisholm autograph Jersey Miami Marlin's own star outfielder, courtesy

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of Bettingpros dot Com. Your place to start betting smarter

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>not harder, which, by the way, on Betting Pros, Welsh

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and are gonna have an amazing MLB preview coming up

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.119
<v Speaker 1>in March, so make sure you subscribe to the channel

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>for that. But in the meantime, if you want to

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>win the Jazz chishm Jersey. Subscribe to Fantasy Pros MLB

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>YouTube right now. Click subscribe, ring the ballot to lit

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>goes Ding. That's it. That's all you gotta do. Comment

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>below on the video and you are entered to win

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the Jazz Chism Jersey. So comment with your thoughts. Keep

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it clean, though, folks. We run a tight ship over here,

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's all you gotta do to win the Jazz

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Chism Jersey. Yes, Welsh.

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 2>During leading off last year we had a bet going

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 2>we did when we hit fifteen thousand subscribers, Joe has

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 2>to do something. May I present a double down? Let

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 2>you and I pick a number by the start of

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 2>leading off if we could get to what do you

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 2>think is reasonable?

0:04:58.000 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 3>Sixteen or seventeen thousand?

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to push the envelope seventeen thousand. That was

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>my baseball number seventeen, so I feel like I always

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>were seventeen when I played, so I think that would

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>be a nice number. So what's the double hell? Because

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thousand was me wearing the wig for the show

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and leading off, Yes, and that's already happening, So I

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine what you have in your brain.

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking we both wear wigs and we both rock

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 2>the mustaches.

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>We did the mustaches last year, but we do it

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>fourteen we did with wigs. We do wigs mustache, all right, yeah.

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 2>And that would be the first leading off of the

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 2>year we would do together.

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 3>If we get to that number seventeen.

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Some of a b I'm in, let's go all right,

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>So there were seventeen thousand. There, you have it, everybody.

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 1>So we sat for everybody. Mustache, mustache rides and wigs.

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>That's what's gonna happen here. Let's get to dissenting opinions.

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Here's some players I like more than the Welsh Louis

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Castillo a twelve spot difference from each other peers. I'm

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>higher on the closers too, which is weird because you're

0:05:58.120 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>mister closers. I don't know that happened. I have to

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>go back to my rankings to fix that. Christian Walker

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get enough love from you or anybody else. I'm

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.679
<v Speaker 1>higher on people than him. I am hier on Max Fried.

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a scary one. Adleie Rutchman's the other one. And

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 1>of course, no surprise to anyone's been listening to the shows.

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm higher than welsh on Alex Bregman by thirty spots.

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 2>So if you would have asked me, you have one

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>player to guess who are descent is gonna be, I

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 2>would have said Alex.

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Everybody, he's got a thirty one hundred, one hundred guy.

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Like that's basically he's not a thirty.

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 2>No, he's not gonna be a thirty. He's gonna be

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 2>like a twenty.

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.119
<v Speaker 1>No, he's not twenty. He's a twenty five to twenty

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>seven guy. Anyway, let's talk about Rutchman, because you know

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I am not the big catcher guy. I was surprised

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>so much that Rutchmand was that guy. That was the

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>big difference between us. I'm sixteen spots hier on Adlie Rutchman.

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I do believe he is a tier unto himself. We

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of had this discussion when we did the Infield Guide.

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>If you missed that, go back and listen to the

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>previous programs. Watch him on YouTube. We did the Ultimate

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Infield Outfield and we just did the Starting Pitcher Guy

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 1>too with Nick Pollock. They're all up there. You can

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>binge watch all all of them. He is a tier

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>onto himself. Yet I am higher on Bradley Richmond than you.

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>That was kind of surprising to me. Is that surprising

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to you.

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 3>No, not at all.

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 2>I if I mean, everybody's going to be high on

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 2>pretty much any catcher with me, I agree he is

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 2>a tier of his own two catchers. I might prioritize him,

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 2>But even then, I'm in taut right now, taut draft

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 2>and hold fifty teen draft, and hold we're doing.

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 3>And it's two catchers because that's how they rolled.

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>And I didn't go at Adlegue in the second, the third,

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 2>or the fourth, and I think he ended up going

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 2>in the third or fourth.

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 3>It's just about catchers right now.

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe.

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Right now, as you're listening to this, you can go

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 2>over to Fantasy Pros and you can find the.

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Welsh's top draft targets.

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 2>There's an article for you, and there will be a

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>player at every single position if you care.

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 3>What I have to say.

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 2>The catcher on that list is not ranked one, two, three, four, five, six.

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 2>It's not in the top seven or eight because I

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 2>don't want to pay high prices for catch I could

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 2>be wrong about this, and of course, like the top

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 2>guy at a position like Adley is uniquely great. But

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I think the gaps of production between the starters and

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>catchers is the smallest gap of any fantasy position out

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 2>there from and that's including closers starting pitchers. There's just

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the gap is so small that I can get a

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 2>I think I can get a catcher that can produce

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 2>eighty to eighty five percent of the production.

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Of like catcher number two or catcher number three. So

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm not surprised you would have a catcher higher than me.

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Counterpoint to that, and I guess this is skewed because

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I play in more points based leagues as opposed to

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>like the Rodo world because of all the hits, because

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>he plays so much, because of the RBI, the run potential,

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of the power everything he does, and also the ninety

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>plus walks last year, like Grutchman, to me, is the

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>tier into himself and worth a little bit of a

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>premium now. And two catcher leagues, I think especially, so

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it had to have points. You don't typically get the

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 1>two catchers in a deeper league too. If you're like

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>my home league, right's fifteen teams, it's me, it's Chris Meaney,

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's some friends of ours actually in the industry,

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's like it's somewhere between really good fantasy players

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>friends of mine and I don't know. I think I

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>probably invited you and you're like, I mean, too many

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 1>of the den when to pay with you? So I

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>might have said it just like that, I'm too busy

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>bring trading hanging out with you?

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Is it points?

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Though? Yeah? I had dead points. Oh no, that's why

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm That's why you don't want to see So I

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 1>asked you one did you did? Yeah, you need to

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>do it, and I said fine, I only asked one time.

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to be, you know, belligerent about it.

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>But in those formats he becomes very special, and I

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>think that we haven't seen the complete version of Adeleie Rushman. Yeah, like,

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there's another gear in this guy that we

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>have yet to scratch the surface about. Good he's going

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to be. He is I think an really interesting MVP

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>candidate this year too, because he's also a catcher because

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of everything he does. I'm still team Julio, but if

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to hedge on somebody else, that would be

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>an interesting one for me. And carrying that over into

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>fantasy again, I do think he's see I look at

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>real Muto and I'm starting to worry. He's in his

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 1>thirties now, Like, what's that declines to start to creep in?

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, Will Smith still in the middle of that lineup.

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>It's good, but after that, like there's some guys that

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>have some power, like the Alvarez is Moreno's an average guy.

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>But I want the total package. A total package to me,

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>is is going to be Rutchman because I'm looking ahead

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to the projectability, not so much on what even last

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>year was. I think there's more coming when it comes

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to Rushma.

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to disagree again. Is his er He No,

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 2>but he is his guy. If I were to take

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 2>a catcher in the top one hundred, it's only Adley,

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 2>But everything I do, Catcher's fault. Bagman and I we

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 2>just did a mock draft on ESPN. On ESPN's platform,

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 2>I got j two Ermudo in a twelve team at

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I get Gabby Morino at the end of dress. He

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 2>got Sean Murphy in the two hundred. I just don't

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 2>think the gap is that big where I'm like, Okay,

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Adley is so much better than the next guy that

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 2>that is worth more than taking whatever said hitter is

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 2>there versus that tier. I'm down with Adley. I understand

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 2>why you're doing it, points leagues, he gets a little

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 2>bit of a boost. It is really just more about

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 2>like my thoughts on the position, and sure that's anything else,

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 2>but he.

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Is the best. Well, let's get to another Why do

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you like?

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Why do you love Aaron Nola? Why do you.

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Read my mind? Nola was the next guy I want

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, and then we'll switch over to the

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>guys you like more than me? Nola, I have twelve

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>spots higher than you. What I like about Nola is

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the consistency, and I'm you know, you know me. I'm

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>already digging very deep into the betting world of baseball

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>right now, and I've replaced maybe more bets than I

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>should have, but I don't think so. Like I think

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I've been very.

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Joe's first thing, by the way, on the podcast we

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 2>got on, I'm like, hey, what's up, Joan, And He's like,

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm making so many bets.

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Like not even I think there was five I made,

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>but they were they were very calculated bets that I

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of bets in just a random does

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>not really well. Look when Matt Olsen to lead the

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>league in homers, is it plus eight to fifty you Bennett? Okay,

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>like is it? Where is that on FD right now?

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, I digress Aaron Nola, the consistency of Aaron

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Nola the last few years. I keep thinking about the

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Phillies and and you know, the Phillies of this team

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that just you know, every year just shows up and

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>figures it out, and they are able to you know,

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 1>get hot at the right time, get in the playoffs.

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think, like my money right now, I haven't

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>placed it yet, but my money's leaning towards the Phillies

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to win this division this year. I'm concerned a little

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>bit about the Braves middle of the rotation. I don't

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>believe in Morton anymore. Sale is a reclamation project to me.

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:16.599
<v Speaker 1>But if you're looking at what this guy's done the

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, you know, I understand people are

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>scared away from the four pour six era, But the

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>XCRA was three seven to seven, the x FIT was

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>three six three. I think he was a little unlucky

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>last year, and we were talking about one of the

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>most consistent guys. We just talked about it on one

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of the shows we just did. Over the last five years,

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Nola was one of the top five guys in strikeouts,

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and he's going later than some of these other aces.

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>He's going after guys like Yamamo to who haven't thrown

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a pitch yet in the big leagues, and I just

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's straight out wrong.

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 2>The consistency, in my eyes, is more like his every

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 2>other year thing. That's the problem, and that's why a

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of people are back in.

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>But like, if you take every other year thing Welsh again,

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like, that's fine, But you know what the every

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>other year thing back two years ago, when his ERA

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty one was four to six three, his

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 1>XCRA was three three five, you know, his x FIP

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>was three three seven. So it's it's actually not him.

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just he's got bad luck every other year. And

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not something though, Okay, I think you can you know,

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>quantify and say, well, that's going to happen all that

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>time on these odd years, Like that's just kind of silly.

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>All I care is about the consistency of that XCRA

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and x FIP is in that mid threes. So when

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the things go awry, at least they still have all

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the strikeout potential and the win potential. The Phillies are

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna get me.

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe the problem is his expected the area is

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the third highest of his career, and the three seven

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 2>to one is the highest over the last four years.

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's a twenty seven that prime range. While a

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 2>significant drop in strikeouts, as a matter of fact, it

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 2>is the if you don't count his first two seasons,

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 2>so since twenty seventeen on, it's the lowest strikeout percentage

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 2>he's had. To his credit, he's also like lowered his

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 2>walks a little bit. But I just don't I don't

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 2>like the strikeout potential. The low nineties guy he went,

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 2>he's always thrown the sinker a whole bunch. He went

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 2>primary curveball this year, which was a really good with pitch.

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know, like, what is that transition going

0:13:58.040 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 2>to be. Is going to go back to being more

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 2>primary sink or maybe that'll lower the era. I guess

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm just unimpressed with Aaron Nola. I don't I have

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 2>him really low. I think actually.

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Unimpressed with the guy who has had again throw twenty

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty He's had two hundred or more strikeouts Welsh in

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>every single season since twenty eighteen. How is that not

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>impressed of you?

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the innings are consistent, that is the big

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 2>strike consistent.

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Era might fluctuate, but geez man.

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 3>The era is not consistent.

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 2>The ball's getting harder, hit harder, he's pressing more in

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 2>the pitch mix change from curveball to this last year.

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know if he's into that air like

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 2>where he sits. It's like Bobby Miller or Jerry Perez,

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 2>there's Grayson Rodriguez or' Zach Eflin. Like I'm I'd rather

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 2>take shots in that range of where he is because

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe he does turn it around. You are right the

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 2>expected the ara it's not awful, And if he gets

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 2>to be a mid three guy again, he's going to

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 2>just eat up a bunch of innings. He's gonna have

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 2>some wins and he'll get some strikeouts. Maybe it's the

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 2>boringness of it, but I've moved off of Aaron Nola's

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 2>He's getting a little bit older, he's just getting getting

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 2>hit harder. The strikeouts are going to and I just

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 2>have a lot less interest. I am one of the

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 2>lowest rankers on him on Fantasy Pros well.

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is why we're having this opinion, because I

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's important to throw out some of these names

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that we have the big differences on. Let's take a

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>quick break in the action to tell you about Rival Fantasy.

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>It's officially Fantasy Baseball season and it's time for MLB

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>best Ball on Rival Fantasy. That's right, Rival Fantasy now

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>has best Ball. Full season lobbies are live now until

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Opening Day. Then weekly and daily drafts will be available

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>from opening day through the end of the World Series.

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Best Ball is all the fun of the draft without

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the season long management. Enter a league, drafter squad and

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the app does the rest. No need to set your

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>lineup or make waiver moves. The highest score at the

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the regular season will be the winners. Invite

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>your friends, your enemies, and start drafting for the twenty

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty four fantasy Baseball season today. Sign up at Join

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Rival dot com Slash Fantasy Pros to claim your two

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars deposit match again. That's join Rival dot Com

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Slash Fantasy Pros. Welcome to the future of fantasy sports.

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Rival Fantasy. And now back to the action.

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Welsh's. Obviously he's higher on tray Turner

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>than me, No surprise. You've been higher on tray Turner

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>than me since tray Turner was in this league.

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 3>And I don't even like Trey Turner that much.

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, but I always like him less. However much you

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>like him, I like him less. You're hiring Ellie de

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>la Cruz than me. I keep fluctuating with my Ellie

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>ranking up and down, like it depends on my week.

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>You know it's probably is. I keep going back, and

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I watched the highlights of certain things. I'm like, man,

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>he looks so good in the other highlights where he's

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>fooled on pitches and things like, like, I'm trying.

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 2>To figure out the highlight of him hitting the the

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 2>BP ball of Hunter off of Hunter Green that smashed

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Hunter Green's car. He hit a ball and it broke.

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 3>His own window.

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll also say, Ozzie, he's been working with Barry Barry

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Larkin a whole lot, which I like.

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>But sorry, let's keep going to Let's go with oneal

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Cruz because there's a massive gap there between us. With

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>oneal Cruise. It's almost fifty spots different now and again.

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>For me, it's also just some of those similar things

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>from Ellie Deler which is the swing and miss is there.

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I know the upsides there, I know the talent's there.

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>The Pirates are slowly sort of putting things together a

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit like I feel like the Pirates, you know,

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>even saw it last year. They were hot at the

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the year. So here's your chance to sell

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>everybody on cruise again because onneal Cruz is a player

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>that I know everyone was ont on last year. It

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>does feel very post type sleeper, But in terms of cost,

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's post hype sleeper?

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 2>In terms of ADP, I think that's specifically one of

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 2>the reasons. Like based on your own rank. If you

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 2>actually see Ellie somewhere in the seventies and O'Neill O'Neill

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 2>is in the nineties, I mean, there's not much of

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 2>a difference, but it is based on the cost of

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 2>cruise where you guys are taking your risks. Ellie is

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of a risk, Gestism is kind of a risk.

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 2>O'Neal Cruz is behind all those guys. We saw him

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 2>after that really bad start with the bad strikeouts at

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 2>the end of twenty twenty two, cut the strikeouts over

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 2>that last month to make better contact. Then the beginning

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty three he did the same thing. The

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 2>strikeouts were not there, he was making his contact. Then

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 2>he gets hurt. This is the entire year we rebound.

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 2>He's a bigger power guy than Ellie de la Cruz.

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 2>If we're making that comp which is pretty common here,

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 2>but how often do you see twenty twenty or twenty

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 2>five to twenty five guys come at any type of

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 2>a discount.

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>They're usually built up.

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 2>That's not the case here. If O'Neil Cruz meets the

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 2>expectations of projections atc bat X and he's over twenty

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty and he hits two forty, he will only be

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 2>able to beat his value be where you draft him.

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.880
<v Speaker 2>He will not be able to go backwards. Run RBIs

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 2>could be maybe at a little bit of a minimum.

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 2>We'll see where he's batting in the order based on runs,

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 2>but he's gone to steal fifteen to twenty five, and

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 2>I legit think he's gonna hit thirty. Massive one of

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the highest max EV guys out there with a cutdown

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 2>strikeouts and that lineup is not that bad, you know,

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Brian Kee Bern Hayes hitting the ball a little bit harder.

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Brian Reynolds is a great source at the top of

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the lineup. I think he is one of the best

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 2>deals out there until he's not, which people like me

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 2>that are into it are gonna make him not a deal.

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 2>But it is hard to come by twenty five, twenty

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 2>five or twenty twenties at any type of a discount,

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 2>and you're getting that outside the eighties. So I want

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Oneal Cruz on every single one of my teams, and

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I think I have to be the highest in the

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 2>world on him as well as ranks. This is just

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 2>gonna be one of those guys that I'm fully in on.

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>All right. Again, it's I like the player, but I'm

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at the ADP. He's going, you know, eighty seventh

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>overall the consensus ADP on fans Bros, which you could

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>see it is, but Xander Bogart is going ninety seven,

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and Bogart's I know it's hair together. Sorry, that's fine,

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you can, but I would say that if I'm just

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>looking for a straight up shortstyle play, well there's the

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>guy that's giving me twenty twenty with a better batting average,

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>most likely because the second half of Bogarts was much

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>better than the first half. He did that classic struggle

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>with the big contract thing. So to me, I'm looking

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>at that, I was like, do I want to take

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the risk of Cruise even though maybe there is that

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty home run beside, maybe it's there to want to

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>settle in for the give me the TS twenty twenty

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to eighty guy. I'm gonna think the twenty twenty two

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>eighty guy ten spots later. I'm just going to every time.

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Seems I think, I think, just think.

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 2>I think there's also a balance. Everybody should do it,

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 2>or you should at least come to terms within your

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 2>drafts is find out like where are the places that

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna take my shots. I don't think it's great

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 2>to go in and be like everybody is on the

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 2>table and then you're like, I'm taking Ellie and Cruise

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 2>and I'm taking Wyatt Langford and I'm taking Jazz, and

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 2>you want to like find.

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>The right spots to do that.

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 2>O'Neil Cruz is one of those for me, you know,

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 2>one of those rookies the Jackson holidays, the cheerios like

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 2>I like those two because the cost is so much

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 2>later based on potential returns. I think it's a lot.

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 2>It is harder to stomach, like Eli day La Cruz

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 2>at his cost in the twenties or thirties or something

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 2>like that, and it not work out.

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>When you take Cruise.

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 2>You could have two pitchers and three hitters already, and

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 2>then we've already proven that there's some great hitters behind that.

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't I don't think it absolutely demolishes like the

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 2>scope of what your team could be, unlike taking a

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 2>risk in those first couple of rounds, like a blow

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 2>up in your face. So that's it is a little

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 2>bit more beyond even just oneal cruise. There could be

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 2>other guys that you pick and choose, but I don't

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 2>want to also take like Jazz and him and then

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 2>a rookie like pick your spots.

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's continue on with some of these guys.

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Will pick one more out Abrams your fourteen spots higher

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>on the me Jazz Chisholm eighteen. But you've always been

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a Jazz guy to wreak Schooble, no doubt there. Yamamoto

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Trout, you are sixteen spots higher than me,

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>which is funny because we just had this Chisholm Trout debate.

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So is there a guy that stands out to you well,

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>so you feel like you know this guy, like you

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>want to plant your flag and be like, yeah, I'm

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>high on this guy and I believe in this guy

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>because is it Abrams is a chishm Is it Trout

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>or is it one of the pictures school or Yamamoto.

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of been Yamamoto. I'll tell you.

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 2>I am trying to get a little bit of like

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 2>the physicality out of my brain because like seeing him

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 2>in person, like he is a smaller guy, but it's looked.

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I hate on the short guys, man, like a short

0:21:58.119 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>guys can't catch.

0:21:58.880 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 3>H I'm not trying to.

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 2>I saw Davey Garcia today over at the White Sox

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 2>and like, that guy's five foot seven, Like they listened

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 2>at five foot nine and I was like, no, you're not, No, sir,

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 2>you're not.

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 3>But and he's a reliever and he was moved into

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 3>a reliever.

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I say, I like to look right in the eyes

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 1>of major league players. I think that's a nice feeling

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>for me.

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, that would be one that you can get a

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of relievers you could take a look at, but

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 2>getting all that out ahead. We talked about that on

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 2>the Ultimate Pitching Guide. Yamamoto stuff looks like it's gonna

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 2>play high. I know Nick wasn't excited about the potential innings,

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 2>but like Yamamoto and Trout, those are two players that

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:32.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of honed in on this range, two very

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 2>different players. I love Yamamoto as a two. I think

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 2>he's super safe as far as command, low whip numbers,

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 2>good strikeout numbers. Dodgers are gonna get a bunch of wins.

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 2>It's just is that gonna be one hundred and forty

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 2>or one hundred and sixty or one hundred and eighty innings.

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 3>That's something you have to come to terms with. And

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Trout's another one.

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 2>I kind of think I've planted a little bit of

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 2>a flag on because you're getting them at the cheapest

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 2>cost you've ever done before, and thirty five plus homers

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 2>on a regular playing time schedule seems play. The other

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 2>thing I worried about is this team being just such

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 2>a pile of crap at the end of the year.

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 2>They're just like I just go to take a rest

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 2>and you know we won't trade you, but we also

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 2>won't play you.

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know.

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 2>I feel like again, this is like returns on lower

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 2>costs is a lot easier for me to stomach. And

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 2>I think I've been building teams that I can. I

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 2>can deal with a cruise or I can deal with

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 2>the trout because I haven't taken a whole bunch of

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 2>risks already.

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>All Right, let's continue on here and take a look

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>at the first round. Now pretty much similar for us

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>along with consensus, we both have a Kunya one overall,

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we both have Bobby Wood Junior at two. We both

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>have Julio at three, Mookie Bets at four, in Corbyn

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Carol at five. Where we start to differ at six

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you have Fernando Tatis and I have moved up Kyle

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Tucker into the sixth spots. So that's one difference. Again,

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>minute difference. I have Tatis at eight, so or splitting hairs.

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>It was probably going to shock you is where I

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>have Matt Olsen ranked, which I've done a lot of

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>work on this and I've looked at a lot of

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>first base, a lot of Matt Olsen's stats from last

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>year too. I have n't bumped up into the first round,

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I understand where you're a little lower

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>on him.

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think I'm actually like a little high

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 3>on him still.

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>But you just u the Today fan Club. Today I

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 1>became the president of the fan club. I mean, if

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna look at the row numbers from Olsen,

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>who was also a player in his prime, one hundred

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and twenty seven runs last year, one hundred and thirty

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>nine RBI, fifty four home runs. Now, I know he

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:21.479
<v Speaker 1>doesn't steal a basis, so that's fine, but he did

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it to eighty three. And I think you know, if

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you go around the most consensus people, most people will

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>have Freddy Freeman ahead of Matt Olsen. He's going eighth overall.

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Molson's going fourteen. And I don't want to just flat

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>out say that's wrong, because I understand Freddy Freeman's going

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to give you, you know, the stolen bases that he

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>gave you last year. Okay, he stole twenty bags last year,

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>thirteen the year before. I don't know if that's sustainable

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>at the age of Freddy Freeman though, And I think

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>too many people are getting too wrapped up in that

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and saying, oh, it's Freeman over Olson if those so

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>one bases come back to ten, does it? I mean,

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a guy who hit twenty more homers,

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>and I will take those twenty more homers over the

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>ten steals because I can find those ten steals in

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four Major League Baseball. So let's talk about Olson.

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>He's a first round pick for me in the middle.

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>What say you can I sell you on Matt Olsen

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in that range?

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you really don't have well, okay on that right.

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm making a good argument for him,

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel like I'm like laying it out there.

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Freeman always goes ahead of him. I don't think that

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>should be the case anymore.

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 2>You know. The argument that I like, the really like

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 2>that you made is that the stolen bases don't need

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 2>to be a big primary rea. It doesn't need to

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 2>be one of the top two focal points if you're

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna make the case for Freddy Freeman over Elson, because

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 2>you can pick those up anywhere, Like it's throw a

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 2>rock and you can pick up a guy that steals

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 2>twelve bases or fifteen bases now, so you're not wrong

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 2>about that. But Freddy Freeman is like elite batting average guy.

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 2>You come back to what you were talking about before

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 2>with like points leagues. He's gonna get tons of hits.

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 2>You know you can count on batting average and he's

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 2>most likely gonna be hitting three and he's gonna have

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Shoe Heeyo Tani and Mookie Bets hitting in front. So

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 2>the RBI opportunities could be absolutely massive, and you still

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 2>have just rate bats behind him, so you know, run

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 2>RBI could go through the roof, though they do. With Olsen,

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 2>the power isn't there to stolen bases. It's really a

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 2>big batting average thing. So you don't have to sell

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 2>me on Olsen because I want Olsen. Olsen is like

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 2>a primary second round pick that I want in a

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of leagues. I don't need to wait on first.

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 2>I will gladly take Matt Olsen.

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 1>That you have to have it on the wheel.

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 3>It's just over some of the other names.

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 2>And I am prioritizing Freddy Freeman because I think Freddy

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Freeman is floora floor.

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 3>It is five categories.

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Sure, it's not elite power like I'm gonna get with

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 2>Matt Olsen, but batting average is exponentially better. I do

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 2>get those stolen bases. I think the runs can be higher.

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 2>RBI and homers are maybe a little bit of a difference.

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.719
<v Speaker 2>So selling on Olsen no in this range?

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, because you've got Freeman basically where I

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>have Olsen. So you have Kyle Tucker, than Oltani and Freeman.

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I have Kyle, Tucker, Olsen, Fernando. I'm sorry, you have Tatiase, Tucker, Otani, Freeman.

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>I have of going downwards, Tucker, Olsen, Tatis and Juan Soto.

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 2>So Otani was my big change. Otani was actually my

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 2>big change that I've done more recently. And I'll be

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 2>frank if if if let's say he qualified in the outfield,

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 2>I think it'd be hard to not have him as

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.360
<v Speaker 2>the number two overall player, if you like really think

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 2>about that. And that's that's what I'm dealing with, Like,

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 2>should I really only have him at eight if he

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 2>qualifies at util?

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that I haven't? Right, That's where I've got him,

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think him. I think that's reason I think

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you're your conundrum is quite reasonable about that, because you

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>are looking at the spot. But I always say the

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>same thing as like, well, all those people complain about

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>locking in utail spots when David Ortiz and Nelson Cruz

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>were banging, Like who cares? Like you're getting productivity? It

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. Is a guy that went to m v

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.479
<v Speaker 1>P what so you know they were they were they

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:53.360
<v Speaker 1>were banging bang bang, you know like McK foley, Oh

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>oh oh yeah, he's completely something.

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I got you.

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>You're still do over on. Let's look at let's look

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>at the bat I've made the Welsh uncomfortable, folks. In

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>case you're wating.

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Trying to shut me down, you shut me down a

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 3>little bit.

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 2>All right, We're gonna look at the BATEX, Derek Carty's

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 2>projection system. The bat X, says Shohyotani. Thirty nine homers,

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:21.479
<v Speaker 2>twenty four stolen bases, one hundred and seven runs, one

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 2>hundred and four RBI with a two ninety three batting average.

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>That is the elite of elite, of elite.

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 2>And you could easily justify that over Julio Rodriguez, Corbyn, Carrol,

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 2>his teammate Mookie bets. He's going to steal more than

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Mooki might hit more homers, as many run RBI and

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:39.719
<v Speaker 2>a better batting average.

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Otani legit can be number two.

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 2>It's the because if you draft him, you're out on

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Marcelo Zuna, you're out on like Jad Martinez if you care,

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 2>and you're kind of behind a little bit positionally. So

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 2>from a pure bat standpoint, I decided, you know what,

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 2>screw it, I'm making him eight. But there's a part

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 2>of me that wants to put him up into that

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 2>core like four and if he qualified at a position.

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>If he did, I would agree with you. But he doesn't.

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So we can't not this year anyway. Look in next

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>year when he's pitching again, he'll probably be two or one.

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Like that's probably, I mean, depending on the format of

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever you're playing in. How it allows. Now we both

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>have Soto over Judge, I have Otani Between those two guys.

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>The defining factor for me was Sodo over Judge was

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the toe injury. The iron Judge just came out and

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>said to the fress his career, he's gonna have to

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>manage this toe issue that he's got. That doesn't make

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>me feel good at the end of the day. Like

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>if I've got to split hairs, and that's what you're

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>doing here in the first round. You're splitting hairs. That's

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a big toe to be splitting, you know what I'm

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about, Like the Iron Judge thing. If this is

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>something that costs him fifteen games a year, that might

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>not sound like a lot, but you know what it is.

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>It is the difference of you missing a category by

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a few points. It's a difference of you losing a

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>week or two in the middle of the season then

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>missing out on playoffs, like or even worse if it

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>happens at the end of a season and you miss playoffs.

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>That was the defining factor for me. Was there something

0:29:58.000 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>for you with Soto over Judge besides that?

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, I just want to point like what you're saying

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 2>is like pretty pretty astute because even besides, like you know, hey,

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 2>he could miss some of those games, he's already got

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 2>something like that's even more I don't even need to

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 2>like think too much into it. Taking a guy that

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 2>already has something at that high cost that that's why

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 2>we're dinging Corey Seeker. Cory Seeker might not miss a

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 2>single game. He's kind of noted like I'm not sure

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 2>if I'll be back, but he might not miss any

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 2>time and he could be back and everything's glorious. And

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Corey Seker was a guy that was creeping into the

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 2>first round, but he's still.

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>In my first round now, like I'm still wait and

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>see about this.

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, I moved him back into the mid twenties,

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 3>actually just got him in town.

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Because at the end of the day, if he misses

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like a week, like who cares. This is the same

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff that people were doing early on with Machado that

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought was right.

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 2>But guys that have had prior injury stuff having more

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 2>things that that's kind.

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Of what not just more a chronic thing. I think

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the defining factor for me where it's against I

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>don't like Judge, but we are trying to define these

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>these small minuscule differences between these great elite players, and

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's like, well, I just think SODA's gonna

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>play more games, so give me Sodo. I agree with that.

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 2>And I mean and also Sodo just came off of

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 2>like you know, career like homers and everything in a

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 2>San Diego ballpark, and now he's gonna go to New

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 2>York like never hit well, Yeah, I'm optimistic that like

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna ball out again and we could be pushing.

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna push high thirties, maybe even into forties, lots

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 2>of runs, lots of RBI, like he steals some, and

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 2>we don't have this lingering toe thing. So yeah, I

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 2>mean it all plays in that he is the guy

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 2>over Judge.

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, So the rest of yours after Judge, Jose Ramirez,

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Trade Turner, Mettals, and then mister Jordan Alvarez. The end

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>for me after Aaron Judge is Freddie Freeman, Jose Ramirez,

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Corey Seeger, and Spencer Stryder. So right at the turn

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is where I have Strider and Garrett Cole. You don't

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>have any pictures in there, but I understand they're probably

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>like right around the corner. But you have Trey Turner

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Stell and I have Corey Seeger. So I think that's

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the interesting debate. I never thought i'd get to this

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>point here too, because even though I have never been

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the big Trade Turner guy, everybody always knows that. I

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>just think in twenty twenty four, Trade Turner is just

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a little less special than he used to be because

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I can find stolen bases of other places, and I

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>want the power. That's where I'm going now. And Corey Seeger,

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, is a better chance to give me more power.

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I know he has injury issues every year or too.

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I get the risk of Corey Seeger as a

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>first round pick, but Welsh Turner over Seeger. You've already

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>made that decision so far. If Corey Seeger says I'm healthy,

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>good to go, he takes VP, He's plays at the

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>end of spring training, does that flip flop for you

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>or you're staying true?

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if anybody paid attention to my ranks prior to

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 2>the injury, I moved Corey Seger above Trey Turner, so

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 2>I had that I may and that was actually kind

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 2>of a tough one because even though the speed seems

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 2>to be ticking down a little bit, he still stole

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 2>like thirty and the bat is if Tray Turner can

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 2>make that adjustment where he's gonna be like, oh, okay, Hi,

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm this guy that steals a bunch of bases, but

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 2>now I'm also gonna hit and then the bases go

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 2>away and he's gonna hit for more power.

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>The hard hit number is better.

0:32:57.840 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 3>I think we can stomach that.

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 2>If he goes from a you know, twenty forty guy

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 2>to a thirty thirty guy to a thirty twenty guy,

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 2>it's good. But Corey Seeger's batting average is a lead

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 2>of elite. The Homers through the roof RBIs to there Cory,

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Marcus Simeon hitting in front of him is phenomenal.

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 3>So I love Corey Seger. I just he's just got

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 3>injury stuff in.

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 2>The past and then you go and have this was

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 2>it the Herninge surgery and he's probably gonnadh when he

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 2>comes back. It's more to me than him just being like, yeah,

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 2>I should be good for opening Day, Like this is

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 2>a serious thing that he did. I don't think I

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 2>can make the move pretty much no matter what. But

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 2>in my tout league, I took Corey Seeger in the

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 2>third round. I started Corbyn Carroll, Pete Alonzo. It's OBP

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 2>so huge speed, huge power, and then I went with

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Corey Seeger.

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>In the third round. It's a great value OBP monster. Yeah,

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a huge value. That's especially in an expert league too,

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge value. All right, let's get to the

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>second round. I've got Garrett Cole starting line with Louis Robert, Albie's,

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Lindor and Austin Riley. You've got Bryce Harper, Spencer Stryder,

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Austin Reiley, Garrett Cole, Vlad Guerrero Junior popping in there.

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm too low on Harper. I've got

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>him outside this He's at twenty one in this next

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.919
<v Speaker 1>grouping there again pretty much usual suspects for the most part,

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 1>But I keep looking at second base and what Ozzi

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Albi's gives me what everybody else gives me that position,

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and I still I can't quit him. Still, I was

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the highest on I'm probably than anybody last year. I'm

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>still high on him this year. So in your opinion, Welsh,

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>because you've got him in this lower grouping coming up

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in twenty plus, do you think that he should be

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a top twenty player? You still outside of him on

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>what comes to Albi's right, not Harper Albe's.

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think he's right in that territory.

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I'm like insanely optimistic that he's

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 2>going to like reach another level. Part of it actually

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 2>also becomes about and I had so many drafts early

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 2>on why Ozzi Albi's was like a cornerstone for some

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 2>reason of a lot of my drafts. And then I

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 2>would move through and I'd go, boy, I really like

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 2>where labor Tory and boy tell Marte is still there,

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 2>and even on a certain bill they go, you know,

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Andres Menez really makes sense for this team because I

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 2>took a lot of these power hitters in at second

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I kind.

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Of like the position. I like some of the later depth.

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I have to be disciplined about it because I think

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 2>it's it is stupid to be like, well, I'm not

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 2>going to take them because I like a lot of

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 2>these other guys blah blah blah.

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 3>But then you screw up and you don't get them.

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:24.280
<v Speaker 2>But from the Bryson stop, there's so many stolen bases

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 2>to be had that if I'm given the opportunity for

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 2>a bat like Bryce Harper specifically, who I mean, you know,

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 2>baseball savant is red as red can be. Walk numbers

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 2>way up expected well but top three percent, seven percentile

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 2>expected slug and a two ninety batting average. That and

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 2>expected two ninety batting average to go along with all

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 2>these big, crazy hard hit numbers Bryce Harper's coming back.

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna get like first round, Bryce Harper coming again.

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 2>I can't take Ozzie Albi's over him. And then when

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 2>you look at those little tiny factors the position, I

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 2>feel a little bit more comfortable with what I can

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 2>get later at second base than I do specifically first

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:04.919
<v Speaker 2>base or in some instances, I actually think like Luis

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 2>Robert versus Albi's is even kind of a fascinating one

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 2>if you're trying to you know, if you're playing in

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 2>a five outfielder and you're like, oh, I might screw

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 2>up outfield.

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Hey, I've got Albe's at seventeen. I mean, excuse me,

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Robert at seventeen. So I'm a little higher than most

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 1>as well, a little higher than you too. Looking through

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the rest of these, it's pretty much the same players,

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>just a different order. After Vlad you have Devers, Louise, Robert, Corey,

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Seeger Lindor, Albi's, Dela Cruz, Alonzo, Corbyn Burns, Michael Harris,

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and Gossman. Now I don't have Harris, I don't have

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Dela Cruz. So some of the different names for me.

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 1>As I'm going through here, it is after Alby's at eighteen,

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Lindor at nineteen, Austin Riley at twenty, then Harper Alvarez,

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Simeon, who I want to talk about in a second,

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:49.439
<v Speaker 1>then Devers, Gossman, Corbyn Burns. Maybe a little pitching heavy

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>here than some other people, Trey Turner, Vlad Junior, Pete Alonzo,

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and Zach Wheeler. Simeon's the one I want to bring

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>up because you've got Dela Cruz in there, which is

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a huge leap of faith, and it's all like the

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:02.320
<v Speaker 1>hitter version of the Aaronola argument we had at the

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>top of the show. This guy scored one hundred runs

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 1>for the last five years. The only aread he didn't

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>was guess what twenty twenty when it was the pandemic

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>year right, one hundred and twenty three hundred and fifteen hundred,

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:14.839
<v Speaker 1>one and one twenty two. He has driven in one

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred runs. Two of the last three seasons. He has

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>stolen fourteen bases or more three seasons in a row.

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>He's hitting somewhere around that two sixty five is range.

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>That's probably what we're looking at. Like, when do we

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.280
<v Speaker 1>start thinking about Marcus Simeon and giving him more respect.

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is almost the exact same argument

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Aaron Nola, just the hitter version, where he's there,

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he's in a tough position, he produces it's a you know,

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a good lineup. Like what am I missing? Why am

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I so much higher on Marcus Simeon than the consensus?

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't think you're really missing anything. I

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 2>actually think I would just come back to exactly what

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I said about Ozzie Albis.

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 1>He's great, Like, Okay, then how do you put de

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>la Cruz over Marcus Simeon? Because you do? And again,

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I love Eli de la Cruz the player, but that

0:37:57.280 --> 0:37:59.240
<v Speaker 1>was a huge leap of faith on a player because

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 1>at his back he is one of these Marcus Simeon

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>seasons this year, and I think that's a that's a

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>bridge too far from my personal rankings.

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, part of it is I think Elli Dailor Cruz

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 3>is gonna steal fifty plus.

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bases this year that we're gonna go of this argument?

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:16.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I mean the guy, the guy stole over

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty bases while hitting barely two hundred this year. So

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 2>if in a full playing time and if projections are

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 2>gonna live up to anything in the batting average.

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Where he hits two thirty two forty.

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Also, he goes on and he just did an interview

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 2>at camp where they were asking do you like to

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 2>hit homers or steal bases more? And he's bass love

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 2>stealing bases. I think he's in a steal fifty. I

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 2>think he's gonna be one of the most aggressive base

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 2>stealers in all of baseball this year. So if he

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:45.800
<v Speaker 2>can hit two forty and he steals fifty, he's gonna

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 2>walk in. And if he hits two thirty or two forty,

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:49.919
<v Speaker 2>by the way, I know that's not good, he's gonna

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 2>walk into fifteen to twenty homers. So you have a

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 2>legit shot at a twenty to fifty guy who might

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:56.800
<v Speaker 2>have some stinky batting average. I think the runs in

0:38:56.920 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 2>RBIs can suffer. But that's the thing, Marcus, I mean,

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 2>it's just gonna be His average isn't awesome, but he's

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 2>just gonna be kind of consistent across the board. You're

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna get these high extremes with with a guy like

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Ellie Day La Cruz, and these are different positions. So

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 2>this kind of comes back again to my like where

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 2>do you like to pick and choose on the risk reward.

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Ellie day La Cruz, in my mind, is a player

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 2>that can set you over on stolen bases while producing

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 2>in other categories. But I do feel like Ellie, like O'Neal, Cruise,

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 2>like Jazz Chisholm, like Trout, like any of those guys.

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 2>I do feel like I'm now a little bit more

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 2>cognizant of what's going on in my draft and I

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 2>have to be I have to uh with it, like

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 2>walk on glass a little bit more like I feel

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 2>like I have to be more careful.

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Please, yes, oh, can you please have a welshism here?

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 1>What was it like the are you walking on broken glass?

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you're trying to do?

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Walking on sunshine?

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Like? You know?

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Uh, what's the where you're being careful? What's the thing

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 2>where you're being careful?

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:52.919
<v Speaker 3>And you don't want to know Welsh?

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>What is the thing where you're being careful?

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 2>What's the thing?

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 3>What's the saying?

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it like I'm walking on eggshells? Eggshells? It's eggshells

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:02.320
<v Speaker 1>walking on broken glass as an Anny Lennox song. So

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 1>and I know we're the only baseball podcast who made

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it any Lennox reference today, I could guarantee.

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 3>You walking on sunshine.

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Guys. The rest of these again, your second round mind

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is very, very similar in terms of the players, just

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a couple of different orders here and there. But I

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 1>will say too, like I think I respect you of

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Michael Harrison there, I'm I think I will be moving

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Harris in. The problem is who I'm moving out, which

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 1>is probably Zach Wheeler at thirty, and that's probably a

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 1>change I'm going to make. So the two changes that

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to make after this conversation too with you

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 1>too is Harper. I have to move Harper up a

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and I got to move Harris into that

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>top thirty. I'll probably bump Wheeler for that. But I

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta tell you, man, I think Marcus Simeon deserves more love.

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:43.879
<v Speaker 1>He should be in the top thirty for everybody, maybe

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>even top twenty five, because I have him twenty three overall,

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and I just keep looking at it again. The position

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:53.840
<v Speaker 1>he plays, the productivity, the consistency. I think it's the

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>same thing where you know everyone, you on everyone, you

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:58.399
<v Speaker 1>you make fun of me about Alex Bregman all the time.

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Is Alex Bregman. All world is as good as Simeon

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy right now. No, but man, that floor is

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>just underappreciated, and I'm sick and tired of people just

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>not appreciating it.

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.480
<v Speaker 2>If you don't have Marcus Simeon and Alex Bregman on

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 2>your next mock draft team or real draft or whatever,

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna be disappointed.

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's speaking of disappointment, let's get to our starting

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>pitcher lists here. Now, it's pretty much the same. Actually,

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, we both have Strider at one. We

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>both have garat Cole too. I've got Gosman ahead of Burns.

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:29.840
<v Speaker 1>You've got Burns ahead of Gosplin. Why do you have

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Burns ahead of Gosmin.

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I love the movie, talked about that on

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 3>the pitching.

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I love the move.

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's a little bit more ballpark friendly. I

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 2>love the organization, I love the offensive support. I just

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 2>think I think everything around is in intangible, not to

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 2>say like there's a lot of weird clouded Burns and

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 2>the Brewers and not competing like you're gonna be in

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 2>in the competition, independent race the entire season long. It

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 2>is a tougher division that's something to consider. But I

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 2>think Corbyn Burns is still towing the lines of like

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 2>being really a pitcher, and Orioles have done really great

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:03.839
<v Speaker 2>things with pitchers in general, So if they do get

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 2>their hands on him at all, maybe he's tinkering around.

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I feel like he's in really good hands. So I'll

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 2>jump back into like another two hundred and fifty strikeout,

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:12.800
<v Speaker 2>you know season for Corbyn Burns.

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 3>I think he's easily the number three.

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm going Gosma over Burns because I think Gosman's going

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to have more strikeouts than him this year, same division.

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be tough either way. But you know, Gosman

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>last year are two thirty seven. I think there's a

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:27.440
<v Speaker 1>better chance he gets back to two thirty than Corbyn Burns,

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>who's sitting at two hundred last year. And again it's

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 1>thirty strikeouts. This is not a small amount. It's kind

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>of like that Freddie Freeman argument with Matt Olson. We're

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about a big difference here, Like these are difference

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:42.359
<v Speaker 1>makers in these levels, especially in season. Long rodo after

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>number four is done, Number five is Zach Wheeler for

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:49.280
<v Speaker 1>both of us. Number six, of course you have George Kirby,

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I have Louis Castillo, his teammate. At seven, I have

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Pablo Lopez, which you also have Pablo Lopez at eight,

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I have George Kirby. Aa do you have Louis Castillo?

0:42:57.520 --> 0:42:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So we just flip flopped our Mariners. By the way, everybody,

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 1>The Mariners I think are the best rotation in baseball,

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna keep talking about this and saying it.

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I've already bet them to win the American League West

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 1>because of that rotation. I think it's gonna help Julio

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:13.799
<v Speaker 1>get to MVP as well. So I'm gonna be mister

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Mariner this year. I might have to go get me

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 1>like a Marins a marinerswag like some serious.

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I like the I like the trident that's like this

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:22.879
<v Speaker 3>tri the trident one that's on there.

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Ye cool, But I wanted Trent Lions won a playoff game.

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the Seattle Mariners can get to a World Series.

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twenty four is gonna be a fun year.

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 2>They got the rotation and the bullpen for it. I

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:36.320
<v Speaker 2>The thing that keeps floating around for me is like

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 2>I think Matt Brash could end up being like the

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:40.800
<v Speaker 2>biggest surprise closer if they were to give him that

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.279
<v Speaker 2>job with that sweeper, I think, I think that team

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:45.359
<v Speaker 2>is in a good position with a good bullpen, good

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:48.359
<v Speaker 2>starting pitchers. But I wanted to add something that works.

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Your no injuries happened. You got Gilbert, you got wu

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>you got Bryce Miller, you got all these guys here

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:54.319
<v Speaker 1>and more to come.

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, going backwards just a tiny bit when you said

0:43:57.560 --> 0:43:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Gossman over Burns, I do want to point out our

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 2>buddy Ariol Cohen's ATC projections agree with you if you

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:07.960
<v Speaker 2>believe the like actual number, like the you know, like

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 2>two thirteen, they have Gossman at two hundred and thirteen

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 2>strikeouts versus Burns two hundred and ten, and the innings

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 2>are actually six more innings for Corbyn Burns, so they

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:21.840
<v Speaker 2>fa ATC favors your argument on Gossman.

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, So after we switched our Mariners, you've got Gallon,

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Castillo and Glass. Now I've got Kirby Glass now and Gallon,

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:29.839
<v Speaker 1>So again pretty much the same guys. Everybody knows I'm

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a little lower on Gallon because of the innings thing.

0:44:32.680 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you one question here where we

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>close out the show, and I'm gonna give my answer

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to who's the one guy when we look up that

0:44:38.760 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>cracks this top ten that's not in our top ten?

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I know I have my answer. Do you

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>need more time to think about it? Because I can

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.959
<v Speaker 1>give mine, Why don't you start with yours?

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I got quite a few names.

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go simple here now. Noah was a guy

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that I just, you know, talked about. He's only a twelve.

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go a little deeper, have a little bit

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 1>more fun. Freddy Peralta last year, through one hundred and

0:44:58.120 --> 0:44:59.919
<v Speaker 1>sixty five innings, struck out two hundred and ten guys.

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:02.320
<v Speaker 1>If he throws one hundred and eighty innings and he

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:04.879
<v Speaker 1>goes to two twenty, he's going to be in this group.

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 1>The era was a little high three eighty six, but

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the deeper stats are sill pretty good. The

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 1>whip was one point one to two, was very solid.

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the brewers, the brewers have to believe in

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Parolta to have made this Corbyn Burns trade, because

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they're throwing in the towel. I

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 1>think they're just saying, hey, we've got to restructure what

0:45:22.400 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 1>we're doing here. So if they believe in Freddy Parolta,

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody else should. I think he's a player

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that's going at a discount. It should not be. I

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>don't think he is. I think he is a fantasy ace,

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm okay with him as my fantasy ace. I

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:35.800
<v Speaker 1>know some people are not, but I am Welsh. Is

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 1>there a name for you not in this top ten

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:39.279
<v Speaker 1>you think is going to crack it? Yeah?

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:42.399
<v Speaker 2>There are a few guys that jumped to my mind

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 2>that aren't going to be picked, Like Bobby Miller was

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 2>one of those kind of an innings cap, Yamamoto was

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:50.320
<v Speaker 2>in there, Joe Ryan, those are a few of the

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 2>guys that I immediately thought of. Joe Muskrove I throw

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 2>it as well. But the guy I'm going to settle

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 2>in is Logan Web. Logan Web I think is one

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 2>of those, just simply because the guy who's going to

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:03.440
<v Speaker 2>absolutely eight innings, he had over two hundred and sixteen

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 2>this past year, really really low walk numbers. If George

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Kirby can do it, Logan Webb coming at a better cost,

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 2>he absolutely can as well. Ballpark factors work pretty decently.

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be a pretty tough division. The difference that

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 2>holds him back is probably the strikeout numbers overall. But

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 2>you got a great closer, you got a solid offense around.

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 2>But this is just a guy that can continuously maintain

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 2>some really low era, doesn't walk guys, and if the

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 2>strikeouts come up, I think he could creep into the

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 2>top ten.

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So here's what we want you to do. Now that

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you listen to all this, go to Fantasy words dot

0:46:36.120 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>com slash mock or just download draft Wizard and put

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it on your phone and go start wearing some mock drafts.

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 1>With this information, we're giving you great your own cheat sheets,

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:48.279
<v Speaker 1>use cheat sheets and the drafts software to you know,

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 1>put Tig Welsh's rankings, my rankings. Whoever's Moro Price got

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Bogman and Mike Mary might be better off with theirs,

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 1>but still take that happen. I don't know. We're doing

0:46:56.600 --> 0:46:58.920
<v Speaker 1>an investigation. It's going to be a whole thing. The

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>draft kit is also available for free fantasypros dot com

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 1>slash draft Kit. Go there, check it out. Start to

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:07.120
<v Speaker 1>get prepared because pictures and catchers are here. We have baseball.

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 1>It's already started. Like we are rocking and rolling right now,

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So get ahead of everybody else. Run the draft simulation.

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Sink your leagues. It's free. Sink your leagues. Check out

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the tools, and then if you want to go premium

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you can to unlock all the other ones and get

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>your draft software hooked up to all of your drafts

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:25.400
<v Speaker 1>so that you are more prepared for everybody else to

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:27.399
<v Speaker 1>make the best decisions, because the draft is just part

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of it. Draft Wizard is there to set you up

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:31.799
<v Speaker 1>for success, and then my playbook is there to take

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you through the rest of the season. So go ahead,

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:36.360
<v Speaker 1>use the tools here Fantasy pros and I don't just

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:38.840
<v Speaker 1>mean me in the Welsh and let's subscribe to the channel,

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:42.839
<v Speaker 1>drop the comments, win a Jazz Chishom jersey. So again, subscribe,

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 1>drop a comment, you might win a jersey and you

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 1>might see us with the mustaches again this year. Plus wigs.

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:49.839
<v Speaker 1>That's doubleing. Yeah.

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, so here's a question, huh do we do like

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:54.479
<v Speaker 2>long hair hippiewigs or do we do live.

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I think we do a whole thing on

0:47:56.560 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>social media where we have a couple of choices and

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we let them choose, or maybe we do it for

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 1>our discord people fantasypros dot Com slash chat Man of

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the pluses of joining Discord. You get to choose the

0:48:05.880 --> 0:48:07.719
<v Speaker 1>wig for Joe Pizi in a poll.

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Mister potato heads, maybe you know what we should do.

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Can we get an interactive tool where we could have

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 2>us and then they could just enter like put like hair,

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 2>and maybe that might be the team a little far.

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I think we might have to just be going to

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Spirit Halloween and getting some wigs. I think that's I

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:24.239
<v Speaker 2>just have my big aspirations. Well, I want them to

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:25.279
<v Speaker 2>be able to figure out what they want.

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:27.719
<v Speaker 1>These are your big aspirations after all these years, this

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is your.

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:31.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, mister potato head like Welsh and Joe.

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Heads, well you know, all right, let's get out of

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:36.280
<v Speaker 1>here before we walk into any more glass or eggshells.

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:37.800
<v Speaker 1>That'll do it for us, But the story of the

0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:41.439
<v Speaker 1>game goes on for the Welsh. I'm Joey p We'll

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:43.960
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. Kids. Sorry,