Speaker 1: This is gonna sound like a horror story, but for
Speaker 1: some people it's a reality. Imagine you head to the
Speaker 1: mailbox after doing your taxes, your reach in you think
Speaker 1: you're going to get your tax refund, only to find
Speaker 1: that somebody's already filed and gotten your return. Identity thieves
Speaker 1: can use your personal information to file for your refund
Speaker 1: or commit other forms of ID theft. The last year
Speaker 1: of the i r S identified approximately four point one
Speaker 1: billion dollars in suspected tax refund fraud due to I
Speaker 1: D theft. Now, thankfully there's LifeLock. With LifeLock, you have
Speaker 1: access to a team of US based specialists who know
Speaker 1: the steps to take to fix identity issues, whether it
Speaker 1: happens during tax season or any other time. Of course,
Speaker 1: no one can prevent all identity theft or monitor all
Speaker 1: transactions at all businesses, but nobody is better than LifeLock.
Speaker 1: Join now and get ten percent off when you visit
Speaker 1: LifeLock dot com slash rush. That's LifeLock dot com slash rush,
Speaker 1: or call one three and use the promo code rush.
Speaker 1: On Monday afternoon, right before that big blizzard was supposed
Speaker 1: to destroy New York, the National Weather Service knew the
Speaker 1: storm might fizzle, but they kept giving worst case predictions
Speaker 1: of epic snow amounts because, according to The Washington Post,
Speaker 1: they didn't want to confuse the public to a bunch
Speaker 1: of idiots. The Post criticizes that decision. They call it
Speaker 1: well intentioned but flawed. They say it could erode public
Speaker 1: trust and weather forecast. The Weather Service has a responsibility
Speaker 1: to put out the best possible forecasts, as the Post,
Speaker 1: if they learned that they're wrong about something, they must
Speaker 1: revise their forecast until the public immediately. Well that's not
Speaker 1: how the Post or other drive by media outlets think
Speaker 1: about climate forecasting. I mean, for decades have been all
Speaker 1: kinds of melodramatic global warming forecast that have not happened
Speaker 1: the end of snow, for instance, when it turned out
Speaker 1: some so called climate scientists faked their data to drive buys,
Speaker 1: ignored it when it was obvious the world was not
Speaker 1: heating up as predicted, they broomed the term global warming
Speaker 1: and they started talking about climate change instead. So the
Speaker 1: drive by media is upset that the Weather Service will
Speaker 1: erode public trust by not reporting accurate forecast the day
Speaker 1: before storm. But they couldn't care less about the bogus
Speaker 1: forecasts of climate doom that they have been reporting for decades.
Speaker 1: Anybody have a little problem with this