WEBVTT - Patriots Catch-22 4/16: "My Guys" on Defense, Latest Draft Buzz

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the Patriots Catch twenty two podcasts with Evan

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Lazar and Alex Barth.

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 2>And Lazar.

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody nailed it, Joined as always by our Bara.

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Here is Evan Lazar and Alex bar Okay, so let's

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>do early day three and late day so you can

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>get to that. Ted Johnson is I still believe. I

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>will not quit Tesz Johnson. I will not quit.

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Right there, I will not quit.

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:47.319
<v Speaker 1>I won't quit test Johnson like I'm gonna's strategy. I'm

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna go down with the ship with Ted Johnson. I'm

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>not wrong until I'm wrong, right. Isn't that one of

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>your your shows like that, that's one of your your

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>staples committed.

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 3>That's big vulgar thing. R Waiver on Michael Pennox last

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 3>year and read me the Riot Act.

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But until you're wrong, you're not wrong. That's a big take.

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I know Felger sometimes has, so I'm just saying I'm

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>not wrong yet. On tedes Johnson, he could be really

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>good in the NFL. We don't know yet. Yeah, and

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the case with all these guys, I suppose. But hello, everybody,

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>welcome in Patriots Catch twenty two, eight days, eight days,

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>ago till the NFL. Who's counting, Alex, I am counting

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>at this point, Let's get there, let's get the picks made,

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and let's figure out who's going to be Patriots out

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of this class. But eight days to go to the draft.

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>It's very exciting time with the draft. I feel like

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>all the hay is almost there. We're almost in the

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>barn at this point, I would say, and we get

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to the point now where we just are in the

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>middle of reading body languages at press conferences and lying

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>season and all that kind of stuff.

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 3>So well, as Mike Rabel said yesterday, like he talked about,

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 3>they're going through their running simulations to figure out what

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna do.

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>They refuse to call them mock drafts, even though that's

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they are.

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think they're I think they're a little more involved.

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 3>They're not they're not putting the PF. Maybe they are

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 3>putting the PFL, but like you know, setting up certain trades.

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, we we used to on our old show,

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 3>we used to do that exercise all the time, and

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 3>please this is ridiculous. Yeah, well we're now we're not

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 3>doing it to the same extent. They are, but it's

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 3>a it's a good sparing.

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Ourselves to the actual in GMS. Okay, but I do

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>love how every single GM gets up there and says, yeah,

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we're we're running simulations. And I was like, you can

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>just say that you're doing mock drafts like that, that's

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>what simulations, that's what.

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 3>You're doing simulation. If they're not gonna call them mock drafts,

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 3>maybe all start calling my mock draft simulation. Yes, paytris

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 3>to the simulation three point Patriots draft simulation.

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>There you go. Now we're now, we're in the business.

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>We're in the know. Anyways, before we get rolling here,

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>support the home team. Join New England's events staff here

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 1>at Jilted Stadium. Seasonal positions available in food and beverage, parking, insecurity.

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Visit www dot thecraft group dot com, slash careers and

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>apply today. Alex, you were a vendor at one point,

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>weren't you.

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 3>I was in high school as a hawker.

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>You were a hawker here? That was my first explain

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>what that means. I don't know the hawkers.

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Are you see him out there? The guys in yellow

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>shirts that are so I didn't work in one of

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 3>the concession stands. I would have the bag of pizza

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 3>or water or whatever. I didn't sell beer. I wasn't

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 3>old enough when I worked here to sell beer, but

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 3>the bag of whatever over the shoulder. Get pizza here.

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 3>It wants pizza. And it was games concerts. That was

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 3>the first of three times I worked for.

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a that's incredible. That's a that's a great story,

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. That's that's right up there with mister Kraft

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>being on the bleachers at the old Page Well, uh Sullivan,

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever? What was it called again, shaffer Staium?

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 2>That was?

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 3>That was my first Patriots game that I went to.

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 3>I worked as a hawker. Was what season did they

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 3>open it would have been I think it was twenty ten.

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Did they open against the Bengals? It was an opener

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 3>against the Bengals. That was my first game and I

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 3>was working.

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating. Were you ever on the on the bleachers

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>at the old Foxborough Stadium? Did you get to a

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>game before they.

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Got for a Patriots game?

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.799
<v Speaker 3>I went for revs. Game and I think like maybe

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 3>why I was younger, maybe one or two other events,

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 3>but not a Patriots game.

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I My very first game was at the

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>old Foxborough Stadium. It was a night game. I can't

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you if it was Sunday or Monday night or whatever,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's a night game in the pouring rain against

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe Aaron Brooks's New Orleans.

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 3>There you go, that's a poll.

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it was pouring and I remember, you know,

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't have been more excited. I didn't care at

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the time, but my parents were very worried about about

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the weather and about you know, me getting soaked at

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, at four or five years old. But it

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>was a good time. Anyways, enough down memory lane, let's

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>get in.

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Hang on. I found the game. It was against the Bengals.

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 3>I was right, twenty ten against the Bengals. Patriots won

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 3>thirty eight twenty four. I just want to see how

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Brady did. Brady was twenty five to thirty five, two

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 3>fifty eight, three touchdowns, no picks. Ho hum, oh yeah, exactly.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Home Wes Welker caught a couple of touchdowns. Good day.

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I know that there's there's some helmet news today that

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>is I didn't even think we're gonna get in Tom

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Brady adjacent.

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 3>Wait, hang on, Carson Palmer. That came thirty four of

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 3>fifty three hundred and forty five yards.

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Two touchdowns, fifty attempts.

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 3>It was a duel. There was some helmet news.

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>There's some helmet news, but there Today is also the

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifth anniversary of the day the Patriots drafted Tom Brady.

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Thought there was yesterday.

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's today in the in the sixth round.

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But regardless of it is today or yesterday, Oh.

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 3>To day, because it's Belichick's birthday twenty.

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Five years ago.

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, and it's also Bill belichicks o old man.

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So happy birthday to the coach.

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Birthday to Bill.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>There all that and all the pleasantries are out of there.

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 3>We we got a little installed generally.

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into the pre draft press conference yesterday. Both

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 1>of us were there with Mike Rabel at the podium,

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and that was a pros pro press conference. He to me,

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I know that everybody wants to read into everything and

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>read between the lines and look at body language. I

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>know is his left tackle answer. There's a lot of

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>body language doctors out there that are trying to decipher

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>what exactly his mood was towards the tackles. The way

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I read it was that that was a pros pros

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>press conference. He gave nothing away a lot of words.

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Well so nothing I would push back on. He gave

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 3>nothing away, very little. I think we learned a lot

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 3>about his big picture draft philosophy, and some of that

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 3>might just be because it's the first year we're covering

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 3>him doing a draft. And yeah, there wasn't much to

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 3>learn about Bill's draft loos fy at the end because

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 3>there was twenty years of data to go through, but

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 3>we didn't really get anything about this draft. These press

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 3>comms is the last few years, whether it was Elliot

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 3>wolfor Matt grow I remember walking out last year. I

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 3>think I said this to you when I wrote it

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 3>at the Times, you can go and find it. I

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 3>came out of that saying they're going quarterback, receiver, tackle,

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 3>those are the whatever, whoever it is, that's the order.

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Because Wolf he talked about the depth of the tackle

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 3>class and said they liked the group they had. He

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of hyped up their receivers and like I remember,

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 3>he kind of laid it out the year before. They

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 3>talked about more in so many words, reliance on the

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 3>combine and what did we get we got a very

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 3>combine based draft. Yeah, so the last two years. This

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 3>press conference was very indicative, very telling. I felt like

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 3>we got quite a few answers to the test coming

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 3>away from that, I don't know that I again, I

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 3>think I have a better understanding of the way Rabel

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 3>viewsed roster building as a whole. But there's not much

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 3>and some of it is the way this draft is structured.

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 3>There's not much that applies to this specific draft. The

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 3>only thing I think that does. I don't know if

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 3>you want to start here or start somewhere else. I

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 3>want to jump the gun. But was his answer about

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 3>like taking a risk on a player who's maybe not

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 3>a personality fit if the guy's talented.

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that that is kind of where I did want

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to start, because I thought that was the most important

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>answer to come out of the press conference yesterday, because

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, just coupling this with all the buzz about

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Walker lately as it pertains to the Patriots at

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>four overall, and you know, Jalen Walker just being that

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>type of guy. You know, I've compared him in the past,

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>both playing style, perspective and leadership to Dante high Tower,

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>just like one of those guys that is going to

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>be a captain, is going to be a leader, is

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>going to ooze football and tangibles and character in your

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>locker room. And I look at Rabel's answer yesterday where

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it was Mikey already who asked the initial question about,

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically drafting good guys, you know, football high

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>football character players, and he said he kind of stopped

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>him and was like, well, talent comes first, right, like

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>they gotta be good at football. And then he also added,

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to get the direct quote, so I

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>can I can quote him directly. We can't can't do

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>what we want to do with just a bunch of

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>good dudes. That's not going to get it done. So essentially,

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I read at as him saying it's not

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>enough just to be a good guy. He also had

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a good football player.

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 3>So I interpreted that a little differently. I took that

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 3>more about Abdul Carter. And there's been that's obviously in

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 3>the news too, with Shuder meeting with the Giants again

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 3>and all of that, but that the Bob McGinn report

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 3>that you know, not the guy's not the there's just

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 3>some questions about his work ethic. Basically, not that he's

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 3>the worst person in the world, there's some questions about

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 3>his work ethic and is that the kind of guy

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Vrabel's gonna want to bring in? And we talked about

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 3>I think we talked about this last week. I talked

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.719
<v Speaker 3>about with Felger last week about this is part of

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 3>the reason why you build a strong culture, and that

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 3>was part of that question that it was she already

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 3>right specifically mentioned Morgan Moses and said when you have

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 3>guys like Morgan Moses and other leaders, does it help you?

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 3>You know? And builded this for years, builded this for years,

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 3>I would say more successes than failures. It wasn't all successes,

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 3>but the majority were successes. But it's a lot easier

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 3>to do that ten years into building the culture than

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 3>year one when you're trying to establish it. But what

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 3>I kind of interpreted that as from Vrabel was basically,

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, if a guy's good enough, he's good enough,

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 3>and we'll make it work. And you don't want he

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 3>talked about you know you're gonna meet with him. You

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 3>don't want a guy that you think is irredeemable. But

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 3>all right, if a guy's not Matthew Slater, he's not

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Devin mccordy, but he's a really in terms of leadership.

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 3>Obviously those guys are good football players, but if they're

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 3>not those guys in terms of how they operate in

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 3>the locker room, but he's a really good football player.

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Will you need good football players first, and then you

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 3>bring them in and you work on it from there.

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 3>So there had been some questions about would the Patriots

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 3>rule out abdul Carter because of some of those mental

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 3>red flags. One, I think those are a little overblown,

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 3>but for what they are, and this team has put

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 3>culture at a premium throughout the offseason. I kind of

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 3>took that Vrabel answer to mean, as long as they

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 3>think he's within a realistic realm, which the stuff that's

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 3>been reported I don't think is anything egregious. Yeah, it's

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe not what they want, but it's not egregious. I

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of took that to mean, like Abdul Carter, that

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 3>stuff's not going to be disqualifying for him getting drafted

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 3>by the Patriots.

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I think we're saying the same thing, just

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>through two different players. And the reason why I brought

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>up Jalen Walker was one because I don't feel like

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we've necessarily totally unpacked Jalen Walker on the show as

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a potential Patriot, because I haven't felt until recently that

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>he was really in this conversation, you know, I have him.

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll look it up in a second to be exactly,

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>but I have him like eight or ninth on the

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>board right now, in the top ten. Certainly a top

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>ten player in this draft, but I don't necessarily see

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>him as a top five talent in a class like this,

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>even in a class like this, I should say. But

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of scuttle but and this is

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, mostly coming from the media obviously, that Jalen

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Walker's character and his intangibles and his lead ship would

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>maybe push the Patriots to draft somebody like him, maybe

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>even over someone like Abdul Carter. And the way that

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I took Vrabel's answer, just taking it at face value,

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is I think the football player comes first, like who

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>what they are on film, and the talent of the

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>player has to come first. And I like Jalen Walker

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>as a player. I like the complete package that he

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>brings to the table, as we've been talking about. But

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I have some reservations about picking him that high as

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a tweeter, Like he's really not a guy that's going

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to have a full time position. He's gonna be somebody

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>like High Tower that first and second down you're gonna

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>play him off the ball. Third down and obvious pass situations,

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be rushing the passer, probably off the edge.

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have to move him around. He's gonna have

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a chess piece on the defensive side of

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the ball. I don't think he's a natural fit at

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>either spot in terms of full time usage off ball

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>linebacker or at edge. He's also six and forty pounds

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to lay the edge with that length and with that

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>size at you know, a seventy percent clip is probably

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be unrealistic.

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 3>No, he's gonna be a primary linebacker, like High Tire's

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 3>gonna be a primary linebacker. Even Bentley kind of and

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Bentley's obviously bigger, but John Bentley kind of did that

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. Yeah, I think you talk about the

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 3>talent coming first to me, it's more And Vrabel talked

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 3>a little bit about this yesterday. Was it you asked

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 3>this about like what's the tiebreaker if the players are

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 3>greated similarly, which is a great question for this draft specifically.

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Try to get him. I think he knew what I

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>was going He knew he were going.

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:31.839
<v Speaker 3>For Yeah, but no, but he said some of the

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 3>things we've said, right, Yeah, position is a tiebreak. I

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 3>think he said that, right, Samium utility and premium position

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 3>is a tiebreaker. Combine testing, combine testing is I think

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 3>he didn't say it, But if I were to project

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 3>or just how I would approach it if I was

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 3>in that spot, and what does that matter? I don't know.

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not there. I would think though, like personality, leadership approach,

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 3>mental approach, I would think that applies as a tiebreaker

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 3>as well. So I don't know that it's you know,

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Carter and Walker being the same player, like if they're close,

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 3>if they have Carter and I'm just pulling numbers out

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 3>of my ass here, Yeah, they have Carter graded as

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 3>an eight point five, they have Walker graded as an

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 3>eight point three. Are those leadership and tangible things? And

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 3>the questions about Carter's work ethic are those worth point

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 3>two right or point three? Does that put car? I

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 3>think that's more the conversation rather than like, well, they're

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 3>graded the same in Walker as I think it's about

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 3>does that how they view that couldn't be enough to

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 3>close the gap between the two.

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Players, right, And just my opinion, like just going from

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>predictive mode to just my take on the players. I

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think that those two players are particularly.

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they're that close either. But if they

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 3>have them, are they close in the Patriot's eyes because

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 3>the leadership makes them close or are they close on

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 3>tape and then the leadership comes in and puts Walker

0:14:59.600 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 3>over the top.

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Because I just feel like, and it's not I hate

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that if the draft discourse makes us do this, like

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like I'm dumping on Jalen Walker because I'm

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>making an argument for Abdull Carter, But it's not the goal.

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to dump on him. But I think

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>there's little things that are getting overlooked when we say, oh,

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>these guys are kind of just comparable players. Abdull Carter

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is two inches taller and ten pounds heavier than Jalen

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Walker is. I would also just say that he's a

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>lot more explosive and a lot more dynamic off the

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>ball than Jalen Walker is. As a pass rusher like

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Abdull Carter has all the tools to be like a

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Von Miller Micah Parsons level pass rusher. Jalen Walker is

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>going to have that in his back pocket that he's

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a decent on the line edge rusher, but he's a

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>linebacker like He's truly an off the ball linebacker in

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of the position, I think he's gonna lock the

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>most snaps at I would say it's probably gonna be

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>at the second level in the box. Now, unlike High Taler,

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>like High Tower had the side in the power and

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and just the overwhelming, you know, sledgehammer of play straight

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that off ball linebacker Walker has closing speed like Walker

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is a very good open field bursty, closing speed type

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of player that he can chase down guys in the

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>open field. I don't know if that was necessarily High

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Towers game, but when I watch you know, Walker playoff

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>ball linebacker, I see a lot of the same, like

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>compressing space, you know, plugging gaps, firing downhill at the

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage. You know, that's sort of his game,

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is just clogging the middle of the field. And then

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>when you get into those pass rushing situations. You know,

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>he can rush off the edge a little bit, he

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>can rush over the guard or the center and use

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>quickness on the inside. So similar type of players. But

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, Abdual Carter to me is in a different

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>tier completely the Jalen Walker. So it would be disappointing

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to me a little bit if Jalen Walker was the

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>pick at for I'm not saying it would be the

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>worst pick in the world. We're not talking about, you know,

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a cold, strange level react from me here, but it

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>would not be my pick like that would not be.

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Fav I've used this line a lot in the for

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 3>this year's class, and I know it kind of sounds

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 3>like a cop out, but I think it's fitting. It

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 3>was my Mason Graham line for months. It still kind

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 3>of is. Yeah, I think Carter would be I don't

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 3>think Walker would be a bad pick. I don't think

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 3>he's the best pick they could make. Yeah, he's not

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 3>a bad pick. He's a good pick, but they would

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 3>be leaving there there are better players of it. And

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 3>some people may say, well, then that means he's a

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 3>bad pick because they didn't make the best pick. I mean,

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 3>there's what I mean by it is like there's ways

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 3>you can justify it where there there is a path

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 3>I think to Jalen Walker having a better career in

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 3>New England than Abdull Carter would. There is a path

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 3>to that. It's a much tougher path to get to, though,

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 3>than the path to Carter's peak. It would path to

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Carter being better than want and it would have.

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 1>To be like work ethic related, Like it would have

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:59.719
<v Speaker 1>to be work ethic football character related.

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well that's why physical sales, that's why we're having

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the conversation.

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 3>But like, yeah, that's so they can he can get there,

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 3>they can the pick can be justified. Yeah, it's just

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 3>going to be you need a lot to go right

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 3>for that. Yeah. I mean you need a lot to

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 3>go right for any draft pick to be to work out.

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 3>It's not an easy process, but relatively speaking, there there's

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 3>more projecting you're doing with Jalen Walker, and this would

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 3>apply to other guys.

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Well. I wanted to kind of get to that because

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to me, I feel like this draft has turned into,

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you know a little bit Abdul Carter versus Jalen Walker,

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>which again I don't think is particularly close, but that

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the conversations we're having.

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I think the real conversation to have is Carter and Walker.

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 3>And what I mean by or sorry is is Campbell

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 3>and Walker. Yeah, And what I mean by that is,

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 3>I think if Carter's there, you take him. And I

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 3>think if Carter's there, they will take them. So that's

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 3>That's not a conversation in the sense that we can

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 3>discuss the top three. But it's not we're not debating prospects.

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 3>It's not a conversation relating to the PA. It's just

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 3>wait and see if Carter's gone and Hunter's gone. Obviously

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 3>putting that qualifier in there, I think Carter or Campbell

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 3>and Walker is where you get. If I had a guess,

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 3>it's just me guess. There's no inside information. If I

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 3>had to guess, those are the top two players on

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 3>their board, and I don't know which one would be

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 3>one and two, but I would guess it's those two

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 3>and then everybody else.

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>So the other answers that he gave that people are

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>dissecting a little bit here are are, obviously his response

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>about left tackle and the fact that he sees starting

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>caliber left tackle. Some people took that as him being

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>a little bit lukewarm, you know, not coming out and

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>saying this is the next Jonathan Ogden. I don't think

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>he would say that even if there was another Jonathan

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Augda in this draft. But it did stand out to me.

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is something that I've tried to reiterate a

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit about this draft at tackle, because I think

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>there's some concern that if they don't draft a tackle

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>at four, then like last year, they're kind of gonna

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>miss the boat on true star arding upside at left tackle.

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>But he made it sound like he has a group

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that there's a group. Now it could be Campbell, Membu

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and maybe Calvin Banks end of group, right right. But

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we've talked a little bit about and I

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and I I see them as this, you know, the

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:21.239
<v Speaker 1>ariantisies U, the Josh Connerley's of the world. You know.

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I took that response and I don't want to do

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>body language doctor, Like, if you think his body language

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>was off on that answer and he's you know, out

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>on the tackles, then that's your prerogative. I don't look

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that much into body language. I'm not a scientist in

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that respect.

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 3>He kind of he just kind of is the same

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 3>body language across question.

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't look too much.

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 3>Into that, just how he is when he's dealing with

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 3>the media.

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>But is there you know, I still think that it's

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>very much in play that they draft who they feel

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is just the best player available at four, regardless of position,

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and come back up for a Josh Simmons and Arianisery

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and Josh Connery or maybe hope one of those guys

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>foster them the thirty eight.

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Uh, I think that's possibility. Like to me, there's two

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 3>ways to read that, and don't do you still transcript up?

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 3>I can pull it up, but.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>No, but I can.

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I just I described that one the full answer. Look

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 3>at two phones. Thles are over here, Okay, the full answer.

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 3>He So he gets asked specifically, is there a tackle

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 3>worth taking it for him?

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 3>And he kind of rather than answering whether or not

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 3>there's a tackle worth taking it for, he kind of

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 3>gets into what he thinks a player worth the fourth

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 3>overall pick is. Yeah, and he talks about a player

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 3>in an impact position who can make an impact as

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 3>a starter right away. And then he says, I think

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 3>there are multiple starting tackles in the draft.

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I got it. So I think that

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.119
<v Speaker 1>that's really what you start to look for impact players

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 1>when you start picking that high. What they're going to

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>do for you, what's the impact, what's the position? You

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>talk about premium positions. That's where you weigh saw the

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>circumstances to be.

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 3>He's not just talking the questions about tackles, but he's

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 3>not just talking about tackles there. I think that's his

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 3>philosophy for the fourth overall pick. And then he says,

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 3>I think they're yes, I think they're starting tackles in

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 3>this draft. Starting tackles in this draft doesn't mention four.

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 3>So you can read that one of two ways. Is

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 3>his qualifier for the fourth overall pick instant starter, in

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 3>which case starting tackles in fourth overall pick tackles would

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 3>mean the same thing. And we do know he talked

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 3>highly about Campbell and armand Membu at the NFL Owners Meets.

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 3>That's one way you can interpret it. The other way

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 3>you can interpret it is we yeah, they're starting tackles

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 3>in the draft. It doesn't just have to be at four,

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 3>So you can go one way or the other. I

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 3>kind of heard it as the former. Maybe that's me

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 3>going in with some preset bias about what I want

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 3>them to do. I'll admit that, but I'm with you

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 3>if there are starting tackles past the fourth pick. There's

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 3>not a lot We've talked about how fast this thing

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 3>drops off after arianta Ursery. Does he get to thirty

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 3>eight maybe, I really don't think Connorly's getting there now.

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 3>If Simmons gets at thirty eight, it means his knee

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 3>is bad, which I am. You guys know how I

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 3>am on that. I'm very worried about that. I'm not

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 3>against them not taking a tackle at four. They can't

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 3>let it come to them though, like last year, because

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 3>they will miss the run. I really think there's gonna

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 3>be a run on tackles again this year. And I'll

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 3>say I think there's gonna be a run on tackles

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 3>next year. I think this is going to continue to

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 3>happen until the tackle shortage is over, which is going

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 3>to take a few years to get there. So I

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 3>think they have to be ready to move up. They

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 3>have the ammunition to do this, and on the tackles too.

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 3>When we're talking about Simmons, it wasn't a tackle specific answer,

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 3>but he was asked by Andrew Callahan what lessons he

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 3>learned just from his top draft picks in Tennessee and

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 3>wasn't asked about injuries, but he mentioned just kind of

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 3>factoring in injuries when you look at a player, And

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 3>so with Simmons, who has an injury that is tough

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 3>to come back from, and there are long term not

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 3>just short term implications. It's not just about when will

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 3>he be healthy as a rookie, but will his knee

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 3>hold up structurally in the long term or will it

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 3>be long term to her ability issues because of this injury.

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 3>That is something that they're going to consider. Caleb Fairly,

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 3>I know, is the name that some people pointed to.

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>There was also the Georgia tackle I'm blanking on right now,

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>his name Wilson. I think Wilson.

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 3>He was here for like a second so practice.

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>He was a late later first round picked in Fairly,

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>but they took a real chance on him both injury

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and football character, and that that goes down as not

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to pick on Vrabel, but that goes down as one

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of the worst first round picks of the last decade.

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah he got there.

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he didn't even really play for the Titans. So

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>they took on some risk with those picks, and both

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>of those guys had injury red flags, fairly had huge

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 1>injury red flags. Was a top fifteen, top twelve talent

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in his draft just based off the film, but was

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>significant injury red flags, and neither one of those players

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>weren't out.

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 3>So his was a back. Yeah, Failies was a back.

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Wilson's it was I think it was an ankle. I

0:24:57.880 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 3>don't remember exactly what it was.

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>There was also with and there were there were some football.

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Character issues, but part of it too was he had

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 3>an injury that was was chronic, which means that it's

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 3>not something that Seltzer's going through this right now with

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Jaalen Brown. It's not something that you heard it, it

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 3>heals and you're done. It's not like a broken arm, right,

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 3>It's something that is just going to kind of last

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 3>and always be an issue. I'm not a doctor, but

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 3>from what I've seen, like medical people say, this injury

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 3>that Simmons has can have not guaranteed, can have some

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 3>lasting impacts.

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 3>So if that's the guy you're going to draft a

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 3>left tackle, I've made the comp before Malcolm Mitchell. When

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 3>Malcolm Mitchell was healthy, he was a good player, and

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 3>I think when Josh Simmonson is healthy, he's a really

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.959
<v Speaker 3>good player. Is it gonna be healthy enough to justify

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 3>a first round pick? That's what I worry about. I

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 3>haven't seen the medicals. I wouldn't know what to make

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 3>of them if I did, but you know, you gotta.

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 3>I think he's one where I think sometimes teams really

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 3>like a player and maybe the doctors tell him be careful,

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 3>but you know, they see the tape and they sim

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 3>as the player. I'd hope they listen to the doctors

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 3>on And it sounds like Rabel from his experience in Tennessee,

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 3>understands that.

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, especially early, I guess one thing to take an

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>injury flyer on a guy later.

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, no. And I mean this is coming from

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 3>the same guy who has said, you know, I want

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 3>them to take Seth McLaughlin. Yeah, who's torn achilles. That's

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 3>no joke of an injury either. That's in the fifth round,

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 3>have fun with it. In the top fifty. It's a

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 3>very different conversation, all right.

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>So the last thing that stood out to me from

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>this press conference, and then I want to move on

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to my guys segment, on defense this week was obviously

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the very answer at the very very end about Joe

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Milton in the trade of Joe Milton, and I think

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the if you just take his answer at phase value,

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 1>and look, he's not going to come out and say

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that Joe Milton is a bad locker room guy and

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not a good fit with Drake May. I don't

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>think he would come out and say that publicly. But

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>if we just take the answer at phase value about

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the reps, I kind of understand where he's coming from. That.

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>When you go into a camp with an entrenched starting

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterback that is not in an open competition of any

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>kind with anybody else, you go into that camp giving

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>like ninety percent of the meaningful reps to that quarterback,

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>especially when the quarterback is a second year guy, like

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>especially when it's a young quarterback in the league like

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Drake May. So in order to continue to develop Joe Milton,

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think he was just saying that they're

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 1>just outside of maybe preseason games where they you know,

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't want to play Drake May. They wouldn't want

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to risk injury with Drake May. There wasn't a ton

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of reps to go around. If you just take that

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>at face value. I think the only thing that I

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>took away from that, because I've kind of closed the

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>book on Joe Milton he's not here anymore, is that

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>them drafting another quarterback at least in the top one

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 1>point fifty that they might have some investment in and

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>they might feel compelled to develop. It just doesn't seem

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>realistic if they're going into this saying Drake May is

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>going to get ninety percent, Josh Dobbs is our true backup.

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's our QB two as the veteran backup.

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This sounds to me more like, Okay, if there's a

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in the seventh round, they have two seventh round picks.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.199
<v Speaker 1>If they really like a quarterback at the end of

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the draft and the seventh round, sure, you know, take

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>a fly or whatever. But I think they're kind of

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>looking more towards that like Camp arm territory of like,

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>let's just get some a third quarterback in here for

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:20.880
<v Speaker 1>trading camp.

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 3>They need, you need three quarterbacks operate, Yeah, you probably

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 3>need four. Really ideal you force they're gonna add quarterbacks,

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, it's gonna be super late in the draft. Udfa.

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 3>But it goes back to something I talked about after

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 3>the trade, and I think kind of qualified it. I

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 3>think a lot of people are looking at it as well,

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 3>why would you trade your backup quarterback if Drake Mayge's hurt.

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 3>They viewed him as the third string right, he was

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 3>going to be the third string quarterback, emergency game day quarterback. Again,

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Dobbs was going to be the backup. And so because

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.719
<v Speaker 3>I think some people were confused, why would we request

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 3>a trade if he wants a chance to compete and

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 3>he goes to Dallas where Dak Prescott is ingrained as

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 3>the starter, because he wants he just want a chance

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 3>to compete for the backup job, which I don't think

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 3>they were going to give him here. He should beat

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 3>out Will Greer in Dallas and be there and Dak

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 3>gets hurt, so like you know, who knows. But I

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 3>don't think they viewed it as they were trading their

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:13.479
<v Speaker 3>backup quarterback. They were trading the third string guy. They

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 3>were trading the emergency game day guy. Whether now, whether

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 3>you think that's right or wrong, that's another story. I

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 3>would have had him as the backup over Josh Dobbs.

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 3>I think Josh Jobs there in a room, experienced guy

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 3>like another coach. I would have had Milton as the backup,

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 3>and you know, assuming he continued to progress and all

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 3>that showed it on the field and kept up. But

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 3>I think they viewed him as the third quarterback.

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it just just looking you know how it pertains

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to the draft. I think there are just some mock

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>drafts out there that I've seen with you know, a

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Riley Leonard for example, or you know, we did a

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>mock draft yesterday before the Vaible Press or that I

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>took Curtis Rourke in the seventh round, you know, just

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>as a as a flyer. I think that's still on

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the on the table. Potentially Curtis Rourke makes a loss sense. Yeah,

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>got a good two seventh round picks at the end.

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>You're really just trying to get ahead of undrafted free

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>agency at that point. Maybe they I'll do it at

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that point in the draft, But I just look at

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that quarterback spot as truly the third quarterback spot. Like

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, and I was taking a step further, it's

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.479
<v Speaker 1>basically just a camp arm as somebody that they can

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe stash on the practice squad all year. Long, so

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't necessarily expect them to be making any more

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>real investments at quarterback, you know, in terms of top

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>one fifty picks at that position. So did you have

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>any other big things that I missed? I mean those

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>were kind of my.

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Pretty much again, like we didn't get as much out

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 3>of that as we usually do it. And it's not

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 3>me complaining. Yeah, right, Rabel has a different style.

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we didn't.

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 3>The running back thing was a little interesting. All had that.

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean he definitely left the door open there

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>for gent, Like he didn't close it and say, no,

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're analytically driven, we don't, we don't care

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a running backs like you know, I would.

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Have said, well, well, he did give a whole answer

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 3>on analytics. Yeah, yeah, which I know you love.

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's good.

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 3>But he did say you got to go back to

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 3>the film. You got to confirm it all with the film.

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Which as long as you're doing that.

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I've always said, but that that the way that he

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about analytics is allway, is how the way that

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that you should apply your.

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Way vouch for that community. You have to vouch for

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 3>the entire community.

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't yes, you do.

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 3>It works.

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>The analytics is a way in football. I'm not talking

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>about other sports. I don't know enough about it.

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 3>This is like you pinning uh Dan Campbell on me

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 3>for being like a football guy.

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Analytics are are a way to provide context to what

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing on tape. So you watch the film, just

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>like Rabel said, you watch the film and you say,

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>this guy seems to be really good after the catch, right,

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>like that that's the strength of his game. Well you

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>might say that, and then you might look at the

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>analytics and he's you know, twenty fifth out of twenty

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>six qualified receivers in the draft and yards after the

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>catch per reception, and so then you just have to

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>go back to the tape and say, well, where's the

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>disconnect here? Was it the routes he was being asked

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to run? Is it the scheme? Is it you know

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>where he's playing on the field? Like, why is the

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>juice that I see after the catch not translating to

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the numbers? Whereas sometimes you might say this guy's really

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>good after the catch, and then the numbers say he's

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>really good after the catch, And now we have a

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>guy that we can say is a lead after the catch.

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>You know Luther Burden, Sure, Kyle Williams, you know someone

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>like that. Great that that's all it's all about. Uh

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I did. I thought his answer about you know, the

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>injury prediction was really interesting. Yeah, I don't know as

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>much about that stuff as I do about like the

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>nerd math.

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 3>But like you're talking about the one about Tennessee.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh, well he's he mentioned that they they have ways

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 1>predictive models about a durability and how and if guys

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>have prior injury in college, Like are those injuries you know,

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to your point about you know Simmons's knee, like, are

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>those injuries going to linger into the pros? Do that?

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Does that set up potentially injuries down the road? That

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff is newer, I would say, in terms of the

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>sports science. But it's cool, like it's it's uh, it's

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>some innovative tech that's actually working in medicine.

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 3>You want to use all the math you want the medicine.

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 3>I have no problem with that. Yeah, that fine, go

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 3>for that. But they're back to the running back thing.

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was interesting because the question was like,

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 3>do you have a philosophy on like running backs in

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 3>the top ten? They basically said, no, I don't, but

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 3>they have to be able to do all these things,

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 3>and he basically just described Ashton Genty.

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 3>But then the last thing he said was and what

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 3>the team's prior convictions are. So he basically said. The

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 3>question was do you believe a running back should go

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 3>in the top ten? And he basically said, if a

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 3>running back is really good, if a team is comfortable

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 3>taking them in the top ten, they should so yeah,

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Like he kind of the answer for me was, well,

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 3>if they're like, if they're he was like ash And

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 3>the answer is basically, if a running back was going

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 3>to go in the top ten, ash and Genty is

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 3>that kind of guy. Yeah, I don't think they'll do it,

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 3>but it's something to remember if like Genty becomes a

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 3>free agent in a few years or request a trade

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 3>or whatever.

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>The interesting thing to me about his answer was that

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>he mentioned a receiving upside and like pass catching. Yeah,

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and not that he's a zero as a pass catcher,

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>but like Derrick Henry is not necessarily James.

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 3>He didn't take Derek Henry in the first round. Yeah,

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 3>And they remember, they repeatedly when Henry was there, brought

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:08.879
<v Speaker 3>in smaller backs to catch the football. Deon Lewis there.

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well that's sort of My point is, like, so

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry, and I know it wasn't a first round pick,

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>but Derrick Henry was their offense in Tennessee rightfully, so

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:21.919
<v Speaker 1>they built the entire thing around him. Now, the one

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:24.439
<v Speaker 1>thing that Derrick Henry I I think separates him from

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 1>other running backs that we've seen is there's a clear

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>correlation between play action success and Derrick Henry being on

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the field. Like the Titans numbers with Derrick Henry in

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the backfield on play action were just insane for like

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a three or four year period because you know, obviously

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>defenses are stacked.

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Running sets up the past.

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>What a concept when you have Derrick Henry, sure, and

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you have you know, just you know, Joe Schmoe running

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>back behind the quarterback, it's not.

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Just say so, it's it's worth investing in a good

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 3>running back, I.

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Would say Derrick Henry. My point was that Derrick Henry

0:34:57.880 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is kind of his own thing in that.

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.399
<v Speaker 3>Regard or the Eagles. What were the Eagles play action

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 3>numbers this year? I actually don't know.

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>If thought my head, well, the guns here, it's different,

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that's true, but yeah, they sure fine. But I thought

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that was interesting that he included pass catching. I did

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>go back, you know, semi recently and watched you know,

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>some agent's twenty twenty three tape to get the pass

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>catching feel for him a little bit at a lot

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>more in twenty three. I still think that he's more

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>of like an underneath uh, you know, sneak out into

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the flat, you know, check down over the middle type

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of pass catcher. I don't know if he's a dynamic receiver,

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know if you're gonna be mismatch aligning

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>him in the slot or out wide or having him

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>run all these vertical routes from the back, you know,

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 1>wheels fitting into the scene, things like that. Like, I

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's necessarily his game, but he certainly

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is a a an adequate receiver.

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 3>I would say, you know, for the basic wide receiver,

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 3>for the basic running back pass catching skills you're looking for,

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.280
<v Speaker 3>he's go, yeah, like he's really good at that stuff.

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 3>But he's not a guy like I wouldn't put in

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 3>the same categori as a guy like Burshard Smith or

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:08.879
<v Speaker 3>the Quinn Allen or Woody marks where you're gonna kind

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 3>of use him as a hybrid wide receiver like that

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 3>James White stuff. But for the the base stuff, you're

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 3>gonna ask a running back to doing the passing game

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 3>both as a receiver and as a blocker. I would

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 3>say he's not just baseline. He's better in those areas.

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's transition into my guys here and then

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>those second hour of the show will open up the

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 1>calls in the email, So just bear with us here

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>for a few more minutes. Hey Patriots fans, if you

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>want to see Toyota's best offers, including those not seen

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>on TV, go to buy a Toyota dot com. It's

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Toyota's official website for deals for the official vehicle of

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 1>the New England Patriots, Toyota. Let's go place this and

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:47.800
<v Speaker 1>spring has sprung, so why not spruce up your space

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 1>with Bob's discount furniture. Embrace the new season by shopping

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>fresh furniture fines from Bob's trendy, top rated and affordable

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>collection of beautiful bedroom sets, high quality dining styles and

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 1>feature packs so is plus tons of accent, accent decor

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and outdoor must have So get a spring on the

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>season's latest style was saving big only at Bob's Discount Furniture,

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the official furniture store of the New England Patriots. A

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of spring and sprung and season in that one.

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get into my guys on defense. We

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 1>changed it a little bit up this week to get

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit faster through these guys. We spent a

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of time on this last week. Well, this is

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>like the draft previous, I know, but I'm trying to

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>move it along a little bit quicker. So we do

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>have the five positions here, you know, interior, defensive line,

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 1>edge linebackers, cornerback, and safety. No we don't, Yes, yes

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we do.

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 3>They're going to take a kickers, So let's hold us

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 3>last week. Let's start week.

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the defensive line. Uh my, my first

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>guy on this list. I tried to do early late

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I kind of cheated in. I tried to do that

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 3>We don't know who the first round guys are on defense.

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 3>It's Carter and it's.

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, so my my defensive lineman on Day two,

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Collins from Texas. I feel like, is your kind

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of guy.

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 3>He is? He was that was gonna be mild. I

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 3>had a couple, but he was going to be my pick.

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:16.839
<v Speaker 1>So six six yeah, three thirty yeah, thirty six inch

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>arms like this is just an absolute monster, monster of

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:24.959
<v Speaker 1>a man. Now, if the Patriots were in a traditional

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Belichick two gaping defense, like Alfred Collins is a two

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>gapping three four end is like exactly what he fits.

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure it's an exact system fit for

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what the Patriots are going to do now, but I

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 1>still look at him in the patriots a current defense

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>with Vrabel and there's in their new system like can

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you play nose tackle?

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 3>At that time they played that Jeffrey Simmons.

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Role is a three technique. I mean, like maybe, but

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that Milton Williams is going to play that role.

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 1>But like what I look at with Alfred Collins is

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 1>put him, you know, in the shade, in the A

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>gap and just let him hold the A gap for you,

0:38:57.680 --> 0:38:59.400
<v Speaker 1>like he's not going to be moved. I mean, that

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>guy's an app mammoth. Like he's huge, he's got great length,

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:04.799
<v Speaker 1>he knows how to use it. I think the one

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 1>thing that really stood out to me though watching his

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>film that it was exciting that got me really excited

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>about the player. His motor like he's he's.

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 3>A loves his calary.

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>He runs hot and and to be that big and

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>play that hard for that many snaps in a game

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is sometimes a question mark. And he is just a

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>mean dude.

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 3>So obviously not it's not Rabel. Like oddly we've made

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 3>all these Tennessee comps with Rabel. I'm gonna this might

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 3>be a first for this offseason. I'm gonna make a

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Tennessee comp that doesn't involve like Rabel. Okay, Simmons next

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 3>to Devandre Sweat because he's got some Toandre Sweat in

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 3>his game. He's playing that role in that Texas defense, right,

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 3>he's the next guy up?

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Like is that Milton Williams and Alfred Collins.

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I really like Alfred Collins a lot I do. I

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 1>just thought that he can't teach size, he can't teach power,

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:54.879
<v Speaker 1>and you can't teach effort and he checks all three

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of those boxes.

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 3>So since you went to him, yeah, I should go

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Dion Walker. He's really falling now. That one sucks. I

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 3>was so ready to be he plays standing up at

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 3>three hundred and forty pounds like.

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>That one but that's the problem is he like literally

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and figuratively, he plays standing up his pad level.

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 3>He plays like a player sign like fifty pounds smaller

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 3>than he is, and that is that is both a

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 3>good thing and a bad thing.

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>He's got to get his pass down.

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 3>You know. Sometimes there's like those cats that grow up

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 3>in a house with all dogs and the cat or

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 3>the doges the house all cats, and the dog just

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 3>like thinks it's a cat. Yeah, that's kind of like

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:31.439
<v Speaker 3>like he he plays like a two hundred and eighty

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 3>pounds speed rusher. Yeah, but he's three hundred and forty pounds.

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 3>It's anyway. So instead of that, I'll go similar guy,

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Jamark Caldwell. Yeah, similar, Probably gonna go a little bit

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 3>later Ben Collins. But same thing. One of these hyper

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 3>athletic uh three. I think he I don't think he's

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 3>three thirty. I think he's in the three twenties. Yeah,

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 3>but a guy that can kind of do some similar things.

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Wide body just just a big butt.

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:57.399
<v Speaker 3>Well you know that Bill Belichick Kirby Smart story about

0:40:57.400 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 3>the forty right, No, oh, have you not heard that?

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Might have so, Kirby Smart told us at a coaching

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 3>clinic This was a few years ago, but it's on

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Twitter if you want to go find it. And I

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:08.240
<v Speaker 3>don't remember.

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>If Kirby was with Bill the big butt.

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Bill wanted to stand. This is a Bill starting

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 3>line at the forties.

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bill Parcells thing.

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh is it to see which lineman of the biggest

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:17.800
<v Speaker 3>ass when they get down in the in the stands?

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? No, that this is that started with Parcels. Who

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Parcels. I mean, people know this, but

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not breaking any news. Parcells is an amazing talent evaluator,

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 1>like one of the best talent evaluators.

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Pretty good for the grocery.

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's out there. I mean, obviously he's going into

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots Hall of Fame and uh and a big

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>reason why is because he drafted a lot of the

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 1>first pillars of Dynasty one point zero. You know, he

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 1>drafted most of those guys. He was he was the

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>first guy to talk about the behinds and making sure

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that those linemen have having a big, big butts and

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>they cannot lie. All right, My next guy here, Day three,

0:41:55.960 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 1>interior defensive lineman Tim Smith. Tim Smith from Alabama. I

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 1>really thought he stood out at the Senior Bowl, downed

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Mobile back in January. He's been on my list ever

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>since then. Heavy handed, aggressive, up the field, interior rusher.

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I can stop, to run, can shoot gaps, can beat

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>guys latterly to the to the spot, really good upper

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 1>body strength. I feel like he's another one of these dudes,

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>like Alfred Collins is kind of like the second round version.

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Tim Smith is to me the Day three version if

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots are looking for that true interior run stuffer

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and a pair next to Milton Williams and Barmore and

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Keon White and just add to the rotation Tim Smith.

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I've been trying all draft season mock draft big board

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to find a place to write and talk about it.

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Always one guy that like I want to get into

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 3>mock drafts and I don't.

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it just hasn't worked out. But I think that

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Tim Smith is a Patriot type player for sure.

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 3>So my Day three Alfred Collins guy. Day one's Kenneth Grant,

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:57.919
<v Speaker 3>Day two's Alfred Collins. Smart Caldwell is Cam Jackson from Florida. Yeah,

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 3>another guy Senior Bowl. But I'm gonna go with J. J.

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Pageese Pilgrim Mats big Board pick he's a project player.

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 3>He's a project player. He's not a guy that might

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 3>make an impact right away. He's supposed to go on

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Day three, so that's okay. But really really good athlete

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 3>for his size, So I was trying to look. He

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:18.799
<v Speaker 3>measured in at three twenty at the Senior Bowl, but

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 3>then was three zho nine at the Combine. So I

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 3>don't know where he's gonna play in the NFL. I

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 3>would like him to play around three fifteen three twenty,

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:29.400
<v Speaker 3>but I think part of the reason he took some

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:32.880
<v Speaker 3>of that size off is in addition to playing on

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 3>the defensive line, and he can play multiple positions.

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:37.280
<v Speaker 1>That's probably his best trade.

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Well or is it the fact that they would you

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 3>and you think, all right, So I'm gonna say they

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 3>played him on offense. You're thinking three hundred and twenty

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 3>pound guy on offense, lead fall back like the Patriots

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 3>used to use Richard Seymour. No, they use him as

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 3>a running back. They use him as a short yarded

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 3>running back. He had twenty one carries last year. Eighteen

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:56.440
<v Speaker 3>of them went for first downs, including seven touchdowns. He

0:43:56.480 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 3>can carry the football. He ran some routes at the

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Combine in he didn't look out of place. So if

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 3>you put some weight back on, who knows where that's at.

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 3>But can he give you like a Patrick Ricard kind

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 3>of thing. And I know I've compared Robber Huts to

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 3>Patrick McCard, but this is much more similar with the

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:14.440
<v Speaker 3>body type. And I think he has the potential to

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 3>be a multi positional, three down rotational player on defense.

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 3>He's got a ways to go to get there. Like

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 3>he's winning on pure athleticism right now. The technical part

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:24.840
<v Speaker 3>of his game needs to be refined certainly, but this

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 3>coaching staff is good with that. And if you give

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:29.080
<v Speaker 3>him a year or two, I think he can be

0:44:29.120 --> 0:44:31.839
<v Speaker 3>a really, really fun piece. I think he can be

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:34.399
<v Speaker 3>a guy you can get really creative with and can

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 3>make an impact on both sides of the ball.

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like it. His versatility was the number one

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:40.919
<v Speaker 1>thing I wrote down, yeah, just in my notes about him.

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.319
<v Speaker 1>I really felt like his speed to power was kind

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of a foundational move for him. Though. You know, he's

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>got that ability to really roll his hips and convert

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 1>speed to power in the pass rush, and that's going

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to give him a nice foundation. Maybe you add like

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>an armover or swim or something. Like that to just

0:44:56.800 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 1>compliment that I liked his tape a lot too, as

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, an early day three, mid day three kind

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of guy, impressive player in terms of the movement skills.

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:08.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to the edge. I kind of cheated.

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I put two day two edge guys. Gotta like them

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>bowl so much I couldn't decide. So my first one

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:16.839
<v Speaker 1>is Femiola Daejo from UCLA. I just feel like he's

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a Rabel type of player. Explosiveness, play, strength, effort, finish, versatility,

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 1>played off the ball early on in his career at UCLA,

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>then moved to the edge this past season, a great

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Senior Bowl week. That's another one of those guys that

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:35.840
<v Speaker 1>got on my radar down in Mobile. But what I

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 1>really liked about him effort, finish, explosiveness off the ball,

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And I just am clamoring for the Patriots to give

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Torell Williams and Mike Rabel one of these balls of

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:49.359
<v Speaker 1>clay on the edge, Like I don't necessarily need their

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 1>edge pick to be an early, you know, top fifty

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>selection on a guy that's an already finished product, like

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with taking on some development upside there at

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that position. I think Oldeho, the guy I compared him

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:07.399
<v Speaker 1>to his boy Mafi out in Seattle, like you give

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:10.759
<v Speaker 1>him a year or two to develop underneath Rabel and

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Terrell Williams and Harold Landry and Chase On and Anthony

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Jennings and Keon White are going to be playing a

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of the snaps there in twenty twenty five, by

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:22.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six, twenty twenty seven, Like ol Day, who

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 1>might be one of the better Day two edge rushers

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:26.760
<v Speaker 1>out of this class. He's got a ton of tools.

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I'll go to the opposite for Day two. I'll go

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 3>with the guy that's ready, Jack Sawyer.

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 3>I've been on this since the beginning. They're kind of

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 3>guy culture, tone setter, physical. What's the word they've used

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:39.399
<v Speaker 3>to describe their defense so many times? Violence? Yeah, right,

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:41.160
<v Speaker 3>plays with violence.

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Both these guys playing violence. You know.

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, He's a guy you can put opposite calevon Chase

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:48.720
<v Speaker 3>on your speed rusher. He's power on the other side,

0:46:49.320 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 3>the Ohio State thing, all of it. He just he's

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:54.760
<v Speaker 3>he's such a fit. He is everything that this offseason

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 3>has kind of been pointed towards.

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely the last one I had here and I can't.

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't get this guy out of my head, even

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:04.280
<v Speaker 1>though I don't think he's necessarily a great system fit anymore.

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:08.840
<v Speaker 1>But Josiah Stewart from Michigan just twitched up rusher, really

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>undersized for the position, probably pigeonholed into like a three

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:17.719
<v Speaker 1>four outside linebacker situational pass rusher type of role, which

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is why maybe he doesn't make as much sense anymore

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:23.240
<v Speaker 1>for the Patriots. But I just loved watching Josiah Stewart

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:26.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Senior Bowl against USC last year, just absolutely

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 1>eight up the USC tackles, a great first step, exposed

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:33.839
<v Speaker 1>in this great bend. Just an absolute twitched up mover.

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:35.799
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna be a good proble. I think

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:38.759
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna outplay his size, Like you know, Marcus Jones,

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:41.799
<v Speaker 1>we had him in here on Patriots Unfiltered yesterday, Like

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:44.720
<v Speaker 1>he's like the defensive back version of this. Josiah Stewart's

0:47:44.760 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like the edge rusher version of a guy

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 1>who's undersized. So he'll probably go in like the third

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:51.480
<v Speaker 1>or fourth round because of that. But it's gonna just

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 1>be a really good football player regardless of the size.

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 3>All Right, you want the Day three version of that guy,

0:47:55.800 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 3>then sure. Colin Oliver Oklahoma State. Yeah, really productive for

0:48:00.640 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 3>the Cowboys for three years, miss most of last year.

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it was a foot injury, right, yeah, foot injury.

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 3>So he's another one. There's an odd number of players

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:12.440
<v Speaker 3>in this draft, like more than usual that missed significant

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 3>time last season, like in the season leading up to

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:18.839
<v Speaker 3>the draft. So there's value there, right, and he's gonna

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:21.400
<v Speaker 3>have to come back. He's another He's undersized. I have

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 3>it here. He is six two forty with thirty inch arms,

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:28.280
<v Speaker 3>but he flies off the edge, great speed, good bend,

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 3>and he's had the production, so like he's kind of

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:32.840
<v Speaker 3>proven it. He's probably never gonna be more than just

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:34.839
<v Speaker 3>a third down rusher. But if you want a guy

0:48:34.960 --> 0:48:37.799
<v Speaker 3>develop in that package, he's gonna go later because it's

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 3>a deep class and he was hurt. And by the way,

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 3>there's spoiler alert, he's not the only Oklahoma State player

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 3>that fits this description. There could be some value there

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 3>and he could be an interesting find for them.

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I know where you're going. It might be

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:50.360
<v Speaker 1>at the next position.

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:52.160
<v Speaker 3>It is at the next but the other guy, I'd

0:48:52.200 --> 0:48:56.360
<v Speaker 3>give you two How much have you done on Kaimon Rucker.

0:48:57.120 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 1>He's on my list. I have like a couple of

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:00.239
<v Speaker 1>more guys to go.

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:02.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure what to make of him. I really

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 3>liked him in college, but it's tough for projecting him.

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 3>I thought i'd like it, like because when I watch

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:09.239
<v Speaker 3>him in the fall and watch him as a college player,

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:12.359
<v Speaker 3>mostly like I'm mentally filing it away. But like it's

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 3>tougher to project him to the NFL than I thought

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 3>it would be.

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have like five or six more edge guys

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to before the draft.

0:49:19.160 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we'll cover that next.

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Baron Sorel from Texas, Savion Jones from melosu Kay Robinson

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:27.520
<v Speaker 1>from Alabama, who's getting some love now, you know as

0:49:27.520 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a just an edge rusher, you know, pure speed edge rusher. Yeah,

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:33.640
<v Speaker 1>so there's a couple more of those guys. All right,

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:37.960
<v Speaker 1>let's move over to linebacker. My day two linebacker Demetrius

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Knight from South Carolina. Yeah, shot out of the cannon,

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>just an explosive downhill trigger his game, his game against Alabama,

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 1>like had it all like just chasing down Jalen Milroe,

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, and uh and closing from from depth on

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Milroe and just tackling him in space, Like there's

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>not a whole lot of guys that can get Jalen

0:49:57.520 --> 0:49:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Milroe on the ground, like you watch Jalen Miller as

0:49:59.840 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a runner is a leade elite, and Demetrius Knight's able

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Like I said, physical downhill striker, take

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:10.720
<v Speaker 1>online lineman at the point of attack. I run guys

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:13.360
<v Speaker 1>down in the flats. You know, when he's moving downhill,

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:16.160
<v Speaker 1>he's moving at a great speed, And I just love

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:19.799
<v Speaker 1>his aggressiveness, his attack mindset. I think he's gonna fait

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:20.760
<v Speaker 1>right in in the NFL.

0:50:20.880 --> 0:50:22.320
<v Speaker 3>So I feel like I've talked about a lot of

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:24.600
<v Speaker 3>these guys. You guys know, I like Knight, I like

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Chris Paul, I like Danny Stutsman, I like Beart Carter

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Vrabel's gonna love Stutsman. Yeah, like Sutsman could be Patriot.

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:32.920
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I'll go I'm gonna give you two day

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:34.840
<v Speaker 3>three guys. So one, this is what I was in

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:37.360
<v Speaker 3>at Nick martin Oklahoma State. So it's a little different.

0:50:37.400 --> 0:50:38.839
<v Speaker 1>They had him in here for thirty they did.

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:41.760
<v Speaker 3>It's a little different than Oliver because Oliver had played

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:44.319
<v Speaker 3>he was a three year starter. He played a lot

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:45.759
<v Speaker 3>for three years. I don't know he was a starter,

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:48.279
<v Speaker 3>but like he had a regular role. Martin really didn't

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 3>play like at all until twenty twenty three. He was

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 3>freaking unbelievable one hundred and forty tackles all over the field,

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:57.359
<v Speaker 3>looked like one of the best athletes on the field,

0:50:57.440 --> 0:51:00.760
<v Speaker 3>whoever the opponent was. I mean, he was flying around regularly,

0:51:00.800 --> 0:51:03.520
<v Speaker 3>get into the football, making plays on the ball, three

0:51:03.600 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 3>down player, all of that, and then two games into

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:09.440
<v Speaker 3>the season last year he gets hurt and he was

0:51:09.480 --> 0:51:10.840
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the season. I don't know if you

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:13.200
<v Speaker 3>have his injury ev and I don't have it pulled up,

0:51:13.880 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 3>but Mick Martins, yeah, so yeah, you talk about a

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:25.400
<v Speaker 3>ball of play, Rightney, Okay, So, like I, I the

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 3>guys that just have one year of experience, whether it

0:51:28.880 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 3>be injury related or something else, it always worries me because,

0:51:34.200 --> 0:51:36.239
<v Speaker 3>as we've seen in the past, you can have one

0:51:36.360 --> 0:51:38.800
<v Speaker 3>really good year in college football the piece hasn't come together,

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 3>and that can just be kind of it. So, like I, I,

0:51:45.080 --> 0:51:46.760
<v Speaker 3>this isn't me telling you he's gonna be a great player.

0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 3>This is me telling you there's a lot there that

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 3>I like that I'd like to see them work with

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:53.759
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that he's a projected like fifth sixth

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:55.960
<v Speaker 3>round pick, that's where you should be taking a guy

0:51:56.080 --> 0:51:58.719
<v Speaker 3>like yeah. So people are gonna hear this and say

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Cameron mcgron and roll their Yeah. He is kind of

0:52:01.560 --> 0:52:03.920
<v Speaker 3>similar to Cameron mcgroun, if anything, is litt less experienced

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:04.880
<v Speaker 3>than Cameron mcgron was.

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I got a lot of heat for liking Cameron mcgron.

0:52:06.920 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll take that flyer every time. If you take that

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:12.319
<v Speaker 3>flyer four times the pick or five times, you get

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:14.120
<v Speaker 3>one stud player out of it. And I'm talking about

0:52:14.120 --> 0:52:15.600
<v Speaker 3>in the fifth, sixth, seventh round.

0:52:15.800 --> 0:52:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm fine.

0:52:17.560 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 3>You want to take one flyer like that a year,

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:22.719
<v Speaker 3>especially if you have like day of what eight picks, yep,

0:52:23.000 --> 0:52:25.440
<v Speaker 3>nine picks, go for it. So Nick Martin is a

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:28.239
<v Speaker 3>guy put on that list, especially because the fit. I

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:30.759
<v Speaker 3>think they're in a position where for And that was

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 3>the weird thing about mcgroen. He wasn't their kind of linebacker.

0:52:33.520 --> 0:52:37.080
<v Speaker 3>He didn't fit into their defense. I think Nick Martin

0:52:37.200 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 3>fits really well given the linebacker editions they've made, Like

0:52:41.160 --> 0:52:43.040
<v Speaker 3>he plays the position the way they want it played.

0:52:43.120 --> 0:52:44.719
<v Speaker 3>There's gonna be less of a growing curve for him.

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:47.040
<v Speaker 1>He was my fifty first guy on my Big Boy. Really,

0:52:47.200 --> 0:52:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get him on there because I tried

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:52.239
<v Speaker 1>to get everybody that they had in for a thirty visit.

0:52:52.480 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Reportedly had in here a thirty visit. He's one of them.

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 1>And to your point, the way that they the body

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 1>type that they've looked for at line, it's nick more the.

0:53:01.360 --> 0:53:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Body and the athleticis. Yeah, he's a really good appen Yeah.

0:53:03.800 --> 0:53:05.359
<v Speaker 1>He checks all the boxes for them.

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:53:05.920 --> 0:53:08.120
<v Speaker 1>The guy that I had on day three was Jack

0:53:08.200 --> 0:53:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Kaiser from Notre Dame because I just think he's like

0:53:10.480 --> 0:53:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a throwback linebacker. Yeah, you know, he's just one of

0:53:12.880 --> 0:53:15.680
<v Speaker 1>those guys that's gonna, you know, move lad early, follow

0:53:15.760 --> 0:53:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the ball, good instincts, gonna be around the football a

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 1>lot as a tackler, going to clean up in the

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>run game. I believe that Jack Kaiser is gonna be

0:53:24.200 --> 0:53:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a tackling machine at the next level. He might not

0:53:26.280 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 1>be the most impactful linebacker, Like he's not gonna be

0:53:30.120 --> 0:53:33.040
<v Speaker 1>someone that's gonna make splash plays all over the field

0:53:33.280 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>like a Demetrius Night might. But Jack Kaiser, I think,

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a guy that's gonna rack up tackles

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:39.399
<v Speaker 1>just being in the action.

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Also team captain, and I think any any line as

0:53:42.640 --> 0:53:47.359
<v Speaker 3>we go, edge rusher's, linebackers, corner safeties, like yeah, when

0:53:47.400 --> 0:53:50.080
<v Speaker 3>you're getting a Day three that special teams experience is important.

0:53:50.120 --> 0:53:52.759
<v Speaker 3>He has a ton of special teams experience. Ye King's guy,

0:53:53.200 --> 0:53:56.440
<v Speaker 3>My Day three linebacker Sean Dolak from Buffalo. I don't

0:53:56.440 --> 0:53:58.080
<v Speaker 3>know how much you know about Sean Dorry. I don't

0:53:58.280 --> 0:53:59.800
<v Speaker 3>because that is the kind of guy that would be

0:54:00.320 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 3>a little off your board here. So Sean Dolak tell

0:54:03.200 --> 0:54:06.720
<v Speaker 3>me this sounds like a Mike Vrabel player. Sean Dolac

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:10.520
<v Speaker 3>began his career at Buffalo as a walk on. Now

0:54:10.640 --> 0:54:15.360
<v Speaker 3>five years later he is a consensus All American. The

0:54:15.440 --> 0:54:19.520
<v Speaker 3>production is absolutely insane. I think he had one hundred

0:54:19.560 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 3>and sixty tackles last year, had one hundred and sixty

0:54:22.239 --> 0:54:25.240
<v Speaker 3>tackles two years before that. He was heard in between.

0:54:26.760 --> 0:54:30.239
<v Speaker 3>He's kind of undersize six five. You know, he's not

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:32.319
<v Speaker 3>necessarily as big and as strong as some of these

0:54:32.360 --> 0:54:35.200
<v Speaker 3>guys are, but plays with great instincts, plays with a

0:54:35.239 --> 0:54:39.759
<v Speaker 3>great motor. Again, captain walk on to All American. That

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:41.920
<v Speaker 3>whole thing he might not get drafted. He might be

0:54:42.040 --> 0:54:44.520
<v Speaker 3>u DFA. You talk about a guy that can come

0:54:44.560 --> 0:54:47.800
<v Speaker 3>in and be a core special teamer for years, certainly

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:50.000
<v Speaker 3>has that projection, and then maybe he fills in a

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:52.520
<v Speaker 3>little bit of linebacker as well. When we talk about

0:54:52.560 --> 0:54:55.600
<v Speaker 3>a Vrabel guy, like I kind of said before, Jack

0:54:55.640 --> 0:54:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Sawyer is everything that the sauces has been pointing towards

0:54:59.200 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Sean Dolac. The tiebreaker there might just be Ohio State

0:55:02.760 --> 0:55:06.080
<v Speaker 3>because Sean Dolak has that as well. Isn't necessarily gonna

0:55:06.080 --> 0:55:09.400
<v Speaker 3>be like a big defensive weapon, but he seems like

0:55:09.480 --> 0:55:11.279
<v Speaker 3>the kind of guy they're gonna wan on the football team.

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:14.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, Corners, I'm sticking with the Notre Dame theme here.

0:55:15.120 --> 0:55:17.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean going with Ben Morrison from Notre Dame as

0:55:17.440 --> 0:55:18.440
<v Speaker 1>my I did too.

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:20.359
<v Speaker 3>He's there's great value there.

0:55:21.120 --> 0:55:24.040
<v Speaker 1>He's injury, which I think is is a little bit

0:55:24.120 --> 0:55:26.200
<v Speaker 1>why he's not getting as much buzz as some of

0:55:26.280 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 1>these other guys at the cornerback position. But his man

0:55:29.719 --> 0:55:32.560
<v Speaker 1>coverage tape, like his ability to stick to receivers in

0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:35.560
<v Speaker 1>man coverage. I'll take that against pretty much any non

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Travis Hunter corner in this class. Like I thought his

0:55:38.280 --> 0:55:41.800
<v Speaker 1>game against Stanford in particular. Was it was great. I

0:55:41.880 --> 0:55:44.040
<v Speaker 1>mean he was just in everybody's hip pocket for four

0:55:44.080 --> 0:55:50.680
<v Speaker 1>straight quarters. Feisty man coverage corner, extremely sticky and glued

0:55:50.719 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to the route break at all times. He is a

0:55:53.640 --> 0:55:57.200
<v Speaker 1>pattern matching machine. Like, he's not someone that's gonna necessarily

0:55:57.280 --> 0:55:59.400
<v Speaker 1>make a ton of plays on the ball. He's just

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:01.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna take this guy out of the game and you're

0:56:01.960 --> 0:56:03.920
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be able to throw him the football. I

0:56:04.080 --> 0:56:07.840
<v Speaker 1>am surprised, and maybe it's just a type thing. I

0:56:07.920 --> 0:56:09.759
<v Speaker 1>also think it's you know, a flavor thing. And I

0:56:09.800 --> 0:56:11.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's also you know, this time of year, a

0:56:12.000 --> 0:56:14.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of people tend to gravitate towards guys that have

0:56:14.400 --> 0:56:17.480
<v Speaker 1>big interception numbers or pick sixes or whatever the case

0:56:17.560 --> 0:56:20.080
<v Speaker 1>may be. You know, I'm a man coverage guy. It's

0:56:20.120 --> 0:56:22.800
<v Speaker 1>probably just from being a you know, a Patriots person.

0:56:23.400 --> 0:56:25.880
<v Speaker 1>But I look at Ben Morrison as as one of

0:56:25.920 --> 0:56:28.759
<v Speaker 1>the top top man coverage corners in this crowd.

0:56:28.800 --> 0:56:30.359
<v Speaker 3>Well he was. He was a first round pick until

0:56:30.360 --> 0:56:33.279
<v Speaker 3>the hip injury. Yeah, so he's another guy. It's another

0:56:33.320 --> 0:56:35.239
<v Speaker 3>guy where like the medicals are gonna be a part

0:56:35.239 --> 0:56:39.200
<v Speaker 3>of the evaluation. Yep, I should probably go Darien Porter

0:56:39.360 --> 0:56:42.000
<v Speaker 3>or Chevon Revel, Like that's so my kind of corner. Yeah,

0:56:42.040 --> 0:56:45.560
<v Speaker 3>I think I saw Revel komped to h Tarik Wolan.

0:56:45.880 --> 0:56:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was a little disappointed with Revel a tad.

0:56:48.960 --> 0:56:52.239
<v Speaker 3>How there's nothing to see. He's played like fourteen games,

0:56:52.280 --> 0:56:54.440
<v Speaker 3>I know, but I you got to watch something and

0:56:54.560 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 3>he's a pure projection.

0:56:55.960 --> 0:56:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Uh, he's a little stiff, like he's he's a

0:56:59.160 --> 0:57:02.560
<v Speaker 1>big stiff dude, but he's a literally explosive guy. Like

0:57:02.640 --> 0:57:03.279
<v Speaker 1>I could see it.

0:57:03.440 --> 0:57:06.600
<v Speaker 3>In like the right matchups. Right, he's his own corner,

0:57:06.640 --> 0:57:07.160
<v Speaker 3>which is tough.

0:57:07.320 --> 0:57:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just didn't necessarily love the transitions, Like I

0:57:10.239 --> 0:57:12.680
<v Speaker 1>thought he was a little stiff in the hips, but I.

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:14.759
<v Speaker 3>Think that's something you learn as you play. And he

0:57:14.920 --> 0:57:17.120
<v Speaker 3>just hasn't played a lot of football. Yeah that's possible,

0:57:17.160 --> 0:57:18.840
<v Speaker 3>like the injury this year killed him. So those are

0:57:18.920 --> 0:57:21.120
<v Speaker 3>those of the guys I'd usually go towards Sevon Revel,

0:57:21.960 --> 0:57:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Darian Port, I means six three two a what random

0:57:24.720 --> 0:57:26.520
<v Speaker 3>four to three, he's just like ninety years old. And

0:57:26.640 --> 0:57:30.040
<v Speaker 3>another guy that's his own corner, yeah, Jacob Parrish, Yeah,

0:57:30.160 --> 0:57:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Jacob Parrish. There's a lot of John Jones there. Yeah,

0:57:33.240 --> 0:57:35.439
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of John Jones can play the slot

0:57:35.520 --> 0:57:38.240
<v Speaker 3>like he'll be primarily slot corner. The NFL can play

0:57:38.240 --> 0:57:41.640
<v Speaker 3>the boundary, can play safety, plays bigger than a size, physical,

0:57:41.920 --> 0:57:44.360
<v Speaker 3>really smart football player. That's just kind of guy you

0:57:44.440 --> 0:57:49.320
<v Speaker 3>want your secondary. I think versatility all right, versutill He's

0:57:49.320 --> 0:57:51.240
<v Speaker 3>probably more important on the offensive line than anywhere else.

0:57:51.320 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 3>After that, I think versatility in the secondary is more important.

0:57:54.360 --> 0:57:56.400
<v Speaker 3>The more you can do in the secondary, not only

0:57:56.440 --> 0:57:59.240
<v Speaker 3>does it help you keep depth, it helps you just

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:02.000
<v Speaker 3>guy's coverage it right, because if a guy can line

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 3>up anywhere and realistically play any of those spots, the

0:58:04.880 --> 0:58:07.800
<v Speaker 3>defense doesn't know what to expect or the offense doesn't

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:10.920
<v Speaker 3>know what to expect. So I think Parish can come

0:58:10.960 --> 0:58:14.480
<v Speaker 3>in here give them depth in the slot. Could potentially

0:58:14.560 --> 0:58:17.000
<v Speaker 3>start if Marcus Jones leaves. He's in a contract here.

0:58:17.000 --> 0:58:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I'd like them to keep Marcus Jones, but you know

0:58:19.120 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 3>he gets hurt a lot too, write that sort of thing,

0:58:22.120 --> 0:58:24.120
<v Speaker 3>and I just think he can be useful player for them.

0:58:24.400 --> 0:58:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I had one corner on my big board. Yeah it

0:58:28.120 --> 0:58:31.320
<v Speaker 1>was Jacob Parish. Like I feel like Jacob Parrish to

0:58:31.400 --> 0:58:31.680
<v Speaker 1>play this.

0:58:33.600 --> 0:58:35.240
<v Speaker 3>I had one corner on but he said to the

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:37.040
<v Speaker 3>visits they met with Blalcomb and it.

0:58:37.080 --> 0:58:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Was Jacob Parish who also they reportedly had a visit,

0:58:40.760 --> 0:58:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and I just you explained it. He's Jonathan Jones to

0:58:44.800 --> 0:58:47.840
<v Speaker 1>point out to me and to play the slot. Carlon

0:58:47.920 --> 0:58:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Davis and Christian Gonzales on the outside, Jacob Parrish in

0:58:50.640 --> 0:58:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the slot makes a whole lot of sense. I think,

0:58:52.920 --> 0:58:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jonathan Jones is probably the right colm. There's

0:58:55.760 --> 0:58:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of Trent McDuffie in there if you

0:58:57.520 --> 0:58:59.200
<v Speaker 1>want to go ceiling, like if you want to be

0:58:59.240 --> 0:59:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a hot really on the player. But that's the archetype, right,

0:59:02.400 --> 0:59:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's probably at his best, you know, playing

0:59:05.160 --> 0:59:08.840
<v Speaker 1>inside or moving around the formation with like a a

0:59:09.000 --> 0:59:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Z receiver, you know, the pure route runner of the

0:59:11.600 --> 0:59:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of the group, and then you know, occasionally play on

0:59:14.920 --> 0:59:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the outside. But I love Jacob Parrish's film. He also

0:59:18.560 --> 0:59:20.400
<v Speaker 1>puts his nose in there in the run game at

0:59:20.440 --> 0:59:23.960
<v Speaker 1>his size pretty well and scrappy guy too, So I

0:59:24.200 --> 0:59:26.680
<v Speaker 1>was really high on him too. U Day day three

0:59:27.400 --> 0:59:30.880
<v Speaker 1>cornerback Mac McWilliams, Yes, UCF had.

0:59:31.120 --> 0:59:33.200
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of Day three. I was literally about to

0:59:33.240 --> 0:59:36.160
<v Speaker 3>say the other John Jones comp John Jones.

0:59:36.200 --> 0:59:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I kind of see a little Jack Jones in him too.

0:59:38.480 --> 0:59:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Like I said, there was somebody I think was Kobe Bryant,

0:59:41.600 --> 0:59:44.080
<v Speaker 3>I saw like Jones.

0:59:44.400 --> 0:59:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So Mac McWilliams is again, a slot corner, probably

0:59:48.040 --> 0:59:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a nickel at the NFL level, maybe a safety, even

0:59:51.280 --> 0:59:52.800
<v Speaker 1>nickels safety if you want to call it that.

0:59:52.960 --> 0:59:54.840
<v Speaker 3>He played a little deep safety at Yeah, he.

0:59:54.840 --> 0:59:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Can play man to man in the slot though. I

0:59:57.080 --> 0:59:59.240
<v Speaker 1>had a really good Senior Bowl week. Was really feisty,

0:59:59.400 --> 1:00:02.720
<v Speaker 1>really sticky and coverage, play man to man, you know,

1:00:02.920 --> 1:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>run around with slot corner slot receivers. I should say

1:00:05.760 --> 1:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>all day long. I really liked mc McWilliams and mobile.

1:00:09.000 --> 1:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought he came in with an edge. I thought

1:00:10.960 --> 1:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>he came in with some fires and competitives, that alpha

1:00:13.840 --> 1:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>corner mentality, like he'd break up a pass and you

1:00:16.800 --> 1:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>let him hear about it. I like those types of guys.

1:00:19.160 --> 1:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't hurt to have those types of guys. Ever,

1:00:21.960 --> 1:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you know Jacob Parrish is kind of the

1:00:24.400 --> 1:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>day too version of this, I would say Mac McWilliams

1:00:27.160 --> 1:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>is the day three So.

1:00:28.560 --> 1:00:30.280
<v Speaker 3>I and you covered it all there, and I love

1:00:30.360 --> 1:00:33.320
<v Speaker 3>his ability to play safety too. Yeah, I am curious

1:00:33.560 --> 1:00:35.960
<v Speaker 3>what you thought. We talked a little about a bit

1:00:35.960 --> 1:00:37.960
<v Speaker 3>about him last week of Denzel Burke.

1:00:38.880 --> 1:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Denzel Burke to me was I had some

1:00:44.160 --> 1:00:46.480
<v Speaker 1>questions about his top end speed, his long speed to

1:00:46.520 --> 1:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>carry verticals on the outside a lot. It kind of

1:00:50.160 --> 1:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>reminds me a lot of Sean Waite like in terms

1:00:52.400 --> 1:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of his career path. And maybe it's just the ohigest

1:00:54.720 --> 1:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>very similar.

1:00:55.560 --> 1:00:55.720
<v Speaker 3>You know.

1:00:55.800 --> 1:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>It was a really high projected player early on in

1:00:59.080 --> 1:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>his career, had an injury, had some issues.

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Well not just projected. He was a freshman All American.

1:01:05.000 --> 1:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so he was.

1:01:05.800 --> 1:01:09.280
<v Speaker 3>He was the first true freshman to start again to

1:01:09.360 --> 1:01:12.280
<v Speaker 3>start the season open for Ohio State since former Patriot

1:01:12.320 --> 1:01:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Andy Katzimware.

1:01:13.400 --> 1:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's an interesting stat.

1:01:14.520 --> 1:01:16.160
<v Speaker 3>I just want to get Andy Katzman. Yeah, I know

1:01:16.280 --> 1:01:19.280
<v Speaker 3>there and the show of like three years you've never gasl.

1:01:19.360 --> 1:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Burke is one of those guys that's gonna play in

1:01:22.680 --> 1:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the league for a while. But he might not ever

1:01:25.320 --> 1:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>be like a standout player, but he's going to be

1:01:27.520 --> 1:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>able to play a lot of snaps. A comp that

1:01:29.920 --> 1:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I came up with with him was kind of like

1:01:31.480 --> 1:01:33.919
<v Speaker 1>a Jalen Mills type, right, Like he's just that sort

1:01:33.960 --> 1:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of player, like not necessarily exactly the style of play,

1:01:38.080 --> 1:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>but just like the usage of like, Okay, this is

1:01:40.960 --> 1:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an NFL defensive back for a while, But

1:01:43.640 --> 1:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is he ever going to be like a number one corner.

1:01:46.400 --> 1:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Probably not, but he's he's going to belong on an NFL. Yeah,

1:01:50.680 --> 1:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that those are your corners.

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:53.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if I had to give another one, it

1:01:54.120 --> 1:01:56.360
<v Speaker 3>I like blal Cone. I don't know how much sense

1:01:56.360 --> 1:01:58.320
<v Speaker 3>he makes for them at this point. They need slot guys.

1:01:58.320 --> 1:02:02.680
<v Speaker 3>They're actually pretty good on size. But who's the I'm

1:02:02.760 --> 1:02:04.440
<v Speaker 3>laying you on the name now there is another slot guy.

1:02:04.520 --> 1:02:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh Jabar Muhammad. Yeah, Morgan played on the boundary exclusively,

1:02:09.080 --> 1:02:12.400
<v Speaker 3>almost exclusively in college. Was part of both the Washington

1:02:12.520 --> 1:02:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Or and Oregon teams that went to the playoff. He's

1:02:14.920 --> 1:02:17.320
<v Speaker 3>gonna move in the inside of the next level really good.

1:02:17.400 --> 1:02:20.120
<v Speaker 3>When the ball's in the air, he you know, he's

1:02:20.200 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 3>not the stickiest cover corner, but he's fine. But he

1:02:23.320 --> 1:02:25.200
<v Speaker 3>does a good job of recovering. And then when the

1:02:25.240 --> 1:02:27.040
<v Speaker 3>ball's in the air and at the catch point, especially

1:02:27.080 --> 1:02:30.480
<v Speaker 3>for guys' size, is very very competitive. So I think

1:02:30.520 --> 1:02:32.840
<v Speaker 3>there's some real UNTAP patent if you can improve his

1:02:33.000 --> 1:02:35.360
<v Speaker 3>cover skills and kind of get him, you know, in

1:02:35.440 --> 1:02:38.120
<v Speaker 3>the film room and recognizing patterns and things like that,

1:02:39.400 --> 1:02:41.000
<v Speaker 3>and just maybe work on his footwork. I don't know

1:02:41.040 --> 1:02:42.880
<v Speaker 3>exactly what it is that his cover skills aren't there.

1:02:43.120 --> 1:02:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Those are just a couple of things that can you

1:02:44.560 --> 1:02:46.240
<v Speaker 3>can do to improve it. Like I think there's some

1:02:46.320 --> 1:02:48.000
<v Speaker 3>real untap potential. But he is small. He's gonna have

1:02:48.000 --> 1:02:48.640
<v Speaker 3>to play in the slot.

1:02:49.040 --> 1:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, safety, See this is a good pace, all right.

1:02:52.160 --> 1:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>He didn't take an hour and a half to get

1:02:54.160 --> 1:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>through all the different positions. Is nice already. Kickers.

1:02:56.880 --> 1:02:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't care if say we're doing kickers.

1:02:58.320 --> 1:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>My day two safety might be the same as yours.

1:03:00.640 --> 1:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>But I just love this player so much I had

1:03:02.560 --> 1:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to give him the hype. Andrew from Texas is just

1:03:05.880 --> 1:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the absolute dog.

1:03:07.080 --> 1:03:10.040
<v Speaker 3>That's the That's the guy I've been screaming about them

1:03:10.120 --> 1:03:13.800
<v Speaker 3>getting for two years now retired. Is that not the

1:03:13.920 --> 1:03:15.480
<v Speaker 3>exact guy? He so?

1:03:16.280 --> 1:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>For whatever reason, like I feel like I'm much higher

1:03:20.520 --> 1:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>on him than a lot of other people.

1:03:21.960 --> 1:03:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Are, Like every week, what are you people looking at?

1:03:26.280 --> 1:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's because of the size, Like I would think,

1:03:28.200 --> 1:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>like he's not the biggest guy.

1:03:29.240 --> 1:03:31.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm not super word. How big was devinc Cordy? I'm

1:03:31.360 --> 1:03:35.840
<v Speaker 3>not super fine. Can you cover ground? That's all I

1:03:35.960 --> 1:03:37.280
<v Speaker 3>care about all but like.

1:03:37.760 --> 1:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Just absolute uh shot out of a cannon trigger to

1:03:42.600 --> 1:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the football, whether it's ranging over the top, you know,

1:03:45.960 --> 1:03:48.439
<v Speaker 1>fill in the alley in the run game, screen game,

1:03:48.840 --> 1:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever the case may be. That interception that he made

1:03:51.080 --> 1:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>against Georgia was just ridiculous, uh, insane ball skills, Like

1:03:55.520 --> 1:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>has that ability to rotate, you know, down into the

1:03:57.800 --> 1:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>robber role or play the deep part of the field,

1:04:00.080 --> 1:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>or play split safety. I just think that he's gonna

1:04:02.920 --> 1:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>be a hell of a football player. That another one

1:04:05.960 --> 1:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of those guys that might not have like the size,

1:04:08.800 --> 1:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>speed measureables that everybody you know goes ooh and ah over,

1:04:13.800 --> 1:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's gonna vastly outplay the physical tools that that

1:04:17.960 --> 1:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>are at his disposal, with instincts and just you know,

1:04:21.480 --> 1:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>feel for the game and and uh and just talent,

1:04:24.280 --> 1:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, in terms of football talent. So I can't

1:04:27.480 --> 1:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>say enough good things about Andrew mccooba. I think he's

1:04:29.680 --> 1:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a heck of a safety. And I put Billy Bowman

1:04:32.720 --> 1:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>like kind of in the same sort of bucket. Guy

1:04:35.360 --> 1:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>with those two guys. I thought both those guys were

1:04:37.920 --> 1:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>awesome watches.

1:04:38.800 --> 1:04:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, mccoob was one of my favorite players in this draft, like,

1:04:42.520 --> 1:04:44.280
<v Speaker 3>not like one of the best, but I think he's

1:04:44.520 --> 1:04:47.120
<v Speaker 3>really good at what he does. And the fact he's

1:04:47.120 --> 1:04:49.400
<v Speaker 3>getting slept on since you took him for Day two.

1:04:50.520 --> 1:04:52.600
<v Speaker 3>I'll just throw Xavier Watson there another guy that I

1:04:52.640 --> 1:04:56.280
<v Speaker 3>think could play the back end for them. Yeah, but

1:04:56.480 --> 1:04:59.720
<v Speaker 3>I I like mccoomba and Bowman. I Bowman now is

1:04:59.720 --> 1:05:02.880
<v Speaker 3>getting Day two looks. Apparently. I thought he was like

1:05:03.000 --> 1:05:05.520
<v Speaker 3>one oh six great, but now I guess some people

1:05:05.560 --> 1:05:07.200
<v Speaker 3>think he could go on day two. I think Bowman

1:05:07.200 --> 1:05:11.280
<v Speaker 3>is a little different Bowman played. He's he's shorter, but

1:05:11.400 --> 1:05:13.600
<v Speaker 3>he's like he's got more muscle on him, a little

1:05:13.600 --> 1:05:15.960
<v Speaker 3>bit more. I think he plays the game more physically,

1:05:16.200 --> 1:05:19.440
<v Speaker 3>more with an edge. He's more to me that hybrid.

1:05:20.040 --> 1:05:22.200
<v Speaker 3>He's kind of similar to Mac McWilliams, where I think

1:05:22.200 --> 1:05:25.920
<v Speaker 3>they're both hybrid slot corner deep safeties. But I think

1:05:26.000 --> 1:05:29.080
<v Speaker 3>McWilliams is more primarily a corner. I think Bowman is

1:05:29.160 --> 1:05:32.200
<v Speaker 3>more primarily a safety like Andrew mccoob. But we've talked

1:05:32.200 --> 1:05:32.520
<v Speaker 3>about this.

1:05:33.000 --> 1:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Put mccooba as a playmaker that is gonna be around.

1:05:36.120 --> 1:05:38.800
<v Speaker 3>So, like, we've talked about this deep safety role for

1:05:38.840 --> 1:05:41.400
<v Speaker 3>a few years now, and we talk about it every time.

1:05:41.480 --> 1:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>We talk about it in two ways, Devin mccorty and

1:05:45.720 --> 1:05:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Deron Harmon. And there's the guy that's gonna be out

1:05:47.840 --> 1:05:50.800
<v Speaker 3>there and you're gonna play single high a lot because

1:05:50.840 --> 1:05:53.520
<v Speaker 3>this guy's on the field seventy eighty ninety percent of

1:05:53.560 --> 1:05:55.800
<v Speaker 3>the time Devin mccorty was leading the Patriots and snaps

1:05:55.840 --> 1:05:57.680
<v Speaker 3>every year. And then there's also, all right, if you

1:05:57.720 --> 1:05:59.840
<v Speaker 3>don't get that guy, can you get a guy like

1:06:00.120 --> 1:06:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Drawn Harmon who can come on the field and just

1:06:02.720 --> 1:06:06.040
<v Speaker 3>play it situationally when you're in clear passing situations, two

1:06:06.080 --> 1:06:08.680
<v Speaker 3>minute trail, third and long things like that. So, to me,

1:06:09.240 --> 1:06:12.680
<v Speaker 3>like Billy Bowman is a situational deep safety. Billy Bowman

1:06:12.800 --> 1:06:14.280
<v Speaker 3>is not gonna be a guy who's gonna play ninety

1:06:14.280 --> 1:06:16.160
<v Speaker 3>percent of your defensive snaps. It's gonna be out there

1:06:16.240 --> 1:06:18.439
<v Speaker 3>fifty to sixty percent of the time. He's gonna play

1:06:18.480 --> 1:06:20.280
<v Speaker 3>the role really well, but you're not gonna want to

1:06:20.320 --> 1:06:24.600
<v Speaker 3>overdo it. Andrew mccooba, I'm fine if Andrew mccoop maybe

1:06:24.640 --> 1:06:26.640
<v Speaker 3>not as a rookie, but like Andrew mccooba, to me

1:06:26.760 --> 1:06:28.600
<v Speaker 3>is a guy that can full time play the Devin

1:06:28.680 --> 1:06:31.680
<v Speaker 3>mccordy role and be on and not come off the field.

1:06:31.960 --> 1:06:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Bowman to me is more situational. So the guy that

1:06:34.480 --> 1:06:37.080
<v Speaker 3>I looked at and I say rotational in that situation.

1:06:37.200 --> 1:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have been pumping this guy's tires as sort

1:06:39.920 --> 1:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Deron Harmon Day three pick is Malchai Moore

1:06:43.680 --> 1:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>from Alabama. Yeah, who has similar you know, range and

1:06:47.000 --> 1:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>instincts and ball howking ability in the deep part of

1:06:50.600 --> 1:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the field. I think he's one of those guys that

1:06:53.360 --> 1:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is exactly the Deron Harmon role, like third down in

1:06:57.200 --> 1:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>eight and you gotta have it, like you just put

1:06:59.320 --> 1:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>him in the deep middle. He's going to cover the post,

1:07:01.640 --> 1:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>He's going to cover over the top. He's gonna, you know,

1:07:04.600 --> 1:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of those arm punts that every once in

1:07:07.840 --> 1:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a while Dron Harmon would take advantage of the closer

1:07:11.360 --> 1:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>right and go and make those types of plays. Is

1:07:13.760 --> 1:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>he Ed Reid in the middle of the field. No,

1:07:15.680 --> 1:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>like's not. He's not that kind of impact player, but

1:07:18.560 --> 1:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy that can come in and play that

1:07:20.360 --> 1:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>role and allow Kyle Dugger and Jabriel Peppers to do

1:07:23.320 --> 1:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>their thing closer to the line of scrimmage. And we've

1:07:25.520 --> 1:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>been talking about this a lot, and I feel like,

1:07:27.480 --> 1:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, every single year, and some people push back

1:07:30.080 --> 1:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>on it, but I really feel strongly that they got

1:07:33.000 --> 1:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to get those guys Dugger and Peppers back into their

1:07:36.360 --> 1:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>natural spots, especially yes when the game is on the

1:07:39.800 --> 1:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>line and when they're really in those money situations. Get

1:07:43.360 --> 1:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Dugger out of the middle of the field, get

1:07:45.560 --> 1:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>him closer to the box, get him moving forward again,

1:07:48.240 --> 1:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>get him blitzing, get him covering tight ends, you know,

1:07:50.920 --> 1:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>like that sort of thing. I think there's so they're

1:07:53.240 --> 1:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>much better players when Dugger and Peppers are doing those

1:07:56.200 --> 1:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>types of things versus asking them to play free safety.

1:07:59.680 --> 1:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>So even if it's a guy that comes in that's

1:08:01.520 --> 1:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>only going to play thirty five forty percent of the

1:08:03.680 --> 1:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>snaps fifty percent of the snaps, but it's allowing those

1:08:07.000 --> 1:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>guys to play where they should be playing. I think

1:08:09.440 --> 1:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that would really complete this secondary like puzzle completely to get.

1:08:14.360 --> 1:08:17.920
<v Speaker 3>We're back to the Javon Holland talk based all right,

1:08:17.920 --> 1:08:21.160
<v Speaker 3>do you have any more safety Day three? Deep Safety Uh,

1:08:21.640 --> 1:08:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Dante Trader from Maryland.

1:08:23.080 --> 1:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I loved him at the Senior Bowl. I thought he

1:08:25.160 --> 1:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>was a really good player.

1:08:26.040 --> 1:08:27.720
<v Speaker 3>This is Bill's guy. You know, he was a top

1:08:27.800 --> 1:08:29.760
<v Speaker 3>ten lacrosse recruit coming out of high school.

1:08:30.120 --> 1:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he was. He he moved up the board a

1:08:32.880 --> 1:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I think maybe the Senior Bowl helped him.

1:08:35.439 --> 1:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>He had a good week down.

1:08:36.520 --> 1:08:38.479
<v Speaker 3>Big Tom lacrosse player and football player.

1:08:38.760 --> 1:08:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

1:08:39.160 --> 1:08:40.960
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I was just going to get to

1:08:41.040 --> 1:08:45.280
<v Speaker 3>focus on football. Rob like again too, sport athletes like.

1:08:45.360 --> 1:08:48.519
<v Speaker 3>He's athletic as hell. He's one of the most truly

1:08:48.600 --> 1:08:52.240
<v Speaker 3>athletic players in this draft to me, hyper athletic safety.

1:08:52.520 --> 1:08:55.479
<v Speaker 3>At the very worst, you're getting a plus special teams player.

1:08:55.520 --> 1:08:57.160
<v Speaker 3>And for a guy that's projected to go I mean,

1:08:57.560 --> 1:09:00.280
<v Speaker 3>I think could probably get him one seventy one would

1:09:00.320 --> 1:09:01.800
<v Speaker 3>be the earliest I think you need to take him.

1:09:01.840 --> 1:09:02.960
<v Speaker 3>You might be able to get him with those two

1:09:03.000 --> 1:09:06.880
<v Speaker 3>hundred picks. A guy like that to make good, that'd

1:09:06.920 --> 1:09:07.720
<v Speaker 3>be good solid pick.

1:09:08.040 --> 1:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's kind of a hybrid safety to me, just

1:09:10.880 --> 1:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>at least the way I used him at the scene.

1:09:12.520 --> 1:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think he's he can play a little bit

1:09:14.320 --> 1:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>in the box and cover tight ends and also played.

1:09:16.720 --> 1:09:18.840
<v Speaker 3>He's still so raw. I like him as a coverage player.

1:09:19.720 --> 1:09:22.000
<v Speaker 3>He's still so raw. You've got to turn him into

1:09:22.040 --> 1:09:23.760
<v Speaker 3>whatever you want him to be. I don't know that

1:09:23.840 --> 1:09:25.439
<v Speaker 3>he has a skill set at this point that it's

1:09:25.479 --> 1:09:27.599
<v Speaker 3>like he needs to play here, he needs to play there.

1:09:27.840 --> 1:09:30.200
<v Speaker 3>He's just an athlete. Stick him somewhere and let him

1:09:30.240 --> 1:09:30.799
<v Speaker 3>learn the position.

1:09:31.080 --> 1:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>In mobile he played, they had him doing one on

1:09:33.840 --> 1:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>ones against tight ends for a lot of the week

1:09:36.360 --> 1:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and he did a really good job. Like I think

1:09:37.880 --> 1:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>he was one of the better safeties in respects of,

1:09:40.439 --> 1:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, covering some of those tight ends down there

1:09:42.240 --> 1:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>at the Senior Bowl. So definitely a guy on my

1:09:44.439 --> 1:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>list as well. All Right, we're going to get into

1:09:46.400 --> 1:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>all your lovely calls and emails here. We've got tons

1:09:48.439 --> 1:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of emails rolling in alex So as you can expect,

1:09:50.920 --> 1:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, eight days before the draft. You know the

1:09:52.600 --> 1:09:55.599
<v Speaker 1>people you want to be heard from. But before we do, wait,

1:09:55.680 --> 1:09:56.479
<v Speaker 1>we we more position.

1:09:56.880 --> 1:09:59.920
<v Speaker 3>You almost stuck down by me. Yes, give me one kicker.

1:10:00.200 --> 1:10:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Give name a kicker in the draft.

1:10:01.880 --> 1:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzgerald.

1:10:03.160 --> 1:10:07.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, why Ryan Fitzgerald flories state why big Leg Okay.

1:10:07.120 --> 1:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Can hit from fifty plus? Made a fifty nine yarder

1:10:09.960 --> 1:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>against Georgia Tech.

1:10:10.840 --> 1:10:11.160
<v Speaker 3>I heard.

1:10:11.200 --> 1:10:12.599
<v Speaker 1>I read that on NFL dot Com.

1:10:12.720 --> 1:10:14.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah I did. I think that was an islands.

1:10:15.000 --> 1:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, big leg cut it through the Foxborough winters, got

1:10:19.400 --> 1:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>good ballflight, you know, the ballflies high, which is what

1:10:22.800 --> 1:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Springer was talking about. I got to cut it

1:10:24.960 --> 1:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>through the wind in the air here in Foxborough. Ryan Fitzgerald,

1:10:29.200 --> 1:10:32.519
<v Speaker 1>I still like Sauls. I think they're gonna take Borgallis is.

1:10:32.560 --> 1:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>The other thing Springer talked about a.

1:10:33.880 --> 1:10:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Lot was consistency. So Sauls had a really good twenty

1:10:36.880 --> 1:10:39.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty two. He had an excellent twenty twenty four. He

1:10:39.960 --> 1:10:42.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of slipped in twenty twenty three. He took a

1:10:42.120 --> 1:10:44.920
<v Speaker 3>step back. He didn't have a good year. Borgallis has

1:10:44.960 --> 1:10:47.479
<v Speaker 3>been steady all four years, has been a starter at Miami.

1:10:47.840 --> 1:10:49.519
<v Speaker 3>I think that's what they're gonna value more than the

1:10:49.840 --> 1:10:50.320
<v Speaker 3>bad weather.

1:10:50.479 --> 1:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Fitzgerald, at least from what I read, again, did

1:10:52.960 --> 1:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>not do any homework on the Kickers, besides reading NFL

1:10:55.439 --> 1:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>dot COM's scotting report. Yeah, like forty to forty nine

1:10:58.880 --> 1:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>range is a little iffy for him, but he's like

1:11:01.400 --> 1:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>money from inside forty and then he's got the big

1:11:04.400 --> 1:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>leg to kick fifty plus, but those like intermediate kicks

1:11:07.439 --> 1:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>were a little bit of a up and down roller

1:11:09.400 --> 1:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>coaster for him, And I feel like that might take

1:11:11.479 --> 1:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>them off the board, you know, that might put them

1:11:13.920 --> 1:11:14.919
<v Speaker 1>in a different category.

1:11:15.000 --> 1:11:17.519
<v Speaker 3>So then the guy you're probably looking at, if you

1:11:17.680 --> 1:11:20.800
<v Speaker 3>value that, is Tyler Loop from Arizona. Loop seven of

1:11:20.840 --> 1:11:23.040
<v Speaker 3>eight from forty to forty nine last year, but also

1:11:23.160 --> 1:11:26.160
<v Speaker 3>was six of nine from fifty plus, including Evan a

1:11:26.360 --> 1:11:27.880
<v Speaker 3>sixty two yard sixty two.

1:11:28.120 --> 1:11:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Get the all right, you good? Now at your.

1:11:30.439 --> 1:11:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Kickers, there's like just numbers wise forget talent. There's not

1:11:34.280 --> 1:11:35.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot of kickers in this draft.

1:11:35.560 --> 1:11:38.519
<v Speaker 1>No, no, but it's but there's in like there's some

1:11:38.640 --> 1:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>draftable kickers. Yeah, I just named the couple.

1:11:40.800 --> 1:11:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Pork also get drafted. I think fitzals and Fitzgerald might

1:11:44.120 --> 1:11:45.280
<v Speaker 3>be Yeah, Loop, we'll see.

1:11:45.840 --> 1:11:49.519
<v Speaker 1>Patriots Catch twenty two is sponsored by Massachusetts two fifty campaign,

1:11:49.880 --> 1:11:53.479
<v Speaker 1>commemorating a history of possibility, Plan your revolutionary weekend at

1:11:53.560 --> 1:11:56.519
<v Speaker 1>Massachusetts two fifty dot org and easy to drink, easy

1:11:56.560 --> 1:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy. But like the official beer sponsor of the

1:11:59.120 --> 1:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>New England Patriots. All right, let's get to your phones.

1:12:01.720 --> 1:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Into your emails. Thank you so much for waiting on

1:12:04.400 --> 1:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the line. I know you guys have been waiting for

1:12:05.960 --> 1:12:08.759
<v Speaker 1>a while. Patty is an aguam. What's up, Patty?

1:12:09.960 --> 1:12:10.720
<v Speaker 5>What is going on?

1:12:10.920 --> 1:12:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Jon?

1:12:11.400 --> 1:12:14.080
<v Speaker 6>How we doing doing great today?

1:12:14.120 --> 1:12:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Man?

1:12:14.840 --> 1:12:18.599
<v Speaker 6>Eight days to the draft. I just wanted to express

1:12:18.680 --> 1:12:21.120
<v Speaker 6>one of the things that's been Somebody brought this up

1:12:22.160 --> 1:12:23.760
<v Speaker 6>and I can't remember who brought it up, but like

1:12:23.920 --> 1:12:27.080
<v Speaker 6>the facts are not the fact, but like the hypothetical,

1:12:27.160 --> 1:12:29.840
<v Speaker 6>if we were to pick genty at number four, what

1:12:29.960 --> 1:12:32.479
<v Speaker 6>are the odds that, like he signs a second contract?

1:12:32.680 --> 1:12:35.679
<v Speaker 6>And just let me rank here for a minute. Alex,

1:12:35.760 --> 1:12:38.880
<v Speaker 6>I'm in agreement with you because I think you were

1:12:39.040 --> 1:12:41.160
<v Speaker 6>one of the first two people to bring up I mean,

1:12:41.240 --> 1:12:45.080
<v Speaker 6>our first three round guys. You know, they they have

1:12:45.200 --> 1:12:47.360
<v Speaker 6>to contribute, they have to play, they have to contribute,

1:12:47.400 --> 1:12:50.200
<v Speaker 6>maybe not even start. But to me, the bigger picture

1:12:51.520 --> 1:12:54.559
<v Speaker 6>thing with this draft, because it doesn't look like it's

1:12:54.560 --> 1:12:58.000
<v Speaker 6>gonna happen with what's the last year's draft, is I

1:12:58.080 --> 1:13:00.920
<v Speaker 6>want all three of those picks, all four of those picks,

1:13:00.920 --> 1:13:03.040
<v Speaker 6>I'm sorry, in the first three rounds to be able.

1:13:03.160 --> 1:13:05.280
<v Speaker 6>I want guys that are going to sign second contracts

1:13:05.320 --> 1:13:08.960
<v Speaker 6>because how long did we go without signing a first

1:13:09.080 --> 1:13:11.479
<v Speaker 6>or second round guy over the last ten years? I

1:13:11.560 --> 1:13:13.880
<v Speaker 6>think Duggar was like the last one last year, right,

1:13:13.920 --> 1:13:16.200
<v Speaker 6>And I don't even know the answer to the question.

1:13:16.600 --> 1:13:17.720
<v Speaker 3>I remember looking it up.

1:13:17.840 --> 1:13:18.559
<v Speaker 2>It it was.

1:13:20.320 --> 1:13:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it'd been like five or six years.

1:13:22.280 --> 1:13:24.880
<v Speaker 6>And I think, I mean, anyway, not only do they

1:13:24.960 --> 1:13:27.559
<v Speaker 6>need to hit, they need they need guys that they're

1:13:27.600 --> 1:13:30.000
<v Speaker 6>going to sign second contracts and be part of this

1:13:30.280 --> 1:13:33.120
<v Speaker 6>nucleus in this in this rable era. That's all I got,

1:13:33.200 --> 1:13:34.400
<v Speaker 6>That's all I had to get off my JAD. But

1:13:34.400 --> 1:13:36.680
<v Speaker 6>I'll tell you guys next week next week with my

1:13:36.800 --> 1:13:37.679
<v Speaker 6>predictive picks.

1:13:38.040 --> 1:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Awesome, love it, Pattie, Thanks for the call. It was

1:13:41.600 --> 1:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a while that in between guys. It was like Dante

1:13:44.280 --> 1:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>high Tower was like the last one for like a

1:13:46.280 --> 1:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>really long time in between guys that they drafted in

1:13:49.840 --> 1:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the first round and signed the second contracts. I think

1:13:52.720 --> 1:13:55.599
<v Speaker 1>Juwan Bentley might have ended the run technically for overall

1:13:55.720 --> 1:13:57.839
<v Speaker 1>draft picks yeah, which.

1:13:57.680 --> 1:14:02.719
<v Speaker 3>Is uh, yeah, I've never and Jennings knows and Jennings

1:14:02.880 --> 1:14:08.080
<v Speaker 3>for top one hundred picks before them, it was if

1:14:08.160 --> 1:14:13.120
<v Speaker 3>you don't count, if you don't count, Joe Toney's franchise

1:14:13.160 --> 1:14:14.880
<v Speaker 3>tag it was Oh, that's right, it was Logan Ryan

1:14:14.920 --> 1:14:17.680
<v Speaker 3>and Deron Harmon. Yeah, so they had a get there.

1:14:17.960 --> 1:14:20.639
<v Speaker 3>As for Genty in a second contract, I mean it's

1:14:20.640 --> 1:14:24.240
<v Speaker 3>a fair question. It's obviously a position where durability is

1:14:24.320 --> 1:14:30.160
<v Speaker 3>more more of a question than usual gent you're not

1:14:30.320 --> 1:14:32.560
<v Speaker 3>drafting gent d. I don't want to say you're not

1:14:32.640 --> 1:14:34.960
<v Speaker 3>drafting Genty with a long term outlook. I don't want

1:14:34.960 --> 1:14:37.240
<v Speaker 3>to say this, like I think one of the big

1:14:37.400 --> 1:14:40.080
<v Speaker 3>boosts for drafting Genty if you're drafted, the part of

1:14:40.120 --> 1:14:43.559
<v Speaker 3>the conviction for drafting him. He's an immediate chart shot

1:14:43.600 --> 1:14:45.280
<v Speaker 3>in the arm of the offense. This is not a

1:14:45.320 --> 1:14:47.200
<v Speaker 3>guy that needs to develop. This is not a guy

1:14:47.280 --> 1:14:49.599
<v Speaker 3>that needs to grow. He's going to step on the field.

1:14:50.360 --> 1:14:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Does he have just all things, even Evan, Yeah, he has.

1:14:56.120 --> 1:14:57.920
<v Speaker 3>He has a quicker path to make an impact. He's

1:14:57.960 --> 1:14:59.720
<v Speaker 3>a better chance to make a massive impact more than

1:14:59.760 --> 1:15:01.000
<v Speaker 3>any other player they'd take it for.

1:15:02.080 --> 1:15:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you know, Travis Hunter and Abdol Carter aren't there.

1:15:05.960 --> 1:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that what you're trying to say with Gendi

1:15:08.280 --> 1:15:12.599
<v Speaker 1>to me at least, is like you just inherently expect

1:15:13.200 --> 1:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>running back to have a little bit of a shorter

1:15:14.920 --> 1:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>shelf life. Yeah, and I think his career, I've said

1:15:18.280 --> 1:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>this in the past, I think would probably mirror something

1:15:21.080 --> 1:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>like Zeke Elliott's career, where the rookie contract is phenomenal,

1:15:25.520 --> 1:15:27.559
<v Speaker 1>Like he's like an All Pro player every single year

1:15:27.960 --> 1:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of his rookie contract, but then once you get into

1:15:30.200 --> 1:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the second contract, you're five year six, year seven, you

1:15:33.840 --> 1:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>just see a precipitous drop off like you did with Zeke.

1:15:36.840 --> 1:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's similar because Zeke also carried the ball

1:15:39.280 --> 1:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>out at Ohio State and was like a featured back

1:15:41.320 --> 1:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>at Ohio State, and then he came into the NFL

1:15:43.760 --> 1:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and was the best player from his rookie class. Is

1:15:46.960 --> 1:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>his rookie year, I would say, and was awesome for Dallas,

1:15:50.280 --> 1:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Like Dallas was a wagon that year and had him

1:15:52.240 --> 1:15:52.799
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs.

1:15:52.840 --> 1:15:54.840
<v Speaker 3>I just think if you're drafting genty, part of the

1:15:54.920 --> 1:15:57.080
<v Speaker 3>reason you're drafting him is to get the offense going

1:15:57.080 --> 1:15:57.960
<v Speaker 3>as quick as possible.

1:15:58.040 --> 1:16:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's probably so you think the Dallas was probably

1:16:00.640 --> 1:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, they didn't know that Dak was going to hit,

1:16:02.400 --> 1:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but they had a similar kind of plan for sure

1:16:05.160 --> 1:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Cowboys. All Right, Todd is in North Carolina.

1:16:08.160 --> 1:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>What's up, Todd, Todday, Todd?

1:16:12.400 --> 1:16:12.960
<v Speaker 3>What you got.

1:16:14.360 --> 1:16:14.599
<v Speaker 1>Three?

1:16:15.160 --> 1:16:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Two one?

1:16:16.040 --> 1:16:17.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, Todd? We had you on hold for a while.

1:16:17.720 --> 1:16:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Give us a call back if you want. Randy's in Providence.

1:16:20.520 --> 1:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>What's up, Randy?

1:16:22.560 --> 1:16:26.120
<v Speaker 5>Hey, how's it going? Guys? I had a quick draft

1:16:26.240 --> 1:16:27.760
<v Speaker 5>question for you and a couple of names I wanted

1:16:27.800 --> 1:16:30.559
<v Speaker 5>to throw at you, but I first Alex had been

1:16:30.600 --> 1:16:34.000
<v Speaker 5>talking about working at the stadium to open the program,

1:16:34.439 --> 1:16:35.960
<v Speaker 5>and I wanted to share a quick story, if you

1:16:35.960 --> 1:16:39.880
<v Speaker 5>don't mind, when I worked there in the warehouse in

1:16:40.120 --> 1:16:42.000
<v Speaker 5>like two thousand and five and two thousand and six,

1:16:42.439 --> 1:16:45.320
<v Speaker 5>that was the year Teddy Brushy was coming back. And

1:16:45.760 --> 1:16:48.599
<v Speaker 5>the warehouse they like stock up concession stands and food

1:16:48.680 --> 1:16:52.519
<v Speaker 5>locations and stuff. And back then, the security CSC guys

1:16:52.960 --> 1:16:54.960
<v Speaker 5>had like a food rum right by the mouth of

1:16:55.000 --> 1:16:57.320
<v Speaker 5>the tunnel, and I was stalking that up when Teddy

1:16:57.360 --> 1:17:00.240
<v Speaker 5>Brushy came out onto the field. And I mean he

1:17:00.360 --> 1:17:01.840
<v Speaker 5>was at the podium all the time. He tea him

1:17:01.880 --> 1:17:04.519
<v Speaker 5>on TV, and he looked like a totally regular dude.

1:17:04.520 --> 1:17:07.160
<v Speaker 5>You know, he looked like someone's dad. He's very conservative,

1:17:07.240 --> 1:17:10.639
<v Speaker 5>mild mannered, et cetera. But I remember watching him run

1:17:10.720 --> 1:17:14.120
<v Speaker 5>past me, and he just looked like a madman. His

1:17:14.280 --> 1:17:17.360
<v Speaker 5>eyes were so intense it was it blew my mind

1:17:17.400 --> 1:17:18.840
<v Speaker 5>that it was the same guy that I had seen

1:17:18.920 --> 1:17:21.880
<v Speaker 5>on TV. So I don't know, I thought it was

1:17:21.920 --> 1:17:26.320
<v Speaker 5>a fun story to share with you. But the Travis Hunter,

1:17:26.640 --> 1:17:31.599
<v Speaker 5>he came out with the CBS basically saying like I think,

1:17:31.640 --> 1:17:34.400
<v Speaker 5>directly saying, if he wasn't allowed to play full time

1:17:34.479 --> 1:17:37.519
<v Speaker 5>both sides of the ball, he would essentially retire. And

1:17:37.880 --> 1:17:40.559
<v Speaker 5>I wonder how you guys think that's going to affect

1:17:40.640 --> 1:17:45.240
<v Speaker 5>his stock, not just with us, but just like with

1:17:45.360 --> 1:17:47.439
<v Speaker 5>the rest of the league, and not even just in

1:17:47.560 --> 1:17:49.280
<v Speaker 5>that he wants to play both sides of the ball

1:17:49.360 --> 1:17:51.720
<v Speaker 5>full time, but the idea that he can come in

1:17:51.880 --> 1:17:56.280
<v Speaker 5>making such a demand might offset some coaches or ruffle

1:17:56.400 --> 1:17:59.679
<v Speaker 5>some feathers and so puts. And then the couple names

1:17:59.720 --> 1:18:01.640
<v Speaker 5>that after he guys is uh, I don't think I

1:18:01.720 --> 1:18:04.439
<v Speaker 5>heard you mentioned either Omar Norman Law or J. J.

1:18:04.560 --> 1:18:09.200
<v Speaker 5>Pagays good penetrating tackles. And then one guy on offense.

1:18:09.520 --> 1:18:12.240
<v Speaker 5>Have you guys seen any lamb laris and tape? The

1:18:12.320 --> 1:18:16.000
<v Speaker 5>guy is it's it's wild stuff. I mean, one hand

1:18:16.040 --> 1:18:18.599
<v Speaker 5>to catch it as well. He's breaking tackles, hurtling players

1:18:18.680 --> 1:18:23.840
<v Speaker 5>left and right. It's really entertaining, highlight, real stuff to watch.

1:18:25.280 --> 1:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>So thanks, thanks for the caller. Any good call to

1:18:29.600 --> 1:18:32.559
<v Speaker 1>the first point? Uh what was the first place? Travis

1:18:32.640 --> 1:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Hunter saying Travis Hunter, Yeah, that's what I want. Yeah.

1:18:35.439 --> 1:18:37.920
<v Speaker 3>So for he didn't say he'd retire if he couldn't

1:18:37.920 --> 1:18:40.640
<v Speaker 3>play both ways full time. The full time was not

1:18:40.720 --> 1:18:41.160
<v Speaker 3>a part of that.

1:18:41.439 --> 1:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:18:42.040 --> 1:18:45.439
<v Speaker 3>Also, go ahead, dude, like, don't play football. I I

1:18:45.479 --> 1:18:47.000
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's gonna impact it that much.

1:18:47.200 --> 1:18:48.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it impacts it at all.

1:18:48.640 --> 1:18:50.760
<v Speaker 3>No, he he wasn't talking about playing full time. And

1:18:50.840 --> 1:18:53.479
<v Speaker 3>I do think he'll play whatever, and he's gonna play

1:18:53.479 --> 1:18:56.160
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver primarily. I think wherever he ends up, I

1:18:56.240 --> 1:18:58.280
<v Speaker 3>do think he'll still mix in a little bit on defense.

1:18:59.600 --> 1:19:02.120
<v Speaker 3>And I again i'd call his block right, say you know,

1:19:02.120 --> 1:19:04.519
<v Speaker 3>all right, finding go cover kicks. You want to be

1:19:04.560 --> 1:19:06.639
<v Speaker 3>on the football field, so bad, go cover kicks.

1:19:07.120 --> 1:19:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's gonna matter one. No, I think

1:19:10.200 --> 1:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that this kind of stuff never really truly matters to

1:19:14.320 --> 1:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>prospects status. I mean, he's obviously extremely unique in terms

1:19:18.160 --> 1:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of what he can do, but I think he's going

1:19:20.439 --> 1:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a Cleveland Brown, And I don't think there's

1:19:22.040 --> 1:19:24.519
<v Speaker 1>really much that he could say outside of like pulling

1:19:24.600 --> 1:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>like an Eli Manning and saying I refuse to play

1:19:26.760 --> 1:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>for the Cleveland Browns. Right, that would stop him from

1:19:29.920 --> 1:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>being a Cleveland Brown. So I don't necessarily look too

1:19:32.840 --> 1:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>much into any of that kind of stuff. And I

1:19:35.360 --> 1:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>am with you, it's not necessarily that he's saying that

1:19:37.360 --> 1:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>he has to play one hundred percent of the snaps

1:19:39.080 --> 1:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of the football. He just wants the

1:19:41.320 --> 1:19:45.479
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to potentially play both sides. And I keep mentioning

1:19:45.520 --> 1:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it because he was with us yesterday. But you know,

1:19:47.640 --> 1:19:50.599
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Jones has played both sides of the ball. Obviously

1:19:50.720 --> 1:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>not at a high clip on offense, but he technically

1:19:53.479 --> 1:19:55.439
<v Speaker 1>has played both sides of the ball. So I don't

1:19:55.439 --> 1:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be too hard for a team

1:19:57.880 --> 1:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to pease Travis hunt Her in that respect. You'll get

1:20:01.720 --> 1:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>them snaps on both sides of the football eventually. All

1:20:04.520 --> 1:20:07.799
<v Speaker 1>right here he is Eldred's in North Carolina. What's up? Eldred?

1:20:09.840 --> 1:20:13.680
<v Speaker 2>There we go, Hey, fellas, how y'all doing good? I

1:20:13.760 --> 1:20:19.040
<v Speaker 2>got a question, really too okay, uh, every mock draft

1:20:19.160 --> 1:20:23.320
<v Speaker 2>and then some of the chat sports or NFL Rush

1:20:23.520 --> 1:20:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Patriots or whatever you know podcast be listening to why

1:20:27.040 --> 1:20:29.960
<v Speaker 2>everybody want to keep getting splot receivers when all that

1:20:30.040 --> 1:20:33.280
<v Speaker 2>we got is a bunch of slot receivers, not an X,

1:20:34.160 --> 1:20:38.920
<v Speaker 2>not a true EG. And the stuccest question is what

1:20:39.160 --> 1:20:43.559
<v Speaker 2>round do because I can't finding on PFF. Do they

1:20:43.680 --> 1:20:49.599
<v Speaker 2>got Jordan uh selected to go in and Jalen Smith

1:20:49.680 --> 1:20:53.080
<v Speaker 2>and John Giles if they're coming back or they just

1:20:53.160 --> 1:20:54.200
<v Speaker 2>camp body and I.

1:20:54.280 --> 1:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Take it off their Thanks fellas, Thanks Eldrid. I think

1:20:57.040 --> 1:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>those last two guys that you mentioned they were on

1:20:58.920 --> 1:21:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots roster are our practice squad, you know, camp

1:21:02.479 --> 1:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>tryout types. Dante Thornton I think is probably gonna be

1:21:05.880 --> 1:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>mid day three, you know, fifth or sixth round up there.

1:21:09.240 --> 1:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>He is a complete project, Like he doesn't have very

1:21:14.680 --> 1:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>many branches to his roundtree. He's got you know, catch

1:21:17.960 --> 1:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>point issues that he's going to have to work out.

1:21:20.080 --> 1:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>He is a size speed project. And you know, if

1:21:22.760 --> 1:21:24.839
<v Speaker 1>he goes to a team that knows how to develop receivers,

1:21:24.880 --> 1:21:28.719
<v Speaker 1>like if he goes to Pittsburgh for example, and trades

1:21:28.760 --> 1:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a trains underneath dk Metcalf, who is like probably the

1:21:32.120 --> 1:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>apex of his archetype. Then maybe Dante Thornton can turn

1:21:36.360 --> 1:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>into something.

1:21:37.400 --> 1:21:37.559
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

1:21:37.800 --> 1:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>The reason it's a good question about you know, there's

1:21:40.280 --> 1:21:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of conversations about Jalen Knowle or Kyle Williams

1:21:44.240 --> 1:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>or Luther Burden, you guys that play in the slot

1:21:47.560 --> 1:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>versus outside. And I would just say, there's not a

1:21:50.920 --> 1:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>ton of pure x receivers in this draft at the

1:21:55.040 --> 1:21:57.759
<v Speaker 1>top of the draft. But outside of Ted and Jenden Higgins,

1:21:58.360 --> 1:22:01.599
<v Speaker 1>if it's not one of those two guys, maybe Trey Harris,

1:22:01.720 --> 1:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, would probably be like first, second, third round.

1:22:04.520 --> 1:22:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

1:22:04.880 --> 1:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And so those are the three guys that really that

1:22:07.160 --> 1:22:09.439
<v Speaker 1>I can think of unless you're an a man or

1:22:09.520 --> 1:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>guy who can play a little bit on the outside

1:22:11.600 --> 1:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe full time and you know, obviously like Day three guys.

1:22:15.840 --> 1:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's what I think. The enticing guys is the

1:22:19.360 --> 1:22:23.639
<v Speaker 1>point I'm trying to make. You know, Noel Williams, Burden,

1:22:24.000 --> 1:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>like Buka, Matthew Golden, even like those guys are more

1:22:28.720 --> 1:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>move you know, Z flanker type of receivers uh than

1:22:32.120 --> 1:22:34.559
<v Speaker 1>the pure x guys. And that's just the type of people,

1:22:34.680 --> 1:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the type of receiver that people are looking for.

1:22:37.120 --> 1:22:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I would also push back on the idea that

1:22:38.800 --> 1:22:42.000
<v Speaker 3>all the Patriots have are slot guys. I don't think

1:22:42.280 --> 1:22:46.679
<v Speaker 3>that's at least not proven. Uh, you know I, Pop

1:22:46.760 --> 1:22:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Douglas is not. You gotta we gotta go back to

1:22:49.160 --> 1:22:51.000
<v Speaker 3>that McDaniels offense. That's the other reason we're talking so

1:22:51.120 --> 1:22:54.240
<v Speaker 3>much about the slot. This is not an offensive passing

1:22:54.280 --> 1:22:56.599
<v Speaker 3>game that runs through the X receiver. It's an offense

1:22:56.600 --> 1:22:58.320
<v Speaker 3>that runs through the slot receiver in the tight end.

1:22:58.720 --> 1:23:01.880
<v Speaker 3>So Pop Douglas is a good player. Like I have

1:23:01.960 --> 1:23:05.040
<v Speaker 3>nothing against Pop Douglas. He's not a Josh McDaniel slot player.

1:23:05.479 --> 1:23:07.880
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna be more in that Chris Hogan role. He's

1:23:07.880 --> 1:23:09.680
<v Speaker 3>gonna line up in the slot, but he's gonna go

1:23:09.760 --> 1:23:11.840
<v Speaker 3>more vertical. He's not a chain mover. He's not a

1:23:11.880 --> 1:23:13.479
<v Speaker 3>guy you can throw the ball two one hundred twenty

1:23:13.520 --> 1:23:16.479
<v Speaker 3>times a season. He's just not built for that. Jalen

1:23:16.560 --> 1:23:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Polk is more that prototype. But is he a guy

1:23:20.880 --> 1:23:23.639
<v Speaker 3>that you're comfortable putting into that spot without any real

1:23:23.680 --> 1:23:28.360
<v Speaker 3>competition this year? After that, Baker's gonna play primarily on

1:23:28.400 --> 1:23:33.040
<v Speaker 3>the outside. Booty is a z outside guy. I think

1:23:33.120 --> 1:23:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Bourne is a true Z. Maybe you're gonna play Steph

1:23:36.120 --> 1:23:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Diggs in the slot, but I guess I should have

1:23:39.400 --> 1:23:41.160
<v Speaker 3>included him in there. If they're comfortable with Diggs is

1:23:41.200 --> 1:23:43.240
<v Speaker 3>that guy. I don't know that that's the best uses

1:23:43.240 --> 1:23:45.720
<v Speaker 3>of him, though I want him as the Z. To me,

1:23:46.040 --> 1:23:52.080
<v Speaker 3>ideally it's Diggs. Digs is the full time Z. Pop

1:23:52.160 --> 1:23:54.599
<v Speaker 3>Douglas is kind of your fourth receiver, your big play.

1:23:55.120 --> 1:23:56.559
<v Speaker 3>You know he's not gonna play a lot. When he's

1:23:56.560 --> 1:23:58.960
<v Speaker 3>on the field, he makes an impact. He's Dan Avindla, right,

1:23:59.320 --> 1:24:01.160
<v Speaker 3>And then you gotta get at an X in a slot.

1:24:01.800 --> 1:24:03.680
<v Speaker 3>And I don't even know that they need. Like, if

1:24:03.680 --> 1:24:06.200
<v Speaker 3>they want to throw Booty out there at the X, fine,

1:24:06.320 --> 1:24:08.160
<v Speaker 3>if they get a really good slot receiver, I think

1:24:08.240 --> 1:24:10.439
<v Speaker 3>that would work. Or you have Booty and Born and

1:24:10.520 --> 1:24:13.439
<v Speaker 3>Baker all compete, what have you? Like, I do think

1:24:13.520 --> 1:24:15.639
<v Speaker 3>slot's a need because this is a slot heavy offense.

1:24:15.680 --> 1:24:18.120
<v Speaker 3>They don't have anybody proven there. Pop Douglas to me

1:24:18.240 --> 1:24:20.640
<v Speaker 3>is a proven player, but he's not a guy you

1:24:20.720 --> 1:24:22.519
<v Speaker 3>can put in that role in this offense for what

1:24:22.680 --> 1:24:23.880
<v Speaker 3>that players asked to do well.

1:24:24.000 --> 1:24:26.719
<v Speaker 1>So the question is really and coming off the injury

1:24:26.880 --> 1:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>is with Diggs, it's his dig's going to be able

1:24:30.280 --> 1:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a high volume receiver next year. Because if

1:24:33.680 --> 1:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>he's a high volume receiver next year, then he is

1:24:36.479 --> 1:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the Z receiver in this offense that gets fed to targets.

1:24:40.040 --> 1:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>That's the Edelman Welker, you know, Dion Branch, Troy Brown

1:24:44.360 --> 1:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>type of receiver in this offense. Like he's the chain mover,

1:24:47.560 --> 1:24:50.880
<v Speaker 1>he's the engine of the offense. My big question with

1:24:51.240 --> 1:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>McDaniels just in general, you know, and we get to

1:24:54.479 --> 1:24:56.839
<v Speaker 1>talk to him a little bit more like his offense

1:24:56.960 --> 1:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>is historically now not so much the Raiders because they

1:24:59.479 --> 1:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>ended up getting DeVante Adams and they kind of pivoted

1:25:02.000 --> 1:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>away from this, But historically speaking in New England, they've

1:25:05.040 --> 1:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>had a sacrificial X receiver whose job is literally just

1:25:08.240 --> 1:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to draw coverage away from where they're actually trying to

1:25:11.360 --> 1:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>throw the football. So is he always going to have

1:25:15.160 --> 1:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>an X receiver that's just doing wind sprints on the

1:25:17.760 --> 1:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>outside and occasionally if he gets behind the defense he'll

1:25:20.120 --> 1:25:23.679
<v Speaker 1>see targets. Or are they going to try to revamp

1:25:23.800 --> 1:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the offense around a X receiver that is the high

1:25:27.200 --> 1:25:29.360
<v Speaker 1>volume guy in the offense. You know, they did it

1:25:29.400 --> 1:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>in Vegas, DeVante Adams. They obviously did it here with

1:25:31.920 --> 1:25:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Randy Moss, but that's DeVante Adams and Randy.

1:25:34.800 --> 1:25:37.719
<v Speaker 3>Moss and even those two guys. Even those two guys,

1:25:38.000 --> 1:25:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Moss was here with Welker. Yeah, Moss wasn't catching a

1:25:41.080 --> 1:25:45.639
<v Speaker 3>hundred passes, right, Welker was to a lesser extent in Vegas.

1:25:46.240 --> 1:25:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Kobe Myers, yeah, was in that role. So you need

1:25:49.800 --> 1:25:53.160
<v Speaker 3>a guy in the slot that you're comfortable targeting one

1:25:53.240 --> 1:25:54.880
<v Speaker 3>hundred to one hundred and twenty times in the season.

1:25:55.800 --> 1:25:57.720
<v Speaker 3>It's that guy on this roster right now. I don't

1:25:57.760 --> 1:25:57.960
<v Speaker 3>think so.

1:25:58.200 --> 1:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>So you don't think it's Steph Diggs because I think

1:26:01.800 --> 1:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it might be.

1:26:02.640 --> 1:26:05.760
<v Speaker 3>He probably is the best shot. Yeah, I wonder with

1:26:05.840 --> 1:26:07.360
<v Speaker 3>the injury, if that's how they want to use him.

1:26:07.600 --> 1:26:08.920
<v Speaker 3>You also don't have him at the beginning of the year,

1:26:08.960 --> 1:26:11.000
<v Speaker 3>like you don't know where he's at. Fair Enough, he

1:26:11.120 --> 1:26:13.280
<v Speaker 3>is the best shot, But I don't feel great about

1:26:13.280 --> 1:26:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Pulp being that guy. I like again, I like Pop

1:26:16.240 --> 1:26:18.559
<v Speaker 3>as a player. That's not his role, that's not where

1:26:18.600 --> 1:26:22.000
<v Speaker 3>he's going to be at his best. Maybe who else

1:26:22.120 --> 1:26:24.599
<v Speaker 3>is even really in contention, like has the skill set

1:26:24.680 --> 1:26:24.800
<v Speaker 3>for that?

1:26:25.040 --> 1:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's their vision for Diggs, assuming that

1:26:28.439 --> 1:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>he's healthy, is to really be the chain mover and

1:26:31.000 --> 1:26:32.360
<v Speaker 1>be the engine of the offense.

1:26:33.080 --> 1:26:34.960
<v Speaker 3>And I want to see him in was in in

1:26:35.040 --> 1:26:38.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty one before he got sick, like Peek Bourne in

1:26:39.000 --> 1:26:39.439
<v Speaker 3>twenty one.

1:26:40.160 --> 1:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a I mean it's adjacent like where.

1:26:43.760 --> 1:26:46.639
<v Speaker 3>It's adjacent, but he was he was playing off of myrons.

1:26:46.760 --> 1:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but Bourne was like in a catch and run role,

1:26:49.120 --> 1:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, like I think Diggs is a true like

1:26:51.280 --> 1:26:53.719
<v Speaker 1>it's thirty eight, I'm gonna get you nine ten eleves.

1:26:53.840 --> 1:26:56.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I don't have a problem with that being

1:26:56.560 --> 1:26:58.280
<v Speaker 3>part of diggs role. I want to see him at

1:26:58.280 --> 1:27:00.280
<v Speaker 3>all three levels. I think he can still make plays

1:27:00.280 --> 1:27:02.360
<v Speaker 3>at all three levels. So I'm talking about the guy

1:27:02.400 --> 1:27:05.040
<v Speaker 3>that you're gonna have go, you know, run return route

1:27:05.160 --> 1:27:07.160
<v Speaker 3>at the sticks. Yeah, and that's what he's doing. He's

1:27:07.160 --> 1:27:08.720
<v Speaker 3>gonna do really well and he's gonna pick up yards

1:27:08.720 --> 1:27:11.960
<v Speaker 3>after the catch. But that's like his assignment. I want

1:27:12.520 --> 1:27:13.960
<v Speaker 3>that can be part of what Diggs does, and he

1:27:14.000 --> 1:27:16.439
<v Speaker 3>can function in this role at times, but I want

1:27:16.479 --> 1:27:17.200
<v Speaker 3>him doing more than that.

1:27:17.400 --> 1:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>So I agree, I could see that. I think that

1:27:19.680 --> 1:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the role you know that you're probably talking about they're

1:27:22.080 --> 1:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>probably envisioning for pop Like I think Douglas is going

1:27:24.800 --> 1:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>to be, you know, to peer like number three inside

1:27:27.880 --> 1:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of Haas that's running the juke series and things like that.

1:27:30.960 --> 1:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, Diggs is probably gonna be running the seams

1:27:33.280 --> 1:27:35.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. You know, I I could see that. I

1:27:36.240 --> 1:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>think that, you know, when you look at the McDaniels

1:27:39.040 --> 1:27:42.120
<v Speaker 1>offense and the receivers that typically you know, have played

1:27:42.120 --> 1:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the X in his offense, Like I think Trey Harris

1:27:44.120 --> 1:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>from Ole Miss is exactly the type of X receiver

1:27:46.560 --> 1:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that they would target. That is a that he is

1:27:49.160 --> 1:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a sacrificial act?

1:27:50.240 --> 1:27:52.439
<v Speaker 3>Was he the one you compared to Lafel? Yeah, well

1:27:52.479 --> 1:27:54.800
<v Speaker 3>you can do a little more than that, like sacrificial

1:27:55.000 --> 1:27:56.479
<v Speaker 3>get no offense because you know, I like this players

1:27:56.560 --> 1:27:57.840
<v Speaker 3>jimir Berg or.

1:27:58.880 --> 1:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>De mere Bird and Nelson or like extreme examples of

1:28:01.880 --> 1:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about. But yeah, like that's the role.

1:28:05.000 --> 1:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>But that made some plays though, Yeah, and I think

1:28:07.280 --> 1:28:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Trey Harris would make some play, you know, like I

1:28:09.680 --> 1:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I think.

1:28:10.240 --> 1:28:11.920
<v Speaker 3>That that's but you need to take that guy in

1:28:12.000 --> 1:28:12.639
<v Speaker 3>the second round.

1:28:12.840 --> 1:28:14.640
<v Speaker 1>No, I think that that's probably someone you take it

1:28:14.720 --> 1:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the third round or maybe.

1:28:15.880 --> 1:28:17.559
<v Speaker 3>At one O Sick can Dante Thorton do that.

1:28:19.040 --> 1:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe in a couple of years that if he develops.

1:28:21.040 --> 1:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, Dante Thornton is a is a one trick

1:28:23.240 --> 1:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>pony without very many other tricks.

1:28:25.920 --> 1:28:28.360
<v Speaker 3>When you say sacrificial, I'm thinking just windsprints.

1:28:30.600 --> 1:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I think when I say sacrificial, I mean like a

1:28:33.000 --> 1:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>guy on the outside that again is not Randy Moss,

1:28:38.360 --> 1:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Like he's not really dictating coverage plan, but you have

1:28:42.120 --> 1:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to at least respect the fact that he's on the field, right,

1:28:44.720 --> 1:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Like we're not talking about a complete We're just not

1:28:47.479 --> 1:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>even gonna worry about this guy being out there. But

1:28:50.439 --> 1:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not a high volume role, and it's a role

1:28:53.000 --> 1:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that is a lot of clear outs, you know, taking

1:28:55.840 --> 1:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>coverage out of the way, occupying the post safety in

1:28:59.040 --> 1:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the field, like that sort of stuff,

1:29:01.479 --> 1:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Like because they're trying to hit you know, different areas,

1:29:04.040 --> 1:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, between the numbers at the first and second level,

1:29:06.479 --> 1:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, with tight ends, slot receivers, running backs out

1:29:09.240 --> 1:29:11.519
<v Speaker 1>of the backfield. Uh so you have to have somebody

1:29:11.720 --> 1:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that is there to take the top off. But that's

1:29:14.800 --> 1:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a guy that's gonna see a whole lot

1:29:16.920 --> 1:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of targets. I think Trey Harris is probably the best

1:29:20.360 --> 1:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in this draft, and you know, the third round range

1:29:23.240 --> 1:29:26.519
<v Speaker 1>as somebody that could purely do that. Now if it

1:29:26.680 --> 1:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>was me to your point, a little bit like Jalen

1:29:30.439 --> 1:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Nole can come in and be like the true slot

1:29:33.160 --> 1:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>right in this off Yeah, Kyle Williams might be able

1:29:37.120 --> 1:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to do that too and play a little bit more

1:29:39.160 --> 1:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>on the outside and kind of play almost like digs

1:29:41.920 --> 1:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>where he has like a little bit of inside outside versatility.

1:29:45.200 --> 1:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So I just think those guys offer a little bit

1:29:47.320 --> 1:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>more whereas if you're taking Trey Harris or if you're

1:29:50.320 --> 1:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>taking a o manor if you're taking even Dante Thornton later,

1:29:54.160 --> 1:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>like you're taking them to play that role for the

1:29:57.760 --> 1:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>rest of their career, right like that that's what they're

1:29:59.720 --> 1:30:00.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm going to do.

1:30:00.720 --> 1:30:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Is one most point. At what point you look at

1:30:03.120 --> 1:30:05.760
<v Speaker 3>it and just say that's mac Collins and they don't

1:30:05.760 --> 1:30:06.200
<v Speaker 3>take an X.

1:30:06.400 --> 1:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of where I'm at right Like, it's like,

1:30:08.320 --> 1:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>would you would you do that when you could have

1:30:11.080 --> 1:30:13.479
<v Speaker 1>Kaishan Boody do that, or you could have MATC Collins

1:30:13.560 --> 1:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>do that? Like would you really waste a top one

1:30:15.920 --> 1:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred draft pick on something that Kaishan Boody is is

1:30:19.240 --> 1:30:21.679
<v Speaker 1>capable of doing. You know, every once in a while,

1:30:21.760 --> 1:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>when Kaishan Boody gets a match up and he has

1:30:24.120 --> 1:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a good release, he's going to get a go ball.

1:30:26.120 --> 1:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's like football ash yeah, right, like you

1:30:29.320 --> 1:30:31.559
<v Speaker 1>know that, do you have to use another top one

1:30:31.640 --> 1:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred pick on a guy that can just is just

1:30:33.720 --> 1:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna do that?

1:30:34.479 --> 1:30:37.439
<v Speaker 3>I I want them to prioritize the slot. That's what

1:30:37.560 --> 1:30:39.760
<v Speaker 3>I I you need that guy that can and and

1:30:39.800 --> 1:30:42.479
<v Speaker 3>you're right, it's tigging. I I er, it's it's it's nol.

1:30:42.800 --> 1:30:45.080
<v Speaker 3>I even wonder about Kyle Williams in that role a

1:30:45.120 --> 1:30:47.559
<v Speaker 3>little bit, just because like he's not a big guy either.

1:30:48.080 --> 1:30:49.960
<v Speaker 3>He strikes me as more of a ze than like

1:30:50.040 --> 1:30:54.400
<v Speaker 3>a McDaniel's slot. Yeah, yeah, he's just a great are you?

1:30:54.479 --> 1:30:55.519
<v Speaker 3>Are you done with Restreppa?

1:30:56.560 --> 1:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Pretty much like if I'm drafting Rostreppa, though I'm drafting

1:30:59.400 --> 1:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>him like to push or replace Pop Douglas, Like he's

1:31:02.200 --> 1:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>like the fourth guy in this mix.

1:31:04.000 --> 1:31:07.400
<v Speaker 3>To me, I do very different things yet not really though,

1:31:07.439 --> 1:31:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Like I.

1:31:07.680 --> 1:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Think that if you fast right, but they're both in

1:31:11.479 --> 1:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>my mind guys that they're gonna have running quick hitters,

1:31:14.160 --> 1:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>like you're gonna have Ristreppa running the juke route. You're

1:31:16.320 --> 1:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna have Rastrepo, you know, finding soft spots over the

1:31:19.040 --> 1:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>middle of the field and zone like that would be

1:31:20.960 --> 1:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that I would say he probably is

1:31:22.680 --> 1:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>better at than Pop, Like Pop doesn't have a great

1:31:25.920 --> 1:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>feel for zone right now yet, and like kind of

1:31:28.800 --> 1:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>finding those pockets and making himself available and things like

1:31:32.000 --> 1:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that and settling and all that good stuff, Like Rastreppo

1:31:35.160 --> 1:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>could probably do that a little bit better already. But

1:31:37.520 --> 1:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Pop is obviously way more dynamic, you know, as a mover,

1:31:41.760 --> 1:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Rostrepo. To me, I still think is is

1:31:44.160 --> 1:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a Danny Amandola type, Like I still think that that's

1:31:46.840 --> 1:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a decent time.

1:31:47.280 --> 1:31:48.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he is the burst for that.

1:31:48.400 --> 1:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>But I you're saying, yeah, all right, let's get to

1:31:51.200 --> 1:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>some of these emails. We have a lot of a

1:31:53.040 --> 1:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of emails rolling in. So, uh, this is an

1:31:57.280 --> 1:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting question, and I think it's something that we've talked

1:31:59.360 --> 1:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>about a little bit. But this is Steven from Crown

1:32:03.439 --> 1:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Point and he did a lot of homework. I don't know,

1:32:05.160 --> 1:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we can't really translate this to Radio Steven, So I apologize,

1:32:08.280 --> 1:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>but basically his his argument is, you know, Will Campbell

1:32:12.800 --> 1:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously has a lot of talk about his arm lane

1:32:14.720 --> 1:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty two and five minutes thirty combine thirty three at

1:32:17.720 --> 1:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>his pro day, and he mentioned all of the he

1:32:22.000 --> 1:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>did the homework of all the pass rushers that Will

1:32:24.880 --> 1:32:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Campbell faced and our top one hundred guys that he

1:32:27.520 --> 1:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>faced in twenty twenty five and wrote down all of

1:32:31.400 --> 1:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>their their arm lights and basically made the point that

1:32:35.160 --> 1:32:38.639
<v Speaker 1>he's been winning against guys with longer arms than him

1:32:39.080 --> 1:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>for yeah, three years in the SEC.

1:32:41.920 --> 1:32:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Those guys are going to the league.

1:32:43.600 --> 1:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So the one guy that I looked at when

1:32:45.760 --> 1:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I wrote my film review of Will Campbell, which published

1:32:49.200 --> 1:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>today on Patriots dot Com, was a Shamar Stewart who

1:32:52.000 --> 1:32:53.479
<v Speaker 1>has over thirty four inch arms.

1:32:53.560 --> 1:32:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:32:53.840 --> 1:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>And now I'm not the biggest Shamar Stewart fan, so

1:32:56.120 --> 1:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a little bit. You know, I already kind

1:32:59.120 --> 1:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of have some concerns about Stuart as a player, and

1:33:01.800 --> 1:33:05.759
<v Speaker 1>I kind of pumped up Campbell using Stewart as an example.

1:33:05.840 --> 1:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>But Stewart is a has thirty four inch arms and

1:33:09.360 --> 1:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>is a bull rusher, Like that's a power, linear, down

1:33:12.439 --> 1:33:15.439
<v Speaker 1>the hill bull rusher with great arm light and great

1:33:15.520 --> 1:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>raw measurables, and Will Campbell had no problem whatsoever anchoring

1:33:19.280 --> 1:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>against Jamar Stewart in that game. So I use that

1:33:22.439 --> 1:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>as an example. You know, it's a great point. It's

1:33:25.840 --> 1:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a great point about Will Campbell's arm length and something

1:33:29.240 --> 1:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that I feel like we've touched on a little bit.

1:33:31.520 --> 1:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>This is another question about tackles from Larry, and he

1:33:36.040 --> 1:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>just wanted us to give like the best case and

1:33:38.920 --> 1:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>worst case scenario for Will Campbell and armand Membo. Now

1:33:43.479 --> 1:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I always put this caveat in there. The worst case

1:33:45.920 --> 1:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>for any draft prospect is that they stink in their

1:33:47.880 --> 1:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the league, right, That's the worst case. But

1:33:50.800 --> 1:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>let's let's talk about, you know, realistic worst cases. And

1:33:54.080 --> 1:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you know the answer for Will Campbell's obvious

1:33:56.439 --> 1:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>he's either a best case, great franchise left tackle or

1:34:00.080 --> 1:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>worst case he's a left guard, starting left guard in

1:34:02.400 --> 1:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. With Membo, I think it's either a franchise

1:34:05.439 --> 1:34:06.719
<v Speaker 1>left tackle or right tackle.

1:34:06.880 --> 1:34:07.000
<v Speaker 3>You know.

1:34:07.240 --> 1:34:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the one case for the pro Membu

1:34:10.520 --> 1:34:13.639
<v Speaker 1>people that I don't hear enough of pro Membu people make,

1:34:14.160 --> 1:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is that worst case scenario. If we're gonna give Will

1:34:17.120 --> 1:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Campbell that he's gonna be a good guard no matter what.

1:34:20.520 --> 1:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Then why would we not give Membu that he's gonna

1:34:22.920 --> 1:34:24.439
<v Speaker 1>be a good right tackle no matter what?

1:34:24.680 --> 1:34:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Right?

1:34:24.840 --> 1:34:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Like that just stands to reason.

1:34:26.600 --> 1:34:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Because the Patriots don't need a right tackle, and there

1:34:28.760 --> 1:34:31.400
<v Speaker 3>is an argument not to need a left guard immediately.

1:34:31.479 --> 1:34:37.120
<v Speaker 3>But I would I would structure that differently, like who

1:34:37.280 --> 1:34:41.120
<v Speaker 3>has the quicker path to the worst case And I

1:34:41.160 --> 1:34:45.160
<v Speaker 3>think it's Membo. Yeah, that move is so tough, and Campbell, Yeah,

1:34:45.160 --> 1:34:49.320
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't have the longest arms, but they've they're not

1:34:49.920 --> 1:34:52.639
<v Speaker 3>uncharacteristically short, despite what some people think. He's at thirty

1:34:52.640 --> 1:34:55.880
<v Speaker 3>three inches, the same as Rashawan Slater. And mostly he

1:34:55.920 --> 1:34:58.800
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have to learn anything new. He gets to play

1:34:58.840 --> 1:35:01.559
<v Speaker 3>the same position he's played a entire life armand Membu

1:35:01.640 --> 1:35:03.040
<v Speaker 3>is to come in and play a position he's never

1:35:03.120 --> 1:35:07.000
<v Speaker 3>played in his life. Like that's a major variable that

1:35:07.120 --> 1:35:09.519
<v Speaker 3>doesn't get talked about, Like people talk about, oh, well,

1:35:09.560 --> 1:35:13.200
<v Speaker 3>you know it's arm length versus position switch, and they

1:35:13.280 --> 1:35:15.360
<v Speaker 3>just go to arm length because it's physical. But it's like, okay,

1:35:15.439 --> 1:35:19.479
<v Speaker 3>but one guy has gotten here despite that shortcoming the

1:35:19.600 --> 1:35:21.080
<v Speaker 3>other guy, we have no clue what it's going to

1:35:21.160 --> 1:35:24.880
<v Speaker 3>look like yeah, and so there's much more unknown there.

1:35:25.160 --> 1:35:27.439
<v Speaker 1>So the question is is that, yeah, I guess the

1:35:28.040 --> 1:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>pro membuah thing is okay, Morgan Moses is thirty four

1:35:34.479 --> 1:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>years old, right, So if we try him at left

1:35:36.920 --> 1:35:40.320
<v Speaker 1>tackle as a rookie and worst case scenario he fails

1:35:40.360 --> 1:35:42.800
<v Speaker 1>at left tackle as a rookie, how long are we

1:35:42.920 --> 1:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>really expecting Morgan Moses to keep playing? So is there

1:35:46.240 --> 1:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a chance that in twenty six armand Membu is just

1:35:50.120 --> 1:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>our starting right tackle. Now you're back to the driving

1:35:53.080 --> 1:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>board at left tackle and you have to do that

1:35:55.280 --> 1:35:57.720
<v Speaker 1>whole thing all over again. But you would be in

1:35:57.800 --> 1:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the same spot at right tackle too. If Morgan Moses

1:36:00.120 --> 1:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>this decides, I'm retiring at thirty five years old, like

1:36:03.800 --> 1:36:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you also are going to need a right tackle. So

1:36:06.479 --> 1:36:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, like again, like we talk about backstops

1:36:09.240 --> 1:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Campbell being left guard, I don't know our

1:36:11.720 --> 1:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>guard in general. I don't understand why nobody just says

1:36:14.280 --> 1:36:16.439
<v Speaker 1>the backstop for Membu is right tackle, right.

1:36:16.840 --> 1:36:19.200
<v Speaker 3>It's just it's fair. But again, then the question I

1:36:19.320 --> 1:36:23.360
<v Speaker 3>ask is who is who is more likely to get

1:36:23.400 --> 1:36:25.920
<v Speaker 3>to the worst case, who has a tougher path to

1:36:26.040 --> 1:36:27.120
<v Speaker 3>avoid that worst case.

1:36:27.760 --> 1:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would probably say, you know, Membo is is

1:36:31.000 --> 1:36:33.519
<v Speaker 1>probably more likely to play right tackle long term than

1:36:33.600 --> 1:36:37.320
<v Speaker 1>left tackle, just based off of what I see him

1:36:37.360 --> 1:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>on tape. You know, his body type and his obviously

1:36:41.200 --> 1:36:42.519
<v Speaker 1>his experience on that side.

1:36:42.600 --> 1:36:47.439
<v Speaker 3>So instead of assuming the worst case scenario, yeah, let's

1:36:47.439 --> 1:36:49.200
<v Speaker 3>actually look at which player is a better chance of

1:36:49.240 --> 1:36:51.360
<v Speaker 3>avoiding the worst case scenario. And I think that's Campbell.

1:36:52.040 --> 1:36:53.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a fair point. I just think it's funny how

1:36:54.000 --> 1:36:57.519
<v Speaker 1>like everybody's like asked that question about Membo. It's like,

1:36:57.680 --> 1:36:59.479
<v Speaker 1>it's it's right. The answer is right there. It's just

1:36:59.520 --> 1:37:02.519
<v Speaker 1>a natural position, which is right tackle. All right.

1:37:03.479 --> 1:37:06.479
<v Speaker 3>You could argue his natural positions guards soon he's recruited

1:37:06.479 --> 1:37:08.360
<v Speaker 3>as coming out of high school, he's built more like

1:37:08.439 --> 1:37:09.040
<v Speaker 3>one physically.

1:37:10.400 --> 1:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but he's so athletic and he's got the lank tackle.

1:37:13.479 --> 1:37:14.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why you would move him.

1:37:14.600 --> 1:37:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Inside, because every tackle should always be moved inside to guard.

1:37:17.760 --> 1:37:19.960
<v Speaker 3>We should have no tackles because nobody's good enough at it.

1:37:20.160 --> 1:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So two questions from fill in North Carolina that are

1:37:23.200 --> 1:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>good ones. One shout out to you. I'll get to

1:37:25.040 --> 1:37:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that in a second. But this first question is along

1:37:28.439 --> 1:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the same lines of what we're just talking about. We

1:37:30.400 --> 1:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>brought this up a couple of shows ago about J. C.

1:37:33.160 --> 1:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Latham and him trying left tackle as a rookie and

1:37:35.960 --> 1:37:38.600
<v Speaker 1>now they get him back to right tackle, and he

1:37:38.800 --> 1:37:41.400
<v Speaker 1>just asked, you know, what's the difference between Membo and

1:37:41.560 --> 1:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>J C. Latham. I think there are different types of players.

1:37:44.720 --> 1:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Latham's a pham booth player. Latham's a power player. He's

1:37:48.000 --> 1:37:52.439
<v Speaker 1>someone that has got incredible power at the point of

1:37:52.479 --> 1:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>attack and people moving skill. Membu is a much better

1:37:55.439 --> 1:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>athlete than JC Latham is, and that gives you a

1:37:58.640 --> 1:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit more hope about him switching to the left side.

1:38:01.320 --> 1:38:02.559
<v Speaker 1>So that's a short answer there.

1:38:02.920 --> 1:38:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

1:38:03.160 --> 1:38:06.920
<v Speaker 1>The other question that Phil had or just a guy

1:38:07.000 --> 1:38:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that he is gravitating towards as a sleeper is Isaac Tesla,

1:38:11.600 --> 1:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>who we got up a couple of shows ago as well.

1:38:13.800 --> 1:38:15.519
<v Speaker 3>There's a slot for you and I.

1:38:15.720 --> 1:38:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I had just watched Tesla semi recently to is it Tesla?

1:38:20.040 --> 1:38:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Tesla like Thatla.

1:38:22.520 --> 1:38:24.360
<v Speaker 3>That's how they was saying that at the combine, you

1:38:24.360 --> 1:38:25.760
<v Speaker 3>don't have to be that ridiculous with.

1:38:27.520 --> 1:38:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Isaac Teslaw sounds funny. It sounds think of like.

1:38:31.560 --> 1:38:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Think like it's like t apostrophe s instead of the

1:38:36.120 --> 1:38:36.880
<v Speaker 3>imagine feels like that.

1:38:37.720 --> 1:38:40.280
<v Speaker 1>What I was impressed by him, uh well, first of all,

1:38:40.360 --> 1:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the the athletics, athleticism. His relative athletics score as RAS

1:38:45.000 --> 1:38:47.640
<v Speaker 1>was off the charts, Like really good athlete. Another one

1:38:47.720 --> 1:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of these like Day three developmental guys that's got a

1:38:50.200 --> 1:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>ton of physical talent. But what I was really impressed

1:38:53.120 --> 1:38:55.599
<v Speaker 1>with with him was was how good he is after

1:38:55.680 --> 1:38:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the catch, like on screens and stuff like that, Like

1:38:57.800 --> 1:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>he's a true catch and run threat. Not in necessarly elusive,

1:39:00.840 --> 1:39:03.400
<v Speaker 1>but he's one of those guys that just h is

1:39:04.040 --> 1:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, got great contact balance.

1:39:06.200 --> 1:39:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Six four twelve, he gets moving bounce off of Yeah,

1:39:09.920 --> 1:39:12.680
<v Speaker 3>I like his billy tracked the ball to downfield like

1:39:12.720 --> 1:39:13.560
<v Speaker 3>he does a good job with that.

1:39:13.920 --> 1:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I kind of put him in a similar bucket

1:39:16.120 --> 1:39:19.479
<v Speaker 1>as Thornton Dante Thorton just because they're both like a

1:39:19.560 --> 1:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>little raw but have great great uh size, speed, weight measurables.

1:39:23.640 --> 1:39:25.599
<v Speaker 3>So I hadn't really thought of this. With the slot.

1:39:25.640 --> 1:39:27.120
<v Speaker 3>We talked about all these guys to play on the

1:39:27.160 --> 1:39:30.040
<v Speaker 3>boundary in college and move inside just slaw heavy heavy,

1:39:30.080 --> 1:39:32.720
<v Speaker 3>heavy slot receiver. Is he a guy that can move

1:39:32.760 --> 1:39:33.840
<v Speaker 3>outside at the NFL.

1:39:33.920 --> 1:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Could he be the X potentially, But I like, I

1:39:36.760 --> 1:39:38.599
<v Speaker 1>feel like with him, you know, he's such a ball

1:39:38.640 --> 1:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of clay in terms of his technique, like his releases,

1:39:41.160 --> 1:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and especially if you're going to play the X and

1:39:43.120 --> 1:39:45.519
<v Speaker 1>play a lot of like backside coverage, you're gonna see

1:39:45.600 --> 1:39:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of press man, so you have to be

1:39:47.320 --> 1:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>able to release at the line of scrimmage. Like that's

1:39:49.200 --> 1:39:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the number one thing. I know. There's not a lot

1:39:51.360 --> 1:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of evidence. It's not that I don't think he could

1:39:53.280 --> 1:39:55.280
<v Speaker 1>do it, more of a projection. Yeah, there's just not

1:39:55.360 --> 1:39:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it on tape. Yeah, what's a lot

1:39:57.439 --> 1:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of what's him of him on tape is screens, seam routes,

1:40:02.400 --> 1:40:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, underneath crossers, you know, shallows where he's just

1:40:05.840 --> 1:40:08.400
<v Speaker 1>catching run with the football. But I thought some of

1:40:08.479 --> 1:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the screen stuff that he was doing was really impressive.

1:40:11.000 --> 1:40:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Like he's going to be a true gadget player right

1:40:12.920 --> 1:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the gate. I have a great comp for him,

1:40:15.160 --> 1:40:17.080
<v Speaker 1>But I just feel like that that was interesting. I

1:40:17.479 --> 1:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't expecting that. I was expecting a little more craft

1:40:19.920 --> 1:40:23.439
<v Speaker 1>nonetheless explosiveness. He's actually the opposite. He's a rock.

1:40:23.640 --> 1:40:25.559
<v Speaker 3>He's a. He's a boomer He's a boomer bus player.

1:40:25.560 --> 1:40:27.360
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna catch that really short stuff and then the

1:40:27.400 --> 1:40:27.760
<v Speaker 3>go ball.

1:40:28.000 --> 1:40:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, Curtis in Saint Louis.

1:40:30.720 --> 1:40:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Wait, was there's something else in that email that was it?

1:40:33.200 --> 1:40:33.400
<v Speaker 3>It was?

1:40:34.880 --> 1:40:38.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's said, because you brought up Tesla. Yeah. Uh,

1:40:38.800 --> 1:40:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Curtison Saint Louis has two questions, uh that are both

1:40:42.880 --> 1:40:45.960
<v Speaker 1>good ones. First one, is there a pick the Patriots

1:40:46.000 --> 1:40:47.920
<v Speaker 1>can make it for that would make you pull your

1:40:47.960 --> 1:40:50.800
<v Speaker 1>hair out or left feeling underwhelmed? He has his, but

1:40:50.920 --> 1:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I I'll reveal it after reveal ours.

1:40:55.640 --> 1:40:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Sure, Okay, come on, I know it's it's a weird draft.

1:41:00.320 --> 1:41:01.920
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of play. Again, there's a lot of

1:41:01.960 --> 1:41:05.200
<v Speaker 3>players that like are fine picks. I can see the path.

1:41:05.320 --> 1:41:10.400
<v Speaker 3>I definitely have my preferences at four. I mean, if

1:41:10.600 --> 1:41:14.439
<v Speaker 3>we want to go nuts, like if they take like

1:41:14.520 --> 1:41:16.960
<v Speaker 3>the second best player to a position, right, So if

1:41:17.000 --> 1:41:22.439
<v Speaker 3>they took like if they took like Kelvin Banks right

1:41:22.640 --> 1:41:26.519
<v Speaker 3>with Will Campbell and in Membo still on the board,

1:41:26.520 --> 1:41:29.719
<v Speaker 3>if they took it's tough to even say a receiver

1:41:29.840 --> 1:41:32.960
<v Speaker 3>because I Matthew Golden, like I wouldn't necessarily be super

1:41:33.040 --> 1:41:34.560
<v Speaker 3>upset if they took him over Ted. I don't know

1:41:34.720 --> 1:41:37.040
<v Speaker 3>I'd love either guy at four, but that would make

1:41:37.120 --> 1:41:42.920
<v Speaker 3>sense if they took like Walter Nolan over over Mason Graham,

1:41:43.000 --> 1:41:44.640
<v Speaker 3>right like, I think it would probably have to be

1:41:44.760 --> 1:41:47.200
<v Speaker 3>something like that. There aren't that many players in this

1:41:47.320 --> 1:41:49.559
<v Speaker 3>draft that is outright hate for them. They're really aren't,

1:41:49.920 --> 1:41:50.760
<v Speaker 3>at least at the top.

1:41:51.360 --> 1:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like I am contractually obligated to say

1:41:54.720 --> 1:41:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Ashton Dante, but I don't think I would be like

1:41:57.880 --> 1:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that pulling my hair out. I probably would be underwhelmed

1:42:01.040 --> 1:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>by them taking Gent because I'd have all the reservations

1:42:03.560 --> 1:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>about taking a running back that high, but he's so

1:42:06.800 --> 1:42:09.479
<v Speaker 1>talented that I wouldn't be like, what a horrible pick,

1:42:09.600 --> 1:42:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Like it's that that would not make sense, Like that's

1:42:11.800 --> 1:42:12.559
<v Speaker 1>not what you know I know.

1:42:12.560 --> 1:42:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Who would be and no offense to the player is

1:42:14.920 --> 1:42:18.639
<v Speaker 3>more about them. Will Johnson, Yeah, I just don't He's

1:42:18.680 --> 1:42:21.439
<v Speaker 3>a fine player. There's better players on the board, and

1:42:21.600 --> 1:42:24.920
<v Speaker 3>taking a boundary corner that high for the setup they have,

1:42:25.560 --> 1:42:27.559
<v Speaker 3>that would make no sense that I couldn't even think

1:42:27.600 --> 1:42:29.840
<v Speaker 3>of one because he's not even on my radar. For

1:42:29.920 --> 1:42:32.400
<v Speaker 3>the fourth overall pick, Will Johnson would make no sense

1:42:32.439 --> 1:42:32.600
<v Speaker 3>to me.

1:42:32.880 --> 1:42:37.400
<v Speaker 1>So the pick that I would probably uh be pulling

1:42:37.439 --> 1:42:39.280
<v Speaker 1>my I don't think i'd pull my hair out for anybody.

1:42:39.320 --> 1:42:41.519
<v Speaker 1>But the pick that I'd probably feel the most underwhelmed

1:42:41.520 --> 1:42:42.559
<v Speaker 1>by would be Jalen Walker.

1:42:42.640 --> 1:42:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Honestly, like I just I think I'd be more underwhelmed

1:42:46.160 --> 1:42:47.040
<v Speaker 3>by like Mason Graham.

1:42:47.240 --> 1:42:49.479
<v Speaker 1>So his was Mason Graham, Colonel said Mason Graham.

1:42:50.000 --> 1:42:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

1:42:51.880 --> 1:42:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's just the way that I have the like

1:42:54.360 --> 1:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the my top ten is set up like I have

1:42:56.720 --> 1:42:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Mason Graham with the higher grade. Like I just think

1:42:58.479 --> 1:43:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Mason Graham is a better player. I don't know. I

1:43:01.520 --> 1:43:03.680
<v Speaker 1>just I don't love the idea of Jalen Walker at four.

1:43:03.760 --> 1:43:05.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't love the idea of Mason Graham at for either,

1:43:05.840 --> 1:43:07.599
<v Speaker 1>And I don't love the idea of gent Like. Those

1:43:07.640 --> 1:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>are the three guys that if they took it for

1:43:10.240 --> 1:43:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I would be underwhelmed. Would I be cold? Strange? Like

1:43:12.800 --> 1:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to bring back what I said earlier, I don't think

1:43:15.160 --> 1:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I would have a meltdown on the air about them

1:43:17.080 --> 1:43:19.040
<v Speaker 1>taking any under those players, But I would be.

1:43:19.080 --> 1:43:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Underwhelming, you know what? You know what would it would

1:43:21.200 --> 1:43:23.640
<v Speaker 3>really be for me? It's not even a player. If

1:43:23.680 --> 1:43:26.600
<v Speaker 3>they're so determined to trade down that they trade the

1:43:26.640 --> 1:43:29.000
<v Speaker 3>pick for less than what it's worth just so they

1:43:29.080 --> 1:43:31.760
<v Speaker 3>can trade down, that that would bother me. Be it

1:43:31.880 --> 1:43:34.000
<v Speaker 3>for a couple of reason One, get what it's worth

1:43:34.320 --> 1:43:38.599
<v Speaker 3>to new Ish front office, like don't set the don't

1:43:38.640 --> 1:43:40.920
<v Speaker 3>set the standard that you can be had in the

1:43:41.000 --> 1:43:44.160
<v Speaker 3>trade just to move like, don't don't be that team.

1:43:44.479 --> 1:43:46.280
<v Speaker 3>And that tells me they don't like anybody on the board.

1:43:46.280 --> 1:43:47.960
<v Speaker 3>And whoever they take it nine, they probably don't like

1:43:48.040 --> 1:43:50.800
<v Speaker 3>that much. So it's not me saying don't trade down.

1:43:50.840 --> 1:43:53.799
<v Speaker 3>Let me be clear, if they get like real value,

1:43:54.800 --> 1:43:57.400
<v Speaker 3>do it trade down if you get what the pick's worth.

1:43:58.360 --> 1:44:00.800
<v Speaker 3>If they trade down for if they go from like

1:44:02.280 --> 1:44:05.200
<v Speaker 3>four to nine, four to ten, four to twelve for

1:44:05.320 --> 1:44:08.080
<v Speaker 3>like a third round pick, I'd be pretty disappointed.

1:44:08.360 --> 1:44:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a fair point. And I feel like there

1:44:11.080 --> 1:44:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of people out there that are just

1:44:14.840 --> 1:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>trade down at all costs, Like even if it's for

1:44:16.680 --> 1:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>pennies on the dollar. No, just trade down and set

1:44:19.200 --> 1:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that precedent. And I'm with you, it's the president's bad.

1:44:22.000 --> 1:44:24.479
<v Speaker 3>And I also get the better player, agreed.

1:44:24.640 --> 1:44:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that it's that leveled off of a

1:44:29.200 --> 1:44:31.960
<v Speaker 1>top ten. Yeah, that we're really saying that they're all

1:44:32.120 --> 1:44:36.439
<v Speaker 1>the same player. I just think that that's oversimplifying it.

1:44:36.640 --> 1:44:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think there's a difference between these players.

1:44:38.760 --> 1:44:41.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think when you look at it for them specifically,

1:44:41.600 --> 1:44:47.240
<v Speaker 3>right Campbell, Membu, Jalen Walker, like how far back are you?

1:44:47.439 --> 1:44:47.479
<v Speaker 2>Like?

1:44:48.040 --> 1:44:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, Ted McMillan, Mason Graham, Tyler Warren, it

1:44:51.080 --> 1:44:54.240
<v Speaker 3>could work. I think those three it's not a full tier,

1:44:54.280 --> 1:44:58.160
<v Speaker 3>it's like a half tier. So Hunter and Carter or

1:44:58.240 --> 1:45:03.160
<v Speaker 3>tier one. I would say, Walker, Campbell, and Membu are

1:45:03.400 --> 1:45:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Tier two A, and then the rest of those guys

1:45:06.320 --> 1:45:10.040
<v Speaker 3>are to B. So like I if you don't have like, yeah,

1:45:10.120 --> 1:45:12.800
<v Speaker 3>I could be convinced to go to to B, but

1:45:13.640 --> 1:45:15.439
<v Speaker 3>you got to convince me to do it. I don't.

1:45:15.840 --> 1:45:17.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm not just gonna do it to do it.

1:45:17.880 --> 1:45:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, I'm with you. And it's funny because I

1:45:20.240 --> 1:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like we said that thing about nine and forty yeah,

1:45:23.520 --> 1:45:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and then like everybody ragged on us and said, oh,

1:45:26.000 --> 1:45:28.519
<v Speaker 1>like you wouldn't do that, You're crazy, And then it

1:45:28.720 --> 1:45:31.599
<v Speaker 1>like resurfaced when the Saints with the Derek Carr news

1:45:31.760 --> 1:45:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and how everybody wants this King's ransom and I was like,

1:45:34.080 --> 1:45:35.960
<v Speaker 1>what happened? I thought that nine for forty was that

1:45:36.080 --> 1:45:36.680
<v Speaker 1>was part that was.

1:45:36.720 --> 1:45:38.519
<v Speaker 3>Part of that take was like, if the team's moving

1:45:38.600 --> 1:45:40.439
<v Speaker 3>up to get a quarterback, make them pay the quarterback tax.

1:45:40.520 --> 1:45:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, one hundred percent. All right, a couple more emails.

1:45:43.560 --> 1:45:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Here, we'll get back on my future pick.

1:45:45.040 --> 1:45:47.240
<v Speaker 1>We get back to the phone calls. I gotta you

1:45:47.320 --> 1:45:49.200
<v Speaker 1>gotta be a little bit greedy. Like I'm not saying

1:45:49.240 --> 1:45:51.479
<v Speaker 1>that you want to be like crazy where you get

1:45:51.760 --> 1:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, a bunch of hang ups, you know on

1:45:54.040 --> 1:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the old phone when you're trying to make the trades.

1:45:55.880 --> 1:45:57.880
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's gonna be a little bit greedy with

1:45:58.000 --> 1:46:00.800
<v Speaker 1>some of these, you know, along those same lines. You know,

1:46:01.000 --> 1:46:05.000
<v Speaker 1>just uh, Tom from Jersey was asking if you would

1:46:05.240 --> 1:46:07.560
<v Speaker 1>roll the dice on Will Campbell you know, do you

1:46:07.840 --> 1:46:11.320
<v Speaker 1>because by trading down uh and uh and seeing if

1:46:11.360 --> 1:46:13.280
<v Speaker 1>he makes it to you? And he said, you know

1:46:13.360 --> 1:46:16.760
<v Speaker 1>he's not a guy that he's like running the card

1:46:16.840 --> 1:46:19.760
<v Speaker 1>up for kind of guy, and Uh, I think where

1:46:19.800 --> 1:46:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I've come to, you know, in conclusions, still another show

1:46:26.000 --> 1:46:28.360
<v Speaker 1>this week, And I wrote this on in my thing

1:46:28.439 --> 1:46:32.080
<v Speaker 1>on Patriots dot Com, is do I think that He's

1:46:32.680 --> 1:46:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a perennial future Hall of Fame all pro you know,

1:46:36.880 --> 1:46:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Ogden, Orlando Pace, Joe Thomas like level prospect. Uh No,

1:46:42.720 --> 1:46:44.760
<v Speaker 1>But when I look at him, you know, I see

1:46:44.760 --> 1:46:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Jake Matthews. I've made that comp before.

1:46:47.640 --> 1:46:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I know other people have made the Bernard Raymond comp

1:46:49.960 --> 1:46:52.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Colts and Bernard Raymond the last couple of

1:46:52.200 --> 1:46:54.880
<v Speaker 1>years has been like a top Tennish tackle, a left

1:46:54.920 --> 1:46:57.840
<v Speaker 1>tackle in the NFL. I think, you know, as much

1:46:57.880 --> 1:47:00.840
<v Speaker 1>as uh, you're gonna say, wow, you're saying this as

1:47:00.960 --> 1:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>corny and cliche as some of that stuff is, Like,

1:47:03.200 --> 1:47:06.680
<v Speaker 1>there's something about Will Campbell that just like his intangibles

1:47:06.720 --> 1:47:10.519
<v Speaker 1>and his character and his demeanor and just his attitude

1:47:10.560 --> 1:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and what he's about dog that just kind of tells

1:47:13.120 --> 1:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>me that, like he's going to break through a ceiling potentially. Yeah,

1:47:17.320 --> 1:47:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'm I'm for trading down for at the right price,

1:47:22.120 --> 1:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>like we were just talking about in a draft like this,

1:47:25.760 --> 1:47:29.560
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not like so gung ho about it that

1:47:29.680 --> 1:47:32.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to lose out on Will Campbell for pennies

1:47:32.880 --> 1:47:34.760
<v Speaker 1>on the dollar. It'd have to be a trade where

1:47:35.520 --> 1:47:38.519
<v Speaker 1>we all see the return and we're like, yeah, like

1:47:38.600 --> 1:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>they had.

1:47:39.080 --> 1:47:42.439
<v Speaker 3>Again, I go to first round pick, second round pick,

1:47:42.920 --> 1:47:45.000
<v Speaker 3>and then depending how far down you're moving like a

1:47:45.040 --> 1:47:47.960
<v Speaker 3>future top fifty pick, Yeah, somewhere in there. That that's

1:47:48.000 --> 1:47:51.320
<v Speaker 3>where I'm That's where I'm settling. Like I'd obviously start higher,

1:47:51.840 --> 1:47:54.120
<v Speaker 3>but that's that's ultimately I think what would get it done.

1:47:54.320 --> 1:47:56.160
<v Speaker 3>I lets you moving way down like the twenties, but

1:47:57.240 --> 1:47:59.320
<v Speaker 3>how far down can you move? For Campbell, it's tough.

1:47:59.800 --> 1:48:02.479
<v Speaker 3>The thing that would make me nervous is Miami lurking

1:48:02.560 --> 1:48:05.519
<v Speaker 3>at thirteen. I don't think you're necessarily if you're moving

1:48:05.560 --> 1:48:07.840
<v Speaker 3>back beyond thirteen, you're not gonna get them. But I

1:48:07.880 --> 1:48:10.600
<v Speaker 3>also and the Bears at tend to like those are

1:48:10.720 --> 1:48:13.320
<v Speaker 3>teams that it makes a lot of sense for him

1:48:13.360 --> 1:48:16.439
<v Speaker 3>to go to that have ammunition to move up. So

1:48:16.560 --> 1:48:18.519
<v Speaker 3>you may look at it and say, we can go

1:48:18.680 --> 1:48:21.240
<v Speaker 3>back to call it eight with Carolina, right, or I'll

1:48:21.400 --> 1:48:23.200
<v Speaker 3>just do nine because that's what we're doing this week.

1:48:23.880 --> 1:48:25.479
<v Speaker 3>You may look at it and say, okay, there's no

1:48:25.560 --> 1:48:27.920
<v Speaker 3>tackle teams between four and nine. We can move back

1:48:27.960 --> 1:48:30.200
<v Speaker 3>and get them, and now, uh oh, here come the

1:48:30.280 --> 1:48:32.479
<v Speaker 3>Bears up to seven, Here come the Dolphins up to

1:48:32.520 --> 1:48:35.599
<v Speaker 3>eight and now you got jumped. That's what you gotta

1:48:35.600 --> 1:48:38.680
<v Speaker 3>be worried about. When they did the move back for

1:48:38.800 --> 1:48:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Gonzales in twenty three. The thing that they had that

1:48:42.640 --> 1:48:44.640
<v Speaker 3>we didn't know at the time that it's reported, they

1:48:44.760 --> 1:48:47.920
<v Speaker 3>knew two of those teams weren't going to take a corner,

1:48:48.320 --> 1:48:51.479
<v Speaker 3>and they knew Washington really liked Emmanuel Forbes for whatever reason.

1:48:51.880 --> 1:48:54.920
<v Speaker 3>So they they had it. But there was still the

1:48:55.000 --> 1:48:56.920
<v Speaker 3>risk that somebody was gonna move up. Like there's always

1:48:56.960 --> 1:49:00.559
<v Speaker 3>that risk. So that's what I worry about with Campbell.

1:49:00.600 --> 1:49:03.519
<v Speaker 3>I don't think realistically, were you moving down. There's a

1:49:03.600 --> 1:49:06.240
<v Speaker 3>ton of tackle teams there, the Bears and Dolphins, and

1:49:06.280 --> 1:49:07.880
<v Speaker 3>maybe there's some others too that I'm missing, but like,

1:49:08.200 --> 1:49:10.960
<v Speaker 3>there are teams lurking that can move up and jump

1:49:11.080 --> 1:49:13.920
<v Speaker 3>you to take the tackle. That would be the bigger

1:49:13.960 --> 1:49:14.519
<v Speaker 3>concern for me.

1:49:14.840 --> 1:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So Andrew and DC writes in about Will Campbell too,

1:49:18.760 --> 1:49:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and he just he said that he wasn't impressed with

1:49:22.200 --> 1:49:25.439
<v Speaker 1>him early on in the process. But me, Evan, you know,

1:49:25.760 --> 1:49:28.679
<v Speaker 1>gloating about Will Campbell or whatever I think he said, moting,

1:49:28.720 --> 1:49:32.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know moning anyways about Will Campbell. He watched

1:49:32.720 --> 1:49:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the tape again and he said that he sees it

1:49:35.320 --> 1:49:38.479
<v Speaker 1>more of a technician now and you know, his pass blocking.

1:49:38.560 --> 1:49:40.760
<v Speaker 1>But the one thing he points out about Campbell that

1:49:40.840 --> 1:49:45.240
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't see is great finishing or raw power to

1:49:45.400 --> 1:49:47.600
<v Speaker 1>his game, and said that he thinks that Membo and

1:49:47.680 --> 1:49:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Banks have that more regularly. And I actually would agree

1:49:50.720 --> 1:49:52.600
<v Speaker 1>with that, Like, I don't think Will Campbell is a

1:49:53.320 --> 1:49:56.320
<v Speaker 1>true stack the pancakes kind of guy. He's more of

1:49:56.400 --> 1:49:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a technician. He's more of a positional run blocker athlete,

1:49:59.400 --> 1:50:02.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, and protection. I would just say that, you know,

1:50:02.640 --> 1:50:05.080
<v Speaker 1>he he just plays a different style than those two guys.

1:50:05.160 --> 1:50:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Those two guys are more you know, road graders. They

1:50:07.800 --> 1:50:10.880
<v Speaker 1>got a bigger size and weight to them as well.

1:50:10.920 --> 1:50:14.040
<v Speaker 1>They're more blocky, you know, wide bodied type of players

1:50:14.640 --> 1:50:18.760
<v Speaker 1>than Will Campbell is. But to me, you know, it's

1:50:19.600 --> 1:50:21.800
<v Speaker 1>pass blocking is the most important thing. Yeah, Like I

1:50:21.800 --> 1:50:24.599
<v Speaker 1>would put pass blocking in as the number one thing

1:50:25.200 --> 1:50:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for my you know, if I'm building a team, my

1:50:27.439 --> 1:50:29.920
<v Speaker 1>left tackle would it would be a very high level

1:50:30.000 --> 1:50:33.240
<v Speaker 1>pass blocker first and foremost. I think protecting the quarterback

1:50:33.280 --> 1:50:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and keeping the integrity of the pocket is the most

1:50:35.320 --> 1:50:38.680
<v Speaker 1>important thing that tackles do at the NFL level. So

1:50:38.920 --> 1:50:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the best pass protector out of the group,

1:50:41.640 --> 1:50:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think he has plenty of like snarl and.

1:50:44.040 --> 1:50:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Toughness to and I was gonna say, let's see what

1:50:45.880 --> 1:50:47.240
<v Speaker 3>he looks like when he comes in after having to

1:50:47.280 --> 1:50:49.320
<v Speaker 3>hear about his freaking arms from form that, yeah, some

1:50:49.479 --> 1:50:50.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of edge he's playing with.

1:50:50.400 --> 1:50:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Don I hear what he's saying. Though, In general, when

1:50:52.840 --> 1:50:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you watch the tape, amongst these three guys, I would

1:50:55.840 --> 1:51:00.880
<v Speaker 1>say Campbell is probably the least in terms, you know,

1:51:01.160 --> 1:51:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of raw power, He's probably third on the list,

1:51:04.479 --> 1:51:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's just a difference of what you know you

1:51:06.760 --> 1:51:09.160
<v Speaker 1>want in the player. And again he asks like who

1:51:09.240 --> 1:51:11.040
<v Speaker 1>plays like that at the end of the level. And

1:51:11.439 --> 1:51:14.760
<v Speaker 1>this is this reason is why I keep going back

1:51:14.840 --> 1:51:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Jake Matthews comp because I don't think Jake

1:51:17.240 --> 1:51:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Matthews has ever been known for being like a true

1:51:20.040 --> 1:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>road grader or a true people mover in the run game.

1:51:23.240 --> 1:51:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But he's just a very technically sound, very polished left

1:51:27.280 --> 1:51:29.920
<v Speaker 1>tackle that that doesn't get beat too often. And I

1:51:30.000 --> 1:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's what Campbell's gonna be. So Andrew, your your

1:51:33.080 --> 1:51:36.120
<v Speaker 1>eye is not totally off. I just I don't know

1:51:36.160 --> 1:51:39.799
<v Speaker 1>if I would prioritize, you know, he says his subject

1:51:39.880 --> 1:51:42.919
<v Speaker 1>line is Campbell isn't violent, you know, And I understand

1:51:43.000 --> 1:51:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that that's that's fun, right, and you can see that

1:51:46.080 --> 1:51:49.479
<v Speaker 1>that's tangible when you watch tape of offensive Linemanaer. Guys,

1:51:49.479 --> 1:51:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that finishes is fun to watch, But I don't know

1:51:52.120 --> 1:51:55.200
<v Speaker 1>if that's necessarily the most important thing when it's all

1:51:55.240 --> 1:51:57.120
<v Speaker 1>said and done. All right, let's get back to the

1:51:57.200 --> 1:51:59.479
<v Speaker 1>phones and I will wrap up the show here. Sean

1:51:59.640 --> 1:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>is in Vancouver. What's up Sean?

1:52:02.640 --> 1:52:03.439
<v Speaker 7>After pass over?

1:52:03.640 --> 1:52:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Alex and Evan hopefully, thank you sir, you too.

1:52:07.120 --> 1:52:07.920
<v Speaker 4>I have two things.

1:52:08.479 --> 1:52:12.400
<v Speaker 7>One question I have is about a wide receiver who

1:52:13.320 --> 1:52:16.400
<v Speaker 7>was injured, but I've heard that he's good to go

1:52:16.520 --> 1:52:18.960
<v Speaker 7>now as Tory Horton. My concern though, is is this

1:52:19.080 --> 1:52:23.160
<v Speaker 7>frame too small? And then the other question I have

1:52:23.320 --> 1:52:26.400
<v Speaker 7>is is a hypothetical and what you guys would do yourself,

1:52:26.479 --> 1:52:29.960
<v Speaker 7>but what you think the Patriots would do if New

1:52:30.080 --> 1:52:34.639
<v Speaker 7>Orleans decides to make a trade and offer their second

1:52:34.720 --> 1:52:39.760
<v Speaker 7>round pick with the Patriots stay and just turn it

1:52:39.800 --> 1:52:42.760
<v Speaker 7>down and draft well Campbell, like assuming.

1:52:42.640 --> 1:52:44.080
<v Speaker 3>That Carter and.

1:52:47.040 --> 1:52:52.800
<v Speaker 7>Hunter and Hunter are gone, or would they make the

1:52:52.880 --> 1:52:56.519
<v Speaker 7>trade and they you know, and after that, would they

1:52:56.720 --> 1:52:59.719
<v Speaker 7>just keep picked at nine to thirty eight and forty

1:53:00.280 --> 1:53:01.479
<v Speaker 7>stay there or where they move around?

1:53:01.800 --> 1:53:01.920
<v Speaker 5>Right?

1:53:02.000 --> 1:53:02.200
<v Speaker 6>That's it.

1:53:02.439 --> 1:53:04.559
<v Speaker 3>I'll take it off there, thanks j Yeah, I hope

1:53:04.560 --> 1:53:07.000
<v Speaker 3>they'd ask for more in that trade. I think if

1:53:07.040 --> 1:53:09.040
<v Speaker 3>you end up with thirty eight and forty, especially after

1:53:09.160 --> 1:53:11.960
<v Speaker 3>moving back, you're definitely moving up. Should be What's the

1:53:12.000 --> 1:53:15.439
<v Speaker 3>first question? Is Tory Horton's brain too small? Frame frame?

1:53:15.520 --> 1:53:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I heard brain at first too, but I was like,

1:53:17.400 --> 1:53:18.560
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't say that. I heard that.

1:53:18.680 --> 1:53:20.639
<v Speaker 3>Well, that was like did he did he say spring

1:53:20.680 --> 1:53:22.880
<v Speaker 3>because he had a sprain ankle. You can have a

1:53:22.960 --> 1:53:27.000
<v Speaker 3>size sprain. He plays, he plays bigger than he is,

1:53:27.080 --> 1:53:28.519
<v Speaker 3>and he's got some room to put muscle on. I

1:53:28.560 --> 1:53:32.080
<v Speaker 3>don't think he can play. I'd have him put muscle on.

1:53:32.240 --> 1:53:34.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't think his current frame is where you want

1:53:34.400 --> 1:53:36.760
<v Speaker 3>him to play, but I think his frame you can

1:53:36.920 --> 1:53:38.720
<v Speaker 3>you can change that and get him to where you

1:53:38.760 --> 1:53:39.200
<v Speaker 3>need him to be.

1:53:39.439 --> 1:53:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm not totally out on Tory Horren. I don't

1:53:41.360 --> 1:53:43.400
<v Speaker 1>hate him as as somebody that they can pick him

1:53:43.400 --> 1:53:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the fourth or fifth.

1:53:44.120 --> 1:53:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Round on a little bit. There's an AX for you.

1:53:47.320 --> 1:53:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know, I didn't like necessarily, I wasn't

1:53:52.760 --> 1:53:57.599
<v Speaker 1>wowed by I actually watched him against Travis Hunter. Yeah,

1:53:58.280 --> 1:53:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and like most of his yards in that game where

1:54:00.120 --> 1:54:03.519
<v Speaker 1>like shallow crossers. Like so he's another on how much

1:54:03.520 --> 1:54:05.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty three did you? I think this was in twenty

1:54:05.120 --> 1:54:10.360
<v Speaker 1>three fins Travis Hunter. But look at a perfectly capable

1:54:10.479 --> 1:54:12.320
<v Speaker 1>flyer and then like to your point, is a guy

1:54:12.439 --> 1:54:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that was higher on the board, significantly higher or projected

1:54:17.160 --> 1:54:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to be higher and then got injured and and you know,

1:54:19.640 --> 1:54:22.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking to try to to try to do

1:54:22.520 --> 1:54:24.599
<v Speaker 1>that thing, you know where you you kind of buy

1:54:24.680 --> 1:54:27.160
<v Speaker 1>low on a player in the draft, and Tory Horton

1:54:27.280 --> 1:54:29.519
<v Speaker 1>is probably that at wide receiver, Like I think he's

1:54:29.560 --> 1:54:33.120
<v Speaker 1>probably the guy to be doing that at wide receiver.

1:54:33.880 --> 1:54:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing is quickly about the Saints. Nick

1:54:36.640 --> 1:54:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Underhill does a great job covering the Saints. I think

1:54:39.600 --> 1:54:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it's NOLA dot Football is his site, and he does

1:54:43.480 --> 1:54:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic job. One of the most plugged in guys

1:54:46.800 --> 1:54:50.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Saints. And he's been reporting pretty consistently that

1:54:50.200 --> 1:54:53.240
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't see the Saints drafting Shadoor Sanders, like that

1:54:53.400 --> 1:54:56.360
<v Speaker 1>they're not that's not They're they're not a Shadoor team.

1:54:56.440 --> 1:54:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, maybe they want to trade up for Mason Graham.

1:54:58.400 --> 1:55:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Evan I I just would pump the brakes because I

1:55:01.680 --> 1:55:04.040
<v Speaker 1>trust Nick and I trust is reporting with it. I

1:55:04.080 --> 1:55:06.360
<v Speaker 1>would pump the brakes a little bit on the nine

1:55:06.400 --> 1:55:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to four jump for Schador.

1:55:08.760 --> 1:55:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they want Mason Grimm. I've been saying, I've been

1:55:10.400 --> 1:55:12.760
<v Speaker 3>putting in my mock drafts the Saints taking Mason Graham

1:55:12.800 --> 1:55:17.080
<v Speaker 3>because it's Kellen Moore trying to recreate Jalen Carter and

1:55:17.120 --> 1:55:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Milton Williams with Tyler Bursey and Mason Grim.

1:55:20.680 --> 1:55:25.400
<v Speaker 1>A very very worst version of Milton Williams and trying.

1:55:26.640 --> 1:55:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Trying.

1:55:27.680 --> 1:55:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the one thing too, about the quarterback thing.

1:55:31.600 --> 1:55:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly, all these teams, the Browns, the Giants, maybe Vegas,

1:55:37.360 --> 1:55:40.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Jets, maybe the Saints, maybe the Steelers. It's

1:55:40.600 --> 1:55:44.800
<v Speaker 1>like six teams. All of those teams are saying, we'll

1:55:44.880 --> 1:55:46.960
<v Speaker 1>just get the quarterback in the second round. Yeah, not

1:55:47.080 --> 1:55:49.400
<v Speaker 1>all of them can get the quarterback in the second round, right,

1:55:49.440 --> 1:55:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Like someone's gonna have like gonna be lose out on

1:55:52.760 --> 1:55:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the musical chairs if every single team is targeting Jackson

1:55:56.000 --> 1:55:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Dart and Jalen Milroe, and there's five teams that are

1:55:58.600 --> 1:56:01.160
<v Speaker 1>going after two players and three teams are gonna be

1:56:01.240 --> 1:56:01.720
<v Speaker 1>left without it.

1:56:02.120 --> 1:56:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, the Raiders will get will happen. So what could

1:56:04.720 --> 1:56:08.240
<v Speaker 3>end up happening is we could see a run on

1:56:08.360 --> 1:56:10.840
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks late in the first round. Where do you get

1:56:10.920 --> 1:56:13.720
<v Speaker 3>the Browns and these teams trying to trade up from

1:56:13.760 --> 1:56:17.880
<v Speaker 3>the early thirties, and that would impact the Patriots. The

1:56:17.960 --> 1:56:21.080
<v Speaker 3>question is in what way? On one hand, might make

1:56:21.120 --> 1:56:23.480
<v Speaker 3>it more expensive to trade up, because if you're trying

1:56:23.520 --> 1:56:25.560
<v Speaker 3>to move up to get a tackle and these teams

1:56:25.600 --> 1:56:27.360
<v Speaker 3>are trying to move up to get a quarterback, they're

1:56:27.400 --> 1:56:29.680
<v Speaker 3>gonna offer more. And if there's a team in their

1:56:29.760 --> 1:56:32.560
<v Speaker 3>dead set on taking a tackle and you can't jump them,

1:56:33.080 --> 1:56:36.040
<v Speaker 3>that makes it tough. Now, the flip side is if

1:56:36.120 --> 1:56:39.720
<v Speaker 3>maybe those teams aren't set, that's gonna push a tackle

1:56:40.280 --> 1:56:44.200
<v Speaker 3>or a receiver down to thirty eight. So maybe so

1:56:44.400 --> 1:56:46.080
<v Speaker 3>it'll be interesting. But if you need a tackle, you

1:56:46.120 --> 1:56:47.640
<v Speaker 3>need to tackle, it'll be interesting to see how that

1:56:47.720 --> 1:56:49.680
<v Speaker 3>plays out. I think we're gonna see a lot of

1:56:49.720 --> 1:56:51.200
<v Speaker 3>trades in the back half of this first round. I

1:56:51.200 --> 1:56:52.560
<v Speaker 3>don't think you're gonna see a ton at the top

1:56:52.800 --> 1:56:55.400
<v Speaker 3>once we get into the twenties, especially like if the

1:56:55.480 --> 1:57:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Steelers twenty one, right, so if the Steelers take a quarterback, yeah,

1:57:00.640 --> 1:57:03.920
<v Speaker 3>and the Browns and Giants don't, right, well, now here

1:57:04.040 --> 1:57:06.080
<v Speaker 3>cut the Browns and Giants start trying to move up,

1:57:06.400 --> 1:57:08.440
<v Speaker 3>and that's the range you're talking about the Patriots trying

1:57:08.480 --> 1:57:11.720
<v Speaker 3>to trade into for Josh Connerley and maybe Arianta or Yeah.

1:57:11.760 --> 1:57:13.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a great point because I there's a lot of

1:57:14.000 --> 1:57:16.520
<v Speaker 1>reporting out there about this Shador visit to the Giants,

1:57:16.560 --> 1:57:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and there's another thing I want to get to in

1:57:18.560 --> 1:57:21.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of news, but one second on this just there's

1:57:21.280 --> 1:57:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reporting out there and now it's kind

1:57:23.480 --> 1:57:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of getting walked back about this Chador one last private workout.

1:57:27.960 --> 1:57:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess they have a one last private workout with

1:57:30.120 --> 1:57:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the entire top of the quarterback class, like the Giants

1:57:33.000 --> 1:57:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about. So they're going to Chadoor today, They're

1:57:36.640 --> 1:57:41.160
<v Speaker 1>going to Jaln Milroe on Friday or maybe it's Thursday, Friday, Saturday,

1:57:41.360 --> 1:57:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to Tyler Schuck at some point.

1:57:43.920 --> 1:57:46.800
<v Speaker 3>You see that combine throw that went out there from.

1:57:48.240 --> 1:57:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So they're they're doing they were planning on doing this

1:57:50.720 --> 1:57:53.440
<v Speaker 1>with all the quarterbacks. So this is not a unique

1:57:53.480 --> 1:57:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to Chador thing. But some of the reporting out of

1:57:56.360 --> 1:57:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the Shador stuff is that they might actually be looking

1:58:00.040 --> 1:58:02.120
<v Speaker 1>at Shador at the top of the second round, not

1:58:02.960 --> 1:58:05.320
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the first round. So all these teams,

1:58:05.400 --> 1:58:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the Browns, the Giants, uh, those teams that are have

1:58:09.000 --> 1:58:12.560
<v Speaker 1>been whispered to be connected to Shador Sanders might be

1:58:12.640 --> 1:58:14.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at Shador standers at the top of the second round.

1:58:15.120 --> 1:58:18.120
<v Speaker 1>But the problem with that is, I don't think Shador

1:58:18.200 --> 1:58:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Sanders is getting past the Steelers at twenty one. So

1:58:21.560 --> 1:58:25.960
<v Speaker 1>if you don't somehow jump Pittsburgh at twenty one, if

1:58:26.000 --> 1:58:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you're the Browns, are you're the Giants, you're not getting

1:58:29.280 --> 1:58:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Shador in my opinion. So it's just a weird thing.

1:58:32.280 --> 1:58:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Like it's a I don't really like Chador is gonna

1:58:34.400 --> 1:58:36.720
<v Speaker 1>go higher than thirty three or thirty four. I think

1:58:36.800 --> 1:58:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna say a round, right, So like at

1:58:39.240 --> 1:58:43.120
<v Speaker 1>some point, you know, the slide's gonna stop, right, And

1:58:43.200 --> 1:58:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like twenty one with Pittsburgh's to stop. So

1:58:45.520 --> 1:58:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that leaves them with you know, Milroe Dart Howard.

1:58:48.480 --> 1:58:51.040
<v Speaker 3>You know that Pittsburgh gets nervous and tries to move

1:58:51.120 --> 1:58:52.160
<v Speaker 3>up in the middle of the first.

1:58:52.480 --> 1:58:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, really quickly. Then we'll take this last call and

1:58:55.120 --> 1:58:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll end it. This is a question from Matt

1:58:58.040 --> 1:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in the OC on tja Oh. I guess is in

1:59:02.000 --> 1:59:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a contract dispute. I don't guess. You know, this is

1:59:04.360 --> 1:59:07.600
<v Speaker 1>what we're here in reports of this. TJ. Watt is

1:59:07.640 --> 1:59:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in a contract dispute with Pittsburgh. It seems like maybe

1:59:11.560 --> 1:59:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a trade would be in order. Are you in or

1:59:13.840 --> 1:59:14.840
<v Speaker 1>out on TJ Watt?

1:59:14.880 --> 1:59:16.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what am I trading? I take the player's

1:59:16.760 --> 1:59:18.480
<v Speaker 3>a hell of a player. Yeah, I don't think he's

1:59:18.520 --> 1:59:20.080
<v Speaker 3>getting moved, but great player.

1:59:20.200 --> 1:59:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, in Yeah, I'd definitely be in. But he's he's

1:59:23.080 --> 1:59:25.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty thirty one years old. Like, I'm not trading in

1:59:25.240 --> 1:59:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the farm for TJ.

1:59:26.000 --> 1:59:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Wait. I guess uh is Palazola right from Pim Pazzolo,

1:59:29.840 --> 1:59:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Steve Palasola round pick set a third round pick?

1:59:32.680 --> 1:59:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

1:59:33.360 --> 1:59:36.080
<v Speaker 3>What could be more poetic than trading the Matthew Judon pick. Now,

1:59:36.120 --> 1:59:37.680
<v Speaker 3>they probably asked for sixty nine and I'd give it

1:59:37.680 --> 1:59:39.680
<v Speaker 3>to them. Yeah, but if you can get a third

1:59:39.720 --> 1:59:42.200
<v Speaker 3>round pick, I might even do like second third pick swap.

1:59:42.240 --> 1:59:44.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what their third round pick is in Pittsburgh,

1:59:44.200 --> 1:59:47.800
<v Speaker 3>but thirty eight for what and whatever their third is?

1:59:48.760 --> 1:59:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Can I just why do we have to make it

1:59:50.600 --> 1:59:53.320
<v Speaker 1>so complicated like we do all these trades now where

1:59:53.400 --> 1:59:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like every time we talk about trades, and I'm

1:59:55.920 --> 1:59:57.920
<v Speaker 1>not just picking on you, I'm picking on everybody. Every

1:59:57.960 --> 1:59:59.720
<v Speaker 1>time we do these trades. It's gotta be like, well,

1:59:59.760 --> 2:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the Ariots get their second round pick, their fifth round pick,

2:00:03.600 --> 2:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>their seventh round pick twenty twenty nine, and then this

2:00:06.400 --> 2:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>team gets this pick, and.

2:00:07.600 --> 2:00:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Because that's how these trades happen.

2:00:09.080 --> 2:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Like what we just say, like the value is like

2:00:11.000 --> 2:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a third round pick, that's it. Can we can we

2:00:14.080 --> 2:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>just not get all complicated about it?

2:00:17.000 --> 2:00:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Sorry?

2:00:17.440 --> 2:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, thank you? Uh what I would probably trade a

2:00:21.200 --> 2:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>third round pick for TJ. Watt, Yes, but I wouldn't

2:00:23.360 --> 2:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>give up much more. And I know that sounds crazy,

2:00:25.560 --> 2:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but like just the value of the player, the age

2:00:28.280 --> 2:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of the contract, like that's the world now.

2:00:30.440 --> 2:00:32.600
<v Speaker 3>So this is so and then this is where that

2:00:32.840 --> 2:00:35.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of well, let's make it complicated comes from. If

2:00:36.000 --> 2:00:38.640
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers are making that trade, they're trying to get

2:00:38.680 --> 2:00:40.640
<v Speaker 3>tools to make sure they can move up if they

2:00:40.720 --> 2:00:43.920
<v Speaker 3>need to. And get your door. Yeah, quarterback, right, thirty

2:00:43.920 --> 2:00:48.840
<v Speaker 3>eight helps them significantly more than sixty nine does. So

2:00:49.040 --> 2:00:51.520
<v Speaker 3>that's where Okay, they're gonna want thirty eight, but you

2:00:51.560 --> 2:00:53.760
<v Speaker 3>don't want to give up that much. Okay, fun, you

2:00:53.880 --> 2:00:56.560
<v Speaker 3>give up thirty eight, but you get that third back.

2:00:56.880 --> 2:00:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Now you pair two of those thirds and move back

2:00:58.800 --> 2:01:00.960
<v Speaker 3>up in the second. You're back where you need to be. Well,

2:01:00.960 --> 2:01:03.800
<v Speaker 3>why wouldn't Pittsburgh just make the trade themselves? Because you're

2:01:03.840 --> 2:01:05.400
<v Speaker 3>helping them out and that's part of the deal. You're

2:01:05.400 --> 2:01:06.280
<v Speaker 3>making it easier for them.

2:01:06.560 --> 2:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, John is in the high on the highway,

2:01:09.400 --> 2:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and so cow John, are you on the ten?

2:01:11.080 --> 2:01:11.120
<v Speaker 6>Like?

2:01:11.200 --> 2:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Which highway are we talking about?

2:01:12.720 --> 2:01:14.720
<v Speaker 3>With the LA stuff? Give it a break.

2:01:15.280 --> 2:01:16.360
<v Speaker 7>I'm on the five on.

2:01:16.440 --> 2:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>The five, Yeah, I was close.

2:01:21.440 --> 2:01:22.440
<v Speaker 8>Hey, what's going on, guys?

2:01:22.600 --> 2:01:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

2:01:23.160 --> 2:01:25.360
<v Speaker 8>I just got a quick comment about Will Campbell.

2:01:26.040 --> 2:01:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

2:01:26.760 --> 2:01:29.440
<v Speaker 8>I think that we very well have won a couple

2:01:29.520 --> 2:01:33.000
<v Speaker 8>more games this year, like that Colts game and Miami

2:01:33.080 --> 2:01:35.480
<v Speaker 8>without two, we could have easily been picking seven, eight,

2:01:35.640 --> 2:01:38.600
<v Speaker 8>nine in this draft, and I think we'd be splamming

2:01:38.680 --> 2:01:41.120
<v Speaker 8>our fits against the table hoping Will Campbell fell to

2:01:41.240 --> 2:01:44.800
<v Speaker 8>us there. Yes, So I think that I think that

2:01:45.120 --> 2:01:47.960
<v Speaker 8>now that we're picking four. All these Pats fans are

2:01:48.000 --> 2:01:51.640
<v Speaker 8>turned off by Will Campbell. But you know, I think

2:01:52.000 --> 2:01:54.200
<v Speaker 8>it's gonna be our first pick anyway, with around the

2:01:54.240 --> 2:01:56.240
<v Speaker 8>same talent pool you'd get at seven, eight nine, So

2:01:56.280 --> 2:01:59.920
<v Speaker 8>I think, uh yeah, I thought, yeah.

2:01:59.760 --> 2:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>John, great call, great way.

2:02:01.560 --> 2:02:03.800
<v Speaker 3>It seems too easy, It seems too good to be true.

2:02:03.920 --> 2:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that part of the hate for Will Campbell? It's

2:02:05.920 --> 2:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>just too obvious I've made, I've made. I've said this

2:02:08.440 --> 2:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>take a million times. I'll say it one more time

2:02:10.520 --> 2:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>before the end of the draft, and I'm sure at

2:02:13.160 --> 2:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>least once. But this is one of those drafts where

2:02:17.400 --> 2:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>there's not a big talent gap. Once you get past

2:02:20.120 --> 2:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Travis Hunter and Abdul Carter. There's a little bit of

2:02:22.680 --> 2:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a drop off there in town and it kind of

2:02:24.440 --> 2:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>levels off at the end of the day where the

2:02:27.240 --> 2:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>player plays left tackle versus running back, versus tight end.

2:02:32.080 --> 2:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>When you have Hunter Henry on the roster, you are

2:02:35.320 --> 2:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>going to probably see a lot of teams that try

2:02:38.800 --> 2:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to marry up need with best player available, right, They're

2:02:41.760 --> 2:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna say these guys are our best players available. They're

2:02:44.880 --> 2:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>all kind of similarly graded. Where are holes and the

2:02:47.840 --> 2:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Patriots have a giant void of left tackle. Will Campbell's

2:02:51.360 --> 2:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the best left tackle on the board. And that's why

2:02:53.720 --> 2:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>at this point, I feel like everybody, whether they are

2:02:56.760 --> 2:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>like us that have been on board pretty much the

2:02:58.680 --> 2:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>whole time on Will Campbell, or they're now coping and

2:03:01.920 --> 2:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>just saying it's gonna be Will Campbell. So let's just

2:03:03.960 --> 2:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>all accept the fact that it's going to be Will Campbell.

2:03:07.720 --> 2:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>We're all there. We're all there now because every mock

2:03:10.280 --> 2:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>draft I read now is the Patriots taking Will Campbell.

2:03:12.920 --> 2:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>We have reached the acceptance stage.

2:03:15.160 --> 2:03:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Finally, of the week the draft used to be two

2:03:18.160 --> 2:03:21.360
<v Speaker 3>weeks earlier. They should like a whole week in here.

2:03:21.400 --> 2:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>We don't need I have an LA related take, but

2:03:24.880 --> 2:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll save it. I'll save it. I know I'll drive

2:03:27.080 --> 2:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you crazy, But confidence it's important to have you when

2:03:30.960 --> 2:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you're when you're on the road with Bridgetone tires on

2:03:33.640 --> 2:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>your car, truck, suv, or mini van, you're riding on

2:03:36.640 --> 2:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>tires you can trust. Bridgestone tires are engineered to give

2:03:39.680 --> 2:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you a peace of mind so you can focus on

2:03:41.440 --> 2:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and join the journey. So whether you're on your morning commute,

2:03:43.960 --> 2:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>across country road trip, or a relaxing Sunday drive. Bridgetone

2:03:47.680 --> 2:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Tires will be with you wherever life's roads may lead.

2:03:50.000 --> 2:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Bridgestone Solutions for your journey available now at Sullivan Tire.

2:03:53.760 --> 2:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll be back next week next Wednesday for

2:03:56.320 --> 2:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>our official official Draft preview show because we haven't been

2:03:59.800 --> 2:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>pre viewing the draft for the last six months, so

2:04:01.880 --> 2:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to have another show and call it the

2:04:04.000 --> 2:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Draft Preview Show. But we'll see you guys next week.

2:04:09.640 --> 2:04:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Hey, this is Fred. Thanks for tuning into the show.

2:04:12.120 --> 2:04:14.640
<v Speaker 4>If you really want to help us, make sure that

2:04:14.720 --> 2:04:17.760
<v Speaker 4>you like us wherever you get your podcasts, like Apple

2:04:17.840 --> 2:04:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Podcasts or Spotify, and also make sure you follow us

2:04:21.880 --> 2:04:24.720
<v Speaker 4>on the New England Patriots YouTube page to see this

2:04:24.880 --> 2:04:25.440
<v Speaker 4>show in.

2:04:25.520 --> 2:04:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Everything else that we do here what the Patriots. Thanks

2:04:28.480 --> 2:04:28.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot,