Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. It's time for a
Speaker 1: panic shutdown. We need to get answers on election interference
Speaker 1: and soon limited stay at home orders in Cali, and
Speaker 1: how to prepare for a worthwhile Thanksgiving. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck sex and Show, where the mission or mission is
Speaker 1: to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no
Speaker 1: mistake America, you're a great American. Again, the Buck Sexon
Speaker 1: Show begins. He's a great guy. No, why does the
Speaker 1: media want you to be constantly afraid? Ask yourself that question.
Speaker 1: There are very important answers that will come to mind.
Speaker 1: Why do they want you terrified now? Of everything they're
Speaker 1: telling you about? Just look at the dominant news stories.
Speaker 1: Look at what's in the headlines. You have the election
Speaker 1: that's over and Trump won't accept the results, and everyone's
Speaker 1: supposed to be completely freaked out about this. But if
Speaker 1: you dig into it a little bit, if you look
Speaker 1: at what's going on. States haven't even certified their elections yet,
Speaker 1: there's nothing that's illegal, nothing that's outside of the established process.
Speaker 1: This is playing out. This system is in fact working
Speaker 1: as it was designed to at every stage. Now, this
Speaker 1: is a very complicated system. There's a lot of variables,
Speaker 1: a lot of things that can happen, and yes, things
Speaker 1: can go wrong, but there are provisions made for that.
Speaker 1: Those who are telling you that democracy itself is under threat,
Speaker 1: those who are doing everything they can to humiliate and
Speaker 1: undermine anyone who just wants answers. Here, Let's see what
Speaker 1: evidence is there. Let's read these affidavits about voter fraud.
Speaker 1: The people that want to shut all of that down
Speaker 1: are doing so for a reason, and we know who
Speaker 1: they are, we know what they want, who they support,
Speaker 1: and it's not Donald Trump. Now look at COVID stories
Speaker 1: of people talking about how hospitals are about to get overwhelmed.
Speaker 1: You've got these Joe Biden advisors out there discussing long
Speaker 1: term shutdowns. All of this is happening right now. And
Speaker 1: we've been here before. We know what's true at some
Speaker 1: level and what's not. We understand the limitations of some
Speaker 1: of these policies they're implementing, and in some cases there's
Speaker 1: no upside, there's only downside. But they want you to
Speaker 1: believe that within two to three weeks hospitals will be overwhelmed.
Speaker 1: This time, there were no hospitals that turned away patients.
Speaker 1: There was nobody who didn't have a ventilator. Just think
Speaker 1: back to March and April in this country, in the
Speaker 1: worst hit regions of the US. It didn't get to
Speaker 1: the point that they said it would, but there was panic. Well,
Speaker 1: what I'm telling you right now is we need a
Speaker 1: panic shutdown. People need to stop trying to terrify everybody
Speaker 1: and you. And that's the real threat as I see it,
Speaker 1: because when you're when you're completely unnerved, when you're operating
Speaker 1: under this cloud of constant anxiety, which the media and
Speaker 1: the Democrats and the anti trumpsters are just just feeding
Speaker 1: on right now, and the lockdowners going to and the
Speaker 1: mask shamers, when you have to make decisions with that
Speaker 1: going on all around you as an individual, and yes,
Speaker 1: as a society, you don't make very smart ones. You
Speaker 1: don't make very good ones. And I think that's really
Speaker 1: some level the point. They want you worried, they want
Speaker 1: you concerned, and yes, some of them have I think
Speaker 1: brainwashed themselves. I do believe there are people in the media,
Speaker 1: perhaps many of them, who really think that Trump is
Speaker 1: a threat to our democracy, who really believe that By
Speaker 1: taking this to court and having lawyers present judges with
Speaker 1: affidavits and other evidence and look at the numbers and
Speaker 1: ask for recounts that this is you know exactly what
Speaker 1: Stalin would have done. Paul pot right out of his playbook.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is insane what you're hearing about this.
Speaker 1: The claims that are being made all the time about
Speaker 1: just what Trump is doing are false, and you know
Speaker 1: their false. And because of the environment, Because of the environment,
Speaker 1: you have people that don't care what the costs are
Speaker 1: to the bad decision making as long as it serves
Speaker 1: the political purpose. Schools shut down is probably the best
Speaker 1: example of the second point too. When the schools shut down.
Speaker 1: There's no way to justify this based on the numbers,
Speaker 1: based on what we've seen. But they had to do
Speaker 1: what they thought before to make sure that the country
Speaker 1: did not feel like it was normalizing, that we were
Speaker 1: getting through the pandemic. It was useful against Trump, so
Speaker 1: they figure, let's do it again because that was our position.
Speaker 1: And no one wants to admit that they were wrong.
Speaker 1: No one wants to admit who's making decisions about keeping
Speaker 1: schools closed that they never should have done this, And
Speaker 1: if they were to change course now, it would be
Speaker 1: an admission of that on the voter fraud issue. Right,
Speaker 1: You've got both of these. There's such a fixation with exaggeration,
Speaker 1: so much intensity around getting people to stop asking the questions,
Speaker 1: give up, concede, bend the knee. Eventually they may get
Speaker 1: what they want in terms of aiden victory. That's possible,
Speaker 1: and if the votes show that, that's where we are. Friends.
Speaker 1: It's a pandemic year. Things are crazy. I know Donald
Speaker 1: Trump did a great job as president, but you know,
Speaker 1: unfortunately the media is entirely against him and we got
Speaker 1: a once in a century pandemic happening. It's possible. It's
Speaker 1: possible that when all the votes are counted in it's
Speaker 1: all done, he is not the president of the United States.
Speaker 1: And yes, there might be a lot of fraud. There
Speaker 1: might There certainly are a lot of regularities. There's all
Speaker 1: that stuff in there too. But if we can't prove it,
Speaker 1: we operate within a system that says this is where
Speaker 1: we are. We don't have an alternative unless we want
Speaker 1: to blow up the whole system, which is what liberals do.
Speaker 1: That's what the left does. They don't get their way,
Speaker 1: they threaten the whole thing. If we don't get the
Speaker 1: desired outcome here, after we've exhausted all options in court,
Speaker 1: after we've gone through all of this, is incumbent upon
Speaker 1: us to say, all right, fine, let's focus on those
Speaker 1: Georgia Senate runoff races, and let's continue to push the ideas.
Speaker 1: Let's push the political movement that Donald Trump started of
Speaker 1: a conservative populism that fights for what it believes in.
Speaker 1: None of that changes, but here we are. It's going
Speaker 1: into the holidays. The media is going to have less
Speaker 1: and less that they're reporting on, because, as you know,
Speaker 1: media is a narrative. It's a construct from people that
Speaker 1: make a living doing just that. All right, They come
Speaker 1: up with what they think you should hear, they think
Speaker 1: you should know. The one thing you'll see a continuation
Speaker 1: of here is to keep the pressure on, to keep
Speaker 1: the pressure on Trump and the recount efforts and the
Speaker 1: legal challenges, and to keep pressure on everybody to think
Speaker 1: that COVID is completely beyond our control. Unless you just
Speaker 1: abandon all all of your liberties, unless you give up
Speaker 1: whatever whatever rights you're supposed to have under the constitution,
Speaker 1: you have to say, sorry, doesn't count right now. Because
Speaker 1: Governor Cuomo or Governor Newsom have better ideas. Governor Whitmer,
Speaker 1: Governor Murphy, you know, Governor Wolf go down the list.
Speaker 1: They know better. So we'll just allow them to completely
Speaker 1: overreach and to make these dictatorial moves, or else the
Speaker 1: hospitals will will overflow, they tell you, or else everyone
Speaker 1: around you could die. This is what they say. It's
Speaker 1: not true. It's not true, but there is a pandemic
Speaker 1: of panic out there, and there are a lot of
Speaker 1: people who are pushing it. They do so to control you.
Speaker 1: They do so because it allows them to monetize your fear.
Speaker 1: Every time there's a new story that's some other thing
Speaker 1: that could be terrible about COVID that you know, new
Speaker 1: study says that COVID may actually turn your entire head
Speaker 1: into a potato. And everyone clay, oh my gosh, I
Speaker 1: don't want to be a potato. And they all click.
Speaker 1: And it turns out some guy who's kind of crazy
Speaker 1: thinks he had COVID and said he you know, you
Speaker 1: click gun it into the stories. Nothing but you clicked
Speaker 1: on it. There's no accountability for this anymore. The biggest
Speaker 1: news organizations in the country, in the world do this
Speaker 1: on a regular basis, so they're making money off of
Speaker 1: your fear. They're controlling you through your fear, and they're
Speaker 1: also mobilizing their own side by creating false fear in
Speaker 1: them that what they're telling people is true. And they
Speaker 1: sit above all of this like puppet masters, turning us
Speaker 1: against each other, making people, making people go into this
Speaker 1: Thanksgiving scared of their family members, scared of spending time
Speaker 1: with loved ones. For what well, I told you why
Speaker 1: they do it, But understand the motivations, and then it
Speaker 1: becomes a lot easier to ignore the hysteria. Look at
Speaker 1: this for yourself. This is a time in America, or
Speaker 1: the ability to think for yourself, to come to your
Speaker 1: own conclusions based on information that you have verified that
Speaker 1: you know is accurate. It's more important than ever because
Speaker 1: there is so much out there. There's so much propagandizing
Speaker 1: going on, and unlike in previous eras, it follows you everywhere,
Speaker 1: you carry it with you. You carry the surveillance and
Speaker 1: propaganda machine that big tech has made to keep your
Speaker 1: mind stuck in this matrix of panic and fear. So
Speaker 1: you have to find a way to break out from that.
Speaker 1: And yes, I think listening to a show like this
Speaker 1: one is a step in that direction a big one
Speaker 1: because I actually get to tell you what I think
Speaker 1: is true. And I don't answer to anybody. I answer
Speaker 1: to you, the audience. That's it. There's no one who
Speaker 1: ever tells me what to say, no one who ever
Speaker 1: tells me what to think. And I wouldn't take a
Speaker 1: job that was the case. And so here I am
Speaker 1: trying to tell you, please please block out the nonsense.
Speaker 1: We can go through this process. There's nothing The system
Speaker 1: is not broken because Trump and his lawyers are looking
Speaker 1: for answers. He's not a tyrant. They're not gonna have
Speaker 1: to pry him with a crowbar out of the White House.
Speaker 1: This is all crap, it's all lies, it's nonsense. They're
Speaker 1: gonna keep saying that. They're gonna keep saying it. They're
Speaker 1: hoping to wear you down. They're hoping to wear us
Speaker 1: down so that we don't support the quest for answers.
Speaker 1: And I tell you this, it's a quest that may
Speaker 1: be unsuccessful. I do not overpromise here, but that doesn't
Speaker 1: mean we shouldn't do it. You know, we still check.
Speaker 1: We should still know important for this election and critical
Speaker 1: for the next election. And then on top of that,
Speaker 1: we have this pandemic that is, yes, still infecting people,
Speaker 1: and yes it is still dangerous, especially to people in
Speaker 1: a certain age group. But they don't want you to
Speaker 1: see what the real numbers are and what's really happening
Speaker 1: all around you. They want to run the same playbook
Speaker 1: of oh my gosh, everybody, hide, don't leave your home,
Speaker 1: do what the experts say. Now, there are a lot
Speaker 1: of reasons for this. One of them, though, is that's
Speaker 1: what they told you the last time. Can you imagine
Speaker 1: if you just said, you know what, I'm going to
Speaker 1: enjoy my life for now. I'm going to go for
Speaker 1: walks without a mask on oh my gosh, outside without
Speaker 1: a mask. I'm going to see my loved ones if
Speaker 1: I have symptoms. If any of us are sick, we
Speaker 1: will we will stay away, we will quarantine. But if
Speaker 1: no one has any symptoms, we're willing to take that
Speaker 1: risk unless you have a relative who's particularly elderly and immunocompromise.
Speaker 1: And that's a decision that you should make as individuals,
Speaker 1: not that the government should be making for you. If
Speaker 1: you do that, if you live your life, and you
Speaker 1: are able to have greater joy and more important memory
Speaker 1: because you've ignored the so called experts on the media.
Speaker 1: Then that's a step in breaking their control over you.
Speaker 1: Then that's a step in removing that constant cloud of fear,
Speaker 1: in separating from those mechanisms that they use, like we're
Speaker 1: all a bunch of lab rats and they want us
Speaker 1: to go a certain direction of the maze. Break yourself
Speaker 1: away from this. We will get through this election recount,
Speaker 1: we will get through this pandemic. We're going to be okay.
Speaker 1: But you don't have to let them control you. You
Speaker 1: don't have to let them brainwash you in order to
Speaker 1: get there. In fact, it only makes everything worse. Fight
Speaker 1: back against this. Establish your own individual freedom, your own
Speaker 1: individual limits. Don't let them do what they want to
Speaker 1: do to you right now. Don't fall victim to this
Speaker 1: pandemic of panic that the media is trying to jam
Speaker 1: down on your throat every chance they get. You're in
Speaker 1: the freedom mind. This is the Buck Sex and Show Podcast.
Speaker 1: What do I mean by panic? What do I mean
Speaker 1: by losing your mind? Exaggerating and no longer having any
Speaker 1: grip on reality because of the left wing narrative. There
Speaker 1: are so many examples of it out there, and perhaps
Speaker 1: the best one right now is the utterly deranged but
Speaker 1: somehow amusing because he's so crazy. Keith Olberman play too.
Speaker 1: But history will also ask what was in the hearts
Speaker 1: of the men and women who continued to support this
Speaker 1: creature Trump after his defeat, after his repudiation, after the
Speaker 1: national wildfire that was COVID nineteen accelerated into this hellscape
Speaker 1: of conflagration in the days after the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 1: Who let Trump continue to run the pandemic fight into
Speaker 1: the ground. Who let Trump stay manifestly insane as he
Speaker 1: is in office? Who refused to risk anything, refused to
Speaker 1: risk even a momentary loss of power, to instead be
Speaker 1: certain that death ruled this nation? Who were these people?
Speaker 1: Did you put them on trial? Did any of them
Speaker 1: go to prison? What did you do to Trump after
Speaker 1: it was clear that he knew what was ahead and
Speaker 1: lied and lied and lied and lied and lied. What
Speaker 1: did you do to make sure that no leader could
Speaker 1: ever commit this treason again? Treason not against the country,
Speaker 1: treason against humanity, treason against humanity. Sorry, I've actually sitting
Speaker 1: here gay. This guy is a total loon. Remember he
Speaker 1: was MSNBC's biggest draw for years. They're paying this guy
Speaker 1: millions of dollars a year. It's a total lunatic. He
Speaker 1: sits there with a thesaurus or and then bringing together
Speaker 1: the myriad of all the big words that I can
Speaker 1: throw into one monologue so that I can sound like
Speaker 1: somebody who's very intelligent. What a what a total joke.
Speaker 1: But this is what, this is what happens. This is
Speaker 1: what you get. Trees are the guns humanity. Maybe I
Speaker 1: should just do a show like I'll just do a
Speaker 1: show as Keith Alberman one day. Well, I don't go
Speaker 1: to sound. What's going on? All right? If I if
Speaker 1: I changed my voice and I sound for it, he's great,
Speaker 1: he does. It's whatever, man, he calls me sex, tex
Speaker 1: bump or whatever, which I gotta say? That would people always,
Speaker 1: you know, ask me what my stage name would be.
Speaker 1: It's already Buck Sexton is my name, and you all
Speaker 1: know this. People, who oh, is it your real name?
Speaker 1: As if that's some kind of attack. My middle name
Speaker 1: is Buckman. Everyone has called me Buck since I was
Speaker 1: a baby. That's all that is. It's always been Buck.
Speaker 1: But Tex sex Bump would be would be a good
Speaker 1: stage name. Actually we're really gonna go there, so i'd
Speaker 1: have to work on my dance moves though, producer mark
Speaker 1: for what industry? Is that a good name? My stage name?
Speaker 1: Ye know what stage? I don't know. Let's just say
Speaker 1: Broadway because there could be kids listening. So all right,
Speaker 1: and now, oh oh more, panic, more and more, Oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, let's just say the craziest stuff about Trump possible.
Speaker 1: This is what they're doing. Play three. All those people
Speaker 1: who now have the virus, who don't make it from
Speaker 1: now until January twentieth. This blood is on his hands
Speaker 1: because this isn't like he's sitting around thinking how can
Speaker 1: I hell, he's sitting around doing nothing. He's doing nothing,
Speaker 1: and he knows what he needs to do and he's
Speaker 1: not doing it, and neither are these Republicans. And I
Speaker 1: just I don't know when America turned into this particular
Speaker 1: version of America, but I gotta tell you I don't
Speaker 1: like it. He's doing nothing. I've never seen a president
Speaker 1: that didn't care whether people lived or die. I mean,
Speaker 1: they say these horrible things about him. What about the
Speaker 1: vaccine that has ninety five efficiency effectiveness that we only
Speaker 1: have because the federal government backstop them and said we'll
Speaker 1: pay for the vaccine. Make your best stuff and we
Speaker 1: will pay for you to make it. Now, we'll cover
Speaker 1: We'll cover you. What about that? Oh no, he's done nothing, though,
Speaker 1: what does Whoopie Goldberg, renowned critical thinker and epidemiologist, what
Speaker 1: does she think the president's supposed to do? There are
Speaker 1: state by state lockdowns going and everywhere, and they're not
Speaker 1: going to do a damn thing. So what is Trump
Speaker 1: supposed to do? Exactly? Thanks for listening to the bus
Speaker 1: sets and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. The
Speaker 1: answer was, I would follow the science. I am not
Speaker 1: going to shut down the economy period. I'm going to
Speaker 1: shut down the virus. That's what I'm going to shut
Speaker 1: down again, No national shutdown, No national shutdown because every region,
Speaker 1: every area, community is can be different, and so there's
Speaker 1: no circumstance which I can see would require a total
Speaker 1: national shutdown. I think that would be counterproductive. Well, that's
Speaker 1: good to hear, but he still wants a national mask mandate,
Speaker 1: which is also nonsense. Why is that going to be
Speaker 1: better than what we have now? Where is the national
Speaker 1: mask mandate going to? What's that going to affect what
Speaker 1: state that doesn't have a mask mandate is going to
Speaker 1: be so much better off with the national a federal
Speaker 1: mask mandate. Never mind the constitutional issues that obviously come
Speaker 1: to mind here, under what authority would the federal government
Speaker 1: say you have to wear a mask all the time.
Speaker 1: If the federal government could say you have to wear
Speaker 1: a mask all the time, the federal government can also
Speaker 1: tell you that you can only wear, you know, blue
Speaker 1: shirts on Tuesdays because they say so. There's no authority
Speaker 1: for this, there's no basis for this. People say, oh,
Speaker 1: but quarantine powers. Quarantine is for the sick, this is
Speaker 1: for everybody. We have transformed our understanding of public health
Speaker 1: policy this year in terrible ways. Now, completely completely healthy
Speaker 1: people who are ninety nine percent of the people in
Speaker 1: the country right now, even with COVID surging, have to
Speaker 1: do all these things because the government says so, because
Speaker 1: they're now saying that the risk is too great. But
Speaker 1: he's not going to shut down the economy. He's going
Speaker 1: to shut down the virus. This is this is a
Speaker 1: promise that only a moron could make. How is he
Speaker 1: going to shut down the virus? He has nothing to
Speaker 1: say about this. They don't have some secret plan. This
Speaker 1: is the part of this. There's all this hysteria you
Speaker 1: heard of from Whoopi Goldberg before Trump doesn't care able
Speaker 1: people dying, Olberman wants in prison for crimes against humanity
Speaker 1: or whatever. You've all this hysteria, right, the panic that
Speaker 1: I keep talking about, and then you get these very
Speaker 1: flimsy talking points from the left about what they think
Speaker 1: should be done here they have no answer. What more
Speaker 1: harassment of people for having too many at at a
Speaker 1: Thanksgiving gathering, more harassment of people because they are involved
Speaker 1: in doing the normal things that human beings do around
Speaker 1: the holidays. They think that's gonna shut down the virus.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna I'm gonna shut down the economy. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: I'm gonna shut down the virus. Really, how we never
Speaker 1: we never get to how we just got more of
Speaker 1: the same. And they're actually the things they say that
Speaker 1: are intelligent or that makes sense, the things that Democrats say.
Speaker 1: You go, okay, well that's not crazy, because there are
Speaker 1: things like Biden saying I'm not gonna shut down the
Speaker 1: whole country. Okay, well that's that's at least some concession
Speaker 1: to not being completely bonkers. But here here's the Vice
Speaker 1: president and Penn's talking about the same thing. Play eleven.
Speaker 1: That being said, President Trump wanted me to make it
Speaker 1: clear that our task force, this administration, and our president
Speaker 1: does not support another national lockdown, and we do not
Speaker 1: support closing schools. You'll hear from doctor Robert Redfield at
Speaker 1: the CDC that actually, the CDC never recommended that we
Speaker 1: close schools at any point this year. Now, a couple
Speaker 1: of things here. One notice notice that Redfield, I mean sorry,
Speaker 1: I noticed that penns here is telling you that they
Speaker 1: don't want a national shutdown, that that's not a good idea.
Speaker 1: And that's exactly what Biden says. So what is the
Speaker 1: thing that, what is the thing that Trump is supposed
Speaker 1: to do that he's not doing that the Trump administration
Speaker 1: is derelict on We never hear it. They never come
Speaker 1: up with what it is. Okay, beyond that, talks about schools.
Speaker 1: Here in New York City, where I'm doing this show,
Speaker 1: schools are shut down. Public schools now, private schools and
Speaker 1: parochial schools have stayed open and they're fine, but public
Speaker 1: schools are shut down. We are lectured all the time
Speaker 1: by people who are who are really the primary purveyors
Speaker 1: of the most extreme lockdowns and masks and all the
Speaker 1: rest of it. Right, we're lectured by them about how
Speaker 1: they have to listen to the science, but they have always,
Speaker 1: in every phase of this, been picking and choosing what
Speaker 1: science they listen to. And I don't even mean on
Speaker 1: areas where there's disagreement. I mean they just ignore things.
Speaker 1: They just ignore. There is no basis, there's no basis
Speaker 1: in science, in data to believe that mask wearing outdoors,
Speaker 1: for example, is necessary does not exist. If it did,
Speaker 1: trust me, you would know about it. Doesn't exist, no
Speaker 1: basis for it. There's no basis to believe that any
Speaker 1: substantial transmission of this happens outside. So if we're talking
Speaker 1: about acceptable risk, almost no risk would inherently be acceptable risk.
Speaker 1: Right when you have almost no risk of getting it outside,
Speaker 1: then that's acceptable. Stop wearing a mask outside in New
Speaker 1: York City right now? If I went out on the street,
Speaker 1: ninety percent of people outdoors by themselves masks on. Why
Speaker 1: because And the people will say, oh, it's because it's
Speaker 1: more convenient, Well, then then why when they walk around
Speaker 1: with the mask on but pulled down, and then when
Speaker 1: they go inside they just pull it on. It's obviously
Speaker 1: more comfortable. Okay. No one likes breathing through these idiotic
Speaker 1: face diapers. No one enjoys it, at least not that
Speaker 1: I know of. But with schools, the CDC never said
Speaker 1: shut down schools. Now, I argue with the CDC about
Speaker 1: other stuff. I understand that. But the way the left
Speaker 1: plays the game, anything that the CDC says that they
Speaker 1: like cannot be argued it's science. And then when the
Speaker 1: CDC says things that the teachers unions, which is all
Speaker 1: this is about, that the teachers unions don't like, it
Speaker 1: gets ignored. It's like it didn't happen. Wow, that seems
Speaker 1: seems quite a bit contradictory, doesn't it. It It seems like
Speaker 1: that's not the way you would approach something if it
Speaker 1: was really all about the science. Here's the CDC director. Now, granted,
Speaker 1: he's a guy who said that face masks are even
Speaker 1: better for protecting you than a vaccine, which was an
Speaker 1: irresponsible and indefensively stupid thing to say. It is we
Speaker 1: all know it is, okay, but he is the CDC director,
Speaker 1: and we have a lot of data on schools globally
Speaker 1: as well as here in the United States, and here's
Speaker 1: what he's telling you about whether schools should be open.
Speaker 1: Play ten using the data to make decisions in their communities,
Speaker 1: particularly as relates to K through twelves and institutes of
Speaker 1: higher learning. These clearly the data support that it's really
Speaker 1: important from public health perspective, both from the pandemic as
Speaker 1: well as what well you'll hear about in a minute,
Speaker 1: that these schools stay open. They should all be open.
Speaker 1: There is no good reason for them to be closed.
Speaker 1: There's no excuse for them to be closed. This is honestly,
Speaker 1: it is outrageous. This should not be happening, but it
Speaker 1: is happening, and it's happening because there are powerful interests
Speaker 1: known as teachers unions that are essential for the Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: who have decided that they like being able to hold
Speaker 1: cities like New York as well as other places hostage
Speaker 1: by pretending they're also terrified of COVID that they can't
Speaker 1: actually go in and teach kids. So your grocery store clerk,
Speaker 1: your local pharmacy worker shows up, does their job and
Speaker 1: God bless them for doing it. But your teacher in
Speaker 1: the public school system too scary to be around the kids.
Speaker 1: When kids, as we know we have the data, they're
Speaker 1: at effectively no risk. But they're also very unlikely to
Speaker 1: spread it to adults, probably because their immune system handles
Speaker 1: it very well, so they don't become major major vectors
Speaker 1: of viral spread. Right, even if they do get an infection,
Speaker 1: their body handles it very well. The young immune system
Speaker 1: does very well against COVID, thank god, right, could you
Speaker 1: imagine I didn't even want to tell you what it
Speaker 1: was like the Spanish flu pandemic of nineteen eighteen, in
Speaker 1: the second wave. It was remarkably deadly, I mean horrifically
Speaker 1: deadly in a very fast period of time for people
Speaker 1: from twenty to forty so, you know, and at that
Speaker 1: time people had a shorter lifespan, so that was really
Speaker 1: those are your primary caregivers for children. Those are the
Speaker 1: people that are prime working age, and you'd think they'd
Speaker 1: be and they were. They were dropping all over the place.
Speaker 1: And it was very rapid too. It was not what
Speaker 1: you see here with COVID, where it's weeks of progression
Speaker 1: and you fight it and you got a shot. People
Speaker 1: were dying in days after getting it. So we're in
Speaker 1: a far better position with this than we were with that.
Speaker 1: I mean, really, they're not comparable diseases in terms of lethality,
Speaker 1: and they're just they're not and not a part of
Speaker 1: that is because we have better treatment than everything else.
Speaker 1: But if you read about the Spanish flu of nineteen eighteen,
Speaker 1: especially in the second wave that hit, it's terrified, It's
Speaker 1: truly terrifying. So here we are with all the information
Speaker 1: we need to know that schools are fine, schools should
Speaker 1: be open. Why isn't the media demanding schools open because
Speaker 1: the media is run by democrats and democrats all though
Speaker 1: they need teachers unions, and your mainstream media outlets will
Speaker 1: not cross teachers unions because that's their team. That's why
Speaker 1: there's no other reason. There's no other good explanation for
Speaker 1: why schools are shut down with the tremendous damages is
Speaker 1: doing to kids their development. They're learning to the parents
Speaker 1: who have to care for them, and the Newsoms and
Speaker 1: the Cuomos and the Pelosi's, they don't give a crap.
Speaker 1: They don't care. In fact, they'd rather just be the
Speaker 1: great science believing fighters of COVID with their public policy.
Speaker 1: They'd rather play that game in their heads than deal
Speaker 1: with the reality of the fact that the panic they've
Speaker 1: created around this has resulted in these nonsensical and destructive
Speaker 1: school lockdowns. That's really where we are. You're in the
Speaker 1: freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Well,
Speaker 1: I understand why it's confusing. They're like, Okay, said mass work,
Speaker 1: and I'm doing I'm here and these spaces are safe,
Speaker 1: and you're closing my space and leaving open the spaces
Speaker 1: where people are on mass and I think that's very
Speaker 1: I worry about that because then it gives people the
Speaker 1: option to say, well, bars and restaurants are open, then
Speaker 1: I can have twenty people over for Thanksgiving. And so
Speaker 1: I don't like it to be any number. I like
Speaker 1: it to be keep it to your immediate household, because
Speaker 1: you know, if you say it can be ten and
Speaker 1: it's eight people from four different families, then that probably
Speaker 1: is not the same degree of safe as ten people
Speaker 1: from your immediate household. Understand that ten people from your
Speaker 1: immediate household, there's no degree of safe because one person
Speaker 1: who went to the grocery store, or who went to
Speaker 1: a restaurant, or who whatever, comes home, and the most
Speaker 1: likely place you get this is we all know is
Speaker 1: within the same household, so the different household thing, it
Speaker 1: does really work the way she's proposing it. It's all
Speaker 1: about the odds, friends, this is all about understanding what
Speaker 1: the risks are as a percentage. No one has perfect
Speaker 1: answers about any of this, But that's doctor Burke's who
Speaker 1: you're hearing a lot less from these days, and she's
Speaker 1: out there telling everybody will now be your immediate household.
Speaker 1: This is a really, I guess you could say a
Speaker 1: teachable moment. This is a classic moment because what you're
Speaker 1: seeing is that government overreach will always result if we
Speaker 1: allow it, and unless we say enough, that's overreach. Government
Speaker 1: overreach will result in more overreach. There's a there's a
Speaker 1: snowball effect, right. What they do. They say, we're going
Speaker 1: to make this unsupported, unconstant, scientifically unsupported, unconstitutional demand of you,
Speaker 1: and then what happens is people will say, hold on
Speaker 1: a second, that doesn't even work because it's not supported
Speaker 1: by the science. That's very urbitrary. You're making arbitrary dictates
Speaker 1: and saying that we have to obey them. So then
Speaker 1: what they'll do is instead of instead of coming back
Speaker 1: to you. This is just the nature of government. This
Speaker 1: is how it functions. They're not going to say, you
Speaker 1: know what, you're right, we shouldn't be making that arbitrary
Speaker 1: decision for you. They'll say, huh, let's change, let's do
Speaker 1: another You're okay, fine, it's not good enough. Let's tighten
Speaker 1: the screws a little more. Let's have another arbitrary decision
Speaker 1: imposed on you by the government. So it was, you know,
Speaker 1: we want you to stay at home with a certain
Speaker 1: number of people. You're right, that doesn't really make sense.
Speaker 1: So let's now say it's only people that live with
Speaker 1: you you should have Thanksgiving with. Now that's just her opinion,
Speaker 1: I understand. But this is the way those opinions, as
Speaker 1: we know from individuals like doctor Burke's, become laws, they
Speaker 1: become regulations, and this is how you get to the
Speaker 1: absurdity of the mask up between bites in California. Right, Well,
Speaker 1: we want people, we know the restaurant industry is getting
Speaker 1: really bad hurt, and we say, masks work, So we'll
Speaker 1: let you be in a restaurant. You'll work in a
Speaker 1: restaurant as long as they're wearing a mask. Ball you work.
Speaker 1: But to sit and eat, you gotta pull a mask. Down.
Speaker 1: So you're right, that doesn't really make sense. So let's
Speaker 1: tell people to start masking up in between bites. Right,
Speaker 1: that's what I mean. It always results in more government
Speaker 1: overreach because it's not in the nature of a system
Speaker 1: like this, it's not in the nature of either bureaucracy
Speaker 1: or just the functionings of a government entity to think
Speaker 1: we shouldn't have been doing the thing we did. Didn't work,
Speaker 1: we shouldn't have been doing it in the first place.
Speaker 1: So we're just going to step back from that. That
Speaker 1: can only happen if the people push Otherwise, the government
Speaker 1: action is always more government, more government action. That's their response.
Speaker 1: And that's all over the place with the COVID lockdowns
Speaker 1: and everything else. Right, you see this, Okay, lockdowns didn't work.
Speaker 1: You know what we need. Lockdowns didn't work. We need
Speaker 1: more severe lockdowns. Find me an area and I'll show
Speaker 1: you how this applies. Right, find me a place where
Speaker 1: they've done things that we're not supported by the science
Speaker 1: that we're just dictated by government officials and you know
Speaker 1: in the past, and I will present you with Oh,
Speaker 1: and now here's their new version of this, with even
Speaker 1: more arbitrary rules, with even more tinkering around the edges,
Speaker 1: and as I keep saying, this only stops when we
Speaker 1: finally say we're just not going to do this anymore.
Speaker 1: We're not going to accept these kinds of rules. Or
Speaker 1: you can listen to people like this, this nurse who's
Speaker 1: telling you do everything that I say, or else you're
Speaker 1: going to have a tube down your throat. Play seven. Yes,
Speaker 1: we're frontline here in the hospital, but the real front
Speaker 1: line is on the streets, in the grocery stores. Wash
Speaker 1: your hands, wear your masks, stay away. I promise that
Speaker 1: the little bit of time and a little bit of
Speaker 1: effort it takes outside of here is worth it, because
Speaker 1: once you're here, wearing a mask is better than having
Speaker 1: a tube down You're true comments. I understand she's a
Speaker 1: nurse and she's clearly distraught, and I feel badly that
Speaker 1: she's so terrified of this, and she's seeing patients who
Speaker 1: were dealing with it, and she's seeing patients who were dying.
Speaker 1: I'm also here to just say, as a human being
Speaker 1: with a brain who has seen what has gone on
Speaker 1: for nine months now, you can wash your hands, you
Speaker 1: can wear your mask. You can do that all day
Speaker 1: long and still get sick. So the constant hectoring of
Speaker 1: you know, do this, do this and you'll be fine,
Speaker 1: Do this and you'll be fine. It doesn't work that way.
Speaker 1: It doesn't. They can keep saying it's just not true.
Speaker 1: They can keep making the claim doesn't change the facts.
Speaker 1: So remember that as we go forward here, they will
Speaker 1: not admit where they were wrong, and where we allow
Speaker 1: them to continue to be wrong, they will only get
Speaker 1: more wrong. Thanks for listening to the Bust and Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. You haven't really seen it yet,
Speaker 1: but you will, especially if there is a Biden administration.
Speaker 1: You'll see the way that COVID nineteen and the government
Speaker 1: powers that have been taken here are used for things
Speaker 1: that have nothing to do with COVID. It's going to happen.
Speaker 1: We have now conceded that just because they say so. Governors,
Speaker 1: for example, can tell you where you can travel, who
Speaker 1: you can see, what you can do, what business you
Speaker 1: can open. That you have to constrict your breathing. You
Speaker 1: have to interfere with the most natural, necessary thing you
Speaker 1: do every day. Breathing is first the first thing you
Speaker 1: do all every day. When you wake up, you are breathing.
Speaker 1: If you are not, you are dead. They will interfere
Speaker 1: with the most basic biological process you have with a
Speaker 1: pen and a phone, with a declaration from on high.
Speaker 1: You don't think that that has an effect on where
Speaker 1: society is going and how much control they think they
Speaker 1: can exert over the rest of us all my friends.
Speaker 1: That absolutely does. And Joe Biden is already starting to
Speaker 1: say things that lets you understand just where this is
Speaker 1: going to be used, how this will be deployed play
Speaker 1: clip twelve. But the purpose here is to get We
Speaker 1: talked a lot about what the governor's about, what the
Speaker 1: immediate needs are. I'm gonna we're gonna impose the We're
Speaker 1: gonna enforce the excuse me, employ the Defense Reconstructive Act
Speaker 1: to be able to go out there and dictate companies
Speaker 1: build and do following things. We need much more testing,
Speaker 1: we need much more masking. We mean that's more. We
Speaker 1: need clubs. We're USUAB Yeah, I mean, I know it's
Speaker 1: Biden just kind of using a whole jumble here. You
Speaker 1: think that they're going to stop it just stuff that
Speaker 1: us He's gonna use the Defense Production Act. He says,
Speaker 1: you think that stops at COVID. These these people, the Democrats,
Speaker 1: playing the climate change for examples, an existential threat to humanity. Now,
Speaker 1: a normal, reasonable person doesn't think, oh, they can leverage
Speaker 1: the Defense Production Act to create you know, windmills or
Speaker 1: green jobs or whatever it is that they're talking about.
Speaker 1: But Democrats are not normal in that regard. They believe
Speaker 1: that it's an existential threat and therefore it does fall
Speaker 1: under national security, national security auspices, and they can use
Speaker 1: something like the Defense Production Act to pursue the crazy
Speaker 1: green New Deal policies and this stuff with COVID. You know,
Speaker 1: we need more masks, we need more testing. They've been
Speaker 1: saying that all along. That has not changed anything. Right,
Speaker 1: we were told we didn't have enough, you know, we
Speaker 1: were told we didn't have enough ventilators, and then we
Speaker 1: found out we didn't even need the ventilators. We were
Speaker 1: told that we were running out of ppe. And now
Speaker 1: everywhere I go they're they're actually giving out masks. A
Speaker 1: lot of stores and places I go, they're actually giving
Speaker 1: you free masks. Here you go, take a mask. You know,
Speaker 1: I remember, we needs to give out breath mints. At
Speaker 1: places now they're giving you masks to prevent the spread
Speaker 1: of an aerosolized disease. But that's where we are. This
Speaker 1: is where the situation the country is in right now.
Speaker 1: But they're going to use this stuff for a whole lot,
Speaker 1: and you need to be aware of that right now,
Speaker 1: because this is unprecedented in my lifetime. I don't know
Speaker 1: if the country's ever been through something quite like this before,
Speaker 1: where they've been able to anesthetize us enough with fear,
Speaker 1: but also with delicious food, entertainment options, the Internet, all
Speaker 1: this stuff. If we lived in a pre internet era
Speaker 1: and people were just told to stay in their homes
Speaker 1: and they couldn't communicate and escape into all these different
Speaker 1: entertainment venues and everything from their homes, I think this
Speaker 1: would all be if we couldn't do your job from home.
Speaker 1: Think about that. Imagine if we didn't have all these
Speaker 1: technologies that allow for virtual meeting and everything else, the
Speaker 1: lockdown wouldn't have lasted a month. But in his sense,
Speaker 1: technology has also While it has enabled us to be
Speaker 1: far more comfortable and more capable during these lockdowns, it
Speaker 1: also has been a necessary condition for them. You really
Speaker 1: think if you were stuck in a home where all
Speaker 1: there was, let's say, was a black and white TV
Speaker 1: with four channels or three channels or whatever it was,
Speaker 1: and you barely could get in touch with anybody via phone,
Speaker 1: and you couldn't go anywhere, you couldn't see anyone, and
Speaker 1: you couldn't go to your job, and you couldn't do
Speaker 1: your work from home. How long do you think that
Speaker 1: would last in society. So, because of the technological changes,
Speaker 1: people are much more accepting of this than they would
Speaker 1: otherwise be. My concern though, is that everyone now just
Speaker 1: kind of has this fatalism about well, if the government
Speaker 1: says they've got a really good reason, if the government
Speaker 1: says that they have a real need to shut down
Speaker 1: the Bill of Rights, who am I? Who am I
Speaker 1: to tell them? Now? Who am I to stand in
Speaker 1: their way? And as you know the answers, you're everybody,
Speaker 1: You're you're in an absolute position to stand in the
Speaker 1: government's way over these things. If not you, there won't
Speaker 1: be anyone. If we the people don't speak out against this,
Speaker 1: if we don't decide that what they've been doing is
Speaker 1: crossing boundaries that they have no right to cross, they're
Speaker 1: just gonna keep going they're not going to stop. And
Speaker 1: I think this was unfortunately something that took too long
Speaker 1: for a lot of a lot of conservatives to come
Speaker 1: to this conclusion. I didn't see it at first. I thought,
Speaker 1: and this was a mirror imaging fallacy. I thought the
Speaker 1: Democrats would do. If I were Biden, what I would
Speaker 1: do coming to office is try to get everybody back
Speaker 1: to normal life and prosperity, and get that vaccine out
Speaker 1: as fast as possible, and then just and be the
Speaker 1: guy who's almost the great liberator from COVID. That's not
Speaker 1: going to be the Democrat approach. They're going to use
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one the way that Obama used two thousand
Speaker 1: and nine after the financial crisis, which was what can
Speaker 1: I do now? How can I exploit the crisis and
Speaker 1: a terrified and beaten down population to achieve the policy
Speaker 1: design ends that I want. That's what the Biden team
Speaker 1: is coming in and that's what they want to do,
Speaker 1: which is why I know the left is complaining right
Speaker 1: now about how they think that Biden's not doing. You know,
Speaker 1: Biden won't do enough that they want, and just wait,
Speaker 1: just wait, They'll find their way into the upper reaches
Speaker 1: of this administration, assuming there's a Biden administration, and they'll
Speaker 1: be making all kinds of decisions that you're not really
Speaker 1: allowed to fight against because if you are, if you
Speaker 1: do so, you are making it impossible for us to
Speaker 1: protect people from COVID. You are standing in the way
Speaker 1: of science. All of these, all of these slogans will
Speaker 1: be deployed for things that have nothing to do with COVID.
Speaker 1: Get ready for that. This is the mobilized It's the
Speaker 1: Olynskiite mobilization of a population around one issue that can
Speaker 1: then be used to deal with any issue. Doctor Fauci's
Speaker 1: out there these days. He's still you know, he's maybe
Speaker 1: he's gonna be a with a Biden administration that they
Speaker 1: come in. He's gonna be talking about the stuff. How
Speaker 1: can I help Joe Biden? You know, I like him
Speaker 1: more than Trump because you know, he's a Democrat like
Speaker 1: I am a big lib. You know, we'd all know
Speaker 1: Fauci's a big Lib. And he says this about where
Speaker 1: we are with the vaccine. I wanted to share some
Speaker 1: thoughts about it, play nine and I hear a lot
Speaker 1: now when we made these announcements this past Monday, and
Speaker 1: then two mondays ago about some reticence of people, well
Speaker 1: did you rush this? Was this too fast? Is it
Speaker 1: really safe? And is it really efficacious? The process of
Speaker 1: the speed did not compromise at all safety, nor did
Speaker 1: it compromise scientific integrity. It was a reflection of the
Speaker 1: extraordinary scientific advances in these types of vaccines, which allowed
Speaker 1: us to do things in months that actually took years before.
Speaker 1: So I really want to settle that concern that people
Speaker 1: have about that. Where was that very straightforward Foucci on
Speaker 1: the vaccines a couple of months ago? Did he ever
Speaker 1: call out Kamala Harris and Joe Biden for straight up
Speaker 1: undermining sense that the vaccine was going to be safe,
Speaker 1: which is what they were doing. Can't trust a vaccine?
Speaker 1: They were even asking you, would you trust a vaccine
Speaker 1: or the Trump? I don't trust the scientist, Spid says,
Speaker 1: but I can't trust the Trump. Well, Trump's not in
Speaker 1: a lab with a beaker and a Bunsen burner saying
Speaker 1: I'm developing the very busincks. He No, that's not what
Speaker 1: was happening. We all know it. So what exactly was
Speaker 1: the was the reason that Faucci was was m Ia
Speaker 1: on this. Wouldn't it have been helpful to have this
Speaker 1: this this guy who's become the chief voice of the
Speaker 1: really the lockdowners and the panic mongers. But wouldn't wouldn't
Speaker 1: it be good to have that guy come out and say, hey, everybody,
Speaker 1: take this vaccine. In fact, Rand Paul is also a doctor.
Speaker 1: People forget that MD Rand Paul is saying that he
Speaker 1: thinks people should be able to get the vaccine like tomorrow.
Speaker 1: I mean, the FDA they say is about is about
Speaker 1: to clear one of them. But you know, we're here
Speaker 1: hearing all about this delay and all this other stuff.
Speaker 1: If you want to take a vaccine that is currently
Speaker 1: there should be something that you can just sort of
Speaker 1: sign that says, look, I'm not worried about this anymore.
Speaker 1: I wanted to take it. I want to do it.
Speaker 1: So much of the slowdown in this process comes from liability,
Speaker 1: from the basically the ever present blood sucking from society
Speaker 1: that the trial lawyers unfortunately are responsible for. That's that
Speaker 1: never really gets talked about enough because the trial lawyers
Speaker 1: are very powerful, big lobbyists, very very important demographic for
Speaker 1: a very important special interest for the Democrat Party. But
Speaker 1: it's this is another reason why businesses have to do
Speaker 1: all these stupid mandates because if they don't do stuff
Speaker 1: that's suggested by the state or that's demanded by this state,
Speaker 1: also one has to do is get COVID or then
Speaker 1: they come and they sue. They say, well, you don't
Speaker 1: require masks, so I'm suing you, right, same problem we
Speaker 1: have the vaccines. We have to be super duper duper
Speaker 1: sure that they're safe for basically everybody or else they
Speaker 1: are going to be lawsuits around this. And I'm gonna
Speaker 1: tell you this right now. If if I were over
Speaker 1: sixty and I had the opportunity to take this vaccine
Speaker 1: and you know, jab it into my arm or my
Speaker 1: butt or wherever, you know, wherever you need to do it.
Speaker 1: I think it's the arm probably, I don't know. I
Speaker 1: don't really feel like they do shots in the butt anymore.
Speaker 1: But wherever you got to jab it, you know, um,
Speaker 1: then then I would do it, absolutely, without without question.
Speaker 1: I would take it. I know some of you who
Speaker 1: have your concerns everything else, you should have that freedom
Speaker 1: to make your choice. But I would take it. If
Speaker 1: I were in a high risk category, I would not
Speaker 1: not even blink and I would take it. So I
Speaker 1: think people should be able to take it even more
Speaker 1: easily and even more quickly. I'm sitting here wondering, we
Speaker 1: keep hearing it's going to take all this time to
Speaker 1: distribute this. If we get this vaccine out to you know,
Speaker 1: a large percentage of people who are basically retirement age, right,
Speaker 1: so let's say sixty five and old older. If we
Speaker 1: get this out within a month, we've got twenty or
Speaker 1: thirty million seniors who have been been inoculated. The death
Speaker 1: rate from COVID the following month is going to drop
Speaker 1: like a stone in water. And that's really what we're
Speaker 1: concerned about. I know there's this stuff about oh long COVID,
Speaker 1: and people will get all terrified about these news stories
Speaker 1: they read. It's really whether people make it through this
Speaker 1: virus without, you know, without losing their lives. That's our
Speaker 1: primary concern. And if you inoculate senior citizens, you're in
Speaker 1: a great position to watch the death the death rate
Speaker 1: just completely, almost almost evaporate. Very few people in their
Speaker 1: thirties and forties and fifties die for very very few.
Speaker 1: So even if we just get it to the most
Speaker 1: vunerab we get it to senior there'll be tremendous benefit
Speaker 1: that comes from that. And I'm sitting here just saying,
Speaker 1: I mean, look, I talked to a guy from Warp Speed,
Speaker 1: a doctor interviewed him a couple of weeks ago about
Speaker 1: what's going on. I don't understand we're waiting. What are
Speaker 1: we still waiting for? Why are we still waiting? Why
Speaker 1: isn't this vaccine, you know, this weekend in drug stores
Speaker 1: across the country, or at least in distribution centers the
Speaker 1: federal government set up. Let's go. There's no benefit to
Speaker 1: waiting this point. It does feel a little bit. I
Speaker 1: know we're supposed to be so thankful that we've gotten
Speaker 1: to this point, but I'm telling you it's legal stuff.
Speaker 1: That's it's fear of lawsuits. They gotta do this, they
Speaker 1: gotta do that, they gotta do all these little final
Speaker 1: things when really people are dying. We should be getting
Speaker 1: this vaccine to them as soon as possible. Day's count.
Speaker 1: Why isn't it being distributed right away? That that's my
Speaker 1: feeling on this, So I would take it to due
Speaker 1: even more radical places. I agree with Rand Paul. You
Speaker 1: should be able to sign a waiver. That's like, just
Speaker 1: give me the vaccine to more. I don't wait for
Speaker 1: anymore this approved crap. It obviously works. Give me the vaccine.
Speaker 1: That's what I would do. You're in the Freedom This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. No, I'm not concerned.
Speaker 1: The vast majority of the American people. They've already all
Speaker 1: the point that has indicated all all the Republicans who
Speaker 1: worry about it as higher. But over seventy eight percent
Speaker 1: of American people believe it's without question, is legitimate. And
Speaker 1: I just think it's and I think most of the
Speaker 1: Republicans I've spoken to, including some of the governors, I
Speaker 1: think this is debilitating. It's not a It sends a
Speaker 1: horrible message about who we are as a country. You know,
Speaker 1: I really don't need to have any lectures from Democrats
Speaker 1: who've been telling us that Trump was a traitor for
Speaker 1: the Russians. Total fantasy, total bull I really don't need
Speaker 1: to have them tell us about how how it looks
Speaker 1: bad for us as a country. Just, you know, enough
Speaker 1: enough with that nonsense. It's so pathetic, it's so transparent,
Speaker 1: and it's just another pressure mechanism to get people to
Speaker 1: drop the quest, to get the investigation to get real
Speaker 1: answers about different aspects of voter irregularity and voter fraud.
Speaker 1: Let's see, let's see, they just did their own version
Speaker 1: of not accepting the results and doing a special counsel.
Speaker 1: They wanted to throw people. They did throw people in prison.
Speaker 1: The Democrats had people thrown in prison because they didn't
Speaker 1: like the twenty sixteen election. That's what happened. And they
Speaker 1: dragged the country through this nonsense nightmare of Russia collusion
Speaker 1: everything else. And now they want a lecturists about Oh,
Speaker 1: this's just not a good look. Oh this is not really,
Speaker 1: this is not the America I know and love. Shut up,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. Oh really, this guy's gonna be president. I
Speaker 1: don't care that he's president. The guy's just he's such
Speaker 1: a loser. It's so sad. This is the best the
Speaker 1: Democrats get. They put this guy. He's just a been
Speaker 1: there forever, interchangeable with one hundred other politicians. Loser, speaking
Speaker 1: of which we always can count on our side to
Speaker 1: help their side. In some cases, there's always gonna be
Speaker 1: some people always have Some Republicans who decide that they're
Speaker 1: going to take a swipe at the Republican Party because
Speaker 1: they really want that pad on the head from the
Speaker 1: New York Times. You know, they want the Democrats to
Speaker 1: just to like them. They can't help, but they want Democrats.
Speaker 1: They just they want to be one of the Yeah,
Speaker 1: they don't agree with them and everything, but they want
Speaker 1: to be one of the good ones. And you know
Speaker 1: who's really a perfect example. It's maybe the quintessential example
Speaker 1: of this right now, good old Willard Mitt Romney played nineteen.
Speaker 1: I'm surprised that that there as many people as you said,
Speaker 1: to give it credibility, even with their own country, because
Speaker 1: the president said before the election, if you were to lose,
Speaker 1: it would be because of voter front, would be because
Speaker 1: of crypt And then a day or two after the election,
Speaker 1: whether vote was called other major networks, he indicated there
Speaker 1: was massive fraud and that he had been robbed of
Speaker 1: the victory. And that was before there was any evidence
Speaker 1: that had been gathered. So it's one thing to charge
Speaker 1: a crime before you actually see any evidence. Normally you
Speaker 1: find evidence, and then after seeing evidence, then you reach
Speaker 1: a conclusion about whether or not there was a crime committed.
Speaker 1: But I understand the president it's not happy with the result.
Speaker 1: He's entitled to pursue his legal remedies, but I think
Speaker 1: in all likelihood it's pretty clear that that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: will become the next president. Notice he never had these
Speaker 1: kind of words for Democrats over Russia collusion. Mitt Romney
Speaker 1: was was real quiet about that, but he's happy to
Speaker 1: happy to take shots at our side. Maybe Trump thought
Speaker 1: there was fraud in the election because Democrats made sure
Speaker 1: that it was really easy before the election for them
Speaker 1: to be fraud Mit you ever think of that? Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the Bust. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Let's
Speaker 1: get one of my friends in the mix here, Dave Reeboy.
Speaker 1: He is a national security and political analyst man who
Speaker 1: knows a lot about a lot of things. Dave, good
Speaker 1: to have you on the show. Great to be here. Thanks.
Speaker 1: So how are you feeling about where we are right
Speaker 1: now in this whole lawsuit recount process. I mean, I
Speaker 1: know there's this unbelievable push to get people to abandon
Speaker 1: that they're really just trying to peel off Trump supporters,
Speaker 1: and I just keep trying to say to everybody, let's
Speaker 1: let's stay in this until we have judges ruling and
Speaker 1: we see some evidence and we know what's really going on.
Speaker 1: That seems very straightforward to me. But clearly there's an
Speaker 1: enormous effort to shut that down. Yeah. Look, I mean
Speaker 1: I don't I don't particularly see a problem with if, um,
Speaker 1: with with taking this to uh to to the courts,
Speaker 1: as you know, as is the president's uh, you know,
Speaker 1: in the campaign's legal right to to do, UM I have.
Speaker 1: I mean, I look, if this is the first election, UM,
Speaker 1: if this is the first election in America with no fraud,
Speaker 1: as as many in the media and on the left
Speaker 1: UM are trying to tell us, I would be very
Speaker 1: very surprised. UM. I think that, you know, to establish
Speaker 1: the pattern of fraud, frankly, you have to go back
Speaker 1: either years or months, um, to see what the Democrats
Speaker 1: had been doing from kind of going from state to state,
Speaker 1: filing lawsuit and and and getting rules changed to make
Speaker 1: it easier to do so. I mean, I don't think
Speaker 1: I think you have to be an unreasonable person today
Speaker 1: to uh to say with a straight face that, um,
Speaker 1: you know that we wouldn't have any kind of election security.
Speaker 1: We shouldn't, um, you know, we shouldn't demand a voter
Speaker 1: id when you vote. I mean, that's the dumbest thing
Speaker 1: I've ever heard. You know, you need them right well,
Speaker 1: but but doesn't it Also it raises suspicion that you know,
Speaker 1: it's funny to me because Democrats never really do the
Speaker 1: well Republicans commit voter fraud. They don't do the counter accusation,
Speaker 1: which just from a you know, that would be an
Speaker 1: obvious move, but they don't do it because I think
Speaker 1: they know, Man, no one really believes that that voter
Speaker 1: fraud is a Democrat thing. I mean, the culture of
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party and the and the absolutism that's at
Speaker 1: the heart of so much progressivism means that they feel
Speaker 1: justified in playing these kinds of playing these kinds of
Speaker 1: games and cheating when you know, if you if you
Speaker 1: look at the elections where there has been cheating, it's
Speaker 1: usually in favor of a Democrat. So and that's established. Look, look,
Speaker 1: Republicans like guns, they like voter fraud. So it's you know,
Speaker 1: it's it's a it's it's kind of like that. But
Speaker 1: but really, um, you know, you go back and you
Speaker 1: you establish that Democrats have been working to loosen these
Speaker 1: laws and too really too to make it possible to
Speaker 1: commit voter fraud. Like everything that they've done over you know, frankly,
Speaker 1: over the last let's let's say, over the last several
Speaker 1: years having to do with the twenty twenty election has
Speaker 1: been has been oriented towards making sure that there are
Speaker 1: that there is as little election security as possible. Well,
Speaker 1: that's what I was going to say to you, I mean,
Speaker 1: and anyone who's paying attention whenever there's something. And by
Speaker 1: the way, voter voter ID. The Supreme Court has already
Speaker 1: ruled that voter ID is a valid state concern. It's
Speaker 1: not racist. And know all these things, you hear, the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court already ruled them out a case in Indiana
Speaker 1: that the Supreme Court took up. Um, But they still
Speaker 1: will say these things and at every opportunity, even when
Speaker 1: there should be a universal agreement that a voter protection
Speaker 1: is for the good of the whole system. In the process,
Speaker 1: Democrats always oppose signature match, oppose clearing out voter roles,
Speaker 1: oppose I d A. I mean, you go down the list, right,
Speaker 1: So so that's so, that's the so that's the story.
Speaker 1: I mean, I was actually, um, I was heartened by
Speaker 1: Rudy Rudy Giuliani's presentation the other day when he kind
Speaker 1: of walked through this, but what he missed is he
Speaker 1: missed us that at every point, you know, at every
Speaker 1: kind of point of alleged voter fraud, that that um,
Speaker 1: you know, the ability to do that was was created,
Speaker 1: was created by by Democrats in terms of rule changes
Speaker 1: or law changes or or things like that, you know,
Speaker 1: especially in places like Pennsylvania. Um. So, so that's that's
Speaker 1: very much part of the story that I think it's
Speaker 1: getting that it's it's sort of, um, it's sort of
Speaker 1: being being forgotten. Um. But yeah, I mean, look, we
Speaker 1: can't live in a we can't live in a country,
Speaker 1: we can't have any social cohesion whatsoever if a significant
Speaker 1: chunk of our citizens believe that, no matter who they
Speaker 1: vote for, the results are fixed. Um. I know what
Speaker 1: you know, I know what that's like. My family knows
Speaker 1: what that's like. Um. And you know, I'm sure a
Speaker 1: lot of your listeners know what it's like to live
Speaker 1: in a country where you know, oh, it doesn't matter
Speaker 1: who you vote for because they're going to fix it anyway. Yeah.
Speaker 1: And we're speaking of David Reeboy political commentator or national
Speaker 1: security analyst here, David. You know another thing that that's
Speaker 1: come up though. Tucker on his show last night talked
Speaker 1: about Sidney Powell, and he said that, you know, they
Speaker 1: invited her on the show, she won't come on the show.
Speaker 1: She had I should say, she has not yet come
Speaker 1: on the show, and they wanted her to just give
Speaker 1: them some of the evidence, and she keeps. My understanding
Speaker 1: is as of this morning, she said, well, there is
Speaker 1: an affid David that that she shared with them, you know,
Speaker 1: a sworn affid David. But what do you think, because
Speaker 1: I'm seeing a lot of for the first time now
Speaker 1: feels a little bit like there's a circular firing squad
Speaker 1: that's happening here on the right, where we're going after
Speaker 1: each other on this when we really should be going
Speaker 1: after the truth. I don't think there's anything wrong with
Speaker 1: Tucker asking somebody who's part of this natural conversation to say,
Speaker 1: show us your evidence. I also think that somebody else,
Speaker 1: you know, in this case, Sydney Powell, has a right
Speaker 1: to say, Look, I'm really busy doing a lot of
Speaker 1: things trying to bring these legal challenges. But you know,
Speaker 1: it seems like people are picking sides on this when
Speaker 1: I don't understand why I don't. I don't see what
Speaker 1: the sides are to pick. Look, I mean, yeah, I
Speaker 1: mean I agree with you. I think at the end
Speaker 1: of the day, I think Tucker had the better argument
Speaker 1: here between between the two because I mean, look, Sidney
Speaker 1: Powell is an adult, and she's a great lawyer, and
Speaker 1: she you know, she is under no obligation to answer
Speaker 1: questions that will give away the game, right, So if
Speaker 1: Tucker will ask a question and she'll that, will you
Speaker 1: know that will put the legal case in jeopardy. She
Speaker 1: can say that, she can say, you know what, I
Speaker 1: know the answer to that, but you know, because uh,
Speaker 1: you know, because I don't want to you know, I
Speaker 1: don't want to answer. She doesn't want to show her
Speaker 1: cards at this stage. Sure, right, so so so on that.
Speaker 1: So I don't understand why she wouldn't go on, because
Speaker 1: it's like, would you rather have the exposure of being
Speaker 1: on a widely watched um TV show or not have
Speaker 1: it or instead have Tucker say things, you know, say
Speaker 1: things that are undercutting your case. So I think it
Speaker 1: could have been really easy for her to go on,
Speaker 1: spend three minutes or five minutes saying, look, this is
Speaker 1: what I think happened over the course of you know,
Speaker 1: she could have said the same thing that she said
Speaker 1: frankly at the press conference, and and and and we
Speaker 1: would have been totally finn. What did you think? I
Speaker 1: gotta ask you, David, what did you think of the
Speaker 1: press conference? Look, I thought it was I thought it
Speaker 1: was Jerry compelling. I you know, I see some friends
Speaker 1: and colleagues, you know, especially on the right. I know
Speaker 1: the media, you know, the media is to do what
Speaker 1: they're going to do. Um. But but some folks, I
Speaker 1: mean National Review and some of these other kind of
Speaker 1: establishment conservative place places, they went completely nuts about this
Speaker 1: and they they I don't know what press conference they
Speaker 1: were watching. I thought, for example, that that Rudy's case
Speaker 1: was pretty compelling, um, in terms of in terms of
Speaker 1: a public performance. You know, Uh, some people are you know,
Speaker 1: some people on the right are saying, yes, yes, this
Speaker 1: is only you know, the real show is in the courts. Yes,
Speaker 1: the real show is in the courts. But it's also
Speaker 1: in the court of public opinion. So they're in the
Speaker 1: position where they have to do both. They have to
Speaker 1: manage both very well. So they have to keep the
Speaker 1: public informed enough to bear with them until the legal
Speaker 1: stuff goes through, and then they have to then in
Speaker 1: court make you know, make that case very compelling in
Speaker 1: a legal way. So they're really walking a uh, they're
Speaker 1: really walking a tight rope. I thought the press conference
Speaker 1: was was good, especially Rudy's portion where he just kind
Speaker 1: of outlined this is how it happens. And and frankly
Speaker 1: for anyone who's been following politics for you know, for
Speaker 1: for years or decades, like, yeah, that's exactly how it happens.
Speaker 1: You know. Um, there are there are are There are
Speaker 1: a lot of questions here about um about fraud that
Speaker 1: I think are legitimate. Now. On the other hand, too,
Speaker 1: as you see some stuff bubbling up online, um, and uh,
Speaker 1: you know, there's there's a conspiracy theory about some weird
Speaker 1: software called scorecard and hammer that that is kind of
Speaker 1: complete nonsense, and it's dispiriting to see people who have
Speaker 1: good reputations who are buying into it. Um. Yeah, if
Speaker 1: there's someone's going to say that votes were changed by
Speaker 1: a software, I need I need like real proof right
Speaker 1: before I need something. I'm like, oh, okay, that's real.
Speaker 1: I'm not taking that on faith from anybody. I don't
Speaker 1: know what's going on here. Yeah, yeah, yeah, And and
Speaker 1: what is kind of dispiriting to me is that, you know,
Speaker 1: kind of hasn't shaken my head all day? Is that really?
Speaker 1: On both sides of the political spectrum, you have a
Speaker 1: lot of folks who have kind of forgotten or forgotten
Speaker 1: how to weigh evidence. You know, So if I if, I, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's all about the political fight. It's all It's all
Speaker 1: about who wins at the end of it. It's not
Speaker 1: about how we get there. And I think that's particularly troubling.
Speaker 1: But David will have you back to see where we
Speaker 1: are on this and uh, hopefully things hopefully we just
Speaker 1: get to resolution and answers that I just want a
Speaker 1: resolution with answers and I can handle that. I know
Speaker 1: you feel the same way. Follow David David reeboy here,
Speaker 1: folks on on social media wherever you can, and David
Speaker 1: really appreciate you joining. Man, My pleasure talk to you
Speaker 1: sim you're in. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: I I know we talk about how journals are the
Speaker 1: worst on here a fair amount, but it's it's important.
Speaker 1: It's important that you recognize that the journalistic establishment in
Speaker 1: this country has completely betrayed its mission and cannot be
Speaker 1: trusted and does not deserve either your trust or your respect.
Speaker 1: I think you need to know that. And I really
Speaker 1: I've worked with them around them, I've been I've worked
Speaker 1: at CNN. I mean, I've I know how this stuff goes.
Speaker 1: They are absolutely in the tank, not just for the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party, but for the destruction of their own profession
Speaker 1: as a means of advancing Democrat goals. There's there's there's
Speaker 1: no sense that they have of something being too shameful
Speaker 1: for their profession as long as it helps the Democrats.
Speaker 1: And this is why you get these these kind of
Speaker 1: grand standing moments. Part of me is almost saddened by it,
Speaker 1: because I wish we had people who were just dogged
Speaker 1: guardians of the truth and really just wanted to get
Speaker 1: the facts and get the answers that people need and
Speaker 1: present them as information, not as editorial disguised as information.
Speaker 1: I really wish that exists. It doesn't exist. But here
Speaker 1: it's got a funny moment where in the West wing,
Speaker 1: you know, in in the act, in the place where
Speaker 1: they hold the press conferences in the West wing of
Speaker 1: the White House. Uh, you have this kind of a
Speaker 1: scene breakout when they try to when the administration tries
Speaker 1: to make a straightforward statement about what's going on with COVID,
Speaker 1: Play clip one, thank you? What is going on the
Speaker 1: private collections? Every one of you work? Why are you
Speaker 1: underviding democracy? Why are you why? Why? It's like good?
Speaker 1: These are adults. These are people who work in information
Speaker 1: collection and distribution. They're supposed to be pros. Why are
Speaker 1: you undermining democraty? Why are you undermining everything that's good
Speaker 1: in the world. Why are you committing trees in a
Speaker 1: dat humanity? Oh my god, get a grip, people, What
Speaker 1: is going on with these journals? Unbelievable, unbelievable. This is
Speaker 1: this is how This is how they are. So that's
Speaker 1: the way they approach Trump administration officials. This, this is
Speaker 1: how they talk to Biden. You know, they're gonna the
Speaker 1: treatment that you saw for Obama for eight years. You're
Speaker 1: going to see that degree of being a toady, being
Speaker 1: an obsequious little throne shiner for Biden. Their hearts aren't
Speaker 1: in it the same way, but they know that's the
Speaker 1: journals know that's what they have to do now. So
Speaker 1: just get ready for that. I know, it'll be a
Speaker 1: little bit of a surprise, because come on, Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: who really thinks this guy? Come on, right? But they
Speaker 1: loved Obama, and they really did. The journals were in
Speaker 1: love with Obama. It was irrational. It was there was
Speaker 1: this this exhilaration that they had every day knowing that
Speaker 1: Barack Obama was president because you know, the journals share
Speaker 1: this kind of leftist, progressive, utopian ideology and they thought, oh,
Speaker 1: Obama is going to make the world perfect, which was
Speaker 1: it's sort of sad. It's funny, sad and a little
Speaker 1: scary all at the same time. But they're going to
Speaker 1: do similar things for Joe Biden. And an example here
Speaker 1: is the way that they will toss questions to him
Speaker 1: that are just an opportunity for him to spew back
Speaker 1: his own talking points. At the journals, who are going
Speaker 1: to be the eager little scribes of whatever the Democrat narrative.
Speaker 1: Maybe play a team. You have said that lives could
Speaker 1: be lost if you don't start getting briefings from the
Speaker 1: Trump administration, and now here we are more than two
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty thousand lives could be lost. Given that,
Speaker 1: how do you justify not taking legal action to get
Speaker 1: the briefings that you say are critical, that you say
Speaker 1: you need to take a lot of time. Take time.
Speaker 1: It's not going to speed it up considerably in my view.
Speaker 1: And in the meantime, I am hopeful that I'm going
Speaker 1: to be able to get cooperation from our Republican colleagues
Speaker 1: in the Senate, the House, as well as the governors.
Speaker 1: To build a consensus is how we perceive when we do.
Speaker 1: But why not use every tool in your toolbox to
Speaker 1: get the information that you say you need to do
Speaker 1: your job and to do it effectively on day one?
Speaker 1: I'm making a judgment based on many years of experience
Speaker 1: and how to get things done with the opposition. Why
Speaker 1: won't you soon the Trump administration to get the briefings.
Speaker 1: Notice that going to the courts, going to the courts
Speaker 1: in this way is completely fine within the process, and
Speaker 1: it is fine with it. If he wants to do that,
Speaker 1: go for it, right, But you don't get what you
Speaker 1: want from a from a political party or from the
Speaker 1: from the president's office, go sue him right away. The
Speaker 1: journals jump right to that. But Trump having a legal
Speaker 1: team that's suing over vote counts, and that that is
Speaker 1: a terrible threat to democracy. So trying to use the
Speaker 1: courts to demand access to classified information when you're not
Speaker 1: even yet the president elect totally cool, but suing to
Speaker 1: make sure that we know how many votes were counted
Speaker 1: that shouldn't have been counted and all the rest of that,
Speaker 1: that is basically tyranny, and the country's falling apart because
Speaker 1: of it, and oh my god, we're all going to die, right,
Speaker 1: That's that's the way the journals set all this stuff up.
Speaker 1: They're just dishonest, folks. There's no there's no effort whatsoever
Speaker 1: to present information in a way that does not benefit
Speaker 1: their side. And the more you embrace that conclusion, the
Speaker 1: more you keep that in the back of your mind
Speaker 1: as you read news, as you consume news, the more
Speaker 1: the better informed you'll be. Always thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Yelling
Speaker 1: with his friends, that's okay. Look, he is phonier than
Speaker 1: a vegan at a steakhouse and he just proved it,
Speaker 1: and that video just undid him. But there's a fix
Speaker 1: to all this, Whether it's Laurie Lightfoot or Newsom are
Speaker 1: the mayor of DC. Simple fix. If you're a government
Speaker 1: official and you shut other people's businesses down, you don't
Speaker 1: get paid because if they lose their paycheck and you're
Speaker 1: the one responsible, you don't get your paycheck. Let's see
Speaker 1: how that goes. I'm not being facetious about it. There's
Speaker 1: no skin in the game of these government officials. They're
Speaker 1: making big decisions about the peasants like us who have
Speaker 1: to live by their rules. But they don't live by
Speaker 1: them and they have no consequence. They don't lose a
Speaker 1: dime of their salary. They get taxpayer money and it
Speaker 1: never goes away. Let that go away. Let them suffer
Speaker 1: some consequences financially. You're going to see this change. I
Speaker 1: want you to remember all that. First of all, I
Speaker 1: think that Mike Huckabee's kind of corny dad jokes, and
Speaker 1: you know he leads into him man, he owns it.
Speaker 1: I'll say that about him. He doesn't back off it
Speaker 1: at all. So I'm fine with it, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean, Because because he owns it, because he goes
Speaker 1: with I can't even do a good impersonation of a
Speaker 1: corny Mike Huckabee joke because it's a whole next level.
Speaker 1: But he's really good at them. And I will say
Speaker 1: this too, just as an aside. I had friends who
Speaker 1: used to work on Mike Huckabee show at Fox News,
Speaker 1: and they always said he he is a super nice
Speaker 1: guy and this business. I really respect that he treated
Speaker 1: his staff very well. That you'd be surprised some of
Speaker 1: the people. I don't think that's surprising to you at all.
Speaker 1: I think Mike how coolbe comes across as a really
Speaker 1: nice guy, but you'd be surprised some of the folks
Speaker 1: who really aren't what they present as on TV, including
Speaker 1: some of them on our side. But Mike is one
Speaker 1: of the good ones. He's a good dude, and I
Speaker 1: do find his jokes sometimes I don't laugh at them,
Speaker 1: but I'm still I'm still amused by them. But on
Speaker 1: the important point here, the hypocrisy that you've seen on display,
Speaker 1: I can tell you this right now. Many of the
Speaker 1: loudest voices we're going into Thanksgiving week next week, and
Speaker 1: many of the loudest voices that you will hear, many
Speaker 1: of the people out there who will be the first
Speaker 1: ones to say, how dare you? How dare you gather
Speaker 1: with more than is it six people? Is it ten people? Remember,
Speaker 1: there's no basis for this other than what politicians on
Speaker 1: a whim decide. Right, There's there's no science that says
Speaker 1: six people is safe, eight people is dangerous, or ten
Speaker 1: people is dangerous, but five people is safe. That that's
Speaker 1: not how it works. All of this is about personal
Speaker 1: risk tolerance, risk mitigation, and understanding that there's there's no
Speaker 1: perfect safety and I just would much rather live in
Speaker 1: a country. I'd much rather live in a world where
Speaker 1: I'm in charge of my safety to the greatest degree
Speaker 1: possible when it comes to things like this my personal health,
Speaker 1: instead of thinking that government bureaucrats give a crap, because
Speaker 1: they do not, and they keep showing you that. Look
Speaker 1: at some of the primary lockdown advocates in politics, I mean,
Speaker 1: really think about this for a moment. Cuomo, Newsome, Lightfoot,
Speaker 1: the mayor of Chicago, Governor Whitmer, Pelosi, Feinstein, every single
Speaker 1: person I've named there, Oh de Blasio in New York,
Speaker 1: every single person who is out in front demanding lockdowns,
Speaker 1: who's out in front demanding that you obey or else,
Speaker 1: They've all been shown to be big frauds. They've all
Speaker 1: been shown to be phonies. So what I want to
Speaker 1: tell you is you're preparing now. I know it's not
Speaker 1: until next week that we have Thanksgiving, but what I
Speaker 1: want to tell you as we're getting ready for it,
Speaker 1: is that those same people they can you can be
Speaker 1: assured of this. On Monday and Tuesday they will be
Speaker 1: telling you to be scared and not to gather, and
Speaker 1: then on Thursday they're going to do whatever the heck
Speaker 1: they want in their own homes away from the cameras.
Speaker 1: I assure you of that. This is part of the
Speaker 1: disease of the mind that is liberalism today. They can
Speaker 1: always separate out their preference for policy from individual action. Right.
Speaker 1: What they want all of you to do is one thing.
Speaker 1: What they want to do themselves is another. And they
Speaker 1: don't see that as a disconnect. They think that they
Speaker 1: should be allowed. They're special, they're important, and they still
Speaker 1: should advocate for all the good policies for everyone else.
Speaker 1: So you know, they can sit there, and if we're
Speaker 1: gonna use a metaphor here, they can sit and eat
Speaker 1: that pint of ice cream every night, But they want
Speaker 1: to tell everybody else that they have to do it
Speaker 1: not that they should. They have to eat healthy, so
Speaker 1: they take the pint of ice cream out of your
Speaker 1: hands and they feel good about themselves in the process.
Speaker 1: This is a This is common for collectivists. In fact,
Speaker 1: this is one of the appeals of being a leftist
Speaker 1: is that because of your public promotion of certain policies
Speaker 1: and certain ideas, because of the way that you advocate
Speaker 1: for things that you think, in the aggregate will be
Speaker 1: better for everybody, it excuses you. You know. An example
Speaker 1: of this from history would be the period of those
Speaker 1: of you who are who are interested in Catholic Church history.
Speaker 1: You talk about the indulgences, right, well, what is an indulgence?
Speaker 1: And if you go back you learn about them, you
Speaker 1: find that it's a way to reduce your punishment after
Speaker 1: you die, a way to reduce your time in purgatory,
Speaker 1: and it often involved making a donation. Right, so, you
Speaker 1: would be punished for your sins in the afterlife. But
Speaker 1: if you wrote a check, you'd and by the way,
Speaker 1: it wasn't a check, I know, it would have been actual.
Speaker 1: They weren't operating with banks the way that we do,
Speaker 1: but they would have you know, if you made a
Speaker 1: donation of land or a donation of you know, gold
Speaker 1: coins or whatever. But with the onset of the idea
Speaker 1: of purgatory in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, that purgatory
Speaker 1: was this in between place where you would have to
Speaker 1: suffer for your sins and then eventually and everyone was
Speaker 1: going to go to purgatory because unless you were assayed,
Speaker 1: unless you were perfect, unless you were Jesus himself, so
Speaker 1: they would have you give money. So there was the
Speaker 1: plenary indulgence, and then there was a partial indulgence. Right,
Speaker 1: So if you've got a plenary indulgence, that meant you
Speaker 1: went straight to heaven, and a partial indulgence meant, well,
Speaker 1: you spend it a little less time in purgatory, but
Speaker 1: you still got to suffer a little bit for your
Speaker 1: sins in this life before you can go to heaven. Now,
Speaker 1: this was all meant to help people get to eternal
Speaker 1: salvation in some ways, at least by church doctor at
Speaker 1: the time. In some ways, it's perhaps best known because
Speaker 1: of its usage during the Crusades, which, as you know,
Speaker 1: is one of my favorite historical period. I find the
Speaker 1: whole period of the Crusades and much of what I
Speaker 1: talk about on this show in our Shields High and
Speaker 1: History podcasts with Lepanto, which is coming out soon, Malta,
Speaker 1: with the Siege of Constantinople in fourteen fifty three, even
Speaker 1: the Real Dracula, which we just did much of that
Speaker 1: is very much an extension of the Crusade. It's just
Speaker 1: a continuation of that period. We think of Jerusalem and
Speaker 1: people think of Richard the Lion Heart and think the First,
Speaker 1: the Second, the Third Crusade, but that whole period really
Speaker 1: extends and ends around the time of the Renaissance, or
Speaker 1: really in the in the mid to late Renaissance. They're
Speaker 1: still crusading going on in one form or another. But anyway,
Speaker 1: that's that's the leftist mentality on display that if you
Speaker 1: support the right policies, it's the equivalent of in the
Speaker 1: medieval church dropping a few gold coins in the collection
Speaker 1: plate so you spend who knows how much less time
Speaker 1: in purgatory, so they're comfortable with it. I'm telling you
Speaker 1: about this just because I think. Oh and as we know,
Speaker 1: it also led one of one of the primary reasons
Speaker 1: for the Reformation and Martin Luther Protestant, the Protestant Schism
Speaker 1: was because indulgences became so corrupt. Well, it actually corrupts.
Speaker 1: It actually corrupts liberalism too, to have this mentality. And
Speaker 1: they're not really liberals as you know, they're leftists. They
Speaker 1: are they're collectivists. There we don't we need better terms
Speaker 1: for the left, I will say that. And the left
Speaker 1: works as abroad as a sweeping but we should come
Speaker 1: up with something more. I think progressive in many ways
Speaker 1: is the most useful because that is their Their goal
Speaker 1: is just incrementalism toward the goals of the left all
Speaker 1: the time. I mean that that's the strategy. It is
Speaker 1: an incrementalist it's really an incrementalist totalitarianism. I mean, talk
Speaker 1: to any democrat you know, and you ask them what
Speaker 1: they want this country to look like in fifty years,
Speaker 1: and it's some kind of a utopia. But to get
Speaker 1: to that utopia, it has to be totalitarian in scope, right,
Speaker 1: a place without I think of the John Lennon song,
Speaker 1: you know, imagine all the people all that stuff. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: imagine a society where everyone has everything they need, everything
Speaker 1: they want. There's no violence, we're all equal, we all
Speaker 1: have equity. But that utopian vision is only achievable by
Speaker 1: the elimination of freedom and individual choice. But in the meantime,
Speaker 1: you got a lot of libs back to my initial
Speaker 1: premise here, that will be telling you that for Thanksgiving
Speaker 1: you should be doing the following. And I can assure
Speaker 1: you it's a guarantee that they will not be doing
Speaker 1: the same thing. Not all of them, but a good
Speaker 1: number of them will say you can't gather more than
Speaker 1: six people, or you have to wear masks indoors in
Speaker 1: your own home. They're not going to do it. You know,
Speaker 1: I live in a place in New York City where
Speaker 1: there's mask and social distancing hysteria. I mean they do.
Speaker 1: There's there's little places in the elevator where your feet
Speaker 1: are supposed to go, as if that's going to help
Speaker 1: the social distancing, that's going to save you from getting
Speaker 1: the virus. You know, you were standing four feet seven
Speaker 1: inches from somebody, and then if you stand on the
Speaker 1: little places where your feet are supposed to go in
Speaker 1: the elevator, you're going to be standing six feet away,
Speaker 1: oh six feet away. Then you're going to be safe.
Speaker 1: And you know this, And I understand there's a lot
Speaker 1: of pressure to attack people who say these things, but
Speaker 1: the six feet rule is entirely arbitrary. There's nothing about
Speaker 1: this six feet rule that is scientifically based. They just said,
Speaker 1: what's a good amount of distance, Let's go at six
Speaker 1: feet in my gym where I work out, which I
Speaker 1: know any day now they're going to shut it down,
Speaker 1: and I'm just gonna go back to, you know, eating
Speaker 1: mac and cheese and gluten free cookie dough all the time.
Speaker 1: I know that's that's what's gonna happen this winter. It's
Speaker 1: gonna be job of the buck all over again. I've
Speaker 1: just started to turn around. The gym has been working.
Speaker 1: I've been getting stronger, fitting better into my clothing. Everything's
Speaker 1: been going in the right direction. They're gonna shut down
Speaker 1: the gym, so I've got no social interaction, no gym,
Speaker 1: no places to go and be around other people. Really
Speaker 1: hard to not just netflix and nap and eat too
Speaker 1: much when that's the situation, as we all know. So
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you the the oh, the mask mania
Speaker 1: in my building. I see people all the time who
Speaker 1: I know are the Karens who complain about this, and
Speaker 1: if anyone's mask drops down in front of them, they
Speaker 1: go and they cry to management right away and everything else.
Speaker 1: But I've seen them without masks on. So this is
Speaker 1: a constant thing. This is all throughout the leftist mentality.
Speaker 1: People become addicted to the virtue signaling and a part
Speaker 1: of that, then is that they have a blindness to
Speaker 1: their own hypocrisy and to their own disregard of these rules.
Speaker 1: And as long as that is so widespread among liberals,
Speaker 1: as long as that is something that you're going to
Speaker 1: find among millions and millions of Democrats, we won't reach
Speaker 1: a point of sanity where we can all say enough
Speaker 1: is enough, We're not doing this nonsense anymore. That's the
Speaker 1: big challenge, that's the big problem as I see it.
Speaker 1: So the hypocrisy point, Yeah, it's fun to dunk on
Speaker 1: libs like Gavin Newsom for being such big hypocrites. And
Speaker 1: even if it means we get to hear a fun,
Speaker 1: you know, old grandpa joke from governor or former governor
Speaker 1: Mike co Coulbee, I don't think the people should be
Speaker 1: called their titles, their government titles when they no longer
Speaker 1: have them. I know somethink I'm I'm off on this one,
Speaker 1: but I feel very strongly about it. Anyway. Mike Coulbee,
Speaker 1: I like that he's calling this out because it is
Speaker 1: a big problem, and it's the reason why these stupid
Speaker 1: rules persist, because the people that want to enforce the
Speaker 1: stupid rules on you are the ones, the ones most
Speaker 1: interested in enforcing them against you are the first ones
Speaker 1: who break them behind closed doors and don't care. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom mind. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. And they want to call the Green New
Speaker 1: Deal socialism, and you know what our answer is, what
Speaker 1: do you call one hundred years of tax breaks for
Speaker 1: the oil and the gas and the coal industry. They're
Speaker 1: saying this, give us the same breaks pangent solar and
Speaker 1: all electric vehicles and plug in hybrants and reserves technologies,
Speaker 1: and we will bury the fossil fuel industry. That is
Speaker 1: what burry the fossil fuel industry. That's a Senator, Marquis.
Speaker 1: That's a senator who's saying burry the fossil fuel industry.
Speaker 1: I'm just I just want to point this out as
Speaker 1: we get ready for the possibility of greater democrat control
Speaker 1: and government the possibility. Don't yell at me, but anybody
Speaker 1: who tells you they want to bury the fossil fuel
Speaker 1: industry is a moron. Really, it's not possible to be
Speaker 1: intelligent or to know anything about the fossil fuel industry
Speaker 1: and think that it's the enemy. As I've told you
Speaker 1: on this show countless times, but it bears repeating. We
Speaker 1: are naturally because of the efficiency of the technologies that
Speaker 1: we have always decarbonizing in our fuel sources. You can
Speaker 1: look from the beginning, we were using you know, wood
Speaker 1: and then coal, and people would even say whale oil
Speaker 1: for a while, but that was a relatively limited period
Speaker 1: of time for not a whole lot of industry. But
Speaker 1: the Industrial Revolution, we went from coal, and then we
Speaker 1: went to gas, and then we went to natural gas,
Speaker 1: and now you know, we're on the way. We're doing
Speaker 1: all these things. We're making these moves that are going
Speaker 1: to be less polluting, less carbon intensive. It's already happening.
Speaker 1: But the left treats fossil fuels like the enemy. There's
Speaker 1: a reason why until recently, Exonmobile was pretty much the
Speaker 1: most valuable company on the planet. We don't have a
Speaker 1: modern economy, we don't have a modern world without fossil fuel.
Speaker 1: They just don't seem to understand that there's this idiotic
Speaker 1: zelatry around this where the facts, the reality does not
Speaker 1: seem to matter to them. They simply don't care. It's
Speaker 1: more fun to just talk about this. And then you
Speaker 1: even get stuff like this where the climate is now
Speaker 1: an issue of justice, as if there's a social justice
Speaker 1: element to client him a change, which is also I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm actually trying to follow this, and I'm wondering what.
Speaker 1: Here's AOC though, the grand strategist of the Green New
Speaker 1: Deal talking about climate justice and reproductive justice play fourteen.
Speaker 1: It represents the power of indigenous communities, organizing, the power
Speaker 1: of young people, organizing, the power of the Movement for
Speaker 1: Black Lives, organizing showing that climate is intraceptional with every
Speaker 1: one of our needs and demands. Yeah, it is tied
Speaker 1: to the treaty rights and liberties of Indigenous people in
Speaker 1: the United States of America. Climate action is tied to
Speaker 1: reproductive justice because we can't talk about poison water without
Speaker 1: talking about how so many people across their country, acrossive country,
Speaker 1: are denied the right to build a biological family because
Speaker 1: they've been poisoned by their own water. What I mean,
Speaker 1: I honestly, sometimes AOC speaks. First of all, there's a
Speaker 1: lot of a lot of Marxist tells here, you know,
Speaker 1: the Marxist part of it. And as somebody who finds
Speaker 1: reading about Soviet totalitarianism and Marxism just fascinating. It's like
Speaker 1: deep diving. Some people watch those shows about psycho killers
Speaker 1: and getting inside their heads, you know, Mine Hunter and
Speaker 1: that sort of stuff. For me, that's reading biographies of
Speaker 1: Stalin and understanding the Soviet Revolution and the way the
Speaker 1: the first the Checha under the Czar and then then
Speaker 1: the various iterations I'm sorry, the Okrana rather under the czar,
Speaker 1: and then the various iterations of the KGB would would operate.
Speaker 1: I mean that to me is if you want to
Speaker 1: a vision into the darkness of human the human soul,
Speaker 1: you just have to look at what happens when Marxists
Speaker 1: actually get their way. But one of the tells, one
Speaker 1: of the ways you always know what's going on with
Speaker 1: the Marxists is they use this pseudo scientific language to
Speaker 1: discuss the human condition and political realities. You know, they
Speaker 1: they dress it up with slogans, and so when you
Speaker 1: have somebody like AOC who's talking about about the inter
Speaker 1: intersectional climate and just throwing the word justice in there,
Speaker 1: a lot justice in there all the time. They never
Speaker 1: really think about what the implications of what they're saying
Speaker 1: will be, or they don't understand it, but they know
Speaker 1: that if they say certain things, other people who have
Speaker 1: also been brainwashed with the similar Marxist claptrap will nod
Speaker 1: their heads in unison. I mean this is there is
Speaker 1: a cult like aspect to all Marxist theory, and you
Speaker 1: see it with someone like an AOC, and it's something
Speaker 1: you should be wary of, something that is worthy of concern.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The Busson Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Liberty, Truth and Great Hair. Feel those
Speaker 1: funky beats. It's time for roll call. It's time for
Speaker 1: roll call everybody, Facebook dot Com, Slashbox, Sexton Team buck
Speaker 1: at iHeartMedia dot com. I don't know why the I
Speaker 1: heart when I do the iHeart Media almost sound like
Speaker 1: the Expedia guy. Now you know what I mean Spedia
Speaker 1: dot com. You know what I'm talking about. That they rhymes,
Speaker 1: so it makes sense. Yeah, I give free advertising too.
Speaker 1: Maybe I'll send us a gnome or something. That'd be
Speaker 1: kind of fun. Actually, we'd have a freedom hut nome.
Speaker 1: I think I think that'd be cool. What would we
Speaker 1: name the gnome? Obviously we'd let you name the gnome,
Speaker 1: would be Producer Marks Gnome produce. We call it Producer
Speaker 1: Mark's little helper. I figured you were just gonna call
Speaker 1: a producer Mark or something. M nah ever knows your
Speaker 1: producer Mark is. Um. So, what's going on for the
Speaker 1: weekend for you? Before I get into the roll call?
Speaker 1: You got anything planned? Do you do you do some
Speaker 1: of the Thanksgiving cooking? I think I've asked you this,
Speaker 1: but I forgot No, I don't do any of it
Speaker 1: right now. I mean my in laws usually host and
Speaker 1: they love hosting and cooking, so I let them do it.
Speaker 1: I just enjoy it. That's very nice. That's very nice. Um.
Speaker 1: And you're where are you on turkey versus chicken? I mean,
Speaker 1: I like turkey, I wouldn't call it my favorite meat,
Speaker 1: and I prefer dark beat of either chicken or turkey.
Speaker 1: So my my sense of this is that turkey there's
Speaker 1: there's like a there's a tiny zone where if it's
Speaker 1: really well executed, there's there's the perfect amount of dunness
Speaker 1: and moisteness, and it can be really good if you
Speaker 1: get there. But I have had so many times, especially
Speaker 1: at buffet's and you know Thanksgiving buffet stuff like that,
Speaker 1: right when you go to an event. I've been to
Speaker 1: events where there was like a Thanksgiving buffet. Dried out
Speaker 1: turkey is cardboard, man, It's cardboard, but it's not hard
Speaker 1: to do. That's why I go for the dark meat
Speaker 1: because it will never be dried out. Yeah, the dark meats.
Speaker 1: The dark meats, the better, the better move. And we
Speaker 1: already said your favorite side is stuffing, so is mine.
Speaker 1: So yes, we did have that. That lovely Team Buck
Speaker 1: member wrote in about green bean castrole. I will say
Speaker 1: greenme and castrole sounds good, But the more I thought
Speaker 1: about it, the more it sounds like this is just
Speaker 1: cream of mushroom soup with some green beans thrown So,
Speaker 1: you know, it's a little bit like saying, yes, like Buck,
Speaker 1: don't you like colieflower castrole? I'm like, what is it?
Speaker 1: They're like, well, it's mac and cheese with some colieflower
Speaker 1: thrown in. It's like, well, yeah, that that would be good. Actually,
Speaker 1: I mean that delicious some green beans and make them delicious. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean cream of mushroom soup is a great thing.
Speaker 1: One of my gotos when I was a kid, I
Speaker 1: used to make, once I learned how to make myself,
Speaker 1: grilled cheese and Campbell soup. Who game changer, Game changers,
Speaker 1: there's a time of cheese and tomato soup. I was
Speaker 1: one of my favorite things in life was it was
Speaker 1: just a grilled cheese with American cheese and tomato soup.
Speaker 1: This is what happens. I get. I get hungry at
Speaker 1: this part of the show, so I start thinking about
Speaker 1: food all the time. But I'm just saying, though, grilled
Speaker 1: cheese are so much better. Throw some bacon on there,
Speaker 1: some tomato. It's very, very important everyone. Just a pro
Speaker 1: tip for everybody. One of the most overlooked parts of
Speaker 1: food that you're gonna make for yourself. I'm not talking
Speaker 1: about fancy stuff, but food you're gonna make for yourself,
Speaker 1: whether you're cooking a burger or on the grill, or
Speaker 1: or on the you on a pan, on a stovetop.
Speaker 1: Certainly true for grilled cheese as well. People forget you
Speaker 1: need to season the bread. The bread is a part
Speaker 1: of the whole thing. A lot of people just go, oh,
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna slap my grilled cheese on there. It'll
Speaker 1: brown up whatever. Yeah, but you know, season it with
Speaker 1: a little a little bit of salt, a little bit
Speaker 1: of pepper. I also would say, if you've got a
Speaker 1: little basting brush, a little bit of a base, some
Speaker 1: nice olive oil, because a grilled cheese doesn't need super
Speaker 1: high heat, so you don't need one of those higher
Speaker 1: smoke point heats like avocado oil. Or I use bacon
Speaker 1: fat whenever I cook red meat. I keep rendered bacon
Speaker 1: fat and I use that for red meats, which producer
Speaker 1: mark pro tip. You will like that sounds amazing. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's a good that's a good move. But yeah, I'm
Speaker 1: telling you right now. So for those of you, if
Speaker 1: you're gonna be doing well, I guess no one's gonna
Speaker 1: be well. Some parts of the country they might have
Speaker 1: cookout stuff for Thanksgiving. Our Florida audience is like, bluck,
Speaker 1: we can do it. You're around. But I think you know,
Speaker 1: if you if you take the bun of the burger,
Speaker 1: you you definitely want to season it and put a
Speaker 1: little put a little olive oil on it, and think
Speaker 1: of that as that's part of the dish that you're
Speaker 1: cooking and not just like oh I'm gonna slap the
Speaker 1: bun on at the end. I'm telling you it's a game.
Speaker 1: And you can even put a little bit of a
Speaker 1: garlic powder, you know, experiment a little bit with it,
Speaker 1: but don't let the bread just be the thing that
Speaker 1: you're holding it with, whether it's a grilled cheese or
Speaker 1: a burgers. You know what I'm saying. Producer Mark, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I've never heard of seasoning the bread before. That's very interesting.
Speaker 1: I always like slather it with butter cheese. That's a
Speaker 1: version of it, but like a little salt and pepper
Speaker 1: on your grilled cheese beforehand, I think really really spices
Speaker 1: it up a little bit and makes it makes it better,
Speaker 1: and you know, and then people realize, wait, I can
Speaker 1: also put you know, other things that, like I said,
Speaker 1: garlic powder is a good move. Anyway, That's that's my
Speaker 1: little advice for all of you. Because when I make burgers,
Speaker 1: because I have to use gluten free buns, which tastes
Speaker 1: like cardboard always, they're horrible. I've I learned to do
Speaker 1: this and then I realized, well, when I make normal
Speaker 1: burghers for other people, you know, for normal human beings
Speaker 1: that can digest normal food unlike me. I'll make them
Speaker 1: the I'll make them the bun with this kind of
Speaker 1: extra care. So if nothing else, you take this from
Speaker 1: today's show, Season your Bun, Salt pepper, a little bit
Speaker 1: of oil, a little bit of butter, Season your Bun.
Speaker 1: That should be I could write a book Season your
Speaker 1: Bun and then like life Lessons from the Freedom. Yea,
Speaker 1: you know the Season your Bun by Buck Sexton. I
Speaker 1: see no problem with that title. Just think of the
Speaker 1: artwork a load. Oh, we can have so much fun.
Speaker 1: We went there. I know, family show. It's a family show,
Speaker 1: all right. Here we go, Todd next up here? First
Speaker 1: up here, Hey Buck, I'm a major fan of the
Speaker 1: best hair and political news, and I've been a daily
Speaker 1: listener for a long time. Producer, Mark, you have a
Speaker 1: fantastic taste in music. Now, I what do you like
Speaker 1: in music? What? What brought this song? What did we
Speaker 1: I probably talk some smack about about? What was it?
Speaker 1: Billy Joel and you and you you body slam me
Speaker 1: for that one? Is that probably something like that? I
Speaker 1: always say, like Coldplay in the Chili Peppers. I respect
Speaker 1: your Coldplay move I know that it would be fun
Speaker 1: the same way that people love the trash Creed. Some
Speaker 1: people will trash cold Play, and I'm like Creed was
Speaker 1: great in its day. I don't care what anybody says.
Speaker 1: Ever since I saw Coldplay live, you know, it's like
Speaker 1: they burn. It's like they pulled me out of a
Speaker 1: burning building. Like I can't say anything bad about them.
Speaker 1: They were so good live. It's like you can't talk smack.
Speaker 1: I'm glad you're a believer now, yeah, no, totally, I'm
Speaker 1: a no. I tried to do a believer thing, but
Speaker 1: that's too cold Play. Wouldn't you're not a believer? Is
Speaker 1: he still doing music or isn't Didn't he start his
Speaker 1: own church or something? A church of Justin Bieber? Why yeah?
Speaker 1: Or like, isn't he Is he really into some church
Speaker 1: where they I don't know. I'm just saying I feel
Speaker 1: like Justin Bieber. I don't keep pop, I don't see
Speaker 1: what's going on. I don't keep open celebrity stuff either.
Speaker 1: I know he's got a lot of tattoos that because
Speaker 1: whenever I try to do new searches sometimes it'll be
Speaker 1: the you know, Justin Bieber is like the what do
Speaker 1: you call it the tabloid thing that'll shot? I think
Speaker 1: the Daily Mail, which is a UK based paper, is
Speaker 1: a great is a great news site. They just have
Speaker 1: a lot of like and here's a celebrity in a bikini, which,
Speaker 1: of course producer Mark I immediately avert my eyes because
Speaker 1: I'm focused on the news, of course, and you don't
Speaker 1: want snow Princess finding anything out. Yeah, no, I can't.
Speaker 1: I can't be staring at those Kim Kardashian bikini photos
Speaker 1: that they have on that site pretty much every day,
Speaker 1: like you're really like, I go there and look at
Speaker 1: it's like, oh, they've got the doctor Fauci story talking
Speaker 1: about the lockdown, and then it's like a hero or
Speaker 1: Kim Kardashian. No, and I blocked that. That must be
Speaker 1: what pays the bills. Yeah, oh, I'm sure those get
Speaker 1: a ton of clicks. Now. I know not much can
Speaker 1: be done at this point, Todd writes, but why aren't
Speaker 1: people talking more about the Trump votes that were discarded
Speaker 1: destroy not just the illegitimate cast and created Biden votes,
Speaker 1: but the genuine Trump votes that are no longer around
Speaker 1: to be counted. There are tons of videos of people
Speaker 1: burning dumping and trashing Trump votes. But that's not talked
Speaker 1: about very much, if at all. Why isn't this a
Speaker 1: bigger talking point about the election being stolen? Well, Todd,
Speaker 1: we'd have to see how many votes have been either
Speaker 1: trashed or lost or stolen. You know, that's a big
Speaker 1: part of this. You need to have enough votes that
Speaker 1: it would change the outcome. You know, this is, for example,
Speaker 1: what I would say what I was saying oh along
Speaker 1: about the Russia collusion delusion. They would say, well, that
Speaker 1: they did something on Facebook, and because they did something
Speaker 1: on Facebook, we all should think that that changed the
Speaker 1: course of the election. Right. This is what the Libs
Speaker 1: said about Trump winning against Hillary in twenty sixteen. And
Speaker 1: I was sitting here, Remember I used to use this,
Speaker 1: this metaphor of it's like you would pour. If I
Speaker 1: pour a cup of hot water in a swimming pool,
Speaker 1: you could say that I've I've made a change in
Speaker 1: the temperature, but it's not measurable, right, I mean at
Speaker 1: some level, at some level of sort of micro temperature. Yeah,
Speaker 1: for a second, there would have been a different but
Speaker 1: I didn't really change. And that's what they did with
Speaker 1: the Facebook ads, with Russia collusion, a similar idea at
Speaker 1: some level applies here. Now. I think it's much more
Speaker 1: substantial when you're talking about the discarded Trump votes, But
Speaker 1: it needs to be enough that it would actually change
Speaker 1: the temperature of the pool, if that makes sense. And
Speaker 1: I don't know, I don't know if we're going to
Speaker 1: get there. I just don't. I don't know if we're
Speaker 1: going to get there. But where we should try, we
Speaker 1: should find out, we should absolutely know. I mean, there's
Speaker 1: a reason why it's worth looking into all this, As
Speaker 1: I've been saying. If we can go through the absurd
Speaker 1: three year long special Counsel Russia collusion garbage, with what
Speaker 1: that did to the administration, with all the man hours,
Speaker 1: the tens of millions of dollars of taxpayer dollars spent
Speaker 1: on that, and we can go through that, we can
Speaker 1: spend a month finding out what really happened in this election.
Speaker 1: That's fine, And there's really no counter argument to it
Speaker 1: other than why do you support Trump? He's Hitler? Trump
Speaker 1: is not Hitler. Randy hey buckshields high. So I want
Speaker 1: your opinion on this. My dad graduated from the US
Speaker 1: Naval Academy, served to World War Two. I also graduated
Speaker 1: from the US Naval Academy and served eight years in
Speaker 1: the fleet. Despite all of that patriotic upbringing and background
Speaker 1: in my life, seeing the corruption and voter fraud on
Speaker 1: this election, there's no way that I'd risk my life
Speaker 1: for a country that was such a fraud. Nor would
Speaker 1: I ask a young person that didn't make such a
Speaker 1: sacrifice you served in the CIA, if you were young
Speaker 1: again after an election like this, would you join the
Speaker 1: CIA again? In their lust for power? I don't think
Speaker 1: the Democrats understand the depth of the damage they're doing
Speaker 1: to this country. You can't have a volunteer military unless
Speaker 1: you have volunteers. And when I said that their lust
Speaker 1: for power, the Democrats don't understand the depth of the
Speaker 1: damage they're doing to this country. The sad truth is
Speaker 1: they don't care. All they want is power. Everything else
Speaker 1: be damned. So again, after this election, would the young
Speaker 1: buck sex enjoy the CIA? Randy? I joined the CIA
Speaker 1: very very clearly for one, you know, in response to
Speaker 1: one thing, and that was the attack on this country
Speaker 1: on nine to eleven. I'd never even had never even
Speaker 1: occurred to me to work in the CIA until that happened,
Speaker 1: and I knew that that was going to be a
Speaker 1: largely at least the fight against Alcado was going to
Speaker 1: be largely an intelligence driven operation. I think everybody could
Speaker 1: tell that right away, because it's a small non state group,
Speaker 1: small you know, as opposed to the Chinese military, right,
Speaker 1: It's a small non state group and dispersed all over
Speaker 1: the world. So I've never regretted that decision. I'm pleased
Speaker 1: that I had the opportunity. I might even say proud
Speaker 1: that I had the opportunity to do some very small
Speaker 1: part to try to track down and defeat al Qaeda
Speaker 1: operatives in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. And as for
Speaker 1: whether I would still do it now, yeah, absolutely. I
Speaker 1: still love this country. I think it's the greatest country
Speaker 1: in the world. I know we're having a tough time
Speaker 1: right now, and I understand that people might feel like
Speaker 1: the election has shaken their confidence in our system in
Speaker 1: a way that's well, it's tough to shake off. But
Speaker 1: first of all, we have to continue to fight for
Speaker 1: this country because there's no better place. There's nowhere else
Speaker 1: to go, and America will endure. We've been through two
Speaker 1: World wars, we've been through a civil war, We've been through.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna be honest with you, and I know
Speaker 1: this isn't this isn't going to get all the listens
Speaker 1: and the clicks. And there are other people out there
Speaker 1: that are, you know, screaming into their microphones every day
Speaker 1: and talking about you know, tyranny and everything else all
Speaker 1: the time, not about the COVID tyranny, the tyranny of
Speaker 1: you know, the libs or whatever. We're gonna be Okay,
Speaker 1: We're gonna get through this. There are better days ahead,
Speaker 1: there are victories, there are there are moments of real
Speaker 1: pride in this country that lay ahead, and I think,
Speaker 1: just just take a deep breath and know that you're
Speaker 1: still in the greatest, freest, most powerful, most worthwhile nation
Speaker 1: state experiment in the history in the history of this planet,
Speaker 1: which is a pretty special thing. So I hope that
Speaker 1: brings you some comfort this weekend, knowing that that's all
Speaker 1: still true. So, Randy, I understand your frustration with what's
Speaker 1: gone on right now, But yes, in fact, going to
Speaker 1: the CIA, and to this day, I still wish I'd
Speaker 1: gone to them if I had known what it was
Speaker 1: going to be, what it was going to be like
Speaker 1: to be alongside our military instead of within the military.
Speaker 1: I wish I had served in that capacity instead, if
Speaker 1: I could go back in time. So I think that
Speaker 1: tells you, tells you a lot You're in them. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast more road call to
Speaker 1: kick us off for the weekend. Just remember, friends, you
Speaker 1: can go to Bucksexton dot com for news updates and
Speaker 1: also this weekend is a great opportunity to pass the
Speaker 1: buck to share this show. Where a friend tell people
Speaker 1: about the Buck Sexton Show, please do. It's on the
Speaker 1: iHeart app, It's on Spotify. The more you spread the
Speaker 1: word about this the more we grow. And that is
Speaker 1: how the show grows. And we really really appreciate it.
Speaker 1: It's the single biggest The two things you can do
Speaker 1: if you appreciate the work that we put in here
Speaker 1: every day are to tell somebody about the show, and
Speaker 1: I just mean mentioned to them, I mean share a
Speaker 1: link to listen to the podcast with them. And also
Speaker 1: check out o our excellent sponsors. We've got so many
Speaker 1: great sponsors on this show. I use all the products
Speaker 1: that I say I use from these sponsors daily. I'm
Speaker 1: using them all the time and there it's just it's
Speaker 1: a great relationship and I really hope you will check
Speaker 1: out our sponsors that I give shout outs to with
Speaker 1: our live read throughout the show. Let's see here, Maureen
Speaker 1: hey bucking producer Mark. With all that's going on in
Speaker 1: the past four point five years, four and a half
Speaker 1: years of evil perpetrated against Trump and now with the
Speaker 1: greedious corruption and fraud in our elections, at what point
Speaker 1: is this finally going to be called for what it is?
Speaker 1: Outright treason? That word seems to be scrupulously avoided by
Speaker 1: everyone in all media. Isn't all this actually treason? Thanks
Speaker 1: for all you do for both of us, or thanks
Speaker 1: for all you both do for all of us, Maureen,
Speaker 1: thanks for writing in. Treason is a pretty specific term,
Speaker 1: and you know treason would involve, well, if you're talking
Speaker 1: about it from a statutory standpoint, it would involve assisting
Speaker 1: an enemy military at a time of war. As for
Speaker 1: getting to that point, I mean, who were going to
Speaker 1: really hold accountable for this? We need individuals that engaged
Speaker 1: in the treason, or rather engage in the voter fraud
Speaker 1: if we're going to use the proper terminology, and who
Speaker 1: did it? I'm waiting to hear who did it? We
Speaker 1: need more information, we need more data, and we also
Speaker 1: have to be we have to be sure because we
Speaker 1: have to be right. Unlike the other side, we're not
Speaker 1: just trying to use all of this as a weapon,
Speaker 1: as a thumb in their eye. We're not just trying
Speaker 1: to spite them. I actually want to know. I think
Speaker 1: the truth does matter about this election, and we have
Speaker 1: to get there, and we're not there yet. So that's
Speaker 1: the best answer I could give you at this point. Marie,
Speaker 1: and hey, everybody, have a great weekend. We'll be with
Speaker 1: you next week Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday until next time.
Speaker 1: Shields High