WEBVTT - Heavy Transport Maps Out a Low-Carbon Future

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switched on

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the BNF podcast, and today we bring you a recording

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>from our summit in London, which took place on the

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 1>eighth and ninth of October. The panel featured on today's

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>show is titled Cleaning Up Heavy Transport. So while electrification

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:20.080
<v Speaker 1>has been well established in other parts of the transport

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>sector like passenger vehicles, there are some limits to how

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>far the technology can reach, and heavy transport is one

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of the tougher ones for it to decarbonize. Cleaning up aviation,

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>maritime shipping, and long haul trucking will likely require clean

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>fuels like biofuels, resulting in sustainable aviation fuels or saff

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>for short or ammonia methanol and synthetic fuels. This variety

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of options gives us a lot of pathways to a

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>lower carbon heavy transport sector, but it's also with its

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>own challenges, including elevated prices and some confusion among investors

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>as they struggle to understand exactly which technologies they should

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>be putting their money behind. So with all of this

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to consider, the panelists you'll hear from on this recording

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>explore which clean fuels are currently seeing the greatest uptake

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and whether existing government policy is extensive enough and clear

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>enough to support growth in the sector. They also discuss

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>what feedback they have been receiving from investors, and this

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>results in some suggestions on how to stimulate growth across

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the wider sector. You'll hear from Freya Burton, chief sustainability

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Officer at Lanztech, Chris Johnson, chief commercial officer at C

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>two X, and Lara Nashquinbondi, chief executive officer at ET Fuels.

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>The panel was moderated by Colin mccherricer Bloomberg, nef's head

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of Transport and Energy Storage. For more information regarding BNF's summits,

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>including our upcoming BNF Summit taking place in Shanghai on

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the third and fourth of December, and to view recordings

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>from this and other events in the past, head to

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>about dot BNF dot com forward Slash Summit. Now let's

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>hear from our panel on cleaning up heavy trains and

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>sport from the BNF Summit, London.

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 2>We've heard a little bit about clean fuels and shipping

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 2>in aviation throughout the session so far, but we're going

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 2>to get a little further into it right now, and

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 2>just to kind of set the scene. Right now, both

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 2>shipping and aviation are around two and a half percent

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 2>of global CEO two emissions, but that share is set

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 2>to rise, depending on the forecast to use maybe double

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 2>over the next ten or twenty years. Right now, aviation

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 2>uses about ninety three billion gallons of jet fuel a year,

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 2>and three hundred and twenty million of that is saf

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 2>so less than zero point five percent. On the shipping side,

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 2>eighty four billion gallons of marine fuel used and for

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 2>low carbon fuels, and that's being a bit generous with

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 2>the definitions. It's about one hundred and thirty million gallons,

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 2>so less than zero point two percent. So a lot

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 2>of work to do, but luckily there's a lot of

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 2>people on the case. So I want to ask, as

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 2>a sort of opener to each of you, where you're

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 2>seeing the most activity, interest uptake on the clean fuel side.

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 2>So Laura will start with you.

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Sure, well, it feels like a kind of funny time.

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 3>So by way of background, we co founded ety fuel's

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 3>green fuels developer a couple of years ago, and I

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 3>remember when we did that, there was this huge buzz

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 3>around hydrogen you know, we like to say that we

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 3>co founded the company the day that Merce could come

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 3>out with this big announcement, And there were all these

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 3>projects and it was just this really exciting, optimistic time

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 3>in the hydrogen space. And I think sort of two

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 3>and a half years on, i'm much aged. But beyond that,

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 3>I think on the supply side, you've seen a real shakeout.

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 3>So you know, we as a developer would often get

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 3>other developers coming to us saying, do you want to

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 3>partner up or co invest or whatever. And I'd look

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 3>at the projects and you'd see that someone maybe done

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 3>an engineering study, or they got an option over a

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 3>field that happened to be a bit sunny, but the.

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 4>Projects were not robust.

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, the feedstock hadn't been secured, maybe the engineering

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 3>hadn't been done at all, the TRL of the technology

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 3>was a bit dodgy. But there was just this huge

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 3>hype that was kind of providing this wave to all

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 3>these on the supply side. And I think what you're

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 3>seeing now is two years on, maybe people have got

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 3>a bit of seed funding, but that's run out, and

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 3>so you're really just seeing a bit of the wheat

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 3>separating from the chaff on the supply side. On the

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 3>demand side, it's also quite different. So obviously we're targeting

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 3>the marine sector and a lot of discussion around, you know,

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 3>demand signals, is anyone going to buy the fuel. The

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 3>conversations that we're having, though are really also quite different

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 3>to where they were two years ago. So whereas two

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 3>years ago people were talking about, you know, I want

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 3>to buy my green fuels, and the way I'll price

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 3>them will be here's how much I play for a

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 3>heavy fuel oil, and then I'll pay a bit for EUETS,

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 3>and then I'll pay for debucks more just to be

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 3>a good citizen. Right now, the conversations are either one

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 3>of two one type of conversation with that let's just

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 3>call them less sophisticated or less resource shipping companies. Is

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm dealing with the eu ETS, I'm being told it's

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 3>leg it's biofuels, it's e methanol, it's ammonia. I have

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 3>no idea what's going on, and quite frankly, it doesn't matter.

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 3>I'll wait until twenty thirty somebody will figure out nuclear fusion.

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 3>I'll be fine, and anyway, I'll just pass the whole

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 3>thing onto my end customer. It's the one size fits

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 3>or tax. We'll all deal with it together. The more

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:37.679
<v Speaker 3>sophisticated are doing a few things, so they are running

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 3>the maths on fuel EU, which is bloody complicated regulation

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 3>but actually does some amazing things to incentivize e fuels.

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 4>So they're running the mass on that.

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 3>They are waiting for IMO, and they are looking, at

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 3>least in our space around this shortage of fuel supply

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 3>where some people have done the maths on the lack

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 3>of biofuels have not, and they are thinking about how

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 3>they're going to secure their supply. But everyone's still kind

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 3>of waiting because we haven't quite got there yet on IMO.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 4>So it's kind of a funny time.

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 2>So those are quite big shifts on both the supply

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 2>and demand picture. Chris, does that kind of line up

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 2>with what you're seeing.

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 5>I think there's a consistency of you there. But first

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 5>of all, thank you for the opportunity to be here,

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 5>particularly as a very young company.

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 6>We might be a young company.

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 5>C two x our roots and is a company with

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and twenty year history, and that's mrsk On

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 5>the shipping company.

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 5>Interestingly, we heard yesterday afternoon and one of the panels

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 5>you're talking about, you know, a lot of it is

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 5>driven by supply. We're very much as a company. It

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 5>came from the demand musk. We're making the commitments to

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 5>to green methanol container vessels and needed to assure that

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 5>the supply was in place. And you know we were

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 5>spun out about a year ago is away per by

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 5>ap Mala Holdings and twenty percent now a ap mil

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 5>a MRSK. But being driven actually by a customer on

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 5>setting this up. It meant we were coming in at

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 5>this technology agnostic. So you know, there's a lot of

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 5>work being done over the last year or two to

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 5>try and think through the most competitive pathways to producing

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 5>green methanol. And I think for me that's really where

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 5>the interest is in particular, you know, Lara's describing the

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 5>more sophisticated customers who are really beginning to understand this

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 5>is we need to demonstrate we can be competitive, and

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 5>we're driven by one of our chahlders is very focused

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 5>on that this is a highly competitive industry. Someone was

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 5>saying to me yesterday pointing out they're harder to debate

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 5>sexors are those with some of the thinnest margins and

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 5>the customers are very sensitive and authorship shift a container

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 5>from one shipping line to another if those rates change,

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 5>so they're very cost focus. So we had to make

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 5>sure we were building the most competitive pathways. So that's

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 5>what we're getting in our interests is by demonstrating that

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 5>we do have those pathways. Now we've gone down a

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 5>route initially, we've we've got three projects Egypt, Spain, but

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 5>our focus at the moment is on us and looking

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 5>at the gasification of biomass, which we see as being

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 5>one of the best pathways. It's a well proven technology

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 5>in other services and we are now seeing some of

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 5>the cost space to produce methanol that way. Now, the

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 5>interesting thing is we look at it. We've gone for methanol.

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 5>It is driven by shipping and that's where a lot

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 5>of the conversation is today. But methanol has a big advantage.

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 5>It is a pathway whether it's into the chemical sectors,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 5>and we do expect it in a similar way for

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 5>sort of landstect to play into the sustainable aviation fuels

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 5>on the methanol to jet in a later stage. But

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 5>the conversation as well, we're having this, how do you

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 5>get these projects off the ground? How do you get

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 5>these commitments of the ground, Because all of these projects

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 5>depend on long term commitments.

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 6>So a lot of our conversation on where's the right right.

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 5>Price point to actually make those commitments, which is going

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 5>to get those projects off the ground and get those

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 5>products off the ground at scale because scale is going

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 5>to be important to keep in those costloads. There's a

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 5>real sort of tension here to actually to originate those projects.

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, even when you feel like you've identified the

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 2>right pathway, that that's only the start of the journey,

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 2>and it's a start, yeah for it. I want to

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>come to you on that. What are you seeing right now?

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think one of the things too, I'm sort

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 7>of reflecting back what it was like sort of ten

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 7>plus years ago and what it's like today. And I

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 7>think back to some events where they were investors coming

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 7>to see technology producers and we literally had to bribe

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 7>people to come into the room who were doing fuels

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 7>because everyone wanted to talk about solar and wind. Nobody

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 7>was interested to yours because everyone was terrified after clean

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 7>Take one point zero and they're like, oh god, no,

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 7>don't want to go there. Fast forward to today, everybody, No,

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 7>I'm not being disparaging to marine, but SAFF is the

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 7>sexy fuel. Everybody's talking about saf We love marine and

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 7>we're working on marine as well, but everybody comes to

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 7>us wanting to talk about SAFF. And so sustainable aviation

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 7>fuel has had the most incredible rise in attention that

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 7>we've ever seen. But I think we still have a

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 7>problem in that we're still looking at one sort of

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.359
<v Speaker 7>silver bullet hope, one solution.

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 2>And.

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 7>To the point of finding the right pathway, there are

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 7>lots of right pathways and so today, unfortunately, there are

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 7>still sort of focuses, either from the investor community or

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 7>from a policy standpoint, that we're really focusing on single

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 7>solutions when there are no single solutions. There are lots

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 7>of solutions, And there is a slight realization coming now

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 7>because you're having these broader discussions going, hey, it's not

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:53.599
<v Speaker 7>just fisher trops technology.

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 6>There's alcohol to jet.

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.119
<v Speaker 7>Yes, Heifer's probably king right now, but that will transition

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 7>as more pathways sort of scale up. So it's really

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 7>interesting to see that there is more interest in fuels today,

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 7>but there's still this kind of focus on trying to

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 7>find a winner, and if we do.

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 2>That, we're all going to lose. That's really interesting that

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 2>you bring up sort of cleantech one point zero. I

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 2>started out my career in biofuels early two thousands, and yeah,

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 2>there was this huge amount of interesting time time straight

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 2>down shortly after that. So a lot of people got burned,

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 2>and that reverberated for quite a while. Let's stay on

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 2>this pathway discussion a bit, because I understand that, as

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 2>you say, there's many different pathways, many of them are viable.

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, you've got to put a

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 2>stake in the ground and you have to do something,

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 2>and you have to get investors on board. And so

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 2>how do you manage that tension between saying, yeah, there's

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 2>these different pathways and there's lots of different things we

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.479
<v Speaker 2>can do with we have to do something now, Laura.

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.599
<v Speaker 3>I mean, maybe I don't think this is a controversial

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 3>statement to say, I don't think there are maybe rephrase,

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 3>there aren't.

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 4>That many end states.

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 3>The end state has to be e fuels, and the

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 3>simple reason is fussiled and decarbonize and bifuels are in

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 3>short supply, right, so we can talk about the pathways

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 3>and whether it's energy or biofuels. But in my personal,

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 3>completely unbiased opinion, they're all just really faffing around.

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 4>Because the end of to day it has to be

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 4>e fuels.

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 3>That's the only way you get the scale on the

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 3>decarbonization you need, right and so you know, two percent decarbonization,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 3>six percent here or there. Really what we need to

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 3>focus on is how do we get the e fuels

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 3>up and running as quickly as possible. And my view

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 3>on that is there's really two things. One is, of course,

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 3>we need the demand signals. We need the off takers.

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, as Frey has said, it's already happening in

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 3>saf and you can sort of see the explosion in

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 3>terms of the investment pouring into that sector.

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 4>In marine.

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean bluntly, it will happen because the fuely you

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 3>maritime legislation is already incredibly incentivizing for ethuels. I know

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 3>this sounds ridiculous. People have not done the matter yet.

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 3>When they do the math and they figured out how

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 3>to actually put that into contracts, that will incent ethuels.

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 3>One of the issues I think though, in the e

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 3>fuel space is that often the developers are approaching it

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 3>the wrong way. So when we started the business, i'd

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 3>sort of I mean just by way of careers, so

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 3>I'd done a lot of stuff in finance, banking, pe

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 3>hedge fund. I then spent most of my career in

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 3>the commodities industry, and I was sick of commodities because

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 3>all we were doing for ten years was five percent

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 3>cost reduction, doing the same thing that we've been doing,

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 3>and it just got boring.

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 4>So I went to Google and I was like, I'm

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 4>done with this. I'm going to go and sell advertising.

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 3>But I guess the learning from my journey is if

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 3>you want to win in the commodity space, the only

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 3>thing that matters is where you are on the cost

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 3>curve and do you have scale. And so we actually

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 3>didn't necessarily come at this from how do we get

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 3>a green hydrogen productup and running. I knew nothing about hydrogen.

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 3>We just came at this and thought, how do you

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 3>produce e fuels in the absolute cheapest way? And really,

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 3>all you know the way you do things cheaply in

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 3>commodities you find the cheapest feed dark or the best resource.

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 3>And so I think one of the challenges has been

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 3>much of the innovation in the space has happened in

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 3>places that are not particularly cost effective to produce e fuels,

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 3>So you know, it's an amazing pioneering work. For example,

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 3>that it's not particularly a sunny or windy place. And

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 3>so I think, you know, as Chris has sort of said,

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 3>the regions now where people are focusing the US, Egypt,

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 3>these are much more cost effective places to produce the fuels,

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 3>and I think that will actually help us get some

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 3>more traction.

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to come back to the cost curve part,

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 2>but Chris, do you want to weigh in on that,

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 2>On that same question of sort of tension between pathways

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 2>and doing something now.

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 5>The first thing to say is I fully agree with

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 5>what Freyer said. There isn't a silver bullet out here,

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, and it is a transition for the industry.

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it takes shipping. It has been one fuel

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 5>for most of those years until I was involved putting

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 5>energy in the ships in my shoulders ten.

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 6>Twelve years ago. But before that there really wasn't a

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 6>fuel choice.

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 5>It was fuel, and I think we're now in a

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 5>world where there are multiple fuels that will go into

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 5>whether it's pathways, into aviation, or whether it is into

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 5>the marine sector.

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 6>But you know, I think for companies.

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 5>Such as ourselves, yeah, the focus is important whilst we

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 5>have options and we you know, I would say it's

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 5>pathways for us on the methanol into two different sort

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 5>of markets, which is a good set of options to have.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 5>But you know, we have some options. Our project in

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 5>Egypt is around e methanol by going through gasification, you

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 5>actually have some options because of the imbalance of the

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 5>carbon dioxide and the hydrogen and the sincastream. So we

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 5>sequestraight biogenic carbon and generate BEX or we can add

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 5>green hydrogen into that to create a combination of biomethanol

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 5>and emethanol. So we have some options. So we do

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 5>have some options on the pathways there. But I think

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 5>this cost point is we've got absolutely clear that we've

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 5>got to hit the right cost points for the customers.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 5>You know, lots of people say it's all down to subsidies. Well,

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 5>it's a lot easier to have those conversations if you're

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 5>at the right cost point on the cost curve, and

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 5>so we've been very very focused on that, on meeting

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 5>the customers needs. We're not pushing a technology. We're not

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 5>pushing a location. We're we're trying to.

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 6>Find the roots which actually solve for the customer's needs.

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I mean, Freya, let's talk a bit about

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Lends of Jet and what for the people who are

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 2>not aware Alcohol to jet technology plants up and running

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 2>and invest taken on external investment as well. Tell us

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 2>a bit about that journey in building that up, because

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 2>you've been at Lens of Tech since the beginning and

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 2>that's a more recent part of the business sort of

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 2>spun out. How has that gone.

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so you know, we spun out Lands of Jet

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 7>in twenty twenty, probably the worst time to spin out

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 7>an aviation furel company, but we structured it with a

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 7>sort of an interesting investment opportunity for the investors to

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 7>sort of invest in early and then we build the

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 7>demo and then there'd be a sort of cash call

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 7>so we could move forward in a faster way. We

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 7>can really show how we can accelerate the scale up

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 7>of the Alcoulta jet process. But again it comes down

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 7>to the off takes, the long term agreements, but also

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 7>the environment that you're producing the fuel in. So to

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 7>Lara's point on the you know, having policies that can

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 7>create incentives. You know, the US is an attractive location

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 7>for SAFF producers with the blenders tax credit. You know,

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 7>provisions made in the IRA for certain carbon utilization technologies

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 7>still not given as much money as ccs, but that's

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 7>a different discussion. You know, these are the things that

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 7>support that kind of scale up. So you know, sadly,

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, I'm talking to you in a week where

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 7>we're getting the second massive hurricane hitting that part of

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 7>the US and the area where our facility has been

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 7>hit really badly by Helene over the last couple of weeks,

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 7>and so there's a lot of cleanup and devas station

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 7>in the community. So our focus right now is not

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 7>on the operating of the facility but just you know,

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 7>getting the community back on its feet. But you know,

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.719
<v Speaker 7>I know we don't often talk about climate change. You know,

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.479
<v Speaker 7>in these environments we're all we all know what's going on.

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 7>But I mean, this is if we look at it

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 7>from an energy transition perspective, and this is another massive

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 7>climate event. And if any of you saw the pictures

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 7>from the space station last night, I mean it looked

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 7>like the beginning of a disaster. Movie, you know, but

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.479
<v Speaker 7>it's real and it's happening, and it's impacting not just

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 7>lives and communities, but also the technologies that are building

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 7>the energy transition.

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 4>You know, first time i'd really.

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 7>Learned about the courts, mining and the Appalachians, which is

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 7>so important for chips, you know. So we've got to

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:52.239
<v Speaker 7>think about the broader picture, not just how we're going

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 7>to meet our targets, because I mean, that ship's almost

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 7>sailed for the industry, but how we're going to stop

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 7>these massively devastating events happening again and again.

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a good reminder that none of this stuff is abstract.

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 2>It's getting very, very real, and as John our CEO

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 2>said in the opener yesterday, we're sort of midway through

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 2>this decisive decade and some of this stuff really has

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 2>to pick up quickly. I want to just stay for

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 2>a second on corporate structure. Because Chris owned your C

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 2>two X, owned by am A. Miller is the largest

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 2>shareholder lands of jet spun out.

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 4>What what what?

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 2>What were the advantages and what was the decision process

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 2>in treating those as separate entities rather than just keeping

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 2>them as part of the parent.

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 5>Happy to take it I think it's it's one of focus,

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 5>skill set and a breadth of customer base. You know,

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 5>I think we've I probably would say this, but I

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 5>think we've got a good balance. We call that support

0:19:55.320 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 5>from a very strong corporate and a customer but we've

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 5>you know, separately, we're building up a capability and we're

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 5>focused and I think Mark has been a very innovative

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 5>company over the years. The parent Apemal Holdings are major parent.

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 5>You're supporting a lot of growth projects in different businesses.

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 5>They announced last week, you know, a method of green

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 5>methano or to plastics.

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 6>Business for example.

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 5>So we've got that support and we've got that commitment

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 5>to the transition there. But we've got that focus and

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 5>the ability to operate more entrepreneurially, much more as a

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 5>sort of startup type theme, but with a slight sort

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 5>of corporate overpinning and support. So there's a balance there

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 5>to I think bring in some of that capability and

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 5>we may work with other investors over time as you

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:48.199
<v Speaker 5>know as well. And we're not just focused you know

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 5>now on sort of one customer. We've broadened our base.

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 5>We're thinking about those other pathways, other marine customers, other

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 5>sectorial customers and beginning to think, you know, longer term

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 5>and you know, methanol to jet a different alcohol to jet.

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 2>And for any other comment on just the decision to

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 2>make that a separate spine.

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 7>Echoing Chris's thoughts on the skills side, I mean, Lansa

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 7>Jet was really focused on the aviation sector and while

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 7>we've got a great team with sort of history of

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 7>working in the space, we really wanted to hire into

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 7>this entity, you know, the skills to scale it. And

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 7>you know, Lanser Tech is building facilities around the world

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 7>to get the feedstock. So in our case alcohol ethanol,

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 7>you know, a low cost as I said, is you know,

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 7>got to have a low cost feedstock, especially for something

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 7>like jet fuel. And you know we're focused on that side.

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 7>So Lansa Jet is focused on that second part, the

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 7>conversion from the ethanol to the jet fuel. And again

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 7>the attracting investment into bad entity. And we were talking backstage.

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean Chris was actually involved back in the day

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 7>in its shell days, as we're part of one of

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 7>those investors Interjet. It's one big happy family in this space.

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Lo's of crossover. Laura, I want to you mentioned sort

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 2>of the lower cost and your commodity background coming in

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 2>and just being like that is the critical thing when

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 2>you look at coming back to this pathways question, sometimes

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:17.959
<v Speaker 2>when we've looked at the economics of some of the

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 2>things for both shipping and aviation, there's also this question

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 2>of whether some sort of book and credit system with

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 2>VEX or CCS or director capture might be more competitive

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 2>in the long term than the fuels. I don't know

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 2>what's your what's your view on that.

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess yeah, I mean there's a lot of space

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 3>between now and the long term, right, and I mean

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm hoping to be retired in the long term, So

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 3>I guess the way I see it, right is there's

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 3>actually a disconnect between what people think they need to

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 3>do now. I want to say people the shipping industry

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 3>does go with that what they think they need to

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 3>do now, what they actually need to do in the

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 3>relatively short term.

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 4>Maybe to talk to that.

0:22:56.040 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 3>So, you know, I don't know if Chris would agree,

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 3>but I get the sense that most whether it's aviation

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 3>or marine, what they're doing now is kind of let's

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 3>do some stuff that looks good, doesn't cost us too much,

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 3>and we'll deal with this by twenty thirty five. Reality

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 3>is they kind of need to act by twenty thirty

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 3>to meet their targets.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 4>And I'll talk about that in a second.

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Now, if you're in a world in twenty thirty where

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 3>you've got six percent, you know, in marine you've got

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 3>a six percent carbon intensity reduction target in twenty thirty,

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 3>you cannot do that with energy because you basically have

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 3>to replace out half of your half of your fleet

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 3>almost to do that. You can't do that with bi fuels,

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 3>and I'll talk about why, and so you have to

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 3>do that with V fuels E fuels projects take I

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 3>think the panelist said, or any guy said three to

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 3>five years.

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 4>It's not three to five years, it's six years.

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Six She has minimum in Texas, which is one of

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 3>the best places in the world to do business. And

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 3>so what that means is if you want to secure

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 3>your supply in twenty thirty, you have.

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 4>To be acting now.

0:23:55.200 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 3>And most in the shipping industry are not drawing those

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 3>dots together and maybe to sort of put some numbers

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 3>to that, right. So one of the things I that

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 3>I the shipping industry loves to do is to talk

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 3>about the flavor of the month. You know, people wake

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 3>up and there's a new podcast and now we're all

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 3>doing LNG. And then you wake up next month and

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 3>it's biofuels is where the future?

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 4>And then you know ammonia.

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 3>And the reality is when you look at the landscape,

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 3>ammonia is not ready for twenty thirty. If shipping was

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 3>to meet it's IMO targets for twenty thirty using biofuels,

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 3>the numbers are just baffling, right, So you'd have to

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 3>go from a world where shipping today uses about zero

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 3>point two zero point three percent of the.

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 4>World's global biofuels to.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Meet the low end of what the im I was

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 3>talking about by twenty thirty, you'd have to see that

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 3>go from about zero point two zero point three percent

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 3>to sixty percent of the world's global biofuels. I mean,

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 3>you guys have the data, so you know that right

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 3>that is never going to happen. And then, like I said,

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 3>with LNG again, you do the mass. You look at

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 3>the data to decarbonize an entire fleet by six percent,

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Each LG gives you fifteen percent. So you do the

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 3>mask and you're like, okay, how do I get six

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 3>percent if I've got a fleet of one hundred ships,

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 3>fifteen percent, you've got to move forty of those ships

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 3>onto LNG.

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 6>It's huge.

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 4>And that's by twenty thirty.

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 3>So I think this point around what are we're doing

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 3>in you know, twenty fifteen net zero is great, but

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 3>the industry is going to have some real penalties to

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 3>pay in twenty thirty. And the other bit that I

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:25.239
<v Speaker 3>think people aren't realizing is, at least you know, in

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 3>the in the maritime space, the legislation is not one

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 3>size fits all. The legislation incentivizes first movers and penalizes

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 3>those who are late. So my expectation is that by

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty thirty you'll see real disruption in terms of the

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 3>haves who have prepared and the have nots who have not.

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I think what we do in twenty

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 3>fifty is kind of it's kind of neither here nor there.

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 4>We have to do stuff now.

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this gets the sort of challenge between decision windows

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and impact windows and long asset lives in these sector sectors. Chris,

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 2>what do you think of that kind of same topic

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 2>around book and credit versus implementing things now, yeah, that's there.

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 5>I think it comes back a little bit to sort

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 5>of Forez, but there isn't one pathway, so I think

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 5>offsets will play a role. And I've certainly heard the

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:14.640
<v Speaker 5>same conversations about the aviation sector. I mean interestingly, as

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 5>a project we can generate some of those high quality

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 5>technical credits. But I think Lara's point on lee time

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 5>is a really important thing. And we just talk about

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 5>L and G, but I was involved when do we

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 5>started twenty twelve twenty thirteen on the shel days of

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 5>putting LERG into ships, And there's a whole lot of

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 5>chickens and eggs running around, the eggs not running around,

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 5>the chickens running.

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 6>Around and.

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 5>Or what comes first. And as a company, Shell could

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 5>take that decision. It invested in break bonk facilities and

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 5>in Rotterdam and a bunker barge, but it had the

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 5>LNG portfolio to stand behind that and deliver that, and

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 5>it took a number of years for that to really

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 5>take off. And if it hadn't been for those first moves,

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 5>we wouldn't probably be talking about Ellergy in the shipping sector.

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 5>So this this sleetime is important. It is important. On

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 5>the facilities, it is a minimum probably of six years

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.959
<v Speaker 5>to get project off the ground, possibly longer, and it

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 5>is and is a challenge for our customers on the

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 5>shipping side as well to make the decisions. It's a

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 5>it's a big bit of whether you go down to

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 5>ammonia ship, do we commit on an energy ship? Is

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 5>the energy ship method already? What's is the engine technology there,

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 5>the bunkering facilities, you're there. So there's a lot of

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 5>things which actually have to come together to make this work.

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 6>So credits may bridge some of this.

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 5>It's probably it's not going to be the silver bullet,

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 5>like anything else is not going to be the silver bullet,

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 5>but this timeline is important. We are almost too late

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 5>for twenty thirty now.

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it sounds like similar similar views to what Laura

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 2>was saying. For any thoughts on the same topic.

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, I mean credit only to take you so far.

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 7>I mean, you've got there's so much fuel to replace,

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 7>and I know we're just talking about fuels, but let's

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, there's chemicals that need to be replaced as well.

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 7>So you know, if we're looking at we actually need

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 7>to make the transition and keep fossil in the ground.

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 7>That's you know, the key part of the transition. We

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 7>need to start making stuff. You know, we can't just

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 7>make it go away by buying a credit. There's a

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 7>place for credits and quality offsets, and that's a whole

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 7>nother discussion. But we actually need fuels, we need chemicals,

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 7>and we need them to be done in a different

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 7>way to the way they're done today.

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I want to shift yours have been and ask there's

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of investors in the room, and I want

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 2>to ask what you're hearing each of you is hearing

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 2>from investors when you're when you're pitching right now, you

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 2>spend time in front of investors and you're pitching projects

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 2>or or raising rounds. What are you hearing and kind

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 2>of how has that changed over the last few years.

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 2>You hinted at the beginning about how it's a world

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 2>of difference versus five years being five years ago being

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 2>in a back room somewhere that no one wanted to

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 2>come to, versus now. But maybe we'll start here, Laura,

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 2>and then work our way down around what you're hearing

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 2>from investment.

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean so, I've often wondered if there was a

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 3>way to go long emethanol without having to do this

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 3>job like how would I do it something that's just

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 3>a bit less hiring. And I think I've sat on

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 3>the other side most of my life where I've had

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 3>the checkbook and given it out, And I think the

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 3>thing that's interesting on the investment side is this. So

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 3>what Freya said about SAF being the sexy thing, right,

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 3>that is absolutely where investors' mindsets her up right, And

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 3>so I'm sure Chris doing the same. Right, We're all

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 3>talking a great game on methanol to jet. It's not

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 3>even a STM certified. It will be, and that's all fine,

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 3>But the reality is people want to go into the

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 3>SAFA space and the reason is they look at the

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 3>headline on the regulation and they say, oh, there's quotas

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 3>for ethuels in SAF there's real penalties, whereas Marinia you

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 3>haven't got actual quotas for ethiels. Most of them, like

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 3>ninety nine at nine percent, have not actually looked at

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 3>the marine legislation and done the back calculation, which is

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 3>that you cannot meet twenty thirty targets where there are

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 3>punitive penalties, you cannot meet those without a substantive portion

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 3>of e fields. So this whole thing about SAF having

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 3>binding quotas. I think it's a bit of a meme,

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 3>but that's kind of where the investment community is at.

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 3>The Second thing, and this, I think is more of

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 3>a valid point, is investors are saying, unless you've got

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 3>a revenue line, what kind of a business are you?

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 3>And I think there's been a lot of kind of

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, a lot of sort of lack of robust

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 3>projects in the pipeline that didn't actually have the feedstock

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 3>or you know, a good cost model, and so that's

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of clouded the whole space and people are shying

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 3>away and saying, I can't really assess which of these

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 3>projects is actually good from a sort of project development perspective.

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 3>There is no revenue line because the shipping companies aren't

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 3>signing long term off take and so I'm just going

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 3>to stay out of space until someone figures it out.

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 3>And I think the challenge on the off take side

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 3>is I joke about this with some of my old

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.479
<v Speaker 3>colleagues who still have, you know, stable jobs at Rio Tinto.

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:13.959
<v Speaker 3>One of the jobs I used to have was I

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 3>was in charge of setting the procurement policy and risk

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 3>management for our freight and and our bunker. And I

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 3>would literally spend all of my days telling people not

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 3>to take positions no fixed prices. We've got to retain

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 3>our exposure in line with the market. And the real

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 3>challenge is the risk exposure for these procurement teams has

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally changed and they haven't adapted their procurement strategies to

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 3>deal with that. And so until we sort of see

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 3>all of the regulation play into procurement strategies, the investment

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 3>community won't move.

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Chris any thoughts on that. On the same question about

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 2>investors and how that conversation is changing.

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 5>I think, I mean, it does come down to some

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 5>of the fundamentals. Who's the customer, who's underwriting in the

0:31:56.880 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 5>long term contracts, on the revenue SAR, the feedstock, the

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 5>quality of the project execution, where you sit on the

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 5>cost curve is really important. And all of these things,

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 5>by the way, are not mutually exclusive. Of course, the

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 5>quality of the teams and the capabilities and the experience

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 5>of the teams is very important. But the other thing

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 5>I would add, and it plays into this pathways point,

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 5>is focus is focus on what you need to deliver.

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 5>Getting that first project off the ground is really important.

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, you may have growth you know, you need

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 5>to demonstrate you've got a view on growth, but you

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 5>don't get that right to growth unless you deliver those

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 5>first projects and take the time to set those up appropriately.

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 5>But once you're there and you get some of the

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 5>support there, that offers a platform of growth. And I

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 5>think the other piece that you know, I've seen this

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 5>because I've sort of also been involved here over the

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 5>last years and advising some funds on investments, is a

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 5>focus on your what is the support are you really

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 5>capturing some of those supports to just get over this

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 5>sort of critical phase to get those contracts in at

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 5>the right price points and get the projects off the

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 5>ground and to get those fundamentals.

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 2>There and free. I mean, you've seen this go from

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 2>the full arc of early days at Landstech to now

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 2>many years on with a very different stage of the

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 2>commercial process. Where how have those conversations changed, particularly in

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the last two or three years.

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 7>Well, I mean, I think you know, echo what the

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 7>others said. You know, making money very important, but how

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 7>do you know, if we backtrack, how do you make money.

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 7>You've got to have off takes, You've got to be

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 7>able to sell it at the right price and what's

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.959
<v Speaker 7>that dependent on. So just looking at the staff space,

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 7>that's dependent on unfortunately policy, And I don't mean that

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 7>you want to have a technology that's dependent on incentives

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 7>and handouts.

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 4>You don't want that.

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 7>But you want to be able to sell your product

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 7>at least, so you want to have a market that

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 7>is going to help you know, the market environment where

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 7>you can sell your staff or whatever type of fuel

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 7>you have. And up until now that hasn't really existed.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 7>It's been incredibly unstable because of the sort of tumultuous

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 7>time of biofuels excuse me one point zero. And then

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 7>with SAFF in the UK, which is interestingly one of

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 7>the more progressive countries in terms of their staff SAFF legislation,

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 7>you know, investors were waiting to see what would happen

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 7>with this so called revenue certainty mechanism, you know, in

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:31.839
<v Speaker 7>a SAFF mandate. And this has only just been sort

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 7>of buttoned up in the last couple of months, so

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 7>there was this incredible uncertainty. And looking at European legislation,

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:43.879
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I've been working on one policy in renewable

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 7>energy for ten plus years, and what kind of investor

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 7>is supposed to you know, be forthcoming. When policy is

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 7>unstable and there's no clarity and the Commission is still

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:00.839
<v Speaker 7>putting out sort of FAQs about the policy frameworks because

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 7>nobody really understands what it means or it's too vague,

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 7>and until these things are kind of clear, investors are

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 7>always going to have a challenge in knowing where to

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 7>put their money. But luckily, in the saf space, a

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 7>lot of that has you know, moved forward, but that

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 7>is still a problem and it all comes down to

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 7>how much money you're going to make. I mean it's

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 7>pretty it's a pretty straightforward answer, but also the other

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 7>things that what they're looking for.

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 2>To on that policy runt. I mean, there's a lot

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:31.919
<v Speaker 2>of policy makers in the room. Is there any any

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 2>of you have some requests you'd like to air to them?

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Grievances as well, if you'd like speed.

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean I think policy makers and investors always get

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 3>a bashing. You know, people complain that the regulation is

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 3>not clear, the regulation has not been finalized. I mean

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 3>the regulation will never be finalized by definition, right, I

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 3>mean regulation evolved.

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 4>I actually think the regulator is well done.

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:55.439
<v Speaker 3>Regulators, I think it's done a really good job today

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 3>at least in Europe. And if the IMO, even on

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 3>the low end of the targets, if the IMO comes

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 3>out where people are talking about.

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 4>Them coming out, that will be a real win.

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 3>So I actually don't think the issue is necessarily policy makers.

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 3>I think the issue is as fair I said, sometimes

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 3>people actually have to understand what that policy means, and

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, help sheets and all that stuff, and the

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 3>regulation is complicated, and I think if I sort of

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 3>had a, you know, an ask for policymakers, I would say,

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 3>we all know e fuels is going to be the

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:25.839
<v Speaker 3>end state.

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we can talk.

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 3>About multi fuel pathways together, that's fine, but you know,

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 3>really e fuels is the only way, as I've talked about,

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 3>that you can decarbonize at scale. And so what I

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 3>think would be incredibly helpful, and we've seen it in

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 3>Staff as a great case study, is to have specific

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:46.479
<v Speaker 3>parts of the policy that very clearly call out ethuels. Now,

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:49.240
<v Speaker 3>we can get to the same place by having absolute

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 3>emission and reduction targets that don't specify a pathway, but

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 3>from an investor interpretation point of view, having those really

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 3>clear signals, it's just night and day in terms of

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 3>being able to move money into the sector.

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 4>So that would be that'd be my ask.

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 5>A Decho frays point on time and times not on

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 5>our side from a transition. But I do keep a

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 5>degree of optimism here. You know, I think we saw

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 5>some positive moves, you know, on the IMO when they

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 5>were meeting two weeks ago here in London. But I

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 5>keep some optimism. You know, there was a reason you

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:25.399
<v Speaker 5>started talking about elergy and hipping. It wasn't actually really

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:27.399
<v Speaker 5>decarbonization ten twelve years ago.

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 6>It was about emissions.

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 5>It was about socks, it was about Knox, and it

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 5>came because of the emission controller is the echos. And

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 5>this was IMO legislation which has brought change, whether it's

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:40.399
<v Speaker 5>scrub as loads, sulfur fuels, et cetera. So you do

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 5>see some of this come and when it comes, you

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 5>get that change and furely you is actually an example

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 5>of this is as Laras talks about. So I yes,

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 5>it takes some time, but actually when it comes, it

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 5>does lead to change. So I do keep some degree

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 5>of optimism here. But the things that can support just

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 5>getting over this first hurdle are also.

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Important as well for any other final requests for policymakers, ease, Yes.

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 7>Don't let perfect be the enemy of the good. I mean, yes,

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.479
<v Speaker 7>end state Great, we've got to get there, or else

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.879
<v Speaker 7>we're totally screwed, and so speed things up.

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Let's move forward.

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 7>And you know, using a sporting analogy, we don't just

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 7>need the home runs to win. You need the singles

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 7>and doubles. So you know, that's what's important on the

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 7>policy side, to let things sort of move forward.

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I've got one more question. I'm going to ask

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:34.919
<v Speaker 2>just to quickly hopefully end on a bit more forward

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 2>looking note. If you were to sort of look back,

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 2>we're ten years into the future. What was obvious about

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 2>clean fuels that isn't obvious now? So any sort of

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 2>bold prediction you'd like to make there about what we're

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 2>going to think was obvious but isn't now.

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's particularly bold, but I will I'll

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:55.919
<v Speaker 3>put it out there.

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:57.320
<v Speaker 4>I think.

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 3>I think people are underestimate how differentiating this legislation. I'd

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 3>say this being all of the decarbonization type legislation, is

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 3>going to be on customers.

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:10.919
<v Speaker 4>And what I mean by that is.

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 3>We are entering a world where there are now U

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:16.919
<v Speaker 3>risk exposures. It's not just how much do I pay

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:18.479
<v Speaker 3>for my energy? And can I get the same energy

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 3>price as everybody else? It is now, do I have

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.879
<v Speaker 3>access to that energy that is going to also give

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:29.359
<v Speaker 3>me decarbonization? Do I have security of supply on that

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 3>for more than just six months? And do I have

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 3>a good visibility on the chain of custoder as to

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 3>where that energy has come from? And I think those

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:40.839
<v Speaker 3>are all things that are not relevant today but will

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 3>become such differentiators for whether it's shipping or aviation or

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:48.919
<v Speaker 3>anyone else who has a punitive decarbonization target to meet.

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 3>And I think when we roll forward to twenty thirty,

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:53.839
<v Speaker 3>which is for a lot of these sectors, the next

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 3>kind of step up, we're going to see that play up.

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 4>And I think a lot of companies.

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 3>Will wake up not having prepared and be completely stung

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:03.240
<v Speaker 3>by that, and others will be sitting there basically raking

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 3>in and actually making you have a lot of money

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:07.720
<v Speaker 3>out of decarbonization because they started early for that reason,

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to because they tried to do it to

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 3>be good citizens.

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 2>So very differentiated out comes.

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 5>Chris quickly over, I think I'm going to keep it simple.

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:16.240
<v Speaker 5>I wish we'd started sooner.

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 7>YEPA, we underestimated how much hydrogen we needed.

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:24.359
<v Speaker 2>Laura Chris Freya, thank you very much for sharing your

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 2>expertise with us. I have a feeling this is a

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 2>topic that we're going to continue to talk about more

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 2>and more at our summits in the future. So to

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 2>all of you, please join me in thanking our panelisties.

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode of Switched On was produced by Cam Gray

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:52.320
<v Speaker 1>with production assistance from Kamala Shelling. Bloomberg ne EF is

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates.

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:58.240
<v Speaker 1>This recording does not constitute, nor should it be construed

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>as investment and vice investment recon or a recommendation as

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg ANIAF should not

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 1>be considered as information sufficient upon which to base an

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP nor any of its

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>affiliates makes any representation or warranty as to the accuracy

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 1>or completeness of the information contained in this recording, and

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>any liability as a result of this recording is expressly disclaimed.