WEBVTT - NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman Talks NHL Playoffs

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 2>We know that political tensions as we keep talking about

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 2>US China, they are definitely high. They're also high between

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 2>the United States and Canada. Pretty tense on the ice

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 2>as well as tonight's Game two of the Stanley Cup

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Finals between the Edmonton Oilers and the defending champion Florida Panthers.

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 2>And that, of course was Game one, the Oilers leading

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 2>the best of seven series thanks to a win in

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Game one. Our next guest was watching. Of course, he'll

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 2>be watching it again tonight, we assume, as he has

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 2>watched all other finals and guided and growing the league

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 2>for the last thirty two plus years. He's the National

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Hockey League's first ever commissioner, making him the longest serving

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 2>executive chief executive among major North American pro sports leagues.

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>With us, we've got a Gary Badman, Commissioner of the NHL,

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>joining us from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Also joining us to

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 1>our in house hockey experts, Scarlettfew. She's a Bloomberg TV

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>anchor of The Close. She's back in our New York studio.

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Mische Beman, Welcome to the program.

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 3>It's good to see you.

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>No Canadian team has one just thinking, are the Canadian

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>fans a bit more edgy considering the political tensions between.

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 3>The US and Canada right now? Can we talk politics

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 3>a little bit? We can do that. Thank you for

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 3>having me. It's good to be with you. Our fans

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 3>are passionate for the teams that they root for, there's

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 3>no question about that. But there seems to be a

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 3>little bit of movement towards Edmonton being Canada's team because,

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 3>as you said, the Stanley Cup hasn't been awarded to

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 3>a Canadian team in the last thirty plus years, Montreal

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 3>being the last club to win it in nineteen ninety three.

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 3>In terms of the tensions, initially and it was around

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 3>the same time as our Four Nations tournament, which Canada

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 3>won back in February, there was some booing of anthems

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 3>in both countries. That's all simmered down. People are focused

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 3>on playing hockey, rooting for their team, and the competition

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 3>throughout the end of the regular season and into the

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 3>playoffs has been terrific. And the question that I get

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 3>most frequently asked is well, what does that do for

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 3>the Canadian clubs with respect to the tariffs and everything else,

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 3>because our players in Canada still get paid in US dollars.

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 3>And the answer is the Canadian dollars actually up a

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 3>little bit since all this started a few months ago.

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I think three four months ago, the Canadian dollar was

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 3>at seventy cents.

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 4>It's now it's seventy three.

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 3>And so we'll watch what goes on. But I think

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 3>what the great thing about sports is it brings people

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 3>together and even if there's a little political tension around

0:02:55.120 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 3>the edges, ultimately fans get into and focus on for

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 3>their favorite team.

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 2>So you just answered a question I was going to

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 2>ask you about, you know, the possible negative implications of

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:08.839
<v Speaker 2>US Canada tariffs and on the Canadian dollar. It does

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 2>feel like things have settled down, but are you still

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit on pins and needles about concerns about

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 2>how this could escalate again. We know from the White

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 2>House Commissioner that things can change rapidly and we have.

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 3>To be flexible and adaptable, and we always are, and

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 3>you know that's been something that I've dealt with over

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 3>three decades. The issue on the Canadian dollar, which is

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 3>where any sort of league issue would come, is really

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 3>a function of what happens with the Canadian economy, and

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 3>if the Canadian economy stays stable and the dollar relative

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 3>to the U Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 3>doesn't change traumatically, things should be fine. I think what

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 3>we've seen worldwide is a little bit of softening in

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 3>the US dollar and the Canadian dollar has been holding

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 3>its own. If that changes, if it becomes a problem,

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 3>we'll address it.

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 4>But so far, so good.

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 3>And again the good news is people are focused on

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 3>the hockey, which has been sensational, as you mentioned, Game

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 3>two tonight, and so you know, we're looking forward to

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 3>a really terrific conclusion to what has been a great season.

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 5>All right, well, let's talk about the hockey for a

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 5>moment here, because this will be the sixth straight year

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 5>that a Florida based team is participating in the Stanley

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 5>Cup Final. And of course, a lot of people will

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 5>talk about the state's tax benefits as a reason why

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 5>Florida teams are doing so well. I know that you

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 5>and Bill Daily have kind of dismissed that as a factor,

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 5>but I'm curious, mister Commissioner, what is it about Florida's

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 5>operating environment that enables its teams to consistently outperform.

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's of recent vintage, since we had the salary

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 3>cap in the economic system we have in two thousand

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 3>and five six, nobody was talking about this for the

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 3>first fifteen in eighteen years. Players choose to go to

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 3>teams for lots of reasons, and maybe there's a little

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 3>element of local state taxes, but the fact is they

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 3>look to go to a market they want to live in,

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.799
<v Speaker 3>where they want to raise their families, where.

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Their kids will go to school.

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 3>They look at the organization, they look at ownership, they

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.679
<v Speaker 3>look at the coach, they look at the general manager.

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 3>There is the cost of living. And by the way,

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 3>if the players are getting paid in US dollars and

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 3>they're living in Canada, that sort of offsets any differences

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 3>in local taxes. And as I think, you know, players

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 3>get taxed by the jurisdictions that they play in on

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 3>the road. So I think that gets a little overblown.

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 3>I think it's too much of an excuse for clubs

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 3>that may not be performing as well.

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 4>As they'd like to.

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's a little bit of an injustice

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 3>to the great job that the ownership and organizations have

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 3>done in South Florida in Tampa, and of.

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 5>Course the Florida teams were expansion teams, and there's always

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 5>going to be a lot of talk as our commissioner

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 5>about expansion into other markets like Houston, like Phoenix again,

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 5>and like Atlanta again. The NHL currently has thirty two teams,

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 5>which is kind of considered the sweet spot because the

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 5>structure creates this really consistent and clear format for competition

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 5>and scheduling. You've got two conferences each with two divisions

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 5>with eight teams each. What are team owners specific concerns

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 5>about balance if you do pursue expansion in that format changes.

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, the answer to that question is we're not focused

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.799
<v Speaker 3>on a formal expansion process. Yes, we've been getting interest

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 3>from a number of places, including the three you mentioned,

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 3>but we've said we're not going to announce a date

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 3>and if you want an expansion team, everybody apply the criteria.

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 3>At ten thousand feet. We look at our first and

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 3>foremost ownership market arena and what does it do to

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 3>make the league stronger. And we've told the interested parties

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 3>if you're ready to come in and make a presentation

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 3>to check those boxes, come talk to us and we'll

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 3>focus on what needs to be done in terms of

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 3>what it would do to our structure, our format of

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 3>the schedule. That's not something we're even focused on right

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 3>now because at the present time, expansion is in front

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 3>and center on our agenda.

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 4>For sure.

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask about the media relationships and the

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>way that people here in the US are watching and

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>consuming hockey and the way that they're not. Why does

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the NHL Network in your view, not have a streaming

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>option or a digital app that you can authenticate with

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a third party cable sign on. Does it feel like

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you're leaving money on the table by not offering streaming

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>availability like other leagues do at this point?

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, actually, we do have a streaming capability. Warner Brothers

0:07:55.960 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Discovery streams the games that they have on Max, ESPN

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 3>streams US on ESPN Plus. As it relates to the

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 3>NHL network itself, we're kind of in a transition period

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 3>and we're looking at our options. But ninety nine percent

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 3>of our games are available either linear or streamed in

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 3>the United States, and frankly, to us, the most important

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 3>thing in the short term is always making sure that

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 3>our games are available to the most number of people,

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 3>and we think we do a good job of that

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 3>what we do with the NHL network, which relative to

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 3>everybody else, has far fewer games. That's something that will

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 3>evolve over time with the changing landscape.

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 4>But we do have.

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 3>A large, full breadth capacity for streaming, both in the

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 3>US and Canada.

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Hey, one of the things I do want to ask you,

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's just so much I feel like on

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 2>your plan. And you talked about this in your Mister Commissioner,

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 2>in your Status of the League address prior to Game

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 2>one of the finals, and you talked specifically about the

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 2>status of collective bargaining talks that are going on. I'm curious,

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 2>what are you hearing, where are you What are the

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 2>priorities for the league, and what do you expect to

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 2>be the sticking points? And can you get something done

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 2>before the current agreement expires in September.

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Actually, the current agreement expires a year from September twenty

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 3>six forget me. Yes, yes, so we have plenty of time.

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 3>We started having conversations with the union probably end of

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 3>February early March. I think we're having good, constructive discussions.

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 3>I think for the most part, we're on the same

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 3>page that it's important to work together. We get together

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 3>on a regular basis. We even got together yesterday here

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 3>in Edmonton, and I'm very optimistic that we're going to

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 3>get this done in relatively short order. I don't mean

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 3>today or tomorrow, but at the end of the day,

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 3>the relationship between the NHL and the NHL Players Association,

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 3>which is now under executive director Marty Walsh, was I

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 3>think many of you know him as former mayor of

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Boston and former Secretary of Labor. We're in a good

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 3>place and I think we're going to get it done,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 3>and I think the best the beneficiary from all of

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 3>that will not just be the clubs and the players,

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 3>but our fans. I'm not anticipating any fundamental problems or

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 3>issues that are going to cause us to have fundamental problems.

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 5>Are you on the same page when it comes to

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 5>international competition? You guys had a very successful for Nations tournament,

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 5>and we know the NHL players are going back to

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 5>the Olympics next year, so I'm sure there is a

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 5>desire on both sides to keep the energy of international

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 5>competition going once the Olympics comes and.

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Goes, there's no question about that. So going back in

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.839
<v Speaker 3>ancient history because the pre day it's me, the League

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 3>and the Players Association have been joint partners in the

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 3>execution of international competition, particularly best on best, which is

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 3>the Olympics, the World Cup and things like Four Nations

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 3>that we did to an outstanding result in terms of

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 3>fan interest and the competition itself. Prior leaders of the

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Players Association, Warrant is immediately focused as Marty is in

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 3>terms of understanding the importance of moving this effort forward.

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 3>We know that our players, third of which come from

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 3>outside of North America, love representing their countries. It's important

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 3>to them, which is why the competition at Four Nations

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 3>was so good, so competitive, and so compelling, and so

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 3>he is focused on not just doing that in terms

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 3>of building interest, but it also speaks volumes of how

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 3>well we're working together. And so we're looking forward to

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 3>having in the Olympics two years later, to the World

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Cup two years after that, the Olympics and so on

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 3>a regular basis because we know it's great for the game,

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 3>it's great for fan interest, and again we know how

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 3>important it is for our players to represent the countries

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 3>they come from. And I don't think there's anything that

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 3>really compares in the international landscape to best on Best

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 3>in Hockey. Hey, one thing I.

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Do wonder, Commissioner, is where does women's hockey fit into this?

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 2>And we've seen, you know, certainly interested in women's sports

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 2>skyrocket on so many different levels, and we've certainly seen

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 2>some early success, initial success with the Women's Hockey League,

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the PWHL. I'm curious about the involvement by the NHL

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 2>specifically when it comes to women's sports and what kind

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 2>of investment and solid investment are you guys looking to

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 2>maybe do in that area.

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, certainly at the grassroots level, we're fully supportive in

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 3>our programs, are very, very inclusive and welcoming. The PWHL,

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 3>which is the Women's Professional Hockey League, is off to

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 3>a terrific start. They launched very quickly two seasons ago.

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 3>We help them get off the ground using our infrastructure

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 3>and resources.

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 4>And we work well with them.

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 3>We try to include them in our major events, and

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 3>they just recently announced a two team expansion, so they're

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 3>off to a great start. And again we're thrilled and

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 3>fully supportive. It's great for the game of hockey.

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 5>Commiser, Let's just return to playoffs for this year. When

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 5>you look at viewership numbers, they're actually down about twenty

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 5>percent from last year's playoffs. To what extent does that

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 5>concern you and do you believe it has any kind

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 5>of I don't know, future implications, does it suggest anything

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 5>about the future of the league?

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Actually on a North American basis, which is how we

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 3>look at these things, because we're a little bit different

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 3>than baseball, basketball, and football, because seven of our thirty

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 3>two teams are in Canada and they don't show up

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 3>in US ratings.

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 4>But when you look at North America.

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 3>As a whole, we're about flat. And you have to

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 3>take into account that this may be the first time

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 3>in the history of the NHL where none of the

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 3>four original six US teams were in the playoffs.

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 4>And that's Chicago, Detroit, New.

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 3>York, and Boston, all of which rate extraordinarily well. And

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Boston and New York the Rangers had great runs last season,

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 3>even though they didn't make it to the Stanley Cup final.

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 3>So it's a little bit of apples and oranges. But

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 3>when you look at it on a North American basis,

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 3>it's fine. When you look at, for example, Game seven

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 3>in last year's Stanley Cup final, which was this is

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 3>a redo this year Edmonton and Florida. I think we

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 3>drew sixteen or seventeen million fans North American wide, and

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 3>I think we had about nine million in the United States,

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 3>and the final game of four Nations was at about

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 3>the same level, and so our ratings are strong. We

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 3>tend to be a little bit variable. But don't just

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 3>look at the US. We won't.

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 2>We won't. Thank you so much, busy time for you.

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Good luck with Game two.