WEBVTT - Surveillance: Bloomberg Global Business Forum

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg It

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>got real for Wall Street yesterday to compete five hundred

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>equities gapping lower off the back of several headlines around

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment inquiry. I want to bring in Lorie Calvasino

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of MPC. She heads up the Equity strategy division over there. Laurie,

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>what changed for you yesterday in the last twenty four hours,

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>if anything at all? Well, look, I think, you know,

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>talking to investors about what happened yesterday, I think there's

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>still a state of disbelief, you know, questions I was getting,

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>are is this real? What will really change? I think

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the street is still digesting this. But you did see

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a negative reaction in the market, and we've thought that

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the stage was set for a pullback anyway before year end.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>This is bringing some of the potential triggers for that

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>into focus. Lord the regressor forward is the earnings call

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>for October. We spoke with b MP Perry by yesterday.

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>They've got an exceptionally cautious view on equities and it

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>centers back to earnings. What is your earning UH call

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:21.839
<v Speaker 1>at RBC and how does it fit into owning equities today?

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>So we're at one six five for this year, one

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>seventy four for next year. You know, I think that

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the concerns about second half Earnie's expectations have died down

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I do think there's going to be

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>some teriff adjustment that has to happen generally, though companies

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>have been finding a way to sort of deal with

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>these issues in the short term. I think the real issue,

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 1>frankly is next year. I think Arnie's expectations are way

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>too high. The street is still at ten percent. I'm

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>at five and a half percent. I have what I

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>think are pretty reasonable assumptions on GDP growth slowing a bit,

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>buy back slowing a bit. Those numbers are going to

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>have to be cut at some point. My guess as

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>we do that before the year is up. Laurie, I

0:01:58.160 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>know you're doing your best to look through the political

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>know and I also know you're adding just a little

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of sicklicality pulling away just a little bit from

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the defensive sectors in the equity market. Give us a

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit more detail on that. So look, I think

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the move in bond fields that we saw, you know,

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.519
<v Speaker 1>sort of late August, early September, and that vicious style

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>rotation that we saw was a little bit of a

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>wake up call um, and I think we do, you know,

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of we have a lot of concerns, especially on

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs in the short term. You know, I'm not

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>convinced that this is necessarily a turning point, as a

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>tipping as opposed to a tipping point in the economy.

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.399
<v Speaker 1>That being said, I think we're trying to look through

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the day to day trading. We're trying to think about

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>in three or five years, what will we have wished

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we did today, And we simply found we kept talking

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to investors about industrial stocks, we think they're pricing in um,

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty onerous outcomes. You're literally back at financial crisis lows

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 1>if you look at a relative pe against the broad market.

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So we think that you should shouldn't be so worried

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>about what this quarter is going to look like. Take

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>advantage of the fact that they've been derisked and we

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>actually think you should be taking money out of consumer

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>stocks where all the good news and resilience is baked.

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>LORI thank you so much, flour Kelvinsina, RBC Company, Marcus

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>here at the Bloomberg Global Business Forum. This is joy John,

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>because this is as John tafted in his book a

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>number of years ago about stewardship. And what is so

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>wonderful here with the descendants of the Mars family of

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota from years ago is they got together, they had

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the courage to make with Wrigley of Chicago, and I

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>remember the emotion of that day. Stephen Badger joins us

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>right now of the Mars family and driving forward the

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Mars Wrigley story as well. The company is not Mars Wrigley.

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>It's Mars, right, Mars Incorporated. Yes, I mean, it's so

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting what you've brought in. You've brought in dog food,

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you've brought in the chewing gunment all that. Are you

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the dominant confectionery player now in the world, Well, we

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>would certainly in any given market be the leader. And

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>we have some of the leading brands in the world

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>with M and M's and Snickers and so forth. See

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>how he did that he wa, I can't concentrate. I

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>can't concentrate from what we were like growing up in

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a family like that with with that kind of business

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>around you. Well, you know, it's a normal family, it

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>really is. Uh. You know, in normal families go through

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>normal family issues. That being said, we were very clear

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that uh, as we matured that we had a responsibility

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>with regards to the business and the associates that we have,

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and and really we're here today at Climate Week because

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>of that responsibility. We we see the science that has

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>been out for some period of time and which which

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>is only getting clear about the threat to the climate

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.799
<v Speaker 1>that uh, there's a real and significant issue that needs

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>systemic changed and transformational action to really address the issue.

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And so I think one of the great things that

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that we grew up with and that I carry with

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>me today is that sense of responsibility. So I told

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to us about the kind of things you focused on

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the monment. What are you guys standing to address that? Well,

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>we've had for many years in place what we call

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>are sustainable and the generation plan that we are spending

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars on. We've also are spending a billion

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>dollars on what we call responsible cocoa sourcing, and we're

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>here this week to really advocate for the fact that

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.679
<v Speaker 1>we need to all collectively step up the actions needed

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>to address climate change. The issue is only ever more serious.

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest you're in the cross ears here on

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>two items. One is you make small items thing a

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>pack of Wrigley's Experiment gum that when my father had

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>for years, or you make the fame candy bars which

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>got me through three years of my youth. I get

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that for the Mars bar, Folks is the one I

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>always went for. You've got the little units of sustainability

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>along with the messaging to children. You're here over the

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>head constantly about sugar. You know we don't need to

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>get into that today, But how do you handle sustainability

0:05:55.720 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>given the responsibility of kids and your small unit product show? Well,

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the totality of our business, whether

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it's gum or or chocolate, or pet food or other

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 1>brands like Uncle Ben's, all of those products buying large

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>rely upon smallholder farms around the world for their ingredients.

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Explain that with a pack of gum. How does that work? Well?

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Mint mint is the key ingredient in one of the

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>key ingredients and gum. It's grown by farmers in the US,

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>but also by many farmers in India who are struggling

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the effects of climate change and in

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>how they in their growing operations, and so helping them

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>actually become more sustainable to generate a greater income and

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>also address issues like women's empowerment. Uh IN at the

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>local level is key to the ongoing sustainability of products

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>like that. You can be incredibly focused on sustainable production

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden, imagine there's a line

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of banks and a line of investors knocking on the

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>door and sounding you you can do it better, you

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>can make more money. How do you keep slapping them

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 1>away year after yet? Well, the reality is if we

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>don't deal with climate change, of business doesn't face into

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the reality of climate change, there there will not be

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a future as we know it. Uh So for us

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to have a sustainable future, we have to spend money

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>on this issue, and that's what we're committed to doing,

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>both through the commitments that we're making and trying to

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>galvanize the industry, as well as through our own commitments

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>with our business. I gotta get to the sensitive topic

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>as well, not just about sustainability and climate change, but

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>as Tom mentioned, sugar, the war against sugar, thebasity epidemic

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in this country and in other other countries in the

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>developed world as well. What you're role going to be

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in all of that, Well, obesity is a global issue

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>without a shadow of a doubt, uh. And we're a

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>food business and so we have a great responsibility to

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>ensure that we're marketing uh and selling our products responsibly.

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>We have a marketing code that's been in place for

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>many years and we adhere to that strictly. And it's

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>all about how we position our products, particularly in terms

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of confectionery, as treats that are are to be enjoyed

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on occasion, as opposed to you know, daily so to speak.

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And what do we do about the kids where it's

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>not daily, it's not portion control the corporate messaging, what

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>do we do about the X percent of any nations

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>kids that don't have that discipline around them. Well, I

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's about trying to be clear as to what

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the role of a food business is, what the role

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of government is, and what the role of parents are.

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a collective issue and no one actor can solve it.

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>But what we can do is we can take responsibility

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for our part, be very clear about that and try

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to galvanize the industry to to step up agree with this.

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is the parents have to have a

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>massive discipline here. So when the Snickers is developed, I

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>get half, you get half, and the time we got left,

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I gotta talk. And this is wonderful that you hear

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Steve Badger and we celebrate Friday, folks. I am thrilled

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that Ken Burns will be with us with his magisterial

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>effort on national and country music. Everybody in the music

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>industry goes thank you, thank you, thank you, Stephen Badger

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for what you did with the House of Wilson Pickett.

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Muscle Shoals is beloved. There's a sound, there's an authenticity there.

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>It goes back to him and B Three's did things

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that no one had ever heard before. What was it

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>like to put together your wonderful film and Muscle Shoals? Well,

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you, You're so kind of reference that it was.

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>It was it was incredible, I mean it was. It

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>was an emotional journey, a spiritual journey, a lot of

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>hard work and it was a great joy and honor

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to be able to engage with the folks in Muscle

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Shoals and the other artists who made that. Lack has

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>his wonderful movie Catholic Records of Beyonce, and in it

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>they've got the Stones show up in nineteen sixty whatever,

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>like Children from England. Did you talk to Mick Jagger

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 1>or any of the Stones about Muscle Shoals. I had

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the great pleasure and opportunity to talk to Keith and

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 1>to Mick uh and they couldn't have been more gracious

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>and and um have a greater love for Muscle Shoals

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>than you know I then I would have expected. And

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and more more recently in terms of some of the

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>heroes and Muscle Shoals, Rick Hall, the dear Rick Hall

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>has passed away. Jimmy Johnson just passed away. I didn't

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>know that. So to be able to capture those guys

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on film before that transparred was great. Like he's got

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a terrible job, isn't it still on the planet. I mean,

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Levols been a wonderful friend of the show up

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.599
<v Speaker 1>playing with the Stones keyboards. He's with us once or

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>twice a year on himself, and he talks about the room. Sound.

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's all about the room, isn't it. It's

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>it's a concrete block, right, It's town. It's town, absolutely, Steven.

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>A final question in it comes from home. It comes

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>from my mom. Oh you're the Good Morning was about

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>many decades the Snickers Bar used to be called the

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Marathon Bar in the UK. But we're gonna make that

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>change again. Can we have a special edition? I wish

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I could say otherwise, but no. We we moved it

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 1>to Snickers because we're a global business. We operate in

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>eighty countries and they're just are some efficiencies that come

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>along with Yeah, there's God bless this is this is

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a can we tell company secrets here with Steve bar

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>please day carry. I come out of the meeting every

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>morning usually was team coming out of my years and

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that saves me is I wander by

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the desk of a hundred and six mayor of New York.

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a small candy thing and it is a Mars

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>container and Mike Bloomberg every single morning saves me with

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the TwixT. Well, thank you. We we need we need

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that he's a wealth stocked going into

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the future, Steven, great to catch up you, thank you,

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Stephen Badger of the mass Family. Fasciniting conversation.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Tell how much more coming up? This is an annual visit.

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>We're going to crow bar him in here right now.

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Dr Ferguson, of course, his public service at the Federal

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Reserve System serving Sherman Greenspan, and particularly on September eleven,

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>his esteemed academics, his public service to the Economic Club

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of New York is should point out. I get to

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>enjoy the lunches. Roger Ferguson serves at the Economic uh

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of New York as well. But I really want to

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>devote this entire time with Vice Chairman Ferguson to his

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>true expertise with t I A and his public leadership.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if it's a number one problem

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>in the nation, Roger, but let's just begin by saying,

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>retirement in America is in a terrible, terrible state. Good morning.

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>We we talked to you a year ago. In my

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>frustration is just do something. How close are we to

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a Roger Ferguson. I mean, you're one of the most

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>impatient guys I know in the crucible of a meeting.

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>How close are we to ferguson immediacy in slow motion Washington? Look,

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we're a long way away from it. Frankly,

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, there are some green shoots that

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>might give us some optimism that we're returning to this

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>really big, important, long term issue. So, um, why don't

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I say we're a long way away from it? Every Congressman,

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>every Senator must have the constituent saying, look, it was

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>all best in engines, but actually it is not worked

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>out for anybody of any given age. The incentivizing of

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>younger people, the middle age, those confronting the failure of

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Arissa seventy four that do something is front center. Why

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 1>is its slow motion in Washington? It's slow motion Washington

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>because this is one of those really long term, slow

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>moving challenges. It's not an immediate crisis. Washington, I think

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>is wired towards the immediacy of the headline. And this

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>challenge is, you know, to use a cliche, a bit

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of a melting iceberg, and society, policymakers, etcetera. All turn

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>their attention much more slowly to these slow moving challenges.

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>The second reason why it's it's a little bit difficult.

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Is the answers are all difficult. Um, you know, figuring

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 1>out how to fix Social Security means for sure, maybe

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>touching retirement age, which people are uncomfortable increasing retirement age

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and may mean cutting benefits for certain of people, may

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>mean increasing taxes. All of those are tough calls. Politicians

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>are not wired towards making the toughest calls very very quickly.

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>So Dr Fergus, just for our listening audience, could you

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>scale out what you think is really again kind of

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the scale of the issue, the problem some just some

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>broad numbers. Okay, So let me start with my uh friends,

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>former colleagues were fed. They've come up with numbers of

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a shortfall and retirement savings of anywhere from four to

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>seven trillion dollars. So that's a massive number. Another way

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to think about it is only about half of Americans

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>have access to retirement savings at work. So that's the

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>second way to think about it is stunning. Third way

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to think about it, it's something we already know, which

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, more than half of Americans couldn't

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>get hold of four hundred dollars for an emergency, and

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>so there are lots of different ways to scale this problem.

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>As this problem, he's gotten worse, is it? How has

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it evolved over the last couple of generations. Well, it's

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>actually gotten more. So Here's here's what's happened. For our

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>grandparents generation. The vast majority of them had of retirement

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>plan at work called a defined benefit plan. Now only

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>about ten of Americans have a defined benefit plan. So

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of Americas now defend on a so

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>called defined contribution plan. And that has pushed risk from

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the company to the individuals at a point when we

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>know individuals have a low level of financial literacy, so

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the problem has become more challenging. If you're just joining us,

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the former vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve System, Roger

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Ferguson with us an annual visit here at the Bloomberg

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Global Business Forum, and we're thrilled to focus on his

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>true expertise and leadership in America's retirement crisis. The Times

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of London two weeks ago Roger the business section, the

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>big headline the annuity. You get a retirement pot, you

0:15:57.760 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>buy a life annuity for you and your wife whatever.

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>The annuity at a number of four point one percent.

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>We are nowhere near the proper actual assumption, are we

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. Uh, And that's yet another thing that

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>makes us challenging. So in an interest a low interest

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>rate environment, lower for longer, may be lower forever. There's

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>no doubt that generating the returns have become more difficult.

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a solution of that, which is a broadly diversified portfolio. Right,

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And so people think of retirement is being driven by

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>fixed income and think of low interest rates. But the

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>reality is a really good retirement will be driven by

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>fixed income, by alternatives, by equities, thereby giving a chance

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to get to a much more sustainable retirement income. And

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>so one has to think about, you know, the basic

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>rules of investing apply for retirement as well as anything else,

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and diversification is one of those basic rules which will

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>help overcome the challenge that we're currently seeing. So as

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>we think about, you know, thinking about some of the

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>solution to this grand problem, which is so complex, it

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it might be one of those situations where

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>it's some combination of government, of corporate, the private sector,

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of educating the individual. I mean, it seems like it's

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it can't just be the government stepping in and no, no,

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And the reality is to rethink retirement involves three separate components. UH.

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Government for sure, because the government drives social security, and

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>here we need to think about reforming social security. The

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Social Security administrators have told us that the trust fund

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>UH will be pretty much out of out of gas,

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, UH, completely utilized by the twenty seventeen

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, something like that, maybe a little further out.

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And so we do need government solutions in that space. UM.

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>The government can also help by setting up rules and

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>regulations that help create more savings in the private sector.

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So there's an act now in Congress called the Secure

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Act has been passed in the House, has passed the Senate.

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>That would be very helpful in creating more safe and

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>secure retirement. So we need to get government acting in

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that way to increase the private sector. Can I ask

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a dumb question of the day, I do I do

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and ariska define contribution. Whatever the program is, I get

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>immediate tax savings which can build the growth and down

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>the road, I end up paying the taxes due to

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the government. Why does the government, Why are they so

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>reticent to let anyone put more money into their account

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>if they know they're going to get the money eventually, well,

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you put your finger on it, it's actually the time

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>value of money. And so they're concerned that broke. Look

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the laying trillions of dollars and taxes until all of

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:43.479
<v Speaker 1>us get to be seventy or seventy two. It's not

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to be taken lightly when you think about the state,

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal situation United States, and so you know, the

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>tax view around retirement has always been we're willing to

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>let you differ, but until a certain age, and then

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's seventy two and a half. They required

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the distributions in part to make sure they get the

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>taxes paid where they're going to get the Texas paid

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>down the road. We've got experts at what what number

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:12.959
<v Speaker 1>of people across the broad American wage paying wtube landscape

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>are below their actual assumption. It's a big statistic. It's

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>a big statistic at this stage, What where is the

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>urgency if there's no cost to the government other than

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>as you correctly state, the time value of money. That's

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the issue. And you know, the urgency

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is starting to come from the citizen to me. As

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we all get older and older, and we start to

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>recognize the insecurity that we face around retirement, and that's

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>going to drive what happens in more. I mean, Paul,

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the number of people I know older than me who

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>are seriously looking to move abroad because they can't afford

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to retire here. Those are tangible numbers for people thinking.

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously it's always been Florida, but even North Carolina,

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>low tax states, things like that. But I haven't heard

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>they're moving to Pan Costa Rica. Thailand is very popular. Yeah,

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you know Italy, I mean Rogers, you know, this is

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>very popular, right, These low income states are very very popular.

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>What is the study that you have researched at T. I. A.

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Kraft about across different death stiles of the American population.

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>If you say you can put in all you want,

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>do they put in more money? The answer is it

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>depends um. And so what we see for the younger

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>individuals is because of the student loan and students issues,

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>they are delaying retirement and delaying putting money into retirement.

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Middle income folks tend to be doing better, and obviously

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the older individuals are staying with a frenzy, perhaps because

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they started too late um. And so what this is

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>all ending up with is another study that we did

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>recently that shows is the degree of financial insecurity is

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>very high. So we surveyed a bunch of folks on

0:20:58.119 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>only about a third of them said they were feeling sick.

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>You're about their retirements. We've got people listening worldwide. Al

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>from New Jersey emails in and says, when you talk

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to about something that matters, because they Al's got his

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>retirement all set up. I believe Vice Chairman Ferguson I

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 1>there's any number of ways to go with a beleaguer

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Powell, the criticism to the FED and FED independence,

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we've got the repo uproar of the recent days. I

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>want to talk to you about something that you're quite

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>good at. And this is off of your steam work

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>at Harvard, which is the experiment of negative interest rates.

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>This wasn't This wasn't on the chalkboard at Harvard, was it.

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>This was not on the chalkboard at Harvard, nor wasn't

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>on the chalkboard at m I T on the University

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago. So they we are in uncharted territory. UH

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>sixteen seventy trillion dollars a debt carrying negative interest rates

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>never a place that we've studied, UH, and frankly, I

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>think not a place any of us ever expected to be.

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's take the dynamics of someone who competent as Richard

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Clarative Columbia, who has your shingle out at the FED

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>right now and expert on DSG. We won't go into

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that because we're at the plaza where it would be

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>unsightly to speak of something. So there was like that

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>sculpture over there's half dress Paul here at the plot?

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:14.959
<v Speaker 1>What is this about this family Entertainment UM vice chairman first?

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And the glide path from negative to whatever normal is

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be? Can we do this with stability? Can the

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>drift function, the reaction functions be in control. I think

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>that's a really strong and important question, right. UH we

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>saw a few years ago when UH then Chairman Banankee

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned normalizing rates. There is a so called taper tantrum

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>where markets got very excited UM about the possibility of normalizing.

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think there are some red, some yellow flags

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>saying as we move in Europe, not in the US,

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 1>but is Europe tries to move from negative to more

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>normal rates. You know, a lot of that economy has

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>gotten used to negative rights and the possibility of some

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>instability cannot be ignored, can't be discounted. What do you

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>think that is for some of these European economies that

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>are experiencing negative rates in half for some time, what

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is the path for them to get to more Look

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>what the Europeans, I think we're working to try to

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>do is to get two things happening that haven't happened

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>thus far. First, get their economies, pickly their largest economies,

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, off of this borderline area where a few

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of them might. One might argue Italy, maybe Germany are

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>in or close to recession for a variety of reasons.

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Others may be slowing. They also are working hard to

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>get inflation as others are back closer to their targets.

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Once those two things start to occur, then you will

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to start to see rates normalize. Uh, the

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>same thing. It's also two in Switzerland. So this is

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a big macroeconomic challenge. And they've been at this place

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 1>and fighting this for a long period of time, and

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we wish them best because the European economy

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>is one of what could be one of the one

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of the drivers for global growth. I know when you

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>were on the Charles River, you didn't you ignored Chicago

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>and microeconomics, not at all. We had a conversation with

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Dudley of the New York FED the other day, the

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>micro economist from Berkeley, and it's really interesting to see

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the behavioral function and the microeconomic dynamics of something like

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the repurchase agreement. Or do you have confidence in a

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>New York FED and John Williams and the new team

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there to get it done and do it right? Absolutely,

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I have a high, de great confidence John and the

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>team with the New York FED. I think what they're

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>confronting the repo market was, you know, trying to understand

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the amount of reserves, the sort of technical that have

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to be held by the FED to get the market

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>itself to do its business, UH, to set the repo

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>rate the right way. And this is a new territory

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>for for the FED, so one would expect to see

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>every once in a while just a little bit of

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the rough edges as the markets and the FED get

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>used to a new process. But they're moving in the

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>right direction. I have a high confidence in John and

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the team. Did President Bush the younger ever tweet out

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:59.239
<v Speaker 1>on Roger Ferguson, I think of the crucival you were

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in an early sub member of two thousand eleven two one.

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't funny. You didn't have to put up with

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>presidential tweets. Right. Well, I'll be honest with you. Um,

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>you know there has been periods on and off presidential

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the FED. Um, this one is highly unusual,

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>and that it is so public. But if you go

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>back to the history of the FED, L B J

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>l B J. Richard Nixon knows, you know, come over

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>and have a quiet talk moment um and so, you know,

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>not surprising given how powerful the FED is to have

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of press. You mentioned the pit bull, Roger

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Ferguson on the balcony, the particle there, but conversation giving

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>it back. Yeah, but aether thing. You have to recognize

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that j Pal has been very clear about protecting the

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>independence of the FED. So we give the FED, I

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>give the FED others. Do you know a lot of

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of credibility right now putting up with some Yeah,

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>tough and difficult times. Roger Ferguson, thank you so much.

0:25:55.160 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Particularly with T I A this conversation on retirement in America.

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.239
<v Speaker 1>This is a joy. And he has come to us

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>on impeachment. Short notice. He is Professor Sunstein of Harvard University.

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>For anybody that knows me, he was way out front

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>on impeachment. And I made it a book of the summer.

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>It is readable, it is short, it is must must

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>read on this strange word, and the joy of it

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is Cass Sunstein, who has been affiliated with Republicans and Democrats.

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course, his recent public service to President Obama kept

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>the T word out of it. He does not mention

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>President Trump in a hundred and seventy five pages of

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>your need to understand the word impeachment. Professor Sunstein, thank

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us today. Great pleasure to

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>be here. Cass. Your book is so important. You begin

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>with James Madison and Walso's through the founders, and then

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>of the modern age. How did the comments of Speaker

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi yesterday link to the impeachments of Clinton and Nixon

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>or will this be a new and discrete process. I

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>think they linked pretty well in the sense that the

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>general tenor of her remarks were connected with the I

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:24.400
<v Speaker 1>think legitimate inquiry into President Nixon and the questionable inquiry

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>into President Clinton. I think that's kind of it's best

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>understood from the constitutional point of view. I think she

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 1>got out a little in front of her skis. That is,

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>she was a little too decisive about the breaches of

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the constitutional firewall. Let's call it by President Trump pending

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.360
<v Speaker 1>an investigation. Probably it's good to be more cautious and

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>um inquisitive rather than categorical. And she said he violated

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>his oath of office, which and let's just practice the

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>question whether that's true. That's not the constitutional standard. Uh,

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the on social standards, high crimes or misdemeanors, and you can,

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, not take care that the lawsby faithfully executed

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>by making mistakes honest or even zealous, and you can't

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>be impeached for that reason. Truman did that. Most presidents

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>have made mistakes honest or not so honest, and that

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean they're impeachable. But generally she was in the ballpark.

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Are we anywhere in the vicinity of the high crimes

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and misdemeanors? I think of your dog snow lead out

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>into the mud of conquered Massachusetts in the muck and

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a high crime and misdemeanor. Is President Trump anywhere

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>near the sunsteined definition of high crimes and misdemeanors. I

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>want to defend my dog that she, you know, uh,

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe make a number one or number two in a

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>way that was littally illegal, but that was not a

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>high crime in that was just uh inappropriate, let's call

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it um. In terms of President Trump, I would say

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that we need to know more about the facts of

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the most recent turn, which seems to be what Speaker

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi is principally focused on. So if it's the case

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>as the President says that there was an appropriate conversation

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in which he mentioned let's call it the B word, Biden,

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't put any pressure on or suggest any

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>quick pro quo in terms of financial aid, then there's

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>really no basis for teaching President Trump in that conversation. Uh.

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>If it's the case that it was explicit or implicit

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that he was wielding let's say the taxpayer funding uh

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>possibility or not for Ukraine as a inducement to investigate

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a political opponent, Uh, then we're a very severe concern

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>as the inquiry and possibly you know, follow up in

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the form of an article of impeachment with the completely legitimate.

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So Professor Sunstein, there's an argument out there that is

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>being floated that the real issue that the Democrats should

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>focus on is the mere fact that the pres isn't

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it made a phone call to a foreign head of government, uh, suggesting,

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, to interfere in our elections by uh investigating

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a political opponent. It wasn't necessarily the quid pro quo.

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It was just a mere phone call asking for interference.

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that ring true to you? Uh, it's in the ballpark,

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, whether you're a Democrat or Republican, it

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>just is not legitimate. Let's practical the impeachment question for

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the moment, and they'll get there very soon. But it's

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>not legitimate for a president of the United States too, uh,

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>talk to the head of a foreign country about investigation

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of a political opponent. Uh, even in a context in

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>which there's no quick pro quo, and to get to

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment question, it's not as clear as if there's

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>an inducement. But if the president in the context in

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>which withheld funds are kind of the elephant in the room,

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and the president saying that and UM let's just say

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that both Republicans and Democrats, UM uh appropriately explore the

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>impeachment question. And I say this with um, you know,

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>with awareness of the severity and gravity of even the word.

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>But but that is the president can't do that. Can't

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>say in a context in which everyone knows that there's

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>an economic background to this and there's a economic relationship.

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Can't say you investigate a political opponent. Kess Sunstein of

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Harvard Law, We're thrilled that he could be with us today.

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I really can't say enough about his wonderful book, Impeachment.

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>It is a sprawling walk through of American history from

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the Revolution to the present day. On Impeachment, We're thrilled

0:31:48.880 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to have with us today, Kess Sunstein, this is a joy.

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>As we've spoken with Roger Ferguson, the former vice chairman,

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>with Cass Sunstein of Harvard on Impeachment. One of the

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>moments of of this September we speak to David Lipton, now,

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>who I believe as title as of this. I'm looking

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>at my watch and I think we've got like a

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>two hour ticks. Acting Managing Director David Lipton joins us. Now,

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly without question. Dr Lipton, the American representative to the

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>UH International Monetary Fund to get an update, and it

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is truly a day of celebration for the International Monetary Fund.

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Krystallina Georgieva of Bulgaria, truly a frontline academic, will join

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the i m F. Is it in the matter of ours?

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Dr Lipton? Yeah, this week is a big week of

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 1>transition for us. We have Christine Legard departed, will be

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>celebrating her this weekend. We expect Krystalline and Georgieva to

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>be approved by our decision body, the Executive Board in

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a matter of ours, and she'll be managing director starting

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Monday morning. It's an extraordinary transition of geography and and tone.

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Is is well uh the former leader of the World Bank,

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, esteemed in international economics for years. What does

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the shift like within the institution? Is it just business

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>as usual? Well, we're very good at transitions. This happens

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit. The institution is used to it ready

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to help her take the helm. You know, you're right.

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>She has vast experience. Not only is she from Europe,

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>but her experience across emerging and developing economies in her

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>work uh in in in UH the in Europe and

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>at the World Bank. I think gives her a huge

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>reservoir of support from our membership really very broadly emerging

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>market countries. Correctly say this is the first managing director

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>from an emerging market Bulgaria. So everyone's very excited and

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to this transition myself. Remember the first

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>rate Bulgarian mathematics of the Koran School of New York

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>University in the academics just extraordinary. I find it fascinating

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>here within the tone of modern capitalism, like Angela Merkel

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>coming out of East Germany that uh the crystallity GRGIEVA

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:21.439
<v Speaker 1>came out of the Carl Marks Higher Institute of Economics.

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's this is a real shift. This is

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>not thesis antithesis, and now we're going to have synthesis. Paul,

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>please David, so as a new managing director comes in, David,

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is the one of the key

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>challenges facing the I m F right now? You know,

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>we see uh UH risks to growth in the short term,

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and we've had a period of slowing growth in core

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>economies for a number of years. After all, just two

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago global global growth that's closer to four percent,

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and now it's closer to three percent. So in this

0:34:56.160 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>era where there's questions about integration and interconnectedness and multilateralism,

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the challenges to get our members to cooperate, to ward

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:12.800
<v Speaker 1>off the risks, to try to secure continued growth UH

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and to promote faster growth in the future. So I

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>think it will be a growth orientation achieved through international cooperation.

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 1>One of the threats to that growth orientation is uncertainty

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that we have in the global economy, principally from trade

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 1>issues and uncertainty about global trade. How does that play

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>into kind of the mandate at the I m F. Well,

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 1>we do see trade tensions and uncertainty around that as

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 1>as the number one risk. Yes, but but you know

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and and that it is important that the US and

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>China sit down and resolve this through dialogue. And I

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>think that will mean China having to deal with some

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of the shortcomings in policies that are um causing spillovers

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.839
<v Speaker 1>that are causing discontent in other countries around the world.

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 1>But that said, there are other uncertainties to Brexit is

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a huge John certainty. Um, there are geopolitical uncertainties in

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the in in the tensions with Iran, various others, and

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 1>so if uncertainty is UH allowed to continue, this slowdown

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in trade, which is bringing a slowdown in investment, may

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>become a crippling problem for the global economy. It's not

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>our base case, our base cases for continued growth UM

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and it really is important that the world work together

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to try to address these uncertainties and not have unforced errors.

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's get out front of the meetings that you will

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 1>have here in a number of weeks or at lease

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the World Economic Outlook, the Green Book, the stability. I

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 1>can't remember the color of the books right now. You

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:44.879
<v Speaker 1>keep changing them, I mean, David, But the bottom line

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>is what our audience wants to know, our global Wall

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Street audience wants to know, is the second derivative? Right now,

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I look at Korean export important numbers that German numbers

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the other day. I'm not asking the acting managing director

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to have these memorized, but you're very aware of the GAMA,

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the convexity accelerations that are out there right now. How

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>urgent is it. I think that the way to think

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>about this is that UH, with the trade tensions we're

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing trade investment and manufacturing slowing and that's very broad.

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, consumer sentiment, consumer spending, and

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>service sector is very strong. And so the question is

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>what will happen in the future. Will the um difficulties

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in the business sector eventually impair consumer sentiment and slow

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>things down, or will the consumer strength and service sector

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>strength eventually help pull business up. That's possible if we're

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 1>able to reduce uncertainties for the future. So I think

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the uh you know to me? The bottom line is

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>growth is slowing, risks are growing, and policy makers need

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 1>to get going in That rhymes and it's an easy

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to remember. So well. Evid Lipton with us of the

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 1>International Monetary Fund, the acting managing director here as we

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>celebrate Christallina George Eva of Bulgaria will become the new

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>managing director, replacing Christine Legard. Christine Legard will become the

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>President of the European Center Bank. I'm not gonna ask

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you to get out front of negative interest rates in

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the ECB. That would be rude. But I can I

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>ask you. I can ask you, David, the questions of

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 1>our Buenos Aires office. They have a lot of questions

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of how the I m F will handle the original experiment,

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>that is Argentine Uh, political economics, even social economics. What's

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the next step for the I m F with an

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>ever dynamic Argentina. You know, Argentina's situation right now is

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:51.760
<v Speaker 1>extremely complex. They've had a shock based on the political

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>results of a of a primary and in that setting

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have had to take some very strong measures to try

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to calm things down, and I think they have calmed

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:04.799
<v Speaker 1>markets down. So our job in this setting is to

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:08.280
<v Speaker 1>help them get through this period, give them advice, work

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>towards an eventual uh resumption of a relationship between of

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>some kind of financial relationship with them, which may have

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to wait a while. UM, but we're we're in discussion,

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 1>they are. The Minister is going to be in Washington

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 1>having discussions with our team shortly and we'll be continuing

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.320
<v Speaker 1>those discussions at the the annual meetings that you mentioned

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:35.919
<v Speaker 1>that come up in later in October. You know, we're

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to help Argentina deal with a very difficult situation

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 1>and they're working hard to do that. David, do you

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 1>think the political will exists in Argentina today to move

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that country or rude questions Argentine's want to stabilize their

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 1>country and resume growth. I think everyone shares that it's

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 1>not our business to try to uh uh divine the

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 1>political path forward. We can't do that, but we're standing

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>ready to help whichever uh side wins the presidential election

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and help them find the best way forward for the

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>sake of the Argentine people. The hallmark of the modern

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I m F is transparency of data. What do you

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 1>do in any given nation where you haven't quoted in

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>this case Argentine and Paso in a black market set

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>with a greater depreciation, how does the institution like you

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:36.399
<v Speaker 1>deal with the multiple markets of currency or yield day

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 1>to day. Look, there are places where data are are

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a big problem, like Venezuela where the data flow has stopped,

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but that's not the case in Argentina. We've dealt with

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:49.800
<v Speaker 1>countries that have parallel markets in many, many circumstances before.

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>That's not a big challenge. You know, they're they've had

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to put on capital controls in the midst of the

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>market developments that they've had. And when you have capital controls,

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, some people try to um uh look for

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 1>another way to move money out of the country and

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 1>parallel rates arise. I think that's something that we can

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 1>monitor and we can help them over time deal with UH.

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think the bigger the bigger issues there

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 1>are how to calm the markets and stabilize the situation

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>so that there can be UH an administration after the

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:29.359
<v Speaker 1>election that makes longer term plans and policies that can

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>help bring stability, lasting stability and growth to Argentina. You

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that it's a very complex issue obviously. Is there

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>any sense of timing based upon your discussions with the

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:42.799
<v Speaker 1>administration of maybe how this might play now, It's too

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 1>soon to be able to say that. I mean, we

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we were having discussions with them. Those will be continuing

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in Washington this week and then again during the meetings.

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, their election is coming up later in October.

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's just uh, not something one can foresee if

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you're just joining us a few more minutes with David

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Lipton and the International Monetary Phone. Of course out of

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Wesleyan and Harvards sterling economics over the years, and I

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>always David love to go back with you to your

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.360
<v Speaker 1>tenure with Jeffrey Sachs on Russia. Could we go you

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 1>have a visceral I would suggest you and Professor Sachs

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>have more of a visceral understanding of the Russian economic

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>experiment out of n than anyone breathing. And give us

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:25.720
<v Speaker 1>an update on putin economics in the strength of Russia

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, he had a difficult Moscow election. Granted that's

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a one off, but give us an update on Russia.

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Is a frontier economy, an E M economy, or a

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 1>G eight nation. The Russian economy has been managed very

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 1>well from the standpoint of macroeconomic stability. They've been very

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:50.320
<v Speaker 1>careful about their maintaining a sound budget. As a result,

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they have almost no uh federal debt. Uh. You know,

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>President Putin has given strong mandates to his Central Bank

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:01.800
<v Speaker 1>governor nev you in a too, make sure that inflation

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 1>is under control. That's not the issue they have as

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:11.719
<v Speaker 1>as a result of there the oil situation and the

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>economic situation and the sanctions, they have a low growth rate.

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 1>When we project their growth rate forward, we see it

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>as lower than or roughly the same as Europe in

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:25.800
<v Speaker 1>per capita terms. Now that what that means is we

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 1>are not foreseeing Russian standards of living catching up or

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:33.359
<v Speaker 1>going in the direction of catching up to Europe. That's

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a problem because their their their standard living is lower

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>than Europe, and they should be able, they should be

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:41.879
<v Speaker 1>aspiring to raise that standard of living. So I think

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the challenge for Russia is the broader, long term business

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 1>model question. What is their strength where they they are

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:54.839
<v Speaker 1>a country with great uh education and great technological prowess.

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:58.399
<v Speaker 1>The question is how to build a system that has

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>a stronger private sector drive in the adoption and use

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of technology in ways that will bring prosperity to Russia.

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 1>That's the challenge. I think they understand that, but that's

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the challenge. But this is fascinating because with you and

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Sex at the nascent capitalism of the collapse of

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union, you go to the era I'm going

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>to say, the oligarchs or whatever that means. How do

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you perceive Russian capitalism forward? Do they move beyond the

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:33.359
<v Speaker 1>early models of the nineties and the two thousand's. Well,

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know quite how they get from where they

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>are to what I'm talking about, because I think it

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 1>does mean uh having a system in which there's a

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 1>more vibrant private economy with true competition and UH corporations

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that are able to UH compete with global counterparts and

0:44:57.120 --> 0:45:02.359
<v Speaker 1>be modern, and it's I think it's not happening sufficiently

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:05.319
<v Speaker 1>at this point, and to me that the challenge for

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:09.759
<v Speaker 1>them is to find a way to have a more vibrant, vigorous,

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>dynamic private sector. David, are we seeing direct private investment

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in Russia today? Just give us a sense of our companies,

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Western companies investing in Russia. I think it's modest and

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:25.920
<v Speaker 1>more modest than before the the UH conflict in Ukraine

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:30.239
<v Speaker 1>led to sanctions and great hesitancy on the part of

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 1>UH country companies from a number of Western countries uneasy

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 1>about their participations. David Lipton, thank you so much. We

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>look forward to all of us at Bloomberg to your

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>meetings here. He's I'm gonna say this to the acting

0:45:44.120 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>managing director do one more time as we truly celebrate

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the changing of the guard APTI UH International Monetary fune

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Krystelina or Gava will take over as managing director of

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:01.799
<v Speaker 1>course Frontline Economics from Bulgaria. Dr Lipton, thank you so

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us Bloomberg Surveillance. Thanks for listening to

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on

0:46:11.520 --> 0:46:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:20.719
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tom Keene before the podcast. You can

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:23.960
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio