WEBVTT - Wonder Woman: Maggie Haberman  

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Hi, Brian, Hi Katie, and hello listeners. Brian. This week

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>marks one year since Donald Trump's inauguration as President of

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>these United States. Don't happy Trump adversary, Katie, thank you

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>very much. It's only been a year, it is. It

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly does feel a little longer than a year, and

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot has happened in the past twelve months. To

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>mark the occasion, we sat down with Maggie Haberman, someone

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>who has had a front row seat for much of

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration. This, by the way, is the first

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in a series of podcasts we're doing that we're calling

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>wonder Women. We're going to be interviewing a bunch of

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>female powerhouses and the weeks to come. We thought it

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>was sort of something in the air about girl power

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>right now and about women in general. And Maggie definitely

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>qualifies as a wonder woman Brian, for sure. I mean,

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>she arguably knows Donald Trump more and better than any

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>other reporter covering him. She started writing about him in

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand six for the tabloids here in New York

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and through Politico and The New York Times. She's always

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>had Trump in her sight. She's a top White House

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>correspondent for the New York Times, as many of you know,

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and she appears on CNN regularly as a political analyst,

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and over the past year she's really gotten scoop after

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>scoop on the Trump administration, and in fact was doing

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>some reporting on her phone as we were interviewing her.

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>That's right, she was texting almost the entire time. She's

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>known as a huge multitasker. I think The New Yorker

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>described her as a humming bird, effortlessly doing what she

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>needs to do, which is everything at once. So do

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you remember the story, Katie about President Trump watching TV

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in his bathrobe with news that Trump told Russian officials

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>he fired FBI director James Kummy because he was quote crazy,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a real nut job. I certainly do, Brian, Well, Maggie

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>was behind both of those stories. In our conversation, we

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>talked with Maggie about her first job in journalism, if

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>anything about the Trump presidency has surprised her, and the

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>challenges of covering this White House both professionally and personally.

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>You were the original, really busy woman, So I feel

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>like I'm only sort of following in your path. Well,

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you have me be You've been called a

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump whisper a West wing beat colossus and also maybe

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the greatest political reporter working today. Mozele on that, Maggie,

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, the president calls you something different altogether on occasion,

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a purveyor of fake news at the failing New York

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Times one year in. How is Donald Trump been similar

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to or different from your expectations? Uh? The day he

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>was sworn in, Not a single thing that has happened

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>has surprised me. Literally, not a single thing that has happened.

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that that surprised me, Uh, after I

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>just said not a single thing, I was the only

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>quasi single thing is And thank you for all the

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>very kind words, but um, at least half of them

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>are not true. Um, was that he fired call me

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>because I thought if he was going to do what

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 1>he would have done it on the first day. Um.

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>But this has played out, if not in the precise

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>ways in which I would have imagined, um, along the

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>same contours and along the same lines. Um. He is

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>who he is. He has not changed. I mean, I

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>think one of the one of the conversations that I

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>find sort of head scratching right now is this idea

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that um, which I think is promulgated, primarily by Michael

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Wolf's book, that there's some kind of a deterioration. He's

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the same person who I was interviewing six years ago. Uh.

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>If people wanted to believe during the campaign that there

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>was a strategy, that's fine, But there wasn't a strategy.

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>He did things because it felt good to him, or

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>because he liked it, or because it was fun. He

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, his axios had a story that he's now

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>not getting into the to the west wing until eleven

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>o'clock in the morning. That's about him keeping with what

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>he did a Trump Tower. So I ask you, Maggie,

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>did he run his company Trump Enterprises or whatever it's

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>called organization Trump org, dot com organization may be generous,

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>did he run it the same way that he's running

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the White House? Because it makes you wonder, how was

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he ever able to be moderately successful? If so? So,

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing that people forget about him is

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that A he began his business with UM a hefty

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>loan from his father. So this self made thing is

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>not quite true. UM he was in real estate. He

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.679
<v Speaker 1>was never seen as one of the more successful developers around.

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>He had four bankruptcies, not personal bankruptcies, but his businesses

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>had had problems. Um. And then he went after the bankruptcies,

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>he went into the licensing business, and he went into

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>reality television. Um. His business was essentially a mom and

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>pop shop. It was not a fortune company, was not

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>anything close to that. And he ran it by instantly

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>making people play for his affections. And he despite you know,

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>sort of constantly picking fights for interpersonal confrontation, he really

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>tries to avoid it. Um. You know. For instance, when

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>his campaign manager, Korey Lewandowski was fired in six it

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>was Don Jr. And Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen who did it.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>It was not Trump himself, and Trump in fact wanted

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Corey to know what a great guy he still thought

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>he was. So yeah, this all is exactly who he

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>was before. So he thrives in chaos. He creates chaos,

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and then he responds to the chaos he creates. It's

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>all the cyclical feedback loop that you know, we're all

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>on with him now and his approval writing is in

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the thirties and he seems to have polarized the country

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>more than any president I can really recall. But you know,

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>him really well, at this point, what do you think

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>are the biggest misconceptions about him among both his supporters

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and his detractors. That's an excellent question. I mean, I

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>think that, Um, I think the most common misperception, no

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>matter what side of the aisle you're on, in terms

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of him, is that there's a strategy at play, that

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>he's doing it, that he has some some guidance, master plan.

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>And then the second um, and this is really I

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>think um been interesting for Republicans and Democrats to deal with,

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>is that he's got an ideology. There is no ideology.

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 1>He's got a handful of it, like impulses, um, that

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>have always animated him. But he is perfectly comfortable being

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent on policy. He is perfectly comfortable taking two conflicting positions.

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Consistency is not a hop goblin that gets to him particularly.

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I think those are the main misconceptions about him. I

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>also think that the I mean one that I think

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard for people to grasp again whether you

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>like him or don't like him, but really for people

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 1>who don't like him, is that the storminess of his personality,

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>which clearly is pronounced and frequent, is not incessant. It's

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of rhythmic. It's whether it comes in and then

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it blows storm blows out, comes in and then it

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>blows out. And we wrote about this, Glen Thrush and

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Peter Baker and I did in December in a piece

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>about how he functions as president. And what can be

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>very darring for people who didn't know him for a

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>long time is that he can scream at you and

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>then be making small talk with you a few minutes later,

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>because he's vinted, he's gotten an out of his system,

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't occur to him how you might be

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>receiving it, and he doesn't really care. The only thing

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that is predictable about him is that he is unpredictable

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and his reactions can be original. So you've known Donald

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump a long time because he would tell you I

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>hardly know him well. The facts suggests otherwise. But you

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>were both a big part of the New York tabloid world.

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:40.239
<v Speaker 1>You as a trigger part of well you you wrote

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about him in the New York Posts and Daily News

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>for many years. Um and you come from a media family.

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Your your dad as a Pulitzer Prize winning New York

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Times reporter your mom's a big pr person. Um, so

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll just go back a little bit before we continue

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about Trump today. Obsessive lee, which is all anyone Maggie. God,

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you must get so tired of it. Thank you so

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>much for doing it with us. You must be like,

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's just take a little interlude and talk about Maggie. Yes,

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about you. Okay, you said you never wanted

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a reporter. How did that happen? I couldn't

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>get a job working in a magazine out of college

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>where I had studied fiction writing and child child psychology

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and turned out to be pretty relevant to your job today.

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Deal in fiction, but you do deal with children. I

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>have three children, Um I now and some would argue

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 1>for anyway. Anyway, I couldn't get a job, and so

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>uh I got hired as a clerk at the new Post,

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>which was not a glamorous job. But it was really

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>like fitching coffee, fitching facts is. But I loved the

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>way the newsroom was. I loved the rhythm of it.

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I love the place and what they would do. I

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>think they still do it there is they would, um,

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they would send reporter copy kids out. That's what we

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>were called copy kids. Um out on assignment, you know,

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>go to a fire or go let stick out of hospital,

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>go whatever. Um. The height was getting assigned a day,

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know, you're the Tuesday copy kid who goes

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>out and goes out an assignment. And I got myself

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in the rotation and I really loved it. Uh. And

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that was that was it. But it was not what

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I planned for. What was it about reporting that really

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of floated your boat? Have you seen a movie

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>The Paper, The Michael Paton movie. I mean that was

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the New York Post in the nineties. It was it

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>was interesting, it was colorful. It was the adrenaline rush

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of a scoop of doing it well. And they're talking

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>about being in a newsroom that I think it's so fun.

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I agree, it's just fun. It is fun. And I

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>mean the New York Post was the most pure fun

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>job I ever had. Um and uh. And that that

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>New York Post doesn't exist anymore. That New York Post

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 1>does not exist in quite some time. But what's happened

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in the New York Post. There were editor changes and

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>just sort of, um, it's just a different place now. Um.

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>But what if you always feel comfort ble with like

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, headless body founded topless bar and stuff. I

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a problem. I mean I was also a bartender,

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>so like I might be the wrong the wrong target

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>audience for that, But it wasn't a topless bar. It

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>was not it was right, it wasn't well but so

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, so like, what's Donald Trump's favorite New

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>York Post headline? It was the one supposedly quoting Marlin

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Maples sang best sex I ever had. It was No,

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>he didn't call it. He didn't know what happened. Was

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>so Steve Cuzo, who is UM, does real estate coverage

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.599
<v Speaker 1>and I think some business are there's some business or

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>page six coverage for the for the Post wrote a

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>book called It's Alive, and it was all about how

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the Post almost died until Murdoch bought it back in

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>ninety three. And in the book he talks about how

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the reporter Bill Hoffman, who now works for Chris Ready

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>at news Max Um and Bill Hofman said across from

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>me for years because I was a dictationist and that

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>was the way the newsroom was laid out. But Bill

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>got a friend of Marla Maples on the phone and

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know, I thought the sex was pretty good, right,

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and the woman was like yeah, and he's like best

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>she ever had, right, And the woman's like, I guess.

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's how that headline came to base. So I

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>was going to say, such great and I feel so

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>much better in the New York Post. Hey, I love

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the ear Post. You're not gonna hear me say a

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>bad word about it, but um, at least not right here.

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But but but that's the world that Trump comes from, too, right,

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>feels true, is mostly true. I like the way that reads.

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And so And the first time, in fact, you quoted

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump and a piece was in the New York Post.

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 1>He was talking up Hillary Clinton for president in two

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>thousand six. Yeah, yeah, um yeah. He once was a Democrat. Um.

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know in what he would when he started

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>arguing as his explanation for why he was such a

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>down or to Democrats for a long time was that

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>he uh lived in New York, which is heavily democratic,

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and so you had to give it. That's that's not

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the real, the real main reason. Um. He was one

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of the only people who welcomed Bill Clinton to society

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>after the White House tenure. Ended right, Um, I think

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>invited him to join his clubs, and because some clubs

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't accept him, because this was right after this, after

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>this was right after Monica Lewinsky h and so uh,

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they were quite chummy. They were quite chummy. And and

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump really likes proximity to power and he likes feeling

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:18.839
<v Speaker 1>like somebody owes him a favor. I mean, those are

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>always the two things. And so he believed that Bill

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Clinton owed him something, which is part of why he

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>got so angry when the Clintons were criticizing him. I know,

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:32.199
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eleven you reported seriously on his presidential ambitions,

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>but then I felt a great story that he was

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>launching a campaign in two thousand fifteen. Well, I mean

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that, um, that might not have held

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>up as the best call, but it was certainly defensible

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 1>at the time because in two thousand eleven we did

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>pay a lot of attention to him. He did dominate,

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, the air, and he sucked up all the

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>oxygen the way that he always does. And they didn't run,

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and he announced that he wasn't running in the most

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>cynical way possible. During sweep sweek of The Apprentice after

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>running the most racially cynical early platform we had ever seen,

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>where he was effectively calling the first black president an

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>illegitimate based on nothing other than based on an Internet

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>rumor that Andrew Breitbart, who created the website Breitbart, denounced

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Trump for in two thousand eleven. He thought birtherism was disgusting.

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>And it is amazing the degree to which Trump mainstranda.

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, he is really the granddaddy at the birth

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>or movement, isn't he. I remember seeing him talking about

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it on the View and spreading that around and and

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>how did that take such a hold on the public's imagination,

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Because it's crazy, It was funny. It started out as um.

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>It was it was a fringe issue. It was a

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>fringe issue that most conservatives wouldn't touch for a very

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>long time. And then he started talking about He talked

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>about it on Fox, He talked about it where, you know, wherever,

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and he was making things up. You know, I have

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 1>these investigators and they can't you believe what they're finding. Um.

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, people who worked with him at the time

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>said that there was no such thing um. And it

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>was so raw and strange and so norms breaking. I

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>hate to use the word that we have a phrase

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>that we have used a lot, and it's gotten quite

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a workout in the last year and a half. But

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it was it was effective. It was impossible to look away. Basically,

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.839
<v Speaker 1>what is impossible to not cover? I think to me, though,

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you guys, that is classic Donald Trump. Yes, you say

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>something enough, you know, whether it's Crooked Hillary or whatever,

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that is a that is a page from his playbook.

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>You repeat it. It's like a monstra petition is a

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>huge part of it starts permeating your consciousness in a

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>way that you don't even understand. But what does it

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>say about it's absolutely true? What does it say about

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the base of the Republican Party that Birtherism is really

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>what bonded Trump to those people? Says that it is

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>an aging, older, largely white basse um that had seen

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is not the first time that we've

0:14:56.160 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>seen ever in history, and certainly in in u s history,

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of a small group of people, much more on the

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>far right than on the far left. Uh, but who

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>had a certain what was described by Housesetter as the

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>paranoid style in American politics. Right, others are taking what

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you have, and Obama represented that in Trump. Um my

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>colleague Jonathan Martin, we were both the political at the time,

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>but this really well and a piece in two thousand

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>eleven that what the base saw Trump as was a

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>neon stand in for somebody who would take the fight

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to Obama because the base didn't feel the party was

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>fighting this president hard enough, which clearly is has proven

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>otherwise in history. But that was the sentiment at the time.

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Can we take a little can we take a little

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>turn just for a second momentarily to talk about Roy

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>kone because honestly, I think that people don't understand just

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>how deeply influenced he was by Roy Kuhne. Can you

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>explain quickly, Maggie, who Roy Cone was, the nature of

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>his relationship with Trump and what he taught the Donald

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>as we used to call him. Sure, So, I mean

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Roy Cohen was the legendary John McCarthy fixer and lawyer,

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, dirt peddler on his opponents. The whole playbook

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>was slimed the opposition, attack, attack, attack. Donald Trump and

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Roger Stone, Trump's longest serving political advisor, on and off,

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>both shared Cone as a as a mentor. Michael Cruz

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>at Politico had a great piece on Trump and Cone

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>during the campaign where he unearthed this gem of a

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>quote from Trump talking about Roy Cohne, which was Trump said,

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>he brutalized, but he brutalized for you. And I think

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that that's so succinctly sums up both what what Trump

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>believes people should be doing for him. But if you

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>think about the thing that we've always talked about with

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the Clintons, especially Hillary Clinton, as they want people defending them, right,

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>we always talked about this and covering the Clinton's Trump

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is that at times a gazillion you are supposed to

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>go out and absorb whole bullets, give up your family

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>for him. The professions of loyalty are and the need

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>for it are huge, um and Cone and body that

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and Cone taught him that. And then at the end

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>of Cohn's life, when con Con who was a in

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the closet gay man who had AIDS, when he was

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>dying of AIDS, according to Cone's assistant, Trump dropped him

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Um and she believes he dropped him because of the

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>AIDS panic in the nineteen eighties. Trump does not like

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about Roy Khne particularly. I think he spoke about

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit to my colleagues Jonathan Muller and

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Matt Flagenheimer during the campaign, but it's not one of

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>his favorite topics. But he has really, even though he

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>distanced himself, he's personified the tactics in the style I mean,

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>very much so. And it's uh. You know, a friend

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of Trump's once said to me that, you know you've

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>got Trump's got two people on either shoulder, and one

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is his father, Fred Trump, and the other is Roy

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>Kone and and one of them is whispering in his

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>ear at all times. Yeah. A friend of mine set

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 1>if he could go back in time, he'd kill baby

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Hitler and tell Fred Trump to be a little nicer

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to his kid. I think it. I think it would

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>have required a little more than just being a little nicer. Yeah. Yeah, anyway,

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>back to Maggy, Um, you joined the New York Times,

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and there's been some criticism of you. Um that, even

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>amid all of these scoops. One colleague of yours, unnamed

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>of course, is quoted in Vanity Fair saying you've brought

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a tabloid twitterified sensibility to the Times. How do you

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 1>react when you hear something like that. Um that it's

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>not true that I'm not the first person to get

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>hired from Politico to The Times. That. Um. And I'm

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>not even sure that was meant as an insult, frankly,

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>but UM, I think that the direction that The Times

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>has taken on politics is not attributable to any one person.

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that we have an and on the White

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>House coverage. Uh. And in terms of Trump, we are

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>covering a tabloid president. So if you cover him as

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a conventional president, you're actually going to mislead your readers

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>into thinking that he is a conventional president. He's not.

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>There are only so many ways to do something when

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it is in the written form versus say a TV

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>interview or a live rally and a live television interview. UM,

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I just don't agree with that assessment. We're gonna take

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a quick break and we'll be right back with more

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:13.360
<v Speaker 1>from the first in our Wonder Women's series, Maggie Haberman

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of The New York Times. And now back to our

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Maggie Haberman. Maggie talked about some of the

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>challenges in covering a precedent like this. I mean, it's

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a it never ends it's literally it's like I feel

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>like I did when I had newborns. It's like a

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>long day. You know, when you have a newborn. You

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 1>sleep for two hours and you're up for three and

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>then you, um, you don't have time to take a shower.

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 1>You feel so nasty, have that like nasty green Vilora

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>robe On and Liker and like you know, and so

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like, insteader the baby, it's your laptop. Um. I

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>just cannot get away from that thing. Everybody, I think

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the big challenges. And again I thought that

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I had seen the zeno of this with the Clinton's,

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 1>but I really hadn't. Everybody has a really strong opinion

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:08.719
<v Speaker 1>about what you're doing. Everyone is a really strong opinion

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>at you, at the reporter. Everyone is a really strong

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>opinion about how you're doing your job. People who do

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>not know anything about journalism or suddenly journalism experts, UM,

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>People who do not understand that it is not a

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:26.959
<v Speaker 1>reporter's job to hold an impeachment trial, UM cannot do

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the things that they would like them to do in

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>an interview. UM. I think that people are I think

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that so I think a couple of things. I think

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that there has been this psychic experience, collective psych experience

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>about this presidency. Um. And I think that that has

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>been for most people. It has not been for his

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>most ardent supporters, who do not really believe that he

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>can do that much wrong. Although I do think that

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>if you went and and interviewed a lot of them

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 1>at this point, there are things they're going to be disappointed.

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 1>Whether they would vote against him, I think it's a

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>different issue. But um, for other people, we've never really

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>seen anything like this. We've never seen thinking about something

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:02.439
<v Speaker 1>you said at the very beginning about how he's divided

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the country, and the country is pretty divided before he

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>came in. What he has done that is different is

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>he's done zero to reach out to people who weren't

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>with him already, and that we've never seen before. We

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>have never seen somebody who has come in and said

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the rest of you, you know what, the hairs, the losers.

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>That is what he does. Um. Well, Ron Brownston wrote,

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was very savvy. The tax plan was

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>not about redistributing so much as retribution. It was it

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>was about punishing the blue state. It was a weaponized

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>tax bill in a way that I don't think that

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>as a as a friend of mine put in, I

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think that we have seen anything in front of

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>mine who's a Republican. I don't think that we have

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>seen anything like that in quite some time. But Maggie

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>goes beyond not reaching out to people who weren't it's

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it's but but even more than that, I think he

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, what, did you use the norm norm shuttering,

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>norm shattering? Uh, and the lack of decorum and any

0:21:56.119 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of attempt to be civil and to have manner.

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Now he does. He's not interested in he is not

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>interested in niceties, he's not interested in in norms as

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>we have always defined them. And he's Um, everything is

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>an attack. If he doesn't like you, if you do

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 1>anything that crosses he will. He will call you a

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>great person in one breath and then the next breath

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>call you the worst person in the world, which is

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he does the reporters as well, and which is both

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>personally disorienting and then I think collectively disorienting. UM. I

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>think that initially people wanted to believe that reporters were

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>hero People who didn't like Trump thought reporters were heroes. UM,

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>because people sort of want a hero at the moment,

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and then reporters are reporters. Reporters, they have a job.

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And now I think people have gotten frustrated that reporters

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>can't do more. But the more that they want done

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>can be done by Congress. It's not the job of

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>journalists to prosecute the president. And what everybody knows about

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>this presidency and the Russia investigation and so forth, it's

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>all from reporters. I think reporter shif done a really

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>good job collectively covering this president under very difficult circumstances.

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. It's sort of your We're grateful honestly, Um,

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not reporting on the president on a

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>daily basis, but for everyone who does it to say

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it's disorienting must be a massive understatement. It is. It's

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>just it's a difficult. Um, it's a difficult thing to do.

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And where do you draw the line between news analysis

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>and commentary. So, for instance, we just interviewed Joe and

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Mika on our last podcast, and their criticism now is

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.199
<v Speaker 1>that reporters they think have gone too far in the

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>anti Trump direction, that they're over their skish. Well, he

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't give specific I think they said even they were

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a little over their skis, you know, sort of media

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 1>writ large and I think that included themselves. I mean,

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say they've called the president mentally unstable.

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand who they think has gone further than

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.719
<v Speaker 1>what I think. They don't view themselves of a subjective reporters,

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think the evidence probably bears that out. But

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>when you think about the sort of the quote mainstream media,

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>New York Times, Washington Post, etcetera, do you think that

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the balance has been struck about right or do you

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>think there's too much kind of reporters masquerading his calumnists

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter? Um? I think Twitter is a huge problem

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in general. It certainly is a problem for me and

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a challenge for me. You tweet a hundred and forty

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>times a day, according to the Columbia Journalism Review. Is

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that not true? I think I did. Then I think

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I've stopped a little bit. But mean, it's a it's toxic,

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it's toxic, it's terrible. I also feel like it feeds

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the echo chamber because I feel like reporters tweet for

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>other reporters to be cute and clever for other reporters

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're not really serving the public, They're serving their industry.

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if Twitter would still be in business, we're

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>not for Donald Trump and reporters, it would be, but

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that it would be anywhere near as

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>relevant as it is now, and I don't think it

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>would be as much of a cesspool. It's it's just

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's toxic and so um, and people assume

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>the worst of everything they're reading. Um. I do think

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is a danger for reporters, myself included. UM, I

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 1>do not resent myself in that. But have you thought

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>about not tweeting? Yeah? And then I tweet, So I've

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 1>thought about it. And then do you think more about

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>what you tweet now? Yes? I do. And what about

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a policy at the New York Times? There was it

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there a new policy? There was the Post or

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>New York Times. The Times has The Times has um

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>social media guidelines, and so these social media guidelines that

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>have been instituted by The Times are relatively new. Yeah,

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>it's in the last couple of months. I'm quoted in

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the in the guidelines. I'm just sort of like, I mean,

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that the problem is is like the number

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>The number of tweets that I compose and then delete

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are a lot, either because it will end up I

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>think people will misread it, or because it's just what

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to say can't be said in that many characters,

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>even to eighty um, or because it's just not worth it,

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>or because it doesn't always need to be said right then.

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>The mistake that I made recently was defending myself on

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>some criticism and like, don't go down. It's just not

0:25:57.600 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just about right. It's just it's it's it's you're

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>through the looking last ones. You do that, it's a

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>bad idea. So I didn't, so I've stopped. But um,

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>but I do think that Twitter allows for a tone

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that straight news reporting does not, and I think that's

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that's dangerous. But I think the tone of

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump coverage generally is over the top that I do

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>agree with them on. But I also think that, um,

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I think they've contributed to it. So I'm sorry, Brian,

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. I was gonna, yeah, go ahead, Okay, you

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>brought you brought up this is fun. I know you

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>brought up. You brought up Maggie. Trump's instability, or at

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>least the factor and his irrationality. Joe and Meek, as

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, called Donald Trump mentally unstable and frequently. Pete Winner,

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a longtime Republican strategists who worked for the last three

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Republican presidents, said Mr Trump's recent twitter storm slash interviews

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>are more evidence we've been watching an American president psychologically,

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>emotionally and cognitively decompose. That sounds very right. I mean,

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's unflattering. It's also diagnosing from the couch. I

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>think that my issue with this is that these same

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>people and I and I respect Petee are a lot

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>so I don't want to sound like I'm not um,

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>but they've been saying that he was cognitively declining since

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>the campaign. So you tell me where the bottom is

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and what we're hitting. I've been interviewing this man since

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven on a pretty consistent basis, uh, year

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 1>to year. He's the same person I've been talking to

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you this whole time, and you don't see any evidence

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 1>of it. I see evidence of somebody who is in

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>an enormously stressful situation and a job that I do

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>not think he loves and probably brings out the worst

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in him. I think that certain qualities get exacerbated. But

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think the president is mentally fit to govern?

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that means. I don't know. In

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 1>other words, like I hear the words coming out of

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>your mouth, I understand the sentence. But I'm not a psychiatrist,

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and I do not think that reporters diagnosing people is

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a good idea. You know, his state of mind. Let

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>me just try to phrase this in a different way.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And I know you don't want to reach a sort

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of an opinion. I'm not going to reach that. Yeah,

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna answer that question. What I am going

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to say is that I have I have covered his asiveness.

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I have covered in detail the types of things that

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>he bores in on times of stress, his perseveration over slights, um,

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>his self absorption, and on and on. So I think

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that if people can't decide for them, so I mean,

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing that I find a little drawing,

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is the degree to which everybody needs to have some

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, U s d a stamp unfit, like,

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>look at what's in front of you and decide what

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you think. Um, But none of us is a psychiatrist,

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that we have been putting a

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>gloss any of us on his moods or how he

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>deals with things. But doesn't the amendment kind of require

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>some kind of stamp. Well, that's in Congress again, and

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the that's thee and that's the cabinet. I was

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>going to say, and that's the cabinet, but that's not

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the that's not reporters tell us about a day in

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the life of Donald Trump, Maggie, because you spend a

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of time following his every move. Does he eat

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>as many uh and fish of filet o fish as

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>my mom used to call them, and drink as many

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>diet cokes as we've been told? And as many diet cokeses?

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>How many? A dozen? It's a it's a dozen a day.

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>That is just insane, Maggie. He's not a healthy eater

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and he never has beend tell us about his eating habits,

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is drinking habits, is sleeping habits, and his TV habits.

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't sleep very much. He watches anywhere between four

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and eight to ten hours of TV a day, and

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the TV habits have been increasing, I'm told by several

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>White White House staff, especially since he got back from

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>our lago on the holiday break. He drinks about a

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>dozen diet cooks a day. He loves to eat McDonald's

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Kentucky Fried Chicken, Um, burger king Um. These are his

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>favorite meal. Let's just go to McDonald's. But I'm not

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>sure the answer. There's one that he sent Keeach Keith

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Schiller to when Keith was still in the White Now

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to go to McDonald's. Item o his item God, I

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>think it was a big math, but I don't remember. Honestly,

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing he was fattening though. I'm just gonna go

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>with that. But it's not the grilled chickens. It's not

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the it's not the healthy items. But the report that

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't get into the Oval office until eleven in

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.479
<v Speaker 1>the morning, that's true. That's true. And that's basically how

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>he conducted himself a Trump Tower, like wouldn't roll in

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>until about ten or eleven. Now was this always the

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:05.959
<v Speaker 1>case or is this more recent? It's gotten it's gotten

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>more like that in the last decade or so. So

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>he watches TV in his bathroom. Basically he watches TV. Um.

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Remember he doesn't own a bathroom. Didn't you read that?

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>And I did? Um, that is true, and and he was, Um,

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you think of Michael Wolfs book? I'm curious

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>because they say he doesn't read, he is semi literate,

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't prepare, he knows almost nothing about policy or politics.

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>He's extremely moody, thin skin. Um does this sound right? Well,

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it's what I've been reporting for two years. Yeah, it

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds right. I just couldn't help. But wonder how he

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>got that much access? Um, Steve Bannon walked him in,

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and um, some folks in the comm shop decided to

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>play some level of ball with him, not fully, but enough.

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>He talked to Donald Trump for three hours. I think

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>an aggregate on three of three hours short. Three hours

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is not out of time. So what I think an

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>hour and a half of that was the interview he

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>did in Beverly Hill. I do not think that they

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>spent much time together since Trump spent on the White

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>House now, but he had written some pretty pro Trump columns.

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>He spent years criticizing all of the Trump covering media,

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and he spent the first year of the White House,

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>UH and the transition saying that all of our coverage

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that things were a mess was wrong. Um, that we

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>were all too negative about Trump. UM. I think he

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>described my beat as the barrant presidency of Donald Trump

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>UM in a very derisive way. So I don't understand

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>how he makes that comport with his book if he

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>considers that a negative, because his entire book is that

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>there is something very like Donald Trump changed. Well, he

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't say he didn't know, he didn't change. What changed

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is that Wolfe Michael Wolfe wanted to get access to Trump,

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and so he did so by critic which he would

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>not be the first person to do so. Lots of

0:31:57.840 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>reporters over the years have done that. Have you read

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the book? What do you think of it? I think

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it needed a copy editor. I think that some of

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it is very good. I think some of it is fantastical. UM,

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think conceptually it's It's pretty right. Let's talk

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>about it, and it affirms what the rest of us

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>terrible reporters have been writing for a year and a half.

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>So have you talked to Michael wolf about it? We're

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>not friends. Let's talk about John. If he ever felt

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>like reaching out to me for comment, did be more

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>than welcome to John Kelly was supposedly going to bring

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a sense of discipline well. John Kelly has made the

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>staff feel less scared of one another, which was really

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>happening with Steve Bannon. UM. People felt scared of Bannon.

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh and the Bannon and Jared Navanka fight was horrible

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>UM internally for a lot of other staffers. And he

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>has made staff never feel less frightened of the president

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>himself in the sense that the president is a screamer

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and he can be difficult, but he's done nothing to

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>control the president. Morale is terrible in the West Wang,

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It's it's as bad or worse than it was when

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Rance was there previous as the chief of staff. UM.

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>So Kelly has made a decision that you're not going

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to change what a seventy one year old man does,

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's not. And that seventy one year old man

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>gets in big public fights with his attorney general, his

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State, to name a couple. Do you think

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that's strange? You know you do you think that's aberrant

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>unusual or do you think that that's normally what presidents do.

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the metrics laid before us by by

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>recent books. Yeah, yeah, what what is the state of

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>those relationships with the senior cabinet members to the great question. Um,

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it depends on who it is. Mike Pompeio he has

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a great relationship with and he has this whole time,

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting because they didn't really have a relationship

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>prior to the White House. Um. But he sees him

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>every morning, sees him every morning. Pompeio has figured out

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>how to brief Trump. He has sort of figured out

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>how to speak Trump. Um. Tillerson Rex Tillers in the

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Seretary of State, has not to speak Trump. Um. Although

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Tillerson had been expected to leave this month, is now

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>telling people he doesn't want to leave, So we will

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. Um. What do you think is the

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>conflict between those two guys just a very different style totally?

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just think that, and I think the

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Tillerson is just not used to being somebody's underlying honestly.

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a buttoned up corporate exactly totally, totally

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>like to with every fiber of his being, right, and

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>when the CEO of eggs on mobile, that's basically like

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>being a head of state, right, that's actually that's exactly right.

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And he's used to being sort of honored and fitted

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 1>in a certain way. Um. So I think that's been

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>one obstacle. What up with? What up with Mike Pence? Oh?

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Being more specific? Um, well, every time you see him,

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>he's smiling graciously, you know, sort of nodding in agreement.

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Don't you love how Maggie Maggie's been on her phone

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>when she's like reporting a story right now reporting sty

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>can you tell us? Well? We had we had had

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a tip that um Met Romney had cancer at one point,

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and it turns out he had um and it's prostate

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>cancer and we just hadn't been able to confirm it.

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 1>But somebody else just broke up. Really I'm just dealing

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:04.879
<v Speaker 1>with right now. Yea is he Yeah? And he's still

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>going to run. Um and he's still gonna run. All right, Well,

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>this is very exciting to hear, like breaking news. Who

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:20.240
<v Speaker 1>broke it? Uh? It was I think CNN. Um anyway, Sorry, anyway,

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>they're my employers. Still, I know, I know, what are

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the there's a little sarcasm there, I know, So Pens,

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that. Look. Remember the thing that

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody forgets about Pence is that he was a conservative

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>radio host before he was a congressman, and then he

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>then he was a governor of Indiana, and he struggled

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>politically as a governor of Indiana. He wasn't gonna get real,

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>he was not going to get correct, and so most

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>likely not and so um he um. I don't know

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 1>what the long game is here. I think basically he

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 1>actually took a short hop, right. I mean it was

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>either not get reelected for governor or roll the dice

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and see what happens here. Um. He's very differential to

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the resident, very very very difficult. Yes, every time he

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:06.959
<v Speaker 1>appears with him right, and he has he has found

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a way to handle Trump pretty effectively. Trump really solicits

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>his opinion, likes him, seeks him out. Um, do you

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 1>think he'd be a good president. I think that you

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>never really know what somebody actually isn't like in the

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>job until they get in there. Although I didn't know

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>what Nonald Trump would be like before he got into it.

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Unless chaotic president would be let's get he would be

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 1>a very conventional Republican, conservative Republican president, very conventional, very

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 1>very it would be like, um, they were discovering City

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Hall and Giuliani was the mayor in his second term,

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and I remember we were complaining about something that the

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Press Office had done to us because you know, Giuliani

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 1>was sort of prototypical for Trump, except that Giuliani is

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>incredibly well read and um is has has actual sort

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of policy thoughts and beliefs and core beliefs. Um but

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>very vindictive, but he's got it. But there there's a

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of similarities there in their personalities. Is a reason

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>they're friends. Um But I remember we were all griping

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in the press fan one day and on our way

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:08.959
<v Speaker 1>to an event about something that the Press Office had done,

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and one of the radio reporters who had been there

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>long she's long since passed away, but who had been

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>there many many decades, said, you should be really grateful

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>he does this many events. You know, when it was

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:23.359
<v Speaker 1>back in um in the A Beam days, the mayor

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.479
<v Speaker 1>would be unavailable for weeks. And like that's a little

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>bit what Pence would be. Like I don't know the

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>last time Pence to the live TV interview, Like, I mean,

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>he is really really, really careful and so different stylistically

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>than Trump. So two of the personalities that obviously get

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>enormous attention or Jared and Ivanka you know, they're young,

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>they're rich, they're glamorous. That I think a lot of

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 1>people resent them. They think, oh, well, there's got to

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:54.840
<v Speaker 1>be something kind of corrupt or something a little bit yeah, malevolent,

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>corrupt or not the same thing. No about either of

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:01.359
<v Speaker 1>both of them. What what are the facts that we

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:05.760
<v Speaker 1>know about their roles in the administration, how they operate

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>day to day. Look, I mean, I think part of

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:14.839
<v Speaker 1>the problem early on was that, um they when when

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 1>when Ryan's previous was made chief of staff, the immediate

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that I said to source who told me was

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>it sorta doesn't matter who has the title, because Jared

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>will be acting as the chief of staff anyway. It's

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>only with Kelly that Jared has not been able to

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:29.919
<v Speaker 1>do that. Um. You know they're they're um, they're both

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:37.399
<v Speaker 1>difficult um to read. They are um uh, they're very

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 1>different people. I mean, she really is a lot like

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>her father. Um. Jared is very sort of chill and

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>flat and does speaks as little as possible. Um. And

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>how is she like her father? She has um a

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:52.800
<v Speaker 1>very similar set of grievances. She has a very similar

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>uh sense that people are being unfair to her. Um. Um,

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>she's a lot like him. Do you think she sees

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>what's happening with her father and is distressed in what sense?

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean distressed at both how he is being perceived

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and how he is governing. I don't think she's happy

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with how he is being perceived, and I certainly know

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 1>there're aspects of his governance that she's not happy with him.

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 1>In their policy issues that they've disagreed on many of

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:22.800
<v Speaker 1>them that I just mean his style, not policy. I

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>mean she has always tried to refine his style. At

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the same time. This is when they're one area of

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>reporting in My Golf's book that I think was really

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>dated UM and I think was based primarily from people

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>who knew her when she was younger and before she

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 1>was being roomed to take over the company. UM. She

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.320
<v Speaker 1>has gone from being sort of a somewhat resentful daughter

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to really being, in many ways, the spitting image of him.

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not not I'm not physically obviously, but UM she

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I but she's him without a lot of the flash

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and style. She believe. She does believe that he's got

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 1>a genius. She believes that there are things that he

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>can into it that other people can't. UM and she's

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 1>very riveted by it. Um, but this is not the

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>life that they wanted. This is not and none of

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>this is what they thought was going to happen. Um.

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Like him, she believed that they would walk in and

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 1>be treated sort of deferentially. Um. And she's been a

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:23.399
<v Speaker 1>little surprised at How do you see actually is as

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you look ahead? What are you most concerned about in

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 1>this year too? Um, I'd like I'd like yeah, I'd

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 1>like a little less nuclear fun talk on Twitter. I

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 1>think that that's a little alarming. Um. Um. Yeah, North

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Korea is of great concern to the administration, and and um,

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I think for a good reason. Um, that's my that's

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>my biggest concern. When he tweets that his button, his

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.319
<v Speaker 1>red button is bigger. I mean, you can't make this

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff up, can you, Maggie, Well, no comment, Um, I don't. Um.

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any of it is productive or conducive

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to actual policy or conversations. I just I think it's

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a problem. What do you know about the more investigation,

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the state of it, where it's headed, who it's ensnaring.

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we know very little about that. I mean, really,

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to speak to something that we really

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:17.359
<v Speaker 1>can't see into. What the George Papadoubel's indictment taught all

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of us is how little we actually know about what

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Mueller has. But given that he has gotten a bunch

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of people to plead guilty, you should assume there's going

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>to be more, Maggie. On a personal level, how you know,

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I people are criticized because they don't ask men the

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>same question. And I would argue that I would ask

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 1>men the same question. But given the demanding nature of

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>covering this White House, how are you able to unplug?

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:44.319
<v Speaker 1>How are you able to be with your kids and

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to do the things that you need to do um

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:53.839
<v Speaker 1>when you're not at work? Um? With difficulty? I mean

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't have it. I don't. None of this has

0:41:55.280 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>been easy. It's been really hard on my kids. Um, twelve,

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:01.799
<v Speaker 1>eight and seven. That's little. The other really little. That's

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:03.319
<v Speaker 1>what I would get, That's what I would undo. Over

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the last years, so hard this has been on them.

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Is your husband a saint? Yes? Um, ask anyone who

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>knows us, Um he is. He's also he's the politics editor.

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah so, but he also has long hours because of

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that job. It's just it's been hard on my kids. Um,

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's been hard and and and Trump selection has

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:23.239
<v Speaker 1>seeped into see at the time, seeped into schools in

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a way that very few other campaigns have. So I

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>just my kids have just been surrounded by all of

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this for a while. Do you feel that they're more

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:34.399
<v Speaker 1>anxious and you're more anxious as a result of what's

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 1>going on in the world. I mean, I think that

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they're just being on duty all the time, Like this

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:41.760
<v Speaker 1>lends itself to being anxious. But what But beyond that, though,

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>beyond the hours that the stererm and drag that is constant,

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it is a I think it is an

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>an unnerving time in the world. And I don't think

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that we are any of us is impervious to it.

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Let you just do the best you can. Let me

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:57.280
<v Speaker 1>ask about someone else who who was or is close

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to you, and that's Glenn thrush Um. You guys were

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>set to write a book together. He got into some

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>trouble apparently because of sexual misbehavior. Can you comment at

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>all about sort of what you know about those problems

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and how it's affected your reporting and your relationship. I mean,

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>he's been a friend for a really long time. This

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:21.320
<v Speaker 1>is obviously pretty painful for a lot of people, UM,

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>including UM these women who UH felt mistreated or who

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>were scared or uh who had encounters with him that

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>they were unhappy with and that they did not feel

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>good about. UM. But he also has said he as

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:40.959
<v Speaker 1>a substance of best problem, and I'm glad he's getting

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>helped for that. And beyond that, I don't really want

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it. Let's talk about where you go

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:50.800
<v Speaker 1>from here. So we're finishing up this podcast. It's approaching

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:53.880
<v Speaker 1>three o'clock. You have an appointment, so we're going to

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>get you out of the studio. Thank you, But what

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is the rest of your day going to be? Like, Maggie,

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I have a meeting with somebody of the paper, and

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>then I have to do a TV hit, and then

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I have to meet a source, and then I have

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to go home, and then tomorrow I go to Washington

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And how do you? How do you? Kind of I'm

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>curious because I'm so impressed with your reporting and so

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>much reporting that's been done these days. I mean, I

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:20.239
<v Speaker 1>know this White House leaks a lot, but is it

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>difficult is it difficult to find a source that really

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 1>trusts you and you can really trust Yeah, I mean

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it's look, well, look it's difficult because Trump and the

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 1>people around Trump have historically told a lot more untruths

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 1>than any other campaign that I have dealt with. UM.

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So we developed a system in the campaign, Ashley Parker,

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Alex Burns and I did of sort of how we

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.319
<v Speaker 1>would arrive at a common based soup stock of what

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>we what what was true based on a number of

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>people overlapping in the same account, and then anything that

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:54.279
<v Speaker 1>did not comport with that would get shaved off. And

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 1>we we still use that. UM. The difficulty is just

0:44:58.239 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that there is so much stuff that is un true

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 1>floating around, and then the true stuff is called false.

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So and everyone has an agenda, and everyone has an

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>agenda correct, and it's usually about killing someone else, So

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it's usually not policy, it's usually harming some other person.

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 1>On that note, Maggie, have a nice day. Thanks for

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 1>having me. You guys, thank you so much for Thanks

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 1>to our wonderful production team is always a tip of

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>our hat to produce ser Giana Palmer, our engineer Jared O'Connell,

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:32.920
<v Speaker 1>assistant producer Nora Ritchie. Nor have I ever told you

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I really like the name Nora. I really like the

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>name Nora too, I do. It's my favorite dolls house.

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>And my mom's name was Eleanor, and Ellie is named Eleanor,

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>but I call her Ellie, not Nora. But I could

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>have called her Nora, but anyway, I didn't, And I

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:49.760
<v Speaker 1>like your name. Thanks also to Emily Beana of Katie

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Couric Media, my assistant Beth Dems, and Alison Bresnik, who

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>hits the bull's eye day in and day out on

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 1>social media. Mark Phillips wrote our theme music. Katie Kirk

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and I are the show as executive producers, and please

0:46:02.280 --> 0:46:05.239
<v Speaker 1>if you can drop us a line at comments at

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Current podcast dot com with guest ideas, feedback questions, or

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 1>anything that's on your mind. You can also find me

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:15.360
<v Speaker 1>on social media under Katie Couric, and you can follow

0:46:15.360 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at Goldsmith b. We'll be back next

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:21.720
<v Speaker 1>week with the next installment of our Wonder Women's series,

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:25.439
<v Speaker 1>so stay tuned for that everyone. Meanwhile, thanks so much

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Bye bye, like John McLachlan would say, bye bye,

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 1>done done, done done,