Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom much BLM riots in Kentucky
Speaker 1: and across the country. Doctor Fauci versus doctor Paul on
Speaker 1: Herd immunity and Democrats gear up for the biggest mere
Speaker 1: campaign anyone's ever seen. Buck Sexton coding the news and
Speaker 1: disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, Great,
Speaker 1: You're a great American again. This is the bucks Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Former CIA analysts can speak to three hours without a
Speaker 1: phone call. Try doing that sometimes. No welcome friends to
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton Show. Great to have you with me,
Speaker 1: and no surprise is about what has happened in the
Speaker 1: last twenty four hours. Yeah, sturing the show. I mentioned
Speaker 1: to you that Brianna Taylor's a case had been decided
Speaker 1: by a grand jury, and the Kentucky Attorney General gave
Speaker 1: a lengthy statement about exactly how he came to the decision,
Speaker 1: or rather how the grand jury came to the decision.
Speaker 1: But he explained the law and how it applies here.
Speaker 1: Let's just before I get into the riots and the
Speaker 1: lunacy and the stupid Democrat commentary around this. All that
Speaker 1: and the lies pile the top lies of the BLM
Speaker 1: movement before I get let let's just make sure we
Speaker 1: understand the facts as they are. These are the the
Speaker 1: baseline things you must know before you can even really
Speaker 1: have an opinion on the Brianna Taylor case, and certainly
Speaker 1: before anybody could think they have a justification to protest
Speaker 1: or even riot, although there's no justification for rioting over
Speaker 1: this issue. And there are protests in Louisville, in New York,
Speaker 1: you know, in Seattle, in Portland. I mean, there's this
Speaker 1: is all over the place, right, all kinds of insanity,
Speaker 1: people being intimidated, people being threatened on the street. But
Speaker 1: let's just start with the facts. I think that's the
Speaker 1: most helpful way to look at this problem. Today, police
Speaker 1: were serving a legitimate warrant, and the police officers serving
Speaker 1: the warrant weren't even the ones working the case before.
Speaker 1: So their job was just to go in and affect
Speaker 1: the arrest. That's it. They don't They weren't the ones
Speaker 1: doing the investigation beforehand. There's no personal animist, there's no
Speaker 1: we're gonna go get this person. They were just there
Speaker 1: to affect and arrest. And when they and they knocked
Speaker 1: on the door, it was not a no knock raid,
Speaker 1: which we were told for months and which was a lie.
Speaker 1: Now you could say, buck well, maybe that was a
Speaker 1: good faith there. Why would every news outlet report that
Speaker 1: it was a no knock raid before we knew whether
Speaker 1: or not that was the case. Clearly, they just took
Speaker 1: the side of Brianna Taylor's boyfriend in this, or they
Speaker 1: believed him and assumed that it must be the police
Speaker 1: who were lying, because the police upheld all or held
Speaker 1: all along, that they were the ones who knocked, and
Speaker 1: that there was nothing that they did in that process
Speaker 1: that was unjust, that was wrong. Kenneth Walker was the
Speaker 1: guy Brianna Taylor's boyfriends shot at police. So he opens
Speaker 1: fire on the officers. Okay, he opens fire on the
Speaker 1: officers Kenneth Walker, and they returned fire and they're shooting back,
Speaker 1: and they don't hit Kenneth Walker. A police officer was
Speaker 1: hitting the initial gunfire from Walker, but they hit Brianna Taylor.
Speaker 1: Now there's also been the claim for many months now,
Speaker 1: this goes back to March that Brianna Taylor was asleep.
Speaker 1: So the story that people were told that the activists,
Speaker 1: the anti cop movement out there BLM the Democrat media
Speaker 1: CNN and CNN is a disgusting disgrace full of reckless morons,
Speaker 1: and MSNBC's no better. But the story that people were
Speaker 1: told all this time was that Brianna Taylor was asleep
Speaker 1: in bed and was shot to death by cops who
Speaker 1: did a no knock raid and they just bust in
Speaker 1: and started shooting for no reason. That was the story
Speaker 1: that people were told, and that that's spread all across
Speaker 1: the country, and celebrities, even of the reach and stature
Speaker 1: of Lebron James, made Brianna Taylor's case a huge cause.
Speaker 1: Right look at Brionna, Look what happened to Brianna Taylor.
Speaker 1: And people believe that what they initially were told about
Speaker 1: this is still true. Now there must be a cover
Speaker 1: up right now, there must be something else that's gone
Speaker 1: on here. And it's very once you understand the facts,
Speaker 1: it's very clear what did happen and what the real
Speaker 1: assessment of the situation should be. It's a tragedy. It's
Speaker 1: a tragedy. It was an accident. They were not trying
Speaker 1: to shoot Brianna Taylor. This was caught in the crossfire.
Speaker 1: That was That's what ended up happening here. Because you
Speaker 1: can't shoot at cops that expect them not to shoot back.
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't care how many so called lib
Speaker 1: you know, they always get some former former you know,
Speaker 1: sergeant from somewhere, some former law enforcement officer who somehow
Speaker 1: just hates cops, you know, hates the police, and they
Speaker 1: get tons of lawyers, you know, these ACLU types who
Speaker 1: will go on air and all they want to do
Speaker 1: is trash the police all the time. It doesn't matter
Speaker 1: what they say about the right to self defense. Police
Speaker 1: are going to defend themselves. I don't even care what
Speaker 1: the regulations say. If you have a firearm and someone
Speaker 1: is shooting at you, you're going to shoot back. You're
Speaker 1: not going to sit there and wonder about maybe the
Speaker 1: other person will miss because you don't want to have
Speaker 1: to use your weapon. It's absurd. I understand. Why are
Speaker 1: we even having this discussion. It's so obvious. Well, we're
Speaker 1: having this discussion because there are people out there who
Speaker 1: simply don't care what the facts and what the truth are.
Speaker 1: We're having this discussion because there are people in the
Speaker 1: police reform movement of the Democrat Party, and this is
Speaker 1: a Democrat movement who even the examples you could point
Speaker 1: to where you say, well, can't we all agree, can't
Speaker 1: we all agree that law enforcements should be able to
Speaker 1: defend themselves when shot, when fired at, when shot on.
Speaker 1: And there are Democrats now who would say, no, we
Speaker 1: can't all agree with that because of the legacy of
Speaker 1: systemic racism in the police department, and maybe the cops
Speaker 1: have to take a little extra care here and just
Speaker 1: allow themselves to be put in lethal jeopardy, which is
Speaker 1: never going to happen. But that's this is that this
Speaker 1: is a deranged position, and we've been crawling toward this
Speaker 1: for a while now. Remember it was that police officer
Speaker 1: in Atlanta who wrestled the guy who was non compliant,
Speaker 1: who fought the officers who resisted arrest, took one of
Speaker 1: their weapons away, and then tried to use a taser
Speaker 1: on the officer and as he turns to use a
Speaker 1: taser in the officer with the officer fires, and they
Speaker 1: claimed that this was a murder. No, No, you're supposed
Speaker 1: to get tasered if you're a cop. You're supposed to
Speaker 1: allow a perpetrator to use a less than lethal on
Speaker 1: you and then hope that that perpetrator who is obviously
Speaker 1: angry and full of adrenaline at that moment, doesn't decide
Speaker 1: to take your side, or take your service weapon and
Speaker 1: use it on you as a police officer and execute
Speaker 1: you right there while you're helpless. That was what we
Speaker 1: learned from the Atlanta case. We're a disgusting district attorney,
Speaker 1: completely political, total hack, brought a murder charge against that officer.
Speaker 1: Murder one. They could give that officer the death penalty.
Speaker 1: That's how unjust the left is what it comes to
Speaker 1: these issues. You see, the Left doesn't like police because
Speaker 1: they don't want the mob. They don't want their emotional
Speaker 1: rabble to be constrained by laws. They don't want people
Speaker 1: to feel like they can't do whatever the mob demands
Speaker 1: because there are people who stand in the way. There
Speaker 1: are people who stand ready to, yes, do violence in
Speaker 1: the name of the law so that you and I
Speaker 1: can sleep soundly at night. Left doesn't like that. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: they'll use the force of the law for very minor transgressions.
Speaker 1: Some of you may have seen the video of the
Speaker 1: woman who was arrested at an outdoor baseball like little
Speaker 1: league game, standing or sitting in the stands didn't have
Speaker 1: a mask on, so they arrest her. Oh okay, people say,
Speaker 1: well buck, no, they told her to put a mask on,
Speaker 1: and then when she wouldn't, they said she's trespassing, and
Speaker 1: then they arrested her. Okay, they arrested her for not
Speaker 1: having a mask on. That's right. They took away her freedom.
Speaker 1: They processed her because she didn't wear a mask outside,
Speaker 1: and all the Libs will cheer for this. I hope
Speaker 1: Fauci is proud of what he's done to this country.
Speaker 1: That little moron. Yeah, I know I'm done with him.
Speaker 1: I've been done with him for a while. But I'm
Speaker 1: not even pretending to think this guy is I just
Speaker 1: see the slimy bs arguments from him now all the time,
Speaker 1: never admits all the catastrophically wrong things that have been
Speaker 1: said by him in the past, and just continues to
Speaker 1: make everybody feel like we have no future. We're gonna
Speaker 1: have to keep wearing masks even after a vaccine. No vaccines, perfect,
Speaker 1: gotta keep wearing masks. Probably multiple iterations of vaccines. Got
Speaker 1: a social distance forever. I just want to tell Fauci,
Speaker 1: go blank yourself. You don't know what you're talking about.
Speaker 1: I don't care that you're the world's expert on this.
Speaker 1: The world's expert didn't do a damn thing to help
Speaker 1: us when this act she could have been slowed down
Speaker 1: in the early days. You know, we turn around. We
Speaker 1: asked the medical community give us, you know, oh, please
Speaker 1: pass your wisdom to us from on high medical policy experts.
Speaker 1: Oh wisdom like, let's get everybody on ventilators as fast
Speaker 1: as possible. They're not going to tell you this right now,
Speaker 1: but I know this from talking to other doctors. A
Speaker 1: lot of lives could be saved. It could have been
Speaker 1: saved they had just used oxygen masks instead of ventilators.
Speaker 1: But I remember the whole push for Oh, Trump's not
Speaker 1: using the Defense Production Act. Trump's not doing enough to
Speaker 1: get the ventilators. No, now we got ventilators that we're
Speaker 1: gonna have to turn into espresso machines. We got nothing
Speaker 1: to do with them. Ventilators cause infection very quickly. They're
Speaker 1: they're they're an absolute last resort. They're not men for
Speaker 1: long for the long term usage of trying to keep
Speaker 1: people breathing when they have this COVID problem, which is
Speaker 1: why you know you went on the ventilator you'd a
Speaker 1: fifty percent chance of dying on it. But the the
Speaker 1: the top cast, the elites of the medical policy community,
Speaker 1: they really, they really have been a great job. Heck
Speaker 1: of a job you've done, Fauci. Heck of a job.
Speaker 1: So back to Joe. Sorry, I'm particularly annoyed about that
Speaker 1: today too. Back to Fauci, I'm sorry, I see. Back
Speaker 1: to Brianna Taylor here. There was an injustice done yesterday,
Speaker 1: and it was not the decision to forego murder charges
Speaker 1: that the grand jury did not think there was a
Speaker 1: There was a murder here and there wasn't. Obviously, shooting
Speaker 1: at someone who's trying to shoot you and missing and
Speaker 1: hitting somebody behind that person doesn't make you a murderer.
Speaker 1: It makes you human. It means you made an error,
Speaker 1: a tactical error under pressure that a lot of people
Speaker 1: would make, even people who were trained. But there was
Speaker 1: injustice yesterday. They're in fact, two injustices that I want
Speaker 1: to talk to you about. Neither one of them have
Speaker 1: to do with cops not being indicted for Brianna Taylor shooting.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Life. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. It is shameful. What came out of
Speaker 1: the Attorney General's office and the grand jury, not because
Speaker 1: of grand jurors, but because we know that prosecutors craft
Speaker 1: their own narrative. They can expand the number of witnesses
Speaker 1: that go into a grand jury, or it can be
Speaker 1: very narrow, and if there is an issue of fact
Speaker 1: and law that still remains, individuals should have the right
Speaker 1: to express their defense in a trial by their peers.
Speaker 1: He did not do that. The Attorney Journal of Kentucky
Speaker 1: did not do that. It is very obvious to us
Speaker 1: that there was a grave injustice because did he call
Speaker 1: the other witnesses who said they did not hear the
Speaker 1: officers announced themselves? Were some of the officers in playing clothes?
Speaker 1: So that if you're in the middle of the night
Speaker 1: coming into a private home, which is another very sacred
Speaker 1: place in America's hearts, America aren't in the middle of
Speaker 1: the night playing clothes and people were sleep and they
Speaker 1: could not see who you were. Did he not add
Speaker 1: that narrative so that grand juris could understand what it means.
Speaker 1: And then, let me just say this, it was a
Speaker 1: defective warrant um just making stuff up at this point,
Speaker 1: that's representative of Sheila Jackson Lee. Hyeah find witnesses who
Speaker 1: didn't hear a thing. Well, the witness in the apartment
Speaker 1: are joining because they were This was an apartment three,
Speaker 1: and the person in apartment four heard the knock and
Speaker 1: very clearly said I heard them say police open up
Speaker 1: warrant or you know, police search warrant. So you can
Speaker 1: find other people who didn't see something that that doesn't
Speaker 1: that's not how proof works. Right. You can find someone
Speaker 1: who's two blocks away from a shooting, did you see
Speaker 1: the shooter? No, that's not that. That's meaningless. All that
Speaker 1: matters is that there's a witness who heard this. It
Speaker 1: doesn't matter that there are other people elsewhere who didn't
Speaker 1: hear it. That that's not how evidence works. Unless they
Speaker 1: were closer to the sound of the noise. But even then,
Speaker 1: where were they? And oh, she knows better about the
Speaker 1: investigation than the people that spent months doing this. Now
Speaker 1: she's just making stuff up. This is just being a
Speaker 1: sore loser because she wanted a political outcome here. That's
Speaker 1: what Representative Jackson Lee wanted. She wanted people to be
Speaker 1: prosecuted because there's anger, because there's anger among Democrats, because
Speaker 1: there's anger within a segment of the black community over
Speaker 1: this shooting. It is a tragedy. It's a sad thing.
Speaker 1: Bad things do happen. Bad things do not equal somebody
Speaker 1: goes on trial for murder. You know this is not
Speaker 1: a complicated idea. But Democrats, when they can't get their way,
Speaker 1: they'll pretend that they just can't comprehend. Well, I don't understand.
Speaker 1: You know, this is terrible, This is such an awful
Speaker 1: thing that they didn't what they thought there should be
Speaker 1: a murder charge. Oh, I get it, you know, you
Speaker 1: know what you really see. They just want to see
Speaker 1: a cop here get charged and go through that and
Speaker 1: be and maybe then when the verdict comes out, they'll
Speaker 1: say well, you know, no, of course not. They when
Speaker 1: the verdict happens then and it's not guilty, because the
Speaker 1: cop is clearly not guilty, then they'll call for more
Speaker 1: civil unrest, more riots. You know what the injustice was
Speaker 1: that was done yesterday by the grand jury. It was
Speaker 1: the decision to indict on three counts of wanton endangerment
Speaker 1: because one officer, not even the one who shot fatally
Speaker 1: Brianna Taylor, one officer fired rounds that went into a
Speaker 1: neighboring apartment. Anybody who knows anything about ballistics understands that
Speaker 1: that can happen. Okay, that's why it's such a it's
Speaker 1: such a big deal when police have to pull their
Speaker 1: weapons and use them. You know. So now it's you know,
Speaker 1: by the way a bullet could go through a person,
Speaker 1: depending on the caliber and the and the proximity, a
Speaker 1: bullet could go through a person and hit a person
Speaker 1: behind them. So so now you're gonna hold that person
Speaker 1: accountable for that too. If there if it's a legally
Speaker 1: justified use of force, you're expecting the perfect usage of force. No,
Speaker 1: so what they did was put these three wanton endangerment
Speaker 1: charges under Kentucky law against one officer who didn't kill Brianna.
Speaker 1: He didn't even kill Brianna Taylor. Right, there's murder and
Speaker 1: there's killing. Killing means you take someone's life. Murder is
Speaker 1: you illegally and immorally take someone's life. He didn't do
Speaker 1: either of those things. He just fired at her boyfriend,
Speaker 1: who I've also got to say, people are banging at
Speaker 1: your door at three o'clock in the morning, you just
Speaker 1: start blasting, You just start blasting at them. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's a risky thing to do, especially when it's very
Speaker 1: possible their police, and especially when based on some of
Speaker 1: the additional evidence here, it is still believed by law
Speaker 1: enforcement that Walker was involved in the drug trade. Okay,
Speaker 1: he thought it was drug dealers coming to rob him.
Speaker 1: They just happened to be coming to that apartment to
Speaker 1: rob him at three am. He just happened to be
Speaker 1: the luck of the draw there for him. Let's use
Speaker 1: let's use our heads, folks. But no, the injustice here
Speaker 1: was the charging of one officer with three counts of
Speaker 1: wanton endangerment as just an offering and offering to the
Speaker 1: mob trying to buy them off. Here you go. We
Speaker 1: won't let him off entirely. Guys. We know this was
Speaker 1: a bad situation. But let's let's try to charge this officer.
Speaker 1: He could theoretically go to prison for fifteen years for this, folks.
Speaker 1: It's not a little thing. Three felony counts of wanton endangerment.
Speaker 1: That's that's injustice. You don't charge somebody. You don't use
Speaker 1: the power prosecutor's office to try to make the angry,
Speaker 1: ignorant mob happier. That's not what you're supposed to do.
Speaker 1: That's not that's not the system we live under. You know,
Speaker 1: if they're gonna tell me that I can't in New
Speaker 1: York City have you know two or three ar fifteens
Speaker 1: and a couple of handguns and a you know, a
Speaker 1: couple of shotguns, which is what I'd like to have
Speaker 1: if I could. They're gonna tell me the under law,
Speaker 1: I can't do any of those things. They be are
Speaker 1: darnwell actually enforce the law as it's written. We keep
Speaker 1: saying no. They want to defund police, and they want
Speaker 1: to disarm you, and they want to punish people that
Speaker 1: try to protect themselves. The injustice from the court yesterday
Speaker 1: was charging an officer with anything, and then there was
Speaker 1: a whole lot more injustice and it wasn't about the
Speaker 1: non charging of officers. Thanks for listening to The bus
Speaker 1: Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. I think
Speaker 1: it's grossly and sufficient. It does not deal with the
Speaker 1: fact that the light of Brianna tell Us was taken.
Speaker 1: It does not address being a victim of being killed.
Speaker 1: The value of a light is not at all addressed
Speaker 1: in these charges. You could get in dangerment if you
Speaker 1: shot in the air and nothing. He took a woman's life,
Speaker 1: a woman who was in no way should have even
Speaker 1: been in that situation because the person you were pursuing
Speaker 1: was not there. She committed no crime. She'll only act
Speaker 1: that night when she went to bed that night, and
Speaker 1: she is dead. The indictment does not address the life.
Speaker 1: When we save black lives matter, this indictment says it
Speaker 1: does not matter. Reckless demagoguery from a man who has
Speaker 1: excelled in that area and excelled its starting race riots too.
Speaker 1: Stretching back for decades now, the Reverend Al Sharpton saying
Speaker 1: that black lives do not matter because of this, because
Speaker 1: of this decision from the court. That's his claim. I
Speaker 1: heard other commentators saying the same thing. That they love
Speaker 1: overseeing an MSNBC to put people on TV who will
Speaker 1: say just that that this this tells us that the
Speaker 1: court does not find than black lives matter. Oh here
Speaker 1: here CNN b Cary Sellers play nine. I think it's
Speaker 1: pretty clear that the black lives do not matter. I
Speaker 1: think it's pretty clear that justice is fleeting um that
Speaker 1: if you are a person of color, particularly a black
Speaker 1: woman in this country. Um, you know, the quest for
Speaker 1: justice in the road to get justice is longer and
Speaker 1: harder than most. And I think that yesterday there was
Speaker 1: there was more concern for the walls of the apartment
Speaker 1: next door. Uh. These charges these officers face, or that
Speaker 1: officer faces as a sham. Um. You know, when you
Speaker 1: have one person who's charged for just shooting a gun
Speaker 1: Willie Millie, as we say, down South, with a fifteen
Speaker 1: thousand dollars bond, sometimes you just have to smile at
Speaker 1: the absurdity. See it. It doesn't actually play kate the
Speaker 1: angry mob and the demagogues who rile them up when
Speaker 1: you put forward these charges of reckless endangerment, which is
Speaker 1: which is clearly what this was meant to be. It
Speaker 1: was a consolation prize. Here you go, guys, we'll charge
Speaker 1: one of the cops. So then at least the headlines
Speaker 1: can say one officer charged. He's gonna beat the charge.
Speaker 1: It charge is nonsense, all right. The charge is effectively,
Speaker 1: you know, shooting back at someone who shot at you
Speaker 1: and not putting every round. Imagine if they actually hit
Speaker 1: Walker with all the rounds they fired, then it would
Speaker 1: be oh my gosh, excessive force. Look at it. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's there's no way to make people happy. They've they've
Speaker 1: set themselves into a narrative that they will not move from.
Speaker 1: They're they're just dedicated to this. Now. It doesn't matter
Speaker 1: what the facts turned out to be. Akari Seller's, Reverend
Speaker 1: Awl name, you know, any of them, you know Chris
Speaker 1: Cromo over at CNN, all misstating facts on this consolate.
Speaker 1: None of them say, wow, I guess it. We shouldn't
Speaker 1: have been saying all along that it was a no
Speaker 1: knock rate. It wasn't a no knock right. Well, now
Speaker 1: they're just gonna say the eyewitnesses got it. They did
Speaker 1: the same thing with Mike Brown. You had black eyewitnesses
Speaker 1: that said Mike Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, charged the officer,
Speaker 1: attacked the officer, and the officer shot him while the
Speaker 1: while Mike Brown was charging at him, running at him
Speaker 1: to tackle him. Mike Brown was very large man, by
Speaker 1: the way, the officer was not. And they just say, oh, well,
Speaker 1: they they you know, memories and they get it wrong.
Speaker 1: And so you see that's the thing. They'll just there's
Speaker 1: no such thing as facts for this group. There's no
Speaker 1: such thing as facts when it comes to all these
Speaker 1: issues for the left, because even when we have things
Speaker 1: that we should all say, Okay, here's what happened, to
Speaker 1: the best of our ability to know anything, here's what happened.
Speaker 1: Lest they know, we don't think, we don't agree that's
Speaker 1: what happened. Now, what happened is the thing that we
Speaker 1: tell you, we want to say happened. That's their approach.
Speaker 1: It's very hard to very hard to argue with somebody
Speaker 1: when you can't when you can't even work from the
Speaker 1: same reality. They're operating from a different reality. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're going to talk about how the settlement, or rather
Speaker 1: the charges didn't deal with Brianna the value of Brianna
Speaker 1: Taylor's life. The charges have to do not with showing
Speaker 1: how much they value someone's life. The charges are about
Speaker 1: did this person or persons commit a criminal act for
Speaker 1: which we the state, are going to punish them, ruin
Speaker 1: their lives. But that's what justice demands. Do they commit
Speaker 1: a criminal act? Did they have the men's ray of
Speaker 1: the state of mind necessary to be held criminally culpable
Speaker 1: for this? The law isn't just I'm upset about something
Speaker 1: that I want someone to be punished. That's not the law.
Speaker 1: That's not If it were, we would all we would
Speaker 1: all constantly be getting marched off to prison camps by
Speaker 1: libs who are upset about all the co two we're
Speaker 1: putting in the air. Right, that's not the law. There
Speaker 1: is no good faith argument that what happened here is wrong,
Speaker 1: meaning that there was no murder. There were no murder charges.
Speaker 1: It's not a murder. It's just not. I mean, they
Speaker 1: can argue about this all day. It is a tragedy.
Speaker 1: It is a tragedy. If a city employee was driving
Speaker 1: a garbage truck and the brakes failed and that city
Speaker 1: employee ran over somebody in a crosswalk, that's horrible. That's
Speaker 1: a tragedy. It's awful. Bad things happen in the world.
Speaker 1: That's a terrible thing, and we should all do what
Speaker 1: we can in society has an obligation to help out
Speaker 1: that family that has that law. But you don't a lot.
Speaker 1: I mean, if the brakes failed, you don't lock up
Speaker 1: the guy driving the truck as a murderer. Doesn't matter
Speaker 1: how upset people are. Not a murderer, you know, this
Speaker 1: is an important distinction here. But you see, they're trying
Speaker 1: to they're trying to use emotion to overcome and erode
Speaker 1: the law. They're saying the most inflammatory things possible. And
Speaker 1: here you have multiple commentators that I saw, and I'm
Speaker 1: sure there are a whole lot more saying that this
Speaker 1: judgment shows that they believe quote black lives do not
Speaker 1: matter and quote wow, you see a lot of people
Speaker 1: yesterday talking about hot Brianna Taylor's family got twelve million
Speaker 1: dollars from the city of Louisville. That's the city of
Speaker 1: Louisville say we are really sorry about what happened. This
Speaker 1: should not have happened, and we're going to try to
Speaker 1: help take care of your family and try to ease
Speaker 1: your pain in some way, even though they'll never be
Speaker 1: they will never be able to make it right. Money
Speaker 1: doesn't make it right. And I totally get that and
Speaker 1: accept that. But that's where the you know, the societal
Speaker 1: culpability here, the systems culpability comes in paying for an accident,
Speaker 1: a tragic accident. You don't lock people up for an accident.
Speaker 1: I know, you say, buck, but they they chose, those
Speaker 1: officers chose to draw their weapons. They did what they
Speaker 1: were supposed to do when someone is shooting at you
Speaker 1: and you're a cop and you've said police search warrant,
Speaker 1: and they shoot at you, you shoot back. Full stuff.
Speaker 1: We're not gonna budge on this, you know, we're gonna
Speaker 1: have to start digging in folks and being a little
Speaker 1: absolute on some basic principles because the left is playing
Speaker 1: games with all of this. Now, Oh, maybe they maybe
Speaker 1: they didn't need to shoot back. Maybe they could get
Speaker 1: like a magic you know, net gun and just wrap
Speaker 1: the net around somebody so that then they don't have
Speaker 1: to shoot the I mean, this is the kind of
Speaker 1: idiocy I hear liberals. I'm being serious. I hear them
Speaker 1: talking about things like this. Now, maybe we have some
Speaker 1: there's a dark gun they can use or something else
Speaker 1: to incapacitate a person shooting. No, we have less than lethals.
Speaker 1: They try to use them sometimes when someone shooting at you,
Speaker 1: you're not shooting back with a taser. But they don't
Speaker 1: really care about the truth here, about what's really happening.
Speaker 1: This was all about a narrative. It's all about a storyline,
Speaker 1: and ultimately we have to confront this. People get uncomfortable
Speaker 1: doing it. They don't want to hear it. They many
Speaker 1: of them still believe it. The story that the police
Speaker 1: are systematically hunting black men and murdering them without consequence,
Speaker 1: that is the central premise of Black Lives Matter movement,
Speaker 1: is a lie. It's a lie. It's just not true.
Speaker 1: And they can keep saying it and keep getting worked
Speaker 1: up about it, and it's not true. No part of that.
Speaker 1: It is not systematic, it is not continuous, it is
Speaker 1: not widespread, it is not unpunished, And oftentimes they're picking
Speaker 1: cases where it's not even an unjust shooting. Not always,
Speaker 1: but most of the time. Most of the time, the
Speaker 1: shootings that they pick to make a major cause for
Speaker 1: the movement, they lie about what happened, and then we
Speaker 1: find out the truth. They just pretend like we don't
Speaker 1: know what really happened anymore. Friends, This is about rage
Speaker 1: and resentment and envy mobilized for the purposes of the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party. That's what is really going on here. Just
Speaker 1: tearing us apart, hurting us as a country. We do
Speaker 1: not benefit from this. No one benefits from this except
Speaker 1: those who use this for their own power. Doesn't make
Speaker 1: our community safer, doesn't make us get along better as
Speaker 1: a people. America is this incredibly dis country, and we
Speaker 1: do get along very well overall as a people. You
Speaker 1: look at us compared to all a lot of other
Speaker 1: countries and what goes on there. Democrats want to pull
Speaker 1: all that apart. They want to undo the very foundation
Speaker 1: of our justice system. They want to pretend that just
Speaker 1: because people feel a certain way, the facts don't get
Speaker 1: to interfere with their feelings. And that's not true. That's
Speaker 1: not true. But you're going to see a lot more
Speaker 1: lies about this, and you're never going to see a
Speaker 1: leftist have a debate with somebody who understands these facts
Speaker 1: and his adept on it, because they would get crushed.
Speaker 1: They can't. They can't actually handle an exchange here. They're
Speaker 1: gonna say, is it fair? No, it's never fair. When
Speaker 1: someone is killed by the state in an accident, that's
Speaker 1: never fair. It's wrong, it's tragic, it's bad. Is it murder?
Speaker 1: That's a different question. And our whole legal system is
Speaker 1: built upon what is the guilt? What is the hope
Speaker 1: ability of an individual in an act under the circumstances presented.
Speaker 1: It's not a bad thing happened, Let's go find someone
Speaker 1: to blame for it. Criminally, it's not how it works,
Speaker 1: but that is what we're seeing from these protesters now,
Speaker 1: who did exactly what we knew they would. Running around
Speaker 1: the country now attacking police in the streets. Two cops
Speaker 1: shot last night in Louisville. Let's get into that. You're
Speaker 1: in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Riots were expected in Louisville and riots happened.
Speaker 1: We've got somebody joining us now who is there on
Speaker 1: the front lines letting us know what really went down.
Speaker 1: Julio Rosas is with us now. He is a senior
Speaker 1: writer at townhall dot com. Julio, glad you're safe in Salaman.
Speaker 1: What happened last night? What'd you see? So there are
Speaker 1: a lot of marches, there's a lot of rioting in
Speaker 1: the aftermath of the grand jury decision that was announced yesterday.
Speaker 1: The city was kind of bracing for that. Unfortunately, the
Speaker 1: riots kind of came to fruition around seven o'clock, eight
Speaker 1: o'clock last night at the Hall of Justice is where
Speaker 1: the city government is kind of located around in the
Speaker 1: downtown area. People started to set fires all over the place,
Speaker 1: and then at one point they tried to set fire
Speaker 1: to the wooden boards that were protecting the windows on
Speaker 1: the Hall of Justice, and so at that point the
Speaker 1: Louisville Police Department declared it to be on lawful assembly
Speaker 1: and they said that they hadn't leave or else the
Speaker 1: crowd control of munitions were going to be used, and
Speaker 1: so officers inside the building had to come out to
Speaker 1: put out the fires, but they were just absolutely pelted
Speaker 1: with all sorts of throwing projectiles, and so they had
Speaker 1: to retreat back inside. The crowd then left the area
Speaker 1: because they didn't want to be tear gas and so
Speaker 1: they were they were trying to going through the side
Speaker 1: streets because they were trying to evade police from cutting
Speaker 1: them off. And then at one point it was over
Speaker 1: on Broadway Street where they were marching towards the police
Speaker 1: officers that were up ahead. The officers fired two flash
Speaker 1: bangs in the air that exploded overhead, and then about
Speaker 1: two seconds later that's when we started hear gunshots ringing
Speaker 1: out and people really started to scatter because obviously we
Speaker 1: don't know who's being shot at. And then at that
Speaker 1: point a large number of police officers just swarmed into
Speaker 1: the area to clear everybody out. So there were gunshots
Speaker 1: from what I read, two officers were hit. What do
Speaker 1: we know about them? And what do we know of
Speaker 1: the person who shot them? So the police chief later
Speaker 1: that night, I went to the hospital where they were
Speaker 1: the two officers were taken to. The police chief said
Speaker 1: that they did receive non life threatening gun shot wounds
Speaker 1: and that they are expected to make a full recovery.
Speaker 1: And at the time, he said that they had a
Speaker 1: suspect and custody and that's as far as I know.
Speaker 1: And they did finally release the names of the two
Speaker 1: police officers. And of course, you know, this whole thing
Speaker 1: is about resulting of black lives matter and you know,
Speaker 1: protecting minorities. While one of the officers was shot was
Speaker 1: African American and they have a suspect in custody. Julio, Yes,
Speaker 1: yes they do. What do we know about the suspect? Uh?
Speaker 1: Not much from from lasted from last I heard, I haven't.
Speaker 1: I haven't seen much of an update in term in
Speaker 1: terms of that. I think that they're also still looking
Speaker 1: because there were also other there was also other gunshots
Speaker 1: that that happened in that area and along with the
Speaker 1: rest of the Saluisville because again it was just it
Speaker 1: was just chaos. It was just another It was just
Speaker 1: unfortunately kind of a repeat what we'd be seen across
Speaker 1: the country. It was, I mean, assuming it was very
Speaker 1: similar to what we saw and what you saw, I
Speaker 1: should say, on the front lines in Kenosha, a sort
Speaker 1: of Kenosha was just because they it's a smaller, much
Speaker 1: smaller town with a much smaller police force. So that's
Speaker 1: why they were overwhelmed with trying to protect the Connie Courthouse.
Speaker 1: And then the rest of the downtown area was was
Speaker 1: at the mercy of the riders and looters, and so
Speaker 1: Louisville had had state troopers on standby. They were able
Speaker 1: to clear out the Jefferson Square Park after the gunshots,
Speaker 1: uh and after the officers were hit. And so this
Speaker 1: was what I can't say, this was not a peaceful
Speaker 1: mostly this was not a mostly peaceful march because because
Speaker 1: as as they were marching through, people were breaking off
Speaker 1: and setting fires, they were breaking the uncovered windows, and
Speaker 1: they were being cheered on by the crowd. And of
Speaker 1: course you know there was members of the media they're
Speaker 1: including myself, and they were telling people, you know, like
Speaker 1: you know, stop recording, you know, get the cameras out
Speaker 1: of here, and they were threatening the people who had
Speaker 1: the big cameras because obviously you can't really hide that.
Speaker 1: So this was not this was not a mostly peaceful march.
Speaker 1: That that much, I can tell you were speaking of
Speaker 1: Julio rossa senior writer a town hall Julio, look at
Speaker 1: about a minute. I want to ask you, though, what
Speaker 1: you think in terms of any preparation coordination there were
Speaker 1: is that video of the U haul full of protests
Speaker 1: and ryot material that pulled up broad Daylight right in
Speaker 1: downtown Louisville. What can you tell us about that? Yeah,
Speaker 1: so that there was there was a woman who was
Speaker 1: saying shields, And at first I thought she was asking
Speaker 1: for people who had shields to move up to the
Speaker 1: front of the crowd, which is a very common tactic.
Speaker 1: But then as I got closer to her, I could
Speaker 1: hear her saying, we have shields, we have shields, and
Speaker 1: she was pointing to the U haul truck. At that point,
Speaker 1: people were just rushing and they were grabbing all sorts
Speaker 1: of stuff, banners, homemade shields and and all that. And
Speaker 1: so there is definitely organization behind this, especially when you
Speaker 1: see in places like Portland where you know they have
Speaker 1: it down to an art form essentially, but there is
Speaker 1: a supply chain and there is organization within this. How
Speaker 1: far and how far up and how it deep it goes,
Speaker 1: I'm not entirely too sure, but it was. It was
Speaker 1: a pretty shocking thing to see because that was the
Speaker 1: first time I had ever seen anything like that. Really,
Speaker 1: just real quick, Are we expecting more in Louisville? And
Speaker 1: I think it's going to calm down? And so I think,
Speaker 1: because unfortunately we did have those two officers shot, the
Speaker 1: police kind of are taking zero chances where we saw
Speaker 1: last night. They really cracked down pretty hard. They actually
Speaker 1: rounded up a lot of reporters in their in their
Speaker 1: crackdown and resting people, including two reporters with the Daily Callers.
Speaker 1: So I think they're going to really be bringing the
Speaker 1: hammer down on anything the fairs that might happen we'll see,
Speaker 1: could happen elsewhere in the country. Julio Rosas of town Hall,
Speaker 1: everybody Julio stays safe man. Thanks again for all your reporting.
Speaker 1: We appreciate it. Thank you. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: So now we're in another wave of riots going to
Speaker 1: be happening in cities across the country most likely. Now.
Speaker 1: On the one hand, I have to say, I do
Speaker 1: believe that when these BLM riders do this stuff that
Speaker 1: they do, they're unintentionally cutting campaign commercials for the Trump campaign.
Speaker 1: I mean, they're helping the cause of Trump getting reelected
Speaker 1: by showing the American people, especially those who are not
Speaker 1: brainwashed Democrats, right, those voters that maybe would go either way,
Speaker 1: that kind of believe Joe Biden is not such a
Speaker 1: bad guy, and he's been around a long time, but
Speaker 1: you know, Trump was good on the economy. They see
Speaker 1: the lunatic Democrats marching through the streets, screaming in people's
Speaker 1: faces when they're just sitting there eating, screaming at people
Speaker 1: as they're trying to sleep in their homes at night.
Speaker 1: You know, wake up, wake up. There's no justice, no peace.
Speaker 1: All this stuff that they're doing. People see that and
Speaker 1: they say, I'm probably not going to want to reward
Speaker 1: that kind of childish and destructive behavior. I'm not going
Speaker 1: to say that I like that and not going to
Speaker 1: give my vote to the party that clearly represents that,
Speaker 1: which is what the Democrat Party does. But beyond that,
Speaker 1: I want to note that there's there are inherent contradictions
Speaker 1: in the BLM movement that they're never forced to address.
Speaker 1: That the people that are out there marching are never
Speaker 1: asked about. You know, you'll notice they don't do a
Speaker 1: lot of man on the street stuff with BLM, do
Speaker 1: their reporters. In fact, we heard before from from Julio
Speaker 1: Rossas that they don't want reporters to show what they're
Speaker 1: really doing. Right, that's that's considered, and they expect obedience
Speaker 1: because they think journos journalists are on their team, and
Speaker 1: so they expect that they'll they'll be helpful in the
Speaker 1: propaganda of these movements as mostly peaceful, which is what
Speaker 1: generally speaking, the journos do. They pretend that they're mostly
Speaker 1: peaceful protests even though they're not not a mostly peaceful
Speaker 1: protest when you have people passing out free riot shields
Speaker 1: right after a grand jury makes a decision about charges,
Speaker 1: mostly the right decision. But as I said, I don't
Speaker 1: think that the cops are to face the three charges
Speaker 1: of wanted and endangerment. I think that's just a total
Speaker 1: cave that's cowardice. That's trying to buy off the mob.
Speaker 1: That's all that is. There's there's no justification for that
Speaker 1: looking to charge one of the cops with something. So
Speaker 1: they didn't let them all off. That's all that is.
Speaker 1: That's that was the decision that was made, and I'm
Speaker 1: sure the grand jury felt that way too. Okay, well
Speaker 1: we don't we don't want to let the you know,
Speaker 1: this was bad, so something someone has to get punished
Speaker 1: for something that's not justice. But on this point about
Speaker 1: what is fair, what is right, and what is just,
Speaker 1: I would note that the the bl movement should be
Speaker 1: asked about some things. I mean, they should have to
Speaker 1: explain to people, you know, why is it that they
Speaker 1: do this stuff and they commit injustices while claiming that
Speaker 1: they fight for justice, they attack innocence in the name
Speaker 1: of protecting the innocent. They don't see these contradictions. Even
Speaker 1: if they could, they don't care. This is about raw
Speaker 1: power and only a fool can't see that. Why doesn't ever,
Speaker 1: why doesn't ever understand this right off the bat. You
Speaker 1: can't claim to be a movement about justice and then
Speaker 1: go and destroy the property of people who have done
Speaker 1: nothing to you. They're going and attacking businesses. They're they're
Speaker 1: breaking windows, they are stealing money. Right, Destroying property is
Speaker 1: a form of theft because you are causing get you
Speaker 1: are taking money from that point. When you break a
Speaker 1: store front window, you are taking money from that store,
Speaker 1: from the people who own it and people who work there.
Speaker 1: You're taking from them. Now, we have to get back
Speaker 1: to what kids learn in kindergarten here about keep your
Speaker 1: hands to yourself, don't take other people's stuff. BLM movement
Speaker 1: seems to have forgotten all that, doesn't care about any
Speaker 1: of that. You cannot claim to be a movement concerned
Speaker 1: with justice and do injustice regularly, repeatedly, unapologetically, which is
Speaker 1: what bl does. They say that they're fighting for justice
Speaker 1: with these acts of destruction and intimidation against innocent people,
Speaker 1: but in reality, these Biden voters might as well be
Speaker 1: making Trump campaign commercials because Ohio soccer moms are not
Speaker 1: big on mob violence. When they go into that voting booth.
Speaker 1: I hope they certainly remember that something else. I hope
Speaker 1: people remember remember when all those big companies in America
Speaker 1: were bowing down to and begging forgiveness from and paying
Speaker 1: off a bad faith Marxist movement built on lies that
Speaker 1: has now led to enormous destruction, immisrated communities and a
Speaker 1: number of dead cops. I hope you remember. I hope
Speaker 1: you never forget how many companies immediately bent the knee
Speaker 1: blm rioters going around feeling like they're not only supported
Speaker 1: by the media, but they're funded by corporate America. It's
Speaker 1: a troubling circumstance. Friends. The elites are using the mob
Speaker 1: against those who stand in the way of total control
Speaker 1: of those in charge. This is not a new tactic.
Speaker 1: This has been done in many countries and many times
Speaker 1: in history in the past. Right, the people that are
Speaker 1: calling the shots, that have special privileges and tremendous wealth,
Speaker 1: they get the angry, insecure, unsuccessful mob to start burning
Speaker 1: down other businesses, to start attacking the political competition, so
Speaker 1: that the people who are angry are making sure that
Speaker 1: the people who see what's really going on aren't able
Speaker 1: to throw out the bums who are making all the
Speaker 1: decisions at the top. There's a strategy behind this, you know,
Speaker 1: the democratic elites. I mean, the greatest fraud of those
Speaker 1: elites and the activist class is the pretense that they
Speaker 1: care about working class people. There was a video last
Speaker 1: night where you saw a protester going up to a
Speaker 1: two police officers with a megaphone. This was in Washington, DC,
Speaker 1: our nation's capital, and he was saying, look at you,
Speaker 1: you're protecting McDonald's. You're an idiot. If the cops weren't there,
Speaker 1: they would have trashed the McDonald's, berated any employees who
Speaker 1: were inside, terrified any patrons who were just trying to
Speaker 1: have a simple meal. And these idiot protesters would feel
Speaker 1: righteous about it. On an MSNBC. They treat them like
Speaker 1: they were the freedom writers. They treat them like they
Speaker 1: were people fighting for civil rights. It's appalling, it's appalling
Speaker 1: what they do. But this is where we are. This
Speaker 1: is the society that we live in now. I mean,
Speaker 1: just imagine for a second if in response to charging
Speaker 1: Kyle Rittenhouse with first degree murder, still amazing, that that's
Speaker 1: what end up happening, but it is where we are.
Speaker 1: Imagine if Trump supporters in cities across the country rioted
Speaker 1: at police, destroyed buildings to live media and I mean
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and the rest of them,
Speaker 1: they would demand martial law suspension of habeas corpus and
Speaker 1: order the National Guard to open fire. They have no
Speaker 1: problem with it, no issue with it at all, They
Speaker 1: would demand it. In fact, you cannot be a movement
Speaker 1: devoted to justice that commits injustice, which is what they're doing.
Speaker 1: You cannot explain or justify destroying the businesses, the homes,
Speaker 1: the peace of mind, the safety of people who happen
Speaker 1: to live in a city where there happened to be
Speaker 1: some angry leftists. It's completely unacceptable, and it's why BLM
Speaker 1: does not deserve your support, does not deserve even does
Speaker 1: not deserve deference, doesn't deserve respect. It is a destructive
Speaker 1: Marxist movement based entirely in racial division and resentment and
Speaker 1: anger that hurts people. It is hurting this country, and
Speaker 1: the Democrats are using this. It's a Catharsis for their
Speaker 1: Trump's Arrangement syndrome. It's become an outlet for their rage
Speaker 1: about the fact that Donald Trump has been president and
Speaker 1: his supporters all still support him and people think he's
Speaker 1: done a pretty darn good job. Don't ever forget that
Speaker 1: this is all tied in together, that this is for
Speaker 1: the left a way to try to seize the moral
Speaker 1: high ground while they're really just complaining about Trump's America.
Speaker 1: You're in them. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Every time this happens, we obsess over details, as if
Speaker 1: there are enough details to make America finally believe that
Speaker 1: black folks are worthy of living. The details did nothing
Speaker 1: for Tamia Rice. They did nothing for Iannah Jones who
Speaker 1: was asleep on a co coach. They did nothing for
Speaker 1: Walter Scott when we saw on video he was running away,
Speaker 1: and they certainly didn't do anything for Brianna Taylor. The
Speaker 1: details never seem to be enough to treat our lives
Speaker 1: as valuable by a system that has a foundation based
Speaker 1: on our labor and not our humanity. The demand is simple,
Speaker 1: stop killing us. We know that black victims will never
Speaker 1: be perfect enough for this system. We simply simply want
Speaker 1: to be allowed to live, to rest, and to thrive.
Speaker 1: That's a black black policing reform activist named Brittany Cunningham,
Speaker 1: and that's a very good example of the poisonous and
Speaker 1: deranged rhetoric of Black Lives matter. Does she really think
Speaker 1: that people don't care about black that that's really her belief?
Speaker 1: She really thinks that no one cares about black lives.
Speaker 1: Black police officers don't care about black lives. Members of
Speaker 1: the black community that are out there saying that they
Speaker 1: want more security, more police than neighbors, they don't care
Speaker 1: about black What really is the charge here that the
Speaker 1: system doesn't value black life. There are a lot of
Speaker 1: people in prison right now for killing black people as
Speaker 1: well as other people. A lot of people are being
Speaker 1: punished for this. But what is the real the central premise,
Speaker 1: the reason we have the Black Lives Matter movement is
Speaker 1: the killing of Mike Brown. Mike Brown deserved to be
Speaker 1: shot by a police officer. Doesn't matter that he was black,
Speaker 1: doesn't matter what color he is. He deserved what happened
Speaker 1: under the circumstances as we know them. If you attack
Speaker 1: someone who is a police officer and try to harm them,
Speaker 1: they will shoot you, and that is justified. So the
Speaker 1: movement is founded on a lie, hands up, don't shoot,
Speaker 1: and then there are successive lies after that. She mentioned
Speaker 1: Walter Scott, a case in South Carolina and as the
Speaker 1: system doesn't value his life, that cop was charged with murder.
Speaker 1: The cops going to spend the rest of his life
Speaker 1: in prison. What is she missing here? That wasn't it.
Speaker 1: So she's even talking about cases where people said, yeah,
Speaker 1: actually that cop did cross the line. That is successive force.
Speaker 1: Guy's life is ruined over. So she's throwing in cases
Speaker 1: like that. No one says that police don't commit abuse.
Speaker 1: Police are human beings. Police can be criminals, they can
Speaker 1: be racist, they can, but you know, we're talking about
Speaker 1: less than one one hundredth of one percent or one
Speaker 1: one thousandth of one percent, and you're gonna throw all
Speaker 1: the other seven or eight hundred thousand score law enforcement
Speaker 1: officers under the bus all the time because one person
Speaker 1: does something that sometimes is bad. Sometimes they lie about
Speaker 1: it and make it sound like it's bad when it's not.
Speaker 1: But it's stunning. We simply want to be allowed to live.
Speaker 1: And then we go to the how many people are
Speaker 1: killed every year by police and how many young Black
Speaker 1: Americans are killed by other young black Americans every year.
Speaker 1: We all know the disparity is about you know, six
Speaker 1: or seven thousand to ten, But because it's the state,
Speaker 1: and it's the system, and there's all these political implications
Speaker 1: around it, they want to focus on the ten to
Speaker 1: fifteen cases a year under questionable or perhaps even illegal
Speaker 1: immoral circumstances where a young black man is shot by police.
Speaker 1: They focus on those cases, and there's no effort to
Speaker 1: deal with the thousands and thousands of young black men
Speaker 1: who are killed, sometimes for just being in the wrong neighborhood,
Speaker 1: sometimes for having you know, their hat on in a
Speaker 1: way that offends some gangbanger or whatever it may be.
Speaker 1: There's no effort to deal with that none. This movement
Speaker 1: ignores the thousands of deaths and focuses on a dozen
Speaker 1: or twenty a year, maybe maybe thirty out what depends
Speaker 1: on the year. And then it's a huge national We
Speaker 1: have to go through these national convulsions over this all
Speaker 1: under this premise, Lebron James even said this that we're
Speaker 1: being hunted literally every time we leave our house. That's
Speaker 1: that's a psychosis. That's not true. The state is not
Speaker 1: hunting black people every time to leave their homes, staying
Speaker 1: on hunting anybody every time they leave their homes. This
Speaker 1: is a lie. But you know what these lies do.
Speaker 1: They energize, they mobilize, They get people angry, and when
Speaker 1: you're angry, you're much more susceptible to being controlled. As
Speaker 1: long as somebody tells you where to focus that anger.
Speaker 1: You're looking for that outlet, and then that leads to
Speaker 1: things like what happened last night in Louisville where you
Speaker 1: had two cops shot? This is what it sounded like.
Speaker 1: Is that happened? Play clip one O the shot guns?
Speaker 1: Who goes out look us they're blessed the police? So gunshots,
Speaker 1: two cops hit, could have been killed, maybe never see
Speaker 1: their families again, not not going to live another day.
Speaker 1: Young black man is in custody for shooting both of them.
Speaker 1: What do you think? What do you think he believes
Speaker 1: about police? I mean, there are police reform experts who
Speaker 1: are going on TV who are saying things like we
Speaker 1: simply want to be allowed to live or constantly being killed.
Speaker 1: This is shrill, insane hysteria. It's not true that police
Speaker 1: are not constantly killing on armed black It's a lie.
Speaker 1: It's a lie. More people die every year from lightning
Speaker 1: strikes than unarmed black people are killed by police, fact
Speaker 1: every year in America. So they're complaining about something that
Speaker 1: is statistically less common than a lightning strike, and they
Speaker 1: lie about some of these incidents in order to get
Speaker 1: people even more upset about them than they would otherwise be.
Speaker 1: But folks, this is about agitation. This is about undermining
Speaker 1: our system, undermining our society, dividing us, turning us against
Speaker 1: each other. It's really very ugly. This thing, this whole movement,
Speaker 1: doesn't inspire. It's not about peace and love and bring
Speaker 1: people together. It's about anger and rage and division and
Speaker 1: resentment and envy. The Democrat Party embraces it. Democrat parties
Speaker 1: along with it, and there they will hold people up
Speaker 1: who say things like here is a former police sergeant
Speaker 1: who went on MSNBC speaking about the black Attorney General
Speaker 1: and what he said at the press conference yesterday. Playclip three. Well, listen,
Speaker 1: not only is he being intellectually dishonest about that, you know,
Speaker 1: I find all of his remarks with regards to this
Speaker 1: whole entire press conference offensive. And let me just speak
Speaker 1: to this whole celebrity influencer thing. While look, they can't
Speaker 1: speak for Kentuckians. Let me say this as a black woman,
Speaker 1: he does not speak for black folks. He's skin folk,
Speaker 1: but he is not kin folk. And so just like
Speaker 1: he thinks they can't speak for Kentucky because he's up
Speaker 1: there with a black face, he does not speak for
Speaker 1: all of us. This was not a tragedy, This was
Speaker 1: a murder. He should be ashamed of himself. Share Dorsey
Speaker 1: is wrong and her analysis is garbage. She doesn't strike
Speaker 1: me as somebody who knows what the heck she's talking
Speaker 1: about at all. But she's doing exactly what they wanted
Speaker 1: to do at MSNBC's she's undermining or negating the blackness
Speaker 1: of the Attorney General of Kentucky. I mean to make
Speaker 1: this really about, ultimately the left wanting different racial treatment
Speaker 1: for people in the justice system. Right that if you
Speaker 1: are black, if you're white, if you're some other ethnicity,
Speaker 1: they're supposed to be a different set of rules depending
Speaker 1: on what the left decides. That is a recipe for
Speaker 1: destroying the entire justice system. That is a recipe for
Speaker 1: pulling this country apart at the seams. But that's what
Speaker 1: they want right now. The left is angry, The Democrat
Speaker 1: Party is angry, and they won't They can't control it,
Speaker 1: they don't want to control it. Then brings me to
Speaker 1: the most in some ways insufferable part of all this
Speaker 1: are Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. Now, Oh, prayers up
Speaker 1: for the police officers who are shot. You know, will
Speaker 1: you more helpful if Kamala and Joe stopped defaming cops,
Speaker 1: stopped giving cover to the lies, and told their voters,
Speaker 1: told the Biden Kamala voters out there, don't attack police officers.
Speaker 1: Way more helpful than their thoughts and prayers. Thoughts and
Speaker 1: prayers are always fine, but they're actually in a position
Speaker 1: to do something about this. All right, I'm the surgeon
Speaker 1: that's called in to do heart surgery. Yeah, I might
Speaker 1: get thoughts and prayers, but that's not all I'm expected
Speaker 1: to do. I'm supposed to save somebody. Biden and Kamala
Speaker 1: could save lives, but they don't want to upset their
Speaker 1: supporters by saying, don't shoot cops. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the Ihard Ray, or wherever you get your podcasts. It
Speaker 1: is outdated. It is wrongheaded thinking to think that the
Speaker 1: only way you're going to get communities to be safe
Speaker 1: is to put more police officers on the street. Well,
Speaker 1: we have to do, and what we will do is
Speaker 1: reimagine public safety. What kind of bullcrap is that? First
Speaker 1: of all, it's a straw man. No one saying the
Speaker 1: only way to make community safer is to put police
Speaker 1: on the street. But that is a very important thing
Speaker 1: to do. Do you want to make communities safer? Encourage
Speaker 1: people to get married and stay married, Encourage people to
Speaker 1: finish high school. Don't tell people the cops or the enemy.
Speaker 1: These are ways. Encourage parents to raise their children in
Speaker 1: a two parent household. Those are ways. Oh yes, by
Speaker 1: the numbers, by the social science, those are ways to
Speaker 1: make communities safer. But that's not when people want to hear. No,
Speaker 1: much much more pleasant to the Democrat based to hear
Speaker 1: that the problem are the cops. The problem are the
Speaker 1: people who are there to make sure that little old
Speaker 1: ladies aren't bludgeoned by crackheads on their way to the
Speaker 1: grocery store. The problem are the cops. Sure, sure they are.
Speaker 1: What could be more disgusting and disingenuous in this But
Speaker 1: Libs live in these, these these bubbles, these echo chambers
Speaker 1: of the various websites and news networks that just tell
Speaker 1: them this lie, and they never will look, they'll never
Speaker 1: be confronted by people on the other side. And then
Speaker 1: they fall back into the slogans. But do you not
Speaker 1: believe there's systemic racism. Do you know these are feelings,
Speaker 1: These are feelings, These are not arguments. Do you not
Speaker 1: believe there's a history of a pressure in this country? No,
Speaker 1: that's of course, Yeah, there's a pressure, there's racism. But
Speaker 1: how do we how do we build a society that
Speaker 1: functions as best as it can and a society that
Speaker 1: is ultimately acting in the interests of individual rights and
Speaker 1: justice with its every act. Well, they don't even think
Speaker 1: about that, do they. But put Harris is so funny.
Speaker 1: Reimagining public safety. This is taken straight out of like
Speaker 1: the faculty lounge handbook at Sarah Lawrence College or something.
Speaker 1: Let's reimagine let's like, reimagine public safety. What does that
Speaker 1: even mean? Reimagine it? How And you want to do
Speaker 1: that while there's fifty percent increase in shootings in New
Speaker 1: York City and other cities having big spikes and shootings
Speaker 1: and murders, Yeah, reimagine it while people are getting killed. Ultimately,
Speaker 1: the left also thinks the only bad people the left
Speaker 1: things exists are white male oppressor Republicans. They're the only
Speaker 1: bad people, according to the left wing ideology. Everyone else
Speaker 1: who does bad things it's society's fault. It's because of
Speaker 1: you know, some lack of a social programmer. You know,
Speaker 1: there's some there's a collective responsibility for all the other
Speaker 1: ills of society. But the only people that are irredeemably
Speaker 1: evil and bad are white male Republican oppressors. That's it.
Speaker 1: Every everybody else at least has a saving grace. Everybody
Speaker 1: else is you know, you can look at the totality
Speaker 1: of the circumstances. You know, Yeah, guy's in MS thirteen
Speaker 1: hit man, but you know, he had a tough go
Speaker 1: in the early days in Honduras before he came here illegally,
Speaker 1: and we didn't take him in, so, you know, we
Speaker 1: didn't make him a citizen. So really, the fact that
Speaker 1: he's you know, cutting people's heads off with a machete,
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, let's not blame him. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: you voted for Trump, evil evil, bad person, you white
Speaker 1: male Trump supporters. It's look, you know what I'm saying,
Speaker 1: It's true. You know, this is the reality. The Libs
Speaker 1: will always find a way to justify the behavior of
Speaker 1: other people, you know, and that's one of the great
Speaker 1: things about being a white male liberal is at least
Speaker 1: you get a little bit of you have to constantly
Speaker 1: bow and unless you're super rich and connected, and then
Speaker 1: and you kind of just, you know, are the puppeteer,
Speaker 1: pushing around the rest of the Democrats, making them do
Speaker 1: what you want and pretending, you know, you get to
Speaker 1: be in the Pelosi roll or the Schumer roll, right,
Speaker 1: But if you're a white male liberal, you get to think, well,
Speaker 1: at least I'm sort of one of the good people.
Speaker 1: I'm not one of the really terrible people. So that's
Speaker 1: that's the reality of the country we live in now.
Speaker 1: And I just want to say that the reimagining public
Speaker 1: safety is a phrase that intelligent people could not say
Speaker 1: without feeling ridiculous, you know, without without knowing that they're
Speaker 1: just being complete demagogues, trying to get people all fired
Speaker 1: up and angry about something instead of actually dealing with
Speaker 1: the problems. Speaking of fired up and angry, that's always
Speaker 1: a good transition on this show, speaking of fired up
Speaker 1: and angry. I don't trust this moment of calm we're
Speaker 1: having in the Supreme Court nomination battle. Something's going on,
Speaker 1: something's up. I know they are gonna try something. I
Speaker 1: don't know what it is. I'm thinking about it constantly,
Speaker 1: trying to figure out what is the angle. I've said
Speaker 1: to you, Yes, they're gonna there's gonna be mass disturbances
Speaker 1: on the street. They're going to I mean, they're they're
Speaker 1: gonna call out everything they've got. But they called out
Speaker 1: pretty much everything they had for Kavanaugh didn't work. They
Speaker 1: came close. People often forget that if blasi Ford was
Speaker 1: the only person they put forward and Kavanaugh had not
Speaker 1: come out just in an absolute defense of his character
Speaker 1: and of his soul in front of the country and
Speaker 1: the way that he did, which why they were so
Speaker 1: angry at him, saying, oh, he was so angry. They
Speaker 1: wanted to watch him. They wanted to watch him collapse
Speaker 1: and be destroyed. They wanted to see that. They wanted
Speaker 1: to enjoy that. Instead, Kavanaugh came out as a man
Speaker 1: and came out firing. God bless him for it. But
Speaker 1: they threw everything they had it. They're gonna try something here.
Speaker 1: They're gonna try to do something that. Ah I wish,
Speaker 1: I wish I could see it coming so that I
Speaker 1: could try to prepare conservatives in the right for it
Speaker 1: and you know, get word to the White House. Even
Speaker 1: if I could, woman, I could, but if I knew
Speaker 1: what it was, I don't know what it is. But
Speaker 1: we do know that they're not going to let this
Speaker 1: go easily, even Elisabeth War and hurts. Been a while
Speaker 1: since we've heard from Elisabeth War. Oh, oh gosh, Jake, golly,
Speaker 1: I'm bush grow up. But Daddy always says, I was
Speaker 1: one one million Cherokee and I'm from Oklahoma, and you know,
Speaker 1: I just let's let's take the banks and take all
Speaker 1: of the money and give it around. Are the people
Speaker 1: that haven't done anything for it? Let's do yeah? Oh gosh, yeah.
Speaker 1: Here she is blasting Republicans over the Ginsburg situation. Not
Speaker 1: the Ginsburg situation, it's the Supreme Court seat that is
Speaker 1: open situation. Play fourteen. Rifkinsburg was a woman who never
Speaker 1: let any man silence her. The most fitting tribute to
Speaker 1: her is to refuse to be silenced and to name
Speaker 1: exactly what Donald Trump and Senate Republicans are trying to
Speaker 1: steal another Supreme Court seat. This kind of sleazy double
Speaker 1: dealing is the last gasp of a desperate party that
Speaker 1: is undemocratically overrepresented in Congress and in the halls of power.
Speaker 1: Across our country. The last gasp of a corrupt Republican
Speaker 1: leadership numb to its own hypocrisy that doesn't reflect the
Speaker 1: is of the majority of Americans or the values that
Speaker 1: we hold dear. The last gasp of a right wing,
Speaker 1: billionaire fueled party that wants to hold on to power
Speaker 1: a little longer in order to oppose its extremist agenda
Speaker 1: on the entire country. What is she even saying? Really,
Speaker 1: I know she thinks it. Oh, I'm just so upset. No,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna just oh yeah, I'm gonna be yell, I
Speaker 1: got upset about the right wing? Brilliant. What does this
Speaker 1: even mean? They're trying to steal? How are they stealing?
Speaker 1: What is theirs? Democrats? You're you're acting like crazy people here. Okay,
Speaker 1: if I own a home and I walk into my home,
Speaker 1: I'm not trespassing. You can say it's trespassing, but you're wrong.
Speaker 1: They're not stealing anything. Stealing implies the illicit taking of
Speaker 1: something from someone else who has a right to have it.
Speaker 1: It's not stealing. It's a constitutional obligation to fill the seat.
Speaker 1: But they're just gonna keep lying. If this is not hard,
Speaker 1: there's nothing to stop Republicans. There's no rule, there's no law,
Speaker 1: there's no nothing to stop them from doing this. But
Speaker 1: they just can't accept. They won't accept that this is
Speaker 1: the reality. They won't accept that things have changed a bit.
Speaker 1: It's really it's really stunning, isn't it. They're completely completely
Speaker 1: unhinged over all this, and they won't even rule out
Speaker 1: Supreme Court packing. Here's Joe Biden play fifteen. Will you
Speaker 1: go along with what some Democrats are proposing to expand
Speaker 1: the court? Well, I'm not gonna do. And I hope
Speaker 1: you'll understand this play the press of this game. He
Speaker 1: wants to change the subject, to set him about while
Speaker 1: they are constans principles by moving forward in the middle
Speaker 1: of an election, elections have already started. He wants us
Speaker 1: talking about whether or not we're going to expand the
Speaker 1: cord or we're gonna quart back. I'm not gonna get
Speaker 1: into that. I'm not gonna get into that. Go by
Speaker 1: you know, they called the lid for his campaign again today.
Speaker 1: I think by noon. Eight out of twenty what is it,
Speaker 1: eight out of twenty four days so far, Biden campaigns like,
Speaker 1: am We're done, it's lunchtime? Done for the day. No events, no, no, no, uh, interviews, nothing.
Speaker 1: And now it's so funny now some of the lib
Speaker 1: jurdos out there, or he's just doing debate debate prep. Really,
Speaker 1: he's doing debate for this guy hasn't done enough public
Speaker 1: speaking and debating over he's gotta do a debate prep.
Speaker 1: I mean yeah, for like a couple of days beforehand.
Speaker 1: But come on, really, yeah, he was doing debate prep.
Speaker 1: That's why you know September or the first week of September,
Speaker 1: he missed a couple of days because he was doing
Speaker 1: Like they're a little cover for this guy, no matter what,
Speaker 1: but they want to leave open all these options so
Speaker 1: that they can tell their base they're gonna do something.
Speaker 1: But here here's the truth. Friends, they're gonna they're gonna
Speaker 1: pack the court as soon as they think it's in
Speaker 1: their interest to pack the court. They're not gonna. There's
Speaker 1: no promise they're gonna make. Remember this all. We got
Speaker 1: to this point because Harry Reid blew up the filibuster
Speaker 1: Because if benefit of Democrats who are in power at
Speaker 1: the time, you know they can help it. They have
Speaker 1: a lost for power. They will do whatever they can
Speaker 1: to increase that power. There are no norms or rules
Speaker 1: or principles that will be allowed to get in the way.
Speaker 1: Now they gotta live with that. Now they got to
Speaker 1: live with the consequence of their actions, and you know,
Speaker 1: take it long and hard. Sorry stinks for them, What
Speaker 1: a shame. Too bad. But I'm telling you they're gonna
Speaker 1: do something, and I'm gonna keeping you know, send of
Speaker 1: your thoughts on this one. Let me know what you
Speaker 1: think they're gonna do. They they cannot, I mean emotionally, psychologically.
Speaker 1: The Democrats will not be able to process the possibility
Speaker 1: of a truly right of center Supreme Court. Just I mean,
Speaker 1: it's not gonna be like you know, it's not gonna
Speaker 1: be like putting ted cruise on the court. I can
Speaker 1: tell you that it's gonna be you know, if if
Speaker 1: if one is far left lunatic, you know, Soda Mayor
Speaker 1: and ten is just as Scalia right, they the Court's
Speaker 1: gonna be at like a six if we get Anykony Barrett.
Speaker 1: That's the thing. But they're used to it being at
Speaker 1: like a three or four. And sorry, that's not that's
Speaker 1: not written in the constitution. It's not the way it
Speaker 1: has to be. Lives maybe don't make the court so important.
Speaker 1: You're in this is the Buck Sexton Show podcast to
Speaker 1: serve on the board of the Ukrainian energy company facing
Speaker 1: serious corruption charges. You were the vice president running point
Speaker 1: on Ukraine. The average Joe here's that and says that
Speaker 1: sounds fishy. What's your understanding of what your son was
Speaker 1: doing for an extraordinary amount of money. I don't know
Speaker 1: what he was doing. I know he was on the board.
Speaker 1: I found out he was on the board after he
Speaker 1: was on the board, and that was it. And there's
Speaker 1: nobody that knows a lot of time. Isn't this something
Speaker 1: you want to get to the bottom of. No, because
Speaker 1: I trust my son, But that doesn't pass the small test,
Speaker 1: Like when you're a vice president, isn't there a higher standard.
Speaker 1: Don't you need to know it's happening with your family.
Speaker 1: Don't you need to put down some guardrails unless there
Speaker 1: was something that was there was something on his face
Speaker 1: that was wrong. There's nothing on his face that was wrong.
Speaker 1: So look, if you want to talk about problems, you know,
Speaker 1: let's talk about Trump's family. I mean, come on, this
Speaker 1: is so guys are amazing. So you think that everything
Speaker 1: that happened was kosher. You know, there's not one single
Speaker 1: bit of evidence, not one little tiny bit does this
Speaker 1: anything done was wrong? You know that, but you keep
Speaker 1: asking me these questions. It's okay, he you know, you're
Speaker 1: you're you know, you're doing what you have to do.
Speaker 1: Look at how surly and defensive Biden got in this
Speaker 1: interview that was a part of an Axios interview asking
Speaker 1: I mean about about Hunter Biden, who look, Democrats want
Speaker 1: to pretend that they're all about transparency and accountability and
Speaker 1: good government. And that's of course laughable. But here's one
Speaker 1: of the reasons why it's laughable. You're running foreign policy
Speaker 1: for the US government in a country like Ukraine that
Speaker 1: desperately needs US help. Okay, this isn't like you're the
Speaker 1: point man for the US relationship with Great Britain, which
Speaker 1: is kind of like, you know, goes as it is.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's not really gonna the Brits will be Okay,
Speaker 1: no one's gonna There's not gonna be some huge change
Speaker 1: in our policies. Ukraine really needed us, and your son
Speaker 1: is getting paid whatever it's close to a million dollars
Speaker 1: and sit on the board of a company in an
Speaker 1: area he knows nothing about It's about the appearance of impropriety.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, You moron. He does not one bit of
Speaker 1: evidence anything's wrong. No, the evidence is this looks bad
Speaker 1: and people lose faith in the system because of it. Right,
Speaker 1: So I just want to say that's that's obvious. But
Speaker 1: even when he gets asked the question, you have to notice,
Speaker 1: even when he's just he's talking about this issue, it's
Speaker 1: clear that he is outraged that a journal would even
Speaker 1: ask him. He's outraged that a journal would even push
Speaker 1: him on this because they're supposed to be on his team.
Speaker 1: He's not supposed to get real questions. And I'm supposed
Speaker 1: to be asked real questions. No, no, no, of course not.
Speaker 1: He's supposed to have people that just give him a
Speaker 1: constant BackRub on TV and tell him how amazing he
Speaker 1: is and how the American people should vote for him,
Speaker 1: even though, like I firmly believe that he does not
Speaker 1: have He does not have a the company, he doesn't
Speaker 1: have the first physical, psychological, emotional constitution to be president
Speaker 1: United States. Folks. I don't think he's up for the job.
Speaker 1: I really mean that. I don't. I don't. I don't
Speaker 1: say that'd be provocative. I think that, and I think Democrats,
Speaker 1: some of them, some of the people at the top
Speaker 1: echelon Democrat Party, they know this, but they're just he's
Speaker 1: just supposed to get them past the election and then
Speaker 1: they'll figure everything out afterwards. And they're they're little cheap
Speaker 1: in the Democrat Party where just go man. You know,
Speaker 1: they'll do whatever they're told, and they'll go along with this.
Speaker 1: And you know when when when President Kamala takes the reins,
Speaker 1: they're gonna look, they're not gonna be even a little
Speaker 1: bit remorseful about this. They're gonna say, look at what
Speaker 1: we pulled off. Ha ha. We stopped Trump from getting
Speaker 1: four more years by putting forward this, this empty suit
Speaker 1: buffoon that should be focused on, you know, feeding nuts
Speaker 1: to the squirrels and reading picture books to his you know,
Speaker 1: his grandkids, which is fine, nothing wrong with that, but
Speaker 1: he shouldn't be president, right, He shouldn't. He should be
Speaker 1: doing those other things that I said. Stead he wants
Speaker 1: the nuclear codes, and Democrats are saying, if you don't
Speaker 1: give it to him, you're a bad person. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Okay, it's been a little bit since we've
Speaker 1: talked to our friend James Altucher. He's an entrepreneur, podcaster, writer,
Speaker 1: all those good things. He's with us now. They're talking
Speaker 1: about what's going on in this country and here in
Speaker 1: New York City in particular. What's going on James, Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: how's it going? And thanks so much for having me
Speaker 1: on the show again. Yeah, man, And it looks to
Speaker 1: me like somehow and New York I believe is maybe
Speaker 1: the most concentrated example of this. But I feel like everyone,
Speaker 1: as we're getting closer now than ever to a vaccine,
Speaker 1: the panic is getting dialed up among a lot of
Speaker 1: people on the left and a lot of people in
Speaker 1: the mainstream media as if things are going to get
Speaker 1: almost get the feeling that they believe things are gonna
Speaker 1: get worse if we have a vaccine. Yeah, it's it's strange.
Speaker 1: I mean, here we are, We're in the seventh month
Speaker 1: of economic lockdowns, and cases are minimal at this point.
Speaker 1: We already know so much more about this virus than
Speaker 1: we did in March. Like in March, we had no
Speaker 1: idea about the contagion rate, the fatality rate, treatments, you
Speaker 1: know what, will ventilators work or not, will masks work
Speaker 1: or not? And so we crushed the economy like could
Speaker 1: you imagine let's say there was no pandemic and somebody said, Okay,
Speaker 1: everybody who has a business, we need you to shut
Speaker 1: that business down for a minimum of six months and
Speaker 1: everybody has to stay at home. We're just doing this
Speaker 1: for fun. You would say that's insane. You're going to
Speaker 1: crush the economy so bad that society and culture will
Speaker 1: never be the same again. And that would have been
Speaker 1: the correct answer, but there was this justification that we
Speaker 1: had this virus. And now you know, who knows what
Speaker 1: would have happened differently if we didn't have a liked them.
Speaker 1: But we do know for sure the economy has been crushed.
Speaker 1: It's just obliterated. New York City is a great example
Speaker 1: where I mean, just yesterday the Bulasio fired nine thousand
Speaker 1: critical City employees with and we don't know, there's no plan,
Speaker 1: we don't know when that's gonna stops. There's no plan
Speaker 1: on any of this right now. And you know, I
Speaker 1: wonder what your thoughts are as we get further in
Speaker 1: your I know that you had that editorial that you
Speaker 1: wrote in the New York Post and then Seinfeld responded
Speaker 1: in the New York Times, and I agree with you
Speaker 1: it was weird that he was attacking you personally because
Speaker 1: the argument that you're making a lot of people I
Speaker 1: know who are in New York and who understand a
Speaker 1: scene here have been making version versions of it. And
Speaker 1: it's not a person. It's not anyone being a good
Speaker 1: person or a bad person. This is what I see
Speaker 1: happening in the place where I live. And you were
Speaker 1: not living in a thirty million dollar mansion at the
Speaker 1: time in the hands for what I understand now that
Speaker 1: we're a little deeper into this only a month later,
Speaker 1: now I am living in the thirty million dollar manasion. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm just kidding. That would be nice. But you know,
Speaker 1: now that we're even a little deeper into this, what
Speaker 1: are the trends that you're seeing. We're supposed to get
Speaker 1: to opening of indoor dining in New York City. Obviously,
Speaker 1: other cities across the country also are watching what's going
Speaker 1: on here, taking some of their cues. They're all Democrat controlled.
Speaker 1: So what do you think I mean, are we gonna
Speaker 1: I believe I used to think that they were trying
Speaker 1: to lock us down until the election, and I want
Speaker 1: to put this theory past you. And then if Biden wins,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, the easy answer is, oh, things
Speaker 1: are getting better and we're gonna be okay, we don't
Speaker 1: need to pay it anymore. I actually don't think that's
Speaker 1: true anymore. Now. It's lockdown well beyond the election, and
Speaker 1: to use the pressure and the authoritarian impulse that the
Speaker 1: Democrats have here to push through policies and effectively. I
Speaker 1: think they liked this control. I think they want to
Speaker 1: keep doing this deep into twenty twenty one, even if
Speaker 1: Biden wins. Yeah, I believe that too. I mean, look,
Speaker 1: Biden's talked about a national mandate for masks, which is
Speaker 1: just insane. I'm not saying anything about masks, but I'm
Speaker 1: just saying, a national mandate. That means, whether you live
Speaker 1: in the densest part of New York City or you
Speaker 1: live in the mountains of Montana and you're going out
Speaker 1: to get your mail a mile away, you have to
Speaker 1: wear a mask. Like it. It's insane to make any
Speaker 1: kind of national law. I guess so what I think
Speaker 1: is happening, and you're seeing this in New York City.
Speaker 1: First off, you're seeing already economic collapse, which is why
Speaker 1: the mayor is being forced to, you know, do all
Speaker 1: these firings just to save you know, to save money.
Speaker 1: But what you're really seeing, and nobody will will acknowledge this,
Speaker 1: what you're really seeing is what is called traditionally fascism.
Speaker 1: So fascism you could think of as a state controlled
Speaker 1: capitalism mixed with identity politics. So in i'll and I
Speaker 1: hate to go straight to Nazi Germany to describe this,
Speaker 1: but you know, originally the Nazi Party was called the
Speaker 1: National Socialists. The Nazi Party when they took over, took
Speaker 1: over every single part of capitalism, what you you know,
Speaker 1: what you bought, who could sell, what you ate, you know,
Speaker 1: how you moved. And that's what's happening in New York
Speaker 1: City is that we were told to all close down
Speaker 1: our businesses and to stay at home, not even to
Speaker 1: go outside, and now the economy's ruined. And then identity politics.
Speaker 1: Obviously in Germany there was heavy identity politics either you
Speaker 1: were German or you weren't. But now in New York
Speaker 1: City you have the mayor, you know, talking about how
Speaker 1: we can't open restaurants because the wealthy don't need to
Speaker 1: eat out as much, completely disregarding the fact that half
Speaker 1: a million people will be unemployed if restaurants closed down,
Speaker 1: and you know, critical revenues that are used to pay
Speaker 1: city employees and healthcare workers will be gone. And you know,
Speaker 1: what do you call identity politics mixed with you know,
Speaker 1: extreme state control capitalism? This is what fascism is. It's
Speaker 1: not a far right movement, it turns out to be
Speaker 1: a far left movement. I think your analysis is fine
Speaker 1: from all these cities, and eventually, you know, for the
Speaker 1: first time ever, and and Buck, I know you'll you'll
Speaker 1: acknowledge this, for the first time ever, you and I
Speaker 1: can have a conversation about the practical aspects of state secession.
Speaker 1: You know, a state leaving the United States. A year ago,
Speaker 1: that would have been an insane conversation, but now there's
Speaker 1: actually a path to that being possible, which is almost
Speaker 1: as insane. Well, yeah, I think that the riffs that
Speaker 1: we're seeing, these political riffs as they play out, especially
Speaker 1: with the exodus from states like California and New York,
Speaker 1: and there's that's gonna continue this narrative of you know,
Speaker 1: the the Democrats socialist project. It took a while for
Speaker 1: it to reach catastrophic failure, but it is failing in
Speaker 1: these places. You know that there are certain states at
Speaker 1: a tremendous concentration of wealth. A lot of New York's
Speaker 1: a great example. California is a great example. And it
Speaker 1: takes time to ruin something that was so wealthy and
Speaker 1: so fortunate. Right, It's kind of like the Braddy kids
Speaker 1: who inherit the family company and the family fortune. They
Speaker 1: don't go bankrupt day one, but over time they pretty
Speaker 1: much sometimes we'll ruin it. And I think that's what
Speaker 1: we're seeing now. I mean, now when you get to
Speaker 1: the Cuomo Newsom level. Newsom is spending time saying that
Speaker 1: only electric cars, I think, are going to be sold
Speaker 1: at California starting in you know, a twenty thirty five
Speaker 1: or I mean, this is this is looney tune stuff. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, and look, California, which has always been considered
Speaker 1: so progressive and so open to equal opportunity in theory,
Speaker 1: is actually the reverse of that. California has or one
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety two career paths that require blue collar licensing.
Speaker 1: So if you want to braid hair or be a
Speaker 1: manicurist in La or San Francisco, you've got to spend
Speaker 1: money to get a license, and for one hundred ninety
Speaker 1: two other professions as well, more than any other state.
Speaker 1: What do people want who are protesting? The thing that
Speaker 1: they want most is prosperity and jobs, And the actual
Speaker 1: laws of states like California and New York are preventing
Speaker 1: people who most need jobs from getting jobs because the
Speaker 1: state is trying to control every aspect of how we
Speaker 1: make money, how we raise our families, how we find
Speaker 1: prosperity for ourselves. And I'm not being ideological, like this
Speaker 1: is just how you how people survive, and it seems
Speaker 1: like the laws are trying to prevent us from doing that. Oh,
Speaker 1: you have to stay indoors, and then if you want
Speaker 1: to work, you have to apply for all these licenses
Speaker 1: just to I don't know, braid hair or In New York,
Speaker 1: now nobody can eat out. It's not it's illegal to
Speaker 1: eat in a restaurant. And meanwhile, there's not really I'm
Speaker 1: not saying there's no health risk at all. But people
Speaker 1: will do what is right for them if they need
Speaker 1: to quarantine because we know, okay, the coronavirus affects older
Speaker 1: people and people with pre existing conditions, those people will
Speaker 1: quarantine the same way they would in a flu epidemic,
Speaker 1: the same way kids my quarantine in the nineteen thirties.
Speaker 1: If polio broke out in their school, people would take
Speaker 1: off from school for a little bit. You didn't need
Speaker 1: laws and shut down the entire economy in order to
Speaker 1: in order to survive these epidemics that we survived each time.
Speaker 1: What do you think about the argument, speaking of James
Speaker 1: al Tutor, author, writer, podcaster, what James and at Fellow
Speaker 1: New Yorker, the argument that lockdowns didn't even have the
Speaker 1: intended effect of suppressing the virus. Where do you come
Speaker 1: down on that? Well, the lockdown the entire purpose of
Speaker 1: the lockdowns from the very beginning of this, I mean
Speaker 1: back in late February early March, I spoke with one
Speaker 1: of the top epidemiologists from Imperial College who was helping
Speaker 1: you guide policy and everything, and he was saying, Okay,
Speaker 1: we need, we need. We don't know if this virus
Speaker 1: can be contained or not, and we didn't know that then,
Speaker 1: but we need to at least try containment, meaning you know,
Speaker 1: some form of quarantine, and he said the reason for that,
Speaker 1: which was which became the official reason in every country,
Speaker 1: was to so called flatten the curve, to make sure
Speaker 1: that hospitals wouldn't get overwhelmed by a sudden spike in cases.
Speaker 1: That was the entire reason for any sort of shutdown.
Speaker 1: And the idea was to never eradicate the virus with shutdowns.
Speaker 1: That was never once spoken about. And now they're saying, well,
Speaker 1: now we have to keep every the economy closed until
Speaker 1: the virus eradicate. When have we ever done that for
Speaker 1: any sort of illness or disease. We didn't do the
Speaker 1: pro polio. We didn't do it for flu. There's been
Speaker 1: pandemics in nineteen fifty eight, nineteen sixty eight, you know,
Speaker 1: two thousand and three, two ten. We've never done this before.
Speaker 1: And I think, if anything, that the lockdowns could be
Speaker 1: exasperating problems, not only problems with the virus because now
Speaker 1: everybody's quarantined inside, potentially giving it to each other, but
Speaker 1: also you know, there's there's collateral damage. Has been mentioned
Speaker 1: in the media a lot, but there's collateral damage from
Speaker 1: keeping people at home. There's rising abuse cases. There's rising suicide,
Speaker 1: there's rising drug addictions, there's rising divorces, there's rising deaths
Speaker 1: from not being able to be treated for cancer or
Speaker 1: blood pressure or strokes or whatever. So again, I think
Speaker 1: people should have been trusted to quarantine themselves, which is
Speaker 1: essentially what happened anyway, and we probably would not have
Speaker 1: had any significant difference in deaths, but the economy would
Speaker 1: have kept going instead of the precarious situation we're in now,
Speaker 1: where you know, New York City is going to have
Speaker 1: to fire tens of thousands of people. Other major cities
Speaker 1: will entire, you know, fifty five million people at one
Speaker 1: point or rather applied for unemployment insurance that during this period.
Speaker 1: This is like horrific. Yeah, well, I hope people wake up,
Speaker 1: I don't know, you know, instead of shouting at people
Speaker 1: to put their masks on outside on the street like
Speaker 1: a moron. I hope everyone will just understand what's really
Speaker 1: going on here, and maybe we can start to turn
Speaker 1: New York City and the rest of the country around
Speaker 1: with it. James Altucher guys check out his show, his podcast,
Speaker 1: read his stuff online. James, always great to have you man.
Speaker 1: Stay safe. Thanks Buck, Thanks for having me on the show.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. Doctor Falci. Today, you said you are
Speaker 1: not for economic lockdown, yet your mitigation recommendations, from dating
Speaker 1: to baseball, to restaurants to movie theaters have led to
Speaker 1: this economic lockdown. Do you have any second thoughts about
Speaker 1: your mitigation recommendations considering the evidence that despite all of
Speaker 1: the things we've done the US, our death rate is
Speaker 1: essentially worse than Sweden. I don't regret saying that the
Speaker 1: only way we could have really stopped the explosion of
Speaker 1: infection was by essentially, I want to say shutting down.
Speaker 1: I mean essentially having the physical separation and the kinds
Speaker 1: of recommendations that we've made. You've been a big fan
Speaker 1: of Cuomo and the shutdown in New York. You've lauded
Speaker 1: in New York for their policy. New York had the
Speaker 1: highest death rate in the world. How can we possibly
Speaker 1: be jumping up and down and saying, oh, Governor Quomo
Speaker 1: did a great job. He had the worst death right
Speaker 1: in the world. No, you misconstrued that, Senator, and you've
Speaker 1: done that repetitively in the past. They got hit very badly.
Speaker 1: They've made some mistakes right now, if you look at
Speaker 1: what's going on right now, the things that are going
Speaker 1: on in New York to get their test positivity a list,
Speaker 1: all right, I can't even I can't handle this guy anymore. Okay, bull,
Speaker 1: I got a call from the Test and Trace Corps
Speaker 1: yesterday the day before that. They don't know anything. They're
Speaker 1: just harassing me. You know, you know, are you making
Speaker 1: sure you stay inside? Yeah? Of course. Are you doing
Speaker 1: everything that we tell you to do? Yeah? Sure? Do
Speaker 1: you know how to get a COVID test if you
Speaker 1: need to? Yeah? I mean, I'm being serious. This is
Speaker 1: what they asked me on the phone. They call me
Speaker 1: if they have a human being called we look, I'm
Speaker 1: polite as a person doing their job. I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: hold a whole I don't hold them accountable for these
Speaker 1: stupid policies, right, They're just doing what they what they're
Speaker 1: told is their job. But the heck is this and
Speaker 1: Rampaul's totally right. Fauci runs around being a little fanboy
Speaker 1: for Cuomo. Cuomo is the worst, the worst COVID response
Speaker 1: in the world from this moron. And it's the numbers.
Speaker 1: Look at the debts, look at the numbers. Okay, the
Speaker 1: worst in the world. And Fauci's now, well, they've done
Speaker 1: all these good things. What have we done now that
Speaker 1: we were doing earlier on Oh, we're not sending COVID
Speaker 1: positive seniors in nursing homes. Okay, Quoma, figure that one
Speaker 1: out the hard way. But see, this is the problem, folks.
Speaker 1: It's all now. Well, sure you got hit really hard,
Speaker 1: even though you have lockdowns, and even though you had
Speaker 1: all these things. And yes, it's true that the lockdowns
Speaker 1: were never meant to stop the virus from spreading permanently.
Speaker 1: But because you're doing these things that we tell you
Speaker 1: to do so well now in places like New York,
Speaker 1: that's why the test positivity is so low. Well, what
Speaker 1: about the fact that if it worked really well, it
Speaker 1: would have worked really well in April, It would have
Speaker 1: worked really well for the ten weeks that New York
Speaker 1: was just on a total panic and people were dying,
Speaker 1: you know, by the thousands every day. Yeah, that it
Speaker 1: would have been different. It would have been different, right.
Speaker 1: But no, now that we've been through it, they're going
Speaker 1: to tell oh, it's because we're doing things so well
Speaker 1: now that these areas are at lower degrees, which also
Speaker 1: means I'm want to note that if we do see
Speaker 1: a resurgence of cases in the wintertime and coinciding with
Speaker 1: the flu season, you know what they're gonna tell us guaranteed,
Speaker 1: you guys aren't doing a good enough job with our recommendations.
Speaker 1: It's your fault, the class. This is the classic maneuver
Speaker 1: of unaccountable bureaucrat morons. There's another there's another possibility here
Speaker 1: over t sell immunity and cross immunity, which is, there
Speaker 1: are a lot of papers written by real doctors, real
Speaker 1: scientists at the top level and the international community saying
Speaker 1: that they're actually finding this is a big component of it.
Speaker 1: But the journals don't want to hear that, and they
Speaker 1: the journals want to want to flex their web md
Speaker 1: muscles against actual mds like this buffoon over at NBC
Speaker 1: Plate twenty one. So the answer is no, it is
Speaker 1: not nine percent of people that are susceptible to the infection.
Speaker 1: So I guess my question is for I'm not a doctor,
Speaker 1: I defer to your bertise on this and to his
Speaker 1: But so Americans, here one thing from the CDC director
Speaker 1: and another thing from you. Who are we to believe.
Speaker 1: You're supposed to believe the science, and I'm telling you
Speaker 1: the science. So he's not telling a science. I'm telling
Speaker 1: you the science, and that's the answer. And if you
Speaker 1: want to look up all the data, you're free to.
Speaker 1: You can also talk to the following epidemiologist. Guess why
Speaker 1: is he still going out before converts and speaking if
Speaker 1: you say he's stand today in the presence that he
Speaker 1: was as stated the last time, Americans are looking for
Speaker 1: the best information, right, yeah, I'm giving it the best information.
Speaker 1: And it's confirmed by people like Martin Coldorff, who's a
Speaker 1: Harvard epidemiologist at Harvard Medical School. Let me finish, please,
Speaker 1: Jay Bardacharia and Johnny and EDI's both epidemiologists at Stanford.
Speaker 1: So he's naming doctors who have written on this and
Speaker 1: who have looked at all the data, who are world class.
Speaker 1: And yet if you still bring up cross A cross
Speaker 1: immunity and T cell immunity added to antibodies to get
Speaker 1: us to what is closer to herd immunity, right, the
Speaker 1: disease spreads much less quickly. Even if thirty or forty
Speaker 1: percent of the population is immune, you have a much
Speaker 1: smaller field for it. To spread right, So that is
Speaker 1: much more likely to be what has caused to slowdown
Speaker 1: than these these policies that didn't work in the beginning,
Speaker 1: but now we're told, oh, will they have worked? Now?
Speaker 1: You know it's they're they're never gonna folks, just get
Speaker 1: ready for this now. They'll never admit they were wrong
Speaker 1: because they've done so much damage and they've been such
Speaker 1: smug jerks about these mandates and lockdowns. They'll never admit
Speaker 1: they were wrong. Thanks for listening to The bus Essen
Speaker 1: Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Ain't no party like
Speaker 1: a Team Buck party, because a Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we got Buck turned up to eleven. It's time for
Speaker 1: roll call. Alrighty, roll call everybody, Facebook dot com, slash
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton if you want to send us the Facebook
Speaker 1: message on Instagram Buck Sexton or Team Buck at iHeartMedia
Speaker 1: dot com so all fun things there. You can send
Speaker 1: us those emails and let's get to what do we
Speaker 1: got here? Let's get to uh, Maureen, come on, Maureen,
Speaker 1: and well no, oh that's the that's not Maureen, that's high.
Speaker 1: That bad Yeah, that was really bad. I just realized
Speaker 1: that one. I'm definitely one of those people who's been
Speaker 1: singing songs with the wrong lyrics for so long now
Speaker 1: that I refuse to believe that I've had it. I've
Speaker 1: had it wrong that long. Do you know what I mean?
Speaker 1: Did you really think it was come on, Maureen? No, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: no no. I knew that one as soon as as
Speaker 1: soon as I said it. But there are others that
Speaker 1: I'm like, no, it can't be that, you know, So
Speaker 1: I'd love to hear some examples when you think of them. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'll definitely think of stuff. I've definitely had songs though
Speaker 1: that for a long time, I was singing the wrong lyrics.
Speaker 1: And then someone's like, that's not the lyrics. I'm like,
Speaker 1: yes it is. You know, it's hard to believe that
Speaker 1: you've been singing the wrong song lyrics for a very
Speaker 1: long time. But anyway, I missed the nineties when I, oh,
Speaker 1: I want to be Jesse's girl. Yeah, he's right. I
Speaker 1: wish that I had. I wish that I could be
Speaker 1: Jesse's girl or whatever. I had that one wrong. I
Speaker 1: think everyone had that one wrong. Yeah, I wish I
Speaker 1: had Jesse's girls. What he's saying, right, I think I
Speaker 1: said I wish I was. Anyway, there's some other ones.
Speaker 1: Producer Nick has pointed that out. All right, let's get
Speaker 1: back to what Marien actually has to say. Hey, bucking
Speaker 1: producer maur quick question. Once President Trump names his SCO
Speaker 1: to his pick, is it legally allowed for the Senate
Speaker 1: to just immediately vote on it with no hearings whatsoever?
Speaker 1: I feel the hearings or nothing but theatrics and an
Speaker 1: invitation should for the left to drag things out and
Speaker 1: create a hostile environment for an appointee. After the immediate vote,
Speaker 1: she should be sworn in the very next day. Thanks
Speaker 1: for all you and Mark do for us, Maureen. I
Speaker 1: think that, yeah, they don't have to have hearings. I
Speaker 1: think it's up to the Senate. They just have to
Speaker 1: give They have to have a vote for the advice
Speaker 1: and consent clause to be to be fulfilled. And yeah,
Speaker 1: I think that they shouldn't. I think they absolutely should
Speaker 1: not do the hearing. I think that the hearing is
Speaker 1: a mistake. I think that it's a bad idea. It
Speaker 1: just allows them another line of attack against Amy Coney Barrett.
Speaker 1: They'll play games. They'll try to extend it out. They'll
Speaker 1: play timeline games. They'll say there needs to be a
Speaker 1: you know, a federal investigation of Amy Coney Barrett's you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know, stockholdings or something. They'll come up with something.
Speaker 1: These people are. These people are ruthless and crazy, and
Speaker 1: they don't want to believe it. They've been the party
Speaker 1: of baby killers for the last forty years. They don't
Speaker 1: want to believe. They don't want anyone to. And there's
Speaker 1: some part of them they realize is that the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court doesn't give you this wave of a hand that says, oh, yeah, no,
Speaker 1: you can totally do abortion any time of pregnancy. A
Speaker 1: lot of people are gonna think, hmm, maybe this isn't
Speaker 1: the innocuous thing that they've been saying it is. Let's
Speaker 1: see what we have here. Next up in the mix, Joe, Hello, men,
Speaker 1: just listen to today's show and is always tremendous. I
Speaker 1: gotta admit I'm liking this take no prisoner's attitude you've
Speaker 1: adopted of late. This is the time to put our
Speaker 1: foot down and end the madness. So I, for one,
Speaker 1: appreciate that tone your setting as I'm sure your other
Speaker 1: listeners due to keep up the fight, you and producer
Speaker 1: Mark continue with the fun, entertaining and informative show. You
Speaker 1: guys are good team. Shields high Joel, thank you right
Speaker 1: see producer Mark. The people have spoken good. They like us, Yeah,
Speaker 1: they like us exactly. It's nice we get to keep
Speaker 1: jobs a little longer. Isn't that exciting? I like to
Speaker 1: hear that. Yes, yeah, I like I like that too,
Speaker 1: Like I want to get one of these jobs that
Speaker 1: I don't want to do. I've done that before. That's
Speaker 1: no fun. Yeah, we have fun. What is the worst
Speaker 1: What is the worst job you've ever had? Like, I
Speaker 1: mean going back to when you're scoop and ice cream
Speaker 1: as a teenager, Like, what's the what's the one job
Speaker 1: you're like? This sucks? Oh, because worst job I've ever
Speaker 1: had I probably can't say on this radio show. I
Speaker 1: actually did scoop ice cream once. That was Um, it
Speaker 1: wasn't as bad as you think, but it was still
Speaker 1: I mean manual labor. I was an unpaid camp counselor
Speaker 1: for a summer called the Counselor in Training where you're
Speaker 1: one year shy what you need to be. They had
Speaker 1: this program and then you would guarantee to be a
Speaker 1: camp counselor of the year after it. But I realized
Speaker 1: once I was in it. One, if they like you,
Speaker 1: they'll just hire you. You don't have through the trading.
Speaker 1: And two all I was doing was making peanut butter
Speaker 1: and jelly sandwiches and carrying around big bags of equipment
Speaker 1: all day in the hot sun, like by myself. It
Speaker 1: was the worst word job in the world. For free.
Speaker 1: It was a free job. No, I'm sorry, shouldn't say free.
Speaker 1: I think they gave me a for eight weeks. I
Speaker 1: think I got a one hundred and fifty dollars stipend
Speaker 1: or a two hundred dollars stipend or something like that,
Speaker 1: you know, so I could get myself a nice walkman. Hey,
Speaker 1: when you were a kid, that's all that mattered. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I was like fourteen or fifteen. I guess you grew
Speaker 1: up in what the sixties, So one hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: dollars was a lot of money. Yeah. No, I mean
Speaker 1: you could buy a whole twenty acre farm for one
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty dollars when I was a kid. Get jerk,
Speaker 1: but yeah, yeah, that was a bad That was a
Speaker 1: bad gig. I'm trying to think of other gigs that
Speaker 1: I've had. Tutoring. I tutored to make extra money when
Speaker 1: I was or just to make money when I was
Speaker 1: in high school, and tutoring is entirely dependent. The kids
Speaker 1: were always well behaved. It was dealing with the parents
Speaker 1: that was a that was a challenge. You know. The
Speaker 1: parents would be like, why didn't he get an A?
Speaker 1: And like, well, I don't know. I gave the kid
Speaker 1: a great outline and we went through this stuff. But
Speaker 1: you know, maybe he's got to study a little harder,
Speaker 1: or maybe he's just not that smart. You know, these
Speaker 1: are like you can't I don't know the parents. I'm
Speaker 1: not a miracle worker. I don't know what to say,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, I'm doing the best I can.
Speaker 1: You mean you didn't just take the test for them? No,
Speaker 1: that's you gotta pay more money for that. And apparently
Speaker 1: now you can go to prison for that as we
Speaker 1: see from these uh this like college admission scandal. Thing
Speaker 1: most fun job I probably ever have was being a
Speaker 1: soccer coach. That was awesome. I want to coach again
Speaker 1: one day. It's so fond to you ever coach, No you.
Speaker 1: I mean you could coach ice hockey that I probably could.
Speaker 1: I've never played though, Yeah, but if you know enough
Speaker 1: about the game, like, I'm a much better coach than
Speaker 1: I was a player, just because I can understand and
Speaker 1: conceptualize the things. Who's gonna teach you the game? What
Speaker 1: do you mean you don't know any sports? I mean
Speaker 1: I guess soccer, I played them. I know tennis and
Speaker 1: I know soccer. How do you How do you coach soccer? Hey,
Speaker 1: score a goal, occasionally, run around the field with the ball. Wow,
Speaker 1: look at you. You know that's funny is that the
Speaker 1: audience is ninety five percent with you on the soccer hate.
Speaker 1: So I can't even I can't even begin, you know,
Speaker 1: I can't even like watching. Tried as a kid to
Speaker 1: play quarterback or something. It would have been fun to
Speaker 1: play football, And football didn't really exist in New York
Speaker 1: City as a sport that was played in high school.
Speaker 1: We just didn't have the fields or the programs for it,
Speaker 1: so it didn't So that's why you get a lot
Speaker 1: of soccer and lacrosse instead. But if you have soccer
Speaker 1: and lacrosse fields, you have football fields. Um. Yeah, but
Speaker 1: they didn't have the they didn't have the programs, meaning
Speaker 1: they wouldn't have they have enough kids in football is
Speaker 1: very expensive football team and yeah, I mean there's there's
Speaker 1: and plus you got to compete with the uh you know,
Speaker 1: you got to compete with this, the soccer and the
Speaker 1: lacrosse teams that want those those fields. So yeah, there's
Speaker 1: not a lot. I think if you get out in
Speaker 1: the burbs, there's a little bit more football, but not really.
Speaker 1: It's not like in the South. I watched Friday Night
Speaker 1: Lights and there's football's life. We love it. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know they build major stadiums like in Texas for
Speaker 1: high school football. I know that's you've seen Friday Night Lights,
Speaker 1: right of course. Yeah yeah, all right, Andy? Right, Hey,
Speaker 1: Buck and Mark, long time. I'm listener. Going back to
Speaker 1: real news at the Blaze and Saturday Commie Bear crew. Wow, Andy,
Speaker 1: you do go back my man original Saturday squad. Listen
Speaker 1: every day. Buck is by far the air apparent to
Speaker 1: mister Limbaugh. Don't tell my competitors that, Andy, but thank
Speaker 1: you anyway. Listening to the Tuesday podcast, and I think
Speaker 1: you can't take your eye off Romney. He's a shyster
Speaker 1: and my expectations that he will not allow the Rather,
Speaker 1: he will allow the vote and vote no with the Democrats.
Speaker 1: He's never said he would side with Trump, just that
Speaker 1: he would allow a vote. He's got an ego the
Speaker 1: size of Cleveland and will capitalize on any opportunity he
Speaker 1: sees to make himself a maverick. Allah. John McCain, Andy,
Speaker 1: I do not disagree with you, Man, I said. I
Speaker 1: didn't say that we're celebrating Mitt. I'm just saying, Okay,
Speaker 1: he's moving the right direction, and if he does the
Speaker 1: right thing here, we got to say good stuff. Mitt. Right,
Speaker 1: we give credit where it is due, you know, I
Speaker 1: always say that, and we do so. If Mitt votes
Speaker 1: for assuming it's Amy Coney Barrett, we're gonna we're gonna
Speaker 1: have like a mid appreciation day on the show, Well,
Speaker 1: a mid appreciation the twenty seconds. Maybe I'll bring my
Speaker 1: baseball glove. Yeah, what is that for? It's a it's
Speaker 1: a baseball mit. Oh yes, yes, no, I knew that.
Speaker 1: Uh So we'll see, man, Jim, I mean, rather, Andy,
Speaker 1: I think you could be correct on this one. Though.
Speaker 1: We're gonna watch mid very closely. He is a he's
Speaker 1: a slippery one. That's for sure, you're in the freedom Hud.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. More roll call
Speaker 1: Jim gets us going here. Lame duck President one a
Speaker 1: president who lost an election but serves from November to
Speaker 1: January twentieth two. A president who served eight years and
Speaker 1: its ineligible to be voted toward the end of his
Speaker 1: eighth year. Obama was a lame duck. Trump is not.
Speaker 1: Shields and Gabbles High. Okay, Jim, thank you for the clarification.
Speaker 1: We appreciate it. Ken, Dear Buck, I discovered you pretty
Speaker 1: recently now I listen to you on your iHeart podcast. Yes,
Speaker 1: new Team buck Ken. Nothing makes me happier than new
Speaker 1: Team Buck joining him the fold year. I find you
Speaker 1: refreshingly unpolished and relatable in comparison to your contemporaries. Okay,
Speaker 1: I'll take it unpolished. I'm not sure you know, but
Speaker 1: does that mean I look scruffy. You're also extremely perceptive
Speaker 1: and I've become one of my go to resources for analysis.
Speaker 1: Keep up the excellent work. Since I'm a long haul
Speaker 1: trucker and live on the road, I guess that makes
Speaker 1: me team Gypsy Shields High. Hey, Ken, we love Team
Speaker 1: Buck truckers man. Great to have you on board. I
Speaker 1: promise we'll keep you entertained, updated informed. That's how we roll,
Speaker 1: and we'll keep we'll keep along there with you. Please
Speaker 1: tell some of your your fellow truckers out there, you
Speaker 1: know you're hanging out, you know, getting a milkshake or whatever.
Speaker 1: You know, you'd say, Hey, you gotta check out this
Speaker 1: guy's podcast, Pass the Buck. Is that what you think
Speaker 1: truckers do? Well? I was I can't. I would say,
Speaker 1: not a beer. They're you know, their livelihood is dependent
Speaker 1: on being reliable and high level drivers, so they can't
Speaker 1: be drinking beer that you know. I'm of course, but
Speaker 1: you think they just all go to the truck shop
Speaker 1: together share a milkshake every night. I don't know if they.
Speaker 1: I mean, milkshake is a good thing. I like milkshakes.
Speaker 1: What's wrong with milkshakes? And milkshakes are granted. I'm just
Speaker 1: curious your mindset of what truckers do. I mean, when
Speaker 1: they're at the stop, I assume they get food and
Speaker 1: you know chat. I don't know. Fine, fair, all right,
Speaker 1: I saying, yeah, the truckers team Buck truckers will weigh
Speaker 1: on this. They'll tell us whether they indeed so. Look,
Speaker 1: milkshake is technically a little high calorically can be a
Speaker 1: little fatty. I understand forever these guys want to be
Speaker 1: able to fit into their trucks. They're not just drinking
Speaker 1: a milkshake every night. I mean, I'm pretty sure if
Speaker 1: you if you want to gain weight, one of the
Speaker 1: best ways to do would just be, you know, after
Speaker 1: you've eaten dinner, it's time to go to bed, just
Speaker 1: have make yourself a nice big milkshake and just just
Speaker 1: pound that thing because you're you're looking at it's easy
Speaker 1: to drink eight hundred, eight hundred to one thousand calories
Speaker 1: that way easy. Yeah, that's why I don't like, Like,
Speaker 1: I enjoy milkshakes, but it's not my go too because
Speaker 1: like I'm drinking it, let me eat ice cream. It's solid.
Speaker 1: It makes me feel like I'm enjoying something. Yes, Yes,
Speaker 1: and Team Bucks milkshake brings all the ears to the yard. Um, No,
Speaker 1: you went there? Yeah all right, Chris rides producer Mark
Speaker 1: is your color commentator when sports come up, background and insight,
Speaker 1: shield side Yeah, no, he's so. Yeah, we don't have
Speaker 1: Mark you play by play on the show. That would
Speaker 1: be weird. Hey, Mark, just start pretending like you're watching sports,
Speaker 1: but he does tell us about what's going on this sport. Well,
Speaker 1: since since we're on the subject, anything interesting happening this
Speaker 1: week in sports? Yeah, I mean you've got the Stanley
Speaker 1: Cup Finals. The who's in the Stanley Cup Finals? It's
Speaker 1: the Tampa Bay Lightning and the Dallas Stars. A good
Speaker 1: series so far. Yeah, okay, cool, I'm glad that's the
Speaker 1: big thing on my ducket. I like it. Nick. Hey Buck,
Speaker 1: listen to your show yesterday, and I have an answer
Speaker 1: for how the left will block the Scotus vote. Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm all ears. Nick. You keep saying it'll be done
Speaker 1: because historically and legally it is correct. That is the
Speaker 1: very argument they will use because historically the USA is
Speaker 1: a racist country run by old white men and a
Speaker 1: constitution was written by rich white men, so they cannon
Speaker 1: must be ignored. Any Senator who says differently will be
Speaker 1: branded a racist and be canceled. Unfortunately, this is the
Speaker 1: world we live in. This is one time I'd like
Speaker 1: to be wrong, but no, I'm not. Hang tough, my friend, Nick.
Speaker 1: We'll see. I don't think I don't think that's gonna
Speaker 1: be there, but I don't know. I don't think that's
Speaker 1: gonna be the approach. But I like that you're thinking
Speaker 1: outside the box because I don't know how procedurally that
Speaker 1: would really change the thing. I mean, maybe that's going
Speaker 1: to be part of their of their pressure campaign, but
Speaker 1: I think that they're gonna They're gonna think something else up.
Speaker 1: I don't know. Todd, thank you for highlighting the story
Speaker 1: of Jake Gardner on your show Monday. It is a travesty,
Speaker 1: a tragedy. It's just heartbreaking. Nebraska maybe fly over country
Speaker 1: to most of the rest of the America and the
Speaker 1: butt of a lot of jokes. But we are good people,
Speaker 1: optimistic and hard working, loyal and kind, God fearing and
Speaker 1: America loving. This is not the way Nebraskans treat each other.
Speaker 1: Don Klein and whoever sat on that grand jury should
Speaker 1: be ashamed of themselves for the rest of their lives
Speaker 1: for bringing those charges against mister Gardner. They have blood
Speaker 1: on their hands for cowering to the mob. You're right,
Speaker 1: his own local government betrayed him, and now another VET
Speaker 1: has committed suicide. It didn't have to happen. Buck, You
Speaker 1: really showed your class and character by speaking up about
Speaker 1: Jake Gardener and his story and taking the strong stance
Speaker 1: you did. Thank you. If this can happen in Nebraska,
Speaker 1: it can happen anyw where. It's terrifying. Well, Todd really
Speaker 1: appreciate you writing in with this, and we certainly do
Speaker 1: our best to raise important stories like this to the
Speaker 1: national level national consciousness, and it is. It's a heartbreaking story,
Speaker 1: and certainly we have always appreciated I mean Nebraskans have
Speaker 1: a special place in my heart because kfab Omaha was
Speaker 1: one of the first big stations to put this show
Speaker 1: on the air now going on almost exactly four years ago,
Speaker 1: so we've had Nebraskans listening in now for years, and
Speaker 1: we really appreciate the way that they've made Team Buck
Speaker 1: a part of their daily lives. Horace Buck, I have
Speaker 1: to disagree with you on the Brionna Taylor shooting. Let's
Speaker 1: not forget her boyfriend was wanted for selling drugs. He
Speaker 1: wasn't a terrorist about to blow up a building. They
Speaker 1: could have waited until the exit the building and apprehended
Speaker 1: him at that time or any other time. There was
Speaker 1: no need to confront him in his girlfriend's apartment. They
Speaker 1: knew it was his girlfriend's apartment. A cornered person that
Speaker 1: is more likely to resort to fight over flight. I
Speaker 1: do believe you've heard that some police were is worthwhile.
Speaker 1: If so, what reform do you see a problem with
Speaker 1: no knock warrants? I know you don't have a problem
Speaker 1: with stopping frisk another place we disagree. But if you
Speaker 1: agree there should be some police reform, what does it
Speaker 1: look like to you? Horace? This is gonna sound like
Speaker 1: I'm dodging, but we're at the very very end of
Speaker 1: the show. I'll say this, no knock warrants. The reason
Speaker 1: that they would do that is because, especially for drug cases,
Speaker 1: if you knock and you give somebody a few minutes
Speaker 1: to put all the drugs in the toilet, you're not
Speaker 1: gonna find drugs on the scene necessarily, right, or they're
Speaker 1: gonna hide the stash. So that's why that exists. And
Speaker 1: as for police reform, it's a very broad range of issues.
Speaker 1: I actually seek prosecutorial reform more than specifically police reform.
Speaker 1: So that's the best answer I can give you with
Speaker 1: a clock ticking down to zero. But thank you for
Speaker 1: writing in and a team until tomorrow, shields, high