WEBVTT - Episode 86: s259 Wedges

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>The guys from paying They've kind of showed me how

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>much the equipment matters.

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 2>I just love that I can hit any shot I

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of want.

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be able to tell some fun stories about

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>what goes on here to help golfers play better golf.

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 3>What's up, everybody? Welcome back to the Ping proven Grounds Podcast.

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 3>Shane Bake and alongside Marty Jertson. Pretty excited about this,

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 3>and I gotta be honest with you. I love the guy,

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 3>I love the clubs, I love the wedges. Let's have

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 3>a day.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Huh Yeah, Yeah, it's been fun. We got Jacob Clark

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>with us. He's the head of our wedge designs, leads

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>all of our wedge designs, and we have just been

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>really trending. I mean, I think it internally, Jacob, you

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>could talk about it a little bit. We've had a

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>goal to increase the number of our tour players playing

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>our current wedges, and we're just off the charts right

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>now with the with our last couple wedge models, and

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a deep dive into S two to

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine. Jacob tell us a little bit about just

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>S one fifty nine's success on the PGA Tour and

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>LPGA Tour.

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's been a really cool journey to

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 4>look at the progress that we made. And I remember

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 4>sitting down probably five or six years ago, and that

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 4>was kind of at the forefront of our minds is

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 4>how do we really establish a quality relationship with our

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 4>tour players so that they feel comfortable in wedges that

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:22.839
<v Speaker 4>give them the best performance.

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Weekend and week out.

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 4>And obviously I'm going to be super biased towards it,

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 4>but I would say that lob wedges are like one

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 4>of the most finicky clubs in a player's bag, Like

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 4>love wedges and three woods are the ones that you

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 4>kind of hear the most about. And over time, we

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 4>kind of were like taking an assessment of like where

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 4>our tour staff was and we saw an opportunity for

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 4>improvement of what are the needs that they have that

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 4>we may not be addressing and S one fifty nine.

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 4>As we started kicking off that project probably four years

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 4>ago and looking at from a design side of things

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 4>and how do we work with our players, what are

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 4>the elements of the club that we might be missing

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 4>out on. It kind of started this journey where we

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 4>are now and I think that's part of the reason

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 4>why we rebranded, going from the Glide family into the

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:12.839
<v Speaker 4>S one fifty nine and kind of signify like, hey,

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 4>this is a different chapter in the history of ping wedges.

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 2>So it's been really cool to.

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 4>See the adoption over the last couple of years. And

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 4>one of the things that's really interesting with them too

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 4>is that with players and wedges that there are so

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 4>many different opinions of how head shape should look, how

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 4>do they want them to sit, how do they want

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 4>the impact sensation through the ground and the sand to be.

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 4>And it's not like a one size fits all, like

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 4>drivers are a little bit more straightforward of like hey,

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 4>you picked up ball speed, or your dispersions tighter, your

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 4>spends the more consistent around the face. With wedges, there's

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 4>a lot more nuance and feel and huge variety of

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 4>like different perceptions that players want. So I think we've

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 4>made a lot of strides in this space, and I

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 4>think as S two to fifty nine launches and we

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 4>start getting a lot of momentum behind the product, we

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 4>should continue to see a lot of growth in the space.

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I know how excited you were for

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 3>US one fifty nine. I mean I know we were.

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 3>I think we were at the ASU practice facility and

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I hate giving an issue a shout out here, but

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 3>the prices de laite is awesome. We were out there,

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 3>you're hitting pitch shots, and you were excited about it.

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 3>You're hopeful. It seems like it passed expectations in terms

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 3>of what you and the team were looking for, not

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 3>just with the tour players but across the board.

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, And I think one of the cool things is

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 4>I think we've we've had a lot of the performance

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 4>elements there for a long time, and that's something we

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 4>do really well at PING is evaluate a lot of

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 4>the very highly technical pieces like I'm sure we'll talk

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 4>about face friction and golf club golf ball interaction. We

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 4>felt like we've been a leader in that space for

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 4>a while, but I think I kind of like personally

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 4>took it upon myself looking at when a player puts

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 4>a club down, they're getting their first impression. How does

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 4>it sit behind the ball, how does it look in

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 4>different face orientations. That was where we had the most

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 4>opportunity for growth and talking about at that facility, and

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 4>we were working through and I was super excited for

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 4>S one fifty nine, and then the more time I've

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 4>spent with that product, working with players, using it myself,

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 4>having lots of conversations around it, just started to open

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 4>up more opportunities for two fifty nine and how we

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 4>can build on the elements that made one fifty nine

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 4>successful but kind of take it up to the next

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 4>level to unlock just golfers getting more confident with the with.

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>The golf club. And I think a big piece of that,

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Jacob is obviously like the grinds. I mean, we made

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>such a big improvement in our offerings that could fit

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a wide range of golfers in different conditions, and we

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>even see it in our in our tour data, and

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not they're all not using the tea grind. There's

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>such a big diversity there. Tell us a little bit

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>about the grinds in the s two fifty nine, some

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>learnings from one to fifty nine, maybe some work with

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>some tour players.

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure.

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 4>So in terms of our overall grind lineup, we're not

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 4>introduced any new grinds to the family. They've all been

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 4>refined that I'd say one of the biggest changes, and

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 4>this is the one I personally get the most excited

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 4>about is the E grind. So we've had the I

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 4>two in our lineup for a while, and people familiar

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 4>with ping are familiar with the iconic I two all

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 4>the elements of the club that's kind of known as

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 4>like the ultimate bunker club. So spending time understanding, okay,

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 4>what are the elements of that golf club that make

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 4>it really good out of bunkers. So in S two

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 4>fifty nine, we wanted to take the performance characteristics of

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 4>that golf club, how it hits the ground, how it

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 4>hits the sand, and bring it into a more traditional

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 4>headshape with the previous iterations it's been on the I two,

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 4>which is that stretched out, drawn, more higher toe profile.

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 4>There is a subset of golfers that love that head

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 4>shape and that's super nostalgic for them to look back on.

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 4>Hey this, I use this growing up. I remember getting

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 4>my first set of real golf clubs and I had

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 4>I two's. But there's a lot of people that are

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 4>in dire need of a lot of the things that

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 4>this soul does, but one of more, I guess, approachable

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 4>head shape.

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 2>So what does the soul do? What does this soul do? Yeah,

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 2>so the E grind in particular.

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 4>So I think the thing that people are most familiar

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 4>with on the E or the I two is there's

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 4>a dishing in the mid section of the soul. So

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 4>what that does is it kind of scoops out a

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 4>section of material kind of right behind where the lead

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 4>edge bounce blends in. And one of the coolest things

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 4>about that feature is that on square and slightly open

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 4>face shots around the greens, especially if you're playing off

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 4>like firm turf, it allows it to sit really low

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 4>to the ground on those shots. But when you open

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 4>it up, and when you open it up the most

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be in a bunker. When you open

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 4>it up all the way, you have this back edge

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 4>bounce that can kick in and allow the golf club,

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 4>based on the shaping and that dish in the front section,

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 4>to get down into the sand early so you can

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 4>get under the ball. But then the back edge bounce

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 4>kicks in and keeps it super shallow through the sand,

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 4>which gives the player that sensation and helps the ball

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 4>come out at the appropriate speed instead of continuing to

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 4>go down, down, down into the bunker.

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 2>That is part of it.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 4>And then you have the heel side of this golf

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 4>club on the trail edge really if you can probably

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 4>see it from your seat, the heel side of the

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 4>golf club on the trail edge relief is really steep,

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 4>so it falls away sharply away from the lead edge

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 4>as you open it up and you're in some of

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 4>those kind of lies or a bunker might be firm,

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 4>you can utilize that part of the soul to get

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 4>the golf club under the ball to create height. If

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 4>you look at back at the old it twos that

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 4>heelside is super steep and falls away, and that's what

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 4>players loved about it. They felt like they could get

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 4>under the ball from anywhere, be able to create some

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 4>different shots.

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 2>And so we're really excited to kind of bring that

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 2>one back. Marty.

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 3>You know something interesting, and Jacob you said this off

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 3>the bat, but you know, when you launch modern golf,

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 3>like modern tour golf, you'll hear announcers, especially older announcers,

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 3>will talk about players in what club they pull out

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 3>of the bag, they hit pitch shots around the green.

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 3>You see guys miss greens. Now they grab the lobwitch

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 3>as they're walking down the ferry, much like they do

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 3>with a putter when they hit a shot in the green,

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 3>maybe with a par five. Yeah, I mean the emphasis

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 3>on the sixty degree yep. And it's been important over

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 3>the last few years. But it feels like it's even

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 3>more important now than it's ever been been. It feels

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 3>like the club that young players, young pros are leaning

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 3>into to hit any type of golf shot around a green.

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And part of that is firmer greens, faster greens.

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So the days were used in your fifty six. If

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the greens are slower you know, right, you know, right

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.719
<v Speaker 1>after overseed in Arizona for example, Oh yeah, I could

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>chip that out over there with my fifty six. But

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the tour conditions now are have evolved, Jacob. I mean,

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you see a weekend and week out out there. They

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.719
<v Speaker 1>need to control it with a combination of boat trajectory

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 1>and spin. So we also have some new technology in

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the face which can give more spin to a higher

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>lofted club, where maybe in generations of the past you

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>get too much loft on the club, the ball would

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>slip up the face. You couldn't control it right. So, Jacob,

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I would love for you to talk a little bit

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>about the face technology, and then we'll dive back into

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the grinds.

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so kind of building on that point of One

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:26.079
<v Speaker 4>of the things I think is really cool and I've

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 4>learned this a lot by you measure a lot of

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 4>players hitting wedge shots around the greens and already alluded

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 4>to how tour conditions have gotten firmer over and as

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 4>agronomy develops and you get different types of turf. One

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 4>of the things that we see around the greens and

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 4>probably inside about twenty yards is that a player's launch

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 4>angle is their land angle on the green. So you

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 4>kind of think because like the ball isn't in the

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 4>air long enough for the spin to really take control

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 4>of the flight. And one of the things that's cool

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 4>about that is players can now launch the ball higher

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 4>with the face friction that we have through the micromax

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 4>screws and the higher loft of wedges, the machining texture

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 4>on the face, the face blast, all of those things

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 4>allow the golfer to deliver more loft with the lob

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 4>bledges that we were talking about, but they can generate

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 4>high spin shots and with a high level of predictability,

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 4>like the play if you see a tour player, and

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 4>a high level player hit the wedge shot around the

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 4>green that rides up the face comes out slow usually

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 4>like slow, comes up short right, that's like an immediate

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 4>like hand the wedge back like you're done. And so

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 4>like I'm guarding you gets that all the time when

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:37.839
<v Speaker 4>I'm working with players, like what do we need to

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 4>do to make sure that they're in a club that

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 4>doesn't do that? And so like part of that is

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 4>getting them in the correct grind and how it matches

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 4>up with their technique, golf course conditions, et cetera. But

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 4>the face friction plays such a huge role in that

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 4>golf club golf ball interaction to where it's like we know,

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:57.959
<v Speaker 4>I mean even right now in Arizona's coming out of

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 4>overseaed the grass looks it's a little bit on the

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 4>furry side. You're almost always going to have something between

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 4>the club and the ball. So when I'm working with players,

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 4>one of the ways that you can kind of tell

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 4>how it's going is like when you're hitting shots around

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 4>the greens and you hit the chip and you just

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 4>see cover of the golf ball in the face, you

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 4>can see, okay, we've probably had pretty clean contact that

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 4>either were super low mowing height or we're down grain.

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 4>But like now, if you go chip, almost every shot

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 4>you see a little a little bit of grass on

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 4>the face and you could hit it perfect like impact location.

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 4>We're usually looking like groove three, group four. You could

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 4>hit it absolutely perfect, great technique, And if you start

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 4>to see that ball slide in those conditions, you're like, Okay,

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 4>maybe there's something wrong. Players start to head their technique

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 4>in different ways to come out in the window they want.

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.559
<v Speaker 4>But through our face friction and all the research that

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 4>there's so many people here that spend a lot of

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 4>time on this stuff that are so much smarter than

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 4>I could ever imagine being of just being able to

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 4>maintain similar launch and spin characters ristics across those different

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 4>lies and different shots. Like you've probably heard me say

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 4>it before, but I view this stuff as like kind

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 4>of equivalent is like MOI on a driver, where if

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 4>you hit one right out of the middle of a driver,

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't really matter, kind of like you do all

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 4>the time show Yeah, but when you hit it all

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 4>over the face, like I do you need all the

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 4>MOI that you can possibly get. What this friction does

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 4>is it kind of does the same thing for maybe

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 4>you're not as avid of a golfer and you don't

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 4>really understand how to read different lies and how the

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 4>ball's going to react out of them. You can use

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 4>a very similar technique that you would from a fairway

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.959
<v Speaker 4>light rough lie. You're playing early in the morning, there's

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 4>do all over your golf ball, and you can trust

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 4>that it's going to come out in the same window.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 4>Like you hear players talk about that all the time

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 4>of it comes out of my window. It comes out

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 4>of my window, Like that's the first check for them

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 4>before they even look at TrackMan numbers or like looking

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 4>up and the ball matches in the air where their

0:12:57.440 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 4>eye expects it to be. Like, that's such a huge

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm in a fitting for the elite player.

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the idea of the launch angle, your your land

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>angle equals your launch angle. That's got to just help

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 1>golfers in general, just to know that, Jacob, what would

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>be like, let's say you got a kind of furmish

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>conditions fifteen feet fifteen feet a green over a bunker,

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a tour players hitting like a lob shot or something.

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>What would like a range of launch angles and then

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>corresponding land angles be for that type of shot, yeah,

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>for sure.

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 4>So usually what you'll see is most players kind of

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 4>have like three ish general windows that they're gonna hit

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 4>around the green. Like obviously there's nuance for exact scenarios

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 4>and stuff. I would say most of the high launching

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 4>shots that you see that's the short sided over bunker are.

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 2>Usually going to be like in the low forties, Okay.

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 4>Most like player stock shots I usually see kind of

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 4>live around thirty ish. That's gonna be more that flighted

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 4>shot that's got a little more spin on it, kind

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 4>of the one to grab. But then they're mid flighted

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.599
<v Speaker 4>shots that you can still generate a lot of spin with.

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 4>They kind of have different combinations of stopping power and

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 4>how you can utilize those in different conditions. Where Like

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 4>the example I like to use is a play and

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 4>I live in North Carolina, You've got Bermuda everywhere, Bermuda greens.

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 4>If you are chipping onto a firm, down grain Bermuda

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 4>green in the summer, if you're coming in with a

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 4>shallow land angle, I do not care how much spin

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 4>you have on that golf ball. If you're bouncing down grain,

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 4>it's already so far past the hole that it doesn't

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 4>like the spin catches us and you're fifteen feet by already,

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 4>but you have to use those combinations of like launch angle,

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 4>which like some matches up with the land angle still

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 4>generating high spin for that shot to be able to

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 4>stop it. When you've got those pins that are maybe

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, two three four paces onto the green,

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 4>you don't have a ton of space to work with.

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 4>That's I think that's an element that players can start

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 4>to take into account of it. My greens get really firm,

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna have to stop this more with height rather

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 4>than spend, so whatever they need to do with their

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 4>their technique to kind of create a nice matchup for

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 4>stopping power in that situation.

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 2>It's just understanding your conditions a bit more. Only going

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 2>to work in your favor.

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Kind kind of jumped in the way of you going

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 3>through the grind. So if you can kind of finish

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 3>off some of the grind offerings obviously now with the

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 3>with S two fifty nine.

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so we went through the E grind, the two

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 4>new grinds that we introduced on S one fifty nine,

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 4>where the H and the b U. The H is

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 4>kind of a nice middle ground.

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Where there is.

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Inspired by our works half moon grind, so it's got

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 4>relief in the heel and toe sections to give you

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 4>that versatility. For some different face angles, still have the

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 4>lead edge sit load to the turf, but the mid section.

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Is more similar to the S.

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 4>So those two are pretty similar in how they hit

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 4>the ground on your square face shots. But as you

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 4>open manipulate the face on the eight, it's going to

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 4>sit a little bit lower to the turf than the

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 4>S does. And then the B grind it's a little

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 4>bit wider sole that flatter soule. So I see that

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 4>work really well for players that play on really firm

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 4>golf courses usually because that lead edge on square face

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 4>shots sits super low to the ground, but it's got

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 4>a nice wide soul, So that one works well for

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 4>players that don't manipulate the face lot, they kind of

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 4>gravitate more towards square face shots that firmer turf. So

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 4>all we're trying to do with these different grinds is

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 4>just control that vertical impact location on the face. We

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 4>talk about hitting groove three group four because you get

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 4>a nice combination of height and spin there. That bee

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 4>grind works really well for players that may tend to

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 4>hit shots a little bit thin and struggle to generate

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 4>that extra height around the greens.

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>MB stands for bounce bounce, so that take an angle

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>off exactly lead edge to sit lower.

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I said that one sits the lowest on

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 4>our square face shots. A lot of tour players have

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 4>used that kind of depending on conditions. A lot of

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 4>girls out on the LPGA, they generally gravitate towards more

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 4>square face orientation shots. They also don't miss it in

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 4>the spots that you and I do around the green

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 4>where they're in jail, so they missed it in the

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 4>appropriate spots.

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 2>Imagine that it's weird being smarter than the game man.

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 4>Cool, So the B works really well for that. The

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 4>W is one that's our widest soul. It's a very

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 4>full soul. This is what we play in the sandwich

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 4>right with the correct and there's we were Marty and

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 4>I actually talked about this a few weeks ago. We

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 4>added a new fifty and fifty two W to the

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 4>set too, so that one works really well for players

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 4>one that maybe play a slightly wider soul iron if

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 4>they're in the G family of irons. It makes that

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 4>transition a little bit easier. It also has a slightly

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 4>lower CG, so it's a little bit different. Flight also

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 4>works well in just softer conditions. So if you're a

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 4>player that uses that golf club almost exclusively for full shots,

0:17:58.520 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 4>maybe play somewhere that's a little bit soft.

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 2>It can be a great fit just bringing.

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 4>That flight in a more predictable spot, just because the

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 4>impact locations are going to be more consistent for that player.

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I know you've hit that one quite a bit.

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>That's in my bag for sure.

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 3>You like, you like, and you talked to me about this,

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 3>but you like it for bunker shots too. I mean

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 3>that's one of the things you're a big fan of.

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely and Jacob help me, I guess realize this is

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and Jacob's done it with a lot of our tour players.

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Is hey put the put a wider soule in, putting

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 1>something that's going to be better for those longer bunker shots, longer,

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>more powdery, where if you get your lob wedge in there,

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you literally can't swing hard enough to get to get

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball.

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 3>Not getting it, You're not hitting that thing thirty yards

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 3>no matter how hard.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You hit it, absolutely yeah.

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 4>And one of the things that's cool too is like,

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 4>and when Marty and I were working through that is

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 4>as a player, like you can always manipulate the face

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 4>to add more loft to it if you but it's

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 4>like what you have on the bottom is what you

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 4>have on the bottom, And so you get in those

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 4>really soft bunkers and like a lot of the players

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 4>out of work with even if they aren't necessarily a

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 4>longer bunker shot, but you get some of that heavy,

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 4>fluffy white sand that you see down like in Florida.

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes having that additional width is super helpful just to

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 4>have a more predictable flight, like being able to control

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 4>the ball speed a little bit better. Other souls that

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 4>are a little bit lower bounce can tend to be

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 4>a little bit inconsistent when you get into that heavy sand.

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 4>So kind of complementing your set and understanding like, hey,

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 4>I've got some clubs in my set that have higher

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 4>bounce for these types of scenarios and being able to

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 4>plug that in. I think the only other ground we

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 4>haven't covered is the tea grind t grind, Yes, tea

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 4>for thin thin was the original nomenclature yeah, thin tour.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 4>You've got a lot of different suggestions there, but the

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 4>tea grind is one. It's probably the most popular grind

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 4>that we use out on the tour. That one we

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 4>got a lot of feedback from players and just kind

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 4>of looked at, Okay, players that have used the T

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 4>grind in S one fifty nine, if they were making

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 4>any modificationtions to it, what were some of the things

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 4>that they were doing, So looking back at that, and

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 4>then also too, like looking at the legacy of wedges

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 4>that we've had over the last ten years, like what

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 4>are some of the lob wedges that players have had

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 4>the hardest time getting out? And I think the one

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 4>that sticks out the most is the Glide two point

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 4>zero T. Like Saya Thigala has used a version of

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 4>that for a while. Victor also Harris has messed around

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 4>with it a lot. So looking at like, what are

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 4>the elements of that club that they really liked?

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>How did it hit the ground?

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 4>The tea is by far the most aggressive, and you

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 4>can see that narrowed up the soul a good bit

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 4>compared to the S one fifty nine T, and then

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 4>you still have that extreme heel and toe relief. The

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 4>heel side of that with that relief is actually pretty

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 4>similar to where that egrindea is how it falls away

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 4>sharply just so as you open manipulate the face, that

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 4>lead edge is just right on top of the turf.

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 4>So players love that, they get a lot of confidence

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 4>from it, and I think it's one that's going to.

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Do really well for us out on tour.

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 3>And it is it Is it normal for I mean, Marty,

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 3>I do this. Is it normal for players to play

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 3>different grinds in their fifty six and sixty. Is that's

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 3>something you see more consistently with the good players you

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 3>see it less less so on tour. Yeah.

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 4>I think part of it too is that just given

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 4>the nature of our lineup where we have six grind

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 4>options in the lobledge and we kind of taper down

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 4>through the set just because we ask our lobledge to

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 4>do a lot more things, and the soul is going

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 4>to have a much bigger impact on slower speed shots.

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 4>We're playing it with more face orientations, variety of speeds delivered,

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 4>li angles, there's a lot more variety that comes into play.

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 4>But generally, I would say most players gravitate towards something

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 4>lower in the lobledge, being able to open it up

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 4>if they get into those dicey situations where they're may

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 4>be short sided a bit to be able to create

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of height, but then go into something higher

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 4>bounce and they're fifty six. And you even have a

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 4>lot of players like Corey Connors as an example of

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 4>a player that chips with fifty six almost all the

0:21:59.440 --> 0:21:59.959
<v Speaker 4>time if he can.

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 2>He likes the predictability of the flight, and.

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 4>I think that's one of the things like if you're

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 4>looking at like the spin loft and how he delivers

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 4>it based on his delivery characteristics. When he gets into

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 4>those different conditions around the green, the fifty six comes

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 4>out in the most predictable window for him consistently. He

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 4>has a lob wedge that he uses on some different

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 4>bunker shots or if he gets into those situations where he's.

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 2>A bit short sighted.

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 4>But having two different options in the space is super helpful,

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 4>just because you can always manipulate the face open to

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 4>add loft to generate different shots, create different launch and

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 4>spin profiles. But that's something that's very common. I like

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 4>to think of your wedges, not I think of almost

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 4>as like three different sets, like and I think about

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 4>that when I'm designing, like the forty six through fifty two,

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 4>or Okay, how do we connect these golf clubs to

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 4>the rest of your irons. So we're looking at gapping

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 4>predictability front back, the middle wedge is fifty four to

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 4>fifty six.

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Someone like Corey.

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 4>Obviously we're gonna spend a lot of time evaluating chipping performance,

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 4>how does it do around the greens, But for a

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 4>lot of other players, it's more, let's hit a bunch

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 4>of off speed shots, distance control, hit one low, take

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 4>spin off, float one up a little bit, having a

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 4>lot of consistency front back, and.

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Then most of our of our evaluation with the lobledge.

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 4>Is going to be done kind of inside thirty yards.

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.719
<v Speaker 4>We need to understand how it performs in those other scenarios,

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 4>so they're not kind of left guessing, But we value

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 4>the performance in that inside thirty yards much more heavily

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 4>than we would on like, hey, I can rip this

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 4>thing full ninety yards just because the number of use

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 4>cases is so much lower on those more full shots.

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we've certainly seen that through our ARCOS data validated

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>big time. Yeah, for sure you use your highest lofted

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>wedge green side.

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, so you got to wait.

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a big part of our fitting process,

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>just like we see with fairway woods being used off

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the team more if you're a faster player, Well, we

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>want to kind of curate the fitting process to be

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to be kind of weighted that same amount. Jacob, I

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask you who is the most challenging or

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 1>who who kind of manipulates the club the most on

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the PGA tour. You've got different ways you can. You

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>talked about leaning the shaft forward or back, like adding

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>or subtracting shaftling. You got raising the handle, lowering the handle.

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Then you have the amount of opening the face, Like

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>who does that the most? I mean to me when

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I see saw him around the green.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Answer is zero doubt on that one.

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 4>It's like because I think he is like inside of

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 4>one hundred or a hundred and five yards, it's lob

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 4>wedge everywhere, Like even if it's getting closer and he's

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 4>like I can just hit like a high hook on

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 4>this one and like get it to get.

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>It to go.

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 3>But in terms of changing out that lob wedge, like

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 3>once a month does that mean if he's hit it

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 3>that much.

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 2>He goes through him pretty fast.

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but yeah, I think it's like far and away

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 4>sahethan just because it's like the creativity that he has

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 4>around the greens and how he I mean he talks

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 4>about like kind of how he learned the game and like, yeah,

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 4>playing out at a public course and just chipping all

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 4>the time and like using a lot one just like

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 4>just figuring it out, being able to hit different trajectory windows.

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, he definitely is one that like the Tea

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 4>Grind is perfect for him because he is using so

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 4>many different face orientations, delivering shots with twenty degrees of handling,

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 4>and then he's trying to hit the next one to

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 4>the moon, like how high can I launch this thing?

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 4>So he's definitely one that's a great to really stress

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 4>test some of those those Tea Grind prototypes to make

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 4>sure we're in a good spot.

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 3>How about the finish options.

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so we have the Hydropearl that's kind of our

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 4>like our flagship finish that has that all weather performance,

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 4>and we also have the Midnight as well, so that

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 4>anti glare. It's a QPQ Finish, so it's super durable.

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 4>I think that was one of the things that we

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 4>wanted to make sure of, and when we start to

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 4>coming out with this finish and the last few wedge cycles,

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 4>is making sure that it's something that's going to last

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 4>in golfer's bags and it's not going to wear out

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 4>after a couple of rounds where they start to see

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 4>a lot of deterioration of the golf club. We also

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 4>strive for them to be very similar in performance, So

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 4>we have the hydroparl on the chrome wedges that you see,

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 4>but we're trying to engineer as much of that face

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 4>friction back into the midnight wedges, so we see very

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 4>similar performance between the two. And it's like a lot

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 4>of it just kind of comes down to a golfer's

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:34.239
<v Speaker 4>preference of what they like to look at.

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Jacob, I'm curious, I'm gonna hear directly your take on

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the forty six degree right, how many of our tour

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>players play the forty six versus like their blueprint s

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>or t pitching watch. Yeah.

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 4>I was looking through the numbers of our last tour

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 4>port and I think there are probably six or seven

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 4>in the in bags. So I typically see players who

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 4>gravitate towards that if they like to hit more of

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 4>those off speed shots with it. One of the things

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 4>I thought was actual really interesting is that Chris O

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 4>lamprect he actually plays at forty six and a forty eight.

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 2>He's got a little bit of ball speed. If you

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 2>weren't aware, it's a little yeah. So it's like what

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 2>he has to do at the.

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 4>Other end of his bag is pretty creative, and he

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 4>doesn't need a three wood that goes three thirty, so

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 4>he kind of has a different setup. So with all

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 4>of his speed, he's he has to tighten up his

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 4>gapping in that part of his set. So he goes

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 4>like I think his forty six maybe at forty five,

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 4>and then he's got the forty eight, so he goes

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:33.679
<v Speaker 4>on like three three degree.

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Gas like five wedges.

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, okay, yeah, So that that's one of the only

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 4>players I can think of that's played five wedges before

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 4>that doesn't go up to like sixty four plus.

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a handful out there.

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Interestingly, we see a lot of girls on the LPGA

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 4>gravitate towards the forty eight as their gap wedge, so

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 4>as kind of their delivery dynamics change a bit. Players

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 4>all have one spot in their set where they kind

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 4>of get a big gap. So for a lot of

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 4>PGA tour players kind of like eight to nine iron

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 4>where it's like, okay, their normal set configuration is it'd

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 4>be like twelve yards twelve yards and then you get

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 4>like a seventeen I mean, Marty and his team have

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 4>done a great job with co Pilot of figuring out

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 4>how do you gap correctly, but with the way that

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 4>the girls deliver it and their launching spin characteristics, we

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 4>found that that forty eight does a great job of

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 4>kind of bridging the gap into the rest of their set,

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 4>and given the speeds that they hit it, they can

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 4>have a little bit larger loft gaps and still have

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 4>reasonable numbers. So it's interesting to see how it kind

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 4>of plays out between players of different speeds and how

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 4>it serves a different purpose. Looking at the grip as well,

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean we always are kind of talking about technology

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 4>within ping. Can you talk a little bit about dialo

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 4>wedge in terms of the gripping and anything new different

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 4>this time around. Yeah, this is actually a really cool

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 4>thing to work on. One of the things that you

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 4>see tour players do when they're hitting wedges around the

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 4>greens or distance wet is, they're super consistent with their setup.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Like you could tell them to open the face five

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 4>degrees and then ten degrees and then go back and forth,

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 4>and they're going to be like.

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Bang on every time.

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 4>So we wanted to engineer in some features that gave

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 4>your average golfer the opportunity to have some references to

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 4>set up really consistently. So on our old wedge grip,

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 4>we had indicators at the bottom for being able to

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 4>choke down in one inch increments.

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 2>So this grip is already three quarters of an inch longer,

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 2>just to.

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 4>Give you a bit more space to work down the

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 4>shaft hitting some specialty shots around the green. So we

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 4>still have those choked down indicators at the top of

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 4>the grip this time. And then we have these vertical

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 4>lines that are for different face orientations opening and closing,

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 4>so that those are at fifteen degree increments, so that

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 4>gives players a flexibility to open up the face and

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 4>still have a gripping location that they can reference. And

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 4>then one of the cool things is at the bottom.

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 4>You can see the little features below right at the

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 4>bottom of the grip. Those are for different shaft lins.

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 4>So if you're moving your ball position around, you can

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 4>move the shaft forward and back to either hit low

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 4>shots or high shots and get into that consistent setup

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 4>every time.

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Pretty, it's pretty cool. It's fun to give somebody that

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>grip Shane and they will automatically already start to use

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the handle more, go up and down, interesting and grib

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you know. Just it's almost like introducing something new to

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the brain. It gives them permission to do it right

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>where I think otherwise, like I can't grip down to

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the shaft or make the clip too short, Jacob.

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Is it tough to dive into a world of improven

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 3>on a wedge that was so impactful? I mean, I

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 3>mean you think about going back to the computer and

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 3>you're thinking about, Okay, we had this job for four

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 3>years to make this wedge that tour players would love.

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Now how do I make that better? I mean, is

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 3>that an extremely tough assignment or is that an exciting assignment? Ah?

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes to both, Yeah exactly.

0:30:55.960 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 4>I think it's tough, especially when you're first kicking off

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 4>the project of it's so early on in the previous

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 4>one that you're starting to get some feedback, and that's

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 4>where I think a lot of like the team of

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 4>our brand ambassadors is super helpful that we spend a

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 4>lot of time getting their feedback on stuff and being

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 4>able to show them parts earlier in the process where

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 4>we can get that feedback for the next iteration, and

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 4>really understanding like some of the nuances and the very

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 4>different perspectives that they bring, Like we've got young, old, male, female,

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 4>just a huge variety of brand ambassadors that teach top

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 4>tour players and then your weekend golfers and getting some

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 4>of their feedback and understanding like, hey, what are the

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 4>things that you see out in the field. And one

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 4>of the ways I kind of like to look at

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 4>it is I like this. I try and spend as

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 4>much time as possible, like watching people hit wedges, whether

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 4>it's your average golfer out of the club on a

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 4>weekend or watching tour players, because it's easier to the

0:31:59.880 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 4>more reps you get watching players, the easier it is

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 4>to start noticing like patterns, like you get a comp

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 4>like you might get a comment from a player of hey,

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 4>I feel like this is happening, and you hear it

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 4>once and you can kind of be like Okay, like

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 4>maybe that's just you. But then you get like six

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 4>weeks down the road, you're like, I've heard three other

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 4>people say that to me in very different circumstances. So yeah,

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 4>it's tough to like, like you said, the first time

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 4>you sit down to like open up the cat file.

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 2>You're like, I'm not really sure where you right now.

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 4>But just soliciting that feedback as much as possible, and

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 4>like talking to people that are in different regions of

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 4>the world, different different countries, different types of grasses and

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 4>seeing what performance elements they are looking for, what are

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 4>they maybe missing. It definitely can get exciting and it's

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 4>so good to have such a great team.

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned brand Ambassaards.

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 3>When when Mayo calls you after you send them new wedges,

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 3>is it an exciting answer or nervous answer? Like what

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 3>are you thinking in your brain as you're hitting the

0:32:58.360 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 3>green button dance.

0:32:59.160 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Of the phone.

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 4>Let's see, I'm thinking mostly of which where are we

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 4>going to go today? Like it's it's always so fun

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 4>to get his feeds back going to be something, Yeah,

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 4>it's gonna it's gonna be an interesting conversation because he

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 4>is the thing I love about Joe is he is

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 4>so passionate about like learning and wanting to understand what's

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 4>going on. So I know I'm either going to get

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 4>a really good question that like I probably won't be

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 4>able to answer, but the hope is that I can't

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 4>answer it now, but I can hopefully call him back

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 4>in six months be like, hey, we've done all this research,

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 4>we've found this, and just getting that feedback. So yeah,

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 4>it's like, it's so good to have people like I

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 4>would much rather have people that are willing to call

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 4>and voice their opinions rather than kind of like a

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 4>yes man that just says like, oh, yeah, that's great,

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 4>like yeah.

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on the best questions from our brand and masters.

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And the beauty of that relationship is when they stump us.

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's what Jacob's talking about, you know, and Joe

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>has been good at that. He stumped us, and then

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>we go do some research, we figure it out, everyone

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>gets better.

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 3>And when you're around him, you get that sense that

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 3>he he wants to stump you because he's interested exactly.

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't want to stump you because he wants you

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 3>to to not know the answer. He wants you to

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 3>stump you because he also wants to learn as well.

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 3>It seems like, I mean we're at dinner with Joe

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Mayo last night, and I mean he's eating dinner with

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 3>one hand literally looking at swing videos with the other.

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean he can't get away from it because it

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 3>is his life. It's yeah, his brain is just like

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 3>always going. And I think like kind of to talk to,

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 3>like about another brand bastador. Like I've spent a ton

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 3>of time with Stan Outley over the last ten years.

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 4>I remember meeting him when I'd been working here for

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 4>like three weeks, and I'm just this shell shocked, like

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 4>I have your book at my house legend, Yeah, exactly,

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 4>and like going through and being able to talk with

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 4>him about what he's learned from so many mentors that

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 4>are like icons of the game and players that he

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:04.280
<v Speaker 4>worked with, and how Stan approaches it is very different

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 4>than Joe, but at the end of the day, like

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 4>they both want to learn more and they have a

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 4>desire and passion for expanding their knowledge and like helping

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 4>people play better. Yeah, and like Stan, like I said,

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 4>has been great for so many of those things to

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 4>like ask questions and stand and I'll be sitting at

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 4>a dinner table and like haven at it with each other,

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 4>and then we get to the MRAs. Oh, we were

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 4>saying the same thing the whole time, we just said.

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 2>It in different ways.

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Ye, Jacob, Let's talk a little bit about fitting wedges, right, So,

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I think the ultimate scenarios you're on PGA tour, you

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>have a nice short game facility, you could go try

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>them all out. I think the reality is a lot

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of people the best they can do is maybe go

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to an indoor environment, talk a little bit about some

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>tips or tricks for the everyday golfer of things for

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 1>them to think about leading up to the fitting, the

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>role of maybe webfit wedge and things of that nature.

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I think if you kind of were to

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 4>break it down into a few different environments, like the

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 4>indoor retail environment is very challenging just because you're somewhat

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:11.359
<v Speaker 4>limited to whatever set up the store has. I think

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 4>when I look at fitting a lob wedge in that scenario,

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:18.720
<v Speaker 4>especially as most players gravitate towards hitting more full shots inside,

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a big mistake because we see the

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 4>biggest differences in grind performance on those lower speed shots.

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 4>So usually what I encourage people to do in that

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 4>environment is Hey, let's go through webfit wedge, which is

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 4>going to kind of get some general understandings of your technique,

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 4>the types of golf courses you play, get your recommendations

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 4>from there, and then hit some fifteen yard shots and

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 4>try and hit one low, medium, and high. We're looking

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 4>for ball contact, like I said, groove three group fours

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 4>where we want to live and then also too, just

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 4>like the acoustics of that impact. Like some of the

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 4>best fitters that I've ever worked with, like lou Bb

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 4>for example, most wedge fittings he does like he could

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 4>do with his eyes closed because he's just listening for

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:03.760
<v Speaker 4>the ball capture and how that club and ball are interacting,

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:06.879
<v Speaker 4>how the club's hitting the ground. So when you're hitting

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 4>those shots, like you're gonna be able to tell like, oh,

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 4>like that's the sensation I'm looking for. So definitely gravitate

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 4>more towards short shots inside and kind of hit a

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 4>couple of different trajectory windows. But if you get outdoors

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:21.919
<v Speaker 4>and you have the opportunity to do that, I would

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 4>say with your lob wedge, I would look at like

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 4>three to five different locations that kind of encourage players

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:32.800
<v Speaker 4>to hit different shot types. So I think one of

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 4>the mistakes I made early in my career when I

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 4>was fitting people as I would stand in a location

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 4>and tell them to hit a shot, and there was

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 4>a lot of times where that shot wouldn't match up

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 4>with what they saw in their head. And so you're

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 4>not going to get a great kind of data feedback

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 4>on that. But you can put them in environments that

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 4>would hopefully encourage a certain shot not that you and

0:37:58.040 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 4>you also kind of have to match it with the

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 4>player's skill. I'm not going to put a fifteen handicap

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 4>on like downhill, lie over a bunker, yeah, into the

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 4>grain like yeah, good luck, good luck man, Yeah exactly,

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 4>But pick anywhere from three to five different locations that

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 4>encourage a different kind of shot type.

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 3>So and probably realistic shots. I mean, I think, yeah,

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 3>it's huge, and Aronda Green's like, what are you doing here?

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Like what kind of shot are you going to hit?

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Would you feel comfortable doing this? And this is a

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 3>shot you have once or twice around.

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah exactly, And I think a lot of times players

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 4>in that environment gravitate towards the shot that they have

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:35.919
<v Speaker 4>once a year, right, And it's like, oh, I can't

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 4>hit that when this wedge is that's good.

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 3>It's like watching people practice sometimes and you're like, dude,

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 3>you're not you don't have this shot much. Yeah, I

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 3>mean it is a waste of your time, you know.

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, yeah, it's it's interesting. The wedges look great.

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I get so excited about all new product,

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 3>but I mean, for me, s onety nine was a

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 3>game changer in my bag. I love them so much.

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 3>I've been in love with them and to see new

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 3>iterations is so cool. So congrats to you and the team.

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 3>I know people are gonna love this, and I know

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 3>you're fired up about him as well.

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm excited. Should be going, Jacob the Man.

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:07.840
<v Speaker 3>This is the Ping Proven Grounds Podcast