WEBVTT - Stephen Engle on China, Taiwan (Audio)

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, as he had mentioned um China extending its drills

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>near Taiwan following Nancy's Pelosi Nancy Pelosi's visit to the

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>territory that was a week ago. Now drills ongoing joining

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>us now, as Steven Angel Bloomberg's TV chief North Asia correspondent, Stephen,

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>what's the situation around Taiwan at the moment. Yeah, So

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we were going to have those four days of military exercises,

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>which we did have from Wednesday to Sunday following Nancy

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi's exit from the island after her controversial visit, and

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 1>they did have these six exclusion zones encircling Taiwan, and

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.599
<v Speaker 1>that's where we had a number of different exercises with

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 1>the p l A, Navy, the Air Force as well

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>as rocket teams. A number of different missiles were fired,

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>ballistic missiles as well as claims by Japan that a

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>few of them actually went over the island of Taiwan

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and also into Japan's Exclusive Economic Zone or e Z.

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So it was set up for being quite an inflammatory

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a week. Obviously that was supposed to conclude on Sunday.

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>But again we're hearing from the military of China that

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>they've either extended or launched new exercises. As we just

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>heard from Ed that anti submarine operations are underway as

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>well as well as air to see strikes. And again

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan would call this the most provocative by the p

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>l A and decades. We'll have to see where it

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>goes from here, Steve, as you know, I mean, the

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>big concern here is on the invasion front, right that

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that the mainland Chinese forces would actually invade Taiwan. Are

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>people saying that this is essentially a dress rehearsal under

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>these circumstances, I think they're using this opportunity to fine

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>tune their tactics obviously, and to poke little holes in

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the fence around Taiwan. Uh see where there's vulnerabilities. And

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>for their sake, Taiwan is doing the same thing. They're

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing the tactics being used by the p l A

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>forces and where they need to bolster their defenses as well.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I would be the last wanted to say that Nancy

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi's visit would spark an invasion of Taiwan. I think

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>there's been a standoff in a status quo for a

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>long time for very good reason. Neither side if you will,

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>would want war right now. But I think they're just

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>testing each other right now. Yeah, to what degree, both

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi's visits and what we're seeing from the Chinese military

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at the vironment, it's really tailed to domestic audiences rather

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>than address rehearsal for an invasion. Oh, he absolutely, absolutely,

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about shij and PINGI absolutely has a

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>domestic audience to cater too. I think when Nancy Pelosi

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>actually landed on the island, there was an outcry from

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>ultra nationalists on way bar in the Chinese social media

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that the Beijing did not do enough well in the

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>last you know, six days or so. They've been trying

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to escalate, if you will, the military exercises and show

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a sign of strength, if you will, against the moves,

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and there's been some economic moves as well, But just

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>how far can China go without also damaging itself as

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>well on the economic front. So if you're she she

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in Ping and you're dealing with difficulties on the economic

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>front visa vie the property market, you're looking at the

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>People's Congress in the fall, do you exploit this as

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>a way of building nationalism? I think obviously everything they

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>do kind of tries to build up nationalism and support

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 1>for the Communist Party. I think that's Is it a distraction,

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>It's well, it depends on how you do it. I mean,

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>if you are seen by the populace in China as

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>losing the optics game, then then it is a distraction.

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But if you also say, you know, vilify Nancy Pelosi,

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>villify the u S efforts to destabilize the status quo,

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>then they can use it to their advantage, especially as

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you say at ahead of this Party congress where seed

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in Ping will very likely get that third consecutive term.

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>A number of other countries Australia you're included, have described

0:03:56.320 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>China's actions after Pelosi's visit as an overreact. Shouldn't do

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you think the US and its allies got a bit

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>caught off? God by just how long these drills have

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>been going on for now? Well, Joe Biden was asked

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>about that today and he expressed confidence that China would

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>not escalate beyond just these drills. As I said, the

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>economic sanctions so far a pretty miniscule. Again, the big

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>economic trade between the two is on integrated circuits and

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>China absolutely needs those integrated circuits from Taiwan, so cutting

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that off would do itself there you know, some harm um.

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But again Joe Biden also kind of refused when he

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>was asked, did did Nancy Pelosi cause this tension these

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>military games? And he refused to falter. Really he's saying

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that was her decision to go. But I'm sure there's

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of internal dialogue and maybe some uh

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>conversations if you will, behind the scenes. Is like that

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.039
<v Speaker 1>probably wasn't such a good idea. Well, it's interesting you

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>bring up the semiconductor story, I mean where Taiwan is

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>concerned and the product that needs to go to the mainland.

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>What has commercial shipping been like in the Taiwan Straight

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>over the last week. Well, there was big concern obviously

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>because these six exclusion zones, or as state media in

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>China called them, danger zones. Uh many of them, or

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>at least three of them I could see on the map,

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>are in the Taiwan Straight uh key shipping lane. Obviously

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>for global shippers, some have had to divert around the

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>east side of the island rather than go through the

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan Straight But shipping tracking data that Bloomberg has seen

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>shows that four of the p l A so called

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>danger zones are being traversed right now by merchant ships.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So it seems as though the threat, at least according

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to many of the shipping lines, has diminished. How does

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>all of this get received domestically in Taiwan, not just

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Nanci Pelosi's visit, the military flaxing that's going on from China,

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, how do how do the ordinary Hiwanese feel

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>about all of this? Yeah, that that's an interesting question.

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it probably um they've they've been dealing with

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>this threat for many, many years. I lived in Taiwan

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in the early or to mid nineties, and there was

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>there was these kinds of things. In fact, six there

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>was an eight month long standoff called the Third Taiwan

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Straight Crisis. Two different US aircraft carrier groups were sent

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to the area. One the Nimbits even passed through the

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan Straight There was serious saber rattling going on, and

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan got on with its business. And I think they're

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.559
<v Speaker 1>still doing that as well. There's gonna be a little

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of economic pain, but even the Ministry of Finances

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>chief statistician giving a press conference, the Chief statistician, essentially saying,

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>because of the China's reliance on electronics and integrated circuits

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and the like, we expect very little chance of China

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>imposing stricter economic sanctions that would be the biggest pain.

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>That the military threat has always been there. But yes,

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 1>these are very provocative war games, obviously, Stephen, good stuff. Oh,

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, very quickly, what do we know about

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the way in which this is being represented in Chinese

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>press outlets. Oh, they're absolutely using it to their advantage

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.119
<v Speaker 1>as they would. I mean, the most of the media

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>outlets are controlled by the Communist Party, so they'll they'll

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll be using this to their advantage. Obviously. Always a pleasure, Steve,

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for being with this Bloomberg. Stephen Engel,

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>who is our chief Asia TV North Asia TV correspondent,

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us from Hong Kong