WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off April 3rd, 2023 (Ep. 639)

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Hello, ladies and gentlemen, welcome in to leading off right

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>here and finishing growth crow to you by Prize Picks.

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I am the Welsh, that is the worm, and we

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>are here and says the worm down there. I didn't

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>even notice that on the overthlay Ryan Wormley a awesome,

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>fantastic weekend of baseball. But you had a big move.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>How you doing, buddy?

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 2>I did have a big move.

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Anybody who's seed me on shows before can probably tell

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 3>from the background that looks a little different than usual.

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 3>This is not a final setup of what my podcast

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 3>studio will look like down the line, but it's what

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 3>I could throw together here. Yeah, big move this weekend

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 3>bought my first house. Very exciting and a special thank

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 3>you to my parents who flew out from Virginia to

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Denver to help.

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Me with the move this weekend.

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 3>So I really appreciate all their help because it is

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot moving by yourself. Is I was telling you

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 3>before the show my fourth move in the last three

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:56.319
<v Speaker 3>and a half years, So hopefully this is it.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm done.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna be here for several years and can finally

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 3>just settle in one place.

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Where are you at now?

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 3>I am just north of Denver. I'm in North Glenn. Technically,

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 3>it's like twenty minutes north of the city.

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>What's your address? Give your address out.

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 2>That's just that's as much detail as I'm willing to get.

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder. I just wonder we can get your address.

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Awesome weekend of baseball and we've got it all here

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>for you today. We've got the headlines, We've got lots

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of injuries. We're gonna bring back the stats. We are

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.479
<v Speaker 1>also going to give you price picks, our best bets

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in DFS. It's all going down here and leading off,

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>we are day two of No Joe Piece Apia by

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>the way, which, by the way, just a little sequitor.

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>When I'm out of here about an hour or so after,

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I am going to be with Joe in about two

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half hours. And I'm not joking you. When

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>he texted me his kids are here, so we're gonna

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>go meet up at David Busters. I think we might

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>video the basketball contest, which I'm going to smoke him in.

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not joking you. He said, we're thinking about

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>going to an escape room. I've never done an escape room,

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>so I might be doing an escape room with Joe,

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>with Joe and his kids here in a couple hours.

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 2>So you've never done one.

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I've never done in.

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 3>This Oh they're so fun. I've done a bunch of them.

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 3>We've done them. It's sort of a tradition to my

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 3>friend group. At everybody's bachelor party or the morning of

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 3>the wedding. We've done them, and so it's kind of fun.

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 3>We did one that was Serial Killer themed and it

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 3>was like it was like movie themes, so it was

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 3>like Saw and seven and Silence of the Lambs and

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 3>it was funny. We started off, they individually handcuffed everybody

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 3>to pipes around the room, shut off the lights in

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 3>the pitch black, and just left and we were talking.

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 3>That was the morning of my best friend's wedding, so

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 3>we were talking to all the bridesmaids you know, later

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 3>that day and they were like, oh, well, you know,

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 3>we had some nice mimosas we did our hair this morning.

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 3>We were like, yeah, we were handcuffed in a pitch

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 3>black room somewhere that was themed like Saw.

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:46.839
<v Speaker 2>It was very different, but it was a ton of fun.

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 2>I love escape rooms.

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've had some, like wedding parties handcuffed and dark rooms.

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>But there was a saw theme, Ryan, So I don't

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>know what you're talking about. That's nutty, but just letting

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody know you can be on the lookout for that.

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk some baseball, Let's talk some stuff. Also, welcome

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>into the peanuts and cracker jacks. With all of the chat,

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>feel free to throw out stuff. See if we can't

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>comment as we go. You say nice things, we respond,

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You say mean things, and we will lose it and

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>chastise you.

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>That's how it goes. This week in big headlines, stolen

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>bases are up. I want to say the final number

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>with seventy nine. I could be maybe incorrect about that,

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I know. On here the note we have is the

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Orioles pace of stolen bases, because I believe maybe it

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>was ninety or something like that, but I believe ten

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases off of the first four games came from

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore Orioles, who are accuorating to more than ten

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>percent of all of the stolen bases in baseball. They

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>stole ninety five in twenty twenty two. So the final

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>tally here worm is we have stolen bases way up.

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>The leader is Cedric Mullins. We've got I believe, four

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>guys with three stolen bases, and we're going to talk

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>about one of those guys, one of my favorites that

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>was able to put up three so stolen base big time,

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>my friend. And it is maybe could taper down a

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but it's looking good. Yeah.

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, the Orioles, like you said, they're at ten

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 3>no caught ceilings. Obviously a success rate one hundred percent.

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 3>They're going to keep running, especially with their fast guys.

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 3>We talked a little bit about that on Friday. But

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 3>there while they are, you know, clearly pacing the field here,

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 3>they're not the only one. The Astros have six steals,

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 3>White Sox, Guardians, Yankees each have five. Those next four

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 3>teams have combined for only three caught steilings. So again

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 3>it's not just a volume that's up, it's the success

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 3>rate is way up. I think Jeff Passon had something

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 3>that was like eighty three percent success rate for the league.

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember if that's exactly where something like that,

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 3>which is an absurd number.

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 2>This is what we expected. Again, we talked about this

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 2>on Friday. We thought this is what we were going

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 2>to see.

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 3>We saw it on an opening day, We've now seen

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 3>it throughout opening weekend.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 2>This is a thing.

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 3>It's here to stay and it rises everybody's stolen based

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 3>potential outcomes.

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Whether you're one of the fast guys or the slow guys.

0:04:58.120 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 2>The opportunity is just there.

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the success rate is what really stood out to me, right,

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>The success rate is something I think to monitor. Everyone's

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about the overall number, but that success rate does

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>I think that could be the game changer for the

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>rest of the year.

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think for sure, because I think that's what

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 3>you're going to see. I think the attempts are just

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 3>going to keep going up if people are keep being successful.

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's sort of a simple concept, right. If

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 3>they were not getting these stolen basics, they're getting caught stealing.

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 2>Every time the number was going to go down, they're not.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 3>There's now added value in running and you're going to

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 3>I know, fre Rob Manfrey would like to keep saying that,

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, analytics are bad for the game or whatever.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 3>That's a longer conversation for a different time. But the

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 3>analytics quote unquote, if you run bases and you get

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 3>on without getting out, it's better they're going to keep

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 3>doing it.

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's going to keep going up.

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And like Wonky said right here, if the picture

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>can throw over, the success rate is going to be

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>better than that. Hey percent, It's just going to keep

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>going as that's going on. Jeff Passen also jumping back

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>on that, he had a great thread of everything where

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.799
<v Speaker 1>we saw game time cut by about forty minutes overall.

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twenty two, average game time on the first four

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>days of the MLB season was three hours, nine minutes.

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>It was two thirty eight, which is crazy. It's about

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>the same amount of games. Batting average is up by

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>about fifteen points. It was two thirty in twenty twenty two,

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>two forty five this past year. Obps up, sluggings up,

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>all that, and the stolen base is seventy of eighty

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>four from twenty nine of forty three is what we

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>had last round, which is just it's absurd. It's really absurd,

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>absurd in the best ways. By the way, I'm all

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>for everything being fun, and I'm all here for the

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases. Like doctor Glenn, I would like you to

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>strap in my friend because he even had to throw

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Look at the saltiness. He threw a welch. I know

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>someone salty when they throw a welch instead of welsh

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>because he knows. I'm gonna talk about the other big headline,

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Corbin Carrol. Calbyn Carroll stole three bases against the Dodgers.

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>This is what's on our headlines. I didn't even put

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it there, but this is part of that stolen base thing.

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he's ready to run wild. And obviously I'm

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 1>a big Corbyn Carol fan. He stole two against No.

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>A cinderguard. It's that big deal, you know, like you

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>have to have an exchange rate. We've talked about this.

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Everyone got on me about Jeff Springs this weekend because

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I was like having a little bit of fun and

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone's like tigers and it's like, okay, well, what is

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the exchange rate then? Is that eight strikeouts versus a

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>really good team, or nine strikeouts versus a decent team.

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Stealing against No. A cinderguard? Okay, no throw overs? Right,

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>they didn't even attempt to throw on the first one,

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and the very next pitch he stole third without a throw,

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>without a throw, and then he proceeded to steal one

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>more base. He is now second in baseball after one game,

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and he had two lefties up going in the early front,

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>which he wasn't running at A side note, I want

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to give as well to everybody that's kind of like

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>still weird about him Wonky I was gonna say, but

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, take that it's not Wonky Penguin. Is that

0:07:55.680 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>on the broadcast the Diamondbacks openly talked about it is

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>so weird too that Tory Leavello his number one question

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>he's asked Ryan is why is Corban Carroll not leading off?

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And he said he did not want to put the

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>young guy in that position early on, which is stupid,

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>which is such silly old baseball stuff. But he acknowledges

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to get there, but he purposely is

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>doing it, not to put the pressure on him. Not

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that he's not set well. I think after stealing two bases,

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>putting himself in by the way, that two stolen base

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>he got from stealing second and third put him in

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>run position where the Diamondbacks then scored on the very

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 1>very next play. That's the type of stuff that old

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>baseball heads love and will put him in a better spot.

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 1>So three stolen bases a pretty big day for the

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>rookie Corbyn Carroll, right, and there's a lot of stuff

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that I just threw up.

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, No, I think it is kind of silly. On

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 3>the one hand, I do think that, you know, a

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 3>manager knows his players better than we do, so like theoretically,

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 3>maybe he's like trying to use some insight into oh

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 3>this kid actually might not, you know, want to deal

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 3>with the pressure leading off. I think that's kind of

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 3>bogus though, Like I agree with you if you're a

0:08:58.280 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 3>really good player, like you're going to be a really

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 3>good play player, especially at the top of the lineup,

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 3>where you can help your team more and find more

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 3>early success and then just gain that early confidence. So

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 3>I do think that's kind of a weird notion on

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 3>the on the steals and on Carol, I wanted to

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 3>ask you how high of an over under what I

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 3>need to set for you to not take the over

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 3>on his total stolen bases this season?

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, Like well what's the number? Oh?

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Why? Like like sixty?

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I'm not ridiculous. I mean, if people have been

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>following along, there's a point the projections had him under

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty to start the year. I just want to remind

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody the bat X had him under twenty way over.

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna seal forty plus this year.

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Ryan and I do too, but I'm not.

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm not totally against saying some pretty outlandish numbers because

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 3>of this first weekend we've seen again, I think the

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 3>attempts are going to continue to go up as the

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 3>success rate stays high. I think these rules are gonna

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 3>have that big of an imp and a guy who

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 3>has elite speed like Carol if his team is gonna

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 3>let him run like I don't see any reason why

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 3>a guy like him, or like Mullins and Mateo and

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore or some of these guys that we already kind

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 3>of look at as elite level speed guys in elite

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 3>level base dealers, I don't see any reason why they

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 3>couldn't go well above fifty or even sixty. I I

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 3>am not holding back my enthusiasm for this new new

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 3>landscape of the league at all. And I guess sort

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 3>of a second follow up question that I have for

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 3>you is, as a fantasy manager, when you look at

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 3>so and bases being up across the board, do you

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 3>take the angle of Okay, I really need to invest

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 3>in the elite guys because it's gonna be harder to compete.

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Or do you say, I don't need to invest as

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 3>much draft capital and you know, trade value in the

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 3>elite guys because you can find them on the margins

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 3>more if everybody's running more.

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 2>How do you approach that?

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I lead, Okay, that's a really good question because I've

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>always leaned into having a couple elite guys. I don't

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 1>think you have to have the Outaward demond sies or

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. But I was leaning into the guys

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that were thirty plus. I thought Andres Jemenez would be there.

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a big target of mine. I do think with

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the waters rising a little bit, you can start to

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>stack but still have a top guy, you know, still

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 1>have an upper tier two upper tier players, and stack

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of other guys. So, by the way,

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>apologies off my own it's being weird. I can see it,

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>but I love you all. I just want you to know.

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on. Joey Gallo homers twice and doubles after

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>beginning zero for six with forced trikeouts. We also had

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>yal Mancotton now Homer and double twice on Sunday, Ryan,

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>are you back on Joey Gallo and or yal Moncotton.

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm definitively not back in on Gallo. I would

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 3>say I am on My god. I mean this is

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of like a post post post post post hype sleeper, right,

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean a guy not that he's never had a

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 3>good season obviously. Uh, you know a few years ago

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 3>he was really good, but really up and down, never

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 3>quite put it all together in the way his elite

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 3>prospect status would have had us all hope to see.

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 3>But he looks really good to start. The tools are there.

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 3>He's still only twenty seven years old. Like, this is

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 3>the exact type of high ceiling guy that I'm willing

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 3>to buy in on a sort of a later career

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 3>breakout that we've gotten used to with a lot of

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 3>these top prospects, you know, in the last decade or so,

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 3>it seems like everybody comes in and makes an early impact.

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Just because he didn't reach those lofty levels and expectations

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 3>we had doesn't mean he can't.

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 2>Again, he's still twenty seven years old, So.

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 3>He is a guy that I would would be very

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 3>willing to buy back in on and see what happens.

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 2>It takes one of those high upside swings Gallo. No,

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean he had he had a great game. Congrats.

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 3>I didn't think he was never gonna have a good game. Again,

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 3>it's not nearly enough for me to buy back in

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 3>on it.

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Shame on. Yeah, you can't get full No, I'm not

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>doing that. Also that point out sometimes there's got to

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>be players where it's like, even if they you just

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>have to be committed. And it's like, I'm committed to

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>never committing to Joey Gallo, even if he becomes the

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>best player in baseball, I'll just be wrong. We'll just

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>be wrong.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm not I'm willing to be wrong on Gallo if he,

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, explodes this year.

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, And I'm with you. I actually I am

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>very much fear for the Moncada stuff. Another one of

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>those guys. I would just throw out. What I'm super

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>interested in the stolen base market is the guys that

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>go from two or three up to ten or twelve.

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's what that's what like what you were alluding to,

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and having the elite guys would change it. Also want

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to point out we have a celebrity in the chat.

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Joe pisa Pa is here, big t.

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Joe, I told him about our escape

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>room that I might potentially be along with you guys

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>with But I also said, you and I are going

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to have Joe Pisap and I are going to be

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>having a basketball shootof competition in a couple hours and

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll get it filmed.

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 3>That'll be going, yeah, if we get that filled, We'll

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 3>get that on the fantasy for his MLB Twitter account.

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 2>That's a promise, we'll get it. Yeah.

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>But back to the baseball buying on Mancata, not on

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Joey Galla. We had some injuries. Anthony Rendon dealing with

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a knee issue and also being a huge, huge a

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>hole if you will. I don't know if everybody saw it.

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>This weekend he grabbed a fan, said a few choice

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>words and tried to swipe at him and Baseball. They

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>said he's dealing with a knee issue right now, but

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Baseball is also looking into a potential suspension on Anthony.

0:13:59.920 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Y don't the biggest takeaway on that whatever side you take, like, oh,

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>screw fans and saying stuff to players or whatever, anthonyermand

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>don't look like a psycho. He looked like the joker.

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>He could be the next joker. He had this like

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>crazy smile and he had like the big guys and

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>he's like, oh you call me, and it was a

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>wild I don't know if you saw the video orm Yeah.

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 2>I did.

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Well. You remember when the movie Smile, That horror movie

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 3>was out and they kept putting all the actors in

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 3>baseball stadiums to say this smiling. He kind of looked

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 3>like one of those actors that had been dropped into

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 3>the stadium.

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>He totally did. He looked like a total psychopath on there.

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And Baseball is reviewing it. Horgey Mintael, this is an

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting one. This is the stolen bas episode. Horne. Mateo

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>was held out Sunday with a finger issue after stealing

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>four bases and he leads baseball. So, I mean literally

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>two games, steals four bases, leads baseball. Miteo right now

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is everything that people wanted out of his story, Ruiz,

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and this is what Miteo kind of does. My only

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>problem with him in my big betlong term has been

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>can he hit consistently? And I don't think so. It's

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>also been my problem with a guy like historyuiz can

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>he hit consistently get on base to have those stolen

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>base attempts? But either way, Mateial's near the top a

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit banged up. You also had Robbie Ray hitting

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the eye l and this might be a much more

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>extended one. Also some vlo dips. I had major worries

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>about Robbie Ray coming into the season and it kind

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of came to fruition. I don't know what you feel

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>about Robbie Ray right now.

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 2>I was higher on him coming into the year than

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 2>you were.

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 3>He's a similar to Max Freed, Like we talked about

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 3>a Friday where I just have him everywhere and then

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 3>the injury hurts me. Robbie Ray, I just I am

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 3>getting destroyed in this first weekend on the fitching health

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 3>you know front. But I know Ray is a guy

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 3>that I liked quite a bit. Obviously, you know, tons

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 3>of strikeouts, all that. Everybody knows about Robbie Ray. But yeah,

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 3>really concerning just a the way he looked and be

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 3>now the fact that it might be an extended app sences,

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 3>it's not good.

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Did you You don't have those two on the same team,

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>do you?

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 3>I do in fact, it's my most important to my dynasty.

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Ly like most money you know on the table here

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 3>and both of Carlos Rodin, who even in Spragg had

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 3>already started off with the injury.

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Not a great start in that group.

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh, we are into this part of the season too,

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>justin this is a good point. Don't draft starting pinchers

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in the first nine rounds. Ever, that's what this is.

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>The part of the season. By the way, I did

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>implement this in my final two drafts of the season

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>was something I kind of did not that it was

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in the first nine rounds, but I really didn't go

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>heavy sps. So I suppose it's something that can you

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>can be not hurt, but you really have to. You

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>got to hit it off on a couple other players,

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>which one we'll talk about here in a second row.

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Max Munsey dealing with groin issues. He's not expected to

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>land on the IL, but he might lead baseball and strikeouts.

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Currently get five strikeouts I think on Saturday, and he

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>just continues to strike out. Carlos for don it's gonna

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>be facing live hitters this week, which I think is

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a really good sign. I actually believe I believe that

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see they said he's gonna throw one bullpen

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>session and then he's gonna have a rehab stint. I

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know if how many rehabs starts he really is

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>going to need. So if let's just hypothetically say it's

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>one and one, you might have him back by late

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>ish April, which would be a very very good sign.

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know, Carlos Radon coming back where we're losing

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>all these other guys. Travis Story is going to begin

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a throwing program in two weeks, which is going to

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>help the timeline. Joey bart lands on the IL as

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the Giants also signed Gary Sanchez and JT. Brubaker maintained

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John So that's no bueno on any of the

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>injury front. My friends, I know none of us want

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>any of those. But what you do want is a

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>premium lockdown account over at Fantasy Pros and you can

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>get it one year free, one year free, premium upgrade

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Pros where you can get custom advice, premium content,

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>industry leading mock drafts, manage multiple drafts, you subscribe, you comment,

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and you win. And that is how you can get

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>locked in and while you're at it, go and download

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the My Playbook app. You get lineup assistance, waiver assistants,

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>trade analyzers, league analyzers, get all of your leagues in

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>one spot. It's actually maybe the most valuable fantasy tool

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:06.959
<v Speaker 1>in the entire land, so you can manage all your

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>fantasy lineups, dominate your league. Download My Playbook and of

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>course subscribe, comment for your chance to win, and get

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>yourself hooked up with a little bit of premium content

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>over on Fantasy Pros. Do that, my friends. Let's talk

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>about some stats, maybe a little bit more quickly. I'm

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more drowning out and drawing out things

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>than Joe Is. How about Jeffrey Springs. Jeffrey Springs six innings,

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve k's on just eighty one pitches. Here's my take,

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>real quick, Ryan Is. I had my DMS lit up

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>about Dylan cease because I had Dylan Ceese's a bus

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>and everyone's like, hey, look at this, look at that.

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>But when I celebrate being the most right person on

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the planet about Jeffrey Springs, I'm not allowed to celebrate.

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>So here's the deal. You don't get it both ways.

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>You get to pick one either you don't get to

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>hassle me about something I'm wrong about, or you get

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to and I also get to throw it in your

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>face when I'm so right about Jeffrey Springs, who look

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>like the best picture in baseball. So I'm just pointing

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it out there because Sunday was a good day of

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Springs and Corbyn Carroll. Maybe that was Saturday. There's

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a good weekend of Welsh right things outside of newt

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Bar not playing Ryan. So just wanted to throw that

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>out because Jeffrey Springs looked mighty, mighty mighty guys.

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, quickly, I fully agree.

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 3>And also, well, yeah, first of all, like you either

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 3>are allowed to react to these opening games or you're not,

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Like you can't, like you said, overreact to one and

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 3>not the other.

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>But number one comment, I keep saying, that's fine that

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it was against the Tigers. Here's my but I don't

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>mean to interrupt you. It's fine that it was against

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the Tigers. But good pitchers play well, they do good

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>against bad teams. Great pitchers play great against bad teams,

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>and that is what he did. And that is my

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>main point. It is like, cool, it's against the Tigers.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna strike out twelve every day, but like

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>hit a a no hitter through five and struck out

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>twelve against the Tigers. Great pictures should do that, And

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:00.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what's so fun about it.

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 3>That's so that's the exact point I was going to

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 3>make before you very politely interrupted me, which is that, yes,

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 3>this is this is what a great pitcher would do

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 3>against a bad team. I don't care that it was

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 3>a bad team, because he didn't look just good or

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 3>fine or decent. He looked awesome. That is like great teams,

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 3>great players being great against terrible teams. That's a key

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 3>way of how you know they are great. I'm a

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 3>big college basketball guy. That's that's a key tenant of

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 3>ken Pom, which is revolutionized a sport.

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Like if you're.

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Really really good at something, you should utterly dominate the

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 3>people who are really bad at it. And that's what

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 3>happened with Springs against the Tigers. I'm really excited about it.

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with you on that one. So it

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>was a very very good start the three up. Definitely

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the top of the three up of the best performances.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Adam Devall phenomenal eight for fourteen five seventy one, two homers,

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>eight RBI for thriving in Boston. This is another one

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of those like you can probably buy in on Adam

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Deval and then I'm gonna just throw out Brendan Donovan

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>five for fourteen three fifty seven, two homers, four RBI

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>been leading off because newpar has been out. Who are

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you more excited about Donovan or Daval? And the reason

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I asked that too is because Deval is very acquirable,

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>probably still out on the wire in a lot of spots,

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>probably you know, got picked up in a few over

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of days. But who are you more

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>invested in Daval, in that Boston lineup and that Boston

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>ballpark or Brendan Donovan.

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a good point on the fact that Duval

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 3>is more acquiable right now.

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Donovan is the guy I have more of. I don't.

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I actually think I have Daval anywhere. Donovan's a guy

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 3>I have more of and was really excited about. Obviously,

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 3>the positional flexibility is just fantastic and really exciting, especially

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 3>if you're in a league with smaller benches, daily lineups,

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, any sort of scenario where you can take

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 3>advantage of that flexibility. I love him and I thought

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 3>he could take you know, a step forward in the

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 3>power department this year. He has to start the year obviously,

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 3>like they trust him enough with new bar out to

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 3>put him at the top of the lineup.

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm really excited about Donovan.

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 3>There's always one like Hitter who's kind of past his

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 3>prime you don't expect much of who just roasts the Orioles.

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 3>It's been like Randal Gritch of can pass years. It

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 3>just seems like it's going to be Duval this year.

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm like fully prepared for every Boston Baltimore series to

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 3>end up with Duval hitting like three bombs and ten RBI.

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I didn't quite do that this time, but I still Again,

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 3>I like your point about him being very acquireable and

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 3>I would be looking to get him.

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:17.239
<v Speaker 2>But I like Donovan better of the two.

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Gotta be curious in the chat. Put it in there

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>who you like Donovan or Adam Davall. We already had

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 1>a Donovan in here. Be curious what you got on

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the stat downs. Chris Bassett lit up three and one

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>thirds niner and runs ten k's I'm worried because Velo

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>was down and spin was down across the board. This

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.640
<v Speaker 1>also happened in spring training, so he is an actual

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>worry after one start for me, maybe not for everybody else.

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sale gave up seven and runs and three innings

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>with three homers, and Alex Bregman oh for sixteen with

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>seven strikeouts. One of those guys are major worry for you.

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 2>I would say Bassett and Sale more concerning to me

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 2>than Bregman. Bragmany.

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 3>We've seen him go through prolongs slung plumps before he

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 3>always breaks out of it.

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm not doubting him at all. But the two pitchers,

0:22:57.960 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 2>they're a little more concerned.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, my friends, let's go and take a look

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>at a little bit of Prize Picks. Yes, we are

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>getting down with it, the sponsor of our podcast because

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy pros leading off each and every weekday is presented

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>by Prize Picks, the easiest and fastest way to play

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>daily fantasy sports. Pickover unders on player props to win

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>up to twenty five twenty five times twenty five that

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>would be amazing, twenty five times your money. Use a

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>promo code leading off when you sign up, and they'll

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>match your first deposit up to one hundred bucks. Been

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty good so far, We've had some pretty good ones.

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you guys are all playing, hopefully

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you are along with us. Why don't we get yours?

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>As the chat has reminded me, I've done lots of talking,

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>so let's get yours to start, and then I will

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>give give mine.

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I actually don't recall how I did on Friday's

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 3>show on my prize picks, so I'll have to go

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 3>back and check that and and see how I did.

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 3>But for today, I have Byron Bucks did more than

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 3>one and a half hits runs RBI.

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 2>It's Marlins. Bucks is just a guy.

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Like when he's healthy, I'm pretty much always going to

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 3>buy on him, you know, being great, and now he's

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 3>health reed Debt Mers I'm going under four and a

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 3>half hits allowed against the Mariners. Debt Meurs is another

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 3>one of these sleeper pitchers that a lot of people

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 3>got in the mid to late rounds and drafts that

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 3>there was a ton of hype about.

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 2>I was a part of that hype. I'm very excited

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 2>about him this year.

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 3>So we'll see, you know, if he can start off

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.719
<v Speaker 3>strong there and then Rasmussen is a guy that I

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 3>really liked having last year.

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 2>I always worry about.

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, just how much the Rais are going to

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 3>actually let him go deep into games. But he did

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 3>go deeper into games in the second half last season.

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 3>He had a couple of outings in August and early

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 3>September where he was striking out seven, eight, nine, ten guys.

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 3>So to only need to get more than four strikeouts

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 3>here against the lowly Nationals, I'm very excited about that

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 3>one as well. So Buckston more than one and a

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 3>half hits, runs RBI, debt Mers less than four and

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 3>a half hits allowed fewer and more than four strikeouts

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 3>for res Muson.

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm with that. I have some similar stuff in here.

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>This is actually one of my favorite ones. I have

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>a little one that I did for bigger money on

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Debtmers and Rasmusen strikeout over this one my official play though,

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with Wander Franco Fantasy score eight and a half.

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I love the matchup Oniell Cruz Fantasy score of six

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I love Oneal Cruz today and I'm

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>going to read Debtmers five and a half k's more.

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Those are my three prize picks that I'm putting together,

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and I love them very much. And like I said,

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm also playing the smaller side of ras musen in

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>him as a little solo two to one. If you

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>guys want to do the prize picks promo code leading

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>off download play along with us. That also leads to

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>our bets, So I'm kind of tailing a little bit

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of these. I've got Oneal Cruz total bases plus one fifteen.

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>You can get that over at Caesars right now. I've

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>got Debtmers five and a half strikeouts over which I

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>got it is minus minus one ten, but I really

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>like it. Actually think the George Kirby number is interesting too.

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>The reason is the Mariners, I believe, are in the

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>top ten of most strikeouts, maybe in the top five

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>of most strikeouts so far this season. So even if

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Kirby outduels him, I actually like your no hits one

0:25:57.720 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>are the your four and a half hits, But the

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>strikeout one for Debt feels great. And I really like

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn Carrol Stile in base today it's plus two forty.

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Last night, by the way, it was in the four

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>hundreds and we missed out opportunity today, but it's still

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>plus two forty and my last one is Drew mash

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Muse and strikeouts, which we've been talking about four and

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a half plus one twenty three on fan Duel. So, Ryan,

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you got on your best plays? Your best's

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>which everyone can check out over on the prop cheat

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 1>sheet over at Fantasy Pros, which I highly suggest you do.

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Adam Davall actually leads the way of their favorite projected

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>play at point five total bases, which is minus one sixty.

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>You'd have to play, but go check out the prop

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>cheat teet yourself.

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely.

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 3>I like all of your picks, honesty, and I like

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 3>all the names that I already listened in prize picks,

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 3>but for the sake of picking some other names, I

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 3>have Marcus Simeon over half an RBI against the Orioles

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 3>that's plus one seventy five. I actually like Kyle Bradish

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.679
<v Speaker 3>a lot, but the defense has not been very good

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 3>for the Orioles and the bullpen has not been very

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 3>good for the Orioles, So I like SAME's chance of

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 3>getting an RBI in that one.

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Mookie Betts.

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 3>I also have getting an RBI that's against the Rockies

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 3>plus one seventy. Bobaschet been really hot start the year

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 3>over one and a half hits against the Royals, that's

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 3>plus one forty eight. And then I threw in a

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 3>fourth one here and we talked about Debtburs and we

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 3>talked about Kirby. I have the under seven and a

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 3>half total runs in the Angels Mariners game with Debtmvers

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 3>and Kirby going head to head.

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>What was that last one? I think I might have

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>taken under Oh you know what, that's funny. I took

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the three and a half on the first five under. Well,

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I really like that one. So I like your bet,

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>and I like first five to not get to the

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>bullpen there. And by the way, chat blowing up here

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>with lots of good stuff. I like all your guys's takes,

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>especially where was it. Ron's is the best about I

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>am the man, of course, so thank you very much.

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Ron.

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Richard's got me worried though, thinking that we might and

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 1>a couple people that Deptvers might get lit all right

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>quickly On the DFS side, I've only got a couple players,

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>really dig Miguel Vargas two point three on DK Chas

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>McCormick is one of those stolen base guys. He's got

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>three early on and the Astros broadcasting was talking about

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>how he has the absolute green light and he is

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>stealing at will. He's two point six of like Drew

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Respusen in wherever lineup you can get him. What do

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you like on the fan duel dk DFS.

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 2>What do you got a couple guys I like. I

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 2>do like a couple of the Orioles.

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Adlely has one for ten since that opening day bonanza,

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 3>but just thirty six hundred. I think he's my favorite

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 3>catcher on the board there. Nolan Gorman has been really good,

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 3>just twenty five hundred. You know the cost for him.

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 3>He obviously has had a really strong start to the year.

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Is a talented player. I do have Bradish as sort

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 3>of a lower end pitcher there that I like to

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 3>get some value on. Austin Riley's low start to the season.

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 3>I like him, Hora Matteo that obviously he's got the

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 3>finger issue.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 2>This is if he plays.

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 3>I just think he's going to get like two stolen

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 3>bases basically every game he starts and went healthy. That

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 3>glove is going to keep him in the lineup even

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 3>at the bat's struggling a bit. And then you know,

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 3>I like to go in on outfielders as my big spenders.

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 3>So George Springer thirty eight hundred and Yoshida thirty two hundred,

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 3>I like what I've seen from him to start the year.

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Two.

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Last up here is the home run calls, my friends.

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>We also have a leading off group that you can

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>check out on Betting Pros with a contest for MLB

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>picks if you want to check it out Leaderboard for

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Mob Picks, and we're giving away a free subscription to

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros and Betting Pros two monthly leaders, So go

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and check that out over on Betting Pros. And of course,

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>if you guys are on the premium, you can get

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in the discord where you can make your home run

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:14.959
<v Speaker 1>calls and you can be a rock star like some

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of our freakin' rock stars here. We already have a

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>four homer guy. We're gonna have the graphics up here

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>very soon. We're gonna be announcing the prize. I think

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually gonna be able to help out with announcing

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the prize here in the next day or two. But

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>BHB Daddy has four along with b Stros seventeen. They

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>both have four. Houston, Joe Zamboni and Randy have three,

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and I do see Wonky up there with two, and

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>may I note that I technically would have two if

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I followed my heart. I keep following my head, and

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>my head is zero for two. My heart is two

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>for two, and that takes us to the home run calls,

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and I hate to do this. I've got it again.

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I've got a head and a heart call, so I

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I flip. At the end of the day.

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>My head call is Juan Soto up against Ryan Nelson

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>with the Diamondbacks. My heart call is O'Neill cruise worm.

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So what should I do? You tell me what do

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I do here? Give me advice? Do I flip the coin?

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Do I do the opposite? Do I go with my head?

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 3>I say, you do whatever is the opposite of what

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 3>you've been doing, because it has it worked so far.

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>So I should flip the coin and do the opposite

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of what it says.

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, So like Georgian Sidefeld, you flip the coin

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 3>and just do the opposite.

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:27.479
<v Speaker 1>Heads of soda tails is onio cruise, Let's go. It's heads.

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>So we're going with onell Cruise, we're going on it.

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's say we're not going with one Soda. Who was

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>my pick? It's official on'ell cruise. Put it on the board. Worm,

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you probably have a much better system than me. Let's

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>let's hear you get because you do have a homer

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>on you on the contest.

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, first of all, I've now never been rooting harder

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:47.239
<v Speaker 3>for Want Soda a Tato home run tonight. But uh,

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 3>and also I will say my system is clearly not better.

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Because I couldn't take an Oriol on Friday they weren't playing.

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 3>I had to start off my year of taking Oil

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 3>as soon as I could. I'm not going to do

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 3>that every time, but I'm going to take an Oil here.

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking Gutter Henderson, who has gotten a lot of

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 3>hate in the and deservedly so.

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 2>He's obviously been terrible this year.

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 3>I saw he's got a base with the walks but

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have a hit yet this season.

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 2>He's been really bad.

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 3>I believe in the talent. I did want to take

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Adlee Because's why I would have taken it up Thursday,

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 3>and it worked out. So technically, I feel like I

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 3>should be on the board with two as well. But no,

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna take Guttary. This is a pure homer pick.

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 3>I will admit it through and through. I just think

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:21.959
<v Speaker 3>the talent's degree, he's gonna figure it out. I'm not

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 3>like worried about him long term or anything, and I

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 3>promise tomorrow I will not take it, Nora.

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 2>But I had to get at least one in as

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 2>soon as I could.

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Glenn said, Wansoa is gonna hit the longest homer

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of the season tonight. It's literally the opposite. I would also,

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I would like an opposite Welsh tracker. I would like

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>my other identity, my other personality. It's like Juckal and Hyde.

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a Jucklin Hide season. Let's see how Welsh

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Heart does versus Welsh Head. I don't know what we

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>would put this up as because I flipped the coin

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and technically I'm I guess I am going with my

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>heart now with Onyo Cruiz, So we'll check it all out.

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll have graphics up soon. We've got Worm back tomorrow,

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and we've got you guys. Whether you love us or

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:57.719
<v Speaker 1>hate us, we love you. So thank you guys for

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with us today, getting you set for this week.

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Go set your lineups, by the way, lots of good

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>fab out there, and we will be back again tomorrow

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>for all the prize picks, all the bets, and all

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the latest news right here, and leading off, I am

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the Welsh, that is the worm, and I'm gonna go

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>beat Joey.

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 2>P Yeah, tell Joe I said, hello, I know I will.

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Dude in the maybe you know what, maybe he'll get

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>stuck in the escape or maybe he'll never escape. Let's

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>see who escapes first. All right, we're out of here. Guys,

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>have a great one. We'll talk to you tomorrow. By bye.