WEBVTT - US Says Talks for Full Ukraine Ceasefire to Start Immediately

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week Insight from the reporters and

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 2>editors that bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Global business, finance and tech news.

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 2>The Bloomberg Business Week Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Stenoveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 4>We did mention our big story at the sour President

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 4>Trump and President Putin of Russia speaking today in a

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 4>long phone call about ninety minutes on how to bring

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 4>an end to the Russia Ukraine wall. President Putin committed

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 4>to limit Russian attacks on Ukrainian energy assets, but did

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 4>decline to agree to a broader thirty day ceasefire, as

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 4>the United States had sought with more. Let's head to

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 4>the White House into Bloomberg's Tyler Kendall. She's there on

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 4>the lawn of the White House, Tyler, Is this a

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 4>step forward to ending the war between Russia and Ukraine?

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 5>White House would like to paint it as such, But

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 5>importantly you mentioned they are Vladimir Putin falling short of

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 5>backing a thirty day ceasefire fire proposal that the US

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 5>had been hoping for. Importantly, that White House readout goes

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 5>on to say that negotiations will start for a maritime

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 5>ceasefire on the Black Sea, followed hopefully by talks for

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 5>a full seaspire and then a more permanent piece. Importantly,

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 5>I just want to point out that the last time

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 5>Zelenski was here at the White House, that Oval Office

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 5>meeting devolved. He then went to Europe and presented to

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 5>our European allies a similar path that he wanted to

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 5>see a ceasefire in the sea and the sky, as

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 5>he called it. You know, Bloomberg News had been reporting

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 5>that Russia might have been trying to slow roll these

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 5>negotiations earlier this morning, breaking the headline that Vladimir Putin

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 5>would like to see a halt of all weapon flows

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 5>into Ukraine, or, at least, according to sources familiar, the

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 5>halt of US weapon flows into Ukraine. It remains to

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 5>be seen if that is something this White House would

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 5>really get behind, considering just last week it did reverse

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 5>its own halt on US military assistance and intelligence sharing

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 5>in order to get Ukraine to sign on to this

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 5>thirty day piece proposal. Carol just quickly still a big questions,

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 5>particularly considering that this readout does say that both countries

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 5>want a lasting piece. That is raising questions about what

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 5>that really looks like. Considering that we know that our

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 5>European allies and Ukraine have been asking this White House

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 5>what sort of firmer security guarantees they're willing to provide.

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Tyler, just very belief briefly fifteen seconds. Do we

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>know what Ukraine would be giving up in exchange for

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the ceasefire?

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 5>Well, that really remains to be seen at this point.

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 5>They have said that they are willing to negotiate, but

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 5>they need Russia to also come to the table. Ukraine

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 5>has asked the US to ramp up sanctions if they

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 5>do not get this thirty day cease fire into effect

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 5>as quickly as possible.

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 6>All Right, We're going to.

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:51.679
<v Speaker 4>Leave it on that note, Hey, Tyler, thank you so much.

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 4>Tyler Kendall, Bloomberg News reporter there on the lawn of

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 4>the White House. All Right, let's stay with this story

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 4>because back with us for someone to share her expertise

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 4>on Russia. Its longtime leader is doctor Angela Stent. She's

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 4>senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, a member of the

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 4>Council on Formulation, a former National intelligence Officer for Russia

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 4>and Eurasia at the National Intelligence Council. And she's also

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 4>the author of Putin's World, Russia against the West and

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 4>with the Rest, which I am guessing she is probably

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 4>working on updating. She joins us from Washington, DC, Doctor Stent.

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Always good to have you with Tim and myself. First

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 4>of all, I'm just curious about the optics of how

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 4>we got to today and whether or not you see

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 4>this this conversation and the headlines that we have seen

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 4>out of this conversation between President Trump and President Putin?

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 6>Is this progress? Is this a step forward?

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 7>So the way we go, well, thank you for having

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 7>me on again. The way we got here is right.

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 7>The President Trump said during the campaign that he was

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 7>going to end this war in twenty four hours. It

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 7>would never have started had he been president at the time.

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 7>It took a little more than twenty four hours to

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 7>get this particular phone call with Putin, although we know

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 7>that he had previous ones after his election, and so

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 7>he got the Ukrainians by putting pressure on them to

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 7>agree to a thirty day total cease fire, and that's

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 7>what he said he wants from the Russians. I've just

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 7>been reading the Russian readoubt the Kremlins readout of the talks.

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 7>It's a little different from the one that we got

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 7>from the US side, and it mentions that Trump asked

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:31.799
<v Speaker 7>Putin for a cease fire on hitting energy and infrastructure targets,

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 7>and it said that, you know, Putin was favorably inclined

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 7>to it, it didn't actually necessarily say that he agreed

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 7>with it. And a lot of it had to do

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 7>with the restoration of US Russian relations, and apparently they're

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 7>going to organize hockey games between Russia and the United States.

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 7>But the thing that's most notable in the Russian one,

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 7>and I think your correspondent already alluded to it, is

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 7>that Putin's saying that they have to get to the

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 7>fundamental causes, the root causes of why this war broke out,

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 7>and that's going to go right back to NATO, to

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 7>Ukraine wanting to be part of the West, and to

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 7>Putin essentially saying that can happen. So I will be

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 7>curious to see how this works out. I'd also like

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 7>to know how they're going to enforce this very limited

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 7>but still important ceasefire. Don't forget Russia has destroyed seventy

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 7>percent of Ukraine's electricity production during this war. How are

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 7>they going to monitor this and then what comes after it?

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>But Angela doesn't seem like to you that it is

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>indeed the beginning of the end of this war.

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 7>It may be, I think what it's certainly the beginning

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 7>of the US and Russia established, re establishing relations, and

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 7>we've heard that from President Trump is a big Is

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 7>it the beginning of the end of this war? I'm

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 7>still I think the jury's out on that. I think

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 7>we have to see how long Putin drags out the

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 7>negotiation before he agrees to a total cease fire. And again,

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 7>he hasn't really shown that he's interested in ending this

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 7>war anytime soon. He's much more interested in restoring these

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 7>relations with the US and ending his isolation.

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 6>That's interesting.

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 4>The other thing I wonder, Angeline, something that we've talked

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 4>about with you before. I mean, are there ever really

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 4>any guarantees that President Pultant won't try to invade Ukraine

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 4>or another country again? And how does the outcome of

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 4>this negotiate negotiation for an end to the war kind

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 4>of determine the likelihood of that happening again?

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 7>So as President Zelensky, unfortunately for him, pointed out in

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 7>the Oval Office when he then got the president, the

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 7>vice president very angry with him, Russia has violated every

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 7>cease fire it's signed with Ukraine, certainly since the annexation

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 7>of Primere in twenty fourteen. And Russia has also violated

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 7>every treaty it's signed with Ukraine since its independence. So

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 7>I think one has to be very skeptical. And this

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 7>is of course why President Zelenski, again unfortunately for him,

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 7>in the Oval Office, wanted to talk about security guarantees,

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 7>because without very robust security guarantees, there's absolutely no reason

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 7>to believe that Russia wouldn't try and invade Ukraine again.

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 7>The best security guarantee we know would be Ukraine joining NATO.

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 7>That's been taken off the cards now by the Trump administration,

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 7>but it needs these guarantees, and the Europeans, the French,

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 7>the British, and other European countries have said they're willing

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 7>to provide security guarantees, boots on the ground to be

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 7>a stabilizing force stabilization force once the war ends, but

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 7>they say they need American backup for this, and that's

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:55.679
<v Speaker 7>something which the Trump administration has not committed itself to Angela.

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's say this is the beginning of the end of

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the war, and it does. And what does Russia look

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>like on the other side of this is is it

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>stronger or weaker than it was? Is it more? Is

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Putin more emboldened than he was pre invasion?

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So what it looks like is, I mean, the

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 7>economy is not in good shape and it's going to

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 7>get worse the longer this war goes on for Putin.

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 7>So if the war ends, that would and obviously if

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 7>the sanctions are removed, which they would be if the

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 7>war ends at some point, then that would be very

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 7>beneficial for Putin. But yes, he comes out of this

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 7>looking stronger. He invaded another country and provoked and presumably,

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we have to see if Ukraine has to

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 7>make territorial concessions to Russia. He will then you know,

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 7>have taken twenty percent of Ukraine. And unless there are

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 7>these very robust security guarantees, he could invade again. And

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 7>now he'll be in you know, he'll be invited back

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 7>to the United States. Maybe the Europeans won't want to

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 7>deal with him for any time soon, but Russia's actually

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 7>strengthened its international position in many ways while it's been

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 7>fighting this rule.

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, I think about something Tim brought up, and

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 4>it just reminded us. Was it a debate where Mitch

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 4>Romney said, who was asked, you know, I guess or

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 4>the candidates, was it two thousand and eight or before that,

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 4>twenty twelve, and what was the biggest right, what was

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 4>the biggest concern or national security concern for the United States?

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 6>He said Russia and was kind of laughed off the stage.

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 4>But is there some credibility Angela in President Trump trying

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 4>to create some kind of economic cooperation or more economic

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 4>cooperation between the US and Russia to create a different

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 4>future and relationship with Russia going quote, and is there

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 4>some good to that?

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 7>Well, in the nineteen nineties, there were a lot of

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 7>American firms that were very active in Russia. Energy companies,

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 7>launch firms, small funds. They were making money and they

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 7>were doing quite well, and yet the political relationship between

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 7>the US and Russia was very difficult. There were a

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 7>couple of high points after nine eleven when the US

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 7>and Russia with Putin, you know, worked together in terms

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 7>of the beginning of the US campaign in Afghanistan. Also,

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 7>I should point out that there were thousands of American

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 7>business people in Ukraine when Russia invaded. That didn't stop

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 7>Russia from invading. So of course there are arguments to

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 7>build up economic ties with Russia, but I think history

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 7>shows us and even the experience of the last thirty years.

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 7>Putin always likes to separate economics from politics, and you

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 7>can have a good or a strong economic relationship with

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 7>Russia and it doesn't seem to have that much impact

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 7>on what Russia does politically or militarily, particularly under Putin.

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I asked what Russia would look like after this,

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>but what about Ukraine? Because this is the country that

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>three years ago we were talking to you and so

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>many other people thought this war would be over just

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in a matter of hours, a matter of days, a

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>matter of weeks. But look what Ukraine has been able

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to do to defend itself. What does Ukraine look like

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>on the other side.

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, on.

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 7>The good side, Ukraine now has the strongest and largest

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 7>army in Europe. It's developed very sophisticated technical technological capabilities.

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 7>It's been using electronic warfare, it's much more sophisticated than that.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 7>On the other hand, of course, its economy has suffered greatly,

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 7>and you know, it's had cities and villages obliterated by

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 7>the Russians, so it's going to need an enormous amount

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 7>of economic assistance and investment if it is to recover.

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 7>It's also lost a large number of soldiers. We don't

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 7>quite know, but I think for both Ukraine and Russia

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 7>it's in the hundreds of thousands. And it also has

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 7>millions of Ukrainians are now living abroad because of the war.

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 7>They need to come back and they need to help

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 7>rebuild the country. So economically it's it's, you know, in

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 7>very poor shape, even though other aspects militarily it's better off,

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 7>but it will still be in a very fragile state

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 7>at the end of the war.

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 6>Angela.

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, I was thinking about this a lot, like

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 4>what is the relationship between President Putin and President Trump?

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 4>And I know we've talked with you about this before.

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 6>And what is it? You know, is it is Russia

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 6>great power?

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Is it a great economy? You already referenced that it wasn't.

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.119
<v Speaker 4>They're businesses, their alliances, their leadership.

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 6>I mean, is.

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 4>It an economic and political model to emulate. I'm asking

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 4>a little bit facetiously, but I'm trying to understand, you

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.599
<v Speaker 4>know why there is this relationship.

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's not an economic model to emulate because it's

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 7>essentially a hydrocon an exporter. It doesn't have a very

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 7>modern economy. You know, I always when I teach my students,

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 7>I say, tell me how many products in your home

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 7>are from China? On how many from Russia. Well you

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 7>know the answer to that, there many of them from China,

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 7>they're on from Russia. So it earns a lot of

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 7>money by selling hydrocarbons, but it doesn't have really a

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 7>modern economy. It has a shrinking population. It has a

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 7>major demographic problem, and it's had that ever since the

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 7>fall of the Soviet Union and even before then. But

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 7>militarily it is a superpower, and that's in history. Russia

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 7>has always been a great power because of its military,

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 7>not because of its economy. And so it is you know,

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 7>I think the largest nuclear power, the US and Russia,

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 7>the two nuclear superpowers. The Russians have more warheads than

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 7>we do, and so in that sense it's a great power.

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 7>And because of the hydrocarbons and of course it's location.

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 7>It's the largest country in the world world sitting astride

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 7>Europe in Asia, so it has many strong endowments, but

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 7>economically it really does need to modernize.

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey, just thirty seconds left, doctor sten. It does raise

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the question, though, how the rest of the world keeps

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>putin in check, given the strength of its military and

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>given his ambitions, how does that happen? Well, we know that.

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 7>He has ambitions that go beyond Ukraine, and that's why

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 7>the Europeans are very worried about it. And now you

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 7>see France offering you a nuclear umbrella to the rest

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 7>of Europe. You see some European countries, even Poland, talking

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 7>about should they acquire nuclear weapons. So this is one

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 7>of the impacts of this brutal war is at least

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:51.119
<v Speaker 7>country countries in Europe reminding themselves that they're still vulnerable

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 7>to a potential Russian invasion, and some of them are

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 7>talking about the possibility of a war with Russia within

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 7>the next five years.

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 4>Bottom line ten seconds. This is a good this is

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 4>a good move. This is some progress.

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 7>On the call. Yes it is, I mean hopefully if

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 7>they implement this for us ceas file. Of course it's

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 7>a good move.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 4>All right, my guests, is we're going to be coming

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 4>back to you a lot more still on this, and

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 4>we so appreciate that we can.

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 6>Angela, thank you so much.

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 4>Doctor Angela Stent, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution, a

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 4>member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and her book

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 4>author of Putin's World.

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 6>Be sure to check it out.

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.359
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Or watch US live on YouTube.

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 4>One of the things we wanted to talk about is,

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 4>of course, the upcoming FED decision tomorrow. We did see

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 4>the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta's gpt GDP now index

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 4>suggesting US gross domestic product will retract one point seven

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 4>six percent, so a negative one point seven six percent

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 4>the first quarter versus a negative two point zero six

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 4>percent and its previous release on March seventeenth, So you've

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 4>got that going on. Meantime, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessett, well,

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't seem too worried about US growth.

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 6>He spoke on Fox Business this morning.

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 9>The underlying economy is healthy. There is no reason we

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 9>have to have a recession. Can we have a pause

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 9>as we go from this incredible level of government spending

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 9>which is just unsustainable?

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 4>That, of course is US Treasury Secretary Scott Besson earlier

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 4>today on Fox Business. So let's get into it the

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 4>US economy tomorrow's FED decision. Back with Tim and me

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 4>is doctor Steven Skankee, chief economist advisor at the Wealth Advisor,

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 4>I should say chief economist at the Wealth Advisor kill Point.

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 4>He's also a former US Treasury and White House National

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 4>Security Council staff member. He's out there in Washington, d C.

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 4>And then right here in our New York studio is

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Economics US economist Stuart Paul. Hey, Stuart, I want

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 4>to start with you. The FED is expected to hold

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 4>rate steady this week. Tomorrow's decision really.

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 6>All about the dot plot.

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 10>Is mostly about the dot plot, and beyond what we

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 10>actually get from the media and FOMC members expectations for

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 10>the path of interest rates, we're also going to get

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 10>a few clues about what they expect for the economy

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 10>and what's going to be guiding their interest rate decision.

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 10>So we're also probably going to see a downward revision

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 10>of their expectations for twenty twenty five growth, and we're

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 10>also probably going to see an upward revision of their

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 10>estimates for core PCE inflation for the year ahead. And

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 10>between the two of those, the question is what ends

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 10>up dominating. Is it the cooler growth that will lead

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 10>to more rate cuts? Is it the higher inflation that'll

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 10>keep them on hold. We're expecting the median dot to

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 10>still show two cuts in the year ahead, but if anything,

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 10>the distribution of dots we think will be skewed to

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 10>fewer cuts this year because of that uptick in inflation expectations.

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Steve, is that the focus for you too? The dot plot?

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you're focused on as well?

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 11>Certainly it is because it gives us some better understanding

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 11>of what they're thinking about. That's sort of first step

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 11>and than what share Powl says and is press conference.

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 11>They've had a lot of disparate information in the various

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 11>Federal Reserve Bank branches and it'll be interesting to see

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 11>how that gets reflected in the board member's expectations.

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, and I.

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 4>Guess one of the interesting things too is and you know.

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Let me ask you, Steve, we just know the Treasury secretary.

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 4>It's kind of interesting, you know, saying the underlying economy

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 4>is healthy, no reason that we should have a recession,

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 4>and yet nobody's really ruling it out right.

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 6>Can you ever really rule out a recession?

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 11>Certainly not, because while the economy came into this year

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 11>very strong, and even today with you know, slower than

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 11>trend growth in retail sales and all of the negative

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 11>consumer sentiment that has been causing consumers to pull back

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 11>in their spending, the economy is still robust, The labor

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 11>market is strong, and and yes there's changes at the margin,

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 11>but it would take a lot to tip the economy

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 11>into recession. But at the same time, and I think

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 11>this is what frightens markets the most, is that the President,

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 11>his Treasury secretary, his Commerce secretary have all said that basically,

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 11>they're okay if the market is down and if we

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 11>tip into a recession, they're not worried about it because

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 11>they're they're larger plan is to to reset, reboot, rebuild,

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 11>recalibrate the economy, and they seem to be willing to

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 11>accept that as as a necessary cost. If that should happen.

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 6>I just get to I.

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 4>Just got to say, as you're saying this about, I'm

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:54.479
<v Speaker 4>seeing Stewart kind of smile a little bit.

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 6>Stuart, you're smiling.

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 10>Why, Well, because I think that policymakers, even in the

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 10>White House, they do about economic outcomes. Of course, they

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 10>say that there's going to be a bit of an

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 10>economic realignment. But if we think back to past presidents,

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 10>we saw George W. Bush inheriting in the first term

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 10>the bursting of the tech bubble. We saw Obama inheriting

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 10>the global financial crisis. S and P five hundred in

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 10>the first let's say one hundred days that they were

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 10>in office was off at most, probably about fifteen percent.

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 10>There's only so much that sort of self inflicted pain

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 10>from policy decisions, policy announcements, tariff imposite, tariffs being imposed

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 10>and then being walked back that the White House can

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 10>really stomach before they feel some pain. The key difference,

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 10>of course, would be that was Bush's first term Obama's

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 10>first term that were running for reelection. If Trump is

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 10>seeing this truly as his last term and not part

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 10>of some broader magma movement, maybe Steve is right. Maybe

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 10>he's a little bit insulated. I think that policymakers tend

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.959
<v Speaker 10>to be responsive to public sentiment. I think that they

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 10>tend to be responsive to voters.

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 12>And when you only have.

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 10>Let's say, for example, three seats in the Senate that

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 10>are going to be up in twenty twenty six, I

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 10>think that Yeah, I think that it's probably a closer

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 10>call than it might sound. They might be more responsive

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 10>than you're suggesting.

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So what are you saying, Stort. Are you saying that

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>policymakers will continue to be responsive or they have this

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>insulation because the President is not up for reelection and

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>there aren't that many Senate seats that are coming up either.

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 10>I think that they're saying that they're going to be

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 10>They're going to be less responsive than they have been historically.

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 10>I think that there will come a point in time

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 10>where we do get a little bit less rhetoric out

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 10>of the White House and a little bit more of

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 10>a reaction to both the printed data and financial market activity.

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 10>Carol very wisely noted that the FED the Atlanta Fed's

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 10>GDP now cast looks pretty dismal for the first quarter.

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 10>We don't think that it's going to be quite that bad,

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 10>but printing let's say an annualized pace of half of

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 10>one percent in the president's first term. The president's first

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 10>quarter of this term in office is not going to

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 10>be something that's easy to brush off from a public

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 10>sentiment perspective or from a markets perspective.

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Steve, you worked in government, your former US Treasury and

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>White House National Security Council staff member, What do you

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>make of what Stuart is saying with regard to the

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>responsiveness of policymakers.

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 11>Well, the story that they're telling right now, and that

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 11>the President is telling and his cabinet just sort of

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 11>marches in step with him, is that there is going

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.479
<v Speaker 11>to be pain, there is going to be adjustment, and

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 11>he's willing to take that. I think what's different this time,

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 11>and I don't disagree with Stuart that the White House

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 11>and congressional policy making offices elected officials are sensitive and

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 11>they don't want to get hoisted. But I think what's

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 11>different is that this president sees this as his last

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 11>opportunity to do some things that will, in his opinion,

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 11>remake the economy into a better place for the future.

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 11>And anytime you do that, that's going to cause disruption,

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 11>and in fact, a lot of it now. The other

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 11>thing that I think we have to be careful about

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 11>is that they can do a lot of things that

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 11>reduced confidence, lower industrial production, lower consumers spending, and by

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 11>the time they decide they've maybe pushed too hard, they

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 11>probably have already set in motion the process of the

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 11>economy following into a recession.

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, and we know, we've heard, we've heard from the

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 4>administration officials it's like, Okay, we're going to do this,

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 4>and then we're going to get the tax cuts, and

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 4>then you know, it's the reverse of the first time around.

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Stuart, he is said to be remaking the economy,

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 4>but there is pain and if he gets it wrong,

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 4>could we see something problematic and maybe a longer standing recession.

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 6>Just got about thirty seconds.

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 10>We're not expecting so much of a long standing recession.

0:23:57.640 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 10>We're expecting about one and a half percent full year

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 10>growth for twenty twenty five. That's still about half the

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 10>pace that we saw printed in each of the last

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 10>two years, a bit more than half of that. So

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 10>not really a long standing recession. But it's not exactly

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 10>something that's going to bolster your voting base, and it's

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 10>not something that you can take into the midterms with

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 10>a lot.

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 6>Of confidence, not growth, at least for a little bit

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 6>or less growth.

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 4>Guys, thank you so much, Steve Skanky over at kill Point,

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 4>and of course Bloomberg Economics US economist Stewart Paul.

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live each

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 2>weekday starting at two pm Eastern up on Applecarplay and

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 2>the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 2>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 2>York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, it is time for another edition of Bloomberg Plugged

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 1>in your weekly look at evs. Amlikra Fey and I

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about this yesterday when it was one of the

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>most read stories in the Bloomberg terminal, and it's certainly

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>worth revisiting because BYD shares jumped to a record after

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese automaker unveild a lineup of evs that it

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>says can charge almost as fast as it takes just

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 1>to refuel a regular car. Being able to charge a

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>car and the time it takes a combustion engine to

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>vehicle to pull in and out of a gas station

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>could be a game changer could convince drivers who aren't

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>willing to make lengthy stops to actually go electric. Curious

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>what Michael Stadler thinks about this. He's the CTO and

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Zendi. It makes software that helps design

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>EV infrastructure. He joined us from San Diego. Michael, I

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 1>want to get your reaction to this byd news in

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a second. But I got to tell you I described

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>your company as making software that helps to design EV

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>structure infrastructure. Did I get that right? Because I had

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.479
<v Speaker 1>a heck of a time finding exactly what your company

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>does well.

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 13>I mean, of course we do electic vehicles, and thanks

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 13>for having make good afternoon, but we do a little

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 13>bit more than electic vehicles with tools and microgrids, and

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 13>I think that's what we have discussed in maybe today

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 13>and how we charge his elected vehicles.

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so you're watching closely the different types of EV

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>charging systems, the different types of batteries. What do you

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>make of this bid news? Because look here in the US,

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to be driving these vehicles anytime soon,

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I assume, unless the President decides to change the way

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that rules are structured around importing Chinese evs. But if

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>this is indeed something that can be done, it's a

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>game changer for evs.

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 8>Now. No, it's very cool, and I also read it

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 8>to data.

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 13>It's very cool to add two hundred and fifty miles

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 13>in five minutes.

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 8>But it also creates a challenge for.

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 13>The distribution system and the infrastructure because you have to

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 13>provide that power. And if you think about that a

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 13>lot of these cars are around, then it will be really

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 13>a huge challenge for the utility system. And I think

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 13>that's what the problem when a challenge starts with charging

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:53.959
<v Speaker 13>all these electric vehicles in that time.

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 4>So, Michael, tell us how your system works, and I'm

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 4>just curious kind of where you are in this process

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 4>in terms of acquiring customers, putting it to work.

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 6>Give us some kind of size and scope.

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So we are software company, as you guys said,

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 13>and engineering company, and we help our clients puilding the

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 13>infrastructure place which is needed to provide this high power.

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 13>I mean the utilities for example, I mean they have

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 13>huge challenges to provide this power. I mean it can

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 13>take seven to ten years to upgrade the distribution system

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 13>to provide this power. Right, So this is why we

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.959
<v Speaker 13>help our clients to design, plan, install, and run so

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 13>called micro grids, which is basically co generation at the

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 13>place where you charge the electric vehicles.

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So who are your customers right now?

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean we have a diverse portfolio here.

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 13>I mean, of course the engineering company is installing this

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 13>infrastructure to provide the power, but there's also of course

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 13>fleet management says providers who really want to implement electric

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 13>vehicle trucks and all this. We have multiple clients here,

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 13>but mostly engineering companies installing micro infrastructure, micro rates, and

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:08.479
<v Speaker 13>eating infrastructures.

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>How has business been given the challenge that we've seen

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:17.239
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years for American companies to

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>sell evs, the idea that they've gotten a little too

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>expensive for consumers, the demand that a lot of these

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>American companies thought would be there. Look what happened with four,

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>looking happen with the GM. Even Tesla is seeing a

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>sales decline this year. What has your demand been like?

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Has it held steady or has it been affected by

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>what customers are doing?

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 13>Actually insteady, Yes, of course there's uncertain the current blended market.

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 13>But I mean almost thirty percent of all the people

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 13>shopping around from new cars are still considering elected vehicles

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 13>because elected vehicles are fun to try to fear cheaper.

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 13>I mean, I mean, I'm on my fourth electric vehicle

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 13>and I would never go back to a gas car, right,

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 13>So no of us. The market is stable and it's

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 13>actually increasing.

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 4>Hey, so give us a little idea. We are Bloomberg

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 4>is we always like to throw out there. Give us

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 4>an idea. I know we've been asking about customers. We

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 4>are on your website, Walmart, bloom Energy, Generaic. You've got

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 4>some academic universities as u US San Diego, Georgia Tech,

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 4>but there's a lot of other companies. It sounds like

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 4>you guys are doing a lot of research with folks.

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 4>But give us a little bit more idea of where

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 4>the businesses and and the growth that you are seeing,

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 4>whether it's top line.

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 6>I'm assuming you're not profitable.

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 4>Yet or is that we are.

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 13>But the thing is we are really rooted in research

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 13>because what we are doing is a methodology which really

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 13>helps you to install.

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 8>Infrastructure, meaning.

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 13>Generators, natural gas generators, bat or as renewables at the

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 13>place where you'd charge your electic vehicle where you need

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 13>the power for a micro If we call this migrant right,

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 13>And that can be a technical challenging process and it

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 13>needs to be standardized so that you can do this

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 13>really quickly and at an efficient cost.

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 13>And this is why we still do a lot of

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 13>research and we at the cutting edge of research also

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 13>when it comes to new technologies. And this is why

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 13>we're working with universities because we don't have only this

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 13>power problem on the elactic vehicle side. I mean, if

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 13>you think about data centers, right, you also want to

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 13>get a lot of power now from the utility system

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 13>and they're talking about small modular reactors these days. So

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 13>we have to research all these technologies and bring them

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 13>in our software platform to providers, to our clients to

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 13>efficiently plan those microgrids.

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Michael, in terms of infrastructure here, what is this

0:30:56.120 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 1>administration meant for your business? Certainly he's close with Elon Musk,

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>but that hasn't really helped the EV industry. He wants

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to roll back these tax credits. Does that affect your business?

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 8>So far?

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 13>It hasn't affected us, because I think it's it's I

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 13>mean we I mean, as I said, electric vehicles are

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 13>for real and they're not going away, right, And and

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 13>the project takes the projects that we're seeing to take

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 13>a year or two years or whatever it is, so

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 13>you're not just canceling them because of uncertainly that we're

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 13>seeing right now. So so far we actually have a

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 13>nice growth in the micro space, which is not only

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 13>the elected vehicle space. Uh and and we actually grew

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 13>in better than last year.

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Michael Stadler, you're gonna have to leave it there. Thanks

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.719
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Do appreciate it. Cto and co founder

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of Zendy joining us from San Diego.

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 14>Let me drive.

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no no, this is not a twin.

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 14>Honey, Please, I want to try it.

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question time.

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 3>This is the drive to the clothes.

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 12>Plums for music.

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 8>Well driver held.

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Don on Bloomberg Radio.

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 4>All right, TikTok, everybody, We've got just about eighteen minutes

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 4>to go until we see the closing bell. Here are

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 4>the closing bell on Wall Street. Busy little Tuesday. Charlie

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 4>and Bel Maloney just breaking down the trade here. But

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 4>we're off our loads of the session, but still down

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 4>about one point six percent on the Nasdaq one hundred

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 4>and down about one percent on the S and P.

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 4>Tim One of the stories that was really interesting to

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 4>me reading in is what investors are up to, slashing

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 4>holdings of US equities by the most on record. That

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 4>was according to BAA's latest survey, underscoring the massive rotation

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 4>that's underway in global markets. So we saw fund managers

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 4>reported being about twenty three percent underweight in ustocks and

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 4>tim I think that was a plunge of about forty

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 4>percentage points from the pre be A survey.

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Wow, it's a dramatic shift, and it shows just how

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>quickly traders have ditched their optimism about American markets, with

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the S and B five hundred tumbling just about eight

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>percent from an all time high back in February. Let's

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>see what our drive to the Closed guests has to

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>say about this. We've got Scott Ladner with us CIO

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>at the RIA Horizon Investments. They've got about ten billion

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars in AUM joining us this afternoon. Hey Scott, good

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to have you on the program. I'm curious what you

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>make of this Bank of America survey. Is this a

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>sign that it could be kind of contrarian, that it's

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a time to buy, that so many investors have slashed

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>their holdings.

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 12>Well, yeah, I think actually that there is some truth

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 12>in that. I mean, the.

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 14>Slashing of the holdings in the US makes a little

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 14>bit of.

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 12>Sense, though.

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 14>Look, Trump, if Trump has done one thing, he is

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 14>basically bullied, slash scared both Europe and China into actions

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 14>that they probably wouldn't otherwise have taken. So, you know,

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 14>expect to Europe, you know, getting off the debt break

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 14>and basically starting to end money from a fiscal standpoint

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 14>for the first time since really twenty twelve. It can

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 14>be game changing for the revenue for some of those companies.

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 14>And then when you you know, you pivot out to

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 14>China and you know they're clearly worried about what, you know,

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 14>what Trump's terror policy, trade policy is going to do

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 14>to their already somewhat weak economy. And you've seen she

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 14>pivot off of common prosperity. And so you know, these

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 14>these two moves, you know, which were really really you know,

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 14>holding down the equity values in both China and Europe.

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 14>You know, Trump is kind of bullied them into changing

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 14>those things, and that's actually to the benefit of that,

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 14>you know, the equity hold you know, equity market send

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 14>those two geographies, which are almost uninvestable for much of

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 14>the last decade. Yeah, I mean the S and P

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 14>five hundred dollars performance of the rest of the world

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 14>has just been remarkable. But what does that do to

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 14>US investors that buy US companies here? If we're seeing

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 14>out performance outside of the US, what I mean, is

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 14>that going to continue? Given what we've heard from the

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 14>White House and what we've heard from advisors that essentially

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 14>they're not necessarily paying attention to them markets right now

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.399
<v Speaker 14>and that with time they will recover. So I think

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 14>actually it makes the case for US equities more compelling,

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 14>but not probably for another quarter or two. So you

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:11.359
<v Speaker 14>know that you know this is this is a time

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 14>when you know, frankly, in the last five years, diversification

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 14>has been nothing but punished. So you've done anything other

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 14>than invest in the Max seven or the top of

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.240
<v Speaker 14>the US market, you and you're a benchmarket really anything,

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 14>you've gotten creamed, and so Benet you know you've just

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 14>been you've been punished by by diversifying the last few

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 14>months and probably for the next couple of quarters.

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 12>We think you're actually gonna benefited.

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 14>By by from diversification, and so you know, this is

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 14>a this is a time when we're going to see

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 14>some pretty good buying opportunities for US stocks. I mean,

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 14>we're getting some of these things at a bigger deal

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 14>than we would have otherwise had because folks are rotating

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:44.359
<v Speaker 14>out of US and into these other markets. We think

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 14>that's probably more of a trade. But maybe a trade

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 14>this can go on for a quarter or two, not

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 14>for a year or two.

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 4>So you don't think, Okay, so you still think US

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 4>will ultimately outperform by the end of the year versus

0:35:57.080 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 4>European markets are not necessarily.

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 14>Not necessarily for the end of twenty twenty five, right,

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 14>I mean, Europe and China had pretty big leads right now,

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 14>so like in terms of like making up those leads,

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 14>don't know if we get there. But as we kind

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 14>of entering into twenty twenty six, when some of the

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:13.840
<v Speaker 14>you know, some of these fairly challenging things that Trump's

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 14>doing right now with respect to the you know, sort

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 14>of the ideological shifts, you know, those might actually have

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 14>a chance to pay start paying some dividends on the

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 14>deregulatory front, or the taxes front, or some of these

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 14>other things by the time we turn the calendar into

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 14>next year. So you know, I think there probably are

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 14>some opportunities, but I'm not sure US is going to

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 14>catch them this year.

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 6>Are you worried at all about a recession?

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 4>And do you buy the argument that we get from

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 4>the administration that all right, guys, it's going to be

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 4>a little tough, we could get have some economic pain,

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 4>maybe a recession, maybe not. Nobody seems to want to

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 4>kind of throw their hat into that ring definitively, it seems.

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 4>But do you buy that idea that tariffs now, tax

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 4>cuts later and that and maybe regulatory moves and that.

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:53.280
<v Speaker 6>Will be an engine for economic growth?

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I do.

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 12>I do buy that.

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:56.919
<v Speaker 14>And now we are clearly experiencing somewhat of growth slow

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:59.319
<v Speaker 14>down because everybody's just you know, we're kind of entering

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 14>out slow down.

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Like I'm seeing a lot of stories where companies are like, nope,

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 4>you know it's it's we thought we'd be doing a

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 4>lot of deals and we're not.

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 14>Well, look, if you can't plan, you can't invest. If

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 14>you can't plan, you can't act. Like nobody can plan

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 14>in an environment in which we don't really understand what

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 14>the operating principle is going to be for seministration, we

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 14>have some clues, you have some direction. You know, we

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 14>have know this sort of the direction of these things,

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 14>but we know nobody knows anything about the specifics of how,

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 14>you know, how we're going to prosecute some of these policies.

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 14>And so that's until we get some of that detail

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 14>and we and we will get it. I mean it's

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 14>not we're never going to have it like, we will

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:33.359
<v Speaker 14>get it at some point, but until we get it,

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 14>it's going to be it's just a really tough operating environment,

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 14>whether you're a consumer, an investor, or a business owner.

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, okay, so what do you do then? In terms

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 4>of for investors, is it do you put new money

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 4>into equities? We've talked about equities, you know, being cut back.

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:52.720
<v Speaker 4>Would you put new money into US stocks to oversee stocks?

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 6>Or would you play the fixed income world?

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 12>I definitely not play the fixed income world.

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 14>So you look, we think yields are probably about in

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 14>the right right now, you do, yeah, and so you know,

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:05.800
<v Speaker 14>the yield drop It makes sense in the context of tariffs,

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 14>which everybody thinks tariffs are inflationary, tarifts are deflationary.

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 4>No, I would argue with you because if you are

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 4>putting tariffs on products that come in that obviously raises

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:20.879
<v Speaker 4>their costs unless somebody eats them, but it also gives

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 4>an opportunity for domestic producers to say, well, if those

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:25.839
<v Speaker 4>prices are higher, I can raise my prices. There is

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:27.399
<v Speaker 4>some of that argument there as well.

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 12>There absolutely is.

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 14>You're right, Carrol, But I would just argue that taxing terifs,

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 14>at the end of the day, are still a tax,

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 14>and taxes are growth retardant, and growth retardant things are

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 14>tend to be deflationary over time, so that probably it's

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:41.360
<v Speaker 14>not again not a twenty twenty five deflation story, like

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 14>that's not That's not what I'm trying to say. But

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 14>as far as like going forward, if we're looking at

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 14>a ten year yield, you ten year old's going to

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:47.359
<v Speaker 14>care a lot.

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 12>More about it.

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 6>You think tariffs are a good idea.

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 14>I think if you can get so no, okay, simply no.

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 12>But here.

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 14>But there's a caveat to that though, which is important,

0:38:57.680 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 14>And I don't think that people in the market are

0:38:59.400 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 14>pricing this.

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 12>It's the state of the world.

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 14>So let me give you a state of the world

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 14>which I think could exist, and.

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 6>Just got about forty five.

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:06.839
<v Speaker 12>Second, so the state of the world that could exist.

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.240
<v Speaker 14>That would be interesting would be if the reciprocal idea

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:11.760
<v Speaker 14>kind of takes hold and other countries actually lower tariffs

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 14>on the US, right, you might end up in a

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 14>regime where you have lower global tariffs overall. Like that'll

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 14>be a pretty big boost to global growth that I

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 14>don't think is in the market right now. But I'm

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 14>not saying that's necessarily a base case, but that is

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 14>a state of the world that is possible if under

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 14>the sort of reciprocal tariffs agreement where like, hey, we

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 14>just want everybody to pay sort of the same rate,

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 14>all right, We.

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 4>Will certainly see mix for an interesting investing year, and

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:34.319
<v Speaker 4>no doubt about it. Got to leave it there, but

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:36.879
<v Speaker 4>thank you so much, really appreciate it. Scott Laudner's chief

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 4>investment officer of Horizon Investments. As we mentioned, they've got

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 4>about ten billion dollars in assets under management. Joining us

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 4>right here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio.

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple,

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Spotify and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 2>weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 2>dot Com. The iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal