WEBVTT - Physics Experiments

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Man made black holes, low energy vacuum bubbles, strange lits.

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>These are some of the ways that an ill conceived

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>physics experiment could pose an existential risk, not just for humanity,

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>but for all life on Earth and possibly for every

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>atom in the universe if things go particularly badly. Physics

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>experiments seem like an unlikely place to find a clutch

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>of existential risks, but it makes sense. Really. There are

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>no other branches of science that explores the places where

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>something is magic. Is accidentally creating a tiny black hole

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>could happen. Physics is the purest branch of science. Back

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 1>in the thirties, physicist Ernest Rutherford put it something like

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>all science is either physics or stamp collecting. Physics, in

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>particularly particle physics, is the place where the leading edge

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of science explores new frontiers of the universe. It's as

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.839
<v Speaker 1>literal as that. But we are still at an early

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>spot in our understanding of particle physics, in the place

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>in human history where you and I live. Now, those

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>forays by the leading edge of science are blind pokes

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in the dark, and we face a dilemma because of this.

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>We can't understand the universe without poking at it, but

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>we can't really say if poking at it is safe

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>until we poke it. The idea that particle physics could

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>end the world sounds like nothing more than paranoid fantasy,

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.759
<v Speaker 1>born from something like fear of science and it's big,

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>hulking machines that blast invisible particles into one another, but

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>concerned that dangerous exotic stuff could be created inside a

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>particle collider come from the physics community itself. Physicists are

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>aware that they know enough about physics to build machines

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that can simulate nature, but don't know enough to say

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>for certain just what will happen inside those machines. We

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know enough to know that those experiments were running

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>are existentially safe, but we're doing them, pushing the envelope

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>anyway and hoping for the best. To understand how things

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>like low energy vacuum bubbles and man made microscopic black

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>holes could accidentally be made here on Earth, you have

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to know a few things about physics first, and I

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>will tell you everything you need to know. To start,

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>I'll need you to hold your hand up in front

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>of your face. I want you to focus on, say,

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the back of your hand. Hold it up in front

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of you. Gaze upon it, kind of lose yourself in it.

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Let your eyes come in and out of focus, so

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that your hand becomes the only thing in the world. Now,

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>find some little spot on your hand and focus on it.

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Let your self be drawn into that spot, drawn into

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>your hand. As you travel into that tiny point on

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>your hand, you will grow smaller and smaller and smaller,

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>so that you can pass easily through your own skin,

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>past your bone, and into your veins, further and further inward,

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>growing smaller as you descend, shrinking through your blood and

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>plunging into one of the giant, gummy disc red blood

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>cells in it, growing smaller and smaller, so that you

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>pass right through the cell walls untouched, smaller and smaller

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>among the galaxy of a hundred and twenty trillion atoms

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that make up a single red blood cell. Plunging into

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the electric cloud that envelops one single fuzzy oxygen atom,

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you are surrounded by the electrical field, like a fog

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that encapsulates the nucleus and binds the electrons to it

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>A million miles away. Here inside the atom, you will

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>learn the truth of the universe. Everything looks different than

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>what you've always learned in school. There is no atomic

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>solar system, with the nucleus as the sun and the

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>electrons like planets in orbit. The electrons are everywhere and

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>yet nowhere at once and at the center. There is

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>no proton, no neutron. There are no particles like tiny

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>pieces of matter, like crumbs of the universe. There are

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>only vibrations of energy. These are the true building blocks

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, the corks and the gluons and all

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of the other elementary particles that make up everything that

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>the material world is built from. You are here in

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the quantum world, and now that you look around, you

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>see that there are vibrations everywhere. All around you, you

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>see fields of different kinds of energy passing through each other,

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>interacting with one another. And within those energy fields are

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>countless moving, pulsating vibrations. Look back upward, now up from

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>your place in the quantum field, pass the atoms to

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the cells and out of your hand. Look up to

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>your own face and to the sky and the sun

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>behind you. All of those things, you, the sky, the

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>sun are made up of spectacularly complex arrangements constructed from

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the energetic vibrations of complimentary force fields, entangled by irresistible

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>forces until time runs its course for them and their

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>arrangement collapses when they break down and travel along their

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>fields until they are attracted into some new arrangement. From

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a frog as it dies, to the algae of a

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>pond that decomposing, to the belly of a fish, to

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the mouth of a mother, to the iris of a

0:05:56.120 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>newborn child. The cycle of life and death is nothing

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>more than the movement of energy along a universe of

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>force fields. You can see now that everything, every site

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you've ever seen, everything you've ever touched, everything you've ever

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>smelled or tasted, every emotion you've ever felt, all of

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>it is made from the interaction of the energy fields

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that make up our universe. Even you, you can see

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.119
<v Speaker 1>now that you are a bundle of discrete vibrations held

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>together by attractive forces in the hyperlocal area of the

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>universe that until a few moments ago you always thought

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of as your body. Pinch your thumb and your index

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>finger together tightly. The sensation of pressure that you feel,

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing more than the electromagnetic force pushing back against itself.

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Physicists have known all of this for more than a century,

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and now you see the true nature of the universe.

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Every thing is energy. All of the vibrations in the universe,

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and so all of the matter in the universe are

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>remnants of the energy left over from the Big Bank.

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Almost every vibration unleashed, and the first trillions of a

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>second after the Big Bank came in equal and opposite pairs,

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and they canceled each other out. They annihilated each other,

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>almost all of them, but not all. This is Don Lincoln.

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>He's a physicist at Fermi Lap near Chicago. Very early

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on in the universe, there was some asymmetry, some little

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>difference between the two of them. And what happened is

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a very slightly larger number of matter vibrations

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>than antimatter vibrations, something to the tune of three billion

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to three billion and one. And then the three billions

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>canceled and the one was left over. And that's the

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>matter of abrations that are left that make up the

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>what we see now in our universe. Why there is

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>something and not nothing is one mystery that particle physicists

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>have run across while plumbing the void. Another is exactly

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>where our universe came from. It's looking increasingly likely that

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there was nothing that came before that our universe erupted

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>randomly from an aberration in an energy field, like a

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>bubble of steam rising in a pot of boiling water,

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, the basis of a theory by physicist

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Roger Penrose from Oxford University called conformal cyclic cosmology, says

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that this is just the way that universes are formed.

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>One bubbles up, lives, dies, and leaves nothing behind but

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the remnants of the black holes that formed in it,

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>which are scooped up in the structure of the next

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>universe that bubbles up to replace the old one. To

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>us living in this universe, such a process would take

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the longest scales of time a man tenable, but to

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>someone with a different perspective of time, perhaps watching universes

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>bubble up, collapse, and bubble up again might be like

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>watching a pot of water simmer. All of this is

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to say that if our universe arose from an aberration

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in an energy field, or from the remnants of the

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>collapsed universe that came before ours, then it could happen again.

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Our universe could be reborn in a different form within

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>itself and from a closer look at the Higgs field,

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it appears that it's constantly trying to do just that.

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the energy fields that make up our universe

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is the Higgs field. It is the field that gives

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>mass to other energetic vibrations. Without the Higgs field, nothing

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.199
<v Speaker 1>would have mass, which means that the Higgs field is

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the energy field that allows you and all other matter

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in the universe to physically exist. Without mass, there cannot

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>be matter to be bound together, and without matter, there

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>cannot be chemistry, which binds that matter together and creates

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>new forms of matter. And so without chemistry there can

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>be no life, which means without the Higgs field, there

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>can be no life, which is one reason the Higgs boson.

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>The particle that carries the energy of the Higgs field

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and interacts with other particles, is called the God particle.

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>The other reason is that God particle was originally short

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>for the God damned particle, which is what physicists called

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it because it eluded them for so long. It seems

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit heavy, but think of mass is just another

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>property that a vibration can have, like how a ball

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>can be read, round and bouncy all at the same time.

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>When you know what properties of ball has, you can

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>predict what it will do in any given situation. Like

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:58.959
<v Speaker 1>if you drop the ball, you can say that it

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>will probably bounce a couple of times and then roll away.

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And since it's red and round, you know what to

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>look for when you go try to find it in

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the grass to get it again. The same goes for

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>sub atomic particles too. Their properties, like their electrical charge

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and their mass, let physicists predict how particles will interact

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>with particles from other energy fields. And since everything is energy,

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>if you can understand how every energetic particle interacts, you

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>can understand everything. And since Einstein showed the world with

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>his E equals MC squared equation that mass and energy

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>or just two sides of the same equal sign, you

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>can just look at mass like it's just another type

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of energy, which it is. When a vibration arises, let's

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>say a cork from the cork field, it interacts with

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the boson from the Higgs field, almost like it's coded

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>by it. And now that cork has mass, so it

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>can be acted on by other fields like the gravity field.

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>These fields, the cork field, the gravity field, the Higgs field,

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>all of the fields, they are everywhere, at every point

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in the universe. The Higgs is the only field that

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>can give mass to other vibrations, and it has another

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>unique property too. It is the only field that still

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>has an energy when it's turned down to zero, which

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is surprising. If you could turn down all of the

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>energy fields in the universe to zero on some master

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>universe style, there would be no electrons at all in

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the electron field, no corks, no glue ons, all of

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the energetic vibrations would cease, and yet energy would still

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>persist in the Higgs field. It's like if you turn

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>down the volume on this show to zero, yet you

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>could still make out faint pops and crackles in your headphones.

0:12:57.679 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>It would lead you to believe that there was some

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>setting below zero that you could turn the volume down to. Well.

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Physicists have arrived at the same conclusion about the Higgs field,

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>but this opens up an unsettling possibility. If the Higgs

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>field isn't currently at its lowest energy state, and the

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Higgs field is what gives matter mass, then if the

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Higgs field ever slipped into that lowest energy statement, the

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>mass of everything in our universe would suddenly change. In

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>other words, we would all disintegrate. This is theoretical physicist

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Ben Schlayer from the University of Auckland in New Zealand.

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Particle physics and the corresponding chemistry would be suddenly very different,

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and in particular, matter would no longer be at the

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>right size. The different sizes of the atoms that make

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>up matter are based on the distance between the electrons

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and the outer periphery and the nucleus at the center.

0:13:55.480 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>If electron suddenly got heavier, adams would shrink into smaller size,

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>which means everything in our universe would suddenly shrink. All

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of the matter around us would suddenly find itself unstable

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to a great shrinking, and as it shrank, it would

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>give off a huge amount of electromagnetic energy. So they'd

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.719
<v Speaker 1>be an explosion of X rays and that would be

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a pretty violent event. Two theoretical physicists, Sidney Coleman Frank

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>DeLucia determined back in that this new lower energy state

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of the universe would not support chemistry, which means that

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>life would not have the chance to re evolve in

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>this new version of our universe. They called this vacuum

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>decay and said that it was the ultimate ecological catastrophe.

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>But things can actually get worse from there because the

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>shrunken universe is denser than it was before. That means

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>gravity acts on all of the mass throughout the universe

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>more forcefully, too, so that vacuum bubbles outward. Expansion will

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>eventually be and then reversed as it's pulled backward, returning

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to where it started, like an implosion, forcing all matter

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>into an infinitely dense, infinitely tiny ball, possibly the very

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>same place where our universe started from. This is called

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the Big crunch. It's the antithesis of the Big Bang.

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Spacetime ends and the universe ends. In a big crunch,

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it would be like our universe never happened. That the

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Higgs field has balanced between its current state and the

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>lower energy version of itself means that it poses a

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>natural existential risk to us. If it moved into that

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>lower energy state, that would be it for not just

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>human existence, but for everything in the universe. So the

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Higgs field actually poses a universal existential risk for now

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and for the foreseeable future. At least, the Higgs field

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is in a state called meta stable. The good analogy

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is a puddle in a valley at the bottom of

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the hill. On the other side of the hill, say

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>there's an even lower valley, and the Higgs puddle would

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>be happy to settle into that lower one. But it

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>would take a tremendous amount of energy for the puddle

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to move itself up the hill to the other side,

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>energy that the puddle doesn't have, so the Higgs field

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>won't be moving up the hill. But there's another way

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that it could slide into that lower energy state. Unnervingly,

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the Higgs is constantly trying to tunnel through that metaphorical

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>hill to get to the lower valley on the other side,

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and this attempt to tunnel through comes in the form

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of indescribably small pockets of this other lower energy version

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Higgs field that at every moment bubble up

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>from it like a simmering pot. But these lower energy

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Higgs bubbles are too weak to overcome the external pressure

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>or universe exerts on them, so they wink out of

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>existence just as fast as they arise. The trouble is

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that if one of those lower energy bubbles ever does

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>manage to stick around long enough to stabilize and grow,

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it would swallow our universe and bring about that vacuum

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>decay that Coleman and DeLucia wrote about and disintegrate our

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>version of the universe. It would be a big crunching deal,

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you could say, But probability is on our side. Under

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>normal circumstances, the chances of one of those lower energy

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>version bubbles growing are so low it's not expected to

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>happen over the estimated lifetime of our universe, so we

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>appear to be in the clear again. Though that's under

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>normal circumstances. We humans have a tendency to alter normal circumstances,

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>and there's a way that the Higgs field campose an

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>anthropogenic existential threat. A vacuum bubble could grow with the

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>help of a microscopic black hole, which we might actually create.

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Inside one of our particle colliders. Here on Earth, m

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred meters beneath the countryside where Switzerland juts

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>up from the southeast into France. Above sits the Large

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Hadron Collider, the largest highest energy particle collider in the world.

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Hadron is a name for sub atomic particles like protons

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and neutrons that are made up of quarks and gluons.

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Those energetic vibrations that make up matter. If you could

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>go inside the LHC reduce yourself back again to the

0:18:55.920 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>scale of those energetic vibrations, you would see something spectacular.

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>The protons in the Large Hadron Collider are created by

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>passing a laser through a cloud of hydrogen gas, which

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>breaks the atoms apart. Those stripped protons are directed into

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the LHC's vacuum tubes by an electrical current, and they're

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>separated into two beams that are kept apart and sent

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 1>in opposite directions around the elliptical collider. Over the course

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of days, the beams are accelerated until they reach unimaginably

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>fast speeds point nine nine nine one percent the speed

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>of light, where a single proton can make the trip

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>around the seventeen mile circumference of the collider more than

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>eleven thousand times in a single second. At these speeds,

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the protons carry with them as much as five trillion

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>electron volts of energy, an extraordinary amount for something so small.

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>It's like a mosquito with the kinetic energy of a planet.

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>When the beams are at their highest speeds, they're directed

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>into each other so that they cross inside of one

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of the collider's enormous sensitive detectors. Every second a billion

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>collisions take place, and the energy from those impacts turns

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>into mass, which creates particles for just a fleeting moment

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>that we're around right after the Big Bang. So the

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>LHC is a way to rewind nature, to study its origins.

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>To me, it's like I think of using particle colliders

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to understand the universe as an exploration. We're like looking

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>for new stuff and you never know what you find.

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is particle physicist Daniel Whiteson from the

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>University of California, Irvine, And one strategy we have to

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>understand these things is just to look for patterns among

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the particles. And the way to look for patterns is

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to see more of them. That's the goal of using

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the LHC to explore the universe. We want to find

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>more particles, get more clues, see sort of a larger

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>window into the reality that we're seeing currently, and hopefully

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>get some insight. The Large Hadron Collider was first brought

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>online in two thousand nine after decades of planning and construction,

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and it woke up in a world where the field

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 1>of particle physics had hit a wall. The LHC was

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>designed to break through that wall. It was designed, you

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>could say, to break physics. The work of particle physics

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>can be divided between two groups. On the one hand,

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you have theoretical physicists. They come up with all the

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>ideas about how the universe might work, and on the

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>other hand, you have experimental physicists who test those ideas

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>in machines like the Large Hadron Collider. The work of

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>these two groups forms in aura borros, the mythical snake

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that eats its own tail. The experimental physicists find support

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>for the theoretical physicist theories, or they say that they're wrong.

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>The experimental physicists also come up with new data that

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:09.479
<v Speaker 1>the theoreticians can use to create entirely new theories that

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the experimental physicists can then test. As a deeper understanding

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of particle physics develops, the snake grows fatter. In the nineties,

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 1>sixties and seventies, the theoretical physicists dropped a huge amount

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of new work on the desk of the experimental physicists.

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>A group of theoreticians wrote down everything science knew about

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the quantum world and What they came up with is

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a set of formulae known as the Standard Model of

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>particle physics. Over the decades, the Standard Model has been

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>proven correct again and again. The Standard Model does a

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>really good job at describing the particles that exist in

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the quantum world and the forces that govern them. The

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>strong nuclear force binds protons and neutrons into the nucleus

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of an atom. The weak nuclear force causes atoms to

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>decay over time. The electromagnetic force binds atoms together into

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>higher structures like you and meat, and the sun, and

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>mosquitoes and red blood cells. Every particle that the Standard

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Model predicted should exist by now has been discovered. It is,

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>as scientists put it, an extremely reliable model to describe

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the quantum world. The last of the bunch was the

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Higgs boson, which the LHC found in two thousand twelve,

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and with that discovery the experimental physicists exhausted the theoreticians

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>standard model. But as good as the Standard Model is,

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>as reliable as it is, it's been incomplete from the

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>very beginning. It has no place for gravity, and vice versa.

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>With Einstein's famous theory of relativity. It's proven extremely reliable

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>at describing how gravity governs the interaction of large scale

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>things like people and planets. But the other three fundamental forces,

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetism and the weak and strong nuclear forces don't fit

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>into the equation partum field theory. It really doesn't deal

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>with the universe as a whole, and it's well known

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that general relativity does not merge in mill well with

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>a quantum realm. So what physics has on its hands

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>are the standard model and the theory of relativity too

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>totally accurate but totally incomplete pictures of the universe that

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>won't fit together to form a cohesive whole. It's almost

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>like they repel one another. Particle. Physicists built the large

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>hay Drown Collider to figure out why that is. They

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>hope that the incredibly high energy collisions will produce new

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>particles that don't fit into the standard model to show

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>where physics should start looking next. One of the biggest

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>mysteries of all that physicists are hoping to solve is

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>why gravity is so weak compared to the other three

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>fundamental forces. It's strange. Gravity is the force that keeps

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>planets in orbit around massive stars and can catch light

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 1>by the ankles and prevent it from escaping a black hole.

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Yet the other three forces are stronger, and you can

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>see this for yourself if you just lay a paper

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>clip on a countertop and hold a regular old refrigerator

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>magnet over it. As you bring the magnet closer, the

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>paper clip will eventually rise to meet and stick to it.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>What you've just seen is the electromagnetic force and that

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>tiny magnet overcoming the gravitational force exerted by the entire

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>mass of planet Earth. Like I said, strange. To make

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>sense of this, and to unify relativity in the standard

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>model into a theory of everything, some physicists have taken

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to adding new dimensions to our universe. Some models see

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>our four dimensional world of length, with height and time

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>as just a tiny membrane floating within an infinitely larger

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>fifth dimension that we can't sense, called the bulk. Others

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>include as many as eleven total dimensions, most of which

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>are curled up into extremely tiny coils at the corners

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of every point in the fabric of spacetime. These models

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 1>explain why gravity is so weak by allowing it to

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>spread across all of the dimensions. The other three forces,

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>like us are trapped within our four D world, but

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>gravity is not. And if we could sense all five

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>or eleven, or however many dimensions there are, we would

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>see that gravity has the same strength as the other

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>three forces. It just seems weak to us because it's

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>diluted by comparison inside our four D world. So one

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>way that physicists are hoping that the LHC breaks physics

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 1>is by revealing the presence of other dimensions. And a

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>really good way to demonstrate that there are other dimensions

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>would be to create a microscopic black hole. Those aren't

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>supposed to exist in our four D world until the

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>idea came along that's such a thing as microscopic black

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>holes could exist. We used to think that we understood

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>black holes pretty well. It was sort of a golden

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>age of black hole understanding. We learned over time that

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 1>black holes were gaping, all consuming, horrific abominations in space time,

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>with masses so huge that they boggle the mind. Sure,

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>but we could feel good about them. We understood them,

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and we were here, and they were a way out there.

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>They had no way to touch our world, let alone

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>end it. From studying them, we found that black holes

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>were created when some incredibly massive star far larger than

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:02.199
<v Speaker 1>our Sun, exhaust at its fuel and collapsed under an

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>unimaginable force of gravity into an infinitely dense, smaller version

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:10.679
<v Speaker 1>of itself that actually pushed a bottomless pit in the

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>fabric of time and space. Encircling the rim of this

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>black hole is the event horizon, the threshold where the

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>gravitational poll is so strong that anything crossing it is

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>doomed to be forever trapped inside the black hole, torn

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:31.360
<v Speaker 1>apart by the unimaginable gravity with it. Over time, we

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>began to notice black holes everywhere we could detect them,

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>ripping apart nearby stars, pulling them into a ring of

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:42.479
<v Speaker 1>hot gas, and circling the event horizon like water around

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a drain. We began to find them at the center

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of galaxies, including our own Milky Way, which nourishes a monstrous,

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>supermassive black hole the size of four million of our sons.

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>We saw that black holes could cannibalize other black holes,

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>which forms even larger black holes, and perhaps the fate

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of our universe was to one day be swallowed into

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>one giant black hole made up of every black hole

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that's ever existed in every universe that's ever existed, But

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>like any good golden age, this one was not meant

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to last. It ran from the time black holes were

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>predicted in Einstein's theory of relativity in nineteen fifteen until

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>about the mid seventies, when a not yet world famous

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>physicist named Stephen Hawking proposed some ideas about black holes

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that suggested that maybe we didn't understand them so well

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>after all. For starters, Hawking and his colleagues proposed that

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>black holes didn't have to be made of something as

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>big as a star. Black holes could actually be incredibly tiny.

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>This was news. It's true that anything with mass can

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>be turned into a black hole if it's made dense enough.

0:29:57.520 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>If the Earth were condensed to do a black hole,

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.719
<v Speaker 1>it would have an event horizon about as big around

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>as your index fingernail. But as far as physicists understand it,

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the Earth could never actually become a black hole because

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it simply doesn't have enough mass for gravity to collapse

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it into that infinite density. It takes a truly sincerely

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>massive object like an enormous star to undergo that sort

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of transformation. What Stephen Hawking and his colleagues realized back

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies is that there are actually times in

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the universe's distant past, say within trillions of a second

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>after the Big Bang, when everything was much much denser,

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and so during this time, something with a mass like

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the Earth's could have collapsed into a black hole back then,

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and much much smaller things could have two, maybe even particles.

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Hawking called these hypothetical particle sized black holes that may

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>have formed in the very early universe primeval black holes.

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Today people call them microscopic black holes. In addition to

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>his theory that such a thing as very tiny black

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>holes could possibly exist, there was another thing that Hawking

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>realized that brought our golden age of understanding black holes

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to an abrupt end. It was actually possible for them

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to spit matter out. He said this was news too.

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Our understanding of black holes at the time was that

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>they did nothing but consume, ceaselessly, growing eternally. The idea

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that they could spit stuff back out was pretty revolutionary.

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>The idea that black holes could actually radiate energy came

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to be called appropriately Hawking radiation, and Hawking showed that

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a black hole could emit photons and gravitons, the particles

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that carry electromagnetic energy and gravitational energy, respectively. Normally, these

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>particles don't have matt mass, they don't interact with the

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Higgs field. But what Hawking figured out is that the

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>less massive a black hole is, the hotter the temperature

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of the radiation that it spits out, which means a

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>very very tiny, microscopic black hole with a very very

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>small mass would actually have extremely hot radiation because its

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>mass is so small that radiation could be hot enough.

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Hawking realized that the photons and gravitons the black hole

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>spit out could actually have mass themselves. And here's why

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>temperature is a measure of heat. Heat is a form

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of energy, so high temperature means high energy. And since

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>mass and energy are two sides of the same coin,

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>E equals mc squared. Remember, mass and energy are theoretically interchangeable,

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>which means that heat can be translated into mass. Another

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>way you could put it is that if the energy

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of a normally massless particle like a photon or a

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>graviton has a high enough energy, it will interact with

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the Higgs field and get coated with mass, and a

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>microscopic black hole could produce photons and gravitons with energies

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that high. If Hawking was correct, then that means that

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>over time a tiny black hole could actually lose mass

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>itself as it spit out photons and gravitons with their

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>own mass, and at some point, when the microscopic black

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>hole lost enough mass, it would wink right out of existence.

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Black Holes aren't supposed to do this. It seems we

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't understand black holes nearly as well as we thought

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we did. Are comfortable Golden Age came to an end.

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>It's about here where the story begins of how cern,

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>which actively messes with the mass and energy of particles,

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>took up a long time quest to prove that it's

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:08.800
<v Speaker 1>large hadron collider won't do humanity. Actually, wait, it begins

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a little before the LHC came along. The story really starts.

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>In that year was, as far as anybody knows, the

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>first time anyone seriously raised the idea that a particle

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>collider might be able to end the world. Scientific American

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Magazine published a letter from a reader who wasn't so

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>sure that the relativistic heavy ion Collider at the Brookhaven

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>National Lab in New York nicknamed the Rick, was entirely safe.

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 1>The reader was concerned that the rick might produce a

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>microscopic black hole, the kind of thing that Hawking proposed,

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>when particles collided inside of it. Scientific American published the

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>reader's letter along with a response by a physicist named

0:34:56.160 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Frank will Check, and will Check pointed out classical six

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't allow for microscopic black holes to exist at all.

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>That's point one. Point two was that even if the

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>theories that include additional dimensions, theories that are beyond classical

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>physics and actually do allow for microscopic black holes to exist,

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 1>if those additional dimensional theories turn out to be true,

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the energies of the particle collisions in the rick were

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:26.959
<v Speaker 1>still far too low to actually create a microscopic black hole.

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:31.240
<v Speaker 1>So no worries, Well, there was one worry. At least.

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Will Check did mention that it was much more likely

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the Rick could produce an exotic type of matter called

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>a strangelet. Strangelets are heavy particles made of smaller vibrations

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>called strange quarks. Despite their heavier size, they're actually lower

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>energy than typical strange quarks, which means that the universe

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>would prefer them over strange corps. It's just that strangelets

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>tended as all very quickly because of their higher mass.

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.839
<v Speaker 1>The concern over strangelets is that if one of them

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't dissolve into elementary particles, it could conceivably set off

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>a chain reaction, lowering the energy but increasing the mass

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of the matter that makes up Earth, converting our planet

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and everything on it, including us, into a massive, inert

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>dead bulk. Will checks offhand comment at the end of

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>his reply set off a separate, years long tangent of

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>uneasiness and investigation into strangelets and whether they have the

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 1>goods to pose in existential risk themselves. But at least

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the microscopic black hole terror was put to bed, or

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>so it seemed. The terribly disconcerting idea of a man

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 1>made black hole has a habit of winking into existence

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>again and again. A couple of years after the Scientific

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>American readers black hole question was asked and answered, the

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:57.720
<v Speaker 1>looming specter of a potentially world ending black hole created

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in a particle collider rose again, like a new universe

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:05.360
<v Speaker 1>rising to replace an old one. This time the collider

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in question was the Large Hadron Collider, which was beginning

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to be assembled in Europe. This time around, the fears

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>weren't quite so unfounded, because the energies of the collisions

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>in the Large Hadron Collider are an order of magnitude

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>higher than the ricks, high enough, in fact, that if

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>any of those multidimensional theories are correct, the LHC should

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>be fully capable of producing microscopic black holes inside of it.

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So capable, in fact, that a two thousand one paper

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>by physicists Stephen Gettings called the LHC a black hole

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 1>factory and calculated that it could produce a microscopic black

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:49.359
<v Speaker 1>hole every second it's proton beams were crossed. Now it's

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>here where CERN began its long standing quest to prove

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the Large Hadron Collider is safe. On the one hand,

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the LHC might be able to break

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>open the current understanding of the universe and point theoretical

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>physicists in a clear new direction is intensely exciting for

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the particle physics community. But on the other hand, CERN

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>was much less excited about the idea of everybody else

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing their machine as a black hole factory that could

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>end the world. And it's pretty easy to understand why

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the funding for certain at any given point is precarious

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:27.240
<v Speaker 1>enough under the best of circumstances, they count on public

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>funds from multiple nations and work under the threat of

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>those funds drying up at any time, and the stakes

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:38.720
<v Speaker 1>for keeping the Large Hadron Collider funded are very high.

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>This is law professor Eric Johnson, who has written extensively

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 1>on the risks that come along with high energy physics experiments.

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>It's really hard to downplay the amount of money and

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the amount of professional lives that are involved with the

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Large Hadron Collider. Uh. CERN is a multibillion dollar institution.

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>UH there's thousands of people who work there and in

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the field of particle physics. In the field of particle physics,

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:09.919
<v Speaker 1>there really aren't It's not like everyone's off doing their

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 1>own experiments. Particle physics tends to be dominated by the

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>big collider of the day and the data that it's producing.

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:22.240
<v Speaker 1>And if that collider doesn't come online, then there's nothing

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to study for a whole lot of people. Protecting certains

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 1>enterprise is made all the more difficult by the fact

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that what it is doing is pure science. There's no

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>obvious research and development that can be turned into useful

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 1>products that the nations involved can expect to make back

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:41.879
<v Speaker 1>some of their investment with instead. The LHC is as

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:45.800
<v Speaker 1>unadulterated as scientific experiment as you will find on Earth.

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>It was designed and built solely so that we can

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 1>better understand the universe in our place within it. A genuine,

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 1>noble public good to benefit all humankind. It can be

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>tough to make money off of else. That is not

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to say that the Large Hadron Collider hasn't already produced

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>dividends well beyond physics. You could argue and plenty do.

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>That's certain paid for itself many times over. Back in

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteen eighties, when one of its computer scientists,

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a British man named Tim berners Lee, created a method

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:22.320
<v Speaker 1>for linking text files so that they could be shared

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:28.360
<v Speaker 1>universally over computer networks. Burners Lee called it the Worldwide Web,

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 1>so that it could protect its funding, calm fears among

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 1>the non scientific public, discover whether the LHC actually is

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>an existential threat or all of those things. CERN took

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>up its quest to demonstrate that the Large Hadron Collider

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 1>will not doom humanity, who would be a long and

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 1>circuitous route so at that point cern couldn't rely on

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the not having enough power to produce black Hall's argument

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 1>for safety, and they they acknowledge the need for a

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 1>new examination of hazards, and uh they went back and

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:12.480
<v Speaker 1>did some new work on that, and then they said

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand three that Hawking radiation will ensure that

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 1>any black hole that's produced will evaporate almost as soon

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>as it's produced, so that that will be safe. Because

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>any microscopic black holes the colliding particles inside the LHC

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:34.439
<v Speaker 1>might manufacture would have extremely small masses. Hawking radiation says

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that they would emit particles and lose their mass at

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a blinding speed, winking out of existence instantaneously. Just how

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>fast that would happen, called the rate of decay, would

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 1>be a fraction of a fraction of a second, something

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 1>like ten to the negative power of a second, a

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 1>decimal point, followed by zeros, and then finally all the

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:04.320
<v Speaker 1>way down in the position a single one that fraction

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of a second. In this unimaginably short time, the microscopic

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 1>black hole would have no chance to absorb any matter

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and grow larger. On this infantism le small scale matter

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 1>is just too few and far between, so the microscopic

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 1>black hole would be gone before we knew it was

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>ever there, but it would leave telltale traces behind that

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the LHC's detectors could find and show the world that

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>there are dimensions beyond our own. But this argument that

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>suggests the Large Hadron Collider is safe comes with some baggage.

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Between the time that the research began on the safety

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>paper and when CERN released it, the physics community's faith

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in the existence of Hawking radiation was shaken. In the

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 1>early two thousands, the trickle of papers began to question it.

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:58.879
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't disproven, just question enough to erode it as

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing that CERN could fet the survival

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>of the planet on. So CERN looked for another way

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to show the Large Hadron Collider was safe, and this

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 1>time they settled on cosmic rays. Cosmic rays aren't exactly

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 1>what they sound like. They're actually tiny energetic particles that

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 1>travel at incredibly fast speeds through space and smash into

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 1>other particles, creating a spectacular cascade of energy converted temporarily

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>into mass. And if this sounds a lot like the

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>collisions inside the Large Hadron Collider, you're absolutely right. A

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>particle collider is, if anything, a laboratory for stimulating cosmic

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>ray collisions, and because they're so similar, means that since

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:48.400
<v Speaker 1>cosmic rays bombard everything in the universe all the time

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and have for billions of years, then the fact that

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the universe still exists proves that even if particle collisions

0:43:56.280 --> 0:44:00.799
<v Speaker 1>can create microscopic black holes, that microscopic black holes must

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:06.799
<v Speaker 1>be harmless, because again, the universe continues to exist. That

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 1>is the cosmic ray argument, and it's the second thing

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that's certain pinned the safety of the Large Hadron Collider too.

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 1>But there's a problem with the cosmic ray argument as well.

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Cosmic rays aren't exactly like particle collisions inside the Large

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Hadron Collider, and exactness is kind of important when you're

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to show the world that your machine won't bring

0:44:28.680 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 1>about the end of the universe. Cosmic rays travel at

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 1>high speeds, yes, but the particles that the cosmic rays

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:40.359
<v Speaker 1>smash into, say particles in the Earth's atmosphere, are just

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of hanging out there. They're relatively stationary, which means

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that the collisions are a lot like rear end collision

0:44:48.480 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and most importantly, in a rear end collision, the momentum

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of the faster vehicle or particle carries it and the

0:44:56.160 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>other vehicle or particle careening off in some direction away

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>from the site of the crash. This is important because

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it means that if cosmic rays do produce microscopic black holes,

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the momentum of the crash would carry the microscopic black

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 1>holes away from the collision to most likely they'd pass

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>harmlessly through Earth and right out into outer space. The

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:23.720
<v Speaker 1>problem is in a particle collider, the collisions are different.

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:27.239
<v Speaker 1>They're less like rear end collisions and more like head

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:30.879
<v Speaker 1>on collisions, and then a head on collision, the two

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:35.399
<v Speaker 1>particles cancel one another's momentum out when they collide, they

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>don't go anywhere. The upshot of all of this is

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that a microscopic black hole produced by the collision wouldn't

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 1>go careening off away from the impact and into outer space.

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:50.920
<v Speaker 1>It would be stationary. It would stay put, which means

0:45:50.920 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that it would stay put here on Earth. That is

0:45:54.560 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a problem because if we've already thrown out the idea

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of hawking radiation, and along with it, the concept that

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a microscopic black hole would simply wink right out of

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:07.319
<v Speaker 1>existence if it was created, then that means that if

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 1>we do create a microscopic black hole in a particle collider,

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it would hang around here on Earth, which means that

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:17.839
<v Speaker 1>it could possibly grow, which means that it actually might

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:22.800
<v Speaker 1>pose an existential threat to us. As far as safety

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 1>arguments go, this is decidedly not reassuring, especially considering the

0:46:27.520 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>idea of the two thousand one paper by Stephen Gettings

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that said that the LHC is a black hole factory.

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>If that paper was correct, then a new, stable, earthbound

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 1>microscopic black hole is created inside the collider every second

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it's proton beams are crossed. So certain looked again for

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a new way to show that LHC was existentially safe.

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>What they needed was something out there in the cosmos

0:46:55.760 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>that was dense enough to have a gravitational pull that

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 1>could hang to do a microscopic black hole. Something that

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:06.759
<v Speaker 1>could do that would show again simply by existing, that

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:10.920
<v Speaker 1>microscopic black holes really are harmless. It would show that

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:14.439
<v Speaker 1>even if the Large Hadron Collider produced a microscopic black

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>hole and the Earth hung onto it, there's still no

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:21.960
<v Speaker 1>cause for concern. It was basically cosmic ray argument two

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 1>point out, and CERN finally found what they were looking

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:32.960
<v Speaker 1>for in white dwarf stars. A white dwarf is a

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 1>star that's run out of fuel and has partially collapsed,

0:47:36.840 --> 0:47:40.320
<v Speaker 1>so it becomes far denser and exerts a much stronger

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:44.799
<v Speaker 1>gravity on things around it, definitely more than Earth's gravity.

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So any microscopic black holes that a rear end cosmic

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:51.480
<v Speaker 1>ray collision could produce would still be stuck in the

0:47:51.520 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 1>star that wouldn't careen off into outer space. And since

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:59.720
<v Speaker 1>white dwarfs are bombarded with those cosmic rays, and since

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 1>they enough gravity that they could trap a microscopic black hole,

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:07.320
<v Speaker 1>then the fact that they continue to exist strongly suggests

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that microscopic black holes are not a danger. That is

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to say, again, if microscopic black holes even exist. Based

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:19.759
<v Speaker 1>on astronomical measurements of white dwarfs, CERN found eight of

0:48:19.800 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 1>them that, in their opinion, were dense enough and old

0:48:23.239 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 1>enough to sufficiently demonstrate the safety of the large Hadron

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:30.880
<v Speaker 1>collider certain issue of paper, and it was followed by

0:48:30.880 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>another paper that concluded the first paper was sound, and

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:38.319
<v Speaker 1>they circulated both papers to the physics community, which in

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:41.880
<v Speaker 1>turn provided CERN with quotes about just how sound the

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>conclusions of the papers are and just how utterly safe

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:48.720
<v Speaker 1>they show the LHC to be. Certain included these quotes

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 1>on their website, and that's where things stand today. Classical physics,

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:57.719
<v Speaker 1>which represents our current understanding of physics, doesn't allow for

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>microscopic black holes to form in the place. But even

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 1>if those microscopic black holes could form, so long as

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:08.840
<v Speaker 1>those eight white dwarfs exist in the sky, Certain is

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:11.319
<v Speaker 1>willing to bet the whole farm on the safety of

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the LHC. But with physics, our understanding has a way

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of changing. The whole idea of particle physics is to

0:49:21.120 --> 0:49:25.319
<v Speaker 1>discover new things. Particle physics works at the leading edge

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of human knowledge, at the leading edge of theory. That's

0:49:27.680 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole point of it is to be out there

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:33.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out something new. So it does evolve

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:37.360
<v Speaker 1>all the time. And I think it would be naive

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 1>to say that right now this year, we've arrived at

0:49:42.320 --> 0:49:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a point where the theory is not going to change,

0:49:44.920 --> 0:49:47.440
<v Speaker 1>or the assumptions are not going to change, so that

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:51.920
<v Speaker 1>we can feel satisfied that whatever conclusion particle physicists have

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:56.480
<v Speaker 1>today about the safety of a particle accelerator that that's

0:49:56.520 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to change m M. By now, you might

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:15.759
<v Speaker 1>be asking yourself exactly how might a black hole be

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:19.239
<v Speaker 1>created inside the large Hadron collider? Well, that is an

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>excellent question. When you take a little tiny particle like

0:50:23.200 --> 0:50:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a proton, and accelerated to almost the speed of light,

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:30.600
<v Speaker 1>something very peculiar happens to it. The little amount of

0:50:30.640 --> 0:50:33.919
<v Speaker 1>mass that it has starts to grow, and as its

0:50:33.960 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 1>mass grows, the stronger the gravity acting on it grows too.

0:50:38.800 --> 0:50:42.280
<v Speaker 1>A very fast particle accelerated in the Large Hadron Collider

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 1>begins to grow enough mass that it warps the fabric

0:50:46.239 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of spacetime around it. This warping has the effect of

0:50:50.520 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 1>concentrating gravity, and in the minute fraction of a moment

0:50:54.640 --> 0:50:59.600
<v Speaker 1>before two extremely fast moving particles collide, they're bent gravity's

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:04.560
<v Speaker 1>over lap and concentrate gravity even further. The sum of

0:51:04.600 --> 0:51:08.279
<v Speaker 1>all these parts amounts to an unusual amount of mass

0:51:08.320 --> 0:51:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and extremely high gravity concentrated within a very very tiny area.

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:18.080
<v Speaker 1>All of this together could produce a microscopic black hole.

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Because it would lack the kind of escape velocity that

0:51:25.320 --> 0:51:28.399
<v Speaker 1>a cosmic ray might give it. The microscopic black hole

0:51:28.400 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>would be held fast by the gravity exerted by the

0:51:31.040 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Earth's mass. About every half hour, the microscopic black hole

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 1>would oscillate between the LHC and a point on the

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:41.840
<v Speaker 1>opposite side of the world, somewhere off the coast of

0:51:41.880 --> 0:51:46.040
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand, and back inside the Earth. The black hole

0:51:46.040 --> 0:51:50.160
<v Speaker 1>would grow over time, but exactly how long that process

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:53.840
<v Speaker 1>would take depends, as does everything, it seems like, on

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the correctness of one of the unifying theories that combine

0:51:57.520 --> 0:52:02.320
<v Speaker 1>relativity with the standard model. One of the things that's

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:06.560
<v Speaker 1>so unsettling about the idea of Hawking radiation, the theory

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that a microscopic black hole will wink right out of

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:12.240
<v Speaker 1>existence just as fast as it's created, is that whether

0:52:12.280 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Hawking was right or wrong, microscopic black holes still

0:52:16.560 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 1>pose an existential risk. If Hawking was wrong and there

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is no such thing as Hawking radiation, then a microscopic

0:52:24.560 --> 0:52:27.920
<v Speaker 1>black hole could stick around and slowly eat the world.

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:31.040
<v Speaker 1>What would a black hole eating the Earth from the

0:52:31.080 --> 0:52:34.240
<v Speaker 1>inside out look like, Well, it's hard not to imagine

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a microscopic black hole growing in the Earth's core until

0:52:37.560 --> 0:52:40.279
<v Speaker 1>it emerged on the planet's surface, kind of popping out

0:52:40.680 --> 0:52:45.120
<v Speaker 1>as a gaping bottomless pit that some hapless person wandering

0:52:45.120 --> 0:52:48.879
<v Speaker 1>through the woods might accidentally stumble into. But this isn't

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:51.920
<v Speaker 1>what it would look like at all. Remember, if the

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Earth itself could be compressed into a black hole, it

0:52:54.880 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 1>would have an event horizon just about a centimeter in diameter,

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:01.799
<v Speaker 1>So any microscopic black hole that consumed all of the

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Earth's mass would have an event horizon about the same size.

0:53:06.400 --> 0:53:09.440
<v Speaker 1>A microscopic black hole then would never pop up on

0:53:09.520 --> 0:53:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Earth's surface. It would still be unnoticeably tiny as it

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:18.000
<v Speaker 1>tore the planet apart. Plus, let's not forget we couldn't

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 1>see it anyway, being a black hole, like couldn't escape it,

0:53:21.560 --> 0:53:24.719
<v Speaker 1>so it couldn't reflect off the black hole's surface, which

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 1>would make the microscopic black hole both tiny and invisible.

0:53:29.880 --> 0:53:32.360
<v Speaker 1>But we would be able to clearly see the effects

0:53:32.360 --> 0:53:36.239
<v Speaker 1>it had as it tore our planet apart. One of

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the defining traits of a black hole is, of course,

0:53:38.800 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the intense gravitational pull that it exerts on matter around it.

0:53:43.239 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Black Holes are capable of pulling matter literally apart, and

0:53:47.120 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 1>as it does, it releases enormous amounts of energy. That

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:55.240
<v Speaker 1>violence produces extremely high temperatures and all of that hot

0:53:55.440 --> 0:53:59.400
<v Speaker 1>torn apart matter becomes trapped in an orbit around the

0:53:59.400 --> 0:54:03.680
<v Speaker 1>black hole. Eventually that matter falls past the event horizon,

0:54:04.080 --> 0:54:09.120
<v Speaker 1>unable to escape. Particles that the microscopic black hole encounters

0:54:09.120 --> 0:54:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in the quantum world would be among its first victims.

0:54:12.960 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 1>But as it grows over time, the black hole would

0:54:15.719 --> 0:54:19.759
<v Speaker 1>eventually get big enough to devour whole atoms. And as

0:54:19.800 --> 0:54:24.319
<v Speaker 1>the black hole grows, so too will its strength. The

0:54:24.400 --> 0:54:27.200
<v Speaker 1>more it increases in mass, the more of the Earth

0:54:27.239 --> 0:54:30.799
<v Speaker 1>it will draw into it, pulling Earth apart and into

0:54:30.840 --> 0:54:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that gaseous stew of hot matter that circles around it.

0:54:34.960 --> 0:54:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Over time, the magma, the bedrock, the soil, the lakes,

0:54:39.080 --> 0:54:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the very planet itself would be pulled apart. There would

0:54:42.760 --> 0:54:45.080
<v Speaker 1>be no place left for life to live on Earth,

0:54:45.840 --> 0:54:48.919
<v Speaker 1>which would be a moot point anyway, since every bit

0:54:49.040 --> 0:54:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of life on Earth would be pulled apart as irresistibly

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:56.600
<v Speaker 1>as the planet itself, drawn into that roiling circle of

0:54:56.640 --> 0:55:00.480
<v Speaker 1>plasma around the black hole, which would slowly feed on

0:55:00.520 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 1>our planet for a very long time. Under classical physics,

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the time it would take for a tiny black hole

0:55:18.640 --> 0:55:21.960
<v Speaker 1>produced in the LHC to gain enough mass to become

0:55:21.960 --> 0:55:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a threat to life on Earth is longer than the

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:28.120
<v Speaker 1>current age of the universe, more than thirteen billion years,

0:55:29.160 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but that time shortens dramatically when new dimensions are added.

0:55:34.120 --> 0:55:38.120
<v Speaker 1>The additional dimensions allow for stronger gravity on those quantum scales,

0:55:38.520 --> 0:55:41.560
<v Speaker 1>which would allow a microscopic black hole to attract and

0:55:41.640 --> 0:55:46.279
<v Speaker 1>consumed particles early in its life much more quickly. Such

0:55:46.280 --> 0:55:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a black hole could destroy the Earth in as little

0:55:49.000 --> 0:55:52.360
<v Speaker 1>as three hundred thousand years, which is a bit alarming

0:55:52.840 --> 0:55:56.719
<v Speaker 1>considering the possibility the LHC has been creating a microscopic

0:55:56.760 --> 0:56:00.160
<v Speaker 1>black hole every second it's been colliding protons to as

0:56:00.160 --> 0:56:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it came online back in two thousand nine. Humanity might

0:56:04.040 --> 0:56:06.319
<v Speaker 1>still very much place a high value on our home

0:56:06.360 --> 0:56:09.360
<v Speaker 1>planet a few hundred thousand years from now, and prefer

0:56:09.480 --> 0:56:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that it continued to exist. It's probably a good bet

0:56:13.560 --> 0:56:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that our descendants would not want the planet ruined by

0:56:16.640 --> 0:56:21.360
<v Speaker 1>haphazard physics experiments conducted by their ancestors. I imagine the

0:56:21.360 --> 0:56:23.840
<v Speaker 1>rest of life on Earth would have similar feelings on

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the matter too. But what if Hawking was right and

0:56:30.800 --> 0:56:34.839
<v Speaker 1>microscopic black holes do evaporate, It could still pose an

0:56:34.840 --> 0:56:39.640
<v Speaker 1>existential threat because in evaporating microscopic black hole could give

0:56:39.680 --> 0:56:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a low energy vacuum bubble from the Higgs field just

0:56:42.560 --> 0:56:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the boost it needs to grow and ruin the universe.

0:56:47.000 --> 0:56:48.880
<v Speaker 1>If we can rewind back to the moment in the

0:56:49.000 --> 0:56:51.960
<v Speaker 1>LHC when those two particles collided head to head at

0:56:52.000 --> 0:56:56.640
<v Speaker 1>amazing speeds and they're concentrated gravity overlapped, Let's say that

0:56:56.680 --> 0:56:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the microscopic black hole they produced didn't grow up to

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:03.400
<v Speaker 1>tear Earth apart, but instead it evaporated, just as Stephen

0:57:03.400 --> 0:57:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Hawking predicted. As it evaporated, it could become the nucleus

0:57:08.719 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 1>for a low energy vacuum bubble to grow, in a

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:14.800
<v Speaker 1>very similar way to how tiny impurities in a metal

0:57:14.840 --> 0:57:18.120
<v Speaker 1>pot become the places where water can undergo a phase

0:57:18.120 --> 0:57:22.320
<v Speaker 1>transition from liquid to gas within itself. This is what

0:57:22.400 --> 0:57:26.080
<v Speaker 1>we call forming a bubble. An evaporating black hole could

0:57:26.080 --> 0:57:29.240
<v Speaker 1>serve as a nucleation site for the Higgs field to

0:57:29.360 --> 0:57:33.040
<v Speaker 1>undergo a transition from its current state to the lower

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:38.200
<v Speaker 1>energy version of itself, which again would bring about vacuum decay,

0:57:38.240 --> 0:57:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate ecological catastrophe, which, again, at the risk of

0:57:42.960 --> 0:57:46.320
<v Speaker 1>restating the obvious, would be very bad for the current

0:57:46.400 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 1>arrangement of our energetic vibrations. This would not take a

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:53.640
<v Speaker 1>few hundred thousand years to notice. It would happen so

0:57:53.720 --> 0:58:00.160
<v Speaker 1>fast that we likely wouldn't notice we just suddenly be gone.

0:58:02.160 --> 0:58:06.160
<v Speaker 1>So we have then at least two possible catastrophic outcomes

0:58:06.440 --> 0:58:10.160
<v Speaker 1>from the creation of man made microscopic black holes here

0:58:10.200 --> 0:58:13.919
<v Speaker 1>on Earth. And what's unsettling about them is that there's

0:58:13.960 --> 0:58:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a catastrophe for each possibility. Where Stephen Hawking was either

0:58:18.440 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 1>right about evaporating black holes or where he was wrong.

0:58:22.680 --> 0:58:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Take your pick. One day in two thousand and eight,

0:58:34.880 --> 0:58:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a bird that lived in the countryside along the border

0:58:37.520 --> 0:58:41.440
<v Speaker 1>between Switzerland and France found itself a bit of crusty bread.

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Around that same time, one of the electrical supply stations

0:58:46.360 --> 0:58:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that cools the Large Hadron collider's magnets with liquid helium

0:58:50.040 --> 0:58:54.880
<v Speaker 1>suddenly went offline. When workers went to investigate, they found

0:58:54.880 --> 0:58:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit of crusty bread and some feathers. The press

0:58:59.080 --> 0:59:02.640
<v Speaker 1>reported on it, took liberties with it, and that story

0:59:02.720 --> 0:59:07.680
<v Speaker 1>grew to enormous proportions. Words spread that a single bird

0:59:07.720 --> 0:59:11.080
<v Speaker 1>with some baguette had knocked out the Large Hadron Collider,

0:59:11.600 --> 0:59:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the fastest and largest particle collider on Earth. A pair

0:59:16.360 --> 0:59:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of theoretical physicists named Hulger Nielsen and Massao Ninomia had

0:59:21.440 --> 0:59:24.720
<v Speaker 1>been taking note of the accidents in weird setbacks like

0:59:24.800 --> 0:59:27.760
<v Speaker 1>this that plague the LHC as it was being built.

0:59:28.720 --> 0:59:32.320
<v Speaker 1>They had come to believe that something, possibly God, was

0:59:32.440 --> 0:59:36.720
<v Speaker 1>reaching back from the future two sabotage the Large Hadron

0:59:36.760 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Collider and prevent it from ever reaching full power. It

0:59:41.480 --> 0:59:45.439
<v Speaker 1>might mean that the LHC would create something, the physicists said,

0:59:45.880 --> 0:59:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that could destroy the universe. They took the bird in

0:59:49.520 --> 0:59:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the baguette as further evidence for their hypothesis. Nielsen and

0:59:54.960 --> 0:59:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Ninomia proposed issuing a challenge to the future to determine

0:59:58.960 --> 1:00:01.360
<v Speaker 1>if we should shut down the Large Hadron Collider and

1:00:01.400 --> 1:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>abandon it forever. We could present the LHC with some

1:00:05.840 --> 1:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>luck of the draw, maybe something like ten million cards,

1:00:10.360 --> 1:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>all of them hearts, except one, just a single spade.

1:00:14.560 --> 1:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And if we asked the Large Hadron Collider to pick

1:00:16.840 --> 1:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a card, and the Large Hadron Collider picked that one

1:00:19.720 --> 1:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>single spade, an extraordinarily unlikely event, then the particle physics

1:00:24.880 --> 1:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>community should take it as a sign that the future

1:00:28.320 --> 1:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>was communicating a warning to us. Sir, never took the

1:00:32.360 --> 1:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>physicists up on their card draw proposal. Nielsen and Ninomia

1:00:37.200 --> 1:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>suspected that the future was trying to prevent the Large

1:00:40.160 --> 1:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Hadron Collider from creating a Higgs boson, that particle that

1:00:44.120 --> 1:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>gives everything that has mass mass. It was widely hoped.

1:00:48.800 --> 1:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it was largely the reason it was built

1:00:51.360 --> 1:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that the LHC would produce the Higgs boson, which again

1:00:55.080 --> 1:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>was the last undiscovered particle predicted by the standard model.

1:00:59.440 --> 1:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>And in two thousand and twelve, the Large Hadron's computers

1:01:02.400 --> 1:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>found something that had been created for a fraction of

1:01:05.480 --> 1:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a fraction of a second inside the collider that fit

1:01:08.640 --> 1:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the parameters for the Higgs boson. There was no catastrophe,

1:01:13.400 --> 1:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>The world didn't end, and to an extent, the discovery

1:01:16.520 --> 1:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Higgs frustrated physicists even more since it further

1:01:19.960 --> 1:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>supported the stubbornly accurate Standard model they've been hoping to break.

1:01:25.440 --> 1:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>But finding reassurance in the survival of the universe after

1:01:28.720 --> 1:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the successful creation of the Higgs boson in the LHC

1:01:32.320 --> 1:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is actually a logical fallacy. Specifically, it produces what's called

1:01:36.880 --> 1:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the normalcy bias. We tend to assume that because no

1:01:40.640 --> 1:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>catastrophe has befallen us, yet none will. It's the same

1:01:45.240 --> 1:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>false belief that drives investors to buy stock based on

1:01:48.680 --> 1:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>past performance. But any financial advisor worth their salt will

1:01:52.880 --> 1:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you there is no certainty about the future to

1:01:55.600 --> 1:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>be found in the past, and so too will a

1:01:59.000 --> 1:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>particle physicist tell you that. One of the tenets of

1:02:02.680 --> 1:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>quantum physics is that there is no such thing as certainty.

1:02:07.440 --> 1:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>We are incapable of certainty. Instead, particle physicists deal improbability.

1:02:15.400 --> 1:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>As one certain physicist explained it to me, you can,

1:02:18.360 --> 1:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, take the number of times that a car's

1:02:21.040 --> 1:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>engine has ever been started and calculate the probability that

1:02:24.920 --> 1:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the next time you start your car it won't create

1:02:27.720 --> 1:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a chain reaction that ignites Earth's atmosphere. What you have,

1:02:31.600 --> 1:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>then is what's called the lower bound probability that it

1:02:34.160 --> 1:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>would happen in an odd, roundabout way. When cars were

1:02:39.000 --> 1:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>first invented, they actually had a higher probability of igniting

1:02:42.560 --> 1:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere compared to cars today, simply because fewer cars

1:02:47.000 --> 1:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>had ever been turned over back then. The large Hadron

1:02:50.440 --> 1:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>collider is in a similar position with the LHC. We

1:02:54.400 --> 1:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>simply have a smaller data set from the fewer times

1:02:57.280 --> 1:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's been turned on. This is in a perfect analogy,

1:03:01.280 --> 1:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>though there aren't any quantum theories that suggest a car

1:03:04.920 --> 1:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>could ignite the atmosphere, like there are that suggests the

1:03:08.200 --> 1:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>LHC might be capable of creating a black hole or

1:03:11.520 --> 1:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a strange lit But ironically, the more times we press

1:03:15.520 --> 1:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>our luck and run the LHC, the lower the probability

1:03:19.560 --> 1:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that something terrible will happen. Get the thing is, no

1:03:24.040 --> 1:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>matter how many times we run the Large Hadron Collider,

1:03:27.160 --> 1:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we will never be certain that something terrible won't happen.

1:03:31.760 --> 1:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the curse of the universe that quantum physics

1:03:34.560 --> 1:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>carries with it. We are doomed to uncertainty. Eight white

1:03:40.840 --> 1:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>dwarfs still hang in the sky, but we still can't

1:03:44.280 --> 1:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>be certain that one of them won't begin to come

1:03:46.200 --> 1:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>apart tomorrow from the microscopic black hole growing within it.

1:03:50.840 --> 1:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a matter of faith, faith, and probabilities when it

1:03:58.680 --> 1:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to the existential safety of physics. Uncertainty curses. All

1:04:03.080 --> 1:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of us physicists face a dilemma when they talk about

1:04:07.320 --> 1:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the safety of their work to people like you and me.

1:04:09.760 --> 1:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>The general public. If they speak openly about it, they

1:04:13.560 --> 1:04:16.439
<v Speaker 1>may cause a panic and possibly even undermine their own

1:04:16.440 --> 1:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>field of research. If they don't, they appear like they're

1:04:20.360 --> 1:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>hiding something. Here's physicist Daniel Whiteson again. And I think

1:04:24.840 --> 1:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the reason is that they don't believe that there's a

1:04:28.080 --> 1:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of and that there's a lot of numerous e

1:04:32.000 --> 1:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in the public and in journalism, and that a nuanced

1:04:35.920 --> 1:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>position where you're saying, um, there's no none of the

1:04:40.520 --> 1:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>threats we understand are significant. However, there's a possibility of

1:04:45.080 --> 1:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a thing we don't know that we hadn't considered that

1:04:47.280 --> 1:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>could of course destroy the world, but you know that's

1:04:50.760 --> 1:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>unlikely and unknowable and so not something to consider. That

1:04:55.480 --> 1:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of nuanced position, I think it is very difficult

1:04:57.920 --> 1:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to convey. So physicis systs may decide that the general

1:05:01.520 --> 1:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>public can't really understand probabilities, and we'll stop hedging when

1:05:05.760 --> 1:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>they speak about the safety of their work, erasing those

1:05:08.840 --> 1:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>remote possibilities of catastrophe and presenting a full certainty that

1:05:13.880 --> 1:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>particle physics is perfectly safe, that there is no risk.

1:05:18.360 --> 1:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a dangerous position when it inevitably comes out

1:05:22.080 --> 1:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that there is in fact a risk and that scientists

1:05:24.840 --> 1:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>are well aware of it. Trust is lost in the

1:05:27.880 --> 1:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>very people who carry out existentially risky experiments, and the

1:05:32.120 --> 1:05:36.439
<v Speaker 1>most sensational and unfounded stories start to gain traction among

1:05:36.480 --> 1:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the general public. And it's also directly a dangerous position

1:05:41.240 --> 1:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>as far as existential risks go, because existential risks are

1:05:45.200 --> 1:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>by definition remote. They are the risks that get erased

1:05:48.840 --> 1:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>when physicists speak with certainty about the safety of their work.

1:05:53.360 --> 1:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>But as you know by now, those same existential risks

1:05:57.160 --> 1:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are the ones that can erase humanity should the ability

1:06:00.600 --> 1:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>surrounding an experiment suddenly skew towards the remote Unexpectedly. Pretending

1:06:06.720 --> 1:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>those risks are not there is the most dangerous route

1:06:09.640 --> 1:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we can take. But scientists who do have the integrity

1:06:16.400 --> 1:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to admit that they can't be certain their field doesn't

1:06:18.880 --> 1:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>pose existential risks frequently find that they're misquoted or misrepresented

1:06:23.640 --> 1:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in the media, which can lead to them being ostracized

1:06:27.160 --> 1:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>by their colleagues for stirring up problems for the field.

1:06:30.760 --> 1:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>So they may become defensive, which is never good for

1:06:33.960 --> 1:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>keeping lines of communication open. But I think the experience

1:06:37.800 --> 1:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of scientists is that they say Oh,

1:06:40.960 --> 1:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that's very unlikely, but of course possible. And then they

1:06:44.040 --> 1:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>read an article where they say certain scientists says end

1:06:46.800 --> 1:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of the world possible, you know, and so it's it's um,

1:06:50.320 --> 1:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right that they're defensive, but I think

1:06:52.800 --> 1:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that comes from some experience and some caution about the

1:06:57.040 --> 1:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>level of the discourse in the public arena. It is

1:07:00.040 --> 1:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>with this in mind that CERTAIN is to be commended

1:07:02.240 --> 1:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>for working to show that the large Hadron collider is

1:07:05.240 --> 1:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a safe machine, even considering that it was a reactive

1:07:08.560 --> 1:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>procedure rather than a proactive one. CERTAIN is a great institution,

1:07:12.720 --> 1:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and one thing that I admire so much about them

1:07:15.560 --> 1:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is how open they are. And much of what I

1:07:18.280 --> 1:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>was able to do in my research is thanks to

1:07:20.680 --> 1:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>them being very open. They're very very open in terms

1:07:24.160 --> 1:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of sharing their data, sharing their papers, being accessible in

1:07:27.920 --> 1:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of talking to them. That's part of what makes

1:07:30.920 --> 1:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>me admire them so much as an academic myself. I

1:07:34.440 --> 1:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>just think that that's a great model for building and

1:07:37.840 --> 1:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>sharing knowledge, and it's to their credit that they have

1:07:42.200 --> 1:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>looked at these issues with a great deal of transparency.

1:07:45.920 --> 1:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>It is extremely important that the physics community follows CERN's

1:07:49.720 --> 1:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>lead and its willingness to investigate the safety of its

1:07:52.560 --> 1:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>work has their experiments grow more and more powerful in

1:07:56.040 --> 1:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the future. There's a different interpretation to the cosmic ray argument,

1:08:01.520 --> 1:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a more nihilistic one. It says that the presence of

1:08:05.240 --> 1:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>cosmic rays doesn't prove that particle colliders are safe. It

1:08:09.480 --> 1:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>just shows that our particle colliders can't make anything more

1:08:12.080 --> 1:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>precarious than they already are. Turning on a particle collider

1:08:16.040 --> 1:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is safe because we can't turn cosmic rays off, so

1:08:20.400 --> 1:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to be causing any new danger by

1:08:22.280 --> 1:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>turning them on. But what about some decades or a

1:08:25.040 --> 1:08:28.559
<v Speaker 1>century from now, when our experiments begin to reach levels

1:08:28.600 --> 1:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that exceed cosmic rays. If the Large Hadron Collider is

1:08:33.040 --> 1:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>an early incarnation of a long line of particle colliders

1:08:36.680 --> 1:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to come, as physicists hope, there will likely be a

1:08:39.880 --> 1:08:43.519
<v Speaker 1>point where the energies of future colliders rub up against

1:08:43.720 --> 1:08:47.519
<v Speaker 1>and then eventually exceed, the energies of cosmic rays, the

1:08:47.600 --> 1:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>very same cosmic rays that we use today as some

1:08:50.800 --> 1:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of proof that our colliders are safe. And over time,

1:08:54.880 --> 1:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>as physicists develop a greater mastery over the rules of

1:08:57.920 --> 1:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>our universe, particle colliders may transition into laboratories that physicists

1:09:03.040 --> 1:09:05.639
<v Speaker 1>use to bend the laws of physics to their will.

1:09:06.800 --> 1:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Those nearly blind pokes and prods into the darkness of

1:09:10.320 --> 1:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>our understanding that physicists today carry out are providing the

1:09:14.479 --> 1:09:17.639
<v Speaker 1>body of knowledge that physicists to come in the future

1:09:17.960 --> 1:09:21.479
<v Speaker 1>will build upon. And if humanity can survive our infro

1:09:21.600 --> 1:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to physics, a tremendous amount of promise lies in store

1:09:24.920 --> 1:09:28.479
<v Speaker 1>for us from it. An odd thing about the universe

1:09:28.760 --> 1:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>has been bothering physicists for a while now, and it's

1:09:32.000 --> 1:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>something that the discovery of the Higgs didn't help. It

1:09:35.640 --> 1:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>seems more and more that our universe appears to be

1:09:38.520 --> 1:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>finely tuned to allow for life to exist. The Higgs field, gravity,

1:09:44.760 --> 1:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>all of it is right within the narrow bounds that

1:09:47.600 --> 1:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>allow for atoms, chemistry, and life. When the Higgs boson

1:09:52.360 --> 1:09:55.519
<v Speaker 1>was finally founded two thousand twelve, it appeared right in

1:09:55.560 --> 1:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the very middle of where it was predicted, as perfectly

1:09:59.000 --> 1:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>finely tuned as the rest of the fundamental particles. One

1:10:03.479 --> 1:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>answer to the strange situation is that our universes finally

1:10:07.120 --> 1:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>tuned for life simply because of random chance. There's a

1:10:11.240 --> 1:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>remarkable implication of string theory, one of those theories that

1:10:14.800 --> 1:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>seeks to unify gravity with the quantum forces. String theory

1:10:19.200 --> 1:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>says that if you take all of the particles and

1:10:21.800 --> 1:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>forces and dimensions that the theory predicts, you can come

1:10:25.320 --> 1:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>up with ten to the five power different possible combinations

1:10:29.920 --> 1:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>among them. If you consider each of those combinations as

1:10:33.800 --> 1:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a set of rules for a potential universe, including the

1:10:37.120 --> 1:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>combination that governs our own universe, then you have as

1:10:41.240 --> 1:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>many possible universes as ten to the five power. Our

1:10:46.120 --> 1:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>universe just so happens to be one with the combination

1:10:48.880 --> 1:10:52.479
<v Speaker 1>of those dimensions and particles and forces that allow for life.

1:10:53.800 --> 1:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the basis of what's called the anthropic principle. The

1:10:57.400 --> 1:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of universe where life could evolved is the only

1:11:00.439 --> 1:11:03.639
<v Speaker 1>type where we would find ourselves wondering about why things

1:11:03.680 --> 1:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>seem so finely too fine tuning may really not mean

1:11:07.439 --> 1:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>anything at all. By learning about the reality of our universe,

1:11:12.520 --> 1:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>physicists will answer questions like this, and when they do,

1:11:16.800 --> 1:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>they will be able to do amazing things like predict

1:11:20.200 --> 1:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>anything that could possibly happen with absolute accuracy, and perhaps

1:11:25.320 --> 1:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>future physicists will learn to construct new universes within their

1:11:29.160 --> 1:11:33.519
<v Speaker 1>particle colliders grow them from seat. Exactly how we may

1:11:33.640 --> 1:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>someday be able to do this has already been roughly

1:11:36.360 --> 1:11:39.479
<v Speaker 1>sketched out, and now the data must catch up to

1:11:39.520 --> 1:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the theories. To some people physicists creating new universes where

1:11:48.439 --> 1:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>life might arise organically, it's actually a dreary sad idea.

1:11:53.320 --> 1:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Any universe we might create in the lab would almost

1:11:55.960 --> 1:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly have its own space time, and so it would

1:11:58.800 --> 1:12:02.719
<v Speaker 1>be totally detached from our own universe, And so those

1:12:02.760 --> 1:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>physicists who created that universe would have no way to

1:12:06.800 --> 1:12:10.759
<v Speaker 1>alleviate the profound suffering that life in that other universe

1:12:10.880 --> 1:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>might experience. To people who believe that the purpose of

1:12:14.720 --> 1:12:18.639
<v Speaker 1>life is to reduce suffering, creating a universe like this

1:12:19.080 --> 1:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>would be a profoundly irresponsible act by a creator God

1:12:23.320 --> 1:12:30.479
<v Speaker 1>with no power to interview. But there is also a

1:12:30.520 --> 1:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of promise in the idea of lap grown universes.

1:12:35.040 --> 1:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps we will be the life that populates them. Perhaps

1:12:39.080 --> 1:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>future humans will be able to grow new universes to

1:12:42.280 --> 1:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>move into when our universe begins to expire. Perhaps, unbeknownst

1:12:48.160 --> 1:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to us, those physicists of the future will be carrying

1:12:51.240 --> 1:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>out the same kind of experiments that produced our universe,

1:12:55.880 --> 1:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps they will be creating our universe. For phaps,

1:13:00.320 --> 1:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that is how we will make our escape back to

1:13:02.960 --> 1:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the beginning. Perhaps that's what we've always done. On the

1:13:12.720 --> 1:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>next episode of the End of the World with Josh Clark,

1:13:16.560 --> 1:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the future is what's called a transgenerational global commons. We

1:13:20.760 --> 1:13:23.799
<v Speaker 1>share it not just with everyone alive today, but everyone

1:13:23.880 --> 1:13:26.519
<v Speaker 1>to come as well. And for the first time in

1:13:26.640 --> 1:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>human history, it is in the power of those of

1:13:29.040 --> 1:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>us alive to save it or destroy it permanently. And now,

1:13:33.920 --> 1:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>if you think about what the existential risk mitigation is,

1:13:36.680 --> 1:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>not all that is it the global public good existential

1:13:40.080 --> 1:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>risk mitigation, but it's also of transgenerational public good. But

1:13:43.840 --> 1:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to take on the existential risks we face, we will

1:13:46.800 --> 1:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>have to overcome our own worst impulses.