Speaker 1: All right, thanks Scott Channon, and thanks to all of
Speaker 1: you for being with us. Toll free on number is
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine four one Sean. If you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of this extravaganza, you know it's
Speaker 1: I watched Biden yesterday and it was an unmitigated disaster,
Speaker 1: as it usually is with him, and Biden just can't
Speaker 1: keep his thoughts straight. Nobody wants to talk about how
Speaker 1: confused and confounded this guy is, but it's really that bad.
Speaker 1: The blood of patriots, you know, and all this stuff
Speaker 1: about how we're gonna have to move against the government, well,
Speaker 1: the treat liberty is not one the blood of patriots.
Speaker 1: What's happened is that there never been. If you wanted
Speaker 1: to think you need to have weapons to take on
Speaker 1: the government, you need have fifteens and maybe some nuclear weapons.
Speaker 1: Police ship Murray of the Baltimore excuse me, Police Chief,
Speaker 1: merrit Police Chief Murphy Paul of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and
Speaker 1: means confirming my outstanding nominee for to lead the AFT.
Speaker 1: Do you see me the ATF David Shipman, don't say
Speaker 1: there's no possible justification for having a hundred rounds in
Speaker 1: a magazine of about Like I said before, what do
Speaker 1: you think the dear we're in Kim Marvest. This guy,
Speaker 1: David Shipman that he wants to head the ATF or,
Speaker 1: as Joe calls it, the aft. Now, if you listen closely,
Speaker 1: the president it was, it was almost incomprehensible most of yesterday.
Speaker 1: You know one thing, I've talked to a lot of
Speaker 1: people in the medical profession, and I just happened to
Speaker 1: I don't know how it worked out this way of
Speaker 1: my life. I have many friends that are doctors. I've
Speaker 1: actually watched in an operating room a brain surgery take place,
Speaker 1: and it is the most fascinating work you ever want
Speaker 1: to watch in your life. And the modern medicine and
Speaker 1: great surgeons and gifted surgeons. I did an interview recently
Speaker 1: with this guy, doctor Eduardo Rodriguez. This guy did the
Speaker 1: first successful face transplant. There's a fireman. I got to
Speaker 1: meet this guy. This guy's amazing and he's from Mississippi.
Speaker 1: And he went into a burning building because the lady
Speaker 1: was trapped and he's a volunteer fireman. He goes in
Speaker 1: the building. Then one of the floors collapsed right on
Speaker 1: top of him. And burned off most of his face
Speaker 1: and he had to live with that for fifteen years.
Speaker 1: Modern medicine has made it. You know, he's had a
Speaker 1: full face transplant. And then I interviewed another guy. This
Speaker 1: had never been done successfully. He was coming home. He
Speaker 1: works the graveyard shift. I mean, you know, eleven to
Speaker 1: seven in the morning or twelve to eight in the morning.
Speaker 1: It's the hardest shift. I mean, it's really tough. It's
Speaker 1: actually been studies that show that it ages you if
Speaker 1: you work that shift. And anyway, unfortunately fell asleep at
Speaker 1: the wheel, had a really bad accident. The cars on fire.
Speaker 1: There's a good Samaritan and really doesn't like it. It's
Speaker 1: actually a famous singer got out of his saved this
Speaker 1: guy pulled him out of the burning vehicle. He had
Speaker 1: burns over eighty percent of his body. He could no
Speaker 1: longer use his hands, his face was unrecognizable. And in
Speaker 1: they were able to do a face transplant and both
Speaker 1: hands transplanted successfully. In other words, they got the right donor.
Speaker 1: He got a face transplant and two hands that work.
Speaker 1: And now he you know, things that he couldn't do
Speaker 1: after the accident, like dress himself and feed himself. He's
Speaker 1: now able to do. I mean, just amazing stuff. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I digress here a little bit. When you look at
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. Any So, I've talked about the doctors about
Speaker 1: if people are in a cognitive decline. Usually usually I'm
Speaker 1: not a doctor and I'm not playing one on radio TV.
Speaker 1: Usually it's degeneratives. In other words, it's not going to
Speaker 1: get better. Although I did see in USA today that
Speaker 1: there is a new medicine that they've been working on.
Speaker 1: I think it just got FDA approval for Alzheimer's, and
Speaker 1: I think it's the first one they've approved for Alzheimer's
Speaker 1: since like two thousand and one. There haven't been many
Speaker 1: medical breakthroughs. And if you know anybody that's ever had
Speaker 1: any cognitive declining issues or Alzheimer's or any of these
Speaker 1: varying diseases, it's it's horrible to watch. And I'm not
Speaker 1: diagnosing Joe. I'm just saying that the Joe Biden a
Speaker 1: twenty twelve and twenty sixteen is not the Joe Biden today.
Speaker 1: And then when we had Ronnie Jackson on the program yesterday,
Speaker 1: he's saying if he takes a cognitive test, he doesn't
Speaker 1: think he's going to do well. It's here that something
Speaker 1: is going on here. It's obvious. You watched Joe yesterday
Speaker 1: and it's it's obvious. But yet the media, as they
Speaker 1: protected him as a candidate, they're now protecting him as president.
Speaker 1: I mean, he was mumbling and bumbling and slurring his words,
Speaker 1: barely coherent at times. You know, he calls the ATF
Speaker 1: the AFT, talked about the history of the Second Amendment
Speaker 1: and the blood of patriots, you know, and then going
Speaker 1: off on this weird conclusion that well, somebody would need
Speaker 1: nuclear weapons to take down the government. I mean, I'm like,
Speaker 1: it's a part of it is you can make fun
Speaker 1: of him because of all the verbal gaffs, but on
Speaker 1: the serious side of this, you know, everyone else can
Speaker 1: see it. The only ones that are in denial about it,
Speaker 1: and I don't really even think they're in denial, is that,
Speaker 1: you know, the media mob just protects him. You know,
Speaker 1: if you think back in years gone by FDR, you know,
Speaker 1: a lot of America didn't know it was in a wheelchair.
Speaker 1: You know, the media kind of respected the health issue,
Speaker 1: but a lot of reporting about JFK and alleged affairs
Speaker 1: that he had and that the media knew about it,
Speaker 1: but they never reported any of it. Well, we don't
Speaker 1: live in those times anymore. We live in the times
Speaker 1: where you got the likes of you know, these hacks
Speaker 1: New Green Deal Socialist basically the press office of of
Speaker 1: all things New Green Deal Democratic Socialist, and Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: the very people the New York Times perfect case in point.
Speaker 1: Ben Smith, Maggie Haberman. I mean, they're they're like full
Speaker 1: time Trump stalkers. There's still Trump stalkers even though Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's president. Do you think if if any of the
Speaker 1: Trump kids lied on a gun application and threw a
Speaker 1: gun and a dumpster, if you think they were crack addicts?
Speaker 1: Do you think that if they used the N word,
Speaker 1: made anti Asian American slurs? You think if they made
Speaker 1: money with no experience from Ukraine, if they got money
Speaker 1: from Kazakhstan oligarchs and Russian oligarchs and shopping sprees from
Speaker 1: Chinese nationals and a big deal with the Bank of
Speaker 1: China with no experience at all, whatsoever? Do you think
Speaker 1: the media would ignore it? Would they ignore Donald Trump
Speaker 1: bragging on tape that he said, I'm not giving you
Speaker 1: a billion dollars you've got six hours to fire that prosecutor. Or.
Speaker 1: You're not getting the billion dollars. He's leveraging our tax
Speaker 1: money to get a prosecutor. And Ukraine fired because that
Speaker 1: prosecutor's investigating this corrupt company that's buying influence with his
Speaker 1: son who sat on Good Morning America. He had no experience.
Speaker 1: What if Donald Trump did it? It's just like if
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, you know, say, said the AFT, not the
Speaker 1: at F. What do you think the mob and the
Speaker 1: media would be doing. He couldn't pronounce cognitive. He butchered
Speaker 1: this guy's name. I mean, he just butchered it. And
Speaker 1: it's not like it's an off day, because every day
Speaker 1: is now an off day. When he was at the
Speaker 1: G seven and he's you know, gets it. Well, you
Speaker 1: once called Vladimir Putin a killer? Do you still think
Speaker 1: he's a killer? And he can't answer, and there's this
Speaker 1: uncomfortable silence, and even now Democrats are beginning to notice.
Speaker 1: I told you yesterday about this congressman from New York
Speaker 1: his name is Mandare Jones, and asked Biden a question,
Speaker 1: and he said, Biden just stared at me, just stared
Speaker 1: at me when I asked for support on a particulability.
Speaker 1: He wanted it done. He said the president, you know,
Speaker 1: they're already needed to be more involved in legislation on
Speaker 1: the Hill responses, he stared at me and then he
Speaker 1: described an awkward silence. Well, that's exactly what happened on
Speaker 1: stage at the G seven. Then he's got this other
Speaker 1: characteristic that is emerging and is often the case with
Speaker 1: people that have some type of cognitive issues. I don't
Speaker 1: know what's going on. Something is going on. And the
Speaker 1: reason that I don't get hit by the mob in
Speaker 1: the media is because there's so much tape. I've actually
Speaker 1: been expecting it. I have my defense ready. We have
Speaker 1: the montage of all montages already made that I haven't
Speaker 1: played yet because it's so damning and scary even to
Speaker 1: think that. You know that this is a very hostile world.
Speaker 1: There's evil in the world. There's a lot of evil
Speaker 1: in the world. And the evil in the world is
Speaker 1: such that you can't trust any actor that's hostile, like
Speaker 1: Vladimir Putin. Putin's he's not dumb, but he is evil.
Speaker 1: It's a hostile regime. We know what China did to
Speaker 1: the whole world. China's geopolitical ambitions know no bounds at all.
Speaker 1: Kim Jong un has nuclear weapons, Iranian Mullahs want them,
Speaker 1: radical Islamic terrorists. They're studying Joe Biden and they're not
Speaker 1: influenced by the corrupt media mob and by big tech anyway.
Speaker 1: So Joe goes out there and you know he's he's,
Speaker 1: I mean, there was no criticism yesterday at all. All
Speaker 1: he wanted to do is talk about taking away your
Speaker 1: right to keep and bear arms, new new crime prevention.
Speaker 1: Not remember and blame Donald Trump. This started on Trump's watch. Well,
Speaker 1: he didn't even recognize Democrats, wouldn't even say they were
Speaker 1: riots last summer. He never utter a word about it
Speaker 1: at his own convention. You know, police stations burned to
Speaker 1: the ground, autonomous zones and Summer of Love zones and
Speaker 1: chop zones and chad zones and police precincts burned to
Speaker 1: the ground, and looting galore, and cops pelted with rocks
Speaker 1: and bricks and bottles and molotov cocktails. What about the
Speaker 1: group Black Lives Matter, the ones that are on tape chanting,
Speaker 1: What do we want dead cops? When do we want
Speaker 1: them now? Pigs in a blanket for I him, like Bacon,
Speaker 1: never mentioned any of that. He had no criticism of
Speaker 1: these nobel laws, didn't have any criticism of this defund
Speaker 1: the police effort. His own vice president, you know, put
Speaker 1: help promote a bell fund to get the people that
Speaker 1: were responsible for the rioting in Minnesota out of jail.
Speaker 1: You can't make this up. Lack of enforcement on current
Speaker 1: gun is rampant. Every single person that we have on
Speaker 1: video involved in arson and looting, we're not They're not
Speaker 1: being charged, not one of them in New York. They've
Speaker 1: made decisions now prosecute, not to go, not to charge anybody.
Speaker 1: What do you think with the result of that is
Speaker 1: going to be? It's basically a license to keep doing
Speaker 1: what you're doing. And you got this idiot that David
Speaker 1: Chipman that he wants for the AFT to quote Joe.
Speaker 1: This guy's unqualified. You know this. This is a guy
Speaker 1: that said, well, a lot we should lock people up
Speaker 1: before they commit crimes. Uh. Really, have you ever heard
Speaker 1: of a document it's called the US Constitution. This is
Speaker 1: a guy that you know is a is a a
Speaker 1: gun hater. Do you believe in banning assault weapons? I do, sir,
Speaker 1: okay to find assault weapons. Um, assault weapons would be
Speaker 1: something that members of commercemen define. Well, how do you
Speaker 1: define you're going to be running the agency, Um, sentator,
Speaker 1: I think this is a good question. If I am
Speaker 1: que confirmed as ATF director. Um, I got thirty five
Speaker 1: seconds left. Define it for me? Would you police, sir? Um?
Speaker 1: What's an assault weapon? Yeah, Senator Um, the bill to
Speaker 1: ban assault weapons? What is your just no way I
Speaker 1: could define an assault weapon? You don't have any You're
Speaker 1: gonna run an this agency and you don't have a
Speaker 1: definition of assault weapon. Scary all right? Rolling along Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity Show eight hundred and nine for one Sean, and
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. You
Speaker 1: know we can do this flashback because Biden said yes
Speaker 1: absolutely when I asked if funding should be redirected from
Speaker 1: the police. Maybe Joe thinks we forgot because he probably forgot.
Speaker 1: You know that both he and his fellow Democrats, he
Speaker 1: knows that they're overt support of defund the police movement.
Speaker 1: We'll show you all of this tonight on Hannity ninetiestern
Speaker 1: they supported all of it. We'll give you the timeline,
Speaker 1: We'll give you the history tonight in full. You know,
Speaker 1: even Thomas Friedman at this New York toilet paper Times.
Speaker 1: By the way, they need to return their fake Pulitzers.
Speaker 1: It's time for them to do the honorable thing and
Speaker 1: return it. Maggie, you got to return it. Ben, you
Speaker 1: got to return it anyway, and get President Trump reelected
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four. We'll see. He warned yesterday that
Speaker 1: this issue could sink the Democrats and help the Republicans
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty two and reelect Trump in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 1: We have Biden on tap and asked directly if he
Speaker 1: agreed with redirecting funding away from the police. He said,
Speaker 1: law enforcements, they don't need that. The last thing you
Speaker 1: need is an up armer in humvee coming into a neighborhood.
Speaker 1: It's like the military invading. They don't know anybody to
Speaker 1: become the enemy. They're supposed to protecting these people. So
Speaker 1: my jineering point is, and we agree that we can
Speaker 1: redirect some of the funding. Yes, absolutely, anyway. July eighth,
Speaker 1: Biden sat down with an interview with an anti police
Speaker 1: activists and he said, we can reduce the responsibilities a
Speaker 1: sign to the police and read direct the funding. You
Speaker 1: know are you open to this kind of reform. Yes,
Speaker 1: I propose that kind of reform. Yeah, okay, I guess
Speaker 1: that's a lot different. We'll get to that in a minute.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred nine one, Shaun is our number, all right,
Speaker 1: twenty five to the top of the hour of plad
Speaker 1: You're with us eight hundred and nine for one Shaun.
Speaker 1: Now this should not surprise anybody. Now we have Pete
Speaker 1: Buddha judge. I mean, he was a horrible mayor. How
Speaker 1: did he get this job as Transportation Secretary. I don't
Speaker 1: know what area of expertise he has, but he was
Speaker 1: able to get it for whatever reason. Anyway, So he
Speaker 1: gets this job and now he's talking about yeah, he
Speaker 1: wants vaccine passports. This is now happening more and more
Speaker 1: and more. Now I'm I'm having a hard time understanding
Speaker 1: this because I thought we were all told repeatedly to
Speaker 1: follow the science, aren't we. I had a nurse on
Speaker 1: Hannity last night on TV. As a lovely woman. She
Speaker 1: worked all through the entire pandemic, saving lives and risking
Speaker 1: her own life and risking contracting COVID the whole time,
Speaker 1: like so many other frontline healthcare workers. To me, they're
Speaker 1: all heroes. In Houston. At Houston Hospital they fired a
Speaker 1: hunt it's actually Houston Methodist Hospital. They fired one hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty three employees because they choose not to get vaccinated.
Speaker 1: And this nurse's particular case, she had the vaccine, right,
Speaker 1: she had the virus. I would not have disclosed that
Speaker 1: when she agreed to be on the show. I did
Speaker 1: have my team ask if it was okay with them
Speaker 1: if we could talk about her status, and she said, no,
Speaker 1: I had COVID. Now, there was a Cleveland Clinic study
Speaker 1: last week that said if you had COVID, you don't
Speaker 1: need the vaccine. Now, I think the Cleveland Clinic, Linda right,
Speaker 1: correct me if I'm wrong, Like the Mayo Clinic, like M.
Speaker 1: D Anderson or Sloan Kettering or NYU land Gone there.
Speaker 1: There are certain places that have really stellar reputations. Right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think you're right. Okay, So doesn't mean they won't
Speaker 1: get things wrong. But I think that that's a pretty
Speaker 1: strong authority coming from the Cleveland Clinic. So the question
Speaker 1: is she's following the science. Why did she get fired?
Speaker 1: Why does she she was there during the entire pandemic.
Speaker 1: That's how that's the thanks she get. I didn't ask
Speaker 1: how she contracted COVID. She may not even know how
Speaker 1: she contracts did it. She might have contracted it at work,
Speaker 1: risking her life every day. Now we're also told, and
Speaker 1: this is something I don't understand either, both Joe Biden
Speaker 1: and Nancy Pelosi are wearing masks at a funeral service
Speaker 1: and both are fully vaccinated. I don't know. I guess
Speaker 1: a funeral service for Senator John Warner. They wore it yesterday.
Speaker 1: They're fully vaccinated. Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi all wearing masks.
Speaker 1: I mean, if you're concerned about vaccine hesitancy, maybe you're
Speaker 1: causing it. Because the whole idea was if you got vaccinated,
Speaker 1: you're safe, you're protected. That's what they told us. That's
Speaker 1: the quote science. Now, the science keeps changing, you know.
Speaker 1: Now the CDC, by the way, they're still requiring that
Speaker 1: vaccinated into individuals that use public transportation still wear masks.
Speaker 1: Democrats blocked a goop bill yesterday that was they were
Speaker 1: They were saying, this is ridiculous. The federal mask mandate
Speaker 1: for interstate transit is set to expire in September, requiring
Speaker 1: masks on airplanes, airports, buses, and rail systems, and Democrats
Speaker 1: won't go. They still are insisting on wearing a mask. Well,
Speaker 1: is there something they're not telling us, because that's not
Speaker 1: what they told us when they were telling us we
Speaker 1: got to get the shot. You know, doctor Joe Biden
Speaker 1: was telling us, Doctor Kamala Harris, doctor Nancy Pelosi, all
Speaker 1: these TV and radio personality they're all telling you to
Speaker 1: get the shot. I never told you to get the shot.
Speaker 1: I said, I want you to take this virus seriously
Speaker 1: because it can't kill people. We know that six hundred
Speaker 1: thousand Americans, we lost worldwide, millions of people. I'm not
Speaker 1: a doctor. I don't know your medical condition. I don't
Speaker 1: it is beyond any advice I'm qualified to give you.
Speaker 1: They're just like I don't tell people how to invest
Speaker 1: their money. I tell people what I don't like. I'm
Speaker 1: not a big stock marker person. You know, recently I've
Speaker 1: dabbled in cryptocurrency, but I wouldn't recommend it to anybody.
Speaker 1: Just you know that that's your personal decision you got
Speaker 1: to make. You do your own research. But I told
Speaker 1: people take it seriously, do your own research. There's a tremendous,
Speaker 1: voluminous information all over the internet. Read it and then
Speaker 1: talk to your doctor or doctors, talk to medical professionals
Speaker 1: you trust, and then based on your specific unique health conditions,
Speaker 1: then you've got to make a decision. Now, now we're
Speaker 1: being told the kids don't need to get vaccinated. You know,
Speaker 1: they were going to vaccinate kids like two years old.
Speaker 1: And then it keeps changing. You know, Congress demands to
Speaker 1: probe the super spread er. Wuhan Military Games in October
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen, athletes from several countries got sick with COVID
Speaker 1: symptoms were called streets being locked down two months before
Speaker 1: China ever reported the first case. The greatest evidence we knew.
Speaker 1: We know that fauci knew that gain of function research
Speaker 1: was being was taking place inside of this Wuhan barology lab.
Speaker 1: We knew that they studied coronaviruses in that lab. Now
Speaker 1: we have videotape of bats that they have in that lab.
Speaker 1: I mean, it made sense. And yet you know, if
Speaker 1: you said it a year ago, you're a conspiracy theorist.
Speaker 1: You're you're you're spreading debunk conspiracy theories that was never true.
Speaker 1: What are they trying to do. Why they firing these people.
Speaker 1: These people are heros. Now they got lawyers and the
Speaker 1: first laws who got thrown out. Now they have to
Speaker 1: take it to the next court. It's just a pain
Speaker 1: in the ass every time you got to go into
Speaker 1: a court of law. I mean, these these judges, it's
Speaker 1: all based on the judge. Again, either you get a
Speaker 1: constitutionalist that interprets the law and the constitution, or you
Speaker 1: get a judicial activist. You know, now we find out
Speaker 1: Fox had this foxnews dot Com that the great flip
Speaker 1: flop doctor Fauci resisted President Trump's directive to cancel virus
Speaker 1: research money He's given to the Wuhan virology Lab. It's
Speaker 1: in a new book that has just come out. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, now we know from Fauci's emails he was
Speaker 1: warned almost on day one, on January thirty, first ten
Speaker 1: days after the first identified coronavirus case in America, he
Speaker 1: was warned that it looked like the genome had been
Speaker 1: of this particular virus. One specific genome had been tampered with,
Speaker 1: meaning gain of function in all likelihood. That means it's
Speaker 1: the lab. And most Americans now believe that this happened
Speaker 1: in a lab why because the evidence is it's been
Speaker 1: there from the beginning. It was my first suspicion considering
Speaker 1: they studied coronaviruses and more involved in gain A function research.
Speaker 1: It's the worst cover up in human history. Some House
Speaker 1: Republicans are launching a campaign to hold China accountable. It
Speaker 1: was President Trump that said, yeah, we need to get
Speaker 1: you know, we need to look into this. He was
Speaker 1: called the conspiracy theorist by the mob and the media
Speaker 1: all the you know, like these idiots at the New
Speaker 1: York Times with their fake pulitzers, who says it's not
Speaker 1: safe to travel to China. I wonder what would happen
Speaker 1: to anybody that took that advice at the time, we
Speaker 1: have the largest US healthcare union is fighting this mandatory
Speaker 1: vaccines that they're trying to force people. Now the NFL
Speaker 1: is doing the same thing. They're trying to force people
Speaker 1: to get a vaccine. You know, I'll tell you it's
Speaker 1: it's beyond scary that the media protected Joe throughout the
Speaker 1: entire campaign. I went through a list of questions last night,
Speaker 1: the last two nights, specifically given to the phony New
Speaker 1: York Times that was wrong on Russia, and I went
Speaker 1: through all the questions about Hillary's bought and paid for
Speaker 1: dirty Russian dossier. You know, bulk of information used in
Speaker 1: FISA applications, The top of a FISA applications has verified.
Speaker 1: You know, they got everything about Russia for three years wrong,
Speaker 1: and they got Pulitzer prizes for this. Ben Smith, Maggie
Speaker 1: Haberman has esteemed colleagues at the New York Times. You
Speaker 1: know how wrong they were. They were wrong on pretty
Speaker 1: much well everything. You know, it was right. We got
Speaker 1: it right. We usually get it right. We were right
Speaker 1: on Duke Lacrosse, they were wrong. We were right on Uva.
Speaker 1: We were right on Ferguson, We were right on Baltimore
Speaker 1: Cambridge police. Why how do we have this track record
Speaker 1: of getting things right? Because we actually take our time
Speaker 1: and we get real We do, you know, real reporting,
Speaker 1: investigative reporting. You know what about all these studies that
Speaker 1: now show hydroxychlorica and actually works? Oh excuse me, any
Speaker 1: of these papers ever apologized? No, When Donald Trump said
Speaker 1: that China virus likely came from the lab, he was excoriated.
Speaker 1: The media hid and protected the Biden campaign from Hunter's
Speaker 1: Laptop from Hell. That was real too. Lafayette's where we
Speaker 1: now know was not cleared for Donald Trump to get
Speaker 1: a photo up. They lied about that. The Russian bounty story,
Speaker 1: remember remember that story? That was a fake Two. We
Speaker 1: produced vaccines before the end of twenty twenty in record time.
Speaker 1: They ever give Donald Trump credit for that? No, how
Speaker 1: did those blue state lockdowns work? You think they'll tell
Speaker 1: you the truth about that? I doubt it. Rhonda Santis
Speaker 1: was among Christy, Nome and a bunch of other states
Speaker 1: were Republican governors. Their schools have been open for in
Speaker 1: person learning since last August. Gavin Newsom's kids have been
Speaker 1: getting in person learning at their private school while every
Speaker 1: other school in California public schools shut down. Southern Border
Speaker 1: program of the President worked. President's economic plan worked. The
Speaker 1: President shattered every record low unemployment record for every demographic
Speaker 1: in America. Do you ever get credit for that? No,
Speaker 1: he doesn't. It's pretty amazing. You know, you can go
Speaker 1: back and you can look at from the very beginning,
Speaker 1: and you know they they pushed a phony story about
Speaker 1: Melania Trump and her visa's status. They got that wrong.
Speaker 1: New York Times in October twenty sixteen implied Trump had
Speaker 1: not paid income taxes. Yeah, then when they finally got
Speaker 1: a hold of him, it showed he actually paid a
Speaker 1: pretty heavy amount of them. I mean, just I can
Speaker 1: go through literally a list of everything the media got wrong,
Speaker 1: because I have forty five pages on my list, just
Speaker 1: like you know. Now, all of a sudden, the voting
Speaker 1: Rights Bill and George's Jim Crow two point zero and
Speaker 1: it's far more, far less restrictive than Joe's Stata Delaware.
Speaker 1: Why am I the only person to tell you these things?
Speaker 1: You know now they're saying that it's Jim Crow if
Speaker 1: you if you keep the filibuster. Democrats used it a
Speaker 1: total of eight hundred and six times since two thousand
Speaker 1: and one. In twenty twenty, they used it one hundred
Speaker 1: and fifteen times in twenty nineteen, two hundred and twelve times.
Speaker 1: The year before that one hundred and twenty three times.
Speaker 1: They're using it more than anybody. I mean, it is
Speaker 1: so corrupt out there on every level. Gotcha politics, anything
Speaker 1: conservative they hate? You know, being a conservative is not
Speaker 1: complicated owned by the way. On this other issue, jab
Speaker 1: At Morgan Stanley is barring employees that don't get a
Speaker 1: vaccine from going to the office. Then I'm following the
Speaker 1: science either that we're told. I'm just you know, I
Speaker 1: look at the media landscape out there and I just
Speaker 1: see nothing but pure corruption. The difference between this show
Speaker 1: and what conservatism is simple. You know, the things that
Speaker 1: I believe in, it's very I can sum it up,
Speaker 1: and I've been summing it up very quickly for you.
Speaker 1: We believe in liberty, freedom, capitalism, our constitution, low taxes
Speaker 1: so people will incentivize people to invest and build and produce,
Speaker 1: limited government regulation. We believe in choice for schools, so
Speaker 1: parents can choose way to send their kids to school.
Speaker 1: New York they spend twenty seven thousand dollars a student.
Speaker 1: They're one of the worst records of anybody. We believe
Speaker 1: in law and order, safety and security. We believe in healthcare,
Speaker 1: free market solutions protecting pre existing conditions. I agree with that.
Speaker 1: We want energy and dependence, we want secure boarders, we
Speaker 1: want constitutionalists on the bench, free and fair trade, and
Speaker 1: we believe, as Reagan said, in peace through strength. I
Speaker 1: miss it much because that's what I believe. For thirty
Speaker 1: three years that I've been on the radio, I just
Speaker 1: haven't summed it up that well. Took me thirty three
Speaker 1: years to break it down into its simplest form, and
Speaker 1: we tell the truth. All these people are liberal activists,
Speaker 1: but they don't tell the truth. Our two Sean Hannity's
Speaker 1: show told free our numbers eight hundred and ninety four
Speaker 1: one sewn. You want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: As we pointed out to you yesterday. Now, when Republicans
Speaker 1: do some good things, you got to give them credit.
Speaker 1: You got to reinforce good behavior. And the fact that
Speaker 1: all fifty Republicans in the US Senate said no to
Speaker 1: SR one or S one, that's the you know, that's
Speaker 1: the basically the Politicians Protection Act with all work in perpetuity.
Speaker 1: But there's still power grabs going on. For example, we're monitoring,
Speaker 1: we're watching the ever flipping and flopping and flailing of Mansion.
Speaker 1: Right now, he says that he's against ending the legislative philibuster.
Speaker 1: I don't know if he'll hold to that. Senator Cinema
Speaker 1: out in Arizona has said the same. But it doesn't matter,
Speaker 1: you know, it's kind of I just keep going back
Speaker 1: comparing George's new voting law far more accessible than Joe
Speaker 1: Biden stated of Delaware, Where does he get the nerve
Speaker 1: to call this Jim Crow two point zero. And it
Speaker 1: seems like, you know, we know that, and we've chronicled
Speaker 1: many times how every two years, every four years that
Speaker 1: Republicans are racist, and their sexist, and their misogynists, and
Speaker 1: their homophobic, xenophobic, islamophobic. Now I guess we can add
Speaker 1: transphobic that want dirty air and water, and they want
Speaker 1: whatever Republican who's leading at the time to take a
Speaker 1: picture of grandma, put her in a wheelchair and throw
Speaker 1: her over a cliff. But now the use of the
Speaker 1: race card is pretty much every day. If you're against
Speaker 1: getting rid of the filibuster, you do, that's that's racist.
Speaker 1: If you're against having voter id laws, that's racist. That's
Speaker 1: Jim Crow two point zero. You know when you look
Speaker 1: at the filibuster, well, we went back to two thousand
Speaker 1: and one and Democrats have used the filibuster eight hundred
Speaker 1: and six times, one hundred and fifteen times last year,
Speaker 1: two hundred and twelve times in twenty nineteen, in twenty eighteen,
Speaker 1: one hundred and twenty three times, I mean eight hundred
Speaker 1: and six times. So does that mean for eight hundred
Speaker 1: and six times that they themselves were practicing Jim Crow
Speaker 1: because anyway, it's you know, when it's convenient. They just
Speaker 1: flip and flop on these positions. They act like, oh,
Speaker 1: it would be a disaster if Mitch McConnell did it.
Speaker 1: President Trump was pressuring Mitch McConnell to do it. Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell didn't do it. Republicans didn't do it. Anyway, here's
Speaker 1: the Democrats now on the filibuster issue. What I mean
Speaker 1: by rack does this. We have a right to vote
Speaker 1: in the United States. That is a affwarded to eligible
Speaker 1: American citizens. But we have seen over the last twenty
Speaker 1: years a constriction on who has the right to use
Speaker 1: that right. We have seen it through voter ID laws.
Speaker 1: You can't get on the rules, and if you get
Speaker 1: on the rules, you can't stay. These laws are a
Speaker 1: blast from the Jim Crow past and they have no
Speaker 1: place in twenty first century America. Discriminatory laws and laws
Speaker 1: that were designed to suppress folks rights to vote, instituting
Speaker 1: photo ID laws that on the surface sound good. If
Speaker 1: you pull the average American, they'll say, yeah, well, but
Speaker 1: in practice that's not always easy to do. At the moment,
Speaker 1: what's going on about voting rights is downright evil. With
Speaker 1: these unnecessary and unjustifiable voter ID law it becomes a
Speaker 1: politex because you don't know what form of ID the
Speaker 1: government will actually the other restriction that a poll tax.
Speaker 1: How do you call how do you say? It's a politics?
Speaker 1: We're not trying to make voting harder and order dealing
Speaker 1: with these voter ID laws. This is not about votive verification.
Speaker 1: This is about voter suppression. You're suggested that voter suppression
Speaker 1: is more inciduous now in twenty nineteen than it was
Speaker 1: even in the sixties. How so we have always struggled
Speaker 1: with voter suppression. Republicans claim they're making it easier to
Speaker 1: vote and harder to cheating an election. In reality, they're
Speaker 1: making it harder to vote an easier to cheating an election,
Speaker 1: and we all know it is the most pernicious thing.
Speaker 1: This makes Jim Crowe look like Jim Eagle. Why didn't
Speaker 1: Joe Biden lift a finger for all the decades or
Speaker 1: centuries that he represented the state of Delaware. So they
Speaker 1: want to get rid of the felibuster. They want DC
Speaker 1: Puerto Rico statehood. They don't want any voter ID, no
Speaker 1: integrity at all in our election system. It's I mean,
Speaker 1: you need an ID to buy a six pack up beer.
Speaker 1: If you want to go to the White House, you
Speaker 1: need an ID. If you want to go to the capital,
Speaker 1: you need an ID. If half the time you need
Speaker 1: an ID for everything. You want to buy a jewel
Speaker 1: pod for crying out loud, you need a voter ID.
Speaker 1: What's wrong with integrity? Barack Obama got elected twice and
Speaker 1: there were voter ID laws in every state. Was that
Speaker 1: discriminatory against him? Anyway? Here to discuss this and much
Speaker 1: more is a Senator Mike Lee from the great state
Speaker 1: of Utah. By the way, you know what I love
Speaker 1: about your state? I love a lot of this is
Speaker 1: about your state. You have great skiing, Snowbird is one
Speaker 1: of the greatest places ever. And you have Crown Burger,
Speaker 1: which is one of the best burgers I've ever had
Speaker 1: in my life. Yeah, the Crown Burger with pastrami on it. Yes,
Speaker 1: the Crown Burger with pastrami on it. That's the one. Yes,
Speaker 1: We'll go get one. Oh yeah, of course it's It's
Speaker 1: a fantastic It's a pastime. You can't eat one of
Speaker 1: those burgers and not love freedom. And being in America,
Speaker 1: that's such a good way to put it. So when
Speaker 1: you put everything together, why would I think there are
Speaker 1: five things we need in every state to have integrity
Speaker 1: in our election process and that every American then would
Speaker 1: have confidence in our results. Voter ID signature verification, chain
Speaker 1: of custody controls. You've got to clean up and update
Speaker 1: voter rolls every two years at least. And lastly, most
Speaker 1: states have statutory language that say that says that partisan
Speaker 1: observers get to watch the vote count from start to finish.
Speaker 1: Is there anything wrong with any of those five things? No, no,
Speaker 1: it's not. And look if a state like Delaware does
Speaker 1: or doesn't want to have any of those things, then
Speaker 1: they'll bear the consequences with their own voters and the
Speaker 1: integrity of their own system. Obviously, states like Delaware have
Speaker 1: chosen to adopt things like this, which makes it all
Speaker 1: the more inexcusable for the President and the president's party
Speaker 1: to be condemning states for adopting provision that states like
Speaker 1: Delaware have had for a long time. It's absolutely absurd,
Speaker 1: in part because we cheapen what it means to engage
Speaker 1: in Jim Crowe policy. Jim Crowe policies, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: we're foisted on America by the Democratic Party. But if
Speaker 1: everything is Jim Crow, nothing is. And they cheapen the
Speaker 1: concept of that term and the indignities that American citizens
Speaker 1: suffered under that era brought about by Democrats when they
Speaker 1: use it where it doesn't belong. How real. Well, first
Speaker 1: of all, do you think this issue is now dead?
Speaker 1: In other words, this is not going to pass in
Speaker 1: the next two years? Okay, So s one, this bill
Speaker 1: that is perhaps most properly referred to as the Corrupt
Speaker 1: Politicians Act failed this week. But this thing is not dead.
Speaker 1: It's been around for a few years. It's not going
Speaker 1: to go away anytime soon. They're going to still try
Speaker 1: to pass it later this year, which is why we
Speaker 1: as liberty loving Americans, can't let our guard up, and
Speaker 1: we've got to continue to oppose it on grounds that,
Speaker 1: among other things, Sean would make it easier for people
Speaker 1: to vote illegally, harder for states to detect and stop
Speaker 1: voter fraud, and perhaps in the most nasty feature of it,
Speaker 1: might well be affected, would fund politicians campaigns using your
Speaker 1: hard earned taxpayer dollars. You know, I've had conversations with
Speaker 1: a number of my colleagues the last few days who,
Speaker 1: using the formula, the six to one formula that's included
Speaker 1: in S one, have calculated that their own campaigns would
Speaker 1: have received tens of millions of dollars from the federal
Speaker 1: government in the last campaign cycle if S one were
Speaker 1: on the books. The American people don't want that. That
Speaker 1: causes all sorts of problems, including the fact that when
Speaker 1: the government decides to fund campaigns, it has to decide
Speaker 1: which campaigns it's going to fund. That's really oddously, So
Speaker 1: let me ask you about these other power grabs. What
Speaker 1: are the odds that they will eliminate the legislative filibuster.
Speaker 1: What are the odds that they will successfully pack the courts,
Speaker 1: especially the Supreme Court? What are the odds that DC
Speaker 1: will get statehood, of Puerto Rico will get statehood for example. Okay,
Speaker 1: so all of those questions are bound back up in
Speaker 1: the first question you asked about the legislative filibusters. In
Speaker 1: other words, they can't do any of those things unless
Speaker 1: they knuke the filibuster. If they knuked the filibuster, they
Speaker 1: can do all of those things. They're playing to their
Speaker 1: base right now claiming that they want to do each
Speaker 1: of those things, but that they can't because of the filibuster,
Speaker 1: which they themselves are now hypocritically claiming is racist. I
Speaker 1: think it'll tell them and us a lot about what
Speaker 1: they do, whether they mean any of this to the base,
Speaker 1: or whether they're just shamelessly pandering to their base and
Speaker 1: don't mean it. I'm not sure they can get away
Speaker 1: with it personally, But I'm also not sure that Mansion
Speaker 1: and Cinema's insistence that they won't vote to knoke the
Speaker 1: filibuster in fact safe it. There are tricks that they
Speaker 1: can deploy that wouldn't require the photo, either Mansion or Cinema.
Speaker 1: That worries me a lot. That's why we've got to
Speaker 1: be on guard constantly. What do you make of this
Speaker 1: spipartisan infrastructure deal that apparently that is getting closer to
Speaker 1: come into fruition, which would be one point two trillion
Speaker 1: dollars over eight years, or at least it's current manifestation
Speaker 1: nine hundred and seventy or billion over five years, five
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty nine billion in new spending. You know,
Speaker 1: your fellow Senator and Utah Mitt Romney is a part
Speaker 1: of this group. Do you support what they're talking what
Speaker 1: the proposal is, at least now, because I don't. I
Speaker 1: don't have all the details shown. I'm always willing to
Speaker 1: look at something what they have the details. But let
Speaker 1: me tell you this, I struggle with the assumption that
Speaker 1: we should engage in any new spending at all at
Speaker 1: a time when we've been spending trillions of dollars that
Speaker 1: we don't have, causing inflation to skyrocket. Along with what
Speaker 1: we're doing with the COVID related supplemental unemployment insurance, which
Speaker 1: is in turn facilitating inflation. Hardworking Americans are paying the
Speaker 1: price for that, a heavy price for that, and I
Speaker 1: strongly question whether it's a good idea for us to
Speaker 1: be doing any more spending right now at all, in
Speaker 1: part because this will bring about more inflation. I talk
Speaker 1: about this a lot on my website at leaf for
Speaker 1: Senate dot com. By the way, all right, we'll take
Speaker 1: a quick break. We're gonna hold Senator to Lee. We
Speaker 1: don't get him on the show often enough. We'll talk
Speaker 1: about COVID on the other side. A right, we continue
Speaker 1: with Senator Mike Lee, great State of Utah. Let me
Speaker 1: ask you about Joe Biden his solution to the crime problem. Well,
Speaker 1: let me let me backtrack, because Joe spoke yesterday, and
Speaker 1: let's just say, in typical Joe form, he's struggling mightily
Speaker 1: to get thoughts out. Let's play from play his struggles
Speaker 1: from yesterday. He blood of patriots, you know, and all
Speaker 1: this stuff about how we're gonna have to move against
Speaker 1: the government. Well, the tream liberty is not wondering the
Speaker 1: blood of patriots. What's happened is that they're never been.
Speaker 1: If you wanted to think you need to have weapons
Speaker 1: to take on the government, you need have fifteens and
Speaker 1: maybe some nuclear weapons. Please shift Murray of the Baltimore
Speaker 1: it's gonna be police chief married police Chief Murphy Paul
Speaker 1: of Baton Rouge, Louisiana and me, he's confirming my outstanding
Speaker 1: nominee for to lead the AFT. You see me the
Speaker 1: at F, David Shipman, don't say there's no possible justification
Speaker 1: having a hundred rounds in a magazine. And like I
Speaker 1: said before, what do you think we're in Kim Marvest. Okay,
Speaker 1: So there's Joe Biden slurring his words referring to the
Speaker 1: ATF as the AFT at one point talking about the
Speaker 1: history of the Second Amendment and the blood of patriots
Speaker 1: before concluding that someone would need a nuclear weapon to
Speaker 1: take down the government. He was confused beyond belief. He
Speaker 1: couldn't pronounce the word cognitive and couldn't even mention or
Speaker 1: pronounce the name of this individual. He was struggling to announce.
Speaker 1: I've got to be honest. In one sense, it kind
Speaker 1: of makes me laugh. But on the other side of this,
Speaker 1: I know that Vladim Mayor Putin and President she and
Speaker 1: Kim Jong Un and Iranian Mullows and radical Islamic terrorists,
Speaker 1: they're watching the fact that he's a cognitive mess as
Speaker 1: we are. Yes, And look, there's a lot to pack,
Speaker 1: a lot to unpack in that statement that you just played.
Speaker 1: I had not heard that recording. I think I see
Speaker 1: it's Warsaw the video go ahead, good heavens. I mean,
Speaker 1: I disagree with every syllable he uttered there included the
Speaker 1: words butt and and duck. Look exhibit A there for
Speaker 1: my reaction to Joe Biden's statement is David Chipman himself.
Speaker 1: David Chipman, the same guy he referenced the ATF nominee,
Speaker 1: is somebody who voted against this morning in the Judiciary
Speaker 1: Committee and gave a speech against this morning in the
Speaker 1: Judiciary Committee because he's terrible. I mean, this is a
Speaker 1: guy who said a few years ago that he thinks
Speaker 1: we had to lock people up before they committed a crime.
Speaker 1: I mean, setting aside the Second Amendment, even before you
Speaker 1: get to the Second Amendment, that's a due process violation.
Speaker 1: I called out my Democratic colleagues and said, look, if
Speaker 1: if the shower on the other foot, and you had
Speaker 1: a Republican president nominating anyone who had said something like this,
Speaker 1: you'd be outraged. Where's the outrage here. The fact that
Speaker 1: he's relying on David Chipman for anything is astounding, let
Speaker 1: alone the fact that he's nominated him to be the
Speaker 1: nation's top gun law enforcement guy. We've got to stop
Speaker 1: this guy's nomination. The President also reflected in that statement
Speaker 1: a certain cavalier haughtiness toward all Americans who believe at
Speaker 1: the Second Amendment communicates and have guarantees an individual right
Speaker 1: to bear arms, which, by the way, so too does
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court of the United States. He's reflecting this
Speaker 1: hostility toward Americans who acknowledge that that's what it says,
Speaker 1: and he's mischaracterizing it as saying that we need that
Speaker 1: to overthrow the government. That's really unfair statement, As the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court is knowledge, the Second Amendment protects something. It
Speaker 1: protects something that I've described in a book I wrote
Speaker 1: a few years ago called Our Lost Constitution, in which
Speaker 1: I talked about the fact that the Second Amendment does
Speaker 1: just go back to seventeen ninety one. No, it goes
Speaker 1: back to the sixteen hundreds in England. This thing is very,
Speaker 1: very old, and it recognizes that citizens in a country
Speaker 1: like ours have the right to have arms to engage
Speaker 1: in lawful activities, arms held by law abiding purposes, persons
Speaker 1: for lawful purposes. That's what it protects. The fact that
Speaker 1: he's mischaracterizing it as something that's that people gravitate toward
Speaker 1: in order to overthrow the government, that is shameful. No
Speaker 1: president of the United States, no officer of the United
Speaker 1: States of any start, let alone the President, should ever
Speaker 1: say such a thing, and he should be ashamed. He
Speaker 1: should apologize. Well, this guy certainly shouldn't be in charge
Speaker 1: of or the head of the AFT. To quote Joe,
Speaker 1: let me ask you, you've been outspoken about these requirements
Speaker 1: of the CDC that vaccinated people have to wear masks
Speaker 1: on public transportation. I had a woman on last night
Speaker 1: as a nurse and she was fired from her hospital,
Speaker 1: and now she had COVID. We keep getting lecture that
Speaker 1: we should follow the science. The Cleveland Clinic came out
Speaker 1: with a study last week that said, if you had COVID,
Speaker 1: you don't need the vaccine at all. She's following the science.
Speaker 1: And more importantly, if some people make a decision and
Speaker 1: consultation with their doctor or their own research for whatever
Speaker 1: reason they might have right or wrong, it's still their
Speaker 1: decision if you believe in freedom. And now one hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty three people lost their job, and now the
Speaker 1: CDC is still requiring you wear a mask on public transportation.
Speaker 1: And Joe goes to a funeral of somebody and he's
Speaker 1: still wearing his mask even though he's fully vaccinated. Now,
Speaker 1: if there's any vaccine hesitation, isn't it being caused by them? Yes? Absolutely.
Speaker 1: In fact of what they're doing is they're disincentivizing people
Speaker 1: from getting the vaccine, which is counterintuitive given that that's
Speaker 1: what they claim to want. When you take away incentives
Speaker 1: that other people would otherwise have if they're told, look,
Speaker 1: there's no need for you to wear a mask in public.
Speaker 1: Once you've had the vaccine, more people are going to
Speaker 1: get the vaccine. So this runs contrary to what they
Speaker 1: themselves claim they want, and it runs contrary not only
Speaker 1: to freedom, as you mentioned, but also contrary to the
Speaker 1: CDC's own science. They have yet to produce a single shred,
Speaker 1: a single scintilla of evidence supporting the idea that fully
Speaker 1: vaccinated persons need to wear a mask in public. They
Speaker 1: simply don't, by the way, I asked them two months ago,
Speaker 1: to provide any evidence they have to support the idea
Speaker 1: that even children as young as two have to wear
Speaker 1: a mask on public modes of transportation. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: you see Terence copt checked off of airplanes. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's unbelievable because they can't keep a mask on the
Speaker 1: two year old. That would be called normal. No two
Speaker 1: year old wants a mask on. Senator. It's great to
Speaker 1: catch up with you, and we're going to be following
Speaker 1: your race out there. You've done a great job for
Speaker 1: the people of Utah and I'm looking forward to winning
Speaker 1: your reelection. We'll be following it all along. The way
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty two. Thanks for being with us. Thanks
Speaker 1: so much, John, great to be with you. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine for one. Shawn is our number. You want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. As we start with,
Speaker 1: Bobby is in the great state of Florida. What's up, Bobby?
Speaker 1: How are you glad you called Sean? How are you good?
Speaker 1: To talk to you? Very nice to talk to you.
Speaker 1: I can't push you enough to finally sell and move
Speaker 1: out of that like I did when I retired from
Speaker 1: the NYPD. Okay, let me just tell you what I'm
Speaker 1: doing here. I am doing exactly that. I'm prepared to
Speaker 1: leave New York. Wait till Cuomo puts in the tax
Speaker 1: increase that's coming. You're all going to run. No, Well,
Speaker 1: it's interest. It's even bigger than that. Honestly, you know,
Speaker 1: because I'm a target. Listen, I'm gonna be very honest.
Speaker 1: My lawyers tell me that it's without a doubt, and
Speaker 1: we we act accordingly. We assume every year my taxes
Speaker 1: are pulled, every single solitary year, we assume it's gone
Speaker 1: over with a fine tooth comb. I don't have one
Speaker 1: accounting firm that does my taxes I have another accounting
Speaker 1: firm that comes in behind behind them to double check
Speaker 1: their work because I couldn't fill out one of these
Speaker 1: stupid forms of my life depended on it. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's how careful I have to be because I'm a
Speaker 1: public figure and I'm not listening, I'm not complaining. I'm
Speaker 1: just I'm just telling people what my reality is. Of
Speaker 1: course I unders fully understand. So the reason for my
Speaker 1: call is, I was part of the NYPD during the
Speaker 1: Jurianity administration under Bill Bratton, under Ray Kelly, and yeah,
Speaker 1: we were there, or you know the tick back. I
Speaker 1: was a city resident for thirteen years prior to that,
Speaker 1: living in the Great Borough of Brooklyn, and we were there.
Speaker 1: The problem today and this day what again. You look
Speaker 1: at the candidates that are running, and I know you're
Speaker 1: familiar with a lot of the audience throughout the country
Speaker 1: is not seeing at all. Majority of the people that
Speaker 1: are in the city, we're never around for the seventies
Speaker 1: and eighties and the nineties, so they don't remember what
Speaker 1: it was like and what we had to go through
Speaker 1: back then. So they only see the city now is
Speaker 1: this great bashed in utopia where all the tourists come
Speaker 1: and all of a sudden, now going to complain about
Speaker 1: every little thing. So they start attacking the police department.
Speaker 1: The leaders that you got running out for a mayor,
Speaker 1: the leaders that they elected. All of these people are
Speaker 1: put into power by all these people that have lived there.
Speaker 1: They are the ones that revoked all of the laws.
Speaker 1: They're the ones that decriminalized everything we used to our
Speaker 1: advantage to bring crime down. And now you're a front runner.
Speaker 1: Unfortunately it's not Curtis, because I haven't liked Curtis and
Speaker 1: met him a few times while I was on patrol. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: now Eric Adams, who is out front, people don't remember
Speaker 1: what he was back in the nineties and the two thousands.
Speaker 1: Back he stood side by side with Alic Shruckton, who's
Speaker 1: his best friend, and called for the demise and the
Speaker 1: dismantling of stop, question of frisk in the police departments.
Speaker 1: They're missing all of that rhetoric, you know. And then
Speaker 1: you look at Chicago, and I'll tell you if you
Speaker 1: look at the coverage, for example, I mean, there's more
Speaker 1: coverage about the fact that that Curtis will end euthanizing
Speaker 1: cats in New York City, which is I'm fine with it.
Speaker 1: I love animals. I don't like animals being euthanized. But
Speaker 1: you're right, I mean all of the coverages about the
Speaker 1: Democratic side, because the sad reality is is that you
Speaker 1: know eight nine to one Democrats out number of Republicans
Speaker 1: in New York City, and you know from your years
Speaker 1: working there. Of course, even the New York Post, which
Speaker 1: is prop pro right wing middle and I find the
Speaker 1: more middle of the road than right side. But even
Speaker 1: then they won't acknowledge or give Curtis the support. They
Speaker 1: came out and supported Eric Adams again. He founded a
Speaker 1: hundred Blacks in Law Enforcement and one hundred Blacks in
Speaker 1: Law Enforcement cat Care, and he was critically very critical
Speaker 1: of the NYPD. Stop questioning for us Ray Kelly and
Speaker 1: how we did our job. But he could never never
Speaker 1: say we did a bad job, because we went where
Speaker 1: crime was anywhere, and you said it anywhere there was
Speaker 1: and that's where we went. Unfortunately, the entire group of
Speaker 1: people that now have flooded into New York City and
Speaker 1: lived there, we're never around for any of this, so
Speaker 1: they don't know when we say the bad old days
Speaker 1: are coming back, they don't understand it. They think we're lying.
Speaker 1: They think it's a joke. We built at it. As
Speaker 1: soon as the blasire became theyor rolled me. All of
Speaker 1: my friends were like, see you, we're going to retire
Speaker 1: and we're going to Florida. And it was the best
Speaker 1: thing we ever did, the best thing we ever did.
Speaker 1: What part of Florida? Were part of Florida? Are you in?
Speaker 1: I am just north of Clearwater. I'm about twenty minutes
Speaker 1: and the clear Water on the I know the area. Well, listen,
Speaker 1: I love it. Do you go to uh? Do you
Speaker 1: watch Tom Brady? You go to any Tampa Bucks games?
Speaker 1: I know I go to the Bucks games. I'm not
Speaker 1: a Brady fan, but doing that, I'm now in Florida
Speaker 1: because again I'm a I like another football team. But
Speaker 1: and no, not to Jackson. Well the Giants. Did you
Speaker 1: Did you see Tampa Bay Lightning in the Islanders last night?
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, what a game, what a game. That
Speaker 1: was one of the best games I've has. One of
Speaker 1: the one of the coolest things that happened this year
Speaker 1: is the Islander fans have taken over the singing of
Speaker 1: the national anthem. It's so cool. That was awesome. That
Speaker 1: was I've ever seen watch the Lightning game when they
Speaker 1: do their national anthem, the entire places on their feet.
Speaker 1: We're doing the same they are, but they're not sinking,
Speaker 1: they're not sing taking over and singing. That is uniquely
Speaker 1: like that, not like that. I mean, I hope this.
Speaker 1: I hope this catches on because I think it's a
Speaker 1: It would be a loud message key politics out of sports,
Speaker 1: out for sports. Absolutely. I don't care what you do
Speaker 1: like that, just I come to watch a game if
Speaker 1: I want political. By the way, people like everybody else.
Speaker 1: You don't care who you're sitting next to. You. You
Speaker 1: have a shared passion with somebody you don't know, you
Speaker 1: both love a team. You're high fiving strangers, you're buying
Speaker 1: a stranger of beer, you know, sharing your popcorn with strangers.
Speaker 1: I mean, I have a great time. So you're taking
Speaker 1: the most unifying event and you're destroying it and poisoning
Speaker 1: the well by bringing politics into it. So sports and
Speaker 1: music are those two venues to sports and music are
Speaker 1: those two venues to me that should not have politics involved,
Speaker 1: because that's when you can disconnect from the realistic part
Speaker 1: of the world and just go back to saying I'm
Speaker 1: gonna have fun, disconnect and not pay attention to ten
Speaker 1: minutes and where we find that brown And unfortunately people
Speaker 1: want to find and hold on to everything the most
Speaker 1: minute and call you out on it rather than just say,
Speaker 1: you know what, I'm going to look past that. We
Speaker 1: both like the same sports teams? Cool? What else do
Speaker 1: we have in common? They can't sell short It's getting
Speaker 1: really stupid. Come on down, strong man, let me tell
Speaker 1: you what. Bobby, listen. Thanks for all your service in
Speaker 1: New York. I'm glad your life. I'm glad you have
Speaker 1: a happy retirement is sound hand tournament. I'm working down here.
Speaker 1: I got five years on down here, twenty years day
Speaker 1: of five years here. Awesome. Now you're gonna have three
Speaker 1: pensions by the time you're done. I love it. That's
Speaker 1: good for you. Come on, come down. Tax benefits all fantastic,
Speaker 1: I know. And I get my carry permitting a day.
Speaker 1: Thank you, all right, Bobby, appreciate it all right. Back
Speaker 1: for our busy phones Chicago. Janine is with us. Hey, Janine,
Speaker 1: how are you glad you called? John? Thank you, thanks
Speaker 1: for taking my car to the pleasure to speak with you.
Speaker 1: The pleasure is all mine. Well, so I called actually
Speaker 1: because my friend told me this bizarre story. So we
Speaker 1: live in the suburbs of Chicago, and she was flying
Speaker 1: back from Detroit to Chicago last week and she's on
Speaker 1: a major airline which I will not name. And there's
Speaker 1: this young African American man who was literally vaping during
Speaker 1: before the entire flight, and the flight attendants were well
Speaker 1: aware of it, knew exactly what was going on, and
Speaker 1: completely ignored him. Now, you know, maybe our lorry Lightfoot
Speaker 1: just had the biggest issue, you know, public house issue
Speaker 1: in Chicago is racism. Well the problem is is that
Speaker 1: when you don't hold people to the same standards, people
Speaker 1: start going, uh, wait a minute, why is this guy,
Speaker 1: you know, not being held at a standard? And I
Speaker 1: truly think that. So he was like he was vaping
Speaker 1: like the whole time. He wasn't like no, And I
Speaker 1: have pictures and that she took. By the way, I'm
Speaker 1: kind of laughing, and I got, you know, make a
Speaker 1: little fashion here. I've been on a plane and you know,
Speaker 1: I love my jewel I'm a known to maybe just
Speaker 1: you know, very discreetly, you know, put my hand to
Speaker 1: my face, but you kind of can do it in
Speaker 1: a way where you don't blow out any smoke at
Speaker 1: all and it has no odor whatsoever. I might have
Speaker 1: done that once or twice. Linda, would you say that
Speaker 1: that's pretty accurate. I'd say it's a lot more than that.
Speaker 1: Remember we had the long flight, everybody, the whole TV team,
Speaker 1: the whole radio team, we're on which was it? We
Speaker 1: were on Emirates Air. Where the hell are we going Singapore?
Speaker 1: That's time we were going to Vietnam. Okay, it was
Speaker 1: like twenty hours in the air. I'm not going twenty
Speaker 1: hours without a hit on my jewel. I'm not doing it.
Speaker 1: And I'm sorry, but you can do that in the
Speaker 1: bathroom and you know, but it doesn't smell. It's not
Speaker 1: like a cigarette, it's not nothing like that. But if
Speaker 1: the guy's that brazen about it and that dopey about it,
Speaker 1: I mean, if somebody said to me, you know, don't
Speaker 1: do that, well, first of all, I'm not. I'm not
Speaker 1: stupid enough to get caught. I mean, the guy's an
Speaker 1: idiot for just doing it out in the open. Well,
Speaker 1: I just she just couldn't believe it, Like nobody would
Speaker 1: used to say say something. I mean, as of this year,
Speaker 1: it is a federal offense. I mean, that's a federal
Speaker 1: offense to take a hit on a jewel. Yeah, according
Speaker 1: to the faay it is, you're not allowed to have
Speaker 1: any Okay, I never did it my whole life. That's
Speaker 1: just a joke. That was for radio hyperbo league purposes only. Okay. No,
Speaker 1: the whole point is that I think, you know, maybe
Speaker 1: somebody could have said, no, hey, maybe just like put
Speaker 1: that away, or you know, maybe just not the safest
Speaker 1: thing or whatever they figured it. No, that's inconsiderate. I
Speaker 1: agree with you. Do you feel like overall that there
Speaker 1: is this idea that certain groups based on you know,
Speaker 1: very superficial things like whether it's your skin color or whatever.
Speaker 1: They're not me that there's not an objective standard, That
Speaker 1: there is this very woke idea of making laws um
Speaker 1: really subjectively applied. And that doesn't work. That doesn't work.
Speaker 1: And I think we have to really look at all
Speaker 1: the things they're doing. Like you were talking to um
Speaker 1: the you're the last senator and he was talking about
Speaker 1: you know, voter ID and all this. If you try
Speaker 1: to say like a certain group of people can't get
Speaker 1: a voter ID, you try to say a certain amount
Speaker 1: of certain group of people. You know, they shouldn't be
Speaker 1: prosecuted for looting because they have an excuse. You can
Speaker 1: make up excuses for people, and that is not holding
Speaker 1: everyone to the same law. And I'm sorry, but it's
Speaker 1: the humanizing. If humanizes that group, it's like saying that
Speaker 1: they don't have that. You can't make that moral choice.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. Let me tell you something did not. The
Speaker 1: only reason Democrats want this is because they think they
Speaker 1: can cheat. That's it. There's no reasonable explanation. All right,
Speaker 1: I gotta i gotta role. Let me let me just say,
Speaker 1: I'm no, I'm not ever taking a hit on a jewel,
Speaker 1: on a on what was that? Emirates Air never did
Speaker 1: it once? Right, right, Linda, that's right. I mean, well,
Speaker 1: first of all, the guy sounds like an idiot. I mean,
Speaker 1: you could do it discreetly and not show everybody what
Speaker 1: you do it. I don't think he's being an idiot.
Speaker 1: I think he's just one of those people who does
Speaker 1: not think that the law applies to him. He probably
Speaker 1: went to the Hillary Rodham Clinton school of the law
Speaker 1: does not apply to me. Listen, It's it's not like um,
Speaker 1: I mean, it's not a danger to anything or anybody.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter if it's a danger or not, it matters.
Speaker 1: I think you got to be considerate of other people
Speaker 1: around you. You don't if they don't want smoke in
Speaker 1: their face, even if it's no odor, they don't want it.
Speaker 1: He's very lucky he wasn't sitting in front of me
Speaker 1: because I would remember we were we had our own
Speaker 1: little compartment in first class where you can close the door.
Speaker 1: I mean, and even still smoke travels. It's not like
Speaker 1: it's stopped by anything. No, I'm you're talking about smoke
Speaker 1: when I'm not talking about smoking it outright. I'm just
Speaker 1: taking it like anything, right. But that's what that guy
Speaker 1: was doing. That's what she was told talking about. He
Speaker 1: was sitting there like he was in his living room. No, yes,
Speaker 1: he was like, oh hey, you know the sad thing
Speaker 1: is is and then you're creating a confrontation. You're putting
Speaker 1: the flight attendance, you know, in a bad position because
Speaker 1: now they got to tell you to stop. Then if
Speaker 1: you tell somebody to stop something, then you know, a
Speaker 1: potential conflict arises. And then the next thing you know,
Speaker 1: you're making an emergency landing to throw some jackass off
Speaker 1: the plane and you just wasted three hours of your
Speaker 1: day at least exactly, and they decided to ignore it
Speaker 1: and get everybody where they were going. Quick break right back,
Speaker 1: stay right here for our final news round up and
Speaker 1: information overload. All right, News round Up, Information Overload, Hour
Speaker 1: eight hundred and ninety four one Seawn. You want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. So well, finally Kamala
Speaker 1: is going to the porter she needed at first travel
Speaker 1: to Let's see Guatemala and find out what what are
Speaker 1: the real causes? Why are people coming to the border anyway? Well,
Speaker 1: number one, you as a candidate provided for said you
Speaker 1: get free healthcare. Joe invited people when I get elected,
Speaker 1: come to the border, you'll get asylum. And now we
Speaker 1: have record numbers of illegal immigrants. They're not even getting stopped.
Speaker 1: They stopped the end Stay of Mexico policy, they stopped
Speaker 1: building the border wall. They brought back catch and release,
Speaker 1: but it's it's a revised version of it, which is
Speaker 1: basically process and release and don't even give a court date,
Speaker 1: and then we'll invite your whole family. And by the way,
Speaker 1: if you were deported because you entered the country illegally,
Speaker 1: and you was sent back. We're telling you to come
Speaker 1: back and we'll let you, let you apply for asylum. Now,
Speaker 1: I mean, that's how nuts this is getting. So it's
Speaker 1: taken all this time for Kamala Harris to realize home,
Speaker 1: maybe I should go to the border and see what's
Speaker 1: actually going on there. Okay, it's a little bit late
Speaker 1: and a little too little too late. And you know,
Speaker 1: it's been ninety two days since she's been appointed the
Speaker 1: Borders ar. Twenty three Republicans, by the way, have now
Speaker 1: moved to censure of Joe Biden for sabotaging America's border security. Well,
Speaker 1: he's not only he's facilitating the law breaking, he's aiding
Speaker 1: and embedding. As a matter of fact, he's not enforcing
Speaker 1: the laws of the land, which he swore an oath
Speaker 1: to do such. You know, Harris's border visit apparently will
Speaker 1: avoid any illegal immigration hot spots. When she goes there tomorrow,
Speaker 1: They're going to keep her apparently hundreds of miles away
Speaker 1: from any of the illegal immigration hot spots to make
Speaker 1: sure the American people don't see the problem that she's
Speaker 1: been avoiding. I doubt she's gonna walk into any of
Speaker 1: the cages that she and Joe have been building, where
Speaker 1: we have all these kids in the middle of a pandemic,
Speaker 1: a very high rate of people testing positif for COVID,
Speaker 1: in the middle of a pandemic, living on top of
Speaker 1: each other. I mean, it's this thing is a joke.
Speaker 1: You know. She's been doing next to nothing the entire time.
Speaker 1: The Attorney General of the Great State of Arizona, who
Speaker 1: also announced that he's running against Senator Kelly in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty two, Mark Bernovich is with us. He invited the
Speaker 1: Vice President a long time ago to come, so I
Speaker 1: guess they're checking the box. But the real reason that
Speaker 1: she's even going is because Donald Trump started trolling her
Speaker 1: and he announced that he's going to the border next Wednesday,
Speaker 1: and I'll be down there with President Trump and with
Speaker 1: Governor Abbott. I think it's now my fifteenth trip to
Speaker 1: the border everywhere from a you know, the Rio Grand
Speaker 1: all the way straight through Arizona and San Diego. I've
Speaker 1: been down there many many times. I've seen enough to
Speaker 1: know how bad the problem was, and Donald Trump fixed
Speaker 1: a lot of the problem. We had the lowest numbers
Speaker 1: in decades of illegal immigrants entering the country. Now we
Speaker 1: have the highest number, highest influx of illegal immigrants in
Speaker 1: twenty five to thirty years. Mister Attorney General, thanks for
Speaker 1: being back on us. Thank you, Sean for having me.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about you invited Vice President Harris to tour
Speaker 1: the border with you. What do you see happening tomorrow.
Speaker 1: I see this as a photoop since we invited her,
Speaker 1: since she's been appointed, the borders are and three months, Sean,
Speaker 1: we've seen five hundred thousand, half a million people across
Speaker 1: our border illegally. We know that this is a result
Speaker 1: of the failed Biden policies where they essentially encourage you
Speaker 1: if you've talked about incentivized people coming over here by
Speaker 1: giving them government benefits, but that they're not enforcing the law.
Speaker 1: So they've stopped the deportations with one point two million
Speaker 1: people of final deportation orders. Do you know you and
Speaker 1: I've talked about our lawsuits pending right now in federal court.
Speaker 1: We're waiting for the judge to make a decision. But
Speaker 1: in the meantime, you have people in prisons in short
Speaker 1: term custody that are being released that have been convicted
Speaker 1: of felons. We know that the drug cartels are taking
Speaker 1: advantage of this. The main numbers are out increase in
Speaker 1: sentinel coming across our border. We know that Biden's own
Speaker 1: FBI director, Christopher Way, testified that there's no question that
Speaker 1: cartel activity is spilling over to our border. So finally,
Speaker 1: finally seeing that this is indeed in crisis, even though
Speaker 1: they won't call it that, that indeed it's endangering American lives,
Speaker 1: she's going to go down for a photo op. And
Speaker 1: it's just so disappointing to me because there's not talking
Speaker 1: about actually just enforce the law. Shan enforce the laws
Speaker 1: it is. That's the first st episode. Let me let
Speaker 1: me talk about the law aspect of this, and you
Speaker 1: correct man if I'm wrong, But my recollection is during
Speaker 1: the Biden Obama years that then governor of Arizona, your state,
Speaker 1: Jan Brewer, tried to take the federal government to court
Speaker 1: because they weren't enforcing the laws of the country, which is,
Speaker 1: we have laws you're not allowed to enter this country illegally.
Speaker 1: And now, unfortunately, because I talked to Governor Abbott many
Speaker 1: times about this, governors are they literally have handcuffs on
Speaker 1: they can enforce the laws that the federal government are
Speaker 1: supposed to be enforcing. That has now put Governor Abbott
Speaker 1: in the position that he's now dedicated two hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty million dollars to building his own wall. Explain to
Speaker 1: me that if the federal government refuses to enforce the laws,
Speaker 1: why can't the states do it? Well, Sean, you are
Speaker 1: right about that prior case history, and that's what happened
Speaker 1: is the US Supreme Court case went up. Governor Brewer
Speaker 1: tried to make certain crime state crimes related immigration, and
Speaker 1: the US Supreme Court basically said, no, no, this is
Speaker 1: something the federal government has the responsibility to. It's clear
Speaker 1: in the Constitution. So therefore the states are preempted from
Speaker 1: doing anything. The problem with that, and this is the
Speaker 1: problem it's going on in DC. They're doing all this
Speaker 1: stuff on COVID bills, they're trying to nationalize elections, all
Speaker 1: this stuff that's inconsistent with the Constitution. And meanwhile, the
Speaker 1: thing that the government's supposed to do is protect our
Speaker 1: national security, protect our borders, they're absolutely not doing so.
Speaker 1: The Biben administration. You know, that's one of the reason
Speaker 1: why we have these three lawsuits against them is they're
Speaker 1: clearly not doing their job. And literally under Title AID
Speaker 1: to US Code, it says the federal government shall within
Speaker 1: ninety days of deportation order to part people. One point
Speaker 1: two million people at those orders, and they're refusing to
Speaker 1: deport them. It's jeopardizing our safety. It's jeopardizing our security.
Speaker 1: And Kamala Harris going down to Central America to spending
Speaker 1: hundreds of millions of dollars, our taxpayer dollars to address
Speaker 1: the root causes. I could have saved her that money.
Speaker 1: But the root causes is that they're incentivizing and they've decriminalized,
Speaker 1: and people come here and Americans all of this country. Sean,
Speaker 1: this isn't a Texas problem, sound an Arizona problem. We
Speaker 1: will all pay the price through an increase in drugs
Speaker 1: in our neighborhoods, increase the cartel's power, and literally the lawlessness.
Speaker 1: We're sending a message to the rest of the war
Speaker 1: world that we are weak. You know Biden talks about
Speaker 1: red lines, Well, they won't even enforce the lines on
Speaker 1: the border right now. You know, the lines that draw
Speaker 1: the separation between Mexico and the United States. What makes
Speaker 1: you think that the Biden administration is going to support
Speaker 1: lines or red lines anywhere else. So what does this
Speaker 1: mean in all practicality for the state of Arizonas Because
Speaker 1: you have a high percentage of illegal immigrants in the state,
Speaker 1: you can't remove them legally because the federal government prohibits that.
Speaker 1: Now they seek services. I assume everybody needs food and shelter,
Speaker 1: and those that need healthcare and not going to be
Speaker 1: turned away, and children are not going to be denied
Speaker 1: access to schools? Are they no be? And even under law,
Speaker 1: I mean, you can't deny if someone shows up the
Speaker 1: hospital and they're sort of legal status, you can't deny them,
Speaker 1: you know, emergency or healthcare services. So the Biden administration
Speaker 1: is essentially having all these people come over now, and
Speaker 1: I'm telling them to come over. It is overwhelm the
Speaker 1: system and it's going to cost taxpayers, as you know,
Speaker 1: not only one hundreds of millions billions of dollars. I mean,
Speaker 1: we know right now this is something Sean that so
Speaker 1: many people are upset about here in Arizona. There's literally
Speaker 1: a hotel in Scott's Dale, Arizona, the detention center now
Speaker 1: in a very swanky area. If Kamala Harris wants to
Speaker 1: see what's going on with their failed policies. You know,
Speaker 1: I would normally roll off the red carpet for her,
Speaker 1: but there's not a lot of hotel rooms available now
Speaker 1: because they're all being taken up as attention centers. We
Speaker 1: literally are spending tens of millions of dollars to house
Speaker 1: people that broke the law and then providing these benefits.
Speaker 1: It's unfair to taxpayers, it's inconsistent with the constitution, the
Speaker 1: rule of law. You know, That's why I've got these
Speaker 1: multiple lawsuits going on trying to hold them accountable. But
Speaker 1: my goodness, this is why elections matter. We need good judges,
Speaker 1: federal judges. They're going to say, you know what, I'm
Speaker 1: going to enforce the Constitution in the law and not
Speaker 1: do what my policy preferences are. And I know President
Speaker 1: Trump tried to change that with some excellent judicial appointees,
Speaker 1: but we need more of them. We cannot let the
Speaker 1: Biden administration, it's ustic department, not only take over our
Speaker 1: elections but basically not enforce the law and got our
Speaker 1: immigration system. It's just unfathomable to me. All right, let's
Speaker 1: talk about the latest and that is you're now throwing
Speaker 1: your hat in the ring. You're running for Senate. You're
Speaker 1: running against Senator Kelly Mark Kelly, who's not very popular
Speaker 1: in the state. He seems to be the most reliable
Speaker 1: Schumer vote in the United States Senate. I've never seen
Speaker 1: him take a contrary position, unlike, for example, Kristen Cinema.
Speaker 1: To her credit, she wrote an op ed this week
Speaker 1: why she supports keeping the legislative legislative philibuster and she's
Speaker 1: not going to vote with the Democratic leadership. Kelly has
Speaker 1: not done the same thing. What is the feeling in
Speaker 1: Arizona about Senator Kelly. I think Arizonans want a senator
Speaker 1: that's going to represent Arizona values and not cowtow to
Speaker 1: Chuck and Nancy. And just as you said, Sean, he
Speaker 1: is voting with Schumer every single time. He's one of
Speaker 1: the sponsors of S one, the bill that would nationalize
Speaker 1: our elections and concentrate more power in Washington DC. He
Speaker 1: voted for the COVID release bill that'll stop the ability
Speaker 1: of states to cut taxes. I mean, my goodness, this
Speaker 1: is he is a leftist dream because he wants to
Speaker 1: concentrate power in Washington, d C. He wants to tax, tax, tax, spend, spend, spend,
Speaker 1: and get everyone dependent on the federal government. And maybe
Speaker 1: the most importantly Sean, here in Arizona we are in
Speaker 1: this border crisis and he is Mia. He won't say anything,
Speaker 1: he won't do anything, And my goodness is we need
Speaker 1: senators that to represent Arizona values, you know, not be
Speaker 1: another reliable vote for Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi. Yeah, right,
Speaker 1: as we continue, Attorney general now Senate candidate from the
Speaker 1: great State of Arizona, Mark bernovitches with us. Is it
Speaker 1: going to be a big primary? Any other people announced yet? Well,
Speaker 1: I mean there's a couple of folks. But the reality Sean,
Speaker 1: as you know, I've run statewide, I've been vetted. Is
Speaker 1: you know my wife's the federal judge. I've been through that.
Speaker 1: She's been through that confirmation process. I got more votes
Speaker 1: than Cinema or McSally in twenty eighteen. I'm a principled conservative.
Speaker 1: I'm the real deal. I know how to articulate and
Speaker 1: defender of values and so people can always find out
Speaker 1: more at Berno forasy dot com. R O. I know
Speaker 1: it's a tough name to spell, by the way, Well,
Speaker 1: you've got the worst website of any politician I've ever heard.
Speaker 1: I mean, how do you expect people to find your website?
Speaker 1: Told me that I can't even I can't even repeat it.
Speaker 1: And you just said it. What is it? B r
Speaker 1: n O s O r asy dot com Berno forasy
Speaker 1: dot com. I can't help. How about Mark B for
Speaker 1: senate dot com? Can't you get that domain? Why don't
Speaker 1: you make it easy? All right, let's I'll talk to her.
Speaker 1: If you did that, impossible, nobody's ever going to be
Speaker 1: able to look up your record and your positions on
Speaker 1: issues if you can't find the website. Welle no no,
Speaker 1: I guarantee you nobody can can spell Bernovic. I couldn't
Speaker 1: accept it's in front of me, otherwise I wouldn't be
Speaker 1: able to spell it well. Sean, I am a bad politician,
Speaker 1: but I am a principal conservative. I appreciate that part.
Speaker 1: But I'm just giving you some humble advice. I mean,
Speaker 1: nobody's gonna find your website. You got to change the
Speaker 1: website domain. Linda, can you help this guy out? I mean,
Speaker 1: is we love by the way, we love having you
Speaker 1: on the show. You're a great guy. And I was
Speaker 1: just thinking maybe you had a career in a digital placement,
Speaker 1: you know, marketing. I don't know. I'm gonna hang on, Linda.
Speaker 1: You're you're like the tech expert on the show. You're
Speaker 1: far more technically advanced than I am. Do you think
Speaker 1: that's a good website domain? Because I don't. I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna lie and say that Burno for a Z. People
Speaker 1: are going to spell it wrongfully. Nobody's gonna find it.
Speaker 1: It's not intuitive, it's not How about Mark b first
Speaker 1: Senate dot com? Try that one? All right, we may
Speaker 1: have to change it then, Sean, because you you are
Speaker 1: pretty savvy at this stuff, So I'll talk to my people.
Speaker 1: How about burn all that's kind of my name, it's
Speaker 1: kind of my given name. Okay, But then once they
Speaker 1: find in the site, you can you can call yourself
Speaker 1: Berno then no catch on. Then you can have Berno
Speaker 1: hats and Burno T shirts and Berno whatevers for sale,
Speaker 1: don't you know, do whatever you wants? Yeah, yeah, there
Speaker 1: you go, bumper stickers, maybe yard signs. I don't know
Speaker 1: what do I know. I've only been doing this thirty
Speaker 1: three years. I don't know much you've done it. Yes,
Speaker 1: you're you're a genius at this stuff. And night when
Speaker 1: a wise man talks you listen. You don't play cards
Speaker 1: against somebody with the sena first name, and he don't
Speaker 1: get the land worn Asia. When Sean handed he gives
Speaker 1: your political advice, you take it. You'd be surprised how
Speaker 1: often I'm ignored, Linda. That's a fact, isn't it. I
Speaker 1: don't know. The way he just answered that question was perfect.
Speaker 1: He's been doing well as far as I'm concerned. I appreciate,
Speaker 1: we appreciate you being with us. Attorney General, Great State
Speaker 1: of Arizona, Bernou Bernovich, Mark Bernovich. Hopefully I'll have a
Speaker 1: new website. But the next time he's on the program,
Speaker 1: thanks for being with us. Thank you. Sean eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine four one shot. No, nobody's gonna find that website.
Speaker 1: I'm not disagreeing with you. It is not into it.
Speaker 1: But to see it spell but shined with me about
Speaker 1: a minute to me, what's your phone number? Sean one
Speaker 1: eight hundred nine shine m And do you know how
Speaker 1: many people spell that name wrong? A ton? That's why right?
Speaker 1: What do you know? Well, we have plenty of we
Speaker 1: have so many calls we can't handle the calls that
Speaker 1: we had. It's not the point. The point is is
Speaker 1: that we actually spell the name wrong, and we have
Speaker 1: all the wrong spellings registered to reroute to this number.
Speaker 1: So but but there's a reason I don't spell it
Speaker 1: out often because if you can't figure that part out,
Speaker 1: you're probably not going to make it on the show anyway,
Speaker 1: because you're not stun enough to figure it out. The
Speaker 1: people that spell a wn think you spell it wrong,
Speaker 1: So you know, no, there would be too many numbers
Speaker 1: if that's not the point, A U N or s
Speaker 1: h a wun. So people have to figure out it's
Speaker 1: s E a N And if you figure it out,
Speaker 1: you're probably smart enough to get on the air. My
Speaker 1: point is is that what he should do is he
Speaker 1: should buy all the misspellings and rolled back to Brno
Speaker 1: for a Z and tell him. Because I don't, I
Speaker 1: will do as I go with this quick break right
Speaker 1: back I twenty five to the top of the hour.
Speaker 1: All right, some of the other news we haven't gotten
Speaker 1: to yet. Um is an angry teacher. This is pretty
Speaker 1: interesting here. And then East des Moines, Iowa High School
Speaker 1: who's not allowed to teach CRT critical race theory and
Speaker 1: then the unhappy teacher, by the way, because of a
Speaker 1: mandate from the Iowa Governor, Kim Reynolds to do the
Speaker 1: Pledge of Allegiance and have an American flag in every classroom.
Speaker 1: Oh oh, I get the vapors. Listen. This is what
Speaker 1: today is the first time our country has recognized jenteenth
Speaker 1: his national holiday, and yet aren't getting ready to go
Speaker 1: back to school in the My governor has put into
Speaker 1: place some ridiculous legislation that many governors across the country
Speaker 1: have put into place, such as I can't teach anything divisive,
Speaker 1: I can't teach critical race theory, and I can't teach
Speaker 1: about racial equity. This is it all public schools, colleges,
Speaker 1: and universities. So teachers in the past, we've been an
Speaker 1: activists every show of last year. We really need to
Speaker 1: stand up and do it right for our kids right now.
Speaker 1: So this is a call to action, teachers. We got
Speaker 1: to stand up and fight for our kids. Because this
Speaker 1: is the other thing that my governor has mandated for
Speaker 1: next year is that every classroom it's mandatory that we
Speaker 1: all have an American flag, and it is mandatory that
Speaker 1: we all do the Pledge of allegiance every morning. You're
Speaker 1: going to be hearing from me a lot next year.
Speaker 1: So I'm like listening to this, and I'm saying, Okay,
Speaker 1: if you're if you think your role as a teacher
Speaker 1: is not to talk about at all what makes America
Speaker 1: a great country, I don't think you belong. You know
Speaker 1: who wants to send their kids into that classroom? And
Speaker 1: this is where this is where parents are just trapped
Speaker 1: because if we all have to pay taxes, a lot
Speaker 1: of your tax money, especially like property tax money, all
Speaker 1: that goes to schools, whether you're using the schools or not.
Speaker 1: If you want to send your kid to a private school,
Speaker 1: then you got to pay more money on top of that.
Speaker 1: A lot of people can't afford to do that. I
Speaker 1: mean my mom, the prison guard, my dad, the family Corps,
Speaker 1: probation officer, and waiter. I mean, they never took vacations.
Speaker 1: They didn't buy new cars till much later in life
Speaker 1: because they couldn't afford them because they were sending their
Speaker 1: kids to Catholic schools, as you know, relatively inexpensive then,
Speaker 1: but it still was a big chunk of their budget.
Speaker 1: And they they worked over time, they did everything they
Speaker 1: could to make it work because they didn't like the
Speaker 1: public school system. I mean, it's just getting worse every day.
Speaker 1: And then you look at I'll tell you another example
Speaker 1: of you know, government mess. Everything the government touches as
Speaker 1: a mess. You know, for those of you that believe
Speaker 1: these false promises of New Green Deal socialism, you know,
Speaker 1: just look at the track record of the same people
Speaker 1: that are selling it to you, because they're the ones
Speaker 1: that bankrupted Medicare and Social Security. They never put the
Speaker 1: money in a lock box like they promised. They're the
Speaker 1: ones that can have that at support, defunding the police,
Speaker 1: as mantling the police, no bail laws, so they can't
Speaker 1: even keep you safe and secure in your own town
Speaker 1: or own city. They don't believe in law and order.
Speaker 1: You know, these are the same people that promised you
Speaker 1: you get to keep your doctor, keep your care and
Speaker 1: save money, and millions lost their doctors, lost their care,
Speaker 1: and we're all paying about two hundred and fifty percent more.
Speaker 1: So now you're going to trust them with every other
Speaker 1: aspect of your life. Why would you put your faith,
Speaker 1: hope and trust in people that fail to such a
Speaker 1: high level. You know, look look at all the great
Speaker 1: benefits as the unemployment and benefits. It's killing small businesses.
Speaker 1: I told you the story the other day of the
Speaker 1: CEO of Lane's Chicken Fingers in Texas. I hope, by
Speaker 1: the way, there's a there's a company a where is
Speaker 1: it located in Florida? It's actually a chicken salad. It's
Speaker 1: it's a chicken salad fast food place. Did you ever
Speaker 1: hear about this place, Linda? All these variations of chicken salad.
Speaker 1: The chicken salad's phenomenal. Who would ever think that you
Speaker 1: can turn chickens? What are the variations? There's like all
Speaker 1: different kinds of tasting. You can look it up. I
Speaker 1: don't remember them, but I've tried many. Did you get?
Speaker 1: And I love all of them? I love chicken salad
Speaker 1: and you can't remember one of them and tell me
Speaker 1: about it. I got the main one, all right? How's that?
Speaker 1: The regular one, regular chicken salad. It was so amazing
Speaker 1: you got the same same. Hell yeah, no, I've tried
Speaker 1: like five or six of them. They got all different
Speaker 1: versions of chicken salad. But that's all they sell is
Speaker 1: chicken salad. And the place is like you gotta wait
Speaker 1: online just to get your chicken salad. It's unbelievable. Now
Speaker 1: that there's CEO of Lane's Chicken Fingers, I guarantee you
Speaker 1: this place has to be doing well, and I'm glad.
Speaker 1: I'm always happy to hear the people do well in business.
Speaker 1: The food industry is a very tough business. I've worked
Speaker 1: in chicken salad, Chick that's it, Yes, yeah, I found it.
Speaker 1: One of the versions. Let's see the chicken salad, chicken salad,
Speaker 1: chick Hearts Soul, and chicken salad Stacy, the original chick
Speaker 1: always made fresh chicken salad BLT. Then we got the
Speaker 1: Southern favorite, got cranberries. Told you, I told you, Actually
Speaker 1: didn't tell me anything. That's why I had to look
Speaker 1: it up. I told you they had all the different versions.
Speaker 1: You're asking me to remember, I haven't been in in
Speaker 1: Tampa in a long time, and the place does phenomenal business.
Speaker 1: Phenomenal um anyway, So I'm obviously this guy that owns
Speaker 1: Lane's Chicken Fingers in Texas talks about paying teenage managers
Speaker 1: fifty grand. That's not bad. That's a really good salary
Speaker 1: for a teenager. That's serious money. That's a really good
Speaker 1: salary for anybody. Anyway, here's the CEO of this company.
Speaker 1: If the next time find out what the locations are.
Speaker 1: We're gonna be in Texas next Wednesday, and when I'm
Speaker 1: down there, I'm going to try and seek out this
Speaker 1: place if it's anywhere near where. If there's a place
Speaker 1: near where we are, would you check that out for me?
Speaker 1: I will find out. I don't even know where I'm
Speaker 1: going in Texas? Do you know where we were going?
Speaker 1: I have no idea. I know where you're going where?
Speaker 1: We can't tell anybody had surprise. Oh well, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: be with the President and with the governor Greg Abbott.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be fun. I'm President Trump. Anyway, this is
Speaker 1: the CEO of the company. Tell me about the nineteen
Speaker 1: year old who you did, indeed make a store manager
Speaker 1: at fifty thousand bucks a year. Did you see his potential? Absolutely? Jason,
Speaker 1: who's you're referring to. Jason started with us when he
Speaker 1: was sixteen, you know, nine dollars and fifty cent hourly employee.
Speaker 1: He started with a lot of other people. He showed
Speaker 1: the potential, the work ethic, the drive. He understood our culture,
Speaker 1: our values, and when the opportunity arose he took advantage
Speaker 1: of it. Are there a lot of young I mean,
Speaker 1: I can see how some youngsters in your organization might
Speaker 1: want to say, I forget college if I can make
Speaker 1: fifty grand in my teens. I'm staying, baby, Is that
Speaker 1: how they looking at things? I believe they do. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're they're looking at a decision to get into fifty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars one hundred thousand, hundred, fift thousand dollars of death,
Speaker 1: to go to college and then maybe get out and
Speaker 1: make fifty thousand. I like to tell these kids that
Speaker 1: they can become a general manager, make really good money,
Speaker 1: and then the ultimate goal is to let them own
Speaker 1: their own franchise businesses at some point. I mean, fifty grand.
Speaker 1: I think that's pretty awesome. All right, let's get to
Speaker 1: our busy phones. Many of you being very patient here.
Speaker 1: Let's say hi to Amy's in Colorado. Hey, Amy, how
Speaker 1: are you glad you called? I'm good, Sean, thank you
Speaker 1: so much for taking my call. I appreciate it. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you for calling. Sure And just a click comment
Speaker 1: on Joe Biden. We've been talking a lot about his
Speaker 1: cognitive decline, and it really is disturbing and What disturbs
Speaker 1: me even more Sean, is that his family is putting
Speaker 1: him out there on the world's state, not worried about
Speaker 1: what other countries are thinking of the United States or
Speaker 1: how every think, so they dislike the power. His wife
Speaker 1: is the biggest example that I can find. She's encouraging
Speaker 1: him to do this, and I don't think she should be. Well,
Speaker 1: I gotta you know, when you really think about it,
Speaker 1: you know, it's at the end of the day, what
Speaker 1: are we going to do. We have to fight for
Speaker 1: our country and we have to fight for twenty twenty two.
Speaker 1: Do you see any other alternative? No, I really don't.
Speaker 1: We really have to get the message out there that
Speaker 1: our country can't stand, you know, for this for much longer.
Speaker 1: And you know, anybody that has a family member who
Speaker 1: has in cognitive decline or has seen it themselves knows
Speaker 1: what's going on and should be outrage as well. And
Speaker 1: we should be speaking out more about it. Maybe it's
Speaker 1: taboo to talk about I don't know, but we should
Speaker 1: really be pointing out the bad choice he's making. You
Speaker 1: do it every day, and that's why I listened to
Speaker 1: Sean to get the real news. And I appreciate what
Speaker 1: you do every day. We just need to get the
Speaker 1: message out on our messages getting out. I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: I'm feeling a rising tide of real concern about the country,
Speaker 1: and I think it feels very reminiscent of twenty ten
Speaker 1: and the Tea Party movement and twenty sixteen in the
Speaker 1: rise of President Trump. And I could just tell you
Speaker 1: that if I'm right about this, and if everybody does
Speaker 1: their part, we'll be able to turn things around. We'll
Speaker 1: know a lot more after election Dot Night in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty two, because you got Senate seats in Florida, Georgia,
Speaker 1: North and South Carolina, New Hampshire, Wisconsin, Ohio, Arizona. These
Speaker 1: are going to be pivotal, pivotal races. And if the
Speaker 1: Republicans do well they take back the House also, we'll
Speaker 1: be in good shape. Anyway, I appreciate the call. Eight
Speaker 1: hundred nine for one Seawn is our number. If you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program about the
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden family. You know is there we have We
Speaker 1: have a dual justice system in America. It's that simple.
Speaker 1: Unequal justice, don't We don't have equal application of our laws.
Speaker 1: We don't have equal justice under the law. Uh, let's
Speaker 1: say hi. Two. Let's see here. Steve is in Indiana.
Speaker 1: What's up, Steve? Glad you called? Yes, thank you, so
Speaker 1: I'm taking my call. I want What I want to
Speaker 1: suggest is not easy. I'm not I'm not the full
Speaker 1: step to think this will all be easy or popular,
Speaker 1: but I think it's one step a step in the
Speaker 1: fight for what's going on to the order that that
Speaker 1: conservative governors ought to be availing themselves up in order
Speaker 1: to push the illegals into into liberal states or back home.
Speaker 1: And that is we can't stop them from coming across, obviously,
Speaker 1: but we can make their life unbearable here in this
Speaker 1: way they We have to remember that the people themselves
Speaker 1: who are coming, yes, they are victims of horrendous crimes,
Speaker 1: can be across. But they're also both victim and oppressor
Speaker 1: of themselves because they are the financial engine. By paying
Speaker 1: their two or three thousand dollars to the Coyotes to
Speaker 1: bring them across, they're paying that to the cartels who
Speaker 1: are themselves organized crime. And that organized crime of child trafficking,
Speaker 1: sex trafficking, human trafficking, drug trafficking is organized crime, and
Speaker 1: it falls under the Rico Act. Every state has a
Speaker 1: version of the federal Rico Act. Texas has one, and
Speaker 1: under the Rico Act, if you participate in organized crime,
Speaker 1: which the people coming across are, and then they send
Speaker 1: money back home to get the rest of their people here,
Speaker 1: all of that is the financial engine, the operating capital
Speaker 1: for the organized crime of the cartels to do their trafficking,
Speaker 1: and because they are participating in that, that makes them
Speaker 1: subject to RICO. What's unpopular is I would if I
Speaker 1: was a governor, I would make it clear that if
Speaker 1: you are feeding, if you are teaching, if you are employing,
Speaker 1: if you are in any way giving aid and comfort
Speaker 1: to someone participating organized crime, which they are, then you
Speaker 1: are subject to arrest and you are subject to the
Speaker 1: forfeiture of your properties or whatever it was you were doing.
Speaker 1: To maturely assist those of organized crime, and in doing
Speaker 1: so you don't have to rest many. But I think
Speaker 1: you'd send a message that if you get caught with
Speaker 1: the illegals in your hotel, which I would take their
Speaker 1: hotels too. Or you're missing a very big point here.
Speaker 1: Joe and Kamala are paying for the hotels, well, that
Speaker 1: be using your money to pay for them. Well, I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't disagree, but I would still go after if
Speaker 1: it's holiday in I would go after holiday and put
Speaker 1: them on notice that we are going to go after
Speaker 1: you at the Rico Act. But even if it comes down,
Speaker 1: and this is the unpopular part, we know there's politicians
Speaker 1: in Texas even who are in favor of them because
Speaker 1: of the Chief Labor and they're gonna they're donors and
Speaker 1: they're going to be pushing back on politicians. But look,
Speaker 1: it's an eighty percent solution in my opinion, that at
Speaker 1: least an eighty percent offering of something that might work.
Speaker 1: And we have to try everything. The liberals are trying
Speaker 1: everything that's unethical, illegal, immoral, but because of their power,
Speaker 1: they continue to just push it and don't care. I say,
Speaker 1: we've got to try and whether it's popular or not,
Speaker 1: in order to make it happen and make them pushback
Speaker 1: against it, not just automatically take off the counter. But
Speaker 1: if you look up state Rico, this falls under organized
Speaker 1: crime and the people who are coming are participants in
Speaker 1: that crime. And therefore I think there's a lever and
Speaker 1: something that the governors can put out to their people
Speaker 1: that if you get caught with these people in your
Speaker 1: in your bailey Wick and you're assisting them, you're assisting
Speaker 1: them under the Rico Act. You will be arrested, you'll
Speaker 1: be charged, and you're properly likely forfeited. And I will
Speaker 1: suspect that there'll be a wave of people that say, look,
Speaker 1: don't don't, don't come here. You're not welcome here. And
Speaker 1: eventually the people themselves have to make a decision. I
Speaker 1: either moved to a liberal state where they'll employ me,
Speaker 1: or I'll moon back home because I don't have a
Speaker 1: place to be here in Texas. That's I think it's
Speaker 1: worth the trot. Appreciate the call. I wish we did
Speaker 1: have people that respected our laws, our borders, our sovereignty,
Speaker 1: and not politicians aiding and abetting lawbreaking, because if you
Speaker 1: or I did it, we'd be in jail. That's gonna
Speaker 1: wap things up. But today Hannity Tonight nine East and
Speaker 1: on the Fox News Channel News, you won't get from
Speaker 1: the mob. You'll meet Mike mccartock tonight. He's a leader
Speaker 1: of this argon group. They want to join Idaho, five
Speaker 1: counties in organ they want out anyway. And then there's
Speaker 1: a guy in Buckhead, Bill White. He wants Buckhead to
Speaker 1: be separate from Atlanta. We also have Joe Concha, Dan Bongino,
Speaker 1: Devin Nounez, Jim Jordan, and Mark Bernovich all coming up
Speaker 1: nine Eastern tonight on Hannity