WEBVTT - Separating Digital Duds From Valuable NFT Art 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's get over though,

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>right now to Roger Dickerman. He's the founder and CEO

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of artifacts UM. The website is artifacts a R T

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I f e X dot Art. They just held a

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>show UM Digital Icons plus Miami or Digital Icons and

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Miami on June seven with a bunch of artwork, original artwork,

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>three D sculpture and f t s. That should be

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>your clue as to what we're gonna talk about, so

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>non fungible tokens. Roger, thanks for joining us. What what

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.639
<v Speaker 1>did you actually show at the show? Are we talking

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>about physical art that you hang on the wall, three

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>D sculptures like three D in real life? Or was

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>there the were these all sort of computer renders that

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a pleasure to be here. Thank you for having me.

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>So what we showed was digital art and so the

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>proxy is the real world. Imagine a painting on your

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>wall that would be a two D and imagine a

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>sculptor took that painting, a character in that painting, and

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>made it a literal sculpture three D version of that.

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>We're doing that in the digital sphere. So we have

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the two D version of an artist's artwork, and we

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>have a digital sculpture that can be displayed all over

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the place in three D. Four Can you define, Roger,

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>what is a non fungible token? Think digital ownership. So

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>think a digital artist for the past several decades making

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>fabulous art, doing it on behalf of a brand, a commission,

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>a contract. They had no way to do that on

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>their own. One one of my favorite stories an artist

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>named Bill ellis part of the Artifacts project. He worked

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>for an ad agency and he had Nike Lebron James

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>come to him for his work, but he had to

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>do it under the ad agency's brand. That was a

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>sixty five dollar contract. He got paid less than five dollars.

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Non Flungible tokens allow a creator like that to go

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>directly to consumer, to collector with valuable artwork and make

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a transaction. But what I don't understand is say, um,

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I made a three D digital render of a Ducati

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Panagali and I photo shot by dog Steve driving it.

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I could sell the n f T to Paul. That

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>guarantees him the rights to own that digital file, and

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>then I could just give it away copies of it

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to anyone else. Right, So does Paul really own it?

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>This is a great question, right, he owns the spot

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>on the blockchain. Now you can look at physical artwork.

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>To look at museum famously or infamously housing forgeries for

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of years, right, unbeknownst to anybody, physical paintings can

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>be forged to. Physical drawings can be forged to. An

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 1>artist can overprints, right unknown to the collectors, you face

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>these same issue whose ownership matters? It's faked in the

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>human DNA. People want something and they want the true

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>version of that thing. And if he's help with that,

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>how does a consumer you know that they're getting I

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>guess the real thing versus fake? I mean, do you

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of think this investment market is safe? I guess that.

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of a different word, But do you

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's safe? It doesn't even have to be fake? Right,

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>A copy could be exactly the same as the original,

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>It could be the exact same code. But if you

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have the spot on the blockchain, does that make

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it less valuable? I believe it does. I believe it does,

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and I believe that you know, the platform or artist

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>providence matter. So where are you acquiring this from. You're

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>starting to see artists step forward with their own contracts,

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>You're smart contracts, that is, you're starting to see, you know, platforms,

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>established brands step forward as a trust in place to

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>transact and both of those sources will help with that

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>verification process. And in honestly, you know that verification process

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is easy year with an n f T than it

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is a physical painting. I think there are still issues

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>around the the uh you know, whether the Mona Lisa right,

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it's really the Mona Lisa or not. So Roger

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>around these halls here Bloomber, we talk a lot about investments,

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and I guess the question is do you consider n

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>f t s to be a true slash real investment

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>or is this maybe a fleeting sign of a very

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>expensive and frothy market. There are many There are many

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>aspects of n f t s that are just frouthy

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>market will pass, you know, like ships sailing in the

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>night will never hear from them again. However, here the

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>tried and true value propositions of n f T s

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to break it down as art, utility and access art

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>global art market over fifty billion dollars. That has been

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a thing for a long long time. Digital art is

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the most recent art form against several decades old. There's

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>real value. Their auction houses like Christie's and Southeby's starting

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to step up to the plate and see that Christie's

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>recently proof of sovereignty auctions tell the bees recently natively

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>digital auctions. They are leaning into this. They understand there's

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>value and digital art then utility. Now n ft s

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>can do more than just art. Art lad the way.

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Digital artists lead the way. But we're talking about games,

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about our tickets will be n f t s.

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about our jerseys and future metaverses will be

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>n fp They're gonna be around for a long time.

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>The question there, with utility in mind, what can your

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>n f T do? And then lastly access You see

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>these fabulous cases of artists, creatives and beyond opening the

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>doors with their n f T s. For example, another

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>artist is part of our project, Robbie Trivino on his

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>own he's UH Magic the Gathering Tool music. He did

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>some covers for them. He's built a social profile to

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>several hundred thousand people, and he was able to sell

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a key. It's an access key. It's an art piece,

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but also a key to future prints of his future,

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>access points of his future meet and griefs of his

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>future gatherings of his And I believe he he grossed

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred thousand dollars yesterday. Tool uses that guy's

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>art a lot. Yeah, And and I love um tool

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>so much, and I love the artwork as well, But

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I just to me, I don't get the value, like

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is it do you use it as a screen saver then?

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Or is it like on your iPhone? Um, it seems

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>different from having what we consider to be the actual

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>mona Lisa, you know what's interesting? You touch on that.

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>And I make this point a lot. And I think

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>as this market develops, we're gonna see two things spearhead

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>this notion of how do you display digital art, which

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>will help with that value connection. We're gonna see better

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>frames flat out better frames, frames that you can put

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>on your wall in your home that will blow any

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>physical frame away. They will be thin, they will be sleek,

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 1>they'll be able to look traditional if you want, to

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to build into the wall if you want,

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and they are going to blow your mind. The art

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 1>will be able to move, it will change based on

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>time of day, It will be programmed to do different things.

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>N f T s are really going to shine when

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>those frames improve. And then also in digital lands. You know,

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we talk about futuristic movies, right ready Player one, Steven Spielberg.

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>You get into that future world in which people spend

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more time in these digital universes when

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the display used cases improved there, and you can take

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>your n f T into those digital worlds where you

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of time. That's also going to drive value. Alright,

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>very cool to me. The most interesting thing is just

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about these concepts and trying to wrap my forty

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>seven year old brain around them. I like it. I

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>like it. Roger, thanks so much for joining us. Roger Dickerman,

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>their founder and CEO of Artifacts, talking to us about

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>non fungible tokens. It has you have to admit that

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely a fascinating topic. This is Bloomberg right now.

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in Darren Williams. He's the CEO

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of Southern Bank Corps. Southern Bank Corps is a for profit,

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>mission driven community developed develop financial institution. They're based in

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the Mississippi Delta. UH. Darren, thanks so much for joining

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>us here. UM. I love to start off with you

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>just kind of giving us a thirty thousand foot view

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of Southern Bankcorps. Who are you guys, and just give

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of the type of business that you

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>guys are pursuing. Sure, Paul, first of all, thanks for

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>having us on so Southern Bank Corp. We are, as

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you said, a community development financial institution or a c

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>d f B I. We're about two billion in assets, Fidget.

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Two locations spread out through the Arkansas makes the Delta

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 1>UH and one of the most persistently poor community of

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Our our our communities are largely rules

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and financial, African American and low wealth communities. We are

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in place where many banks have fled with bank consolidation. UM.

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Happened across the country for you know, you know, two

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>dozen years now. The number of banks and rule and

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>underserving low wealth communities continues to shrink, and we know

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>when those communities don't have access to account of credit

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 1>and traditional financial products and services, then they are often

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 1>um inundated with predator are types of alternative financial services.

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>So we've served those communities where others have chosen to play.

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So last week Square announced the allocation of million dollars

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>as part of this hundred million dollar investment. You're making

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a minority and underserved communities. How are you doing that?

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>How are you getting them help? Well? We well, first

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of all, let me say we're extremely um pleased and

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>excited to have Square as a shareholder. Square, of course

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>is a has a superior payments platform. They are a

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>final sal technology company, one of the best around, and

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>so they have their endorsements. To have their support in

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>their partnership means a great deal. They invested common equity

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>mopen million dollar common equity investment in Southern which will

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>allow us to grow and expand, to go deeper UH

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and to go further in the market we serve, and

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and to expand traditional places and UH. In fact, one

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we're very focused on is increasing

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and expanding our financial technology ourselves. So we u over

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the last four years of develop a cloud based corp

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>process of which is the back off the bank UM

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>and on that platform we build digital verticals or the

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>fintech apps. So to have one of the world's leading

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>fintech companies UH partner with us, we are excited about

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>what we might learn from them. UH. So their investments

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to really help us to go deeper and

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>further in helping to serve those who often left out

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and left behind, forgotten about by the financial services space. Darren,

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you know when Matt and I speak to UM CEO

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is like yourself. You'll always like to get a sense

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of how the pandemic has impacted their business, their market.

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Love to get a sense. We know that some of

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the underserved communities around this country were uh disproportionately impacted

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>by the pandemic, by the economic disruption. Tell us about

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.839
<v Speaker 1>your markets and your business and your customers. So, Paul,

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, one thing that that you have to think

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>about is even prior to the pandemic, the Delta region

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most persistent poor community United States.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>It suffered from a number of ill effects of just

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, just poverty, lack of educational opportunities like

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>economic opportunities, and so that's why we do the work

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that we do. That's why our work really focused on

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 1>things that are proven to build wealth and move people

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>from financial UH insecurity, financial security, and so the markets

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that we served that were suffering prior to the pandemics,

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>but like um many markets, the pandemic had had a

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.119
<v Speaker 1>had a huge impact on on retail, on on our hotels,

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>on our restaurant customers. We were able to provide the

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>paycheck Protection Dollar program UH to almost twenty three hundred

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>businesses in our markets, about a hundred and fifty million

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>dollars and paycheck protection dollars that we provided, and many

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of them, many of the customers that we talked, we

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>actually we actually did a survey and some fifty percent

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>of them said they had no other alternative UH and

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>would have probably closed down but for those paycheck protection dollars.

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>And so really we're proud to provide that SBA program

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that support to them and they are slowly recovering UH

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's it's hitting that some are doing better

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>than others, but they without that, the devastation would have

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>been much worse. You, um you were spearheading that ten

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar push, and you also were working with Jamie

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Diamond at JP Morgan David Solomon at Goldman Sachs on

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's Great American Economic Revival initiative. How do you

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>see that we're continuing with this new administration, Well, I

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>can I can tell you that the first meeting, the

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of the financial services team we had with President Trump.

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Really proud that David Solomon, Brian Wannahan, UMU and others

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>really encouraged administration to um support and invest and make

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it and and and and support the efforts. Had a

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>car about to make sure those paycheck protection dollars went

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to minority depositor institutions and to see the bias because

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>we serve those who are often left out and left

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>behind and don't have access to larger banks. And so

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>really proud to have that partnership. And now that Wall

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Street partnership UH is taking taken additional form. So Brian

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>mornahand in Bank America also made a multimillion dollar investment

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of them just just some time they go. And so

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>really please at these partnerships with cit if I, NBIS

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and and and Corporate America continues to flourish. Also proud

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of the philanthrophic community, which has been a long time

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>support of mission focused banks are even redoubling their efforts.

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And now the government you asked really about theerka's response.

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So for the CD five space, there's some twelve billion

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars that's coming to the C five space through the

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 1>government support. And in fact, today Vice President Harris is

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>going to make an announcement UH and she's gonna be

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>introduced by Lisa mensa Opportunity Financial Network, one of our

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>leading trade associations for cd if by loan funds UH

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to talk about the this administrative support

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of this industry and so really proud to have that

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>attention focused on right now. All right, Darren, thanks so

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Darren was one of the Bloomberg

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty and he continue to lead the push to help

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>those UH. Support those probably is a better way to

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>say it, that are under banked in the Mississippi Delta

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>area and throughout the u US. Let's bring in Ben

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>Emmons UH. He is a Managing director at Global Macro Strategy,

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>UM of Global macro Strategy at Medley Global Advisor has

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>been up been getting your notes and absolutely loving your research.

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Let me get your take first on the inflation debate,

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>because this is obviously the focus of markets. On the

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>one hand, you've got fiscal stimulus of five trillion and

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>more coming, um, monetary easing of an extra well four

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>trillion on the balance sheet, and then some um pent

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>up demand by consumers with fient savings rates, um companies

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that are investing capex and UH and spending money like

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>they haven't in many, many years. And what's holding us

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>back then from from real inflation that's gonna stick around

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for a while. Man, thanks having us again. Um, yeah,

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that's it's actually an interesting question. Maps to the extent

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of that, how do you define transitory as we talk

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>about it? Right? Like, you know, if you look at

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the PPI data today, you drill in that you see

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the autose and sector example that was off the charts,

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it's like twenty seven or thirty eight percent year and

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>your change in producer prices on those and that that

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds a lot like a peak inflation, right, That's very extreme.

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what markets are looking at. If you

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:25.359
<v Speaker 1>get these kinds of jumps in these sort of categories

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>becomes almost untenable while you cannot really sustain that price level,

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>whereas the art factors that you mentioned, of all the

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>spent of demand and savings and cap acts, that's all

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>working itself through the economy could sustain at least a

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>higher level of inflation that we've had pre pandemic, when

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we were really in a low inflation environment. So I

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>think if you square too, I think we have a

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>transitory narrative about, yes, you have excessive price increases in

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>some categories, that this happened to be a major demand

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>because as we unmine this pandemic slowly, at the same time,

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>there's an underlying current that is clearly pointing to that

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>at least the growth of the economy stays stronger, and

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that should lead us at least closer to that long

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>term average of what the Fed wants. Two. Looking at

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the high yield, they're not very high, Ben, I mean,

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just extraordinary what's happened in that market. Just give

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of what your call is there, what

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>your what, what what your take is. Yeah, I find

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>an interesting cold, Paul, because you know, if you look

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>at how yield has done really well, you know, if

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to invest in fixed income, that's what that's

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the place to be this year. Right, And and if

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you drill in there too, what's really driving it again,

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it's energy, materials and autos, right, those are the sectors

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>have done exceptionally well. So there's a lot about I think,

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, global demands reopening. That is, you know, have

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>investors in the in particularly those bonds, and I guess

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>if you add in the cruise lines and the leash hospitality,

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they've been issuing bonds during the pandemic, and they they've

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>been scooped up, right, So I yield is strong really

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>because the economy is strong. It is there's very little

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the fault risk at this moment. But we also have

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to take note of the fundamental factors. You know, one

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>key factor I think that is driving inflation is his

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>used car component in CPI and in p p I

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to sustain that way. So I do

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>think that that high yield, if it is traditionally seen

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>in autos and related type of sectors. You know what

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.239
<v Speaker 1>we had back in two We've got to get an

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>oil price change right at drove the energy sector high

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>yield much wider somewhat could happened in this case too,

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 1>once these auto prices start to correct. If you have

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>this really like the situation where auto prices are just

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 1>too high and demanded supply works itself out right, I

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's where maybe somewhat of a of a down

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>draft could happen in high yield. What it means for

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>broader markets will see why it It tends to be

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty slow bleed initially, but it is to be watched

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>because it's definitely a levels that is yeah, I would say,

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>brings us back to the two thousand seven complacency levels.

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>What what do you think about the meme stocks that

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing. I spend a little time on Wall Street

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>bets today and it just blew my mind. And it's

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>not my first time there, right, it's but every time

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I go there, I'm like, holy cow. Um, there's some

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>big dogs here and and they're doing some crazy stuff,

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>but they've managed to push like game Stop into the

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Russell one thousand. Now. Um, a lot of the stocks

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're a lot of these meme stocks are big palatiners,

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a forty six billion dollar company, you know. Um, what's

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>your take on on what's going on? And do you

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of time now on Reddit. I don't

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>spend much stim on Reddit, and that's but there's an

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting platform to keep keep an eye on that there

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is in there's a lot of sentiments and hype there

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>about these stocks and seems to be communicated there quite

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit. But if you really look at that sector

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and just again look at the fundamental way, but I

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>find really interesting exactly what you're telling. You have the

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>market capitalization of some of these companies ballooning at the moment,

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's all driven by equity value increasing. And there's

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.239
<v Speaker 1>some companies Game Stuff is one of them a MC

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>two and I believe it's good or actually go go

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>one of those others two. They actually pretty levered, right,

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of short term that And what's

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>now occurring is like if you're seen with SMP last

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>week upgrading AMC's rating to triple C plus but still

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the stars rating, but it's upgrading. That's exactly the effect

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 1>from this this hype around that stock to start prices

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>off a lot, keeps going up. The equity value that

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>these to improve, the market capitalization increases, and that brings

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the leverage of that bounce sheet by itself down and

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I think this is what draws in the fundamental investors whom,

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned now have to take it more seriously

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>because those stocks have a bigger weight and say you

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>russell one thousand index, right, so fund managers have to

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to these stocks, whether they like it or not.

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>So I think if you if you look at that

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>whole space, you want to particularly look at the companies

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 1>that are that have actually short termed death and as

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a result can be able to deliver that that sort

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of speak good either indeed equity sales and use the

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>proceeds to bring down to that and world actually value

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>those up and the dead leverage goes in. Hey Ben,

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. As always, always appreciate

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 1>getting your perspective and your views across asset classes. Ben Emmons.

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>He's a managing director Global macro Strategy at the firm

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>medley A Global Advisors. We love talking to Ben. Again.

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 1>He puts out some fascinating research notes with great regularity,

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I might add, and there's always a good read giving

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>you some good thoughts for these markets. This is Bloomberg. Well,

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of economic data came out this morning. Retail

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>sales a little bit weaker than expected in the month

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of May, although the April data will was revised higher,

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>but the market scenes to be looking at that pp

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I data Producer Price index came in higher than expected,

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>so that factors into the inflation discussion. Let's break some

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 1>of these numbers down and preview what we will likely

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>here here from FED Chairman j Pal tomorrow. We do

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 1>that with Elena Shulietteva, senior US economists for Bloomberg Economics. Elena,

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Any takeaways here one

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>way or the other out of the economic data that

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>we saw this morning that jumped out to you. So

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>the retail sales report, yes, at the headline it showed

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a decline, but you need to remember where it's coming from.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So the previous two months of data were revised higher,

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>basically showing even a bigger boost from the stimulus checks

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that consumers received earlier this year. So this is just

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 1>normalizing from significantly elevated levels of retail sales. If you

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the retail sales in level terms, there are

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>still way above the trend that persisted before the crisis.

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>So the data still supports our expectations for a very

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>robust reading on consumers spending in the second quarter of

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>this year when GDP numbers are released. And one more

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>thing to highlight is that the report actually shows ongoing

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>rotation uh in terms of conser what preferences consumers are

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>dying to get back into, you know, experiences, things like

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>dining out, vacationing and things like that. And the report

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>actually shows that there is a pickup in the services

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>sector of the economy if you look at the restaurants

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>sales components of the reports. So that is all a

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 1>pretty good news. Actually, I think I wonder about the

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>savings UM thesis Lena every time I read about especially

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>UM an inflation hawk. But anyone who's talking about big

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 1>growth coming up says it's going to be powered by savings,

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and I, you know that data I can't see through.

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, does that count money I put away in

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>my I ra A? Does that count the meme stocks

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying? How is it measured? And how broad is

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that savings? Does everybody have a ton of savings or

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is it just you know, rich people on the coasts.

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's very difficult to assess. But yeah, a lot

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of it is held in um UH in the hands

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of more high income people, so a part of it

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>will go into the stock market, I think, but it

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that the rest will just stay in the

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>savings and checking accounts. So there are a lot of

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:24.239
<v Speaker 1>different ways to look at this data. So one is

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>just simply to look at at how savings and checking

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 1>accounts UH compared to prependemic trends, and there's a huge

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>discrepancy there, so there's a lot more money held in

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>checking and savings accounts. You can also look at saving

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 1>strength UH based on personal income and spending data, which

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>usually is released at the end of the months each month,

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>so that shows two point three trillion extra savings in

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>the hands of the US consumer. While not all of

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it will be spent consumer servings to just that about

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of this money will be spent on goods

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>and services, and I think that's going to be an

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>important driver, along with other things such as a powerful

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>wealth effect that we will see this year. So some

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>still know his money basically helped h to boost a

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>consumer spending in the beginning of the year, and UH

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>those more powerful trends like savings and the wealth effect

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>will continue to put consumer spending higher as the year progresses.

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, Elena, let's fast forward to tomorrow preview of

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>what we may hear? Bet Chairman Pow, what are you

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>looking for? So the market will be looking at whether

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Mr Powell flips in terms of UH his message, and

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's gonna happen. Can you afford to

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>do that without losing his credibility? I mean that would

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>really be giving up. He would be a huge loser

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>if he did that now, and to use some trump

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like that, but doesn't have any reason to do so.

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>So uh. Basically, back in equal he said that the

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>recovery is far from complete and the FED will continue

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to provide accommodation until the recovery is complete. So it

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>was not complete back then, it's not complete now. If

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you look at the payrolls report, write the latest two

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of them, so that actually reinforces that is message from

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the Fed. So despite an inflation pick up, I think

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the Fed will stick to the same exact message. They

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>will upgrade UH their projections for inflation in the tamary

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>economic projections, but will quickly discount it as temporary. Our

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>favorite words, you know, temporary trendient factor um in the

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>press conference. One thing to which will be the dot

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>plot and whether the median dot for twenty twenty three

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>moves showing a lift of Oh yeah, that is also

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>quite far away, and I think we will speak to

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>our old book for dots go also on the terminal,

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 1>but of course, uh always great to get your take

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>as well. Elena juliet Jeva, thank you so much for

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>joining us senior US economists at Bloomberg Economics. Thanks for

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Miller three. Pet On fall Sweeney I'm on Twitter at

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio