WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off Sept 15th, 2023 (Ep. 739)

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, good afternoon, maybe good night, frendos. It is

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>leading off. I'm the Welsh, that's Casey Bubba, and we're

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by Prize Picks. Use that promo code

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>leading off today, Get locked in, get hooked up and

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>play some prize picks because we are going to be

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 1>prize picking today. Oh dear friend as, I hope you

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>guys are doing great. I hope you guys are winning

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>your playoff matchups. I am continuously every night looking at

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 1>the scores, updating, trying to see where I can get

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>an edge. Maybe we can help you today a little

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>bit less news at the top that we're going to do,

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>or just headlining type of things in replacement of maybe

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>helping you guys pick up some players. I've got some

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>category chasing, so I picked a player that is readily

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>available across the board. If you're trying to pick up

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.959
<v Speaker 1>some hitting categories. We're going to be talking about some

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>streamers for the weekend streaming. I've got some options we

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>can dig through. Answer your questions. We got some bets,

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of this, a little bit of that.

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a Corbyn Carroll and I destination today.

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I I was gonna say my creativity, but not to

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>break the fourth wall, Bubba. But we didn't travel anywhere.

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>But I am wearing the Corbyn Carrol shirt, the fun

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>Friday shirt. This is the additional Carol shirt if everybody

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>wants to know, Like see here, look this was us

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>at the Grand Canyon and see it's the same shirt.

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.839
<v Speaker 1>So it is the there rego. There's the fund shirt.

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I know it's a Cocoboa Friday. Oh rock show.

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Sorry you got you gotta love it. How are we doing?

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Brother? We're doing good. We're doing good. It's a Friday.

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Ready to get into the weekend. Baseball still cranking out,

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 2>but it's just been some weird stuff on the diamond lately.

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 2>If you're playing Fantasy, so buckle up for the last

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 2>two weeks, is all I can say. Yeah hopefully.

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean you should be relatively prepared for that. I

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>think I kind of forget I do this every year.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I forget how wild the last couple of weeks are

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>from betting perspective, like trying to get in on like

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>prop bets. I didn't have a good day on Wednesday.

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>The bets are weird, the games are weird, the playing

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>time is odd. Everything is. This is a very strange

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>time of year, and it also creates the bug. And

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I did this on I t L where he wanted

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to do his whole like we should en buy September

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>first type of thing, and it's like maybe no, maybe it's.

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Just yeah, maybe it's almos. Maybe yeah, maybe we wouldn't

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 2>We wouldn't be doing this if that's the case.

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Very good point. Yeah, yeah, he's trying to take jobs

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>away from good hard working fantasy yeah, which is ridiculous.

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know. I think it also kind of

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>comes back to like the cry baby nature of some

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff where it's like arkn only play road

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah blah. I like variants. It does stink

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>and it hurts sometimes, but I enjoy variants across the board.

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's what we're gonna be talking about. You and

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I are not this, but you can easily find out

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>how at least half of the fantasy Baseball Twitter space is.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But Heim Bloom fired from the from the Boston Red Sox,

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and everybody's got to take because they're all Red Sox fans.

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Not you and I were West Coast guys. One of

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the few West Coast guys, but you just forget how

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>many Red Sox fans are out there, because everybody is like, like,

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>this is just like a simple firing, and everyone's like

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 1>take take, take, take, take, take, take take machine. But

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I hate his name, So I'm glad he's gone because

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I look at his name and I want to say

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a chain. I want to be super like dumb.

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know.

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Did you have any thoughts that twelve hundred other analysts

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't already said on Twitter?

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's actually pretty funny the way he said that,

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Because I mentioned it on the first pitch last night,

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm sitting there going, I had no idea he was

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 2>such a polarizing figure until the fire he took place.

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Like you said, it seemed like eight eighty percent almost

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 2>was like from the rooftops. Thank god it finally happened.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 2>There's twenty percent of going, Oh, he was just doing

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 2>his job. That's what they hired him to do. And

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, now they're throwing him out, they're blaming him

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 2>for what they told him to do. Blah blah. I

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 2>think it's funny. I don't care either way. The Red Sox,

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're going to Red Sox. They're either gonna

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 2>spend money or they're gonna keep doing what they're doing.

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's gonna matter who's in that seat,

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>but I thought I thought it was funny to see

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 2>all the reactions, Like you said, yeah.

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's crazy. So this one time, yeah, gentile

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of me. Well, it's just the name. It's the name

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is frustrating. I look at it. I think I literally

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>said it earlier in the air. I was like Chain,

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, no, huh. I'm like, uh, I call.

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Him chain every time I see it. Chain, not even

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know.

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's it's a it's a very jolting. But

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I like have a dumb brain sometimes, so it doesn't matter.

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>This one time, a long, long time ago, Bogman and

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>I were asked to come on.

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 2>This radio show.

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It was this New York radio show and we we

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>went on and they didn't really give us a prep

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>but this was like I want to say, this was

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>like a basketball time or something like that. And we

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and we went on and was like the first question

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>out the gates got him trying to think of who

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.119
<v Speaker 1>he is. You remember who the Knicks owner was Someone's

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna say it in the chat, whoever the Knicks owner

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>was was not Dolan, right, No, it was Dolan. It

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was I think so. And the first question out was like, so,

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>what you think about all this stuff going on with Dolan?

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And me and Bogman are both like what, like huh?

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And then and and and we realized, like it's such

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>an it was an East Coast bias thing, like that's

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that they live and Breathe was like

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that side and we had no idea what was going on.

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>This reminded me of the heinm Bloom thing, like I

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>think the Red Sox screwed it up. They screwed up

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the Mooki bets trade without question, big time. It hurts

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>because you're seeing the Orioles compete for a playoff run,

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees still kind of being the Yankees, the Razor

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>being better, you know, like everyone's competing. While so I know,

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it like hurts and stuff, but it just doesn't mean

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>anything to anybody else. But I know, like Red Sox

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>fans are like, ah, we got him, and then but

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>then you're inundated with it. But it is kind of

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the biggest news.

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 2>But it's pretty funny that, like you mentioned that he

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 2>messed up the Mookie Best trade, which he did, there's

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 2>no denying that. But then I saw a tweet the

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 2>other day, a couple of days ago actually about the

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 2>A's and like what they read their return for like

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Mattles and Sean Murphy and one of the other trades

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 2>that was worse than the Mookie Bets trade, and no

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 2>one in Open's getting fired because they're just trying to

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 2>move down. My point is you're seeing the difference between

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 2>winning franchises and the A's and the A's like whatever

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 2>we tried.

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, you're also saying East Coast bias. This is a

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>ver this is the newer version of East Coast bias.

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 2>I think I think if the A's guy got fired,

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 2>it would be as crazy because it's the A's.

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess, I don't know, Yeah, Like would the Angels

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>if they got rid of their leadership? Would this be

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>like twelve hunt? Maybe you know what actually might be?

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 2>It might be countrywide because of the because well that's

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 2>what I'm kind of getting out, Like would this be bigger?

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>If I'm trying to think, I can't think of who

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the hell it is if they fired the Angels management,

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>would it be bigger than the hind Bloom situation could.

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.239
<v Speaker 1>But I kind of don't think it would be because

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of the bias, but it should be because like they're

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a disaster and how they can keep going about it.

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, sometime we do that there'd be

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a fun like mini show, mini series to do MLB's

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>worst trades and go back and look at like the

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>awful trades, because yeah, you think of like just in

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the last ten years, some of the trades that we've seen,

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty pretty astonishing. I always like to win a

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>trade is finalized like over time. Like what's coming to

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>mind here is the Diamondbacks have made multiple just horrifically

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>bad trades, and then when the last piece is gone,

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you'll get the article from that one writer who's like, ah,

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the last remnants of this and they'll be like, this

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>was the last remnants of the Goldie trade when Carson

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Kelly got designated, and it's just you look back and

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you're like, like.

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 2>They're all just so awful. I won't even ask, but

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 2>I have a hunch the Swanson trade didn't go so well.

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>No that well that I'm telling you go back and

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>look like, I think this year had like the final

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>final remnants. One of them, Nick Ahmed got designated and

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone was like, oh, here's the last Justin of the

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Justin Upton trade. And I.

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Was a while ago.

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then the Swanson trade because I was with

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the Braves, and then the Swanson trade was a total disaster,

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Goldie trade disaster. But you know who's counting. Who's counting?

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but I'm you know what, you just turned

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>me into the Red Sox fans. I'm making it about

0:07:59.160 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>all these bad trades.

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 2>The last thing I'll say that people could probably not

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 2>care about this anymore, is it's funny if Giants fans,

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 2>like yesterday there's a big debate should they keep far

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Han and Capler and management said they're keeping them through

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 2>next season at least, where all of a sudden, I

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 2>didn't even realize it, there was a large like mob

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 2>saying they should be fired and replaced because they're not

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 2>doing a good job. So I was like, wow, I

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 2>did not see that one coming. So it's every team.

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 2>So I'm trying to say it just depends on where

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 2>your ear lace at night.

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's the head hunting. It's just the difference

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is the headlining article on ESPN. There's going to be

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a Red Sox owner and not wait until Cashman's gone.

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna be fun, Oh god, be fun. It might

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>have I mean not that esp would have to like

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>cover baseball, but if they did, they'd have like a special.

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, they'd shut it down and they'd be like

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Dune Dun breaking special the cap.

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 2>It might come on national television if Fran Cashman gets fired,

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm breaking news.

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Like that might be the thing that gets ESPN to

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about baseball, and.

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 2>That would be amazing during football season. It might make

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 2>the top five things on the website.

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. A couple of notes from interesting stuff that happened

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>over the last twenty four hours. Could I Singa dominated

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the Diamondback six inning, struck out ten as the Mets

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>blowing out the Diamondbacks, pushing them back, And could I

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Singa just continues to be good on the back half

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of the year.

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 2>He is good.

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>We've talked a bunch about like what that like top

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to twenty SP's are going to be boy Senga

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to be in that conversation, and might I

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he'll be cheap ish or if he's

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>going to kind of fall into the blobby territory like

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Scott and White and spor like to have used the

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>term blob. Maybe he's gonna be in there. I think

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be very invested in could I Singa next season?

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 2>I love coud I Singa. In that early draft that

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.199
<v Speaker 2>we started the first seven rounds again real draft for

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 2>those that keep track at home, he did not get drafted,

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 2>and I was shocked because I had him on my radar.

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 2>But the way the flow of the draft was, I

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 2>needed to field some other spots that were drying up quickly.

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to take him in round six. I didn't

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 2>up taking him at all. Ryan Bloomfield has the first

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 2>pick coming back, and we talked about it multiple times.

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 2>He's pretty locked in on something crazy. I've been Singa's

0:09:58.880 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 2>the first pick around so.

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Thing, so like how many how many pictures does he have?

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 2>I think he has two started.

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean say guys like three.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, That's why I have Yuri pres and Sures

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 2>And I'm like, I should have taken Singing, but I

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 2>need I had no closers and closers were almost gone,

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 2>so I had to take a clothe like in a

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:15.599
<v Speaker 2>draft and hold format where you can't add closers, you

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>need at least something, and that's what dictated it. Otherwise

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>I had sing it for sure. Hindsight three amazing.

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Hindsight from a month ago. I think next year, I've

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>not worked on my ranks. I'm not gonna I'm gonna

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 1>in October. I'm gonna like start my initial rank and

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff with you. My initial reaction this moment Senga over sus.

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you without question. But that's what Mon thought

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 2>about these early drafts. It's like if you win some

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 2>you lose. So I'm like, you're gonna get some values

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 2>in around fifteen and sixteen or something you're like, wow, awesome,

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 2>and there's these other ones like not good.

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Bob, Yeah, you're right also in just like paying off

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, getting back to the we're talking about the

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Yankees and the Red Sox, but Michael King eight strikeouts,

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>one run, four and two thirds, not getting the big

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>run but getting stretched out as a starter. YE pay

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>attention to this next year, and I feel pretty confident

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>about Michael King the rest of the way through whatever

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>those starts are going to look like. I don't know

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>what his schedule is next week. If he pitched yesterday,

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 1>he's probably only gonna have one this next week.

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you have that starts? He's got two more starts.

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm literally just loading.

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, two more starts on the end of the year,

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>but not two starts now.

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, one start next week? Sorry my bad, so

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 2>starting next week New York Yankees Michael King, who I

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 2>do agree with you on this. I thought people should

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 2>have grabbed him this past week. But the Yankees. He

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>will get Verse Toronto and then his final start. He

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 2>could get two starts to last week at Toronto, at

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City potentially, so he could have three more starts

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 2>to Toronto starts in a case he started. Toronto's wishy washy,

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of strikeouts.

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's wishy washy, but I think the strikeouts are there.

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>He's been he's not. You know, if he could get

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to five or six, that'd be great. Maybe that's next year.

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's the thing. I was looking at the stretching

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 2>out part. Like you mentioned the four and two thursdys.

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 2>You'd like to see more. But he got up to

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 2>eighty seven pitches, he's gone sixty one, sixty nine, seventy nine,

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>eighty seven, he's going to be close to one hundred.

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna get you the win chances.

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>I also think the pitching market that's available in like

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>most leagues, like you might people well, yeah, exactly, someone listening.

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>You might have like awesome pictures out there, but like

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>I would say, like the general, you know, leagues that

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody's playing in, there's just not really great pictures. There's

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>not good two starts and stuff that, like I would

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.599
<v Speaker 1>be more into prioritizing. And I did this like on

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>CBS earlier in the week, so you'll know where I'm going.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>But like, even if a guy is like a you know,

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.839
<v Speaker 1>more of a three to four inning guy, if I

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>can get one or two of those guys that maybe

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>they jump into a win or maybe you know, the

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 1>stretched out nature of it's in question, I would rather

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>have Michael King or Christopher Sanchez. Is what the whole

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>conversation was around then trying to like pigeonhole unless I'm

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 1>in a points league, and then instead of trying to

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>pigeonhole just some random starter in there that might you know,

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like having to start Brandon Fought today, that's not a

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>great feeling. That's really not a good feeling. I would

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>rather have a Christopher Sanchez who can go three or

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>four inning, so maybe two or three times in a

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>whek or two even two times in a week, get

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>better strikeouts, maybe sneak in a win, then get blown

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>out by You know, Fought's gonna get lit up today.

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 2>It's just Bertal.

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get.

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Out Pepio and King. Those of the two guys, if

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 2>they're available for you for the last two weeks, I'd

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.599
<v Speaker 2>go and get them quickly. Pepio's got tigers and two giant.

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Starts, so I agree. All right, So category chasing, we're

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>going to answer your questions. So you have a couple

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>more minutes. If you are on the live stream podcast listeners,

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>come and hang out with us a couple more shows.

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>We will answer your questions here in just a second.

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>But I put together some category chasing. I use the

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>last fourteen days as a little bit of a barometer.

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Here are some players in bubba. If you want to

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>throw in a player, please do. You can also tell

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 1>me what you think of these four categories. I'm not

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>worrying about batting average just because, like I don't know,

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a bigger crap shoot. But if you're chasing homers, runs, RBI,

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases, here are some guys that could be readily available.

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Number one, if you're trying to chase homers on the

0:13:55.880 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>open market, we've talked about him, Nelson Velasquez. Four homers

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>over the last two weeks. That is a home run

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>category chase that I think you can do. Anybody you

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to add Bubba.

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 2>To the I absolutely love the last as for some

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 2>reason Torque still available, Like it's surprising. Is the one

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 2>that I mentioned actually is Wilmer Flores.

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 1>He's a little less than what you got with Yeah,

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I almost put on.

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Flores has been very sneaky good, he bad. He actually

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 2>helps you in almost all four categories outside stolen bases.

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I only added one, but had I added

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to he would have been number two on the list runs.

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>How about this in Detroit Matt Vierling twelve runs scored

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>over the last two weeks. That is almost a run

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>per day. If you're chasing some runs right now, he

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is getting some proverbial run with the Tigers. That would

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>be someone I would pick up in the runs department.

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Over on RBI, this one has been weird, but Robbie

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Grossman's been hitting three in some instances for this team.

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>He has nine RBI for the Rangers over the last

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, so that could be another one of those options.

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Is and when you're hitting three, by the way, what's

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>so great about that is you were hitting in behind

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Simeon and Corey Seger on that team. So yeah,

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that that could be a really nice opportunity. And then finally,

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're going for stolen bases, actually put two here.

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Terrange with Milwaukee he has five stolen bases over

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks, as well as Jacob Young with

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the Nationals. Batting average isn't there. I think with Young,

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Buddy has four stolen bases. So if you're chasing stolen bases,

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>those would be where you can open market get anybody

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>else you want to add that. I didn't bring up

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>as far as any of the four category chasers.

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, surprisingly, Jack Sowinsky's hitting for average right now. He's

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 2>available in a ton of leagues, and he's got three

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 2>homers and three steals over the last two weeks. He'd

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 2>be one to look at and Tommy fam I know

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 2>we always joke about him, but no one rosters him

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 2>and he's still being very, very productive.

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>He's available, he's the biggest.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 2>You'd be surprised, like a lot of twelves. It's like

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 2>a fifty to fifty shot, but most of the leagues I'm.

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>In, he's an absolute slam if he's available out there.

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I also wanted to move up just in the prep.

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to move up the weekend streamers that we

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>usually talk about, and I put them here. So I

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>put a I put three starters on Saturday, three starters

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. You pick one that you like the best,

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>because these might not all be the best options, but

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I put together three that I thought made the most sense.

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>On Saturday, JP France is going up against the Royals,

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Tyler McGill, Heylo R McGill is going up against the Reds,

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and Ranger Suarez is going up against Saint Louis. McGill

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is the only home game there. The other tour on

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the road. So JP France is in Kansas City, Ranger

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Swarres is in Saint Louis. You pick one to stream

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday, which one are you going with.

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm going to McGill because that Cincinnati offense

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>has hit a complete roadblock. It's been really rough. At

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 2>least McGill should be able to get your strikeouts. So

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 2>that's the angle I go too. They're not great Americans

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 2>go that's mine too.

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>If you had to rank them, I think I would

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>go McGill, France and then Ranger Swarez France is not phenomenal.

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, I'm not I'm not supergainst it. It's just

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>like the Kansas City offense. Maybe attack that a little bit.

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 2>I want to mention just one for people to keep

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 2>an eye. Oh, he's not pitching this weekend anymore. I

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 2>know he is. Gibson long Nick Pollock turned me on

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 2>to him. You played him as a prospect, Sawyer Gibson.

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna be pitching Saturday, and I think there is

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 2>some viability there going up against the Angels offense that

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 2>is dreadful, and then you get Oakland next week, so

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 2>he'd be a guy to watch.

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, on Sunday, here are your three. Jordan Wicks at Arizona.

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Wicks has been phenomenal, but you know still Arizona's offense.

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Arizona's been struggling. Read debt meers going up against the Tigers.

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been attacking the Tigers. I love Griffin Canning today

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 1>here on Friday. By the way, Redetmer's going up against Detroit.

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>Both of those are road games. A home game. Jose

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Kingtana going up against the Reds in New York. So

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you pick one to stream on Sunday. Who are you

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>going with?

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 2>This one? Was interesting because everyone hates Kintana, but he

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 2>limits the damage so well, like really really well. I'm

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna go read debt memors though for the strike cut

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 2>ups versus Detroit to take Detmer's. The volatility and run

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 2>prevention has been there for Denmors, but I'll take Deptmar's

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 2>strike out of side. But don't don't just poop poo

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Ca and Tonic. That's he's actually been pretty darn good.

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Cantana's my choice.

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 2>That's my choice. He's been very good. I will not

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 2>hate on that at all.

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think you can also, like when we did

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>category chasing, you could look at some of these guys

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and you can see if you're chasing strikeouts. McGill and

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>debt Meer's of the six we've talked about, have probably

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the best upside Ranger Suarez and Kingtana probably have the

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>best potential to go long and yeah in race and

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>ratios are in there. But also I would say the

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>biggest upside ratio guy might be Jordan Wicks against the Diamondbacks,

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>because Jordan Wicks has got like a I think it's

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>like last thirty days of subject to creation. Yeah, so

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>he's the upside play, but.

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 2>He strikeouts disappeared. He struck everybody out in his first start.

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 2>He strikes out and nobody since then, it's like one

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 2>or two k's a game. It's bizarro world.

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Prime primary change up guy. You know that that can

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:53.959
<v Speaker 1>primary change up guys, I think can kind of come

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and go. I mean, look at you know, the good

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Sandy al Contra. You throw like a ninety mile an

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>hour whatever change up. Yet his strikeouts wouldn't be dominant,

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're a little bit more finicky on

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts when that's your primary pitch, and that is wix

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>like primary pitch. So let's go to some listener questions.

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Mike uh said, which, with Mitch Garver possibly being shut down,

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>who should I look as a replacement. We just talked

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>about I just talked about this sun CBS where we're like, well,

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>cut Sean Murphy for Mitch Garver and then Garver goes

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and gets hurt. You got a replacement or two.

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Luis Campisano would be when I'd be looking to right away.

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Bo Naylor has actually picked up the pace quite a

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 2>bit in Cleveland, and they got a lot of right

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 2>handed pitching against to face coming up. And then just

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 2>check your leagues. I know he should be gone, but

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Logan O Hoppy is still hitting really, really well and

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 2>surprising not everybody jumped back in on that right away.

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if a hobby was out there, he's been a

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 1>top ten over the last two weeks. Over the last

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, he's been freaking monster.

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 2>He and't sleep on Jonaheim. He'll get to play every

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 2>day again, and he's a couple of weeks off from

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 2>getting back. So maybe you got that going for you.

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if Jonahim is out there, but

0:19:57.920 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>if he was sure, I would do that.

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Tapisano and bo Naylor be my two.

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm with agreement on that. I mean, I also think,

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>like you know, if moreno was out there. I might

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>look at Marino he might have been cut, could you know,

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>average and whatnot?

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 2>And Patrick Bailey just returned from the concussion. Iell gets

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 2>coolers all week and so you got that going for

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 2>you too.

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>They kick Joey Bart to the curb. Mike Coles says,

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>what are we doing with Jazz? How about Ellie? I

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 1>think you're just a general question. I think you can,

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>if you have viable options, you can move on from

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>either one of these guys with a week left or

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>so to go in your in your playoffs, I don't

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>think you have to hold. You kind of want to

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe bench, but.

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Maybe wait and see on Jazz's news on Friday, because

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna be playing well. I think with Thursday, when

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 2>not many teams play, you don't get any news. So

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 2>you got to just be a little more patient, wait

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 2>for the news to come out by the lineup, lock

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 2>and go from there if you can't wait, and then

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you, Welsh, but I'd wait a little longer

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 2>if you could.

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree, lisaid, Okay, second round of playoffs are

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>next week. I'm dropping Gavin Williams for Javey or Asad

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and then starting Burns Ryan Asad need two more. By

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>the way, I kind of agree with this one. I

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>think Asid Gavin William's just.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 2>Been too inconsistent and get Texas too.

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I think that is a good move. So

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>he needs to Scooble at Detroit. Clevenger who has two

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>starts or Garrett versus the Mets. I'm gonna go cle

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Clevenger is the easy one with the two starts, but

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I might go Garrett. I just don't.

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 2>I don't trust facing the Dodgers. I love School. School

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 2>has been nothing but amazing, especially over like last month

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 2>or so. He had a couple hiccups early, he's been awesome.

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 2>I the Dodgers man just avoid the club Dog and

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Garrett too.

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>What will be tough is if he goes off today.

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>He's pitching, School's pitching today, So if he has a

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>great performance.

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Going to help him.

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it'd be tough to cut him. Here's

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>what I would say. I think Garrett and schoobl are

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>close enough that Schooble is just the better pitcher with

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the better strikeout upside then Garrett that I could justify

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>with a really good performance today. Being like you know what,

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's hold on to Schooble. Let's see where we're at

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>next week, because Garrett isn't good enough to be like,

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, just drop school because of a bad matchup.

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Keep Clevenger and then maybe wait on the next move.

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 2>At least see what happens today and then because if

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 2>your final week Garrett gets two starts against the Mets

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 2>and the Pirates.

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Bill had said, Am I crazy thinking about keeping Gunner

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>over Vlad next year?

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Not crazy at all? No, it's not crazy. I would

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 2>keep Gunner over Lad personally.

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm I'm just still banging away at my uh

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>my dynasty ranks here. So it's not speaking of C. J.

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Abrams or Royce Lewis in a dynasty league.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Lewis, Oh, I love I love Abrams. Royce Lewis is

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 2>a five wells still fifty and has close this way,

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Is there like a round preference you're holding for these

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 2>two because they're actually a lot closer than I think.

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Sure, Yeah, i'o was gonna go. I'm gonna go with Abrams.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Royce has serious, serious medical history, but Royce has been insane.

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they're close close. C. J. Abrams is so

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>much more of a dominant, stolen based guy. It's him.

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>But to Baba's point, if it was like Abrams at

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a five and Royce at a ten, I'd probably keep

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Royce here.

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's that's a great question. That's a

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 2>lot closer. I think people realize at first glance.

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, whips said Joe. Ryan two starts next week at

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati and versus the Angels. Too risky to start in

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>weekly league.

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 2>No, you do it just because I hate Great American

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 2>but the Reds are struggling and you want that Angel

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 2>start badly.

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I do it. Should I start Michael King over

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Sonny Gray?

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I have to see what the matchup is, but my

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>initial is.

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 2>No Minnesota next week. Gray's got the Angels. That's going

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 2>to make it great out the gate. King has got

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 2>trying to to play. So Anny Gray Sonning great? Easy.

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, one hundred percent agree with that. Brian says, Sale

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>right or King? Which two to have the next two weeks?

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I would go with King and say I don't need

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.239
<v Speaker 1>to see what Kyle Wright. I'm just not that far.

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Wright shouldn't be in the agenda.

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>You are correct there, Yeah, I'm just not into that. Finally,

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Gielito in a points league tonight championship matched down by

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>forty year in a points league, maybe I think he's

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna give blown up.

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 2>He might be down eighty by the time that's done. Yeah,

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 2>So I mean, can you add, could you drop him

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 2>and pick someone else up today?

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's a good point because he's probably not an

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>He's probably not a negative. But like if he's not

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>positive either, if someone else were out there, yeah, I

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>would not, by the way, I would.

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Try to find a long shot chance of a save somewhere.

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>No, thanks, all right, thank you, good questions. Thank you guys.

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully that'll help you out going into the weekend. Injuries,

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Garver's we mentioned he left with left foot soreness

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that could be bad. On the good side, the Rangers

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>are saying that there's some optimism that Josh Young will

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>return for the Monday series against the Red Sox, so

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe he got dumped in some league. He might be

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>back on Monday. Brewers Craig Counsel told reporters that he

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>expects Christian Yelich to return here Friday for the Friday

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>series against the Nationals, so that's good. And the Orioles

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Oils manager Brandon Hyde told reporters that Ryan mount Castle

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>is not an injured less candidate, which is frustrating to me.

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Mri came back clean on the left shoulder. That might

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit of a death blow for Heston Kershtudd.

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 1>He didn't start yesterday. He pinched hit. They had what's

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>his name O'Hearn at first base. Mountcastle comes back soon.

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>That's going to kind of dink it out a little bit.

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So kurstud might not be the best option right now.

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Moving forward, three up and three down up, Raphael Devers

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>four for six with a homer. Corey Seeger three for

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>four with a homer and three RBI. And how about

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Josiah Gray kicking myself, I was Askedes on CBS. I

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>almost said Josiah Gray. I didn't he went six and

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>one third struck out ten yesterday. What a great start

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that was on the down Merle Kelly falling apart. Oh,

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>it's two hot. He keeps saying five innings, gave up

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>seven earned runs, just got blasted. Kevin Gossman four and

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>two thirds, gave up four walk six in Anthony Santander

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>zero for four with four strikeouts. Those are some big

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>old downs and the continued vibe of a high in

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers screwing you over Gossman and Merl's not a

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>high end starting pitcher, but like this brutal, Like what

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Gossman did. That destroyed your ratios, that destroyed your whip,

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>hurt your earned runs. That was a really, really brutal blow.

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 1>But you know them's the playoffs, right, Bubbo.

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 2>They are them the breaks, as they say, so, yep,

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:22.479
<v Speaker 2>the breaks.

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's go and check out Prize Picks promo code leading

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>off at his Prize Picks time. You can go and

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>make a deposit one hundred dollars match because it's a

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent match up to one hundred bucks, so

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you get a three hundred dollars back to you. You

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>can start creating some prize Pick lineups today and make

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>some Moneyes, how are you we going to price pick today?

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 2>How am I going to price pick today? We're looking

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 2>at the Wilmer flora as over half a run scored

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 2>and Coors. I'll take that all day. Rayce lewis over

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 2>one and a half total bases as he continues to

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 2>just be a machine at the plate and then going

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 2>back to Coors Mike just strimp skill for one and

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 2>a half total bases over the last week. He's played

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 2>phenomenal and I think that's going to keep going for sure. Yeah.

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I actually thought he's another one of those guys. We

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>did this on ITL yesterday, but I had mentioned he

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>might be one of the pickups to look at. I

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>picked him up in a league where DJ Stewart keeps

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>going in and out a lineup, so I picked up

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to Strimsky. He's been really, really good, so that might

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 1>be a solid one for me. I've got Justin Steele

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy scored thirty one and a half. Diamondbacks can obviously

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 1>play up, but Steele has been ridiculously phenomenal. Diamondbacks are

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>trending in the wrong direction, so thirty one and a half,

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 1>especially going up against Brandon Fought, that win is probably

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>going to help just in general, because I think Justin

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Steel's in line for that. I'm going Cory Seger eight

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half because Noah Cinderguard, so I think he

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>might get this in his first hit bat because no

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Cindergard is trash. So I'm going to go with Corey

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Seeger and Jose Altuve eight. He was a sneaky guy.

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I actually wanted to get a bet in on because

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of a nice good BVP versus Zach Grank. I wanted

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to get him in a little hit parlay, but they

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>want to for Jose al Tov because of his history

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>with Zach Granke. Speaking of best bets, Bubba, where are

0:27:58.480 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you gonna play some bets today? I need to get

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 1>on track, so let's get going.

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Going back to cours again. Jady Davis over one and

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 2>a half to little bases at plus one twenty. He's

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 2>hitting well over three hundred over the last since September.

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Started with a couple of home runs. I love what

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 2>he's doing there. And then I took a couple of

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 2>first fives, mixed it up a bit for you. Cincinnati

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 2>first five minus one twenty one hundred. Green has been

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 2>outstanding his last he starts he's not in Great America

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 2>and going mecause Peterson like my chance is there? And

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 2>then I love Scooball we kind of talked about earlier.

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Griffin Canning's awesome too. It should be actually an interesting

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 2>pitching duel. Too bad offenses kind of in Anaheim. It

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 2>give me Detroit first five minus one thirty.

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm about that, Gryffin Canning. So I got four

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>things for you. I've got the Atlanta Miami first five,

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.239
<v Speaker 1>four and a half over. I always hate saying these

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>because they sound so ridiculous. It's juiced up a bit,

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, when I have a bad week

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>like I did Wednesday, I want to get back to

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the basics. I'm betting for five runs to be scored

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>through the first five against Johnny Quato on the braves

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and then Bryce elder Is on the dockets. So I

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>feel good about that one. You could play it to

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 1>five and a half and get much better odds. That's fine.

0:28:58.720 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd be fine with that. I think there's going to

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>be run scored. So I like that Atlanta Miami first five,

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. I like the Yankees to be

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>up by a run through the first five. That's Garrett

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Cole going up against Oviedo. That is minus one thirty.

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I like Scooble today on the strikeouts five and a

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>half over. It's juiced up one minus one forty. But

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the Angels, they have struck out the third most over

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the last three games. They just strike out a bunch,

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and Schooble has like seven plus strikeouts and like six

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>straight starts, so I'm in on Schooble. And then finally,

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>just to get the juices flowing a little bit, I

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>did a hit parlay Judge, Riley and Tatis all to

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>register just one hit that pays plus one seventy five,

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>so almost two to one on your money. If you

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>want to get a little hit, I like doing those

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>hit parlays. Sometimes those are fun, though you know one

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>screws you if you want it. I also point out

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>if you just did Judge and Riley, you could just

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>get straight even money. If you just want to bet

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>on both of those guys getting hits, you can do that.

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's no Corbin Carol today. As I said, corbyt

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>like I just I'm wearing the shirt in solidarity.

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 2>I just didn't have the memory.

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you what I thought about doing today,

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>but I thought it. I don't know if it would

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>be like inappropriate. I got kicked back one time, by

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the way on one of our destinations that I wasn't

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do. So now I have it like in

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the back of Yeah, I got it in the back

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of my head. For a little bit, but I was

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna do the one of me and Corbin in front

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of the fake alien the Mexico press conference. Of that

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we found the one thousands.

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.959
<v Speaker 2>Would that been good? I just would have been amazing.

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 2>I thought I'm current.

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I told you I'm trying to stay current. It

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>would have been like us And there's actually a really

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>funny picture that had like the two fake little coffins,

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and it like we would have been standing in front

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of them. It might have been too morbid. I I

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know if I would have gotten

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>kicked back or not. So I decided not to for

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>forgiveness permission, Yeah, exactly, DFS. I almost skipped DFS here,

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>did you?

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Did you? DFS? Or was that the best? We bets DFS.

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 2>We got thirteen games slate on Friday, starting at seven

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 2>or five Eastern. There's a lot of picture Dan hitting options.

0:30:57.560 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 2>He almost name a few, justin Steele going into airs

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 2>on at ten point one K as it continues his

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 2>in olsa Young run, Dreeke Scubel talk talk about him.

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 2>He's nine Cavers the Angels and Griffin Cannies eight point

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 2>two K. I like both those guys like in a big,

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 2>big way, So mix and match him playing together. I

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 2>don't care to have some fun with that. Stacks giants

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 2>at Chase Anderson and Coors Houston versus Cranky Twins versus

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Schultens and if you want to get different, k C

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 2>versus Christian Xavier Twins are super cheap. That's part of

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 2>the value here. We get Alex Kirolof at two point

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.479
<v Speaker 2>eight cavers Shulton's. There's other cheap Eason Waller, Willie Castro

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 2>and whatnot, Sada and Rafaela. He's been leading off for

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Boston in the last few games. Hit number three hundreds

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 2>is called up a couple of home runs of late

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 2>as well. He's three point one cavers Berrios, and you

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 2>got Richie Pelasios going up ginz Aarra Nola Polasio's two

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 2>point five k. The Flying plasios Is of Saint Louis

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 2>and Joshua of Pittsbury have been sneaky good of late,

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 2>so I like their value as well.

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Just turned the placios Is into like the Graysons like.

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm ready to I'm ready to get them in the

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 2>looch libre ring.

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Did you, by the way, did you do it nice

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>little tongue roll on the breeze?

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 2>So I heard that.

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I didn't acknowledge that.

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 2>So I got to keep Joey p might not be

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 2>here about keep them in spirits.

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I appreciate that. There were a couple other picks.

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I just do it real quick since we're kind of

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>burning today. Victor said, can we trust Bailey Ober at

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox tonight? I would not if I was desperate,

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I would try not to.

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 2>But if you if your options are Ober and Gilito,

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 2>trust Ober. Yeah.

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a good point, Mason said him or Ramuto

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>for the final two weeks head to head points, I'd

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>actually go him.

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, I think that's where you go Readmitch Is.

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 2>It's just tough to give up on if anybody can

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 2>get hot him, Yeah, go Hime, go hime.

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you think sheehan can get it back together Detroit

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>on Monday? Again? Here's why I think it could. But

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>why do I not want to do it? Because it's

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a Monday to start the week. If you were a

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>two week and it was spreading over, maybe and I

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>needed to just take a shot. I don't want to

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>start my week off bad. So I'm not going to

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.959
<v Speaker 1>do that one at all. And then uh the only

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>other one BT said ORBTF said, should I stream green today?

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I agreen y, yes you should, So then do it

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>home run calls here? Oh we got the home I forgot.

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I have the home run board here. I forgot because

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I got knocked off of it.

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah we forgot.

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, Blue Harvester fifty eight, what kind of push

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty dude? JJ Tator fifty four, Razor ramone fifty three,

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>those are the only in the fifties. Still a pretty

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>tight race once we get to like the end of

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>next week. If it's a four or five gap, I

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be pretty tough to try to

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>make that up. You've got Bobby good Bench Warmer Hoffman

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.239
<v Speaker 1>walking up at forty five empty fisher. Those guys got

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>all forty five there, and mister Zamboni as well, and

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>BHB Daddy forty four. So that's what it takes to

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>make the top ten. I've got forty three, so I

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>got knocked off. So I am a loser, big old loser.

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Who are you going for your home run call today?

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Since it's a weekend play. I want four games in

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Coors Field. Give me Chris Bryant too has return and

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 2>shut me up. Two home runs since his return. You've

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 2>got four hits and three games.

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll think Chris Brandt, Wow, I'm going to go. I'm

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna give it. I'm gonna do a cheap one. I'm

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Matt Olson over the weekend. Just give

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>me Matt Olson today through the rest of the weekend.

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>They got to go.

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Two home runs for Welsh and move along.

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Just trying to get up a few more homers, trying

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to get going. That's gonna do it. Four more shows.

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you guys are locked in with us hang

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>out with Us or I'm sorry, not four more shows.

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Two more weeks, so six more shows. I can't count.

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm thinking of another show. There's only four more shows,

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>so make sure you guys are subscribed to the YouTube. Also,

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you just want to be here for the offseason so

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't miss anything. Thank you guys for that hang

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Out with Us live. You podcasters keep subscribed as well.

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>More with Us, so make sure that you enjoy it.

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll try to get joeyp here at one of those

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. Right, towards the end of the season. We'll

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>be back again next week Monday, Wednesday, Friday. Prep you

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>for everything that we possibly can. That's Bubba on the

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's at bad Intrick, I am at Is at the

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Welsh We love you all. Have a fantastic weekend.

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 2>We're talking next week out here.