1
00:00:02,400 --> 00:00:06,000
Speaker 1: This is the Labor Podcast with your host JJ Zachertha

2
00:00:06,160 --> 00:00:14,280
Speaker 1: JJ zacher reefon what's up everyone. It's JJ zacharyesin in

3
00:00:14,320 --> 00:00:17,200
Speaker 1: this episode ten eighty four of the Late Round Fantasy

4
00:00:17,200 --> 00:00:21,319
Speaker 1: Football Podcast. Thanks for tuning in. Before I get to

5
00:00:21,360 --> 00:00:23,400
Speaker 1: the topic today, I just want to send another reminder

6
00:00:23,440 --> 00:00:26,279
Speaker 1: that the Late Round Prospect Guide is currently available for

7
00:00:26,280 --> 00:00:29,040
Speaker 1: pre order and it's better than ever. This year's guide

8
00:00:29,080 --> 00:00:31,880
Speaker 1: includes an outline of what goes into the models, prospect

9
00:00:31,960 --> 00:00:34,879
Speaker 1: profiles for every running back, wide receiver and tight end

10
00:00:34,920 --> 00:00:38,080
Speaker 1: who is at the combine over thirty year two profile

11
00:00:38,080 --> 00:00:42,080
Speaker 1: write ups. There's rankings and more. It'll launch in mid March,

12
00:00:42,320 --> 00:00:45,520
Speaker 1: so pre order it now at fourteen ninety nine because

13
00:00:45,520 --> 00:00:48,159
Speaker 1: that's going to rise to nineteen ninety nine in just

14
00:00:48,200 --> 00:00:51,360
Speaker 1: a couple of weeks. You can find out more over

15
00:00:51,400 --> 00:00:55,000
Speaker 1: on lateround dot com. When I tell people that I

16
00:00:55,040 --> 00:00:58,320
Speaker 1: have prospect models, they often respond with something NFL combine

17
00:00:58,320 --> 00:01:01,360
Speaker 1: related that if I'm inputting a bunch of data, clearly

18
00:01:01,400 --> 00:01:03,320
Speaker 1: the combine is going to play a role and how

19
00:01:03,360 --> 00:01:06,720
Speaker 1: well the model likes a player. But really, there aren't

20
00:01:06,720 --> 00:01:08,800
Speaker 1: a ton of inputs in the models that have to

21
00:01:08,800 --> 00:01:12,880
Speaker 1: deal with the NFL combine sort of speed score matters

22
00:01:12,880 --> 00:01:15,759
Speaker 1: for running backs and tight ends, and heightened weight measurements.

23
00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:18,600
Speaker 1: Those are all taken from the NFL combine, So I

24
00:01:18,640 --> 00:01:21,520
Speaker 1: can't say that nothing matters of the combine as it

25
00:01:21,600 --> 00:01:24,160
Speaker 1: relates to the ZAPT model. But I've seen a lot

26
00:01:24,200 --> 00:01:26,959
Speaker 1: of discourse on social media this week about what does

27
00:01:26,959 --> 00:01:30,440
Speaker 1: and doesn't matter, how wide receiver forties are irrelevant, how

28
00:01:30,440 --> 00:01:33,280
Speaker 1: this drill or that drill, how none of it really matters,

29
00:01:33,560 --> 00:01:37,360
Speaker 1: at least analytically. I don't totally agree with all of that,

30
00:01:37,840 --> 00:01:40,320
Speaker 1: because not only are their direct inputs for me, like height, weight,

31
00:01:40,360 --> 00:01:43,800
Speaker 1: and speed score, but draft capital is the single most

32
00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:47,520
Speaker 1: important input in these ZAT models where these dudes get drafted.

33
00:01:47,760 --> 00:01:50,680
Speaker 1: And even though it's true that NFL teams often overdraft

34
00:01:50,720 --> 00:01:54,240
Speaker 1: wide receivers when they're really, really fast, how players perform

35
00:01:54,280 --> 00:01:56,800
Speaker 1: in the combine is still more than likely having an

36
00:01:56,800 --> 00:02:00,880
Speaker 1: impact on draft capital when you think of it from perspective.

37
00:02:01,400 --> 00:02:03,520
Speaker 1: Even if our little models in our corner of this

38
00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:06,440
Speaker 1: football world may not care that much about what happens

39
00:02:06,480 --> 00:02:09,760
Speaker 1: in Indianapolis each year, what's happening in Indie is still

40
00:02:09,800 --> 00:02:12,160
Speaker 1: having a pretty real impact on the landscape overall at

41
00:02:12,240 --> 00:02:15,640
Speaker 1: running back, wide receiver, and tight end. Now, as you know,

42
00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:18,600
Speaker 1: the combine just concluded for this year's class, and naturally

43
00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:22,000
Speaker 1: there's a lot to talk about. On today's show, I'm

44
00:02:22,040 --> 00:02:23,760
Speaker 1: gonna go through who I think are the biggest winners

45
00:02:23,760 --> 00:02:27,360
Speaker 1: and losers from that combine. Keeping this whole draft capital

46
00:02:27,360 --> 00:02:32,760
Speaker 1: impact in mind, let's do it. One of the main

47
00:02:32,840 --> 00:02:35,480
Speaker 1: stories from this year's combine was how fast the wide

48
00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:38,840
Speaker 1: receiver group was. We had eleven wideouts run faster than

49
00:02:38,880 --> 00:02:41,160
Speaker 1: a four four forty. Those one of the highest marks

50
00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:43,359
Speaker 1: that we've seen at the combine dating back to when

51
00:02:43,400 --> 00:02:46,600
Speaker 1: the thing started. This is going to undoubtedly get a

52
00:02:46,639 --> 00:02:49,760
Speaker 1: lot of players pushed up draft boards who probably shouldn't

53
00:02:49,760 --> 00:02:52,680
Speaker 1: be pushed up draft boards. Some of them I don't

54
00:02:52,760 --> 00:02:56,160
Speaker 1: mind as players necessarily, but the vast majority of them

55
00:02:56,360 --> 00:03:00,519
Speaker 1: have serious problems with their production profiles. Like Zacharai branch

56
00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:03,440
Speaker 1: I talked about this at length in The Perspective's episode

57
00:03:03,480 --> 00:03:06,359
Speaker 1: last week. But Branch to me fits the mold of

58
00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:09,240
Speaker 1: the type of wide receiver that's just completely burned teams

59
00:03:09,280 --> 00:03:13,080
Speaker 1: in the past consistently. This is straight from this year's

60
00:03:13,120 --> 00:03:16,480
Speaker 1: Prospect Guide. It says if Branch is selected inside the

61
00:03:16,520 --> 00:03:19,520
Speaker 1: top one hundred, as NFL Mock Draft database currently projects,

62
00:03:19,880 --> 00:03:22,480
Speaker 1: he'll be the eleventh player drafted in that range since

63
00:03:22,520 --> 00:03:25,399
Speaker 1: twenty twenty with a career behind the line target share

64
00:03:25,440 --> 00:03:29,280
Speaker 1: above thirty percent, and the first to exceed forty percent.

65
00:03:29,800 --> 00:03:33,040
Speaker 1: Only two players in that bucket, Wandel Robinson and Luther Burden,

66
00:03:33,280 --> 00:03:36,760
Speaker 1: posted breakout scores above seventy five, which, by the way,

67
00:03:37,120 --> 00:03:41,120
Speaker 1: Zacharia Branch way below that seventy five mark. The others

68
00:03:41,680 --> 00:03:45,839
Speaker 1: Lynn Boden, Amari Rodgers, Anthony Schwartz, Kadarius Tony, Rondel Moore,

69
00:03:45,920 --> 00:03:49,800
Speaker 1: Vaalis Jones, Trey Tucker, and Malachi Corley. I know you

70
00:03:49,840 --> 00:03:52,520
Speaker 1: guys have heard this before. I've said this now multiple

71
00:03:52,520 --> 00:03:56,200
Speaker 1: times in the podcast, but it's important to repeat. Zachariah

72
00:03:56,240 --> 00:04:00,600
Speaker 1: Branch's production profile is not very strong. And then there's

73
00:04:00,640 --> 00:04:03,760
Speaker 1: Dion Burks. Burks is getting some love from bigger name

74
00:04:03,840 --> 00:04:07,480
Speaker 1: draft experts. An NFL mock Draft database right now has

75
00:04:07,560 --> 00:04:10,160
Speaker 1: him as a potential Day two pick, but he has

76
00:04:10,200 --> 00:04:12,640
Speaker 1: a one point three to five career yards per rout

77
00:04:12,720 --> 00:04:16,040
Speaker 1: run rate that's third worse than the class. Since twenty twenty,

78
00:04:16,240 --> 00:04:18,400
Speaker 1: The ZAP model has twenty four wide receivers who have

79
00:04:18,520 --> 00:04:21,000
Speaker 1: entered the league with career yards per out run rates

80
00:04:21,240 --> 00:04:24,679
Speaker 1: below one point five. The only one to provide any

81
00:04:24,720 --> 00:04:29,960
Speaker 1: meaningful fantasy production is Josh Palmer. Jeff Caldwell tested like

82
00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:34,040
Speaker 1: an absolute beast when his production profile isn't overly special.

83
00:04:34,120 --> 00:04:36,920
Speaker 1: Brenton Thompson, he's kind of interesting as like a tank

84
00:04:37,000 --> 00:04:39,640
Speaker 1: down maybe Calvin Austin type player, and he ran the

85
00:04:39,640 --> 00:04:42,839
Speaker 1: fastest forty of the group that was expected. But even

86
00:04:42,920 --> 00:04:47,760
Speaker 1: his production profile has some flaws. And there's Bryce Lance,

87
00:04:48,040 --> 00:04:51,520
Speaker 1: Trey Lance's brother. He tested really, really well. He ran

88
00:04:51,560 --> 00:04:54,479
Speaker 1: a four to three four forty at six three two

89
00:04:54,480 --> 00:04:58,120
Speaker 1: oh four. I guarantee you that people are gonna fall

90
00:04:58,160 --> 00:05:01,719
Speaker 1: in love with him. They're gonna that Christian Watson comp

91
00:05:01,720 --> 00:05:04,279
Speaker 1: on him and go after him in rookie drafts, and

92
00:05:04,360 --> 00:05:06,919
Speaker 1: look for any of these guys. I see the vision.

93
00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:10,280
Speaker 1: I see the vision with Bryce Lance. I don't think

94
00:05:10,320 --> 00:05:13,839
Speaker 1: they're autobus. I'm just telling you that a lot more

95
00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:17,200
Speaker 1: marks don't favor them than do favor them. For Lance,

96
00:05:17,440 --> 00:05:19,640
Speaker 1: he broke out very late, to the point where he

97
00:05:19,640 --> 00:05:21,960
Speaker 1: doesn't even have a breakout score in the model, and

98
00:05:22,040 --> 00:05:24,040
Speaker 1: he's gonna be over twenty four and a half years

99
00:05:24,080 --> 00:05:28,240
Speaker 1: old at draft time. That's a clear red flag, even

100
00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:32,400
Speaker 1: if that upside case is evident. There's a lot of

101
00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:35,120
Speaker 1: that in this year's class. I allude to this on

102
00:05:35,200 --> 00:05:38,599
Speaker 1: the wide receiver prospects who produce like studs episode, but

103
00:05:38,640 --> 00:05:40,479
Speaker 1: I do think we're bound to see one or two

104
00:05:40,480 --> 00:05:43,200
Speaker 1: of these guys really buck some trends this year, just

105
00:05:43,200 --> 00:05:45,120
Speaker 1: because of the sheer number of wide receivers in this

106
00:05:45,160 --> 00:05:50,240
Speaker 1: class who are fine but not special. Fine prospects will

107
00:05:50,279 --> 00:05:54,000
Speaker 1: slip through the cracks. I'm talking about fine analytically, and

108
00:05:54,080 --> 00:05:58,880
Speaker 1: sometimes every once in a while athleticism will translate. So

109
00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:01,080
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna be shocked to some like Bryce Lance

110
00:06:01,440 --> 00:06:04,240
Speaker 1: makes a legit impact in the NFL. It's just that

111
00:06:04,400 --> 00:06:06,919
Speaker 1: over the long run, if you generally fade the uber

112
00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:09,360
Speaker 1: athletes who didn't produce in college, you're gonna win out.

113
00:06:10,120 --> 00:06:12,919
Speaker 1: And when I say producing college, I mean good age

114
00:06:12,920 --> 00:06:15,919
Speaker 1: adjusted production, and there's a lot of that in this

115
00:06:16,000 --> 00:06:20,080
Speaker 1: year's class. The combine really showed that we have some

116
00:06:20,160 --> 00:06:26,039
Speaker 1: really good athletes, but the production profiles they're not amazing. Nevertheless,

117
00:06:26,080 --> 00:06:28,400
Speaker 1: all those guys that I just mentioned they were winners.

118
00:06:29,000 --> 00:06:31,800
Speaker 1: I'd expect better draft Capital. Now that the combine is over,

119
00:06:34,279 --> 00:06:36,640
Speaker 1: Jeremiah Love was already far and away the best running

120
00:06:36,640 --> 00:06:39,200
Speaker 1: back in this year's class, and nothing from the combine

121
00:06:39,480 --> 00:06:42,479
Speaker 1: remotely changed that. I've had a lot of people ask

122
00:06:42,560 --> 00:06:45,039
Speaker 1: me if he's better than Bejon Robinson or Jamior Gibbs

123
00:06:45,120 --> 00:06:48,719
Speaker 1: or Ashen Gente as a prospect, if the Zap model

124
00:06:48,760 --> 00:06:51,400
Speaker 1: likes him more or less, And the answer is that

125
00:06:51,400 --> 00:06:54,560
Speaker 1: the Zap Model still likes him less. But as I've discussed,

126
00:06:54,600 --> 00:06:58,480
Speaker 1: it really doesn't matter. He's still an incredibly great prospect,

127
00:06:58,880 --> 00:07:02,640
Speaker 1: and his comps they are just stud after stud after stud.

128
00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:05,320
Speaker 1: I really don't want people to get hung up on

129
00:07:05,320 --> 00:07:07,520
Speaker 1: the fact that he's gonna likely be an elite producer

130
00:07:07,720 --> 00:07:10,960
Speaker 1: as opposed to a legendary performer. These are tags within

131
00:07:10,960 --> 00:07:13,960
Speaker 1: the Zap model. That's just a quick and dirty label

132
00:07:14,120 --> 00:07:17,000
Speaker 1: to help us wrap our heads around the scores. To me,

133
00:07:17,560 --> 00:07:20,920
Speaker 1: he's a fantastic prospect, and his four to three six

134
00:07:21,120 --> 00:07:23,320
Speaker 1: forty at two hundred and twelve pounds, which gave him

135
00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:26,400
Speaker 1: a one hundred and seventeen speed score, that just cemented

136
00:07:26,400 --> 00:07:29,600
Speaker 1: that the model just has a decent amount of weight

137
00:07:29,640 --> 00:07:32,000
Speaker 1: for the receiving metrics, and his receiving numbers in college,

138
00:07:32,040 --> 00:07:35,240
Speaker 1: they were great, not excellent. Love is the rookie one

139
00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:37,760
Speaker 1: oh one in all formats. I actually don't think it's

140
00:07:37,840 --> 00:07:39,960
Speaker 1: very close when you consider the hit rates for these

141
00:07:39,960 --> 00:07:42,760
Speaker 1: early first round running backs and the talent and size

142
00:07:42,800 --> 00:07:46,360
Speaker 1: profile that he's bringing to the table, and with so

143
00:07:46,480 --> 00:07:48,560
Speaker 1: many running backs not even running the forty at the

144
00:07:48,560 --> 00:07:50,800
Speaker 1: combine this year, and with the position just being super

145
00:07:50,840 --> 00:07:55,720
Speaker 1: thin overall, Jeremiah Love is a clear, clear winner stemming

146
00:07:55,720 --> 00:08:00,040
Speaker 1: from the combine. Now, like I just talked about this

147
00:08:00,160 --> 00:08:03,240
Speaker 1: running back class, it hasn't had this obvious RB two

148
00:08:03,320 --> 00:08:06,320
Speaker 1: in it. I talked about Emmett Johnson possibly being that

149
00:08:06,400 --> 00:08:09,520
Speaker 1: guy because of his great receiving profile. I'll talk about

150
00:08:09,560 --> 00:08:11,800
Speaker 1: him in just a second. But the running back who

151
00:08:11,840 --> 00:08:15,000
Speaker 1: probably saw his stock rise most, who someone now places

152
00:08:15,040 --> 00:08:18,160
Speaker 1: the RB two in this class was Mike Washington out

153
00:08:18,160 --> 00:08:21,640
Speaker 1: of Arkansas. Now, Washington had a minor red flag and

154
00:08:21,720 --> 00:08:24,520
Speaker 1: adjusted receiving yards per team pass attempt within the ZAP model,

155
00:08:24,840 --> 00:08:28,640
Speaker 1: but overall the production profile could be worse. He had

156
00:08:28,640 --> 00:08:31,320
Speaker 1: a best season reception share above twelve percent. His best

157
00:08:31,320 --> 00:08:33,640
Speaker 1: season in adjusted yards per team play was one point

158
00:08:33,640 --> 00:08:37,240
Speaker 1: eighty seven. That was fifth best in the class. Maybe

159
00:08:37,280 --> 00:08:39,480
Speaker 1: he's a little bit older, but he won't be twenty

160
00:08:39,559 --> 00:08:43,960
Speaker 1: three until the summer. I'm not even that concerned about age. Meanwhile,

161
00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:46,520
Speaker 1: his size is good. He's six foot one, two hundred

162
00:08:46,520 --> 00:08:50,439
Speaker 1: and twenty three pounds, and at that size he ran

163
00:08:50,480 --> 00:08:53,160
Speaker 1: a four to three three point forty at the combine.

164
00:08:53,520 --> 00:08:57,440
Speaker 1: That is absurd. That generated the second best speed score

165
00:08:57,480 --> 00:09:01,920
Speaker 1: in ZAP model history, trailing Onlykeith Marshall, and he barely

166
00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:05,240
Speaker 1: trailed Marshall. Speed scores an input in the ZAP model.

167
00:09:05,240 --> 00:09:07,960
Speaker 1: So Washington's great speed score gave him a little bit

168
00:09:07,960 --> 00:09:10,760
Speaker 1: of a bump to his overall ZAPP score. But I

169
00:09:10,760 --> 00:09:13,600
Speaker 1: think it's unbelievably important to know that it doesn't just

170
00:09:13,679 --> 00:09:16,559
Speaker 1: completely change his outlook. In fact, if he ran a

171
00:09:16,600 --> 00:09:18,040
Speaker 1: four to four to three instead of a four to

172
00:09:18,080 --> 00:09:21,920
Speaker 1: three three without any change in draft capital, his ZAP

173
00:09:21,960 --> 00:09:25,720
Speaker 1: score would barely change at all. What I think happened

174
00:09:25,720 --> 00:09:27,800
Speaker 1: with Washington, though, is what I said at the top.

175
00:09:28,280 --> 00:09:30,960
Speaker 1: Even at running back, a showing like that can improve

176
00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:34,600
Speaker 1: a player's draft stock. It will improve it, especially when

177
00:09:34,600 --> 00:09:39,560
Speaker 1: there's no clearcut RB two in this draft class. Washington

178
00:09:39,600 --> 00:09:42,000
Speaker 1: has a pretty good profile. Now, I don't think it's elite,

179
00:09:42,360 --> 00:09:44,000
Speaker 1: but I think it's good enough to the point where

180
00:09:44,040 --> 00:09:45,839
Speaker 1: I wouldn't be shocked if he goes Day two in

181
00:09:45,880 --> 00:09:49,000
Speaker 1: the draft, and in this running back class where it's

182
00:09:49,000 --> 00:09:54,080
Speaker 1: pretty weak after Jeremiah Love, that matters a lot. Now,

183
00:09:54,120 --> 00:09:57,599
Speaker 1: speaking of Emmett Johnson, let's talk about him. Something that

184
00:09:57,679 --> 00:09:59,480
Speaker 1: we all need to keep in mind is that these days,

185
00:09:59,480 --> 00:10:02,480
Speaker 1: when players tested the combine, in my opinion, it's for

186
00:10:02,520 --> 00:10:05,680
Speaker 1: one of two reasons. Number One, they're not locked into

187
00:10:05,679 --> 00:10:08,480
Speaker 1: a particular draft spot, and they want to prove their worth,

188
00:10:09,240 --> 00:10:11,880
Speaker 1: even if they're not as athletic as they probably should be.

189
00:10:12,440 --> 00:10:14,560
Speaker 1: I'm talking like day three picks who want to prove

190
00:10:14,720 --> 00:10:17,720
Speaker 1: that they can be Day two guys or undrafted players

191
00:10:17,800 --> 00:10:21,120
Speaker 1: who just want to get drafted. They want to show

192
00:10:21,200 --> 00:10:23,880
Speaker 1: why they should be drafted, so they test. And then

193
00:10:23,960 --> 00:10:26,880
Speaker 1: number two, they test because they just know they're athletic.

194
00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:30,520
Speaker 1: Jeremiah Love did this. He was gonna go high no

195
00:10:30,600 --> 00:10:33,560
Speaker 1: matter what, but he saw an opportunity to just lock

196
00:10:33,640 --> 00:10:37,280
Speaker 1: that in, whereas other players often don't want to risk that.

197
00:10:38,520 --> 00:10:40,720
Speaker 1: What that means is that we're moving more and more

198
00:10:40,760 --> 00:10:43,679
Speaker 1: to a sample of players who are just generally athletic

199
00:10:44,240 --> 00:10:47,120
Speaker 1: because the players who aren't athletic are waiting for their

200
00:10:47,160 --> 00:10:50,400
Speaker 1: pro days to test. Now, with all that being said,

201
00:10:50,480 --> 00:10:53,360
Speaker 1: Emmett Johnson posted the worst speed score in the class

202
00:10:53,360 --> 00:10:56,680
Speaker 1: at ninety three point four, which honestly wasn't a huge

203
00:10:56,679 --> 00:10:59,040
Speaker 1: surprise if you watch him play. He's not a long

204
00:10:59,040 --> 00:11:02,720
Speaker 1: speed guy. Actually, his ten yard split was more middle

205
00:11:02,720 --> 00:11:05,040
Speaker 1: of the road in this class. That just plays into

206
00:11:05,040 --> 00:11:08,920
Speaker 1: the long speed idea even more. Now. I'm not overly

207
00:11:09,000 --> 00:11:12,280
Speaker 1: concerned about that speed score. We've seen this pass catching

208
00:11:12,360 --> 00:11:15,440
Speaker 1: archetype not bring the craziest speed scores in the past.

209
00:11:16,240 --> 00:11:18,600
Speaker 1: The problem for Johnson, in my opinion, was that he

210
00:11:18,679 --> 00:11:20,880
Speaker 1: decided to do the three cone and he was the

211
00:11:20,920 --> 00:11:23,920
Speaker 1: only running back to do it, and it resulted in

212
00:11:23,960 --> 00:11:27,240
Speaker 1: like a twenty fifth percentile rate. I'm at the point

213
00:11:27,240 --> 00:11:29,280
Speaker 1: with Emmett Johnson where I think he needs to find

214
00:11:29,280 --> 00:11:31,600
Speaker 1: a very specific landing spot in order to thrive in

215
00:11:31,600 --> 00:11:34,480
Speaker 1: fantasy football as a three down back. His top comps

216
00:11:34,480 --> 00:11:39,120
Speaker 1: in the model are Michael Carter, Kenneth Gainwell, and James White.

217
00:11:39,160 --> 00:11:42,199
Speaker 1: All of them had their moments, and I think Johnson

218
00:11:42,240 --> 00:11:45,679
Speaker 1: can have his too, But to be a kyn Williams type,

219
00:11:46,080 --> 00:11:47,640
Speaker 1: he needs to find a team that's going to just

220
00:11:47,720 --> 00:11:49,760
Speaker 1: fall in love with him the way the Rams did

221
00:11:49,760 --> 00:11:53,200
Speaker 1: with Williams. And maybe there's like an Aaron Jones like

222
00:11:53,240 --> 00:11:56,800
Speaker 1: outcome here too. But all of these situations just tells

223
00:11:56,840 --> 00:11:59,440
Speaker 1: you that we need some nuance when evaluating Johnson and

224
00:11:59,480 --> 00:12:03,360
Speaker 1: his transition the NFL. Overall, it was an l for

225
00:12:03,440 --> 00:12:06,600
Speaker 1: him at this year's combine, even within this below average

226
00:12:06,679 --> 00:12:11,640
Speaker 1: running back class. Jeremy Bernard continues to be a very

227
00:12:11,679 --> 00:12:14,240
Speaker 1: tough prospect for me during this draft cycle. I know

228
00:12:14,320 --> 00:12:16,560
Speaker 1: a lot of analytical models they're not gonna like him.

229
00:12:16,640 --> 00:12:18,720
Speaker 1: He had a career one point nine yards per out

230
00:12:18,800 --> 00:12:22,359
Speaker 1: run rate and typically Day two wide receivers have underperformed

231
00:12:22,440 --> 00:12:25,360
Speaker 1: versus draft capital expectation by almost two PPR points per

232
00:12:25,400 --> 00:12:27,880
Speaker 1: game when they've been under that two point zero mark.

233
00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:32,320
Speaker 1: But the ZAP model looks at versatility too, and Bernard

234
00:12:32,400 --> 00:12:34,880
Speaker 1: had that. He got rushing work. And I've said this

235
00:12:34,920 --> 00:12:38,040
Speaker 1: before in the show, but Bernard played in Washington before

236
00:12:38,080 --> 00:12:41,920
Speaker 1: going to Alabama. He was on that team with Jalen Polk,

237
00:12:42,240 --> 00:12:47,600
Speaker 1: Jayleen McMillan, Romadunze, and Denzel Boston, and he was able

238
00:12:47,679 --> 00:12:50,240
Speaker 1: to see a lot more production in that offense than

239
00:12:50,280 --> 00:12:53,079
Speaker 1: Boston did. Now, they are different types of wide receivers,

240
00:12:53,240 --> 00:12:56,400
Speaker 1: but I still think that's noteworthy. Bernard ran a solid

241
00:12:56,440 --> 00:12:58,400
Speaker 1: forty at two hundred and six pounds, and then he

242
00:12:58,440 --> 00:13:00,640
Speaker 1: went out hit the best three cone of any player

243
00:13:00,640 --> 00:13:04,679
Speaker 1: at the combine. That fits his profile pretty well. He's quick,

244
00:13:04,840 --> 00:13:07,200
Speaker 1: he's a good yards after the catch guy. He's got

245
00:13:07,200 --> 00:13:09,360
Speaker 1: the right build for that kind of thing, that kind

246
00:13:09,400 --> 00:13:12,080
Speaker 1: of role. I do think that we could be looking

247
00:13:12,120 --> 00:13:14,880
Speaker 1: at a Paris Campbell type prospect, though that's the fear

248
00:13:15,840 --> 00:13:18,720
Speaker 1: that's in his range of outcomes. In fact, so many

249
00:13:18,760 --> 00:13:22,280
Speaker 1: of his comps in the ZAP model consists of bus unfortunately,

250
00:13:22,800 --> 00:13:25,079
Speaker 1: but even if the analytics community is more out than

251
00:13:25,120 --> 00:13:28,920
Speaker 1: in with Bernard, I'm still kind of intrigued, especially after

252
00:13:28,960 --> 00:13:33,880
Speaker 1: this good combine. I thought ted Hurst was another winner

253
00:13:33,880 --> 00:13:36,480
Speaker 1: at this year's Combine. I've let it be known that

254
00:13:36,600 --> 00:13:38,680
Speaker 1: I don't think he has the greatest production profile in

255
00:13:38,679 --> 00:13:41,079
Speaker 1: the world, especially when adjusted for strength of schedule he

256
00:13:41,080 --> 00:13:44,320
Speaker 1: played at Georgia State. His breakout score at ranks in

257
00:13:44,320 --> 00:13:47,560
Speaker 1: the fifty fourth percentile. That's good, it's not great. His

258
00:13:47,600 --> 00:13:49,880
Speaker 1: best season in yards per team pass attempts was only

259
00:13:49,880 --> 00:13:53,240
Speaker 1: two point one four, But there's definitely some intrigue with

260
00:13:53,280 --> 00:13:56,360
Speaker 1: this archetype. It's often a go big or go home archetype.

261
00:13:56,720 --> 00:14:00,360
Speaker 1: It's a high variance one and post combine. According to

262
00:14:00,400 --> 00:14:03,640
Speaker 1: the Zapp model, his third best comp is Nico Collins.

263
00:14:04,800 --> 00:14:06,720
Speaker 1: Now that's not even considering the fact that he had

264
00:14:06,720 --> 00:14:09,360
Speaker 1: a ninety fifth percentile speed score while having the best

265
00:14:09,360 --> 00:14:12,880
Speaker 1: broad jump in the class. Considering herst is coming from

266
00:14:12,920 --> 00:14:16,280
Speaker 1: a smaller program at Georgia State, having a good combine

267
00:14:16,679 --> 00:14:19,800
Speaker 1: was so important, and in my opinion, he had a

268
00:14:19,800 --> 00:14:24,400
Speaker 1: great one. Carnal Tate was listed at six three, one

269
00:14:24,480 --> 00:14:27,280
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety five pounds in college. At the combine,

270
00:14:27,360 --> 00:14:29,320
Speaker 1: he came in at six foot two, one hundred and

271
00:14:29,400 --> 00:14:32,360
Speaker 1: ninety two pounds. It's not significant, but it is a

272
00:14:32,400 --> 00:14:36,240
Speaker 1: little bit smaller than what we initially thought. That wasn't

273
00:14:36,240 --> 00:14:39,160
Speaker 1: the problem for Tait though. The bigger issue was he's

274
00:14:39,160 --> 00:14:41,640
Speaker 1: a vertical threat who ran a four to five three forty.

275
00:14:42,680 --> 00:14:45,120
Speaker 1: Now after that forty, there's a tweet that came out

276
00:14:45,120 --> 00:14:48,200
Speaker 1: from Adam Schefter and it said, quote Ohio state wide

277
00:14:48,200 --> 00:14:51,280
Speaker 1: receiver Carnel Tate, a potential top ten pick, was timed

278
00:14:51,320 --> 00:14:54,560
Speaker 1: by several NFL executives and gms on Saturday with a

279
00:14:54,600 --> 00:14:57,080
Speaker 1: forty time in the range of four four five to

280
00:14:57,200 --> 00:15:01,640
Speaker 1: four four seven seconds. Although the comp buying registers official times,

281
00:15:02,000 --> 00:15:05,400
Speaker 1: teams always conduct their own timing, and those measurements with

282
00:15:05,520 --> 00:15:07,760
Speaker 1: some teams were lower than his clocks four or five

283
00:15:07,760 --> 00:15:10,240
Speaker 1: to two, which actually was a four or five to three.

284
00:15:10,840 --> 00:15:13,160
Speaker 1: What I found funny about that was number one, there

285
00:15:13,240 --> 00:15:15,200
Speaker 1: seemed to be a little bit of damage control going on,

286
00:15:15,480 --> 00:15:18,800
Speaker 1: Let's be honest, but number two. Within the ZAP model

287
00:15:19,160 --> 00:15:22,840
Speaker 1: Pro Day numbers, they're adjusted by point zero five. We

288
00:15:22,960 --> 00:15:25,480
Speaker 1: add that to the forty time because often we'll get

289
00:15:25,520 --> 00:15:29,640
Speaker 1: faster times at pro days, a little home cooking. And

290
00:15:29,680 --> 00:15:32,160
Speaker 1: what's funny is that if you make those adjustments to Tait,

291
00:15:32,440 --> 00:15:36,320
Speaker 1: you get a pretty similar forty as his clock time. Now, look,

292
00:15:36,360 --> 00:15:39,000
Speaker 1: this change is absolutely nothing in the ZAP model for Tait.

293
00:15:39,120 --> 00:15:41,320
Speaker 1: Kind of I mean, there is a chance that Tait

294
00:15:41,400 --> 00:15:44,880
Speaker 1: now goes lower in the NFL draft because of this. Honestly,

295
00:15:44,880 --> 00:15:46,560
Speaker 1: I'm not sure why he even ran if he was

296
00:15:46,600 --> 00:15:49,400
Speaker 1: in this vicinity for the forty, since he was already

297
00:15:49,440 --> 00:15:52,360
Speaker 1: likely to be a high end pick. But regardless, if

298
00:15:52,400 --> 00:15:54,360
Speaker 1: he falls a few spots in the draft because of this.

299
00:15:54,440 --> 00:15:57,320
Speaker 1: Number one, I think that's silly, but number two, it

300
00:15:57,360 --> 00:16:00,800
Speaker 1: could impact his ZAP score just slightly. I'm calling him

301
00:16:00,840 --> 00:16:03,520
Speaker 1: out today because, yes, he was a loser at the Combine,

302
00:16:03,560 --> 00:16:06,520
Speaker 1: but no, I wouldn't really care that deeply about what

303
00:16:06,640 --> 00:16:09,040
Speaker 1: happened there. I think Tait's a good prospect. I don't

304
00:16:09,080 --> 00:16:11,240
Speaker 1: think he's as elite as the other Ohio State guys

305
00:16:11,280 --> 00:16:13,160
Speaker 1: who have come out over last half decade or so,

306
00:16:13,520 --> 00:16:18,440
Speaker 1: but he's a very good prospect. Seth mcgallan was a

307
00:16:18,480 --> 00:16:20,920
Speaker 1: really interesting winner at the Combine this year. For those

308
00:16:20,960 --> 00:16:22,840
Speaker 1: who don't know him, he's a running back who kind

309
00:16:22,840 --> 00:16:25,520
Speaker 1: of went all over the place in college. He started

310
00:16:25,520 --> 00:16:28,520
Speaker 1: in Oklahoma in twenty twenty, was dismissed due to legal

311
00:16:28,520 --> 00:16:31,400
Speaker 1: issues which were eventually dropped, took some time off, went

312
00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:34,760
Speaker 1: to Butler Community College, transferred to Mexico State, where he

313
00:16:34,800 --> 00:16:37,760
Speaker 1: played with the aforementioned Mike Washington, and then he finished

314
00:16:37,760 --> 00:16:41,520
Speaker 1: things off in twenty twenty five in Kentucky. Considering he

315
00:16:41,600 --> 00:16:44,920
Speaker 1: started in twenty twenty, Yes, he's old. He's over twenty

316
00:16:45,000 --> 00:16:47,840
Speaker 1: five years old actually, which is incredibly uncommon for a

317
00:16:47,920 --> 00:16:51,440
Speaker 1: running back and should make us not go crazy with him.

318
00:16:51,640 --> 00:16:53,920
Speaker 1: But I thought he had a good combine. His vertical

319
00:16:53,920 --> 00:16:55,800
Speaker 1: in broad jumps put him in the ninety nine percentile

320
00:16:55,800 --> 00:16:58,360
Speaker 1: on BURS score according to Player Profiler, and he ran

321
00:16:58,400 --> 00:17:01,520
Speaker 1: a four four nine forty at two hundred and fifteen pounds.

322
00:17:01,840 --> 00:17:05,120
Speaker 1: That's a great speed score. He was arguably the most

323
00:17:05,160 --> 00:17:09,879
Speaker 1: athletic running back in this class, behind Mike Washington. Again,

324
00:17:09,920 --> 00:17:12,440
Speaker 1: I think the age profile here, it's definitely a huge

325
00:17:12,440 --> 00:17:15,480
Speaker 1: red flag. You should not prioritize him early on in

326
00:17:15,520 --> 00:17:17,960
Speaker 1: your rookie drafts, but McGowan is definitely something that you

327
00:17:18,000 --> 00:17:23,639
Speaker 1: should keep an eye on. Kenyan Sadik absolutely destroyed the

328
00:17:23,680 --> 00:17:26,080
Speaker 1: combine at tight end. I haven't talked about a ton

329
00:17:26,080 --> 00:17:28,160
Speaker 1: of tight ends because I've been so focused on running

330
00:17:28,160 --> 00:17:31,080
Speaker 1: back and wide receiver. But Brandon Gadoula and I we've

331
00:17:31,080 --> 00:17:32,919
Speaker 1: been working on the modeling side of things for the

332
00:17:32,920 --> 00:17:35,600
Speaker 1: position and we're in a great place with it now. Actually,

333
00:17:35,640 --> 00:17:38,479
Speaker 1: on Wednesday, I'll be sending out a newsletter about that

334
00:17:38,600 --> 00:17:40,840
Speaker 1: new tight end model. You can check that out by

335
00:17:40,840 --> 00:17:44,520
Speaker 1: signing up for the free newsletter lateround dot com. But

336
00:17:44,560 --> 00:17:47,720
Speaker 1: Sadiq had a one hundred percentile forty in speed score

337
00:17:47,920 --> 00:17:50,960
Speaker 1: while also crushing his jumps I mean he tests is

338
00:17:50,960 --> 00:17:53,119
Speaker 1: basically the best tight end athlete, at least one of

339
00:17:53,160 --> 00:17:56,600
Speaker 1: them in combine history, and I would imagine that his

340
00:17:56,680 --> 00:17:58,639
Speaker 1: draft capital is going to rise as a result of that.

341
00:18:00,000 --> 00:18:02,040
Speaker 1: Sadik looks good in the tight end model. If he

342
00:18:02,080 --> 00:18:04,360
Speaker 1: goes top ten, he'll have a real shot to land

343
00:18:04,359 --> 00:18:07,520
Speaker 1: in that legendary performer category. But right now he's just

344
00:18:07,560 --> 00:18:11,240
Speaker 1: an elite producer. His production profile has gotten some heat

345
00:18:11,359 --> 00:18:14,080
Speaker 1: and it's not flawless, but the model doesn't see it

346
00:18:14,119 --> 00:18:17,719
Speaker 1: as terrible either. Now, another tight end the model really

347
00:18:17,840 --> 00:18:20,800
Speaker 1: likes is Eli Stowers, and this isn't even influenced by

348
00:18:20,880 --> 00:18:23,880
Speaker 1: late round coo David Kitchen, who's a big Vandy fan.

349
00:18:24,680 --> 00:18:27,280
Speaker 1: Stowers was six four two and thirty nine pounds of

350
00:18:27,320 --> 00:18:29,359
Speaker 1: the combine and he ran a four to five one

351
00:18:29,480 --> 00:18:32,320
Speaker 1: forty that gave him a ninety fifth percentile speed score,

352
00:18:32,760 --> 00:18:34,480
Speaker 1: and then he showed off a freaking forty five and

353
00:18:34,520 --> 00:18:37,639
Speaker 1: a half inch vertical by far the best of the combine.

354
00:18:37,840 --> 00:18:39,680
Speaker 1: Breakout score is one of the inputs in the tight

355
00:18:39,760 --> 00:18:42,280
Speaker 1: end model too, not just the wide receiver one, and

356
00:18:42,320 --> 00:18:45,159
Speaker 1: it's based on receiving yards per team pass attempt, and

357
00:18:45,280 --> 00:18:47,920
Speaker 1: Stowurs score is one of the best in the class,

358
00:18:48,040 --> 00:18:51,439
Speaker 1: and it's actually better than Sadik's. There's a lot to

359
00:18:51,640 --> 00:18:55,080
Speaker 1: like about his profile. Those two tight ends, they look

360
00:18:55,160 --> 00:18:58,200
Speaker 1: like the clear best two according to the model. They

361
00:18:58,200 --> 00:19:02,800
Speaker 1: both slayed the combine. The final player I want to

362
00:19:02,840 --> 00:19:05,600
Speaker 1: talk about today is Jenaium Price. Now there's still some

363
00:19:05,800 --> 00:19:07,720
Speaker 1: chance that Price ends up as my RB two in

364
00:19:07,720 --> 00:19:10,400
Speaker 1: this class if he gets the draft capital and if

365
00:19:10,440 --> 00:19:13,520
Speaker 1: no other player in this class gets that capital outside

366
00:19:13,560 --> 00:19:17,280
Speaker 1: of Jeremiah Love. But there's very little chance that I'm

367
00:19:17,280 --> 00:19:19,920
Speaker 1: gonna be high on him, that I'm gonna like Jenireum

368
00:19:19,960 --> 00:19:24,040
Speaker 1: Price more than the market. There's so much missing from

369
00:19:24,080 --> 00:19:26,960
Speaker 1: his production profile because he played with Jeremiah Love, and

370
00:19:27,000 --> 00:19:29,560
Speaker 1: I get that. I talked through that in the Prospect

371
00:19:29,560 --> 00:19:32,600
Speaker 1: Guide at length. But here's the thing. If we're gonna

372
00:19:32,600 --> 00:19:36,640
Speaker 1: make excuses for Price, reasonable excuses, we need to fall

373
00:19:36,680 --> 00:19:39,680
Speaker 1: back on something objective and tangible to feel good about

374
00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:44,080
Speaker 1: a strong investment. And the combine did Price no favors.

375
00:19:44,160 --> 00:19:47,240
Speaker 1: In my opinion. He was listening at five eleven two

376
00:19:47,280 --> 00:19:49,800
Speaker 1: hundred and nine pounds in college. At the combine. He

377
00:19:49,840 --> 00:19:52,280
Speaker 1: came in at five eleven two hundred and three pounds.

378
00:19:52,720 --> 00:19:56,720
Speaker 1: That's not nothing. When players are lighter than expected, you

379
00:19:56,800 --> 00:19:59,919
Speaker 1: hope they run a faster forty than you expect. You

380
00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:03,000
Speaker 1: I hope that's the reason. But Price had an incredibly

381
00:20:03,040 --> 00:20:07,240
Speaker 1: normal four four nine that resulted in an incredibly normal

382
00:20:07,359 --> 00:20:10,840
Speaker 1: ninety nine point nine speed score. He had the second

383
00:20:10,880 --> 00:20:14,240
Speaker 1: best explosive run rate in this class across his career,

384
00:20:14,359 --> 00:20:18,200
Speaker 1: that's according to PFF data, but that speed didn't necessarily

385
00:20:18,280 --> 00:20:21,760
Speaker 1: match up with his speed score. I'm just concerned about

386
00:20:21,760 --> 00:20:25,800
Speaker 1: this profile. I think it's really reasonable to be concerned.

387
00:20:26,359 --> 00:20:29,359
Speaker 1: You have arguably the worst production profile and this entire

388
00:20:29,440 --> 00:20:32,880
Speaker 1: draft class, and it's for a player who tested as

389
00:20:32,880 --> 00:20:36,240
Speaker 1: just an above average athlete. There's a lot of projecting

390
00:20:36,240 --> 00:20:38,840
Speaker 1: that has to go on here, and maybe that ends

391
00:20:38,920 --> 00:20:42,680
Speaker 1: up working out. Maybe every single excuse ends up being

392
00:20:42,720 --> 00:20:45,840
Speaker 1: totally valid. But to me, Price is going to have

393
00:20:45,840 --> 00:20:49,960
Speaker 1: to find the perfect landing spot for me to get excited. Now,

394
00:20:49,960 --> 00:20:51,640
Speaker 1: there were a lot of other players of the combine

395
00:20:51,680 --> 00:20:53,639
Speaker 1: this year. I could have talked about a lot of

396
00:20:53,640 --> 00:20:56,439
Speaker 1: different guys, like, for instance, I think Skyler Bell had

397
00:20:56,480 --> 00:21:01,199
Speaker 1: a great combine. McKay lemon apparently had bad interviews. But

398
00:21:01,280 --> 00:21:03,200
Speaker 1: I wanted to shout out who I think deserved to

399
00:21:03,240 --> 00:21:05,720
Speaker 1: be shouted out the most, and now we just have

400
00:21:05,760 --> 00:21:08,200
Speaker 1: to wait for these Pro Day numbers to come rolling in.

401
00:21:09,200 --> 00:21:10,760
Speaker 1: That's it for today's show, though, thanks to all of

402
00:21:10,800 --> 00:21:12,719
Speaker 1: you for listening. If you get subscribed to the Late

403
00:21:12,760 --> 00:21:15,560
Speaker 1: Round Fantasy Football podcast, make sure you are bestwarching for

404
00:21:15,600 --> 00:21:18,480
Speaker 1: it pretty much anywhere podcasts can be found, and follow

405
00:21:18,520 --> 00:21:21,240
Speaker 1: me on Twitter and on Blue Sky at Late Round QB.

406
00:21:22,240 --> 00:21:24,760
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening everyone. I'll be talking about some broader

407
00:21:24,840 --> 00:21:27,320
Speaker 1: combine takeaways in the Late Round show this week over

408
00:21:27,359 --> 00:21:30,880
Speaker 1: on YouTube. That'll be on Wednesday at noon Eastern YouTube

409
00:21:30,880 --> 00:21:34,680
Speaker 1: dot com slash at LATEROUNDFF and then it's a mailbag week,

410
00:21:34,880 --> 00:21:37,159
Speaker 1: so i'll have that on Friday. I'll talk to you

411
00:21:37,240 --> 00:21:37,680
Speaker 1: guys then