WEBVTT - Bridgewater Exits Dalio Era With Revamp

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg business Week Inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebec from Bloomberg Radio. Well,

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>we know the financial world continues to evolve. In one

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 1>thing we have seen over the last couple of years

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is a string of iconic firms run by their iconic

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>founders figuring out succession plans and the way forward. Among

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>those firms, Bridgewater, whose billionaire founder Ray Dalio handed off

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>control five months ago in a Bloomberg exclusive and the

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>most read story on the Bloomberg Today. Bloomberg News Editor

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 1>at Large and New Economy Editorial Director Eric Shatzker joining

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>us on the major revamp of the world's largest hedge fund.

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>He joins us in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. First

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of all, great story, great reporting. This is someone you know, Well,

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>just remind you you've had many conversations kind of put

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Ray Dalio in in kind of his place when it

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:08.279
<v Speaker 1>comes to the financial community and something. Ray is a

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund investing legend, an call master of the universe,

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in Wall Street terms. He built the world's largest hedge

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>funded Bridgewater Associates and amassed more money in hedge fund

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>strategies than anybody ever had and anybody ever has to date.

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>At its peak, Bridgewater had more than one hundred and

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion dollars under management. And one of the important

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>things undercurrents to the story is that in the course

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of amassing all those assets, Bridgewater under Ray's leadership, kind

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of defied gravity because the conventional wisdom in hedge funds

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is that each strategy has a natural size cap to it.

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>There are only so many opportunities that any one firm

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>can harvest, so if you try to run too much money,

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you're going to erode your returns. Now, this didn't this

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.959
<v Speaker 1>law didn't seem to apply to Bridgewater for a long time,

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and then in the twenty tens they had a prolonged

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.239
<v Speaker 1>period of underperformance and really had to take a hard

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>look at themselves in the mirror and ask what was wrong?

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>What's what are we not doing right? They started to

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>take some steps to reconcile or resolve those issues while

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Ray was still there a couple of years ago. But

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>now that he's gone, the new generation of leadership has

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the freedom to go much further and they are and

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>how is that going for them? Well, it's early days

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>yet this was just announced today. In fact, some people

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bridgewater would say, thank goodness, were actually starting. There

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was a sense inside the firm that while Ray was

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>still the boss and the controlling shareholder, some of these

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>changes were difficult to implement. I'm not sure I would

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>quite go so far as to say he was resistant

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to them. But now you have younger people running the

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>firm who have ideas of their own and who want

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to implement them. So it will take some time to

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>see if this idea of capping their flagship hedge fund

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>strategy pure Alpha will help to deliver better returns in

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that strategy. What it will mean practically is the clients

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>who want more Pure Alpha or who aren't in that

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>strategy and want access to it may not get it,

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And institutional clients are going to have to be competing

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>for that more so than they have been. That's right,

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>There's always been a ceiling, but now the ceiling is

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>much lower on how much they're willing to manage. The

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>maximum at one point was about one hundred billion dollars

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be twenty to thirty percent less

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>than that going forward, So more money into talent in AI,

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>machine learning, expanding an age. Yeah, this is the flip

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>side of the coin. Talk to us a little bit

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>about these strategies and what strikes you the most in

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of what this means for going forward. And it's

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:06.279
<v Speaker 1>new CEO. As they cap the opportunity set in pure Alpha,

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>they're cutting some jobs. They no longer need as many

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.839
<v Speaker 1>people to support that strategy, and they're reallocating those resources

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to these new initiatives. One of those initiatives is growing

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the firm's international footprint in Asia in particular. Another is

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>building out their equities business. A third is sustainability, and

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a fourth, as you mentioned, is AI and machine learning. Bridgewater,

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>like many firms in the hedge fund industry, has been

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>experimenting with AI and machine learning for quite some time.

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>To date, nobody has really figured out a way to

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>master those technologies in a way in a manner let's

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>say that truly supersedes human decision making. That's the dream

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that you'll be able to program a machine and the

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>machine will be able to do will be able to

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>invest better than the human right. It hasn't happened yet.

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And what this tells you is that Bridgewater, by putting

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>this effort underneath one of the co chief investment officers,

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Greg Jensen, is really getting serious about trying to reach

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that holy grail, let's call it. We'll find that holy grail.

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>It feels like they're kind of investing in the ideas

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of that younger cohort of investors. Is that how you

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>would describe it. I think the younger people who are

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>now running the firm in their thirties and forties, for

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the most part, recognize that this is the future and

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that they need to chase the future as hard as

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>possible if they want to get there first. One of

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the things to keep in mind about technologies like generative

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.799
<v Speaker 1>AI right, or quantum computing, which is around the corner

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 1>but not quite here yet, is that it might be

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>winner take all. If you get there first, you open

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>up such a lead over your competition that they may

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>never catch up. Yeah, it's kind of fascinating about, you know,

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Ray Dalio Bridgewater for the It's interesting Bridgewater has written

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>about this to its clients and they call those types

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of technologies force multiplier technologies. We'll think about it right

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>if they get it right, and you can think about

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the returns that could be potentially off of that. Hey, listen,

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>got about a minute left. I think about Ray Dalio,

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and I do think about for many years his outperformance

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and how well he did under with Bridgewater. But he

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>also talked about society at large. Is that still a

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>part of the fabric at Bridgewater. Ray cared about society.

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>His concern for society and his concern that we are

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>able to get along with one another and we don't

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>devolve into you know, partisan bickering and the potentially terrible

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>consequences that could come out of it were unique to

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Ray himself his point of view, But the people who

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>run Bridgewater now have their own ethos. What they did

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>say what near Bardo, the new CEO said to me

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is for us, it's not ideologue goal. We are where

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>we need to be. For example, we're in China because

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>we our clients want us to be there, and we'll

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>be there so long as we can. But it's not

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>about ideology. I love to and we're running out of time.

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>But this whole idea of his contribution, what he calls

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a flywheel and that's an all idea of like chasing

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>new talent, right new ideas. That's right, and it will

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>become this virtuous circle. So don't kill me. But it

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>almost sounds a little Kathy woodlike, Oh, I don't think

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they craved that comparison warmly and a little bit okay, okay, good, Yeah.

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like maybe the young people are getting there.

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Um. Great story again, thank you, Carol,

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and it is most read on the Bloomberg in the

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>past eight hours. Eric Shatzker Editor at Large. He's editorial

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>director for Bloomberg New Economy, joining us in studio. Check

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it out at Bloomberg dot com and of course on

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal. You are listening and watching Bloomberg Radio.

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast Cat just

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Live week days from two to five pm Easter on

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business a band you. You can

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>also listen live to our flagship New York station, Just

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Say Alexa, play Bloomberg Eleve and Dirty. You know, we've

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about the one year anniversary of that

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Russian invasion of Ukraine, and Carol, I did not know

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>about this until reading this story. But President Vladimir Putin

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>he begins the war. A network used throughout Europe, including

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>by the Ukrainian military, then faced an unprecedented cyber attack,

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's one that everyone is finally talking about. Yeah.

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it went from no one to everyone,

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and they should be. The story is coming up in

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the new issue of Bloomberg BusinessWeek on newsstands tomorrow, already

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>online at Bloomberg dot com, slash business Week, and of

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>course on the Bloomberg Let's get to it with Bloomberg

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>News Cyber and Emerging tech reporter Katrina Manson. She joins

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>us via zoom in New York City, and of course

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 1>you've got the editor of Bloomberg Business Week, Del Webber

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>right here in our Bloomberg Interactive broker's studio. So tell

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>us about this hack in my ongoing propaganda for rto messaging.

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Katrina and I found ourselves in the Washington DC bureau

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and Katrina was like, have you heard of this company Vias?

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, what are you talking about? She

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was like a satellite company. I was like, I don't

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>know anything you're talking about. And it turns out that

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a hack at the beginning of the Russian invasion,

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and no one initially attributed that to Russia, but as

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the weeks passed and Western governments, you know, finally got

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>around to pointing a finger, they pointed that figure a

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>finger out Russia, which obviously Russia says that we're innocent.

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But what it really revealed was something that I thought

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>was worthy of further exploration. And Katrina did a great

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>job on this, and it turns out satellites are really

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>unsecure and that is a little frightening when you think

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>about the amount of data that is sent there um

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and and so this via st hack that you read

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>about Katrina tell us why it ended up being a

0:09:55.800 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>much overdue wake up call for the satellite industry. When

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I think trapping it down was so fascinating. Reports came

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>out in drifts and drabs. There were other journalists who

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>are very obsessed with this issue, who were of course

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>covering it, but it was very hard to put together

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the overall picture, and some cybersecurity researchers did incredible work

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>really trying to encourage the company to talk about this

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in public. When I say cybersecurity researchers, I mean hackers

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>they have been trying to hack space for a decade

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>plus for white hat reasons. That's classically known as for

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>good to share their information so other people improve. But

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:36.599
<v Speaker 1>it's a really sensitive area. And so one of the

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 1>main people I spoke to for the story, Ruben Santa Marta,

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:43.239
<v Speaker 1>he's been warning since twenty fourteen that space is insecure.

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And he said to me that page ten and eleven

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of one of these very esenteric papers that he'd written

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>actually essentially predicted exactly what happened to the Ukrainian military,

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>which relies on commercial satellite in remote places to get

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>their Internet connections. That's essentially how they want to link

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>frontline troops, to command control, to control drones, all the

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>things that you would need to respond to a very

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>swift or what was intended to be a very swift

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>lightning invasion by the Russians. So the stakes were incredibly high,

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and it came down to a lot of researchers who've

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>been climbing the bell for this for so many years.

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Another one I spoke to, called James Parville for the story.

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>He intercepted satellite data transmissions that's from the satellite down

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to in this case ships that were relying on satellite connections,

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and he got hold of the crew manifests passport details,

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>credit card details. It is extraordinary how much out there

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>in space is not encrypted and how easy it is

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to get hold of it. I see, And I was

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>so hoping she was going to talk about Captain Midnight.

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>But we'll get to that later. I mean, we have to,

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we have to. I mean, I wonder if you can

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about the US intelligence on this.

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>The US looks into it gleans that the Russians were

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>prepared to take significant diplomatic and strategic risks, which feels

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>like something that you could have told us before the

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>US intelligence looked into that, Katrina. But I wonder if

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you can talk about how much the US knows as

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>we stand today, and maybe the extent to which we

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Well, I can tell you what I know,

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>which is definitely not everything. But I think the US

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>worked very quickly within about four weeks to work out

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that they thought it was the gru that's responsible. That's

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Russian military intelligence. They have alleged we done lots of hacking,

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>according to the US in the past. And what was

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting about that was that it was coordinated with the invasion. Now,

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>once they established that, they then spent six weeks trying

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to convince the Europeans that they were right. And I

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.959
<v Speaker 1>think it has interesting echoes for the rest of how

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the US approached the Ukraine invasion, which was to flag

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>early on to the Europeans, look, this is going to happen.

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>We have the intel, and the Europeans, namely the French

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and German, said no, we don't think so. And in

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the case of the satellite hacked, the US actually went

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>above and beyond and shared additional intel. I'm told European

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>official with the French and the Germans to try and

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>convince them not only that this had happened, but that

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it was really important to blame Russia in public, and

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that's something countries simply don't usually do well. As you say,

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the story, you have a quote

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>from a source who says it is super super repeatable.

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's distressing. I was going to say, the

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>good news is that this will never happen again. I

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 1>may well be invited back, I'm sorry to say so.

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>So walk us through what has to happen in order

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>for this to not happen again, I think at the

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>most extreme, and some groups in the US are calling

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to make space systems um a critical infrastructure sector. I mean,

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that is terrible job and I'm sorry to even introduce it,

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's essentially to say, give this sector way more

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>UM prominence, government support, and essentially potentially regulation. That's something

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>sallite companies mostly don't want, and I think the US

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>government isn't going to do that. We've got quite Congress

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to step in. It's part of a five year review.

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just going to get sucked into all

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>sorts of bog down into stuff. But the easiest thing

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to do is to set standards. And that's actually what

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the source who said this is super super repeatable it's doing.

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>He wants international countries to agree, well, how do we

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>run our satellite systems? What do we do with the

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>satellite up in space? How do we control the link,

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>what goes into the ground network. And as you have

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>more and more satellites going up into space, I mean,

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are can I think, what do these numbers

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>look like? Yeah, I mean it's from about five thousand

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>active satellites in orbit at the moment to within the

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>next seven years, but my end predictions are one hundred thousand.

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>That's because satellites are getting smaller, launch is getting easier.

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's into this new low or low Earth orbit, which

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is much closer, so easier to get to. The satellite

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that got hacked was a geostationary satellite way higher, so

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see way more satellites in which means

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that if one gets hacked, there are others you can

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>rely on. But I think what's key is establishing standards

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and working out what goes into that gloom and protecting

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>ground networks. I mean, that's actually what the entry was

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in this hack. And there are really convoluted chains between

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the different operators of a satellite network, and it seems

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that the ball got dropped in that case there was

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a third party operator, right, that's whose speech then it

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>went all the way to buy some It's our new

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of warfare, right, cyber warfare, And like you think

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>about nuclear deterrance, like how we create that kind of

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>deterrence when it comes to global satellites. Incredible story. Katrina Manson,

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>cyber and Emerging tech reporter at Bloomberg News via zoom

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe Weber editor of Bloomberg BusinessWeek. This story in the

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>new issue at Bloomberg BusinessWeek magazine. This is Bloomberg business

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Week Inside, from the reporters and editors who bring you

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>America's most trusted business magazine, plus global business finance and

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week Podcast with Carol mesre

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and Tim Stenebec from Bloomberg Radio. Nowdy, we're going to

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>get to another story that is among the most read

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg and it's certainly something we've touched on before,

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and that is worrisome when it comes to looking at

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the consumer debt picture here in the United States. Yeah, Carol,

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about car debt and it is a huge

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>problem piling up for a lot of consumers across the country.

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So here to tell us more about it and her

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>reporting on this issue is Bloomberg News Consumer finance reporter

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Paige Smith from our Bloomberg ninety nine one studio in

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>DC page. Thank you so much for being back with us.

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>What's going on here with this just exponential car debt.

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me, folks. Nice to be back. So

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it is sort of a number of factors, I mean,

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>when you consider there were sort of a lull during

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. I mean, I don't know about you, but

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I heard of friends turning in their subarus and getting

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>more back than they'd paid for them. But yes, that

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not is gone now. And basically, you know, negative

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>equity or essentially owing you know, the debt exceeding the

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>value of your vehicle is not an uncommon occurrence. It's

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>quite common in fact. But you know, we spoke with

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>dealers who are seeing consumers come onto their lots with

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand dollars in negative equity or even more for

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that matter, So gone or the days when you could

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>get more for your vehicle than you paid for it,

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, factor in it. There are a number

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of other factors like high interest rates to consider now.

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is just it's a tough time for consumers,

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and for folks who have auto loans in particular, it's

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a really tough time, partially because of those high interest rates,

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 1>but also in the story you mentioned that the initial

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>cost of the car is already too high for a

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of people exactly, and when you think about it,

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>so you have, you know, a car that might be

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand or sixty thousand dollars and then you have

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in January, for example, the new car interest rate was

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>six point nine percent and you have a loan for

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 1>maybe seven years. That's a lot that you're paying. At

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, we have you know, a

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>number of consumers are paying more than a thousand dollars

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a month for their car. If you think about it,

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that's more than some people pay for rent every month.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's just it's really expensive about their folks, you

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>know what's really it's like heartbreaking. But you talk about

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>negative equity, it's never good. But it's somewhat unusual or

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>not among car owners. Right we see this. What's different

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>right now page right is it just kind of a

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>size and scope that we're seeing exactly. I mean, you

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>have folks who were kind of you know, maybe wanting

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to buy a car. And if you have a car

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that lasted you through the pandemic, but now you're going

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to look for a new car. It's it's extremely expensive.

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And yes, the terms or longer interest rates are higher.

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Now you're seeing, you know, severely the rate of severely

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>delinquent loans hit the highest level since two thousand and six.

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just a lot to think about as

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a consumer, and it's it's overall really expensive, and they're

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>also struggling to get any type of refinancing right exactly exactly,

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say that, you know, folks, we've already seen

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>lenders kind of tighten their standards. So you know, if

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to go out and get any sort of

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 1>an auto loan, it might be harder for you to

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>do so these days, you know. I wonder, you know

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>makes me think about different things that have come before

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>regulators in the past, whether it's student loans and the

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>amount of death there and how that has become problematic

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for so many to manage, especially as we look right

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>now right Supreme Court considering up the President Biden's plans

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to forgive a lot of debt. So I do wonder

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>can you can you tell us something more about how

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 1>many of Americans are potentially in trouble or underwater at

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>this point? Are we talking about forty percent of car loans?

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Do we? I'm just curiously we have any idea a

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more into terms of how big a problem

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is could potentially be. I don't have that data right

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>off the top of my head, but I know that

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>almost sixteen percent of of some of almost sixteen percent

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of consumers surveyed in a recent poll, we're paying more

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>than a thousand dollars a month on their on their

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>car payments. And I think that for the average for

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the number of trade ins that had negative equity associated

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>with them, it was reaching like an average of fifty

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>five hundred dollars. So you know, it's like rolling that

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>some from one vehicle over into the next. And then

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing about folks who might even roll that dead

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>into a third vehicle. So to speak to regulators too,

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you hinted at that sin is definitely on the radar

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Consumer Fight Financial Protection Bureau. They're collecting data

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>on this and they're going to be watching closely, and

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>so are we page that piece for the CFPB is

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of what I was thinking about because earlier today,

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I know you're on the clothes with Scarlett, and I

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.719
<v Speaker 1>was telling her that I see these hot takes on

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>social media all the time of people saying that the

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 1>car delinquencies are going to be the new housing crisis,

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and she was saying to me, well, usually you can

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of bet on people repaying their car payment more

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>consistently than their house payment, because you need the car

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>to get to work. And I know that some of

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>your sources said that as well, that you know, if

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>even if your car is more expensive than a house,

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to keep your job, which is your source of income,

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got to keep that car at play, definitely. And

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm based in DC, you folks her in

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>New York. It's it's easier for us to get on

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>jump on a train, or jump on a bus. The

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of a marror kids don't have that opportunity.

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>A car is extremely important to get from point A

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to point B, to buy groceries, to pick up your kids.

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>And on top of that, this is you know, was

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a really awful saying. But during the you know, during

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the the financial crisis in two thousand and eight, there

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.199
<v Speaker 1>were even some folks saying that they could live in

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>their car. And it's it's just these are sort of

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the struggles the consumers are facing and considering when these

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>payments are getting so high. There's also like this whole

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>idea like if the debt comes undone, you know, who's

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>who's responsible for it? Right on the financial side of things.

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, the lenders of auto loans, those companies

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that actually do the lending, what are they doing to

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>help consumers? Because I think you guys include in the story,

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you include about how they're extending some of the life

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>of auto loans. So just talk to us little bit

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>about that and what they're doing. Yeah, So it's sort

0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 1>of a double edged sword, I would say, because certainly

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the auto loans are being extended, which means that as

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 1>a consumer, your monthly payment might not be as expensive,

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, you know, when

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you pay off that car, you will have paid much

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>more than if you had, you know, showed up at

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that dealership with a check in your hand, or had

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>paid just straight cash. So that's why I say it's

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of a double edged sword. Your monthly payment might

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 1>be less, but in the end you are still inevitably

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 1>paying more. I know, the longer duration right when they

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that's tough, that's tough. It just it reminds me so

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>much of the student loan conversation. Right now, Paige, your

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>headline is car debt piling up, with more buyers ten

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars underwater on loans. I know it's hard to

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>put a number on it. But six months from now,

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a year from now, how big do we know that

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>number could get? And how big is the shoe going

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>to be that drops on this? Gosh, I am scared

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to put a sort of number on that right now,

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>but I will just reiterate that this is definitely on

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the radar of auto industry folks. Dealers are watching this

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>really closely. The CFPB is watching this really closely. You know,

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>like I said, the average trade in for trade ins

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>with negative equity, that average is around fifty five hundred

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. But as I said, the dealers we're seeing,

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, folks come onto their lots with as much

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>as ten thousand dollars negative equity, So we could see

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>it expand hopefully it maybe doesn't or maybe not hopefully,

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, we are. It's sort of a wait and

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>see game, I would. I would say at this point, yeah,

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and you do wonder like if you need a car,

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you need a car, or can you put it or

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 1>can you put it off and say I'm just going

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to live with the older car or whatever and just

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>deal with it and just kind of hopefully write it out.

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm blown away by the average new car interest rate

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>six point nine percent in January four point three percent

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>year earlier. I think the cars that I've bought over

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>the last ten twenty years, it was like no no

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>interest rate. Yeah, kind of giving you the car away.

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>It felt like, Paige, thank you so much, really appreciate it.

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Page Smith, consumer finance reporter at Bloomberg News. There in

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>our nine to nine one studio in Washington to see.

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's just another reminder, Mattie that that low rate

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>environment that was the unusual era, that's not normal. And

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>so this is that reset we're seeing as we come

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>off of that, you know, very inexpensive, cheap, no cost

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>money that was with us for so long. Yeah, it

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.239
<v Speaker 1>feels like people really got used to that idea of

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>every two years, I can get a new car, and

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>now that is just absolutely not the case anymore for

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks. Right, you're getting hit on both ends. Right,

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the cost of cars have gone up and then rates

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>and the rates are higher as well. You're listening to

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us live weekdays from

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>two to five pm Easter on Bloomberg Radio. The Bloomberg

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Business a band you too. You can also listen live

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven, Dirty broca A journal. Yeah, but you let

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>me drive? No, no, no no, no, honey, please, I'll do

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the riding gravels, mate, I want to drive. It's good question.

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the globe. Don comul thing

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Well Brier j down on Bloomberg Radio. All right, folks,

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>just about seventeen minutes left in today's trading session, first

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 1>trading session in the month of March. Stocks bouncing around here.

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>But we've been talking about it, Mattie all day. Really key.

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>We got it early this morning. We had that ten

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>year hitting four percent. So watching that treasury trade, it's

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>really critical to watch that, and we are going to

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>get to that and all of the macro headwinds facing

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>us with Leo Kelly, founder and CEO at Verden's Capital Advisors,

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>back with us in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. Leo,

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 1>great to meet you for the first time and great

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to have you here with us. What's what's the vibe

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 1>right now? Are you on a vibe session thought? Are

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you on a soft landing thought? What are you thinking?

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Not on a soft landing thought? I think the market

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>has I'm on an unrealistic expectations vibe. I think what

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in the marketplace is there's a lot of

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>wishful thinking. There's there's folks that just wanted to go

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>back to the way it was right, And that's natural

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>with investors. They just wanted to be good again, and

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 1>they close their eyes and they hope and pray. Do

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you tell them that markets don't always go up, they

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>don't always make money in the market, and you have

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>to define the market right. Everybody wants the growth market

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to return, and they want low interest rates. I think

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>people have to get their head around the fact that

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we're in the midst of a secular change, a multidecade

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>change that is going to change the markets, and so

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I think inflation is higher for longer than people expect

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 1>interest rates will be going up. By the way, the

0:27:57.040 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>last secular interest rate move was forty years. The one

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>before that forty years. These are not short in nature.

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think we have to start rethinking how we

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>look at markets. What's the reason for this thought for

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you in terms of what happens with inflation staying higher

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:21.360
<v Speaker 1>for longer? Yeah, that one's easy. So in the last

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>ten fifteen years, probably since I've been coming on the show,

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the federal reserves bounce. She It's gone from four hundred

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>billion eight trillion. We spent two trillion in fiscal spending

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in the financial crisis. We spent five trillion in COVID.

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>We grew M two money supply forty percent in two years.

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>There's just so much money. And by the way, that's

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>just the US. Every other country in the world did

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it alongside of us. So there's just so much capital

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>in the system that fundamentally, I just don't see how

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>people think inflations are going to go back to two.

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be a low interest rate environment. We start

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to reduce money supply, and everybody's excited that m to

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>flatten this year, right, We're not. We're not even going

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>back down yet. One thing I want to ask you

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is is also the reasons inflation will stay higher for

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>longer or maybe it's just a new higher level forever

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>because things are changing in terms of demographics, aging populations.

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the regulatory environment as we moved towards

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a greener world, you know, the pushback on globalization. We

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>had a guests and we've had several guests over the

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>last few weeks, you know, just talking about Yeah, things

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>are changing. We talked about with their Mark German about Apple,

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, suppliers they're moving out of China. There are

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>some really dramatic shifts also going out beyond the amount

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of money that's been slashing around in the global economy

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>one percent, so thematically one of the things that we're

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about, and it's good news for the recovery of economy.

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>On the back side of all of this is not

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>just not just rebuilding the supply chain, but reimagining the

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>supply chain. Right, There's going to be a lot of

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>economic activity around that. But again, the deglobalization is deflationary.

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the question should be asking yourself, is the

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>anomaly that inflation is going to be higher going forward?

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Or did we just have the anomaly really right? I

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>think the anomaly was below average inflation, below average volatility.

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>A FED who had a third mandate of protecting asset

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>prices at all costs. That's not how it's been historically.

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we are leaving a moment, not going into

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a moment. Agreed. Agreed that the low rate environment, the

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>zero the negative rates that folks was abnormal. We had

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>not historically what we've seen. We had eighteen trillion dollars

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of negative yielding debt at its peak. Yeah, today we

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>have zero. I guess I wonder about unbelievable. Unbelievable, it's crazy. Yeah,

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy. But I wonder about the stimulus piece. You

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>were talking about the amount of money spent during COVID,

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But that was two years ago when Biden had this

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>stimulus package and people got that extra cash in the bank.

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Why aren't we feeling the consumer or pain a little

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>bit more right now and seeing spending drop a little

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>bit more. Yeah, it's there's a couple of reasons. One,

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>some of this fiscal is still in the system. So,

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, the student debt relief is just now getting

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Supreme Court, and the deferral payments are gonna

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>hit now, and so that pain won't be felt until

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>probably this summer or this fall. So there's a lot

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of deferral of a lot of these programs. We also

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:29.479
<v Speaker 1>have to look at the job market. The job market's

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>very tight. There's a mismatch of skill versus job opening.

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>There's more openings than there are people looking for work.

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And so I think if there is a good side,

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>there is a good side. And one of the positives

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening right now is corporate America for the

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>first time as long as I can remember, came out

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of this and they were smart about it. Their balance

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>sheets are in better position, banks aren't overleveraged. The consumer

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is still reasonably strong. Although credit card debts rising right

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>delinquencies are starting rises is a normal stuff in economic

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>tough times, but they're stronger than they've ever been at

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>this moment. Okay, So, so there's some underlying strength. However,

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the FED has more work to do, and the FED

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>will get what it wants. It always does. Well, what's

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting and having to that point, you know, we had

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a crypto collapse, we have had some other things kind

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of pick away if you will, And yet here we

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>are and the system is working, and the markets are working,

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen liquidity. Having said that, though, just to

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>put it to end, because we only have about thirty seconds,

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you are in a large cash position right now. Yes,

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>how large? Can you give us a little skyes well,

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>so for every client is different, but think about it

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>this way. We're about three to four times are normal

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>cash holding. It's nice that cash is no longer a

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>cement blockchain to our ankle. You know, in the water,

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we're actually getting a yield, so it's helping us. But

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I think people have to be aware volatility is back.

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be part of the game, and so

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>having cash around on a regular basis is a good

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>thing so that you can take advantage when these Vottle moments, pa,

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>because you will put it to work at some point.

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>We will put it to work when the valuations are attractive.

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, gotta run, so good to have you in studio.

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Great to be here. Thanks for having me. Appreciate it,

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Love it. Leo Kelly, founder and CEO Vernon's Capital Advisers.

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Here on our Bloomberg Interact and Broker studio. This is

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, and

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>starting at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App. You

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal