WEBVTT - The YouTube Story Part One

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Technology with tech Stuff from works dot com. Hey there,

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to text Stuff. I am your host, Jonathan Strickland,

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 1>executive producer, here at how Stuff Works, and today I

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>thought we'd take a look at one of the most

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>influential sites on the Internet. In fact, it's the second

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>largest search engine on the Web. And if you haven't

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>looked at the title of this episode, you might be

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking I'm talking about Yahoo or something, but nope, I'm

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>talking about YouTube. It's a site that has recently been

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in the spotlight for lots of not so great reasons,

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>but we'll get into those a bit later. And I

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>should mention this is part one of a multipart episode,

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and as of the recording, I'm not exactly sure how

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>many episodes this is going to end up being in total,

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>but I suspect it will be too. I'll let you

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>know more in our next episode after I've those notes done.

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>But today, YouTube is the dominant player in online video content.

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Users watch, share, and upload hours of videos every moment,

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna take a look at how YouTube got

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>it start, how it rose to prominence, and some of

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the stories and scandals that have shaped it along the way.

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's start at the very beginning, which I am

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>told through song is a very good place to start,

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and that would be at PayPal. Now. PayPal, to back

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>up even further, was founded partially by two other companies.

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Peter Thiel, Ken Howary Luke Nozack and Max Levchin created

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a service called Confinity. Like today's PayPal, this was a

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>money transferring platform, and in two thousand, Confinity merged with

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>an online banking site called x dot com, which was

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>co created by Elon Musk. So already we've got some

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>really big names involved in this story, namely Peter Thiel

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and Elon Musk. Really, the news service became known as

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>PayPal shortly thereafter, and by two thousand two had attracted

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>attention from a little company called eBay. eBay moved to

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a choir PayPal for the princely sum of one and

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a half billion with a B dollars. Now, this acquisition

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of people really rich. Or let's get

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>real here for a second. People, it made some people

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 1>rich and other people it made way more rich than

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they already were. Because I hate to tell you this,

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>but the fairy tale of the developer who comes from

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>nothing and then becomes a millionaire isn't nearly as common

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.399
<v Speaker 1>as we would all like to think. Often it's more

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>like rich person goes and does things and gets more rich.

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>But that's a topic for another show on another podcast.

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Really now, two former employees of PayPal, Chad Hurley and

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Steve Chen, were shooting the breeze at Chen's then new

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco home, and I like to imagine they were

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>having money fights with each other, throwing balls of cash around.

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>That's probably not accurate. They did shoot some video while

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>they were hanging out, and then they lamented that sharing

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>video online was unreasonably hard. The Internet and the Web

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>had started to transform everything, but it was still difficult

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to get video to anyone. This is the era before

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone, so for one thing, we didn't all have

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>video cameras in our pockets. And it was the era

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>before anyone had created a really dependable platform upon which

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you could upload and share video that could get a

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of traction. Meanwhile, there was a third former PayPal

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>employee named Jawed Catam who was lamenting that there was

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>no easy way to find videos of specific events online.

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>He was thinking about some events that had really made

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the news and you should be able to find video

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of those events online, But unlike other sources on the

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>other types of media, there was no really good way

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>of searching for video. So you could find news reports

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes images, but you couldn't necessarily find video clips. Now,

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>there were two events in particular that he cites as

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>being sort of the inspiration for thinking about this, and

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>one of them is is a catastrophe, and the other

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>one not as much, although it was treated as a

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>catastrophe at the time. So the two events he cited

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>in an interview in two thousand six were the moment

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>during the halftime show of the two thousand four Super Bowl.

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>That moment the moment in which Janet Jackson's breast was

0:04:56.160 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>exposed during what was later called a wardrobe malfunction. So

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that was the first event he cited as one of

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the reasons he wanted to create a platform that would

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>be easier to share video because he couldn't find video

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 1>of that event. And the other was a tsunami that

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>had devastated places like Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and India,

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>and he knew that there were a lot of people

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>who had captured video footage of the tsunami and that

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>video footage could be really valuable for people and educational

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>for people, but there was no easy way to search

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>for it. You couldn't find it anywhere. And he knew

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that there were other events like this, but again there

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>was no way to find them. So he would end

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>up having a meeting with Chen and Hurley, the two

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>guys I mentioned earlier, and talk about this problem, and

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>they were all kind of going over this same issue. Now.

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>There was no platform at that time where you could

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>easily upload a video and other people could go there

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to watch it that really gained traction. There were a

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of little sites, but no one had really come

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to the forefront. When it came to video online, your

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>options were pretty much limited. You might host a file

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>on a server and people could visit a website and

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 1>download the file to their own machine. That's not terribly

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>user friendly and it took a long time and still

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>let's somehow. That's how some of the earliest web series

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>like Red Versus Blue from Rooster Teeth distributed their content

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in the early days, is that you would actually pop

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>onto their site, download a file when it became available,

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and then on your computer at home you would launched

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the video in a video player program that was compatible

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>with whatever file format the content creator was using. It's

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>not the smoothest experience. You can also create a web

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>based video player using one of several different proprietary formats,

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 1>which just made things more confusing. Microsoft had Active Movie,

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>which was a media player that launched in Nix and

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>allowed streaming media. Real Player had launched their application the

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>following year in and Apple would follow suit in n

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>with quick Time four and their streaming media format, So

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>there were a few solutions out there if you wanted

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to host streaming video on a site, but it was

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>still not the greatest experience in the world from a

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>user perspective because most people were relying upon dial up modems,

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>so it was really slow to access anything. They had

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to download whatever the applicable movie playing program was and

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>have that stored on their machine, and streaming video was

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>just hard to do without all those annoying buffering issues.

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>So still not very great now. Those solutions also, again

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we're not entirely based on the web. You had to

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>have that program, so first you have to go and

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>download your Active movie player, and then you would have

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to access the website that actually has the streaming content

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>on it, and if you went to a different site

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that had say quick Time for streaming content on it,

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you would have to get a totally different later because

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they were incompatible formats. This proprietary approach was fragmenting the

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>experience and that's never really satisfying from a user perspective.

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand two, Adobes Flash product came along, and

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that simplified things because people began to adopt that as

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>this standard for streaming technology at the time. And a

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of years later, more people had access to broadband speeds,

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>making streaming video a viable option that didn't always include

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>ages of buffering time. So you had sort of this

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>convergence of different events that were making it easier to

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>have a streaming video service. You had Flash coming about,

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 1>which gave a lot more versatility to streaming video, and

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you had the fact that more than half of American

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>households had access to what was then considered broadband speeds,

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>which was much lower than what we consider broadband today.

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>So in early two thousand five things were kind of

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>falling into place. It was the right time to look

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>into creating a platform in which users could upload video

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>footage and watch other video clips. It would become parts

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>social platform, parts search engine, and the three felt they

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 1>were onto something and began to have some serious discussions

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 1>about what it would take to launch such a platform.

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>So who are these guys? Well, Steve Chen was born

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.959
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy eight in Taipei, Taiwan. His family moved

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to Chicago, Illinois, when Chen was fifteen years old. He

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>attended the University of Illinois Champagne, Urbana. This was a

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>school that had some pretty notable alumni, particularly in the

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>field of computer science. For example Mark Andreson, who would

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>go on to co create the first commercially successful web browser, Mosaic.

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>He went there. Chen was interested in coding and graduated

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>from the university and moved on to work for PayPal,

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and he would end up meeting Chad Hurley on his

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>first day on the job. Hurley was born in nineteen

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven in Birdsboro, Pennsylvania. He studied fine art at

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the University of Pennsylvania, and he leveraged his artistic abilities

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to help design user interfaces and join PayPal to work

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>on its UI. And that's really important. We often will

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>not really consider how challenging it is to create a

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>user interface that is clear. It gives the user very

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>uh simple instructions on how to use the service, and

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of clutter there. It's actually a

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>lot more challenging to do than you would think. And

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>so Hurley came from this from a fine arts perspective,

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.719
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty interesting to me. Jawad Karnem was born

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy nine and East Germany and his family

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>moved to West Germany in nineteen eighty, which was a

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>thing back then because there used to be an East

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>and West Germany. I remember those His parents were scientists

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and researchers. They moved to the United States in nineteen

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Kareem would attend the University of Illinois along with Chen,

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>although he didn't actually meet Chen while attending the school,

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and he dropped out before graduating in order to go

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>work at PayPal. Now, according to the sources I research,

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Kareem didn't meet up with Chen until they were both

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:23.719
<v Speaker 1>at that company, until they were both at PayPal, though

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>they again did attend the same university. Kareem would later

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>leave YouTube and finish his studies first, though he would

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>graduate in two thousand and four with his undergraduate degree.

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>He would leave YouTube later on and pursue post graduate degrees,

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and early on he was frequently left out of stories

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>about YouTube's rise to success, though that was later rectified.

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'll talk a little bit about why he was

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of written out of the history and just a

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Oh and uh. Like I said, YouTube wasn't

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>their first go at a video platform service. There was

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>an earlier failed concept that I think I should address.

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>The original video platform concept before they settled on YouTube

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>was one that Chen Hurley and Kaream called tune In

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>hook Up and yes, it was meant to be a

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>dating website. Users were supposed to post videos of themselves

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and Peru's other videos, all in the name of finding

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a certain special someone with whom you could then hook up.

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>According to Kareem in an interview in two thousand sixteen,

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the founders even trolled through Craigslist personal ads and offered

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>women twenty dollars to upload videos of themselves to this

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>service in order to populate it, but they found zero takers. Anyway,

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that particular startup fizzled, but the three founders saw possibilities

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in using the video platform technology a different way, And

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>on February two thousand five Valentine's Day, which Kareem would

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>later say was to a coder, just a normal day,

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>which I think is just a sly remark on the

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>personal lives of your typical coders, the team pivoted away

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>from this concept of tune in hook up and they

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>pivoted toward YouTube. Hurley registered the trademark for the logo

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>and the domain of the site on that day. Their

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>new platform would be one where people could upload videos

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>about whatever subjects they like within reason, and I wouldn't

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have a narrow focus on dating like their original concept,

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>but rather serve as a general video publication and consumption site.

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>But would it work well? They weren't sure. Chinn and

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Kareem were focused on creating the technical platform for the service,

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>while Hurley concentrated on the user interface and the logo

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>design for the site. The team built out the infrastructure

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for the service, and the first video to officially hit

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>YouTube would not go up until April two thousand five. Now,

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure a lot of you already know the name

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of that video because it is a piece of Internet history,

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But just in case you don't and you some pub

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>trivia knowledge in your back pocket. The title of the

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>very first video upload to YouTube was Me at the

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Zoo and it's a video of Jawad Kareem standing in

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>front of an elephant enclosure at the San Diego Zoo

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and it published on April two thousand five. As of

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the recording of this podcast, it has accumulated more than

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>forty four million, five hundred thousand views. It lasts eighteen

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>seconds long and contains the important information that elephants are

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>really cool because they have really long trunks. And while

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm poking some fun at the content of the video,

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the important thing was it was a piece of content

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that could be tested out on the platform itself. What

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>was in the video wasn't nearly as important as the

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that this was the first video to go live

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>on an official YouTube server it would ultimately face the public.

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>This wasn't just some random test video on a server

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that was never going to be forward facing and only

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>be used by developers. This was the first actual YouTube video,

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and that is why it is significant. Now. I have

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot more to say about YouTube in those early days,

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>but before I get into that, let's take a quick

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>break to thank our sponsor. All right, it's two thousand

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>five April. YouTube still was not yet open for the public. Essentially,

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in late April early May two five, the company launched

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>its beta home page. They had secured a deal with

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>an internet service provider called Server Server Beach, and the

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>deal was for an unlimited data plan for a hundred

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and twenty nine dollars a month. The earliest incarnation of

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>YouTube wasn't exactly a home run. Kareem said that their

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>original version of the site didn't let users select which

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>videos to watch. Imagine that going to YouTube, but you

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>have no control over what video is going to play. Instead,

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it was a Russian roulette style of experience. You'd go

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to the site and it would randomly serve up one

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of the videos stored on its servers. And because there

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>were relatively few videos available and meant you were likely

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to see a lot of the same stuff, it wasn't

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the sort of experience that would lead people to coming

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>back for more. And in fact, Karim himself had gone

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to airports and filmed planes landing and taking off just

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to have more content to throw into the servers, because

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>otherwise you didn't really have anything to populate them, and

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that is obviously any that's a problem any user generated

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>platform is going to face. You don't have a lot

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of content until you have users to generate that content.

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>But how do you attract the users in the first place.

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>It could have been the very end of YouTube at

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that very beginning, because they had to get enough people

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in there to create content to to alter the user

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>interface of this approach, and the founders were still sussing

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 1>out what YouTube was supposed to be because besides the

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>dating site idea they had already abandoned, they thought perhaps

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that YouTube would be a place where you'd have relatively

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>small circles of friends and you would share videos between

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>the folks in that circle. In other words, the YouTube

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>founders had a vision for their service kind of similar

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to what Twitter founders thought their users were going to want,

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out that both groups weren't quite on target.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>While they thought this is a place where you could

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>share videos with your close friends and family, what they

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>saw was that people wanted to share to the rest

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of the world. It was a much grander scale than

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>they had anticipated. The site was still struggling to find

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>its place when on July four, two thousand five, Kareem

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>attended a Faithful Independence Day barbecue party and it was

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.719
<v Speaker 1>hosted by a guy named Mike Greenfield. Greenfield had been

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>another PayPal employee back in the day. Also in attendance

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of that already was a guy named Keith Rabboi or

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Reboi I guess it would be the French pronunciation. He

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>had another PayPal employee. He had been an executive with PayPal,

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and Reboi and Kareem got into a conversation about YouTube,

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and Kareem was convinced to show off YouTube by plopping

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>down in Greenfield's bedroom and using Greenfield's personal computer to

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>check out all the videos on YouTube. They literally sat

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>down and watched all of them. Jawed, Kareem and Uh

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and Keith Reboi, So, Keithan and Jared are sitting there

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>there watching every single video that's on YouTube these days,

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 1>If you tried that, you would never finish watching it.

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>There would just be too much content there. You would

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 1>die of old age before you got through it all.

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>But back then, on July four, two thousand five, the

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>entirety of all the content on YouTube consisted of about

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty minutes worth of videos. Many of them were playing

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is taking Off and Landing Now. Despite the lack of

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:07.959
<v Speaker 1>compelling content, Keith saw the potential in YouTube and offered

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to become an investor on the spot. And according to him,

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the only other time he ever felt compelled to make

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>an investment that quickly was when he first heard about

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the concept of Airbnb. Kareem was getting ready to leave

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>YouTube in order to pursue a PhD program at Stanford.

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>He would continue to serve as a consultant for YouTube

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>while he was going off to pursue his studies. Meanwhile,

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Keith Reboise showed off YouTube to Yeah, another former PayPal employee,

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>this one named roll Off. Both of both had actually

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>worked as the chief financial officer of PayPal, so you

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>may notice this is a bunch of former PayPal folks

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>who were all kind of coalescing around this YouTube concept,

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, without PayPal, YouTube never would have existed.

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>In the summer of two thousand five, Botho was working

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>at an investment firm called Sequoia cap at All and

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>both was able to help secure an initial investment in

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>YouTube through Sequoia. Now they get those investments going, they

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>had to change the narrative a bit of YouTube and

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>had it focused solely on Chen and Hurley and kind

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of write Kareem out of the picture because Kareem, who

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 1>had left to continue his studies, was creating kind of

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a problem. Not on purpose, it's just because of his absence.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>The justification was that it would be really challenging to

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 1>pitch a company to potential investors if part of the

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>story was that one of the three founders had recently

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>left the company. They made YouTube sound less stable, so

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>they sort of erased Kareem from the history of YouTube

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>for the time being. He would eventually get written back

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>into that history, and he also would not complete his

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>postgraduate work. He never earned that PhD from Stanford. He

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>did earn a master's degree, and he did with Tame

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Shares of YouTube, which softens the sting of not getting

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that doctor in a little bit. Now. Both have created

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a memo and presentation arguing for the investment into YouTube

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>for Sequoia Capital. His investment plan was to supply one

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>million dollars initially, followed by a four million dollars Series

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>A funding and in return, Sequoia Capital would get at

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>stake in YouTube once it emerged from Series A funding. Now,

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>the actual details of the funding deal once it was

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>concluded are a bit clouded in secrecy, but a lot

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of the sites I research suggested the initial investment was

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>more like half a million dollars, with another three million

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars investment in Series A funding in November two thousand five,

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>for a total of three and a half million dollars

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of that initial funding. But considering what happened to the

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>site over the following years, any investment of around that

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>size was more than worth it and more than paid

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>for itself. When you talk about big gets, this one

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely counts now. Just to backtrack a bit, in September

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five, YouTube hit a milestone. The site had

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>its first video to hit one million views. This video

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>was an advertisement for Nike, and it started Brazilian soccer

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>player or football player if you prefer, named Ronald Dino.

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>He puts on a new pair of Nikes and then

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>he shows off some truly impressive ball juggling skills with

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>his feet before kicking the ball precisely so it hits

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the goals crossbar and bounces back to him. He's standing

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>many yards away from the goal. It's actually really impressive

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to me that he is so precise with his kicks.

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>He's juggling the ball, kicks it while it's coming down,

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>It hits the crossbar, bounces right back to him. He

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>starts juggling the ball again, does this a few more

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>times in a row consistently. The video itself is about

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>two minutes forty five seconds long, and I came to

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the realization that I will never do anything in my

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>life as well as that man was able to juggle

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and kick a soccer ball. You could also argue that

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 1>this was the first viral video on YouTube. It was

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.479
<v Speaker 1>an advertisement and it got more than a million views.

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty much a breakaway success in those early days.

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Also in September two thousand five, Julie Supan left the

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Best Buy Corporation to join YouTube as the head of

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>marketing for the company. Now with the founders, she brainstormed

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>the position YouTube wanted to take to the public, like

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>what were they going to portray themselves as? What was

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>their mission statement? And they decided that YouTube was going

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>to become a broadcast medium for average people. This is

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>all according to a piece that was written in mash

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Double a few years ago. One thing that set YouTube

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>apart from many other sites was that they were deciding

0:23:55.840 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to to convert video files into a standard format. See

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other video sites, you had to actually

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>have a specific format before you could upload it. YouTube

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>would allow users to upload videos in different formats, and

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>then the site would take care of converting those formats

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>into flash, which removed that pressure from the user to

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>make sure the video file they were sending met some

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>specific criteria. There was a limit to how long a

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>video could be, but the file format didn't matter as much.

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And when you remove that barrier, it made YouTube much

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>more user friendly and helped attract more traffic. Imagine that

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you've shot a video and you want to upload it

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to a service, but then you find out that you

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>have to use a completely different format. You would have

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to convert the file, or maybe look for a different service,

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>or even reshoot your footage and put it into a

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>new file format. Before you could do that, YouTube said no, no, no,

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll take whatever format you want to create your videos

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.479
<v Speaker 1>in and that will do the change on our side

0:24:56.840 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and post it to our flash based media player. Around

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the same time, YouTube users were really starting to push

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the platform's capabilities According to Time magazine, it was in

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>November two thousand five when the company first started seeing

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>data transfers of around eight terabytes of size every single day.

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>That unlimited data of land wasn't part of the picture anymore,

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and so I was starting to get expensive to operate

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the business. To pay for those bandwidth costs, the company

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>had to invest in engineers to build out the site.

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>They needed servers to hold all that video content, and

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>they needed data service plans to cover the cost of

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the massive amounts of traffic that was hitting the site

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>every day. And at the time YouTube didn't really have

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 1>any monetization plans. It was clearly an up and coming service,

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>but it was operating at a loss. The company headquarters

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>weren't much to write home about either. For a while,

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>they were operating out of Sequoia Capital's headquarters, but the

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>company soon relocated to San Mateo, California, and they moved

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>into a space that was a of a pizzeria, specifically

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Amichi's East Coast Pizzeria, and according to a YouTube designer

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>named Christina Broadbeck, the building had a real rat infestation problem.

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>She said the rats were cats sized, which I think

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>puts them in the category of r O U s S.

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>All of this was happening while the site was still

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>technically in beta. YouTube didn't emerge from this beta phase

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>until December fifteen, two thousand five. The site had used

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 1>investment money to increase the number of servers and to

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>improve bandwidth service to make sure using the site was

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>a positive experience, and over the next several months, the

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 1>site continued to gain users and videos. In February two

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand six, videos on the site we're getting fifteen million

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 1>views per day, with about twenty thousand new videos being

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>added every single day. Now it grew not only in

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.719
<v Speaker 1>content but an employee count. It also began to encounter

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the first instance of intellectual property headaches for the service.

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 1>In February two thousand six, YouTube receive a request from

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the American Broadcast Network in BC. NBC employees saw that

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a clip from Saturday Night Live called Lazy Sunday was

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>up on YouTube. This was part of SNL's digital short

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.679
<v Speaker 1>series with Andy Sandberg and Chris Parnell. Lazy Sunday had

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>racked up more than one point two million views NBC

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the clip taken down, along with around five

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>other clips containing NBC content mostly from Saturday Night Live,

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>and YouTube would comply with the request, But later in

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:38.360
<v Speaker 1>June two thousand six, NBC approached YouTube with a different request.

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>The broadcast company formed a partnership with YouTube. In June

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand six, NBC created a digital channel on YouTube,

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>on which it would share clips of various shows, including

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>special material made just for the YouTube channel. So why

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>did they have a change of heart? Well, part of

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it might have had something to do with the fact

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that NBC had come in last place among the big

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>four broadcast companies, the others being ABC, CBS and Fox.

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>By June two thousand and six, YouTube boasted that people

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>were watching approximately seventy million videos per day. That was

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a valuable audience. So NBC was hoping to convert those

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>viewers into television viewers and to give them a little

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>extra material to kind of bring them in and have

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>them watch shows like The Office or Saturday Night Live.

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>One month later, that seventy million videos per day was

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 1>up to a hundred million videos per day. It seemed

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>like YouTube was unstoppable. In between those two NBC communications

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>came around of Series B funding, another venture capital fundraising series,

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>this time YouTube raised about eight million dollars from Sequoia,

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and a video that would end up becoming the first

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>true mega hit on YouTube went online in that month

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. That video was from a guy named Judson Lately,

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and it was titled The Evolution of Dance. Now it's

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>since been surpassed. It's no longer the most watched video

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of all time, but for a while it reigned supreme

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>with more than a hundred million views. I got a

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>lot more to say about those early days with YouTube,

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>but before I jump into that, let's take another quick

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>break to thank our sponsor. All right, back to June

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and six. Now, that was when one of

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the first successful web series on YouTube premiered, because this

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>would become another hallmark of YouTube was not just the

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>one off videos or the videos that would come from

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a single creator or a group of creators, but the

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>actual web series where you would have an ongoing story.

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>This series was called Lonely Girl fifteen, and when it launched,

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>there was no indication that this was a scripted show

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>with an actre is portraying a fictional character at the center. Instead,

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it appeared to be the genuine vlog or video diary

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of a young lady named Brie. Brie was actually an

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>actress named Jessica Rose, and it all started off pretty

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>grounded and believable, mundane, even just the day to day

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>issues that a teenage lady is facing. But while it

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>was getting popular, the ruse did not last long. In

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>September two thousand six, just a few months after it launched,

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it became pretty widely known that Lonely Girl fifteen was

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a scripted show, that it was a performance and non

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>actual vlog. Once the gig was up, the show took

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a turn for the totes crazy, with storylines involving weird

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>cults and quote trait positive blood end quote. Now. I

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>never got into the web series while it was on,

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>so I can't really give you my own personal opinion

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>about it. I was only tangentially aware that Lonely Girl

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>fifteen was a thing at the time. I had heard

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>about it, but never sought it out. In August two

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand six, YouTube launched a revenue generating strategy. They called

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it participatory video ads. They also introduced brand channels. This

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is similar to what NBC had launched earlier that summer.

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>The ads would appear in the upper right corner of

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>YouTube homepage in a prime spot for listed videos, and

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>if you clicked on that video in that space, it

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>would take users to sponsored content. Advertisers could link those

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>videos to brand channels or two other clips on YouTube,

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and the site rolled out some features that made it

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>easier to share links with other users, encouraging the spread

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of viral videos. The brand channels could feature brand specific

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>logos and graphics, so each channel could be set apart

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>from the YouTube standard as well as from each other.

0:31:56.480 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>October was a really big month for YouTube, and two

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand and six, first the company partnered with CBS, adding

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to the sites growing influence. They had already had the

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>deal with NBC, and now CBS was on board. YouTube

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>also would launch a content i D tool, the first

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of its kind for YouTube. This was an automated program

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>designed to detect material that could infringe upon copyrights, and

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it also partnered with a company called Audible Magic to

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>develop a technology that could analyze and identify audio clips.

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>That way, if you uploaded a popular song against a

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>video that was just a static image, for example, YouTube

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>could still detected automatically and take down the video in

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>order to protect copyrights. This set the stage for an

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>enormous turn of events in the history of YouTube. In

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 1>October two thousand and six, Google made an offer that

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>YouTube couldn't refuse. This was an acquisition valued at about

0:32:55.400 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>one point six five billion dollars. YouTube employees would get

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>shares of Google stock and become rich, or at least

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>rich on paper. Well, that is, the ones who weren't

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>already rich from all that filthy PayPal money they had

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>received just a few years previous. And I say filthy

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>totally tongue in cheek. It was completely legitimate money. It

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>was just a whole lot of legitimate money. Now, according

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to legal briefs that were filed as part of a

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit that I'm going to talk about in just a moment,

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>we know that Chad Hurley made about three hundred thirty

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>four million dollars in Google stock due to this deal.

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Steve chen was at a slightly more modest three hundred

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>one million dollars, and John Kareem, who had left the

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>company to pursue an education, received the smallest payout of

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the three founders. His stocks were valued at somewhere around

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty six million dollars. Not a bad haul to be honest.

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Christina Broadbeck, whom I mentioned earlier as a YouTube designer,

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:02.959
<v Speaker 1>had shares were slightly more than nine million dollars, So

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it really paid off to be a YouTube employee in

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 1>October two thousand six, and in all there were between

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 1>fifty five and sixty five YouTube employees in total. That

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>was it for a one point six five billion dollar acquisition.

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 1>That's incredible. As for Google, it had already been pursuing

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a streaming video strategy of its own before it purchased YouTube.

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it was the second most popular video streaming

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>service that was online by a distance second, but it

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>was still second place. Now there were Google engineers who

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>were genuinely baffled at YouTube success. Google's technology allowed for

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>videos with much better resolution than YouTube, but the engineers

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>had underestimated how appealing YouTube's automatic conversion process was to

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the average user. Because with Google's video service, you had

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to use a specific video codec and provide information about

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the technical details of the video of itself like its resolution.

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:04.760
<v Speaker 1>With YouTube, all of the work was done for you.

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>You just had to upload the file and YouTube did

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the rest. And so users had mostly ignored Google's product,

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 1>even though you could get higher quality video out of it,

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and they flocked to YouTube instead. Google saw the writing

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 1>on the wall and thus made the move. Towards the

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>end of October, YouTube removed about thirty thousand videos in

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 1>an effort to respond to copyright infringement cases, and in November,

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:31.399
<v Speaker 1>YouTube signed a deal with the National Hockey League, which

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>would become the first big sports deal in YouTube's history.

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>By January two thousand seven, when YouTube was not even

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>two years old, yet, the service was so popular that

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>analysts estimated the traffic to YouTube was equivalent to what

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>the entire Internet experienced back in two thousand so, in

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>other words, YouTube required as much bandwidth to operate in

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seven as the entire Internet did seven years earlier.

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.879
<v Speaker 1>Of course, other services like Netflix would later follow suit

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>with similar kind of mind blowing statistics. In March two

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven, YouTube became the target of a massive lawsuit,

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the one I alluded to earlier. The plaintiff was Viacom.

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the cable company that owned brands like Nickelodeon

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and MTV. The lawsuit was to the tune of one

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in damages, and it all centered on Viacom's

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>claim that YouTube and by extension, Google, had failed to

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>act appropriately when it came to protecting intellectual property. Basically,

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit argued that YouTube was allowing users to upload

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>media that didn't belong to them, costing media companies millions

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of dollars of loss of revenues in the process. Now,

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a tricky situation for multiple reasons. For one,

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>YouTube was on the receiving end of thousands of videos

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>every day, so checking each one for evidence of copyright

0:36:56.239 --> 0:37:00.080
<v Speaker 1>infringement was not easy. Specifically, it wasn't easy to you

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>manually or not even possible manually, so you had to

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>rely on automatic approaches, and algorithms could be tricked. You

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 1>might have seen a YouTube video here or there on

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a popular television show, or a movie or music video

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>or something along those lines, and noticed that everything seems

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to be flipped with like backwards writing and other clues.

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Now that could be an indication that the uploader made

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that flip with editing software in an attempt to fool

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.800
<v Speaker 1>any content recognition algorithms because they're looking for the reverse

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>version of that. But it's also tricky because arguing that

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:38.280
<v Speaker 1>piracy results directly and lost revenues is impossible to prove.

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>The argument seems to say, this person over here watched

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>unauthorized copies of our content on YouTube, and they should

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>have just purchased those copies. If the unauthorized copies didn't exist,

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>then that person would have bought a legitimate copy. But

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing, it's impossible to prove that someone would

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>actually follow through with that. Further, it's impossible to say

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that some of the people who saw the unauthorized copies

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't go out and buy legitimate copies of the content

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>later on, or maybe they already owned a legitimate copy

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of the content, but they were using YouTube to access

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the content without getting their personal copy out from wherever

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 1>they had stored it. So, in short, it's impossible to

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 1>prove the extent to which piracy impacts revenue. To add

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 1>to that, there were suspicions that people at YouTube, just

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>before the acquisition with Google, started to boost YouTube's numbers

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>by allowing this unauthorized material to be uploaded to the site.

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>In other words, they were patting the value of the

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>service by allowing some shady stuff to go on, and

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>then once the site got acquired it was no longer

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>their problem. That's a pretty cynical way of looking about it,

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>but it was something that a lot of people were

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 1>floating by at the time. YouTube, for its part, cited

0:38:57.200 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and claimed that the company

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 1>had been following the rules set out by the d

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 1>m c A. The lawsuit would stretch out over seven years,

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>only concluding in two thousand fourteen when the parties settled

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 1>out of court. This followed two different setbacks for Viacom.

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:23.320
<v Speaker 1>The first had happened in when Judge Louis Stanton ruled

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>favorably mostly for Google. Viacom would appeal that decision. It

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.879
<v Speaker 1>was sent to a federal appeals court, but they sent

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it back down to a different court, a court that

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>was once again presided over by Judge Stanton, the guy

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 1>who had said that Google was mostly in the right

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>back in and Stanton gave essentially the same ruling in.

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Then Viacom would appeal that decision, and that's when they

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>two companies were scheduled to meet in fen before they

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>reached this settlement, which was never made public, so we

0:39:56.080 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>don't actually know what money changed hands in the process.

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Us The general opinion in the text sphere seemed to

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 1>be that Viacom didn't really have much of a case.

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>The d m c A offers up a concept called

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>safe harbor. Safe harbor is a protection for services like

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and other platforms that allows users to contribute content

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 1>to that platform. The basic idea is that if you

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:24.280
<v Speaker 1>have a platform and you let your users create the content,

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you are not responsible for the stuff other people upload

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to your platform because you didn't create that content. Your

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>users didn't. You just gave them a space for them

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to put their stuff. In addition, YouTube had tools that

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>would automatically seek out instances of copyright infringement, and the

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:45.320
<v Speaker 1>company provided processes through which intellectual property owners could post

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>claims against material that they said infringed on their intellectual property.

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So those processes could be anything from redirecting monetization so

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in other words, someone else uploads a copy of a

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>movie that you made, you could, as the owner of

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 1>that intellectual property, choose to turn monetization off so they

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 1>can't make any money off of it, or even redirect

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that monetization so any money they would have made goes

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 1>to you, or you could actually demanded that video be

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>removed and would be taken down off of YouTube. That

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:18.959
<v Speaker 1>tool by the way, has been the center of much

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>debate and controversy, as over zealous content owners have abused

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:25.839
<v Speaker 1>it in the past, sometimes even using it to take

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>down their own videos that they put up in an

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 1>effort to protect their intellectual property. I'll chat about that

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 1>more in the next episode. I'm sure now, even though

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know what happened with that, I think

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 1>we could say that at least YouTube from outward appearances

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:47.359
<v Speaker 1>could claim that they were in all good faith pursuing

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the processes necessary to protect other people's intellectual property. Whether

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 1>they were really doing that to their fullest extent, that's

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:58.879
<v Speaker 1>still a matter of debate. H I like to take

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 1>people at their word. But the same time, I figure

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 1>if I ran a company that was worth billions of dollars,

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I might claim that I was doing everything I could

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to be on the up and up and not worry

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 1>so much about whether that was true. But I'm not

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 1>in that position. If someone would like to put me

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in that position and test my moral fiber, I welcome it.

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Send your billion dollars to how stuff works care of

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland, And I cannot stress how important that last

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>bid is, because if Josh gets his grubby hands on it,

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll never see it. All right, I'm gonna end this

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>episode with a quick rundown of another feature that really

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>transformed YouTube and opened up a world of opportunities for

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a select few individuals, particularly in the early days, and

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that is the YouTube Partner Program. This was YouTube strategy

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that made it possible for the average person to launch

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a channel and to monetize it. Now. Previously that was

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 1>something only the brand channels could do big big media companies,

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But now it is possible for a person to become

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:02.399
<v Speaker 1>an Internet celebrity and act really make money off of it. Now.

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I've often mentioned to my friends who claim I'm Internet

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:09.279
<v Speaker 1>famous that that kind of fame is largely useless. First

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of all, I'm not really famous. Second, what little fame

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I do have, I can't leverage in any remotely useful way.

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't even get a good table at a restaurant

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:23.720
<v Speaker 1>with it. But YouTube's partner program gave a few folks

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the shot at making a living by creating online videos,

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:30.839
<v Speaker 1>and before long a small number of YouTubers began to

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:34.720
<v Speaker 1>earn decent some amounts of money, sometimes more than decent,

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 1>like up to six figures a year making videos. We

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 1>also started seeing more viral videos coming from people who

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:46.880
<v Speaker 1>could create a compelling share double video. There tons of

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:50.800
<v Speaker 1>examples of viral videos and YouTube's history, and we often

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:54.880
<v Speaker 1>saw some of those same people attempt, often unsuccessfully, to

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>repeat that experience by creating more videos similar ones to

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the ones that got a big hit. And it became

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>clear that hitting a home run with a viral video

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 1>once it was not a guarantee that you'd ever end

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:10.920
<v Speaker 1>up with a sustainable business. Though if your video was

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 1>popular enough, you could still make some decent cash off

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of a single shot. It might just take a while

0:44:17.040 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and be spread out over several years. And that brings

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:23.399
<v Speaker 1>us up to early two thousand seven. Obviously, we've got

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot more to talk about in the history of

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 1>YouTube to bring us up to date, so in our

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>next episode, we'll look at how YouTube has expanded in

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the last decade, as well as some of the controversies

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 1>surrounding the company. Will explore the bizarre world of the

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 1>YouTube kids app, which has had some truly David lynche

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 1>In scale weirdness going on with it, and we'll also

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 1>take a closer look at some of the battles between

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:50.279
<v Speaker 1>content creators and the various intellectual property claims that have

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>happened over the past several years. Meanwhile, if you guys

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 1>have suggestions for other topics I should cover here on

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff, you should let me know about them. One

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>way you can do that is sending me an email.

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 1>The addresses tech Stuff at how stuff Works dot com,

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>or you can drop me a line on Facebook or Twitter.

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:08.440
<v Speaker 1>The handle for the show at both of those is

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:13.240
<v Speaker 1>text Stuff HSW Remember on Wednesdays and Fridays, I record

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 1>this show and I stream it live. If you want

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to see the show early and find out what's cool

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in tech, sometimes more than a week before everyone else does,

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 1>just go to twitch dot tv slash tech Stuff. The

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:28.439
<v Speaker 1>schedules up there and you can join the chat room

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and chat with me and and watch as I make

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>gooflem ups in between takes it happens. I hope you

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:38.319
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed this episode. I look forward to talking to you

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 1>with more about YouTube and kind of exploring how that

0:45:42.640 --> 0:45:45.759
<v Speaker 1>site has evolved ever since Google took possession of it,

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I look forward to hearing from you guys,

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 1>finding out what you want me to talk about in

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the future. Remember, it can be any sort of topic.

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:55.399
<v Speaker 1>It can be a technology, could be a company, could

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:57.919
<v Speaker 1>be a personality in tech. Maybe there's someone you want

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 1>me to interview on the show, or me to be there,

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 1>someone you want as a guest host for an episode.

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Give me a shout and let me know and I

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:14.279
<v Speaker 1>will talk to you again. Release soon for more on

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics. Is it how staff

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:27.280
<v Speaker 1>works dot com