WEBVTT - Trump Climate Rollbacks Face Legal Scrutiny (Audio)

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday, surrounded by coal miners and coal executives, President Trump

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>signed a sweeping executive order meant to reverse Obama administration

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>policies on power plants and climate change, which were meant

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to fulfill the United States commitments to reduce emissions under

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the Paris Climate Accords. The executive order will require federal

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>agencies to reconsider or revise numerous emissions related rules, and

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 1>some states and environmentalists are already gearing up to sue

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>over possible changes. The eventual impact of the order, meanwhile,

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 1>is not yet clear. Here with us to talk about

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the President's executive order are Charles Warren, a partner at

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Kramer Levin Neftalis and Frankel, and Patrick Parentea, professor at

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the Vermont Law School pat The executive order the President's

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>signed is entitled Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth. What

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>will this order do to promote American energy independence? Do much?

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>The order can be broken down in three parts. One

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the immediate effect, which is to repeal many of the

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration policies and guidance with regard to reducing carbon

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>pollution that's causing climate change, and also preparing for the

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>already evident impacts of climate change, So those those things

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that were not formal rules were wiped off the books

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>with a stroke of a pen. The other thing, of course,

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is that he directed all of the agencies of government

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to look at their their rules, policies, procedures and and

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>see which ones are standing in the way of production

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of domestic energy, with an emphasis of course on oil, gas, coal,

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and nuclear and only slight mention of renewables and other resources.

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So those are the immediate things. The lifting of the

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>coal moratorium on public lands that was put in place

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>because studies have shown that coal federal coal is being

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>sold at below market value and in the United States

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is actually losing money on coal leasing. Um that that's

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>been lifted. So that's an immediate thing. And then there's

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a whole in a much more important second category of

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>rules that are already in the books, like the Clean

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Power Plan, like the methane rules for new oil and

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>gas facilities and so forth. UM. I'll let Charles talking

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>about some of this as well. And for those the

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>rule does the order does nothing, those will have to

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>go through notice and comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act.

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>They'll then be challenged in court, And as many commentators

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>have said already, and I'll just repeat, it'll be years

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>before we know whether any of these proposed rollbacks of

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>rules that are already on the books will actually be

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>upheld by the courts. Chuck, what do you consider to

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>be the most hurtful to the environment of all these possibilities. Well,

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look at the the rules, obviously

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the Clean Power Plan, if it were to be overturned,

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that could extremely hurtful, and then the methane rule and

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the flaring of methane. And also you know now they're

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at One of the things that they can

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>do right away is the Obama administration had basically said

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to consider the effects of climate change in

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of decisions. Now that's going to be reversed.

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think one of I think that, as Pat said,

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this stuff you don't really know if

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen. One of the things, though, that

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't know, is that the effects of these actions,

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>if you look at them on an international in an

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>international sense, could really uh sort of slow the momentum

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>from the Paris Climate Accords and give countries like India

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think less with China because I think they're

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>really moving forward for other reasons. It's abod a place

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>like India, which is really becoming one of the biggest

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>greenhouse gas emitters, could really take advantage and say, well,

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the United States looks like they're not really too interested

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in pursuing these climate change goals, and so I think, uh,

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're an emerging economy and we're growing and

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna I think we may have to put some

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of that on the back burner. So that, to my mind,

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>is one of the fallouts that could really end up

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>hurting the climate change effort more than some of these

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>other things, because I think for a variety of reason

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Pat touched on some of them, and I'll just add

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>another one. I think the economics of coal just are

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>pointing to the fact that it's not going to be

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to come back. And to the extent

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that you could talk about some possible new coal jobs,

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of any new coal exploration will

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>likely be done with machines more than men. So think

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that I think that's not going to have much of

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>an impact, But I have a concern about what it

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>means for the global effort. If you just take the

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 1>United States out of the kind of leadership role that

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we had under the previous administration. Environmental groups and a

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>coalition of mostly Democratic states and cities have called President

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump's Executive Order on Energy dangerous and illegal. The order

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>directs federal agencies to begin reconsidering and rolling back policies

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>implemented by the Obama administration to combat climate change and

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>fulfill American commitments under the Paris Climate Accords. We're talking

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>about the President's executive Order with Chuck Warren, a partner

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>at Cramer Levin, and Pat Parente, professor at Vermont Law School.

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Pat We've been talking about how it's going to take

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of agency action here UH to implement a

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of the things the President says he wants to

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>do to roll back these regulations, and this coalition says

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna sue UH over whatever it is that they do.

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>How much freedom of action do these federal agencies actually

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>have to roll back the rules that the Obama administration implemented. Well,

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>they've got to go through the same process they went

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>through to build up the rules, to to adopt the rules,

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to repeal them. UM. And that's all governed by the

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Administrative Procedure Act. It requires public notice and comment and

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>some instances that may require public hearings or meetings UM,

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and a chance for people to weigh in and the

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>response to their comments. It requires a factual basis, a

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>scientific basis, a legal basis. UM. So you know, you

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>can't snap your fingers and say, I don't like this rule,

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to repeal it. UM. You've got to go

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>through a lengthy administrative process first, and then, as I

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>said earlier, that inevitably will be followed by litigation challenging

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever the new rules that the Trump administration adopts UH,

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>that will have to go through addicial review process the

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>same way the Obama rules did. And that's why I

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 1>and others have said it will be years, frankly before

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we get a final resolution, and that will probably have

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to come from the United States Supreme Court. And who

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>knows who will be sitting there when and if these

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>rules finally make their way there, Chuck. The Clean Power

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Plan was the cornerstone of President Obama's effort to combat

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>climate change. It is in court, and the Trump administration

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is asking a federal appeals Court to put its review

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of the CPP on hold. What will happen in that case, Well, actually,

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know if they're going to put it

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>on hold, because effectively a couple of things can happen.

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>If they make a decision and uphold it, it's still

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>have to go to the Supreme Court because there's still

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, a state that's in place and

0:07:55.360 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>so um it if they make it. If they make

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a decision against it and say that you know, and

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>they want to send it back d p A, then

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously E p A it will go back to the

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>PA and that will be a big defeat for the

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>environmental side. But I don't think it. I don't think

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it makes much sense for the court to really put

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it on hold now because even if they decided to

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>uphold it, it still has to go to the Supreme Court,

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's still going to take a while before it's

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>uh decided. And I think one thing to point out

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in this though, is that more than this rule, it's

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the economics that have been driving things, and the use

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of coal is weighed down because the price of natural

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>gas is low. We have an abundant source of natural

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.479
<v Speaker 1>gas that's going to continue, and a lot of utilities

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>have moved away from coal. I mean, the only thing

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you get out of this is you'd run a few

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>more old cold plants longer. I don't know that that

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>would lead to any increase in jobs. It's probably not,

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and it wouldn't really do anything visa the Independent. In fact,

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty independent now and every all the forecast looks

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>like we're going to become even more independent. So I

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's in one sense, the Clean Power Plan is

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>very important, but I think that the facts and the

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>economics are inexorably leading to where the Clean Power Plan

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>wants to go. Anyway, Well, speaking of the economics path,

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the order, as we've been discussing, kind

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of emphasizes coal and oil a lot in what the

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>President is trying to promote. What is the impact likely

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to be of this order on their renewable energy industry,

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>which has been growing so much. I agree wholeheartedly with

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Chuck's comments. You know, Trump can try to repeal administrative rules,

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>but he can't repeal the market, and he can't repeal science,

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and both things are moving inexorably forward. And on the

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>science side, of course, it's it's all bad news. You know,

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the effects of climate change are bad and getting worse

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>all the time. They're irreversible. The science is unmistakable, and

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing he can say or do that will change

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>any of that. And on the economic side, UH, you

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>know it just to cite one factor here that you'll

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:25.839
<v Speaker 1>be you'll recognize, Moody's Investor Services has just proposed projected

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty six gigawatts of Midwest coal fire generation UH is

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>at serious risk of closure UM in the next few years.

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So UM, the market is moving very strongly towards renewables.

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>They're still still big obstacles UH to full deployment of

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>renewable storage being the biggest one. But you know, there's

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>lots of work being done to overcome those obstacles, and

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>there's very, very every reason to believe that they will

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>be overcome. The grid is is modernizing and getting smarter

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>all the time, it's integrated all ready. We're seeing that

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>solar um is out producing every other fuel for electricity

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of job creation five to one. In fact,

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>solar is the fastest growing sector of the employment market

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. So those are just a few of many

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 1>indicators that the Trump order is cutting against where the

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>market is going and certainly against what the science says

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>we need to do, uh to provide a safe sustainable

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>future and Americans, but for everybody on Earth. And on

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that note, Bloomberg New Energy Finance forecast that wind and

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>solar energy will grow over the next three years even

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>without the Clean Power Plan. So, Chuck, do you see

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>some of these states that are taking on climate change

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>benefiting from the market on renewable energy and maybe at

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of a few years they'll have the market cornered. Well,

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I tune. I think that a good point in the

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>sense that California has been sprinting ahead on renewables. And

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I just saw something where there's like over two hundred

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand jobs just in California, uh, for in the renewable

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>energy sector. And I do think that the states that

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>move ahead in this area are going to be catching

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the wave here of employment. And to put that in perspective,

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the coal industree now employs something like sixty seven thousand jobs.

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:32.719
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously way down from what it was thirty years ago.

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>And if you just look at the state of California

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and renewables, you're over two hundred thousand jobs. So you're

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at what if you really want to do something

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>about jobs, you put the focus on renewable energy as Pat.

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I agree with what Pat was saying completely. Chuck, Chuck,

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you. That's that's uh, that's Chuck Warren, a partner

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>at Kramer, Levin and tell Us and Frankel, and Pat Parento,

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a professor at Vermont Law School. Thanks very much for

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>being here. On Bloomberg Letter discussed the President's Executive Order

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>on Energy and Economic Growth.