WEBVTT - Faster Apple Products and Google's $5 Billion Buy

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power. CALLI

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and Beyon this is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Caroline Hyde in New York in for

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Emily Chang, and this is Bloomberg Technology coming up in

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the next hour. One week later, Twitter is no longer

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>getting a new board member on el Mask might have

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>changed the biggest shareholder of the company's mind blast rising

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>inflation with the war in Ukraine still raging on, We'll

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>see how it's felt across the pond and how crypto

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>could potentially help. And we'll go to the floor of

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the NAZDAC for a conversation with the head of the

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>US Listings and Revenue to get a look at the

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>current I p O market how all this volatility is

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>affecting filings while amid the war in Ukraine rages on.

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Consumers on both sides of the Atlantic currently turning their

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>belts due to the rising cost this on them, particularly

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>at the gas pump for example. A key question that

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>many have been talking about is whereas the store of

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>value is it gold is a digital goal for example.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about all of that with our next guest,

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>John Glenn UK Economic Secretary to the Treasury of course, MP,

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's one of sort of wonderful to have you here, minister.

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.119
<v Speaker 1>And I'm interested first and foremost about what are some

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>people have said as the red carpet being rolled out

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in the United Kingdom at the moment too, cryptocurrencies to

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>innovation of that sort. Why, well, I think we've got

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>to accept that this is going to be a great opportunity.

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>We've got to regulate to innovate those. So we've gripped

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>it in the UK. I made a speech last Monday

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and I announced a number of interventions. We want to

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>bring industry together with our regulator, with government so we

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>can work out the best steps to take this interesting

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>phenomena forward because it has many applications both for financial

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>services and to the wider economy. And so I'm excited

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>about that and I'm pleased that we're able to get

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that engagement with industry both here and in London in

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>order to drive it forward. Let's talk about here in

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>New York and the meetings you're having with SEC Federal Reserve.

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>This has got to be a cross atlantic regulation because

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a global asset class well, every jurisdiction will

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>have a slightly different take on it that I was

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>here in the autumn and I'm back here now, as

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you say, in Washington this week as well, talking to regulators,

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>talking to government for talking to industry as well, to

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>ensure that we meet expectations, that we think creatively about

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>what we need to do to get this into the

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>right place, so that consumers have certainty that any risks

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>are dealt with and faced up to, and we can

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>actually come to terms of some of these challenges in

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of how do we tax or do we tax

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>in what way? And how do we create a regulatory

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>framework that is reliable and gives innovators some assurance about

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the future. What do you make of talent? And in particular,

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I think of what the Bank of England have been

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>worrying about the scams that are involved within the crypto space,

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Bailey speaking out about that, the head of the

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England. Meanwhile, I think it was the Magavinglens fintech.

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>How be leaving to a crypto job, are you seeing

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>more jobs being grown there and you see how do

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you see the sort of tension between institutional finance moving

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 1>into the world of the well in the UK we've

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>been a global hub of fintech and we've seen that

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to be very resilient and I see in cryptocurrency and

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:23.519
<v Speaker 1>the exchanges that are developing in the UK a great opportunity. Yes,

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it's right that we've got to get the right regulatory

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>framework in place, and Andrew Bailey has been very clear

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>on that. We've got to come to terms with the

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>promotions regime that protects consumers, but we've also got to

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>embrace the opportunities of new technologies and new phenomena and

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>how it will apply to markets. Let's talk about the phenomenon,

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the sensationalism in many ways some people would say of

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>non fungible tokens and f t s. We've seen, of

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>course some valuations take a nose dive, but still a

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of interest. And what I mean, we've got the

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Royal Mint looking to create an f T. Just tell

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>us our audience a bit about that. Well, that was

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the announcement last week that the Chancellor wants

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>us to create an n f T in partnership with

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the Royal Mint. And it's important that we pick up

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>on the emblems of change that exist here and the

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>opportunities that will exist in the future. So we've asked

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the Royal Mint to develop that n f T and

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we look forward to that happening by this summer. Of course,

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>look at a time in the United Kingdom where my

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>family on the phone talks day in day out about

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the inflation, the cost of gas, electricity, what's happening in

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of the ramifications in many ways, of course antagonized

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>by the invasion of Russia into Ukraine. But talk to

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>us about you know, how the UK feels right now.

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at February north point one pc growth, the

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>economy being stifled, and that's before you even factor in

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the implications of the Russia Ukraine invasion. Well, clearly, these

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>are incredibly challenging times. I think we all hope that

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>we've come out of COVID and we get to brighter times,

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>but that hasn't happened. What's happened in the Ukraine has

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>had a very difficult has a very difficult impact on

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>the economy, and we are we are seeing that we

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 1>also had global pressures in terms of inflationary pressures, and

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that's playing out, its playing out here in the US,

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>it's playing out in the UK and across the globe,

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and these are challenging times for for British consumers. Challenging

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>times for British consumers where they're being asked to burden

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>heavier taxes. I mean, in particular, perhaps the largest overall

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>tax burn in the UK since the nineteen fifties, and

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a time where they look to their own Chancellor of

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the Exchequer and feel he Rashi Sunak is perhaps out

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>of touch with some of the burdens they're having to share.

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>You are, of course within the team of Reshisu Snax,

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering how how he is dealing with the

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>pressure that is currently upon him upon his family when

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>of course many are warring that his own family members

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't been paying their own tax that they should have

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>been doing. And and we look in particular at his wife,

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>who of course has is billionaire super rich in her

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>own right, but many field didn't pay UK taxes on

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>her overseas earnings. How is that being digested? Well? I

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>think the chance is absolute professional in the way he's

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>worked over these last two years. He was parachuted into

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>this role as the start of a global pandemic, and

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>he's worked tirelessly to provide interventions to support the British economy.

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I recognize these are challenging times for him and his family,

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>but he will come through them. But his focus is

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>on doing what it takes to get the British economy

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>into the right place through these very, very difficult times,

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's made a number of interventions dealing with the

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>thresholds of when you start to pay national insurance and

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>tax support for the least well off in society. Of course,

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>there will be many who will say there's more to

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>be done, and he will look to the future fiscal

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>events to address some of those concerns. How do you

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>feel when as a member of you know, Conservative party,

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at really what ethically it's being judged at by

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>at the moment when we think of that that the

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>party gave the leader of your party went underwent. When

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>we look at the Chancellor of Exchecker who seeming lea

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't seem to be in touch with the reality,

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>many people feel that. And he's holding a green card

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>at the same time as being chance to the Exchequer.

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>What sort of really tethering he has in the longer

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>term to the country. And then you of course, I

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>mean nothing to do with you, I realized, but certain

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you know today just the unseating of an MP and

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and a crisis election because of you know, previous misdemeanors

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to sexual abuse. I mean, how does

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it make you feel when you're trying to stand up

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>here in the US and defend your Conservative Party. Well,

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been in this post for nearly four and a

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>half years. I'm the longest serving Economic secretary we've had

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. It's great privileged to do this job,

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and I like the Chancellor focus on the task in hand.

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I've done that through three chancellors, and I've always been

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>impressed by the professionalism of the people I've worked under.

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And there's no difference with Rishi Sunach who's a first

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>rate boss of first rate Chancellor, and I have absolute

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>confidence in that he will come through these difficult moments

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and we will see what can be done in terms

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of future fiscal events of the budget. Well, come back,

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>tell us the story I'm following in the UK, and

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>indeed how you continue to embrace some change and certainly

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in the world of technology, the UK Economic Sectuary to

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury that is John Glenn Well. Week feels like

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a month, doesn't it? With Elon Musk and Twitter. Just

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>take a quick look at where things stood just one

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>week ago. Because last Monday, it was of course revealed

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the Musk held nine stake and Twitter, making him the

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>company's biggest shareholder. While the next day Musk was invited

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to join Twitter's board of directors, which accepted. We then

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>learned Musk was delayed in reporting his new steak and

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and concerns that the sec might start looking around.

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Twitter employees also started voicing concerns about having Musk's involvement

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and the influence he might have on the company. And

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>then over the weekend, when you've been tweeting about Twitter

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>quote dying, then tweeted the Jeff Beys also about turning

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's headquarters into a homeless shelter. And on Sunday night,

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we learned that Twitter the CEO Pagal that Musk won't

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>be joining the board after all after some pretty bad

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 1>jokes on Twitter as well, Buy a Musk. So we're

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 1>going to dive into all of this, and the first

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>angle we're going to look at is why Musk might

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>have rejected the offer. In particular, to be on the

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>board joining me now John C. Coffee, Junior Professor Law

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>at Columbia University Law School. And what's an extraordinary story

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to be unfolding? And I'm interested at the moment, professor,

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>about first and foremost what you think is behind all

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of this, what is initially perhaps a rejection about well,

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>on one level, this looks like deja vu all over again,

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>or Elin being Ela. He did this, said Tesla. When

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>he didn't disclose or he falsely disclosed that he had

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>an offer to take the company private, that Saudi Arabia

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>was standing behind, you didn't have it. And when the

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>sec sued, he agreed that he put in the general

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>counsel of the company is an intermediary between him and

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>any public statement about the company. Now, he's never been

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>happy with that, he's never really obeyed that. But now

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.839
<v Speaker 1>we're over at Twitter and he's doing the same thing.

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>He's under a legal duty to disclose when he crosses

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>five percent. He eventually got up to near ten percent.

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Think about all the people who sold in that interval

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>between five percent and ten percent, which could be a

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred million or more in terms of shares. Now, those

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>people would have sold at a much higher price if

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>he had disclosed that he was buying and that he

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>was going on the board, whether it was just becoming

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the largest shore of the company. Because he is basically

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the world's richest band it can buy what he was.

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>When he didn't disclose, they sold at a lower price

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>than they would have gotten with fair disclosure. And some

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of those people may sue in a class action claiming

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that they were cheated by effectively insider trading when he

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>brought the stock with disclosing information that he was required

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 1>by lawder's clothes. You can debate both sides of that,

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>but it is likely to get either a private lawson

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>or the SEC suing on behalf of those shareholders has

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.719
<v Speaker 1>been concerned they were concerned about some trading activities at

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Tesla when he was traded heavily, when he was an

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>effect paging the shareholders, pulling them to see if they

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted him to change his ownership levels. There could be

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>the SEC and the SEC is mind a recurring pattern

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of close to the line or over the line inside

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of trading violations, and that could bring a very serious lawsuit. Professor,

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about produciary duty here because many felt

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>perhaps it was in any way many ways defensive of

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter to a broad him onto the board. At least

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it stops him perhaps building up the stake further than

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>any further than for example, however, what limitations would have

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it put on a mask to his own communications, his

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>own tweeting, if he indeed had joined the board. Of course,

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason he did not go on the

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>board which partly that the CEO really couldn't tolerate some

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of the statements he was making. He for example, tweeted

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the world that he would like to have Twitter stopped

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>selling advertising. Now that must have stunned the CEO because

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter makes about nine of its revenues from advertising. If

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you're the CEO, you just can't have anyone, including this

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>richer man as a director, making statements for that having

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>them cleared by management counsel or anywhere. So that was

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>one about a half business, and I don't think the

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>CEO could focus on long term planning where he's going

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.599
<v Speaker 1>to get a daily barrage of comments in all directions

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>from Elon Musk. So just to walk us through again

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the legal ramification saying you're expecting a sec an indeed

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>path private lawsuits currently. I mean it's something thatferent different

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>things that have There could be a class action by

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>investors who sold during the period when he had not

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 1>closed what he was supposed to disclose is greater than

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>five percent ownership, which went up to ten percent. The

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>SEC could say, also, uh, these statements really a due

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>amount to a material omission. You didn't disclose that you

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>own over five percent. You breached your legal duty, and

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>we say that also could amount to insider trading. Or

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>they could just say you made false and reckless statements.

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I think fines, professor, would that be what comes in it?

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry? And would the ramifications be fines or something worse? Oh,

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>if you are well. First of all, inside of trading

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>can be a criminal offense. The SEC can't charge your crime,

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>but the Department of Joctors conceivably could beyond that. The

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.719
<v Speaker 1>SEC can sue for damages equal to as much as

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>three times the game made or the laws subverdict. Here

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>would be a game when he bought this stock, he

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't disclose at the asset when he crossed five percent

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>what he was doing, and the SEC could see three

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>times the game on the staff between the five percent

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>level and the ten percent level. He's the richest man

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in the world. That won't bankrupt him, but painful amount

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to pay. John Coffee, Jr. Columbia Law School Professor, fascinating conversation.

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. I want to stick with Musk

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and with the internal issues he was of course facing

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>from Twitter and welcome in when Securities managing director Dan

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>ives for what is another extraordinary story involving you know

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Musk and from your perspective, what happens now if he's

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>not on the board? Ok? I think you know him

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>being on the board that was almost a Cinderella's story

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to the point that he'd be on the board, they'd

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>women his ownership to fift and your strategically could help

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the company. Now it's a total different situation. I view

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it as more hostile. I think the opposit ste going forward.

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And now the question is does he team up with

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>private equity and how active does he get? I mean

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for Twitter. I think this goes from a Cinderella's story

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to the potentially game of Thrones with uh, you know,

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Musk and Twitter and the board clearly gonna lock heads.

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Great analogies that what if they're gonna lock heads? Do

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you anticipate Well, first and foremost is your number one

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>perspective that we do see some sort of buyout just

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter eventually get bored or go private. What do you expect, Look,

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, before Musk is involved, I mean, Twitter as

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a stock's been a significant on the performer. Advertising has

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>been extremely disappointing, which is why he's sort of the

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>night and shining armor at least for investors in Twitter.

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think now the next step is going

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to be he's going to be allowed for us. I

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>do not expect that he's gonna go home, reduce his steak,

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and now there's gonna be a bright spot on Twitter

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and from the strategy advertising that obviously have a key

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>quarter coming up. And for Twitter, for you know, for

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the board, it's their worst nightmare because Musk in the

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>boardroom is contained Musk outside the boardroom. Now this becomes

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a soap opera, get out the copform. I mean, he's

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>an activist in STI with eight million who follow him

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. And I'm interested as to what therefore you

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>think can be damaged imitations here? What what will be

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the product innovations that potentially start happening. Look, I think

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>eventually this is gonna sort of end with some sort

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of strategic initiatives and know whether that ends with an

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>ultimate sell, if that ends with maybe sunsetting some products

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>focus on some of the subscriber and advertising side, because

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the issue right now. I mean, they're losing Instagram,

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and others in social media. Must that's not necessary

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>as expertise, but I mean, this is really gonna over

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the coming months, and you know, I think year you're

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>really gonna be I think very tough situation for Twitter

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and Spoard if they somehow, you know, miss execute again

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>over the coming quarters. Before you go, we've got time

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to just also think about the world of cybersecurity from him,

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>because I caught my attention was your note that you

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>put out about sale Point. Of course, the deal being

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>done there in the purchase. What do you make of

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the focus and where to be putting your money at

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the moment in terms of cybersecurity. I think it's a

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>golden age from cybersecurity. It's a defensive area of tech.

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Look at sale Point getting bought and you know, Manny

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and got bought by Google, and I looked at names

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>like Tennable, pal out those cyber arc Checkpoint among others,

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think in it really just shows the value

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of cybersecurity. Public investors will sell of the stocks the

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>strategic and financials will buy them. Dan, I'm it is

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>always so great to catch up with you with all

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the analogies of whe Bush. We thank you so much. Well,

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm more X. This is bringing back I'm Caroline Hyde

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and new or this is Blombog technology. Here are a

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>few of the other stories that we've been following in

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Canadian e commerce software firm that's Shopify, plans at ten

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 1>for one stock split. Now will we're giving CEO Toby

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Looker a special founder share that will preserve his voting

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>power as long as he's at the company now shares

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a Shopify And they've been under pressure and what by

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>half this year, but ending the day as you can

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>see a little bit higher. Sony and the owner of

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Lego Group. Now those two companies have invested two billion

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars and Epic Games, the maker a Fortnite. The investment

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>values Epic at thirty one and a half billion. The

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 1>video GameMaker is one of the five most valuable startups

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>in the US. It's currently waging, of course, though a

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>costly legal battle with Apple and Alphabet of a fees

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>charged by app stores. China meanwhile has approved the first

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>batch of new video game licenses. Since July, Bluebugs learned

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that regulators have distributed a list of approved titles to developers.

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Last August, China's far reaching tech crackdown spread to online gaming.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>The government introduced measures capping playtime for minors and new

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 1>requirements aimed at curving addiction. This is Bloomberg Technology. I'm

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hyde in Family Chang with several big names, of

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>course expected to go public this year. Some are kind

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of decelerating their efforts with a volatile market upon our hands.

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now to discuss all of this in the pipeline.

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>How solid it is, Karen Snow, Senior vice president ahead

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of us listings and revenue for the NAZZAC. Some fantastic

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to have some time with you, Karen and talk to

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>us about the solidity of the pipeline. How are we

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing companies? Are they just hunkering down weathering until we

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>do see an ease up in volatility? Is it something different? Yeah,

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I think companies are really preparing to go public. I

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>think this year is going to be a situation where

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>you see windows of opportunity uh, and they want to

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to hit the market when that window opens.

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>We are starting to see signs of life. What I

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>would say is that we're very focused on the VIX,

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>which is the volatility index UH, and when that um

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is between a really below twenty five, which is really

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>where we like to see it. Ent of companies go

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>public when it's below that level, So we're very focused

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>on that as a lead indicator, as well as a

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>convertible market, which has started to open up. The VIX

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>has stayed below twenty five for the past eighteen sessions,

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>which I think is a good sign uh. And we're

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>starting to get inbound calls from companies that are looking

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to go public at the end of April early May.

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>What kind of companies come, uh, Well, there are a

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of interest from consumer companies. That's about thirty seven

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>percent of the pipeline tent or tech companies. Nineteen percent

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>are healthcare companies, about ten percent are financial companies, and

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:58.479
<v Speaker 1>the remainder are industrial and energy companies. So really good

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>breath and depth from and representation from the entire economy.

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>And when you're thinking about how it would be taken

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>down by the market. It feels as though everyone's offer

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>an inflation headge at the moment, and these companies sort

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>of an analyzing how they can tell that story in

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>some way. Yeah, I think it's important. Um. You know,

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>valuations have adjusted for that inflation. Um. You know, companies

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>have to address the current pipeline situation UM with you know,

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>all the disruption um. So they definitely have to have

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>their ducks in a row. Uh. And I think there's

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>no rush to go to the public markets at the moment.

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of ways to raise capital UM, so people

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>really want to make sure that they're ready. What I

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>would say is that we see a very healthy pipeline.

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>The pipeline for companies is greater than it was this

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>time last year, So we're very optimistic about that. Talk

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to us about whether or not there is a disconnect

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>between the public markets and the private markets at the moment,

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I think we're starting to see that close. Uh. You know,

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>what I would say is that, you know, public markets

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you exactly where they think things belong um, and

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>private markets respond a little bit more slowly to that.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's a bad thing, but that is,

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the key differences between the public

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and the private markets. I think companies that are looking

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to go public understand that, um, and they've gotten their

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>heads around their current valuations and what the market expectations

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>might be. We've had, of course, a fascinating story in

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>whichever way you want to slice it with what's happening

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>between Elon Musk and indeed Twitter, and what many have

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>looked at is perhaps a lack of a controlling state

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>by a founder, whereas we look at a Shopify for

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>example today that's doing a stock split and and making

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>sure that the founder continues to maintain some sort of

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>level of control. When companies are coming to the market

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, how are they looking at those sorts

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of narratives in the way in which companies are structured. Yeah, well,

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>what I would say is that E s G has

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>become much more topical for private companies coming to the market.

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>We're spending a lot more time with companies on the

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 1>private side as they're preparing. Governance has always been very

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>topical UM and UM. You know, it's really up to

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the company how they want to structure their business. UM.

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, investors I think will assign a discount or

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a premium based on what they feel as the right structure.

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>You of course saw an expert on the E and

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the S as well as as the G, and I'm

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>interested in the social path at the moment that now

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 1>is a time more than any that we're thinking about

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>humanity really when we're looking at Russia, Ukraine, when we're

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking about all the stakeholders, the way which employees want

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to see their companies stand for something, when they see

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>the customers want to see their companies stand for things.

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>How you seeing that being sort of exercised by businesses

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and looking to list as well. Yeah, well there's a

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>lot more conversation around UM stakeholder capitalism because of that.

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>It's the entire ecosystem m UM that is focused on it.

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>And I think companies are recognizing that their customers, that

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>their employees, that their investors are all focused on these

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>issues and want to make sure that UM, wherever they work,

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>wherever they shop, UM, that those brands and companies are

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 1>doing the right thing, whatever that may be. And how

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>about the the environmental because suddenly it feels as though

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 1>a country with an administration that was so focused on

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>energy transition is suddenly having to think about well digging

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>oil gas what we usually depend on for our energy.

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm interested is to what companies you're coming through.

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>You said about what ten per cent will there? About

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:45.360
<v Speaker 1>what energy businesses, what kinds of energy businesses? Yeah, well

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a lot of new energy. We're actually, um,

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, experiencing a lot of transfers to NASDAC and

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the utility sector as that UM, whole sector transitions to

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>new energy. UM. So we've been seeing this for quite

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>some time. UM. I think that the current climate UM

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>has really raised people's awareness UM as it relates to

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>our dependency on carbon UH. And then of course you

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 1>have the sec SEC out with their climate change proposal.

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot going on in the space. UM.

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>This is a lot of bobbing and weaving and threading needles.

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think there's any doubt that our economy

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>is transitioning to new energy. Well, Karen Snow has been

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>great to have some time with you and let you

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>get back to the healthy pipeline and see as and

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>when the company's come back, and I that vixed level

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>currently sub we thank you so much, Karen snow off NASDAC. Meanwhile,

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's been a while since Jeff Bezels pledged to

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>fill the skies with a fleet of delivery drones zipping

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>parcels to customers homes in thirty minutes. Now almost actually

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a decade after that promise, Amazon's drones have mostly technical

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>challenges to show for themselves. Amazon Prime Air co founder

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Conchi giving even a video posting it on LinkedIn showing

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a package being delivered in the middle of well nowhere,

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about all of this and more when Spencer

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Soaper with his big take. Of course, a key story

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that dropped on the Bloomberg for our terminal uses today

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 1>and Spencer will have been the main issue. Well, the

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 1>main issue is this design where Amazon wanted to combine

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the new verability of a helicopter that go up and

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>down with a plane that could fly forward, and that's

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a really difficult design to pull off. They wanted it

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>for the payload that it can carry up to five pounds,

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 1>which represents about eighty five of Amazon's deliveries, as well

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>as the range they wanted to be up the drone

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do a fifteen mile round trip,

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>which they see as being critical to serve a big

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:51.360
<v Speaker 1>enough population um and so that design has been tricky,

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, last summer they had a really bad

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>incident when the drone was transitioning from that up and

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>down flight pattern to the forward pattern, where one of

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the motors failed. There's there's six propellers on the drawn.

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>One of the motors failed and it completely disabled the thing.

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 1>All of these safety mechanisms that were supposed to kick

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in failed as well, and you ended up with a

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>pound drone dropping from the sky to the ground. And

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it's this hot lithium battery on board that powers it,

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 1>creating a brush fire that spread. And so that was

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>alarming to federal aviation officials who are worried about the

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>airworthiness of this thing. You know, we're gonna have this

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>flying over roads and people and and schools. You know,

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>how safe is it? And yet despite all those headwinds,

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 1>despite the issues that the engineering issues, the safety issues,

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>this seems to be an area that still committed to

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Is Is it because of the supply chain headaches, the costs?

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>What is it that makes it still so attractive? Yeah, well,

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you figure thirty minutes that's really a critical window where

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you think, you know what, that's fast probably than me

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 1>leaving my house and going to the store and coming back,

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>whereas a lot of their other options like two hour

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>delivery or same day delivery, a lot of times you're

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>still just quick to run out to the store. In fact,

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's really that trying to match that instant gratification.

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Um is where drones fit in as well as some

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of the things you talk about like costs and you know,

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>dispatching drivers. Is that uh, you know, robotic drones are

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate solution to that, to that quick delivery challenge.

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So they continue to deploy capital there. Invest it's all

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 1>about R and D. We know that with Amazon, they've

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>also of course has been raising some extra debt to

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to finance general corporate purposes. But a massive

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>one sale coming from Amazon talked to us about what

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we think it will be useful. Yeah, they haven't given

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of clarity on it other than like

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the unity's general corporate expenses. And so with Amazon, they

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>keep expanding capacity, They keep expanding um uh, you know,

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to get closer to customers. Uh. And so we're

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>going to see see more of that, you know, the

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:00.719
<v Speaker 1>creep of the Amazon where house is going to get

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>closer and closer to you, and the facilities get more

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and more specialized to to be more efficient and and

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>really from your perspective, the safety concerns that workers I'm

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in telling their inside stories, you think they're surmountable potentially.

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of the workers believe in the technology,

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>just think that there's a little bit of too much

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>haste to bring this to uh uh, you know, to

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>people's homes to actually try to deploy it where they

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like maybe this needs to come back to the

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>R and D cycle and more tinkering and more um

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>learning before before they're trying to prove the airworthiness of

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>these machines. Spencer soaper, great reporting and it's amazing, big take.

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I urge every want to go and see it online

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and on the Bringing Bag terminal. Thank you so much.

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Time now for our crypto report with our crypto contributor.

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>That is a question Anni Bassa Bitcoin while declining again

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in the last twenty four hours under pressure, but it's

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>not actually the underperformer, right, Yeah, very interesting here we

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>have all coins that have really dropped a lot more

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>now looking at a seven day decline of more than

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent for for for first stable coins and alt

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>coins such as Cardono to Luna, as we know that

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>these companies are already kind of buying each other's reserves.

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:26.479
<v Speaker 1>When you look at terror, Luna for example, buying not

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>just Bitcoin but also Avalanche was down more than on

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the seven day period here, Caroline, So you're looking at correlations.

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>While some are dropping more than others, It's important to

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>recognize now how much this entire community is related to

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>each other. So if you're buying Bitcoin, what happens to

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the terror price, if you're buying Avalanche, or what happens

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to the terror price? Um, what else is bitcoin related to?

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very interesting you're seeing this intensifying correlation

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>with the NAZAC one d. If you take a look

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>at this chart, it's greater than really it's ever been.

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>So Nazac sells off, so does bit coin. How important

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is that to market participants because many every now and

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>then sort of send out full tweets saying, like the

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>corronations putting back a little bit, but do they want

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to see it dislocate somewhat from the nast act I

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>guess that means that it's deemed a risk asset. Yeah.

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I had a conversation with the hedge fund manager who

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is typically invested in a lot of other hedge funds,

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and asked if this is now a diversifier and he

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>said he was able to hold stable because or generally

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>stable because he had Bitcoin rather than a lot of

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>other risk assets. So to your point, there's some traditional

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>money managers that do take a look at this and say, okay,

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>we still want a diversifying asset here, but most people

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>who are so bitcoin believers in buying bitcoin don't look

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>at the volatility here. And again we are down below

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>forty dollars again on bitcoin, right, So what we're back

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to asking what is that floor? They're still looking to

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>what that three hundred thousand or five hundred thousand per

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin price target looks like over the next five years.

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>The question is if this or is it dud, then

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>how quickly do we get to five thousand? And indeed,

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>what it means for the nasson interests coming from institutional

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>colims right exactly? Because what is it correlated to? They

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>are still gonna have that question. We are getting more

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>answers and they're definitely quants out there that are doing

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the math on this, because even beyond Nazdak the you

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and I had spoken to somebody a little earlier making

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that correlation with the dollar. If the dollar weakens, that

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>gives you a case for bitcoin as an alternative currency,

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it. Or if inflation rises that's another correlation that

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>used to be there now that is breaking down more dramatically.

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So again, early days of an asset class a fun

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street strategist thing to do to figure out what

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it is really related to and geographical demand. We have

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>any breakdown on that of late, that's an interesting question,

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>especially because Tara has been such a big buyer. There's

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions about what it means to have

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>one buyer being such a big base here to the asset.

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, beyond that, unclear as to how much more

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>or after a Bitcoino and Salt Bahamas coming up around

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the corner, how much interest is being drum up among

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>new investors around the world. We brace ourselves for a

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>whole load of headlines coming out of assault actual we

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>just digest what was well a whole load of expersions

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>being cast towards some older participants in Wall Street. Coming

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>from one Peter till At, of course the overall Bitcoin

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>two over in Miami Bloom Shanali Brassak, where the breakdown

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and correlations. We thank her meanwhile coming up using wigs

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to help solve the problem of bias in a I.

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be a fascinating conversation with the

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>co founders of Parfait about how they're really looking at

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>data sets, open source data sets that they're helping to

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>improve the people of color. This is blom Back disrupting AI. Indeed,

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it's data sets. It's the ultimate goal of parfe It's

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a company fan of two sisters and some other co founders,

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're doing it by getting into the rapidly growing

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>wig market. Now they have the backing of some of

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the pretty big names already, including Serena Ventures. But by

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of course Serna Williams joining me. Now are two women

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>behind this happened to be sisters, as we just mentioned,

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a sony for Igmanadian and it's great to have some

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>time with both of you and as first and foremost

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about what inspired you to would want

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to take in what is a rapidly growing market in

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:30.439
<v Speaker 1>a large one in terms of total addressable market. Yeah,

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>so the origins of Parfrey really started with an experienced

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a problem experienced by many women, which is managing and

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 1>caring for our textured hair. The journey for me started

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.240
<v Speaker 1>at ten years old when I had a very terrible

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 1>experience with a chemical actor that made all of my

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>natural hair fall out, and so I really started using

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>hair wigs and extensions to give my hair a break

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and then a chance to regrow and have essentially spent

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years navigating the friction field market of

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>hair wigs and extensions. So real. From our collective experience

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>solving technical challenges during our times and some of the

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>largest tech companies in the world, we were really inspired

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to leverage AI and computer vision to improve the lives

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 1>of people in our communities. And with black hair at

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the top of our list of problems that needed real

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>investment for a better solution, PARTE was really born with

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 1>a mission to develop products and services with technology that

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>recognize and prioritize all people, starting with people of color.

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>And if we talk to us about how you're going

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 1>to be using facial recognition skin coloring to be able

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>to match people to the correct wig for example. And

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking at servicing your direct to consumer, what

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>what was missing in the data in the open soul

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>stage already? Yeah, you know, our world continues to be

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>more informed and shape our artificial intelligence, and as we

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>think about the future, we really have to start prioritizing

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and final solutions to make it much more equitable. And

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 1>so the training data using based recognition technology currently are

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>largely imbalanced and it often relies on data it's very

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>similar in makeup, and thus the visual makeup of those

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 1>faces do not represent the composition of faces worldwide. So

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>this often results in very poor performance for people of

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>color who don't fit into that data set. And so

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the impact of this can be seen in the innovations

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and compumor facing a I that caused negative external experiences

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>for people of color. You know. One study by the

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Insue Technology soft findings autonomous driving systems that have

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>more difficulty in detecting pedestrians with darker skin. Um you know,

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:30.479
<v Speaker 1>another studies showed that you know, non white test taker

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.760
<v Speaker 1>is taking exam proper and software imported issues would attempting

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 1>to verify their identities and so at part they were

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:39.280
<v Speaker 1>really trying to tackle these problems to make major progress

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in improving the product and service outcomes for marginalized communities,

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 1>starting by building bacial recognition technology for women and people

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of color. So, so five million already raised. I mean,

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, you've got a product that you want to unfold.

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>You've got a list of what ten thousand at least

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>people that signed up to be starting to buy their

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>wigs by you. And but you're looking at, of course

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>improving manufacturing when it comes to wigs, but also, as

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you say, building up the data set, making aim more

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>fit for purpose less bias. Start to tell us how

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you go about doing that from the ground up. Yeah,

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 1>from the many apologies I said so too earlier, So

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>this one was aimed at you. Yeah, so um, right now,

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing this industry hasn't seen innovation in quite some time.

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 1>You're the raw hair and lace products that are used

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to construct these wigs really require significant time and manual intervention,

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.280
<v Speaker 1>which is a large reason for the exorbit price tag.

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 1>And so really our goal is to fundamentally change the

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 1>way that these products are produced from the source, making

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it faster and cheaper to produce customized wigs at scale, okay,

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm interested in therefore also if we're code, when

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the manufacturing revolutionizing that getting people a

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:52.879
<v Speaker 1>more valuable product, but are more consumer sensitive price point

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in particular on perhaps something that usually will cost thousands

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 1>coming down to the hundreds. If we're I'm interested in,

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>what also you need to do in terms of bringing

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>less biased within the data that you're using. How are

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you going out and ensuring that you're making it better

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and a more efficient AI? You know, you know, we

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>can't ever say that our visual intelligence is going to

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>be perfect. And while we take those precautions, you know,

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>going out and collecting law data ourselves, making sure that

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>our data sets are valves when it comes to annotations

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and gender and all those types of things, we also

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>have a very human focused pipeline in which our silas

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and our you know, live team members are going in

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 1>and correcting and annitating any data that doesn't that the

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>customers needs. And ASA briefly, I mean, of course, your

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 1>product is for people of all colors, and therefore very

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 1>much you can see that from your marketing and the

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 1>way in which you're focus. But talk to us about

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 1>just how big a market this is. Remind the people

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>have been putting money in there that this is sizeable,

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this is scaling. Yeah, this is a thirteen billion dollar market.

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 1>It's expected to grow by thirteen percent thirteen point two

0:38:56.840 --> 0:39:01.360
<v Speaker 1>billion by six and so women have been largely underserved

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in the core pieces of wig wearing that require you

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to be able to wear these products to look natural

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and confident, and that's true customization. And so what we're

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 1>really doing is creating a way for these women to

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 1>be able to customize their wigs and extensions without all

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of that manual friction. And quite frankly, what we have

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.720
<v Speaker 1>found is because of the way the manufacturing process is today,

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:26.839
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be required for us to be able

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to scale this to the thirteen billion dollar market that

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>needs it um we would require AI and technical intervention

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we're working on today with this round

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of funding. Well you and Live today, we thank you

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming out of Beater and coming on

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>this program. So if we're co Igmanadian, we thank you

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>so much. Co founders of Parfit a fascinating story, go

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 1>check it out and all their marketing. Meanwhile, that does

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it for this edition. Of bloom bag technology. We'll joined

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow by the like so Matthew Ball from Billy and Co.

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg