WEBVTT - The History of Streaming Music

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to stuff you should know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh and there's

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 2>chalk and it's just us streaming along merrily on our way, right, yeah,

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 2>how it goes. This is off to a terrible, terrible start.

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Life is but a dream? Right, Yeah, but aren't they

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 2>talking about a stream.

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Merrily, merrily and merrily ringer on the rosies pocket little No.

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 2>No, that's not it. That's about like the Black Death

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 2>or something.

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's just move on.

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So we're talking today about streaming music. That's why

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I made that joke. I should make scare quotes for joke.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about streaming music, the history of it, and

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 2>I love this, Chuck, this is a great idea of yours.

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Was this your idea? Listeners suggested idea.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 3>No, this is just me. I was maybe waxing philosophic

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 3>about I'm wearing with somebody, and then I was like,

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 3>that would be kind of a fun episode.

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, you were right. And one of the things I

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 2>love about this is this is history, like world changing

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 2>history that we lived through and not like as kids,

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 2>like this happened very much in like our adult lives.

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 3>You know, Oh, yeah, for sure, just a seismic shift

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 3>in how music was released and consumed and the finances

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 3>around it. And yeah, I thought it was super fascinating

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 3>that there was a point in history not so long

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 3>ago where people were spending a lot of money comparatively

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 3>on buying CDs and physical media until they just said,

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 3>you know what, I'm going to buy music anymore. I

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 3>want it. I want it for free, like screw all

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 3>those musicians and trying to make a living.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, pretty much. And it's not so the musicians were

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 2>caught in the middle. It was the labels that were

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the greedy fat cats that pushed it too far because

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 2>it didn't matter whether it was the clunkiest album or

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 2>the best that Richard Marx had to offer, both ends

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 2>of the spectrum. You were paying nineteen ninety nine for

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 2>that thing, whether you liked it or not.

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Was that how much they were?

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely, I don't remember being that much. Yeah, they

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 2>definitely were. I think they got down toward the end

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 2>in maybe the twelve ninety nine fifteen dollars range, that's

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 2>what I remember. They were very much nineteen ninety nine.

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 2>For a while, you paid it was like twenty bucks

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 2>of CD like that was a birthday present, right there?

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 3>One CD YAO who initially fought the big fight and

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 3>refused to release a record unless it was I can't

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 3>remember how much it was, but it was quite a

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 3>bit less.

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Who Tom Petty baby Man, what a cool dude.

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, RP.

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 2>So, like you said, people just kind of got tired

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 2>of overpaying. But at the same time, this was a

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 2>time where frequently albums were released where no one, even

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:58.839
<v Speaker 2>the band probably thought that more than one or two

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 2>songs were worth The rest were just crud. What you

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 2>didn't get burned time and time again buying an album

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 2>and being like, I only like the two songs I

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 2>heard on the radio. Everything else on this album is terrible.

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.839
<v Speaker 3>No, I was a little different. I wasn't a singles guy.

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 3>I never bought a singles that was always an album guy, right,

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 3>And so I would buy albums that were good and

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 3>not albums that had one good song.

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 2>But if that's that's what I'm saying, you didn't know

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 2>how good or bad the other songs were until you

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 2>got the album because you only had heard the one

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 2>good song on the radio. So you would hope, hope,

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 2>hope that the rest of the album was as good

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 2>as the song on the radio, and it never was.

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 2>There was like an avalanche of difference between the quality

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 2>of how good the radio song was and how bad

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 2>all the other songs on the album would be. That

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 2>was my experience, at least.

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, I didn't follow as prey to it, I think

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 3>because and I'm not like some snob or anything, but

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 3>most of the albums that I would actually invest in

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 3>buying because you know, I had a limited amount of money,

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 3>we're like good, really great bands.

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, whatever, let's move on. I think we've missed one

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>of our famous stumbling blocks. I'll stick with my guns,

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 2>you stick with yours.

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, I just didn't have the kind of dough to

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 3>be like, Ooh, I like that song, I'll get that album.

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 3>I like had to really know it was awesome.

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 2>I didn't either, and that's why I hated it so

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>much that I'm still upset about it today. Maybe I

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 2>was better at it, Yes you were. I think that's

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 2>ultimately the point you're driving. I'm glad you just came

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 2>out and say it.

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 3>So everything changed from the big Heyday leading up to

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 3>the nineteen nineties into the two thousand's when a teenager

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 3>from Massachusetts, a hacker named Sean Fanning, got together with

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 3>a finance partner named Sean Parker, who would later go

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 3>on to be the very famously the first president of Facebook,

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 3>got together and said, Hey, we got this new thing.

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 3>It's a file software. It's a peer to peer thing,

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 3>so you can get music for free, basically by trading

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 3>it with your friends. And initially it was just I

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 3>believe Sean Fanning was like, I just want to trade

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 3>music with my friends who live on the other side

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 3>of the country. Then they realized they could get investors

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 3>make it into a real business, and that was Napster.

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And one of the other things that was required

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 2>for this to work were CD ripping program software that

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 2>came out around the same time, where you could put

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 2>in a factory made, label produced CD and rip all

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 2>the music from it and turn it into MP three's.

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 2>As you did that time and time again, your MP

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 2>three collection would build up, and when you installed Napster,

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 2>it would find all those MP three's and then you

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.679
<v Speaker 2>could trade them with other people like you were saying,

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 2>And it was such a hit, Chuck, that within two years.

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about Napster shutting down. It only lived for

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 2>two years. Originally, by the end of two years it

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 2>had something like fifty seven million users in.

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Two years, Yeah, I saw eighty million.

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 2>That's I believe it. That it was sensational and the

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 2>idea that it was a teenager that not only introduced

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 2>this to the world but completely changed the way that

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 2>music is made is just satisfying but also just mind

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 2>boggling because things have been done a certain way for

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 2>so long and the labels were so in control. The

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 2>idea of this guy coming along, it's like the original disruption.

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, at the peak of Napster there were twenty seven

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 3>billion transfers per month song transfers, So it's just incredible.

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 3>And this is another great stat that LVIA found at

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 3>one point supposedly sixty one percent of all traffic on

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 3>college servers were people sharing MP three's.

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 2>Totally by that too, man. So, like we said, musicians

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 2>mostly got caught in the middle of this. It was

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 2>the labels that were really taking the hit, and some

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 2>musicians are like, this is great, this is a great

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 2>way to spread music and awareness. Chuck d was very

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 2>famous a proponent of it early on, but there were

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 2>also the exact opposite. Some artists were like, to heck

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 2>with that. I think it was a famous quote from

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Doctor dre And he ended up joining Metallica, A and

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 2>M Records, the RIAA and started filing suits against Napster,

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 2>and some of them, including the RIAA and Doctor Drake,

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 2>started suing Napster users, that is, their fans for pirting

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 2>their music, like suing them directly personally individually.

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they went after them under the Rico Act, the

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Racketeering Act. Metallica was specifically seeking ten million bucks. And

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 3>what they didn't realize was this was, you know, this

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 3>was an online thing, so you could get another software

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 3>program like if you know. What they ended up doing

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 3>was they ended up getting a list of more than

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 3>three hundred thousand in it's like three hundred and thirty

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 3>something thousand who had shared Metallica's music and got Napster

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 3>to ban them. And what they didn't realize was that

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 3>all they had to do those users was get another

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 3>piece of software to allow them to get into Napster

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 3>under another name. And so it was a pretty quick workaround.

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so Metallica got such a bad name for this.

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 2>This is such bad pr for them. And I can't

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 2>remember the name of their basis, their original basis or

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 2>there maybe their second basis. He left in protest saying

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 2>like this is wrong Newstead, but it was it new

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 2>said okay, they they were there's still today people are

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 2>like Metallica's who they're fans. They did not. They found

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 2>the names of their fans and had Napster banned them,

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 2>and there was a screen you would get that said,

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 2>at the request of Metallica, you are not allowed to

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>access Napster any longer. But they didn't sue any individual fans.

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.719
<v Speaker 2>The ria ir AA did, and so did doctor Dre

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:06.479
<v Speaker 2>And I read about one twelve year old girl, Brianna Gahara,

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 2>who had to pay two thousand dollars because the RIAA

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 2>sued her and she had to pay two grand a

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 2>twelve year old girl. That's what it was like. That's

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 2>how upset the labels were at this point.

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, she probably didn't think about that when she was

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 3>getting two thousand dollars worth of free music.

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Well essentially it's what they were doing. But she still

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 2>ended up paying like two dollars a song, which is

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 2>really that's outrageous. Today in twenty twenty four.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's double yeah. At least so one thing this

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 3>did was just you know, brought it to the news

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of people that weren't sort of on

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 3>the on the front edge of that technology, we're like, oh,

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 3>wait a minute, there's a site where you can just

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 3>go get music traded. So it actually it was sort

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 3>of like the barbar streisand effect it ended up creating

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 3>more users. Napster tried to hang in there. There was

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 3>an attempted acquisition at one point for ninety something million

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 3>bucks that a judge shut down for some reason that's

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 3>not worth getting into. But they tried to become like

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 3>a legitimate player. They paid royalties, eventually about twenty six

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 3>million dollars of royalties. They tried different models, they tried subscriptions.

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Nothing really worked, I think because that time. By that time,

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 3>there were other like I mentioned LimeWire that was the

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 3>one I used. I never used Napster, Kazah, frost Wire,

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 3>these other ones. Competitors came along, and so Napster, while

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 3>like completely changing the game because they were the first ones,

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 3>didn't end up being some big huge They couldn't get

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 3>some big acquisition for it.

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 2>No, they just like you said changed the game. But

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that also was changed from Napster

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 2>in its brief two years and then its follow up

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 2>successors like kaza is the idea that, like, people aren't

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 2>going to pay yeah, fifteen or twenty dollars or even

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 2>twelve dollars for a CD anymore. It's not how we

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:00.719
<v Speaker 2>want to do it. That's ridiculous for not doing it.

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 2>I would rather take my chances at getting sued by

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 2>the RIAA and get music for free than pay for

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 2>an album that I'm only going to like one song on.

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 2>That's what I said. And it was just the everything

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 2>was completely upended. And Apple came along in two thousand

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 2>and three and brought massive stability to this huge c change,

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 2>but it didn't go back to the way it was.

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 2>They said, we're gonna we have a model here that

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 2>can actually accommodate both in this new kind of environment

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 2>of how music is created and delivered.

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Now, Yeah, I want to jump back a second. I

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.719
<v Speaker 3>wonder if because I think it's a real shame that

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, you know, maybe at fifteen dollars is too

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 3>much for a CD considering how cheap they were to produce.

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 3>But I think it's a real shame. People were like,

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 3>I want to pay zero dollars for music now, like

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 3>I think it should be free and screw everybody that

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 3>makes a living doing this under if initially, if the

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 3>record labels had immediately just gone down to like six '

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 3>ninety nine for a CD, if that would have changed

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 3>the game.

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Maybe. I think one of the things

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 2>that did change attitudes like that was a general public

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 2>awareness that was spread that the artists were being harmed

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 2>by this.

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like you're taking.

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Music did deserve you did deserve to be compensated for

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 2>the music you made, like it shouldn't be free. Year

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 2>So it was kind of like the It was like

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the pendulum of development, you know, but with music instead.

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, so I agree you mentioned Apple and specifically

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 3>iTunes is what came out in two thousand and three

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 3>and the iPod and they started selling songs for ninety

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 3>nine cents. One thing we didn't mention was that if

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 3>you had a PC and you were on LimeWire or napster, like,

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 3>there was a decent chance you might get a virus.

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 3>They were pretty rife with viruses, so you could you

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 3>could avoid you could avoid that danger and you could

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 3>pay ninety nine cents. You can get that single song.

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 3>If you're if you're You, if you're Josh, and you

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 3>don't want to take a chance on buying a full album,

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 3>you could just get that single Richard Mark song it

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 3>don't it don't mean nothing, and you would be super excited.

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Well that was the thing. Richard Marx is a bad

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 2>example because I think his two major albums both had

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 2>multiple hits on them. So all right, I'm just gonna

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 2>say it. Well, let's go with UTAs Saints. They're a

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 2>perfect example from roughly this era. They were I don't

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 2>even know where they were from, maybe British electronic.

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 3>I think I remember that that song, yes, because that

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 3>was a.

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Song, right, it's samp something good. It sampled Kate Bush

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 2>and they would say like you toss Saints. Yeah, yes,

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 2>that song. So you bought that album. To the album,

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 2>you would just be like.

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 3>God, well that's your problem, you know, buy LP.

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 2>I was big time into electronic music at the time,

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 2>and people weren't coming out with albums like every week

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 2>that were you know, electronic. It was still very guitar heavy,

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 2>so I know you had to work with what you

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 2>got and frequently get burned. Sorry Utah Saints if you're

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 2>out there listening.

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 3>So, overall, statistically, from and this is a pretty staggering

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 3>stat from two thousand and one to twenty ten, when

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 3>this first started. Over that next decade, physical music sales

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 3>dropped sixty percent all over the world, about fourteen billion

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 3>dollars in revenue loss. Digital sales rose about four billion,

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 3>But that left a ten billion dollar annual discrepancy and

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 3>what the music business was bringing in.

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. If that doesn't get it across, I don't know

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 2>what does.

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, because at that point it's basically just Richard

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Marx keeping the music labels afloat. The fact that they

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 2>had any money was essentially one hundred percent tributable to him.

0:14:57.920 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know what they say, It don't mean nothing

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 3>until you sign it on the outed line.

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's what he's talking about. My man.

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Should we take a break?

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Okay. So while Napster was like, hey, we're into

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 2>file sharing, some other ones were as well. At the

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 2>same time, roughly an alternative model was developing, and that

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 2>was just streaming, right, So rather than like downloading an

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 2>actual MP three that you would keep on your hard drive,

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 2>you could burn onto CD do whatever. This was like,

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 2>there were like music servers. This is this is crazy.

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 2>To bear with me for a second. That would actually

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 2>you would stream the music over the internet through like

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 2>a player on your on your computer. Usually had to

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 2>download the player itself. This is before they called them apps,

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 2>and you could sometimes select songs and then other times

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 2>it was more just like an f radio station where

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 2>they would almost play it plates whatever, random songs that

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 2>you had no control over.

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Right, well, you did have control in that you could

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 3>skip songs and stuff. You just couldn't pick the songs.

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes though, you could only skip a finite number of

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 2>songs before it's like nope, you have to listen to

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 2>this CARDI one.

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but that was the big problem with Launch Media

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 3>that they probably could have gotten away with it if

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 3>they didn't give you the ability to skip songs, right

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 3>because it was a little more like radio. But because

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 3>they had that fast forward button, the RIAA got involved

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 3>again and was like, we don't like that because one

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>thing I don't think we mentioned is radio. It was

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 3>a way for people to listen to songs and music

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 3>and get turned onto new stuff.

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 2>It was a live transmission.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but what radio also was was a free advertisement

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 3>for those bands. So you know, every time a song

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 3>gets played on the radio, that's an ad to little

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Josh Clark, like, hey, mis Sucker, go out this album

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 3>if you like this.

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Utah Saints are great.

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 3>This is this disrupted everything. The fact that you could

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 3>skip songs. That's why the IAA got upset because you know,

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 3>they're like, well, this is a lot like radio, but

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 3>you can't skip songs of the radio. We want people

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 3>to hear these songs because they're little ads.

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly. So that was a big problem. The streaming

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 2>services were as big a problem, maybe not as big,

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 2>but pretty close to the same amount of problem as

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 2>file sharing services were, too. They weren't like any kind

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 2>of solution as far as the music industry was concerned.

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and those were you know, like Launch Media, who

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 3>eventually became Yahoo Music. Those again, though, were just playing.

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 3>There was like a I don't know if it was

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 3>a real person programming, but it was as if a

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 3>DJ was playing music. The first legit on demand streaming

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 3>surface was Rhapsody in two thousand and one, which started

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 3>out as part of listen dot Com, was bought by

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 3>a company called Real Networks, and then eventually, in sort

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 3>of an odd twist, it bought Napster and in twenty sixteen,

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 3>rhapsoly was rebranded as Napster.

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Do you remember Real Player That was one of

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 2>those that software you had to download to stream music?

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Yeah, I remember that.

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.479
<v Speaker 2>I went and looked at old real Player skins and

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 2>it's just like, oh my god, those things were so ugly.

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 2>But they I mean, they're super. They look super two

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 2>thousand and five.

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Just seeing that little LimeWire lime actually gave me some

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 3>feels because I was doing by the way, I was

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 3>doing the same thing. I'm not saying, like when I said,

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 3>it's a real shame that people just said I want

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 3>my music free, like I was doing it too at

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the time.

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, well, I'm glad you said that.

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 3>I was part of that, that real shame.

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 3>I was like, oh, great, LimeWire, I can trade music.

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 3>But pretty quickly I was I mean, I kept buying

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 3>CDs for a while of the bands I loved, and

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 3>pretty quickly I was like, wait a minute, there's something

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 3>about this. It doesn't feel right.

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 2>Hey. One other thing that's occurred to me Chuck Is.

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure somebody's like, well, yeah, CDs might be like

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 2>fifteen dollars a piece, but don't forget Columbia House, where

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 2>you get like ten of them for a penny.

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 3>I never did that.

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 2>You didn't. Did I ever tell you my Columbia House story?

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 3>You did, But I think people need to hear it

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 3>if they haven't heard it. Okay, so told me last

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 3>week at a Cubs game. Was it just that recent?

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 2>Huh? And I got to work on my memory. I

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 2>need some prevag in. So like you would send off

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 2>for those of you who don't know, you would send

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 2>like literally you tape a penny to a postcard and

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 2>send it into Columbia House and you could you could

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 2>check like what albums you wanted them to send you,

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 2>and like magic, they would send you those ten albums

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 2>for a penny, But then you were automatically signed up

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 2>for their subscription service and they would send you albums

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 2>that you didn't want it like two times the price.

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 2>So it really wasn't a good deal unless you could

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 2>get out of it with just those first ten albums.

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 2>And I did exact factly that because when they sent

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 2>me the first first handful of records that I didn't want.

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I sent them back with a letter explaining that I

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 2>was twelve years old when I entered into this contract.

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 2>There's nowhere in the United States that it's legal for

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 2>a twelve year old to enter into a contract, So

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 2>please stop sending me albums. And they did.

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 3>I love it. Very precocious kid.

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks. I like that story. So I was a little bastard.

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you mean like the rapper.

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 2>No, that's old Dirty Bastard, right.

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking Low Wayne and Old Dirty Bastard got together.

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, little Bastard. That's my new rap name.

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Not tepid t all right. So Panta Pandora, not pantorra

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Pandora came along in two thousand and five. It began

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 3>as Savage Beast Technologies, and they were founded on this

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 3>idea of the algorithm to recommend songs to where it

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 3>would curate like this is Chuck's station. And the way

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 3>they did this was through something called the Music Genome Project,

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 3>which I remember just thinking it was the coolest idea

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 3>and thing ever back then, and it was a cool thing.

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 2>It was.

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 3>It was basically that they would analyze four hundred and

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 3>fifty unique attributes of every song that exists from you know,

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 3>as simple as like what genre is it to like

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 3>how nasally somebody's voice was.

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Then they would evaluate it on a scale of one

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 3>to five with half increments, and the end result would

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 3>be the songs you know, quote unquote DNA. Initially, they

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 3>had a musicologist that did this by ear in the

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 3>hand and it took like fifteen to thirty minutes a song.

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 3>Eventually AI took over, but it was that was the

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 3>big attraction for Pandora was like this super cool project

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 3>where they're categorizing music so specifically that it will start

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 3>to learn what you like and you can curate your

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 3>own radio station.

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 2>That's nuts. I never heard of that music genome project before.

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh really, it was sort of all the rage at

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 3>the time.

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 2>Pretty groundbreaking. I mean, I'm taking it this is in

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 2>the early two thousands.

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean it was when Pandora started. That was sort

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 3>of the basis of how they worked.

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, two thousand and five.

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So Pandora also started to try a subscription model.

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 2>Were they the first They may.

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Have been, Well, I think Naster tried it but it

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 3>didn't work.

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So Pandora was the first I guess that was

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 2>successful at it. It was I think three dollars a

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 2>month for streaming music with no advertising, which sounds like

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 2>a deal, But there are only like ten songs on

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 2>the internet at the time it's it did, and they

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 2>tried like ten hour free trials kind of like those

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 2>AOL sample discs. Yeah, but only one. They only had

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 2>like a one percent conversion rate.

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 2>And one of the reasons why I think that doesn't

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 2>get mentioned very often is that we're talking this is

0:22:55.400 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 2>like the mid oughts two thousand and five. People were

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 2>not at all comfortable with giving their credit card information

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 2>out over the internet. Yeah, and that's the only way

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 2>you could buy.

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Back then, Yeah, when it just seemed like the most

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 3>like top secret thing you could even have as a

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 3>part of your life, right.

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So I really truly think that that was one

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons why this got a slow start. People

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 2>were just so comfortable with paying for things using their

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 2>credit card over the internet. And that's I mean, how

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 2>else you're gonna build some but you're gonna send them

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 2>a physical bill for your online streaming service.

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 3>You get a letter from a twelve year old after that.

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly imagine Pandora getting checks mailed to them every month.

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 2>That'd be hilarious. But I mean, I guess that's what

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 2>you'd have to do to get business going.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think you're totally right. Those early days of

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 3>e commerce, I think a lot of us had some

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 3>trepidation about entering those digits online, you.

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Know, Yeah, and it might become it might be is

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 2>a confirmation bias where I, like, I was like that,

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 2>so I just assume other people were as well. But

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 2>most of the people I knew were not comfortable giving

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 2>out their credit card info at that time.

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 3>No, I think you're right on the money, no bias whatsoever.

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 3>You're just right cool.

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 2>So Congress got involved, actually in the United States at least,

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 2>and they came up with the Copyright Royalty and Distribution

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Reform Act of two thousand and four. That's how disruptive

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 2>napster was. Yeah, in four years, Congress had passed an

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 2>act essentially trying to help smooth this over. I'm sure

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 2>it was largely in the favor of the labels, but

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 2>it set up the US Copyright Royalty Board where these

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 2>these software companies and streamers would come and take claims

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 2>or be taken to this board by music labels to

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 2>figure out who owed who what.

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, which was a big, you know, through a

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:46.959
<v Speaker 3>big wrench in the plans of a lot of these

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 3>companies that were just emerging. I think the ones that

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 3>were sort of smaller gave up pretty quickly because it

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 3>was such a legal quagmire. Like Yahue Music wasn't even

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, a smallish one. They shut themselves down.

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah for sure. So again Apple kind of rides to

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 2>the rescue. And in two thousand and seven they introduced

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the iPhone. Because I don't know if we said it

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 2>or not. Before the iPhone came along, if you wanted

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 2>to listen to downloaded music anywhere away from your PC,

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 2>you had to buy an iPod or one of it's

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 2>also ran competitors like Zoom or something like that, but

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 2>you had to have like a physical device to listen to.

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:30.959
<v Speaker 2>When the iPhone came out, it was like throw all

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 2>that crowd away. Now you can not only listen to

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 2>your MP three's that you're buying off the iTunes store,

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 2>you can listen to streaming music. You can do everything

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 2>you can on the internet, you can do on your iPhone.

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 2>So it provided a super stable, safe platform, not at

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 2>all skanky. You weren't going to get viruses or anything

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 2>like that from downloading apps from the App store. And

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 2>Pandora actually saw the writing on the wall very early,

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 2>and they had an app like I think the next

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 2>year that was available for the iPhone that was a

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Pandora streaming app. And I think the first year, within

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 2>nine months that the app that the App store came out,

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 2>the Pandora app was on almost a quarter of all

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 2>iPhones in the world.

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this also brought back funny memories of this is

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 3>kind of like when we were getting going with the

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 3>TV show.

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Ish really at those twenty thirteen.

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm just talking about no, no, no, I'm not saying

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 3>the launch of the iPhone. I'm saying the apps being

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 3>like the end all be all. Like I remember very

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 3>specifically in some of those TV meetings some of the

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 3>guys on staff, like all they could talk about was

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 3>apps and look at this new app and it does this,

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 3>and it does this cool thing, and it does this

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 3>cool weird thing, and it was just app, apps, apps,

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 3>And it's just funny to look back how that is

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 3>at least changed for me. I mean, maybe people still

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 3>use all kinds of funky apps, but almost every app

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 3>I have is utilitarian and serve some kind of like

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 3>function for doing something right.

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 2>But if you wanted to razzle dazzle a C suite

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:10.719
<v Speaker 2>executive who is like ten years older than you at

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 2>the time, all you had to do is even let

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 2>them know you were thinking in terms of apps, and

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 2>they would just automatically promote you. I totally remember that time.

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 2>We've survived a lot of weird times, haven't we.

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 3>Hey we have, including the great stuff you should know.

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Fire of eight.

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right, death of Richard Marx.

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh he didn't die, did he.

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 2>No? Okay, that was a terrible joke. I'm sorry, Richard Mark, Sorry,

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Utah Saints, Sorry Richard Mars Right.

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Uh so we have to talk about Spotify. Should we

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 3>do that or take a break?

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 2>First, let's talk about Spotify, all right?

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Spotify comes along. They changed the game. Pandora was still

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 3>trying to be you know, kind of like radio in

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 3>a way. Spotify was like, know, we're really going to

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 3>be on demand and this is kind of what everyone's

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 3>been waiting for. It was a company out of Stockholm, Sweden,

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 3>very famous for swedeness, for encouraging and supporting their tech industries.

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 3>That's why there's somebody coming out of there. But they

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 3>launched in two thousand and six, and then I think

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Weighted had to wait until twenty eleven to launch in

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 3>the US because they had to you know, they were

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 3>I guess smart enough early on to pre negotiate with

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 3>record labels and kind of get all that settled, so

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 3>they weren't just dragged into court right away.

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Right so early in their early years, even when they

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 2>were just available in Europe, in Western Europe, they had

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.239
<v Speaker 2>ten million users and at one point six of them

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 2>were already paying users. Right So before this thing even

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 2>hit the US, it was valued at a billion dollar

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Spotify was, and when it hit the US, it it

0:28:54.480 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 2>just reached this incredibly massive level. One of the things

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 2>that Spotify did, I think today there they're at like

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 2>six hundred and fifteen million active users something crazy like that.

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 2>But one of the ways that they managed to kind

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 2>of come in and be like, hey, peace everybody, was

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 2>that they really paid royalties to the artists and the

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 2>labels or whoever owned the copyright of that song. They

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 2>paid like seventy percent of their revenues went to pay royalties,

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 2>and so they have been losing money every year since

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 2>at least twenty eleven, probably back when they debuted in

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and six and I think twenty twenty three. No,

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 2>the first two couriers of twenty twenty four, yes, they

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 2>they made record profits, and because they lost money every

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 2>year up until then, a record profit for them could

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 2>have been one dollar. But they finally turned profitable essentially,

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 2>and they're saying, like, now we're going to be profitable,

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 2>profitable from here on out. One of the criticisms they

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.479
<v Speaker 2>took is that they became profitable by going through massive

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 2>rounds of layoffs and jacking up the price of their subscriptions.

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 2>But the point about to know about Spotify is they

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 2>created a new standard by saying we're going to actually

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 2>pay real royalties to the people who own this music.

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh for sure. So I think we take that break.

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Now, Okay, we'll be right back, all right.

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 3>So twenty fifteen, a little several new players came on

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 3>the scene. Title you might have heard a lot about

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 3>at the time, all capitals TIDL. This was an artist

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 3>owned alternative kind of like you know, United artists and

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 3>movies back in the day. Like musicians actually got together

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 3>under the guidance of jay Z to buy a company.

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Initially it was an Norway based company called a SPIRO

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 3>that we're developing. It stood for wireless music player but

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 3>the WIMP and it was higher bit rates, supposedly better

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 3>quality and also like real human editors making music recommendations.

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 3>So jay Z gets on board. He's like, man, we

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 3>can't call it whimp in the United States. It's not

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 3>tough at all. So they changed it to title, right.

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I read an interesting article. Also, big ups to Olivia

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 2>for helping us with this one. But she found an

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 2>article from Loud and Quiet dot com written by Stuart

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Stubbs called five years on a very silly launch of

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Title and if you like, just kind of laughing a

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit at the misfortune of super egotistical, wealthy people

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 2>like that article a lot. Yeah, he just slams like

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 2>this launch and I haven't seen it because I can't

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 2>bear to watch it based on his description of how

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 2>awkward it is. But apparently it was one of the

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 2>most awkward star studded events ever held.

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I've seen it. It was awkward. It was just

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, man, Sometimes companies just screw it all up,

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, right.

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the big screw ups was to

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 2>basically tell the audience not to clap for anything, which

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure was a decision because you don't want it

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 2>to seem like these stars showed up so that they

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 2>could be applauded for everything they said. Yeah, but instead

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 2>it made it super awkward and quiet. From what Stuart

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Stubb says, it is.

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Very weird for Madonna to walk out on stage and

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 3>be met with silence. It was slightly surreal.

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 3>So Titles Deal was another company obviously because they were

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 3>artists that wanted to pay through pretty well and musicians

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 3>got a seventy five royalty on each song. It wasn't

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 3>too long after that they were being sued for underpayment

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 3>and it ended up not being a financial success as

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 3>a company, right. A bit of a mess, it seemed like.

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 2>But it got bailed out by Jack Dorsey, the co

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 2>founder of Twitter. He was leading a company called Block Inc.

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 2>And in twenty twenty one he used Block Inc funds

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 2>to buy an eighty six percent share in Title for

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 2>three hundred million dollars. Yeah, and essentially the shareholders in

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Block sued. They sued Jack Dorsey for this because they're like,

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 2>you did this as a favorite to jay Z. You

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 2>can't do that to us. This is a terrible deal.

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 2>And they actually had the lawsuit dismissed.

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think. I mean, if you want to compare,

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 3>I believe that jay Z, what did they pay like

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 3>fifty something million?

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Everybody chipped in fifty six million?

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, so then flipped it for three hundred to

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 3>his friend.

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 2>But really it was probably worth half of the original

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 2>price by this time because it was not a success

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 2>at all, and even still today, I saw it has

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 2>about five million users, it says, but that that's even

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 2>disputed by people outside the company. And like I said that,

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 2>judge dismissed the case against Jack Dorsey and he said

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 2>that that there's nothing legally wrong in approving it, even

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 2>though it was quote a terrible business decision.

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, man, that's pretty funny.

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I was so mad.

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I wonder if you've snuck up behind jay

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 3>Z and looked at his phone what he's playing.

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 2>With the real player he's ogreat I.

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 3>Did look up that logo, by the way, and it

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 3>was a wave of nostalgia. Might another one that came

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 3>out in twenty fifteen. You might have seen Neil Young

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 3>screaming at people on your television set right around then.

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 3>It was Pono that was his this is actual device.

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 3>It was a player, the Pono player, and it was

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 3>a crowdfunded campaign that raised about ten million bucks. And

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 3>the whole pitch here was from Neil Young, especially was

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 3>MP three's are garbage and that compression stinks and this

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 3>is all the night. Like Neil Young was much more

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 3>critical and probably cussed a lot more, but he's like,

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 3>the quality here is better, and this is the way

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 3>music should be listening. It's a travesty how we're listening

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 3>to music these days. And that company, I mean, I

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:15.879
<v Speaker 3>guess Neil Young failed to realize it. By and large,

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 3>most people don't care about the quality to that level.

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:20.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a lot of people just can't detect it. It's

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 2>not even that they don't care, it's that once you

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:26.760
<v Speaker 2>get to a certain bit rate measured in kilobytes per second,

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 2>that's how much how many bits are being transferred per second.

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 2>So obviously the more bits transferred, the more of the

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 2>song that's captured, the better the sound quality. Somewhere outside

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 2>of two hundred and fifty six kilobytes a second. When

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 2>you start going over that, people generally can't tell the difference,

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 2>especially if you're just using like earbuds or something like that.

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're just playing it through the speaker of

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 2>your iPhone.

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Especially, Yeah, oh god, do people do that?

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Very obnoxious people do.

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, A CD, just for comparison, is a little over

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:03.839
<v Speaker 3>fourteen high hundred kilobits per second. And you said two

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 3>fifty six is where people can't tell much of a difference.

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 3>That's like, that's like people with a good ear they say,

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 3>if you're around ninety to one hundred and you're not

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 3>the most discerning listener and you're not playing, you know,

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 3>through something great, then you probably won't be able to

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 3>tell the difference.

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Right. But again, if you're Neil Young, yes you're really

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 2>upset about this, but it's a course. He really missed

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 2>the mark by assuming that everybody felt this way about it.

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I mean you can you can get just

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 2>great quality of music from a fairly compressed rate. Yeah,

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 2>I agree.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Twenty fifteen also, and this kind of surprised me. It

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 3>felt like it had been around longer. But that's when

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Apple Music, not iTunes, but the Apple Music streaming finally

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 3>was launched surprisingly late to the game, supposedly because Steve

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Jobs didn't like the idea. So Apple and Amazon, who

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 3>had been selling MP three's just like Apple had, they

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 3>launched about a year later. So they're both giants that

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 3>were kind of late to the streaming game.

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Apparently Steve Jobs thought that it was basically piracy

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 2>to make people rent music rather than own it, and

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 2>that people didn't want to rent music, they wanted to

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 2>own it, so therefore subscription streaming services were basically just

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 2>taking advantage of their users. And he kind of said,

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:25.959
<v Speaker 2>if you pay one hundred dollars a year to listen

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 2>to your favorite song over ten years, you paid one

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars to listen to that song and you don't

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 2>even own it, rather than just buying it once for

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 2>a dollar or something like that. And he makes a

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 2>good point, but he's also leaving out all the other

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 2>music that you've listened to over that ten year period.

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 2>It's a weird way to put it. Yeah, it's a

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 2>little disingenuous, but he was very much opposed to it,

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 2>and Apple was not about to get into the streaming

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 2>game while he was alive.

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 3>He's like, if you're wealthy like me, you'll pay for

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 3>a different streaming subscription for every song you want to

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 3>hear exactly, just to make it fair.

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 2>And that's madness.

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Pandora, we should Mention was bought by Sirius XM and

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty nineteen, and we should, you know, talk a little

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 3>bit about how the finances worked today, because it was,

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, there was a bit of a things have

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 3>regulated just a bit. You know, things really went in

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 3>the tank. I think that the twenty fourteen was that

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:28.359
<v Speaker 3>the lowest point in dollars for the music industry. They've

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 3>come back now. In twenty twenty two, revenues hit twenty

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.479
<v Speaker 3>six point two billion, which is about a twenty five

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:37.800
<v Speaker 3>percent drop compared to when CDs died. But that's a

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 3>seventy percent increase from where they were in twenty fourteen.

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that's a that is a low point

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 2>for sure.

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So they've sort of course corrected enough to where

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 3>I think they're like, hey, it'll never be the heyday

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 3>of CDs again, right, but not every Like people are

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:57.320
<v Speaker 3>actually paying for music now with these subscriptions.

0:38:57.800 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And it does turn out that Steve Jobs will

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 2>absolutely wrong. People are generally totally cool with renting their

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 2>music through subscription services. I think eighty four percent of

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 2>music revenue comes from paid subscriptions. Yeah that's a I mean,

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 2>that's significant. And one two thousand and ninth study found

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 2>that piracy had dropped because of the affordability of legal

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 2>ways of consuming media, not because of enforcement, not the

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 2>threat of being sued by Metallica, but just the fact

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 2>that it was easier and by this time people got

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.800
<v Speaker 2>used to putting their credit card info on the internet.

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 3>The threat of Lars Ulrich's coming into your room and

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 3>speaking to you for twenty minutes. Yeah, that's enough right

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:43.839
<v Speaker 3>there for sure. As far as what they pay, I mean,

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Spotify's the biggest dog in the market. They have about

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.400
<v Speaker 3>thirty percent of the streaming market and like you said,

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 3>more than six hundred million active users. But these royalties,

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Title pays the most at one point three cents, Apple's

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 3>point seven, YouTube music point seven. Spotify pays point four

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 3>cents per stream, same as Amazon and then Pandora's down

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 3>to point one. You're obviously making a lot more money

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 3>off of Spotify because they're the biggest player, so it's

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 3>less per stream. But as an artist, if you're a

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 3>hit on Spotify, then there's a lot of money to

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 3>be made.

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Right Yeah. I think Spotify paid over nine billion dollars

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 2>in royalties in twenty twenty three, three times more than

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 2>they paid six years earlier. And there've been studies about

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:34.760
<v Speaker 2>how much money is actually made by the artists. There's

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 2>sixty six thousand artists that make ten grand or more

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:42.720
<v Speaker 2>a year on the platform through music sharing, eleven thousand

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 2>of them make more than one hundred thousand dollars a year,

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:48.760
<v Speaker 2>and then twelve hundred of them make a million plus.

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:51.839
<v Speaker 2>And of course most of the twelve hundred are names

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 2>that you've heard of that are already making tons of

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 2>money anyway. But you know, toward the lower end of

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:00.399
<v Speaker 2>that scale, there are indie artists that never in their

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 2>life would have made a million dollars in a record

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:07.400
<v Speaker 2>label deal that are now like making producing, sharing their

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 2>own music, running their own social media, and they're making

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:15.240
<v Speaker 2>a million dollars a year more from their music, which

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 2>is That's one of the ways that this completely changed

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 2>the game, not just in taking money away from the

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 2>music labels, but also in making it easier for independent

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 2>artists to just exist without the music labels.

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, for sure, I got a couple of things

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 3>for you here on that line, our beloved Pavement that

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:41.320
<v Speaker 3>we both love. Sure Harness Your Hopes was a B side,

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 3>kind of throwaway song, not throw away, but a B

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:46.879
<v Speaker 3>side from nineteen ninety six. It never made it onto

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 3>their album. It went viral on TikTok last year. You

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:53.879
<v Speaker 3>know about all this, right, No, so the song goes

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 3>viral on TikTok for some reason. And like huge Pavement

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 3>for eight song from nineteen ninety six got one hundred

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 3>and forty eight million streams on Spotify. Wow, which, if

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:10.280
<v Speaker 3>the math is right, close to six hundred thousand dollars

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:14.359
<v Speaker 3>just from Spotify from a you know, B side from

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:15.359
<v Speaker 3>nineteen ninety six.

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 2>That's awesome.

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:19.439
<v Speaker 3>That's amazing. So that kind of stuff can happen, which

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 3>is great. And then I looked up I was curious

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 3>who the most stream like, the most streamed song ever

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 3>on Spotify is. My guess would have been a Taylor

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Swift song. Believe it or not. Taylor Swift has the

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 3>her highest charting Spotify as far as number of streams

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 3>go is the forty second highest. What is it?

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 2>Just so she has so many songs that that it

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:45.240
<v Speaker 2>counts for her streams, I guess because she has tens

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 2>of billions of streams.

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 3>No, that's for a song like one specific song.

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh, I see you're saying in dollar amounts and royalties.

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, in streams like her. Her Her most streamed

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 3>song is Cruel Cruel Summer, and that is number forty

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:00.320
<v Speaker 3>two on the list.

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 2>First of all, that's Banana rama. And secondly, I think

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:08.800
<v Speaker 2>my point still stands. She just has so many songs

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 2>and variations of her songs that when you put it

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 2>all together, she has like thirty eight billion streams a

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 2>year of Spotify. Yeah.

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's for her whole catalog, which is incredible.

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 2>So who's number one? That she's way down at forty two.

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 3>The weekend, which one his song Blinding Lights Wow, is

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 3>the most downloaded song on Spotify And I did I

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 3>think it was. I can't remember. I think it was

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 3>like four or five billion streams. And I did some math,

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 3>and I may not be right, but if I did

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 3>my math right, it looks like that that dude has

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 3>made more than one hundred million dollars on that song

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 3>off of Spotify.

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 2>That's just off of Spotify, right, Yeah, that's not including

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:54.919
<v Speaker 2>like YouTube music, Amazon music sales of the actual MP

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:55.800
<v Speaker 2>three year album.

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 3>How many ways can I say? Only Spotify.

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:03.800
<v Speaker 2>In hindsight, even that doesn't quite make sense. I'm not like, ah,

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 2>that makes sense. It's funny how the internet can do that.

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:09.880
<v Speaker 2>I would have guessed Gongam style, but that's a little

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 2>little dated, I guess.

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 3>I just like, if that math is right, that's that's incredible.

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. But that's the kind of money you

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 2>can make off that. I saw Drake made like three

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 2>hundred million dollars off of Spotify in a year recently.

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, and if you're again, indie bands are now

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.719
<v Speaker 2>at the table. They can do this all themselves. They

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 2>can just split it among themselves as bandmates. And you know,

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 2>if you just hit it just right, you can go

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 2>viral like that Pavement song did and really make it

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 2>not just money wise, but your career. You can expose

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 2>yourself to so many people virtually on social media or

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 2>streaming music, is what I mean. But also there's an

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 2>other side to it as well, because record executives haven't

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 2>gone anywhere. There's still plenty of them, and so when

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 2>you do have a contract with the label. They'll very

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:08.480
<v Speaker 2>frequently be like, hey, this song has to have an

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 2>amazing hook that's no more than ten seconds long because

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 2>we want to get it viral on TikTok. Go make

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 2>a viral video on TikTok. Essentially is what they're saying,

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:20.360
<v Speaker 2>and so that's shaping how artists are making music, and

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of them are not happy about that.

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's also reshaped, you know, the sort of the

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.399
<v Speaker 3>album era is kind of dead. I mean, there's still

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:30.480
<v Speaker 3>plenty of albums and still plenty of artists doing that,

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 3>but it's almost, like Livia points out, it almost is

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 3>like going back to the days of the forty fives

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:40.000
<v Speaker 3>in the nineteen fifties where it was you know, these

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 3>singles are being released and that's interesting. I know that.

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, one thing we should mention is that there

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 3>is they're trying to get it pushed through now the

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Living Wage for Musicians Act through the house, where they're

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 3>basically saying, hey, minimum royalty should be a penny per stream. Like,

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 3>I know, you make a lot more on Spotify because

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:05.319
<v Speaker 3>it's the biggest player, but they're paying four cents and

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 3>like if everyone paid a cent, that would be a

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 3>huge difference.

0:46:09.280 --> 0:46:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and if you're like I totally agree with that,

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 2>you can go to Actionnetwork dot org and look for

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Living Wage for Musicians ACT. This morning, they only needed

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 2>four hundred and thirty two more signatures to reach their goal,

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 2>so apparently it automatically becomes law at twelve thousand signatures.

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 2>If I'm not mistaken, nice work.

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad you put that out there.

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 2>I am mistaken by the way. But yeah, there was

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 2>one other thing I wanted to point out to the

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:40.240
<v Speaker 2>way that it's evolved. Because there's not a huge gamble

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:43.240
<v Speaker 2>in making music like there was when you have a

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:46.360
<v Speaker 2>whole production going on in a label and you're actually

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:51.880
<v Speaker 2>physically producing the albums. There's way more availability and potential

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 2>for artists to explore genre bending, genre fusing all sorts

0:46:57.560 --> 0:47:01.320
<v Speaker 2>of gambly risky new types of music that they would

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 2>never be able to try if they had like a

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 2>major album or a major major label contract and that

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:10.399
<v Speaker 2>label was not willing to take those risks. So that's

0:47:10.440 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 2>another way that shaped it positively.

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, you and me could get together and

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:17.480
<v Speaker 3>put out a song and get it out there and streaming,

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 3>like we could do that.

0:47:20.160 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what should we do? Should we call ourselves pendulum

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 2>of development? And we're gonna play Both of us are

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:29.719
<v Speaker 2>going to play the mandolin, but neither of us know

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 2>how to play the mandolin? Is the hook?

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:38.399
<v Speaker 3>Well, who's our slide whistle player? Jerry? Okay, sure, we're

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 3>gonna cut her in on this.

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:42.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, I mean, but she can still be the

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:47.439
<v Speaker 2>slide whistle player. Oh okay, great, you got anything else?

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:49.520
<v Speaker 3>I got nothing else. This is a fun little trip

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:50.360
<v Speaker 3>down memory lane.

0:47:50.719 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was agreed. Good choice, And that's it. Everybody

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 2>for streaming music, which means, of course it's time for

0:47:58.760 --> 0:47:59.439
<v Speaker 2>listener mail.

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm gonna say this is we're sort of correcting

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:09.399
<v Speaker 3>our omission of our Minecraft episode when we couldn't think

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:10.439
<v Speaker 3>of the kid's name.

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Kober.

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:13.239
<v Speaker 3>It was a kid in the audience, and we could

0:48:13.320 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 3>remember his name. So we got a letter from Boden's mom.

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh hey, guys, my son. Boden was the kid who

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 3>asked about Minecraft at the Medford show. He was the

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 3>one with the glasses who also made the joke about

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 3>being a retired factory worker.

0:48:27.280 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Was so great.

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 3>That'll make sense if you've seen this show. He didn't

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 3>ask about mobs, and in fairness, there were probably ten

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 3>other kids after him who also asked about Minecraft. I

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:39.239
<v Speaker 3>don't think that's true, so I'm not sure if he's

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:42.359
<v Speaker 3>the one you're thinking of. Well, he was, Sarah, but

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:45.400
<v Speaker 3>she says regardless, I'm pretty sure he considers this to

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:48.759
<v Speaker 3>be his greatest contribution to humanity to date.

0:48:49.800 --> 0:48:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Man, that kid is so cool.

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Sincerely thanks from a very grateful parent. And that is

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:57.040
<v Speaker 3>from Sarah, so big. Thanks Boden. Yeah, and I'm glad

0:48:57.080 --> 0:48:58.399
<v Speaker 3>we could get your name out there.

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thanks a lot. Boden, was a great idea and

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 2>we appreciate your mom writing in. That was Sarah.

0:49:04.440 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, awesome.

0:49:05.800 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you want to be like Boden and Sarah,

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 2>come to one of our shows and suggest an episode.

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 2>You can also just make it easier on yourself and

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 2>send it via email, Wrap it up, spank it on

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 2>the Minecraft, and send it off to Stuff podcast at

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 2>iHeartRadio dot com.

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:26.799
<v Speaker 3>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 3>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.