WEBVTT - Rick Rubin in Conversation with Malcolm Gladwell

0:00:15.436 --> 0:00:23.916
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Today, the interviewer becomes the interviewee and it's nearly

0:00:23.956 --> 0:00:27.396
<v Speaker 1>forty years. As a producer, Rick Rubins helped unlock creativity

0:00:27.476 --> 0:00:31.876
<v Speaker 1>and inspire musical genius time and again. The artist he's

0:00:31.916 --> 0:00:34.716
<v Speaker 1>worked with often say one of Rick's superpowers is his

0:00:34.876 --> 0:00:39.156
<v Speaker 1>expert ability to listen deeply. This month, Rick released his

0:00:39.276 --> 0:00:42.316
<v Speaker 1>first book, called The Creative Act, A Way of Being.

0:00:43.196 --> 0:00:46.236
<v Speaker 1>In it, he shares practical principles on how anyone can

0:00:46.276 --> 0:00:51.636
<v Speaker 1>generate creative authenticity and ultimately find their voice. The book

0:00:51.676 --> 0:00:54.476
<v Speaker 1>also explores how a state of openness and belief can

0:00:54.516 --> 0:00:58.276
<v Speaker 1>help inspire creative ideas and break down obstacles that limit

0:00:58.396 --> 0:01:02.516
<v Speaker 1>artistic momentum. Malcolm Gladwell talks to Rick on today's episode

0:01:02.516 --> 0:01:05.756
<v Speaker 1>about The Creative Act. Together, they break down principles in

0:01:05.796 --> 0:01:08.956
<v Speaker 1>the book that are applicable to feelings of stagnation even

0:01:09.156 --> 0:01:13.196
<v Speaker 1>beyond artistic life. Rick talks about why he believes creativity

0:01:13.276 --> 0:01:16.796
<v Speaker 1>comes from external forces rather than internal ones, and he

0:01:16.836 --> 0:01:20.156
<v Speaker 1>explains why he believes self expression is not about you.

0:01:23.236 --> 0:01:26.396
<v Speaker 1>This is broken record line of notes for the digital Age.

0:01:26.676 --> 0:01:31.716
<v Speaker 1>I'm justin Richmond. Here's Malcolm Gladwell with Rick Rubin. Rick

0:01:32.556 --> 0:01:35.636
<v Speaker 1>Hey so I have a million questions, and I thought

0:01:35.676 --> 0:01:39.956
<v Speaker 1>the fun thing to do would be to go through

0:01:39.996 --> 0:01:43.756
<v Speaker 1>and I would just read you things I underlined, because

0:01:43.756 --> 0:01:45.076
<v Speaker 1>there are things that I would love for you to

0:01:45.116 --> 0:01:46.956
<v Speaker 1>talk or that we could talk about, but to you

0:01:47.036 --> 0:01:49.236
<v Speaker 1>in particular. But one of the fantastic things about this

0:01:49.276 --> 0:01:52.276
<v Speaker 1>book is that I've almost rarely read a book where

0:01:52.996 --> 0:01:54.996
<v Speaker 1>if I felt like I was being I was being

0:01:55.076 --> 0:01:58.636
<v Speaker 1>invited to contribute. Do you know what I mean? Like

0:01:59.036 --> 0:02:01.076
<v Speaker 1>every time you made a point, I was like, Oh,

0:02:01.116 --> 0:02:04.156
<v Speaker 1>I have something to be add about that or this.

0:02:04.476 --> 0:02:06.076
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've never read a book like that where

0:02:06.116 --> 0:02:08.596
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, half the time I'm talking to myself as

0:02:08.636 --> 0:02:11.076
<v Speaker 1>I'm reading it. So that's what I thought. We would

0:02:11.076 --> 0:02:13.796
<v Speaker 1>get into that as well a little bit. But that's great,

0:02:13.916 --> 0:02:16.556
<v Speaker 1>that's great. I'm so happy. First of all, I'm happy

0:02:16.716 --> 0:02:19.676
<v Speaker 1>like it, happy you read it, happy you like it,

0:02:19.716 --> 0:02:21.836
<v Speaker 1>and I'm happy that it had that effect on you.

0:02:22.116 --> 0:02:23.596
<v Speaker 1>And there was I will tell you there was a

0:02:23.676 --> 0:02:27.156
<v Speaker 1>version of the book, an unsuccessful version of the book

0:02:27.636 --> 0:02:32.236
<v Speaker 1>maybe four years ago, that talked about a lot of

0:02:32.236 --> 0:02:34.556
<v Speaker 1>the same stuff that the book talks about. The content

0:02:34.676 --> 0:02:40.516
<v Speaker 1>was similar and the writing was beautiful, but it wouldn't

0:02:40.596 --> 0:02:44.356
<v Speaker 1>have elicited the reaction that you had, and that's why

0:02:44.556 --> 0:02:47.796
<v Speaker 1>it didn't come out then. And from the beginning, the

0:02:47.876 --> 0:02:50.996
<v Speaker 1>purpose of the book was always I want people to

0:02:51.036 --> 0:02:53.676
<v Speaker 1>make great things. I want people, I want as much

0:02:53.716 --> 0:02:56.196
<v Speaker 1>beautiful art in the world as possible. I'm a fan

0:02:56.236 --> 0:03:00.036
<v Speaker 1>of beautiful things and exciting things and new things happening

0:03:00.076 --> 0:03:04.276
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and the book was like a call

0:03:04.356 --> 0:03:08.716
<v Speaker 1>to arms to go out and make something beautiful, change

0:03:08.756 --> 0:03:13.236
<v Speaker 1>the world, you know. So I've many questions, but I

0:03:13.276 --> 0:03:15.116
<v Speaker 1>wanted to start with a very general and which is

0:03:16.436 --> 0:03:20.116
<v Speaker 1>because you're in a world of music, we're reading a

0:03:20.116 --> 0:03:22.996
<v Speaker 1>lot of this through the lens of music. We're assuming

0:03:22.996 --> 0:03:25.516
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about musicians, and you give examples of musicians

0:03:25.556 --> 0:03:27.916
<v Speaker 1>from time from time and time. You will also talk

0:03:27.956 --> 0:03:32.276
<v Speaker 1>about visual artists. You add that into the mix. But

0:03:32.316 --> 0:03:35.956
<v Speaker 1>I was curious about, are we really talking about all

0:03:36.156 --> 0:03:39.756
<v Speaker 1>art here or is there a difference in the way

0:03:39.756 --> 0:03:43.356
<v Speaker 1>that music and visual art are done that that you're

0:03:43.396 --> 0:03:49.476
<v Speaker 1>specifically speaking to. I think it's how all creative choices

0:03:49.516 --> 0:03:53.476
<v Speaker 1>are made. So not only does it include the visual arts,

0:03:53.876 --> 0:03:58.996
<v Speaker 1>it includes starting a new business, a new recipe you're

0:03:58.996 --> 0:04:04.116
<v Speaker 1>making as a chef, architectural choices you might make solving

0:04:04.116 --> 0:04:08.636
<v Speaker 1>a problem in life where you're not getting along with

0:04:08.716 --> 0:04:12.716
<v Speaker 1>a fan Emily member and you want to get closer

0:04:12.756 --> 0:04:16.276
<v Speaker 1>to them and have better communication. Yeah. Originally I thought

0:04:16.276 --> 0:04:19.676
<v Speaker 1>of it as more of a how to book about creativity,

0:04:20.276 --> 0:04:24.516
<v Speaker 1>and it became a book about how to be, how

0:04:24.556 --> 0:04:26.916
<v Speaker 1>to be in the world to allow creativity to happen,

0:04:27.156 --> 0:04:28.716
<v Speaker 1>And as it turns out, how to be in the

0:04:28.716 --> 0:04:33.836
<v Speaker 1>world that allows creativity to happen solves a lot of issues. Yeah.

0:04:33.956 --> 0:04:36.756
<v Speaker 1>I did feel like about halfway through I began to

0:04:37.356 --> 0:04:40.236
<v Speaker 1>forget you were in music, and I felt like he

0:04:40.316 --> 0:04:43.756
<v Speaker 1>was starting to talk more broadly about everyone. It's hard

0:04:43.756 --> 0:04:46.316
<v Speaker 1>to escape the assumption that this is going to be

0:04:46.316 --> 0:04:49.076
<v Speaker 1>a book about music at the very beginning, but there

0:04:49.276 --> 0:04:50.756
<v Speaker 1>so there's a couple I want to start reading to

0:04:50.796 --> 0:04:54.876
<v Speaker 1>you some things and getting you to talk about them

0:04:54.916 --> 0:04:58.876
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. One is without the spiritual components from

0:04:58.876 --> 0:05:02.756
<v Speaker 1>page from the chapter called the Unseen. Without the spiritual component,

0:05:02.996 --> 0:05:06.956
<v Speaker 1>the artist works with a crucial disadvantage. It's a really

0:05:06.956 --> 0:05:11.636
<v Speaker 1>really interesting idea, and one really that I had heard

0:05:11.716 --> 0:05:15.836
<v Speaker 1>that phrase that way before. What is a disadvantage here?

0:05:16.436 --> 0:05:21.316
<v Speaker 1>And what do you meaning by the term spiritual component.

0:05:22.356 --> 0:05:27.356
<v Speaker 1>The spiritual component is belief in something bigger, something different,

0:05:27.396 --> 0:05:32.956
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. It could be believing in some universal power,

0:05:33.716 --> 0:05:36.236
<v Speaker 1>believing that if you walk under a ladder you'll have

0:05:36.356 --> 0:05:39.236
<v Speaker 1>bad luck, you know, could It could be anything that

0:05:39.396 --> 0:05:45.476
<v Speaker 1>takes you out of the ordinary to allow you to

0:05:45.556 --> 0:05:52.116
<v Speaker 1>see a wilder potential is good when you're making art. Yeah,

0:05:52.156 --> 0:05:54.636
<v Speaker 1>the goal of making art is not to show you

0:05:55.356 --> 0:06:00.756
<v Speaker 1>just what everybody else sees. It's to see what's possible.

0:06:01.036 --> 0:06:06.196
<v Speaker 1>And what's possible is radical. It really is radical. It's

0:06:06.196 --> 0:06:10.396
<v Speaker 1>like we've built very a very small world for ourselves

0:06:10.436 --> 0:06:13.876
<v Speaker 1>with our reason. Yeah. Have you ever had a mystical

0:06:13.916 --> 0:06:18.356
<v Speaker 1>experience in your life? Yeah? Okay, do you want to

0:06:18.476 --> 0:06:21.396
<v Speaker 1>describe it at all? Oh, well, I mean maybe my

0:06:21.476 --> 0:06:25.156
<v Speaker 1>definition of mystical I have had. I'm open, I'm wide

0:06:25.156 --> 0:06:29.556
<v Speaker 1>open however you describe it. I mean, I've had moments

0:06:29.636 --> 0:06:33.756
<v Speaker 1>probably around the death of my father would be an

0:06:33.756 --> 0:06:36.516
<v Speaker 1>example of the death of my father was a lot

0:06:36.556 --> 0:06:38.276
<v Speaker 1>more than just about the death of my father. I

0:06:38.316 --> 0:06:40.396
<v Speaker 1>guess that's the best way. You become aware in that

0:06:40.476 --> 0:06:45.476
<v Speaker 1>moment that oh he's part of joining going somewhere whatever,

0:06:46.596 --> 0:06:49.516
<v Speaker 1>much much, much, much much larger and older than we

0:06:49.556 --> 0:06:52.636
<v Speaker 1>would have imagined. That's that was probably the closest I

0:06:52.636 --> 0:06:55.556
<v Speaker 1>came to that that I saw that in the gift

0:06:55.596 --> 0:06:59.596
<v Speaker 1>of my grief was that, Yes, was being becoming aware

0:06:59.636 --> 0:07:03.076
<v Speaker 1>of that. Would you say that based on that you

0:07:03.396 --> 0:07:07.636
<v Speaker 1>have been able to live at times in a deeper way,

0:07:07.756 --> 0:07:10.956
<v Speaker 1>based on that experience open something in you to allow

0:07:10.996 --> 0:07:14.356
<v Speaker 1>you to see more than you saw before. Yes, I

0:07:14.716 --> 0:07:18.356
<v Speaker 1>absolutely I would. I would count that experience is one

0:07:18.356 --> 0:07:21.596
<v Speaker 1>of the most crucial of my life. And in a

0:07:21.596 --> 0:07:24.356
<v Speaker 1>million years, I would never have thought that the death

0:07:24.396 --> 0:07:27.116
<v Speaker 1>of someone I love more than anyone else would open

0:07:27.196 --> 0:07:30.116
<v Speaker 1>me up in that way. That would be an example

0:07:30.676 --> 0:07:35.756
<v Speaker 1>of touching something I would say spiritual, something, something unseen,

0:07:36.076 --> 0:07:39.996
<v Speaker 1>something from beyond, something that wouldn't have made sense to

0:07:40.036 --> 0:07:44.116
<v Speaker 1>you before it happened. Yeah, if someone would have described

0:07:44.156 --> 0:07:45.676
<v Speaker 1>it to you, you might have thought, that doesn't really

0:07:45.716 --> 0:07:48.276
<v Speaker 1>make sense to me, But then you got to feel it,

0:07:48.756 --> 0:07:52.676
<v Speaker 1>and then you understood. And belief is that way. There's

0:07:52.716 --> 0:07:55.436
<v Speaker 1>a part in the book that talks about what you

0:07:55.516 --> 0:07:59.396
<v Speaker 1>believe in doesn't have to be true, that doesn't really matter,

0:08:00.076 --> 0:08:04.836
<v Speaker 1>but belief has a power, and belief allows you to

0:08:04.916 --> 0:08:08.476
<v Speaker 1>go further than you thought you can go. Yeah, and

0:08:09.156 --> 0:08:13.796
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of tools in the book that

0:08:14.516 --> 0:08:18.796
<v Speaker 1>talk about overcoming voices that tell us we can't do

0:08:18.876 --> 0:08:22.236
<v Speaker 1>things because we've learned we can't do things. You know,

0:08:22.276 --> 0:08:26.516
<v Speaker 1>we've learned what's possible and what's impossible, and if we

0:08:26.596 --> 0:08:29.916
<v Speaker 1>accept what's possible and what's impossible, we can't go beyond.

0:08:30.036 --> 0:08:33.676
<v Speaker 1>If the right brothers accepted it was impossible for man

0:08:33.676 --> 0:08:38.716
<v Speaker 1>to fly, we still wouldn't be flying. All of the

0:08:38.916 --> 0:08:45.076
<v Speaker 1>great revolutions that have happened have happened because someone believed

0:08:45.116 --> 0:08:49.196
<v Speaker 1>in something that everyone thought wasn't possible. Yeah. This taps

0:08:49.236 --> 0:08:52.316
<v Speaker 1>into a larger theme in your book, which I thought

0:08:52.396 --> 0:08:56.076
<v Speaker 1>was really powerful, which is time and again you come

0:08:56.116 --> 0:08:58.796
<v Speaker 1>back to the idea that the artists, one of the

0:08:58.876 --> 0:09:03.796
<v Speaker 1>artists jobs is our obligations is to look outside of

0:09:04.236 --> 0:09:06.676
<v Speaker 1>him or herself. I mean, you do talk about how

0:09:06.716 --> 0:09:08.836
<v Speaker 1>you need there's a chapter where you talk about the

0:09:09.996 --> 0:09:13.556
<v Speaker 1>paying very close attention to what's going on inside your

0:09:13.556 --> 0:09:17.316
<v Speaker 1>own head and heart, Like here's an example not long

0:09:17.316 --> 0:09:19.476
<v Speaker 1>after that first quote, when looking for a solution to

0:09:19.516 --> 0:09:23.036
<v Speaker 1>a creative problem, pay close attention to what's happening around you.

0:09:23.756 --> 0:09:25.876
<v Speaker 1>And what I love about that is like, it's not

0:09:25.956 --> 0:09:31.236
<v Speaker 1>that you think back over your history, remember some important

0:09:31.236 --> 0:09:33.836
<v Speaker 1>thing you read five years ago written by some genius. No, No,

0:09:33.916 --> 0:09:37.276
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about in the moment here and that. Look

0:09:37.276 --> 0:09:42.436
<v Speaker 1>around and you can find kind of solutions, clues, what

0:09:42.676 --> 0:09:46.316
<v Speaker 1>have you just in the kind of most prosaic details

0:09:46.516 --> 0:09:49.596
<v Speaker 1>of your existence at that moment, like in the room

0:09:49.636 --> 0:09:53.836
<v Speaker 1>where you are. Yes, now, I can't say it works

0:09:53.836 --> 0:09:56.396
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent of the time. It's not saying that.

0:09:56.876 --> 0:09:59.436
<v Speaker 1>It's saying that if you live in a way where

0:09:59.436 --> 0:10:02.556
<v Speaker 1>you're really open and paying attention to everything around you,

0:10:03.196 --> 0:10:06.916
<v Speaker 1>the answers you're looking for are knocking on the door

0:10:07.236 --> 0:10:12.196
<v Speaker 1>all the time. They don't come when you're searching for them.

0:10:13.036 --> 0:10:15.556
<v Speaker 1>They come when you're open and allow them to come.

0:10:16.396 --> 0:10:17.756
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I talk about in the

0:10:17.796 --> 0:10:21.156
<v Speaker 1>book is um if you have a problem to solve,

0:10:22.236 --> 0:10:25.516
<v Speaker 1>instead of thinking about it, hold the question in your

0:10:25.556 --> 0:10:29.396
<v Speaker 1>awareness and go for a walk or swim or do

0:10:29.556 --> 0:10:33.436
<v Speaker 1>something that takes your mind off of what you're trying

0:10:33.476 --> 0:10:37.476
<v Speaker 1>to solve and engages you in something else. Yea. And

0:10:37.956 --> 0:10:41.836
<v Speaker 1>most often when you're engaged in something else, the part

0:10:41.836 --> 0:10:44.396
<v Speaker 1>of you that's in the way of solving the problem

0:10:45.116 --> 0:10:50.796
<v Speaker 1>loses its control over you, and you through whatever it is.

0:10:50.836 --> 0:10:53.716
<v Speaker 1>You can find a way to go for a drive

0:10:53.916 --> 0:10:56.556
<v Speaker 1>something where you have to you have to pay attention enough.

0:10:56.756 --> 0:11:01.116
<v Speaker 1>If you're driving, you can sort of drive on autopilot

0:11:00.876 --> 0:11:03.796
<v Speaker 1>in you know, without really paying attention. But if you're

0:11:03.836 --> 0:11:06.756
<v Speaker 1>really not paying attention, you'll crash. You can you can

0:11:06.796 --> 0:11:10.436
<v Speaker 1>tune out that much. So there is some part of

0:11:10.476 --> 0:11:15.236
<v Speaker 1>you that's occupied when you're driving with the work at hand.

0:11:15.716 --> 0:11:18.556
<v Speaker 1>The reason I thought that was interesting was I wondered

0:11:19.156 --> 0:11:21.476
<v Speaker 1>one thing that struck me. And I could be totally wrong,

0:11:21.556 --> 0:11:25.036
<v Speaker 1>but my sense is that increasingly, and a lot of

0:11:25.076 --> 0:11:28.676
<v Speaker 1>creative fields, creativity is to find as something that is

0:11:28.836 --> 0:11:33.156
<v Speaker 1>internal and deliberate. You look within yourself and your own

0:11:33.196 --> 0:11:35.916
<v Speaker 1>experience and you mind them for and you're talking about

0:11:35.956 --> 0:11:40.956
<v Speaker 1>something that is in part external and unconscious. And I

0:11:41.036 --> 0:11:43.876
<v Speaker 1>have a good friend who's a screenwriter, and I think

0:11:43.876 --> 0:11:48.316
<v Speaker 1>by virtue of being my friend and watching, I'm a reporter,

0:11:48.396 --> 0:11:50.836
<v Speaker 1>a journalist, you know. I call people up and interview

0:11:50.876 --> 0:11:54.156
<v Speaker 1>them and record what they say. He's changed the way

0:11:54.196 --> 0:11:58.356
<v Speaker 1>he writes screenplays. Now he does as much reporting as

0:11:58.476 --> 0:12:01.036
<v Speaker 1>he does as much as someone who's writing a nonfiction book.

0:12:01.516 --> 0:12:03.956
<v Speaker 1>And he's doing it not because he's just cutting and

0:12:03.956 --> 0:12:05.556
<v Speaker 1>pasting what he hears in the world and do is

0:12:05.716 --> 0:12:07.676
<v Speaker 1>but he's doing a version of what you're talking about,

0:12:07.716 --> 0:12:10.996
<v Speaker 1>which is he's old himself up to the if he

0:12:11.036 --> 0:12:14.076
<v Speaker 1>wants to talk about, you know, scientists, he goes and

0:12:14.116 --> 0:12:16.156
<v Speaker 1>talks to lots and lots of scientists and it opens

0:12:16.236 --> 0:12:18.796
<v Speaker 1>him up to the way they think and feel. And

0:12:19.636 --> 0:12:23.636
<v Speaker 1>that kind of approach to creativity strikes me as being

0:12:23.636 --> 0:12:25.476
<v Speaker 1>one that seems out of vogue in a certain way.

0:12:25.596 --> 0:12:28.036
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not what they're teaching in running schools. No,

0:12:28.196 --> 0:12:30.196
<v Speaker 1>it's not what they're teaching. And there was a line,

0:12:30.356 --> 0:12:31.836
<v Speaker 1>there's a line in the book and I only know

0:12:31.916 --> 0:12:34.076
<v Speaker 1>it because I was working on the audiobook yesterday and

0:12:34.436 --> 0:12:38.716
<v Speaker 1>I read it yesterday, and it's against funny countintuitive line

0:12:39.156 --> 0:12:46.076
<v Speaker 1>that self expression is not about you, and it's just

0:12:46.156 --> 0:12:48.676
<v Speaker 1>such a and when I read it, you know, it's

0:12:48.756 --> 0:12:51.756
<v Speaker 1>it's stopped me in my tracks, even though it's an

0:12:51.796 --> 0:12:54.876
<v Speaker 1>idea from several years ago, but it hit me hard again,

0:12:55.316 --> 0:13:00.356
<v Speaker 1>you know, recognizing it. So everything we are comes from

0:13:00.396 --> 0:13:03.756
<v Speaker 1>outside of us, the data that we take in from

0:13:03.756 --> 0:13:05.996
<v Speaker 1>which we make whatever it is that we make comes

0:13:05.996 --> 0:13:08.236
<v Speaker 1>from outside of us, all of it. None of it

0:13:08.316 --> 0:13:12.716
<v Speaker 1>starts with us. Everything starts outside of us. So we

0:13:12.796 --> 0:13:14.876
<v Speaker 1>have a storehouse of all of the stuff that we've

0:13:14.916 --> 0:13:18.556
<v Speaker 1>experienced over the course of our lives, and then we

0:13:18.636 --> 0:13:23.836
<v Speaker 1>can find connections between those things, and we can find

0:13:23.876 --> 0:13:27.676
<v Speaker 1>connections between those things from the past and these things

0:13:27.676 --> 0:13:31.476
<v Speaker 1>happening now, whatever it may be. And when you're looking

0:13:31.516 --> 0:13:36.516
<v Speaker 1>for it, it's surprising how often the answers are right there. Yeah,

0:13:36.876 --> 0:13:40.516
<v Speaker 1>this is reading another with my favorite lines. Distraction is

0:13:40.556 --> 0:13:45.516
<v Speaker 1>not procrastination. Procrastination consistently undermines our ability to make things.

0:13:45.796 --> 0:13:49.316
<v Speaker 1>Distraction is a strategy in service of the work, which

0:13:49.396 --> 0:13:51.796
<v Speaker 1>is to your point. So a lot of what this

0:13:51.996 --> 0:13:55.716
<v Speaker 1>exposure to the world outside of us is about is

0:13:55.716 --> 0:13:59.116
<v Speaker 1>a kind of productive distraction, right, That's what you're saying

0:13:59.116 --> 0:14:02.756
<v Speaker 1>with that, it's a combination. There's a productive distraction and

0:14:02.876 --> 0:14:06.356
<v Speaker 1>an inspiration. The connection with the outside world also can

0:14:06.396 --> 0:14:08.796
<v Speaker 1>be really inspiring. It can be inspiring if you pick

0:14:08.836 --> 0:14:11.556
<v Speaker 1>play that are inspiring. I try to pick places to

0:14:11.636 --> 0:14:14.716
<v Speaker 1>be where I find inspiration on a daily basis. You

0:14:14.796 --> 0:14:17.556
<v Speaker 1>have a little moment where you're talking about how different

0:14:17.996 --> 0:14:22.396
<v Speaker 1>all of us have different strategies for that kind of

0:14:22.556 --> 0:14:25.556
<v Speaker 1>inspirational place. And you said Andy Warhol was said to

0:14:25.556 --> 0:14:28.876
<v Speaker 1>create with a television, radio, and record player all on simultaneously.

0:14:29.236 --> 0:14:31.316
<v Speaker 1>For eminem the noise of a single TV set is

0:14:31.356 --> 0:14:34.316
<v Speaker 1>his preferred backdrop myself. Proust lined, as well as with

0:14:34.396 --> 0:14:38.156
<v Speaker 1>sound of absorbing cork, close the drapes and warrior plugs.

0:14:38.636 --> 0:14:40.956
<v Speaker 1>And I was curious, what's yours? Do you have a

0:14:41.036 --> 0:14:43.916
<v Speaker 1>kind of mode like that? I would say I like

0:14:44.036 --> 0:14:51.076
<v Speaker 1>to be in a quiet place, big beautiful nature, less people. Yeah,

0:14:51.156 --> 0:14:54.596
<v Speaker 1>i'd say natural beauty and less people. It's funny. I'm

0:14:54.636 --> 0:14:57.396
<v Speaker 1>exactly the opposite. I was right at a very productive

0:14:57.436 --> 0:15:00.876
<v Speaker 1>warning in a coffee shop. It was crowded, and I

0:15:00.916 --> 0:15:05.036
<v Speaker 1>was seating it like literally right up against the six

0:15:05.076 --> 0:15:08.756
<v Speaker 1>foot four kid. I think it's like twenty two years old,

0:15:09.196 --> 0:15:12.916
<v Speaker 1>sitting next to his parents. And the kid was super interesting,

0:15:12.916 --> 0:15:15.996
<v Speaker 1>and he was talking about the PLO in the nineteen

0:15:16.076 --> 0:15:20.876
<v Speaker 1>seventies and yes, or Arafat, and there was something about

0:15:20.916 --> 0:15:23.476
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know, I can't put my finger on what.

0:15:23.516 --> 0:15:25.756
<v Speaker 1>That kind of triggered After a while, I kind of

0:15:26.076 --> 0:15:28.796
<v Speaker 1>he became my background noise. But it was such a

0:15:28.836 --> 0:15:32.596
<v Speaker 1>different voice that I was fixing a chapter of something

0:15:32.636 --> 0:15:35.476
<v Speaker 1>I was working on, and I just thought suddenly saw

0:15:35.516 --> 0:15:37.556
<v Speaker 1>a solution, and I think it was what we were

0:15:37.556 --> 0:15:40.876
<v Speaker 1>talking about. It was some combination of there's something about

0:15:40.956 --> 0:15:45.756
<v Speaker 1>that being surrounded by unusual voices that really wakes me

0:15:45.876 --> 0:15:48.956
<v Speaker 1>up to the range of solutions. Right, I'm reminded, Oh,

0:15:49.116 --> 0:15:51.556
<v Speaker 1>there's like, there's this kid who's thinking about something I

0:15:51.596 --> 0:15:55.356
<v Speaker 1>don't think about in a context I'm not in. Who's

0:15:55.356 --> 0:15:58.396
<v Speaker 1>super interesting, Like, wow, so you know there's a solution

0:15:58.436 --> 0:15:59.916
<v Speaker 1>out there. It was that. It was funny because I

0:16:00.276 --> 0:16:02.276
<v Speaker 1>had just read your chapter which talks about that, and

0:16:02.356 --> 0:16:05.156
<v Speaker 1>I was in that situation. Is that a place that

0:16:05.196 --> 0:16:09.276
<v Speaker 1>you go to every day many days? I like, I

0:16:09.876 --> 0:16:14.076
<v Speaker 1>need I need so, I need voices. I need noise

0:16:14.156 --> 0:16:17.516
<v Speaker 1>and voices and activity in order to be able to create.

0:16:18.436 --> 0:16:22.876
<v Speaker 1>During the pandemic, I had one Sturgele Simpson album that

0:16:22.956 --> 0:16:25.356
<v Speaker 1>I played over and over and over again. He was

0:16:25.396 --> 0:16:28.396
<v Speaker 1>my voice? Was it meta? Modern? Met? What is that? Albums?

0:16:28.436 --> 0:16:32.516
<v Speaker 1>Fantastic album? Whatever? Was so good? It's great. He was great.

0:16:32.716 --> 0:16:35.076
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he's out there. He helped me

0:16:35.156 --> 0:16:40.556
<v Speaker 1>through many, many lean times during the pandemic. But that

0:16:40.756 --> 0:16:45.276
<v Speaker 1>idea I almost feel like you're describing the things you

0:16:45.316 --> 0:16:48.916
<v Speaker 1>have learned by working with elite practitioners of the art

0:16:48.956 --> 0:16:52.116
<v Speaker 1>of creativity. But I was struck by the gap between

0:16:52.676 --> 0:16:55.996
<v Speaker 1>what you've learned from the top performers and what we're

0:16:56.036 --> 0:17:00.596
<v Speaker 1>teaching to people at the outset, and that it concerned me.

0:17:00.596 --> 0:17:03.476
<v Speaker 1>I almost feel like there's a gap between what we're

0:17:03.516 --> 0:17:08.676
<v Speaker 1>telling people and what the truly creative are doing. Yes, yes,

0:17:08.796 --> 0:17:12.916
<v Speaker 1>that's on the same point on this gap. There's a

0:17:12.916 --> 0:17:15.076
<v Speaker 1>moment when you're talking about secually my favorite part of

0:17:15.076 --> 0:17:19.356
<v Speaker 1>the book, when you're talking about strategies for unblocking yourself

0:17:19.716 --> 0:17:22.876
<v Speaker 1>in all the different ways that you think about that

0:17:22.956 --> 0:17:26.196
<v Speaker 1>or approach that when you're working with people and one

0:17:26.196 --> 0:17:29.356
<v Speaker 1>of them was right right in the voice of someone else,

0:17:30.076 --> 0:17:33.956
<v Speaker 1>that's what we said, and Rick, once again, in the

0:17:33.996 --> 0:17:38.956
<v Speaker 1>world we live in, that is an incendiary thought. That's

0:17:39.036 --> 0:17:42.396
<v Speaker 1>called appropriation. And you have this beautiful I want to

0:17:42.476 --> 0:17:47.276
<v Speaker 1>quote in a similar vein you say there are countless

0:17:47.276 --> 0:17:51.836
<v Speaker 1>examples of imitation turning into legitimate innovation. Having a romanticized

0:17:51.916 --> 0:17:54.436
<v Speaker 1>vision of an artist, genre, or tradition may allow you

0:17:54.476 --> 0:17:57.156
<v Speaker 1>to create something new because you see it from a

0:17:57.156 --> 0:18:00.796
<v Speaker 1>different perspective than those closer to it. So not only

0:18:00.876 --> 0:18:03.156
<v Speaker 1>you saying that it can be really useful to inhabit

0:18:03.196 --> 0:18:07.596
<v Speaker 1>someone else's voice or tradition, you're also saying that that

0:18:07.636 --> 0:18:13.316
<v Speaker 1>can spark whole new, more beautiful, greater kind of innovation

0:18:13.356 --> 0:18:16.116
<v Speaker 1>because you're approaching it from your own perspective. You talking

0:18:16.116 --> 0:18:19.156
<v Speaker 1>about Sergio Leone's Spaghetti Westerns being a good example of that,

0:18:19.156 --> 0:18:22.876
<v Speaker 1>that they transform understanding of what a western is. I

0:18:22.956 --> 0:18:25.516
<v Speaker 1>thought a lot about the audiobook we did with Paul

0:18:25.516 --> 0:18:30.356
<v Speaker 1>Simon when he's talking about Graceland, which is that right, yes?

0:18:31.956 --> 0:18:35.716
<v Speaker 1>Or talking heads you know, remain in light or fear

0:18:35.716 --> 0:18:40.596
<v Speaker 1>of music. Those were inspired by African rhythms. Yeah, there's

0:18:40.636 --> 0:18:44.036
<v Speaker 1>a great tradition in doing this. I mean if pretty

0:18:44.116 --> 0:18:48.956
<v Speaker 1>much the best of everything was based on something else, always,

0:18:49.476 --> 0:18:52.516
<v Speaker 1>and then it's the it's through the new interpretations. Like

0:18:52.556 --> 0:18:56.836
<v Speaker 1>the Beatles were doing American motown music, but because they

0:18:56.836 --> 0:19:00.596
<v Speaker 1>were English and because of the distance, they weren't trying

0:19:00.676 --> 0:19:03.316
<v Speaker 1>to do it different. They did it different because they

0:19:03.316 --> 0:19:05.596
<v Speaker 1>were different. Yeah, and that was the beauty of it.

0:19:05.636 --> 0:19:09.116
<v Speaker 1>And that's how the Beatles became the Beatles, you know. Yeah,

0:19:09.156 --> 0:19:11.796
<v Speaker 1>they became the Beatles because they are the Beatles, but

0:19:11.916 --> 0:19:14.516
<v Speaker 1>the music they were doing was they were trying to

0:19:14.516 --> 0:19:17.076
<v Speaker 1>do motown or as you point out, the Ramones were

0:19:17.076 --> 0:19:20.196
<v Speaker 1>trying to be the Base City Rollers. Yes, which is

0:19:20.196 --> 0:19:23.516
<v Speaker 1>a true. Yeah, Johnny Ramone told me that himself, so

0:19:23.596 --> 0:19:25.996
<v Speaker 1>I know that to be true. That is so hilary

0:19:26.116 --> 0:19:28.036
<v Speaker 1>for those of you who don't know the Basity Rollers.

0:19:28.476 --> 0:19:32.156
<v Speaker 1>They were just about the dumbest bubble bubble gum band

0:19:32.196 --> 0:19:35.236
<v Speaker 1>of the They were like the boy band of the

0:19:35.236 --> 0:19:39.356
<v Speaker 1>early seventies. And the Ramones think that they had that

0:19:39.396 --> 0:19:42.236
<v Speaker 1>song s A t U R d a y n

0:19:42.756 --> 0:19:44.796
<v Speaker 1>s A t u R. And then if you listen

0:19:44.796 --> 0:19:48.716
<v Speaker 1>to the Ramones, they have those type of gabba gabby

0:19:49.116 --> 0:19:53.156
<v Speaker 1>you we accept you know, similar types of chance. Yes,

0:19:53.276 --> 0:19:55.276
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Yeah, they take it and they twist it

0:19:55.276 --> 0:20:00.436
<v Speaker 1>in this brilliant, beautiful revolutionary way. But so we look

0:20:00.476 --> 0:20:02.556
<v Speaker 1>about I sort of harp on this, but how do

0:20:02.636 --> 0:20:05.996
<v Speaker 1>we get away from that notion? So it is legitimately

0:20:05.996 --> 0:20:08.036
<v Speaker 1>the case, and I know this because I are examples

0:20:08.036 --> 0:20:12.196
<v Speaker 1>of people who I know who are legitimately terrified of

0:20:12.436 --> 0:20:17.156
<v Speaker 1>even so much as dipping their toe in another traditionary voice,

0:20:17.196 --> 0:20:21.636
<v Speaker 1>for fear of being criticized it's almost like we're terrified

0:20:21.676 --> 0:20:25.956
<v Speaker 1>of the sources of creativity. We're terrified to admit to

0:20:25.956 --> 0:20:28.916
<v Speaker 1>ourselves what we're doing in the name of creativity. The

0:20:29.076 --> 0:20:34.916
<v Speaker 1>reason someone imitates someone else is because they love someone else.

0:20:35.436 --> 0:20:39.196
<v Speaker 1>That's why it's only flattery when someone is inspired by

0:20:39.236 --> 0:20:42.276
<v Speaker 1>someone else. If you if you decided to write because

0:20:42.316 --> 0:20:44.916
<v Speaker 1>someone else wrote and you like their writing, and you

0:20:44.956 --> 0:20:48.756
<v Speaker 1>decide to become a writer, that's not against them, That

0:20:48.796 --> 0:20:53.676
<v Speaker 1>doesn't take anything away from them. That's a tribute to them. Yeah,

0:20:53.756 --> 0:20:57.276
<v Speaker 1>And all of the music that gets made based on

0:20:57.596 --> 0:21:00.596
<v Speaker 1>loving someone else's music is attribute to them. Whether it

0:21:00.716 --> 0:21:03.556
<v Speaker 1>be people of the same color or different color, doesn't

0:21:03.556 --> 0:21:05.796
<v Speaker 1>matter that it has nothing to do with that. That's

0:21:05.836 --> 0:21:09.916
<v Speaker 1>not what it's about. Yeah, it's a current misread of

0:21:09.956 --> 0:21:12.996
<v Speaker 1>the situation. Yes, you know what it is, and it

0:21:12.996 --> 0:21:14.476
<v Speaker 1>goes to something else. You talk a little bit, You

0:21:14.476 --> 0:21:17.716
<v Speaker 1>talk about the abundance mindset in getting to that part

0:21:17.716 --> 0:21:20.476
<v Speaker 1>of the book. You talk about the importance of understanding

0:21:20.516 --> 0:21:23.796
<v Speaker 1>that number of ideas, essentially, the number of ideas out

0:21:23.836 --> 0:21:27.156
<v Speaker 1>there is infinite, not finite. Yes, when you understand it's

0:21:27.196 --> 0:21:31.676
<v Speaker 1>infinite there, then you're not scared of imitating someone because

0:21:31.716 --> 0:21:33.716
<v Speaker 1>You're like, there's a million things out there we don't

0:21:33.796 --> 0:21:35.916
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to hold tightly to what we've done

0:21:36.276 --> 0:21:40.916
<v Speaker 1>and be react in a hostile manner if someone tries

0:21:40.956 --> 0:21:43.996
<v Speaker 1>to imitate us, because there's a million fishing to see.

0:21:44.076 --> 0:21:46.916
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's fine. I think the idea that the

0:21:47.036 --> 0:21:50.396
<v Speaker 1>number of new ideas is infinite has kind of fallen

0:21:50.436 --> 0:21:53.676
<v Speaker 1>out of favor somehow. Yeah, it's it's just odd. It's

0:21:54.076 --> 0:21:57.716
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people can be wrong and it's okay, you know,

0:21:57.876 --> 0:22:00.436
<v Speaker 1>like that's fine. In some ways, the fact that's fallen

0:22:00.436 --> 0:22:05.396
<v Speaker 1>out of favor means the people who embrace the tried

0:22:05.476 --> 0:22:09.116
<v Speaker 1>and true methods that have worked will find greater success

0:22:09.156 --> 0:22:13.036
<v Speaker 1>and they'll be less stuff in between. Yeah, is your

0:22:13.876 --> 0:22:18.396
<v Speaker 1>understanding of this notion of abundance? Is it a product

0:22:18.476 --> 0:22:21.476
<v Speaker 1>of having worked for I don't know how many years

0:22:21.516 --> 0:22:24.036
<v Speaker 1>you've been in the industry, many decades. Did you feel

0:22:24.076 --> 0:22:25.716
<v Speaker 1>the same way when you were twenty one and there

0:22:25.796 --> 0:22:28.316
<v Speaker 1>was Is it natural for the very for the very

0:22:28.356 --> 0:22:31.636
<v Speaker 1>young to be much more jealous, to touch more jealously

0:22:31.676 --> 0:22:35.156
<v Speaker 1>guard their ideas because they haven't had years and years

0:22:35.156 --> 0:22:38.316
<v Speaker 1>of experience in seeing the kind of waterfall of ideas

0:22:38.316 --> 0:22:41.316
<v Speaker 1>that's out there. Is that fair? No, it's fair. I've

0:22:41.356 --> 0:22:44.676
<v Speaker 1>always felt this way because I see it, you know,

0:22:44.716 --> 0:22:47.236
<v Speaker 1>I see all of the ideas I see I want

0:22:47.236 --> 0:22:49.596
<v Speaker 1>to learn everything. There's no time. There's no time to

0:22:49.676 --> 0:22:53.396
<v Speaker 1>learn all the things I want to learn. I'm endlessly curious,

0:22:53.756 --> 0:22:58.116
<v Speaker 1>and I'm always looking. I'm thinking back to It's really

0:22:58.156 --> 0:23:00.236
<v Speaker 1>more about what we were just talking about. But the

0:23:00.356 --> 0:23:04.076
<v Speaker 1>reason I learned about reggae music was because of the Clash.

0:23:04.116 --> 0:23:06.156
<v Speaker 1>If it weren't for the Clash, I don't know if

0:23:06.196 --> 0:23:08.636
<v Speaker 1>I would have ever come in contact with reggae music.

0:23:09.356 --> 0:23:12.316
<v Speaker 1>So is it bad that the Clash did reggae music

0:23:12.836 --> 0:23:16.836
<v Speaker 1>because they turned on a whole generation of people who

0:23:16.876 --> 0:23:21.036
<v Speaker 1>otherwise may not have ever heard about it. Do you know?

0:23:21.076 --> 0:23:25.156
<v Speaker 1>It's like, it's it's a crazy idea to think that,

0:23:26.556 --> 0:23:28.796
<v Speaker 1>not to be inspired by the things that are inspiring

0:23:28.916 --> 0:23:32.396
<v Speaker 1>us and to show it and to own it and

0:23:32.436 --> 0:23:36.956
<v Speaker 1>to fly the flag of these great trends or genres

0:23:37.836 --> 0:23:41.036
<v Speaker 1>is nothing more beautiful. Yeah, we're gonna pause for a

0:23:41.076 --> 0:23:43.116
<v Speaker 1>quick break and then we'll be back with more from

0:23:43.196 --> 0:23:47.916
<v Speaker 1>Rick Rubin and Malcolm Gladwell. We're back with more from

0:23:47.956 --> 0:23:52.436
<v Speaker 1>Rick Rubin and Malcolm Gladwell. I remember pretty early in

0:23:52.436 --> 0:23:55.756
<v Speaker 1>my writing career when I was unhappy. I thought I

0:23:55.316 --> 0:23:57.676
<v Speaker 1>was I was limited as a writer. And I remember

0:23:57.716 --> 0:24:00.516
<v Speaker 1>sitting down with I've forgotten which book it was, one

0:24:00.556 --> 0:24:04.436
<v Speaker 1>of Michael Lewis's books and one of Janet Malcolm's books,

0:24:04.556 --> 0:24:09.796
<v Speaker 1>two narrative nonfiction writers who are extra really good at

0:24:10.396 --> 0:24:12.396
<v Speaker 1>the one thing I thought I was weak at, which

0:24:12.436 --> 0:24:16.356
<v Speaker 1>is character, literally sitting down and studying them like they

0:24:16.356 --> 0:24:19.916
<v Speaker 1>were a talmud, Like, what's he doing here? How much

0:24:19.956 --> 0:24:22.596
<v Speaker 1>time does he spend literally measuring how much time does

0:24:22.636 --> 0:24:27.036
<v Speaker 1>he spend describing someone? I was getting itchy feet. I

0:24:27.036 --> 0:24:29.236
<v Speaker 1>would I didn't induce a character, and I think, oh,

0:24:29.236 --> 0:24:30.796
<v Speaker 1>you must be bored of the character list, And then

0:24:30.796 --> 0:24:33.556
<v Speaker 1>I would Michael Lewison was like, he is the same

0:24:33.636 --> 0:24:35.356
<v Speaker 1>character of the whole book and we're not bored of him.

0:24:35.396 --> 0:24:37.636
<v Speaker 1>How does he do that right? Or Jeta Malcolm would

0:24:37.636 --> 0:24:40.876
<v Speaker 1>like peel one layer after another off the onion. You'd

0:24:40.876 --> 0:24:42.956
<v Speaker 1>be like, there can't be any onion left. There was

0:24:42.996 --> 0:24:45.636
<v Speaker 1>always onion left. I was like, how does she do that?

0:24:46.596 --> 0:24:48.996
<v Speaker 1>To your point? About you got that lovely thing about

0:24:49.036 --> 0:24:52.316
<v Speaker 1>the back and forth between the Beatles and the Beach Boys,

0:24:52.916 --> 0:24:56.916
<v Speaker 1>Brian Wilson sees White album and says it white album

0:24:56.996 --> 0:25:00.436
<v Speaker 1>that inspired it starts with it starts with rubber Soul.

0:25:00.636 --> 0:25:03.716
<v Speaker 1>It starts with rubber Soul. Yeah, and then based on

0:25:03.956 --> 0:25:08.356
<v Speaker 1>Brian Wilson hearing Rubber Soul, he makes pet Sounds based

0:25:08.396 --> 0:25:13.196
<v Speaker 1>on the song Only Knows, Paul has the idea for

0:25:13.236 --> 0:25:16.916
<v Speaker 1>Sergeant Pepper. Yeah. And the point that I make there

0:25:17.076 --> 0:25:20.636
<v Speaker 1>is not they weren't doing that at a competition. It

0:25:20.716 --> 0:25:26.276
<v Speaker 1>was out of love and inspiration, and it was an

0:25:26.396 --> 0:25:32.476
<v Speaker 1>upward spiral between them of inspire reaction, inspirer reaction, lifting

0:25:32.516 --> 0:25:35.716
<v Speaker 1>the level, lifting the level. It was they made each

0:25:35.716 --> 0:25:38.996
<v Speaker 1>other better. They weren't trying to beat each other. It

0:25:39.076 --> 0:25:42.436
<v Speaker 1>was different than that they loved each other. Yeah, explain

0:25:42.516 --> 0:25:44.196
<v Speaker 1>to me. It's suit of obvious, but I'd love for

0:25:44.196 --> 0:25:46.956
<v Speaker 1>you to talk about it. Why is it important that

0:25:46.996 --> 0:25:49.316
<v Speaker 1>it comes out of love and not competition. What is

0:25:49.356 --> 0:25:53.796
<v Speaker 1>it about a competitive drive that is more limiting than

0:25:54.156 --> 0:25:56.876
<v Speaker 1>a drive of love. Well, first of all, we're talking

0:25:56.916 --> 0:26:00.076
<v Speaker 1>about majority of what we're talking about is art, and

0:26:00.556 --> 0:26:03.396
<v Speaker 1>the way that I see art is it really is

0:26:03.396 --> 0:26:07.676
<v Speaker 1>about our own self expression. So I'll give you an example.

0:26:07.836 --> 0:26:09.916
<v Speaker 1>I just wrote a book you write a lot of books.

0:26:10.596 --> 0:26:14.796
<v Speaker 1>The idea of Rick's book competing with Malcolm's book is

0:26:14.836 --> 0:26:19.476
<v Speaker 1>an insane idea. You write a Malcolm book, I write

0:26:19.476 --> 0:26:22.556
<v Speaker 1>a Rick book. No one but Malcolm can write a

0:26:22.556 --> 0:26:25.436
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm book. No one but Rick can write a Ric book.

0:26:26.036 --> 0:26:32.196
<v Speaker 1>They're mutually exclusive things. Everything is like that. So if

0:26:32.236 --> 0:26:35.676
<v Speaker 1>you're focused on beating someone else, it makes me think

0:26:36.156 --> 0:26:39.076
<v Speaker 1>you're not actually playing the same game that I'm playing.

0:26:39.116 --> 0:26:41.436
<v Speaker 1>The game that I'm playing is I want to make

0:26:41.476 --> 0:26:44.996
<v Speaker 1>the best thing that I can make for me, that's all,

0:26:45.956 --> 0:26:48.396
<v Speaker 1>and if someone else likes it, it's great. There's a

0:26:48.636 --> 0:26:51.476
<v Speaker 1>chapter in the book about success, which is success is

0:26:51.516 --> 0:26:54.156
<v Speaker 1>when you feel good enough about it, a piece of

0:26:54.196 --> 0:26:57.076
<v Speaker 1>work you've made to share it in the world. That's

0:26:57.116 --> 0:26:59.956
<v Speaker 1>the moment of success. Whatever happens after that's completely out

0:26:59.956 --> 0:27:02.516
<v Speaker 1>of our control. But the moment that you sign off,

0:27:02.516 --> 0:27:05.196
<v Speaker 1>it's like here, okay, here we go, and then move

0:27:05.236 --> 0:27:09.476
<v Speaker 1>on to your next project. That's where success lies. So

0:27:09.796 --> 0:27:14.316
<v Speaker 1>to work on a vibration of competition. It's one thing.

0:27:14.356 --> 0:27:17.476
<v Speaker 1>If it's about running a race, this is not running

0:27:17.476 --> 0:27:22.116
<v Speaker 1>a race. This really is always apples and oranges. Yeah,

0:27:22.156 --> 0:27:25.476
<v Speaker 1>although you know it's funny, I think you're selling your

0:27:25.476 --> 0:27:28.316
<v Speaker 1>idea a little short. I was thinking about this when

0:27:28.316 --> 0:27:30.996
<v Speaker 1>I read that part. I'm a big fan of cars,

0:27:31.756 --> 0:27:36.556
<v Speaker 1>and there's a very particular moment in the early aughts

0:27:37.316 --> 0:27:42.676
<v Speaker 1>when car design goes through a stage that I think

0:27:42.716 --> 0:27:45.156
<v Speaker 1>everyone in the who loves cars thinks was one of

0:27:45.836 --> 0:27:49.116
<v Speaker 1>a kind of extraordinary moment of It was a kind

0:27:49.116 --> 0:27:51.676
<v Speaker 1>of when cars started to look very kind of bowhousing.

0:27:51.716 --> 0:27:53.596
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, you know cars, but there was a

0:27:53.676 --> 0:27:56.076
<v Speaker 1>very beautiful E class that Mercedes put out in the

0:27:56.076 --> 0:28:00.236
<v Speaker 1>early arts, which is very clean lines, round headlights. At

0:28:00.236 --> 0:28:04.076
<v Speaker 1>the same time, Audie put out the first iteration of

0:28:04.076 --> 0:28:05.796
<v Speaker 1>the style they're still in, but it was very clean

0:28:05.876 --> 0:28:09.116
<v Speaker 1>and very They all were doing this a very similar esthetic,

0:28:09.156 --> 0:28:11.316
<v Speaker 1>which was a rejection of a lot of the kind

0:28:11.316 --> 0:28:14.156
<v Speaker 1>of clutter and complication that had gone on in the

0:28:14.356 --> 0:28:16.836
<v Speaker 1>in the previous generation of car design. And you could

0:28:16.876 --> 0:28:20.676
<v Speaker 1>see it across all the kind of elite carmakers. And

0:28:21.476 --> 0:28:23.196
<v Speaker 1>you know, normally you would say, these are guys who

0:28:23.196 --> 0:28:25.836
<v Speaker 1>really are in competition with each other. They're battling over

0:28:25.876 --> 0:28:29.036
<v Speaker 1>a finite marketplace. They're making the same thing cars of

0:28:29.076 --> 0:28:35.196
<v Speaker 1>people drive. But they weren't all pursuing this Ballhouse design strategy.

0:28:35.276 --> 0:28:38.316
<v Speaker 1>It was out of love. Absolutely. The guy at Audie

0:28:39.236 --> 0:28:41.996
<v Speaker 1>saw that E class and it's like, oh my god,

0:28:42.036 --> 0:28:44.516
<v Speaker 1>that's a gorgeous car. I want to do my version

0:28:44.516 --> 0:28:46.436
<v Speaker 1>of it. I mean it was no, it wasn't like

0:28:46.516 --> 0:28:50.356
<v Speaker 1>let's take market share from you know, at that level.

0:28:50.396 --> 0:28:52.276
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe it was in the marketing group, but

0:28:52.316 --> 0:28:56.036
<v Speaker 1>at the level of the designer, it was clearly they

0:28:56.116 --> 0:29:00.916
<v Speaker 1>all fell in love with this particular So I think

0:29:00.956 --> 0:29:04.676
<v Speaker 1>it goes beyond what we think of as the as

0:29:05.036 --> 0:29:07.236
<v Speaker 1>the art narrowly as the arts. I think you see

0:29:07.276 --> 0:29:11.396
<v Speaker 1>it everywhere that fun mentally in a million different ways.

0:29:11.636 --> 0:29:15.036
<v Speaker 1>Even people who are locked in competition with each other

0:29:15.916 --> 0:29:18.156
<v Speaker 1>sometimes push that aside and do things out of a

0:29:18.196 --> 0:29:20.956
<v Speaker 1>genuine affection for what they were just they're just blown

0:29:20.956 --> 0:29:22.476
<v Speaker 1>away by something they see, you know, they're like, oh

0:29:22.516 --> 0:29:27.196
<v Speaker 1>my god, here's an even more metaphysical version of that,

0:29:27.836 --> 0:29:32.636
<v Speaker 1>where the same thing happens, but it's not a reaction.

0:29:33.836 --> 0:29:37.276
<v Speaker 1>So in the example you gave, Mercedes came out with

0:29:37.316 --> 0:29:41.516
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful new design, an Autie inspired by that design

0:29:42.236 --> 0:29:49.036
<v Speaker 1>made something new. They're also throughout history examples of two

0:29:49.236 --> 0:29:57.956
<v Speaker 1>or three similar novel approaches entering at the same time. Yeah,

0:29:58.196 --> 0:30:02.036
<v Speaker 1>not based on seeing each other. Yeah, just based on

0:30:02.316 --> 0:30:07.036
<v Speaker 1>it's time for this. Yeah. And maybe it's possible that

0:30:07.076 --> 0:30:10.636
<v Speaker 1>the thing that inspired Mercedes to want to do it

0:30:10.716 --> 0:30:13.516
<v Speaker 1>is the thing that inspired Audie to want to do it.

0:30:13.556 --> 0:30:17.916
<v Speaker 1>But that's different than Audie wanting to copy what Mercedes did. Yeah.

0:30:18.636 --> 0:30:21.716
<v Speaker 1>And that's a fascinating thing when there are these movements

0:30:21.716 --> 0:30:24.796
<v Speaker 1>of art where it just springs up all over the

0:30:24.836 --> 0:30:26.996
<v Speaker 1>planet at the same time, not because they saw it

0:30:27.036 --> 0:30:29.436
<v Speaker 1>and want to do it, but because now is the

0:30:29.436 --> 0:30:32.516
<v Speaker 1>time for this new thing, whatever it is. Yeah, But

0:30:32.836 --> 0:30:36.116
<v Speaker 1>at its root, it's the same thing because they're falling

0:30:36.116 --> 0:30:39.756
<v Speaker 1>in love with the same idea in the world simultaneously.

0:30:40.236 --> 0:30:42.116
<v Speaker 1>You can o have fall in love with what Joe

0:30:42.156 --> 0:30:45.356
<v Speaker 1>across the pond is doing, or me and Joe can

0:30:45.396 --> 0:30:47.836
<v Speaker 1>fall in love with something you know in the world

0:30:47.876 --> 0:30:51.716
<v Speaker 1>of ideas that's really beautiful and novel. But I think

0:30:51.716 --> 0:30:54.916
<v Speaker 1>that the engine is the same, which is it's love. Yes,

0:30:55.796 --> 0:30:59.076
<v Speaker 1>it seems more magical when there isn't when you don't

0:30:59.076 --> 0:31:02.156
<v Speaker 1>see one like it first. Yeah, there's something about it.

0:31:02.236 --> 0:31:04.676
<v Speaker 1>When I don't know if it's ever happened to you,

0:31:04.916 --> 0:31:06.916
<v Speaker 1>it has happened to me. Where I'll have an idea

0:31:06.956 --> 0:31:09.876
<v Speaker 1>for something and I don't act on that right away,

0:31:10.276 --> 0:31:13.116
<v Speaker 1>and then within six months or a year someone else

0:31:13.156 --> 0:31:16.276
<v Speaker 1>does it. They didn't steal my idea. Yeah, it was

0:31:16.356 --> 0:31:19.076
<v Speaker 1>time for that to happen. Let's keep going to so

0:31:19.156 --> 0:31:20.996
<v Speaker 1>much wonderful stuff here I want to give I want

0:31:21.036 --> 0:31:24.116
<v Speaker 1>to give listeners more of a taste of several moments

0:31:24.156 --> 0:31:27.636
<v Speaker 1>when I was either surprised and in one case really

0:31:27.676 --> 0:31:33.516
<v Speaker 1>genuinely wanted more of a explanation. And that was when

0:31:33.556 --> 0:31:36.916
<v Speaker 1>the work has five mistakes, it's not yet completed. When

0:31:36.916 --> 0:31:39.796
<v Speaker 1>it has eight mistakes, it might be Yes, Rick, what

0:31:39.836 --> 0:31:42.916
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? We get hung up on the idea

0:31:42.916 --> 0:31:47.676
<v Speaker 1>of perfection and we think perfection is what we're looking for,

0:31:47.876 --> 0:31:52.876
<v Speaker 1>when really what we're looking for is something with emotion

0:31:52.916 --> 0:31:56.556
<v Speaker 1>in it, something with humanity in it, and humanity has flaws.

0:31:57.756 --> 0:32:02.476
<v Speaker 1>So we can use the example of the leaning power

0:32:02.476 --> 0:32:04.156
<v Speaker 1>of pizza. At the time that it was made, it

0:32:04.196 --> 0:32:06.836
<v Speaker 1>was a mistake, and now it's one of the most

0:32:06.916 --> 0:32:10.756
<v Speaker 1>visited buildings in the world, and it's visited purely because

0:32:10.756 --> 0:32:15.796
<v Speaker 1>of the mistake. You know. We collect old Persian rugs

0:32:15.836 --> 0:32:18.956
<v Speaker 1>that were handmade and that have been lived in whereas

0:32:18.996 --> 0:32:22.036
<v Speaker 1>you can buy a new machine made rug now that's

0:32:22.716 --> 0:32:25.716
<v Speaker 1>more perfect than that, but it doesn't have the same

0:32:26.276 --> 0:32:30.156
<v Speaker 1>humanity in it. And the reason I use the example

0:32:30.156 --> 0:32:33.796
<v Speaker 1>of five and eight art their random choices, those are

0:32:33.836 --> 0:32:38.436
<v Speaker 1>not specific, does not if you have five, you got

0:32:38.436 --> 0:32:40.756
<v Speaker 1>to get to eight for it to work. But it's

0:32:40.756 --> 0:32:43.556
<v Speaker 1>a way of thinking where we're not looking to make

0:32:43.596 --> 0:32:49.236
<v Speaker 1>it perfect. We're looking for the soulful version that could

0:32:49.236 --> 0:32:53.876
<v Speaker 1>either be going further towards perfection or backwards away from it.

0:32:54.436 --> 0:32:56.796
<v Speaker 1>And it might just as well be backwards away from

0:32:56.836 --> 0:32:58.876
<v Speaker 1>it for it to feel good when we're making art.

0:32:59.156 --> 0:33:02.596
<v Speaker 1>Can you think about a project you've worked on that

0:33:02.756 --> 0:33:07.276
<v Speaker 1>you think is beautiful and authentic in precisely this imperfect

0:33:07.316 --> 0:33:11.596
<v Speaker 1>way that has mistakes? Do you think it benefited from

0:33:11.636 --> 0:33:14.756
<v Speaker 1>I can give you an example close to both of

0:33:14.756 --> 0:33:18.716
<v Speaker 1>our hearts, which is interesting. When we had the Broken

0:33:18.836 --> 0:33:24.636
<v Speaker 1>Record logo design, it was originally done, it was designed

0:33:24.636 --> 0:33:27.996
<v Speaker 1>on a computer, and it was of a very formal design,

0:33:28.076 --> 0:33:32.236
<v Speaker 1>graphic design, and a friend of mine suggested you would

0:33:32.276 --> 0:33:34.996
<v Speaker 1>have tried to doing that by hand? Yeah, And then

0:33:35.396 --> 0:33:37.516
<v Speaker 1>we suggested to the design and try it by hand,

0:33:37.636 --> 0:33:39.196
<v Speaker 1>and the one that we ended up picking was the

0:33:39.236 --> 0:33:43.276
<v Speaker 1>one done by hand. It was less perfect than the

0:33:43.276 --> 0:33:48.116
<v Speaker 1>original version, but it had more personality. Yeah, it's very

0:33:48.116 --> 0:33:51.036
<v Speaker 1>clarifying because I think it's very easy to lose sight

0:33:51.076 --> 0:33:55.276
<v Speaker 1>of what the audience for a work of art wants.

0:33:56.036 --> 0:33:58.436
<v Speaker 1>They want the creator, they want to it's a way

0:33:58.476 --> 0:34:01.556
<v Speaker 1>of looking into the mind or heart of the creator.

0:34:02.236 --> 0:34:05.396
<v Speaker 1>They want. Don't want some abstract thing that fits every

0:34:05.476 --> 0:34:09.476
<v Speaker 1>criteria of perfection, right, we're looking for, you know. To

0:34:09.516 --> 0:34:13.036
<v Speaker 1>give the example back of when I went through my

0:34:13.036 --> 0:34:16.436
<v Speaker 1>period where I was obsessively reading Michael Lewis and Janet Malcolm,

0:34:17.116 --> 0:34:19.716
<v Speaker 1>Jenna Malcolm's a good example of this or both. When

0:34:19.756 --> 0:34:23.636
<v Speaker 1>you read them, you feel like you you know the

0:34:23.716 --> 0:34:25.716
<v Speaker 1>two of those writers. When you read their writing. At

0:34:25.756 --> 0:34:28.156
<v Speaker 1>the end of a Michael Lewis book, you feel like

0:34:28.196 --> 0:34:30.796
<v Speaker 1>you've been hanging out with him and have a window

0:34:30.796 --> 0:34:34.636
<v Speaker 1>into his world. Jenna Malcolm's books are weird and quirky

0:34:34.676 --> 0:34:38.436
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes disturbing, but you love that because you're like, oh,

0:34:38.556 --> 0:34:41.756
<v Speaker 1>she's such a kind of fascinating character. And my worry

0:34:41.956 --> 0:34:46.156
<v Speaker 1>when I was reading them was that people weren't having that.

0:34:46.156 --> 0:34:48.916
<v Speaker 1>That was not the experience my readers were having. That

0:34:48.996 --> 0:34:52.316
<v Speaker 1>they were getting they were getting something that was too abstract.

0:34:52.876 --> 0:34:56.836
<v Speaker 1>They were getting information, but not that kind of They

0:34:56.836 --> 0:35:00.156
<v Speaker 1>weren't really getting me. You know, it took a long time.

0:35:00.276 --> 0:35:03.596
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about. That thing I'm describing was twenty years

0:35:03.596 --> 0:35:07.356
<v Speaker 1>into my writing career, and what you're talking about is

0:35:07.876 --> 0:35:13.836
<v Speaker 1>really mo moving away from classical journalism, because my understanding

0:35:13.876 --> 0:35:17.796
<v Speaker 1>of journalism is the writer is invisible. It's only the

0:35:17.916 --> 0:35:20.676
<v Speaker 1>story and it's just, you know, just the facts. That's

0:35:20.676 --> 0:35:24.596
<v Speaker 1>all it is. So in a way, this would be

0:35:24.756 --> 0:35:30.116
<v Speaker 1>a bastardization of journalism. But that's why it's engaging, and

0:35:30.196 --> 0:35:33.036
<v Speaker 1>that's why it's interesting, and that's why it's popular. It's

0:35:33.116 --> 0:35:38.356
<v Speaker 1>not regular journalism. It's it's journalism through your filter, the

0:35:38.516 --> 0:35:42.676
<v Speaker 1>personal filter. There's a there's a documentarian named Nick Broomfield

0:35:42.716 --> 0:35:46.796
<v Speaker 1>who I love, who makes these crazy movies. He tends

0:35:46.836 --> 0:35:51.196
<v Speaker 1>to pick outrageous characters to focus on, but he always

0:35:51.276 --> 0:35:56.196
<v Speaker 1>ends up part of the movie. And usually when documentarians

0:35:56.236 --> 0:35:58.756
<v Speaker 1>make a movie, you just see the subject, but he

0:35:58.996 --> 0:36:02.476
<v Speaker 1>ensconces himself into the finds a way to insinuate himself

0:36:02.516 --> 0:36:07.276
<v Speaker 1>into the story, and it's wild and bizarre, and it's

0:36:07.356 --> 0:36:09.756
<v Speaker 1>unusual for the director of a documentary to become a

0:36:09.756 --> 0:36:12.916
<v Speaker 1>main character in every one of the documentaries he makes

0:36:13.156 --> 0:36:17.876
<v Speaker 1>about different people. Fascinating. Yeah, so I love it. Yeah, Wait,

0:36:17.916 --> 0:36:19.716
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other things. I want to I want

0:36:19.716 --> 0:36:22.556
<v Speaker 1>to make sure we um. You had this little section

0:36:22.796 --> 0:36:27.716
<v Speaker 1>that I loved when you're talking about AlphaGo, the AI

0:36:27.956 --> 0:36:31.716
<v Speaker 1>software system that was designed to master the game of

0:36:31.716 --> 0:36:36.156
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese game of Go, and how there's this famous

0:36:36.156 --> 0:36:39.796
<v Speaker 1>showdown between the computer and a Go grand master, and

0:36:39.876 --> 0:36:43.436
<v Speaker 1>the computer wins by making a move that had never

0:36:43.476 --> 0:36:46.036
<v Speaker 1>occurred to any Go player. You know, they had you say,

0:36:46.036 --> 0:36:48.636
<v Speaker 1>you say there was most Go players would have considered

0:36:48.676 --> 0:36:51.316
<v Speaker 1>A or B choice, and the computer went to see

0:36:51.436 --> 0:36:54.836
<v Speaker 1>and it blew ever Yuin's mind. And you said when

0:36:54.876 --> 0:36:58.316
<v Speaker 1>you read about that that you cried. I did, and

0:36:58.356 --> 0:37:00.596
<v Speaker 1>it was it wasn't I didn't read about it. I

0:37:00.596 --> 0:37:03.196
<v Speaker 1>watched the documentary. You watched the documentary. Yeah, I was

0:37:03.236 --> 0:37:06.076
<v Speaker 1>watching a documentary about it and it made me cry.

0:37:06.156 --> 0:37:10.596
<v Speaker 1>And when I cried, I didn't unders stand it at first.

0:37:11.316 --> 0:37:15.196
<v Speaker 1>It took a while I thought about it more. My

0:37:15.276 --> 0:37:18.476
<v Speaker 1>reaction forced me to think about it more. It's like,

0:37:18.556 --> 0:37:21.356
<v Speaker 1>why am I crying? I'm not invested. I don't play go,

0:37:21.996 --> 0:37:26.116
<v Speaker 1>I'm not invested in this story at all. Yet I'm crying.

0:37:27.196 --> 0:37:32.636
<v Speaker 1>And originally my first thought was, am I crying because

0:37:32.716 --> 0:37:36.956
<v Speaker 1>machines are beating humans? No, that's not what it is.

0:37:37.956 --> 0:37:43.756
<v Speaker 1>I'm crying because the way that the computer one wasn't

0:37:43.876 --> 0:37:48.476
<v Speaker 1>by knowing more than the grand Master. The computer one

0:37:48.956 --> 0:37:52.116
<v Speaker 1>because it knew less than the grand Master. And that's

0:37:52.116 --> 0:37:55.996
<v Speaker 1>what made me cry. It's that the computer didn't have

0:37:56.156 --> 0:38:02.596
<v Speaker 1>all of the baggage and cultural dogma of how you're

0:38:02.636 --> 0:38:06.476
<v Speaker 1>supposed to play Go. It only knew these are the

0:38:06.556 --> 0:38:08.276
<v Speaker 1>rules of the game. I'm playing the rules of the game.

0:38:09.156 --> 0:38:11.596
<v Speaker 1>And it was fascinating to me because it made me

0:38:11.796 --> 0:38:17.156
<v Speaker 1>realize if we can let go of the beliefs of

0:38:17.156 --> 0:38:22.036
<v Speaker 1>what how we're supposed to do things, anything maybe possible.

0:38:23.116 --> 0:38:24.916
<v Speaker 1>It's the tip of the iceberg for the game Go,

0:38:25.116 --> 0:38:29.236
<v Speaker 1>for sure, but maybe it's the tip of the iceberg

0:38:29.316 --> 0:38:32.356
<v Speaker 1>for everything. And if we can get back to that

0:38:32.956 --> 0:38:37.876
<v Speaker 1>beginner's mind of not knowing, of accepting that we don't know,

0:38:38.596 --> 0:38:42.556
<v Speaker 1>we can break through in ways never understood before. Yeah,

0:38:42.836 --> 0:38:46.756
<v Speaker 1>never thought possible before. It's funny because I didn't see

0:38:46.756 --> 0:38:50.316
<v Speaker 1>this documentary and when I read about your description of

0:38:50.676 --> 0:38:53.796
<v Speaker 1>how much you were moved by that moment. I was

0:38:53.836 --> 0:38:57.676
<v Speaker 1>also moved, but not for the reasons you were. I

0:38:57.716 --> 0:39:01.956
<v Speaker 1>was moved because what that told me was that when

0:39:02.036 --> 0:39:06.956
<v Speaker 1>human beings play Go, they're not playing Go. In other words,

0:39:07.476 --> 0:39:11.756
<v Speaker 1>the computer saw Go in it's entirety in a technical sense,

0:39:12.636 --> 0:39:15.436
<v Speaker 1>so every conceivable movie you could make made one that

0:39:15.476 --> 0:39:18.276
<v Speaker 1>would never have occurred to us. When human beings play Go,

0:39:18.356 --> 0:39:24.676
<v Speaker 1>we're playing this very small, parochial version, governed not just

0:39:24.716 --> 0:39:29.956
<v Speaker 1>by the rules and potentials of the board, but by

0:39:29.996 --> 0:39:36.436
<v Speaker 1>our own assumptions, habits, practices, culturals. And I actually kind

0:39:36.436 --> 0:39:39.716
<v Speaker 1>of love that about us, In other words, that we've

0:39:39.836 --> 0:39:44.676
<v Speaker 1>colonized and humanized and brought all of our kind of

0:39:44.916 --> 0:39:51.876
<v Speaker 1>heartrending limitations even to something like a board game. That's

0:39:51.956 --> 0:39:55.556
<v Speaker 1>very moving to me. Like the computer has the chili

0:39:55.636 --> 0:39:58.916
<v Speaker 1>impersonal version of Go, and this reminds us we're not

0:39:59.036 --> 0:40:03.116
<v Speaker 1>playing the chili impersonal version. Our Go bears the imprint

0:40:03.196 --> 0:40:07.996
<v Speaker 1>of our own limitations and cultural specificities. And I find

0:40:08.036 --> 0:40:13.036
<v Speaker 1>that really endearing, you know, like great, but it's funny

0:40:13.356 --> 0:40:16.556
<v Speaker 1>we both see the same thing and are moved by it.

0:40:16.636 --> 0:40:18.756
<v Speaker 1>I don't think what I'm saying what you're saying are incompatible.

0:40:18.756 --> 0:40:21.996
<v Speaker 1>I think they're actually compatible. No, I think they're almost opposites.

0:40:22.236 --> 0:40:25.756
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that they are both something to fall

0:40:25.796 --> 0:40:29.276
<v Speaker 1>in love with about the story is amazing. I love that. Yeah,

0:40:29.316 --> 0:40:32.676
<v Speaker 1>but this is actually something that you, Well, what I've

0:40:32.716 --> 0:40:35.076
<v Speaker 1>just described is something you do a lot in this book,

0:40:35.076 --> 0:40:38.956
<v Speaker 1>which is there are a lot of moments where it

0:40:39.036 --> 0:40:42.996
<v Speaker 1>appears that you're making points that contradict each other, but

0:40:43.076 --> 0:40:46.516
<v Speaker 1>you're not. This is the furthest from Black and White.

0:40:46.836 --> 0:40:48.356
<v Speaker 1>This book. There is a lot of this kind of

0:40:48.436 --> 0:40:51.436
<v Speaker 1>yinging and yanging in it. I thought was really very

0:40:51.556 --> 0:40:56.276
<v Speaker 1>very you. It's very like it's not like you do

0:40:56.316 --> 0:40:59.276
<v Speaker 1>it this way, not this way. Like the necessity of

0:40:59.316 --> 0:41:04.796
<v Speaker 1>being both inwardly sensitive and outwardly sensitive. It's not one

0:41:04.876 --> 0:41:06.996
<v Speaker 1>or the other. It's like just it's there's a balance

0:41:06.996 --> 0:41:09.636
<v Speaker 1>that you have to kind of observe. We'll be right

0:41:09.636 --> 0:41:12.596
<v Speaker 1>back with the rest of Malcolm Gladwell and Rick Rubin's conversation.

0:41:13.196 --> 0:41:17.516
<v Speaker 1>After a quick break, we're back with more from Rick

0:41:17.596 --> 0:41:21.716
<v Speaker 1>Ruben and Malcolm Gladwell. There's a passage there that I

0:41:21.756 --> 0:41:24.596
<v Speaker 1>really love what you're talking about. Sometimes there is a

0:41:24.676 --> 0:41:28.756
<v Speaker 1>musician who you'll listen to when they're trying something radically new,

0:41:29.716 --> 0:41:32.596
<v Speaker 1>remember this, and you're baffled by it the first time

0:41:32.636 --> 0:41:34.476
<v Speaker 1>you listen, and baffled the second time, and you keep

0:41:34.516 --> 0:41:37.796
<v Speaker 1>listening and keep listening, and then finally become something you

0:41:37.796 --> 0:41:40.916
<v Speaker 1>can't live without. And I was wondering, was there someone

0:41:40.956 --> 0:41:45.636
<v Speaker 1>in mind when you several the first My first experience

0:41:45.636 --> 0:41:48.196
<v Speaker 1>of that was a group called Trouble Funk. In the

0:41:48.236 --> 0:41:51.636
<v Speaker 1>early days of hip hop, when I was in high school,

0:41:52.036 --> 0:41:54.756
<v Speaker 1>the only place you could hear hip hop was once

0:41:54.836 --> 0:42:00.316
<v Speaker 1>a week, one hour show on WHBI called Mister Magic's

0:42:00.356 --> 0:42:03.356
<v Speaker 1>Rap Attack, and that was the only and I recorded it.

0:42:03.396 --> 0:42:06.076
<v Speaker 1>I cassette recorded it every week, as did all the

0:42:06.076 --> 0:42:09.356
<v Speaker 1>other hip hop heads in my high school, and you know,

0:42:09.436 --> 0:42:12.836
<v Speaker 1>maybe the six of us, and we would record that

0:42:12.916 --> 0:42:14.756
<v Speaker 1>every week and then that would be all we would

0:42:14.796 --> 0:42:16.796
<v Speaker 1>listen to all week because there were at this point

0:42:16.796 --> 0:42:20.396
<v Speaker 1>in time, there really were no hip hop records available

0:42:20.556 --> 0:42:22.876
<v Speaker 1>to buy. There may have been the sugar Hill Gangs

0:42:23.516 --> 0:42:27.316
<v Speaker 1>Rappers Delight, but that was the only one. Yet on

0:42:27.356 --> 0:42:29.516
<v Speaker 1>this radio show he played all these songs. It's like,

0:42:29.556 --> 0:42:30.996
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know where they came from, and they

0:42:30.996 --> 0:42:34.516
<v Speaker 1>were all like twelve inch you know, DJ Living where

0:42:34.516 --> 0:42:37.476
<v Speaker 1>I lived, it didn't exist. So I'd listen to that

0:42:37.556 --> 0:42:40.396
<v Speaker 1>every week and hear whatever was going on in rap music.

0:42:40.396 --> 0:42:44.476
<v Speaker 1>And again it was a very tight time because all

0:42:44.516 --> 0:42:46.956
<v Speaker 1>there was was an hour and with you know, plus

0:42:46.956 --> 0:42:50.596
<v Speaker 1>it had commercials in it for places like Brad's Record

0:42:50.676 --> 0:42:52.476
<v Speaker 1>den in the Bronx, which is I guess where you

0:42:52.476 --> 0:42:54.716
<v Speaker 1>could have bought some of those other songs that I

0:42:55.236 --> 0:42:59.636
<v Speaker 1>had never gone at that time I've gone since. And

0:43:00.436 --> 0:43:03.516
<v Speaker 1>one week, in the middle of these all rap songs,

0:43:04.156 --> 0:43:06.756
<v Speaker 1>he played a trouble funk song, which is not rap music.

0:43:06.836 --> 0:43:10.116
<v Speaker 1>It's go go music, and it's long, and the song

0:43:10.196 --> 0:43:14.476
<v Speaker 1>was maybe seven or nine minutes long, So a seven

0:43:14.596 --> 0:43:18.796
<v Speaker 1>or nine non rap song took up seven to nine

0:43:18.836 --> 0:43:24.276
<v Speaker 1>minutes of my sixty minutes. Plus commercials removed my little

0:43:24.276 --> 0:43:26.796
<v Speaker 1>bit of rap music for the week, and I was

0:43:26.956 --> 0:43:30.876
<v Speaker 1>so angry, and I would every time I would listen

0:43:30.916 --> 0:43:32.636
<v Speaker 1>to the cassette, I would forward through the trouble Funk

0:43:32.676 --> 0:43:35.316
<v Speaker 1>song to get to the rap music. And I did this,

0:43:35.356 --> 0:43:37.876
<v Speaker 1>and then one time I listened to the trouble Funk song.

0:43:38.796 --> 0:43:43.396
<v Speaker 1>And then it took time, but eventually, within a couple

0:43:43.436 --> 0:43:45.636
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, the only thing I was listening to on

0:43:45.676 --> 0:43:48.956
<v Speaker 1>that tape was the Trouble Funk song. Yeah. So that's

0:43:49.516 --> 0:43:52.116
<v Speaker 1>one example, but I'm sure there are many more. When

0:43:52.156 --> 0:43:53.836
<v Speaker 1>the first first I remember the first time I heard

0:43:53.916 --> 0:43:58.316
<v Speaker 1>Nine Inch Nails. I didn't like any of the industrial

0:43:58.396 --> 0:44:00.676
<v Speaker 1>music I had heard up until the point of nine

0:44:00.676 --> 0:44:03.796
<v Speaker 1>Inch Nails, And when I heard Nine inch Nails, my

0:44:03.916 --> 0:44:07.316
<v Speaker 1>initial reaction to it was, this is that kind of

0:44:07.396 --> 0:44:10.036
<v Speaker 1>music I don't like. I don't like production, I don't

0:44:10.116 --> 0:44:14.796
<v Speaker 1>like those sounds. And then eventually took probably a year,

0:44:16.596 --> 0:44:19.916
<v Speaker 1>nine inch Nails became my favorite group. But the things

0:44:19.956 --> 0:44:23.076
<v Speaker 1>that I didn't like about it weren't the things that

0:44:23.116 --> 0:44:25.196
<v Speaker 1>were good about it in the case of nine Inch Nails.

0:44:25.556 --> 0:44:31.556
<v Speaker 1>In nine Nail's case, Trent's songwriting was so far superior

0:44:31.676 --> 0:44:35.316
<v Speaker 1>to anyone else making that kind of music that once

0:44:35.356 --> 0:44:38.996
<v Speaker 1>I could hear his songs, it didn't matter whether or

0:44:39.036 --> 0:44:41.876
<v Speaker 1>not I like the style. Yeah, And then when I

0:44:41.916 --> 0:44:45.396
<v Speaker 1>liked the songs, eventually I grew to even like the

0:44:45.476 --> 0:44:49.076
<v Speaker 1>style because his songs made me like the style. Oh.

0:44:49.156 --> 0:44:53.276
<v Speaker 1>I see. It's this interesting thing about for different kinds

0:44:53.276 --> 0:44:57.036
<v Speaker 1>of experience and creative experiences, there are different thresholds. The

0:44:57.116 --> 0:45:00.076
<v Speaker 1>familiar has a very low threshold. The unfamiliar has a

0:45:00.196 --> 0:45:03.796
<v Speaker 1>much longer threshold. But what's interesting with that story, and

0:45:03.796 --> 0:45:06.316
<v Speaker 1>it's very particular to you, is that you had the

0:45:06.396 --> 0:45:10.436
<v Speaker 1>patience to wait long enough so you could reach the

0:45:10.476 --> 0:45:13.876
<v Speaker 1>threshold of understanding what was what trouble Funk was doing

0:45:13.956 --> 0:45:17.516
<v Speaker 1>or what Trent Resident was doing. That's unusual. So a

0:45:17.556 --> 0:45:20.036
<v Speaker 1>lot of what you're talking about in this book really

0:45:20.076 --> 0:45:22.996
<v Speaker 1>does seem to be things that can be taught and

0:45:23.756 --> 0:45:27.236
<v Speaker 1>understood and shift your This what you're describing now is

0:45:27.236 --> 0:45:30.916
<v Speaker 1>something very not impossible to teach, but very hard to teach.

0:45:31.756 --> 0:45:36.076
<v Speaker 1>To persist with something you didn't like, the trouble Funk,

0:45:36.676 --> 0:45:39.676
<v Speaker 1>and yet somehow you kept coming back. In one way,

0:45:39.796 --> 0:45:42.716
<v Speaker 1>you didn't dismiss it. You disliked it without dismissing it.

0:45:42.756 --> 0:45:46.476
<v Speaker 1>That's I guess what I'm trying to say that people

0:45:46.516 --> 0:45:50.716
<v Speaker 1>when they disliked they dismiss but you didn't. I want

0:45:50.756 --> 0:45:54.996
<v Speaker 1>to understand why didn't you. I may have back then,

0:45:55.036 --> 0:45:58.196
<v Speaker 1>I may have dismissed it, but for whatever reason, because

0:45:58.236 --> 0:46:00.276
<v Speaker 1>it was on a cassette, and because I had to

0:46:00.356 --> 0:46:02.316
<v Speaker 1>keep coming back and forward when it would come on

0:46:02.596 --> 0:46:05.156
<v Speaker 1>and I might be doing something else in my room,

0:46:05.236 --> 0:46:07.316
<v Speaker 1>it was able to get through to me. And this

0:46:07.476 --> 0:46:10.436
<v Speaker 1>again we get to the metaphysical aspect of it. The

0:46:10.596 --> 0:46:13.036
<v Speaker 1>universe wanted me to hear trouble funk. That's why I

0:46:13.076 --> 0:46:16.156
<v Speaker 1>was able to hear it. If it wouldn't have presented

0:46:16.196 --> 0:46:20.916
<v Speaker 1>itself over and over to me, I wouldn't have So yes,

0:46:22.076 --> 0:46:27.676
<v Speaker 1>I allowed it in, but it wasn't all me. I'll

0:46:27.716 --> 0:46:31.396
<v Speaker 1>give you another example. It's not uncommon when I'm out

0:46:31.396 --> 0:46:33.836
<v Speaker 1>and about to have someone recommend something that they think

0:46:33.836 --> 0:46:36.116
<v Speaker 1>I'll like, and when they recommend it to me, I

0:46:36.156 --> 0:46:38.396
<v Speaker 1>listen and it sounds like a terrible something that I

0:46:38.436 --> 0:46:40.676
<v Speaker 1>don't like, the kind of thing I don't like. Whatever

0:46:40.676 --> 0:46:43.956
<v Speaker 1>it is. An example would be it's not a real example,

0:46:43.956 --> 0:46:47.196
<v Speaker 1>I'm hypothetical. Example is, Oh, you love this new horror movie.

0:46:47.316 --> 0:46:49.196
<v Speaker 1>I don't like horror movies. There's no chance I'm going

0:46:49.276 --> 0:46:53.276
<v Speaker 1>to watch a horror movie. That wouldn't work. If three

0:46:53.516 --> 0:46:57.676
<v Speaker 1>different people who don't know each other all suggest to

0:46:57.756 --> 0:47:01.436
<v Speaker 1>me to watch that horror movie, I will watch that

0:47:01.516 --> 0:47:04.476
<v Speaker 1>horror movie, even though I know it's something I don't like.

0:47:04.796 --> 0:47:08.236
<v Speaker 1>And the reason is the universe really wants me to

0:47:08.236 --> 0:47:10.796
<v Speaker 1>be aware of this. People are telling me. Why are

0:47:10.796 --> 0:47:14.716
<v Speaker 1>people telling me this is not for me. So that's

0:47:14.716 --> 0:47:17.916
<v Speaker 1>an example of again paying attention to the signs around you.

0:47:18.356 --> 0:47:21.996
<v Speaker 1>If several of your friends tell you the same thing

0:47:22.356 --> 0:47:26.316
<v Speaker 1>that you initially discounted, it might be worth a look.

0:47:26.636 --> 0:47:29.316
<v Speaker 1>This is funny because this goes into one of my

0:47:30.036 --> 0:47:32.636
<v Speaker 1>similar to one of my little I have a rule.

0:47:32.676 --> 0:47:35.276
<v Speaker 1>I have these implicit rules I carry around in my head,

0:47:35.556 --> 0:47:40.476
<v Speaker 1>and one of my rules is never say somethings that

0:47:40.556 --> 0:47:44.796
<v Speaker 1>you consume or see or whatever is bad. Only say

0:47:45.596 --> 0:47:50.436
<v Speaker 1>I think it's bad right now. Yes? Great? And if,

0:47:50.636 --> 0:47:55.796
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the whole world, social media particularly would

0:47:55.796 --> 0:47:59.956
<v Speaker 1>be so greatly improved by that rule, right I don't

0:47:59.996 --> 0:48:04.156
<v Speaker 1>like what you I don't like what you said right now. Yes,

0:48:04.956 --> 0:48:07.796
<v Speaker 1>it's very different from saying what you said is wrong

0:48:08.276 --> 0:48:12.676
<v Speaker 1>right about polar opposite, And but adopting that with art.

0:48:13.036 --> 0:48:16.716
<v Speaker 1>I wonder about how many I'm talking about some of

0:48:16.756 --> 0:48:21.236
<v Speaker 1>the critical community, how much criticism, how much it would

0:48:21.276 --> 0:48:25.156
<v Speaker 1>change our understanding of art if critics universally followed that rule,

0:48:25.516 --> 0:48:28.156
<v Speaker 1>and it was if they always acknowledged that they may

0:48:28.196 --> 0:48:30.476
<v Speaker 1>be in a situation that you were in with trouble funk,

0:48:31.196 --> 0:48:34.956
<v Speaker 1>that the universe wasn't there yet you weren't there yet.

0:48:35.476 --> 0:48:38.556
<v Speaker 1>And also that story about trouble Funk is that you

0:48:38.636 --> 0:48:41.876
<v Speaker 1>weren't looking for trouble Funk, you were looking for hip hop.

0:48:42.316 --> 0:48:45.156
<v Speaker 1>So like it was an intrusion in the beginning. It

0:48:45.236 --> 0:48:49.316
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a treasure. It was something that didn't belong, and

0:48:49.396 --> 0:48:51.316
<v Speaker 1>it was something that didn't belong and was taking up

0:48:51.436 --> 0:48:56.716
<v Speaker 1>valuable time, valuable cassette techste space. Yes, because it was

0:48:56.756 --> 0:48:59.596
<v Speaker 1>only sixty minutes. Did you have the nineties back then

0:48:59.636 --> 0:49:01.956
<v Speaker 1>or just the sixties? We had sixties and nineties and

0:49:01.996 --> 0:49:05.556
<v Speaker 1>eventually one twenties. I remember that when twenties were huge.

0:49:06.036 --> 0:49:11.396
<v Speaker 1>But that idea of building into critical assessments, some notion

0:49:11.476 --> 0:49:16.716
<v Speaker 1>about probability, that my judgment is conditioned on two things.

0:49:17.196 --> 0:49:19.676
<v Speaker 1>It do seem credit to me, and it is at

0:49:19.716 --> 0:49:22.396
<v Speaker 1>this moment, and both of those things may not be

0:49:22.436 --> 0:49:25.676
<v Speaker 1>true in some future date. I just that is so

0:49:25.796 --> 0:49:29.956
<v Speaker 1>insanely liberating to me, Like, and I don't understand. Can

0:49:30.036 --> 0:49:33.596
<v Speaker 1>we pass this law It says you're only allowed you

0:49:33.716 --> 0:49:36.276
<v Speaker 1>must always use I think and right now in any

0:49:36.316 --> 0:49:41.156
<v Speaker 1>creative judgment. Yeah. It's also related to another thing mentioned

0:49:41.156 --> 0:49:43.756
<v Speaker 1>in the book, the idea of I can't do that. Yes,

0:49:44.476 --> 0:49:46.996
<v Speaker 1>We never say I can't do that. You can say

0:49:47.116 --> 0:49:50.476
<v Speaker 1>I haven't done that yet. Yes, yes, that is the

0:49:50.516 --> 0:49:53.676
<v Speaker 1>same that functions the same way. The reason I think

0:49:53.676 --> 0:49:55.916
<v Speaker 1>a book like this is so important is this is

0:49:56.036 --> 0:49:57.916
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a tangent. But I went to

0:49:58.436 --> 0:50:00.596
<v Speaker 1>give a talk at a university two weeks ago, and

0:50:00.676 --> 0:50:02.796
<v Speaker 1>I was to the psychology department, and I was talking

0:50:02.836 --> 0:50:06.236
<v Speaker 1>to these psychologists and they were talking about mental health,

0:50:06.836 --> 0:50:09.396
<v Speaker 1>and they were talking about a lot of really lovely

0:50:09.436 --> 0:50:12.756
<v Speaker 1>research right now about how the language that you use

0:50:12.876 --> 0:50:17.156
<v Speaker 1>to describe your feelings and emotions and traumas and things

0:50:17.676 --> 0:50:21.156
<v Speaker 1>is enormously important. You know, to describe something this way

0:50:21.316 --> 0:50:24.076
<v Speaker 1>or that way is not a difference in style. It

0:50:24.156 --> 0:50:27.716
<v Speaker 1>is actually a difference in the way that you are processing, understanding,

0:50:27.796 --> 0:50:30.956
<v Speaker 1>recovering all those kinds of things. And one of the

0:50:30.996 --> 0:50:34.116
<v Speaker 1>things this book did to me was, I think this

0:50:34.276 --> 0:50:37.516
<v Speaker 1>one way of understanding your book is it is in

0:50:37.556 --> 0:50:41.556
<v Speaker 1>that spirit the categories that we use and the language

0:50:41.556 --> 0:50:46.196
<v Speaker 1>that we bring to our understanding of creativity really really matters.

0:50:46.676 --> 0:50:48.836
<v Speaker 1>Like in that section I love this that I love

0:50:48.836 --> 0:50:50.596
<v Speaker 1>so much about when you're talking about all the ways

0:50:50.636 --> 0:50:54.556
<v Speaker 1>you can jog someone out of being stuck when you're stuck.

0:50:54.596 --> 0:50:57.156
<v Speaker 1>You don't think you don't think you can be jogged

0:50:57.196 --> 0:51:00.076
<v Speaker 1>out by some change in your setting or but in

0:51:00.156 --> 0:51:04.516
<v Speaker 1>truth you can. You remain acutely sensitive to the influences

0:51:04.516 --> 0:51:07.996
<v Speaker 1>of your environment. And it's so hard for us to

0:51:08.076 --> 0:51:12.036
<v Speaker 1>understand that the influence and impact of those kinds of

0:51:12.756 --> 0:51:17.196
<v Speaker 1>framing devices and settings in language are framing devices, right,

0:51:18.036 --> 0:51:24.956
<v Speaker 1>that is often what causes us to suffer unnecessarily. Absolutely.

0:51:24.996 --> 0:51:29.196
<v Speaker 1>There's a teacher named Marshall Rosenberg who wrote a book

0:51:29.196 --> 0:51:32.796
<v Speaker 1>which is not a great book, called Non Violent Communication,

0:51:33.476 --> 0:51:35.716
<v Speaker 1>and he's a great teacher, but he's not a great writer,

0:51:35.836 --> 0:51:39.716
<v Speaker 1>and he passed recently unfortunately. But I would suggest people

0:51:40.276 --> 0:51:43.516
<v Speaker 1>if they're interested in Marshall Rosenberg, there is an audio

0:51:43.996 --> 0:51:48.836
<v Speaker 1>called speaking Piece that is better than the book, and

0:51:48.876 --> 0:51:53.996
<v Speaker 1>then watch videos of him on YouTube, just because the book.

0:51:54.196 --> 0:51:57.756
<v Speaker 1>I found the book hard to understand, but it's basically

0:51:57.796 --> 0:52:01.236
<v Speaker 1>all about this. The language of our culture is violent,

0:52:01.876 --> 0:52:04.796
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just violent towards each other, it's violent

0:52:04.836 --> 0:52:09.276
<v Speaker 1>towards ourselves. Every time we say I should have done that,

0:52:09.596 --> 0:52:12.756
<v Speaker 1>When you say I should, it's called a make wrong.

0:52:13.196 --> 0:52:16.196
<v Speaker 1>So by saying I should have done it means I

0:52:16.316 --> 0:52:18.796
<v Speaker 1>was wrong. This is the right way to do it

0:52:18.996 --> 0:52:20.956
<v Speaker 1>when at the time you were doing the best you could.

0:52:21.116 --> 0:52:24.196
<v Speaker 1>So so when when at the time you're doing the

0:52:24.236 --> 0:52:28.716
<v Speaker 1>best you can, to make yourself wrong isn't helpful. Yeah,

0:52:28.756 --> 0:52:32.996
<v Speaker 1>And there's a whole list of trigger words and ways

0:52:33.156 --> 0:52:39.636
<v Speaker 1>of sharing a vocabulary of feeling that helps us better communicate.

0:52:39.756 --> 0:52:42.956
<v Speaker 1>And when we communicate better, we tend to get along better.

0:52:43.316 --> 0:52:48.036
<v Speaker 1>It's beautiful, beautiful teaching. Yeah. A couple other smaller things.

0:52:48.356 --> 0:52:50.356
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple of moments in this book where I

0:52:50.476 --> 0:52:54.356
<v Speaker 1>scribbled in the in the margins who is Rick talking about?

0:52:54.636 --> 0:52:57.516
<v Speaker 1>But there was one that I wanted you to if you,

0:52:57.676 --> 0:53:00.356
<v Speaker 1>if you, if you don't mind. You talked about how

0:53:00.876 --> 0:53:03.116
<v Speaker 1>you were working with an artist on a song which

0:53:03.156 --> 0:53:06.076
<v Speaker 1>was a love song, and you were trying to solve

0:53:06.076 --> 0:53:08.996
<v Speaker 1>the problem, and you finally solve the problem by telling

0:53:09.156 --> 0:53:12.596
<v Speaker 1>the artist, don't think of a romantic partner, think of

0:53:12.636 --> 0:53:15.436
<v Speaker 1>it as a devotional to God. Who is the song

0:53:15.476 --> 0:53:17.116
<v Speaker 1>and who was the artist? Can you tell me? That

0:53:17.156 --> 0:53:20.316
<v Speaker 1>was Johnny Cash And the song was the first time

0:53:20.356 --> 0:53:24.636
<v Speaker 1>ever I saw your face. Oh my goodness, Oh that's

0:53:24.636 --> 0:53:29.916
<v Speaker 1>so interesting. I know that version so well. That's totally

0:53:29.916 --> 0:53:33.876
<v Speaker 1>blowing my mind because that's what it listens, like, Yeah,

0:53:33.916 --> 0:53:36.276
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, it's genius. Rick, that is genius. And

0:53:36.636 --> 0:53:39.836
<v Speaker 1>it was also Oh and I interviewed Roger mcgwimney other

0:53:39.916 --> 0:53:44.556
<v Speaker 1>day and he talked about the first Bird single was

0:53:44.796 --> 0:53:49.116
<v Speaker 1>mister Camberine Man and out of the Blue. He said, Yeah,

0:53:49.116 --> 0:53:51.196
<v Speaker 1>when I sang it in the studio, no one knows this,

0:53:51.876 --> 0:53:55.916
<v Speaker 1>but I sang it as a devotional to God. I said,

0:53:55.916 --> 0:53:57.476
<v Speaker 1>but the lyrics aren't about that. I was like, yeah,

0:53:57.516 --> 0:54:00.676
<v Speaker 1>I know, but that's how I was able to sing

0:54:00.716 --> 0:54:04.276
<v Speaker 1>it and feel it, and it blew my mind. Oh,

0:54:04.316 --> 0:54:07.236
<v Speaker 1>that's really interesting. This is why I miss liner notes

0:54:07.276 --> 0:54:09.876
<v Speaker 1>so much. I feel like this is the function of

0:54:10.356 --> 0:54:13.836
<v Speaker 1>but rat those two facts about first time I saw

0:54:13.876 --> 0:54:17.756
<v Speaker 1>your face and mister Tamory Man, those both changed the

0:54:18.076 --> 0:54:22.236
<v Speaker 1>radically change the way you hear those songs. Yes, the

0:54:22.276 --> 0:54:26.636
<v Speaker 1>Cash song makes way more sense. I've always not understood

0:54:26.716 --> 0:54:29.836
<v Speaker 1>why I found that song so powerful. Yes, it really

0:54:30.476 --> 0:54:32.756
<v Speaker 1>in the context of all those ones, it's one of

0:54:32.796 --> 0:54:36.156
<v Speaker 1>the ones that it pops in this kind of strange

0:54:36.196 --> 0:54:39.076
<v Speaker 1>way and it's haunting in the way you don't And

0:54:39.116 --> 0:54:41.636
<v Speaker 1>now I understand why he's singing it. With a completely

0:54:41.676 --> 0:54:45.356
<v Speaker 1>different intention than I imagined. Yeah, it's and if you

0:54:45.396 --> 0:54:48.236
<v Speaker 1>listen to the original song, it's unbelievable. Or when I

0:54:48.276 --> 0:54:51.676
<v Speaker 1>say the original, the popular version, because the popular version

0:54:51.796 --> 0:54:54.196
<v Speaker 1>is not the original either. You know, it was written

0:54:54.436 --> 0:54:58.876
<v Speaker 1>by Ewan McCall and it's an Irish folk song. And

0:54:58.956 --> 0:55:01.076
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever heard the Irish folk song version of it,

0:55:01.076 --> 0:55:04.676
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like a yodel, you know, it's very unlike. Yeah,

0:55:05.676 --> 0:55:08.556
<v Speaker 1>all the all the versions that we're familiar with. I

0:55:08.596 --> 0:55:10.236
<v Speaker 1>realized when I read that as well, that I have

0:55:10.276 --> 0:55:13.036
<v Speaker 1>a version of that, which is years and years ago.

0:55:13.116 --> 0:55:15.996
<v Speaker 1>I sat down on an airplane next to a guy

0:55:15.996 --> 0:55:17.836
<v Speaker 1>who happened to be reading one of my books, and

0:55:17.876 --> 0:55:21.076
<v Speaker 1>I had this very very long conversation with him, and

0:55:21.636 --> 0:55:24.036
<v Speaker 1>he was I still remember what he did. He opened.

0:55:25.116 --> 0:55:27.796
<v Speaker 1>His job was to go around the country opening Trader Joe's.

0:55:28.516 --> 0:55:30.116
<v Speaker 1>He was coming from New York. They were opening a

0:55:30.156 --> 0:55:32.236
<v Speaker 1>store like in Brooklyn or something, and he'd just been

0:55:32.236 --> 0:55:36.556
<v Speaker 1>in Brooklyn for a month, lived in Atlanta, had two kids.

0:55:37.636 --> 0:55:41.156
<v Speaker 1>It was by thirty eight years old, business school degree,

0:55:41.196 --> 0:55:44.276
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe not. Anyway, I had a lovely chat

0:55:44.316 --> 0:55:47.116
<v Speaker 1>with him and I realized, oh, that's my reader, and

0:55:47.196 --> 0:55:50.516
<v Speaker 1>every time I'm stuck, I think about him. Beautiful. It's

0:55:50.556 --> 0:55:53.196
<v Speaker 1>for him. He was beautiful, and he said because he

0:55:53.236 --> 0:55:55.436
<v Speaker 1>only read. He told me, he said, I'm very very busy.

0:55:55.516 --> 0:55:58.316
<v Speaker 1>I teach Sunday school, I'm a coach in my kids

0:55:58.396 --> 0:56:00.356
<v Speaker 1>little league. Going to have this job which is very demanding.

0:56:00.396 --> 0:56:03.316
<v Speaker 1>I have time to read three books a year. And

0:56:03.396 --> 0:56:07.396
<v Speaker 1>I realized, oh, and he's chosen one of mine. I'm

0:56:07.436 --> 0:56:11.316
<v Speaker 1>one of his three, which is like phenomenally flattering thing.

0:56:11.916 --> 0:56:14.476
<v Speaker 1>And I realize, Oh, if I can keep being one

0:56:14.516 --> 0:56:17.876
<v Speaker 1>of his three books every year, then I I will succeed.

0:56:18.676 --> 0:56:21.356
<v Speaker 1>Beautiful and the beautiful about him all the time, He

0:56:21.436 --> 0:56:24.436
<v Speaker 1>was like, A yeah, really really, but it is it's

0:56:24.476 --> 0:56:29.676
<v Speaker 1>insanely liberating to know that's what it's for, right, Yes,

0:56:30.516 --> 0:56:36.276
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you randomly got a sign that seat

0:56:36.756 --> 0:56:41.276
<v Speaker 1>he happened to be reading your book on that particular flight. Yeah,

0:56:41.316 --> 0:56:44.756
<v Speaker 1>it could be it's all a coincidence. Yet it's what

0:56:44.796 --> 0:56:46.916
<v Speaker 1>you needed to hear to be able to keep doing

0:56:46.916 --> 0:56:49.356
<v Speaker 1>what you've been doing for all these years. Since then

0:56:50.196 --> 0:56:54.516
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's accidental, who knows. That's that's that's the points,

0:56:54.516 --> 0:56:59.716
<v Speaker 1>Like these things happen all the time. Yeah, maybe they're

0:56:59.716 --> 0:57:02.076
<v Speaker 1>all accidents. It's fine, It doesn't matter if they are

0:57:02.196 --> 0:57:05.996
<v Speaker 1>or not. But if they happen, and if you can

0:57:06.156 --> 0:57:11.236
<v Speaker 1>use that information like you do, we all win. Yeah,

0:57:11.316 --> 0:57:15.756
<v Speaker 1>all to the better or one last thing, the last

0:57:15.796 --> 0:57:18.996
<v Speaker 1>thing I underlined in your book, page three sixty five,

0:57:20.156 --> 0:57:23.596
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, wait, I didn't expect this. Rich

0:57:23.916 --> 0:57:26.876
<v Speaker 1>was hold on, let's let me just go there. And also,

0:57:26.956 --> 0:57:30.116
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why in retrospect I found it so surprising,

0:57:30.716 --> 0:57:33.356
<v Speaker 1>but you say, when I work with artists, we make

0:57:33.356 --> 0:57:36.676
<v Speaker 1>an agreement, we continue the process until reaching the point

0:57:36.756 --> 0:57:41.436
<v Speaker 1>where we are all happy with the work. All in

0:57:42.236 --> 0:57:46.276
<v Speaker 1>is talisized in that. And I was like, I realized,

0:57:46.396 --> 0:57:48.916
<v Speaker 1>and maybe this is because how badly I needed your book.

0:57:49.556 --> 0:57:52.716
<v Speaker 1>It never occurred to me that there would be art

0:57:52.756 --> 0:57:54.796
<v Speaker 1>on the level that you have been a part of

0:57:54.836 --> 0:57:59.796
<v Speaker 1>creating without dissent. I just I was just shocked. I

0:57:59.836 --> 0:58:03.636
<v Speaker 1>was like, wait, You've done all this for so many years,

0:58:03.636 --> 0:58:08.516
<v Speaker 1>with so many different people under an explicit promise of unanimity.

0:58:09.556 --> 0:58:13.956
<v Speaker 1>Blew my mind. They'll be descent along the way, But

0:58:14.116 --> 0:58:16.636
<v Speaker 1>that just means we haven't gone far enough. It just

0:58:16.756 --> 0:58:20.076
<v Speaker 1>means if you like it, and I don't it's not

0:58:20.116 --> 0:58:22.276
<v Speaker 1>good enough. And if I like it and you don't,

0:58:22.476 --> 0:58:25.836
<v Speaker 1>it's not good enough. And if we can get to

0:58:25.876 --> 0:58:28.636
<v Speaker 1>the point where we both love it, it's probably better

0:58:28.796 --> 0:58:30.756
<v Speaker 1>than the one that one of us loved and the

0:58:30.796 --> 0:58:33.996
<v Speaker 1>other didn't. And if there are five people in a band,

0:58:34.636 --> 0:58:37.236
<v Speaker 1>and if three of them like it and two of

0:58:37.236 --> 0:58:39.836
<v Speaker 1>them don't, and you get to the point where all

0:58:39.876 --> 0:58:43.556
<v Speaker 1>five of them like it, chances are it's better. And

0:58:43.636 --> 0:58:47.476
<v Speaker 1>that's just that you're done. Yes, yeah, no, it was

0:58:47.516 --> 0:58:50.796
<v Speaker 1>just like such a kind of I just thought of that.

0:58:50.796 --> 0:58:53.476
<v Speaker 1>That idea that what you're building in the end is

0:58:53.516 --> 0:58:56.516
<v Speaker 1>a kind of harmony among all the all of the voices,

0:58:56.636 --> 0:59:00.436
<v Speaker 1>is a beautiful way to end a very very beautiful book.

0:59:01.076 --> 0:59:03.756
<v Speaker 1>There's a part in the book where we talk about cooperation,

0:59:03.836 --> 0:59:08.116
<v Speaker 1>which is exactly this working with other people. Historically, I'll

0:59:08.156 --> 0:59:12.876
<v Speaker 1>say most times that people work together, there's a rivalry

0:59:12.916 --> 0:59:18.036
<v Speaker 1>of ideas. Each person is arguing to win the debate

0:59:18.156 --> 0:59:21.956
<v Speaker 1>to have their idea be the one that's chosen. And

0:59:22.476 --> 0:59:26.156
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that's not productive, and the best way to

0:59:26.236 --> 0:59:29.516
<v Speaker 1>do it is for everyone to demonstrate their ideas. It's

0:59:29.556 --> 0:59:32.236
<v Speaker 1>even better if they're demonstrated in a blind way where

0:59:32.276 --> 0:59:36.196
<v Speaker 1>we don't even know whose ideas what. We just hear

0:59:36.236 --> 0:59:42.516
<v Speaker 1>the ideas and then everybody picks and usually it's pretty obvious,

0:59:42.676 --> 0:59:45.916
<v Speaker 1>and it really does happen naturally. And it's only through

0:59:46.476 --> 0:59:50.396
<v Speaker 1>the ego of wanting it to be my way that

0:59:50.436 --> 0:59:55.436
<v Speaker 1>they're these conflicts. But if everyone is working together for

0:59:55.476 --> 0:59:58.116
<v Speaker 1>it to be the best that it can be, and

0:59:58.156 --> 1:00:00.356
<v Speaker 1>if we respect each other enough to know if I

1:00:00.396 --> 1:00:01.996
<v Speaker 1>think it's the best it can be and you think

1:00:01.996 --> 1:00:05.276
<v Speaker 1>it can be better, I'll go on that ride and

1:00:05.476 --> 1:00:10.556
<v Speaker 1>same the other way. Ultimately we get to beautiful place. Rick.

1:00:10.636 --> 1:00:13.596
<v Speaker 1>That is lovely, And thank you for writing such a

1:00:14.276 --> 1:00:17.236
<v Speaker 1>beautiful book. May many, many many people enjoy it as

1:00:17.316 --> 1:00:19.516
<v Speaker 1>much as I have. Thank you so much. I really

1:00:19.556 --> 1:00:25.356
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your eating it. It's fantastic. It makes me happy.

1:00:25.716 --> 1:00:27.756
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank Rick on the Record for taking

1:00:27.756 --> 1:00:31.636
<v Speaker 1>the time to put his philosophies around creativity in a book.

1:00:32.116 --> 1:00:34.876
<v Speaker 1>The Creative Act, A Way of Being is out now.

1:00:35.276 --> 1:00:37.196
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to check it out. You can subscribe to

1:00:37.196 --> 1:00:40.516
<v Speaker 1>our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Broken Record Podcast.

1:00:40.876 --> 1:00:43.396
<v Speaker 1>We can find all of our new episodes. You can

1:00:43.436 --> 1:00:46.636
<v Speaker 1>follow us on Twitter at broken Record. Broken Record is

1:00:46.676 --> 1:00:51.596
<v Speaker 1>produced with Helpful, Leah Rose, Jason Gambrel, Ben Holiday, Eric Sandler,

1:00:51.956 --> 1:00:56.556
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer Sanchez. Our editor Sophie Crane. Our executive producer is

1:00:56.596 --> 1:01:00.876
<v Speaker 1>Mio LaBelle Broken Record is a production of Pushkin Industries.

1:01:01.236 --> 1:01:03.676
<v Speaker 1>If you love this show and others from Pushkin, consider

1:01:03.716 --> 1:01:08.156
<v Speaker 1>subscribing to Pushkin Plus. Pushkin Plus is a podcast subscription

1:01:08.276 --> 1:01:11.836
<v Speaker 1>that offers bonus content and uninterrupted ad free listening for

1:01:11.956 --> 1:01:14.876
<v Speaker 1>four ninety nine a month. Look for push Complus on

1:01:14.996 --> 1:01:18.796
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast subscriptions, and if you like our show, please

1:01:18.836 --> 1:01:21.516
<v Speaker 1>remember to share, rate, and review us on your podcast

1:01:21.516 --> 1:01:25.516
<v Speaker 1>at our theme musics by Kenny beats On Justin Richmond