WEBVTT - Galvanize Climate Solutions Co-Founder Tom Steyer Talks Energy Solutions

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now is Tom Steyer, a co founder of

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Galvani's Climate Solutions. Tom, great to have you back. Thank

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us. What are you

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>hoping to hear from Harris's campaign, given that we haven't

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>heard so much in terms of how she differs from

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>President Biden.

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, what I'm expecting to hear Lisa, and hoping to

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>hear is that her agenda around the economy is going

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 2>to be about opportunity. Then in fact, she understands that

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 2>America is the land of opportunity and it gives every

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 2>of the chance to do the most, and that is

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 2>exactly what drives this economy, what makes our capitalism capitalistic

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 2>economy so strong. At the same time that I expect

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 2>her to continue most of the policies of the Biden

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Harris administration.

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 3>So she will continue on this electrifying the grid. What

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 3>more do you expect if she were to win, that

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 3>they can add on to what Biden did. When it

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 3>comes to the Inflation Reduction Act.

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think to a large extent, it is going

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 2>to be about implementing the Inflation Reduction Act, which is

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 2>really two things. It's not just about the grid, it's

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 2>about deploying the existing technologies when solar batteries, evs, but

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 2>it's also about innovating and creating the next generation of

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 2>energy related companies and technologies. So that second part is

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 2>absolutely critical. We're seeing deployment happen spurred by the IRA,

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 2>but very much driven by private money. What we need

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 2>to see is new companies solving some of the problems

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 2>around energy in ways that work for consumers and companies.

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 3>Well, when it comes to that competition and if you

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 3>think climate is existential, why not let the cheap Chinese

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 3>evs into the United States.

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm square. Here's my answer for you. Look, I am

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 2>a huge believer in trade. I believe that the benefits,

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 2>the dispersed benefits to American consumers of trade are huge

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>and important, and we've all enjoyed them for a long time.

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 2>And it's theoretically true too. What is true is that

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese economy is doing something strange. They are leading

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 2>them manufacturing of almost every clean energy product wind, turbine,

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 2>solar arrays, batteries, evs. But what's also true is they're

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 2>by far the biggest polluter in terms of carbon emissions,

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 2>and they're using their carbon emissions to try and drive

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 2>their economic program of leading this energy transition to pull

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 2>their very weak economy out of the ditch. So, in fact,

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 2>the idea that they should be charged for their emissions

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 2>that are about a third of global emissions makes very

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 2>good sense to me, and we're doing it in not

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 2>direct way, but it's actually a way that turns out

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 2>to be pretty fair.

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 3>The other big issue, not just national security when it

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 3>comes to China, but the other big political issue in

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 3>the election is who's going to win the union vote.

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 3>How does Kamal Harris strike that tone the fact that

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 3>they want to see more evs in the road. But

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 3>actually this unnerves a lot of rank and file of

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 3>those labor unions in places like Michigan, which is critical

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 3>to Democrats maintaining the White House.

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, But let's take a step back, if we could, Henry,

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 2>which is this We've all listened to Elon Musk and

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump talk about their attitude towards organized labor and

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 2>labor unions. In fact, they've been sued over what they

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 2>said on Twitter. So the truth is, it's not a

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 2>choice between Kamala who is a very strong union person,

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 2>and a blank person. It's someone who clearly is anti

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 2>union and an anti working person. And that's been a

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.399
<v Speaker 2>long history over decades of where mister Trump has gone

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 2>and where he's likely to go. So yes, it's absolutely

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 2>clear that Michigan. Obviously, the UAW has a huge sway

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 2>in Michigan and they're a really important part of the

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Democratic coalition. But the truth is that the person who

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 2>supports working people and who supports organized labor is definitely

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris. And to go any other way is to

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 2>ignore the facts of this week, let alone the last

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 2>two decades.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 4>And Tom, you're painting quite a dichonomy between the two candidates.

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 4>And I just wonder in your conversations with not just

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 4>investors but portfolio companies that want to do clean technology,

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 4>if there's a sense that they're holding back on investing

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 4>because of the uncertainty of the race, and it might

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 4>continue to do so if it is a Trump presidency.

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think when we talk about the possibility of

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 2>a Trump presidency, let's break it down into two things.

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 2>One is what's going to happen in the United States

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 2>of America. And I think that to a very large extent,

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to the deployment of the existing technologies.

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>They're just cheaper. You know, if you look around the

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 2>world last year, so twenty twenty three of new electricity generation,

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 2>eighty six percent of it was renewable. They're not doing

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 2>that to be nice. They're doing it because it's a cheaper,

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 2>better deal. And those lines have crossed and there's nothing

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>that mister Trump can do to change the economic forces.

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 2>What is really important from the standpoint of addressing the

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 2>climate crisis more broadly, is this. This is obviously a

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 2>global issue. It requires global cooperation and American leadership. That

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 2>is something that a Trump and administration will never do.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they famously withdrew from the Paris Accords. He's

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 2>talking about getting out of NATO, let alone cooperating with

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 2>the UN efforts around climate. So from the standpoint of

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 2>the American economy, we're going to continue to deploy I

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 2>think that's baked in the cake, just because it's a

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 2>better deal. Texas has tripled its solar since twenty eighteen.

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's the state where they love to say how

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 2>bad renewables are, but they're a bigger win producer and

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 2>producer than California.

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Tell me Jeff about thirty seconds. Do you think that

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Musk's friendship with Donald Trump will ensure that there will

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>be a friendly environment for electric vehicles even though Trump

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>gets since the office. No.

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that mister Trump doesn't really have policies and

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't have friendships. So whatever he said on said

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 2>this week, that's something that will change over time because

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 2>they don't even have a platform. They literally don't have

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>a platform because they don't have policies. They just have

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 2>instincts urges, and pensions.

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Tim Styer of Galvanized Climate Solutions, who really appreciate you

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>coming in as always, thank you for being here.