WEBVTT - Attack on Trump and Apple's Record High

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from.

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.159
<v Speaker 2>The heart where innovation, money and power co lie in

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley.

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 3>NBN.

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 4>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 5>Coming up, we'll have full coverage on the aftermath the

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 5>attack on former President Donald Trump.

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 4>That says the RNC kicks off in Milwaukee.

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 6>And we'll turn our attention to M and A.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 7>It's Google Eyes Whiz for its biggest ever acquisition.

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 5>Plus we bring you the latest on Apple as shares

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 5>hit a record high. For now, look, let's go on

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 5>the ground to Milwaukee where former President Trump, we understand

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 5>has arrived for the Republican National Convention joining us now

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 5>in most Kayley lines, a lot of breaking news to

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 5>continue to digest.

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 8>Kayley, Yeah, there is, of course, the utmost being what

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 8>happened over the weekend at Israelly in Pennsylvania, in which

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 8>the president was shot former president in the right year,

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 8>obviously an attash assassination attempt that he survived, but very

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 8>much changes the tenor of what is going down in

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 8>Milwaukee this week. There is an incredibly intense security. Donald

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 8>Trump himself admitted that he was considering postponing his trip here,

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 8>but did indeed come early, in fact, yesterday afternoon, and

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 8>is preparing, we understand according to an interview he just

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 8>gave to Fox News to announce his vice presidential pick today.

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 8>But of course the news does not stop there. We

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 8>learned just this morning that the judge in the criminal

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 8>case brought against him in Florida, the Document's case, a

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 8>judge appointed by him, Eiland Cannon, has now completely dismissed

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 8>that case against him on the grounds and the appointment

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 8>of special counsel Jack Smith, who of course brought that

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 8>case was unconstitutional. Essentially went around Congress, is what the

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 8>judge has ruled here. Obviously, there is room for an appeal.

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 8>The Justice Department is probably likely to do so. But

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 8>that's just another piece of news that works in the

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 8>former president's favor. As the proceedings at the convention here

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 8>get underway in Milwaukee.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 7>Later in the program, Kelly, We're going to discuss some

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 7>of the big names from the technology world who have

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 7>either come out and endorse President Trump following the events

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 7>of the weekend, or weighed in frankly over what happened.

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 7>The other story, of course, is the response from President Biden.

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 7>What is that playing out like in the news cycle

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 7>where you are.

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, The President clearly is still trying to keep himself

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 8>in the news cycle.

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 9>Ed.

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 8>We have heard from him addressing cameras three times since

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 8>that shooting on Saturday. He of course first made remarks

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 8>from Delaware the same day that it happened. He gave

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 8>brief remarks to the press in the early hours Sunday rather,

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 8>and then of course gave that Oval Office address at

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 8>primetime eight pm Eastern last night, basically calling for unity,

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 8>calling on Americans to turn down the temperature, tone down

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 8>some of the rhetoric in the aftermath of what he

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 8>said is something that shouldn't be taking place in America,

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 8>political violence. He said that there is no place for

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 8>it in this country, even as he was giving that speech,

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 8>not just as a president, but a presidential candidate who

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 8>was running against the very man who, of course was

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 8>shot at a rally on Saturday during the usual course

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 8>of the democratic process. So we're likely to see a

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 8>tone shift to from the Biden campaign, who have pulled

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 8>down their advertisements in the aftermath of this assassination.

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 4>Attempt.

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 8>They're probably going to be retooling their messaging. And Donald Trump,

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 8>we understand is as well. He of course will be

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 8>addressing the convention on Thursday evening, and an interview to

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 8>the Washington Examiner after the shooting, he said he is

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 8>reworking that speech. He said it was going to be

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 8>a humdigger and dinger, and now he's going to be

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 8>used as an opportunity to call for national unity.

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 7>Bloombo's Katie Lyons in Milwaukee, thank you. Meanwhile, we want

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 7>to hone in now on social media and disinformation online

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 7>following the attack on President Trump. We heard earlier today

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 7>from former National Security Advisors to the US John Bolton

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 7>on the attack, but also on how conspiracy theories will

0:03:59.080 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 7>remain in its way.

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 10>We need to do the review of this in a

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 10>calm way.

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 11>I think do it.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 10>Quickly as well, because there are already conspiracy theories about

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 10>what happened on Saturday that I think are learning tunes.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 10>But I don't think they're going to go away until

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 10>we have an independent objective review.

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 7>I want to bring in Bloomberg's Davy Alba, who was

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 7>on duty this weekend, and Davey, you wrote a really

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 7>important report Saturday into Sunday about how quickly misinformation spread

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 7>on key social media platforms, in particular, X, just summarize

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 7>your reporting for us.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:36.239
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is kind of to be expected after

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>any major news event that there will be information flying

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>from all sides as the facts become clear. But the

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>thing that we've seen over and over at this point

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is that people are all too willing to share conspiracy

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>theories as well.

0:04:57.880 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 3>About what actually happened.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there was an advantage in this particular moment.

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 3>That there were live cameras and so.

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Much documentation of what actually happened when the president was

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>shot in the ear to the former president, I should say, However,

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you know that didn't stop some others from spreading unfounded narratives,

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 1>such as, you know, some actual people who have hold

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>elected office who said that President Biden ordered the shooting.

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>There were rumors flying about the identity of the shooter

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that were completely unconfirmed, but people were pointing figures at

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>specific individuals, And there were also tons of rumors about

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this event being staged when there is no evidence that.

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 5>I just want to hone in on that fact because

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 5>your story really brings it to light Davy. Ultimately, these

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 5>aren't just average uses social media. These are sitting law makers,

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 5>these are elected officials, and I want to understand how

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 5>much more complex that makes the role of social media.

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's a really great question, and I think what

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>comes into play here is that we've seen content moderation

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>efforts over the past year get weakened. You know, the

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>idea that social media platforms are in a position of

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:35.119
<v Speaker 1>basically deciding what speech can remain up and what should

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>be taken down is something that was very controversial over

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the past few years and really took root I think

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this year with many Republicans sort of saying that there

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>are these social media platforms are in a position of

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>censoring speech. So I think the platforms are in a tough.

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 3>Position right now. You know, they have.

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>To make these calls about whether someone who actually holds

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>elected office can continue to post essentially whatever they want,

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>or if the speech is so false that, you know,

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the facts simply don't bear the out, do they do

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>something about it? And I think that the answer in

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>this presidential election cycle is still not clear, and these

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>companies continued to be in a tough place.

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 4>Devi Alba brilliant reporting.

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 5>We thank you working throughout the weekend, but we can

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 5>now talk about someone who has deep experience what it's

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 5>like to work within one of those social media platforms

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 5>and indeed has a bird's eye perspective of it. Now,

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 5>Kara Frederick's with us from the Heritage Foundation research and

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 5>educational institution with air mission to promote conservative public policies. Kara,

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 5>you served as director of the Tech Policy Center, with

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 5>research focusing on big tech emerging technology policy. What's so

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 5>fascinating is your prioral at Facebook as well. Facebook's Global

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 5>Security counter Terrorism Analysis program.

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 4>You helped create it, you lead it.

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 5>Give us the sense of what ultimately the social media

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 5>platforms are doing right now to respond to the weekend, Well.

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 9>It's a farcrive from what I used to do starting

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 9>in twenty sixteen, where we were essentially building an airplane

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 9>in midflight. So what happens in a situation like this.

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 9>I was specifically devoted to foreign Islamist terrorism, so it

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.679
<v Speaker 9>was a very different animal. But at the same time,

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 9>what all of these teams are working together with it

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.239
<v Speaker 9>and companies are doing. They're working with their community operations teams,

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 9>they're working with their engineers, usually the trust and safety engineers.

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 9>They're working with their policy teams, they're working with people

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 9>in global security, like the team that I led, and

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 9>they're trying to identify if the attacker, attacker was on

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 9>the platform, if he has active accounts, if he was

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 9>ever on the platform, if he posted anything.

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 3>They're trying to potentially.

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 9>Take down some of that information for so the public

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 9>can't necessarily see it and instigate copycat attacks and whatnot.

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 3>But ultimately they.

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 9>Are trying to identify the perpetrator in the minutes after

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 9>those attacks that happened and get them off the platform.

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 9>The whole mo of these teams is to make the

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 9>platform hostile to these types of actors, and that's what

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 9>they're going to be doing in the moments after an

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 9>attack breaks on the news.

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 7>Like this, Cura, good morning, and thank you for coming

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 7>on Bloombay Technology. I'd like to just focus on what

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 7>happened the last forty eight hours, the social media discussion

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 7>immediately following the attack on former President Trump, but also

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 7>the sort of continued sharing of content. And one thing

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 7>that I noticed or I reflect on, is how many

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 7>people discussing the platform X and how they were pleased

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 7>basically to be able to get information so quickly. But

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 7>as Davies just pointed out in her reporting, within the

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 7>stuff shared on x much of it was misinformation.

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 6>It was false.

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 7>How do you balance speed of access to information to

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 7>the check that you have to get it right.

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 3>It is a very, very difficult question.

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 9>And my best advice, having been a camera terrorism analysts

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 9>for the Department of Defense for six years and then

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 9>having worked in counter terrorism at the platform level at

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 9>a big tech company, is to wait to be very

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 9>prudent about number one even identifying the attacker. We knew

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 9>in the couple minutes after this there were different pictures

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 9>of who it could have potentially been floating around on

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 9>social media.

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 3>They were wrong. There are other pictures they were wrong.

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 9>So I think the act of prudence in this case

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 9>is to wait to try to get the full picture.

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 3>And you know what's really interesting too.

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 9>Is there is a cohort of open source analysts who

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 9>are digging through a lot of these information.

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 3>They're working many times on their own.

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 9>They were not necessarily employed by these big tech companies.

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 9>They're not even vendors or contracted out, but they're digging

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 9>through a lot of the information. They're putting the pieces together.

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.559
<v Speaker 9>But my advice to everyone, just people that are looking

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 9>at vowyeers, just wait the full story eventually comes out.

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 9>But in terms of waiting, the scales in either way,

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 9>I think big tech platforms have to do a much

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 9>better job of showing that they are more neutral arbiters

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 9>of information, because, as the Bloomberg reporter said, prior to this,

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 9>you know, tech has been under a microscope because they

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 9>haven't gotten so many of the calls. Right look at

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 9>the Hunter Biden laptop story when Twitter was breaking the

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 9>links to the dms for that legitimate story in the

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 9>twenty twenty campaign. So big tech has a lot of

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 9>making up to do when it comes to this. They

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 9>don't have the trust of the people, and I would

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 9>say rightly.

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 5>So it was interesting that ahead of all of this,

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 5>Meta did, indeed as it had said it would do,

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 5>lift all restrictions on Trump's accounts ahead of the US election,

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 5>and it was understood car and I'm interested is as

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 5>we do try and gain trust, it's also at a

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 5>time where we've got artificial intelligence and technology working against

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 5>us in terms of really understanding the true nature of things.

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 5>How much is that making life ever more difficult.

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 9>I think it's exacerbating it to the nth degree. I mean,

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 9>you look at AI, and I'm a big fan of AI.

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 9>I'm a big fan and pro innovation. When it comes

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 9>to open sourcing these models and these AI tools, I

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 9>think that's going to take us farther than our foreign

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 9>adversary counterparts who are working on more closed models of

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 9>these large language models, et cetera, et cetera. So I

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:14.839
<v Speaker 9>am a big fan of AI. I want to get

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 9>that out front. But as we say in the tech community,

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 9>if you build it, they will come. Bad actors are

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 9>always going to co opt technology that outpaces attempts to

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 9>govern it. This technology is developing even more rapidly than

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 9>I even foresaw when I was working with it in

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 9>twenty seventeen and then researching it in twenty eighteen. Now

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 9>we were talking of an AI winter back then another

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 9>AI winter, and yet with the explosion of GPT four

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 9>now called chat GPT. I mean it looks like these

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 9>technologies because they can tailor information, amplify information, and do

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 9>all of this at machine speed and scale. That's the kicker,

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 9>machine speed and scale. We are going to see a

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 9>world of synthetic media, where the truth is going to

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 9>be harder and harder to discern, and that puts a

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 9>lot of onus on the platform to get it right.

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 7>At the abset car, we have a question from one

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 7>of our audience members, which is how much of Project

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty five will actually make it into the GOP platform.

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 7>But let's answer that in the lens of technology, please.

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah. So we don't know what's in Trump's mind or

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 9>Trump's campaign's mind, but we do know what the platform

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 9>has said. The platform is pro crypto, the platform is

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 9>pro AI development, and the platform.

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Is pro space.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 9>So I think when it comes to what the Trump

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 9>campaign and potential Trump presidency, second Trump presidency is going

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 9>to do, I don't speak for them, but it looks

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.719
<v Speaker 9>like they're trying to paint an affirmative agenda, an affirmative

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 9>vision of the things that they are for when it

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 9>comes to technology, rather than the things that they are against.

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 3>So I would expect a lot of.

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 9>Pro innovation to take place under a potential second Trump presidency.

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 4>An extraordinary voice to have join us today.

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 5>Frederick Tech Policy Center, Director at the Heritage Foundation and

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 5>decent Experience, having worked at Facebook, and indeed in counter terrorism.

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 4>We thank you.

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 7>Let's keep talking about the Trump trade that's kind of

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 7>intensified following the events of the last forty eight hours.

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 7>We spoke about DJT, but crypto related names, not just

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 7>coinbases is sort of exchanged, but some of the miners

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 7>also doing well. The idea being that Trump had been

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 7>scheduled to speak at crypto events. He's seen as the

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 7>more crypto friendly of the two candidates. I'd also point out, Caro,

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 7>there are other stocks in other areas moving to the

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 7>upside on the same logic, and.

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 5>Certainly it's not only crypto names that are moving today.

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 5>Investors reassessing assets across the board. Ed the price in

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 5>what a Trump win in November really does mean across

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 5>asset classes with us to regul all down bluemgs just

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 5>mentu Shanali Bassek No, we can talk crypto more Volueishnati,

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 5>but just dig into some of the industry utes power

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 5>the S and P five hundred thirty eighth record.

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 4>That's right.

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 12>So of course ED just brought up crypto related stocks.

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 12>So if you look at the bitwise ETF that tracks

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 12>those crypto stocks, which I know SHNAI is going to

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 12>get more to the bitcoin side of things, but of

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 12>course that houses stocks like if you're looking at Marathon

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 12>Digital right platforms, Coinbase. We did see a pop in

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 12>that today because if you're thinking about President Trump, who

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 12>has been very pro a crypto exposure and things like that,

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 12>you're seeing a pop there.

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 4>But then also beyond just that too, if you're looking at.

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 12>Maybe more regulated type sectors with financials as well as healthcare.

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 12>Those are two key areas to watch as far as

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 12>what that means, because usually if there's say a Republican

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 12>potential sweep there, that would be more easy policy toward.

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 12>When you're looking at banks and financials, and then as

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 12>well as the healthcare side of things, especially those insurers.

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 12>If you're thinking about CBS obviously owns Etna, and then

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 12>obviously when you think about other insurers like that too,

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 12>those are some industries keeping a close eye on. And

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 12>then also when it comes to fossil fuels, but then

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 12>we're renewable energy or solar stocks too because those have

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 12>been more prominent and gotten a support under a democratic presidency.

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 12>But if you're thinking about sun solar sunrun in stocks

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 12>like that, that's something to watch too, because they could

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 12>have potentially more restrictions. There thing's going undone if there

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 12>is a Republican president.

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 7>Well, the exception is that rule probably Tesla that's up

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 7>almost six percent in a bit of a Trump Shinali.

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 7>The macro view here is that the market's trying to

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 7>assess who's going to be president and by extension, what

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 7>policy will be to various parts of the economy and

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 7>different industry groups.

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, let's take a look across what that means across

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 13>asset classes, because of course it is of course impacting

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 13>the stock market and certain sectors, as Jess was saying, energy, financials,

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 13>places that Trump would be expected to have a massive

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 13>mark on policy. But then also you're seeing a really

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 13>big move here, as we've been saying, in bitcoin, of

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 13>roughly ten percent or more since Friday.

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 6>It ended well below.

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 13>Sixty thousand, closer to fifty seven thousand on Friday, and

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 13>now you're watching it surge past sixty three thousand. Remember,

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 13>Trump is largely seen as more of a pro crypto candidate,

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 13>bitcoins not alone. You see the dollar also rising as well,

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 13>because you are watching this expectation that in a Trump administration,

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 13>what you would have as the odds rise. Is of

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 13>course that tariff policy and therefore potentially a stronger dollar.

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 13>I would also add point to the curve steepener. When

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 13>you think about the bond market, it's not the front

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 13>end of the curve really that's moving. It's the tail

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 13>end of the curve. You're seeing a bigger sell off.

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 13>Think here, taxes being looser in the future, potentially think

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 13>here this idea that you might have a more of

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 13>a fiscal burden on the United States. Of course, you're

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 13>seeing that thirty year really sell off. Briefly today you've

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 13>seen that two thirty curve disinvert and steepen, and of

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 13>course that is that short end staying flat and that

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 13>sell off in the long end starting to be pronounced.

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 13>There are a lot of factors under the surface here,

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 13>but just significantly many asset classes really moving into today.

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 5>Perfect summary from Shananibase and just Ment.

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 7>Google parent Alphabets in talks to acqui cyber security startup Whiz,

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 7>according to a source, a deal that may be worth

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 7>as much as twenty three billion dollars, which would make

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 7>it the tech giant's largest acquisition to date. Bloomberg's mark

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 7>Bergen's here from London. Give me the rest of the details.

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 7>This was a surprise.

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 14>It was a surprise, although if you're following Google and

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 14>their cloud market over the past maybe five years, it's

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 14>not their last big acquisition. Mandient in similar space cybersecurity

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 14>slider right under Google Cloud.

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 6>Looks like they're trying to do it again.

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 14>This is something where you know they have been this

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 14>sort of perpetual third place in the market behind aws

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 14>in Microsoft. Microsoft in particular has been really pushing the

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 14>album up on cybersecurity, making that the case that sort

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 14>of that's their advantage Azure. But at the same time

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 14>Microsoft has some pretty noticeable and public flaws and the

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 14>mistakes around cybersecurity that Google, I think is trying to exploit.

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 14>So it is an aberration in the sense that it's

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 14>the biggest deal by a long measure in something where

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 14>Google has stayed away from deals for anti trust reasons lately.

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 5>Some vcs could be making a sizable return and recent

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 5>Lightspeed Ventures Thrive Capital in the latest round. We understand

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 5>of wiz, but is that regulatory risk ki Mark.

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 14>So for sure is that this company's started in twenty twenty,

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 14>so it's remarkable this twenty three billion would be almost

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 14>twice its last valuation, so it's a pretty massive returns.

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 14>I think the argument that Google's going to make. I

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 14>won't speak for the FTC and the TJ on this,

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 14>but the argument that Google's going to make is we

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 14>are not in any way monopoly in the cloud market.

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 14>But the Google will cite that they're in third position.

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 14>That Mandy a deal I believe was about five billion.

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 14>That one cleared. I don't expect Whiz will be approved

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 14>on day two. These things typically take some time if

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 14>it goes through, but it's you know, Microsoft is clearly

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 14>has some issues around around the anti trust, so you

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 14>can't rule that out. But I think Google's case is

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 14>going to be in this market, we are far from

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 14>the market leader and far from a monopoly.

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 5>And as we know, the agreement hasn't been reached and

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 5>talks could still end without one. But for now, interesting

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 5>to talk with the Matt Bergen. We really appreciate it.

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 6>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. Ed Lovelow here in San Francisco,

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 6>Caroline hid in New York.

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 5>An interesting one in Tesla more than five percent higher.

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 5>It's got a solar business, a sizable one.

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 15>Ed.

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 5>It is like the name that encapsulates green policy. But

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 5>it is also of course perhaps a Trump trade here

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 5>with Elon Musk going in Previously, we understood the reporting

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 5>happening on the weekend, Ed that indeed we saw being

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 5>backed by Trump is Elon Musk.

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 4>Max Traffckin is here to discuss a little bit more.

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 4>But Ed, can you just dwell on the fact that.

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 5>Almost before occurred this weekend an extraordinary set of circumstances

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 5>in Pennsylvania.

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 4>We had reporting that indeed.

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk was going to be supporting a super pac.

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 6>Correct.

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 7>So Musk made this public endorsement following the assassination tempt

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 7>on former President Trump. But late Friday night, and you

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 7>may have missed it, Bloomberg reported, citing sources, that Musk

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 7>had made what we're characterizing as a sizeable donation to

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 7>a low profile organization called the America Pack, which is

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 7>actually due to to do disclose its funding today July fifteenth.

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 7>So depending on the timing of when Musk made that donation,

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 7>we will get some more information about it. But let's

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 7>bring in bloombergs Max Chafkin, because I find this really interesting,

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 7>you know, the history of Musk's relationship with former President Trump.

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 7>Maybe it doesn't matter now he's endorsed Trump publicly through

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 7>the platform X.

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, absolutely.

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 16>I mean Elon Musk in twenty sixteen did kind of

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 16>start to drift towards Trump. Mean, he was initially on

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 16>a couple of these executive councils and then broke with

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 16>the former president over the Paris Climate Accord. But what

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 16>we've seen over the last five or so years is

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 16>a thawing of those relations. Even as they've insulted each other,

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 16>you know, often publicly, there has been a cooling and

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 16>definitely an ideological convergence.

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 6>When you look at sort of what.

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 16>Elon Musk is saying on his you know, ex page

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 16>and what the former president is saying on the campaign trail,

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 16>there are a lot of commonalities. And on top of that,

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 16>of course, Elon Musk has what I'd say is a

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 16>pretty bad relationship with the Biden administration. Right you have

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 16>multiple federal agencies investigating various aspects of his business. Elon

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 16>Musk has had all sorts of extremely negative things to

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 16>say about the current president. So you can see a

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 16>lot of reasons why they would be able to find

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 16>common ground. And of course, until recently President Trump's former

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 16>President Trump's finances have started to look a lot better,

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 16>but until recently he really needed money. So they both

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 16>kind of need each other.

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's what we're seeing when you go

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 5>to the Elil Musk needing each other, needing Trump or

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 5>indeed anyone who's in the White House. Remind us of

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 5>the government contracts that Elol Musk basically sits a top of.

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, so Elon Musk is I mean, of course, he

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 16>is known as an innovator, but he's also been a

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 16>very successful government contractor. You know, many of his businesses,

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 16>most of much of his business depends on relationships with

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 16>the government, either in terms of direct contracts with SpaceX

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 16>or Tesla of course depends on these text credits and

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 16>has for the entirety of its existence. So you can

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 16>sort of see why he has an interest. And of

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 16>course he's got a lot more planned right. SpaceX is

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 16>hoping to go to Mars, wants to be involved with that.

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 16>And if you look at the GOP platform, which we're

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 16>going to see at the convention, it does bring up

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 16>commercial space Mars, it brings up AI, the fears of

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 16>sort of the wokeness in AI or it implies that,

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 16>which is another pet elon Musk issue. On the other hand,

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 16>President Forum President Trump has said very negative things about

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 16>the EV industries, so there is potential tension there as well.

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 7>Max I wrote in my hyperdrive Newslader last week about

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 7>the idea of what happens to public funding or IRA

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 7>funds in the event of ivor White House. And no

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 7>one I've spoken to would say if Trump wins the

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 7>presidency that would just go away. But I just wanted

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 7>to remind our audience of the New York Times reporting

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 7>from earlier this year that Trump met with oil executives

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 7>and basically said, if you help fund my campaign, I

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 7>will be, let's say, less supportive of evs.

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 6>So then we bring in Musk.

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 7>It doesn't really add up Trump's sort of historic attitude

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 7>towards electric vehicles and Musk and Tesla is the market incumbent,

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 7>the company that paved the way for electrification.

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, it's hard to know how to parse that, And

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 16>of course what Canada's say on the campaign trail is

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 16>necessarily what ends up happening.

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 6>From the sort of Musk point of view. Two points one.

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 16>Is that I think Trump making those comments and then

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 16>those comments leaking could be read as a sort of

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 16>blink read you know, orange light for somebody like Elon

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 16>Musk to donate.

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 6>It will be.

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 16>Interesting to see if President Trump foreign President Trump softens

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 16>his attitude to the EV industry. The second thing is

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 16>that Tesla is the market leader. It doesn't necessarily hurt

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 16>the company if if the Trump, if a hypothetical second

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 16>Trump presidency, you know, kind of cracks down on the

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 16>EV industry or gets rid of a lot of subsidies,

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 16>it might even just sort of lock in Tesla's position.

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 16>Now that's not something you want to hear if your

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 16>interest is in growing the EV industry in a big way.

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 16>But it's not clear that that's even Musk's goal at

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 16>this point.

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 7>Max Tefkin's written so much care about the history of

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 7>mask and politics. We just showed that graphic of some

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 7>of the other names over the weekend that publicly endorsed

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 7>officially endorsed President Trump, and for me, this is a

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 7>big story. Cara, I find it so interesting.

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 5>Notable that people are now willingly taking to social platforms,

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 5>many of them will a prevalent user of etel musk

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 5>Sex as well. To make these sorts of endorsements and statements,

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 5>it has to be reflected, and of course many CEOs

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 5>within technology were coming out and condemning the violence that

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 5>we saw this weekend as well, and using social platforms

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 5>of which to do that. But Max just the last

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 5>take on ultimately, whether we see more money weighing in

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.719
<v Speaker 5>here and any clarity on the extent that we hear

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 5>of DA must support.

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 16>You know, Silicon Valley entrepreneurs and CEOs and investors they

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 16>want to back winner. So I don't think it's totally surprising.

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 16>You know, even before this assassination attempt, Trump had had

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 16>a very good couple of weeks. So I don't think

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 16>it's surprising that we're seeing the corporate money flow in

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 16>because that the way these guys think, right is they

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 16>want a voice in whichever they judge to be the

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 16>likely winner. So I think that's part of what's going on,

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 16>And it would not surprise me if we see more

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 16>money from Silicon Valley, and in fact we could see

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 16>you one must take a potentially active role here, either

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 16>you know, just on his X platform or with you know,

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 16>further donations we'll see, But nothing would supper at this

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 16>point as far as Mask and Trump coming closer together,

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 16>nice chef can.

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 5>The perfect voice and all things in learning, we appreciate it.

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 5>Coming up, we're going to be talking to a CEO

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 5>about a further integration in AI. Tell Tom Sebel, founder

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 5>and CEO of C three AI a partnership with Google Cloud.

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 5>This has been by technology. We want to talk about

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 5>AI partnerships. Another one being announced. Tom Sebel of C

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 5>three AI the CEO there to talk us through. What

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 5>is your partnership with Google Cloud, the launcher new AI

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 5>programs and most notably AI for government programs AI, Generative AI.

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 5>We're talking here, Tom, can you just stick into what

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 5>has driven this partnership with Google Cloud ultimately how it

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 5>enables you to serve with government and consumers that little

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 5>bit more.

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Google Cloud has been a great partner and we've been

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 2>working with them at massive scale in state local government,

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay to bring solutions there associated with property appraition that

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 2>will associate with law enforcement, and now in state government

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 2>and federal government. We've come up with a very unique

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:24.439
<v Speaker 2>solution utilizing generative AI to make all the complexities associated

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 2>with things like the Affordable Care Act okay, and all

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 2>of the services that come out of health and human

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 2>services of medicare Medicaid CMS. What have you immediately.

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Accessible to the public.

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 2>We've solved all the difficult problems associated with data expiltration, cybersecurity, hallucination,

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 2>those are gone, and now we deal with these you know,

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 2>these programs that are biblically in scale, in the complexity,

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 2>and you can ask any question in one hundred and

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 2>thirty three languages and get the answer immediately, the correct

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 2>answer the first time in the language that you inquired.

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 2>So it's really it makes it so that governments can

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 2>provide better services at lower cost into more certified constituents.

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 5>And indeed government has been a real strength of C

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 5>three AI. What's also notable is well the fact that

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 5>you're teaming with Google's cloud.

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 5>Many might say that actually Microsoft as you and Amazon AWS, well,

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 5>Amazon will broadly these hyperscalers might be your own competition.

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Do you have to do the deal for infrastructure with Google?

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 2>These are all partners. Microsoft is a great partner. AWS

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 2>is a great partner. We do a ton of work

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 2>in the defense and intelligence community with AWS. But let's remember,

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 2>I know that people like to focus on the defense

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 2>and intelligence community. You know, it's roughly twenty percent of

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 2>the federal budget. You know, most of the budget. Is

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 2>it benefits programs, social security, health, insurance, retirement programs, and

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 2>we can use generative AI to allow government to provide

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, much higher service requiality services at lower cost.

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 2>This applies not only in the United States. I mean,

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 2>this applies to the National Health Service of the UK.

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 2>This applies to have a sight.

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 6>Let me jump in here for a second.

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 7>I think that Tom may have some zoom issues, which

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 7>we forget is kind of normal in the day and

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 7>age that we live in. I mean, when we get

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 7>him back and we'll work on that car, I think

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 7>what I want to ask him and understand is like,

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 7>is this a vote of confidence in C three AI

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 7>being a technology provider? In other words, Google Cloud are

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:33.959
<v Speaker 7>like they're quite good. So, mister Cebo, I think you're

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 7>back with us. Thank you for joining us on bloombow technology. Okay,

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 7>so let me give that question to you. Is this

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 7>a sales channel thing where you guys can go to

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 7>a certain customer demographic or is this Google Cloud saying

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 7>actually C three AI has really got something here from

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 7>a product level that we don't have.

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is a deep technology partnership. We've been working

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 2>with Google Cloud very closely for years. Surely a deep

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 2>technology partnership. Take advantage of the important work they're doing

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 2>with Generative AI and Gemini and make that, you know,

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 2>more accessible using the C three AI platform, which represents

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, two or three billion dollars for the

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 2>software engineering. So this is a technology partnership that goes

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 2>back some years, and we are partnering technologically. Yes, we

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 2>are jointly developing, and yes, we are jointly servicing and

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 2>selling and servicing customers all around the world.

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 6>Mister Cebel.

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 7>One story recovered earlier in the program was reporting that

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 7>Alphabet or Google are looking at wiz in the m

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 7>and a context you've just partnered with them. It's interesting

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 7>to consider the antitrust repercussions of that. But have you

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 7>seen the report and what do you make of that?

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Well? I think that you know, I mean, one of

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 2>the existential threats that we have to the world relates

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 2>to cybersecurity, and I think that any one of these

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 2>hyperscalers that are beefing up their their cybersecurity capabilities makes

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the world a safer place, So I think it's a

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 2>good thing.

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:08.479
<v Speaker 5>Tom c Will can't even get onto your thoughts of

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 5>AI in the world of fake news. It's something that

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 5>I know that you've been thinking a lot about. We

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 5>look forward to having you back on the show. Tom Cewill,

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 5>founder and CEO of C three AI, on that partnership

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 5>with Google and what are you looking at now?

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 7>Some of the other news stories today in Talking Tech.

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 7>First up, AutoNation warns of a big hit to second

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 7>quarter earnings. The US car dealership chain says profits could

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 7>be lower by a dollar fifty as shared this after

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 7>a cyber attack left the auto retail industry crippled for

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 7>weeks earlier this month. AutoNation says it does not expect

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 7>to the attack to have a material impact on its

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 7>financial conditions going forward. Plus, smartphone shipments are on the rise.

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 7>That's according to IDC. Global smartphone shipments rows six point

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 7>five percent in the latest quarter. Apple iPhone shipments stabilized

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 7>with forty five point two million handset ship The rise

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 7>comes as smartphone makers including waway In's Roalm, slash prices

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 7>in China to entice consumers in the biggest mobile market,

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 7>and Finally, spending on Korean cultural products is forecast is

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 7>nearly double to one hundred and forty three billion dollars

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 7>by twenty thirty. That's according to new research release by

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 7>TikTok and analytics company Kantar. The sry popularity of the

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 7>k culture products sought an amplificator by social media, which

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 7>has become gathering place for K pop fans who are online.

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 4>Caroy staying in Asia.

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 5>Panasonic CEO Yuki Kasumi spoke to UMG Ryan in Tokyo

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 5>about the need for company managers to feel more of

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 5>a sense of crisis given a low profitability. Kasumi also

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 5>discussed the outlook for Panasonics EE battery business.

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 4>Just take a listen my key.

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 6>You can't do me.

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 15>You are in terms of the sense of crisis, we

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 15>have not fulfilled our commitments and improved our earnings. As

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 15>a result, the group as a whole has not achieved

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 15>a level of profits that meets expectations of investors. This

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 15>has led to a slump in the stock price. Has

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 15>also led to the price to book ratio falling below one.

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 15>I would like to emphasize that all of our management

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 15>team must recognize that this is a critical situation and

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 15>we must manage our businesses accordingly.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 17>The Evy battery business has been a focus for you,

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:21.240
<v Speaker 17>but that's been really affected by external demand.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 17>When are you expecting to see a turnaround? And do

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:29.240
<v Speaker 17>you see any positive signals coming from your strategic partner, Tessa.

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 15>When we start supplying batteries to for example, Mazda and Superu,

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.879
<v Speaker 15>our plant in Japan will be in full operation as

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 15>well as in the US. We will continue to expand

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 15>our business in the US, and we will follow the

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 15>demand of US automakers and invest according to the growth

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 15>of that demand. So in that sense, we will make

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 15>our investments in such a way that the plants will

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 15>not be forced to stop operating.

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 17>Ayonna, what can you tell us then about the US

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 17>demand outlook, especially because you've been doing pretty well in

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 17>your business there. But it's also because of the Inflation

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 17>Reduction Act, Right, And I wonder what are your calculations

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:17.280
<v Speaker 17>of what happens after the presidential elections if the incentives

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 17>are taken away?

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 15>Well, I have heard that the IRA will not disappear

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 15>immediately if Trump becomes president because of the way the

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 15>US legal system works. This means that it will take

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 15>a few more years. The spread of EVS is expected

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 15>to slow down not only because of the IRA, but

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 15>also because the charging infrastructure is not yet sufficient, and

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 15>I think there are other reasons as well. One reason

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 15>is that evs are expensive even with the IRA, and

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 15>as these issues are resolved, the spread of evs is

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:55.240
<v Speaker 15>expected to increase in the long term. We will invest

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.359
<v Speaker 15>accordingly and will manage our business in such a way

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 15>that the speed of EV A DOT will not directly

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 15>affect our business condition.

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 17>Are you expecting to see more price competition though in

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 17>the EV battery market, especially from the likes of giants

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 17>like China Coatl for example. Will you need to readjust

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 17>your cost structure.

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 15>There are different types of batteries that can be used

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 15>in cars that prioritize price and sacrifice some performance, and

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 15>those are thoroughly pursued performance and safety. Although there is

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 15>price competition, we will continue to supply equipment and vehicle

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:34.280
<v Speaker 15>makers that recognize the quality of our batteries.

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 7>That was Bloomberg's Sherry Arms speaking to Panasonic CEO Yuki

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 7>Kasumi in Tokyo Bazu in on Apple The stock hit

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 7>fresh record highs today after an upgrade to buy at

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:59.879
<v Speaker 7>Loop Capital on the iPhone's AI potential. Morgan Stanley's also

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 7>did the iPhone maker so its top pick list, with

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 7>AI also being seen as a catalyst.

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 5>Caroc Yeah, and I think we need to stick with AI.

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:14.399
<v Speaker 5>But also revenue being generated internationally. Look in India, where

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg is reporting that Apple's revenue has searched thirty three

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:18.840
<v Speaker 5>percent in the twelve months through March.

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 4>According to a Bloomberg.

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 5>Source, sales during the period were eight billion dollars, up

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 5>from six billion a year ago. Stuff into it, An

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 5>rag Rana of Bloomberg Intelligence, a lot of buoyancy around

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 5>this name today, Ana Ragan, what do you make of

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:31.720
<v Speaker 5>the Indian sales?

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, you know, Caroline, I'm in your camp.

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 18>I think the sales pushed from India and China are

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 18>far more important than my view in the you.

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 11>Know, both in the short run in the long run,

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 11>than than AI.

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:47.919
<v Speaker 18>But you know, very very happy to see that India

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 18>is a very big market for Apple.

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 11>I mean, the end market is over six hundred million.

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 18>Smartphones and Apple has you know, less than five percent

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 18>market shared. So over the long term, I think India

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 18>is going to be a very exciting story for Apple,

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 18>but it's going to take some time because currently China

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 18>is eight times bigger than India.

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 11>In terms of units smartphones or iPhones.

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 18>So China still is the main story at this point

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 18>over the next two to three years.

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 11>But I think India is very exciting for the longer

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 11>future of Apple.

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:19.879
<v Speaker 6>So it might be like early days.

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 7>But one interesting point of the reporting from Bloomberg was

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 7>that of that eight billion dollar figure, more than half

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 7>was iPhone sales rather than other devices or services.

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 6>How do you have to play.

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 7>The Indian market differently, like in terms of asps or

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 7>your patients for a growing or emerging middle class.

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, so you know, Apple can truly gain a lot

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:44.399
<v Speaker 18>of market share in India by you know, let's say

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 18>listening the price of their lower end model.

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 11>But they don't really, you know, play that game.

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 18>They are all about, you know, the margins, and you know,

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 18>they don't play the market share game, so we don't

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 18>see them launching a cheaper phone or anything. I think

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:00.760
<v Speaker 18>Indian market is going to be gradual. I mean gradually,

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 18>And I say when I compared in China, China is

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 18>Apple market shared in the Chinese market is twenty percent

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 18>and in India it's less than five.

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:12.279
<v Speaker 11>So you over time, as the Indian consumer becomes.

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 18>More affluent, when purchasing Baba becomes you better than what

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 18>it is right now. We think Apple is one area

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 18>where they'll gravitate to because of the luxury nature of

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 18>the product, because of the brand that's associated with the

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 18>quality it's associated with, and then the prestige.

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 5>And Agrana breaking down the international growth. It is a

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 5>new record high for Apple today. We thank you meanwhile

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 5>that does it for this addition of Bluemog technology. And

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:40.800
<v Speaker 5>it has been quite the show to be digesting.

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:43.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and it's going to be a really big week

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 7>in America. You know, our colleagues will continue to broadcast

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 7>from a Walkery and R and C. And here there

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 7>are so many technology stories to tell recap on the podcast.

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 7>Many of you do listen to the podcasts every day.

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 7>You find it on Apple, Spotify, iHeart and of course

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 7>on the Bloomberg platforms as well in New York City

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 7>and San Francisco.

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:03.879
<v Speaker 6>This is Bloomberg Technology