WEBVTT - What Will Coinbase’s Earnings Call Reveal?

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto Daily, Bloomberg ID Podcast, and I'm

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Philip lagger Crantzler, Senior crypto editor for Bloomberg News. In

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>today for Stacy Marie Ishmael, it is Wednesday, January. All right, folks,

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>let me state the obvious here. Two was not a

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>good year for crypto, from the Terra Lunar collapse to

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the Celsius and three a C bankruptcies to the ft

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>X implosion last November. The end of Sam Bank Manfred's

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Empire created a contagious effect that was especially felt by

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>crypto exchanges like publicly traded coin Base. In early January,

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the exchange settled with New York regulators who accused it

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of significant compliance program failing, and that wasn't the end

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of coin Bass troubles. Later in January, coin Base also

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>said it's laying off its workforce and closing the bulk

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of its Japan operations. And the picture may be equally

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>dim for other global exchanges. Users are nervous and in

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>many cases they're pulling funds from the exchanges. And joining

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>me today to talk about this are Bloomberg Senior editor

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Anna Era. If volumes are down and you have this

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>customers and people are just holding, are scared or withdrawing

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>even worse, with drawing the crypto they have on your platform.

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>You cannot go on survival mode. And one thing we

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>know of coin bas is that they're pretty good at

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>survival mode, right, and Bloomberg reporter Uhan Moving forward the exchanges,

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they really have to be more transparent. They have to

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>prove that they're not misusing customer funds. That's no longer

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>taken as granted. Coin Base is having a bad month.

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Coin Base has reached a one hundred million dollars settlement

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>with New York regulators. Half of the money is a fine.

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Regulators found that the crypto exchange violated anti money launching

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>laws and letting customers basically open accounts from insufficient background checks.

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>The other fifty million, but what it's going to be

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>used to improve compliance? She has climbed up with It

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>started in early January with a settlement worth about a

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars with New York. You can you tell

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about what happened there and what

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>were the allegations against coin base. The acquisitions from the

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>regulator is that coin bas treated customer onboarding process as

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a simple check the box exercise and failed to conduct

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>due diligent and in the the order dimensioned examples of

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>for example, coin base Latin individuals who are faking to

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>be employee of a company to open an account on

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>behalf of that company in an effort to steal funds

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>from the company, and coin bas Um said that they're

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>taking substantial measures to correct these short shortcomings. They highlighted

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that these were all historical issues and they're ready to

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>move forward. This was one of the events that coin

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>base has been grappling with, as well as other major

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>exchanges including Finite and um ftx before it's collapsed. Yeah,

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to touch on that because um in no

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>way it is coin based alone and being a crypto

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>exchange that has fallen a foul of regulators and you know,

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>gotten in trouble over limits or shortcomings in KYC. I mean, Anna,

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you've covered this for years. How has it been over

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the years when it comes to crypto exchanges and you

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>know the various blow ups and shortcomings in that regard. Yeah,

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So KYC has always been a big issue for crypto

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in general and for crypto exchanges. At the beginning there

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>were you know, exchanges that famously never actually asked for

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>any documentation for you to trade on them. I remember

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>there was a famous testimony I think it was by

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>someone who's now a vc UM who said, and it

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>was a sort of prosecutor before and said that they

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>asked some exchange to provide documents and because they didn't

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>never check them. They had clients with names Mickey Mouse

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>who lived in Main Street. So it's an issue, and

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you know some of them have opped obviously their game

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>for because you know, regulators are breathing down their neck.

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's it's always been a challenge and

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it may may remain a challenge for a while, in

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>part because you know, you can ask for documents, it

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>depends how much you're checking right. And you know, ky

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>C and a m L, to be fair a big

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>problem in finance in general as well. You know we've

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>had banks that got in trouble for it too, But

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in crypto has always been like a recurring issue. You

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>make a good point there. I mean, if you if

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.239
<v Speaker 1>you look at the banking industry, it wasn't many years

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>ago that some of the private banks got into major

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>troubles over ky c or you know, even looking the

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>other way. So should be fair crypto to point out

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that it has happened in other corners of the financial

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>universe as well. I want to come back to coin

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>based because they, as we alluded to at the very start,

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that the bad January didn't really end there UM. And

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>this last week we got another bombshell UM and this

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>time it was job cuts. You as she you cover

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that what and how significant were the cuts that they announced?

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>So Queinbays announced that they're doing another round of layoff,

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>this time affecting about nine hundred and fifty employees, or

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>about of his workforce. And we know that Quein based

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>UM even last year they've they've done layoff already. In

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>June they laid off eighteen percent of his workforce, roughly

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>UM twelve hundred people were affected, and then they did

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a smaller round UM in November affecting sixty positions UM.

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>So Brian Armstrong in his letter to employees he said

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that this is really the first time coin base has

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>seen a crypto cycle, coinside was a broader economic downturn,

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and then he admitted that when he did the head

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>on layoff UM last year in hindsight, he should have

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>cut even further at that time. So UM so because

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>quin Bass is the publicly treated company UM, I think

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that the layoff and the general UM cost cutting measures

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>were not a total surprise to analysts and investors. The

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 1>company UM do have to cut off, cut off more

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>expenses to to really survive to this UM prolonged crypto downturn.

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And then obviously coin bas was not the only one

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>doing UM layoff in the in the industry. Remember coin

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>basis just the latest company to announce another round of

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>job cuts this month. Genesis, the troubled crypto brokerage under

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Berrysober Digital Currency Group, cut about thirty percent of its

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>workforce who will be is cutting jobs, while silver Gate

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>laid off forty percent of its staff. There is one

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that that and this is something that Armstrong pointed out. UM.

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>They are cutting also some of these projects that maybe

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't close to generating revenues or profits. But I mean,

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in your views and also Anna by all means, you know,

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>when you cut like this, and you cut this deeply,

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.679
<v Speaker 1>aren't you risking a little bit that you do away

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>with things that might generate a lot of future potential. Yes,

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>UM during the Bowl market coin Bass was really trying

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to position itself as this bridge to the broader website

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>economy and instead of just focusing on providing a trading

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>platform for clients. But we know that since the Market

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Downtown started last year, Point Based has been course correcting.

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>They're returning back to focus on their core revenue generating

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>services UM trading and staking namely, and then they're cutting

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>back on some of these other projects that don't immediately

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>seem to benefit and financially and this is something that

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>they have to do to cut costs, but then it

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>also will jeopatize their their future potential when it comes

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to diversifying their business beyond just trading. I think there's

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>also an issue of like, you might not have a choice.

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Things are going really badly for exchanges in general because

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, trading volumes are low, and in the end,

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>exchanges in crypto have been relying on trading fees because

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I mean, it's been changing a bit, but

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>unlike something like equities, where fees have have been shrinking

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 1>for years and they've had to become more data businesses

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>or technology businesses, crypto exchange groups have been able to

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:56.239
<v Speaker 1>rely on like trading fees via trading fees on equities

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 1>or um derivatives or whatever it is, and so you know,

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the way their business models were built. So if

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>volumes are down and you have as customers and people

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>are just holding, are scared or withdrawing even worse, withdrawing

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the crypto they have on your platform, you cannot go

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on survival mode. And one thing we know of coin

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>bas is that they're pretty good at survival mode. Right,

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>they've been around longer than many other platforms. Perhaps they

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't made any big splashy like moments like we could

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 1>have thought of like FTX, or they're not, but they

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of have been in crypto somewhat reliably steady, and

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>this is not their first winter. But as so sort

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of Armstrong was saying himself, the difference and fundamental difference here,

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I think is that you know, it's a crypto winter

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>coupled with like a bad macro environment, and so maybe

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>they're starting to think it's not gonna you know, it's

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>not gonna end this year, and we have to preserve

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, resources even more. Up next, more with Bloomberg

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Senior crypto editor Anna Airera and Bloomberg reporter Ushang on

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the future of crypto exchanges will be right back. Obviously,

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that was the sort of cataclismic event for the market

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>back in November when ft X filed for bankruptcy, and

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>then it was, you know, the charges of fraud against

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the founder of Sam bankman Freed and two of his

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>top of lieutenants. And we're now learning crossing the Bloomberg

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>terminal that a judges at a trial date of October

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>two of this year, So Sam bankman Fried's trial on

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>those fraud charges are set to begin in October two.

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>What did that mean for the crypto exchange sector as such,

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the sort of loss of confidence that followed ft ex's implotion.

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you made the exact right point with um.

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>This is really a crisis of confidence for the entire industry.

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>We've seen that following the FTX collapse. There's been concerned

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>for other major exchanges as well, and in fact, all

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of these big exchanges, Finites included, they have to come

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>out and say that they're different from FDx, and they

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>try to use various ways to prove that they have

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the reserves that clients deposit their coins on ways on

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the on their platform. So I think moving forward the exchanges,

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>they really have to be more transparent. They have to

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>prove that UM they're not misusing customer funds. That's no

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>longer taken as granted. UM. People have this distrust about

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>putting their their tokens on the exchange, and we've seen

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 1>deposits level falling from the exchanges as users take out

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>their tokens and move into code storage, which they think

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>UM would be safer and give themselves more control over

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>their assets. So if you turn the f t X

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>question on its head, it's also kind of an opportunity

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>for a company like coin base to take the market share.

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Coin Base has been trying to distinguish itself as a

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>trusted and compliant company amid all the recent crypto chaos.

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>The CEO, Brian Armstrong, spoke with David Rubinstein in December.

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>We show in our publicly audited financial statements that you know,

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>corporate cash is separate from customer funds, and you don't

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>have to take our word for it. You know, UM,

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you know a Big four accounting so far, and obviously

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it's early days, it looks like it's financed mostly that's

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of putting a strangle hole on the market. What

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>is the Are there any indications where their indications from

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong about whether or not there is a void for

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>coin based to be stepping into here, we have to

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>look at it from two perspectives. On one hand, ftx

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>was an up and coming strong composer into space, and

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that FTS is gone that UM just left

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>their customers migrating to other platforms. If they still choose

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>stay in the space, finance will benefit from that. UM

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>coin Based, being a US focused platform, will also benefit

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>from that. But then at the same time, coin base

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>is scaling back some of its overseas ambitions. We know

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that as part of the job cuts that's recently announced,

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>they're winding down most of their operation in Japan for example.

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>UM they are UM as an a mension. They don't

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>have choice. They have to focus on their core market

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and core services. So finance is very good in the

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>international market, and that's not something that coin base can

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>entirely compete with. I think it's wiped out a competitor

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Like FTX, US was slowly gaining ground and

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>they were spending a lot of money to get US

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>customers and retail customers, as we've written before, So you know,

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely like there's more there's more space now there's one

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>less player, but at the same time, like the pie

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of shrunk for everyone. So it makes it, you know,

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>quite hard. And I just want to finish off by

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about I mean, as we we talked a little

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>bit about earlier, it's not just going based. Pretty much

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody is cutting jobs. You've watched this industry on for

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a good couple of years now, and this is obviously

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>like just very significant retrenchment across the board. Yeah, I

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's becoming quite protracted, and you know, I'm wondering,

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>like where many of these people are going. We had

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a story earlier this year about how banks were hiring

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the staff, but now I'm thinking, you know,

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>some banks are also letting off people. Tech firms I've

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>had hiring freezes. It's quite interesting to see where where

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the talent will be. There are firms that

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>are still hiring, we're hearing, but you know, clearly, like

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>if fifty people get fired from one firm, only you

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>know who has this support now to hire? And you know,

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>one big thing is that I imagine some of the

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>companies are still waiting for the situation to like finish unraveling,

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe you are waiting to see who have the

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>excess creditors are to know if any of them are

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>your counterparties, and then if more dominoes will fall, and

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>if you'll be exposed more so maybe you're not inclined

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to make any big investments now. It is quite quite stark,

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Like the situation has changed a little bit. The easy

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>money has has stopped, and so you know, it'll be

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see where people end up. And you know,

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>like if some of them go back to traditional finance

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and do like finance jobs. If it's it's it's very interesting,

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, Thank you, Anna and you ah That was

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Senior Crypto editor Anna Arera and Bloomberg reporter you

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Ah Yang. You can find more of their reporting on

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal and on Bloomberg dot com. For more,

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>be sure to check out our viice weekly newsletter, Bloomberg Crypto.

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily podcast from Bloomberg and

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more shows from I Heart Radio,

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. Send us your comments, questions, or suggestions

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>for the show to Crypto at Bloomberg dot net. The

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky Verglina. Our senior

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>producer is Janet Babin. Our producers are Mohammed Faruk and

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Sharon Barriro. Our associate producers are Ty Butler and Moses

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>on Them. Desta wonder At is our engineer. Original music

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>by Leo Sidrn. I'm Stacy Marie Schmal. We'll be back tomorrow.