WEBVTT - Turning Writers into Publishers

0:00:15.316 --> 0:00:22.516
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. In two thousand and eight, the writer Kevin Kelly

0:00:22.596 --> 0:00:26.796
<v Speaker 1>published this essay about a big, exciting, ultimately kind of

0:00:26.836 --> 0:00:29.876
<v Speaker 1>simple idea. If you want to make a living doing

0:00:29.876 --> 0:00:33.316
<v Speaker 1>something creative, you don't need millions of fans or even

0:00:33.596 --> 0:00:37.276
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of fans. You just need a thousand

0:00:37.516 --> 0:00:41.756
<v Speaker 1>true fans. The math works, Kelly argued, because of the Internet.

0:00:42.156 --> 0:00:45.476
<v Speaker 1>The Internet gives everybody everywhere the ability to connect with

0:00:45.516 --> 0:00:48.436
<v Speaker 1>everybody else, and it means that people like writers and

0:00:48.556 --> 0:00:52.156
<v Speaker 1>musicians no longer have to go through intermediaries like publishers

0:00:52.156 --> 0:00:55.316
<v Speaker 1>and music labels and retail stores that traditionally wound up

0:00:55.356 --> 0:00:58.156
<v Speaker 1>capturing most of the revenue from the sales of creative work.

0:00:59.116 --> 0:01:02.156
<v Speaker 1>If you can find your thousand true fans, Kelly argued,

0:01:02.436 --> 0:01:04.236
<v Speaker 1>and if you can figure out a way to sell

0:01:04.356 --> 0:01:07.436
<v Speaker 1>your work directly to those fans, you could make a

0:01:07.476 --> 0:01:14.636
<v Speaker 1>living doing the creative thing you love to do. I'm

0:01:14.716 --> 0:01:17.236
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Goldstein and this is What's Your Problem, the show

0:01:17.276 --> 0:01:19.756
<v Speaker 1>where entrepreneurs and engineers talk about how they're going to

0:01:19.876 --> 0:01:22.916
<v Speaker 1>change the world once they solve a few problems. My

0:01:22.956 --> 0:01:26.316
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Chris Best. Chris is the co founder

0:01:26.316 --> 0:01:30.076
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of Substack. Substack is a company that helps

0:01:30.076 --> 0:01:34.476
<v Speaker 1>writers send subscription based email newsletters, which, as Chris says,

0:01:34.636 --> 0:01:37.156
<v Speaker 1>is a very simple idea built on top of some

0:01:37.356 --> 0:01:41.956
<v Speaker 1>very grandiose beliefs, beliefs about culture and ideas and commerce.

0:01:42.676 --> 0:01:45.276
<v Speaker 1>More to the point, substack is one of the best

0:01:45.356 --> 0:01:48.716
<v Speaker 1>tests I've seen of the theory of a thousand true fans.

0:01:51.836 --> 0:01:53.956
<v Speaker 1>The idea for substack came to Chris and his co

0:01:54.036 --> 0:01:57.556
<v Speaker 1>founder Hamish back in twenty seventeen. At the time, Chris

0:01:57.556 --> 0:02:00.596
<v Speaker 1>had just left Kick, the messaging platform that he'd co founded,

0:02:00.956 --> 0:02:03.396
<v Speaker 1>and there were lots of things he thought had gone

0:02:03.436 --> 0:02:06.516
<v Speaker 1>wrong with media and the Internet. He'd always been an

0:02:06.516 --> 0:02:08.876
<v Speaker 1>avid reader and a believer in the power of writing,

0:02:09.196 --> 0:02:11.396
<v Speaker 1>and he wanted to share his ideas with the world.

0:02:11.756 --> 0:02:14.116
<v Speaker 1>And so naturally I was like, well, I should write.

0:02:14.196 --> 0:02:17.316
<v Speaker 1>How hard could that be. It's just typing. I already

0:02:17.316 --> 0:02:19.916
<v Speaker 1>know how to type. And I started writing what I

0:02:19.956 --> 0:02:22.236
<v Speaker 1>thought was going to be an essay or a blog

0:02:22.276 --> 0:02:27.036
<v Speaker 1>post that was kind of just detailing my frustrations with

0:02:27.116 --> 0:02:32.116
<v Speaker 1>the state of media and the Internet. It was sort

0:02:32.116 --> 0:02:34.796
<v Speaker 1>of this like a complaint or a screed of some

0:02:34.876 --> 0:02:37.756
<v Speaker 1>sort that was just like the Internet came along made

0:02:37.756 --> 0:02:40.996
<v Speaker 1>it global an incident free to distribute writing, which is great,

0:02:41.196 --> 0:02:44.076
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, these platforms killed a lot

0:02:44.116 --> 0:02:46.436
<v Speaker 1>of the business models that used to support great writing.

0:02:46.436 --> 0:02:50.436
<v Speaker 1>Craigslis killed the classifieds, Facebook, Google took over the advertising industry,

0:02:50.916 --> 0:02:53.796
<v Speaker 1>and now we're all sort of stuck clawing for attention

0:02:53.916 --> 0:02:57.436
<v Speaker 1>on these various feeds waw, waw, waw, complaining, complaine. And

0:02:57.556 --> 0:02:59.756
<v Speaker 1>I sent this piece of writing to my friend Hamish,

0:02:59.916 --> 0:03:03.556
<v Speaker 1>who's actually a writer, and he very gently told me

0:03:04.116 --> 0:03:06.836
<v Speaker 1>you're not the original snowflake you think you are in

0:03:06.916 --> 0:03:09.676
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen writing a thing it says, wow, be Facebook

0:03:09.756 --> 0:03:12.276
<v Speaker 1>is bad for us, Like, you know this, this is

0:03:13.116 --> 0:03:15.596
<v Speaker 1>not exactly fertile ground. You didn't get the scoop on

0:03:15.716 --> 0:03:17.836
<v Speaker 1>that one. Yeah, I didn't get the scoop on that one.

0:03:18.156 --> 0:03:19.956
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I'll tell you that all of my friends

0:03:19.956 --> 0:03:21.556
<v Speaker 1>who are writers are not going to be shocked to

0:03:21.636 --> 0:03:24.356
<v Speaker 1>hear that there's been some disruption to the business model

0:03:24.436 --> 0:03:28.796
<v Speaker 1>that supports their work. And basically like, look, you maybe

0:03:28.876 --> 0:03:31.836
<v Speaker 1>write about all of this, but so what And you

0:03:31.916 --> 0:03:35.396
<v Speaker 1>sort of asked the question He said, the more interesting

0:03:35.556 --> 0:03:37.156
<v Speaker 1>thing would be, like, what do you do about it?

0:03:37.476 --> 0:03:40.916
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to complain, it's easy to poke holes. But

0:03:41.076 --> 0:03:44.076
<v Speaker 1>let's assume that all of this is true. How could

0:03:44.116 --> 0:03:46.396
<v Speaker 1>you even how could things be different? How could things

0:03:46.516 --> 0:03:50.796
<v Speaker 1>be better? And we started sort of arguing about that

0:03:51.036 --> 0:03:53.396
<v Speaker 1>and batting around a bunch of things, and we were

0:03:53.436 --> 0:03:58.076
<v Speaker 1>both subscribers to Ben Thompson's Stratechery at the time, and

0:03:58.116 --> 0:04:00.276
<v Speaker 1>we were like, you know that dude's making which is

0:04:00.356 --> 0:04:02.916
<v Speaker 1>just to be clear, that's a paid newsletter that lots

0:04:02.956 --> 0:04:05.476
<v Speaker 1>of people in the in the tech industry subscribe to.

0:04:05.756 --> 0:04:07.916
<v Speaker 1>It's an email letter that he's exactly. It's a paid

0:04:07.916 --> 0:04:10.916
<v Speaker 1>it's a paid email newsletter. We're seeing other people doing

0:04:10.996 --> 0:04:14.076
<v Speaker 1>these things where they're like, you know, you can write something,

0:04:14.156 --> 0:04:15.836
<v Speaker 1>you can charge for it. We were just fascinated by

0:04:15.876 --> 0:04:18.956
<v Speaker 1>this thing, and we ended up sort of hitting on

0:04:19.076 --> 0:04:22.076
<v Speaker 1>the idea of substack. Is this very simple thing that

0:04:22.756 --> 0:04:26.156
<v Speaker 1>does kind of two things. On the one hand, it's

0:04:26.236 --> 0:04:31.516
<v Speaker 1>this very grandiose idea that's aimed at this broad societal

0:04:31.596 --> 0:04:35.836
<v Speaker 1>problem of like, hey, this the total domination of all

0:04:35.876 --> 0:04:38.396
<v Speaker 1>of our attention by this business model of these engagement

0:04:38.476 --> 0:04:41.316
<v Speaker 1>maximizing platforms is bad, and we need to like create

0:04:41.396 --> 0:04:43.996
<v Speaker 1>a real alternative for that with a different business model,

0:04:44.076 --> 0:04:46.876
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's like an alternate universe with different

0:04:46.956 --> 0:04:49.236
<v Speaker 1>laws of physics for how you spend your time and attention.

0:04:49.956 --> 0:04:52.396
<v Speaker 1>Very high faluting. But on the other hand, it's like

0:04:52.716 --> 0:04:54.476
<v Speaker 1>what if you could send people email and charge the

0:04:54.556 --> 0:04:59.436
<v Speaker 1>money for it? Right, right, And it's pretty low faluting.

0:04:59.596 --> 0:05:02.876
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you know, it's a very specific thing that

0:05:02.996 --> 0:05:06.516
<v Speaker 1>some people newsletter. It's an email newsletter. Yeah, people say,

0:05:06.636 --> 0:05:11.316
<v Speaker 1>what a newsletter. It's like actively unsexy technology, yes, right, right,

0:05:12.356 --> 0:05:14.956
<v Speaker 1>So I mean I'm curious. So you know, obviously substack

0:05:15.076 --> 0:05:17.476
<v Speaker 1>is a thing. Now I have to say, like, I

0:05:18.516 --> 0:05:22.596
<v Speaker 1>don't think of it as a substitute for you know, Twitter.

0:05:22.796 --> 0:05:28.036
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is my social media of choice. Unfortunately, I think

0:05:28.076 --> 0:05:30.756
<v Speaker 1>of it as more of a close substitute to something

0:05:30.876 --> 0:05:33.236
<v Speaker 1>like The Atlantic or The New York Times, who in

0:05:33.316 --> 0:05:38.396
<v Speaker 1>fact are now clearly building their own email newsletter businesses. Partly,

0:05:38.436 --> 0:05:42.156
<v Speaker 1>I presume in response to your success at substack, right,

0:05:42.356 --> 0:05:44.676
<v Speaker 1>have you found in whatever data you have that substack

0:05:44.876 --> 0:05:50.316
<v Speaker 1>is a substitute for social media. I think it's at

0:05:50.396 --> 0:05:53.036
<v Speaker 1>least a substit I mean it's at least a substitute

0:05:53.156 --> 0:05:57.796
<v Speaker 1>in that as readers, as consumers, we end up having

0:05:57.876 --> 0:06:00.676
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a finite amount of time. Yeah, so

0:06:00.916 --> 0:06:03.636
<v Speaker 1>every minute somebody is reading substack is a minute they're

0:06:03.716 --> 0:06:05.556
<v Speaker 1>not looking at social media but could make. And that

0:06:05.636 --> 0:06:07.716
<v Speaker 1>sounds kind of ridiculous when you sort of produced its

0:06:07.716 --> 0:06:10.116
<v Speaker 1>like everything is in competition with everything else. But I

0:06:10.116 --> 0:06:12.596
<v Speaker 1>actually think that's sort of like the fundamental shift that

0:06:12.636 --> 0:06:15.356
<v Speaker 1>we've undergone, Like the whole dawn of social media was

0:06:15.396 --> 0:06:17.276
<v Speaker 1>because we used to live in an age where it

0:06:17.396 --> 0:06:19.996
<v Speaker 1>was possible to get bored. Yeah, and you would have

0:06:20.116 --> 0:06:23.076
<v Speaker 1>time in your life where you're like, gee, I'm bored.

0:06:23.356 --> 0:06:26.116
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had something to spend my attention on

0:06:26.556 --> 0:06:28.436
<v Speaker 1>and if somebody could come along and give me something

0:06:28.516 --> 0:06:31.036
<v Speaker 1>for free to do, that would be a great deal.

0:06:31.796 --> 0:06:34.196
<v Speaker 1>And we've just come to the end of that age there.

0:06:34.476 --> 0:06:37.236
<v Speaker 1>There just isn't every chunk of your attention that you

0:06:37.276 --> 0:06:39.636
<v Speaker 1>ever want to spend on anything has been taken up.

0:06:39.676 --> 0:06:43.436
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, there's increasingly loud clamoring and your phone

0:06:44.156 --> 0:06:48.116
<v Speaker 1>badly absorb every second of your brain life. Still though,

0:06:48.236 --> 0:06:52.916
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's possible that sub stack, that the attention

0:06:52.996 --> 0:06:55.436
<v Speaker 1>sub stack has taken and I'm happy for it. I

0:06:55.476 --> 0:06:57.596
<v Speaker 1>think it's great that writers can make money, and I'm

0:06:57.596 --> 0:06:59.716
<v Speaker 1>excited to talk about that. But it's possible that that

0:06:59.836 --> 0:07:03.996
<v Speaker 1>has come mostly from not from social media, but rather

0:07:04.156 --> 0:07:07.876
<v Speaker 1>from unsocial media. I mean, you literally have people leaving

0:07:07.956 --> 0:07:11.516
<v Speaker 1>traditional media places where they are writing columns and starting

0:07:11.556 --> 0:07:13.956
<v Speaker 1>to write substacks, right, Like, that's the it's a very

0:07:14.116 --> 0:07:17.436
<v Speaker 1>natural kind of adjacency. No, you know, to be honest,

0:07:17.476 --> 0:07:20.236
<v Speaker 1>it's almost certainly both. You know, people that had people

0:07:20.276 --> 0:07:23.836
<v Speaker 1>that were working as professional writers, right, a lot of

0:07:23.916 --> 0:07:25.756
<v Speaker 1>them can go to substack and get a great deal.

0:07:25.956 --> 0:07:28.396
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome, we love it. But there's an even bigger

0:07:28.516 --> 0:07:32.116
<v Speaker 1>cohort of people who were not professional writers before and

0:07:32.236 --> 0:07:37.036
<v Speaker 1>who but for substack, might not have been writing. Either.

0:07:37.156 --> 0:07:39.236
<v Speaker 1>Young people who didn't see a path and sort of

0:07:39.356 --> 0:07:41.516
<v Speaker 1>you know, might have gone to you know, had something

0:07:41.556 --> 0:07:44.396
<v Speaker 1>to give the world as a writer, and without this

0:07:44.516 --> 0:07:46.556
<v Speaker 1>model might have had to go to law school like

0:07:46.596 --> 0:07:49.476
<v Speaker 1>their parents wanted them to. Or people that work in industry,

0:07:49.596 --> 0:07:53.116
<v Speaker 1>or people that have some adjacent thing that you know,

0:07:53.916 --> 0:07:57.116
<v Speaker 1>making building an audience and sometimes on substack and sometimes

0:07:57.196 --> 0:08:00.796
<v Speaker 1>building a fortune, and who but for substack, would otherwise

0:08:00.876 --> 0:08:02.596
<v Speaker 1>not be writing. It's not like they would, you know,

0:08:02.716 --> 0:08:04.796
<v Speaker 1>have a job at the Atlantic or something and who

0:08:04.956 --> 0:08:06.836
<v Speaker 1>who I have never heard of, who most people have

0:08:06.956 --> 0:08:10.156
<v Speaker 1>never heard of, right, which is cool and interesting. I mean,

0:08:10.196 --> 0:08:12.956
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like a smaller YouTube in that way,

0:08:13.116 --> 0:08:17.356
<v Speaker 1>right where there's just this vast array of niches that

0:08:17.516 --> 0:08:21.036
<v Speaker 1>people can fill. And so I mean I am curious

0:08:21.316 --> 0:08:25.556
<v Speaker 1>to that point to get a sense of basically the

0:08:25.956 --> 0:08:30.436
<v Speaker 1>distribution of I don't mean the literal email distribution, but

0:08:30.516 --> 0:08:34.316
<v Speaker 1>the sort of distribution curve of substacks of the newsletters

0:08:34.356 --> 0:08:37.836
<v Speaker 1>people write like, how big a substack? How big a substack?

0:08:38.036 --> 0:08:39.676
<v Speaker 1>What have we shared? I think we've shared that we're

0:08:39.756 --> 0:08:43.636
<v Speaker 1>over a million paying subscribers, hundreds of thousand of people

0:08:43.636 --> 0:08:47.356
<v Speaker 1>who started a substack. I forget what our latest So sorry,

0:08:47.396 --> 0:08:51.476
<v Speaker 1>a million paying subscribers and the what is the well,

0:08:51.516 --> 0:08:53.516
<v Speaker 1>I guess for that when the average subscription is like

0:08:54.396 --> 0:08:58.316
<v Speaker 1>sixty bucks a year ish, yeah, eighty somewhere in there. Okay,

0:08:58.596 --> 0:09:03.116
<v Speaker 1>So is that something like eighty million dollars a year

0:09:03.196 --> 0:09:05.756
<v Speaker 1>that people are paying not to you, obviously, but to

0:09:05.796 --> 0:09:07.836
<v Speaker 1>the writers, of which you get ten percent? Is that

0:09:07.916 --> 0:09:10.236
<v Speaker 1>the ballpark way to think about it? Yeah, I mean,

0:09:10.276 --> 0:09:12.196
<v Speaker 1>it's it's more than that, but it's that's you know,

0:09:12.436 --> 0:09:15.356
<v Speaker 1>that's the right, if I if I ballparked it at

0:09:15.356 --> 0:09:17.916
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million for the writers, ten of which goes

0:09:17.956 --> 0:09:20.556
<v Speaker 1>to you, would I be not wildly wrong. You're in

0:09:20.596 --> 0:09:23.596
<v Speaker 1>the right order, mind, dude. Okay. Um. And then so

0:09:23.796 --> 0:09:26.996
<v Speaker 1>within that, like again to your point of like, well,

0:09:27.036 --> 0:09:29.956
<v Speaker 1>there's a few famous people, and you know, I'm curious

0:09:30.076 --> 0:09:33.996
<v Speaker 1>to know how how the how the distribution works there,

0:09:34.356 --> 0:09:36.636
<v Speaker 1>you know, how much are the top people making? And

0:09:36.756 --> 0:09:42.436
<v Speaker 1>then like what's the median? Yeah, so the distribution is

0:09:42.556 --> 0:09:45.956
<v Speaker 1>super sort of power laws you might expect. So I

0:09:45.996 --> 0:09:49.876
<v Speaker 1>think the top ten people make something like twenty or

0:09:49.916 --> 0:09:52.676
<v Speaker 1>twenty five million bucks a year between them. Wow, good

0:09:52.756 --> 0:09:54.836
<v Speaker 1>for them, they should only live them be Well, yeah,

0:09:55.316 --> 0:09:58.476
<v Speaker 1>people were making millions of dollars a year. Individuals are

0:09:58.516 --> 0:10:00.716
<v Speaker 1>making millions of dollars a year. Individuals are making millions

0:10:00.716 --> 0:10:03.276
<v Speaker 1>of dollars a year, but a very small number. It's

0:10:03.316 --> 0:10:06.836
<v Speaker 1>like the Taylor Swift of substack and there's you know,

0:10:06.916 --> 0:10:09.596
<v Speaker 1>there's they're actually quite a healthy number people who are

0:10:09.636 --> 0:10:13.276
<v Speaker 1>making you know, real money. If you think of real

0:10:13.316 --> 0:10:15.436
<v Speaker 1>money is like multiple times which you'd make as a

0:10:15.996 --> 0:10:18.716
<v Speaker 1>writer at a publication. I definitely think of that as

0:10:18.796 --> 0:10:22.876
<v Speaker 1>real money. But Okay, so your question is like what's

0:10:22.876 --> 0:10:26.836
<v Speaker 1>the distribution and the like, tell me about the median person, Like, yes,

0:10:26.916 --> 0:10:29.596
<v Speaker 1>there are some superstars, and I am happy for those superstars,

0:10:30.036 --> 0:10:33.756
<v Speaker 1>but what's like a normal Like how many people are

0:10:33.836 --> 0:10:36.996
<v Speaker 1>making fifty thousand dollars year? Like fifty thousand dollars years?

0:10:37.116 --> 0:10:39.716
<v Speaker 1>Like up perfectly, you know that's a that's a living.

0:10:39.836 --> 0:10:41.836
<v Speaker 1>And if you can write your own email newsletter and

0:10:41.916 --> 0:10:43.916
<v Speaker 1>make fifty thousand dollars a year, that's cool. But how

0:10:43.996 --> 0:10:46.916
<v Speaker 1>many of those people are there? I mean it's like hundreds,

0:10:46.956 --> 0:10:51.236
<v Speaker 1>I think? Okay, okay, I mean if you're charging five

0:10:51.276 --> 0:10:54.636
<v Speaker 1>bucks a month and you can get a thousand, a

0:10:54.716 --> 0:10:57.036
<v Speaker 1>couple thousand people to pay you five bucks a month, like,

0:10:57.276 --> 0:10:59.996
<v Speaker 1>that's a living, and like a couple thousand people isn't

0:11:00.036 --> 0:11:02.876
<v Speaker 1>that many? Right? So? Like, how does that work? Are

0:11:02.916 --> 0:11:05.796
<v Speaker 1>there examples of that? Are there? Sort of things you've

0:11:05.836 --> 0:11:08.076
<v Speaker 1>found that people have made that work? Are there particularly

0:11:08.116 --> 0:11:13.156
<v Speaker 1>interesting niches will have filled? That math is very important

0:11:13.196 --> 0:11:17.196
<v Speaker 1>to why substack works. The fact that a relatively small

0:11:17.316 --> 0:11:20.236
<v Speaker 1>number of people can chip in five bucks a month

0:11:20.276 --> 0:11:22.596
<v Speaker 1>and start to be meaningful. And it's interesting because if

0:11:22.596 --> 0:11:24.516
<v Speaker 1>you can get to a thousand, there's usually not a

0:11:24.596 --> 0:11:27.076
<v Speaker 1>reason you couldn't get to two thousand or five thousand

0:11:27.156 --> 0:11:29.836
<v Speaker 1>or ten thousand over time, and then that's why you

0:11:29.876 --> 0:11:31.436
<v Speaker 1>get this sort of power law thing where you have

0:11:31.716 --> 0:11:36.316
<v Speaker 1>this upside. But there's lots of things about what it

0:11:36.476 --> 0:11:38.076
<v Speaker 1>takes to get there. The thing I think is most

0:11:38.116 --> 0:11:41.316
<v Speaker 1>interesting about it, though, is how different the kinds of

0:11:41.476 --> 0:11:44.516
<v Speaker 1>things you want to do to get there are from

0:11:44.756 --> 0:11:46.356
<v Speaker 1>the things that would that you would do if you

0:11:46.436 --> 0:11:50.116
<v Speaker 1>wanted to kind of like maximize your audience to get

0:11:50.276 --> 0:11:53.796
<v Speaker 1>ad impressions right all of a sudden, Your incentives if

0:11:53.836 --> 0:11:55.436
<v Speaker 1>you want to if you're trying to get your thousand

0:11:55.476 --> 0:11:59.956
<v Speaker 1>true fans, your incentive is to create something that a

0:12:00.156 --> 0:12:04.756
<v Speaker 1>thousand people deeply value and fall in love with and

0:12:04.876 --> 0:12:06.636
<v Speaker 1>want to pay you for and want to keep paying

0:12:06.676 --> 0:12:08.876
<v Speaker 1>you for. Right you want to earn and keep the

0:12:09.196 --> 0:12:12.756
<v Speaker 1>trust of a thousand people making something they deeply value.

0:12:13.476 --> 0:12:15.716
<v Speaker 1>And what that means is that there's if there's something

0:12:15.796 --> 0:12:18.876
<v Speaker 1>out there that's like that that a thousand people would

0:12:18.996 --> 0:12:22.196
<v Speaker 1>deeply value, but you couldn't necessarily get a million people

0:12:22.236 --> 0:12:25.836
<v Speaker 1>to click on it's very very valuable on substack, and

0:12:25.916 --> 0:12:28.036
<v Speaker 1>so there's a whole class of very valuable stuff that

0:12:28.196 --> 0:12:31.636
<v Speaker 1>otherwise might not get created that can now get created.

0:12:31.836 --> 0:12:33.796
<v Speaker 1>And so, I mean the obvious ones that come to

0:12:33.916 --> 0:12:36.156
<v Speaker 1>mind are sort of business related, and there have been

0:12:36.276 --> 0:12:39.196
<v Speaker 1>you know, industry newsletters have existed for a long time

0:12:39.276 --> 0:12:41.476
<v Speaker 1>for this reason, right, There are lots of industry newsletters

0:12:41.516 --> 0:12:44.436
<v Speaker 1>that are a thousand dollars per subscription because you know

0:12:44.596 --> 0:12:46.236
<v Speaker 1>your work is paying for it. I mean that's one.

0:12:46.356 --> 0:12:49.276
<v Speaker 1>Are there kind of less obvious ones, you know, ones

0:12:49.316 --> 0:12:53.356
<v Speaker 1>that are more oh less work related? Say, And that

0:12:53.516 --> 0:12:56.236
<v Speaker 1>was one of our earliest questions, and we sort of

0:12:56.276 --> 0:12:58.436
<v Speaker 1>we wondered this. We're like, well, okay, people if they

0:12:58.476 --> 0:13:01.076
<v Speaker 1>can if they can say that it's for their job,

0:13:01.196 --> 0:13:02.556
<v Speaker 1>or they can put it on a corporate credit card,

0:13:02.556 --> 0:13:04.436
<v Speaker 1>they'll pay for it. But will they really pay for

0:13:05.236 --> 0:13:09.356
<v Speaker 1>something else? But pretty quickly we had people doing kind

0:13:09.356 --> 0:13:14.436
<v Speaker 1>of like literary comedy and culture writing and politics and

0:13:15.516 --> 0:13:19.476
<v Speaker 1>the breadth of topics that it turns out that you

0:13:19.596 --> 0:13:25.196
<v Speaker 1>can make on substack is kind of ridiculous. There's somebody

0:13:25.276 --> 0:13:27.796
<v Speaker 1>writing reviews of canned fish. I don't know if he's

0:13:27.796 --> 0:13:29.276
<v Speaker 1>making a ton of money, but it's like that's the

0:13:29.356 --> 0:13:31.996
<v Speaker 1>sort of level of meeting to say, I mean, sure,

0:13:32.036 --> 0:13:34.716
<v Speaker 1>it's the internet, Right, so every niche you can imagine,

0:13:34.796 --> 0:13:36.796
<v Speaker 1>and then a ton more that you can't imagine are

0:13:36.836 --> 0:13:39.876
<v Speaker 1>going to exist. The interesting question to me is what

0:13:40.036 --> 0:13:42.116
<v Speaker 1>can you get a thousand people to pay five bucks

0:13:42.156 --> 0:13:44.236
<v Speaker 1>a month for? And and maybe more to the point,

0:13:44.356 --> 0:13:46.956
<v Speaker 1>like what have you learned about how to do that?

0:13:47.036 --> 0:13:51.716
<v Speaker 1>Because I feel like that trick is actually generalizable beyond substack, Right,

0:13:51.756 --> 0:13:55.556
<v Speaker 1>that's the basic, you know, minimum viable product. Find your

0:13:55.796 --> 0:13:59.356
<v Speaker 1>core customers, make them love you, iterate like, I want

0:13:59.396 --> 0:14:00.716
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to do that better on the

0:14:00.836 --> 0:14:04.196
<v Speaker 1>podcast that I make. Right, it's clearly a more mass model,

0:14:04.636 --> 0:14:07.236
<v Speaker 1>but still the idea of like making a thing a

0:14:07.316 --> 0:14:11.036
<v Speaker 1>few people really love, I think is is really compelling.

0:14:11.196 --> 0:14:13.676
<v Speaker 1>And so what have you learned about how to do

0:14:13.796 --> 0:14:18.316
<v Speaker 1>that specifically? Yeah, so topic can be almost anything. The

0:14:18.476 --> 0:14:20.916
<v Speaker 1>things that really matter are you want to have a

0:14:21.076 --> 0:14:25.436
<v Speaker 1>distinct perspective. Exactly what that means depends on what it is,

0:14:25.916 --> 0:14:28.116
<v Speaker 1>but you want it to be either a distinct voice

0:14:28.236 --> 0:14:32.396
<v Speaker 1>or distinct worldview, or some distinct expertise or distinct sensibility,

0:14:32.916 --> 0:14:35.556
<v Speaker 1>something where the thing that the people are paying for

0:14:35.916 --> 0:14:38.916
<v Speaker 1>is not the content. Nobody has a problem that nobody

0:14:38.996 --> 0:14:40.996
<v Speaker 1>comes to substack and says I wish I could get

0:14:41.036 --> 0:14:42.676
<v Speaker 1>more email. I wish I had more things to me.

0:14:43.076 --> 0:14:46.276
<v Speaker 1>Nobody has that problem, right. The thing that you pay

0:14:46.356 --> 0:14:51.036
<v Speaker 1>for is I need this person's take or this person's thought,

0:14:51.196 --> 0:14:55.716
<v Speaker 1>or this person's recommendation, and I want them to curate

0:14:55.836 --> 0:14:59.236
<v Speaker 1>a slice of my intellectual life or my attention for me.

0:14:59.676 --> 0:15:02.796
<v Speaker 1>I want to delegate some of my worldview building to

0:15:03.036 --> 0:15:06.796
<v Speaker 1>this person who I've built up this trust with over time.

0:15:07.476 --> 0:15:10.236
<v Speaker 1>And in order to get that to worth paying money for,

0:15:10.876 --> 0:15:14.916
<v Speaker 1>you want that to be distinct enough that you're not

0:15:15.476 --> 0:15:17.476
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're not giving them something that they could

0:15:17.516 --> 0:15:20.076
<v Speaker 1>get in a hundred different places. And you do have

0:15:20.196 --> 0:15:24.916
<v Speaker 1>to kind of think about that integrity right being there

0:15:24.916 --> 0:15:27.516
<v Speaker 1>if you're curating a slice of their attention, being judicious

0:15:27.516 --> 0:15:29.556
<v Speaker 1>about what you're asking them to spend that attention. For

0:15:29.956 --> 0:15:32.356
<v Speaker 1>somebody gives you permission to send them emails or gives

0:15:32.356 --> 0:15:35.516
<v Speaker 1>you adds you to their podcast player, it's not only

0:15:35.596 --> 0:15:37.396
<v Speaker 1>should you send them good stuff, but you kind of

0:15:37.436 --> 0:15:39.396
<v Speaker 1>want to not send them things that are not worth

0:15:39.476 --> 0:15:42.756
<v Speaker 1>their time or are not interesting. You mentioned you called

0:15:42.796 --> 0:15:46.676
<v Speaker 1>it integrity, but the idea of respecting people's time their inbox,

0:15:47.276 --> 0:15:51.716
<v Speaker 1>and it reminded me of the fact that not only

0:15:51.956 --> 0:15:56.356
<v Speaker 1>is substack subscription based, people pay, you know, to get

0:15:56.436 --> 0:16:00.316
<v Speaker 1>a lot of substecks. It's pretty anti AD, right, like,

0:16:00.716 --> 0:16:02.796
<v Speaker 1>if you have a substeck, are you even allowed to

0:16:02.876 --> 0:16:06.836
<v Speaker 1>put ads in your newsletter? We definitely frown on it.

0:16:06.956 --> 0:16:08.956
<v Speaker 1>And this is an interesting point where we are very

0:16:09.116 --> 0:16:13.196
<v Speaker 1>anti AD, but we're also very pro freedom. Basically, like,

0:16:13.556 --> 0:16:15.716
<v Speaker 1>it's your editorial content. You're allowed to put what you want.

0:16:15.956 --> 0:16:18.876
<v Speaker 1>So we've fallen short of saying we're going to police

0:16:18.916 --> 0:16:21.396
<v Speaker 1>what you put in your newsletter, provided you're not literally

0:16:21.476 --> 0:16:23.436
<v Speaker 1>spamming people, which we take a very dim view of.

0:16:24.516 --> 0:16:26.956
<v Speaker 1>But we don't build any AD technology. We don't we're

0:16:26.996 --> 0:16:29.996
<v Speaker 1>not sort of encouraging people to sort of have a

0:16:30.116 --> 0:16:32.916
<v Speaker 1>hybrid model in general, even though that seems like it

0:16:32.956 --> 0:16:35.076
<v Speaker 1>ought to be appealing. We think that focusing on the

0:16:35.156 --> 0:16:38.156
<v Speaker 1>other thing actually maximizes the benefits of that thousand true

0:16:38.196 --> 0:16:41.596
<v Speaker 1>fans logic, Tell me more, Tell me more about that?

0:16:41.836 --> 0:16:44.116
<v Speaker 1>Is that you don't sound on the fence about it.

0:16:44.236 --> 0:16:45.996
<v Speaker 1>Has the company been on the fence about it? Could

0:16:45.996 --> 0:16:49.356
<v Speaker 1>you imagine becoming more proad. It's something we used to

0:16:49.436 --> 0:16:52.436
<v Speaker 1>get a lot from writers and the kind of the

0:16:52.516 --> 0:16:55.756
<v Speaker 1>logic is like, hey, subscriptions are money. Advertising is money.

0:16:56.036 --> 0:16:58.836
<v Speaker 1>One money plus two money is better than just one money.

0:16:59.636 --> 0:17:02.156
<v Speaker 1>Like it's like, wouldn't I make more money? I think

0:17:02.236 --> 0:17:06.276
<v Speaker 1>for in the writing world, people have seen enough success

0:17:06.396 --> 0:17:10.556
<v Speaker 1>on substack that it's people are starting to get that

0:17:10.676 --> 0:17:13.876
<v Speaker 1>the this model is working. And there's there's people who

0:17:13.916 --> 0:17:16.236
<v Speaker 1>are in that category of people who are making millions

0:17:16.276 --> 0:17:18.196
<v Speaker 1>of dollars a year on substack, who I personally at

0:17:18.236 --> 0:17:20.316
<v Speaker 1>the start had to convince to turn on payments. And

0:17:20.356 --> 0:17:21.876
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, no, I'm not gonna I'm gonna go do

0:17:22.436 --> 0:17:24.316
<v Speaker 1>some sponsorship thing or I'm just gonna grow it and

0:17:24.316 --> 0:17:25.796
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna blow blow. I don't think I can really

0:17:25.836 --> 0:17:27.836
<v Speaker 1>make any money, and then I'm gonna just try it.

0:17:28.156 --> 0:17:31.676
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have whatever The New Yorker, the Washington

0:17:31.756 --> 0:17:35.836
<v Speaker 1>Post very very excellent publications that I pay for with

0:17:35.956 --> 0:17:38.676
<v Speaker 1>my own money, and I don't resent them running ads

0:17:38.716 --> 0:17:42.876
<v Speaker 1>as well. Yeah, I can. I can see the argument

0:17:42.956 --> 0:17:44.636
<v Speaker 1>for that, And I think people can make the argument

0:17:44.716 --> 0:17:46.716
<v Speaker 1>for podcasts. You know, I personally, every time I listen

0:17:46.716 --> 0:17:49.356
<v Speaker 1>to a podcast and there's a break, that's like, now

0:17:49.476 --> 0:17:51.916
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you about something else. I'm like, okay,

0:17:51.956 --> 0:17:54.276
<v Speaker 1>they're like coming right at me right now, you're coming

0:17:54.356 --> 0:17:56.676
<v Speaker 1>right at I'm not gonna and listen, I don't begrudge it,

0:17:56.716 --> 0:18:01.156
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not going to say that I love it. Now,

0:18:01.276 --> 0:18:04.116
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you about something else. We'll be back

0:18:04.116 --> 0:18:06.676
<v Speaker 1>in a minute to talk about bundling, unbundling and a

0:18:06.796 --> 0:18:17.516
<v Speaker 1>problem substack has not yet solved. Now back to the show.

0:18:18.556 --> 0:18:20.996
<v Speaker 1>So the first part of my conversation with Chris was

0:18:21.116 --> 0:18:24.996
<v Speaker 1>largely about that thousand true fans idea. The next part

0:18:25.036 --> 0:18:27.556
<v Speaker 1>of the conversation is about another famous tech saying, this

0:18:27.676 --> 0:18:30.356
<v Speaker 1>one is like kind of half joke, half idea, and

0:18:30.436 --> 0:18:32.676
<v Speaker 1>it comes from Jim Barksdale, who is a big tech

0:18:32.716 --> 0:18:35.316
<v Speaker 1>guy back in the nineties. The key line is this,

0:18:36.076 --> 0:18:38.516
<v Speaker 1>there are only two ways to make money in business.

0:18:38.916 --> 0:18:41.996
<v Speaker 1>One is to bundle, the other is to unbundle. Like

0:18:42.116 --> 0:18:43.356
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of that quote? What do I

0:18:43.396 --> 0:18:45.836
<v Speaker 1>make of that quote? I buy it, I think, and

0:18:46.036 --> 0:18:48.436
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you that so far subject has been

0:18:48.956 --> 0:18:52.396
<v Speaker 1>this big unbundling energy. Right. The fact that as an

0:18:52.476 --> 0:18:56.276
<v Speaker 1>individual writer you can go and start your own thing

0:18:56.396 --> 0:18:58.236
<v Speaker 1>and make it on your own and get the upside

0:18:58.236 --> 0:19:00.476
<v Speaker 1>of what you're doing and sometimes make you ten times

0:19:00.516 --> 0:19:02.636
<v Speaker 1>as much money as you've ever made before, and have

0:19:02.716 --> 0:19:05.716
<v Speaker 1>a business and all this stuff. That's wonderful. It's a

0:19:05.756 --> 0:19:08.756
<v Speaker 1>good thing. I actually think that there's a lot more

0:19:08.916 --> 0:19:12.036
<v Speaker 1>energy left in that thing. Um. I think people people

0:19:12.076 --> 0:19:14.076
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they're like, well, what's going to happen when people

0:19:14.116 --> 0:19:16.796
<v Speaker 1>are getting their eight substack subscription and they're really annoyed

0:19:16.836 --> 0:19:18.956
<v Speaker 1>that they have to have so many different substack subscriptions.

0:19:19.316 --> 0:19:21.476
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, you know what, I like, bring on

0:19:21.636 --> 0:19:23.276
<v Speaker 1>that problem. I would love to live in the world

0:19:23.316 --> 0:19:26.196
<v Speaker 1>where that's your problem. I mean, obviously people that have

0:19:26.516 --> 0:19:28.556
<v Speaker 1>in particular would love to live in the world where

0:19:28.596 --> 0:19:32.356
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. Of course, and there's you know, there

0:19:32.396 --> 0:19:34.036
<v Speaker 1>are some people who who have that today, there's some

0:19:34.076 --> 0:19:35.836
<v Speaker 1>people that are you know, subscribed to a whole bunch

0:19:35.836 --> 0:19:39.596
<v Speaker 1>of things, but far and away, I think there's a

0:19:39.636 --> 0:19:43.436
<v Speaker 1>ton of energy left in this sort of unbundling phase

0:19:43.476 --> 0:19:45.196
<v Speaker 1>of like, I'm a writer, I have something to say,

0:19:45.356 --> 0:19:47.316
<v Speaker 1>and I like, I want it to be my thing.

0:19:48.756 --> 0:19:53.196
<v Speaker 1>I do think there's an interesting effect where bundle economics

0:19:53.236 --> 0:19:57.116
<v Speaker 1>are real, and if we are successful at the grand

0:19:57.316 --> 0:20:00.476
<v Speaker 1>unbundling that we are in the middle of doing, at

0:20:00.596 --> 0:20:05.596
<v Speaker 1>some point there's this economic potential energy that for unlocking

0:20:05.756 --> 0:20:09.596
<v Speaker 1>the surplus of bundle economics for writers and readers, And

0:20:09.676 --> 0:20:11.396
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch of ways you can imagine that happening.

0:20:11.476 --> 0:20:13.396
<v Speaker 1>Like one thing that's happening already is that substacks are

0:20:13.436 --> 0:20:16.676
<v Speaker 1>turning into companies and institutions, right, people are starting as

0:20:16.716 --> 0:20:19.316
<v Speaker 1>one thing and then building a newsroom or building a company.

0:20:19.476 --> 0:20:20.916
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing that would be, like the obvious

0:20:20.956 --> 0:20:22.356
<v Speaker 1>thing would be like, well, what if you just had

0:20:22.436 --> 0:20:24.716
<v Speaker 1>like a Netflix style thing, or like this is what

0:20:24.876 --> 0:20:26.596
<v Speaker 1>medium did. It's like, why don't you just have one

0:20:27.036 --> 0:20:30.396
<v Speaker 1>a substack subscription and then everything like you know, there's

0:20:30.396 --> 0:20:32.756
<v Speaker 1>some magic algorithm that dolls out like who gets the

0:20:32.796 --> 0:20:36.636
<v Speaker 1>money based on what? And the problem with that is

0:20:36.756 --> 0:20:40.796
<v Speaker 1>that it although it unlocks the bundle economics, it kills

0:20:40.876 --> 0:20:44.356
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental magic of what's good about substack, which is

0:20:44.436 --> 0:20:48.996
<v Speaker 1>the direct intentional relationship between the reader and the writer. Right, Like,

0:20:49.076 --> 0:20:51.956
<v Speaker 1>the whole deal is I'd choose what to spend. I

0:20:52.076 --> 0:20:56.116
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly what the right solution to this is yet,

0:20:56.596 --> 0:20:59.756
<v Speaker 1>but my strong intuition is that the right answer is

0:20:59.836 --> 0:21:03.236
<v Speaker 1>that you do, in fact want a bundle or bundles

0:21:03.596 --> 0:21:06.156
<v Speaker 1>but that it needs to happen bottom up rather than

0:21:06.236 --> 0:21:08.996
<v Speaker 1>top down. I think that, you know, as with anything,

0:21:09.196 --> 0:21:11.316
<v Speaker 1>the hard part is making it simple. This is one

0:21:11.356 --> 0:21:14.716
<v Speaker 1>of the fun things about building products, building good products,

0:21:15.036 --> 0:21:21.996
<v Speaker 1>is you like sweat and curse and wring your hands

0:21:22.036 --> 0:21:23.956
<v Speaker 1>and pull your hair out for a long time trying

0:21:23.956 --> 0:21:26.316
<v Speaker 1>to wrangle a thing. And if you actually do a

0:21:26.436 --> 0:21:29.116
<v Speaker 1>good job at the end of it all, you show

0:21:29.156 --> 0:21:33.556
<v Speaker 1>somebody and they say, yeah, obviously, yeah, right, you idiot,

0:21:33.636 --> 0:21:36.196
<v Speaker 1>Like you spent how long coming up with like an

0:21:36.276 --> 0:21:40.876
<v Speaker 1>email newsletter with a website that takes money, you idiot? Like, yeah,

0:21:41.676 --> 0:21:44.356
<v Speaker 1>but that's actually good, right, And you're not there yet

0:21:44.436 --> 0:21:46.756
<v Speaker 1>for the bundle? Is that is that the upshot? Yeah?

0:21:46.756 --> 0:21:50.676
<v Speaker 1>And for the bundle, and we're still in the hard part.

0:21:50.716 --> 0:21:54.596
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, there's so much value right now, Like there's

0:21:55.516 --> 0:21:58.956
<v Speaker 1>there's so much value in these in the subscriptions as

0:21:58.996 --> 0:22:01.036
<v Speaker 1>they exist. And we're already doing a bunch of things

0:22:01.076 --> 0:22:04.716
<v Speaker 1>around cross promotion. We let writers recommend each other rather

0:22:04.796 --> 0:22:07.716
<v Speaker 1>than having some algorithm that recommends it. So that's another choice,

0:22:07.796 --> 0:22:10.076
<v Speaker 1>right In the same way that you're pretty clearly anti

0:22:10.236 --> 0:22:14.876
<v Speaker 1>ad you seem pretty clearly anti recommendation. Algorithm, and that

0:22:14.956 --> 0:22:18.756
<v Speaker 1>one is maybe more surprising to me because you know,

0:22:18.956 --> 0:22:21.516
<v Speaker 1>discovery is hard, and I feel like you must know

0:22:21.716 --> 0:22:23.796
<v Speaker 1>a lot about what people read, and if they read

0:22:23.876 --> 0:22:26.476
<v Speaker 1>one thing, they like another thing, Like why not make

0:22:26.556 --> 0:22:30.876
<v Speaker 1>that kind of you know, collaborative filtering recommendation? Yeah, and

0:22:31.116 --> 0:22:33.076
<v Speaker 1>I would add some nuance there, like I don't think

0:22:33.116 --> 0:22:36.996
<v Speaker 1>I'm against recommendation algorithms per se, but I think the

0:22:37.356 --> 0:22:41.716
<v Speaker 1>specific thing that I'm suspicious of is the thing where

0:22:41.796 --> 0:22:46.356
<v Speaker 1>you make an algorithmic surface that you as the reader,

0:22:46.556 --> 0:22:49.516
<v Speaker 1>delegate as the control of how you spend your attention

0:22:50.276 --> 0:22:53.276
<v Speaker 1>that has some objective that may not be your objective. Well,

0:22:53.316 --> 0:22:56.156
<v Speaker 1>now you just turned substack into Twitter, right, That's that's

0:22:56.196 --> 0:22:58.676
<v Speaker 1>the straw man version though, or YouTube? Right, Like you

0:22:58.716 --> 0:23:00.276
<v Speaker 1>go to YouTube and it's like yea, yeah, you subscribe

0:23:00.276 --> 0:23:02.076
<v Speaker 1>to that. But like, don't worry, here's what you really

0:23:02.116 --> 0:23:04.156
<v Speaker 1>want to call. You don't have to do that. There's

0:23:04.196 --> 0:23:08.316
<v Speaker 1>a way cooler version of it. That's just Hey, lots

0:23:08.316 --> 0:23:10.716
<v Speaker 1>of people who read a glace Let's also read Josh Barrow.

0:23:11.116 --> 0:23:12.796
<v Speaker 1>You might want to check it out. Like that doesn't

0:23:12.796 --> 0:23:16.476
<v Speaker 1>seem like you're trying to steal my mind, like a

0:23:16.636 --> 0:23:20.236
<v Speaker 1>social media platform. Yeah, and I think I would argue

0:23:20.356 --> 0:23:22.076
<v Speaker 1>that we are doing the cool version of this right.

0:23:22.476 --> 0:23:23.956
<v Speaker 1>And the two things that are important to me in

0:23:23.996 --> 0:23:27.196
<v Speaker 1>this are, number one, we're not just optimizing for engagement.

0:23:27.316 --> 0:23:29.076
<v Speaker 1>We're not saying like, here's what you're going to click on,

0:23:29.116 --> 0:23:31.116
<v Speaker 1>and we're saying here's what you might like enough the

0:23:31.196 --> 0:23:32.636
<v Speaker 1>one day you would pay for it. And the other

0:23:32.716 --> 0:23:36.516
<v Speaker 1>thing is where possible, we'd love to have it be

0:23:36.636 --> 0:23:39.156
<v Speaker 1>human powered. Right when you go to read a book,

0:23:39.556 --> 0:23:42.596
<v Speaker 1>the fact that an algorithm said to you that it

0:23:42.676 --> 0:23:44.396
<v Speaker 1>was the best possible book to you, even if you

0:23:44.436 --> 0:23:47.036
<v Speaker 1>could know that was the truth, might be less compelling

0:23:47.116 --> 0:23:50.476
<v Speaker 1>than somebody who you've trust and have gotten to know says, hey,

0:23:50.516 --> 0:23:52.156
<v Speaker 1>I think you should check this out for these reasons.

0:23:52.436 --> 0:23:54.116
<v Speaker 1>And so when you can have things that are that

0:23:54.236 --> 0:23:56.716
<v Speaker 1>are you know, incentivized the right way, and when you

0:23:56.796 --> 0:23:59.476
<v Speaker 1>can have human beings in the loop, we just think

0:23:59.516 --> 0:24:01.516
<v Speaker 1>that that's like a makes for a better experience, and

0:24:01.716 --> 0:24:04.876
<v Speaker 1>we've shown that you can make recommendations that people deeply

0:24:04.956 --> 0:24:07.636
<v Speaker 1>value that way. What's something you haven't figured out yet, Like,

0:24:07.716 --> 0:24:10.196
<v Speaker 1>what's something you're working on now, something maybe you've tried

0:24:10.276 --> 0:24:13.076
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't work, like what's a's a what's a

0:24:13.116 --> 0:24:16.916
<v Speaker 1>problem you're trying to solve? Now? Okay, I'll tell you

0:24:16.996 --> 0:24:21.036
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I'm really fascinated with is when you

0:24:21.236 --> 0:24:25.636
<v Speaker 1>get a bunch of people who deeply value this one

0:24:25.676 --> 0:24:29.116
<v Speaker 1>writer or this one crazy niche and you find all

0:24:29.156 --> 0:24:31.676
<v Speaker 1>the people who are willing to pay five or ten

0:24:31.716 --> 0:24:34.676
<v Speaker 1>bucks a month for that thing. Not only have you

0:24:34.756 --> 0:24:37.116
<v Speaker 1>given them a piece of media and a connection with

0:24:37.196 --> 0:24:41.236
<v Speaker 1>the author they deeply value, You've created You've sort of

0:24:42.036 --> 0:24:46.596
<v Speaker 1>crystallized this potential community. The writing and the writer and

0:24:46.716 --> 0:24:48.396
<v Speaker 1>the thing you subscribe for is kind of like the

0:24:48.516 --> 0:24:52.316
<v Speaker 1>bat signal that draws in the people. But over time

0:24:52.516 --> 0:24:56.196
<v Speaker 1>the community ends up being a major piece of why

0:24:56.676 --> 0:24:59.196
<v Speaker 1>of the value for people right being among all the

0:24:59.276 --> 0:25:01.436
<v Speaker 1>other people who value this enough to pay for it,

0:25:01.796 --> 0:25:05.116
<v Speaker 1>not having a bunch of trolls, because you can moderate profitably,

0:25:06.916 --> 0:25:09.396
<v Speaker 1>and so I think there's a tremendous amount of fential

0:25:09.476 --> 0:25:13.956
<v Speaker 1>energy there. It's something that writers and podcasters really want

0:25:14.156 --> 0:25:18.356
<v Speaker 1>from us, And I don't think that we've totally cracked

0:25:18.476 --> 0:25:20.676
<v Speaker 1>the answer to it yet, but we've been trying a

0:25:20.756 --> 0:25:23.516
<v Speaker 1>bunch of things. Some new stuff is coming up pretty soon.

0:25:23.556 --> 0:25:26.836
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty exciting. And I think if we can make

0:25:26.956 --> 0:25:31.876
<v Speaker 1>the community aspect of it, right, that will end up

0:25:31.916 --> 0:25:36.916
<v Speaker 1>being tremendously powerful. Well, it's interesting because it's like creeping

0:25:37.076 --> 0:25:40.916
<v Speaker 1>back towards social media, right, I mean, maybe a better

0:25:41.116 --> 0:25:45.836
<v Speaker 1>version of it, but fundamentally that's what you're talking about. Yeah,

0:25:45.916 --> 0:25:49.836
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's people talking to each other, people engaging

0:25:49.916 --> 0:25:54.396
<v Speaker 1>with ideas, people building relationships. And it's again it's sort

0:25:54.436 --> 0:25:56.996
<v Speaker 1>of in this I think of it as an alternate

0:25:57.156 --> 0:26:01.676
<v Speaker 1>universe with different laws of physics from the universe where

0:26:01.716 --> 0:26:03.716
<v Speaker 1>all of these giant platforms have grown up of the

0:26:03.956 --> 0:26:07.396
<v Speaker 1>kind of like massive engagement based AD supported thing, that's

0:26:07.436 --> 0:26:09.356
<v Speaker 1>one way to build it. And we're building a kind

0:26:09.356 --> 0:26:13.516
<v Speaker 1>of this alternate rails. So what's the thing you're about

0:26:13.516 --> 0:26:16.796
<v Speaker 1>to roll out? Am I allowed to talk about this one? Yes?

0:26:19.796 --> 0:26:23.676
<v Speaker 1>So we've been working on We've been working on chat.

0:26:24.916 --> 0:26:27.396
<v Speaker 1>That's something that you can do on substack chat like

0:26:27.556 --> 0:26:31.676
<v Speaker 1>real time, like like Slack style or g chat. Yeah,

0:26:31.836 --> 0:26:33.236
<v Speaker 1>you could look at you could think of Slack, you

0:26:33.276 --> 0:26:35.276
<v Speaker 1>could think of i RC back in the day. You

0:26:35.276 --> 0:26:37.956
<v Speaker 1>can think of Discord is like an amazing thing. Discord

0:26:38.036 --> 0:26:40.276
<v Speaker 1>seems like the closest model there is that, right, I

0:26:40.316 --> 0:26:42.236
<v Speaker 1>don't know discord that well, but that's a very it's

0:26:42.236 --> 0:26:45.316
<v Speaker 1>like a community oriented chat, right, I mean is that

0:26:45.436 --> 0:26:48.396
<v Speaker 1>what I should think of for what you're working on? Yeah,

0:26:48.396 --> 0:26:51.516
<v Speaker 1>I think closely related. Is it hard? Have you been

0:26:51.636 --> 0:26:55.076
<v Speaker 1>trying it and like not quite figuring it out? It's

0:26:55.116 --> 0:26:57.556
<v Speaker 1>been working fairly well. I would say we're being We're

0:26:57.596 --> 0:26:59.716
<v Speaker 1>trying to be thoughtful about it. Right. The thing we

0:26:59.916 --> 0:27:02.436
<v Speaker 1>never want to do again is kind of break the

0:27:02.676 --> 0:27:05.516
<v Speaker 1>magic of substack. And in this case, one of the

0:27:05.556 --> 0:27:07.196
<v Speaker 1>things that really matters is you want the writer to

0:27:07.236 --> 0:27:09.596
<v Speaker 1>be in charge. Right. This is something where I'm if

0:27:09.676 --> 0:27:13.196
<v Speaker 1>I have my community, like and this is my little island,

0:27:13.276 --> 0:27:16.316
<v Speaker 1>my own private social network. Um, I want to be

0:27:17.036 --> 0:27:18.436
<v Speaker 1>in charge of that. It's not I don't want it

0:27:18.476 --> 0:27:20.316
<v Speaker 1>to be something that ends up being like and people.

0:27:20.636 --> 0:27:22.796
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are substack writers who have tried having

0:27:22.836 --> 0:27:25.356
<v Speaker 1>a slack or a discord or one of the telegram right,

0:27:25.396 --> 0:27:28.196
<v Speaker 1>people just telling telegram, and it's often just like it

0:27:28.516 --> 0:27:31.236
<v Speaker 1>becomes like this source of pain for them. They're like,

0:27:31.276 --> 0:27:33.156
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, it's this whole thing and I'm like,

0:27:33.396 --> 0:27:35.196
<v Speaker 1>it's not mine and I can't really it's got a

0:27:35.236 --> 0:27:38.876
<v Speaker 1>life of its own. It's really get really spammy. You know. Yeah,

0:27:38.956 --> 0:27:41.196
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's hard to make it right. And we're

0:27:41.236 --> 0:27:42.516
<v Speaker 1>not trying to make you know to the extent that

0:27:42.556 --> 0:27:45.676
<v Speaker 1>we're building. We're not trying to make the best standalone

0:27:46.316 --> 0:27:48.996
<v Speaker 1>communication product for any purpose. We're trying to make the

0:27:49.116 --> 0:27:54.076
<v Speaker 1>best place to build community and hang out with your

0:27:54.436 --> 0:27:58.076
<v Speaker 1>your substack audience and among your substack audience. Um. And

0:27:58.156 --> 0:28:00.156
<v Speaker 1>so we've been trying to like make sure that we're

0:28:01.116 --> 0:28:04.876
<v Speaker 1>building that with people who are actually doing that, because

0:28:05.116 --> 0:28:08.196
<v Speaker 1>this is the fun part about building something like substack,

0:28:08.236 --> 0:28:10.076
<v Speaker 1>which in my estimation is like a holy new thing,

0:28:10.796 --> 0:28:15.636
<v Speaker 1>is all of the interesting features of it are emergent.

0:28:15.716 --> 0:28:17.476
<v Speaker 1>You don't find out until you have the actual people

0:28:17.556 --> 0:28:20.316
<v Speaker 1>trying to use them, and then you find out whether

0:28:20.396 --> 0:28:22.916
<v Speaker 1>it's working or not. And so we're being pretty thoughtful

0:28:22.956 --> 0:28:26.036
<v Speaker 1>and building it with real people and getting their feedback

0:28:26.076 --> 0:28:30.156
<v Speaker 1>and making sure it's good. So such Stack is not

0:28:30.476 --> 0:28:33.516
<v Speaker 1>that big as a company, right an order of ten

0:28:33.596 --> 0:28:36.156
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year in revenue is very small as

0:28:36.236 --> 0:28:40.236
<v Speaker 1>companies go, And yet I've heard a ton about it.

0:28:40.316 --> 0:28:42.476
<v Speaker 1>It's gotten a lot of coverage in the media. As

0:28:42.516 --> 0:28:46.516
<v Speaker 1>a journalist, I know that journalists love writing about other

0:28:46.676 --> 0:28:48.876
<v Speaker 1>journalists and writing about journalism, and I think that's part

0:28:48.916 --> 0:28:51.556
<v Speaker 1>of it, right, So you've gotten a lot of coverage

0:28:51.596 --> 0:28:55.316
<v Speaker 1>for that. Also, you know, your company has been criticized

0:28:55.396 --> 0:28:58.876
<v Speaker 1>for paying certain kinds of writers to come to the platform,

0:28:58.956 --> 0:29:02.676
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I'm not interested in relitigating the details

0:29:02.716 --> 0:29:05.516
<v Speaker 1>of that, but I'm curious how the sort of two

0:29:05.676 --> 0:29:09.036
<v Speaker 1>sides of that have played out. Right, How getting covered

0:29:09.356 --> 0:29:12.356
<v Speaker 1>much more than a company your size would get covered

0:29:12.676 --> 0:29:15.636
<v Speaker 1>if it weren't basically a media company or a sort

0:29:15.636 --> 0:29:17.516
<v Speaker 1>of media adjacent company. How has that been for you?

0:29:17.756 --> 0:29:20.796
<v Speaker 1>Have the pluses outweighed the minuses? How do you weigh that? Yeah,

0:29:21.436 --> 0:29:22.796
<v Speaker 1>the way that I think of this is that we

0:29:23.596 --> 0:29:26.676
<v Speaker 1>you know, substock has an outsize impact on the culture.

0:29:28.276 --> 0:29:32.516
<v Speaker 1>People care about it for reasons that are valid and

0:29:32.636 --> 0:29:35.876
<v Speaker 1>go beyond the money. We've taken a lot of heat.

0:29:35.916 --> 0:29:38.156
<v Speaker 1>We've had people very thrilled at us and very mad

0:29:38.196 --> 0:29:42.956
<v Speaker 1>at us, and I've always felt like we can't complain

0:29:42.996 --> 0:29:45.236
<v Speaker 1>too much about that. You know, we kind of set

0:29:45.316 --> 0:29:49.196
<v Speaker 1>out with these, you know, the two ambitions. But one

0:29:49.196 --> 0:29:52.236
<v Speaker 1>of the ambitions is very grandiose, right, It's about making

0:29:52.316 --> 0:29:54.796
<v Speaker 1>this new business model for writing and culture. On the

0:29:54.836 --> 0:29:58.396
<v Speaker 1>Internet and having that dramatically shape the world and who

0:29:58.436 --> 0:30:02.676
<v Speaker 1>people are. And there's just no way that you succeed

0:30:02.756 --> 0:30:06.836
<v Speaker 1>at that without, you know, running towards the fire, running

0:30:06.836 --> 0:30:09.516
<v Speaker 1>towards the heat of the culture war and the media

0:30:09.836 --> 0:30:12.396
<v Speaker 1>and the spotlight and all of the things that people

0:30:12.476 --> 0:30:14.756
<v Speaker 1>care about. And so as much as it can be

0:30:14.876 --> 0:30:17.636
<v Speaker 1>both thrilling and uncomfortable, I don't feel like we get

0:30:17.676 --> 0:30:19.716
<v Speaker 1>to complain. This is kind of what we signed up for,

0:30:19.836 --> 0:30:22.556
<v Speaker 1>and all of our paths to success do lead through it.

0:30:25.876 --> 0:30:35.636
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in a minute with the Lightning Round. Okay,

0:30:35.716 --> 0:30:37.796
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to the show. We're going to close

0:30:37.836 --> 0:30:40.436
<v Speaker 1>with the Lightning Round. There are two names that come

0:30:40.516 --> 0:30:42.276
<v Speaker 1>up in the Lightning Round here that I didn't explain

0:30:42.396 --> 0:30:45.036
<v Speaker 1>during the interview, but I should have. One name is

0:30:45.276 --> 0:30:47.796
<v Speaker 1>Jane Jacobs. She's the author of a book called The

0:30:47.876 --> 0:30:51.236
<v Speaker 1>Death and Life of American Cities. The other name is

0:30:51.396 --> 0:30:54.556
<v Speaker 1>Matt Levine. He's a finance writer who writes a newsletter

0:30:54.676 --> 0:30:58.036
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. Now let's get to the Lightning Round.

0:30:58.196 --> 0:31:01.636
<v Speaker 1>What's the most important lesson you learned from reading Jane Jacobs.

0:31:04.796 --> 0:31:10.916
<v Speaker 1>I love the broad impact that's small, practical details of

0:31:11.036 --> 0:31:14.716
<v Speaker 1>the spaces we inhabit can have on how we live

0:31:14.756 --> 0:31:17.516
<v Speaker 1>our lives. And there's lots of stuff in Jane Jacobs.

0:31:17.556 --> 0:31:18.956
<v Speaker 1>It's like that. I don't know if all of it

0:31:19.156 --> 0:31:23.156
<v Speaker 1>is well empirically supportive, but there's this fascination with you know,

0:31:23.276 --> 0:31:27.316
<v Speaker 1>if you have homes that have windows at street level

0:31:27.396 --> 0:31:29.636
<v Speaker 1>and people are looking out, people walking down the street

0:31:29.716 --> 0:31:32.916
<v Speaker 1>feel a different way, and it's this very brass tax

0:31:33.076 --> 0:31:37.556
<v Speaker 1>like physical aspect of geometry that ends up broadly shaping

0:31:37.596 --> 0:31:39.996
<v Speaker 1>people's lives. I think cities are like that, and I

0:31:40.036 --> 0:31:43.636
<v Speaker 1>think that the digital places we create are like that too. Okay,

0:31:43.716 --> 0:31:46.836
<v Speaker 1>if you could have one person in the world start

0:31:46.916 --> 0:31:52.796
<v Speaker 1>writing a substack, who would it be? Might be Matt Levine.

0:31:53.276 --> 0:31:57.396
<v Speaker 1>Oh sure, me too. Same You would make so much

0:31:57.476 --> 0:32:01.916
<v Speaker 1>money it's absurd. I'm sure he's doing well, but yeah,

0:32:03.316 --> 0:32:05.876
<v Speaker 1>it's a good choice. Really really got me with that one.

0:32:06.636 --> 0:32:08.516
<v Speaker 1>If everything goes well, what problem will you be trying

0:32:08.556 --> 0:32:12.236
<v Speaker 1>to solve in five years? One thing I think about

0:32:12.316 --> 0:32:14.916
<v Speaker 1>if we're, you know, successful in all the things we

0:32:14.996 --> 0:32:17.316
<v Speaker 1>want to succeed at, this becomes this bigger and bigger

0:32:17.396 --> 0:32:20.716
<v Speaker 1>that the GDP of the sub stack of verse gets

0:32:20.796 --> 0:32:24.796
<v Speaker 1>gets more and more. You know, we are built on

0:32:24.876 --> 0:32:28.636
<v Speaker 1>this foundation of the ideals of a free press, the

0:32:28.756 --> 0:32:30.796
<v Speaker 1>ideals that writers should get to like, have their space,

0:32:30.836 --> 0:32:32.756
<v Speaker 1>and make what they want. One thing that I could

0:32:32.756 --> 0:32:36.876
<v Speaker 1>see being very interesting is as that goes international, having

0:32:36.996 --> 0:32:41.196
<v Speaker 1>that collide with various societies where unlike here in the US,

0:32:41.276 --> 0:32:43.916
<v Speaker 1>there's not a strong legal and cultural protection for the

0:32:43.996 --> 0:32:46.676
<v Speaker 1>idea that people should be allowed to write have ideas

0:32:46.716 --> 0:32:49.236
<v Speaker 1>people should be allowed to sign up for it. I

0:32:49.316 --> 0:32:51.476
<v Speaker 1>think that's not a free press, right, And it's not

0:32:51.556 --> 0:32:53.596
<v Speaker 1>a free press. There's not a free press. Yeah, and

0:32:53.716 --> 0:32:55.276
<v Speaker 1>yet on subject there is a free press. And what

0:32:55.276 --> 0:32:56.996
<v Speaker 1>does that mean for us that that should be an

0:32:57.036 --> 0:32:59.196
<v Speaker 1>interesting problem? Should we earn the right to confront it?

0:32:59.356 --> 0:33:03.476
<v Speaker 1>How many subseects do you get? Oh man, hundreds? How

0:33:03.516 --> 0:33:07.596
<v Speaker 1>many do you read? How many do you read? Many?

0:33:07.716 --> 0:33:10.196
<v Speaker 1>I pay for tens and I read probably at least

0:33:10.196 --> 0:33:12.236
<v Speaker 1>all of those ones. I read a lot of substack

0:33:12.316 --> 0:33:16.516
<v Speaker 1>to the it's really it's great. I'm an avid user.

0:33:16.716 --> 0:33:17.996
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were going to say it's a problem,

0:33:18.036 --> 0:33:20.156
<v Speaker 1>but I guess you wouldn't say that. Oh, I love it.

0:33:20.236 --> 0:33:23.196
<v Speaker 1>It's a great Everyone should should mimic me in this capacity.

0:33:25.796 --> 0:33:27.796
<v Speaker 1>What's one piece of advice you'd give to somebody trying

0:33:27.796 --> 0:33:37.516
<v Speaker 1>to solve a hard problem, have a grand science fiction

0:33:37.716 --> 0:33:40.556
<v Speaker 1>vision of what you're trying to do, and take one

0:33:40.596 --> 0:33:44.156
<v Speaker 1>step at a time. You think you're going to work

0:33:44.236 --> 0:33:50.236
<v Speaker 1>on Substack forever could be Is there something that would

0:33:50.276 --> 0:33:52.356
<v Speaker 1>like signal to you that it's time to do something else.

0:33:55.116 --> 0:33:57.756
<v Speaker 1>If we go to business and they physically have me

0:33:57.836 --> 0:34:00.116
<v Speaker 1>removed from the office, I would probably have to consider

0:34:00.196 --> 0:34:07.676
<v Speaker 1>my options. Chris Best is the co founder and CEO

0:34:07.916 --> 0:34:12.476
<v Speaker 1>of Substack. Today's show was produced by Edith Russolo, edited

0:34:12.516 --> 0:34:15.956
<v Speaker 1>by Robert Smith, and engineered by Amanda kay Wong. I'm

0:34:16.036 --> 0:34:18.396
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Goldstein, and we'll be back next week with another

0:34:18.436 --> 0:34:19.636
<v Speaker 1>episode of What's Your Problem.