WEBVTT - Tech Rivalries: Google vs. the World

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:17.760
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello again, everyone,

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech stuff. My name is Chris Poett and

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I am an editor at how stuff works dot com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me as usual and you don't even

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have to search for him, is senior writer Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I feel so dirty when they started talking cute.

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to tell her that I love her, but

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the point is probably moot. Okay, well, I'm going to

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>try to puzzle out what that is actually doing with

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>this subject. Absolutely nothing. Sorry I spoiled it for you,

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>But today we're gonna talk about we decided we're gonna

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>do another kind of series. And if you if you're

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're aware of our series, you know that we

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>do these sporadically. Um, but we we like there's certain

0:00:57.880 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>series we like to do where there's a lot of

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff on a particular kind of sub topic in tech

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and we think, oh, that'd be great to tackle that.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>But there's no way we can do one episode that

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>covers the whole topic, right, It's just too big. Right.

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And and for those of you who have been with

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>us for a long time and you you hear us

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>launch series and you go yeah, but you don't come back.

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>It's because we we think of these lists of stuff

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>like this, and then we go, oh, we just didn't

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>two on that, we should wait a while. Yeah, and

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 1>then so so we'll have to get back to like

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the two series we need to get back to sooner

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>rather than later, our our electronic series, in our medical series,

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>because we've had requests for both of those, so we

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>will go back to those. But in this case, we're

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about tech rivalries. And we've talked about some tech

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>rivalries recently in the podcast, Like we've had podcasts that

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>were recently talking about Edison and Tesla, and that's one

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of the most famous rival reason technology in all of history. Yeah.

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>The funny thing about when we talk about companies, which

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do today, is that in a lot

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of cases, uh, some of these companies are sort of frenemies,

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, friends and enemies. They might have a history

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>of working together as well as working at cross purposes. Actually,

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>come to think of it, I guess Edison and Tesla

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>did work to them for a little while. But anyway,

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, they were more enemies than front of me. Yes, yes,

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, so we're going to talk today. The tech

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>rivalry were specifically talking about is Google versus pretty much

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody else. In fact, in a way, this could be

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a part one of google rivalries with other companies, because truly,

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:36.519
<v Speaker 1>Google has had it Scott's finger in a lot of pies. Actually,

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the funny thing is that the one will probably end

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>with is the rivalry that just sort of popped up

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and made us think of this, And it's not somebody

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>we necessarily would have thought of as being or at

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>least I would have thought of as being a competitor

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>with Google. So let's start with the obvious. So from

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a consumer standpoint, like a customer, like an end user

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>like me or or like Chris. To us, Google is

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a search engine. Yes chiefly. I mean there are all

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the other things that Google does as well. But if

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I say I'm going to Google something, that means I'm

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>going to a search for it, and uh, and I

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>mean there is a verb now for googling. So that

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>shows that Google really has dominated this whole section of

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the internet. You know, the marketing department will probably their

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>marketing department probably disagree that it's a verb, but they

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>probably secretly are going, yes, yeah, I wouldn't imagine so

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the so the the first rivalry we wanted to talk

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>about was with Yahoo. You know, another big search engine

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and in fact was a huge search engine back in

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the nineties. Yes, well sort of it, I would argue,

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it was enormous. It was only after the dot Com

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>crash that it started to really have to it really,

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it took that hit pretty hard. Although it survived obviously

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to some of the other companies now, it

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>then built up quite a bit again, only to start

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>suffering again in the late two thousand era. Why, I

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>don't want to, uh to put it down as a

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>search engine, but I don't think um okay y'ah, whose

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>existence predates Googles by a few years. Yeah, and when

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>when Google made the scene, Yahoo was at least one

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of the search leaders. There were others like Alta, Vista

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and Umu hot Bot, which actually used a different engine

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>deemed Yeah, and so there were a lot of them,

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but Yahoo, um at the time they were uh, you know,

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure they were using a lot of human

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>based power. But the thing is they were sort of

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>leveraging that. Now, if you think about Yahoo right now,

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of a content engine. Uh. They have a

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of material that they create, editorial content or a

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>license from other people, and they were sort of doing that.

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>They were sort of contextualizing search, like if you were

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>looking for something in particular, they might tell you, uh,

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, promote somebody that they had worked with and

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>say why it was that you might want to pick them.

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't necessarily as search result, although you would get

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 1>search results. Yeah, the uh that sounds weird. They were

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of a web portal. Yeah, they really were. So

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you think it was sort of a combination of the

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the the search engine, the the Internet search engine, and

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 1>so almost like the online service providers we talked about

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>in previous episodes. It's like the old days of all

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>l and Prodigy. It kind of had its own sort

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>of portal into the Web that wasn't all inclusive, but

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>gave you a good spread of information across various topics,

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>so that you know, you you could at a glance

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>on one page see some interesting headlines and that might

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>be that might be the extent of your experience using

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. Back in those days. Well, people didn't necessarily know.

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I worked in a an I s P and Internet

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>service provider in the mid ninety nineties, and there were

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who would who would call our

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>phone number. I've worked in sales for a bit and

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>people would call and ask, you know, my son or

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>my daughter told me I need to get an Internet

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>account so I can send mail messages. What is this

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>internet thing? And and what do I do? And the

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>thing is, people didn't really know what a u r

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>L was back then because they were being introduced to it.

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 1>It was a sort of a new concept. The Internet

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>had been around, but it wasn't always a consumer uh

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you know service, and it wasn't necessarily user friendly. I

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>mean this was built by engineers. Yeah, and so I

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>love you engineers, I love you all. Yes, but that

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily mean that people knew where they were going

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>on the World Wide Web. I mean Worldwide Web was

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>only you know, a few a couple of years old

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>at that point, a few years old. Yeah, yeah, who

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you know who launched officially as a company in n

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Now it actually grew out of a service that had

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>existed before that, but in became Yahoo and then they

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>launched Yahoo Mail in nineteen. It sort of became a

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>web portal. They purchased Geo Cities in nine, which was,

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, a web page hosting service which now no

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>longer exists, but was. It was big for a while,

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and it it organized web pages into neighborhoods, so it

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>was it was an attempt to make the web more uh,

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>user friendly and understandable to the common consumer by by

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>relating it to concepts that the consumer would already be

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>familiar with. So yeah, I was really doing a lot

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of work in this area. Uh. And then they had

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble burst in the two thousand two

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand one era. Right around two thousand, Yahoo began to

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>do something interesting. Yahoo began to use the search algorithms,

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>licensing them from another search engine company, and that search

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>engine company was Google. Google h they registered Google dot

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>com in the company itself officially launched in night, so

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it was late to the game compared to Yahoo. But

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Google's service was considered to be one of the best

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>on the web. For one, Google was able to index

0:07:55.120 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>millions and later billions of web pages and had a

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>very stripped down simple user interface. I mean it's the

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>same as it as today in the sense that you

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>go to www dot Google dot com, you're gonna see

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the Google logo, you're gonna see the search bar, and

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>then you just type in your query and you hit

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>search Plus. There's other stuff there too, but it's not

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>much right. They kept it really stripped down and simple.

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And so that was Google's philosophical difference between you know,

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:27.119
<v Speaker 1>from Yahoo's point, like Yahoo strategy was web portal, throwing

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>as many services there, try and be as useful as

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>possible and be the destination for the people on the

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>web that they will get their web content through Yahoo.

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Didn't you write an article about that about what the

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Google algorithm? Yes I did. I wrote an article about

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>what makes the Google algorithms so important? And in fact

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>y'ah who recognized how important the Google algorithm was, And

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>so again in two thousand they started to work with Google.

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>They began to use the Google search engine technology on Yahoo. Now, Yahoo,

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of course was really concentrated on building up that web

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>portal aspect of their business at the time, and they

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>used the Google algorithm till about two thousand four, and

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that's when Yahoo ended that relationship with Google and switched

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to an in house developed search algorithm. Uh, so they're

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>back doing their own search at that point, because then

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got another element that comes into play a little later. Um.

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so you then you have started to have

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>this this rivalry in search between Google and Yahoo, a

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>true rivalry as opposed to the kind of weird semi

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>rivalry when you have one company competing against another company

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that's using the first company's technology. That's just kind of

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's hard to get get your mind wrapped

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>around that. Well. In two thousand three, Yahoo bought a

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>company called Overture Services. Now, then in two thousand four,

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo levied a huge patent lawsuit against Google that said

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that Google was was used being technology based on patents

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>filed by Overture Services, which yeah, who now owned in

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>purchase the year before. It all hinged on online advertising,

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>which is the way Google makes most of its revenue. Yeah,

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and Yahoo also has quite a lot of revenue. If

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you ask, if you ask an entrepreneur what Google's businesses,

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to tell you it's search engine. They're

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>going to tell you it's online advertising. So uh and

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and the you know, you, yourself, you the user, are

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the commodity. Then the advertising is the way it generates revenue.

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So this was a big deal. I mean, Google depended

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>on and still does depends on online advertising for money.

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So a lawsuit that could potentially, ah, we'll throw a

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>monkey wrench into the works as far as online advertising goes,

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>was a huge problem. Well, eventually they settled that lawsuit

0:10:56.120 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and Yahoo was granted a perpetual license to use these

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>these technologies to Google, and Google in turn gave some

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>stock to Yahoo, Google stock to Yahoo. Actually the two

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>companies own stock in each other. Um, it's kind of interesting,

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>but one wonders if perhaps Yahoo may be folded a

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>little too easily, because since then, Yahoo has had some

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>problems to the point where they've had massive layoffs and

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 1>the company itself has been devalued massively over the years.

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And there's been some very highly publicized political struggles within

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo over the last couple of years as well, and

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of struggling at the executive level at Yahoo.

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And so then you've got a point in two thousand

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>eight where Google and Yahoo had reached an agreement in

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>which Yahoo could use Google advertising on Yahoo pages. So

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>again you've got like this weird relationship with they're kind

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>of competing against each other, and then they're kind of

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, who wants to depend on this? Well, I mean,

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this is all good news for Google because they're gonna

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>get money using their you know, licensing out this this

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>advertising technology. But there was one little tiny problem. Oh yeah,

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the United States Department of Justice said that this smacked

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of monopoly as far as advertising on the web goes,

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 1>and so they struck it down through antitrust laws. So

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 1>this agreement never came to fruition. Uh. And then eventually

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you get to the point where you rereach today a

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>coint to Business Insider, the most recent figures I could

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>find for the market share for search has Google with

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty five point seven percent of all online search all

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the world around. Yeah, okay, and Yahoo fifteen point seven.

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>So and then you've got you know, he's in third place, yes,

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>being being nine percent. Now, Google is more or less plateaued.

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't really gained or lost a significant percentage of

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that market share in quite some time. It's it's kind

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of lost a little bit, but not a whole, not

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Yahoo has been in a very very slow,

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>gradual decline, Bing has been in a climbing pattern, and

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Being is starting to steal some search traffic, our search

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>market share from both Yahoo and Google. Yes, um, more

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo than Google really at this point. And that actually

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of is another interesting point because you know, Microsoft

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and Yahoo entered into a ten year agreement not too

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>long ago in which Microsoft gets full access to Yahoo's

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>search engine for the ten years. This was related to

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>uh to bing to be able to use the technology

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that Yahoo had developed to help bolster the Being search engine.

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean that Being is completely based on Yahoo's

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 1>search engine technology, but it may partially be based upon it, right,

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:50.959
<v Speaker 1>And if you run a search in Yahoo now, if

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not mistaken, you will get uh bing Yahoo powered search. Yeah.

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>So ten year partnership that was signed by the way

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand nine, So that would end, of course

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in another few years. Yeah. Microsoft's Live search product had

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>been floundering, uh compared to some of its competitors, most

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>notably Google. Um, you know, you wouldn't necessarily think that

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft and Google would be competitors. I mean, Microsoft makes

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>operating system software, productivity software. You know, some electronic devices,

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the Xbox Zoom. Hey wait a minute, what so does

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Google Google creates an operating system called Chromos, and Google

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>has a suite of productivity software called Google Docs. Yeah,

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a rivalry I think is heating up. Yeah.

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And this wasn't around. I mean when you were talking

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>about just a couple of years ago that it wasn't

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a rivalry. This is something that's cropping up now.

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>There was a rivalry as far as search goes because

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of Coach. Microsoft have Microsoft Live Search. And then there

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>was a rivalry in web based email as well, because

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you had hot mail and live mail accounts through Microsoft.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>You had the Yahoo Mail accounts through y'all who by

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the way, y'all who actually totally redid their their mail

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>system after Gmail launched, because then that's the other one.

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>You've got Google's Gmail. So you've got these three different

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>or technically four if you talk about live mail versus hotmail, uh,

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>four different web email based services. Uh. I know, just

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>anecdotally talking with other people who are in the tech industry,

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>tech journalists and and such, they get surprised when they

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>see an email from a hotmail account at this point. Yeah,

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>because everyone thinks of that, at least when I say everyone,

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>like all of the people I talked to think of

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that as like the spam account, um, and my my

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>spam box filled up pretty quickly and hot mail and

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't even given it out to people, so I

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>guess they're just blanketing everything there. Um. So yeah, being

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>launched in the summer of two thousand nine, so it's

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>really not even all that old as the time when're recording,

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is this less than just less than two years? Yeah,

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it's been forever. Yeah, it does actually, um,

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of people were skeptical. I mean,

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Google's had a sort of an iron grip on the

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>search market for years, um, but then Being started eating

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>into Google's market share. When you think about it, two

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>years to go from nothing to thirteen point nine percent

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of the market share of search. That's enormous now. Granted,

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you could also argue that Being is sort of the

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the step child of Live Search, in which case you

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>would have to look at the market share that Live

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Search had and compared to what Being has now. But that,

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, beside the point. Yeah, I've heard generally when

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I've used it, it's been a pretty good search engine,

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and um, a lot of other people seem to feel

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that way too. I have seen critical, critical praise for

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>being um but yeah, all of a sudden, now, uh,

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft is completely retooled at search, and not every company

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>has the pockets deep enough to just go, let's start

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a new one from scratch. Microsoft of beviously does and

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, now they're competing on that front. And then,

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 1>as you pointed out, um, Google decided it wanted to

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>get into the productivity software business as well. And this

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>has caused Microsoft to react because we actually Google sort

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of acquired a series of they had their own, and

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>then they sort of acquired a series of independent cloud

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>based tools and a cloud of courses the internet. Um.

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You use these these pieces of software in your web

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>browser online. The documents are stored online in general, although

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>with Google Docs you can upload uh files and you

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>can also have with Google Gears you can have offline

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>capability as well. Yeah. But yeah, at the time, it

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>may not have looked like it was an indirect competition

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>because that functionality wasn't there. You had Microsoft Office, which

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>as many of you know, is a well well entrenched

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:55.479
<v Speaker 1>productivity suite that includes presentation software and a spreadsheet document creator,

0:17:55.600 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh in an email client, the word which is

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the word processing software, and depending on the package you buy,

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.719
<v Speaker 1>it will include other different pieces of software, but those

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:11.719
<v Speaker 1>are the big ease UM and Google Docs. Google acquired rightly,

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they acquired uh UM, Presentation program, Um and and several others.

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>And then you wouldn't necessarily Okay, so you've got the

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>one that's based on your hard drive, which is Microsoft,

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and you've got the one that's based online, and they're compatible. Uh, well,

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, not such a big deal. Well then Google

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>up the anti They said, let's go ahead and add

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>offline functionality. So now you can download document or you know,

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>work on stuff offline, you can upload it back to

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Google Docs. So Google counters, but you know with Microsoft counters.

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. Microsoft counters with its own online version of

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the Office Suite, which has actually again gotten some critical praise.

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I've seen some reasonably positive remarks on it. And the

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the big benefits of the Google app, which

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>was that it really created new opportunities for collaboration because

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you could share documents across multiple users and then collaboratively

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:13.959
<v Speaker 1>work on projects without having to create new copies of

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a document. That was the big problem with the old

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>offline system was that if I wanted to work on

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a document and I wanted Chris to be able to

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>work on it too, I would have to I would

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have to send him a copy of it, and I

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>would work on one instance of that document on my computer.

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>He would work on another instance of it on his computer,

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and then we'd have to recombine the two, which was

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>always kind of a messy way of doing things. And

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it could mean that perhaps we both made changes to

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the same section, and then how do you incorporate two

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>different sets of changes for the one part of that document.

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Sharing it online meant that everyone was working for the

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.239
<v Speaker 1>same master document and that you know, you still have

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 1>issues that you run into there if you have two

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>people trying to edit the same section at the same time,

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>but you can see it in real time or or

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>close to real time and h and tell the person, Hey,

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>knock it off, I'm working on that right now. Yeah,

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>then you can review it and you can make changes.

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So it made that a little more of a smoother process. So, yeah,

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:13.199
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a rivalry between Microsoft and Google, and it

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>does go beyond just the the productivity software and even

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the operating system, because like we said, Google's launching Chromos,

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's really starting to look kind of interesting. I

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I don't know that's going to get widespread adoption,

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>but Google is putting a lot of muscle behind it. Now,

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind, we've seen Google push other products really,

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>really hard, only to have to eventually give up on them.

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>So there's no guarantee that Chromos is going to be

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge success. But they're not sparing any expense and

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to make it one now, and they're not above

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>defending their turf as we saw earlier in two thousand

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and eleven with the accusations flying back and forth between

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>who's stealing whose search results between Google and being But

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>there's another front too we hadn't talked about. You know,

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Windows has been making an operating system for PDAs and

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>later phones smartphones for years. Um. You know, Windows just

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>came out with a new version of its operating system

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>for phones, which again, UH seems to be getting some

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.959
<v Speaker 1>reasonable success. But it's hard because they already have UH.

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Google already has its Android operating system, which is on

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 1>millions of phones worldwide, and they're also competing on another

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>front with that, which is with another company that creates smartphones, yes,

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and that would be Apple. Yes, there are other companies,

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of course that do create smartphones. We're not forgetting BlackBerry, BlackBerry,

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're not forgetting some of the other players, Nokia

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Symbian. Yeah, although Nokia is now doing Windows Phone.

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that interesting? Yeah, So you've got Google battling Microsoft

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>multiple fronts, including the smartphone. Then you have Google battling

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple on multiple fronts, including the smartphone. Now, and here

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>here's an interesting point. If you were to look at

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the Google versus Microsoft part of this picture, you would

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>say that Google was the one who got there first

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 1>for smart phones in that Android was more of a

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>smartphone operating system than the old Windows Mobile operating system. Now,

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 1>uh so Android was able to get established in that

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>market before Windows Phone showed up because Windows Mobile Windows

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Phone or two different operating systems for phones, and Windows

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Mobile would be the more primitive version. Windows Phone is

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>really snazzy. But Android already had a foothold there. So

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 1>that in that case, you're talking about Microsoft trying to

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 1>take down a giant. But really Google faced that same

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>problem because in two thousand seven, uh the iPhone launched

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in in June, and it wasn't until November of two

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven that the Android phone launched, so Apple had

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a big jump already. You might say, well, that's just

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a few months, that's not a huge deal. It was

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>an enormous deal because Apple was able to do something

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that no one else had done up to that point.

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple was able to create a market for smartphones among

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>general consumers. Right. Of course, BlackBerry already had a pretty

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>big presence, you know, in the in the in the

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>enterprise market forces for companies corporate users. Yeah, because I mean,

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, you might have a p d A, but

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you'd use it for your personal appointments and things you

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 1>don't really necessarily need a smartphone for. And and they

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>were expensive at the time too, so you don't you

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily need one for your own personal use, right sure.

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't until Apple was able to show it

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>as a consumer device, not just a corporate device. Now,

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the key there was to make sure that you still

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>showed it as something that you could do productive work on,

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time show it in a really

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>sleek and sexy and fun way. So it had lots

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of games and the animation was beautiful, and the graphics

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>were gorgeous, and the apps that they developed were really

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>really compelling apps. For the most part, they were couple

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>clunkers in there. But and then opening up the app

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Store was a brilliant move because now you just created

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>a market for all this kind of software. It was really,

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, a great, a great strategy on Apple's part,

0:23:57.800 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and they could not have done a better job with

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 1>their launch. Whether you love the iPhone or you hate it,

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you gotta admit that their launch of that product was

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a complete success. Yeah now, and I'm sorry, no, please

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. I was going to point out I'm amused

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>by this because, uh, you know, a couple of years ago,

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I was asked to write an article. I don't write

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>many articles for How Stuff Works dot Com only have

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a small handful. But on this this um column by

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>technology writer Nicholas Car Do you remember this? And I

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>have to uh have no of him, I don't actually

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>know him. I have to laugh at this because the

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>name of this article is how the Google Apple Cloud

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>computer will work. Because you know, the idea was and

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Car suggested, and at the time it was brilliant because

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, he said, Google can supply the cloud infrastructure.

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple can supply the software and the hardware, which would

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>look amazing WHI would look amazing and work does Yeah,

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple makes stuff that works, and they make stuff that

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>looks really really sleek. On the front end. Apple's got

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, got that. On the back end, Google's got

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure. They know infrastructure, they know cloud computing. Except

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that that was right around the time they became enemies,

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 1>and and and and we had Eric Schmidt on the

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>board yeah Apple, Eric Schmidt, who at the time was

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Google. Yeah, he was on the board

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of director for director for Apple. Because originally you would say, like,

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>well that there's not really a conflict there. Yes, Google

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>is a huge technology company. Apple is a huge technology company,

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>but they both serve different markets, and everything changed. Yeah,

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>and then once they both entered that smartphone market, that

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>really made things complicated. And there were some pretty nasty

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of digs going on, although you could argue on

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the surface that they weren't necessarily digs, that you know,

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone had sort of valid excuses for what they did,

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but you felt that deep down there was really more

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of a how can we get these guys kind of

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>thing going on, and I should also say that even

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>if this smartphone thing had not happened at that time,

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I still find it hard to imagine at Google bowl

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.959
<v Speaker 1>cloud computer. And the main reason for that is because

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that Apple and Google have fundamentally different philosophies

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the openness of technology. So Apple

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>is all about creating a really lockdown, closed system, the

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>benefit of which is that you know what's going to

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>work because you've locked it down and you're not allowing

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>people to come in there and mess with it. And

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Google is not totally open and free. It's not like

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it's Lenox or something, but it's there's like that less

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>there is a perception that Android is completely open, which

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is not true. It's not true. No, it's not true.

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Android is more open than other smartphone operating systems out there,

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>or most of them anyway, but it is not truly open. Yeah,

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Mac os is also somewhat open, but not

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>as it's not as closed as Windows. It's not black

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and white, it's not black and white. But Apple is

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely further along the closed part of that spectrum, and

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Google is closer to the open. And so yeah, you've

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>got uh two thousand seven. That's when both the iPhone

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and Android phones launched. Now, Android at that time was

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it had a huge uphill battle, which eventually it managed

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to to wage uh successfully to the point now where

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 1>you depending on whom you read, you'll see that the

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Android has the dominant market share in smartphones right now. Um,

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>there's some reports that say that goes back and forth,

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and it all depends on how many consumers you have

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>who are using old smartphones and how many of them

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>are still Android versus Apple, and etcetera, etcetera. But the

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>main argument is that Android and Apple are the two

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>big players in this space, and everyone else is kind of,

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the boundary. Yeah, and and the other.

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>The other interesting thing to note is too in the

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>world of apps, Google had difficulty breaking into Apple's app store. Yeah,

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the digs I was talking about.

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>The you know, Google Voice app. Yes, took forever to

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 1>come out. Well, it was originally rejected by Apple and

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>then the and Trust's two thousand nine July two thou

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple rejects the Google Voice app from the app store.

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>In September two tho nine, Eric Schmidt steps down from

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 1>the board of directors from Apple, which some said what

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>might have been at least partially in response to the

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 1>app being rejected. Now Google and Apple both say that

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case. There were there was the antitrust

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>concerns and things of that nature that we're really playing

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>into it. But you know, people will talk, right. And

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 1>then in November of two thousand nine, Google purchased a

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>company called ad Mob, which a mobile advertising company. Right,

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>so you've got this mobile advertising company and no one

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>argues that mobile is the next really, I mean, it

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is the big thing. It's not the next big thing,

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it is the current big thing in web based technology.

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Everyone is grabbing onto mobile devices to access the web,

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's an MP three player that has WiFi capability,

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a smartphone, a tablet, uh, you know, the that's or

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>where it's really going. Even netbooks, you could argue, kind

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of fall into the mobile category just because they're small

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>enough that people take them everywhere. Um. So, yeah, the

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>mobile web is really a huge, huge thing. So purchasing

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>this this ad mob mobile advertising platform was like a

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>shot across the bow. And and plus Apple had been

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>interested in ad Mob and had made an offer to

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>purchase the company just before Google actually did purchase it, Yes,

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>then they countered with another purchase their wireless yes. So

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and and now, as anybody who has seen both in

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>uh an Android device and an Apple iOS device, they

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>have similar styles of advertising in the applications that you

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>see on there. So they are they're turning that into

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a source of revenue. And now you know, I've seen

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the bing app show up, and I don't remember there

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>being any controversy about Apple and Microsoft, uh, you know,

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>putting a bing app in the app store. The It's

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>just funny to me after all the years of Microsoft

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>versus Apple. But we'll talk about that later. We should

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about let's just take this up plus one plus

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>one plus one, Google's plus one right where you can

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like anything on the web. Well, before we get to that,

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know we're running out of time and

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to rush through this last one, but

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>there's still some other stuff I want to talk about

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>really quickly about Apple on Apple and the reason is

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that there are a couple of other fronts where they

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>are they are competing. Again, You've got the chromos coming out,

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>so you've got Google potentially competing against Apple products. And

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about that that's a huge thing because

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple does these high end computers. Right. They're expensive, but

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>they're gorgeous and they work and they're you know, but

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's almost like a boutique kind of purchase, right,

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>because they're there. It's almost like an exclusivity sort of thing.

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Google is doing the Chromos where all the hard heavy

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>lifting is going to be on the the the back

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:56.719
<v Speaker 1>end side, so you don't need a really powerful machine.

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So in theory you can buy a pretty cheap computer

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 1>running the Chrome os. So that's an opposite approach from

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>what Apple takes, so that they're going to compete in

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that space. You've also got Google where they launched the

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Chrome web browser, yes versus Safari, right, and Chrome already

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>has I think, depending again upon whom you read, Chrome

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>has a higher market share than Safari does in web browsing.

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know people who have Matt computers who

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>they were so happy when Chrome came out for the

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Mac because they were not huge Safari fans. I'm one

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of them. And then then you also have YouTube that's

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>renting movies now, which looks like it's competing against Apple iTunes.

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And then there's Google Music, which will be competing with

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the Apple Music Service as well as the Amazon Cloud Player.

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, you've got we We're not going to talk

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>about Google versus Amazon. We could. We can also talk

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>about Google versus Netflix. We can talk about Google versus

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>just about anybody. We only have one other company we

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about. We're gonna go really fast because

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>this episode's going long. Yeah, it was. It was earlier

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>this year, not so far before we recorded this. Yeah,

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>when they announced the well, I was thinking about the

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>plus one feature, and this is I think this sets

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>up what we're about to talk about because suddenly, you

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>know how Facebook a few years ago one because it

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>was maybe a couple of years ago, came out with

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the ability to use their APIs, their application programming interface,

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and you could install it on your web browser and

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>have people like stuff on Facebook on your own web

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>page if you wanted to. Well, that was pretty cool, right,

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you had a Facebook account and more than

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>five million people do um probably more than that. Now

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I might be able to make that six million, But

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you incorporate that into a web page and then suddenly

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.239
<v Speaker 1>someone from Facebook says, oh I like this, they like it,

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it shares it on their wall and then all of

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>their friends can come and read your page. It just

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>meant that there was an additional way to funnel people

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>in to see your content, which is interesting because previously

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the way that people would come and see content there

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:57.479
<v Speaker 1>are two main ways. Right, they would come to some

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of homepage to a site where they visit over

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>over and over again, or they would use search. Well,

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>now you've got a third way, which is socially driven

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of avenues to get to content. So either you share

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it on Facebook where you say, hey, there's this great website,

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 1>go here, or you go to a website that has

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that incorporated like button and it does it for you,

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and then your buddies all say, oh, well, Jonathan liked

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>this one website, we should check that out and see

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>what that's all about. So, in a way, that was

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a shot across the ballot, across all the search engines,

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>because now you're saying, you, guys, used to be relevant,

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>but now we're going to take that away from you,

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>because we're going to have it where people find information

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>organically through their their social connections, not through just going

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to a search engine and typing in some words. So

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that was a yeah, that was a wake up call UM,

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and Google answered, you know, you can do that when

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you have deep pockets and your employees can all spend

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>their time working on UM with the plus one system.

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh So suddenly now Google was competing because you can

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you know plus one basically me, Hey, I like that too, Yeah,

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:04.479
<v Speaker 1>that link, that link is really useful. So I'm going

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to say that out of all the search results I

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>got for this particular query, this is the one that

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I think is the best. I'm gonna plus one that.

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And then when one of your friends comes on, someone

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:14.919
<v Speaker 1>who has a you know, who's one of your contacts,

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>comes on and does a similar search, they're going to

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>see that if they get their search result page up,

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>they're going to see the search results that got the

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>most plus ones from their friends. And again it's kind

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of like a socially driven thing, and they can even

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>see like which of their friends plus one did, so

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>they'd say, oh, what, you know, Jonathan was searching for

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>uh fluid dynamics and so that this one video on

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>non Newtonian fluid was really cool, So I wanna I

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>want to check this out, and then you could plus

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.879
<v Speaker 1>one it and then it again it's socially. Yeah, it's

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>socially driving up the search is Now someone else coming

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in and searching that same query may not see that

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.399
<v Speaker 1>because they're not your contact. So it's it's it's not

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not like wild wet out there. It's not gonna

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:05.839
<v Speaker 1>completely uh game the system for Google search results, because

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing Google does not want to do is

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.280
<v Speaker 1>mess with their algorithms so much that it becomes useless.

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>But it did. Um you know, people were saying, some

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of the tech journals were saying, look, this might be

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:21.840
<v Speaker 1>uh something that will play into Google's maybe possibly finally

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>announced social networking tool. I mean, you had or Cut,

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>but it really didn't take off like you thought, and

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>people have been waiting for this thing for I don't

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>know years. I would say, yeah, Ork it was a

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:38.280
<v Speaker 1>social network like Facebook. Actually it is a social network.

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not gone now. ORC It's very popular in places

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>like Brazil and India, but never got widespread global adoption

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook did. So. Google has already had a history

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of competing with Facebook with things like orch It, but

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it was Ork. It was such a tiny blip on

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the radar from most of the world that we don't

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>even really think about them competing because there was no competition, right,

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you've got someone who has the followers,

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't think of it as competition. Well I didn't,

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>but apparently Facebook did because there again, as as Jonathan mentioned, right,

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 1>not right before, but shortly before we recorded this, a

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>scandal came to light. Yeah. Facebook, Um, it turns out

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Facebook hired a PR firm called person Mars Stellar, a

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>very well known and and pretty well respected firm. Yeah, well,

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>used to be respected. Yeah, it was still well known,

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>might be even better known now. Yeah. Anyway, yeah, the

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 1>PR firm. Facebook hired this PR firm in order to

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 1>pitch stories to bloggers and newspapers that would put Google

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in a bad light, specifically with this socially motivated um

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>search and social circle services that Google's pushing. Uh. They

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>wanted specifically respect to privacy and how Google handles privacy

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and talk about pot calling the kettle black. We've got Facebook,

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>which is not known for being a great protector of privacy,

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>saying hey, Google's really you know, putting your privacy at danger.

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>We want these stories to get out there. So this

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 1>PR firm started to approach various people. One of the

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>people had approached was Christopher. Uh uh, oh gosh, I

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>don't even know how to say his last name. I'm

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna say Safoyan, but it could be totally wrong. It's

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 1>s O G H O I A N. So that's

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>an interesting Chris, if you're out there, let me know. Anyway,

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the Christopher had received a request from the PR firm

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 1>about this, and instead of running the story that the

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 1>PR firm wanted them to run about Google's uh social

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:43.879
<v Speaker 1>uh social circle invading privacy, he ran the email that

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the PR firm sent him. He published, he published it

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:50.240
<v Speaker 1>on his blog, showing that this PR firm was trying

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to engineer this this smear campaign USA Today, same sort

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of thing. USA Today got a request for a story

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 1>pitch about a similar kind of thing, and instead they

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 1>decided to publish a story about the smear campaign. And

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that's when the story really broke across all channels. And

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>uh then later on the PR the PR firm itself

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>was caught removing negative comments from its own Facebook page

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and that helped spurn the the scandal even further. And uh,

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're wondering about the social circle thing,

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of this way that Google shows the people

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you're connected to through various means like Twitter and and

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 1>Google Contacts and all this kind of stuff, and then

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it shows the larger circle that you're connected to from

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>people who are connected to the people that you're you

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that are in your your social circle. So, for example,

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 1>one of the people in my social circle, and it's

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>only because I follow her on Twitter as far as

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I can tell, is Felicia Day or actually Google Buzz.

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it's because I follow her on Google Buzz

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is Felicia Day. But because it's Felicia Day, that means

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that that extra that next step in the social circle

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is enormous. But has lots of people follow Felicia Day,

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So that means that my information is also on display

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 1>for all those people. But this is information that is public.

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:13.240
<v Speaker 1>It is information that you have willingly shared and allowed

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to be public on whatever network like Google Buzz or whatever.

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, it's not like it's digging up

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>information that is behind some sort of security. It's just

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's already out there. So that that's the argument

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:31.439
<v Speaker 1>that other people have against uh Facebook's approach was that, well,

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Google is just sharing stuff that you've already opted to share.

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not like it's sharing information that you didn't you know,

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.839
<v Speaker 1>you said do not share this. So um, yeah, it's

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely a big, big, explosive problem. And you know what,

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Google have had a long history of struggles.

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's none of them were direct struggles like

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>open i D. Yes, Google backed open i D and

0:39:56.960 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>open i D was this idea of creating a single

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:04.359
<v Speaker 1>log in kind of account and you would use that

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>across multiple websites. Facebook at the same time was pushing

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Facebook Connect, which is similar except it wasn't based on

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:17.439
<v Speaker 1>open standards like open i D and it was into Facebook. Yes,

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 1>so it benefited Facebook, but it would also benefit any

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>site that used Facebook Connect because it meant that you

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>were tapping into a social network that had over five

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred million users. So it's there's no there's really no

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 1>surprise when Facebook Connect came out on top, because even

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 1>if you argue that open i D was the better

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>choice from just a consumer safety standpoint or from a

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of a disinterested objective standpoint, from a let's get

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 1>business done standpoint, Facebook Connect made all the sense in

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the world. Alright, Well, we have gone forty minutes with

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, so I suggest we wrap it up now.

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>We again, we could have talked about lots of other

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>rivalries Google has going on, and we probably will do

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.320
<v Speaker 1>another episode at some point just about Google, although I

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>would suggest our next tech rivalry episode, b face, you know,

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 1>focus on a different company entirely. Um, and we we've

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>talked about similar rivalries in the past, like I said,

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>not just Tesla and Edison, but things like you know,

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:19.760
<v Speaker 1>we've done Microsoft and Apple, and we've done a few others.

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>But I think that this is a fun kind of

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>thing to talk about, really look at the two sides

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and kind of see what their strategies were and their

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>their motivation for acting the way they did. Yeah. I think,

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 1>well it's one of those central points in uh in

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>any story, as you need some kind of conflict. So

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one of the reasons that we find

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 1>this so fascinating. Yes, now that we've reached the Danu law, Yes,

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 1>let us conclude. Here is our epilogue. If you would

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like to hear about a specific tech rivalry, let us know.

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>You can send us an email. That address is tech

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff at how stuff works dot com, or contact us

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and Facebook are handled. There is tech stuff H.

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>S W and Chris and I will talk to you again,

0:41:57.160 --> 0:42:03.319
<v Speaker 1>possibly about a rivalry really soon. Be sure to check

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:06.479
<v Speaker 1>out our new video podcast, Stuff from the Future. Join

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 1>how Stuff Work staff as we explore the most promising

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and perplexing possibilities of tomorrow. The House Stuff Works iPhone

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>app has arrived. Download it today on iTunes, brought to

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready,

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 1>are you