WEBVTT - France Wouldn't Consume More U.S. Wine, Even With Zero Tariffs

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Fox along with my co host Lisa A. Brahmowitz. Each

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>day we bring you the most important, noteworthy and useful

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>interviews for you and your money, whether you're at the

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>grocery store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Well,

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>wine has been the topic of a presidential tweet. It

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is also a topic of discussion among those who look

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>for alternative investments. Tom Gearing is managing director and co

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>founder of Cult Wines based in London, but he joins

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>us here in our Bloomberg Interactor Broker Studios. Tom, thank

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you very much for being here. What is Cult Wines?

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 1>What is your business? Psycholt Wines is a wine investment company,

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically so with different traditional merchant or a wine breaker

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>on a wine auction house. All we all sets up

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>completely to deal with private clients all over the world

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and to build up fine wine collections for the sole

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>purpose of capital appreciations, so buying physical cases of wine,

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 1>bottles of wine, storing those wines, ensuring them, managing them

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of the clients providing daily valuations for online

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>platform and then reselling the wines and advising them throughout

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that life cycle for investment purposes. It is not to

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>be drunk in the future. This is to be purchased

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>and resold as a profit for our clients to benefit

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>their over investment portfolio. Now I understand that you got

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>involved in this in a big way before you could

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>legally consume any wine. At the age of thirteen, you

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>started a twelve bottle case of Domain Romani Romani CONTI right,

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a very worthwhile and prestigious wine. What did

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you discover about it? So? I was very fortunate when

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I was growing up. My father was actually an investment

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>banking but it was a massive wine collective, very about wine,

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>So I grew up around wine. I think the first

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>time I even tasted wine was about eleven when I

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>was taken to Burgundy with my father. UM. So he

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>bought a lot of wine at auction. This is actually

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a really salient point in terms of what we do

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>as a business. Um and he bought a case of

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the main Romny County Romani qunt original wooden casing. Now,

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>if anyone knows a lot about wine, these particular bottles.

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>They're producing very small quantity, but they come with almost

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>like a serial number, So they have numbers on the front,

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>which obviously detailed which bottle number it is. Um So

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're buying an original case of six bottles, if

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it had never been tampered with, never been open, it

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>was the original six bottles, they should be the same

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>consecutive numbers. So whatever they number, they are in a series,

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>they should be consecutive. So one, two, three, four, five six.

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>When we got the case home, I opened it up.

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>We were inspecting the bottles, taking photos, condition checking the wines,

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and we found out that the bottom layer of the case,

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom six bottles, when we looked at it,

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the numbers were not consecutives. They were inconsequential. So what

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that means is at some point in time, someone had

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>opened that case and replaced them. So immediately you think

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to yourself, are these wines Counterfeit is their potential some

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>forgent activity going on, because there's no way that these

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>wines shouldn't be in that order. And the reason I

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>say that's a salient point for what we do now

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 1>as a company is that we now manage over a

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred twenty million dollars of wine on behalf our clients

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and actually making sure that our clients are protected from

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>any potential for forging activity counterfeit bottling is essential because

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're buying wine for the purpose of reselling to

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>make a profit, you need to make sure that you're

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>selling wines that are authentic. And this has been a

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>big problem in the wine and she over the last

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifteen years. So that was obviously a very

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>early experience in my in my career, and I wouldn't

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>even say it was a career at that time. I

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>was just thirteen years of age, but it really has

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>stayed with me and it's something that we hold very

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>dear to ourselves now being a professional wine investment company

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>advising private clients all over the world. All right, now,

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to put you on the Twitter spot because

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>earlier today President Donald Trump said, quote, France makes excellent wine,

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>but so does the United States. The problem is that

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>France makes it very hard for the US to sell

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>its wines into France and charges big tariffs, whereas the

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>US makes it easy for French wines and charges very

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>small tariffs. Not fair. Must change is that accurate. Well,

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>let's let's start the accuracy, because often there's not a

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of them with Donald Trump. So they actually are

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that French wine and US wines are excellent. So he's

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>correct with that point. What he's inaccurate about is the

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>fact that in France the domestic French mark, but the

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>domestic market in France for consumption wine is almost entirely French.

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're Italian wine producer, Australian New Zealand,

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they sell very little wine in the domestic market. In fact,

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I travel extensively in France. When I'm in Bordeaux, trying

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to get someone in Bordeaux to drink of Burgundy is impossible.

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you go to Bordeaux, all the wine

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>shops have a hundred percent Bordeaux. So in France it's

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 1>difficult to people get to get people to drink outside

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>their own region, let alone their own country. So the

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>terrorists that he's talking about is absolute nonsense in my opinion.

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean having you know, if Californian wine had zero

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>import taxes to ship to export into France, it would

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>make zero difference to whether someone in France would buy

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and consume Californian lines. And also the other thing to

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>imagine is, you know, you go to a lot of

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>these rural agricultural areas of France and outside the more

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>prestigious border Burgundy, but paces um, you know, in the

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>land without province, whatever it might be, people can go

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to the local cooperative, the local cooperative and they can

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>get a gallon of wine for like two euros. So

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>those type of individuals are never going to suddenly start

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>buying American wine just because there's no tariffs on it.

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's really an economies of scale. So for me,

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I would look at this tweet and say, it's put

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>political posturing. You know, this is nothing more than obviously

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>something that's come up between Trump and Macron, and he's

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>using it as a way to you know, you know,

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>negotiate or bargain with with the French president. But I

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>think in the actual real economy of wine, it would

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>make zero difference in my opinion. It also seems as

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>though there are a lot of idiosyncrasies when it comes

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to the wine and alcohol trade because of course, in

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the United States you have state boundaries that limit what

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>cannon cannot be sold and transported across state lines the

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>when you gave the idea it all right in France,

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the domestic market is so domestic that it would be

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>like an American saying I will not drink a wine

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 1>that comes from the state of Oregon. I will only

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>drink wine that comes from Nappa. Right. That's the kind

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of connection it is there, really is like that. Are

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>there a preponderance of French wines when it comes to

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>this cult wine business or is it's starting to expand

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to include American labels for example? Very very good question.

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking at the investment market for fine wine,

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're very You're talking about probably one percent

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of all wine produced would be categorized to say investment grade,

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>and that markets worth about five billion dollars a year. Now,

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>if you look at say our assets under management, our

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred twenty million dollars around it is in Bordeaux, about

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in Burgundy, so really France and then obvious you've got

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>paces like Champagne, etcetera. So France is probably around of

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>our total a u M. Outside of that we have

0:06:56.160 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>US is our next biggest regional you know, breakdown within

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>our portfolio Italian wines and then New World regions like Australia,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand and and and even South America, but Californian

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>wines in particular, some of the NAPPA producers have been

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>excellent for investment purposes. You know, some of the top

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>wines have made fantastic returns for clients over thinking of

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Screaming for example, absolutely, I mean Screaming. It was a

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>very tough wine to to source and acquire. Obviously it's

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>producing very small quanties. But you're right, you know, if

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you were on that waiting list and you get those

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>wines allocated to you, you're almost guaranteed to make a

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>profit if you resell those wines, because you're getting them

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>as such a great price. There's such little quantity available

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that when you resell, you're almost guaranteed to make a

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>good return. But if you're looking outside of that, you've

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>got some up and coming producers. Obviously some more well

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>known ones that opuswan Dominus that have done very well.

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think the Californian wine wine market from an

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>investment perspective is is very strong and growing. Should I

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>give you twenty seconds, Should I be concerned that I

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>like screwed up bottles? Not? Not at all I mean,

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think in the next twenty years we

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>might see a change in the industry. But it's just

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>not enough scientific and back vintages of wines that are

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>being produced in screwcaps and really show whether they all

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>have any real differences to to to cool closures. Well done,

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for being with us. Tom Gearing, he

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is managing director co founder of Cult Wines. Cheers to

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you and many thanks for being here. A bucket of salt,

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>A bucket of salt. Those are the words used by

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a witness to the EU negotiator Chief Brexit negotiator Michelle Barnyer.

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>He was speaking to European ministers. One witness said that

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Barnyer said the parameters of a possible Brexit agreement are

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>very largely defined, but the witness then said it was

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 1>should all be taken with a bucket of salt. Well,

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's got his own bucket of salt. David Danny Blancheflower,

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Professor of Economics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, can be

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>followed on Twitter at d underscore blanch Flower joins us Now,

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Danny blanch Flower, how big is your bucket of salt? Well?

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>A pinch of salt seems obviously seems an exaggeration. We're

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>two years in when the UK government needs to get

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>some kind of deal done, particularly before a European Council

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>meeting of November twenty five. Um, and Brexit supposedly is

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>going to happen March next year, certainly doesn't look like it.

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>The bucket of salt suggests that, um, there's nowhere near

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to doing that. And you and I have talked about

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>this several times. The Northern Ireland problem seems to be

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a large one. And I was in the UK last

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>week and great fund was being made of a speech

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 1>made by Dominick Rabb, the Brexit secretary, who appeared to

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>have just realized that Britain was an island, which which

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>which meant that trade deals and over the ports were

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>really important. So I think we're a long way away

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>from any kind of deal. May is in trouble, but

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really look like within the party there are

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>alternatives and outside the party. So this is buckets assault

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>being rubbed in the wound. Um, and we're nowhere near

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a deal and maybe no deal at all is what

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>will happen. Well done, Danny Blanche Flower. I like the

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>connections there. I mean I think maybe Mr Rabs should

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>probably Minister Rabs should probably read a little Wadsworth. Maybe

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that will help him understand the disposition of the United Kingdom. No, no, exactly,

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>We're two years in and I mean literally it was

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>all over the TV and the newspapers. He made a

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 1>speech say he don'tly just really realize how important UM

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the port of Dover was and kind of having these

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 1>deals done, and preparations are being made by the UK

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>government for no deal, including stockpiling medicines and food, and

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.719
<v Speaker 1>there was even talk that the huge traffic jam which

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>was likely to occur at Dover with lots of lorries,

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.959
<v Speaker 1>they would have to buy porter parties because a thirty

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>mile jam would mean that, you know, some you have

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to deal with all eventuality. So this obviously looks disastrous.

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 1>But what's interesting I was looking in the ft today

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't appear that UM polling has actually moved as

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>far against the bricks that as you might think. It's

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>still pretty close in the polls, and there's big talk

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.199
<v Speaker 1>about having a second referendum, and the reality is that

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the markets are sort of clear on this. The reality

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is it's not absolutely clear, Danny, Well, not to be

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>two pros poetic about it. But you know King Richard

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the second Shakespeare Sceptred Aisle and all that. Are the

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>British just going to model through or is there a

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>real feeling and you were just there, Is there a

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>real feeling that things are going to be very different

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>a year from now? Well, I certainly think that, um,

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in some sense, people are as he rightly say that

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>they're muddling through. But I talked to a number of people,

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>including a variety of academics from Europe, who were very

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 1>concerned that sort of racial attacks on them, the sense

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that foreigners shouldn't be there had risen, so that there

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>was certainly a sense of that having conversations with people.

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 1>But the Brits will eventually muddel through. But I think

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>he is he was saying that in the past that's happened.

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 1>They're just not clear where we are. But I think,

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>honestly it's a lack of political alternatives. Um, No one's

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>really told an alternative to trying to find some model

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>through um outcome. I mean, I guess the classic would

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>be whatever happens, declare victory, withdraw and pretty much go

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>back to a to a situation pretty much like now,

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 1>and and the basically the transition period will be a

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>really long time and a new government that comes in

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.199
<v Speaker 1>can actually change all of that and go back to

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 1>where we were. So I think buying time pushing you.

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And I've talked about the famous phrase kick the can

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>down the road. Well, this is a giant canful assault

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's gonna kept pushed down the road. So I

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>think I've think people are muddeling through, but there are

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>great concerns that things have changed, and particularly that I

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>mean in the UK that the views about foreigners of

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>something that you know, are you Polish, that kind of

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff has changed a bit. All right, well, let's move

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>from salted beef to pasta because I want to get

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts about what's going on in it's the International

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Monetary Fund coming out and warning that Italy's plan to

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>increase spending carries quote substantial risks and would leave the

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>country vulnerable to market turmoil. Well there's an understatement, right, well,

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>and the European Commission has said this, but in a

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>sense this is hardly surprising. You see the move to populism,

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you see the move of these political parties against against them. Um,

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>mosterity that hang on, Danny. But I mean there's there's populism,

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and then there's just then inability to do simple math.

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>No I agree with that, of course, the inability to

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>do simple math. But that I mean, in some sense

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what's exactly been true in the Brexit conversation we've

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 1>just had. Um, simple math is kind of what's got

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 1>us here in the first place. I'm not suggesting I

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:13.599
<v Speaker 1>agree with it, but I think you're completely right. I

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's a surprise. Um. So now you have these

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>parties like Five Star who got elected on we're going

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to help the workers and so on. So they're going

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to start to push for this, and obviously the I

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>m F and the Youth Commission and others are going

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to push back. But in a sense, these groups have

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a point, which is that austerity has had a really

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>large impact on people. And you might think that that

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>explains a lot of the populism. But you're right, simple

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>math and facts don't seem to be the order of

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the day around the world right now, and that's where

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we are, all right, So I'm going to untether you

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>from simple math and facts give us your worst case

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>scenario for what happens to Italy. Give you about half

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a minute. Well, I mean, obviously the talk talk about UM,

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>not just Brexit, but I I text it is obviously

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the table and we're going to

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>see a major confrontation. I mean, PYM, let's go back,

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>these are double these Italy has double digit unemployment still

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>UM and so there's going to be a battle, a

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>battle between the Commission, the i m F and others

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to try and helpful and it's probably going to be

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a major battle in the worry would be that we

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>won't just be talking about Brexit, will be talking down

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the road about Italy staying enough enough, not least because

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>what is the EU done essentially for those at the

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>bottom end in Italy. Same argument was made with them

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in France with the election. So I think it's going

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a mess. The ability to keep a government

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in place as a mess um and this is going

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to have a great more term all in the markets

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>because people are hurting. It sounds like a messy recipe,

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Danny blanch Flower, Professor of Economics,

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, follow him on Twitter. As

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>we all do a d underscore blanch flower. You're listening

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Market. I'm pim fox all natural ingredients, getting

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>rid of artificial colors, of flavors and preservatives, not for humans,

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but for dogs, cats and your other pets. Here to

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>tell us more more about the change in the world

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of pet nutrition and pet health and all things having

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to do with pets is Ron Coglin. He is the

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>chief executive of Petco and they are based in San Diego.

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>He joins us here in our Bloomberg Interact or Broker's studios. Ron,

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for being here. Appreciated. Give people

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>just the overview first of all of the pet and

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the pet business and then we'll get into natural ingredients.

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Sounds good. Great to be here. So the pet business

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>is a wonderful business. I've been the CEO at Petco

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>now for five months and the thing that is most

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>impressive is just the love that pet owners have for

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>their pets. As a business, this it's a rapidly growing business,

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>growing six percent across and food business is a billion

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar business, so it is a big business. I was

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 1>going to say, the love that they have for their

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.959
<v Speaker 1>pets and the bottomless pocket of money that they spend.

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Some of that's of course going to be spent on food.

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And you've taken a particular position at pet Co. Tell

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>us what you decided to do that's right. So one

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of the things that's clear is pet owners want to

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>do the right thing for their pets, and that includes

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>feeding them the right food and a pet go For

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty years, we've sought to do the right thing for

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>pet parents and pet the pets that they love. So

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>we decided to take a stand against artificial flavors, artificial colors,

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and artificial preservatives, and will we announcing that will be

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>eliminating products that have those ingredients starting in two thousand

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and nineteen, things like ethanol, things like sulfur dioxide, things

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>like high H. I can't even I can't even pronounce

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>half these chemicals that UH ethanol, F D n C,

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>yellow glycerol. We don't think that they belong in our pets.

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>So we're eliminating them and we're the first company, major

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>pet food company that will eliminate them. Okay, when you

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned pet food company, that's got me thinking that there's

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a whole supply chain out there that either has to

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>adapt or they're not going to get into the Pet

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Coast store. Tell us what the reaction has been and

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 1>how that might change your mix of vendors. So there's

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>really a continuum of three different types of pet food companies.

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Um one is those that are already all natural, and

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>we sell a lot of products from companies like Merrick

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>companies like Taste of the Wild as an example. Then

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 1>there are others who said, great idea, we're going to

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>reformulate or we're gonna launch natural versions of our line

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna work really hard to make sure that

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that's successful. Then there are others that say, you know what,

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to make the changes with the artificial ingredients,

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and those uh, those companies won't be on our shelves

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>anymore because we don't think they're doing the right thing

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>for our customers. What about the brands that are attached

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>to various types of pet food and we were talking

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>just before you came on. You know, many people remember

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>pet food as outpo, that was all there was. Are

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>those brands catching up to this preservative artificial free food

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>or are they sort of slow walking the change? Some

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of them are far behind like the ones that you mentioned.

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Others are making the change and will actually have their

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>natural lines in our stores when we start in January,

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and then others are far ahead on already organic foods,

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>on natural foods and lacking artificials. What about the price

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>point of these kinds of foods, Are they higher? Yeah,

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a misnomer that people think because you're

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>going eliminating artific show that necessary things are much more expensive.

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>We pride ourselves and having an array of price points,

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>so we'll have foods without artificials, and the opening price points,

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>will have a product like our wholehearted own brand that

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is uh that doesn't have those artificials in the mid

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>price points, and then we'll have you know, wonderful high

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>end products like the merricks in the Taste of the

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Wilds or candidates that I mentioned earlier. Now, of course,

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>pet Co much more than just pet food. You've got operations, grooming,

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I've got training, You've got a variety of things. You

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>also have partnerships with non pet Co outlets, for example

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>in Canada, I believe we sell products through a third party.

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So the future of PETC, the new pet

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Co as you will, is about it being a nutrition

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>powerhouse but also being a services powerhouse. Our groomers do

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful job. I visited over a hundred grooming salons

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>in my first five months. And the passion that they

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>have for the pets. Sometimes I wonder where they like

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the pets more than they like human beings. If you

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>if you ever wonder, Actually it's obvious most of the time.

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>If you have a new pet, you want to come

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to a pet go to get them trained, And increasingly,

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want vet services, you can come to a

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>petc and that's something will be scaling out. So the

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>whole idea is a nutrition powerhouse and his services powers

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and at the end of the day, we want to

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>be the pet parents partner. I'm making sure we're taking

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>great care of those pets. Did you have to learn

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a whole new vocabulary? I mean, because your previous role

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>was at Hewlett Packard, UH and PepsiCo. Do you have

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to learn a whole new group of you know, vocabulary

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in order to talk about pets and their owners? The

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>first step was opening up your heart. People have a

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>lot more passion for the pets than they do have

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>The PCs even though they loved our PCs UM, they

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>have a lot more passion. But there is a lot

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>of vocabulary. But at the end of the day, it's

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>taking care of something that's precious to people, and we

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>take that very seriously. And you're doing about four billion

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth the business a year right uh, your own

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 1>by Capital Partners, CBC, CVC and the Canadian Pension Plan

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Investment Board. Is it easier in a way to work

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>for privately held company? You know, I've been in public

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>companies my whole career pretty much, and there's a wariness

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.719
<v Speaker 1>about PE and I will tell you that it has

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>been wonderful the support you get, the contacts, the insight,

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>but also you know, they give me a rope to

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>it to run as well. So it's been a wonderful experience,

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and given what's going on with the markets, it's been

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>nice not to be public. Thanks very much for being

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>with us. Ron Coglin he is the chief executive of

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>pet Co, sending out non preservative, artificial ingredient free food

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>for your pets. And the topic now is deficits budget

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 1>deficits when it comes to the federal government. Here to

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>tell us more as IRA Jersey. He is chief US

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>interest rate Strategists for Bloomberg Intelligence. Ira, you have dubbed

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 1>this deficit Day. Yeah. So, so both myself and our

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 1>colleagues at Bloomberg Economics focused on the deficit today and

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>some reports we put out and and you know, we

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>took two different angles. So, um, my colleagues and Bloomberg

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Economics think that maybe the government's own estimates of what

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the deficits going to be UH could be as wrong

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>as a hundred and sixty billion dollars in UH the year.

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that, you know, that's meaningful obviously for

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>what I do, because that means that the Treasury Department

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>might have to issue um, you know, and an extra

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>call it fifteen billion dollars a month of debt that

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe we um. You know, some people don't have in

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>their forecasts right now. Okay, if they don't have it

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in their forecast, do they have the money in their

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>piggy bank in order to buy all that debt? Yeah? Well,

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the questions is at what point do

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 1>people book and say, you know, deficits are too big.

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So normally it's you know, when you have growing deficits

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>as long as the deficit is growing somewhere around the

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>um the level of nominal GDP growth, it's not really

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that much of an issue because that means that the

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the entire economy is growing. You can fund

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the deficits because you have higher income, you have part

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of that income is going to be saved, and and

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>corporations even need um you know, the fun pensions and

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>other things like that. So there's money coming in. But

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing is is that at this point, at least

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>for the next several years, you're not likely to see

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>that you're likely to see deficits growing faster than the

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>level of nominal GDP growth. And that's where you can

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>get challenge. And that's why you need foreign investors, for example,

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to at least make up a little bit of the

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>shortfall from domestic investors. And you haven't seen that the

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>last five years. Foreign investors have not been uh not

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>been buying US debt on a net basis. So they're

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>still very large holders, but they haven't been buying more

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>debt than than they had say in two thousand nine

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>ten Jersey, I want to get you in trouble right now.

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Is any of this linked to the tax cuts that

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>have decreased revenue for the US treasury. Uh yeah, well

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>not not not all of it. I can't say percent,

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>but a large portion of this has to do with

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>with lower spending than was anticipated, say three years ago,

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>when we were UM making budget deficit forecast. UM. The

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>the the unrealistic thing that the government has and this

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is what my Bloomberg Economics team did a did a

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>very good job pointing out, is that the there's this

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>expectation that you're going to have significantly higher revenue in

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 1>two thousand two UM, but that's predicated on growth being faster.

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>There's that's just a little bit unrealistic in their view,

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's one reason why a lot of these forecasts

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>have missed over the past several years. And again by

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>by not by by pretty large amounts, I mean, a

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty billion dollars in the grand scheme of

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>things might not seem like a lot, you know, when

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>when the government has to issue um, you know, a

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars, but you know it's a ten or fift

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>increase in the deficit above and beyond what we thought

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be, so that that's very meaningful. Now,

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Ira isn't there a push pull when it comes to

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>investors because there are groups of investors that have to

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>own what is described as the most risk less asset,

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>which would be US Treasury. Yet on the other hand,

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>they all have benchmarks, and in order to attract investors,

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>will the Treasury have to let interest rates increase? Well,

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury Department um, you know, they have to fund

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the government, right and so so they don't have a

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>choice about the issue. Their decision is where to issue

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and how much of each maturity to issue? So how

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 1>many tea bills are there going to be short term

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>versus long term? And what they've done is they've been

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to keep the portfolio the weighted average maturity of

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Treasury debt reasonably long. Our estimate is is that it

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>will it will fall a little bit over the next

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>four years, primarily because they're going to have to issue

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more in terms of T bills. That Now,

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the good thing about that is that and you know,

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we view our view is that the Fed is probably

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna hike interest rates another three or four times before

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>they stop um and then the next move is likely

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to be for lower interest rates. So the fact that

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>they're issuing more short term debt, means that interest costs

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in aggregate would be lower um than they would be

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>if say, interest rate state stayed relatively high um for

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>for the next three or four years. Um. Yeah, exactly so.

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, you know a lot of

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>people are you know, you look at money market flows,

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and money market flows are actually getting bigger now. And

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a big reason for that is the fact that there's

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>interest rates that are well above zero. Right. It was

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>hard to invest in a money market fund when you're

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>making maybe three basis points in that money market fund.

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Now you're making you know, two ish percent plus or minus,

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>depending on on what fund and how much risk you're taking.

0:27:57.640 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a bit more attractive to a lot of people.

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>So you do see at least some inflows um. And

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's increasing demand for things like treasury bills, which

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously the government's issuing more of. I read Jersey, give

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you fifteen seconds. Does it make sense at a four

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>week bill at two point two percent versus a one

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>year at two point seven two percent? Does that make sense? Yeah? So,

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>so that's all about the expectations of the feed. The

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>reason why you know, you wind up having you know,

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>basis points there in that nine months part of the

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>curve is just it all has to do with expectations

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that the Fed is going to hike a couple of

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>times in between those maturities. Got it, Thank you very much.

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>As always, I read Jersey chief US interest rate strategist

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. I mean, you've got a little buying

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the curve. The thirty year yield

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of three point three six percent, the thirty year bond

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it is up ten thirty seconds. You're listening to Bloomberg Markets.

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg p m L podcast.

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>You can subscut I've been listened to interviews at Apple Podcasts,

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>SoundCloud or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox.

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Abramo wits one. Before the podcast, you can always

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.