Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Shawan Hannity Radio show podcast. All right. This portion
Speaker 1: of the Shawan Hannity podcast is sponsored by Audible. Now.
Speaker 1: By signing up for a thirty day trial with Audible,
Speaker 1: you'll be able to get that audio book you've always
Speaker 1: wanted to read for free. Now discover where Audible audio
Speaker 1: books can take you. To get started, just go to
Speaker 1: audible dot com slash Hannity. That's audible dot com slash Hannity.
Speaker 1: Now look at this news item that I'm sure you
Speaker 1: not haven't heard yet. Headline Japan and their top chord
Speaker 1: has approved blanket surveillance of the country's Muslims. Court struck
Speaker 1: down the second appeal by Japanese Muslim plaintiffs against what
Speaker 1: they perceive as an unconstitutional invasion of privacy and freedom
Speaker 1: of religion. Anyway, there was a leak of a hundred
Speaker 1: and fourteen police files. It revealed nationwide surveillance of Japanese Muslims.
Speaker 1: The files revealed that Muslim places of worship and restaurants
Speaker 1: and Islam related organizations across the capital Tokyo. We're being monitored.
Speaker 1: Now in light of the fact we can't even monitor
Speaker 1: mosques that we know have produced radicals, like, for example,
Speaker 1: the mosque that was attended by the Orlando terrorist. That
Speaker 1: also was the mosque where the first person that was
Speaker 1: that was from that mosque used a suicide bomb, and
Speaker 1: I believe Syria all from the same mosque. Could it
Speaker 1: be would it be so wrong of America to actually
Speaker 1: maybe go in there and find out what's being preached
Speaker 1: in that particular mosque or would that be unconstitutional? And
Speaker 1: in Islamophobia? Well, something is going on in there some how.
Speaker 1: Are these people getting radicalized? Anyway? There are certain days,
Speaker 1: certain moments that I think reveal a massive bias which
Speaker 1: we all know. Journalism is dead, it buried, it's over,
Speaker 1: you know, the media as much as they could they
Speaker 1: you know, the House Select Committee on Benghazi comes out,
Speaker 1: they do their best to look the other way. Six
Speaker 1: requests for additional security. Great Britain pulls out of Benghazi,
Speaker 1: the Red Cross pulls out of Benghazi. We stay and
Speaker 1: we deny the request from people on the ground in
Speaker 1: Benghazi telling our government we're not safe here, we need
Speaker 1: more security. They didn't give them more security. And then
Speaker 1: during the attack, well they're too busy determining whether or
Speaker 1: not we have to ask permission of the Libyans to
Speaker 1: actually send in a rescue team to save American lives.
Speaker 1: And they're agonizing over whether or not the military that
Speaker 1: will put their life on the line to save Americans,
Speaker 1: whether or not they can be in uniform, or whether
Speaker 1: it will be too offensive to the Libyan militants that
Speaker 1: are firing mortars in real time being abs served by
Speaker 1: our government. And in the end, they made our military
Speaker 1: members that were prepared to put their lives on the
Speaker 1: line and save their fellow Americans, they made them change
Speaker 1: in and out of uniform for separate times and still
Speaker 1: never sent them. And then, of course the great lie afterwards,
Speaker 1: the lie that, oh, this is a terror attack, Oh
Speaker 1: this is answer al Shariah related terrorists. Oh we know
Speaker 1: that this has nothing to do with a YouTube video.
Speaker 1: But they tell us a specific lie, and they contradict
Speaker 1: and tell let's see their own family members and the
Speaker 1: Libyan president and the Egyptian Prime minister the truth that
Speaker 1: it was a terror attack, and don't worry. The mainstream media,
Speaker 1: many journalists looked the other way when it comes to
Speaker 1: a terrorist attack at an American diplomatic compound, and our
Speaker 1: government didn't provide the requested security, they didn't send in
Speaker 1: any help to save Americans lives could have been saved,
Speaker 1: and then they lie about it afterwards. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: like criminal negligence. If you were in any other profession
Speaker 1: and you screwed up that bad in any other profession,
Speaker 1: think about it, you would be fired, you would not
Speaker 1: have a job the next day. But that's not the
Speaker 1: case with government. It's a criminal negligence during the attack,
Speaker 1: before the attack, after the attack, lies being told to
Speaker 1: the American people by the President of the United States,
Speaker 1: by the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the National Security Advisor.
Speaker 1: Lies involving a tale of a of a YouTube video
Speaker 1: and this being a spontaneous demonstration. Just think of how
Speaker 1: absurd on the surface this being a spontaneous demonstration. Is
Speaker 1: mortars were fired at the compound in Benghazi. Mortar's mortar fire.
Speaker 1: So you have to believe that in the middle of
Speaker 1: the spontaneous demonstration that one of these terrorists decided to
Speaker 1: pull out of their back pocket of mortar and I'm
Speaker 1: gonna shoot this now spontane is lee, I'm gonna fire
Speaker 1: an RPGs spontaneously. I just happened to have it with
Speaker 1: me in my pocket, and of course all the other
Speaker 1: weaponry that they had in and in in place, because
Speaker 1: that's what you have to believe. You have to suspend
Speaker 1: any recognition of truth to believe their lies. And the
Speaker 1: media covers it up. And if it was Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: it would be a much bigger deal, you know. For example,
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton was given a speech the other day, reading
Speaker 1: a teleprompter as usual. In the middle of the teleprompter speech,
Speaker 1: they tell her how to react. It says, give us sigh,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump sucks. She reads the word sigh. He's attacking
Speaker 1: my faith. You know, it's just like Obama. Navy corpseman.
Speaker 1: I can never get over the fact that he repeated
Speaker 1: again and again and again in a speech Lance corporal
Speaker 1: Navy corpsman, all around the world, Navy corpsman, Christian but
Speaker 1: sharp and lying on a gurney aboard the USNS comfort
Speaker 1: A woman asked, Christopher, where do you come from? What country?
Speaker 1: Corps member Shard responded, Intanzini, the United States of America. Antanzini,
Speaker 1: Navy corpseman. He doesn't know what a corman is, and
Speaker 1: he's the commander in chief. Now let me give you
Speaker 1: another example of the type of bias that exists out here. Now,
Speaker 1: the Attorney General of the United States as Loretta Lynch,
Speaker 1: Loretta Lynch. Eventually, when the FBI finishes, as James Comey says,
Speaker 1: the criminal investigation which is ongoing into the matter of
Speaker 1: the illegal server of Hillary Clinton's, well, she mishandled class
Speaker 1: AVIOUD information. She mishandled UH special Access program information. Just
Speaker 1: the mishandling itself is in and of itself a felony,
Speaker 1: So we know she violated and committed multiple felonies in
Speaker 1: all of this. The investigation were told and then she
Speaker 1: deleted thirty three thousand emails that had to do with
Speaker 1: a wedding and a funeral and yoga and communicating with
Speaker 1: somebody that doesn't communicate via email. That was her lame excuse.
Speaker 1: Apparently they've been able to recover with these things, but
Speaker 1: it's an ongoing criminal investigation, and the FBI is not
Speaker 1: supposed to have a timetable. Although I think it's a
Speaker 1: little odd that the FBI is not kicking it into
Speaker 1: gear a little bit and getting this thing done so
Speaker 1: the American people can have a a factual knowledge base
Speaker 1: about whether, in fact they're gonna have a potential of,
Speaker 1: in the case of Hillary Clinton, some type of criminal
Speaker 1: referral or indictment. So the Attorney General Lauretta Lynch met
Speaker 1: with former President Bill Clinton for a half hour on
Speaker 1: her government airplane at the Phoenix Airport on Tuesday, according
Speaker 1: to an Arizona news station. Now, you gotta put this
Speaker 1: in context, this meeting had been unannounced. This meeting is
Speaker 1: happening while it's Lynches Justice Department. The FBI part of
Speaker 1: the Justice Department is investigating the handling of classified information
Speaker 1: on Hillary Clinton's the illegal private email server, and it
Speaker 1: came to light only when the local ABC Phoenix station
Speaker 1: asked Lynch about it during a press conference, and the
Speaker 1: Obama pointee well said this, I did see President Clinton
Speaker 1: at the Phoenix airport. Um as I was leaving, and
Speaker 1: he spoke to myself and my husband on the plane.
Speaker 1: M Our conversation was a great deal by his grandchildren.
Speaker 1: It was primarily social and about our travels. He mentioned
Speaker 1: the golf he played in Phoenix. Oh, we talked about,
Speaker 1: let's say, golf. We talked about our grandchildren. You know.
Speaker 1: As I was leaving, he spoke to myself my husband
Speaker 1: on the plane. Our conversation was a great deal about
Speaker 1: his grandchildren and does he have grandchildren or grandchild? All right?
Speaker 1: Primarily social and about our travels. He mentioned the golf
Speaker 1: that he played in Phoenix. You know, primarily is an
Speaker 1: interesting adverb, isn't it, Because the meeting was primarily social,
Speaker 1: primarily about travels. But I guess not exclusively about those things.
Speaker 1: She said, primarily. Now, uh, what other issue could be
Speaker 1: on the mind of Bill Clinton as it relates to
Speaker 1: the Loretta Lynch Justice Department that he might want to
Speaker 1: discuss with her? Who's the Attorney General? I don't know,
Speaker 1: maybe Hillary's email server. She says. It didn't come up
Speaker 1: because she knows it would be unethical if it came
Speaker 1: him up, and it was even unethical of her to
Speaker 1: even meet with him. Stunning, and it should be to
Speaker 1: everybody that is sitting attorney general, who, by the way,
Speaker 1: thinks the answer to terrorism and Islamic terrorism is love.
Speaker 1: We just gotta love the terrorists more and they'll love
Speaker 1: us more. Anyways, in a meeting with a former president
Speaker 1: whose wife is at the center of a of a
Speaker 1: Justice Department FBI criminal investigation, now we all know James
Speaker 1: call me the FBI director, he's gonna make a recommendation
Speaker 1: to Lauretta Lynch on whether or not to press charges
Speaker 1: against Hillary Clinton or any of her aids. At the
Speaker 1: end of this probe, he said, he's on it every
Speaker 1: day himself. He's paying attention to it. And having Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton meet with the attorney general alone is not only inappropriate,
Speaker 1: and you know, for them to say the topic never
Speaker 1: came up, I don't believe them, because the fact is
Speaker 1: is that it's unseemly, it's unethical. It's improper for a
Speaker 1: former president to foster a personal connection with the very
Speaker 1: attorney general who will ultimately decide whether or not to
Speaker 1: indict his wife. This is, by the way, the American
Speaker 1: Mirror website pointed out that Bill Clinton was in Phoenix
Speaker 1: to attend a quote Latino leaders round table, according to
Speaker 1: one of the apparent participants. But as the website asks,
Speaker 1: have the Clinton's ever held a political event not invited
Speaker 1: the media? Not often, and in this case, there was
Speaker 1: no media coverage of any such event. You only know
Speaker 1: about it because the photos of Clinton's Phoenix visit were
Speaker 1: posted on social media. So it was Bill Clinton and
Speaker 1: Phoenix for the primary purpose of setting up a private
Speaker 1: meeting with Lynch. I'm an inquiring mind. I'd like to know,
Speaker 1: because it turns out Lynch was in Arizona as part
Speaker 1: of a national tour to discuss law enforcement issues focusing
Speaker 1: on community relations. And the question is whether Bill Clinton,
Speaker 1: knowing her schedule, made a point of this rendezvous, and
Speaker 1: if so, what was the purpose, and if the purpose
Speaker 1: was to shape the outcome of the criminal investigation that
Speaker 1: involves his wife. Even Democratic Senator Chris Coon's confessed that
Speaker 1: the meeting sends the wrong signal, even if it was brief, casual,
Speaker 1: social meeting with a former president. I think she should
Speaker 1: have said, look, I recognize you have a long record
Speaker 1: of leadership on fighting crime. This is not the time
Speaker 1: for us to be having that conversation after the election
Speaker 1: is over. I'd welcome your advice. Now, we don't know
Speaker 1: what was on Loretta Lynch's mind, but I'm pretty certain
Speaker 1: that we know what was on Bill's mind. After all,
Speaker 1: we know who we're dealing with. We're dealing with the Clintons.
Speaker 1: Their entire lives seemed to involve managing scandals, one ethical
Speaker 1: moment after another, one crisis after another. That's can nature
Speaker 1: to who they are. They don't leave anything to chance.
Speaker 1: There's a blogger at hot Air said, even if we
Speaker 1: were to assume that the obvious reason wasn't in play,
Speaker 1: what would possess the attorney general to agree to such
Speaker 1: a private meeting. The man's wife is currently under investigation
Speaker 1: by the FBI, and the optics alone should be enough
Speaker 1: to give any law enforcement official cold chills. Does she
Speaker 1: regularly get together and socialize with the spouses of subjects
Speaker 1: of FBI investigations? Were supposed to believe that they spent
Speaker 1: half an hour talking about Chelsea's kids and the subject
Speaker 1: of the investigation never came up at all. Sorry, that
Speaker 1: doesn't meet the smell test, does it. You imagine if
Speaker 1: Jeb Bush running for president under a criminal investigation by
Speaker 1: an attorney general appointed by a Republican president who had
Speaker 1: a deep investment in Jeb's victory, and George W. Bush
Speaker 1: just happened to meet privately with that attorney general on
Speaker 1: the attorney general's plane to discuss who God knows who what?
Speaker 1: Who's what? You know? Who knows? The president would be going.
Speaker 1: Literally the press would be insane about this. But in
Speaker 1: this case, the story, well, it's being covered, but there's
Speaker 1: no urgency. It's not the same breathlessness. You know that
Speaker 1: if it happened to be a Republican nominee, or it
Speaker 1: happened to be Donald Trump. Look, I've covered the Clintons
Speaker 1: twenty five years plus. I know their m O. I
Speaker 1: know how they operate, I know how they deal with scandals.
Speaker 1: I know they leave nothing to chance. I know they're
Speaker 1: gonna use their willpower to influence things in a direction
Speaker 1: to cover up scandals. That's that's what they do. This
Speaker 1: is who they are, this is what they do. Here's
Speaker 1: another thing. What if they got word that maybe Loretta
Speaker 1: Lynch was leaning towards going against them and going with Comey.
Speaker 1: What if they got fat information? Could it be that
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton purposely? He's a smart guy, he's not a dope,
Speaker 1: doesn't make great decisions sometimes, but he's a not a dope.
Speaker 1: Did he do it on purpose? So she'd have to
Speaker 1: recuse herself and the hopes that maybe they'd get somebody
Speaker 1: more favorable You have to consider that. You know, when
Speaker 1: a book just really hooks you and you just can't
Speaker 1: put it down, well, with audible, well, you don't have
Speaker 1: to discover where audible audio books can take you know,
Speaker 1: maybe it's a book you've been wanting to read for
Speaker 1: a long time. Now. Audible has something special for everyone,
Speaker 1: So download your books or shows on your mobile device
Speaker 1: and listen anytime, anywhere and With an unmatched selection of audiobooks,
Speaker 1: original audio shows, news, comedy, Audible is your best source
Speaker 1: for everyday entertainment. The Audible app makes listening to breeze
Speaker 1: with features like chapter navigation and narration speed control. So
Speaker 1: access your books your shows anytime, anywhere, right from your
Speaker 1: smartphone or your tablet. Joy Audible today and explore the
Speaker 1: world's leading provider of audio books, all beautifully performed by
Speaker 1: talented actors and narrators that you can start a thirty
Speaker 1: day trial and download your first audio book for free.
Speaker 1: Just go to audible dot com slash hannity to get started.
Speaker 1: That's audible dot com slash Hannity for a thirty day
Speaker 1: trial and audio book. Black Lives Matter is threatening to
Speaker 1: disrupt the Democratic Convention. Apparently, Bernie Sanders supporters are not
Speaker 1: going to be the only protesters in Philly. Gee, I
Speaker 1: can't wait for the five of July. This is gonna
Speaker 1: be great anyway. The Republican Convention is on the eight
Speaker 1: and the Democratic Convention the week after, and here we
Speaker 1: are anyway. A leader of the Black Lives Matter movement
Speaker 1: is now warning that activists are prepared to protest the
Speaker 1: platform at the d n C convention in Philly next month,
Speaker 1: Sighting the congressional sit in on the House floor last
Speaker 1: week over gun control as a possible a model the Ray,
Speaker 1: McKesson told Capital Download the congress just sat in, So
Speaker 1: it will be interesting to see how the d n
Speaker 1: C responds to people in protest, given the congressman literally
Speaker 1: just sat in, and they seem to validate that. At
Speaker 1: a meeting with the presumptive nominee earlier this week, McKesson
Speaker 1: said he cautioned Clinton directly that she could not count
Speaker 1: on antipathy to Trump to turn out black voters. I said, Hillary,
Speaker 1: I worry you're not You're underestimating how many people plan
Speaker 1: to sit out this election because their disillusion And if
Speaker 1: the d n C and if Hillary Clinton's camp don't
Speaker 1: help see her as the real choice despite the misgivings
Speaker 1: about her, I think there's gonna be more an uphill
Speaker 1: battle than it an he is Wow, Black Lives Matter,
Speaker 1: here is an interesting side note. Media loves to focus on,
Speaker 1: you know, the handful of Republicans that are less than
Speaker 1: enthusiastic about Donald Trump. But meanwhile, you'd never know that
Speaker 1: the Black Lives Matters group is what I just told you.
Speaker 1: And now Bernie Sanders supporters have decided to sue the
Speaker 1: d n C for fraud, so the u p I story.
Speaker 1: A group of Bernie Sanders supporters is suing the Democratic
Speaker 1: National Convention and their chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, alleging quote
Speaker 1: she rigged the primary for Hillary Clinton. Have a hundred
Speaker 1: and twenty people, including a hundred and four Sanders donors.
Speaker 1: They filed the suit in federal court in the southern
Speaker 1: District of Florida and the congresswoman's home district. In the suit,
Speaker 1: the plane of say that Wasserman Schultz in the d
Speaker 1: n C were fraudulent, negligent, misrepresented their true motivations in
Speaker 1: the Democratic presidential primary, citing internal email and memos that
Speaker 1: have been leaked by someone claiming to have gotten them
Speaker 1: from Russian hackers who access the d n C computer files.
Speaker 1: The plane of say the d n C only ever
Speaker 1: considered Clinton to be the likely nominee lawsuit quotes from
Speaker 1: league memo that states the d n c's goals in
Speaker 1: the coming months will be to frame the Republican field
Speaker 1: and the eventual nominee early and to provide a contrast
Speaker 1: between the GOP field and Hillary Clinton. They had it
Speaker 1: from the get go. They were you know, if the
Speaker 1: system was corrupt, always has been corrupt. Uh. I see Obama,
Speaker 1: I'm trying to understand what this is about. Daily Caller
Speaker 1: had a story today, even the after the fiasco of
Speaker 1: the censored nine eleven transcripts, the Obama administration is trying
Speaker 1: to cover up details of the Orlando terror attack. FBI
Speaker 1: is apparently instructing Florida agencies that responded to the attack
Speaker 1: that night to deny requests for public records pertaining to
Speaker 1: the case. Now, this terrorist matteen called police several times
Speaker 1: during the three hour ordeal to declare his allegiance to
Speaker 1: isis it only a fraction of his discussions with authorities
Speaker 1: that night have been released to the public. And of
Speaker 1: course we first got the the edited were adapted version.
Speaker 1: I pledge allegiance to bleep omitted. I pledge allegiance to
Speaker 1: bleep omitted. It's unbelievable. Anyway. So, in response to a
Speaker 1: lawsuit by local media seeking the release of the nine
Speaker 1: eleven audio, the Seminole County Sheriff's office released a letter
Speaker 1: that they got from the FBI instructing them to deny
Speaker 1: all requests for information and refer news outlets seeking information
Speaker 1: to the FEDS. According to The Orlando Sentinel, the recordings
Speaker 1: and all records are public records under Florida law, and
Speaker 1: they are subject to the Freedom of Information Act requests.
Speaker 1: The FBI doesn't have the authority to hijack Florida's constitution,
Speaker 1: which guarantees us the right to access all non exempt
Speaker 1: public records, said Barbara Peterson, president of the First Amendment Foundation,
Speaker 1: telling The Orlando Sentinel, I don't know what to make
Speaker 1: of that. Uh never Trump dead ender Bill Crystal hasn't
Speaker 1: given up on his search for somebody to hurt Trump
Speaker 1: and give the nomination a Hillary. Give the presidency to
Speaker 1: Hillary's come up with a brand new candidate. Crystal wants
Speaker 1: to take the nomination away from Trump and give it
Speaker 1: to John McCain. He's such a loser. What a bunch
Speaker 1: of cry baby sore losers. These people are anyway, the
Speaker 1: same John McCain that blew his big chance against Barack
Speaker 1: Obama eight years ago. Bright Part reports today that Crystal
Speaker 1: tweeted that McCain was in d C raising money for
Speaker 1: Senate re election bid. I don't even think he can
Speaker 1: beat Dr Kelly Ward. When do I have to make
Speaker 1: my choice in that? When is that primary? I like
Speaker 1: Dr Kelly Ward. I'm tired of McCain and Lindsey Graham
Speaker 1: and the rest of these people. Anyway, Crystal said, just
Speaker 1: left McCain fundraiser in d C. Happy to donate, but
Speaker 1: the question occurred to me, why senate re election? Why
Speaker 1: not run as an independent for president? Doctor Ward? The
Speaker 1: polls have shown tied with McCain and the Republican primary.
Speaker 1: You said it's August thirty, right, pounced on crystals tweets
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton, supporter of Bill Crystal is the worst sort
Speaker 1: of establishment hack. She tweets like I tweet. I tweet
Speaker 1: things like are you a jackass all the time? Or
Speaker 1: just on Twitter? I love you. You watch me when
Speaker 1: I go on my rampages. Sometimes you'll say, calm down.
Speaker 1: People think you're drinking and I'm not drinking because I
Speaker 1: just let her loose. Are you always a jackass or
Speaker 1: you just a jackass on Twitter? These people are obnoxious,
Speaker 1: these you know, keyboard warriors, and they're you know, underwear.
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you a story later about underwear. So
Speaker 1: I wear the boxer brief combo thing. I'll tell you later.
Speaker 1: And I and my my mother in law gave me
Speaker 1: something breaking zackly big breaking news. My wife's well, why
Speaker 1: are you wearing new one? Whereas it's the same underwear,
Speaker 1: just a different color. I didn't know they came in colors.
Speaker 1: I think they're b v d s their haynes. The
Speaker 1: haynes was what they are. That's what I wear. I
Speaker 1: don't know. I'm not ashamed of it. Not wearing a thong,
Speaker 1: I don't get that. How could any woman find that comfortable?
Speaker 1: That's the image of that whole thing is just weird
Speaker 1: to me, you know, right up the old you know
Speaker 1: it's all for fashion too, the key star exactly. Uh. Anyway,
Speaker 1: let's get to our phones here. Let us say hi
Speaker 1: to Chris and Tallahassee, Florida. What's up, Chris? How are
Speaker 1: you hi? Sean? How are you today? I'm good, brother?
Speaker 1: What's going on? I was actually calling yesterday? You were
Speaker 1: talking about um. I think it was that Edwards guy
Speaker 1: and like talking to the I don't. I don't buy
Speaker 1: these people that think they can talk to the dead stuff.
Speaker 1: I don't either. But I have a quick story. I'll
Speaker 1: tell you My son had dou Chane's muscular district and
Speaker 1: passed away on February the twenty. Wasn't in four And
Speaker 1: is it some of the stuff I would think I
Speaker 1: was goofy of the football bat. And I'll tell you
Speaker 1: about two little incidents we had. We had a nurse
Speaker 1: that came to the house so that we could get
Speaker 1: some sleep overnight when he was bad, and he had
Speaker 1: a snow globe that he liked playing with in the
Speaker 1: music and watching the snow at all. Well, me and
Speaker 1: my wife were This was months probably eight months after
Speaker 1: he had passed. We were sitting on the couch talking
Speaker 1: about it still had the chair that the nurse set
Speaker 1: in and the snow globe sitting over, but it started playing.
Speaker 1: It played a melody for about six eight seconds, a
Speaker 1: little bit of one, and we both just kind of
Speaker 1: looked at each other and we went and picked it
Speaker 1: up and talk. It didn't even have a battery in it,
Speaker 1: so we just thought that was a little odd, and
Speaker 1: then a sten I can't comment about something I don't
Speaker 1: know about. You know, one of my favorite authors novelists
Speaker 1: of all time is Tailor Caldwell, and she was a
Speaker 1: phenomenal phenomenal anyway, there was a book written about how
Speaker 1: either she died or her husband died or someone she
Speaker 1: loved diet and they had always talked about sending a sign.
Speaker 1: And this flower that never bloomed bloomed. You know, I
Speaker 1: guess it's possible. I just don't understand it. And you know,
Speaker 1: I believe, I believe that God can do anything. I look,
Speaker 1: I think there is My belief is that there is
Speaker 1: a God that created the heavens and the earth and
Speaker 1: everything that always was, always will be. And I think
Speaker 1: if you look at the majesty of creation from the
Speaker 1: from the smallest gnat to you know, the smallest molecules
Speaker 1: that DNA to the universe to universes within universes within universes,
Speaker 1: and the animal kingdom and the human kind, and you know,
Speaker 1: it's it's spectacular. It's beyond human understanding. The thought of
Speaker 1: a god, I think is almost beyond human comprehension because
Speaker 1: we don't understand it. We're not supposed to understand it.
Speaker 1: Otherwise I'd explain it to you. So I have this
Speaker 1: belief that there's something greater than our off and I
Speaker 1: think that anything is possible, and I think people are
Speaker 1: given different gifts and but I also think that there
Speaker 1: are people that are frauds that prey on people's emotions. Anyway,
Speaker 1: what else did you want to say? I agree with
Speaker 1: that if there was somebody that could talk to the
Speaker 1: people that had passed, I would hunt them down because
Speaker 1: I would give anything for one minute more to talk
Speaker 1: to my phone. But my granddaughter, me and her were
Speaker 1: I'll kind of finish off with this. How old was
Speaker 1: your son? He was thirteen. Life expectancy of du Chane's
Speaker 1: was late teens to early twenties, and he developed cardio
Speaker 1: myopathy when he was twelve, which is the hard part.
Speaker 1: And so everything you know, we I guess you always
Speaker 1: think you had more time. Well we did, but it
Speaker 1: was a horrible thing to go through. Uh. I don't
Speaker 1: know if I could do it again, and I've understood
Speaker 1: for anybody. Look, I just think I I don't. I
Speaker 1: think there's certain things that would crush me in life,
Speaker 1: losing a child is right at the top, not just crushed.
Speaker 1: And I think I'd be drinking Kentucky clear all day
Speaker 1: and pouring it down my throat to ease the pain.
Speaker 1: But I have a granddaughter now that reminds me greatly
Speaker 1: of him. And she and I were I was pulling
Speaker 1: her in her wagon down the street, and our cocker
Speaker 1: spaniel had passed away from cancer, and she didn't she
Speaker 1: hadn't said a word about it since he had passed away.
Speaker 1: We're walking along and all of a sudden, she says,
Speaker 1: Charlie's okay. His names the name was Charlie says, Charlie's okay.
Speaker 1: He's with the red dog and Jonathan and I looked
Speaker 1: at her and said, tell me more. And the red
Speaker 1: dog was a Golden Retriever we had that was reddish looking,
Speaker 1: that passed. Sounds like it. You should read two books, Um,
Speaker 1: what's the one about the boy? The Yellow Book? I
Speaker 1: read that book and and Dan, Heaven is for Real,
Speaker 1: and you should you should see the movie. And you
Speaker 1: should read Dan Piper's book of fifty ninety Minutes in Heaven.
Speaker 1: And you know what, it's interesting because it describes, you know,
Speaker 1: angels and and melodies and music at a level that
Speaker 1: you just can't explain in the Uh, don Piper, sorry,
Speaker 1: and uh you know, if you ask me, I think
Speaker 1: those experiences are real, but you know I never had
Speaker 1: it myself. I'm just saying I believe it. So anyway,
Speaker 1: I gotta run. Thank you, Chris, I'm sorry you lost
Speaker 1: your son, and I thank you for Sherry. That's a
Speaker 1: hard thing. Well, I don't want to hear from my parents.
Speaker 1: It would probably be still be yelling at me from
Speaker 1: when I was a kid. I'd guarantee you my mother
Speaker 1: is still yelling at me. Yes, exactly. Anyway, Nathan is
Speaker 1: in Lynchburg, Virginia. What's up, Nathan? How are you hey?
Speaker 1: Sean Um, the FBI needs to go ahead and investigate
Speaker 1: Lorta Lynch due to what's going on with Bill Clinton.
Speaker 1: In my opinion, Um, she said primarily that right there
Speaker 1: tells you that she didn't say we didn't talk about
Speaker 1: it at all, so therefore she's not lying. But at
Speaker 1: the end of the day, she didn't mention secondary or
Speaker 1: thirdly or fourthly. Um. On top of that, if Bill Clinton,
Speaker 1: he's a Fox, If he Um didn't say anything about it,
Speaker 1: I'm sure that you say he's a fox. He's a fox.
Speaker 1: You know, he's clever, he's he knows what he's doing.
Speaker 1: He's he's been in that position for a while. I agree,
Speaker 1: I think it was I think this may have been
Speaker 1: done by design. I think you have to look at
Speaker 1: that possibility. I mean, he's hit the simplest in her
Speaker 1: a piece of paper with something that she did in
Speaker 1: her past or something that she's doing now and saying,
Speaker 1: how you doing? You know, like in other words, you
Speaker 1: keep you if you go against listen, Lenny is a
Speaker 1: good point. Lenny Dikstra, as a player, used to play
Speaker 1: for the Mets and the Phillies great player. Mitzi was juicing,
Speaker 1: but he said he would hire investigators to look into
Speaker 1: the lives of umpires make comments to them in the
Speaker 1: strike zone got so much bigger because they didn't want
Speaker 1: to be out of That happens all the time. It's
Speaker 1: called blackmail. Uh. Let's go to our phone s. Thank you,
Speaker 1: Nathan and the home of Liberty University, Lynchburg, Virginia. David
Speaker 1: new Joyzy, what's up, Dave? How are you? Hey? Sean?
Speaker 1: How you doing? I? I love your shell and I
Speaker 1: think you you do a great job. The one issue
Speaker 1: I have is when you say Bill Clinton is a
Speaker 1: smart guy. How in the world can you say something
Speaker 1: like that after he pointed his finger at all of
Speaker 1: us in the United States not having essentially and you
Speaker 1: called him smart. Okay, he's got Rhodes collar whatever that
Speaker 1: stands for, but he's not a smart guy. Guys like
Speaker 1: that cheat on their wife and and talk like that
Speaker 1: and then meet with Listen, how smart. I don't listen
Speaker 1: evil people to do evil things, and people that make
Speaker 1: horrible decisions. It doesn't mean that they're not smart. I
Speaker 1: did not have have sex sexual relations with that woman.
Speaker 1: I never told anybody, not a single time. You know,
Speaker 1: look parsing words the way it's clever. I don't want
Speaker 1: to define with the definition you can be you can
Speaker 1: you could be smart. I know brilliant people. Let me
Speaker 1: give you an example. I know brilliant people that are
Speaker 1: smart in every aspect of their lives except their personal lives.
Speaker 1: And they marry the wrong people. And it's like, divorce
Speaker 1: after divorce after divorce doesn't mean they're dumb. It just
Speaker 1: means that aspect of their life they don't make the
Speaker 1: best decisions. And all have sinned and fallen short. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I appreciate the call. I think there's a distinction there.
Speaker 1: You can be smart in some aspects and the total
Speaker 1: dope and a million others for everyone, or for Benghazi
Speaker 1: for I'm sorry, yes, ma'am, I related to Benghazi and Libery.
Speaker 1: Do you know how many there were? No? I do
Speaker 1: not know. And there were just over a hundred plus
Speaker 1: the second quarter. Do you know how many there were? No?
Speaker 1: I do not, ma'am. There were a hundred and seventy two.
Speaker 1: Might have been one s or one seventy three, that's
Speaker 1: how many were there in July and August, and then
Speaker 1: in that weekend a few days before the attacks. You
Speaker 1: know there were a number of them. I know that, yes, ma'am.
Speaker 1: D three by our account, that's over six requests. You've
Speaker 1: testified here this morning that you had none of those
Speaker 1: reached your desk? Is that correct? All? Idam Secretary Mr
Speaker 1: blomouth All wrote you a hundred and fifty emails. It
Speaker 1: appears from the testimony or the materials that we've read
Speaker 1: that all of those reached your desk. Can you tell
Speaker 1: us why security requests from your professionals, the men that
Speaker 1: you just testified and with which I agree, are incredibly professional,
Speaker 1: incredibly capable people trained in the art of keeping us
Speaker 1: all safe. None of those made it to you, But
Speaker 1: a man who was a friend of yours, who had
Speaker 1: never been to Libya didn't know much about it, at
Speaker 1: least that's his testimony, didn't know much about it. Every
Speaker 1: one of those reports that he sent on to you
Speaker 1: that had to do with situations on the ground Olibya,
Speaker 1: those made it to your desk. You asked for more
Speaker 1: of them, you read them, you corresponded with him, and
Speaker 1: yet the folks that worked for you didn't have the
Speaker 1: same courtesy. Well, Congressman as uh As is aware, as
Speaker 1: you're aware, he's a friend of mine. He sent me
Speaker 1: information he thought might be of interest. Some of it was,
Speaker 1: some of it wasn't. Some of it I forwarded to
Speaker 1: be followed up on. Uh The professionals and experts who
Speaker 1: reviewed it found some of it useful, some of it not.
Speaker 1: Um he had no official physician in the government, and
Speaker 1: he was not at all my adviser on Libya. He
Speaker 1: was a friend who sent me information that he thought
Speaker 1: might be in some way helpful. At eleven o'clock that night,
Speaker 1: proxibly one hour after you told the American people it
Speaker 1: was a video. You say to your family, two office
Speaker 1: were were killed today in Benghazi by an al Qaeda
Speaker 1: like group. You tell, you tell the American people one thing,
Speaker 1: you tell your family an entirely different story. Also, on
Speaker 1: the night of the attack, you had a call with
Speaker 1: the president of Libya. Here's what he said to him.
Speaker 1: Ansar al Sharia is claiming responsibility. It's interesting, Mr Katala,
Speaker 1: one of the guys arrested and charged actually belonged to
Speaker 1: that group. And finally, most significantly, the next day, within
Speaker 1: twenty four hours, he had a conversation with the Egyptian
Speaker 1: Prime Minister. You told him this. We know the attack
Speaker 1: in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It
Speaker 1: was a planned attack, not a protest. Maybe that one
Speaker 1: more time we know now we think not it might be.
Speaker 1: We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do
Speaker 1: with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest,
Speaker 1: all right. That was Jim Jordan's uh. Second, it was
Speaker 1: Mike Pompeo first, and they're both members two members of
Speaker 1: the Benghazi Select Committee. And welcome back, lad you with
Speaker 1: us eight nine for one. Shawn Our to Sean Hannity Show,
Speaker 1: and I know the rest of the media seems to
Speaker 1: be ignoring very pertinent information. And we're gonna go through
Speaker 1: this very very slowly with these two men because they
Speaker 1: know this topic better than anybody. Congressman Pompeo, thank you.
Speaker 1: Congressman Jordan's I want to be a member of the
Speaker 1: Freedom Caucus UH, an honorary member. By the way, if
Speaker 1: if Paul Ryan keeps attacking Donald Trump than he does
Speaker 1: Hillary or or Obama, maybe he needs to go to well. UH.
Speaker 1: I think you noticed that Mr. Pompeo didn't hold back
Speaker 1: at the press event the other day, and our report
Speaker 1: certainly doesn't hold back from telling the truth, no matter
Speaker 1: who who might be running for president. All right, here's
Speaker 1: what I want to go through. Let's go through the
Speaker 1: before a Congressman Pompeo, you were very clear on tv
Speaker 1: UH the other night that there was six hundred separate
Speaker 1: requests for additional security before the attack ever took place,
Speaker 1: because of rising tensions, rising radicalism in and around the consulate,
Speaker 1: and some of these came directly from the ambassador himself
Speaker 1: and some got directly to Hillary Clinton. Six requests for
Speaker 1: security at a time that the Red Cross and the
Speaker 1: Brits were pulling out. Correct, Sean, That's exactly right. What
Speaker 1: you see is her own people talking about this being
Speaker 1: a suicide mission. It was another one of her employees
Speaker 1: a month before the attack said this was Wallace. But
Speaker 1: you have to remember the context for her was that
Speaker 1: this was fifty six days out from an important election,
Speaker 1: and in every turn she was putting her own political
Speaker 1: legacy and the president's politics ahead of the men who
Speaker 1: are risking their lives on the ground. And so to
Speaker 1: put security in there would have admitted that the topling
Speaker 1: Kadafi had been a failure, and she wasn't about to
Speaker 1: do that. That would have cost your politically, so she
Speaker 1: instead put those lives at risk. All right. Now, then
Speaker 1: we have the during part and this is unreal to
Speaker 1: me as well, Uh is a true Congressman Jordan that
Speaker 1: there was real time video they saw the attack as
Speaker 1: it was ongoing. The drone that the drone sees some
Speaker 1: of it. The drone then gets repositioned when they are
Speaker 1: rescued by Tigan and Toronto and those guys and and
Speaker 1: the State Department people are taken to the annex, and
Speaker 1: then the drone gets repositioned um, and and there, but
Speaker 1: there is video of the ongoing attack. Is that correct? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, there's the guy in there, there's there's a
Speaker 1: drone that that is positioned over top. And then there's
Speaker 1: the video that's taken from the command center at the
Speaker 1: at the State Department facility. There the guy in the
Speaker 1: in the operations center is seeing things as well. All right,
Speaker 1: So and and we had the security cameras there. Why
Speaker 1: hasn't this video been released to the public. Uh? Again, well,
Speaker 1: there's lots of questions we have. Why can't we get
Speaker 1: certain information released? Why weren't we able to get Have
Speaker 1: you seen the video? Yeah, we we were able to
Speaker 1: see it, but you know, we can't really talk about it.
Speaker 1: Uh well, can I ask you this much the classified setting,
Speaker 1: I got to assume that if this is a spontaneous demonstration,
Speaker 1: and we know that there's mortar fire, you would have
Speaker 1: to believe that people spontaneously just happen to have mortars
Speaker 1: in their back pocket. Sean san this is Mike Pompeo.
Speaker 1: Let me assure you, if your listeners had a chance
Speaker 1: to see this video, they will come to the same
Speaker 1: conclusion that Jim Jordan and I get. Uh, and that frankly,
Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton did within hours. This was a terrorist attack
Speaker 1: as the hottest radical as law US attack on the
Speaker 1: merry consacility. And uh, there was no one on the
Speaker 1: ground that night who thought anything different at any time.
Speaker 1: So then we know during the attack, and I've interviewed
Speaker 1: the men tig and Conto Toronto and all these other guys,
Speaker 1: and we lost two men, Tie Woods and and Glenn Doherty.
Speaker 1: But they were told three times not to go help
Speaker 1: Americans under fire less than a mile away, and then
Speaker 1: they all defied orders, risked their entire careers to save
Speaker 1: the fellow Americans. And uh, in fact, I believe they
Speaker 1: did save lives doing that, and so they went. Do
Speaker 1: we know where that stand down order came from? Well,
Speaker 1: there's conflicting testimony, but I'll say this, I know who
Speaker 1: I believe, I suspect, I know who the American people believe.
Speaker 1: I know who you believe, Sean, and who might believe you?
Speaker 1: Go to go to the question of motive. Who had
Speaker 1: a motive to wait? The guy who's the station chief
Speaker 1: with the CIA is talking with the folks in Washington,
Speaker 1: the same folks in Washington who didn't even get assets
Speaker 1: in the air before the attack was over. Does he
Speaker 1: does he have sent him to a motive to post
Speaker 1: ably wait and and and or are you going to
Speaker 1: believe the guys who actually risked their lives and went
Speaker 1: and saved their fellow citizens. I mean, I know what
Speaker 1: I'm going to believe. But we did have complicting testimony
Speaker 1: from it. And by the way, and Hillary talks to
Speaker 1: all the previous all the previous reports that were done
Speaker 1: on this, but they didn't interview the people that actually
Speaker 1: were there on the ground. They relied on people in Virginia,
Speaker 1: didn't they for their shot. It's been remarkable to watch
Speaker 1: the mainstream media and frankly Secretary Quaton to talk about
Speaker 1: how there's no new information. We had access to literally
Speaker 1: we think everyone who was on the ground that night.
Speaker 1: We talked to um not only the senior leaders, but
Speaker 1: folks who were engaged in the tactical operation. And the
Speaker 1: facts that we learned. I mean, it was unknown at
Speaker 1: no time. This is this is so remarkable, and no
Speaker 1: time did we even try to go rescue these folks. Well,
Speaker 1: and that and that's the other part of this. I mean,
Speaker 1: you had an instance where you know they're in a
Speaker 1: meeting at seven thirty. This one on for hours and
Speaker 1: hours and hours, and the meeting was more about what
Speaker 1: the political excuse would be. And apparently we had troops
Speaker 1: ready to go went and rescue them, but the main concern,
Speaker 1: according to the report, was a whether they need to
Speaker 1: get permission to rescue Americans and be whether or not
Speaker 1: our soldiers that are going to do the rescue can
Speaker 1: be in uniform. And they had to change their clothes
Speaker 1: four separate times and still weren't sent ever. Yeah, can
Speaker 1: they can they? Can they go in uniform? Can they
Speaker 1: go in mark vehicles? Can they take their own weapons?
Speaker 1: They were asking questions like that. Instead it just let's
Speaker 1: focus on doing what we can to get there as
Speaker 1: quickly as we can. The urgency that was shown on
Speaker 1: the ground in both Tripoli and Benghazi from the people
Speaker 1: who were fighting for their lives versus the lack of
Speaker 1: it in Washington is so telling. But as Mike said, Sean,
Speaker 1: politics drove it all. Politics drove the decision to stay.
Speaker 1: When one diplomatic security agent said, what what what Mike
Speaker 1: had said? You know that it's a suicide that everyone
Speaker 1: here is going to die, and they stay because it
Speaker 1: was supposed to be their legacy, their shining example of
Speaker 1: at work. They didn't get people moving in the right
Speaker 1: kind of time frame during because they were concerned about politics.
Speaker 1: And then of course they misled the American people after
Speaker 1: it happened, because they were like six days and the
Speaker 1: message had been, you know, g m A live. We
Speaker 1: can't tell the truth here, We're gonna mislead the American
Speaker 1: Keep all right, now, what about this guy who was
Speaker 1: in control of the drone? John? I know he spoke
Speaker 1: to your committee and we had him on this radio program.
Speaker 1: What information did he tell you about what he saw? Sean,
Speaker 1: We're not allowed to communicate that yet we did interview
Speaker 1: that individual. Who, Well, can I ask a quick why
Speaker 1: can't the American people see this video? Why? What's the
Speaker 1: big secret? We know that we were it was a
Speaker 1: terror attack, it's on video. Why don't we Why don't
Speaker 1: we show the American people what the State Department and
Speaker 1: our government was seeing and didn't react to. So we'll
Speaker 1: let Mike Toos on the Intelligence Committee talk about it too,
Speaker 1: But we're in favor of let me see it. Yeah, Sean,
Speaker 1: they should, and I'm still hopeful that we will. I'm
Speaker 1: confident that we will ultimately get all the transcripts of
Speaker 1: every interview, every word of the American people can see that.
Speaker 1: I'm that's confident that we'll get the video released, but
Speaker 1: I am hopeful that there's no rationale we're not releasing,
Speaker 1: that there's no risk to sources or method. The American
Speaker 1: people ought to be able to see that I formed
Speaker 1: their own Who decides who decides? We can't see this? Saidily,
Speaker 1: it's the very same people who brought you the catastrophe
Speaker 1: in the first place. So in other words, it's the
Speaker 1: Obama administration that's correct. All right, let me ask this.
Speaker 1: This is I think a really important question. So after
Speaker 1: you didn't send that, they didn't send anybody in to
Speaker 1: help them, and then they were agonizing over whether to
Speaker 1: ask permission from Libyan and whether our our brave men
Speaker 1: and women involved in the rescue would be allowed to
Speaker 1: wear their uniforms. Um then the whole lie came up
Speaker 1: after Jim Jordan, you were questioning Hillary Clinton. Now we
Speaker 1: know that while she was telling the American people that
Speaker 1: this was related to a YouTube video, she told her
Speaker 1: daughter that this was a terror attack. She told the
Speaker 1: Egyptian Prime minister it was a terror attack. She told
Speaker 1: the Libyan president it was a terror attack. She even
Speaker 1: mentioned the group and it turned out to be Ansar
Speaker 1: al Sharia. So uh so she just flat out lied
Speaker 1: to everybody. Yeah, she she sure did tell two different stories.
Speaker 1: And we highlight this and what in our report where
Speaker 1: we go day by day, and it wasn't just her,
Speaker 1: it was other senior people in our government again telling
Speaker 1: the truth privately that it was a terror attack, but
Speaker 1: publicly going to the video. Jay Carney on September fourteen,
Speaker 1: out of press briefing says, we have nothing to suggest
Speaker 1: it was pre planned. That very day people in Tripoli
Speaker 1: for the State Department say it was a well planned attack.
Speaker 1: You couldn't be more opposite, well planned the terrorist attack
Speaker 1: versus nothing to suggest there was any pre planning that
Speaker 1: they said publicly. They continued this for days and days,
Speaker 1: and it culminated and frankly even continued after Rice went
Speaker 1: on Investor Rice went on the Five Shows that Sunday
Speaker 1: morning and completely erased the line any type of connection
Speaker 1: to to the truth and said it was a video
Speaker 1: all the way. I don't know what to make of this.
Speaker 1: So before requests were denied by Hillary in our State
Speaker 1: Department and the administration. Then during the attack, they refused
Speaker 1: to send anybody in. They give a stand down order.
Speaker 1: We don't even know where that original standown order comes from.
Speaker 1: Comes from their agonizing over getting permission from Libya and
Speaker 1: whether our troops that are going to do the rescue
Speaker 1: can even wear their own uniforms because they don't want
Speaker 1: to offend the Libyans. And then they eventually end up
Speaker 1: sending nobody while they're watching all of this unfold and
Speaker 1: real time on video and they know these guys are
Speaker 1: dying and they did nothing, and then they lie about
Speaker 1: it after says that pretty much summ it up. Jean,
Speaker 1: you summed it up well. I think Representive Jordan I
Speaker 1: would both agree. Put it in the context of this
Speaker 1: administration as well. They have consistently called these folks JV
Speaker 1: they refer to. They refused to acknowledge that we're at
Speaker 1: war with radical Islamis shattes. This event took place, the
Speaker 1: four Americans, these brave men, were killed in the context
Speaker 1: of an administration that was all about their political legacy
Speaker 1: and not about saving their lives. That's the that's the
Speaker 1: bottom line story of what our committee uncovered in the
Speaker 1: course of our investigation. It should take every Americans breadth away.
Speaker 1: What can we do to get that tape out so
Speaker 1: the American people can say it? Is there any Freedom
Speaker 1: of Information Act? Request it stuped to overcome that, you know,
Speaker 1: until they declassified it's it's appropriate. Can I ask you this,
Speaker 1: would the American people be shocked if they saw it?
Speaker 1: Sean I would say that when the American people see it,
Speaker 1: they will recognize any pretense that this was anything other
Speaker 1: than an attack by radical Aslamacey Hottis would evaporate the
Speaker 1: moment they watched. How many requests have been made to
Speaker 1: release this tape? I want the tape? Yeah, we'll have
Speaker 1: to get you the information that we have been asking
Speaker 1: for this to be released. I've talked to people that
Speaker 1: have seen the tape and they say it's obviously a
Speaker 1: terror attack. Mortars are being fired. Is about a hundred
Speaker 1: or so people and it's a full on attack? Is
Speaker 1: that accurate? So? How many times have people requested the
Speaker 1: release of the tape? Have you guys requested the release
Speaker 1: of the tape? We certainly haven't. We're going to continue
Speaker 1: to and we won't stop until we figured out how
Speaker 1: maybe we'll see it after Hillary is elected or after
Speaker 1: the election, right, I mean, let's hide it from the
Speaker 1: American people and let's elected incompetent president like the one
Speaker 1: we have now. All right, So I am now an
Speaker 1: official member of the Freedom Coalition in Congress. Could you
Speaker 1: please tell Paul Ryan and company to stop trashing Trump
Speaker 1: and maybe use their firepower to stop the Obama agenda
Speaker 1: and the Hillary agenda? Can you can you pass on
Speaker 1: that message from me? All right? I appreciate. A while ago,
Speaker 1: my friend Eric Bowling is one of the co hosts
Speaker 1: of The Five, tells me he's writing this book. It's
Speaker 1: called Wake Up America. The Nine Virtues that made our
Speaker 1: Nation great and why we need the more than ever.
Speaker 1: It's a great title. I love it. And uh, you know,
Speaker 1: so I got a copy. You get an early copy
Speaker 1: of the book when you when you give a blurb
Speaker 1: for a book, and I see he dedicates this book
Speaker 1: to Obama. And I'm like, seriously, you've dedicate the book
Speaker 1: to Barroccle Hussein Obama. What are you doing? All right?
Speaker 1: So it's for years people said write a book, Bowling.
Speaker 1: We liked this wake Up American thing you do on
Speaker 1: cash and in at the end of the show and
Speaker 1: to rant, it's an anti PC rant. We got to
Speaker 1: bring the country back to the right. There pulling it
Speaker 1: too far left. And it really has all been based
Speaker 1: on everything President Obama and his minions have done to
Speaker 1: the country for the last seven and a half years. Remember,
Speaker 1: three weeks before he got elected, he famously said, and
Speaker 1: you've talked about it for years, I want to fundamentally
Speaker 1: transform the United States of America. And then we elected him. Anyway,
Speaker 1: three weeks later he gets the election and he's done
Speaker 1: nothing but pull the country far left. So this is
Speaker 1: a pushback on all that left wing ideology, from the media,
Speaker 1: to the politics, to the academia. And they started to
Speaker 1: write and I finished the book. It flowed, it was
Speaker 1: I loved it. It's amazing. It was easy to write.
Speaker 1: And at the end the publisher said, this is a
Speaker 1: great book. But who do you want to dedicated to you?
Speaker 1: They said, your family, your wife. I said, no, I'll
Speaker 1: acknowledge them, They'll be the first acknowledgement. But I have
Speaker 1: to dedicate this to Barack Obama. He basically made the
Speaker 1: book an easy, easy, right, you know, think about where
Speaker 1: we are now. I mean, we've been covering covering the
Speaker 1: story of Istanbul another terror attack. You know, a week
Speaker 1: after Orlando, we covered another terror attack. All issis related
Speaker 1: to think it was less than two years ago. Obama
Speaker 1: said that the JV team just before the Paris attacks,
Speaker 1: he claimed that they were contained. You know, for years
Speaker 1: this mysterious reluctance of his and Hillary's that they don't
Speaker 1: say as terrorism radical Islamic terrorism. And then you look
Speaker 1: at their decisions. Why do you release terrorists at GITMO?
Speaker 1: Why are you against enhanced interrogation when it led us
Speaker 1: to have been lauden. Why don't you control the borders?
Speaker 1: Why do you give a hundred and fifty billion to Iran?
Speaker 1: And you know, every decision they make, you know, why
Speaker 1: do you pull out of Iraq? Why don't you follow
Speaker 1: up on your red line in Syria? I don't understand.
Speaker 1: Every decision they make makes us less safe, makes the
Speaker 1: America less safe, makes the globe less safe. John Kerry
Speaker 1: says they're on the run. ISIS is on the run.
Speaker 1: That's why they're blowing people up around the world. Obama says,
Speaker 1: we haven't contained. There were the JV team. Meanwhile, John
Speaker 1: Brannan the head of the c i A Uh, James Comey,
Speaker 1: the head of the FBI, and McCall yesterday Homeland Security
Speaker 1: says they're not contained, they're spreading their mad and they're
Speaker 1: they're on their way here. This reminds me of the
Speaker 1: lead up to nine eleven, because you have the Cobar
Speaker 1: towers in Saudi Arabia, Yeah, the embassy bombings in Kenyan, Tanzania, Yeah,
Speaker 1: the USS call, yeah, the first trade center bombing, and
Speaker 1: then boom, nine eleven happens. Oh, how did this happen?
Speaker 1: What is Islam? What is radical Islam? Who are these people?
Speaker 1: Who's al Qaeda? Uh? They're not getting weaker. This is
Speaker 1: not a sign of weakness. This is a sign of
Speaker 1: them kicking our ass. Yeah. And and they can't wait
Speaker 1: to perpetrate another big one here. That's what they're looking.
Speaker 1: They want another nine eleven. We all know. I was
Speaker 1: there for nine eleven. I don't want another nine eleven.
Speaker 1: I think when the Intel Department, every single layer of
Speaker 1: Intel says they're on their way. They've got a plan,
Speaker 1: and they're just trying to get their right plans right
Speaker 1: and work their way through. And then the administration, the
Speaker 1: White House and the and the Secretary of State saying
Speaker 1: they're on the run. What signal are we telling them?
Speaker 1: How about what signal are we telling all our FBI,
Speaker 1: CIA and Homeland Security personnel. But we got this, No,
Speaker 1: we don't have it. You know, you you raised a
Speaker 1: good question because we're now in the middle of a
Speaker 1: campaign and the President's insisting, at the cost of twenty
Speaker 1: dollars a person, why don't we of that to Americans
Speaker 1: in Detroit and in inner city America, you know, rather
Speaker 1: than refugees from Syria when we can set up a
Speaker 1: safe zone. But we had you know, you mentioned James Comey,
Speaker 1: the National Director of Intelligence, Clapper, you mentioned, you know,
Speaker 1: General John Allen, Obama's former special envoy to defeat ISIS,
Speaker 1: and the assistant FBI director now the CIA director and
Speaker 1: the Homeland Security Committee chairman, all saying ICE is gonna
Speaker 1: infiltrate the refugee population. All right, Obama's bringing him in
Speaker 1: and Hillary wants to increase the number five and fifty percent. Right,
Speaker 1: he says ten thousands, She says, let's make it sixty
Speaker 1: thousand refugees. Isn't that gambling with the lives of American people?
Speaker 1: Of course, that they can vet it. Remember, they can
Speaker 1: vet it. Oh, come on, give me Jack, how do
Speaker 1: you vet that time? John Brennan, I would say he's
Speaker 1: probably the most liberal CIA chief we've had in decades.
Speaker 1: He's no right winger, and he's the one who's telling
Speaker 1: us we gotta be careful. There are a lot of
Speaker 1: there's thousands, he says, thousands of ISIS fighters looking to
Speaker 1: kill and infiltrate the West, and as you point out
Speaker 1: Sean through the refugee program, that's one of them. All right,
Speaker 1: So I've been I'm friends with all of you guys
Speaker 1: on the five. I've been a big supporter of the
Speaker 1: show from day one. It's a massive hit. You have
Speaker 1: you were, you were out front like TV. Isn't it
Speaker 1: weird that some people don't want other shows to succeed? Stupid.
Speaker 1: I gotta be honest with showing you were wanted. You
Speaker 1: and Greta were the two people who came forward first,
Speaker 1: you know, we're first, and gret right after and said
Speaker 1: this is a good show. You guys are doing something here.
Speaker 1: No one else believed there. There weren't many people's funny
Speaker 1: because people would ask me, well, why do you say
Speaker 1: this is a hit? I said, because it's it's a
Speaker 1: great show, and it's it's every day I watch you.
Speaker 1: I kind of like it. I know this is probably bad,
Speaker 1: but when you guys really go at it and you're
Speaker 1: killing each other, I like that those parts the most.
Speaker 1: Do you Yeah? Do you miss Beckel dearly? I love one.
Speaker 1: One is a great, great cast member. But Bob was
Speaker 1: my friend first and then and then a TV uh,
Speaker 1: basically the other other side of the commandity. I'm mad
Speaker 1: at I told last time he was on the program
Speaker 1: was for his book, and I said, I'm piste off
Speaker 1: at you because you know, literally you just drop off
Speaker 1: the face of the earth. He doesn't contact us anymore.
Speaker 1: He butt dalaled me on Father's Day? Is that what
Speaker 1: he did? Phone ring? Since Becko? You know, I have
Speaker 1: him in the idea there it's Bob Becoy. I answers
Speaker 1: like he's like, oh hey, uh sorry, butt dialed you
Speaker 1: and then we had a nice conversation. The biggest Who
Speaker 1: have you had the biggest fight on the show with
Speaker 1: what trouble? I'm gonn kidding. I'll be honest with you. Yeah,
Speaker 1: let's let's be straightforward. I well, I've had a massive
Speaker 1: brawl with Greg Guttfeld over the n s A program, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, he's I'm more the show as good as
Speaker 1: it is. Yeah, and we know we're great friends, but
Speaker 1: we had big, big brawls, and I've had big brawls
Speaker 1: with Dana over Donald Trump. She don't she's not a
Speaker 1: Trump support. She gonna vote for Trump. I think you will.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think it's it's like you know, says
Speaker 1: I can't stand and I can't stand it. But at
Speaker 1: the end of the day, you know, if you want
Speaker 1: federal judges that are liberal, if you want Supreme Court
Speaker 1: judges that are liberal, you want a liberal court, you
Speaker 1: want to hold judicial branch that's liberal for our kids lifetimes,
Speaker 1: and then then vote for Hillary, don't vote for Trump.
Speaker 1: It's the same thing. Are you surprised as I am?
Speaker 1: You know that's so that there's this group of Republicans
Speaker 1: that are trying to sabotage Trump, because here's my take
Speaker 1: on Trump. He is gonna build a wall. That's a
Speaker 1: conservative policy. He's told me many times. He even likes
Speaker 1: the Penny Plan. He wants to balance budget and eliminating deficits.
Speaker 1: He told me he wants to fix the v A
Speaker 1: build up our nation's military. Reagan did that. Uh. He
Speaker 1: wants to eliminate Obamacare, he wants energy independence, he wants
Speaker 1: education sent back to the stage. What part of that
Speaker 1: is not conservative? None of that? None of that, sEH.
Speaker 1: I scratched my head because you and I both have
Speaker 1: been pretty vocal about saying we need someone new, we
Speaker 1: need something different in the White House. We need something
Speaker 1: new on the right as well. And I think he
Speaker 1: shakes it up a little bit for Bill Crystal and
Speaker 1: George Will to do what they're doing. I think they're
Speaker 1: they're gonna kill the country. They're gonna get They're gonna
Speaker 1: they're gonna like Hillary Clint, the two of those. I'll
Speaker 1: be more more outspoken. I will tell you right now.
Speaker 1: If Donald Trump loses, I blame the Speaker of the House.
Speaker 1: I blame Senator McConnell. I blame weak, timid, feckless, spineless
Speaker 1: Republicans in d C that have been so timid. They're
Speaker 1: more critical of Trump than they are that they've ever
Speaker 1: been of Obama or Hillary. Absolutely, you know you don't
Speaker 1: like Trump, But but does that mean by default you
Speaker 1: like Hillary or even if you don't like Hillery, you're
Speaker 1: going to get her unless you get everyone behind Trump. Look,
Speaker 1: Mitt Romney got destroyed in right. Take the states one, yeah,
Speaker 1: they should be read. Donald Trump should have those. He
Speaker 1: should have those lockdown. All Donald Trump has to do
Speaker 1: right now is when Florida, Ohio and either Pence, Alvania
Speaker 1: and Michigan. One of those two Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan.
Speaker 1: Right now he's tied. It's a little deeper. He's gotta
Speaker 1: win North Carolina. That's that's become a little more purple
Speaker 1: than we like. I'd like to see him win Virginia,
Speaker 1: New Hampshire, Iowa, New Mexico, Colorado, and Nevada. Just take
Speaker 1: Romney and add those three and that's that's big. But
Speaker 1: those three are tough. He's tied in Ohio, he's tied
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania. Great listen and then look at the recipes
Speaker 1: and pole today thirty nine. Um the Fox pole yesterday
Speaker 1: had him down six. The Queen of Quinnipiac pole had
Speaker 1: him down too. So I'd say it's probably dead even
Speaker 1: right now, as the swing states are dead even. I
Speaker 1: think it's an even race right now. And he's had
Speaker 1: he's had a rough couple of weeks and it's still
Speaker 1: dead even and he hasn't spent nearly the money that
Speaker 1: the leftist. I think the last two weeks have been
Speaker 1: great for him. I think he's gotten back on message.
Speaker 1: You know why Brexit what what? Just that? This is?
Speaker 1: This is this is um. This is nationalism pushing back
Speaker 1: on globalism. And this is the thing that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: when he came down the escalator. The first thing on
Speaker 1: his mouth, you said it was the wall nationalism. Build
Speaker 1: a wall on a southern border, let them pay for it.
Speaker 1: And and the next thing that came out was and
Speaker 1: for now, let's hold off on Muzzi. On Muslim immigration
Speaker 1: into the country. That's nationalism. It's spreading in Europe. Trump
Speaker 1: had the right right idea here. I don't think there's
Speaker 1: any doubt. Look, I don't want to send American men
Speaker 1: and women to go fight wars that get politicized and
Speaker 1: then all that they fought, bled and died for gets
Speaker 1: handed over to a group like Isis, because we then
Speaker 1: have a president that's that's not willing to finish the job.
Speaker 1: You know, we did that in Vietnam. Now we've done
Speaker 1: it in Iraq. And I think if we're gonna fight wars,
Speaker 1: were either win them or we don't go in. So
Speaker 1: the polling right, it's it looks like it's it's even
Speaker 1: if it's a rasmusin Poul has Trump up. The last
Speaker 1: Fox poll has them a statistical tie. She's up by six,
Speaker 1: but it's plus our minus three, so three an each side.
Speaker 1: That makes it statistical tie. Um. But but Trump wins
Speaker 1: in a very important area in independence. He beats her
Speaker 1: an independence. So if you if you think that there
Speaker 1: there's a whole group out there that says I can't
Speaker 1: vote for Trump, if you call him up on the phone,
Speaker 1: he'll go on the voting booth and pull it lever
Speaker 1: I do. And now you know who else I think
Speaker 1: is gonna end up voting for Trump if he gets
Speaker 1: his act together. Bernie, Bernie, show that actually and one
Speaker 1: pole showed this way. So he got of the Democrat vote, right,
Speaker 1: she got sixty of forty is ten percent. Ten percent
Speaker 1: of the Democrat vote going to Trump is a take that.
Speaker 1: Take that the next step and if Donald Trump can
Speaker 1: can pull that off, he's the next president. Ye done, done,
Speaker 1: done zo. Let me talk a little bit more about
Speaker 1: your book. Alright, So you have these nine issues. It's
Speaker 1: can I ask you something about that? You are you
Speaker 1: my show? You show You're so proud that you're You're
Speaker 1: named above Donald Trump on the back of the book.
Speaker 1: Make you feel I'm named your second? What is up? Portal?
Speaker 1: Evin Levin's after Cubaneah, you got me, you got Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: Cuban and Mark Levin. He's gonna be upset, right, No,
Speaker 1: the great one, the great one is the great one,
Speaker 1: and he's nobody better. He's he's a little he's a
Speaker 1: little upset with me late. What are the Why is
Speaker 1: he upset with you? Donald Trump? I think listen, I
Speaker 1: think at the end of the day, he's not voting
Speaker 1: for Hillary. He was obviously not. I I love his passion.
Speaker 1: He supported Ted Cruz. I took a very different approach.
Speaker 1: You took a different approach in the in the primary.
Speaker 1: But at the end of the day, I think that
Speaker 1: everyone's gonna come together. I think the person that has
Speaker 1: to worry is if Hillary Clinton has to pick Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Warren to show up her base, then she can't go
Speaker 1: after the independence as you rightly point out, that are
Speaker 1: now going for Trump. All right, what are these nine
Speaker 1: virtues you talk about that make the country great? And
Speaker 1: why we need more than our conservative value Sean that
Speaker 1: then when I started writing the book, I wanted to say,
Speaker 1: what are the core values of virtues that the conservatives
Speaker 1: at the Conservatives had And I came up. I started
Speaker 1: writing it into being nine also, so I write this book.
Speaker 1: I think it's fantastic. I put some personal stories in
Speaker 1: there about my childhood. Um, and then UM. I send
Speaker 1: it to the publisher and they're like, you know what,
Speaker 1: let's make this even spicier. Go back and let's bring
Speaker 1: in some history. So talk about some founding fathers and
Speaker 1: do some research, and I add some ideas that the
Speaker 1: founding fathers had that end up being American virtues, conservative
Speaker 1: virtues and values, and put in some personal stories. And
Speaker 1: by the way, shoe on the book Out of the Blue,
Speaker 1: within two days eight hours hit number three on Amazon
Speaker 1: all books and number one in all political books. That's awesome.
Speaker 1: Well you well deserved. You know what, You've become a
Speaker 1: strong conservative voice in the country. To you and you
Speaker 1: started out like me with nothing, I mean, and you
Speaker 1: know what you begin to and your rich as hell,
Speaker 1: aren't you. You've made all that money on Wallster don't
Speaker 1: have handity money, but I'm doing all right, nobody, that's true.
Speaker 1: What does everybody say that to me? Because it's true.
Speaker 1: Because I've been radio. I worked for free for years.
Speaker 1: I worked for nineteen thousand dollars in my first radio
Speaker 1: paid job. I've lived in five different states. I try
Speaker 1: was a radio gypsy, going all over the country. But
Speaker 1: you know, no one ever finishes the start to start
Speaker 1: in New York like you did. Let me, I didn't
Speaker 1: start in New York. I'm from Chicago, all right, but
Speaker 1: you started at Fox shoveling snow and mowing launch. Can
Speaker 1: I finish to your story? Though? Yes, you you have
Speaker 1: handity money, but you are the nicest, most generous human
Speaker 1: being on the planet. You're very kind. I have stories.
Speaker 1: I can tell the stories, so you can't because we're
Speaker 1: out of time where you can't tell any stories. Very
Speaker 1: very generous man. All Right, you brought your assistant with you.
Speaker 1: I gotta so you are the assistant to to Eric
Speaker 1: and to KG. Who's easier to deal with? Eric? Or KG?
Speaker 1: She said, Eric Cook? What? Yes? Eric? Eric? Alright, I'm playing.
Speaker 1: I'm sending this, always sending the table. She'll kill me. Alright,
Speaker 1: you'll never see me again. I did see President Clinton
Speaker 1: at the Phoenix airport um as I was leaving, and
Speaker 1: he spoke to myself and my husband on the plane.
Speaker 1: M Our conversation was a great deal by his grandchildren.
Speaker 1: It was primarily social and about our travels. He mentioned
Speaker 1: the golf he played in Phoenix. All right, that was
Speaker 1: Lauretta Lynch describing the half hour me being in Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton's playing on a tarmac in Phoenix, Arizona. Now what's
Speaker 1: interesting about this that even somebody like David Axelrod, who
Speaker 1: ran the Obama campaign, UH, said that it's foolish given
Speaker 1: the investigation in the Hillary Clinton's private email server, and
Speaker 1: of course he's a former senior adviser to Obama and acts.
Speaker 1: I said, well, I take Lauretta Lynch and Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: at their word that their conversation and Phoenix didn't touch
Speaker 1: on email gait and the pro but it was foolish
Speaker 1: to create such optics. Senator John Cornyn sent up. Majority
Speaker 1: Whip also noted a potential conflict of interest, tweeting that
Speaker 1: Lynch must avoid even the appearance of conflict anyway. Donald
Speaker 1: Trump has spoken out and he is ripping into this,
Speaker 1: and some are saying, wait a minute, this is now
Speaker 1: too close to the vest she may have to recuse
Speaker 1: herself when in fact, the investigation into the email server
Speaker 1: scandal is ultimately ended. Let's see what happens here anyway.
Speaker 1: Joining us now is Jay Seculo, Chief count So for
Speaker 1: the American Center for Law and Justice. Danielle McLaughlin, as
Speaker 1: an attorney constitutional expert co wrote the Federal of Society,
Speaker 1: how Conservatives took back, took the law back from liberals.
Speaker 1: Welcome both of you all right now. Knowing that James
Speaker 1: Comey has said repeatedly that this is a criminal investigation
Speaker 1: and that whatever he finds in terms of his investigation
Speaker 1: will eventually be sent to Loretta Lynch, how inappropriate is
Speaker 1: it for the husband of the person being investigated to
Speaker 1: sit on a plane and a tarmac alone with her.
Speaker 1: It's unethical. It violates CODA Federal Regulation forty five point two,
Speaker 1: which prohibits the d o J employee, including the Attorney General,
Speaker 1: from participating in a criminal investigation or prosecution if he
Speaker 1: or she has reason or as a personal or political
Speaker 1: relationship with any personal organization substantially involved in the conduct
Speaker 1: that is subject of the investigation or prosecution. So she
Speaker 1: violates CFR forty five point two from the moment they
Speaker 1: met on Monday or Tuesday in that airplane two down.
Speaker 1: She can't do it, so she has to recuse herself.
Speaker 1: If she doesn't, she's violent in the canad of ethics,
Speaker 1: and frankly sean, we're gonna file the complaint with the
Speaker 1: professional Responsibility section of the Department of Justice. And this
Speaker 1: is also a I think a significant about what about
Speaker 1: as a matter of law, Yeah, no, I think she's disqualified.
Speaker 1: Not now. I think she is disqualified because of that
Speaker 1: rule because fifty two it prohibits a d o J
Speaker 1: employee from being involved in it. That's the ethical standard.
Speaker 1: But the action is it prohibits her from being involved.
Speaker 1: She has done with this case, she frankly, should probably
Speaker 1: go a lot more than that. She she is completely
Speaker 1: completely cast a shadow and taint on this investigation that
Speaker 1: is ear replaceable and not redeemable at this point. But
Speaker 1: then not exactly people to follow the law. I mean,
Speaker 1: for example, the Supreme Court just uppeld a lower court
Speaker 1: decision and the President as it relates to his unconstitutional
Speaker 1: illegal actions executive order on amnesty, and the President basically
Speaker 1: said he's not gonna abide by the court decision. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and he of course he doesn't have that option. But
Speaker 1: let me see something else here, Sean. Bill Clinton is
Speaker 1: a calculating guy. Think about this for a moment. He
Speaker 1: gets off his airplane, finds out Loretta Lynch is coming in,
Speaker 1: then arranges to go on to her airplane and they,
Speaker 1: let's say they just discussed personal matters, just family. The
Speaker 1: ministry of presence. His presence there sends volumes. Did they shake,
Speaker 1: did they hug? Did they what? The discussion is almost irrelevant.
Speaker 1: What is relevant is he was able to do that,
Speaker 1: and that Loretta Lynch agreed to let him do that.
Speaker 1: Up search, he can't be the attorney general for this.
Speaker 1: So I want to ask you a question. Do you
Speaker 1: think this was done by design? Maybe he got tipped
Speaker 1: off that Loretta Lynch was inclined to move forward if
Speaker 1: there's a criminal referral, and he was worried about it
Speaker 1: and he wanted somebody else appointed to the case. I
Speaker 1: our team today discussed that very fact. Because Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: is smart, He's calculating, and he looks for results, and
Speaker 1: just walking on that plane may well have sent that
Speaker 1: message or established it, or maybe he created the fall
Speaker 1: person for this prosecution, so to speak, and that becomes
Speaker 1: the attorney general should I'd like to jump in here,
Speaker 1: and you know what, I'm completely in agreement with you,
Speaker 1: j this was completely inappropriate. I'm a Democrat, right, but
Speaker 1: the optics, the decision, the lapse of judgment here on
Speaker 1: both sides is inappropriate. And as a Democrat, I don't
Speaker 1: want any more clouds of this investigation. I want the
Speaker 1: appearance of objectivity and I want an objective investigation. So
Speaker 1: I don't think Bill Clinton was calculating because this is
Speaker 1: bad for Hillary. This is another scandal that is blowing up.
Speaker 1: I agree that literally Laurillan should recuse herself from this
Speaker 1: investigation because we want what you want and that's an
Speaker 1: objective investigation, all right, So you know, but go ahead, now,
Speaker 1: you go ahead. Well I was gonna say, I mean,
Speaker 1: here's the thing, though, he is a guy that weighs
Speaker 1: the here are the consequences of I do actions. Here's
Speaker 1: the action he is. This is a guy that's made
Speaker 1: his entire political career, as political life, has been weighing things.
Speaker 1: This was he didn't walk on that plane. He did
Speaker 1: not walk on that plane not thinking about the consequence,
Speaker 1: and what what's so outrageous here? It's not just the
Speaker 1: appearance of the impropriety, it's the message, as you just said,
Speaker 1: in the message that it sends. But this is a
Speaker 1: guy that spent his life weighing the consequences of actions,
Speaker 1: and here he made that. He took that action. She
Speaker 1: is the presumptive Democratic nominee. And I'll take it a
Speaker 1: step further, Sean, Bill Clinton may well be a witness
Speaker 1: or who knows a defendant in any action that were
Speaker 1: to rise out of the Clinton Foundation or the email investigation,
Speaker 1: either one. So the Loretta Lynch laps the judgments in
Speaker 1: an understatement. But Bill Clinton is a calculating guy. And
Speaker 1: that's my my statement. Now, Bill Clinton did appoint her,
Speaker 1: Lauretta Lynch, as the US Attorney for the Eastern District
Speaker 1: of New York, So is there a politic call favor?
Speaker 1: But again the optics. Forget the optics, I mean, I
Speaker 1: get the optics. It's a matter of fact, it violates
Speaker 1: the law. You're prohibited, under d j's own guidelines from
Speaker 1: being the lawyer on that case. Lauria Lynch is not
Speaker 1: a particularly political person. You know, you think about a Giuliani,
Speaker 1: pats or a Chris Christina. As far as how can
Speaker 1: you say she's not a political person she met with
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton on her long history of service, I'm not
Speaker 1: going to besmirch her, and I think she met a
Speaker 1: bad call, but her long history demonstration that she's not
Speaker 1: particularly political. I think it's a bad call. But this
Speaker 1: doesn't mean that she's a terrible person or a calculate.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying she's a terrible I know. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying she's calculating. I'm saying Bill Killington's calculating. And let
Speaker 1: me tell you something. A bad bad call, A bad call.
Speaker 1: This was a baseball game, Okay, a bad call you
Speaker 1: know the umpire. This isn't a bad call. This is
Speaker 1: an investigation, a criminal investigation that is going on that
Speaker 1: includes the former Secretary of State is the presumptive Democratic
Speaker 1: nominee for president, and Bill Clinton goes on an airplane,
Speaker 1: the d o J airplane with the Attorney General who's
Speaker 1: supposed to be in charge of this. That's more than
Speaker 1: a bad call. It's more than bad optics. It's not
Speaker 1: legal under the the DOJ's own rules and regulations. I
Speaker 1: just want, like, how does this even benefit Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: by belonging because if he's concerned that she may pull
Speaker 1: the trigger on an investigation, if James Comby's office, the
Speaker 1: FBI recommends a criminal referral, and he's worried that somehow
Speaker 1: she might end up going forward with it, well, then
Speaker 1: what do you do get her off the case. I
Speaker 1: don't have any evidence of that, By the way, I'm
Speaker 1: just saying the the atmospherics point to something else here,
Speaker 1: because this is a guy that has successfully made his
Speaker 1: life one way or another based on calculations. Daniel, what's
Speaker 1: your response to that. I mean, I think you're I
Speaker 1: think you're reaching j And as you said, you have
Speaker 1: no evidence of this. Um, there's no reason to believe
Speaker 1: that if she was to recuse herself. But they're all,
Speaker 1: wait a minute. He knows as wife's under investigation. He
Speaker 1: knows James Comey is clarified it's a criminal investigation. So
Speaker 1: he knows that Loretta Lynch is gonna eventually be involved
Speaker 1: in this case. So he's not stupid. You can say
Speaker 1: a lot of things about him. I mean, maybe maybe
Speaker 1: he's irresponsible, reckless, but he's not stupid. So it seems
Speaker 1: to me that this was a conscious choice on his part.
Speaker 1: And and I don't know if we'll ever really know
Speaker 1: the reasons, but there may be some fear in the
Speaker 1: back of his mind about Loretta Lynch that she may
Speaker 1: not go along and play ball. And if Comey recommends
Speaker 1: a criminal uh and referral, she's gonna convene a grand
Speaker 1: jury for crying out loud? Well, could you could you imagine, Sean,
Speaker 1: if that happened. I mean, let's just take what you
Speaker 1: just said. Let's say that the criminal reference comes from
Speaker 1: the FBI, and now Loretta Lynch says, I'm not going
Speaker 1: to proceed. Now, does anybody, including Democrats I know you're
Speaker 1: a Democrat, does anybody believe that in light of this,
Speaker 1: that that is going to be something that leaves not
Speaker 1: just a bad taste in everyone's mouth, but shows a
Speaker 1: complete alice disregard for our system of justice. No one
Speaker 1: if the FBI were to move forward, and Lauretta Lynn says, no,
Speaker 1: after this nonsense on an airplane in Arizona, no one
Speaker 1: is going to believe that there's not something corrupt going on.
Speaker 1: To recuse herself. Well, she's saying she doesn't, but she
Speaker 1: saying she doesn't she said it was just a conversation
Speaker 1: among friends, which, by the way, is exactly what is
Speaker 1: the reason you do have to recuse yourself when you
Speaker 1: do that? All right, let me ask why is this
Speaker 1: investigation taken so long? Can anyone put this together? Because
Speaker 1: you've got to believe, I mean, from everything I've heard
Speaker 1: from everybody that knows Comey and his past actions, even
Speaker 1: going to the hospital room of John Ashcroft and threatening
Speaker 1: to resign on principle when George Bush was president. Uh,
Speaker 1: he knows that there's a political timeline in play here.
Speaker 1: Now we've told we've had as many as fifty two
Speaker 1: some odd agents working on this case. They apparently recovered
Speaker 1: the thirty three thousand deleted emails. I know the investigation,
Speaker 1: according to our reports at Fox, have now gone even
Speaker 1: further into the Clinton Foundation. But at some point, if
Speaker 1: there's evidence of wrongdoing and lawbreaking, and I believe there is,
Speaker 1: doesn't he have to pay attention to the political clock
Speaker 1: for the benefit of the country. He doesn't because the
Speaker 1: FBI has to operate outside of political consequences or political
Speaker 1: time frames. And what you've got right now, I believe, Sean,
Speaker 1: which is what you've been saying, so if he finds
Speaker 1: the information the week of the Democratic Convention, he's gonna
Speaker 1: come out that week with a criminal referral. Potentially, if
Speaker 1: if I believe I've known James Comy, I believe that
Speaker 1: if he has, if his agents put together a case,
Speaker 1: he reviews that case and determines that it is adequate
Speaker 1: to prosecute that there is He's not gonna operate under
Speaker 1: a timetable of whether there's a DNC convention or not.
Speaker 1: What he will do, I believe is if there is evidence,
Speaker 1: he will present that to the Attorney General, who now
Speaker 1: has to disqualify yourself procuse yourself up for prosecution. Let
Speaker 1: me take it a step further here, and this is
Speaker 1: I think something we have to underscore. There is also
Speaker 1: and I think part of the time frame here, Sean,
Speaker 1: is this started out just about an email and a server,
Speaker 1: and it's broadened. We know that it's now there's the
Speaker 1: questions about the Clinton Foundation. So we don't know the
Speaker 1: scope of the FBI's inquiry, but it's it's significant. When
Speaker 1: I worked with Treasury as a lawyer Treasury, when we
Speaker 1: put together these criminal cases for d O J. It
Speaker 1: was extensive and they were long time frames. So I
Speaker 1: think they're looking at a lot of information here. They're
Speaker 1: gonna take the evidence where it leads. But you know,
Speaker 1: Laretta Lynch is said that this is she's not going
Speaker 1: to interfere negatively with this, but she did, so you know,
Speaker 1: I'm no, I'm not trying to be smirch her as
Speaker 1: a person. But you talk, you're calling it a lack
Speaker 1: of judgment. I'm saying it's an ethical conduct. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: jump in here. You know, I I agree that these
Speaker 1: prosecutions do take their time. I've been involved with them
Speaker 1: on the defense side. I know that you've been involved
Speaker 1: in them on the prostitutorial side. And that's a climent.
Speaker 1: You know, called me the stand up guy, as you say,
Speaker 1: Ashcroft standing up for the inn soce of aillance, standing
Speaker 1: up for the Fourth Amendment. Going back to your suggestion
Speaker 1: that Clinton did this on purpose, Even if you get
Speaker 1: rid of Laretta Lynch, somebody who comes and stands on
Speaker 1: her shoes still has the FBI to answer to, or
Speaker 1: to at least discuss this with the vast majority and
Speaker 1: the bulk of the evidence that's collected so far. So
Speaker 1: the idea that getting rid of somehow of riddle Lynch
Speaker 1: changes the outcome of the investigation. I think it's a
Speaker 1: little bit of a stretch. So then what we think
Speaker 1: she went in there, They talked about their grandkids, and
Speaker 1: they talked about where he's traveling and play golf with
Speaker 1: the while his wife's under investigation. And he said, we're
Speaker 1: all good, right, thank you? She said, he hasn't commented,
Speaker 1: and we have no reason to believe it if, first
Speaker 1: of all, she only commented because she got caught. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's the reason she commented. She got caught because we
Speaker 1: talked about this today. This is they're acting as if
Speaker 1: there is no one in the world of media we
Speaker 1: live in that now none of this would come out.
Speaker 1: And and Bill Clinton, he hasn't said anything. Why would he?
Speaker 1: What does he have to say. He's not a current
Speaker 1: office holder. She is, She's the chief law enforcement officer
Speaker 1: of the United States. Shame on her, Daniel, are you
Speaker 1: gonna answer that? I mean, I think that I'm not
Speaker 1: an enormous amount of disagree, and I think that this
Speaker 1: was a huge mistake. I do not think that this
Speaker 1: was something calculated by Bill Clinton, because I do not
Speaker 1: think it actually serves his purposes. I think that she
Speaker 1: should recuse herself. And as said, as a Democrat, this
Speaker 1: is the last thing that people who believe that the
Speaker 1: process should go forward in the way that processes should
Speaker 1: about political interference without any of these other things that
Speaker 1: we've seen. I want them to be clean and this
Speaker 1: is not clean, and I'm angry about it. Frankly, well
Speaker 1: you should be angry about it, because there's a democrat.
Speaker 1: You should This is it's embarrassing. But let me tell
Speaker 1: you something else. This is the same Adjoorney general who
Speaker 1: ten days ago said, you know how you defeat terrorism
Speaker 1: with love? Okay, so you know that bothers me, bothers me.
Speaker 1: We have very We clearly have different opinions about the
Speaker 1: use of languages that relates to terrorism. Do you think
Speaker 1: it you think do you think loving isis is? I
Speaker 1: think what you mean was loving each other. The idea
Speaker 1: that intolerance breeds this kind of radicalization, and you've study
Speaker 1: up the study the idea that we should be open
Speaker 1: to full of all different stripes, all different religions, and
Speaker 1: not people out on the basis of who they are
Speaker 1: what they stand for. Well, hey, I hold it. That's
Speaker 1: a wonderful statement. Except she was speaking in Orlando where
Speaker 1: there was a mass terrorist attack with forty nine dead Americans.
Speaker 1: I don't care if they're gay, straight, sexual, r relevant,
Speaker 1: they're dead Americans. And the fact of the matter is
Speaker 1: that wasn't to you know, We're not We're tolerant. Here's
Speaker 1: the problem, the Jihada sarrant. I mean, that's the problem.
Speaker 1: And this is again, this is the administration narrative. All right,
Speaker 1: I gotta Jay. I think you're gonna join us on
Speaker 1: TV tonight about this. We'll see you then, Danielle, thank you.
Speaker 1: As we head into the fourth of July weekend. For me, Uh,
Speaker 1: does anybody even know what the fourth of July stands for?
Speaker 1: That gloration of independence from who as people? Most people
Speaker 1: don't know, right, I know everybody in this audience knows.
Speaker 1: But anyway, Kent in uh Kent, Terry is in Michigan, Kent.
Speaker 1: How are you? And welcome to the program. How are you, sir? Good?
Speaker 1: I'm doing good shots. What's going on now? You were
Speaker 1: know all about Operation uh Fast and Furious. Why don't
Speaker 1: you tell us what you know? I know you're Brian
Speaker 1: Terry's brother and you lost your brother in this and Uh,
Speaker 1: we talked to you and still no answers about why
Speaker 1: our government would give guns to criminals and and cartels
Speaker 1: and gangsters and mobsters the way they did, and it
Speaker 1: ended up killing your brother, which once again we're so
Speaker 1: sorry about. It's unbelievable to me. Your brother did not
Speaker 1: need to die. The guns were provided by his government. Unbelievable,
Speaker 1: you know. Shot, that was a sense of senseless death
Speaker 1: on our governments. Uh. Uh watched there. But the means
Speaker 1: I'm calling in is because uh, one of these weapons
Speaker 1: were found at the Paris attack in which attack? Was
Speaker 1: that which attack? The Paris attack? One of one of
Speaker 1: the one of the fast and furious guns were found
Speaker 1: in the Paris attack. Yes, it was on a Judicial
Speaker 1: Watch media thing yesterday. You know, I hadn't even seen this.
Speaker 1: You're talking about the reporter investigation. The r o I
Speaker 1: filed a case by a case agent in the Bureau
Speaker 1: of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms. They tracked the gun in Paris
Speaker 1: attacks to the Phoenix gun owner who sold it illegally
Speaker 1: off the books. Judicial Watch law enforcement sources confirmed. So
Speaker 1: not only did we give these guns to kidnappers, drug dealers, cartels,
Speaker 1: but now they're selling the guns illegally that our government
Speaker 1: provided and they're used in the Paris attack. But they
Speaker 1: want to take away the guns of law abiding citizens.
Speaker 1: You know, I I do, You know, I don't. I
Speaker 1: don't know how I would deal with what you've had
Speaker 1: to go through. You lose your brother, then you find
Speaker 1: out the government provided the gun that killed them, and
Speaker 1: they never put a tracking or GPS device in the gun,
Speaker 1: which would have been easy to do, and as so irresponsible.
Speaker 1: I don't know if I would ever overcome the degree
Speaker 1: of betrayal and anger that I know that I would feel.
Speaker 1: How do you do it? Well? You know, well, you know,
Speaker 1: if it wasn't for the gym Sean, I'll know how
Speaker 1: to do it. But you know what, it's just if
Speaker 1: this angers me when I see more guns show up,
Speaker 1: just like now, it's just like, what's he gonna take?
Speaker 1: What's it it takes for Congress and sent it to
Speaker 1: finally add I've been telling Grassly fits Us, Gaudy, uh Poe,
Speaker 1: all of them guys, so last three or four years,
Speaker 1: it's just a matter of time before these guns show
Speaker 1: off at a terrorist tax either this this country or
Speaker 1: another country. And they're still not and they still don't
Speaker 1: listen to you, right, still don't listen to me. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm not the smartest guy in the world, but it's
Speaker 1: it's kind of sense. These these weapons have killed thousands
Speaker 1: of people between Mexico over there and here, mostly in Mexico.
Speaker 1: But you know, lives matter, right, So I mean, why
Speaker 1: hasn't Congress stepped up and say, hey, we need to
Speaker 1: take care of this problem? And they have it. I
Speaker 1: gotta tell the most disappointing thing in my life right
Speaker 1: now is the Republican Party. They are so weak, timid,
Speaker 1: and effective, unwilling to put their their battle on the
Speaker 1: line and go against the Obama agenda. They've they've now
Speaker 1: funded his entire last year of his presidency to do
Speaker 1: or damage because they're afraid of a fight. They keep
Speaker 1: telling us to need the House, and they need the
Speaker 1: House and the Senate. And then the promises they make
Speaker 1: when they get the House they don't keep. Then the
Speaker 1: promises they make when they get the House and Senate
Speaker 1: they don't keep. Now they're saying that, you know, and
Speaker 1: and now they're afraid of Donald Trump because they actually
Speaker 1: believe Trump will do what he says. We know what
Speaker 1: Sean He's the only one that step forward that promised
Speaker 1: my family answers we become president. You know, all these
Speaker 1: cons and centers the last few years promised my mom
Speaker 1: promised her even though lies it comments promised her. Hey,
Speaker 1: we're accountability for this and we find out nothing. It's
Speaker 1: been five and a half years and nothing. I want
Speaker 1: to put you on hold. I want to invite you
Speaker 1: to an event. I can't say publicly what it is yet,
Speaker 1: but it's the event that I'm doing. Okay, Linda knows,
Speaker 1: and Uh, stay on the line, okay, Ken, alright, eight
Speaker 1: nine one. Shaun's a toe free telephone number. You want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. All right, let's
Speaker 1: get to our phones again. And as we have Davis
Speaker 1: in North Carolina. What's up, Dave? How are you glad
Speaker 1: you called sir? Okay, Sean, I just wanted to call I. Um,
Speaker 1: I've heard you asking Hillary supporters uh for three specific
Speaker 1: things they've done the better the lives of American people. Um, John,
Speaker 1: I believe the reason you're not getting your responses because
Speaker 1: you're asking the wrong question. I think you s'll flit
Speaker 1: the coin and answer three specific things you've done the
Speaker 1: better than the lives of terristry on the world. You
Speaker 1: might get some more answers. Well, I could say that
Speaker 1: you gave up help negotiate the deal with the hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty billion dollars with the RAND. She didn't oppose
Speaker 1: releasing terrorists at HIPMO, she hasn't supported border security. She
Speaker 1: supported giving the former Muslim Brotherhood head Mohammed Morsey, tanks
Speaker 1: and F sixteen. So there's there's four examples, like you
Speaker 1: keep going if you like, yeah, and as well, yeah,
Speaker 1: exactly exactly. You know, it's not funny because people are dying.
Speaker 1: You know, it's unbelievable. I mean, it's it's you know,
Speaker 1: how this woman is even competing in this election says
Speaker 1: a lot about our fellow Americans. And I don't know
Speaker 1: their susceptibility. Let's say the false promises of government. All
Speaker 1: these people believe that they keep their they keep their doctor,
Speaker 1: keep their plans. All these people believed in hope and
Speaker 1: change and yes we can, and they chanted and chanted,
Speaker 1: and they were all excited. And I don't have to
Speaker 1: worry anymore about paying my mortgage, and I don't have
Speaker 1: to worry about my car payment. And if you help me,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna help you, and then everything's gonna be okay.
Speaker 1: And and if Obama's elected, the world's just gonna be
Speaker 1: a better place. People brought into that. And now what
Speaker 1: a week? Have millions more Americans and poverty on food stamps,
Speaker 1: on the unemployment line, out of the labor force? Ever happen?
Speaker 1: I don't I don't have to work, but I don't
Speaker 1: have to worry about putting gas in my car, paying
Speaker 1: my mortgage. Obama's gonna handle it. How could people be
Speaker 1: so naive? Keep your doctor, keep your plans saved per
Speaker 1: family year. Never happened. He's uniquely qualified because he went
Speaker 1: to a Muslim school in Jakarta to bridge the gap
Speaker 1: between the the Western and Muslim world. Well, how did
Speaker 1: that work out in Egypt and Iraq and Syria? How
Speaker 1: did that work out for Israel? Had that workout for
Speaker 1: everybody in the Middle East? Had that workout for the
Speaker 1: rest of the world. How does that Russian reset working?
Speaker 1: Wake Forest, North Carolina. Kenny is standing by Kenny. How
Speaker 1: are you glad you called? Sir? I'm doing will Sean.
Speaker 1: I hope you're having a good day. I'm having a
Speaker 1: great day. Thank you. Good Hey, I wanted to bring
Speaker 1: up some things you got to talking about towards the
Speaker 1: end of day yesterday about the Radio Hall of Fame. UM.
Speaker 1: You know realized you know that you know, hey, your
Speaker 1: your co host, and your friends are around you and
Speaker 1: they're happy for you, and I don't have what can
Speaker 1: I just can I just correct the record. I don't
Speaker 1: have a co host. You know, I have breaking news now.
Speaker 1: This is the Sean Hannity Show. Now. I occasionally allow
Speaker 1: members of my half on the air, and occasionally they
Speaker 1: and occasionally they defy my my I won't say order
Speaker 1: my mandate not to be on the air, and they
Speaker 1: push things that I don't want to push, which annoys me.
Speaker 1: But you know, I still love everybody here, and I'm
Speaker 1: a good boss, and I don't fire anybody. I'm incapable
Speaker 1: of firing bad people. Some of those guys, you know,
Speaker 1: they're they're doing anything for you, and you're they're promoting you.
Speaker 1: I know, but but, but but but if I keep
Speaker 1: saying I don't want to be promoted by the way,
Speaker 1: I'm incapable of firing good people. Overall, I look at
Speaker 1: their entire record, not the fact that what no, just stop,
Speaker 1: because every time I said, don't put on the microphone.
Speaker 1: You absolutely, you're insubordinate. You just do it anyway. They're done,
Speaker 1: put your MinC on now. But do I have permission
Speaker 1: to speak? You have permission to speak. This is the
Speaker 1: person you're labeling, my co host, my executive producer. Thank you, Kenny.
Speaker 1: I'm still glad that people in our audience appreciate the
Speaker 1: love we have for Sean because he is such a
Speaker 1: great boss and such a good talk show host and
Speaker 1: really has the ability to talk about things that even
Speaker 1: our own elected officials won't talk about, which is kind
Speaker 1: of sad since we pay them with our tax dollars.
Speaker 1: But you, we listen too willingly, and that's why we
Speaker 1: want you to be inducted into the Hall of Fame,
Speaker 1: which I really hope you will because I know a
Speaker 1: lot of people texted Hannity tored that's handy. I thought
Speaker 1: it was all over today. I think he's a last day.
Speaker 1: Oh I don't, so we don't even have to hear
Speaker 1: it again.