1
00:00:11,657 --> 00:00:14,937
Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure

2
00:00:14,937 --> 00:00:17,977
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or

3
00:00:17,977 --> 00:00:23,337
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Shoulder to Shoulder Shield Time.

4
00:00:23,977 --> 00:00:29,057
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show team. Welcome to the

5
00:00:29,097 --> 00:00:33,497
Speaker 1: Freedom Hunt. Monday, October thirty, first Halloween edition of the program.

6
00:00:33,857 --> 00:00:37,737
Speaker 1: We've got Supreme Court arguments this morning. Heard on affirmative

7
00:00:37,777 --> 00:00:43,297
Speaker 1: action in college admissions. I listened to over an hour

8
00:00:43,337 --> 00:00:45,217
Speaker 1: and a half. I think it was of this. I'll

9
00:00:45,257 --> 00:00:48,977
Speaker 1: break down for you how I think affirmative action is

10
00:00:49,257 --> 00:00:53,897
Speaker 1: about to be declared unconstitutional in the context of college emissions,

11
00:00:53,657 --> 00:00:57,257
Speaker 1: which it absolutely should be. We'll discuss that. Plus over

12
00:00:57,297 --> 00:01:01,417
Speaker 1: the weekend, the Democrats are desperate, desperate to make the

13
00:01:02,457 --> 00:01:06,097
Speaker 1: election that is coming up, something about Republican violence, and

14
00:01:06,097 --> 00:01:09,697
Speaker 1: they're tying Paul Pelosi's assault to this because they have

15
00:01:09,777 --> 00:01:14,137
Speaker 1: no arguments, and so they're trying to smear the entire

16
00:01:14,257 --> 00:01:17,617
Speaker 1: Republican party with something that has absolutely nothing to do

17
00:01:18,057 --> 00:01:21,257
Speaker 1: with the Republicans, their arguments, or their party. Plus Elon

18
00:01:21,297 --> 00:01:25,777
Speaker 1: takes over Twitter and the Libs are crying. Oh, they're

19
00:01:25,857 --> 00:01:30,297
Speaker 1: so upset. They're crying. It's so sad. But I think

20
00:01:30,297 --> 00:01:33,537
Speaker 1: there's something bigger afoot here. We may find out that

21
00:01:33,937 --> 00:01:40,257
Speaker 1: there is smoking gun evidence of collusion between government officials

22
00:01:40,377 --> 00:01:45,097
Speaker 1: and the big tech Democrat apparatus to throw the twenty

23
00:01:45,177 --> 00:01:47,657
Speaker 1: twenty election. So we're gonna be discussing all this in

24
00:01:47,657 --> 00:01:51,257
Speaker 1: a second. My friends, First and foremost, I got to

25
00:01:51,257 --> 00:01:55,137
Speaker 1: make sure that you are absolutely squared away with your

26
00:01:55,177 --> 00:01:57,177
Speaker 1: financial future. And what are you going to do? I mean,

27
00:01:57,217 --> 00:01:58,977
Speaker 1: where are you going to put your money these days?

28
00:01:59,017 --> 00:02:01,377
Speaker 1: Look at the stock market, things are rough, all these

29
00:02:01,417 --> 00:02:04,897
Speaker 1: problems out there. You're four one case gotten totally battered recently, right,

30
00:02:04,937 --> 00:02:07,297
Speaker 1: I mean, this is what's going on. But if you're

31
00:02:07,337 --> 00:02:09,777
Speaker 1: a thought about being a real estate investor, check out

32
00:02:09,777 --> 00:02:13,297
Speaker 1: my ends at done for you. Real estate dun fear.

33
00:02:13,337 --> 00:02:15,977
Speaker 1: Real estate takes you from me where I was a

34
00:02:15,977 --> 00:02:19,057
Speaker 1: total novice who knew nothing about real estate investment all

35
00:02:19,097 --> 00:02:22,857
Speaker 1: the way to being somebody who owns real estate as

36
00:02:22,897 --> 00:02:26,017
Speaker 1: an investor and can even build out slowly over time,

37
00:02:26,417 --> 00:02:30,017
Speaker 1: a real portfolio of real estate investments. We're talking single

38
00:02:30,057 --> 00:02:35,737
Speaker 1: family homes here in stable growing neighborhoods that can bring

39
00:02:35,817 --> 00:02:39,977
Speaker 1: you free cash flow and also let you build substantial

40
00:02:40,017 --> 00:02:42,857
Speaker 1: equity in these homes over time. It's great. Dune Fee

41
00:02:42,897 --> 00:02:45,017
Speaker 1: real Estate will take you through every step of the process,

42
00:02:45,137 --> 00:02:49,177
Speaker 1: what area, what house you should look at. They'll help

43
00:02:49,177 --> 00:02:51,897
Speaker 1: you get a mortgage, get that loan in place. Then

44
00:02:51,897 --> 00:02:54,497
Speaker 1: they'll put a management a company in touch with you

45
00:02:54,817 --> 00:02:57,217
Speaker 1: at every step. This stuff is complicated. There's a lot

46
00:02:57,217 --> 00:02:58,937
Speaker 1: of paperwork, there's a lot of stuff that if you

47
00:02:58,977 --> 00:03:01,057
Speaker 1: don't know what you're doing, it can be overwhelming. Dune

48
00:03:01,097 --> 00:03:03,777
Speaker 1: Fear real Estate just takes you through all of it.

49
00:03:03,857 --> 00:03:07,617
Speaker 1: They are your guide to real estate investing the smart way.

50
00:03:07,817 --> 00:03:09,977
Speaker 1: Go to Done for You Buck dot Com to see

51
00:03:10,137 --> 00:03:12,457
Speaker 1: how this works. I'm in a done for you client,

52
00:03:12,577 --> 00:03:15,537
Speaker 1: So am I two brothers done for you Buck dot

53
00:03:15,577 --> 00:03:19,137
Speaker 1: com Again, that is done for you Buck dot com

54
00:03:19,177 --> 00:03:21,737
Speaker 1: to become a real estate investor with Done for You

55
00:03:22,217 --> 00:03:26,017
Speaker 1: real Estate. So I listened to this Supreme Court arguments

56
00:03:26,057 --> 00:03:29,057
Speaker 1: this morning having to do with University of North Carolina

57
00:03:29,297 --> 00:03:34,497
Speaker 1: and this group students for Fair Admission at Harvard. Here's

58
00:03:34,977 --> 00:03:37,737
Speaker 1: there's a lot of arguments around it from revaction that

59
00:03:37,817 --> 00:03:40,257
Speaker 1: you'll hear and a lot of stuff that people will say.

60
00:03:40,737 --> 00:03:43,177
Speaker 1: I can break it down for you in a pretty simplest,

61
00:03:43,257 --> 00:03:46,697
Speaker 1: simple way. I think because for one thing, the American people.

62
00:03:46,697 --> 00:03:50,937
Speaker 1: This is one of those policies that you will never

63
00:03:50,977 --> 00:03:53,657
Speaker 1: find a poll that shows majority support for from revaction

64
00:03:54,617 --> 00:03:57,577
Speaker 1: because a for interaction is racial preferences for people based

65
00:03:57,617 --> 00:04:01,897
Speaker 1: upon skin color in the admissions process to college also

66
00:04:01,977 --> 00:04:07,177
Speaker 1: obviously exists in the process of hiring two that's different

67
00:04:07,297 --> 00:04:09,977
Speaker 1: from or separate from this case specifically, although the principle

68
00:04:10,177 --> 00:04:14,617
Speaker 1: is the same, and the argument in favor of continuing

69
00:04:14,657 --> 00:04:20,857
Speaker 1: to use affirmative action as a as an important indicator

70
00:04:20,937 --> 00:04:23,617
Speaker 1: in college emissions is essentially this. And I listened to

71
00:04:23,617 --> 00:04:26,257
Speaker 1: the oral arguments before the Supreme Court today, so I'm

72
00:04:26,297 --> 00:04:28,137
Speaker 1: pretty up to speed on what the latest is here.

73
00:04:28,817 --> 00:04:33,257
Speaker 1: Diversity is good. We can't define We can't define diversity,

74
00:04:33,497 --> 00:04:35,977
Speaker 1: but we know it's really important. And when there's not

75
00:04:36,137 --> 00:04:40,537
Speaker 1: enough diversity, people who are part of diversity feel like

76
00:04:40,697 --> 00:04:44,417
Speaker 1: they're being left out or marginalized. But we don't look

77
00:04:44,417 --> 00:04:48,177
Speaker 1: at numbers to determine whether we've reached enough diversity because

78
00:04:48,217 --> 00:04:51,857
Speaker 1: that would be quotas. But in order to achieve diversity,

79
00:04:52,137 --> 00:04:55,137
Speaker 1: we have to be able to factor it in. But

80
00:04:55,257 --> 00:04:58,697
Speaker 1: it doesn't factor into it that much, only a little bit.

81
00:04:58,737 --> 00:05:01,937
Speaker 1: But somehow we keep achieving the same number of black

82
00:05:01,977 --> 00:05:05,897
Speaker 1: and Latino and Native American students at elite institutions year

83
00:05:05,977 --> 00:05:08,857
Speaker 1: in and year out, without ever taking into account what

84
00:05:08,937 --> 00:05:12,857
Speaker 1: the actual number is is. Even though you notice how

85
00:05:12,857 --> 00:05:15,457
Speaker 1: it's it doesn't even the whole argument is just smoke

86
00:05:15,497 --> 00:05:19,657
Speaker 1: and mirrors. It's nonsense. It's nonsense. It doesn't it doesn't

87
00:05:19,657 --> 00:05:22,457
Speaker 1: hold up. They are discriminating on the basis of race,

88
00:05:22,617 --> 00:05:25,697
Speaker 1: full stop, and they're saying, oh, we don't discriminate that much.

89
00:05:25,737 --> 00:05:27,257
Speaker 1: It's just a little bit, it's a little bit here,

90
00:05:27,257 --> 00:05:31,577
Speaker 1: a little bit there. Uh No, that's wrong. It's really straightforward.

91
00:05:31,817 --> 00:05:34,777
Speaker 1: Affirmative action is a form of racism. That's where we are.

92
00:05:35,617 --> 00:05:38,657
Speaker 1: That's where we are. And what's really brought this to

93
00:05:38,777 --> 00:05:43,497
Speaker 1: the forefront is that there are so many Asian American

94
00:05:43,577 --> 00:05:50,697
Speaker 1: students who are actively being discriminated against, discriminated against in

95
00:05:50,737 --> 00:05:52,817
Speaker 1: the college emissions process. And they even said in the

96
00:05:52,817 --> 00:05:55,177
Speaker 1: World Arguments. You know, this is about the future generation

97
00:05:55,217 --> 00:05:59,177
Speaker 1: of leadership. This is about the spoils system that has

98
00:05:59,177 --> 00:06:01,897
Speaker 1: been created here, that the universities are pipelines to high

99
00:06:01,937 --> 00:06:06,137
Speaker 1: paying jobs, to social and even political prominence. You know,

100
00:06:06,537 --> 00:06:09,537
Speaker 1: you go to Harvard, so that you've gone to Harvard,

101
00:06:09,817 --> 00:06:12,257
Speaker 1: so it's essentially a benefit to have been a student

102
00:06:12,297 --> 00:06:15,337
Speaker 1: there unc also not quite as much as Harvard, but

103
00:06:15,417 --> 00:06:18,537
Speaker 1: similar idea. And so this is a benefit that must

104
00:06:18,577 --> 00:06:22,657
Speaker 1: be conferred to people based on the concept of equity

105
00:06:22,817 --> 00:06:25,937
Speaker 1: and not the concept of equality of opportunity or that

106
00:06:26,017 --> 00:06:31,497
Speaker 1: we are all trying to compete through a meritocracy. And

107
00:06:31,537 --> 00:06:34,417
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you the arguments, the two areas where

108
00:06:35,457 --> 00:06:38,097
Speaker 1: there was just a total collapse of a live argument,

109
00:06:38,097 --> 00:06:39,457
Speaker 1: and not a lot of conservatives talking to this. I

110
00:06:39,777 --> 00:06:42,937
Speaker 1: think it's a mistake. I think that this is somewhere

111
00:06:43,057 --> 00:06:47,337
Speaker 1: that you should see a lot more focus from conservatives.

112
00:06:48,417 --> 00:06:50,857
Speaker 1: But the areas where this whole thing fell apart in

113
00:06:50,897 --> 00:06:53,217
Speaker 1: the oral arguments, and why I think you're going to see.

114
00:06:53,577 --> 00:06:55,457
Speaker 1: I think you're going to see a six three decision

115
00:06:55,537 --> 00:06:58,337
Speaker 1: striking down a firmative action in college applications. This JOm

116
00:06:58,377 --> 00:07:01,297
Speaker 1: we're not going to know for a while because Alito

117
00:07:01,497 --> 00:07:06,337
Speaker 1: said Alito was asking them, asking the side in support

118
00:07:06,377 --> 00:07:10,137
Speaker 1: of this of continuing to use a firmnive action. If

119
00:07:10,137 --> 00:07:12,417
Speaker 1: you aren't using numbers, Basically, how can you know you're

120
00:07:12,417 --> 00:07:16,017
Speaker 1: actually achieving diversity? So if you're not paying attention to

121
00:07:16,057 --> 00:07:17,777
Speaker 1: what percentage of black students. Are we going to have

122
00:07:17,817 --> 00:07:20,177
Speaker 1: in the class? What percentage of Native American, what percentage

123
00:07:20,217 --> 00:07:24,337
Speaker 1: of Hispanic, White, Asian, etc. How can you know you're

124
00:07:24,337 --> 00:07:29,777
Speaker 1: achieving diversity? Now? Now, this is in essence, it's not

125
00:07:29,817 --> 00:07:31,977
Speaker 1: a trap, as in it's dishonest. But this traps the

126
00:07:31,977 --> 00:07:34,217
Speaker 1: other side. It puts them in a position where they

127
00:07:34,257 --> 00:07:37,737
Speaker 1: have to say, well, yeah, basically, what we're doing is

128
00:07:37,817 --> 00:07:41,417
Speaker 1: using stealth quotas, so we know we need to up

129
00:07:41,417 --> 00:07:43,777
Speaker 1: the yield a little bit of this group or that group,

130
00:07:44,137 --> 00:07:46,097
Speaker 1: So then we're going to have a greater emphasis in

131
00:07:46,177 --> 00:07:51,497
Speaker 1: the holistic admissions process for people of one skin color

132
00:07:51,497 --> 00:07:55,057
Speaker 1: over another so that we can achieve our diversity outcomes.

133
00:07:55,257 --> 00:07:57,257
Speaker 1: Really interesting to do. They also will argue, just so

134
00:07:57,297 --> 00:08:01,737
Speaker 1: you know that even population based representation would not be

135
00:08:01,817 --> 00:08:08,497
Speaker 1: sufficient diversity necessarily. Now, so quotas are too strong of

136
00:08:08,537 --> 00:08:12,177
Speaker 1: a racial preference system, they say, But they want to

137
00:08:12,217 --> 00:08:14,617
Speaker 1: achieve a number, but they tell you they can't. Actually

138
00:08:15,097 --> 00:08:17,417
Speaker 1: they don't actually look at the numbers because if they

139
00:08:17,417 --> 00:08:19,257
Speaker 1: were paying attention to the numbers, then you would just

140
00:08:19,257 --> 00:08:21,057
Speaker 1: be doing a stealth quota. You see what I mean.

141
00:08:21,537 --> 00:08:25,657
Speaker 1: They're essentially telling, well, let's say, let's say that Harvard

142
00:08:25,737 --> 00:08:28,377
Speaker 1: University is And I don't know the number off hand,

143
00:08:28,377 --> 00:08:31,337
Speaker 1: but I let's say it's something like seven percent black

144
00:08:31,377 --> 00:08:34,977
Speaker 1: students or five percent black students. You're in year out

145
00:08:35,097 --> 00:08:39,457
Speaker 1: Harvard achieves that number, will you say why if they're

146
00:08:39,457 --> 00:08:44,257
Speaker 1: achieving that number without any major influence being given to

147
00:08:44,577 --> 00:08:47,737
Speaker 1: black students in the application process, as in, if you're black,

148
00:08:47,777 --> 00:08:49,737
Speaker 1: you're going to have a huge advantage to get in.

149
00:08:50,817 --> 00:08:52,697
Speaker 1: Then And if they're not paying attention to what the

150
00:08:52,697 --> 00:08:54,817
Speaker 1: actual numbers are the actually then why do we need

151
00:08:54,857 --> 00:08:57,417
Speaker 1: the program and the first ones? What are they fighting

152
00:08:57,457 --> 00:09:02,697
Speaker 1: against if it's not an important determinant of whether somebody

153
00:09:02,697 --> 00:09:04,857
Speaker 1: gets into school or not, which is really what the

154
00:09:04,937 --> 00:09:06,937
Speaker 1: libs say, Oh, it's one of a holistic, it's a

155
00:09:07,137 --> 00:09:11,017
Speaker 1: there's a mosaic of different reasons. If it's not powerful,

156
00:09:11,017 --> 00:09:13,537
Speaker 1: then why do you even need it? It's clearly powerful.

157
00:09:13,537 --> 00:09:16,817
Speaker 1: They're lying. This is all built on deceptions, and they

158
00:09:16,857 --> 00:09:18,897
Speaker 1: clearly look at the numbers because they're hitting the same

159
00:09:18,977 --> 00:09:21,977
Speaker 1: numbers more or less year in and year out. And

160
00:09:22,057 --> 00:09:23,977
Speaker 1: when you look at the numbers when it comes to SATs,

161
00:09:24,017 --> 00:09:26,217
Speaker 1: when you look at the numbers of who's admitted with

162
00:09:26,297 --> 00:09:28,937
Speaker 1: what kind of scores, what kind of metrics. It's not

163
00:09:28,977 --> 00:09:32,777
Speaker 1: a one factor among many. It is a massive factor.

164
00:09:33,657 --> 00:09:37,537
Speaker 1: If you are a black student, a Native American student,

165
00:09:37,617 --> 00:09:43,097
Speaker 1: or a Latino student applying to Harvard or UNC with

166
00:09:43,457 --> 00:09:48,777
Speaker 1: let's say you know, an Sat in the eleven hundred range,

167
00:09:49,857 --> 00:09:52,737
Speaker 1: you are four or five times is likely depending on

168
00:09:52,777 --> 00:09:54,937
Speaker 1: which group, to get in as somebody who is a

169
00:09:55,137 --> 00:09:59,977
Speaker 1: Wide or Asian. That's what the data actually shows again

170
00:10:00,097 --> 00:10:04,017
Speaker 1: roughly speaking, numbers along those lines. That's an enormous advantage,

171
00:10:04,417 --> 00:10:07,417
Speaker 1: enormous advantage. And they say, oh no, it's just part

172
00:10:07,457 --> 00:10:10,177
Speaker 1: of a holistic process. They're lying. So that's one part

173
00:10:10,177 --> 00:10:12,097
Speaker 1: of it. So it falls apart because they're doing stealth

174
00:10:12,137 --> 00:10:15,017
Speaker 1: quotas and they're pretending they're not doing stealth quotas because quotas.

175
00:10:15,017 --> 00:10:18,097
Speaker 1: Everyone agrees that's a violation of the equal Protection cloth

176
00:10:18,097 --> 00:10:20,777
Speaker 1: at the fourteenth Amendment. There's a constitutional issue there, Okay.

177
00:10:21,497 --> 00:10:23,377
Speaker 1: But then there was another part of this too where

178
00:10:23,377 --> 00:10:26,577
Speaker 1: they started to ask questions like so a student who

179
00:10:26,577 --> 00:10:31,577
Speaker 1: applies from Afghanistan, who's from Afghanistan and maybe fled war,

180
00:10:31,697 --> 00:10:34,977
Speaker 1: there's family or refugees now in this country. He just

181
00:10:35,057 --> 00:10:38,537
Speaker 1: checks the box that says Asian so that student is

182
00:10:38,577 --> 00:10:42,537
Speaker 1: to be treated for admissions purposes, and whether or not

183
00:10:42,577 --> 00:10:45,297
Speaker 1: he gets or she gets a benefit, is treated like

184
00:10:45,377 --> 00:10:48,657
Speaker 1: a student who is, you know, third generation Korean American

185
00:10:48,777 --> 00:10:50,977
Speaker 1: with one parent who's a doctor and another parent who's

186
00:10:50,977 --> 00:10:54,177
Speaker 1: like a small business owner and who went to an

187
00:10:54,177 --> 00:10:59,577
Speaker 1: elite private or parochial school or whatever. That student they're

188
00:10:59,617 --> 00:11:01,737
Speaker 1: checking the same box. How does that make any sense?

189
00:11:03,057 --> 00:11:06,537
Speaker 1: What are Arab Americans supposed to they they're white for

190
00:11:06,577 --> 00:11:09,097
Speaker 1: the purposes of this, They're not a Hispanic, They're not black.

191
00:11:10,537 --> 00:11:13,657
Speaker 1: And also the other place, So what are the categorizations

192
00:11:13,657 --> 00:11:15,937
Speaker 1: that we're using here? They seem very arbitrary, and they

193
00:11:15,977 --> 00:11:19,977
Speaker 1: are very arbitrary. But another part where this all comes apart,

194
00:11:19,977 --> 00:11:21,697
Speaker 1: and one of the justices I forget which one was

195
00:11:21,737 --> 00:11:24,057
Speaker 1: asking this argument. I think it. I think it might

196
00:11:24,097 --> 00:11:28,697
Speaker 1: have been Gorsage, but I can't remember offhand, was saying,

197
00:11:29,457 --> 00:11:32,497
Speaker 1: what qualifies you as being enough of something to claim

198
00:11:32,577 --> 00:11:37,417
Speaker 1: something for the purposes of college admissions? If you're if

199
00:11:37,417 --> 00:11:40,097
Speaker 1: you have one grand Meghan Markle, for example, has one

200
00:11:41,737 --> 00:11:46,057
Speaker 1: one grandparent who is black, and we often hear Meghan

201
00:11:46,137 --> 00:11:49,497
Speaker 1: Markle talked about as a woman of color. Right, I

202
00:11:49,537 --> 00:11:52,417
Speaker 1: believe that Meghan Markle has one grandparent who is by

203
00:11:52,457 --> 00:11:54,697
Speaker 1: I might have her lineage wrong, but I believe that's

204
00:11:55,297 --> 00:11:57,177
Speaker 1: so when you apply to Harvard, if you have a

205
00:11:57,497 --> 00:12:00,737
Speaker 1: grandparent of four who is black, are you considered black

206
00:12:00,737 --> 00:12:03,977
Speaker 1: for the purposes of admission to Harvard? The Supreme Court

207
00:12:03,977 --> 00:12:06,097
Speaker 1: asked the questions, Okay, what if you have a great grandparent,

208
00:12:07,057 --> 00:12:09,657
Speaker 1: what if you have a great great grandparent? And what

209
00:12:09,777 --> 00:12:12,417
Speaker 1: if you just And they say, well, we just we

210
00:12:12,497 --> 00:12:17,017
Speaker 1: let people self identify, But do they really if I

211
00:12:17,217 --> 00:12:19,257
Speaker 1: check the box if I'm applying to Harvard, I checked

212
00:12:19,297 --> 00:12:22,657
Speaker 1: the box that says I'm Native American, and I have

213
00:12:22,697 --> 00:12:24,937
Speaker 1: no proof of this, of nothing whatsoever. And I get in.

214
00:12:25,817 --> 00:12:27,657
Speaker 1: Harvard is going to be furious with them when they

215
00:12:27,697 --> 00:12:30,377
Speaker 1: find out what's going on. Right, people would say, well,

216
00:12:30,417 --> 00:12:33,337
Speaker 1: look at Elizabeth Warren. Yeah, exactly. She perpetrated a fraud

217
00:12:33,777 --> 00:12:37,097
Speaker 1: and Harvard looked really stupid because of it, because you fraudulently,

218
00:12:37,377 --> 00:12:41,337
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren gained this very system that these people going

219
00:12:41,337 --> 00:12:44,537
Speaker 1: before the Supreme Court today, these libs, these lifestyle libs

220
00:12:45,417 --> 00:12:47,337
Speaker 1: who think that this makes them good people. They're like

221
00:12:47,337 --> 00:12:49,537
Speaker 1: on the front lines of some new civil rights struggle

222
00:12:49,537 --> 00:12:53,337
Speaker 1: because they're defending affirmative action. They do all this, and

223
00:12:53,417 --> 00:12:57,297
Speaker 1: you say to yourself, well, hold on a second, if

224
00:12:57,377 --> 00:13:00,457
Speaker 1: you can just claim, if you can just claim it

225
00:13:00,537 --> 00:13:02,737
Speaker 1: and then you get a benefit from it, why shouldn't

226
00:13:02,737 --> 00:13:05,857
Speaker 1: anyone just claim it? What? What? What quality controls are

227
00:13:05,857 --> 00:13:09,377
Speaker 1: in place for these kinds of measures? They had no answer,

228
00:13:09,417 --> 00:13:10,977
Speaker 1: They have no answers or any of this. By the way,

229
00:13:11,417 --> 00:13:13,857
Speaker 1: the whole thing falls apart. I mean, it was such

230
00:13:13,857 --> 00:13:16,657
Speaker 1: a weak and it all just turns into this circuitous

231
00:13:16,977 --> 00:13:19,817
Speaker 1: Oh but there's a history of oppression and diversities good

232
00:13:19,817 --> 00:13:22,017
Speaker 1: and diversity makes things better, and we need to make

233
00:13:22,097 --> 00:13:24,657
Speaker 1: up for oppression, and we need more diversity, So we're

234
00:13:24,657 --> 00:13:26,977
Speaker 1: gonna make more diversity to make up for the oppression.

235
00:13:27,737 --> 00:13:30,537
Speaker 1: Hold on a second. Do we have equal protection of

236
00:13:30,577 --> 00:13:33,177
Speaker 1: the laws in this country or not? Is it illegal

237
00:13:33,177 --> 00:13:35,897
Speaker 1: to discriminate against people on the basis of race or not?

238
00:13:37,017 --> 00:13:38,897
Speaker 1: See one of the one of the problems. They also

239
00:13:38,937 --> 00:13:40,857
Speaker 1: talked about how there was a twenty five year sunset

240
00:13:40,857 --> 00:13:44,577
Speaker 1: provision and Gretter v. Bollinger that Santa Day O'Connor mentioned

241
00:13:44,577 --> 00:13:47,217
Speaker 1: that within twenty five years, which is basically now, but

242
00:13:47,297 --> 00:13:50,177
Speaker 1: within twenty five years, we won't need this anymore, and

243
00:13:50,217 --> 00:13:53,137
Speaker 1: that this was dangerous stuff to be creating racial preferences

244
00:13:53,137 --> 00:13:55,937
Speaker 1: in our society. I mean, the whole thing is so flimsy.

245
00:13:55,977 --> 00:14:01,577
Speaker 1: It's wrong, it's wrong, and the arguments are incredibly weak

246
00:14:01,657 --> 00:14:05,217
Speaker 1: in favor of this stuff. But it was interesting here

247
00:14:05,217 --> 00:14:08,457
Speaker 1: at today. Affirmative action, which the Libs have made a

248
00:14:08,537 --> 00:14:11,577
Speaker 1: huge part, you know, diversity, in diversity and inclusion. All

249
00:14:11,577 --> 00:14:15,577
Speaker 1: this stuff they talk about rests on a foundation of nothing,

250
00:14:16,417 --> 00:14:20,657
Speaker 1: just the emotional needs of Libs to feel good about

251
00:14:20,657 --> 00:14:25,537
Speaker 1: themselves and honestly, the advantages that people like to have advantages.

252
00:14:26,577 --> 00:14:30,337
Speaker 1: There are people who are privileged minorities in this scheme,

253
00:14:30,457 --> 00:14:32,657
Speaker 1: in this framework of college admissions. They don't want to

254
00:14:32,697 --> 00:14:35,457
Speaker 1: give that up. I mean, Soda Myor on the Supreme

255
00:14:35,497 --> 00:14:38,777
Speaker 1: Court it said she's a product of affirmative action. Now

256
00:14:38,817 --> 00:14:41,537
Speaker 1: so do Myor is also the least intellectually capable member

257
00:14:41,617 --> 00:14:44,137
Speaker 1: of the Supreme Court. So it's interesting that she's so clear,

258
00:14:44,657 --> 00:14:47,017
Speaker 1: so quick to say that she is a product of

259
00:14:47,017 --> 00:14:49,617
Speaker 1: affirmative action, as though that's some kind of seal of

260
00:14:49,657 --> 00:14:52,537
Speaker 1: approval of this. But there are people in very prominent

261
00:14:52,577 --> 00:14:57,057
Speaker 1: positions who really want to want to perpetuate this fable,

262
00:14:57,177 --> 00:15:01,377
Speaker 1: this mythology that they weren't given an advantage over other

263
00:15:01,377 --> 00:15:05,097
Speaker 1: people who honestly just outperformed them scholastically. That's what this

264
00:15:05,177 --> 00:15:07,377
Speaker 1: is all about. That's what this is all We have

265
00:15:07,617 --> 00:15:10,617
Speaker 1: a meritocracy or we don't. We either have object standards

266
00:15:10,617 --> 00:15:12,137
Speaker 1: to try to gauge these things, or we don't. We

267
00:15:12,217 --> 00:15:14,257
Speaker 1: either discriminated on the basis of race, or we don't.

268
00:15:15,097 --> 00:15:16,817
Speaker 1: You see, I'm very fired up about this. I know

269
00:15:16,817 --> 00:15:18,177
Speaker 1: a lot of people are going to talk about other

270
00:15:18,217 --> 00:15:21,377
Speaker 1: things today in conservative media. We'll get into that in

271
00:15:21,377 --> 00:15:26,217
Speaker 1: a second. My friends, let's talk about the X chair.

272
00:15:26,377 --> 00:15:28,177
Speaker 1: I'm sitting in an X chair right now. You can

273
00:15:28,177 --> 00:15:30,377
Speaker 1: see it right behind me. Mine is kind of light

274
00:15:30,457 --> 00:15:34,097
Speaker 1: blue color. It is the most amazing, most comfortable chair

275
00:15:34,097 --> 00:15:35,897
Speaker 1: I've ever owned. Think of how many hours a day,

276
00:15:35,937 --> 00:15:37,697
Speaker 1: especially for those of you like me who work from

277
00:15:37,697 --> 00:15:40,257
Speaker 1: an office or work work at home and a home office,

278
00:15:40,817 --> 00:15:42,737
Speaker 1: think of how many hours a day you spend in

279
00:15:42,777 --> 00:15:45,697
Speaker 1: that chair. Isn't it worth it for it to be really,

280
00:15:45,737 --> 00:15:47,977
Speaker 1: really comfortable? Isn't it worth it to you for it

281
00:15:48,017 --> 00:15:49,777
Speaker 1: to be the best chair you've just ever sat? And

282
00:15:49,817 --> 00:15:52,097
Speaker 1: that's what I have. My X chair is amazing I've

283
00:15:52,137 --> 00:15:54,337
Speaker 1: got an X chairs for family members. They love them

284
00:15:54,857 --> 00:15:57,617
Speaker 1: right now. I mean, this is the this is the

285
00:15:57,737 --> 00:16:00,457
Speaker 1: mac daddy, most comfortable chair you will ever see in

286
00:16:00,457 --> 00:16:02,297
Speaker 1: your life. You can get it for twenty one dollars

287
00:16:02,297 --> 00:16:04,017
Speaker 1: a month, that's right, you can. You can finance this.

288
00:16:04,497 --> 00:16:06,097
Speaker 1: The X chair is the best chair you're ever going

289
00:16:06,137 --> 00:16:08,097
Speaker 1: to get less than a dollar a day. Allows you

290
00:16:08,137 --> 00:16:10,937
Speaker 1: to own the chair that I'm sitting in right now,

291
00:16:11,017 --> 00:16:13,577
Speaker 1: and it just makes everything more comfortable, makes you more productive.

292
00:16:13,777 --> 00:16:16,177
Speaker 1: There's an X chair for every style and budget and

293
00:16:16,377 --> 00:16:17,977
Speaker 1: all different kinds of colors, a lot of a lot

294
00:16:17,977 --> 00:16:20,257
Speaker 1: of modifications. I mean, when you go, it almost looks

295
00:16:20,257 --> 00:16:22,177
Speaker 1: like you're buying a car, all these different add ons

296
00:16:22,177 --> 00:16:24,177
Speaker 1: and modifications, but it's all meant to make you as

297
00:16:24,177 --> 00:16:26,777
Speaker 1: comfortable as possible. Check out all these options that are

298
00:16:26,777 --> 00:16:30,857
Speaker 1: amazing financing plans at x chair buck dot com. That's

299
00:16:30,897 --> 00:16:34,897
Speaker 1: the letter X chair buck dot com. No other chair

300
00:16:35,017 --> 00:16:38,777
Speaker 1: can compare to the X chair. Go to x chair

301
00:16:39,217 --> 00:16:42,297
Speaker 1: buck dot com now pick out the chair you want,

302
00:16:42,297 --> 00:16:44,697
Speaker 1: set up away. You can finance it, and you're going

303
00:16:44,737 --> 00:16:46,097
Speaker 1: to be so happy to have this chair in your

304
00:16:46,097 --> 00:16:50,177
Speaker 1: home every day. It's absolutely phenomenal. So here we have

305
00:16:51,377 --> 00:16:57,457
Speaker 1: my friends, the desperate, last ditch efforts of the Democrats

306
00:16:58,217 --> 00:17:02,697
Speaker 1: to try to make the attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband

307
00:17:03,337 --> 00:17:07,617
Speaker 1: somehow the fault of the GOP. CNN has a National

308
00:17:07,657 --> 00:17:12,137
Speaker 1: security contributor, Juliet Kaim. She's an academic. She honestly knows

309
00:17:12,177 --> 00:17:15,057
Speaker 1: nothing about anything having to do with actually keeping people

310
00:17:15,057 --> 00:17:19,657
Speaker 1: safe or secure America, neighborhoods, you name it. But here

311
00:17:19,737 --> 00:17:23,097
Speaker 1: she is saying that because Republicans are okay with violence,

312
00:17:23,897 --> 00:17:27,217
Speaker 1: this is why the Pelos husband attack happened, and that

313
00:17:27,857 --> 00:17:30,897
Speaker 1: you know where she's going. Democracy can't survive this way

314
00:17:30,937 --> 00:17:34,257
Speaker 1: playclip one, and the use of violence essentially as an

315
00:17:34,257 --> 00:17:36,497
Speaker 1: extension of politics. In other words, if you don't win

316
00:17:36,537 --> 00:17:39,937
Speaker 1: the election, violence is always an alternative. Democracies Camp survived

317
00:17:39,977 --> 00:17:43,417
Speaker 1: this way. We believe in elections and poor elections, and

318
00:17:43,497 --> 00:17:46,737
Speaker 1: in the peaceful transfer of power. That peaceful is the

319
00:17:46,817 --> 00:17:49,377
Speaker 1: key word there, it's not transfer. And that is what

320
00:17:49,537 --> 00:17:51,977
Speaker 1: is going on in this country. Elevated by, of course,

321
00:17:52,177 --> 00:17:56,337
Speaker 1: an apparatus often led by the former President Donald Trump,

322
00:17:56,377 --> 00:18:00,297
Speaker 1: that elevates the language so that the listener, you don't

323
00:18:00,337 --> 00:18:03,457
Speaker 1: have to pass what they're saying. The listener, their supporters

324
00:18:03,737 --> 00:18:07,217
Speaker 1: believes that violence is and a sort of essential, if

325
00:18:07,257 --> 00:18:16,297
Speaker 1: not justifiable means. So a lunatic, nudist Berkeley hippie protester

326
00:18:16,657 --> 00:18:21,257
Speaker 1: druggie attack someone, and it's their entire Republican Party in

327
00:18:21,297 --> 00:18:23,017
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's fault. I mean, look at the leap that

328
00:18:23,057 --> 00:18:26,617
Speaker 1: they make, right, it's Absurdainly, these people are ridiculous. I mean,

329
00:18:26,617 --> 00:18:29,257
Speaker 1: this is just propaganda. She's spearing. This is absolutely so

330
00:18:29,297 --> 00:18:30,817
Speaker 1: what what are we all supposed to do? Oh? I

331
00:18:30,817 --> 00:18:33,257
Speaker 1: guess we can't. We can't support the Republican Party because

332
00:18:33,257 --> 00:18:35,457
Speaker 1: some lunatic attack Paul Pelosi and is underwear and hit

333
00:18:35,497 --> 00:18:37,737
Speaker 1: him with a hammer. What does one have to do

334
00:18:37,737 --> 00:18:40,497
Speaker 1: with the other has nothing to do with it. But

335
00:18:40,737 --> 00:18:44,497
Speaker 1: they're so dishonest and so dishonorable, and that's what the

336
00:18:44,497 --> 00:18:48,857
Speaker 1: Democrat Party is all about. And they're facing a real

337
00:18:48,897 --> 00:18:51,697
Speaker 1: and a really embarrassing election and they deserve they deserve

338
00:18:52,177 --> 00:18:56,537
Speaker 1: sheer embarrassment. I mean, we should be canoeing in rivers

339
00:18:56,657 --> 00:19:00,257
Speaker 1: of lib tiers on election night and thereafter. And I'm

340
00:19:00,257 --> 00:19:03,417
Speaker 1: gonna tell you this, they deserve that. Look at the

341
00:19:03,457 --> 00:19:05,257
Speaker 1: arguments they're making. They're not they know they can't make

342
00:19:05,257 --> 00:19:07,817
Speaker 1: the economy, that They know that Joe Biden's an imbecile.

343
00:19:07,857 --> 00:19:09,577
Speaker 1: They know that everything they promised that was gonna happen

344
00:19:09,577 --> 00:19:13,897
Speaker 1: hasn't happen. Total failures. So what do they fall back on? Democrats?

345
00:19:13,937 --> 00:19:20,177
Speaker 1: You threat to our democracy. It's ridiculous, absolutely ridiculous. But

346
00:19:21,057 --> 00:19:23,937
Speaker 1: they're pathetic in this final stage, there's nothing else to

347
00:19:23,977 --> 00:19:27,217
Speaker 1: say about them, because well, a lot you can say

348
00:19:27,257 --> 00:19:29,497
Speaker 1: about them, but I think you summed up by saying

349
00:19:29,497 --> 00:19:33,657
Speaker 1: they're pathetic because ultimately, look at what's going on in

350
00:19:33,697 --> 00:19:36,577
Speaker 1: the country, look at who's been in charge, the decisions

351
00:19:36,577 --> 00:19:39,257
Speaker 1: they've made, and how things are feeling right now. Country

352
00:19:39,297 --> 00:19:43,217
Speaker 1: could be doing a lot better, but we put a

353
00:19:43,337 --> 00:19:48,577
Speaker 1: third tier hack in the Oval office because the Democrats

354
00:19:48,577 --> 00:19:49,777
Speaker 1: said he was going to be great and it's going

355
00:19:49,817 --> 00:19:52,017
Speaker 1: to be restoration of normalcy and all this other stuff

356
00:19:52,017 --> 00:19:54,937
Speaker 1: all lies, but lying is what they do. Lying is

357
00:19:54,937 --> 00:19:56,457
Speaker 1: what they do best, and we all know that. So

358
00:19:56,497 --> 00:20:00,657
Speaker 1: it's entirely unsurprising. And here here's Biden himself, by the way,

359
00:20:00,657 --> 00:20:03,617
Speaker 1: he said that, you know, you can't just condemn the

360
00:20:03,737 --> 00:20:06,737
Speaker 1: attack on Paul Pelosi, you have to also condemn election

361
00:20:06,817 --> 00:20:08,737
Speaker 1: deniers with it, you know, just just wrap it all

362
00:20:08,777 --> 00:20:11,617
Speaker 1: together for political purposes Play four. It's one thing to

363
00:20:11,617 --> 00:20:15,137
Speaker 1: condemn the violence, but if you can't condemn the violence

364
00:20:15,217 --> 00:20:19,337
Speaker 1: unless you condemn those people continue to argue the election

365
00:20:19,497 --> 00:20:23,257
Speaker 1: was not real, that this being stolen, that all the

366
00:20:23,497 --> 00:20:27,337
Speaker 1: all the milarkee that's being put out there to undermine democracy.

367
00:20:27,377 --> 00:20:30,737
Speaker 1: If you can't just apologize and say the violence that

368
00:20:30,857 --> 00:20:34,657
Speaker 1: affects people's mentality, It affects how people think, particularly people

369
00:20:34,657 --> 00:20:37,377
Speaker 1: who are not maybe as stable as other people. So

370
00:20:37,417 --> 00:20:40,657
Speaker 1: the talk has to stop. That's the problem. You can't

371
00:20:40,697 --> 00:20:43,857
Speaker 1: just say, feel badly about the violence, and we condemn it.

372
00:20:44,217 --> 00:20:48,817
Speaker 1: Condemn what produces the violence, and this talk produces the violence.

373
00:20:49,537 --> 00:20:52,177
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is the idiot king of malarkey. Just want

374
00:20:52,177 --> 00:20:54,297
Speaker 1: to be clear about that. I mean, this is this

375
00:20:54,377 --> 00:20:56,897
Speaker 1: is the guy who spews more malarkey than almost anybody

376
00:20:56,897 --> 00:20:59,097
Speaker 1: else in politics these days, certainly at his level as

377
00:20:59,137 --> 00:21:02,177
Speaker 1: the president. It's shameful. But you know what the good

378
00:21:02,217 --> 00:21:06,737
Speaker 1: news is in their desperation, the Democrats, it's also obvious,

379
00:21:06,777 --> 00:21:10,497
Speaker 1: so pathetic. They're showing us they know, oh that red

380
00:21:10,497 --> 00:21:15,617
Speaker 1: wave is coming and it is going to be absolutely wonderful.

381
00:21:15,617 --> 00:21:18,857
Speaker 1: It'll be a cleansing of the American soul. When these

382
00:21:18,897 --> 00:21:22,537
Speaker 1: democrats realize, oh my gosh, a majority of the American

383
00:21:22,577 --> 00:21:24,777
Speaker 1: people still realize what a bunch of morons we are,

384
00:21:25,017 --> 00:21:27,657
Speaker 1: it'll be a great thing. Thanks for rolling with me today.

385
00:21:27,697 --> 00:21:29,937
Speaker 1: Have a great Halloween out there, Go a trick or

386
00:21:29,937 --> 00:21:31,617
Speaker 1: treat or a party or whatever it is you do

387
00:21:31,617 --> 00:21:34,497
Speaker 1: on Halloween. I wish I could say I have fun

388
00:21:34,537 --> 00:21:37,097
Speaker 1: Halloween plans, but I'm not really a Halloween guy. See

389
00:21:37,097 --> 00:21:38,537
Speaker 1: you tomorrow, Shield Time.