WEBVTT - Sequence [14]

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.119
<v Speaker 1>The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are solely

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>those of the podcast author or individuals participating in the podcast,

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and do not necessarily represent those of iHeart Media, Stuff Media,

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>or its employees. It's so warm and conquered tonight that

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>people have their doors and windows open, but the police

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>are saying lock up tight. Sacramento's infamous East Area rapist

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>may still be in town. He raped a twenty nine

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>year old housewife near the Ignacio Valley shopping Center at

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>five thirty this morning. Her husband was tied up nearby

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and had to listen. When you look at what the

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>East Area rapist was doing, he committed fifteen attacks where

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>he's predominantly going into houses. Women would be asleep inside

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>their houses. Sometimes these were mothers and their kids were

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>another room. This is a retired forensic scientist and cold

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>case investigator, Paul Holmes. He spent over twenty years obsessively

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>searching for the Golden State Killer, who was also known

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>as the East Area Rapist, the Vassilia Ransacker, and the

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Original night Stalker. One man thought to be responded for

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:04.119
<v Speaker 1>over fifty rates and a dozen murders in northern California,

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and he would always have a ski mask on. He

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>would go to these women as are laying asleep in

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the bed, get them flipped over toward their face down,

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and tie their hands behind their back. As he's doing this,

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>he's talking through clenched teeth and telling them you need

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to do what I say or I'm gonna kill you.

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>He planned his attacks, he employed solid tactics. He often

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>would have approached the house from one direction and leave

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the house in a different directions, so if there were

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>witnesses seeing him coming, they didn't see him going, or

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:41.839
<v Speaker 1>vice versa. He would park his car many blocks away.

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>During the canvas, of course, law enforcement is going out

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and talking to neighbors and hey, did you see any

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>strange vehicles parked out front? Nobody ever really saw his

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>vehicle because it was so parked, so far away, so

0:01:54.160 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>very tactically sound. A man in a mask robbed, tied,

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and stabbed them, leaving them for dad. Subjects stated, I

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>want to report a murder, no a double murder. I

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>did it. A man who wore an evil style executioner's hood,

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>carried a knife and gun and intended to use them.

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>They have an arrestipe because they can't cove it, I'm

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>not damn Zodiac? Who is the Zodiac and where is he?

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>From My Heart Radio, How Stuff Works and Tenderfoot TV.

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Monster the Zodiac Killer. How investigators solve cases

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.679
<v Speaker 1>is constantly changing with improved technology. The most recent game

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>changer forensic genealogy. The technique uses a mix of genetics

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and family trees. It's helps solve a growing list of

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>decades olds. The capture of the alleged Golden State Killer

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>has made forensic geneology famous, and it's this case has

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>breathed new life into the hunt for the Zodiac Killer.

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>For several years, Paul Holes had almost no success with

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the Golden State Killer case. Every suspect and every tip

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>would eventually lead to a dead end. It wasn't until

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Holes was working a completely separate case that ended up

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>connecting to another case that he encountered. Forensic genealogy holds

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>takes us back to the very beginning of that sequence

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>with the murder of unsuon June. She was killed by

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>her boyfriend Larry Vanner in February at two thousand seventeen,

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this is that five months after my last prime suspect

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was eliminated I'm in the doldrums, but I have a

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>conference call in another case that I had been involved with.

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It was a two thousand and two homicide and Asian

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>female had been bludged to death, buried underneath her house

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>with kitty litter piled on top of her. We had

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>always referred to it as a kitty letter case. And

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>very quickly after this case, her living boyfriend, Larry Vanner,

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 1>had been arrested. Larry Vanner was interesting in that we

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>can never identify really who he was. Larry Vanner wasn't

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>his real name. He had ten different names and we

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>couldn't tell which one he had been given at birth.

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>He had many different birthdays that he had given law

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>enforcement over the years, different social Security numbers. He was

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a mystery man. Then investigators connected Larry Vanner to a

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>different case, the bear Brook murders, and it was on

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this case that Paul Hols learned how forensic genealogy could work.

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It was two fifty five gallon barrels, one found another

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>found in two thousand and one. Barrel was an adult

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>female and a little girl, and the other barrel was

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>two little girls. So that was a family that had

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>been killed. But the other child in that second barrel

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't related to this family. Well, through d n A,

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they showed that that other child was a biological child

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of Larry Vanner and then ultimately he's caught killing unsun

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>June in two thousand and two in Contracost County. Amazing case.

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>But I'm going I got to figure out how this

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>technique has done. How can I use this to catch

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the East Air rapist a k a. The Golden State Killer.

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Forensic genealogy is a layered technique. At the base, it's

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a map of an individual's DNA profile. Private genealogy companies

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>begin selling personal genetic profiles in the early eighties. At

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the time, it was a niche market, but it's grown

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in popularity in recent years. One of these companies, twenty

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>three and Me, now both surround five million customers worldwide.

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So the team and I visited their headquarters to learn

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>more about their product. My name is Kate Black. I'm

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the global Privacy Officer and Senior council at twenty three

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and Me. Twenty three and Me is a consumer genetics

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 1>testing service, so anybody can order a test online, spit

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>in a tube. It's quite a large bit of spit.

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>It takes about thirty minutes to fill up the whole tube,

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>send that off in the mail to one of our laboratories,

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and then within usually eight weeks, get a account rich

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>with reports and information about their DNA selves, everything from

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>ancestry like your ethnicity breakdown where your ancestors were from,

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>as well as some health and wellness related information like traits,

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>how you may respond or react to caffeine consumption, and

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>more of the serious health results like whether or not

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you have the genes associated with late onset Alzheimer's. Our

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>mission is really to give people you know, full access

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to understand their genetics and their genetic self, and that

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely requires an enormous amount of trust in us. As

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a brand and a company, we take privacy very seriously.

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.119
<v Speaker 1>We want to make sure that we are not only

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>upholding our own kind of ethical standards and privacy requirements,

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>but also that we're meeting the expectations of our customers

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and understanding that they're not just a customer or data point.

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>They're really a person with a variety of different things

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that may have brought them to us, and that we

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>can fulfill that journey for them in a way that

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>won't be surprising or unnerving or have unintended consequences. Around

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the same time, twenty three and me got its start,

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>so did forensic genealogy. I think DNA is the most

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>conclusive evidence we hang out at the moment. This is

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Colleen Fitzpatrick, owner and founder of Identifyingders International. It's a

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>company that uses DNA for a number of sir. This

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is including finding missing persons in assisting law enforcement. If

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>anyone knows about DNA, it's her. Well. I'm the founder

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of modern forensic genealogy. I wrote the book, and when

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I wrote the book in two thousand five, it created

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a revolution. It went forward into the forensic community itself

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to mean the application of genealogical techniques and support of

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the legal system. At first, I was having fun with

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the hobby side, identifying old photographs, helping people look at

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>their records and squeezed juice out of them that they

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't know it was there. But then because of my

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>science background, I was starting to be hired for some

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>real cases, some really interesting cases. I was contacted by

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory to help them identify

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.599
<v Speaker 1>a frozen human arm and hand in a glacier, Alaska,

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and that became the hand in the Snow case, which

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I was very important in solving. And then from there,

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, went into the Titanic Baby and Amelia. Ever

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>at those kind of cases became you know, really more

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>accessible and interesting with DNA developments. I worked about seventy

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>cases in thirty countries and I got almost all of them.

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul Hole has learned about forensic genealogy during the bare

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Brooks case and he used the technique to catch the

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>alleged Golden State Killer. But how exactly does the process work?

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>We gave him a call. What we were working with

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>was a semen sample off of the victim's vaginal swab.

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Right there. The DNA that we're interested in is contained

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>within the sperm heads of the semen and it's mixed

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>with the females d NA. So now you need to

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>have a law enforcement lab, those forensic analysts who are

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>very well versed at this process. You need them to

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>go in and separate out the Golden State Killers sperm

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>DNA from all the victims DNA that's on that vaginal swap.

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Once the Golden State Killers DNA was isolated, it was

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>sent to a private lab, and at the lab, a

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>SNIP profile was created. SNIP profile s n P for

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 1>single nucleotide polymorphism just basically a a testing process that

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>looks at hundreds of thousands of single points of DNA

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>across the genome in order to kind of map the

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>genome out in a partial way. Turnaround time can be

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from two weeks to two months, depending on the lab.

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Hole says it's still faster than some forensic labs, which

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>can get caught in backlogs. The information is then uploaded

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>into jet match, a public online database that compiles info

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>from multiple DNA sites. Jet Match also shows relationships between

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>DNA profiles. That's because the original purpose of jed match

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>was for people to research genealogy and build family trees,

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but since it's public, it also means law enforcement can

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>use any of this data in their investigations. Jed match

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>tells you it takes generally twenty four to eight hours

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>for their servers to an essence to the algorithms I

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 1>found with the Golden State killer that within twenty four

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>hours after upload, I had my initial search results. How

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>closely or distantly are related is dependent on how much

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>DNA you share. Our top results only shared less than

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>one percent of their DNA, which was on the order

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of roughly a third cousin. From here, traditional genealogy work

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>kicks in, like hunting down birth certificates and death records

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to trace family lineage. There's five of us on our

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>team on the law enforcement side, and then we had

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>the genetic genealogist Barbara ray Venter, who was the one

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>who was kind of guiding us. The five of us

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>were the ones that were really building the trees, and

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Barbara was kind of, you know, checking in the tree

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that we ultimately linked together where we found to the

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Golden State killer, Joseph de'angelo um. You know, the common

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>ancestors had been born in the eighteen forties. Once we

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>started identifying all their descendants, that family tree very you know,

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>quickly grew to having well over a thousand individuals entered

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>into this tree. Most of them were long dead because

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they're just ancestors. But you have to identify everybody. You

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want to miss the one person who could potentially

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>be the parent of your offender. It took us four

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half months, you know, from the time we

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>got the initial DNA search results to the time that

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>de Angelo was taken into custody. Holes is adamant that

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this genealogy provides an investigative lead. He says, once a

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>suspect is identified, law enforcement still needs to secure a

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>direct DNA sample. Then that direct sample is compared to

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>the original sample used in the forensic genealogy process. This

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>is done in case an error was made while building

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>out the family tree with the Angelo. Even though we

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of identified him, he has some circumstantial evidence that

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>seemed to corroborate that he could be the guy. It

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>was like he got to get that direct DNA sample,

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>So he was put under surveillance and then the first

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>DNA sample was collected and it was enough to basically

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>tell us he's the guy, but we needed to get

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a second sample due to some of the complexities of

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the first sample. The second sample left no doubt he

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>matched to the Golden State Killer's DNA. As I was

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>working through this case, I'm looking to see while is

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>there DNA had this newf angle DNA technology, and I

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>was able to find three cases out in Contracost the

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>county that still had evidence the DNA evidence that have

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>been collected from the women's bodies from back in the day,

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and I was able to get DNA from each of

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>those three cases, and and the DNA profile from those

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>three cases was the same. I'm sitting at p F

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Chang's and Kirk Campbell from Zack d A's office calls me.

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And Kirk opens up by saying, Paul, you absolutely cannot

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>tell anybody this. So immediately I knew, Okay, this is

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be a different phone call. And then he said,

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know exactly what the lab has, but they're

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>really excited. And I was asking him more, what did

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>they tell you? What did they say? They said, well,

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>they got a partial DNA profile, something about twenty markers,

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>like it's m Kirk, it's head. And so now we're

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>sitting in our rental cheap Cherokee and the p F

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Chang's parking lot. It's it's an oh my god type

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of mo moment. And then Steve Kramer, my partner from

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the FBI, calls and he's on speaker in the jeeps,

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>so my wife is hearing Steve and I now strategizing

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>about what are the next steps and what are we

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>going to do? Now? Do I need to get on

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the next flight out of here. For over forty years,

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>countless victims have waited for justice. Yesterday, in arrest warrant

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>was issued, a complaint was filed charging that individual with

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>two counts of murder. The answer was and always was

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the d N A April, authorities

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>arrest and charge seventy two year old Joseph James D'Angelo

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>with eight counts of first degree murder. As of this recording,

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>he's on trial for the crimes attributed to the Golden

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>State Killer. Since d'angelo's arrest, almost two dozen other cases

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>have been solved with the help of forensic genealogy, and

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that number is steadily climbing. However, this new technique is

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>already stirring debate. Most people, of course that are are

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>against it. It's a privacy concern Fourth Amendment unreasonable search

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>against their genetic information. People in the genealogy databases did

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>not explicitly consent to allow law enforcement to search their

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>genealogy DNA profiles in order to help solve a case.

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Companies like twenty three and Me and Ancestry have policies

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep law enforcement from directly accessing their private databases,

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>but for public databases like jet match, there aren't any

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>laws regulating searches. There's a lot of people out there that,

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, are are very upset about law enforcement utilizing

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>this tool. But I think because of the kinds of

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>cases that are being solved with it, that there's a

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>balance in terms of people's perception society's acceptance of the

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>tool being used. Paul Holes says, what people are afraid

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement has access to is very different compared to

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>what they actually have access to. I never had access

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to anybody's DNA profile the database and ordered for me

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to see their genetic information. For me to kind of

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>invade their genetic privacy, I have to have access to

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>their DNA profile and I never had that. All I

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>got were search results of people who shared a percentage

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of DNA, and the results only tell me how much

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>DNA they shared. Still, some privacy advocates are worried that

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>this technique will cause more innocent people to be targeted

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>as possible suspects. At least that's the reasoning behind a

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>bill Maryland lawmakers introduced in January. If it passes, it

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>would completely block Maryland law enforcements ability to use forensic genealogy.

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>More specifically, investigators would be banned from using DNA databases

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to identify unknown DNA found at crime scenes, but Paul

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Hols argues forensic genealogy is less invasive than typical police work.

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Through the use of genealogy in the Golden State Killer case,

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 1>we saved hundreds of men from having the government take

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>possession of their DNA. Considering traditional law enforcement investigations, we

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>were having women calling in saying, you know, my ex

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>husband looks like this hand drawn sketch of the Golden

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>State Killer from eight I think he might be the guy.

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>And then we would go on to her ex husband's house,

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>knock on his door, and actually asked for his DNA.

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>We took possession of his DNA sample. Through the use

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>of genealogy in the Golden State Killer case, we saved

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of men from having the government take possession of

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>their DNA. As though it is, it's sort of that

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>balancing act of Okay, yeah, we're searching a genealogy database

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>where identifying people who are relatives based on their DNA,

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>But the intrusion is is minuscule compared to how legally

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement works. Every single day across the nation. Holes

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>also argues forensic genealogy isn't a tool to be used regularly.

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Use it on your homicide cases, your your sexual assault,

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>your serial sexual assault cases, or if you have that

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>active public safety threat. You know, this guy has killed somebody,

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't know who he is, he's left his DNA,

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and he is out there potentially going to kill other people.

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And that it's that's the type of thing where you

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>bring in this tool sort of as the last resort.

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like, you know, you think of it

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.239
<v Speaker 1>as as the nuclear weapon, and you go and you

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out who this guy is using the

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>genealogy in order to get him in custody before can

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>rape and or kill somebody else. Holes does see where

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>concerns could rise if law enforcement expands its use into

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>everyday crimes. I think that's where you'll see sort of

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the balance shift where people are going to start getting

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable with it, and that's where you know legislation will

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>come in and restrict law enforcements use. But Holes says,

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, people who are decision

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>makers need to understand what the investigative genealogy technique is

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and what it isn't before they pass laws based on perception.

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 1>In the spring of confirmed Zodiac letters were sent to

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a lab for DNA testing. The hope is to pull

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>enough DNA for a full genetic profile and then use

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that profile for forensic genealogy. This isn't the first time

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement has turned to DNA for answers. In the

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Zodiac case, the prime suspect, Arthur Lee Allen, died in

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 1>August of authorities seized that opportunity to preserve some brain

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>tissue for further testing. This is Zodiac expert Michael Butterfield.

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Several years later, in the late nineteen nineties, the San

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Police Department submitted suspected Zodiac communications to the crime

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>lab for DNA analysis. According to retired Inspector Vince Rippetto,

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>DNA was found on a Zodiac communication and that DNA

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>did not match Arthur Lee Allen. Several years later, in

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand two, San Francisco Police inspectors Mike Maloney and

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Carroll submitted suspected Zodiac communications to the crime lab

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>for further DNA testing. Dr Cindy Holt of the San

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Police DNA lab examined the Zodiac letters and envelopes,

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and she stated that a partial genetic profile was found

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 1>on an envelope sent with the Zodiac communication in November

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen sixty nine. According to Holt, that sample was

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sufficient to exclude suspects, but not sufficient to positively identify anyone. However,

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>some critics didn't believe law enforcement had found a partial

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>DNA profile. They believed it was all for show. I

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>was shown the DNA profile that they obtained when I

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>went out to San Francisco p D at one time,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>so I saw what they actually got. So they did

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>get a low level DNA profile, but hold says there

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>were other concerns as well. There's no confidence that you

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>could say was actually the offender's DNA. If the Zodiac,

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, licked the stamps, licked these envelope flaps of

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the letters that he sent in, why can't they get

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>his DNA. But you also have to be concerned about, well,

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>whose DNA is actually on those items they're sent in

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>after the fact, they're not present at the crime scene

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>where you know the offender wasn't at I had, you know,

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>an old time BLO detective. He had some involvement in

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Zodiac back in the day, and he goes, you know,

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I remember growing up, you know, as a kid going

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>into the post office to mail letter back in the

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>late sixties, and you hand the guy an open envelope,

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>but he would lick the envelope and he would lick

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the stamp. Well, who's to say that didn't happen with

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>these particular envelopes and stamps that were sent in, right,

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 1>So how can we say for sure that if they

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>do get DNA from the secondary or peripheral items of evidence,

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that it's actually Zodiac DNA. I would have greater confidence

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>if they get the same DNA profile from multiple items

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>like that, then it looks like it's probably the originator

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of that evidence versus a secondary person that handled that evidence.

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>I sure would like to see primary evidence in the

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Zodiac case produced a DNA profile. Well, with DNA, you

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>never know, you just never know, and you never know

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the power of your what you're testing is. But if

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a degraded, a low level sample, you know,

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:21.239
<v Speaker 1>you can be surprised. This is Colleen Fitzpatrick again. One

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of the cases she worked on was the so called

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Unknown Child of the Titanic. We had to do multiple

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>rounds of testing on that. We really didn't have a

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of DNA to start with, and at the end

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody told me or my understanding was there was enough

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>DNA for one cell of that child's body left and

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.719
<v Speaker 1>that's what did the trick. So that was using ninety

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>year old, nine year old DNA that had been in

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the ground in Halifax, Nova Scotia and had been exposed

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.959
<v Speaker 1>to acid rain for as long as that's been around,

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and yet there was enough DNA in that baby, a

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>baby's body to make the identify action. Here's another example

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:06.239
<v Speaker 1>of degraded and contaminated DNA that was still usable. We

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>had Buckskin Girl under the DNA dough project. That was

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>from a blood sample that was thirty seven years old.

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>It had been doped with hepperine to keep it from coagulating,

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and it had not been refrigerated for thirty seven years,

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and it worked like a charm. So you know, when

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't think it's gonna work, it does. So you

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>never can tell with DNA, and with the zodiac and

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the stamps, you never can tell is worth trying. We

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to know more about these stamps does a small

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>amount of saliva typically provide a good DNA sample? This

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>really interesting question. I don't think there's enough data in

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>recent months to say one way or the other. I'd

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>say definitely maybe, because again you never know. You know,

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I know I had talked to a lab extensively at

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>one time about somebody, I'll grab a coffee cop can

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you get the DNA off that? But basically they said

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>that's a low probability, high risk, whereas if you had

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>DNA like from fingernails or under fingernails, that was a

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>higher chance in a lower risk. And I think this

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>stamp is probably medium because you never can tell where

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the stamp has been. As Paul Hole has said earlier,

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it takes more than DNA for these cases to be solved.

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'd like to point out that nobody is really

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>just convicted on DNA evidence. Even if the DNA matches,

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>there's other things that come in, like, you know, was

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the guy in that area? You know? Did he have

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a criminal record, did he leave fingerprints? Is that his shirt?

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that his a tennis shoe size? There's a lot

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to it. It's not just DNA. Now at eleven, the

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>new hunt for the Zodiac Killer. Tonight, Bay Area police

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>may have found the key to finally cracking the case.

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Good Evening, I'm Elizabeth cut and I'm Kendasita first the

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>suspected Golden State Killer because the Zodeiac Killer be next

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>KPI X five Andrea Boorba joins us from the newsroom

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>with the decades old evidence getting new attention Tonight, Andrea

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>well Ken Elizabeth the Zodiac Killer is responsible for at

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>least five murders in the late sixties and early seventies. Tonight,

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the case that was considered all but unsolvable may have

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>new legs. The Zodiac Killer, who's killing spree in ciphers

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>around the Bay Area draw worldwide attention to this day,

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe weeks away from being unmasked. The Sacramento Bea reports

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that Ballejo police have submitted letters and envelopes from the

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Zodiac Killer to a private lab to obtain a DNA

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>profile the hope that those envelopes he looked closed years

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>ago might be the final piece to crack the case.

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>The lead Ballejo detective in the Zodiac case told the

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>Sacramento be he hopes to use the same open source

0:27:56.200 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 1>DNA database technique that helped identify Joseph D'Angelo as the

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>suspect in the Golden State Killer case. Now, those DNA

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>results are expected in a few weeks. In the newsroom

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Entrea four, But KPIs it's been almost a year since

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:18.640
<v Speaker 1>investigators sent the Zodiac's letters to a lab for DNA testing. Well,

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>this is promising. It's been hard for us to find

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>much new information. Here's Officer Ryan rails Back of the

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Riverside Police Department. This case is still technically open even

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>though it occurred back fifty years ago. Plus it is

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 1>still open because it hasn't been solved. We haven't had

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>any real updates on this case in many years. And

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>here's Lieutenant Joseph Kono Fileo Police Department's Detective Division commander.

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>The case is open, so yeah, we will. We will

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>not release specifics regards to where we are just because of,

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously the investigative integrity of the case. San

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Francisco reporter Kevin Fagan rodan or dticle about the Zodiac

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>for the fiftieth anniversary in December. In it, an anonymous

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>police source says, quote, with the Golden State Killer, they

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>had a full strand of DNA not Zodiac. We have

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>chrons and not good ones end quote. Paul Holes agrees

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the critical step in that case is they need to

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>find DNA from the Zodiac as of you know, the

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>best information and the most recent information I have. They

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>were still looking. Everybody's saying, oh, investigative genealogy is going

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to solve Zodiac. Well, first you have to have the

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Zodiac's DNA as of you know, the information that I know,

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's dated. They hadn't recovered that yet. And as

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for the DNA found in the early two thousand's, Paul

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Holes explains, it's the same problem. What I saw was

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it was so scrappy that I probably with DNA interpretations

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>today that they may not even be allowed to use

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>such a low level DNA profile for comparison purposes. It's

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>so low level. Is it due to some environmental contamination

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>either on the outside and the surface of the stamp?

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Somebody has handled it during the DNA testing process itself

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and has nothing to do with the Zodiacs DNA. They

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>need to get a better sample, in my opinion, than

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>what they actually obtained back in the day. Holes is

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about federal regulations placed on testing DNA the FBI

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Scientific Oversight Committee governs all forensic testing labs

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>UH and how they do their DNA testing and how

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>they interpret the DNA results, And in many ways, it's

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to help standardize the interpretation of these DNA profiles that

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>often are very complex, and so over time these interpretation

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>sidelines have become more and more strict because just you know, I,

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:09.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, learning from real life case examples, they solved

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>where the more lax interpretation guidelines could cause misinterpretations to occur,

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and so they said, we can't have that, and we

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>need to be as conservative as possible because we don't

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>want to falsely incriminate somebody by misinterpreting a DNA result.

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Investigators have been working on this case for decades. Everyone

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>wants to see it solved, but ultimately everything hinges on

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the DNA. If they find a Zodiac d n A,

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>then it becomes a solvable case. If they don't find

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>his DNA, the chances of it being solved become almost zero.

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Next time, un Monster Zoe yet killer. And of course

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>there's been theories over the years that they invented the

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>zodiac to sell more newspapers. Send the letter to the

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>paper he said to prove that I was it kills him.

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you only things that I know and the police. No.

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>But if you go through and read the police, of course,

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it's almost verbatim on what the police said and the

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>police of courts, and exactly what I heard the police

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>say on the radio that night. Popular culture about serial

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>killers is not dedicated to making us ask difficult questions. Instead,

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it gives us easy answers. That's what we find appealing

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>about it. There's nothing fun about Earnie and you know,

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>wacky ciphers and letters that you know taunt and say,

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I like hunting the most dangerous game. Yeah, great, the

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>guy belongs to freaking prison. If I could go back

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and give myself some advice when I was first starting out,

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>be skept to goal of everything. Monster the Zodiac Killer

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is a fifteen episode podcast produced by I Heart Radio,

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works and Tenderfoot TV. Donald Albright and I

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>are executive producers on behalf of Tenderfoot TV, alongside producers

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Meredith Stepman, Mason Lindsay, and Christina Dana. Jason Hope is

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>executive producer on behalf of How Stuff Works, along with

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>producers Trevor Young, Miranda Hawkins, ben Kybrick, and Josh Thane

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Scott Benjamin provides additional voice talent. Matt Frederick is our host.

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Original music is by Makeup and Vanity Set. If you

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't already, make sure to check out the first season

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of Monster called Atlanta Monster, about the Atlanta child murders

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>from the late seventies to the early eighties. Download the

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>ten episode season right now. Have questions or comments, email

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>us at Monster at how stuff works dot com, or

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you can call us at one eight three three two,

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>eat five six six six seven. Thanks for listening. H