WEBVTT - Stop wasting time in meetings

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, This is Laura. Welcome to the Before Breakfast podcast.

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Today's tip is about how to create better meetings. Meetings

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.479
<v Speaker 1>are a necessary tool to do many modern jobs. Other

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>people know things that we don't. These people are unlikely

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>to show up at our offices unbidden at the exact

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.479
<v Speaker 1>moment we wish to see them. They are unlikely to

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>be ready to talk about exactly what we wish to discuss,

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>so we schedule mutually agreeable times to meet. Hence meetings.

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But like email, meetings are a tool to do our jobs,

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>they are not the job itself. And as I look

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>at people's schedules, I see that in many cases there

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>are so many meetings that they may as well be

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the job because there's no time to do anything else.

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>That would be fine if every meeting was the best

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>possible use of everyone's time, But in an organization with

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a meeting heavy culture, the only way to get people

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to a project is to call a meeting.

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So then you wind up with meetings that result only

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in finding out that yep, everyone is still doing her job. Well,

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe because the meeting has been rescheduled twice to accommodate

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>the senior person who keeps getting called into other meetings.

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>To solve that problem of scheduling people, create recurring meetings,

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>ones that always happened at the same time. That seems efficient,

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>but these meetings then no longer need to justify their

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>place on people's calendars, and there can be a lot

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of them. I was giving a speech once where a

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>woman stood up to say that she tracked her time

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and studied her calendar and realized that before she even

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.559
<v Speaker 1>got to say over her schedule, she was booked into

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>one hours of recurring meetings per month. That's about twenty

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>five hours per week. So she worked with her manager

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and teams and got this down to sixty hours per

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>month or about fifteen hours per week. This was being

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>told as a happy story, but fifteen hours before you

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>even get to the one off stuff is a lot.

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>If you waste your own time, that's one thing, But

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:21.519
<v Speaker 1>a six person meeting wasting six people's time is far

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>more expensive. Once the second is gone, it's gone. All

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the money in the world will never buy that time back.

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>But I do think there are ways to make meetings efficient, effective,

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and even pleasurable. The best book I've ever read on

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>this is called The Art of Gathering by Priya Parker. Parker,

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>who plans events for clients, is often pulling together multi

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>day retreats, but a lot of her advice is smart

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>even for your standard Tuesday morning staff meeting. The first

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>step in convening people meaningfully, she writes, is committing to

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a bold, sharp purpose. Practically, this means that something needs

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to change in the world as a result of your meeting.

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Parker suggests working backward from a desired outcome. This brings

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>focus to a meeting. She says, it may even help

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a host decide whether a meeting is necessary for that

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>outcome or whether an email will do. You honor the

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>people at your meeting by making sure you're convening them

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>for a real reason. Second, think about who should be there,

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and just as important, who shouldn't be there. Clearly, you

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to invite someone who will actively sabotage your meeting.

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>But people invite others all the time just to keep

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>them informed or be nice, or to avoid having people

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>feel left out. We think it's collegial. Here's a thought.

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Your meeting is not the cool kid's table at the cafeteria.

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>People who aren't fulfilling the purpose of your gathering, are

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>detracting from it, even if they do nothing to detract

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>from it, Parker writes, particularly in smaller gatherings, every single

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>person affects the dynamic of a group. You want to

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>make sure that everyone who is in the room is

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>participating for every minute they are there. If that's not

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the case, the meeting should be shorter or have fewer people.

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Or people can come for certain agenda items and then leave.

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>A good, tight meeting leaves no space for multitasking. Third,

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>think about the whole flow of the meeting, beginning to end.

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>It goes without saying that a meeting needs an agenda.

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>This means that the host needs to exercise benevolent authority

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 1>to make sure the gathering is moving toward its desired outcome.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>Parker also tells people to pay close attention to the

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>beginning of a meeting. Often, she laments people start gatherings

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>with housekeeping and logistics. It seems necessary, but you are

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>missing an opportunity to sear your gatherings purpose into the

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>minds of your guests, she writes. She suggests thinking about

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a hotel lobby or the first line of a novel.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>A good opening honors and awes the people being drawn in.

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that sounds like a bit much for your Tuesday

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>morning staff meeting, but you could go around the table

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and have each person share one meaningful thing related to

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the topic at hand. This can build trust. Groups that

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>trust each other produce better outcomes. Endings matter too. Sadly,

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 1>many meetings drag on far too long, with people fidgeting

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>and the organizer unsure how to wrap things up or

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>failing in a different direction. People stop precisely at two

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>without changing what they've been gathered to change in the world,

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>because everyone needs to march like middle schoolers to the

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>three o'clock class that inevitably follows the two o'clock class.

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>You want to leave with action items, But I also

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>like the idea of ending the meeting with feedback. What

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>was good about the meeting, what can be changed so

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>future meetings are better. We spend so much time in

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>meetings that anything done to improve them can have a

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>huge payoff. I know all this planning and intention might

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>seem like a lot for a meeting, but that's the point.

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>You can't have fourteen meetings like this each day. But

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean you should lower your standards. It means

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't have fourteen meetings a day, So look over

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>your schedule and figure out which meetings should be given

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>loving attention and which need to be put out of

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:58.679
<v Speaker 1>their misery. I promise you'll soon be feeling less busy

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 1>while getting are done. In the meantime, this is Laura.

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, and here's to making the most of

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>our time. Hey, everybody, I'd love to hear from you.

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>You can send me your tips, your questions, or anything else.

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Just connect with me on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram at

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Before Breakfast Pod that's b E the number four then

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>breakfast p o D. You can also shoot me an

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>email at Before Breakfast Podcast at iHeart media dot com

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that before Breakfast is spelled out with all the letters.

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much. Should I look forward to staying in touch.