WEBVTT - 5/2, Part 1: Brad Ziegler, Jose Ramirez value, nightly recap, and more…

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app, and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy Best

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. To Do To Do, Dina Do Do Do

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Didna do Yeah?

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This as the Fantasy best Friends Forever. Here are the

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports you're not working alongside Frankie Standfeld. I am Greg.

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Say what's going on about Gregg? A Happy Thursday to

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>your bud? One fact about that song? Heard of playing

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>at the bowling alley last night? Did you then bullish strike?

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Probably not all right. I think I only had like

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>one or two of those across the span of three games.

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Not my best work, your best, do your best you

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>can then trying speaking of the best weekend, We're trying

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>to provide you the best show we can and to

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>do that, we brought in a little help joined the

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>program today. For the first few minutes, it's our buddy,

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Brad Ziegler. What's going on, Brad? Hey, guys, how are

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you doing. We're doing really well. Man. How yourself? Oh,

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>doing pretty well, just kind of hanging out. And to

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>see Frank's last name up on the screen, it was

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>shocking to me how many consonants there are. I had

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>no idea. Whenever you hear his name, you just kind

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of don't even think about it. When you see it

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>up there, it's like, Wow, there's one vowel in the

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>long last name. That's unbelievable. Yeah, it's It's been messed

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>up multiple times. Throughout my life. As a childhood basketball player,

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I had multiple jerseys that were spelled very wrong. Brad, Um,

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it looks like somewhere in there, for sure, well, it

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>looks like it should be stampel or stample and like

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>someone just forgot the bottom line on the e. Yeah,

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>basically that's the same mistake that everyone else's me. I've

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>gotten like stamp fee with like an eye on the end,

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>stand fee with a y. I've had stampell, Like you

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>said to Brad, Um, you're not the only one. You're

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>not alone, right, good? I don't I don't feel so bad. Then, fantastic, fantastic.

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad. I'm glad you guys have figured that out now,

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.119
<v Speaker 1>So so Brad. We obviously have you for a few

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>minutes here, and I want to jump right into it

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>with you, and I don't want to begin with a

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>guy that we drafted together Frankie in the first round

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>with the fourth overall pick, and we were excited because

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Jose Ramirez felt to us with the fourth overall pick.

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>We've talked a lot about Josie Ramires and every anytime

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>he does anything, we think it's a sign of him

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.119
<v Speaker 1>king out of a slump. Second half of last year

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't exactly work out so well. The first month of

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>this year was just as bad. Is Jose Ramire is

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>just in a deep slump? Can he not hit a

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>breaking ball? What are you seeing with Josie Ramirez? It's

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of funny like this year is his numbers are

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>actually better against breaking balls than than they are for

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>his career. He's not hitting the fastball. He's hitting O

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>eighty five against the fastball this year, which is just atrocious. Um,

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.679
<v Speaker 1>but he he is such a good fastball hitter that

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you think at some point that's gonna turn around. Um.

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I I you know, on our our show at the

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>draft that we did, I was that was the one

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>guy in the in the first round that I I

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>saw like potentially not ending up a first round player

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>because of the numbers against breaking balls. Um, they still

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>concerned me. I mean, it's it's a super small sample

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>size to to start the year, but um, he's not.

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not like he's ever gonna be a really good

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>breaking ball hitter in my opinion. And with that being

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the case, UM, I think he's I didn't think he

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>was going to be as bad as he's been this far,

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>but I think he will be better, um, you know,

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the season, but not still not elite.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to settle in as like a

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, a twenty homer guy, you know, more like

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this year and and maybe um but but you know,

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>lower average than he's hit in the past. He's obviously

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>not getting on base as much as stolen bases are

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be down. UM. I think that that to me

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest concern with him. UM. In regards to

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this year because you expect him to hit the fastball,

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>and he's seeing a lot of fastballs and he's not

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>hitting them. And I almost wonder if it's almost in

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>his head about the breaking balls, where he's he's thinking,

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I need to work on my breaking ball so much

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that it is taken away from his ability to hit

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the fastball. And that's a really, really good point, because

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the fastball last year was never an issue, and the

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>breaking ball, he pointed out to me yesterday, Frank has

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>traditionally been one in his career, so raving right that

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>he's just so focused on not missing that breaking ball

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>or recognizing the breaking ball, he's just laid on all

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>these fast balls under one's batting against a fastball. It's ridiculous.

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>And we've been using the expected stats over on Baseball

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Savant using their stat cast data, and his expected batting

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>average GREG on fastballs this year is to seventy one,

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like he's been a bit unlucky. I

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>do agree with the point that Brad made that he's

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>probably in his own head here regarding the breaking balls,

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and it might be throwing him off a little bit

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>with the fastballs, But I mean there's a huge difference

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>between his current batting average against fastballs and his expected

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>batting average, and same thing with his slugging percentage greg

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to seventy four slugging percentage against fastballs this year his

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>expected slugging percentage five three. It just seems like he's

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit unlucky. I think once the weather

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>starts to warm up a little bit, especially you know,

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>playing in the Al Central, they played in some cold

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>weather locations to start the year, and and Cleveland as well,

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna see the ball will start to

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>fly out a little bit as well. But overall, I

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>do agree that this breaking ball issue, that's exactly what

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's an ongoing issue when it comes to

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Jose Ramirez. So maybe we don't get the two eight

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>plus batting average that we were expecting out of him,

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>but he's not a sub two hitter either. I think

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>he'll probably raise it up to a round two fifty sixty,

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>but he probably won't get to the batting average we

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>all thought that he was going, and that means he

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>won't get to the value that we all thought we

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>were gonna potentially get fine stolen basis too, and I

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>think the home runs are gonna come and bunches once

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the weather starts to heat up a little bit. What overall,

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>you're probably right about that. Are we gonna get the

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty thirty that we were expecting? Probably not, But if

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>he settles in Homers and still gives us thirty steals

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>with a t S, I think based on this first month,

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>owners will probably take that. You're probably right when it

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>comes to Jose Ramirez um and what he could give

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>us over the next four months after the debacle that

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>was the month of April. Speaking about debacles, I feel

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>like Tom Haller Rangers are thinking right now. He's spoken

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot about this as well this week, particularly the

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>conduct extension that they gave their young closer Josie Look.

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 1>After one month, it hasn't gone all that well, Brad.

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny because I actually think back to two

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>years ago with Edwin Diaz, who was this young closer

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>for Seattle, and they didn't give him the contract extension,

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>but like he was somebody that was coming up and

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone was really excited about and he's dunk and they

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>had to pull him from the closer role for really

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>really about a week or two put him back in

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and then he became the dominant lights out guy that

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>we saw most of the last season. Last night, notwithstanding

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>la Clark is in this spot where he just had

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>beginnings after beginnings after beginnings with Texas and Chris, what

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>were their manager was like at this point, we have

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>no choice. We have to move move him into lower

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>levelage situations. We're sitting here kind of speculating that veteran

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Shean Kelly, who's done it before, we the closer, and

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not unfamiliar territory for for you, Brad, as you

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously had that role before. A closer is there, they

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>don't get the jobs done. You kind of go in

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>there and take over. How do you see this from

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>both Shawn Kelly's perspective and from the perspective of the

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Rangers and who said the clerk, How do you break

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>down this entire situation in Texas well? For me, I

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a scenario where I would be

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>scared um to have the clerk on my team for

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the year, because it's one thing if

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>if it happens with a veteran and and you know,

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point there's a track record of bouncing back

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>after after a rough stretch. You don't have that with

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the clerk, And so it's it's possible that this is

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a longer, a longer issue that

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that you know that you might be dealing with here.

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a really good chance that Shawn Kelly

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>takes his job and runs with it, and and you

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>know it is the closer, you know, you know, deep

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>into the second half the season, not that the clerk

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>won't get a shot necessarily again, and obviously they feel

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>like he's the guy long term there. So I would say,

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>for you know, any kind of a Dynasty League twenty,

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you're probably fine, um, you know, looking at him, but

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I would be very concerned this year. It's his numbers

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>are are scary. He can't close out a three run

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>save against the Pirates the other night. Um, it's it's

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a major confidence issue and for a young a

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>young kid, a lot of times that's a really tough

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>thing to overcome. So, um, I would be very hesitant

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to expect a lot out of him, especially in the

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>next two or three months. Um, hopefully they can get

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>him on track pitching it on lower level of situations,

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>but even then as they start moving in back up

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the pecking order, uh for Foren or the twenty nineteen

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you know bullpen for Texas. I think there's a really

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>good chance that he he kind of gets into that

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.719
<v Speaker 1>seventh eighth inning role is doing well, but Kelly is

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>still pitching well in the ninth and if they're winning

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>baseball games with him, they're not going to take him

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>out of that role slelely to get the guy that

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>they paid a little more money to, uh, you know,

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>back in that job. They want to keep that guy's

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.839
<v Speaker 1>confidence high going into the next season because I don't

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>think anyone, um, you know, thinks that Texas Rangers are

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>competing for an a OS title this year, so they're

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they're more concerned about the long term situation, and that

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 1>was why they gave him the contract in the first place,

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>locking down long term, try to control his money. Um

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>And and right now, you know, after a month into

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the season, it doesn't look like a great idea. But

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>I think by the end of the year it'll balance

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 1>itself out and and he'll be ready to go next year.

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>But I would you know, for saves this year. Um,

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Kelly's a guy for the for a good

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>majority the rest of the season for Texas. And that's

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>really interesting because you mentioned that contratect extension and tying

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>him up for the long term. They have to get

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>him right for the long term like that. That's the plan,

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that's why they invested this money. So you think there's

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a very good chance that Sean Kelly runs away with it.

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>But as someone that's been there, the Rangers aren't really

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>going to compete we think for for the Al West title.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is an opportunity for them to get killing

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the closing role for the next month or two and

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>then trade him away and then get and then give

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a clerk his job back. Is that realistic? Yeah, absolutely,

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it's I mean they're all you're always looking for ways

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to to create value with players, especially veteran guys that

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>are they're on short contracts that you want to try

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 1>to move with the deadline. You know, if he goes

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 1>out and has has the next two or two or

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>three months where he pitches really well, yeah, he'll absolutely

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 1>be traded and and um then then you have a

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>chance in August and September two to get the clerk

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>back or or you know, you can get at least

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>evaluate where he's at at that time and see if

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be the guy, if it will be somebody else.

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>But it's not a lot different than the pottery last

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>season with brad Hand. You know, like brad Hand is

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>not a traditional closer, but but you put him into

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that role. He was doing really well. They got a

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.719
<v Speaker 1>ton back for him and in trade value, so uh,

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it made sense from San Diego standpoint at that time.

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I could see the same thing happening with Texas this year.

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of closures, Brad, I didn't want to bring up

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim situation right now. Cody

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Allen was very ineffective to start the season. They're not

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly tied into him the way that the Rangers are

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>tied into the clerk. They signed Cody Allen to a

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>one year deal and they have a veteran behind him

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in handled robots has that has been around for a

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 1>little bit and we see, you know, yeah, points to

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>this guy type. Butchery has been pitching the seventh, the eighth,

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>ending the setup role for them, and he's been very effective.

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>How do you think the Angels bullpen plays out here

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>moving forward? I would think they probably want to leave

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Butchery in the role that he's in now. UM, he's

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>having success there. He's a young guy. I mean, he's

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>basically he's got such a small sample size in the

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>big leagues that that his September last year is basically

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>his April this year. He's he's almost duplicated the numbers.

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Would that be in the case you you you kind

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>of don't want to move him around a whole lot,

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>because again, I don't know that the Angels. Maybe maybe

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:14.839
<v Speaker 1>they're a team that UM is up playing better down

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the stretch, but they that's you know, you look at

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>this division, you're thinking it's it's Seattle, Oakland and Houston.

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>They're going after this title, and so the Angels are

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:25.719
<v Speaker 1>are going to be more concerned with the long term

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>development of other players. I don't think there is concerned,

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>UM with with their their roles right now. They obviously

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 1>want to win games, because you want to build confidence

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in a in a winning environment. UM, but I think

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna take a guy who's got a you know,

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a little closing experience. I think you know, Roy's probably

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>had two or three saves uh coming into the season

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in his career just kind of in in random spots. Um,

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but he he is a veteran pitcher, he's been around

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a long time. He's had good success year after year.

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's a really good chance that that he's gonna

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>do fine in that role. Obviously, you know, like you said,

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't have a ton invested in Cody Allen. He

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 1>was really bad in the second half last year and

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and down the stretch and so they um to the

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>point where the Indians lost lost complete complete faith in

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>him and and how to go and get Brad hands. So, um,

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it's I don't think. I think Allan's probably done in

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that role. Not that he can't be uh you know, I'm, um,

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, an effective middle inning guy, but he's gotta

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>get healthy first. And um, I think Robots is probably

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the guy right now and Buttery, Buttery moves to the

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>eighth inning and and um, I still, if it's me,

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually would prefer Buttery over Robosts because I think

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>because all of his other numbers is gonna be better

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 1>except for the saves. If you need just saves, Robots

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is probably the guy, or or Shawn Kelly like we

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 1>talked about. But um, I think there's a really good

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>chance that the buttery is actually the guy that you

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>need um to to help all the other the other

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>four categories with your you know your you know you

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>are a whip strikeouts that kind of stuff, you know,

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Rad Ziegler here and and Rad, before I move on

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to Marlin's pitchers, do you want to eat your thoughts?

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And we don't have a couple of minutes left with you,

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>but what do You're a pitcher and you go like this,

0:13:57.960 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>You point to the guy like you think it's pop up,

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and it consistently goes over the fence as handel robeless

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>constantly does How do your teammates react to that? Uh, well,

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it happened to me, or well, at least one time

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>in my career. No one, unfortunately, I don't know anyone

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>else in my team saw it, but it did happen.

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Hector Sanchez on the Giants hit a fly ball to

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>center field in San Francisco, and it was one of

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>those random games where the day game in San fran

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the wind was blowing out to the center and and

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it legitimately, you know, should have been a fly ball,

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>but it was. It was one of those days in

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco was a really high sky, no clouds

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in the sky. Um, and and so it would be

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>one that you know, we hit it high enough and

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and far enough that it would be easy for for

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a center fielder to lose. So I pointed up and

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, unfortunately it landed in like the

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>front row of the seats in center field. And um,

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a good feeling because I just walked away

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>from it thinking like he I really didn't think he

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>hit the ball that well. And you know, the thirty

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>wind on the on the bay in San fran you know,

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>put pushed it out, but um, from road lays to standpoint,

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>like at some point, you know, in in the minor

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>leagues in in you know, when you're in in America,

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>at least in high school and college, a lot of

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>times you play on fields where the lighting isn't that good.

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, whether it's daytime, nighttime. You know, even

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>in a day game, you may not have a great

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>backdrop behind the hitter. Um, so you end up up.

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>You just kind of learned as a as a picture

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to point at everything in the air, whether it's to

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the catcher, whether it's to the outfielders whatever, because you

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>just want to let them know if they didn't pick

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it up off the bat where it's at in the

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>big leagues. That's a tough habit to break because you

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>don't need to do that with the with the lights, um,

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the you know, there are a lot better on most fields.

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>They've got good back drops behind the hitters most of

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the time, um for the fielders to see. So it's

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a tough habit to break. And at the

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>same time, UM, you know, if they're hitting home runs

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're doing it, it's not a not a good

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>feeling as a picture. And um, at some point, you know,

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>there's probably gonna be somebody to say, like, dude, you

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta stop doing it. Um. I know we had a

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>break in about a minute. You have like five more minutes.

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>You can hang with us, just talk about the Marlins. Awesome, Okay,

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So we got the break coming up, so we're gonna

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>talk to Brad. We can come back. And we had

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>this conversation throughout really April, and it was how to

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>rank these Marlins starting pitchers and we've been through it

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>with it was basically everybody, but who say, you're right

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>there right, like Caleb Smith and Trevor Richards and Sandy

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Alcantara and Pablo Lopez. And we're constantly trying to figure

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>out how are we going to rank these guys? And

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>my thoughts are Frank you give his thoughts in Florida

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldventure and everybody gave their thoughts. What I wanted to

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>why I wanted to ask Brad was he pitched with

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>most of these guys a year or two ago, or

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>at least had seen them up close, so he knows

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>there's stuff way better than we do. And we can

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about Pablo Lopez all we want, but I thought, Brad,

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll be very, very incightful with that. So coming up

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>after the break, we're going to get into the Marlins

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to get into what Brad seas and

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>how we ranked them and how badly you should need

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>them and want to pick them up. Also, coming out

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later on next Or will be joined

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>by Dr A from Inside Injuries, and we'll go over

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>everything from Corey Kluber all on A. J. Pollock and

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>what you do there and how you assess the situation. Well,

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, for the next two hours go over everything

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>from last night as well. It's a whole lot to

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>do is Fantasy best Friends Forever. Here from the Fantasy

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Sports radio network Daily Rodo dot Com. Learn from the

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>game's best DFS players. We don't just give you advice.

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily roado dot Com Optimizer In minutes,

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>build an optimized line up for cash games and attorneys.

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Learn from the game's best DFS players joined Daily rodo

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com. The following ad contains shocking material. Listener discretion

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>is advised. Is someone in your family playing a dangerous

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>game of Russian Roulette? Over forty three thousand people die

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a year from drug overdose. A hundred and twenty people

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>a day, five people every hour, one person every twelve minutes.

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Eighty eight thousand people die every year from alcohol abuse.

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Over two hundred and forty people a day, ten an hour,

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>one person every six minutes. Somebody you know, maybe next

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>learn how to help someone you love get away from

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the drugs, alcohol, and bad influences. With the f m

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>l A, people can take a leave of absence from

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>their job and still keep it call now and learn

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>how we can help you. Eight six six four eight

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>four nine six two one eight six six four eight

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>four nine six to one. That's eight six six four

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>eight four ninety six one Fantasy Sports today. And you

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>don't want white beaters and people that are putting child

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>children in harms way. You don't want them running around

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the football field when people know something may have happened.

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, what do you do You

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>have to You can suspend them for a certain period

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of time, but you know it counts to Ruben Foster

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and Kareem Hunt and now Tyreek Hill. If the if

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the legal system isn't gonna do anything about it, what

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is the NFL is supposed to do? On Saturday's eight

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>am Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on your popular

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast providers, Fantasy Best Friends Forever, Fantasy Sports Radio Network,

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Frank Snaffle, Gregg Sousman. Here, Brad Ziegler hanging out with

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>us another few minutes and Brad we we jumped into

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the bubble pens. We jumped him to josieer Mirrors, a

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>guy that you had talked about before the season began

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.239
<v Speaker 1>up with us, and now I want to jump in

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>with the Marlins. Nobody really expects all that much from

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the Marlins, and understandably so it's a rebuilding here have

0:19:59.920 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>a they have nine way on the season, and yet

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Smith is three and l with a bright e

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>r a, a ton of strikeouts and everything looking good.

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>People seem to love Pablo Lopez coming into the season.

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I was really all about sandy 'all, Gantara, how do

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you break down this Marlins rotation? There's there's no question

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>about that. He had the big time strikeout numbers last

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>year too before he got hurt. So, um, he's he's

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 1>uh or I might have been two years ago. I

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>can't remember when when his surgery was, but he's he's

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>big time. He's got great stuff, He's got strikeout stuff,

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and he has a strikeout mentality that that a lot

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>of younger guys don't have. So, um, you know, you

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>can say what you want about some of the Marlins

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>trades that they made, but they basically stole Caleb Smith

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>from the Yankees and and he's working out really well

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>for him. Um you know, I like, actually like um

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Richards quite a bit that he's just getting dinged

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>up by the home run ball this year. He's his

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>batting average a gifts is really good. It's it's been

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>consistent over the course of the season, and it's it's

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of games and he was giving up

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of homers in each game, and it's it's,

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, ended up kind of ruining bad starts for

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>him or ruining good starts for him. Um, you know,

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Lopez has good stuff, but he's it's kind of funny.

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Is for a guy that throws ninety four he's kind

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of a finesse guy. He he pitches with change ups

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot. He's kind of a command guy. Didn't have

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a power breaking ball. Um, I feel like you're kind

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 1>of getting even though they're a different style pictures, you're

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the same the kind of the same stuff

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 1>out of out of Lopez and and Richards um al

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Contra is he's a little more um of a of

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>an enigma because you watch him throw a bullpen and

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>at times you're like, there isn't a picture on earth

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>who could throw a better bullpen than what he just threw,

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and then he gets out in the game and it's

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.120
<v Speaker 1>just not the same. It's, you know, he's tentative. Um.

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>He he you know, will will leave pitches up when

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you know in the bullpen he's not doing that. And

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know exactly what changes I you know,

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get a chance to see him enough to

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>to really try to evaluate it, because in his bullpen

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>he's he's just, um, always under control, got really good

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>body control, good, you know, good smooth the every and

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>then he gets in the game and everything is just

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 1>a little different. I don't know if it quickens up

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>for him a little bit, um, but he's He's had,

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously some some rough starts this year, you know,

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>with a couple of good ones mixed in. And I

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 1>really don't know that any of the three guys are

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>guys that you really want to count on unless you're

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>in a super deep league. Um. But Caleb Smith, I

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>think he's absolutely legit. I think he's a real deal.

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I think what you're seeing right now. I don't know

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to carry a two e r A

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>all season, um, but I think the strikeout number is

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna be there. And and he is walk rate is

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a little lower this year, which is a good sign. Um.

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I I really like him I think he's he's got

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a really good season ahead of him,

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and and a next good next few years ahead of

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>him too. I agree totally regarding Caleb Smith. This tweenie

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>strike rate second in all of baseball right now, behind

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>only Blake Snail. So that tells you the type of

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>company that he's been in. And he's got what thirties

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>seven strikeouts to eight walks three and oh even with

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you know the Marlins offense backing him there, he's giving

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you linked now to he goes seven innings pitched last night.

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely love mygree Caleb Smith. I'm I'm ready to say, Greg,

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>he's the top forty starting pitcher right now, maybe even higher.

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>We might even have to put him into the top thirty.

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>He pitches in a great ballpark, two in Marlins Park.

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest key for him this year as

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>compared to last year is the walks being down for him.

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that was a bugaboo for him, but

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>at least eight strikeouts in three street he has at

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>least six strikeouts and all six of his starts. Caleb

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Smith is absolutely legit. I agree, Bread, I appreciate it.

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I will say before I go there. This is a

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>off topic, but but um, this is a guy touted

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>early in the season, and obviously Greg Holland is pitching

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>probably better than anybody um thought he would in Arizona.

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But I mentioned the guy um when when we were

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>at that draft in New York. Juan Lopez is the

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>lights out for his owner right now and he's moving

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>up the pecking order there and if Holland struggles at

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>some point, gets hurt at some point, Lopez is going

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to be the guy there. So if you have an

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to grab him, that's that's a guy. He's guys,

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, high strikeout numbers, He's he's not walking guys. Um,

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>He's he's gonna be the guy I think. Um, you

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>know at some point there he's gonna be the long

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>term closer in Arizona. There you go. You want Lopez,

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the guy that Brad has been touting since March to us.

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>You may not have a shot yet because of Greg Holland,

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>but keep your eye out for him, Brad. Before we

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 1>let you go, where can people listen to you and

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 1>uh find out more about you? I'm doing a podcast

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Athletic now, UM that that's been a lot

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of fun. It's it's a lot of fantasy football. Um. Uh,

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>we dabble in fantasy baseball a little bit. But um

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>with the draft comp you know, having just happened, we

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>were digging into football quite a bit right now. Um.

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>It's it's you know, if you have an Athletic subscription

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the show, it's called Sports Unsealed. Uh, it's it's a

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun and and you know, hopefully I'll be

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing you all every Thursday for for a long time now,

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we hope. So man, that's Brad Ziegli. Listen to his

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>podcast on the Athletic and follow him on Twitter as well. Brad,

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate the time. We'll talk to you next week.

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Sounds great. Thanks yess. Also there we go for major

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>League reliever. Brad Ziegler joins us each and every Thursday

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>around this time year on the BFS. So, Caleb smith Man,

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of this one of the biggest stories we're getting.

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Corey cluer that's one of the biggest stories coming out.

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh the last night, how he was stolen really from

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees. Brad Casher doesn't make any bad trades. This

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a big loss for them. And I

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>don't even think he was part of the standard trade, Greg,

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>he was partly, was not part of the stand Trede.

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>We just got international money, I believe. Is that what

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was a very just kind of low key.

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I know I thought it was. It was not part

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>of the stand I know it's not part of the

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>standard trade. It was part Well you looked at up

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Cable Smith has that's why. Okay, so you're right, So

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I knew it was Garrett Cooper, but it's Garret Cooper

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that almost went to Miami with him in exchange for

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>picture Mike King and bonus money. So here right, it

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>was basically bonus money. Yeah it was. Yeah, it's it's been. Yeah,

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the bad moves that Cashman

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 1>has done. And Cashman has done great work overall, but yeah,

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean to see what Cable Smith is doing right now.

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>He's got two point zero zero e r A on

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the season. It's fifth two point eight one his X

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>fit two point nine six guys Ill Smith, pretty damn legit,

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna pitch to a two R T E

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>r A. Uh, similar to what Brad was saying. But

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>can he pitch to a low three's e r A.

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>He's got eleven k per nine, he's got a zero

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>point eight three whip right now. This guy is absolutely legit. Greg,

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 1>I think he's been one of the biggest breakout starting

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>pitchers alongside guys like Tyler Glass. Now he's been amazing.

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>The craziest thing for me is you can't count on wins, obviously,

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>especially out with the Marlins. The fact that he's with

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>three three three of the ninth category contributor. Either way,

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna give you e ra's gonna be whip, he's

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna get you kouts. He's not gonna give you saves, obviously,

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>because he's a starting pitcher, um, and it helps him.

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>He's need more of a flyball pitcher. Surround ball rade

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>for the year, he's forty point eight percent flyball, so

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>years more towards fly balls when he gives up contact.

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned the swinging strike grade second in baseball behind

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>only Blake Snell. So he doesn't give up a lot

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of contact, but when he does, it's flyballs. And it

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>helps Greg that he pitches in Marlins Park. Obviously, when

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you give up fly balls as your main source of context.

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like everything's working right for for Caleb

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Smith right now. Yeah, absolutely no reason to sell. I'm

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>not selling. I don't either now unless someone comes to

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>you with some crazy offer, like they're going and like

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>head over heels right now to try and get Caleb

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Smith like a classic cell high by Low do you

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:19.439
<v Speaker 1>trade him for If someone comes to you right now

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, I've had enough of Walker Bueller, you

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Walker Buller for Caleb Smith. Yes, I'm doing that. Yes,

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing that, Frank, Frank, I'll played the fifth. I

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know, man, Caleb Smith is nasty right now, Frank, nasty?

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>All right? Canybe this year is like Blake Snell light

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Why can't he He's unbelievable, unbelievable, walks her down. I

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>don't want to trade him. I don't want to turn Okay,

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>keeping Caleb Smell on the rust shows your room, allow

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to run yesterday pup his fifth save. The other side

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>of this game was Corey Klueber, who would affords you

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>thirds three runs on eight hits, struck out three uh,

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>much more importantly than that comeback or off the arm,

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and not only they originally like there's a broken forearm,

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>and that changed after the game, right Frank, which is

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.479
<v Speaker 1>or is a bruise warm and then became a broken farm.

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 1>So it was I think that's ultimately what happenedt he

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>goes for the X rays, m R I, whatever it is,

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>it comes out that he has a fractured forearm, and

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll find out more an hour to what the timetable

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is looking like for Corey Kluber. That's a really tough break,

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 1>no pun intended for the Cleveland Indians and for fantasy

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>owners alike. Right now, one of my buddies in one

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of in my home league has both Corey Kluber and

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Clevinger, So just a huge hit if you drafted

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>both of those guys or if you're the Cleveland Indians

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to lose both of those starting pitchers. Who know, Corey

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Kluber was not has not been himself so far this year,

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>but my Clevinger was awesome. So hopefully we get an

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>update on my Clevinger moving forward sometime soon. I was

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>watching the game the other day. I know he's just

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of started up when we have started throwing a

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but Corey Kluber greg at five point eight

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>zero e r A, and we had concerns over him

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>coming into the year. We couldn't exactly put our finger

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>on what it was. Maybe it was just the fact

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that he's throwing so many endings over the past couple

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of years, he's getting older. It seemed like, you know,

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the fastball velocity and his this overall, the success or

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>lack thereof of the fastball the past couple of seasons

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and last year specifically, we were worried about it coming

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to the year. I don't have any shares of Clueber.

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you have any shares of clueber Um.

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>And we ranked him maybe slightly lower than the consensus ranking.

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>We weren't completely off on him, but it just seemed

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>like it. But if it was him or someone else

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in that range on the board, more often than that,

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we were going away from Clueber. Yeah, I remember, I

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>would have taken Bower over Clueber. You know, you know

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it's actually crazy. No, yes, I would have as well.

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think back to the last draft I did.

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I was drafting me from my friend and so the

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>highest guy on his board was Corey Cluber and I

0:29:57.720 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>was I wasn't homes I didn't have like the draft

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>board in front of me. I had like emails. I

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>was kind of going back and forth and whatnot. But

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>so I missed that Corey Club didn't get drafted, and

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>instead I drafted the next highest picture I thought on

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>his board, which turned out to be Steven Strassburg. And

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I apologize now. I apologize to him. He's just honestly

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's close enough, Like I don't have him that

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>far away anyway, So it's all good. Shoot, h A

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>text does man something? Sure? It does, man. It's working

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>out right now. I mean most people wouldn't have done that,

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>just in fact, even I wouldn't have done that. I

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have taken Strasberg over to Clubber. But the way

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that the first month is played out, and I mean

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>all of these things are relative. Right now. We're only about,

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, six seven starts into the season for most

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of these starting pictures, so small sample size. But from

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen, something is not right for Clubber. Um.

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>That's not the reason why he broke his forearm yesterday.

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we'll see what the timetable is like

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>from Dr A and hopefully comes back and and it's

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>closer to the picture that he's seen the past couple

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of years, the Indians having just brutal injury re luck

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Man with with Clev, with Bauer, I'm sorry, with Clev,

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>with Kluber, Lindor Early exactly, Kiftness early as well, really

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>really struggling. Unfortunately for the Cleveland needs and their lineup

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is hasn't put it together yet either. I mean, I

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>know they were facing Caleb Smith last night, but overall

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>their offense, even with lind Or in there, has been

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>lack luster. They're starting to get these guys back. Lindor Hittness,

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>we spoke about Cargo the other day. A little bit

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>coming around here. I think gets one hit. I think

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>positive regress. I just realized I had a dream that

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>involved Carlos Gonzalez and you, Like I don't remember the contact.

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I just remember Carlos Gonzalez being like a major part

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of Finn in the argument with you over him, which

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>might have also happened in real life. But I did

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>had this vivid dream of Carlos Gonzalez. I knew in it.

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't remember. I don't remember the context. I just

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>remember now. I would have much rather have been Malix Smith, Greg,

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it was not mal Smith. It was Carlos Gonzalez. I

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>promise you. I promised you. Was um anything else with

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>this Marlins Indians game before we move on. Frankie Um no,

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean pretty standard spoke about the lineup really underperforming

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. I gotta give them at least the next

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>two three weeks. By the end of May. If we're

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>not seeing this Indian's line up turning around with Jose

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Emiraz and Francisco Lindor, I'm gonna really start to push

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the panic button because at that point, like to meet Greg,

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know where your cut off is, Greg,

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>But when we get some Memorial Day I feel like

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that's enough data for teams overall and players overall. We

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>have two months of data at that point where we

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>can kind of make some serious judgments on them Memorial Day.

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna give the Indians until then, and if

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't turn it around, that's when I'm starting to

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>put push the panic button on this offense. I usually

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>put my barometer around April ten. Yeah, you know so rational.

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>You're not a rational Fantasy baseball so Memorial Day is

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>irrelevant to me. Um, But in all, in all seriousness,

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a case by case basis, right, Like there's certain

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>guys that Malex Smith being one of them. He brought

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>him up that I don't need to wait around to

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Memorial Day. I'm cutting him for a guy like like

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Indians and pictures and whatnot. It's case by case.

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>It's what they've done, it's what I believe they can do.

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a prospect that it can be guarant Hampson is

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>another one. I know you talking about him a lot

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>because I had him. I wasn't winning around until Memorial

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Day to see a guarant Hampson figure it out. I

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>got the playing time, he he doesn't play. I cut

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>him a guy like Ryan McMahon who's gotten relatively cold

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.239
<v Speaker 1>as of late. I'm not gonna say I'm gonna wait

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>around it for a Memorial Day for him. We'll see,

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Like if a second baseman gets really hot, they haven't

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>been second basement that I've gotten hot, like Day of

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Santanna has second base eligibility. But I'm not gonna necessarily

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>wait around for that. Now. We somebody tweeted us before,

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>like yas C. L. Plea is a really good example

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm waiting around towards Memorial Day for Yas Week. But

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you get into June and yea, if week still batting

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 1>under two hundred, then you can fairly have the conversation

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>is if we should cut Yasale we that's a fair

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>conversation to have in June. It's not a fair conversation

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to have now. I agree with that. It is a

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>case by case basis, and I would make the argument

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that you presented Ryan McMahon. I think he's a He's

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a good one to hold onto to see through the

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>month of May, because Colorado is about to have a

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 1>ton of games this month in coors Field and go

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>up against some questionable pitching staff. So I would actually

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>be on the other side of the fence when it

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to Ryan McMahon. I know he was a player

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people picked up, and normally, if

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a guy that you just pick up and they're

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 1>not performing, i'd say, all right, you could probably cut

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>that player. But when it comes to Ryan McMahon being

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>part of the Rockies lineup and coors Field and you

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>have all these kind of advantages, I gotta hold onto

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>him through May until Memorial Day and see what happens

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>when he has these games in corps Field and going

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 1>up against these questionable pitching staff so on on the

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>other side of the fence. But for the most part,

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to players that we just pick up,

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>I think you can have a looser, shorter leash rather

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to some of those guys, no, no

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>question about it. Now, a guy that you were very

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>very out on coming into this season, and not that,

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>not just you. I'm not calling I'm not calling you out.

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm calling me. I mean in the entire industry, and

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>rightfully so, because every underlying number about John Lester said

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>he sticks, and I get it. He's thirty five years old.

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>There is no side when it comes to John Lester.

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So everybody just left Lester on the board. And again

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I get it. I'm not calling anybody. I'm not calling

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you out either, Frankie, but draft the John Lester because

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>he was like that guy on the board that you

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>looked at and you're just like, this guy is still there.

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll take him. And I felt so gross

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>about it. On draft day I tried to trade him

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 1>along with Wilson Wilson Traris for Jose Kantana. Literally as

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 1>my draft was going on, I was attempting to do this.

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>But Lester has been pretty good going into yesterday. I

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:41.479
<v Speaker 1>know he was on the I L briefly Mrs Stark,

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>but he's in't pretty good and yesterday against admittedly a

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 1>cold Seattle lineup. Now, yesterday he was at his best.

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>He allowed one hit, one walk, struck out eight over

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 1>seven innings of work. His ear RAY sits at one

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>point seven three right now for John Lester, who has

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>been every bit as good as you could have possibly hoped,

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>honestly better when you took him in the middle rounds

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of your draft. Now, much like last year, he's fipping

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>x fit significantly higher. Right last year his ear A

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 1>finished at three point three to his ex fit was

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>at four point four three. This year that e r

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>A sits at one point seven three, where it will

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>not stay. He's X at three four two. Difference is

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>frank and he gives me a three point four to

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>e r A or around there. I'm cool with it. Absolutely, Yeah,

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a valuable picture. I would like to take this

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>time to personally apologize to John Lester and Madison Bumgarner,

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>who we have to talk about at some point today

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. You're absolutely right. You hit the nail on

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 1>the head, Greg. When it comes to John Lester and

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:42.839
<v Speaker 1>his X fit this year three four two. Even if

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 1>he regresses from a one seven three e r A

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 1>up to a mid three's e r A, that's a

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 1>picture worth owning. I will say this. His swinging strike

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 1>rate is nearly identical to what it was last year.

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 1>So when you look at the strikeouts overall in the

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Caper nine being over nine right now, he should probably

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>be closer to where it was last year year, you know,

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half, case for nine, maybe eight. I

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>do like that at the command to control the lack

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of walks has been much better this year for John Lester.

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about this a little bit more when

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we come back, but overall he's doing some really nice things.

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, John Lester. We'll talk more about Lester and

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>another veteran coming out here. The BFFs, the Fantasy Sports

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Network is ready to take you out to the ball game.

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Our experts and analysts are following the Boys of Summer

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>through all one hundred and sixty two games the two

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen MLB season with the best fantasy baseball analysis

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in the industry. Catch the latest news and notes every

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>day to help you win your fantasy leagues and your

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>dast tournaments. Will always want you back listening and watching

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Network on the fn T s Y

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Radio app and the f N T s Y YouTube channel.

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>The Fantasy Sports Network where we're root Root rooting for

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy baseball team. More Salad two thousand and fifteen,

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and sixteen European Long Drive Tour Champion, two

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen, World Number one. Me personally, I keep my

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>game face on me all the time, especially coming out

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>with the bucker, leaving the range or even leaving the boys.

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? Can go to game face grooming dot

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 1>com from all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:27.319
<v Speaker 1>needs full time fantasy. I feel like we're in an

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>age now where you kind of want to get that

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 1>running back. It's no knock on the receivers. I mean,

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins is really good. Davante Adams I love. I mean,

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you can make a case for him in my opinion,

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 1>to be the wide receiver one this year. But don't

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:41.439
<v Speaker 1>you want a running back if you can't that three

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>down back since they're disappearing. I think you want one

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>because I'm afraid to look at your team if you

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have one. Week days to the four BM Eastern

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Sports Network and on your popular podcast

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 1>providers can't get enough fantasy football. Road To Experts is

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 1>launched their NFL three Fantasy Football Package, which includes the

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>best math Bay seasonal projections and rankings available anywhere on

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the Internet and Davis Madigan The Roto Experts are providing

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>dynasty season long betting, best ball, and NFL Draft content

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:10.799
<v Speaker 1>every day of the year to give you an edge

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what type of fantasy football you play. Say

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>temper cent at roto Experts dot com with the promo

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>code Evan T s Y. It's the NFL three Fantasy

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Football Package only at Rhoto Experts dot Com. Fantasy best

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Friends Radit of Fantasy Sports renew Network Frank Stafford Gregg

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Susman with you. Of course, I want to remind you

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>this swing for the fantasis by playing daily Fantasy Baseball

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 1>with Daily Rotor dot Com become the eighth daily wrote

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of optimizer to you user to win a

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 1>million bucks on FanDuel or draft Kings and become one

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of the council. Are people who have won thousands of dollars.

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>If you're playing l v dfs and not using Daily

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Roder dot com, you're doing it wrong. And the promo

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>code f and ts y discount you get a lot

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of alerts, protected ownership percentage, weather updates, fantasy detections, and

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>everything else that people that use the Daily Road a

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:07.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of optimizers that have produced millions of dollars DFS winnings.

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>As a twenty nineteen mlv Dailey Roto Premium package at

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Daily roda dot com, here's the promo code FMCS one

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and get your temper discount today for you. We got

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting question I just saw on the short

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:23.879
<v Speaker 1>and someone asked, I was mighty and peg you trade

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:27.320
<v Speaker 1>away to Mingo Santana and Chris Archer to get Marcelo Zuna.

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. My initial reaction is that seems

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:33.879
<v Speaker 1>like a lofty price. Yeah, I don't. I don't think

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a little it's a little thought. It was interesting.

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's the value of Marcello Zuna right now.

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting. He's been absolutely dominant he's been awesome. We

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about that the other day. I mean, he was.

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 1>He was one of the guys that we missed on

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:50.240
<v Speaker 1>because we were worried about the shoulder injury during the spring,

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and as he shut us up. He's been absolutely awesome.

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:56.840
<v Speaker 1>And Domingo Santana and the Mariners have, you know, quieted

0:40:56.840 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit. They they've become a little bit cold.

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>But I still have faith in Chris Archer. Once he returns,

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. I could see if if you're like loaded

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>with starting pictures, Greg, maybe you make that move. But

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 1>I would still imagine Mingo, Santana and Archer together maybe

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 1>if you get more than Marcel's. I don't know, I

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 1>under undervaluing I'd like to think you can. Maybe we

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>still are undervaluing him, but i'd like to think you

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 1>can now during the break, I guess not fair during

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the break, but like during the lead up to twenty nineteen,

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the main reasons you didn't like John Lester

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>was because nothing had changed. His arsenal was still the

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>same last year and it just wasn't nearly as effective.

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.880
<v Speaker 1>He had the great defense behind him, Sure, but you

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>look for changes in a picture as a reason to

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 1>buy or as a reason to fade with John Lester

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>this year, one of the reasons that you're in on

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 1>him is because of a change in pitch selection. What

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:51.240
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing when you look into the underlying numbers

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to John Lester. So, John Lester is

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:56.879
<v Speaker 1>obviously an aging picture. He's a veteran and he's got

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to do things a little bit differently. Reminds me of C. C.

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Sabathia or the past couple of seasons. How he's been

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>able to maintain a you know, sub three seven e

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 1>r A each of the past three years because he's

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>changed up his pitching style. He's using more breaking pitches,

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>He's throwing a cutter a lot more. And it seems

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:13.879
<v Speaker 1>to be the case with John Lester here so far

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>on the season, he's throwing his cutter thirty three point

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of the time. Last year that number was

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty four point seven percent of the time. So he's

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 1>using that cutter more. And it's additioned by subtraction is fastball.

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>He's he's a smart pitcher. Again. He knows that his

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>fastball velocity is diminishing and with that, the effectiveness of

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:37.800
<v Speaker 1>his fastball is also diminishing. So he's lowered his usage

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 1>on his fastball about eight percentage points this year, and

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:43.280
<v Speaker 1>he's up to his cart car usage by eleven percent

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and it seems to be one of the biggest differences.

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I do think that there is gonna be some regression

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>at some point. He's not going to maintain a one

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 1>seven three e r A. So you're gonna have him

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:54.919
<v Speaker 1>in the in your line up for those starts where

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 1>he gives up three runs, maybe four runs, He'll probably

0:42:57.600 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>get that e r A up to around the mid

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 1>three is um, you know, three, three, six, whatever it

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>might be. But overall, I mean, if he gave you

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:09.359
<v Speaker 1>that with the run support of the Cubs, you're gonna

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:11.240
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of wins from him too. So overall

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:15.320
<v Speaker 1>all this has been pretty good man Lester and the

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Cubs beat the Mariners eleven nothing yesterday on the other side,

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 1>So this was, uh, this is very interesting, Frankie, you

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 1>had I'm very confused by this. Now, this is this

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is this has to be backwards. The Mariners pitching staff

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is just like wrong. They're assuming Marco Gonzalez got started,

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:36.839
<v Speaker 1>got rocked, right, Okay, So I don't know what has

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Tom Murphy ahead of on the Tom Murphy's a catcher,

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 1>so that doesn't make sense picture alert ESPN has it

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 1>like that anyway, So one of Gonzalez started probably stop

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:52.760
<v Speaker 1>when an inning in two thirds allowed five hits, six runs,

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:54.880
<v Speaker 1>three of them will earned three walks to strike as

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 1>even really good thus far is his first loss the

0:43:57.640 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>season was fight going into last night or yesterday after

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>what happened, he ran into a tough lineup. Obviously, the

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Cubs. Um that's exactly what they are. They're a

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>tough lineup. They're They're a team that takes a lot

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of pitches. They're patient. Uh, they wait for the right pitch.

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>If you don't give it to them, they're gonna walk.

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be next man up mentality. Uh and every

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 1>now and then you're gonna run into one of these

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 1>games where they're gonna blow you up. I mean, hovey.

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>They have a lot of talent on this team. They

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have Javier Bias, they have Wilson and tradrist, Chris Bryant,

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Rizzo. Another one yesterday, he goes deep. It wasn't

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 1>off Marco Gonzalez, but that's the depth of this lineup,

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So he ran into a really tough lineup Greg. And

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna happen from time to time for Marco

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Gonzalez because he's not a picture that gets swings and misses.

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>He pitches to contact, and if there's a day where

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 1>he runs into the wrong team Greg and he's pitching

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the contact and they're making hard contact and not the

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>soft contact he's used to getting, then he's gonna be

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 1>prone to some of these starts. He's got a three

0:44:55.960 --> 0:44:57.839
<v Speaker 1>point to eight e er A, he's got a four

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>point four nine x fit right now, So there was

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:05.279
<v Speaker 1>some regression coming from Mark Hogginzalez. Overall, I still like

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:08.800
<v Speaker 1>him a lot, but I just know there's gonna be

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 1>some inconsistency at time. They're like you, he's one of

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:12.719
<v Speaker 1>those guys that you just leave him in there. You

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:15.879
<v Speaker 1>take the good with the bad. Yeah, he's one. He's

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:19.400
<v Speaker 1>one of these like Rhodo pictures End of the year numbers,

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like he's probably gonna give you a mid three z

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 1>r A a solid wit because he doesn't walk a

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:25.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of guys, but he's not gonna give you strikeouts,

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and you just take the good with the bad. But

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be bad because he pitches in contact and

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>when he runs into a hot lineup like the Chicago Cubs,

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:35.319
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna be prone to some of these pretty

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:38.240
<v Speaker 1>big glow ups. Greg. Now you had, as you mentioned

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the home runs yesterday, Anthony Rizzo and Javier Biez, Wilson

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and Trairis as well. Contrairis has his eighth home run

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:47.879
<v Speaker 1>of the season already. Anthony Rizzo number one catcher thus

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 1>far this year. Through a month he has Money Grandall

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>number two. Um. Anthony Rizzo his seventh home run of

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the year. We we poop poo rizzle a lot. It's

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 1>only seven home runs in the season already. Frank will

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously take that and run with it. Javier Buys his

0:46:00.719 --> 0:46:03.279
<v Speaker 1>homewarwn was his tenth hole run of this season. I

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>read an interesting note about Bias. It looks like he's

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:08.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna continue to start every day at shortstop. Addison Russell.

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:10.839
<v Speaker 1>When he's elder world come off the suspension list will

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 1>be option to triple A. Yeah, interesting note there. I

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 1>do want to touch on Wilson Trairis a little bit. Greig,

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:18.319
<v Speaker 1>this is another one of those guys that we've said

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years, kind of similar to Marcella Zuna,

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Christian Yellows all in the same division. What do you know,

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the National League Central if he's just would up his

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:29.840
<v Speaker 1>launch angle a little bit, stop hitting as many ground balls.

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:33.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, his first three seasons in baseball, he's been

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a fifty two percent plus groundball percentage hitter. That is Wilson,

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>k and Treiers. He hit only ten home runs last year.

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 1>He already has eight on the season and it's May second.

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Why part of that is his groundball rate, He's lowered

0:46:47.080 --> 0:46:50.320
<v Speaker 1>by twelve percent Gregg, It's forty point seven percent groundball

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 1>rate this year for Wilson and Tis. The fly ball

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 1>rate right now a career high forties six point three percent.

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Last year, he said a previous career high of thirty

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:03.920
<v Speaker 1>percent fly balls. So he's consciously trying to put the

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 1>ball in the air more greg and at hard hit

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:09.880
<v Speaker 1>rate as well for Wilson con Trairis. So everything is

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:13.279
<v Speaker 1>pointing to, you know, Wilson and Trairis keeping up this

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:15.880
<v Speaker 1>hot streak right now. The strikeouts are a little bit worrisome.

0:47:15.880 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 1>He's got a twenty eight percent strikeout rate um, much

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:21.680
<v Speaker 1>higher than his career average. That's but he's hitting the

0:47:21.680 --> 0:47:24.399
<v Speaker 1>ball hard, he's lifting it more, he's walking more as well.

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So look, if that's what needs to happen, If if

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:29.400
<v Speaker 1>he needs to keep his strikeouts up for us to

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:32.359
<v Speaker 1>get the rest of this production from Wilson contrators, I'm

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 1>perfectly fine with it. And this is just another example,

0:47:34.560 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Greg where please remind me next year during draft season

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to players that have serious pedigree, kind

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of just throw the underlying numbers out the window. Because

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Cody Bellinger, we know what his pedigree was coming into

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the year, and I wasn't necessarily on Cody Bellinger, and

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll admit that he but he had immense pedigree, he

0:47:54.800 --> 0:47:56.879
<v Speaker 1>had immense upside, and we see what he's doing right now.

0:47:57.000 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Wilson and Trairis another one of those players, jo want

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Mankata kind of just probally underlying numbers out the window

0:48:02.760 --> 0:48:06.080
<v Speaker 1>because these guys who have pedigree, more often than not, Greg,

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 1>if they're sticking around in the majors, they're gonna figure

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 1>it out. We're seeing it with a lot of these

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 1>guys right now. I mean specifically, but Bellinger, Wilson and

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Rariss and uh y'aw Moncada. You kind of throw those

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>underlying numbers out and especially in draft season. I mean,

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 1>all these guys were undervalued, and if you have any

0:48:25.239 --> 0:48:28.759
<v Speaker 1>or all of them, you're sitting pretty right now. Greg, Absolutely,

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 1>You're You're You're feeling really, really good at the moment

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:35.799
<v Speaker 1>if you own any of those guys. Absolutely. Frankie John

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Lester I mentioned as a veteran that has changed it

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:43.359
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit. And you're buying him. We're not

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 1>buying him. I mean, I don't mean you're buying him.

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 1>You're buying that. This is real, is what he's doing

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to this degree, you know what I mean? Like, I'm

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>not going out there and trading for Johns. The point

0:48:50.680 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>was another veteran who you didn't like coming into this

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:56.319
<v Speaker 1>season was Madison bum Garner and Bummy yesterday against a

0:48:56.360 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>fierce Dodgers lineup six innings four hits, also struck out eight,

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed two walks in just one run, throwing a fourteen

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:07.640
<v Speaker 1>pitches over his six innings of work. Didn't get the win,

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as the Giants wouldn't score until the bottom of the

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 1>ninth anyone Buster Posey walked it off. But Madison Bumgarner

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 1>now is the r right under four You hated him

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:21.239
<v Speaker 1>coming into this year. Has your opinion changed at all? Yeah,

0:49:21.239 --> 0:49:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it absolutely has. I mean, there's another apology to do

0:49:23.480 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 1>here for Madison Bumgarner, same as John Lester. Maybe it

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:30.600
<v Speaker 1>was just, you know, the wonky stuff that's been going

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:32.480
<v Speaker 1>on in the past couple of years. The the dirt

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 1>bike accident, the you know, getting hit on the hand

0:49:35.239 --> 0:49:38.560
<v Speaker 1>last year and and basically breaking his hand or breaking

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:40.840
<v Speaker 1>his fingers, whatever it was. He's had a lot of

0:49:40.840 --> 0:49:42.960
<v Speaker 1>weird stuff going on in the past couple of seasons, Greg,

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:46.239
<v Speaker 1>But what he's doing this year is working. The underlying

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers are there for him. He's got an eleven point

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:51.400
<v Speaker 1>one percent swinging strike rate, that would be his highest

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:55.839
<v Speaker 1>since his first pitch strike percentage seventy two percent. He's

0:49:55.920 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 1>really attacking the strike zone early on and counts better

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:01.759
<v Speaker 1>than he's ever done before, and he's because of that,

0:50:02.239 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it gives him the ability to do different things later

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 1>on accounts to try and keep hitters off balance his oatswing,

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:11.759
<v Speaker 1>his chase rate. Basically, he's getting opposing batters to chase

0:50:11.840 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 1>pitches outside the strike zone nearly thirty six percent of

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the time. If the season ended today, Greg, that would

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:21.759
<v Speaker 1>be a career high for medicine. Bumgarner, we're talking about

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy who is thirty, about to be thirty years old,

0:50:25.920 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and well not about to be in August. He's gonna

0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 1>be thirty years old. It seems like he's much older.

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:31.279
<v Speaker 1>It's because he's been around forever and he's thrown as

0:50:31.280 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 1>many endings as he has, and seemingly he's putting together

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:38.759
<v Speaker 1>underlying numbers that are career highs. Right now, he's got

0:50:38.800 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a three nine two ear a. You mentioned, he's got

0:50:40.480 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the ear a under four. The fit is three to six,

0:50:43.000 --> 0:50:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the x FIP is three six three. He's around a

0:50:45.760 --> 0:50:49.319
<v Speaker 1>strikeout for ending the command again one point four four

0:50:49.360 --> 0:50:55.319
<v Speaker 1>walks per nine massive. Bum Garner has been awesome. I mean,

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 1>just to be honest, he's I'm looking at the pitch

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:01.440
<v Speaker 1>usage too. It's not really anything that he's changed up.

0:51:01.480 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 1>He's throwing the change, the changeup on it not you know,

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 1>pun not intended. He's going to change up a little

0:51:07.560 --> 0:51:10.359
<v Speaker 1>bit more this year overall, throwing the curveball last. I mean,

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem like he's really changing anything up to

0:51:12.480 --> 0:51:15.880
<v Speaker 1>his arsenal overall, but for whatever reason, he's keeping hitters

0:51:15.880 --> 0:51:17.359
<v Speaker 1>off balance. I think a lot of it comes down

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:20.239
<v Speaker 1>to the command of his pitches, just establishing the strike

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:23.319
<v Speaker 1>zone early on accounts and keeping hitters off balance. You know,

0:51:23.600 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 1>it gives him that ability to do things later on

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and counts that maybe he hasn't been able to do

0:51:28.520 --> 0:51:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in years past. He's really and it's weird to say

0:51:30.920 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>he's been around forever. He's maturing as a picture. He's

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:36.759
<v Speaker 1>awesome right now. I apologize, who would you rather have

0:51:36.840 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>John Lester Mass Bumgarner going forward? I'll take Bumgarner just

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:43.839
<v Speaker 1>because he's younger and he pitches in a better ballpark. Um.

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:48.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, Like, if if I own either one, I

0:51:48.200 --> 0:51:53.040
<v Speaker 1>feel times better than when I did on draft day.

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Drafting these guys like you would have had to pin

0:51:56.320 --> 0:51:58.160
<v Speaker 1>me into a corner Greg somewhere to force me to

0:51:58.239 --> 0:51:59.839
<v Speaker 1>draft one of these guys like I could have either

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:01.319
<v Speaker 1>to them on any of my teams. I think I

0:52:01.360 --> 0:52:03.799
<v Speaker 1>have six or seven re draft teams where I set

0:52:03.800 --> 0:52:05.680
<v Speaker 1>my line up every single week. I don't have either

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:08.759
<v Speaker 1>of these guys, and that's by design, and right now

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it looks like I'm mistake. Is a guy that you

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have on one of those teams? Young John Ryou I

0:52:13.440 --> 0:52:15.799
<v Speaker 1>don't have any shares of Ryue either. Well, he was

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:18.640
<v Speaker 1>fantastic yesterday as well. Eight innings, four hits, one run,

0:52:18.680 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 1>struck out six, didn't walk anybody. The injuries, no doubt,

0:52:22.239 --> 0:52:27.200
<v Speaker 1>always a concern with him. When he's healthy, he's really good. Yeah,

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:28.879
<v Speaker 1>that's just more of the same man. We know how

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:30.840
<v Speaker 1>good Ken jin Ryu is. I mean he was awesome

0:52:30.920 --> 0:52:32.560
<v Speaker 1>last year as well. He pitched to a one nine

0:52:32.560 --> 0:52:35.320
<v Speaker 1>seven e r A. The problem was only eight two innings.

0:52:35.600 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>The guy hasn't thrown more than a hundred and twenty

0:52:37.600 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 1>six innings since two fourteen. That's a long time. So

0:52:42.160 --> 0:52:45.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubting Kin Jin Ryou. And really, when it

0:52:45.160 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 1>comes to the Dodgers pictures, I know, Modica calls it

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the Magical Mound. I mean, they just know how to

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:51.760
<v Speaker 1>turn pictures around, kind of similar to the Houston Astros.

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Anyone who pitches for the Dodgers seems like you know

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:56.799
<v Speaker 1>they've been awesome, unless you know Walker Bueller this year

0:52:57.080 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 1>with a real Walker Bueller, please stand up. It's not

0:52:59.800 --> 0:53:01.759
<v Speaker 1>a it's not a matter of talent when it comes

0:53:01.760 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to hing and righty, Greg, we know how good he is.

0:53:03.760 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 1>He just has to stay on the field. Cody Bellinger

0:53:06.200 --> 0:53:09.080
<v Speaker 1>stole his sixth base of this season yesterday or anything

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 1>he can't do. He went wonder for four and it's

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:16.680
<v Speaker 1>still batting four twenty five on the season. Folks, It's

0:53:16.719 --> 0:53:20.359
<v Speaker 1>May second and Bellinger is still batting four with what

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:23.760
<v Speaker 1>fourteen home runs, six dollar bases. Give you the exact

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:26.359
<v Speaker 1>line here, Greg, here's what we have. Yety eight hits

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 1>on the season, fourteen home runs, thirty eight ribbies, six

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:33.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar bases, thirty two runs scored, four five average, five

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:37.840
<v Speaker 1>ov P. That's a thirteen sixty seven o P s Folks,

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:43.440
<v Speaker 1>nationally m V pond they pick him. I know, we

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:47.440
<v Speaker 1>both chose Anthony Rendon, which was going quite well until

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I like you might have we both we

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:57.359
<v Speaker 1>both chose Anthony Rendon. Cody Bellinger right now and May

0:53:57.440 --> 0:54:00.600
<v Speaker 1>second looks like the nationally MVP. If christ Meli can

0:54:00.640 --> 0:54:02.480
<v Speaker 1>get healthy. I mean, I'm sure he's something to say

0:54:02.520 --> 0:54:05.719
<v Speaker 1>about that. He has been awesome as well, but and

0:54:05.880 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 1>just all around five tool production. Like we knew Cody

0:54:09.239 --> 0:54:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Bellinger can steal bases, you might have expected, all right,

0:54:13.000 --> 0:54:16.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe ten on the aggressive side, fifteen I know we

0:54:16.719 --> 0:54:19.359
<v Speaker 1>had fifteen last year, he's got six stolen bases. It's

0:54:19.360 --> 0:54:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a maze. Second. I don't want to do the on

0:54:22.600 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 1>pace thing right now, Greg, but I'm gonna do the

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:27.440
<v Speaker 1>on pacee thing. The guy's on pace to hit like

0:54:27.480 --> 0:54:33.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy home runs with basis what's going on? It's insane,

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:37.239
<v Speaker 1>absolutely insane. How about Alex Verdugo. Huh his first first

0:54:37.280 --> 0:54:40.040
<v Speaker 1>game without a j. Pollock starting in center field, two hits.

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:45.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a lefty. A stolen base for Verdugo, I mean,

0:54:45.480 --> 0:54:47.759
<v Speaker 1>something that we didn't really expect from him. Do you

0:54:47.800 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's an organizational philosophy thing? This year? Greg, the

0:54:50.640 --> 0:54:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Johns has just come out and saying, hey, we just

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:54.840
<v Speaker 1>got beat by the Red Sox, who were one of

0:54:54.840 --> 0:54:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the most aggressive teams last year. We're gonna take a

0:54:57.000 --> 0:54:59.480
<v Speaker 1>page out of their book. I think so. I think

0:54:59.520 --> 0:55:02.920
<v Speaker 1>so too. Ave Roberts has the manager absolutely. By the way,

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we're just looking this up because I was just confirming

0:55:05.040 --> 0:55:08.279
<v Speaker 1>that I chose Anthony Rendon, which I did. Do you

0:55:08.320 --> 0:55:12.799
<v Speaker 1>know Chris venture choose is a m v p mm hmm.

0:55:14.840 --> 0:55:19.319
<v Speaker 1>If you guessed who's a Ramirez, you'd be correct. Oh man,

0:55:20.000 --> 0:55:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Still time you might get the award for least valuable. Listen,

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:25.799
<v Speaker 1>still time. Let's not forget Matt Carpenter's April last year.

0:55:26.360 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Just saying again, guys, it's May second. Let's not overact.

0:55:29.719 --> 0:55:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Who did I have as my MVP picks? We both

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 1>had judging rendown. That's not that sucks, that's thanks. Yeah. Yeah,

0:55:41.560 --> 0:55:43.480
<v Speaker 1>my L m n L Rookie of the Year Peter

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Alanso doesn't look so bad. Got a shot. It's great

0:55:46.360 --> 0:55:49.040
<v Speaker 1>right now? Yeah, I think I had. Yeah, it's pretty

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:51.360
<v Speaker 1>good too, Ao come back. Hitter of the Year of

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Dustin Petroia. It looks so good, never came back. What

0:55:54.600 --> 0:55:57.319
<v Speaker 1>did I have for that? Is actually playing really well?

0:55:58.040 --> 0:55:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Batting ever has been a right? I think only has

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:01.320
<v Speaker 1>one home run? My a I'll come back. Picture of

0:56:01.360 --> 0:56:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the Year was Michael Pineda, who got bombed? You chose

0:56:05.480 --> 0:56:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Sitches? Were you good? Yeah, he's been right so far,

0:56:09.760 --> 0:56:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'll come back. Hitter was Danny Murphy. You know

0:56:13.480 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 1>he starts to come back. You chose You chose Jungo

0:56:17.120 --> 0:56:21.480
<v Speaker 1>gang By ale My NL picture was Alex riz and

0:56:21.600 --> 0:56:27.799
<v Speaker 1>your picture was Jose Kitana. Yeah, Jose, Jose, Jose, Jose.

0:56:28.200 --> 0:56:30.960
<v Speaker 1>We will we will certainly look back at that, coming

0:56:31.000 --> 0:56:34.120
<v Speaker 1>out later this summer and checking on stuff. Man, I

0:56:34.200 --> 0:56:36.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's what that's really the lesson here. I think

0:56:36.200 --> 0:56:38.719
<v Speaker 1>I told Gary Sanchez, it's my m v P. Last year,

0:56:38.920 --> 0:56:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I chose. She chose Judge two years in a row.

0:56:41.600 --> 0:56:44.359
<v Speaker 1>You chose Samurinos, your Cy Young Award winner last year too.

0:56:44.560 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 1>We gotta just get away from the Yankees, man, not

0:56:46.880 --> 0:56:49.719
<v Speaker 1>so good. Not's okoy? All right, We're gonna take a break.

0:56:50.000 --> 0:56:52.120
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, will be dot by Chris Venturo,

0:56:52.239 --> 0:56:54.759
<v Speaker 1>the Closer will join us and we'll all talk to

0:56:54.880 --> 0:56:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Dr A later on. These hours with Chris took over

0:56:57.360 --> 0:56:58.799
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of stuff from last night we haven't

0:56:58.800 --> 0:57:00.759
<v Speaker 1>gotten to yet, and it was talk to doctor and

0:57:00.840 --> 0:57:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the will wrapping things up. Fantasy BFS. One hour down

0:57:03.080 --> 0:57:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and one we're to go here on fanc s y