WEBVTT - Tesla, Enbridge, Wall Street, and ETFs (Podcast)

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets podcast sweet

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:09.120
<v Speaker 1>alongside every business day we bring you interview CEO, market

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>crows and Bloomberg experts, along with the Springwhelming the Bloomberg

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>MarketCast podcast or wherever you listen to podcast and at

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com Splash podcast. Very positive and very right

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on this story since day one. He's viewed it as

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a tech story, not a metal bending story per se,

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's been absolutely right. Dan, what was your takeaway

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>from your time down in Austin. Look, I think Paul,

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>with these as well as Apple events, I think investors

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>always want more meat on the boat. You know, obviously

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>they lead the groundwork for what I've used a flex

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to muscles type of event from a scale and scoope

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what they're doing on evs. But you

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a sub thirty k vehicle introduced. I think

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that's still to come, but I think they read the

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>groundwork for it. Stock was so off knee jerk and

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>now becomes a sort of what's the next step on

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>this roadmap? I mean, Dan, you know that I feel

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>like their design and vehicles are just too long in

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the tooth. I mean they Matt Winkler has had his

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>models for more than a decade, wow, which says a

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>lot about the quality of the vehicles, and I'm not

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>debating that, but it's just tired and they all look

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>alike except for the cyber truck, which is I guess what,

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 1>three years late now. So at what point does Elon

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Musk stop fooling around with Twitter and start like working

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>on progress at his car company. Look, I think you

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>hit the nail on the head relative to competition increasing,

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and you won't how sort of come out with more models.

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they've the first time admitted they're going to

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>need basically ten models for the long term, and now

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it's about when do they come out? What do they

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>look like? Look, I personally believe, based on our work,

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>sub thirty k is going to be the key from

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a cheaper vehicle as well as an suv like Tessler.

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really from a mass market, which streets

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>open to focus on and clearly, look cybertruck. A year

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>from now you'll see cybertrucks around and that I mean

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>there was Deliveries should be by your early next year,

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>but that's not going to move the needle from a

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>mass perspective, and that's why this is so important. From

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>sub thirty K, Well, they just need to look since

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.839
<v Speaker 1>the model S was introduced, the nine to eleven has

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:41.959
<v Speaker 1>had four model changes, okay, and today's models doesn't look

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>any different than it did ten years ago. It still

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>looks great. I think, if you I'm going to carve

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>myself never that into it. But I just feel like

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>they need to. You know, if Mercedes or if BMW

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hadn't changed their design language in over a decade, it

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>would be a real problem. Why is it okay for

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>this company? I think it's because when you think an

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles right now, it's still Tesla's world. Everyone else

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>paid in terms of the EV space. They know there's

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity let's call it three million vehicles in terms

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of how they get they just hit there four millions

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of deliveries. So they've really obviously crushed in

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of this initial sort of you know, growth area.

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>But now it's the next phase of the growth story,

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's all about costs. It's all about efficiencies.

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>They can lower by forty fifty percent in terms of

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>what they're talking about. Then all of a sudden, you

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>start to have a twenty twenty eight k Tessla out there. Hey, Dan,

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the most read stories on the

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>terminal today is about Elon mush not surprisingly, but it's

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>about his use of his private plane and he's flown

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the most among some of the richest billionaires AND's and

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it's really spiked up after he bought Twitter. But it

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>just goes to the point he's got so many different

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>companies in so many different businesses and I'm wondering in

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Austin at the investor date to what extent was that

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>brought up or addressed by him or by investors that Hey, Elon,

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>can you focus on where the real money is, which

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is Tesla. Look, I think there's definitely questions around that

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and nothing on Twitter. I think that's something that started

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to go more into the background. But you're starting to

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>see more, you know what I'd say, Ben Strength, you know,

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Tom Zoo and two Mothers are starting to come up

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the TESTA organization. I believe he's been

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>able to balance it well, but no doubt you're starting

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to see, you know, a must ask pay more and

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>more attention to some of these next steps with Tessa

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>with SpaceX, and I think that continues to be a

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>source subject for investors for you know what I've used

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>probably with the most fouled individual in the world. What

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think about I saw a Lucid on the

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>road yesterday. Barely see any of those. I saw Rivian

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>parked by the scars Dale train station. They look sweet,

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>but they're really disappointing in terms of their ability to

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>ramp up production. Faraday whatever it's called. I still have

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>never seen one of those Pollstar, Yeah, Pollstar, but that's

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Volvo right, So okay, I mean, what do you think

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>about these electric vehicle startups that we all had such

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>high hopes for it and everybody bet up the stock

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>initially and now have just been in disappointment after disappointment.

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Are they going to come back? Are they going to survive? Look?

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great comparison what we saw yesterday.

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Tessa flexes the muscles has the scale. You're

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>going to see GM doing the same thing coming at

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the three one through Ari quoter on what's forward. But

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>these startups, it is so difficult to scale and so expensive,

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and in a risingry environment that's tougher and tougher, so

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to survive. Some are not. And I think

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it also just shows the dog ain't the homework excuse

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>like we've seen Rithian others. It just doesn't work in

0:05:55.520 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>this market where the dream quoter unquotter story stocks are

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>no longer. I thought r J. Scaringe was gonna kill it.

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>He took like a decade to bring out the truck,

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and now, I mean, fifty thousand is all they're gonna

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>make in twenty twenty three. If I ordered one of

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>those and I'm on a two year waiting list that

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>just went to three years, I'm gonna be super disappointed.

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it has been up there from a disappointment

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>with riving and trooms out of gate given r J

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know everything we saw from him pre IPO

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>up there with you know, maybe Zach Wilson and some

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>other disappointments, it's been very, very frustrating for industris. Hey, Dan,

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>just real quick, thirty seconds your time in Austin. What's

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the number one question you heard from institutional investors? Well,

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I think today the big focus is, Okay, what does

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>ultimately the timeline look like to get efficiencies down? And

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is the China growth story, continuing to ram push price cuts.

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's focused on price cuts in China. What the demand

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>story looks like. We continue believe that that's robust. But again,

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>haters continue the heat on task with that good stuff.

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, Dan Ives, thanks so much for joining us.

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate getting your perspective as always on Tesla and on

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>all things technology. Again, Tesla stock off about five percent

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>here to a little bit disappointing as you read some

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of the research and some of the reporting, just that

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't more color as Dan was suggesting on some

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of the newer models that just kind of more to come.

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>So you kind of have to just kind of believe

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in Elon and that's been the story for a long

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>period of time. Dan I has from web Bush. Let's

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>get to our c suite conversation. We're talking insurance, Juan Andre,

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is that that thing to do? That? Right? Thank you?

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>We want to draw a CEO of Everest. There's an end.

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>There's not on my list my sheet. It's just because

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Okay. The most important thing the names I

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>care about the New York stock chame symbol stock symbol

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>R E go. We'll get you there. And this is

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a stock that's done really well. So we want to

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>talk to one on here. He's also what a name, Yeah,

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>got out to you all right, So this is an

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>insurance company. Tell us about Everst, tell us about what

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you do, and then we'll get into some of the

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the growth drivers. The challenge is that type

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Yeah, No, absolutely, Paul, pleasure to be here. Look,

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Everest is what we call a hybrid company. We have

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>both reinsurance business and an insurance business. You know, we

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>trade in the New York Stock Exchange, part of the

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred, and we have done exceedingly well over

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the last few years. As a matter of fact, I've

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>been the CEO since January first of twenty twenty, and

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.719
<v Speaker 1>we've grown the reinsurance business about fifty five percent in

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that period of time. January first, twenty twenty. Time to

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>take over a Yeah, it's a wonderful time. You must

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>have taken off your tie and marchin, unbutton your top

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>like I need to breathe a little bit. Yeah, Well,

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>realistically I was only out of the office for a

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 1>couple of months and then I was back all in.

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But it goes back to the story, right, because I

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>think we've done a very nice job managing the company

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>through all of these challenges. And you know, to what

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I was saying, it's not only the growth of fifty

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>six in our reinsurance business over that period of time

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>over sixty in our primary business, but the stock price

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 1>has gone up about forty percent since I started in

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, so the company has done well. So yeah,

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I usually look at a comp screen, as

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>our listeners know, to see how you've done over a

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>five year period. You've outperformed over that period, but I'll

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>put in you know, your starting date still massively outperformed

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>not only the S and P five hundred, but also

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the financial sector. Why do you think it is that

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you're doing so much better than the benchmarks? Yeah, No, Look,

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a few things. Number One, I think

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>we've got a world class team. We've put together a

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>very clear strategy, and we have been relentless about executing

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:44.719
<v Speaker 1>against that strategy. So I think those are sort of

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the key elements that we have. In addition to that,

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>we've also had a good market, you know, and that's

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that it's important to talk about today.

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>It's the fact that in the reinsurance market particularly, we

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.559
<v Speaker 1>have a one in a generation type opportunity. There's a

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>secular supply and demand to balance that's taking place right now,

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and we're uniquely positioned to take advantage of that. And

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>so all of that together, I think, is what's led

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to that outperformance. We're making a big deal on Bloomberg

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Gradi on television today about the rise in interest rates,

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>the ten year Treasury now above four percent. How does

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 1>that impact your business a rising interest rate environment? Yeah,

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely so. By definition, because we're a reinsurance insurance company,

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>we tend to invest in very conservative investments, mostly fixed income,

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>so that really does translate to our portfolio yield increasing.

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's generally a good thing for us. Yeah. I

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>mean last year the SMP was down twenty percent and change.

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>You are up twenty percent and change. Is that Is

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of outperformance going to stick if we have

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 1>a recession? What happens to your business if we go

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>into a serious recession? Yeah, Matt. Look, we tend to

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 1>be essentially a safe port in a recession, and the

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>reason for that is businesses can't do their job without

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>our products, right, You can't run a company without general liability, insurance,

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>property insurance, directors and officers liability, and particularly in the

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>heightened risk environment that you have today, demand for our

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>products is at an all time high. So for us,

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a recession is actually an opportunity for us to continue

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 1>to grow. So are there sectors of the economy or

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>let's put it this way, where do you guys focus

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the sectors that you guys have

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>exposure to or want to have exposure to. Yeah, so

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>we're very well diversified both in reinsurance and insurance, and

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that's really across industries, geography's product lines, et cetera. That

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>gives us the ability to look at particular aspects of

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the economy and say, this is an area where we

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of opportunity and we want to play.

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 1>For instance, property right now is a terrific area for

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>us to play. Areas that we're watching more closely are

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>credit credit related lines, things like mortgage surety, etcetera, etcetera.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Because we don't know if there's going to be a

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>credit cycle beyond some of this, how do you guys

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>really compete against Again, we'd look about the stock Matt

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and now we always focus on stocks. If you get

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a snapshot of how companies are doing over a period

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of time, talk to us about your competition. Sure, it

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>really does vary whether it's reinsurance or insurance. On the

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>reinsurance side, we compete against Munich re, Swiss re hanover Re,

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and then some of the other Bermuda companies, some of

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the smaller ones. On the primary side, we're competing against

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>chob aig Acca, Alliance, Zurich. Those are some of the competitors.

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>How come those the res are all German speaking, Munich,

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>re hanover Re, those are all a very small part

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of the middle of Europe. Why is reinsurance so concentrated there? Yeah,

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I think historically a lot of the large global reinsurers

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>did come out of the continent of Europe, but their

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>worldwide right. Their home offices may be in Munich or Zurich,

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>but they're really worldwide players. But I think a lot

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>of it was just their history and a lot of

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunity in the continent of Europe when they first started.

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So what do you do? Why are we not interviewing

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>him in Bermuda? We should? That was are you actually headquarter?

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>You literally live in Bermuda. Now I go back and

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>forth to Bermuda. Our company is headquartered in Bermuda. Yes,

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>we know a guy in Bermuda. There's and he went

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to Johns Hopkins as Yes, we've got your masters at

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Johns Hopkins right international, we could tie all in. So

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>do you focus your business because you studied international studies.

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:17.199
<v Speaker 1>You've been recognized by Latino Leaders magazine for your contributions.

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>You had Latin American studies also as part of your masters,

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>do you focus on a global business or as your

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>business really focused in the US Now? Our our business

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is totally global. So if I think about it from

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the reinsurance side, I have customers in a one hundred

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen countries around the world. That makes sense. We

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 1>are the seventh largest reinsurer in the world, so we

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>pray a significant role in all of that. On the

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>primary side, we're in the middle of expanding our business

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>from North America also into other countries. So matter of fact,

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we just opened up offices in Santiago, Dusseldorf, Paris, Madrid,

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Singapore and in this year we have additional expansion to

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>go as well. So this leads to my question about growth.

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>What's your plan and look like, say a five year

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 1>plan for growth from here? Are you going to do

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>it organically? Are you? We talked to pack Allaghory yesterday

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's done a lot of it by buying other companies.

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>What does it look like Foreverest. Yeah, for us, it's

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>really more of an organic build and we have been

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>very successful. I mean the growth numbers that I quoted

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>earlier in our discussion, we're all organic based. And I'll

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>give you an example. So in the reinsurance business, January

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>first is where the majority of your renewals take place.

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>So we secured over fifty percent of our portfolio on

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>January one in an environment good number. That's a very

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>good nub because my analyst, Matthew Palazzola, that's his question,

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>ask him how the January one renewals went. Yeah, No,

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's a it's a very Over fifty percent

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of your portfolio being secured in this January one is

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a very good number because what we saw is that

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>once in a generation opportunity that I was telling you about,

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>pricing for property catastrophe went up fifty percent in January one.

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>In the US, it went up forty percent internationally, so

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>we were able to secure over fifty percent of our

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>portfolio at much better pricing, much better terms. So that

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>sets us up with a very good tailwind going into

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three. How much of a problem are you, know,

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>these big superstorms and are we really seeing more and

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>more of them or do we just talk about it

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot? I mean, since Katrina, we haven't seen that

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of devastation in the US, but we've had some

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>big storms along Florida. We had Superstorm Sandy here that

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>closed the New York Stock Exchange for four days. Is

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that a concern for you? It certainly is, and I

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>think it ought to be a concern for everybody. I'll

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>give you a couple of statistics. So last year in

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, the insurance industry paid out over one

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty billion in insured loss. In twenty one

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it was one hundred and thirty billion, and insure laws.

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So what we're clearly seeing is more severe storms. This

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is all driven by climate change, right Caesar warming up,

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Warmer seas lead to more severity, higher category four, category

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>five type storms. So that creates for our industry essentially

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>an impetus to get much better at risk selection and modeling,

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, that's one of the things that we've done

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>at Everest in this period of time is reduce our

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>exposure to natural catastrophe, which then reduces our volatility to earnings.

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And it goes back to the diversification point that I

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>was making earlier. We're a well balanced company, so we

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have to rely only on property. Natural catastrophe exposures.

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>What happens to our good friends down in Florida, can

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>they even get insurances? And that's where you're from, right,

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you grew up in Miami. I am I'm a Florida boy.

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>It happens well. Listen, if Florida has gone through a

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>very difficult period of time, particularly over the last couple

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of years, but the governor in the special legislative session

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that they just had at the end of last year,

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>have put in place some very good reforms that will

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>curve some of the fraud, some of the litigation that

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>basically was creating a capacity crunch, if you will, in

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the state. Now, those reforms will take some time to

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>play out, but ultimately that votes very well for Florida

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>for their consumers. And for the insurance and reinsurance market.

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's so as a state kind of for

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the last backstop in Florida. Look, I think in Florida

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>have a few wasues. One, you're exposed to hurricanes because

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the word is, you have a lot of people moving

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>down there, people like to live on the coast. And

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in addition to that, you have some of the environmental

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>factors I just described. There's a lot of fraud and

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of litigation, and that's really what the

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>governor and the legislature have really just addressed. But again

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that'll take a little bit of time to show up.

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, fascinating stuff. Want Andrade CEO of Everest. It's

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in New York Stock Exchange traded company r E is

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a symbol like reinsurance based in Bermuda, Bermuda. And again,

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>why are we here not in Bermuda? We could have

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>done this. Why isn't there everyone based in Bermuda? Exactly?

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk energy. We'll do that with Greg Ebel.

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>He's the CEO of n Bridge Energy that trades on

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the New York Stock is changed as symbol as e

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>N as a Nancy Bison boy it's got a seventy

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollar market. Captus stocks up about one point

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>two percent today, kind of unchanged on the year. And

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>this isn't a company that also had an investor day yesterday.

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not just Tesla, but a lot of hope are

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to get out in front of their shareholders. Greg,

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. I'd love to

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>first of all, just tell us what end Bridge Energy does,

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>how does it fit into the energy stream, and then

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>tell us kind of what were your big big points

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you tried to make yesterday your investor day. Sure, I appreciate,

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>appreciate being with your Polman. Thanks very much. Yeah. So

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the best way for your listeners probably to think through

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>this and Bloomberg Radio think through this is, you know,

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>end Bridge is really like the FedEx, if you will,

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>from an energy infrastructure perspective, and we're really trying to

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>be that first choice for our customers for energy delivery.

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So we pick up whether it's oil or it's gas,

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>or we're on the renewable side as well, we'll store

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it and ultimately we deliver it to those users. So

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>yesterday it was about going out to the our investors

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and telling them how we you know, we see four

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to six percent growth here over the medium term, continued

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>growth in our dividend, which by the way, we've increased

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>every year for twenty eight years. So that makes us

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 1>one of those, uh, you know, dividend ristocrats out there.

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's a key component in this type of environment.

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's all backed up by about seventeen and a

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 1>half billion dollars of pipeline projects that can go throughout

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>of North America and wind projects and renewable projects in

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>five to seven countries. You know, we move twenty five

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to thirty percent of all the oil and all the

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 1>gas that moves to North America to day every day

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>safely reliably. So are there places I just recall seeing

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a story last month where gas bills just soared in California,

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>whereas everywhere else around the world, around the country, I

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 1>should say, they were stable or even down. Are there

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>places that it's harder to get gas and oil? Two? Yeah, absolutely,

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>so California is a good example, you know. But we

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>have pipelines where the mainline pipe, the main pipeline provider

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>for gas into New England. So New England actually pays

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the highest prices for natural gas in the world,

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>if you can believe put that in the context of

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what everything that's going on in Europe and stuff. And

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that's not because there's no supply, right the supply. I

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>think about the Marsalage shale, they'll think Pennsylvania, Ohio. It's

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>about infrastructure. So if you're relying on infrastructure and you

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>can't get the supply to where the demand is, good,

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>old economics push that. And so you've got a lot

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of people in New England who, through no fault of

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>their own, are extremely disadvantaged in terms of what they've

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>got to pay for what they've got to pay for

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>natural guys. You know, for many years we've been able

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to change that. We'd like to kind of get back

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>at doing that. It's a challenging environment as you know, pipelines.

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>What are the biggest headwinds Because you say a lot

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of people through no faults of their own, but of

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>course we can all vote, and if the big headwind

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>is say a governor or a state legislature, it is

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of our own fault. Well you hit it right on.

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>That is it is when I say no fault of

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>their own right, Obviously they're not approving pipelines are doing

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory side of things, and they're obviously not producing

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the product, so they're they're takers of the product. Most

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of our customers are utilities. So what we really need

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to do is to figure out some way and this

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is true for renewables as as well as pipelines. We've

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 1>got to figure out a way how do we get

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>permitting change so that people can get the energy that

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>they need. You know, something in the last twelve months

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we've probably all realized, and maybe we were just getting

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>too happy about this and complacent, that there is a

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:36.959
<v Speaker 1>real energy trilemma there of energy security, affordability, and obviously sustainability.

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think we've really got to think

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that through. I know here in the United States, Congress

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>has looked, as you probably recall, at various permitting reforms

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that was supposed to be part of some elements that

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>happened last year. It didn't. Maybe this Congress will be

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>able to make some of those changes. And then you

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 1>pointed out at the state level, if you don't get

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>support at the state level and makes it very difficult.

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So great, let's just go to that point here. Um,

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>My energy analysts kind of said, Hey, ask Greg about

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Michigan and line five. And you know, Governor Whitmer of

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Michigan actually campaign against that pipeline project when you ran

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>for office. So just give our listeners a sense of

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe the puts and takes when when you sit down

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>with regulators, whether it's the state level or the federal level,

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>about getting new project approved. Yeah, and you know, often

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's the situation of you know, people's varying

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>views on the pace of energy transition. And again, we're

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>involved in all aspects of this, right from the upstream

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>to the downstream, from liquids the gas to renewables, and

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got a pretty good view on what

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that pays. So you know that situation line five, as

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned it, which is really about a very small

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>piece of pipeline or distance wise, Uh, that's uh, that'sh

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>goes across the straits there, and frankly, uh, you know,

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it's desperately needed that that energy in places like Detroit

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and refineries in Ohio, and it's also tied up, if

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to make it even more complicated, even in international treaties.

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know, despite the commentary out of the governor

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and the Attorney General. I think this is a federal issue.

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>It's being dealt with right at the highest levels both

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Canadian government with the Prime Minister and obviously

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration. So you know, I think this is

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>about there's there's a way to do this, and there's

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a way to do this in a in a very

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>transitional manner that does not but under fair burdens on consumers.

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we're trying to do. And in the meantime,

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you know that pipeline continues to run very safely and

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>deliver the fuel that's needed to fuel the quality of

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>life throughout the Michigan and obviously over in Ohio, any

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Canada as well. We always say on this show,

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>just so you know, we always call it the Great

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>State of Ohio, Greg, that Great State of Ohio or

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>the Ohio State, one of the two, right the Ohio

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>State University. Pretty good season, a little disappointing against Michigan, obviously,

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>but that at all. So, Greg, what's that? What was

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a big message that you wanted to really get across

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>at your investor day yesterday in conversially, what maybe is

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the is the number one issue for investors in your company. Well,

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd say the number one issue for investors in our company,

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're addressing it, is how do you

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>get this seventeen and a half billion dollar backlog of

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>projects into service on time and on budget. And fortunately

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that's spread out over ten or twelve projects, So we

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>feel very good about that. Hence our view with investors

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that look, we want to be that first choice energy

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>investment for you, and the way for us to do

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that is be that first choice energy delivery. And that's

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>what we're really talking about. And you can do that

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in all aspects of the business at Enverridge. Right. Do

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you like utilities, We have the largest gas utility by

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>volume in North America if you like the pipeline inside

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of things, and on the old side, we've got those

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>pipelines if you like gas pipelines and LG and as

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the United States is now the largest exporter

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of energy. We have that in our portfolio. And we

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>also have renewables. We've been in the renewable business for

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years, so we know how to do that,

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>whether it's solar or it's win And that was the

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>message and all that what it's going to get you

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is a further extension of the twenty eight years in

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a row of increase in the dividends. So that's the

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>message we were actually putting out there. All right, Greg,

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for taking the time to join us.

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And you're busy there with your investor investor days, Greg Eble,

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>he's the CEO of n y N Bridge Energy Basing, Calgary, Alberta.

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So away out there, one of those seas I really

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 1>want to get to at some point. It stuck a

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>little investment banking, little Wall Street stuff. We had some

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>investor days. We're done with earnings. We can kind of

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>look back. We can also talk a coin base with

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Shinale because yesterday she talked to Brian Armstrong. Yeah, and

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Brian Armstrong was not on Bloomberg, which I think you

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>know what it was? Simulcast, dude, was it? Yes? I

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>wanted a separate Okay, I was like, why isn't he

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in our Rain Radio studio. Sinali bask Alison Williams, Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Shinnali Bloomberg News joins us here. So Snai, real quick,

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>what's the feedback you got on your discussion with our

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>friends from coin Bass yesterday. Two things here. One is

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that he talked about how a lot of the assets

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>on coin base were associated with the CFTC. They were commodities.

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:29.719
<v Speaker 1>And of course we know that the SEC is very

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>concerned about certain assets being defined as securities. So that

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to be very telling about how this fight

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>really continues to play out. But Gary Genzel and the

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>SEC have said that their staking of ethereum is a

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>security not coin basis. They've said, krack in staking service, okay, right,

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and they find cracking like thirty million bucks. Yeah, and

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>they didn't admit or deny any wrongdoing, but that was

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 1>the size of the total payment here, so yeah, I mean,

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>if you pay somebody thirty million dollars, you don't have

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to admit or deny any wrongdoing. Clearly something happened there.

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>So really, Brindan Armstrong is, you know, trying to exode

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of confidence here, trying to work with the regulators.

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, he wore a suit. So I think this

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of shows you a lot about the place coin

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 1>base is trying to take in the crypto world and

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>try to bridge traditional finance with crypto. Hey, Alison Alson

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Williams Bloomberg intelligence. Also on our Bloomberg Interactor Broker Studio here,

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you were at Goldman Sachs yesterday. What's kind of your

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>takeaway from Goldman from the investment banks, what's kind of

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the narrative you're on the big investment banks. So I

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's still all about the economy. Right, So we

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.959
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up the fourth quarter. We've had Goldman Investor Day.

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I was disappointing. Goldman, I think was disappointing on sort

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of both fronts, you know. And I think we talked

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that, like to me, they're killing it

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in their core business, right, so trading, gaining significant share,

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 1>M and A, which is a lucrative business. You have

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>all these boutiques that you know, have popped up going

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>after that business. There's still number one for a long time.

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the quarters started out pretty strong

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of trading. Question for you, Allison, because if

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>some people are so upset about the consumer, but the

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>reality is with rates up, do you think that what

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Goldman is trying to do, David Salomon is trying to

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 1>do is just say hold on, like we can finally

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>make money and consumer, let us try to do that.

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of what he's trying. Can he say

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>one thing or the other? Well, I think you know,

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it's funny because I think where they what they're doing

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is we're going to focus on the consumer in the

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in the areas that makes sense, right, So the Apple

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>card and the GM business, we're going to focus on

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>those areas. The balance transfer business, which you know, to

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>me never made sense for them. It's I don't know

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.959
<v Speaker 1>what the competitive advantages of doing a strategy that came

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>out in the nineties. It's never really been a winner, um,

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and does not work well in a higher rate environment. Um.

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>So moving away from that and keeping the more profitable

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>businesses um. But you should have just said it like that.

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>He should have said, you know what, this was a

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>bad idea. We made the wrong decision. We're going to

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>move on from that. Well, we keep a couple of

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>pieces of this business. Yes, but we're done. The consumer

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>business is dead. Put it it's what do you put

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a fork in it? Right? It's over, and that's I

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>think people would have been happy with it. They didn't

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>come out and say, well, I think I think what

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>they did say is that they are looking at strategic options, right,

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think people got excited like, oh, they might

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>sell it, and then you know, analysts are like, oh,

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you gonna sell this quarter, You're gonna sell this and that.

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>That's when he was kind of like, Okay, look like

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we've told you what we're going to tell you. We

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>can't say anymore. All right, Alison Williams, Shinelli Bassek, give

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit of a round table here on

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>all things Wall Street. Let's talk eighteen ft. Is that

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>okay with you? Absolutely? I love ETS. I have a

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>whole show dedicated to ETFs on Tuesdays no on Mondays

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>at one pm Wall Street Time. Yasmin daya builder joints

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>us here in our Bloomberg Interactor Broker studio. She's head

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of ETFs and managing director at Engine Number one. Yasmin,

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>thanks much for joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactor

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio. We appreciate you coming in. Just give me

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the thirty second call on what is it? What do

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys do at Engine number one? Yeah? Sure, thanks

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>for having me. And to Number One's an investment firm

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and we're focused on identifying and investing in large scale

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>transformational themes. We're best known by many investors for our

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>activist campaign where we got three people on the board

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of directors at x on Mobile, and I think that

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>campaign sort of shows two things of how we focus.

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Number One, we come at some of these questions around,

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, climate change environmental issues from the lens of

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>an investor. What is additive to shareholder value for a

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>company over time, not ideology or morality of climate change

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>for example. And secondly, we're active owners. We work closely

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>with the companies in our portfolio to think about where

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>are the things that they can do to be more

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>accountable to their plans or accelerate their plans. Have you

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>ever met Vek Ramaswami. I have not personally. Now, okay,

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>so he's this drive guy. Yeah, I think he's running

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a real president. But he will tell you, or he

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>tells us, that he's not anti ESG. He just wants

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to maximize profits. And I had thought of engine number

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>one as being an ESG play. But you're saying that's

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>not the case. Absolutely not. In fact, I think this

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>is actually one of the hard parts of the market,

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is this terminology around ESG. So maybe I can spend

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a second on that and they'll talk about us ESG

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>investing predominantly is about trying to rate companies and rank

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>companies and so rating them by environmental criteria or social

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>criteria and really ultimately saying what's the best company in

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio based on that criteria and what's the worst.

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>The problem with that is, number one, all of that

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is very subjective. What's good to me may not be

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>good to you. And secondly, that whole process is completely

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>delinked from performance. None of that involves how does this

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>actually relate to a company's long term prospects and value creation.

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>We're really looking for where there is an intersection between

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>criteria in these spaces and shareholder value. So we're absolutely

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at this in the investment from the investment lens,

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and our goal is ultimately long term investment performance for investors.

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>All Right, So, I know, Yasman, you guys focus on

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of thematic work in your ETFs, and we

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about supply chain talked to us about

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>how what are some of the themes you guys are

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>working on with your ETF business. Yeah, I think theme

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>based investing is very interesting and from our perspective, one

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of the most interesting themes right now is the relocalization

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of supply chains to North America. Now, to talk about

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>where is this investment going, you actually kind of have

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to spend a little time on where it's been, which

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is that for the past forty years, companies have really

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>been focused primarily and almost exclusively in their supply chains

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>around financial efficiencies, so moving huge parts of their supply

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>chains to lower cost regions, eliminating redundant season supply chains.

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Which the best way to see this is just look

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>at US manufacturing over that forty year period of time.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I was just talking about US lost. The US lost

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>seven million manufacturing jobs, so enormous and magnitude, but it

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>actually left companies very exposed to a lot of i'd

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>say unintended consequences. Ultimately, supply chains were proven to be

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>very fragile. So the big trend right now is bringing

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>back parts of supply chains to help create more resilience

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>supply chains. And we think there's a lot of investment

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunity out But does it make sense, I mean, reassoring

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is the you know, popular term. Does it make sense

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to bring them back to the US because we still

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>have high labor costs, right, or does it make sense

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to move away from countries with whom we may have,

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, our differences, but bring them to places like

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Mexico where they have much lower I mean, this is

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the old story. When I was a kid college, we

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>studied machiadoras in Mexico and that was a bad thing

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>back then. But now bringing a company back and putting

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it it's production in Mexico is a good thing. Yeah,

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a really good question. So first of all, the

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:14.479
<v Speaker 1>cost differentials and labor advantages between the US and China,

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, have narrowed, and in fact it's lower costs

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to produce certain goods in Mexico now, So your point,

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So the opportunity is really broadly North America, I would say,

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in a big way. So that's point one. Point two.

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Automation and innovation is going to be an important part

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of this, because you're absolutely right. There was a reason

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>why many parts, in all parts, frankly of supply chains

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>were put abroad. It was cost. So when bringing certain

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>parts back, you have to think about, is there a

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>way to actually make your manufacturing processes, your manufacturing factories

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>more efficient in the way they operate to help combat

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>that cost differential. And that's one of the big areas

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we're actually investing around, are there also positive? I mean,

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't care about climate change on an a moral ground,

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>but if what you're doing happens to be better for

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the climate, doesn't that please your investors? I mean, we

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>spend our time understanding how these issue areas impact broader

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>stakeholders because it's an important part of understanding risk for companies.

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 1>And certainly the relocalization of supply chains to North America

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>should actually lower emissions over time, just given the regulatory

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 1>standards we have around environmental standards in the US. I'd

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 1>also say it's going to be hugely impactful for job

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 1>creation in the US, particularly in the manufacturing sector, and

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 1>we spent a lot of time looking at when their

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>local plant is built, what does that actually do in

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of, you know, the types of jobs that are

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>brought back, the wages of those jobs, and I think

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>importantly the multiplier effect of that, you know, the extra

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 1>jobs that are created indirectly around that, And so I

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>think that will actually be a huge, hugely important. By

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the way, I'm not sure how much you're focused on this,

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>because that's I guess a longer term right, bringing these

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>production facilities back and those jobs will be created over

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the next years, not months. But is it inflationary It

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly can be. Yeah, that's one of the big thesis

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>across our whole broader. I mean, we're focused on the

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>reindustrialization I would say about North America and implicit and

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that is an inflationary pressure. Yes. Another big theme I

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 1>know you guys spend a lot of time on at

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>engine Number one is energy. What are some of the

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>plays and where you're seeing some of the flows go. Yeah. Absolutely, So,

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 1>just to say up front, the energy transformation, as we

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>call it, is one of the biggest investment opportunities that

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>sits in front of us. By some estimates, it's going

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to take three to five trillion dollars of investment per

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>year to decarbonize our economy. So we're talking about massive

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>investment dollars flowing into the space. We have a very

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 1>different point of view than most classic climate strategies. A

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>classic climate strategy would be built in a way where

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>it's if you don't like it, you don't own in,

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 1>so you avoid the largest emitters, the largest companies and sectors.

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 1>From our perspective, some of the biggest investment opportunities are

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>places like agriculture, transportation, energy. Basically, seventy five percent of

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:03.359
<v Speaker 1>global greenhouse gas emissions come from those three segments. That's

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the heart of the energy transition. So where we spend

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 1>our times across those value chains and just looking for

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 1>opportunity in those spaces, which you know most most places

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>would be just trying to minimize your emissions in your

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 1>portfolio today by investing in sort of younger green technology solutions.

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about those younger green technology Are

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 1>they just not ready to generate profit or oh it's

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>an and not nor I mean, but that's that's I

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:31.320
<v Speaker 1>think the bigger thing here is just widening the aperture

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of where you see the opportunity. A good example of

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>this would be transportation, just to talk about the whole

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>system altogether. When most people think about what's the opportunity

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in the energy transition for transportation, those electric vehicles, and

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll own the companies that are the leaders leading automakers

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and electric vehicles. But there's so much more to the

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>investment approach that you have to think about. For example,

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 1>metals are an important component of batteries, which are obviously

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:59.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be a important part of being all electric.

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Mining equipment is needed to get those metals out of

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the ground. Another type of company you can invest around,

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>and then transportation, how are you going to move all

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>those inputs around. So we just define the opportunity a

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>lot broadened, and I would say most investors do, who

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I think see it more from one sort of sector

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>level lens. I'm learning a lot here. So where are

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the where do you see the flows in that? In

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the energy space, where do you see the flows going

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the most? Are people just looking to get the latest

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 1>technology or can you get them to think bigger pictures

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and the and the metals. By the way, we just

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>have a big BusinessWeek piece that forward, among others, is

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>sourcing aluminum from minds that are allegedly polluting you know,

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>whole communities in the Amazon. Oh. These are complex, complex topics,

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:50.320
<v Speaker 1>which is why I think this is one hundred percent

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the space for active management. It is very difficult to

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>just kind of set it and forget it through an

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 1>index based approach. I think theme based investing broadly is

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.360
<v Speaker 1>actually going to have a real kind of tailwind to

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it because if you think about right now, investors have

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to be hunting for differentiated sources of growth in their

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>portfolio beyond what worked for them for the last ten

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:11.320
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years, which is just let me go to the

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>lowest cost market cap portfolio i can. And so I

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>think some of these themes, but particularly active managers who

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.359
<v Speaker 1>can play it in a really dynamic way, it's going

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to be very interesting for investors as they build portfolio.

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you've got one of the best seats on

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street, which is having a title head of ETFs anywhere.

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>The growth in ETFs is pretty amazing believable. I mean

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just you know, so we can do a whole

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>nother discussion and just on the ETF space and the funds. Well,

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 1>what you guys are doing is unique inside that. Yeah,

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean my favorite thing about ETFs is it's both

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 1>growing and evolving. I mean, it is a huge source

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of growth, but also if you look under the hood,

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the number of strategies that are coming out on the

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>types of dynamic investments you can now access is so

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>much wider than it was just five ten years. It's

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>amazing good stuff and I learned a lot today. Yasmin,

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming in. Yasmin DAYA build

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>your head of ETF, managing director at Engine Number one.

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>A very smart discussion ever. Thanks for listening to the

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three,

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio