1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:04,240 Speaker 1: Yesterday, I talked about a new theory that seems very 2 00:00:04,320 --> 00:00:07,160 Speaker 1: quickly to be turning into reality, and that is that 3 00:00:07,320 --> 00:00:11,559 Speaker 1: Donald Trump will be indicted very soon after election day, 4 00:00:11,800 --> 00:00:16,360 Speaker 1: and Hunter Biden will also be indicted very soon after 5 00:00:16,400 --> 00:00:20,680 Speaker 1: election day. The idea is, we can invite, we can 6 00:00:20,680 --> 00:00:23,840 Speaker 1: indict Donald Trump because we indicted Hunter Biden. So it 7 00:00:23,880 --> 00:00:28,400 Speaker 1: proves the DOJ Americ Garland is somehow non political, and 8 00:00:28,520 --> 00:00:31,000 Speaker 1: that somehow he is saying, look, I'm even going after 9 00:00:31,040 --> 00:00:34,360 Speaker 1: the president Son, while I'm going after former President Donald Trump. 10 00:00:35,440 --> 00:00:38,000 Speaker 1: There is new indications now, and this is coming from 11 00:00:38,040 --> 00:00:41,280 Speaker 1: The Hill newspaper, that the GOP is quote bracing for 12 00:00:41,360 --> 00:00:45,320 Speaker 1: a Trump indictment right after the election. Republican aids and 13 00:00:45,360 --> 00:00:51,200 Speaker 1: stratagists privately expect Attorney General Garland to pursue an indictment 14 00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:54,320 Speaker 1: former President Donald Trump within sixty to ninety days after 15 00:00:54,320 --> 00:00:58,400 Speaker 1: the election, predicting the window for prosecuting Trump will close 16 00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:02,680 Speaker 1: once the twenty twenty four Press Central campaign gains momentum 17 00:01:02,800 --> 00:01:06,479 Speaker 1: quote unquote, Republican aids on Capitol Hill and veteran party 18 00:01:06,520 --> 00:01:10,480 Speaker 1: strategists emphasized they don't have any inside information on what 19 00:01:10,680 --> 00:01:13,000 Speaker 1: Garland might do, but they say, the Attorney General is 20 00:01:13,080 --> 00:01:17,480 Speaker 1: under heavy pressure from Democrats to act on the deadline 21 00:01:17,520 --> 00:01:22,120 Speaker 1: for pursuing an indictment that is fast approaching. Gop aids 22 00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:24,839 Speaker 1: also warned that an indictment of Trump by the Biden 23 00:01:24,840 --> 00:01:29,840 Speaker 1: administration would further polarize the nation, likely strengthened Trump's support 24 00:01:29,920 --> 00:01:33,399 Speaker 1: from the Republican Party's base, as the former president and 25 00:01:33,480 --> 00:01:37,320 Speaker 1: his allies would frame the Department of Justice's prosecution as 26 00:01:37,319 --> 00:01:40,120 Speaker 1: a political witch hunt. And that's exactly where the hunter 27 00:01:40,240 --> 00:01:44,640 Speaker 1: Biden acts aspect of this comes in. They understand how 28 00:01:44,760 --> 00:01:47,400 Speaker 1: unprecedented it would be and how shocking it would be 29 00:01:47,920 --> 00:01:53,480 Speaker 1: for them to indict Donald Trump. They need cover. You 30 00:01:53,560 --> 00:01:57,360 Speaker 1: know what the cover is. The cover is, all right, well, 31 00:01:57,400 --> 00:01:59,000 Speaker 1: we got a drug addict and we're going to charge 32 00:01:59,040 --> 00:02:00,840 Speaker 1: him with lying on a for a gun. We're going 33 00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:03,640 Speaker 1: to charge him with some tax crimes. That's Hunter Biden. 34 00:02:03,680 --> 00:02:06,360 Speaker 1: It will also insulate Joe Biden if we only charge 35 00:02:06,400 --> 00:02:09,160 Speaker 1: him those basic crimes. It's part of the reason why 36 00:02:09,240 --> 00:02:12,200 Speaker 1: Ron Johnson and why Chuck Grassley have been coming out 37 00:02:12,240 --> 00:02:15,000 Speaker 1: and giving more and more information from the whistleblowers so 38 00:02:15,040 --> 00:02:18,160 Speaker 1: that they can basically, in essence, screw up this plan. 39 00:02:18,240 --> 00:02:20,320 Speaker 1: By the DOJ to refuse to actually look at the 40 00:02:20,320 --> 00:02:22,320 Speaker 1: real crimes that we're being committed. Now. I will say 41 00:02:22,360 --> 00:02:24,480 Speaker 1: this now, and I mean this, and I hope you 42 00:02:24,560 --> 00:02:26,400 Speaker 1: understand it, and I hope you will agree with me. 43 00:02:26,720 --> 00:02:30,360 Speaker 1: I don't give a crap anymore about Hunter Biden. I 44 00:02:30,560 --> 00:02:33,120 Speaker 1: care about all the info that connects him to the 45 00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:36,000 Speaker 1: President of the United States America because Hunter Biden would 46 00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:39,080 Speaker 1: have never gotten a paycheck doing what he was doing 47 00:02:39,120 --> 00:02:42,200 Speaker 1: for a living without him doing it with his father. 48 00:02:42,639 --> 00:02:46,040 Speaker 1: It is impossible for the Russians and those in Mexico 49 00:02:46,480 --> 00:02:49,600 Speaker 1: and those in Latin America and those in China to 50 00:02:49,800 --> 00:02:52,080 Speaker 1: do the deals they did with Hunter Biden and James 51 00:02:52,080 --> 00:02:55,480 Speaker 1: Biden without the father's influence and without the father being involved, 52 00:02:55,520 --> 00:02:58,320 Speaker 1: and without the father being the big guy, and without 53 00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:02,600 Speaker 1: the father getting his cut. That's what I know. This 54 00:03:02,720 --> 00:03:05,320 Speaker 1: is not about Hunter Biden, and we need to move 55 00:03:05,400 --> 00:03:08,720 Speaker 1: past that very quickly. If there's an indictment of Hunter 56 00:03:08,720 --> 00:03:12,960 Speaker 1: Biden on these basic charges, it is a victory for 57 00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:17,000 Speaker 1: the Biden crime family. Know that, understand it, And the 58 00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:20,200 Speaker 1: idea that we're gonna that the DOJ has covered now 59 00:03:20,360 --> 00:03:23,600 Speaker 1: is a brilliant one for them, right We indicted Hunter Biden, 60 00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:26,280 Speaker 1: and we indicted Donald Trump. So it's fair. It's not 61 00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:31,000 Speaker 1: fair unless you're indicting Joe Biden. Still, it would not 62 00:03:31,040 --> 00:03:34,800 Speaker 1: even be close to comparable. It's a drug addict, it's 63 00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:39,080 Speaker 1: a kid of a politician, and if you only indict 64 00:03:39,160 --> 00:03:42,160 Speaker 1: him on those things, you're actually protecting the politician, which 65 00:03:42,160 --> 00:03:44,880 Speaker 1: is Joe Biden. Now, before I get into that part 66 00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:46,400 Speaker 1: of the story, I want to tell you a little 67 00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:49,360 Speaker 1: bit about my good friends over at Patriot Mobile. If 68 00:03:49,440 --> 00:03:52,400 Speaker 1: you are ready to have an impact every time that 69 00:03:52,680 --> 00:03:54,800 Speaker 1: you use your phone, and I'm talking about have an 70 00:03:54,800 --> 00:03:58,440 Speaker 1: impact by supporting First and Second Amendment rights, supporting the 71 00:03:58,520 --> 00:04:01,120 Speaker 1: rights of the unborn, and fighting back every time you 72 00:04:01,160 --> 00:04:04,480 Speaker 1: make a phone call, you need to know about Patriot Mobile. 73 00:04:04,880 --> 00:04:10,560 Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile is America's only conservative Christian mobile phone provider, 74 00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:14,120 Speaker 1: and they are using your phone bill when you paid 75 00:04:14,160 --> 00:04:18,080 Speaker 1: every month, to actually fight for conservative causes while saving 76 00:04:18,120 --> 00:04:20,520 Speaker 1: you money. Now, this isn't any extra ad onto your bill. 77 00:04:20,600 --> 00:04:23,160 Speaker 1: They take a portion of your bill every month and 78 00:04:23,240 --> 00:04:27,599 Speaker 1: they give it back to fund conservative causes in Canada, 79 00:04:27,680 --> 00:04:30,520 Speaker 1: to believe in the sanctity of life, freedom of speech, 80 00:04:30,760 --> 00:04:34,880 Speaker 1: and the Second Amendment. And they are winning. Patriot Mobile 81 00:04:34,920 --> 00:04:38,760 Speaker 1: has now been attacked by the big media. Big Tech 82 00:04:38,920 --> 00:04:41,280 Speaker 1: is now coming after them, and that's why I want 83 00:04:41,320 --> 00:04:44,760 Speaker 1: you to support them. If you want an affordable plan 84 00:04:45,240 --> 00:04:47,120 Speaker 1: and you want to get the same great coverage you 85 00:04:47,160 --> 00:04:50,080 Speaker 1: have right now, switch to Patriot Mobile. You're gonna save money. 86 00:04:50,120 --> 00:04:52,560 Speaker 1: They use the same exact towers you're using right now. 87 00:04:52,960 --> 00:04:55,160 Speaker 1: It's an affordable plan for you and your family, are 88 00:04:55,279 --> 00:04:58,520 Speaker 1: even your business or small business. They offer the same 89 00:04:58,640 --> 00:05:02,000 Speaker 1: nationwide coverage as the major carriers because they use the 90 00:05:02,120 --> 00:05:05,679 Speaker 1: same towers. If you haven't found out about Patriot Mobile, 91 00:05:05,760 --> 00:05:11,040 Speaker 1: check them out Patriotmobile dot com, slash ferguson that's Patriot 92 00:05:11,040 --> 00:05:13,640 Speaker 1: Mobile dot com slash ferguson, or call them nine to 93 00:05:13,720 --> 00:05:17,760 Speaker 1: seven to Patriot you'll get free activation with the offer 94 00:05:17,880 --> 00:05:22,880 Speaker 1: code ferguson nine seven to Patriot check them out. If 95 00:05:22,880 --> 00:05:25,560 Speaker 1: this starts to get Harry because of all the whistleblowers 96 00:05:25,600 --> 00:05:27,440 Speaker 1: coming out and all the info that's coming out from 97 00:05:27,440 --> 00:05:31,000 Speaker 1: Grassley and all the information that's coming out from Senator Johnson, 98 00:05:31,720 --> 00:05:35,560 Speaker 1: if it continues to get Harry, then the Democrats are 99 00:05:35,560 --> 00:05:37,920 Speaker 1: in a very tough spot because they have a choice 100 00:05:37,920 --> 00:05:40,920 Speaker 1: they're gonna have to make. They can either defend Joe 101 00:05:40,920 --> 00:05:43,240 Speaker 1: Biden at all costs, or they can say, you know what, 102 00:05:43,320 --> 00:05:47,280 Speaker 1: he's our useful idiot that's no longer useful. The majority 103 00:05:47,320 --> 00:05:51,240 Speaker 1: of Democrats have zero desire want to make this very 104 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:53,920 Speaker 1: clear for Joe Biden to be the nominee next time. 105 00:05:53,960 --> 00:05:55,960 Speaker 1: They don't believe that he is electable, and they believe 106 00:05:56,000 --> 00:05:59,279 Speaker 1: that he's bringing down the ticket on the Democratic side. 107 00:05:59,400 --> 00:06:02,880 Speaker 1: It is a big issue. It's a big problem. They 108 00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:07,560 Speaker 1: may dispose politically of Joe Biden and just say, all right, 109 00:06:07,960 --> 00:06:11,160 Speaker 1: let him, you go after him and nail him, and 110 00:06:11,200 --> 00:06:13,400 Speaker 1: will say that this was a family matter, not a 111 00:06:13,480 --> 00:06:17,480 Speaker 1: Democrat issue. There's a family issue, and let him go, 112 00:06:17,720 --> 00:06:20,880 Speaker 1: and we'll just let the Republicans have him. They know 113 00:06:21,000 --> 00:06:25,640 Speaker 1: he's corrupt. Now this may serve their purpose, and that's 114 00:06:25,680 --> 00:06:27,599 Speaker 1: the only way I can describe it, is that it 115 00:06:27,600 --> 00:06:31,880 Speaker 1: would serve their purpose. But if they decide to defend him, 116 00:06:32,080 --> 00:06:33,719 Speaker 1: then they've got to defend him at all costs. And 117 00:06:33,760 --> 00:06:35,240 Speaker 1: when they defend him, they have to do it in 118 00:06:35,279 --> 00:06:38,760 Speaker 1: a way that makes sense. They have to do it 119 00:06:38,800 --> 00:06:42,240 Speaker 1: in a way that will allow for people to understand 120 00:06:42,760 --> 00:06:46,080 Speaker 1: that they believe that Joe Biden is the president that 121 00:06:46,160 --> 00:06:48,840 Speaker 1: he should be the president for another four years. They're 122 00:06:48,839 --> 00:06:51,320 Speaker 1: going to have to sell that to the American people, 123 00:06:52,160 --> 00:06:54,920 Speaker 1: which is exactly why I believe these indictments are probably 124 00:06:55,000 --> 00:06:58,720 Speaker 1: coming against Donald Trump. They want him and they want 125 00:06:58,720 --> 00:07:01,320 Speaker 1: to take him out of the race for the White House. Now, 126 00:07:01,360 --> 00:07:03,640 Speaker 1: this goes back to something that Center Tech Cruz said 127 00:07:03,680 --> 00:07:06,400 Speaker 1: to rembark Roma on Fox News. Listen, the evidence of 128 00:07:06,440 --> 00:07:09,640 Speaker 1: corruption is now becoming overwhelming, and we've seen in the 129 00:07:09,720 --> 00:07:13,680 Speaker 1: last month the Biden Department of Justice actively leaking that 130 00:07:13,760 --> 00:07:16,360 Speaker 1: it intends to indict Hunter Biden. And I have to 131 00:07:16,400 --> 00:07:19,960 Speaker 1: say those leaks are troubling on three different bases. Number One, 132 00:07:20,160 --> 00:07:22,960 Speaker 1: the Department of Justice shouldn't be leaking anything that is 133 00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:25,600 Speaker 1: against the law to the extent they're revealing grand jury 134 00:07:25,720 --> 00:07:28,360 Speaker 1: secrets that is in fact a criminal offense, and they're 135 00:07:28,400 --> 00:07:32,400 Speaker 1: playing politics, they're not engaging law enforcement. Number Two, the 136 00:07:32,520 --> 00:07:35,120 Speaker 1: substance of what they've leaked is that they're looking at 137 00:07:35,200 --> 00:07:39,440 Speaker 1: Hunter Biden for drug offenses and tax offenses. Now listen, 138 00:07:39,480 --> 00:07:42,720 Speaker 1: by any measure, Hunter Biden is a deeply troubled soul, 139 00:07:42,760 --> 00:07:45,320 Speaker 1: a soul who has struggled with addiction his whole life. 140 00:07:45,920 --> 00:07:48,400 Speaker 1: What is concerning about their focus on the drug and 141 00:07:48,440 --> 00:07:52,240 Speaker 1: tax issues is it is very carefully walling off why 142 00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:54,840 Speaker 1: this is a matter of public concern. If Hunter Biden 143 00:07:54,960 --> 00:07:58,160 Speaker 1: was just a regular guy who struggled with addiction, it 144 00:07:58,160 --> 00:08:00,480 Speaker 1: wouldn't be a matter of public interest. The reason it 145 00:08:00,520 --> 00:08:04,040 Speaker 1: is a matter of public interest is there is significant 146 00:08:04,040 --> 00:08:08,200 Speaker 1: and in fact overwhelming evidence that Hunter Biden was actively 147 00:08:08,280 --> 00:08:12,960 Speaker 1: involved in official corruption with his father, Joe Biden, and 148 00:08:13,280 --> 00:08:17,280 Speaker 1: that involves both Ukraine and the natural gas company Barissma 149 00:08:17,440 --> 00:08:21,200 Speaker 1: that paid Hunter Biden eighty three thousand dollars a month 150 00:08:21,520 --> 00:08:24,040 Speaker 1: when he spoke no Ukrainian and knew nothing about oil 151 00:08:24,080 --> 00:08:27,760 Speaker 1: and gas, and his father was actively doing favors on 152 00:08:27,800 --> 00:08:31,520 Speaker 1: behalf of the oligarch who was paying Hunter Biden, and 153 00:08:31,640 --> 00:08:35,400 Speaker 1: likewise China, Communist China paying Hunter Biden and his family 154 00:08:35,440 --> 00:08:39,319 Speaker 1: over five million dollars including we now know ten percent 155 00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:42,120 Speaker 1: for the big guy, ten percent for Joe Biden. And 156 00:08:42,200 --> 00:08:44,679 Speaker 1: the fact that the bidendj is saying, oh, this is 157 00:08:44,679 --> 00:08:47,640 Speaker 1: all a drug matter. Don't pay attention to the big guy, 158 00:08:47,720 --> 00:08:50,800 Speaker 1: don't pay attention to the corruption. Just make it one 159 00:08:50,920 --> 00:08:55,200 Speaker 1: poor person struggling with addiction. That's highly concerning. And the 160 00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:57,800 Speaker 1: third reason this is very troubling. Is I think all 161 00:08:57,840 --> 00:09:00,559 Speaker 1: of this is a prelude to doing what Joe Biden 162 00:09:00,559 --> 00:09:03,200 Speaker 1: and Merritt Garland want to do, which is indict Donald Trump. 163 00:09:03,280 --> 00:09:05,080 Speaker 1: And they want to be able to say, look, how 164 00:09:05,120 --> 00:09:07,560 Speaker 1: even handed we are. We indicted Hunter Biden, we indicted 165 00:09:07,600 --> 00:09:11,640 Speaker 1: Donald Trump, we indict everybody. And that is politics, not 166 00:09:11,800 --> 00:09:16,080 Speaker 1: law enforcement, politics not law enforcement. He's right, and they're 167 00:09:16,280 --> 00:09:18,440 Speaker 1: planning this, and I think that's why you need to 168 00:09:18,440 --> 00:09:21,800 Speaker 1: be careful not to be excited about a Hunter Biden indictment, 169 00:09:21,920 --> 00:09:24,959 Speaker 1: especially if that Hunter Biden indictment is as simple as 170 00:09:24,960 --> 00:09:27,680 Speaker 1: it was just explained, If it is just these two 171 00:09:27,720 --> 00:09:30,320 Speaker 1: things that actually insulate the president of the United States 172 00:09:30,360 --> 00:09:33,160 Speaker 1: of America, then you understand why. Now let me go 173 00:09:33,240 --> 00:09:35,800 Speaker 1: back to the article I mentioned earlier, The Hill magazine, 174 00:09:36,400 --> 00:09:41,400 Speaker 1: the Hill newspaper, This is Insider Hill, Washington, DC. They 175 00:09:41,440 --> 00:09:44,559 Speaker 1: said that gopa's also warmed. An indictment of Trump by 176 00:09:44,600 --> 00:09:48,480 Speaker 1: the Biden administration would further polarize the nation. It would 177 00:09:48,520 --> 00:09:52,199 Speaker 1: strengthen Trump's support. Now, Democrats may be in favor of 178 00:09:52,240 --> 00:09:55,760 Speaker 1: that because they can't imagine that Donald Trump could actually 179 00:09:55,800 --> 00:09:58,280 Speaker 1: win an election if he is indicted. It would take 180 00:09:58,400 --> 00:10:01,480 Speaker 1: him out, and if it rises the country. I'm not 181 00:10:01,600 --> 00:10:05,199 Speaker 1: sure that they're not okay with that because think about 182 00:10:05,240 --> 00:10:08,920 Speaker 1: the talking point. If you're a Democrat running for office, right, 183 00:10:09,480 --> 00:10:11,600 Speaker 1: you got you know, the Republicans are so out of touch. 184 00:10:11,640 --> 00:10:14,920 Speaker 1: They've got a gaya that's indicted for stealing, you know, 185 00:10:15,120 --> 00:10:18,280 Speaker 1: top secret documents, YadA YadA, YadA, whatever it is, and 186 00:10:18,320 --> 00:10:20,960 Speaker 1: they can run on that, they can campaign, they can 187 00:10:21,000 --> 00:10:24,120 Speaker 1: fundraise on it. A couple weeks after the election. I 188 00:10:24,200 --> 00:10:28,480 Speaker 1: assume one says that Garlan will indict Trump, said one 189 00:10:28,559 --> 00:10:32,439 Speaker 1: veteran Republican AID, expressing a sentiment shared by several other 190 00:10:32,559 --> 00:10:37,040 Speaker 1: gop aids and strategists. Second Republican AID warren an indictment 191 00:10:37,080 --> 00:10:40,400 Speaker 1: could actually end up helping the former president politically, but 192 00:10:40,520 --> 00:10:44,000 Speaker 1: it could also help the Democrats. At the same time. 193 00:10:44,600 --> 00:10:47,920 Speaker 1: People have been talking about splintering support and damping enthusiasm 194 00:10:47,920 --> 00:10:51,960 Speaker 1: among Republican voters for him. An indictment can actually galvanize 195 00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:57,319 Speaker 1: and reunify Republicans around him, said another AID, predicting Republican backlashing. 196 00:10:57,440 --> 00:11:00,360 Speaker 1: Indictment would be stronger if Garlan brings an indictment later 197 00:11:00,400 --> 00:11:03,640 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four elections cycle. In other words, if 198 00:11:03,720 --> 00:11:06,280 Speaker 1: you wait longer than people will be even more angry 199 00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:09,679 Speaker 1: about it. That is true. But again it may play 200 00:11:09,840 --> 00:11:12,440 Speaker 1: for the Democrats, and it may play for them in 201 00:11:12,440 --> 00:11:15,960 Speaker 1: the mid terms. Now, I do believe that Democrats want 202 00:11:16,000 --> 00:11:18,640 Speaker 1: to get rid of Joe Biden and they do not 203 00:11:18,760 --> 00:11:23,120 Speaker 1: want him to run for reelection. It's not the gaffs, 204 00:11:23,200 --> 00:11:27,160 Speaker 1: by the way, that is making Democrats want to get 205 00:11:27,240 --> 00:11:29,040 Speaker 1: rid of Joe Biden, or not be able to find 206 00:11:29,080 --> 00:11:32,720 Speaker 1: his way off the stage. It's even when he's coherent, 207 00:11:32,880 --> 00:11:36,920 Speaker 1: he's not saying the right things. A given example, this 208 00:11:37,040 --> 00:11:39,600 Speaker 1: was a very coherent response when he was at a 209 00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:42,839 Speaker 1: press gaggle and he was asked about Fetterman. Now, as 210 00:11:42,880 --> 00:11:46,160 Speaker 1: you know, Fetterman had a terrible debate. He started a 211 00:11:46,240 --> 00:11:50,840 Speaker 1: debate by saying literally good night. Okay, said good night 212 00:11:51,800 --> 00:11:54,800 Speaker 1: to start off a debate. That's a bad moment. Okay, 213 00:11:54,840 --> 00:11:57,760 Speaker 1: that's a bad moment for anybody. And it was an 214 00:11:57,800 --> 00:12:00,120 Speaker 1: incoherent It was a god awful debate and everybody he 215 00:12:00,200 --> 00:12:03,120 Speaker 1: knew it was. There's not really any Democrats out there 216 00:12:03,160 --> 00:12:07,240 Speaker 1: that are defending how bad the Fetterman debate was. And 217 00:12:07,400 --> 00:12:10,360 Speaker 1: Joe Biden defends it and says he did a great job, 218 00:12:10,520 --> 00:12:12,800 Speaker 1: which makes people look at the debate even more and 219 00:12:12,840 --> 00:12:21,240 Speaker 1: they're like, uh no, no, it wasn't a great debate. Listen, Yeah, 220 00:12:21,280 --> 00:12:23,400 Speaker 1: I thought he was really good. I thought he knew 221 00:12:23,440 --> 00:12:25,920 Speaker 1: what he was doing. I thought he was strong. I 222 00:12:25,920 --> 00:12:27,600 Speaker 1: thought he knew what he was doing, and I thought 223 00:12:27,600 --> 00:12:30,440 Speaker 1: he was strong. No one thought he knew what he 224 00:12:30,480 --> 00:12:34,760 Speaker 1: was doing. Okay, No one thought that he was good 225 00:12:34,760 --> 00:12:37,480 Speaker 1: at doing. No one thought that he was strong. As 226 00:12:37,520 --> 00:12:42,240 Speaker 1: he just described it, the debate was a disaster. And 227 00:12:42,320 --> 00:12:45,439 Speaker 1: these are those moments that even when he's coherent, democrats 228 00:12:45,440 --> 00:12:48,360 Speaker 1: are like, come on, man, like give us something here, 229 00:12:48,400 --> 00:12:52,480 Speaker 1: and then he goes on to say this, look is Pennsylvania. 230 00:12:52,679 --> 00:12:56,200 Speaker 1: I mean, Fetterman is everything that he appears to be 231 00:12:56,800 --> 00:12:59,320 Speaker 1: to know where he stands. He has a great courage, 232 00:12:59,360 --> 00:13:02,520 Speaker 1: he has no reluctant to say what he thinks. He's 233 00:13:02,559 --> 00:13:06,280 Speaker 1: my kind of guy. He's my kind of guy. You 234 00:13:06,360 --> 00:13:09,280 Speaker 1: know where he stands. Fetterman doesn't know where he stands. 235 00:13:09,840 --> 00:13:13,880 Speaker 1: We know this from that debate. Fetterman on fracking was 236 00:13:13,920 --> 00:13:18,520 Speaker 1: a perfect example. They asked him that that question on fracking, 237 00:13:19,080 --> 00:13:22,080 Speaker 1: and he couldn't tell you what he wanted to say 238 00:13:22,280 --> 00:13:25,520 Speaker 1: on the issue of fracking. He had no idea what 239 00:13:25,559 --> 00:13:29,280 Speaker 1: he was saying on fracking, and that's why people watch 240 00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:32,240 Speaker 1: it and they're like, dude, how can you say this 241 00:13:32,280 --> 00:13:37,280 Speaker 1: guy's good? Listen to this on fracking with Fetterman, Okay, 242 00:13:37,280 --> 00:13:39,559 Speaker 1: and you'll understand when the president said he's coherent, No, 243 00:13:39,640 --> 00:13:43,439 Speaker 1: he's not. In a twenty eighteen interview, you said, quote, 244 00:13:43,840 --> 00:13:46,880 Speaker 1: I don't support fracking at all. I never have. But 245 00:13:47,000 --> 00:13:49,960 Speaker 1: earlier this month you told an interview or quote, I 246 00:13:50,040 --> 00:13:54,000 Speaker 1: support fracking. I support the energy independence that we should 247 00:13:54,000 --> 00:13:57,080 Speaker 1: have here in the United States. I've always supported fracking, 248 00:13:57,480 --> 00:14:01,319 Speaker 1: and I always believe that independence with our energy is 249 00:14:01,640 --> 00:14:05,600 Speaker 1: critical that we can't be held, you know, ransom to 250 00:14:05,679 --> 00:14:08,840 Speaker 1: somebody like Russia. But there is that twenty eighteen interview 251 00:14:08,880 --> 00:14:11,600 Speaker 1: that you said, quote, I don't support fracking at all. 252 00:14:11,720 --> 00:14:15,800 Speaker 1: So how do you square the two? Oh, I do 253 00:14:15,840 --> 00:14:21,360 Speaker 1: support fracking and I don't. I don't. I support fracking 254 00:14:21,520 --> 00:14:24,920 Speaker 1: and I stand and I do support fracking. I mean, 255 00:14:24,960 --> 00:14:28,840 Speaker 1: that's that's their best guy. And then Joe Biden's defending that, 256 00:14:29,040 --> 00:14:32,480 Speaker 1: saying it's amazing that this is the this is the 257 00:14:32,520 --> 00:14:35,560 Speaker 1: Democratic party that you want. Now you understand why Democrats 258 00:14:35,760 --> 00:14:38,080 Speaker 1: genuinely want to get rid of him. I think they 259 00:14:38,120 --> 00:14:40,720 Speaker 1: also believe that they're never going to get away from 260 00:14:40,720 --> 00:14:46,040 Speaker 1: the Hunter Biden scandal, even if the DOJ indicts him 261 00:14:46,080 --> 00:14:48,440 Speaker 1: on things that do not connect him to the present, 262 00:14:48,480 --> 00:14:52,680 Speaker 1: because remember, a big investigation in the House and Senate 263 00:14:52,800 --> 00:14:56,400 Speaker 1: may expose things. But as but as it's been said 264 00:14:57,560 --> 00:15:01,800 Speaker 1: several times here and Republican have said this, we can investigate, 265 00:15:01,880 --> 00:15:07,200 Speaker 1: but we cannot indict, and that's one of the big problems. Well, 266 00:15:07,240 --> 00:15:10,240 Speaker 1: we're gonna one week after the election, we're coming back 267 00:15:10,280 --> 00:15:12,520 Speaker 1: to Washington for the lame duck session. The House Oversight 268 00:15:12,520 --> 00:15:14,720 Speaker 1: Committee is going to have a press conference. We're gonna 269 00:15:14,760 --> 00:15:17,040 Speaker 1: be very transparent with the American people on the work 270 00:15:17,040 --> 00:15:20,720 Speaker 1: we've done thus far. We're gonna outline exactly what we've 271 00:15:20,800 --> 00:15:24,760 Speaker 1: uncovered thus far pertaining to Hunter Biden shady business dealings 272 00:15:24,960 --> 00:15:28,640 Speaker 1: as well as suspicious activity on behalf of the president's brothers. 273 00:15:28,880 --> 00:15:32,240 Speaker 1: We're also going to re reshow to the American people 274 00:15:32,400 --> 00:15:35,600 Speaker 1: that outside of the conservative media that have seen the 275 00:15:35,600 --> 00:15:38,480 Speaker 1: text messages and emails that showed that Hunter said to 276 00:15:38,640 --> 00:15:41,720 Speaker 1: numerous people that he kept his father up he was 277 00:15:41,720 --> 00:15:44,160 Speaker 1: sick and tired of having to pay for the living 278 00:15:44,200 --> 00:15:47,160 Speaker 1: expenses of his father, which kind of would lead one 279 00:15:47,200 --> 00:15:50,480 Speaker 1: to believe that Joe Biden has benefited directly from Hunters. 280 00:15:51,040 --> 00:15:54,400 Speaker 1: What does that look like? Does Hunter testify before the 281 00:15:54,440 --> 00:15:59,200 Speaker 1: Oversight Committee's does Biden brother testify? I mean, we're seeing 282 00:15:59,240 --> 00:16:03,520 Speaker 1: a lot of investigations right now, where with January six 283 00:16:03,600 --> 00:16:05,840 Speaker 1: and all that, So who comes to Capitol Hill and 284 00:16:06,160 --> 00:16:10,320 Speaker 1: talks to the American people. We're gonna ask for Hunter 285 00:16:10,360 --> 00:16:13,760 Speaker 1: Biden to come. He will probably receive a subpoena. We're 286 00:16:13,760 --> 00:16:16,440 Speaker 1: going to ask the President's brothers to come. But at 287 00:16:16,440 --> 00:16:21,880 Speaker 1: the very beginning, we know that we're gonna have several depositions. 288 00:16:21,880 --> 00:16:24,640 Speaker 1: We're going to have several transcribed interviews. We want to 289 00:16:24,640 --> 00:16:27,360 Speaker 1: talk to the bankers that issued the one hundred and 290 00:16:27,360 --> 00:16:30,800 Speaker 1: fifty suspicious activity reports or the bank violation to Hunter Biden. 291 00:16:31,040 --> 00:16:34,600 Speaker 1: We've got two witnesses that were former associate of Hunter 292 00:16:34,640 --> 00:16:38,120 Speaker 1: Biden that have volunteered to come in and do transcribed 293 00:16:38,200 --> 00:16:40,960 Speaker 1: interviews with us. So we're gonna start there. We plan 294 00:16:41,080 --> 00:16:44,800 Speaker 1: on having our first hearing sometime in mid January. We 295 00:16:44,840 --> 00:16:47,840 Speaker 1: need to do a little more background information. Remember I've 296 00:16:47,920 --> 00:16:51,160 Speaker 1: requested these bank violations for several months. The last time, 297 00:16:51,280 --> 00:16:54,680 Speaker 1: Treasury Department Janet Yelling sent me a letter saying that, 298 00:16:54,920 --> 00:16:56,840 Speaker 1: well she couldn't give it to us because we weren't 299 00:16:56,880 --> 00:16:58,720 Speaker 1: in the majority. Well we're going to send her a 300 00:16:58,760 --> 00:17:01,920 Speaker 1: letter on November nine, say, if you haven't heard, the 301 00:17:01,960 --> 00:17:04,359 Speaker 1: Republicans are going to be in the majority in January. 302 00:17:04,400 --> 00:17:07,119 Speaker 1: So now we expect those bank violations. Once we have 303 00:17:07,200 --> 00:17:09,760 Speaker 1: those bank violations, and I have two of the one 304 00:17:09,840 --> 00:17:11,280 Speaker 1: hundred and fifty right now, and I can tell you 305 00:17:11,359 --> 00:17:14,639 Speaker 1: they're really bad, Lawrence, we don't have to prove the 306 00:17:14,720 --> 00:17:17,120 Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's a shady business character. I think the American 307 00:17:17,160 --> 00:17:19,399 Speaker 1: people understand that there are going to be more people 308 00:17:19,400 --> 00:17:22,680 Speaker 1: like John Stewart come forward and start throwing Hunter under 309 00:17:22,680 --> 00:17:25,719 Speaker 1: the bus after the disastrous midterms that the Democrats are 310 00:17:25,720 --> 00:17:29,000 Speaker 1: going to have. We're investigating Hunter Biden because we believe 311 00:17:29,040 --> 00:17:33,080 Speaker 1: he's compromised Joe Biden. That's the key point there. We're 312 00:17:33,119 --> 00:17:37,360 Speaker 1: investigating him because we believe he's compromised Joe Biden. That 313 00:17:37,560 --> 00:17:40,720 Speaker 1: is the ball game, and so in the catalyst for 314 00:17:41,000 --> 00:17:44,040 Speaker 1: Democrats decide who their guy is right their big run 315 00:17:44,119 --> 00:17:47,280 Speaker 1: up to the next presidential election, which we're two years 316 00:17:47,320 --> 00:17:51,600 Speaker 1: away from They've got to decide can he get around 317 00:17:51,720 --> 00:17:54,760 Speaker 1: all of this and will people forgive him for selling 318 00:17:54,760 --> 00:17:58,440 Speaker 1: out America? And there are more and more Democrats now 319 00:17:58,440 --> 00:18:01,240 Speaker 1: that I believe, do not think that he can handle it, 320 00:18:01,680 --> 00:18:05,360 Speaker 1: the scrutiny. I don't believe that they believe that they 321 00:18:05,359 --> 00:18:11,160 Speaker 1: can overcome this. So then the question is, if you're 322 00:18:11,160 --> 00:18:13,879 Speaker 1: a Democrat, who do you want to be your next leader? 323 00:18:14,680 --> 00:18:17,760 Speaker 1: It's not Joe Biden, He's a liability. Who is the 324 00:18:17,760 --> 00:18:21,760 Speaker 1: next leader? I think that leader they understand is not 325 00:18:21,840 --> 00:18:26,919 Speaker 1: Kamala Harris either. So if you can bring down their presidency, 326 00:18:26,960 --> 00:18:31,240 Speaker 1: and you can do it quickly so that you can 327 00:18:31,280 --> 00:18:35,200 Speaker 1: move on to the next one, they may sacrifice him 328 00:18:35,520 --> 00:18:40,640 Speaker 1: for that reason. That might be the best option that 329 00:18:40,680 --> 00:18:45,639 Speaker 1: they have. It actually may be their only chance at success. 330 00:18:46,440 --> 00:18:48,199 Speaker 1: I don't think that you're going to be able to 331 00:18:48,200 --> 00:18:51,240 Speaker 1: turn this economy around quickly. The amount of spending that 332 00:18:51,280 --> 00:18:54,639 Speaker 1: the Democrats have done. They don't seem to show any 333 00:18:54,680 --> 00:18:58,919 Speaker 1: indication whatsoever that they want to change. They want to 334 00:18:58,960 --> 00:19:02,440 Speaker 1: alter course, they want to move right into a direction 335 00:19:02,480 --> 00:19:05,920 Speaker 1: of fiscal responsibility. That is one thing that I think 336 00:19:06,040 --> 00:19:10,919 Speaker 1: is very apparent in all of this. So how do 337 00:19:10,960 --> 00:19:15,400 Speaker 1: you move forward, do you sacrifice him? Do you say 338 00:19:15,480 --> 00:19:17,840 Speaker 1: he's been a great guy for us for a long time, 339 00:19:18,320 --> 00:19:21,080 Speaker 1: He's towards the end of his life anyway, based on age. 340 00:19:21,720 --> 00:19:24,280 Speaker 1: Let's give him a parachute, a way to get out. 341 00:19:24,640 --> 00:19:27,960 Speaker 1: Let's give him an opportunity to quasi save his son, 342 00:19:28,000 --> 00:19:30,200 Speaker 1: to make sure he doesn't run and will protect you 343 00:19:30,720 --> 00:19:33,720 Speaker 1: and defend you. If I'm Joe Biden, there's a certain 344 00:19:33,760 --> 00:19:37,000 Speaker 1: point where that becomes I think the reality of your situation. 345 00:19:37,520 --> 00:19:40,800 Speaker 1: If Democrats decide not to keeping like idiots in defending 346 00:19:40,800 --> 00:19:43,320 Speaker 1: you no matter what. They've lost Twitter, by the way, 347 00:19:44,280 --> 00:19:46,119 Speaker 1: and I do believe they're starting to lose the media. 348 00:19:46,440 --> 00:19:51,000 Speaker 1: Not because the media wants to be transparent, Okay. The 349 00:19:51,080 --> 00:19:53,359 Speaker 1: reason why they're losing the media is because the media 350 00:19:53,400 --> 00:19:56,440 Speaker 1: wants to w in the next presidential election. They don't 351 00:19:56,560 --> 00:19:59,320 Speaker 1: want a Rond de Sciantists. They don't want a Donald Trump, 352 00:19:59,359 --> 00:20:03,160 Speaker 1: they don't want a Ted Cruz, right, and I think 353 00:20:03,240 --> 00:20:09,120 Speaker 1: they understand that it's going to be extremely hard to 354 00:20:09,160 --> 00:20:14,640 Speaker 1: get anyone else elected if he's around them. And I'm 355 00:20:14,640 --> 00:20:17,240 Speaker 1: talking about the local level, I'm talking about the state level. 356 00:20:17,280 --> 00:20:20,160 Speaker 1: I'm talking about the national level. He is going to 357 00:20:20,240 --> 00:20:26,920 Speaker 1: drag down the ticket. I want to get back into 358 00:20:26,920 --> 00:20:29,119 Speaker 1: what I was saying about. You know, Joe Biden no 359 00:20:29,200 --> 00:20:33,119 Speaker 1: longer being the useful idiot of the Democratic Party. Okay. 360 00:20:34,440 --> 00:20:38,760 Speaker 1: I also believe that the Democratic Party is moving away 361 00:20:38,880 --> 00:20:43,520 Speaker 1: from Joe Biden. And I'm talking about politicians like Joe Biden. 362 00:20:43,600 --> 00:20:47,600 Speaker 1: Why do I say that they want more extreme candidates. 363 00:20:48,800 --> 00:20:53,440 Speaker 1: Joe Biden is not that extreme and he's not extreme 364 00:20:53,560 --> 00:20:56,960 Speaker 1: enough for them when it comes to attacking police and 365 00:20:57,119 --> 00:21:00,919 Speaker 1: different organizations that are for law, law in order for 366 00:21:01,080 --> 00:21:05,800 Speaker 1: structure in America. A great example of this is Stacy 367 00:21:05,840 --> 00:21:09,480 Speaker 1: Abrams and Georgia. The fact that Stacy Abrams and Georgia 368 00:21:09,680 --> 00:21:12,359 Speaker 1: plays in Georgia, which is a I would refer to 369 00:21:12,400 --> 00:21:15,960 Speaker 1: it more of a red state, maybe purple asque, but 370 00:21:16,000 --> 00:21:19,479 Speaker 1: it's been more conservative than liberal over the years, and 371 00:21:19,560 --> 00:21:22,240 Speaker 1: the fact that the Democrats keep choosing her to be 372 00:21:22,280 --> 00:21:24,720 Speaker 1: their candidate tells you a lot about what they want 373 00:21:24,800 --> 00:21:30,240 Speaker 1: in their candidates. Stacy Abrams just went off on all 374 00:21:30,280 --> 00:21:33,359 Speaker 1: of the sheriffs in the entire state of Georgia, and 375 00:21:33,560 --> 00:21:37,200 Speaker 1: not a single Democrat has come out and reprimanded her 376 00:21:37,400 --> 00:21:41,520 Speaker 1: or has disavowed these comments where she said while all 377 00:21:41,560 --> 00:21:43,600 Speaker 1: these sheriffs just want to be able to take black 378 00:21:43,640 --> 00:21:46,199 Speaker 1: people off the streets. In other words, they're all whites, 379 00:21:46,840 --> 00:21:49,120 Speaker 1: and I hate all of these sheriffs in the state 380 00:21:49,160 --> 00:21:52,080 Speaker 1: of Georgia, which I'm supposed to represent. She is their 381 00:21:52,160 --> 00:21:55,879 Speaker 1: nominee for governor, and she declared during this debate with 382 00:21:55,960 --> 00:21:59,480 Speaker 1: a Republican Kemp on Sunday night that the one hundred 383 00:21:59,480 --> 00:22:03,119 Speaker 1: and seven sheriffs stead have endorsed her opponent, the incumbent 384 00:22:03,160 --> 00:22:06,080 Speaker 1: Republican Brian Kemp. She said, the reason why they do 385 00:22:06,160 --> 00:22:08,560 Speaker 1: is because they want to be able to take black 386 00:22:08,760 --> 00:22:13,959 Speaker 1: people off the street. Now you're gonna hear Governor Kemp. First, 387 00:22:14,040 --> 00:22:15,920 Speaker 1: you're gonna hear what he has to say about all 388 00:22:15,960 --> 00:22:18,720 Speaker 1: the people that support him, and then you will hear 389 00:22:18,760 --> 00:22:23,359 Speaker 1: this assault on everybody in law enforcement as she goes 390 00:22:23,480 --> 00:22:26,320 Speaker 1: scorts to earth. And this is what Democrats want now, 391 00:22:26,400 --> 00:22:29,280 Speaker 1: this is what they are advocating for. This is why 392 00:22:29,320 --> 00:22:31,000 Speaker 1: I think they're ready to be done with Joe Biden 393 00:22:31,080 --> 00:22:34,800 Speaker 1: eminating cash bill. Men and women in law enforcement know 394 00:22:34,920 --> 00:22:36,960 Speaker 1: who is going to be with them, who has had 395 00:22:37,000 --> 00:22:39,560 Speaker 1: their back and will continue to have their back, and 396 00:22:39,680 --> 00:22:42,119 Speaker 1: that is me. And that's why we have the endorsement 397 00:22:42,160 --> 00:22:45,480 Speaker 1: of one hundred and seven sheriffs around the state. As 398 00:22:45,520 --> 00:22:47,520 Speaker 1: I pointed out before, I'm not a member of the 399 00:22:47,520 --> 00:22:49,719 Speaker 1: good old boys club. So no, I don't have one 400 00:22:49,760 --> 00:22:52,880 Speaker 1: hundred and seven sheriffs who want to be able to 401 00:22:52,920 --> 00:22:55,439 Speaker 1: take black people off the streets, who want to be 402 00:22:55,520 --> 00:22:58,879 Speaker 1: able to go without accountability. I don't believe every sheriff 403 00:22:58,960 --> 00:23:00,919 Speaker 1: wants that, but I do know that we need a 404 00:23:00,960 --> 00:23:04,320 Speaker 1: governor who believes in both defending law enforcement but also 405 00:23:04,359 --> 00:23:07,160 Speaker 1: defending the people of Georgia. I have two brothers, one 406 00:23:07,160 --> 00:23:09,119 Speaker 1: who has committed crimes and one who is a social 407 00:23:09,119 --> 00:23:12,359 Speaker 1: worker trying to help keep people from committing crimes. But 408 00:23:12,440 --> 00:23:14,920 Speaker 1: my brother, who commits crimes should be held accountable, but 409 00:23:14,960 --> 00:23:17,359 Speaker 1: my other brothers should never be pulled over for driving 410 00:23:17,359 --> 00:23:20,400 Speaker 1: while black. And yet in this Georgia he is. I'm 411 00:23:20,480 --> 00:23:23,399 Speaker 1: running for governor because we'd lead complicated lives, and we 412 00:23:23,480 --> 00:23:26,360 Speaker 1: need a governor who's willing to hold law enforcement accountable 413 00:23:26,520 --> 00:23:29,280 Speaker 1: but also be supportive. And yes, pay races have been 414 00:23:29,320 --> 00:23:32,360 Speaker 1: given to state law enforcement, but local law enforcement are 415 00:23:32,480 --> 00:23:35,520 Speaker 1: experiencing shortages that are not being funded by this governor 416 00:23:35,720 --> 00:23:38,320 Speaker 1: and federal COVID money as a bonus is not the 417 00:23:38,400 --> 00:23:40,840 Speaker 1: same as a plan for their investment. And I'm the 418 00:23:40,880 --> 00:23:43,040 Speaker 1: only one with a clear plan to invest in local 419 00:23:43,119 --> 00:23:47,560 Speaker 1: law enforcement going forward. So she's gonna invest. But everybody 420 00:23:47,560 --> 00:23:51,119 Speaker 1: that pulls over somebody in Georgia that's African American is 421 00:23:51,160 --> 00:23:53,960 Speaker 1: automatically a racist, and the one hundred and seven sheriffs 422 00:23:53,960 --> 00:23:56,440 Speaker 1: are all racists. But I've got a plan to give 423 00:23:56,440 --> 00:24:01,720 Speaker 1: the races more money. This is the Democratic Party. And 424 00:24:01,800 --> 00:24:05,080 Speaker 1: even Joe Biden, I don't believe can keep up with 425 00:24:05,119 --> 00:24:08,959 Speaker 1: this level of extremism at his age. I don't believe 426 00:24:09,080 --> 00:24:12,359 Speaker 1: he thinks that this is probably what he should be saying. 427 00:24:13,440 --> 00:24:16,119 Speaker 1: I think most people believe this is not what should 428 00:24:16,160 --> 00:24:18,800 Speaker 1: be said. Right now. Will you go out there and 429 00:24:18,840 --> 00:24:22,119 Speaker 1: you indict every single law enforcement official the way that 430 00:24:22,200 --> 00:24:26,680 Speaker 1: it was just said is radical? That's what they want, though, 431 00:24:26,760 --> 00:24:29,360 Speaker 1: So can they get rid of Joe Biden? Can they 432 00:24:29,680 --> 00:24:31,880 Speaker 1: say we must move on from him? And if they're 433 00:24:31,880 --> 00:24:33,840 Speaker 1: going to get rid of him, they've got to do 434 00:24:33,880 --> 00:24:37,320 Speaker 1: it quickly. They don't want to wait until they miss 435 00:24:37,320 --> 00:24:40,000 Speaker 1: out on the opportunity to run other candidates. They want 436 00:24:40,040 --> 00:24:42,639 Speaker 1: a bunch of different candidates to run, and they are 437 00:24:42,720 --> 00:24:47,800 Speaker 1: not the last named Biden. So after these midterms, this 438 00:24:47,880 --> 00:24:50,399 Speaker 1: is my prediction. One, they're going to look to indict 439 00:24:50,440 --> 00:24:53,840 Speaker 1: Donald Trump. I think that is spot on. Two, they're 440 00:24:53,880 --> 00:24:57,160 Speaker 1: gonna say, well, well, indict hunter Biden. There's your quid 441 00:24:57,200 --> 00:25:01,360 Speaker 1: pro quo. Everything should be fine. Now, should understand this, right, 442 00:25:01,400 --> 00:25:06,280 Speaker 1: this all makes sense? Now, right, everything's good? Okay. I 443 00:25:06,320 --> 00:25:11,280 Speaker 1: believe that's part two of this. And then they're going 444 00:25:11,320 --> 00:25:15,760 Speaker 1: to decide quickly when the Republicans get into these investigations, 445 00:25:17,560 --> 00:25:20,639 Speaker 1: do we take our hands off of him, do we 446 00:25:20,760 --> 00:25:27,720 Speaker 1: walk away? Do we say have at him, take him down, 447 00:25:28,640 --> 00:25:31,440 Speaker 1: maybe even impeach him, because if you impeach him, we 448 00:25:31,480 --> 00:25:34,920 Speaker 1: may be getting rid of their problem. If we impeach 449 00:25:35,400 --> 00:25:40,679 Speaker 1: Joe Biden, or there's indictments of Joe Biden for the 450 00:25:40,720 --> 00:25:44,360 Speaker 1: crimes that I believe he is committed, we may be 451 00:25:44,359 --> 00:25:46,600 Speaker 1: bailing out the Democrats. Give them to get a Joel 452 00:25:46,600 --> 00:25:49,280 Speaker 1: free card. They get rid of their other problem, which 453 00:25:49,320 --> 00:25:53,520 Speaker 1: is Kamala Harris. She's not the heir apparent that they want. 454 00:25:53,880 --> 00:25:57,679 Speaker 1: We should all understand that. They believe she's unelectable. I 455 00:25:57,720 --> 00:26:00,680 Speaker 1: think they also just believe she's stupid. There's not a 456 00:26:00,720 --> 00:26:03,159 Speaker 1: lot of Democrats that like working with her. There's a 457 00:26:03,160 --> 00:26:05,399 Speaker 1: lot of Democrats that think she is a cancer to 458 00:26:05,440 --> 00:26:11,760 Speaker 1: the Democratic Party, that she's completely intolerant of staff members. 459 00:26:11,800 --> 00:26:14,280 Speaker 1: I mean, look at the turnover with her staff. She 460 00:26:14,520 --> 00:26:19,000 Speaker 1: is a disaster. So they need new names, they need 461 00:26:19,040 --> 00:26:22,280 Speaker 1: new people, they need people, and I think they would 462 00:26:22,280 --> 00:26:25,480 Speaker 1: look at someone like a Stacey Abrahams, they would look 463 00:26:25,520 --> 00:26:29,520 Speaker 1: at a Bateau of Rouric. Again, they want extreme candidates. 464 00:26:30,680 --> 00:26:32,520 Speaker 1: So can you get rid of all the people that 465 00:26:32,560 --> 00:26:34,840 Speaker 1: you want to get rid of, and that it means 466 00:26:35,000 --> 00:26:37,480 Speaker 1: and bringing all the people you want. I think there's 467 00:26:37,480 --> 00:26:40,960 Speaker 1: a very good chance that could happen. I think it's 468 00:26:40,960 --> 00:26:45,240 Speaker 1: their goal, their agenda, their objective. This is what they 469 00:26:45,280 --> 00:26:47,919 Speaker 1: want to happen, and they're willing to try it at 470 00:26:47,960 --> 00:26:52,520 Speaker 1: all costs, even if that means getting rid of their guy. Now, 471 00:26:52,560 --> 00:26:55,840 Speaker 1: before I get into anymore the insanity of these people 472 00:26:55,880 --> 00:26:57,440 Speaker 1: on the left, I want to tell you real quick 473 00:26:57,440 --> 00:27:00,480 Speaker 1: about legacy precious medals. You know what's happening with inflation, 474 00:27:00,560 --> 00:27:02,280 Speaker 1: you know what's happening with people now talking about the 475 00:27:02,280 --> 00:27:05,439 Speaker 1: idea of recession. You know what's happening with supply chain issues, 476 00:27:05,480 --> 00:27:07,880 Speaker 1: and you know what's been happening with your retirement account. 477 00:27:08,400 --> 00:27:12,360 Speaker 1: If you are not diversified with part of your financial 478 00:27:12,359 --> 00:27:16,200 Speaker 1: strategy involving precious metals, now is a time to call 479 00:27:16,240 --> 00:27:19,280 Speaker 1: the people that I use and trust, Legacy Precious Metals. 480 00:27:19,640 --> 00:27:24,200 Speaker 1: You can get the free investors Guide on gold and silver, 481 00:27:24,440 --> 00:27:29,560 Speaker 1: precious metal investing and how to diversify your portfolio. We 482 00:27:29,680 --> 00:27:32,280 Speaker 1: have seen that they want to raise taxes. We are 483 00:27:32,280 --> 00:27:35,560 Speaker 1: seeing a skyrocketing of our national debt. And if your 484 00:27:35,640 --> 00:27:39,159 Speaker 1: retirement is in only investments that are directly connected to 485 00:27:39,160 --> 00:27:42,840 Speaker 1: the market, you need to take a look at Legacy 486 00:27:43,320 --> 00:27:46,879 Speaker 1: Precious Metals. Call and get the free investors guide right 487 00:27:46,920 --> 00:27:50,720 Speaker 1: now from them one eight six six seven five one 488 00:27:51,240 --> 00:27:56,359 Speaker 1: twenty two eighteen. That's one eight six six seven five 489 00:27:56,560 --> 00:28:03,199 Speaker 1: one twenty two eighteen. Orne at Legacy PM Investments at 490 00:28:03,359 --> 00:28:07,760 Speaker 1: Legacy PM Investments dot com. Now, there's one other thing 491 00:28:07,800 --> 00:28:09,560 Speaker 1: that I want to put on your radar screen that 492 00:28:09,640 --> 00:28:12,720 Speaker 1: is going to be very significant, and that is that 493 00:28:12,800 --> 00:28:16,840 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court is going to hear cases against Harvard 494 00:28:17,600 --> 00:28:21,600 Speaker 1: and UNC on affirmative action. This has not been getting 495 00:28:21,600 --> 00:28:23,639 Speaker 1: a lot of play out there. You probably this is 496 00:28:23,680 --> 00:28:26,080 Speaker 1: the first time you've heard about it, But the US 497 00:28:26,160 --> 00:28:29,600 Speaker 1: Supreme Court is going to hear oral arguments and a 498 00:28:29,680 --> 00:28:33,600 Speaker 1: pair of cases that could overturn the use of racial 499 00:28:33,720 --> 00:28:39,200 Speaker 1: preferences in college admissions. They're focusing on challenges to affirmative 500 00:28:39,240 --> 00:28:44,040 Speaker 1: action policies at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina. 501 00:28:44,200 --> 00:28:48,200 Speaker 1: In both of these cases, the plaintiffs and a nonprofit 502 00:28:48,240 --> 00:28:52,560 Speaker 1: group called Students for Fair Admissions. They are alleging that 503 00:28:52,640 --> 00:28:59,200 Speaker 1: affirmative action policies discriminate against Asian Americans, who otherwise would 504 00:28:59,240 --> 00:29:03,280 Speaker 1: comprise a larger share of student bodies at both colleges. 505 00:29:03,680 --> 00:29:07,640 Speaker 1: But they aren't getting in on the affirmative action action 506 00:29:07,760 --> 00:29:12,640 Speaker 1: no pun intended, because they are Asian American. Now, what 507 00:29:12,720 --> 00:29:16,440 Speaker 1: they're challenging is this court case, the University of California 508 00:29:16,600 --> 00:29:19,600 Speaker 1: versus Bay. It's from back in nineteen seventy eight, and 509 00:29:19,760 --> 00:29:21,680 Speaker 1: that is when the court permit the use of affirmative 510 00:29:21,720 --> 00:29:26,360 Speaker 1: action and college admissions to achieve diversity, quote unquote, provided 511 00:29:26,600 --> 00:29:29,280 Speaker 1: the law said or the ruling said it did not 512 00:29:29,480 --> 00:29:34,120 Speaker 1: operate like a quota system. That holding was later limited 513 00:29:34,160 --> 00:29:36,680 Speaker 1: by two cases against the University of Michigan. Back in 514 00:29:36,720 --> 00:29:40,800 Speaker 1: two thousand and three, now, Grade struck down an undergraduate 515 00:29:40,800 --> 00:29:44,720 Speaker 1: policy that gave points to applicants solely based on race, 516 00:29:45,600 --> 00:29:49,240 Speaker 1: and grutter upheld a law school policy that considered race 517 00:29:49,360 --> 00:29:53,160 Speaker 1: as a factor but did not assign points to the applicants. 518 00:29:53,600 --> 00:29:56,960 Speaker 1: Now the cases are being heard together, though the one 519 00:29:57,000 --> 00:29:59,840 Speaker 1: against Harvard involves a private university and the one against 520 00:30:00,040 --> 00:30:02,480 Speaker 1: University of North Carolina involves a public one. But the 521 00:30:02,480 --> 00:30:04,800 Speaker 1: Supreme Court is going to hear them together now. The 522 00:30:04,840 --> 00:30:09,480 Speaker 1: Fourteenth Amendments Equal protection clause only applies to private institutions 523 00:30:09,920 --> 00:30:12,920 Speaker 1: when they take federal money, and the case against Harvard 524 00:30:12,920 --> 00:30:16,000 Speaker 1: focuses on civil rights laws, just so you know, and 525 00:30:16,080 --> 00:30:18,120 Speaker 1: the case against the University of North Carolina is a 526 00:30:18,160 --> 00:30:22,840 Speaker 1: broader constitutional case. Now, Harvard as one in both the 527 00:30:22,880 --> 00:30:25,960 Speaker 1: district and the appellate courts, though the case has exposed 528 00:30:26,000 --> 00:30:29,760 Speaker 1: its affirmative action policies to a lot of scrutiny in 529 00:30:29,800 --> 00:30:34,400 Speaker 1: the public, revealing that the actual percentage of Asian American 530 00:30:34,480 --> 00:30:37,360 Speaker 1: students who are admitted is about half of what it 531 00:30:37,440 --> 00:30:41,400 Speaker 1: would be based on test scores and grades alone. In 532 00:30:41,400 --> 00:30:44,040 Speaker 1: other words, fifty percent of Asians are losing out on 533 00:30:44,120 --> 00:30:49,600 Speaker 1: Harvard every single admission cycle because of affirmative action. Harvard 534 00:30:49,760 --> 00:30:53,600 Speaker 1: was found to use a quote personality test that ranked 535 00:30:53,600 --> 00:30:59,040 Speaker 1: Asian American groups lower than others. Again, this is so racist. 536 00:30:59,600 --> 00:31:02,160 Speaker 1: And the University of North Carolina also they won a 537 00:31:02,240 --> 00:31:05,000 Speaker 1: district court and the case will appeal directly the Supreme 538 00:31:05,040 --> 00:31:08,560 Speaker 1: Court to join the Harvard case, which they've said yes to. Now. 539 00:31:08,640 --> 00:31:11,760 Speaker 1: Justice Brown Jackson has recused herself from the Harvard case 540 00:31:11,800 --> 00:31:16,760 Speaker 1: because she is a member of Harvard. Harvard's board of overseers. 541 00:31:16,760 --> 00:31:19,440 Speaker 1: Just so you know, this is going to be a 542 00:31:19,480 --> 00:31:22,000 Speaker 1: big case. It's one that we should all be watching 543 00:31:22,560 --> 00:31:25,520 Speaker 1: because this could have a huge impact not just on 544 00:31:25,560 --> 00:31:29,520 Speaker 1: college admissions for all students, but it could also have 545 00:31:29,640 --> 00:31:35,440 Speaker 1: a very very big impact on affirmative action in general 546 00:31:35,600 --> 00:31:38,880 Speaker 1: in this country. Now we think about affirmative action, I 547 00:31:38,880 --> 00:31:41,320 Speaker 1: think the most of the college level, that is not 548 00:31:41,400 --> 00:31:44,920 Speaker 1: always the case. Affirmative action is at all different levels 549 00:31:44,960 --> 00:31:48,960 Speaker 1: within our government and it's in also in the private sector. 550 00:31:49,440 --> 00:31:52,400 Speaker 1: This could open up other lawsuits, and this could open 551 00:31:52,480 --> 00:31:56,520 Speaker 1: up many different debates, arguments, and court cases that could 552 00:31:56,600 --> 00:31:59,800 Speaker 1: change the way that we use affirmative action in this country. 553 00:32:00,240 --> 00:32:04,720 Speaker 1: I think this would be a huge victory for all Americans, 554 00:32:04,880 --> 00:32:08,400 Speaker 1: especially other minorities like Asian Americans, who are getting half 555 00:32:08,440 --> 00:32:12,320 Speaker 1: as many people into Harvard, for example, because of these 556 00:32:12,400 --> 00:32:15,800 Speaker 1: laws and rules. Make sure you share a podcast today. 557 00:32:15,840 --> 00:32:17,920 Speaker 1: By the way, as we talk so much about Hunter Biden, 558 00:32:18,320 --> 00:32:20,880 Speaker 1: please write us a five star review as well, and 559 00:32:20,920 --> 00:32:22,560 Speaker 1: I will see you back here tomorrow