Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. We knew that they were
Speaker 1: going to be nasty about it, but Democrats have shown
Speaker 1: us just how crazy they are as well as how
Speaker 1: vindictive they are, within the first twenty four hours of
Speaker 1: taking power. Now we are in a Biden presidency. Now
Speaker 1: we are in a place where we have to take
Speaker 1: seriously the prospect of four years of the executive branch
Speaker 1: run by Joe Biden. It's gonna be run by a
Speaker 1: Democrat and probably by Joe Biden for that whole time.
Speaker 1: So this is where we are now. I'm hearing and
Speaker 1: seeing things that are truly absurd, upsetting, outrageous. They're coming
Speaker 1: after conservatives right now. They're trying to set up the
Speaker 1: framework for using not just the private sector and different
Speaker 1: cultural institutions, but now increasingly are actual political and legal
Speaker 1: mechanisms to go after people who have disfavored opinions. And
Speaker 1: in this case, it's being too strong of a Trump supporter.
Speaker 1: I think it was a pretty big indicator of where
Speaker 1: all this was going when they were asking or where
Speaker 1: they were demanding that we vet the National Guard for
Speaker 1: pro Trump sympathies. No surprise, did anything happen. Were there
Speaker 1: any riots yesterday anywhere on the Biden inauguration anywhere in
Speaker 1: the country from Trump supporters, No, there were not what
Speaker 1: a shock to absolutely nobody. But because we had one
Speaker 1: day were one group decided to riot at Capitol Hill.
Speaker 1: Now the left will muddy the waters and pretend that
Speaker 1: political violence happens on both sides. In fact, it happens
Speaker 1: really only on the right. That's the new narrative. We
Speaker 1: have to fight against it now. We used to be
Speaker 1: in a stronger position because we would say we don't
Speaker 1: do that, and it was one hundred percent true. Now
Speaker 1: we have to say, well, ninety nine percent of the
Speaker 1: time our side does not. Ninety nine point nine percent
Speaker 1: of the time, our side does not do that. So
Speaker 1: to speak, our side very broadly defined. But we already
Speaker 1: have had left wing riots. Wait, hold on a second,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is in office. I thought this was going
Speaker 1: to stop the rise of the seas and heal the
Speaker 1: planet or that was Obama. But Biden's supposed to be
Speaker 1: a second, a second iteration of the Obama administration. We
Speaker 1: all know that, So why is there so much anger
Speaker 1: out there? Shouldn't this be morning in America? Shouldn't this
Speaker 1: be now? I know the journalists are Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: for them, it's just all one big, warm bubble bath
Speaker 1: right now. They're having a great time. Oh it's amazing,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. It's just coming back in and restoring everything
Speaker 1: that is good and decent about the world. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's it's embarrassing. But I knew this was going to happen,
Speaker 1: as did you. But there are a lot of other people.
Speaker 1: There are other factions on the left that are attacking
Speaker 1: people and things, still, attacking police officers and buildings. We
Speaker 1: saw that in Denver yesterday. We saw that in Portland.
Speaker 1: Of course, Portland is like is like a mecca for
Speaker 1: left wing lunatics. It is a gathering point for the
Speaker 1: craziest of the crazy, and they've effectively got free reign
Speaker 1: in that city because there's so many Democrats and they
Speaker 1: don't want to cross them. It's madness. We'll get more
Speaker 1: into that, but right now, I want to point out
Speaker 1: that the former CIA director John Brennan, whom I did
Speaker 1: not work for, but I know him by reputation and
Speaker 1: I know that he is a left wing zealot. He's
Speaker 1: a very progressive guy. Think about that, all right. He
Speaker 1: was the CIA director under Obama. He was the senior
Speaker 1: counter terrorism advisor to the Obama White House for a
Speaker 1: number of years. This guy had a lot of authority
Speaker 1: and power in the government. He's not just some random
Speaker 1: person who's paid to go on TV, who works for
Speaker 1: a think tank that has two employees that no one
Speaker 1: cares about. He has real connections and on the left,
Speaker 1: he has real gravitas. And he is single handedly and
Speaker 1: this isn't new because of what he did over the
Speaker 1: Russia collusion hoax. He is single handedly destroying the brand
Speaker 1: of former CIA officer, which makes me mad on many levels.
Speaker 1: But he is doesn't have quite the same ring to
Speaker 1: it anymore because of people like him who say absolutely
Speaker 1: insane stuff. They are coming after normal everyday Trump supporters,
Speaker 1: not necessarily with criminal charges, but with the chilling effect
Speaker 1: of a vast surveillance push and the desire to make
Speaker 1: sure that everybody out there who does not support as
Speaker 1: Biden administration knows that they will be treated as harshly
Speaker 1: as possible by the law if there's any cause for it.
Speaker 1: And if they have to expand the scope of the
Speaker 1: law to wrap them up in this to go after
Speaker 1: them criminally, they will do. So. Here you have John Brandon,
Speaker 1: former CIA director, with one of that This was our
Speaker 1: national TV one of the crazier things I've heard on
Speaker 1: MSNBC in a long time, and that's saying a lot
Speaker 1: play three. But because of this growth in polarization in
Speaker 1: the United States and domestic violence in white supremacist groups,
Speaker 1: so I know looking forward that the members of the
Speaker 1: Biden team who have been dominated or have been appointed
Speaker 1: are now moving in laser like fashion to try to
Speaker 1: uncover as much as they can about what looks very
Speaker 1: similar to insurgency movements that we've seen overseas, where they
Speaker 1: germinate in different parts of the country and they gain strength,
Speaker 1: and it brings together an unholy alliance frequently of religious extrememists, authoritarians, fascists, bigots, racists, nativists,
Speaker 1: even libertarians, And unfortunately, I think there has been this
Speaker 1: momentum that has been generated as a result of unfortunately
Speaker 1: the demagoguic gretoric of people that's just departed government, but
Speaker 1: also those who continue in the halls of Congress and
Speaker 1: So I really do think that the law enforcement, homeland security, intelligence,
Speaker 1: and even the defense officials by doing everything possible to
Speaker 1: root out what seems to be a very very serious
Speaker 1: and insidious threat to our democracy in our republic, religious extremists, authoritarians,
Speaker 1: fascist biggest, biggest racists, even libertarians. This lunatic is singling
Speaker 1: out our pro weed legalization, individual liberty obsessed brethren in
Speaker 1: the libertarian movement. This is crazy on National TV, and
Speaker 1: he's telling you what the mentality is of all the
Speaker 1: former Obama national security officials that are coming back now,
Speaker 1: of the deep staters who are now the state. Let
Speaker 1: me repeat that for you. The deep state under Trump
Speaker 1: is now the state under Biden. They are running stuff.
Speaker 1: They're not operating in the shadows. They're not afraid of
Speaker 1: the DOJ finding out about this. They think they'll get
Speaker 1: a performance award if the DOJ finds out about what
Speaker 1: they're going to do against Trump voters, against this Trump insurgency,
Speaker 1: so to speak. Comparing this to insurgency. We all know
Speaker 1: what that means. Many of you served in the military,
Speaker 1: some of you served even in the intelligence community, or
Speaker 1: perhaps in other aspects of government or law enforcement. He's lining,
Speaker 1: this is what democrats are doing now. They're likning people
Speaker 1: that were upset over what they perceive to be an
Speaker 1: unfair and rigged election, upset over that, and comparing them
Speaker 1: to people who set suicide bombers off in crowded market
Speaker 1: squares and behead innocent civilians on video and engage in
Speaker 1: the mass enslavement and rape and torture of women, because
Speaker 1: that's what al Qaeda and the Islamic State and the Taliban,
Speaker 1: that's what those insurgencies do. So that's a very powerful
Speaker 1: word to use when you're talking about this, not in
Speaker 1: metaphorical terms, not in some Oh, I'm trying to use
Speaker 1: the martial rhetoric of the military to talk about a
Speaker 1: political issue. He's saying, No, we need to use This
Speaker 1: is the Obama XCIA director saying, we should see and
Speaker 1: are seeing the entirety of the national security apparatus, homeland security,
Speaker 1: federal law enforcement, even DoD laser like fashion, focus on
Speaker 1: the anti anti Biden, pro Trump insurgency and to bring
Speaker 1: every tool to bear to crush it. This guy's calling
Speaker 1: for counterinsurgency against his fellow Americans like a maniac. On
Speaker 1: the day of the inauguration, of Joe Biden. I've got
Speaker 1: news for the Libs. Despite all their hysterics and everything else,
Speaker 1: the system held. Everything ended up, you know, going basically
Speaker 1: the way that it was supposed to under in a
Speaker 1: constitutional in a constitutional sense, and they got their way.
Speaker 1: They won, and the Republicans now are we're moving into
Speaker 1: this new phase and this is where we are. Did
Speaker 1: they ever do that with four years of Russia collusion lies? No?
Speaker 1: Do you see Republicans now chanting by the thousands like
Speaker 1: spoiled children, screaming not my president. Because that's what the
Speaker 1: Democrats were doing. I know I saw them doing it
Speaker 1: here in New York City. I'll never forget. It was
Speaker 1: a cold, rady night right after Trump had won in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen, and just a stream of people, a river
Speaker 1: of morons, going down Broadway screaming that he's not their president.
Speaker 1: I remember thinking, fact check false, he is your president.
Speaker 1: That's where we are now. We got a bunch of
Speaker 1: loons running around. But instead of just opposing the government,
Speaker 1: instead of leaking to the Washington Post to undermine the
Speaker 1: incoming administration, bringing phony but pretextual prosecutions that they're pretending
Speaker 1: are about something else. No, now they're just calling the
Speaker 1: shots now. Crazy is in charge, don't you see. It's
Speaker 1: not like they have been healed. That's not as though
Speaker 1: all of a sudden they're going to be rational and
Speaker 1: reasonable and calm down a bit and see that there
Speaker 1: is more to life than who ends up being the
Speaker 1: congressman for your district or your senator or your president.
Speaker 1: There's other, much, much more important stuff every day in
Speaker 1: all of our lives. This is just a little tiny piece,
Speaker 1: a portion of it, and one that you should wrap
Speaker 1: up and put aside some days, one that you should
Speaker 1: make sure you don't always think about that. All of
Speaker 1: us should take breaks from this, take a moment to
Speaker 1: make sure that we're spending enough time with family, friends,
Speaker 1: loved ones, you know, take the kids fishing, take the
Speaker 1: misses out for a nice dinner, enjoy yourself, enjoy your life.
Speaker 1: We are all on borrowed time. I wish Democrats would
Speaker 1: just calm down. They are not waging some existential struggle
Speaker 1: against fascism in America known as Republicans. That's not happening.
Speaker 1: It wasn't happening under Trump, and it's not happening now.
Speaker 1: But if they keep pushing and doing this stuff and
Speaker 1: saying they're going to leverage the apparatus of this state
Speaker 1: against us. The backlash to that will grow, the anti
Speaker 1: purge will become a real thing. And depending on how
Speaker 1: severe and how serious they yeah, this could take us
Speaker 1: down an ugly political path, even uglier than what we've seen,
Speaker 1: and not even just political all the time. And that's
Speaker 1: the fear here. That's why I really do want the
Speaker 1: Democrats to calm down. Republicans are going to make arguments
Speaker 1: against what they're doing. We're going to try to convince
Speaker 1: those Democrats who are not fully brainwashed by the left
Speaker 1: that they shouldn't do these structural changes to this country
Speaker 1: that are being talked about by Democrats. But we are
Speaker 1: going to conduct ourselves, we conservatives, are going to conduct
Speaker 1: ourselves like adults, like patriots, like people who believe in
Speaker 1: this country and law and order. Even though right now
Speaker 1: we have taken a mule kick to the face and
Speaker 1: I know it and I feel it, But that's who
Speaker 1: we are. Let's see who they are. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Follow Buck on Facebook, Instagram. And
Speaker 1: I think the other issue of homeland security, as John
Speaker 1: pointed out, yes there's a security issue how do you
Speaker 1: identify armed militias who are intent on doing harm? But
Speaker 1: there's a broader societal issue that it's going to take
Speaker 1: many years to detox the disinformation, the lies, the hate
Speaker 1: that has been spread. A whole segment of the American
Speaker 1: population has been radicalized by what has happened over the
Speaker 1: last four years and by the fact that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is no longer there. They can no longer see Donald
Speaker 1: Trump kind of representing their grievances and the highest office,
Speaker 1: and so those grievances are going to go back underground.
Speaker 1: And I think there's a lot of work to be
Speaker 1: done to deal with the broader societal issues that go
Speaker 1: beyond what even national security homeland security professionals could do.
Speaker 1: Oh even more work than national security. So John Brennan
Speaker 1: saying we need to leverage the national security state to
Speaker 1: surveil and intimidate and go after this Trump insurgency. And
Speaker 1: then Obama's former chief for policy propagandists, Ben Rhodes is
Speaker 1: out there telling everybody, Oh, and it goes even beyond
Speaker 1: that because of how people have been radicalized. He's talking
Speaker 1: about how our side, generally speaking, is radicalized. Meanwhile, who
Speaker 1: was destroying buildings yesterday, it's the inauguration day. What was
Speaker 1: it Trump voters or Biden voters who attacked the d
Speaker 1: NZ headquarters in Portland? Was it Trump voters or Biden
Speaker 1: voters who were engaged in property destruction? And basically a
Speaker 1: smaller scale riot in Denver. I just want to know.
Speaker 1: It's day one of the new administration. The Democrats won
Speaker 1: this election, darn it. But it's where we are. I know,
Speaker 1: I say it, and it's just doesn't feel good, but
Speaker 1: it's true. And we're already seeing political violence from their side,
Speaker 1: because attacking cops and destroying property is lawless and his violence.
Speaker 1: And yet they're so worried about the radicalization on our side.
Speaker 1: What is the what is the defining movement of the
Speaker 1: left of the last ten years? And we're looking at
Speaker 1: political mobilizations that have happened allegedly at the grassroots level.
Speaker 1: What do they have BLM which resulted in hundreds of
Speaker 1: violent protests, riots, destruction of property, police stations burned to
Speaker 1: the ground, police officers murdered, people trying to blind cops
Speaker 1: with lasers, throw bags of yearn at them, hit them
Speaker 1: with rocks, just destroying you know, drug stores and clothing
Speaker 1: stores and stealing sneakers and handbags. All the stuff that
Speaker 1: we saw there was all a part of BLM movement.
Speaker 1: We all know that. Even before that, if you go
Speaker 1: back about a decade, there was the Occupy Wall Street movement,
Speaker 1: which was something that I covered when I got started
Speaker 1: very beginning of my media career, so I remember it well.
Speaker 1: And you know, the truth is the anti cop and
Speaker 1: Antifa movements BLM and Antifa were incubated, and within that
Speaker 1: Occupy movement there were rowdy and riotous protests that happened.
Speaker 1: Under Occupy Wall Street. There were criminal acts taking place,
Speaker 1: shutting down intersections, breaking stuff, throwing rocks at cops. All
Speaker 1: that was happening, particularly in places like Oakland, Portland's Seattle.
Speaker 1: What is the defining I just want to solve to
Speaker 1: remember this. What is the defining political movement or the
Speaker 1: most large scale grassroots political movement of the last ten
Speaker 1: years On the right, You could maybe say MAGA and
Speaker 1: Trump is um, but another another answer would be the
Speaker 1: Tea Party. How much violence, how much destruction was there
Speaker 1: from the Tea Party? Almost none? I mean, it became
Speaker 1: a joke even among conservatives that you know, you didn't
Speaker 1: want to be the person at the Tea Party rally
Speaker 1: who left a rapper on the town green because littering
Speaker 1: is a no no. That was the Tea Party people
Speaker 1: coming together and making their voices heard in a legal
Speaker 1: first amendment cherishing fashion. And then we had the twenty
Speaker 1: ten midterms, which was a wipeout for Democrats in the House,
Speaker 1: as you remember, and brought in this whole new crop
Speaker 1: a lot of your favorite politicians today one in that election.
Speaker 1: A lot of your favorite politicians came into office in
Speaker 1: twenty ten and twenty twelve after the Obama victory in
Speaker 1: two thousand and eight, in large part because of the
Speaker 1: Tea Party movement. So we have a history here. It's
Speaker 1: not even just the history of the last month. We
Speaker 1: have a history of the last ten years. Don't let
Speaker 1: them gaslight you. Don't let them convince you that our
Speaker 1: side is the problem. We're the radicals. We're the ones
Speaker 1: who need to have the security stay brought down in
Speaker 1: our heads. No, they're the authoritarians. That's the issue. You're
Speaker 1: listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Make sure you
Speaker 1: subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. We'll press forward with speed
Speaker 1: at urgency, for we have much to do in this
Speaker 1: winter of peril, and significant possibilities. Much to repair, much
Speaker 1: to restore, much to heal, much to build, and much
Speaker 1: to gain. Few people on our nation's history have been
Speaker 1: more challenged, or found the time more challenging, more difficult
Speaker 1: than the time we're in now. Once in a century,
Speaker 1: virus that silently stalks the country has taken as many
Speaker 1: lives in one year as America lost in all of
Speaker 1: World War Two. Millions of jobs have been lost, hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands of businesses closed. A cry for racial justice,
Speaker 1: some four hundred years in the making, moves us. The
Speaker 1: dream of justice for all will be deferred no longer.
Speaker 1: A cry for survival comes from planet itself, a cry
Speaker 1: that can't be any more desperate or any more clear.
Speaker 1: And now a rise of political extremism, white supremacy, domestic
Speaker 1: terrorism that we must confront and we will defeat. Notice
Speaker 1: how Biden puts together in this speech, the rise of
Speaker 1: political extremism, white supremacy. I still, where are all these
Speaker 1: white supremacists they're always talking about? Just wondering where are
Speaker 1: all the white supremacists we always seem about this rise
Speaker 1: of white supremacy. Well, because they've expanded the term so
Speaker 1: that it's almost meaningless. I mean, it encompasses so much
Speaker 1: that is not in any real way white supremacy that
Speaker 1: it's hard to understand what they're talking about. They just
Speaker 1: use it now the same way they use fascism. I
Speaker 1: don't like, you're bad white supremacy. That's what it means now,
Speaker 1: just the same way when they call you a fascist,
Speaker 1: they're not actually saying that you have anything to do
Speaker 1: with a kind of state control of the economy, with
Speaker 1: socialism and nationalism melded together in this hybrid political system
Speaker 1: where there's authoritarianism at that No, it's not. That's actually
Speaker 1: not what they're just saying, you're a fascist. You're a bad, evil,
Speaker 1: awful person. That's not what white supremacist means, too, because
Speaker 1: they refer to people who aren't in any way racist
Speaker 1: or white supremacists with that term just to smear them,
Speaker 1: just to attack them. But notice, and this was not
Speaker 1: an accident. The fight against white supremacy and the cries
Speaker 1: from a planet in jeopardy, you have to understand the
Speaker 1: way the leftist mind operates. They're looking at a mobilization.
Speaker 1: They're looking at a mobilization through the fight against Trump voters,
Speaker 1: which they will just you know, the term that we'll
Speaker 1: use is why supremacy. Domestic terrorists, meaning you voted for
Speaker 1: Trump and think that Joe Biden is of a foon
Speaker 1: who's not up for the job and never should have
Speaker 1: been elected. But you know, here we are that now
Speaker 1: qualifies as being a domestic terrorist attitude. But also with
Speaker 1: the climate change stuff, they have a messianic feeling about this.
Speaker 1: They have to save the world from climate change, and
Speaker 1: anyone who gets in the way is a denier, a
Speaker 1: term of obvious disparagement. They don't call you a denier
Speaker 1: because they want you to come over to their side.
Speaker 1: They don't call you a denier because they want to
Speaker 1: exchange in good faith debate. What else is the term
Speaker 1: denier used for the Holocaust, in which case they want
Speaker 1: people to be thought of if you don't believe that
Speaker 1: anything the left and the envirol wackos want to do
Speaker 1: to save the planet, if you have a problem with
Speaker 1: any of that, you are inherently you are inherent a
Speaker 1: denier morally similar to a Holocaust denier, because that's just
Speaker 1: what they want people to think, if it's crazy, I
Speaker 1: understand this is such a Olympic. That's what they want
Speaker 1: people to take away from it. They're putting these two
Speaker 1: things together because this is what the left wing mind
Speaker 1: will will mobilize behind, defeating and crushing Trumpism in all
Speaker 1: aspects of society as a domestic terrorist movement, and using
Speaker 1: climate change as the catch all the as the justification
Speaker 1: for any policy they want to implement at any time.
Speaker 1: And if you stand in the way of it, you
Speaker 1: don't want to save the planet. You see, if you
Speaker 1: stand in the way of it, you are a bad person.
Speaker 1: This is the guy who's supposed to be all about unity.
Speaker 1: This is the guy who is, you know, stopping the
Speaker 1: rise to the seas and healing the planet and all
Speaker 1: the other stuff that you are hearing. So I think
Speaker 1: that's that's all worth noting. This is his version of unity.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's promising things like this. This was the
Speaker 1: inauguration speech, Play eighteen. All those are supported our campaign,
Speaker 1: I'm humbled by the faith you placed in us. To
Speaker 1: all those who did not support us, let me say this,
Speaker 1: hear me out as we move forward, take a measure
Speaker 1: of me and my heart. If you're still disagree, so
Speaker 1: be it. That's democracy, that's American. The right to dissent
Speaker 1: peaceably in the guard rails of aripublic is perhaps this
Speaker 1: nation's greatest strength. Yeah, hear me, Clearly, disagreement must not
Speaker 1: lead to this union. And I pledged this to you.
Speaker 1: I will be a president for all Americans, all Americans,
Speaker 1: and I promise you I will fight as hard for
Speaker 1: those who did not support me as for those who did. Sure,
Speaker 1: he will. We can really take that one to the bank,
Speaker 1: can't we. What is one thing that Joe Biden could
Speaker 1: do right now that would calm everything down and make
Speaker 1: it easier to believe there's even the intent. I don't
Speaker 1: even think that this is really a Democrat desire. I
Speaker 1: don't think they want unity. I think they want payback.
Speaker 1: I think they want to punish people for their wrong think.
Speaker 1: I think their plan is to use their new powers
Speaker 1: to not only change society more in their image, but
Speaker 1: to track down and eradicate every vestige of Trumpism in
Speaker 1: our politics, culture, and all throughout society. That's what I think.
Speaker 1: But if they were trying to prove me wrong, you
Speaker 1: know how they could start? You know, you know what
Speaker 1: is one way that they could make it very clear
Speaker 1: they have a different approach. All Joe Biden would have
Speaker 1: to do is say, you know what, guys, let's stop
Speaker 1: with all this domestic terrorist movement talk. Let's not let's
Speaker 1: not speak. Let's not have prominent Democrat officials and people
Speaker 1: that are clearly on team Biden in one way or
Speaker 1: another out there saying that we're gonna bring down the
Speaker 1: wrath of God or Gaya or you know whoever the
Speaker 1: left believes in. We're gonna bring that wrath down on
Speaker 1: the heads of those who stood in Biden's way. No,
Speaker 1: say that we're all We're all gonna let bygones be bygones.
Speaker 1: Say that they forgive the transgressions of the Trump movement,
Speaker 1: even if they're still going to play out and you know,
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about the ones in court. They're gonna
Speaker 1: play out in different ways in society. Uh, say that
Speaker 1: they're willing to forgive their political opponents. Do you think
Speaker 1: they'd ever do that? Joe Biden says, you know, guys,
Speaker 1: we should move past that ugliness. No, got us still
Speaker 1: take shots, got us still make sure you're you ram
Speaker 1: home the advantage you have, right now Democrats, that's that's
Speaker 1: the plan. So they're being sore winners, which is no surprise,
Speaker 1: and they're also starting to take it upon themselves to
Speaker 1: clear out. I mean it's not just in rhetorical terms
Speaker 1: that they're clearing things out, it's also it's also it actions.
Speaker 1: The White House fired Peter Rob This guy was the
Speaker 1: nl RB, the National Labor Relations Board General Council. He's
Speaker 1: the top lawyer at the National Labor Relations Board. I
Speaker 1: know that sounds boring, but the NLRB matters a lot
Speaker 1: to Democrats because it's labor, it's unions, it's regulations that
Speaker 1: affect unions and workers. And this is right at the
Speaker 1: right where the policies and Democrats want where the rubber
Speaker 1: meets the road on a lot of things. So it
Speaker 1: does matter. And this is what Rob wrote when he
Speaker 1: was unwilling to step down because he had a term
Speaker 1: that did not expire until the end of this year.
Speaker 1: So why are they firing him a year early. The
Speaker 1: guy's a career civil servant. He hasn't done anything. Well,
Speaker 1: he's not their guy, you see. You know this is
Speaker 1: what we heard when Trump came in. Oh, he could
Speaker 1: never get rid of Saint Komy, remember that sank To Komy.
Speaker 1: You could never get rid of him. He's such a
Speaker 1: good and honorable man. Since Komi is a lanky weirdo
Speaker 1: and we all know it, a self righteous, oh, I mean,
Speaker 1: just bizarrely socially inept in love with himself weirdo. But
Speaker 1: if you fired him, oh he has a ten year
Speaker 1: term as FBI director. You can't do that. And that
Speaker 1: was the whole thing. Right. Well, here we have the
Speaker 1: Chief Council at the NLRB. I know it's not the
Speaker 1: head of the FBI, but it's not an insignificant position either,
Speaker 1: which is why the Democrats took action on it. Day one.
Speaker 1: Day one, they targeted this, They went after this. This
Speaker 1: wasn't an act, so it's not something that just came
Speaker 1: up in normal business. Here is what he wrote. You
Speaker 1: know that that I think you should hear because just
Speaker 1: shows you the double standards that are underway right now
Speaker 1: and what we're all being subjected to. Quote, it was
Speaker 1: my understanding the incoming administration intended to foster civility and
Speaker 1: union in this country and in the governing of this country,
Speaker 1: promising to adhere to the rule of law and enabling
Speaker 1: its chief law enforcement officers, the independence free from White
Speaker 1: House interference to enforce the laws of the United States.
Speaker 1: A presidential removal of the NLRB's General Counsel prior to
Speaker 1: the expiration of his or her term violates these promises
Speaker 1: and principles. That is the letter that he that he
Speaker 1: put out, and you know what they did. They fired him.
Speaker 1: They fired him. Here's also from his letter. This is too.
Speaker 1: This is to the Office of the President from Peter
Speaker 1: rob The removal of a general Council would send an
Speaker 1: unfortunate precedent for the labor relations of this country that
Speaker 1: will permanently undermine the structure unless the proper functioning of
Speaker 1: the NLRB. In particular, such action undermines Congress's intent that
Speaker 1: the office of the General Council be independent of the
Speaker 1: Board and the Executive Branch, so that the General Council,
Speaker 1: as chief prosecutor of the nlr can prosecute potential violations
Speaker 1: of the NLRA free from political influence and pressure. Indeed,
Speaker 1: my own experience, as well as my conversations with those
Speaker 1: who held this position before me, have confirmed that the
Speaker 1: need for the NLRB General Council to act independently without
Speaker 1: constant fear of removal. I am concerned about the abrupt
Speaker 1: manner in which this is being done, which will cause
Speaker 1: unnecessary interference with immediate agency operations. Signed, Sincerely, Peter b
Speaker 1: rob former now General Counsel. So Biden team came in
Speaker 1: and said, yeah, you're not our guy. You're not a
Speaker 1: You're not a union loving, big business socialist type. So
Speaker 1: you're gone, You're out. Gee. I thought this was going
Speaker 1: to be the administration that restored all the integrity and honor.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Join the conversation
Speaker 1: and message Buck on Facebook, Instagram, or email Team Bucket
Speaker 1: iHeartMedia dot com. He may read it on the show.
Speaker 1: You know, he spoke in the death of his soul
Speaker 1: and we needed this. You know that was beautiful, you know,
Speaker 1: beauty heels, beauty heels, and there was not one part
Speaker 1: of that that wasn't just medicine in the wound. And
Speaker 1: if you have any doubt that one person can make
Speaker 1: a difference, that one person's voice, one person's commitment, one
Speaker 1: person's bedrock faith can be the pivot point for a nation.
Speaker 1: Just watch that speech again and look at look at
Speaker 1: how the country responds, So we knew this was going
Speaker 1: to happen. We knew this was going to happen. We
Speaker 1: knew that the way this would go is that they
Speaker 1: would just say they would just say the most flowery,
Speaker 1: loving and praising things possible about Joe Biden, not just
Speaker 1: day one, not just in the inauguration. I mean, if
Speaker 1: this was gonna be just a welcome to the welcome
Speaker 1: to the Big Chair moment for Joe Biden, I'd say,
Speaker 1: all right, I mean, but now this is going to
Speaker 1: continue on, This is going to continue on. This is
Speaker 1: where things are, and we can all just look at
Speaker 1: this and understand exactly what's really happening here. They have
Speaker 1: their guy. It doesn't really matter that it's Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: It could be anything. Got a Democrat, and you're going
Speaker 1: to see the It's like the captain of the ship
Speaker 1: is taking the wheel and spending it, you know, hard
Speaker 1: to hard to port or is it starboard? Could be
Speaker 1: either way, I guess, and just turning the ship around. Here.
Speaker 1: The media is going from dug in scorched earth opposition
Speaker 1: to walking in front of the Biden procession, you know,
Speaker 1: throwing flowers in the air and giving everybody you know,
Speaker 1: garlands of tulips and kisses, and oh my, that's where
Speaker 1: we are now. So understand it's not only are they
Speaker 1: going to be propping of Biden in every way that
Speaker 1: they can, they're also going to be taking the position, um,
Speaker 1: they're also going to be taking the position that anybody
Speaker 1: that doesn't see it this way is a terrible human
Speaker 1: being and somebody that we should really all be very
Speaker 1: concerned about. But this was my this is my favorite one.
Speaker 1: So this guy at NBC, because you know NBC News,
Speaker 1: same same politics at CNN. Don't don't ever be fooled
Speaker 1: by that. It's you could think of these places as
Speaker 1: extensions of each other. There's really no difference in the
Speaker 1: kind of and people do bounce back and forth. ABC News,
Speaker 1: NBC News, CNN, MSNBC. It's like a big circle. Just
Speaker 1: go round and round and round. Try to get the
Speaker 1: most money in your contract you can. On the right,
Speaker 1: they're like nowhere for you to go. On the right.
Speaker 1: There's it's a lot more limited real estate as we know. Anyway,
Speaker 1: here's Peter Alexander over at NBC News. I just want you,
Speaker 1: I want you to hear this. This is his first
Speaker 1: chance to ask the incoming administration to new question. He's
Speaker 1: setting the tone right away up speaking truth to power.
Speaker 1: Play would the battle for truth may be as tough
Speaker 1: a fight right now as is the battle against coronavirus?
Speaker 1: How do you and present Biden's plan to combat disinformation
Speaker 1: that in many ways led to that assault we went
Speaker 1: just two weeks ago today on the Capitol. Well, I think, Peter,
Speaker 1: there are a number of ways to combat misinformation. One
Speaker 1: of them is accurate information and truth and data and
Speaker 1: sharing information even when I just had to hear and
Speaker 1: even when it is not meeting the expectations of people
Speaker 1: at home who are desperate for this crisis to be over.
Speaker 1: We'll have more to share with you in the next
Speaker 1: few days, hopefully before the weekend. But what we plan
Speaker 1: to do is not just return these daily briefings Monday
Speaker 1: through Frata, not Saturdays and Sundays. I'm not a monster,
Speaker 1: but also to return briefings with our health officials and
Speaker 1: public health officials. We want to do those regularly in
Speaker 1: a dependable way, with data shared with all of you
Speaker 1: and with the public, so that they can also track
Speaker 1: progress from yep, that's the question you get from Peter Alexander,
Speaker 1: how do you and President Biden plan to combat disinformation?
Speaker 1: They're the new regime? Dude, did you not get the memo?
Speaker 1: You're supposed to be combating their disinformation. You're supposed to
Speaker 1: be holding their feet to the fire. You're supposed to
Speaker 1: be asking questions meant to get around their propaganda and evasions.
Speaker 1: But no, he just let he let the game, let
Speaker 1: the game out right away. They're on the same team,
Speaker 1: working toward the same end. That's the whole thing. It's
Speaker 1: just gonna be one big high five circle up there
Speaker 1: in the West Wing, everyone just saying, yes, great Biden,
Speaker 1: where's the bigger threat of authoritarianism? When the entire media
Speaker 1: is opposed to and benefiting from its opposition to a president,
Speaker 1: or when they're all in the president's pocket, remember that
Speaker 1: you're in the freedom hunt. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest from Bucks at
Speaker 1: buck sexton dot com. We got a friend on the
Speaker 1: scene down in DC to talk about what's going on there,
Speaker 1: and also, like me, he's a former intelligence community guy.
Speaker 1: So much to dig into now with this proposed domestic
Speaker 1: terrorism law and all the rhetoric we're hearing from this
Speaker 1: Biden team. Jack Possobic is with us now. He's a
Speaker 1: correspondent for One American News, a former naval intelligence officer. Jack.
Speaker 1: Great to have you back, Hey Buck, thanks for having
Speaker 1: me on, calling in live from the Green Zone here
Speaker 1: in Washington, DC. Tell me about it. What's it look like?
Speaker 1: I mean, everything seemed okay yesterday, although it looked like
Speaker 1: they were preparing for an invasion from you know, China
Speaker 1: or North Korea or something. Look, I gotta tell you
Speaker 1: there are enough troops, trucks, and general military equipment in
Speaker 1: this town right now to repel an invasion from a
Speaker 1: near peer state power. I've never seen anything like this.
Speaker 1: I've been living in DC almost ten years in any
Speaker 1: response to anything that's happened, and we have had attacks here.
Speaker 1: We've had protests, We've had riots all last summer. We
Speaker 1: had police attacked, assaulted, etc. Places burned down. We had
Speaker 1: mobs running literally running through the streets of DC and
Speaker 1: Georgetown going up to people. You never saw this up.
Speaker 1: The White House was attacked at one point over the summer.
Speaker 1: They didn't even put a humby in front of it. Wow.
Speaker 1: And what's the reason for this continued heavy presence after
Speaker 1: the inauguration. You know, I've been in briefings both on
Speaker 1: the record and off the record with PAOs from the
Speaker 1: National Guard and other servicemen that I know. They keep
Speaker 1: telling me that there are no credible, active threats to
Speaker 1: Washington at this time. Is there chatter on social media?
Speaker 1: You bet. It's social media. That's what you'll find there
Speaker 1: every single day of the week. But you're not finding
Speaker 1: anything that rises to the level of a specific delienated
Speaker 1: threat to the Capitol, to the inauguration, to Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: to Washington, or the Capitol building itself. It's just not there.
Speaker 1: Most of the time. You see people, they're walking around.
Speaker 1: In some cases, they're armed in some cases. Yesterday we
Speaker 1: saw really what we saw yesterday that was significant, I
Speaker 1: think was foot patrols, massive amounts of foot patrols surrounding DC,
Speaker 1: throughout the Capitol region, throughout the National Mall. Forty soldiers
Speaker 1: fifty soldiers at a time, just marching around unarmed, yet
Speaker 1: really conducting those presents operations kind of giving everyone, I
Speaker 1: guess you know, some sense of that it is on lockdown,
Speaker 1: But as far as providing actual prevention to an attack,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure if there was anything that was going on.
Speaker 1: Speaking of Jack Posobic, he's correspondent for one American news
Speaker 1: network and a former Naval intelligence officer. Jack, You've had
Speaker 1: one hundred and thirty five civil rights organizations, according to
Speaker 1: Fox News, signing an open letter to Congress yesterday urging
Speaker 1: them not to expand terrorism related authorities. And the letter
Speaker 1: was signed on behalf of the Leadership Conference on Civil
Speaker 1: and Human Rights, and they say that there should not. Essentially,
Speaker 1: there's already plenty of laws in the books about terrorism.
Speaker 1: Why would we be expanding it. What's the purpose of it.
Speaker 1: I think we should all see this as as troubling
Speaker 1: because even in Joe Biden's speech, he is targeting, He's
Speaker 1: targeting individuals and groups on the right with a very
Speaker 1: broad brush. And we're hearing that they're going to mobilize state, local, federal,
Speaker 1: you name it, even DoD resources against this insurgency threat.
Speaker 1: As John Brennan, the XCI director calls it. That that
Speaker 1: to me, that all sounds really kind of menacing. Look.
Speaker 1: I spent time in the ICP, you sent time in
Speaker 1: the ic We know the types of tools that were
Speaker 1: used to wage the global war on terror. We know
Speaker 1: the reach and the power of the NSA, our sigate capabilities,
Speaker 1: are comment capabilities, everything that can be done through that.
Speaker 1: You know, we call it the magic Box of Fort Meade,
Speaker 1: with everything that they can look into around the world.
Speaker 1: Those tools were not designed to be used on the
Speaker 1: domestic American populace. They were not designed to be used
Speaker 1: for American citizens. And what they're attempting to do is
Speaker 1: to widen the aperture of the authorities and allowances for
Speaker 1: those tools so that they can be turned. Ever it
Speaker 1: seems ever so slightly, but you and I know Buck
Speaker 1: that the minute you start widening this net, you are
Speaker 1: going to be catching a lot of people that are
Speaker 1: not involved in any type of extremism, certainly not involved
Speaker 1: in any type of terrorism or any active threats because
Speaker 1: and you're noticing this with even the same words when
Speaker 1: you're talking about the National Guard, and I love the troops,
Speaker 1: there's no question about that, but we're talking about authorities
Speaker 1: here for political leaders when they start saying, well, we're concerned,
Speaker 1: we have concerns, and that we're going to start using
Speaker 1: flags and what my reporting has shown out is that
Speaker 1: they're going through the National Guard soldiers and when they're
Speaker 1: talking about this vetting process. These are the early stages
Speaker 1: of it. When they're vetting someone, that means they're going
Speaker 1: to your social media, to your Facebook, to your TikTok,
Speaker 1: to your Twitter or whatever you have up and they're
Speaker 1: looking for what they call indicators or flags. Well, what
Speaker 1: are some of the things that's ARMYCID or FBI and
Speaker 1: a NCIS is starting to get this directive now too.
Speaker 1: They're looking at do you like the NRA, do you
Speaker 1: have a picture of the Gadsden flag? Don't tread on me?
Speaker 1: Have you liked Turning Point USA? The Patriot Riders which
Speaker 1: go out for military funerals. These are all different types
Speaker 1: of things that they're looking for as just potential indicators
Speaker 1: for extremism. MAGA hats, Keep America Great hats. These are
Speaker 1: all endemic of the political opposition to the current administration.
Speaker 1: And so you've got a situation now where it's really
Speaker 1: one step removed from almost declaring your opposition to all
Speaker 1: the extremists. And I think that that's what you're just
Speaker 1: mentioning that Biden talked about in his speech yesterday. Yes,
Speaker 1: and they're certainly not going to be particularly discerning if
Speaker 1: it's something that allows them to chill the political opposition
Speaker 1: speech to them as well. Right, you don't. You don't
Speaker 1: have to lock up everybody, Jack, as you and I
Speaker 1: well know, you only have to pick a few targets
Speaker 1: here and there with these expanded authorities, and everybody else
Speaker 1: gets the message. We see that with these social media
Speaker 1: suppression campaigns, and I think we're going to see that
Speaker 1: with some of the way they try to apply the
Speaker 1: law here in any kind of expanded authority sense, which
Speaker 1: is what they're taught talking about. But I also want
Speaker 1: to ask you, as a correspondent for One American News,
Speaker 1: the calls for your including some of your fellow journalists
Speaker 1: out there or you know, fellow media people, to stop
Speaker 1: carriage of One America, to stop carriage of news Max
Speaker 1: and Fox News along with it. By the way, this
Speaker 1: I have not I mean, I'm not surprised by it,
Speaker 1: but have you seen this before. It feels like they
Speaker 1: believe with the new Biden administration, this is within their
Speaker 1: sites now to just deep platform not only they're political
Speaker 1: but also their commercial rivals. Right, once again, you've got
Speaker 1: a situation where it's yet another tactic where any dissent,
Speaker 1: any opinion that doesn't agree with them, not only you know, look,
Speaker 1: I grew up in the nineties, right, you know, around
Speaker 1: the same age. I remember that we used to always say,
Speaker 1: if you don't like what you're listening to, turn the channel. Right.
Speaker 1: That was sort of the Howard Sterns standing, turn the channel,
Speaker 1: you have to listen to it. But now we're told
Speaker 1: that no freedom of speech has to be a positive right.
Speaker 1: They call it positive freedom, meaning that you have to
Speaker 1: take away the speech that you don't like, that you
Speaker 1: disagree with. This again, is going to lead to a
Speaker 1: chilling effect in American political discourse. And you're already seeing
Speaker 1: that now today, where people are taking down pictures on
Speaker 1: their social media, they're making sure to be very quiet
Speaker 1: around the workplace so they don't say anything that makes
Speaker 1: anyone think that it could trip their sensibilities. At the
Speaker 1: taking off Trump bumper stickers, you are getting to a
Speaker 1: situation where you are essentially what you're essentially doing is
Speaker 1: that you're ending any meaningful opposition to the left in America.
Speaker 1: Speaking of Jack Posobic, one American news correspondent and former
Speaker 1: Naval intelligence officer, and Jack, I just I want to
Speaker 1: know what you think about the fact that We saw
Speaker 1: violence yesterday in America from leftists, unsurprisingly, attacking cops and buildings,
Speaker 1: including even the headquarters of the Knee and c in Portland.
Speaker 1: There was also a dust up in Denver. So we
Speaker 1: had a couple of places where there were effectively riots,
Speaker 1: and the one in Portland really targeted immigrations and customs
Speaker 1: enforcement offices. But isn't it isn't it? Well, I want
Speaker 1: your take, actually, just telling me what do you what
Speaker 1: do you think is the message that Americans should take
Speaker 1: from the fact that you're there in the so called
Speaker 1: green zone in DZ at green zone in DC with
Speaker 1: thirty thousand troops are so deployed for a quiet and
Speaker 1: peaceful day in DC, and it's actually leftists out in
Speaker 1: Portland who are trying to burn things down and intimidate
Speaker 1: federal officers. Yeah. I mean, it's it's really amazing that,
Speaker 1: you know, if Joe Biden and John Brennan and all
Speaker 1: the rest of these guys want to actually do something
Speaker 1: about domestic terrorism and insurrectionist groups. Boy, I've got a
Speaker 1: whole list for you of groups, starting with Portland. Then
Speaker 1: we go to Seattle, you go to the people that
Speaker 1: were perpetrating Chazz that have still to this day not
Speaker 1: been arrested and locked up. Actually, they got one of
Speaker 1: them in Tallahassee, Florida because he had traveled up to
Speaker 1: Chaz calls himself a YPG sniper because he went over
Speaker 1: to Syria into training these individuals. And I made an
Speaker 1: entire documentary about this. You can go to Antifa movie
Speaker 1: dot com and watch it. I've brought in people from
Speaker 1: the left and brought in people from conservatives. I brought
Speaker 1: in Black Lives Matter people who all said that this
Speaker 1: group Antifa, what they do with their insurrectionists, They're agitators,
Speaker 1: They're exciters. They want violent overthrow of the US system.
Speaker 1: They are not Republicans, they are not Democrats. They want
Speaker 1: to overthrow our system, the entire status quo. So no,
Speaker 1: of course, they are not supporters of Joe Biden in
Speaker 1: the same way that they were not supporters of Donald
Speaker 1: Trump or Hillary Clinton. They represent something far far outside
Speaker 1: the political mainstream, and and this is key. They are
Speaker 1: taking direct action in the streets to achieve it. Jack,
Speaker 1: what is the benefit that the Democrats and the left
Speaker 1: wing media, the Democrat aligned media get from ignoring and
Speaker 1: downplaying Antifa, even when they're attacking, say the DNC headquarters
Speaker 1: in Portland. Not I mean, if you flip on CNN
Speaker 1: right now, very unlikely you'll see the footage that I've
Speaker 1: seen from people like Andy No and I know you've
Speaker 1: got your excellent documentary that people can watch for an
Speaker 1: in depth. Very unlikely you'll see the black clad lunatics
Speaker 1: of Antifa just yesterday on those channels. Why is that, Well,
Speaker 1: the reason is twofold number one. Because they only want
Speaker 1: to portray one side as being negative, not of course
Speaker 1: being conservative, being Trump supporters, right. But they'll take groups
Speaker 1: like Proud Boys or Oathkeepers and then use that to
Speaker 1: paint with a broad brush across anyone who just happened
Speaker 1: to vote for the guy for office, right, and which
Speaker 1: is obviously not fair. But at the same time, they
Speaker 1: want to keep these groups like Antifa around because they
Speaker 1: know that for ninety percent of the time, Antifa's targets
Speaker 1: will be the same political opponents of the left. They
Speaker 1: will be Donald Trump, they will be Trump supporters, they
Speaker 1: will be conservatives, and they know that Antifa has no
Speaker 1: holds barred. They will go to your home, they will
Speaker 1: go to your place of business, they will go after
Speaker 1: you on social media, right, they will go and do
Speaker 1: the things that the Democrats can't, and of course with
Speaker 1: a wink and a nod, they'll disavow everything, but they'll
Speaker 1: never take meaningful action against us. You know, we're going
Speaker 1: through and identifying everybody that was at the Capitol riot
Speaker 1: that it went in. They're using facial recognition, they're asking
Speaker 1: for tips. And look, if people broke the law, they
Speaker 1: broke the law, we should do that. But why isn't
Speaker 1: that same standard being applied to these groups that have
Speaker 1: been doing this night after night in Portland and Seattle
Speaker 1: and across the country. Jack, Before we let you go,
Speaker 1: and I know you've got to get back to reporting
Speaker 1: on what's happening right there in DC because you're in
Speaker 1: the middle of all the security precautions. Are what are
Speaker 1: your biggest concerns and primary observations about this now Biden
Speaker 1: national security team that he's surrounding himself with. Some of
Speaker 1: them are about to be appointed, others are already in place. Look,
Speaker 1: he talks about unity, and he talks about healing, and
Speaker 1: yet he surrounds himself with people that are looking to
Speaker 1: do the exact opposite of that. And so I think
Speaker 1: it is distorting his message. You know, I'm going to
Speaker 1: take Joe Biden as his words what he says. He
Speaker 1: wants unity, He wants unity. But why are you putting
Speaker 1: people around you, sir? Why are you putting people around
Speaker 1: you that are seeking to ask for unity under submission?
Speaker 1: Very good question, one that I think we're going to
Speaker 1: find out, unfortunately the hard way in the weeks ahead.
Speaker 1: But Jack, keep your head on a swivel. My friends,
Speaker 1: stay safe and come back and join us soon. All right,
Speaker 1: appreciate it. They have to get you down here sometime. Absolutely,
Speaker 1: Jack Posovic one American News. Everybody should be following his
Speaker 1: work and check him out. You're listening to the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show podcast. Make sure you subscribe to the podcast
Speaker 1: on the iHeart radio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: So President Biden wants a theme of his presidency to
Speaker 1: be unifying the country. Does he think that Nancy flows
Speaker 1: in Chuchhomer should drop to be potentially divisive Senate impeachment trial. Well,
Speaker 1: he spoke today, as you all saw, about unity in
Speaker 1: his inaugural address and the importance of unity in bringing
Speaker 1: the country together and the resolve of the American people
Speaker 1: in helping to get through this moment. You know, we
Speaker 1: are confident though that just like the American people can
Speaker 1: the Senate can also multitask and they can do their
Speaker 1: constitutional duty while continuing to conduct the business of the
Speaker 1: American people. A real question, of course, it comes from
Speaker 1: the new White House correspondent for Fox News, Peter Doocey.
Speaker 1: A new A real question, and a new question. How
Speaker 1: can you be calling for unity? Let's think this one
Speaker 1: through for a second. How can they be calling for
Speaker 1: unity on the one hand, but on the other hand,
Speaker 1: they are telling us that there should be be a
Speaker 1: post presidency impeachment of Donald Trump. Now, let me just say,
Speaker 1: this would be disaster now that Biden is in office
Speaker 1: and everybody could you know, there wasn't some insurrection on
Speaker 1: inauguration Day and everything that was all hype and craziness
Speaker 1: and everything's okay. Everyone can calm down now that that's
Speaker 1: the case. Can we also calm down about the fact
Speaker 1: that the president didn't incite an insurrection. He lost the election.
Speaker 1: It's over. Biden's in power. Now, what's the point of
Speaker 1: allowing this spiteful after the fact? Clearly part is in punishment,
Speaker 1: and why would the GOP go along with it, then,
Speaker 1: therefore making it a bipartisan in punishment. What's the point, Ah,
Speaker 1: we all know what it is. See, this is the problem.
Speaker 1: The public is aware of this. They will tell us
Speaker 1: it is because of our sacred democracy. They will tell us,
Speaker 1: these politicians, it's because whatever we have to do here
Speaker 1: to you know, put America back on the truck of truth, honesty,
Speaker 1: justice in the American way, whatever, right. A lot of rhetoric,
Speaker 1: a lot of boilerplate phrases about this, That's what they'll say.
Speaker 1: What's the reality, though, what's really happening here with this?
Speaker 1: It's that they want to prevent Trump from running for
Speaker 1: office again. Because there are obviously all of the Democrats
Speaker 1: and a pretty healthy contingent of Republicans, including Republicans who
Speaker 1: were supportive of Trump once he came into office because
Speaker 1: it was good for their careers. They want to stop
Speaker 1: him from running again. Now, if what he did was
Speaker 1: so awful and so heinous that it would even require
Speaker 1: the removal after I should say, the impeachment after leaving office,
Speaker 1: and the barring from future office, if what he did
Speaker 1: requires that, or should I should get that based on
Speaker 1: the merits? Why would they be so concerned about him
Speaker 1: running again in the first place. Wouldn't wouldn't he be
Speaker 1: rejected by the American electorate. Wouldn't the Republican Party say no, Remember,
Speaker 1: there are a lot of people who have careers and
Speaker 1: money and a lot of things riding on not only
Speaker 1: who the president is, but who is the leader of
Speaker 1: the GOP. I mean, the day facto leader, the most
Speaker 1: powerful person in it. A lot of media personalities, a
Speaker 1: lot of news networks, and certainly consultants and advisors. And
Speaker 1: there's a whole whole groups out there of people who
Speaker 1: really benefit based upon who the head of the GOP is.
Speaker 1: And the McConnell faction, the more old guard GOP style group,
Speaker 1: does not want Donald Trump to even have the option
Speaker 1: of coming back because they worry about two things. One
Speaker 1: that he will use that to maintain a real control
Speaker 1: over the party going forward, and two that he could
Speaker 1: actually end up winning in a primary again, which is
Speaker 1: what would have to happen. He'd have to go through
Speaker 1: the primary and he would win again. Now, let me
Speaker 1: just say this, it's disastrous for the GOP to do this,
Speaker 1: no matter what they tell you, because the base will
Speaker 1: feel like this was unnecessary, vindictive, unjustified, and so that's
Speaker 1: why Democrats wanted to it. It's nothing but a pure
Speaker 1: win for Democrats. They get safety from Donald Trump running
Speaker 1: for office ever again, and they get a kind of
Speaker 1: political civil war within the GOP. Why give them that
Speaker 1: victory on top of the victory they've had in this
Speaker 1: last election and the Georgia Senate races. I don't think so.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Follow fuck on Facebook, Instagram,
Speaker 1: and Twitter. You know, the thing that was to me
Speaker 1: so striking about today was that kind of comforting sense,
Speaker 1: even with the masks, even with the distancing, even without
Speaker 1: the crowd. You know, those shots inside Statutory Hall that
Speaker 1: we're familiar with, you know, from every inauguration, the site
Speaker 1: of the Clintons and the Bushes and the Obama's, you know,
Speaker 1: the the Avengers, you know, sort of the super Marvel
Speaker 1: superheroes back up there together, all in one place, well
Speaker 1: with their friend Joe Biden, all of them, I think,
Speaker 1: feeling like that, all of them sharing that same view
Speaker 1: that a lot of Americans had, which is that you know,
Speaker 1: we did narrowly avert catastrophe in America, and that they
Speaker 1: were all there to kind of, you know, kind of
Speaker 1: to buttress their buddy Joe Biden and see him in
Speaker 1: some ways as the as the natural and necessary corrective
Speaker 1: to what's been going on. The Avengers. That's right. Former
Speaker 1: presidents are like the Avengers. Look, I do think that
Speaker 1: this is a principle that got a little bit overshadowed
Speaker 1: for some during the Trump era. But politicians are just
Speaker 1: people doing a job, and we know that. I think
Speaker 1: that we can go back to that universal understanding on
Speaker 1: the right now. I think we should be there. I
Speaker 1: think that most of us understood that about Trump, and
Speaker 1: I remember even some of the most art and early
Speaker 1: supporters of Trump that I know would refer to him
Speaker 1: as essentially the vessel, the tool. He was the hammer
Speaker 1: to deal with the nail. Right, he was the drainer
Speaker 1: of the swamp. It's not that everything he did was
Speaker 1: perfect or that he was superhuman. But we do want
Speaker 1: to move away and should always be away, from thinking
Speaker 1: of politicians as more than just people we've given some
Speaker 1: authority too to get a job done. They are not
Speaker 1: the Avengers, They are not superheroes. They are just like
Speaker 1: you and me. In fact, they're generally a little slimy
Speaker 1: or less ethical and honestly, let's be real, less intelligent
Speaker 1: than you and me. But that's where we are. So
Speaker 1: that's all being thrown out, that basic understanding of the
Speaker 1: role that politics and politicians specifically should play in American life,
Speaker 1: that is being abandoned right now by all these Democrats
Speaker 1: who are such enormous fans, these journals who love Biden.
Speaker 1: Oh they love Biden so much. And I think we
Speaker 1: should all be very clear, very aware of what those
Speaker 1: implications will be going forward. This is not going to change,
Speaker 1: and they're going to continue to be very nasty about
Speaker 1: the Trump administration for sure. I mean, if you're looking
Speaker 1: for like a just a vicious you know, you know,
Speaker 1: but just gross, little swamp swamp tastic journal tough to
Speaker 1: do better. Someone said recently that I kind of remind
Speaker 1: them of Michael Scott from the Office and his feelings
Speaker 1: about Toby is how I feel in the world of
Speaker 1: media about Tapper. I think that's pretty accurate. I think
Speaker 1: he may be. He may be the Toby to my
Speaker 1: Michael Scott. I don't even know the guy. I've only
Speaker 1: interacted them a couple of times. I just know he's
Speaker 1: the worst he's just the worst. And here he is
Speaker 1: with a really a really magnanium comment about the outgoing administration,
Speaker 1: plate twelve. Now, America, meet your new first family. The
Speaker 1: Bidens are walking into the house, now the White House,
Speaker 1: where the President and first Lady will make their new home.
Speaker 1: And for anybody out there wondering, yes, there has been
Speaker 1: a deep clean of the building, given the fact that
Speaker 1: the previous occupants did not take coronavirus particularly seriously, so
Speaker 1: do not worry about that. There is no evidence that
Speaker 1: he could point to that that is true. And there's
Speaker 1: also very limited evidence at best that cleaning surfaces prevents
Speaker 1: the transmission of coronavirus. Just to be very clear about that,
Speaker 1: there's a lot that they don't know. But they run
Speaker 1: around pretending like they have all these answers. But just
Speaker 1: just a gross, a gross thing to say from again
Speaker 1: he is he is Toby from the Office, just just
Speaker 1: the worst. And then there are other people that you
Speaker 1: have to wonder why they don't understand how silly and
Speaker 1: sad their reaction to all this. Maybe, uh, Stephen Colbert,
Speaker 1: he's supposed to be a comedian. I mean, say what
Speaker 1: you will about Jay Leno. I never thought that Mark.
Speaker 1: Who's the other guy, not Leno, you know the other one. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: thank you. I never thought Letterman was funny. I just
Speaker 1: I just always thought this guy, I didn't get it.
Speaker 1: I thought it was all just smoking mirrors around him
Speaker 1: and the you know, the channel and the media apparatus
Speaker 1: rounder just kind of propped him up, and he's all
Speaker 1: these writers. I've never found this guy funny. He seemed
Speaker 1: like a jerk a lot of the time, actually trying
Speaker 1: really hard to be funny. And people who work for him,
Speaker 1: he had a terrible reputation just in the business, horrible reputation.
Speaker 1: And never mind the stuff that came out about him
Speaker 1: and what he did to the guy's wife was married,
Speaker 1: and then the blackmail and the I mean a mess,
Speaker 1: a total mess, Jay Leno. I don't think it's super funny.
Speaker 1: But like I always when I used to I was
Speaker 1: a kid, when I would watch Jane Leno, I would
Speaker 1: stay up late, which I learned now is a bad idea.
Speaker 1: I should go to bed by eleven o'clock every night.
Speaker 1: I wish I'd known this when I was younger, or
Speaker 1: understood this, but it's so much better for your life.
Speaker 1: But anyway, I used to stay up Lena late when
Speaker 1: I was a kid. You know, after my mom would
Speaker 1: put me in bed or whatever, I try to go
Speaker 1: turn on the TV and watch them Jay Leno, and
Speaker 1: I'll say this about the guy. He was trying to
Speaker 1: make people laugh. He was like, I'm doing show biz.
Speaker 1: I'm making jokes. Everybody can laugh at them. I'm not
Speaker 1: punching down. We have totally lost that with these late
Speaker 1: night commedian that's gone. These people are political pundits who
Speaker 1: have jokes written for them now, and they're not very
Speaker 1: smart political pundits. They don't know very much, but they
Speaker 1: have big audiences because they have these legacy media institutions
Speaker 1: that prop them up. I mean, Stephen Colbert was kind
Speaker 1: of funny when he was essentially doing his what was
Speaker 1: the name of that, the Colbert Rapport, right, the Colbert Report.
Speaker 1: He was kind of funny when he was doing that,
Speaker 1: but that was of course making fun of the right.
Speaker 1: I think it was loosely based off of Bill O'Reilly.
Speaker 1: And now he's got this big slot and his show,
Speaker 1: his show is recorded, there's live audiences. It's not far
Speaker 1: from where I live, so I often poss it in
Speaker 1: New York city where the Colbert Studio Colbert whatever studio
Speaker 1: is And this is what he said about Joe Biden's victory.
Speaker 1: I played fourteen. Well you did it. You survived the
Speaker 1: last four years, and your reward a shiny new old president,
Speaker 1: good old Joe. Because today, at eleven forty nine am,
Speaker 1: Joseph robin At Biden Junior was sworn in as the
Speaker 1: forty sixth President of the United States. We watched it,
Speaker 1: Evi's here. We watched it together. The inauguration was a
Speaker 1: joyful occasion, like I do with most happy things. I
Speaker 1: cried a lot. It was true. It was extremely emotional,
Speaker 1: and not entirely in the way that I expected, because
Speaker 1: I have to tell you I have zero gloat in me.
Speaker 1: There is no end zone dance here. What I feel
Speaker 1: is enormous relief. Yeah, an adult should not cry with
Speaker 1: joy at the election of the most old school establishment
Speaker 1: machine politician you could possibly find. Okay, there's nothing new
Speaker 1: or interesting or exciting or revolutionary or anything about this guy.
Speaker 1: But even if there were, you don't cry with joy
Speaker 1: unless it's your family, right. I mean, you know, if
Speaker 1: you're and I'll give you know. Joe Biden can cry, Oh,
Speaker 1: my gosh, you didn't call a doctor. I know what
Speaker 1: an evil person I am, but to cry because your
Speaker 1: politician is now in office as an adult, especially one
Speaker 1: who works in the medias around celebrities all the time
Speaker 1: and should have a bit more of an act as
Speaker 1: if you've been there before. Attitude just goes to show you.
Speaker 1: I mean, these people are they're they're really devoted to this.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's there's something a little bit sad. They
Speaker 1: convinced themselves that Donald Trump was the monster that they
Speaker 1: kept saying on TV. They can they convinced themselves that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was a threat to our democracy, that he
Speaker 1: was going to destroy the republic. Otherwise, you can't you
Speaker 1: can't explain. You can't explain why somebody would cry like this,
Speaker 1: or why he would say that he cried and he
Speaker 1: sounded serious to me. And he does this all the time.
Speaker 1: I mean, he does political commentary and then throws a
Speaker 1: couple of jokes in, which is really not the way.
Speaker 1: It's that that would not be my preference. But it's sad.
Speaker 1: It's sad that people get this attached to a politician,
Speaker 1: especially people who are supposed to be dealing with the
Speaker 1: news and dealing with commentary on a regular basis, But
Speaker 1: it has been a the four years we have been through.
Speaker 1: The amount of hate that has has been piled on
Speaker 1: top of Trump and yes, his voters, is like nothing
Speaker 1: else we've ever seen. There's never been a there's never
Speaker 1: been something quite like this before, and how that plays
Speaker 1: out is really anybody's guests At this point. I just
Speaker 1: think that you're you're going to see You're going to
Speaker 1: see a lot of people who show you that even
Speaker 1: though Trump is gone, they've now emotionalized and internalized politics
Speaker 1: in a way that is unhealthy. That's an easy way
Speaker 1: of putting it. You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Make sure you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart
Speaker 1: Radio act or wherever you get your podcasts. A lot
Speaker 1: of executive orders on day one from Biden, not not
Speaker 1: wasting any time trying to erase some things that Trump did,
Speaker 1: but there's one that didn't get nearly the same amount
Speaker 1: of attention, at least not in the opening hours of
Speaker 1: the by and presidency as many others. But it's a
Speaker 1: reminder of what kind of an administration we're going to
Speaker 1: see here and what sorts of decisions it will make
Speaker 1: in order to play k the left. There's an executive
Speaker 1: order now on preventing a combating discrimination on the basis
Speaker 1: of gender identity and sexual or sexual orientation. Now that
Speaker 1: all that sounds good, right. No one wants discrimination, no
Speaker 1: one advocates for discrimination, and we should all treat each
Speaker 1: other with respect and dignity always. But what this actually means,
Speaker 1: Let's be very clear about this. The way this executive
Speaker 1: order is to be enforced is now any educational institution
Speaker 1: that actually gets money from the federal government is going
Speaker 1: to have they are not allowed to discriminate on the
Speaker 1: basis of gender identity. This now means a two hundred
Speaker 1: pound six f tall male who wants to play on
Speaker 1: the women's field hockey team is, by federal order, mandated
Speaker 1: to be able to do so. This also means that
Speaker 1: women's teams must be open to it, as well as
Speaker 1: women's scholarships for sports. So now you can have you
Speaker 1: can have individuals who are transgender women who decide that
Speaker 1: they want to And this has happened. This is no
Speaker 1: longer theoretical. This is no longer a question of, oh,
Speaker 1: you're taking us down a slippery slope. There have been
Speaker 1: cases brought already. You have track and field stars on
Speaker 1: the women's side who are biologically male. Now, I know,
Speaker 1: you know, we talk a lot about brainwashing, and we
Speaker 1: talk a lot about how all the trump called, you know,
Speaker 1: the media says all this stuff, who's really brainwashed? The
Speaker 1: side that says any person can observe clearly and obviously
Speaker 1: that males overwhelmingly have a physical advantage in strength, size,
Speaker 1: and speed over females, and there's a reason for separation
Speaker 1: based upon gender, in athletic competition, in bathroom usage, and
Speaker 1: a whole bunch of things. Anyone can observe this. And
Speaker 1: you know, I love it when the stupid libs come
Speaker 1: after me for this, as they have in the past
Speaker 1: when I've said, you know this, who oh, will you know,
Speaker 1: ron Da Rouse, you would be able to would be
Speaker 1: able to kick your butt or whatever. And I'm kind
Speaker 1: of like, Okay, you think maybe the one of the
Speaker 1: greatest female MMA fighters of all time might be able
Speaker 1: to in a bare knuckle fight beat a and a
Speaker 1: lot of you're like, you'd beat you, but that's not
Speaker 1: the point. I might be able to take a guy
Speaker 1: that has to sit in a desk hours at hours
Speaker 1: a day doing a radio show in a fight, and
Speaker 1: there's like you're using that as the point of comparison,
Speaker 1: the greatest female fighter perhaps of the last twenty years
Speaker 1: against some dude who you know is eating too many
Speaker 1: donuts these days, they're in quarantine. I don't think you're
Speaker 1: making the case lia you think you are, because yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: I was a college athlete. I know other people are
Speaker 1: college athletes too. They'll tell you the male female and
Speaker 1: this is in no way disparaging female female athletics or sports.
Speaker 1: But I mean, if you if you were, and I'm
Speaker 1: pretty sure here's an example of this. You know, the
Speaker 1: women's the women's national soccer team, and I a lot
Speaker 1: you don't care about soccer. The women's national soccer team
Speaker 1: is the best, one of the best in the world.
Speaker 1: American women's national soccer teams one of the best in
Speaker 1: the world. I think it's generally considered the like number
Speaker 1: one or number two team. And they scrimmaged not not longer.
Speaker 1: They scrimmaged the men's you know, Olympic development. I think
Speaker 1: it was sixteen sixteen, an under team, so basically sixteen
Speaker 1: and seven, maybe sixteen and fifteen year olds, and they
Speaker 1: got crushed, absolutely crushed. So that's the best women's team
Speaker 1: of adults in the world playing against the US you know,
Speaker 1: under sixty or sixteen and underteam. Just to give a
Speaker 1: sense that's met and there were men right male female
Speaker 1: disparity and athletic We all know it's there. Why do
Speaker 1: liberals insist that we cannot observe what is apparent and
Speaker 1: make decisions based upon what is true. This is one
Speaker 1: of these examples. And you could say, oh, but it
Speaker 1: doesn't really matter. Really, if you had trained your whole
Speaker 1: life to be in track and field as a woman
Speaker 1: and you were going to you set a state record
Speaker 1: in high school, would it bother you if you if
Speaker 1: you had all those early mornings, all that blood, sweat
Speaker 1: and tears to be number one, you know in uh
Speaker 1: in the high jump or you know, number one in
Speaker 1: one hundred meter dash, and then some guy who used
Speaker 1: to be called uh, you know, used to be called
Speaker 1: phil comes along and now wants to be called Philomena
Speaker 1: and says that that he's that he's a female and
Speaker 1: was running in this race and sets the state record?
Speaker 1: Uh did? Does that? Does that sit well with you
Speaker 1: if you're that woman, or if you're that coach or
Speaker 1: if you're that team that it's at that record. Is
Speaker 1: that fair and this is happening? I'm not. This is
Speaker 1: not theoretical. There are already cases that I've been brought
Speaker 1: about this. We all can see this, all right. An
Speaker 1: average athletic uh you know, a male of average athletic
Speaker 1: ability is going to be bigger, stronger, and faster than
Speaker 1: than eighty to ninety percent of the women that he
Speaker 1: comes across in the same sport, and again have to
Speaker 1: be average athletic ability. All right. That's I'm just telling you.
Speaker 1: That's where this is. That's we can all see it.
Speaker 1: I'm not. I mean, but people get angry about this.
Speaker 1: It's about equality, No, it's not. It's actually discriminating against women,
Speaker 1: is what it's doing. This is actually harming women in
Speaker 1: the name of equality for all the sexes. That's what
Speaker 1: they're doing. They can't wait on this, arguments to what
Speaker 1: do they do. But see, transgenderism in general now has
Speaker 1: become the the the tip of the spear for the
Speaker 1: socially progressive left. This is this is the four one
Speaker 1: of their civil rights movement. And so they've decided that
Speaker 1: whatever they have to do however, they can push this downfield,
Speaker 1: they'll do it. So, yeah, now you're gonna you're gonna have,
Speaker 1: once again under federal law if you want to be
Speaker 1: and this has happened, if you want to be a
Speaker 1: transgender MMA fighter. So now you're really now you're really harming.
Speaker 1: I mean, now you're really you know, putting people in
Speaker 1: danger because the male female disparity, which this has happened
Speaker 1: already before fallon Fox was the name of the fighter
Speaker 1: transgender female. You're gonna be able to sue and now
Speaker 1: fight and you'd be an MMA champion. This is what
Speaker 1: the Biden at This is the science crowd. This is
Speaker 1: the oh we believe the data people, Yeah, sure, sure
Speaker 1: they do. I mean, this is this is just this
Speaker 1: is crazy. Welcome to the Biden administration. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Follow fuck on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.
Speaker 1: What's next for the Biden Administration's cracked down on all
Speaker 1: things Trump. We've got a man who is fearless in
Speaker 1: his opposition to the machinations of the aggressive left, Sean Davis.
Speaker 1: He is co founder of the Federalist. The Federalist dot com,
Speaker 1: as you all know, is one of my favorite sites.
Speaker 1: Out there. Sean is a frequent writer for IT co
Speaker 1: founder of IT Sean, great to have you back. Thanks
Speaker 1: for having me back. Happy New Year. Yeah, Man, tell
Speaker 1: me this. You know, we had all these troops gathered
Speaker 1: and still gathered in DC, and yet the only violence
Speaker 1: that we've seen in the last twenty four hours was
Speaker 1: a bunch of Antifa lunatics in a couple of US cities.
Speaker 1: What a shock it is. I'll tell you, I've really
Speaker 1: enjoyed the one eighty that the left and the krupt
Speaker 1: corporate media have done. You'll recall that when they were
Speaker 1: trying to burn down the White House and breach its
Speaker 1: perimeter and set fire to churches in DC, when they're
Speaker 1: attacking cops and attacking senators, we were told that the
Speaker 1: Trump administration, even contemplating the use of things like tear
Speaker 1: gas to dispense with mobs, was actually a war crime.
Speaker 1: It violated the Geneva Convention in the Chemical Weapons Treaty,
Speaker 1: and it just proved what an awful tyrant, an authoritarian,
Speaker 1: this awful Orange dictator was. And yet the second the
Speaker 1: Capitol had a threat to it, Man, we had thousands
Speaker 1: of troops roll in. They threw up walls, which for
Speaker 1: you know, years they told us don't work, topped him
Speaker 1: with barbed wire. And it's just fascinating to me how
Speaker 1: situational that the left wings ethics are on this stuff.
Speaker 1: It was bad when Trump did it, but when they
Speaker 1: needed to protect themselves themselves from the bad Orange Man
Speaker 1: and his awful domestic terrorist supporters, suddenly this is a
Speaker 1: thing that we have to do in its only common sense,
Speaker 1: and anyone who thinks it's a bad idea is probably
Speaker 1: also a terrorist. What do you think they're really going
Speaker 1: to do here? With all this talk of expanding and
Speaker 1: they're being pretty explicit about it, I mean, people like
Speaker 1: John Brennan and Ben Rhodes, and this open call for
Speaker 1: not only a dprogramming and reprogramming of Trump supporters and
Speaker 1: using the apparatus of the state now in the Biden
Speaker 1: administration's hands to do it, but also the expansion of
Speaker 1: the surveillance and law enforcement and even military capability to
Speaker 1: handle this threat. On what basis do you think they're
Speaker 1: going to try to go forward with that? Well, my
Speaker 1: friend David Reboy, who's just a fascinating and provocative foreign
Speaker 1: policy thinker, has said about the left of the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party that it doesn't have any foreign enemies. All its
Speaker 1: enemies are domestic. And I think we're seeing that take shape.
Speaker 1: And when they tell us, when they show us who
Speaker 1: they are, when they start start using the language of
Speaker 1: re education, and when they start using the language of gulags,
Speaker 1: when they start referring to their own citizens as insurrectionists
Speaker 1: and insurgents and terrorists, we should believe them. We shouldn't
Speaker 1: scop anymore and say, oh, that's silly talk. These people
Speaker 1: are crazy. Yeah, they might be, but they're also in charge.
Speaker 1: And given what they spent the last four years doing
Speaker 1: what they did during the last campaign, which was used
Speaker 1: a bunch of foreigners and the US intelligence and surveillance
Speaker 1: apparatus to spy on a campaign they didn't like, they
Speaker 1: clearly have no qualms about turning all the tools of
Speaker 1: the state against its own citizens, because after all, we
Speaker 1: are not citizens, We are subjects to be controlled according
Speaker 1: to the last view of the world. And Sean, what
Speaker 1: do you take or what do you make of the
Speaker 1: Biden the calls for unity that seemed to come in
Speaker 1: the same speech. We'll hear about a call for unity,
Speaker 1: but then a ramping up domestic counter terrorism efforts against
Speaker 1: this this radical white supremacist you know, pro Trump movement
Speaker 1: out there. I still see there saying where they keep
Speaker 1: talking about all these white supremacists, There was no where
Speaker 1: does this come from? Where are these mobs of white
Speaker 1: supremacists that we're always being lectured are a threat to
Speaker 1: overturn the government and therefore need the national security apparatus
Speaker 1: turned against them? You asked, you know where all these terrorists?
Speaker 1: Where all these white supres I generally see them on CNN.
Speaker 1: To be honest, one of the ringleaders of the attack
Speaker 1: on the Capitol was on CNN. They also always have
Speaker 1: and I'm not even going to mention him because he
Speaker 1: doesn't deserve the attention one of the white supremacist looney
Speaker 1: tunes who has involved in the Charlottesville stuff. So you
Speaker 1: ask where are they? I see them on CNN Because
Speaker 1: the media actually has an interest in puffing up this
Speaker 1: thing that is really just a small handful of nut
Speaker 1: jobs and coops and trying to pretend like it's the
Speaker 1: whole country. And I think everyone needs to understand when
Speaker 1: people like Biden, who just last week referred to two
Speaker 1: elected GOP senators as Nazis, when that guy goes out
Speaker 1: and he says, oh, oh, we all need unity. What
Speaker 1: he doesn't want is unity. What he wants is submission.
Speaker 1: And there's a huge difference there. And there was an
Speaker 1: email I was on yesterday that talked about the difference
Speaker 1: between authoritarianism and totalitarianism. And authoritarians want you to do
Speaker 1: certain things, they want you to behave, They want you
Speaker 1: to comply. So talitarians want to control your thoughts, in
Speaker 1: your words, and everything you do. It's not enough to comply.
Speaker 1: You have to think the right thing. And that's exactly
Speaker 1: what this Biden demand for unity is. It is a
Speaker 1: demand for submission, and anyone who doesn't submit will be
Speaker 1: targeted by the state. We're speaking of Sean Davis. He
Speaker 1: is a co founder of the Federalist dot com, So
Speaker 1: you should all be checking out when you get whenever
Speaker 1: you're looking for news of the day. Sean, how do
Speaker 1: we now become I guess our own version of hashtag
Speaker 1: resist or you know what do you see now as
Speaker 1: the the direction and mobilization of the GOP of those
Speaker 1: who voted for Trump, whether with you know, with passion
Speaker 1: or just did it because they thought they were better
Speaker 1: than Biden. Whoever, where do we go from here to
Speaker 1: deal with Biden's administration that's already taking a very aggressive
Speaker 1: posture toward the disbelievers right. Why, I think the most
Speaker 1: important thing the right has to do is understand the
Speaker 1: current landscape. There's a lot of people in the Republican Party,
Speaker 1: many in positions of significant power, who continue living in
Speaker 1: this fantasy world in which it's still two thousand and
Speaker 1: four and the Iraq War is awesome, and spreading democracy
Speaker 1: is a great thing, and we've got to do stuff
Speaker 1: for the corporations because they're super important. And the first
Speaker 1: thing we have to do is recognize that's not now anymore.
Speaker 1: It's not two thousand and four, Okay, the neo conservatism
Speaker 1: and the corporatism, that's not the thing that actually gets
Speaker 1: people elected anymore. It is conservatism. It is populism and
Speaker 1: its patriotism. And so I think until the Republican Party,
Speaker 1: especially its leaders in Washington, understand what the voters actually want,
Speaker 1: and unfortunately many of them to test their own voters,
Speaker 1: until they get it through their heads what the voters
Speaker 1: actually want and why they turn to someone like Trump
Speaker 1: in the first place, the GOP is going to have
Speaker 1: a very long, rocky road for the short and medium term.
Speaker 1: If they don't come to grips what their voters actually
Speaker 1: want from their elected representatives. Why is it even even
Speaker 1: an open question that there may be enough Republicans to
Speaker 1: go along with a post and in my view, unconstitutional
Speaker 1: and certainly unwarranted, post presidency impeachment of Donald Trump. What
Speaker 1: the heck is going on in the I mean, Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell has has already said Trump was responsible for the
Speaker 1: insurrections or he's pushed very far in that direction. We
Speaker 1: heard about the threats that Trump had if he pardoned
Speaker 1: the wrong people on the last day, notably Julian Assange,
Speaker 1: that they would be more likely to convict him later.
Speaker 1: What's the what's the GOP calculation here as you see it?
Speaker 1: For those that are making that calculation, well, I think
Speaker 1: the calculation is that they don't like what Trump actually represented,
Speaker 1: which was a complete change to the ruling order. And
Speaker 1: he was He was a very severe, deep threat to
Speaker 1: the party establishments on both sides, which is why he
Speaker 1: was so heavily opposed by them. They are used to
Speaker 1: being able to go and do what they want to
Speaker 1: do and do their deals in the back and make
Speaker 1: all the right laws and stuff for their big corporate
Speaker 1: donors and then go off and laugh and have parties
Speaker 1: about it and get and get rich. That is not
Speaker 1: what voters want. And what Trump revealed was number one,
Speaker 1: just how broken the establishment is, and number two, how
Speaker 1: utterly craven and incompetent that the Republican Party establishment is.
Speaker 1: To go in there and say how high whenever the
Speaker 1: media says jump just reveals how completely and deeply out
Speaker 1: of touch the party intelligency and the party leadership is.
Speaker 1: They really think that the country and the voters work
Speaker 1: for them, not the other way around. Sean, before let you,
Speaker 1: before I let you, Jet, I just want to know
Speaker 1: what is I've been asking, you know, people whose opinion
Speaker 1: I value and trust about this, and those are the
Speaker 1: people that have on the show like you, what is
Speaker 1: your case for optimism and what feels like a tough
Speaker 1: time right now to be a conservative? Well, I've got
Speaker 1: I've got two reasons for optimism. One is theological. You know,
Speaker 1: we're all sinful, we're all fallen, but we have a
Speaker 1: savior who died and rose again to save all of us,
Speaker 1: So that should be our ultimate hope. And our ultimate optimism,
Speaker 1: and the second is more practical and historical. We still
Speaker 1: live in the greatest nation that this earth has ever seen.
Speaker 1: We have the greatest constitution instead of laws the world
Speaker 1: has ever seen, and we have the greatest people that
Speaker 1: the world has ever seen. America is a great country.
Speaker 1: It is an amazing country. And just because we hit
Speaker 1: a few speed bumps and we'd let a few kops
Speaker 1: take control isn't a reason to go and throw the
Speaker 1: baby out with the bathwater. So we have infinite, untold
Speaker 1: reasons to be optimistic about our future, even if it
Speaker 1: seems like it's a little dark right now. Sean Davis
Speaker 1: everybody Federalist dot com for his latest sewn Appreciate it, Buddy,
Speaker 1: talk to you soon. Thank you, Buck, you're in the
Speaker 1: freedom hunt. Thanks for listening to the Buck Sexton Show
Speaker 1: podcast to get the latest from Buck at buck Sexton
Speaker 1: dot com. And then we have to figure out a
Speaker 1: way to solve this health crisis with a vaccine. That's
Speaker 1: what's going to do this. You can throw all the
Speaker 1: money you want at the problem, but it won't solve
Speaker 1: it until we actually find a way to get to
Speaker 1: some kind of healthy way to get people to go
Speaker 1: back to restaurants, to go back to work. And I
Speaker 1: think you're seeing that with some of the executive orders
Speaker 1: yesterday the President Biden put in place around trying to
Speaker 1: get schools back up and running that will help with
Speaker 1: the economy, trying to get ppe in places that it
Speaker 1: hasn't been, using the Defense Production Act really for the
Speaker 1: first time in a meaningful way to try to deal
Speaker 1: with testing and all the other equipment that we haven't
Speaker 1: had access to over this past year. Let me tell
Speaker 1: you this right now, all indicators from what we can see,
Speaker 1: all indicators are that the Defense or that the Biden
Speaker 1: team coming in does not actually have any particularly new
Speaker 1: innovative plan whatsoever to deal with COVID. Okay, so well,
Speaker 1: I wantever to be very clear about this. They can
Speaker 1: say as much as they want that Biden is the
Speaker 1: Great Savior, that they can make all these claims, and
Speaker 1: that's that's fine, right, But when we were actually looking
Speaker 1: at the numbers, what you're going to see is that
Speaker 1: they're going to have to engage in a lot of
Speaker 1: rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic and well pretending
Speaker 1: that what they're doing is somehow better than it is.
Speaker 1: I guess the Titanic is probably a bad analogy. But
Speaker 1: rearranging the goal post, there we go. That's the analogy
Speaker 1: I was looking for, Not the Titanic. Rearranging the goal posts. Here,
Speaker 1: they're gonna have to move them because, for example, they
Speaker 1: keep saying we're gonna get you one hundred million vaccinations
Speaker 1: after Biden's first hundred days, before Biden was even sworn in,
Speaker 1: they were already doing guess what about a million vaccinations
Speaker 1: a day. Now, I'm not a huge math guy, but
Speaker 1: if you're doing about a million a day, and after
Speaker 1: one hundred days you're gonna be at one hundred million,
Speaker 1: and you're doing a million a day before you come
Speaker 1: into office, what exactly have you done? What exactly have
Speaker 1: you added to this um? But nope, not not, not
Speaker 1: gonna be the way this is played. They're gonna act
Speaker 1: like it's oh, so different. They're gonna act like it's
Speaker 1: such a different situation. And you know, here, here you go.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to I'm trying to find there's so many
Speaker 1: examples of this. I mean, one of them is that
Speaker 1: we're now being told why you have to master I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: I lose my mind on this. I lose my mind
Speaker 1: on this. Okay, they really want us to mask up
Speaker 1: even after we're vaccinated. Here, here you go. This is
Speaker 1: the story the Washington Post today. Yes, people with coronavirus
Speaker 1: vaccinations should still distance from each other. Here's why. And
Speaker 1: they get into this whole description of it. You know what,
Speaker 1: there's you know what they're they're a reason for it
Speaker 1: is well, even if you're vaccinated, it's not one hundred percent.
Speaker 1: And we haven't studied whether you could you could fail
Speaker 1: to be infected but still pass this to someone else.
Speaker 1: This is a new me they're creating now, new medical standards.
Speaker 1: No one before this has thought, well, even if you
Speaker 1: don't get infected, because your body as soon as it
Speaker 1: recognized the virus clears it. Even if you don't get infected,
Speaker 1: you're gonna give it to somebody else. That's not the
Speaker 1: case for the measles vaccine. Do you know what the
Speaker 1: measles vaccine vaccine rate is? The vaccination rate for measles
Speaker 1: in terms of success against it is ninety seven percent.
Speaker 1: All right, that's not one hundred percent. So does that
Speaker 1: mean that we have to always be you know, you
Speaker 1: have to always be afraid that maybe you've been exposed
Speaker 1: to measles, even if you've been vaccinated. No, because there's
Speaker 1: herd immunity. And because so even if the rate is
Speaker 1: not a hundred, we're told though, you have to continue,
Speaker 1: you have to continue to act like you could get
Speaker 1: this and spread it. This is just they just keep
Speaker 1: doing this. They like this, they have this mentality. They're
Speaker 1: locked in on this. Think about it. My mentality is
Speaker 1: I want us to have our lives back. Their mentality
Speaker 1: is no, no, no, Oh my gosh. There's still there's risks.
Speaker 1: There's risks. There's risks. Yeah, there's always risks. Vaccine should
Speaker 1: be the end for each of us as individuals. End
Speaker 1: of story. That's it. And I know a lot of
Speaker 1: you aren't even going to get the vaccine. By the way,
Speaker 1: I'm not even talking about that. I'm just saying, if
Speaker 1: you get the vaccine, there is no reasonable basis to
Speaker 1: demand that you mask up and social distance and all
Speaker 1: this other crap. It's just it's just creating a completely
Speaker 1: unreasonable Oh, it has to be one hundred percent perfect.
Speaker 1: There's a radical possibility. I mean, where are we getting
Speaker 1: it now? One in ten thousand, one in thirty thousand,
Speaker 1: do you want to walk around with a mask on
Speaker 1: for the next two, three, four years because there's a
Speaker 1: one in thirty thousand chance that you might get coronavirus
Speaker 1: and might pass something. The disease has over a ninety
Speaker 1: nine percent survival rate. And yet even if you're vaccinated,
Speaker 1: and even if you can't so you're ninety seven or
Speaker 1: ninety five percent protected against it personally, and anyone else
Speaker 1: that's around you they're vaccines, they're ninety five percent protected
Speaker 1: against it. And even if Heaven forbid you somehow are
Speaker 1: in that five percent that still gets ill. Even though
Speaker 1: you've been vaccinated, you're ninety nine percent likely to survive it,
Speaker 1: but you're not allowed to live your life. Mask up,
Speaker 1: shut up, social distance. This is now what's this is science?
Speaker 1: They tell you. This is what is reasonable and the
Speaker 1: way that we should all live our lives. This is crazy.
Speaker 1: You know it, I know it. This is crazy. It
Speaker 1: shouldn't be this way, but this is what we've been there.
Speaker 1: The fear mongering and the panic porn has been so
Speaker 1: widespread that anybody that wants to have a reasonable discussion
Speaker 1: about this is shouted down as if as if there's
Speaker 1: some kind of a monster, as if there's some kind
Speaker 1: of monster. I'm sorry, that's just it's outrageous. And I
Speaker 1: wonder what it's gonna take. I mean, how much more
Speaker 1: of this? You know we're gonna have now the daily
Speaker 1: briefings from the White House with you know, Fauci's gonna
Speaker 1: get out. We're still bad numbers, numbers will get better.
Speaker 1: Gotta wash, gotta social distance, gotta have more washing and
Speaker 1: social distancing. You know, we still know that this is
Speaker 1: what he's gonna say. You know, it could be worse
Speaker 1: before it gets better, could get a little better before
Speaker 1: it gets much worse. There's all this guy, this guy,
Speaker 1: there's nothing of any value, you know. I think we
Speaker 1: need to have the lockdowns and the mitigation continue. I mean,
Speaker 1: and but the Libs love this, just like with climate change,
Speaker 1: this has just become an area where they what they're
Speaker 1: really addicted to is the belief that they're smarter than
Speaker 1: the people that don't agree with them. That's the that's
Speaker 1: the real driving factor for a lot of this. Now.
Speaker 1: Oh I'm I'm a masker and a lockdowner because I'm
Speaker 1: so smart, because I listened to the science. That's what
Speaker 1: they are telling us. I'm a lockdowner because I listened
Speaker 1: to science or you know, I mean, it's just it's
Speaker 1: just madness. I mean, you know, you gotta tell yourself.
Speaker 1: After a while, you realize this, this is absurd. This
Speaker 1: is absurd. But this is where we are. And until
Speaker 1: we tell them enough is enough, until we tell them
Speaker 1: that we are going to take back our liberty, that
Speaker 1: this is no longer. The state cannot just control and
Speaker 1: micromanage every aspect of your life because of a infinitesimal
Speaker 1: chance of an aerosolized virus being passed after vaccination. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you're listen to the Fuck Sexton Show podcast. Make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Liberty, Truth and great Here
Speaker 1: now roll call, what the heck is this music? Did you?
Speaker 1: Did you pick this one? I didn't pick any of these.
Speaker 1: We have a wonderful production department and they did it.
Speaker 1: That's a hey, I feel like it's it's kind of
Speaker 1: like a little bit of a little bit of a
Speaker 1: congo line vibe, you know. Yeah, I don't mind. It'll
Speaker 1: grow on us, right, alright, alright, I guess I guess
Speaker 1: I'll work with it. So we got roll call. Remember
Speaker 1: to go to Buck Sexton dot com check in please.
Speaker 1: I think social media for right now out of them
Speaker 1: seem like it's banning conservatives quite as much. So let's
Speaker 1: go back to those of you who haven't follow me.
Speaker 1: If you have a Parlor account, please do follow Buck
Speaker 1: sex and on Parlor the website and I's back up
Speaker 1: if you have a If you're on Twitter, follow me
Speaker 1: on Twitter. I'm also on TikTok. Now I'm gonna get
Speaker 1: better at making fun of your TikTok videos is my plan.
Speaker 1: So I got all kinds of things I'm gonna be
Speaker 1: getting go home with here. So thank you again for
Speaker 1: all your support what we do here Bucksxton dot com
Speaker 1: for editorial stories, etc. Janet kicking us off here, Hello Buck,
Speaker 1: thank you for all you do. Your podcast is very informative.
Speaker 1: I'm curious what you think about term limits. My idea
Speaker 1: would be that senators would serve two terms, the House
Speaker 1: representatives members would be would serve six terms, the president
Speaker 1: would serve one six year term no reelection. I think
Speaker 1: this would eliminate so much animosity between career politicians which
Speaker 1: we currently have, and the president could concentrate on his
Speaker 1: or her agenda without having to worry about a mounting
Speaker 1: reelection campaign after only two years in office. I doubt
Speaker 1: that it would ever happen, but I feel the time
Speaker 1: has come. Thank you, and also thank you to producer Mark.
Speaker 1: You guys make a great team. Well, thank you Janet
Speaker 1: for the very kind note. Yeah, I love I love
Speaker 1: the idea of term limits. I think it's great. I
Speaker 1: just think the problem is that the people that would
Speaker 1: have to go ahead with term limits, that would have
Speaker 1: to make it a reality, have no interest or incentive
Speaker 1: to do so. So that's I think what you really
Speaker 1: can't get past here, right that there are people there
Speaker 1: are there are people that will talk even about term limits,
Speaker 1: and they're career politicians, and they don't want to give
Speaker 1: up that whole career politician thing. They're they're liking it.
Speaker 1: They're like, I think I'm gonna ride this out, you know,
Speaker 1: I'll spend Look at Joe Biden. The guy's been in
Speaker 1: elected office longer than I have been alive, or maybe
Speaker 1: within a couple of years of that. So yeah, it's
Speaker 1: a great idea, Janet. I just I can't mislead you
Speaker 1: and tell you that I think it's likely it's likely
Speaker 1: to happen, so, but it is a great idea, and
Speaker 1: I think that would would help in a lot of ways.
Speaker 1: Conservatives off and talk about term limits, especially after we
Speaker 1: lose an election, But this time around, I think we're
Speaker 1: just going to have to accept that the term limits
Speaker 1: aren't changing anytime soon. Maureen hey buck and producing our
Speaker 1: quick question. With all the stripping down of our Second
Speaker 1: Amendment rights by big tech, I keep hearing, well it's
Speaker 1: allowed as free speech doesn't apply to private companies. Well, Amazon, Apple, Google, Facebook, Microsoft,
Speaker 1: and Twitter are all publicly traded on Wall Street. Aren't
Speaker 1: publicly traded companies no longer considered private once you can
Speaker 1: buy their stocks. And if they're publicly traded, then why
Speaker 1: aren't they allowing free speech? This is one big pile
Speaker 1: of excuses being made in order to allow Soviet style
Speaker 1: censorship so as to annihilate the right. So, Maureen, yes
Speaker 1: on the Soviet style censorship on your question about public
Speaker 1: versus private. So there's private companies that are that are
Speaker 1: held by individuals, usually in a partnership or you know,
Speaker 1: an LLC, and then there's public companies that have stock
Speaker 1: that is traded on the markets that doesn't That designation
Speaker 1: doesn't change the kind of private actions they can do
Speaker 1: as non government actors, if that makes sense. So, you know,
Speaker 1: the the CEO of a company still gets to make
Speaker 1: decisions without government interference in some in some area, not
Speaker 1: in all areas. There's still regulations and laws, but it's
Speaker 1: not a public that. There's public private sector and then
Speaker 1: there's public private companies, and they're they're not the same thing.
Speaker 1: Public private sector is, uh, you know, independent businesses operating
Speaker 1: or independent of the government versus um public sector which
Speaker 1: is paid for with your tax dollars, government employees, government agencies,
Speaker 1: those kinds of things. Public private company has to do
Speaker 1: with whether individuals can buy or sell. If there's been
Speaker 1: an IPO and individuals can buy and sell the stock
Speaker 1: on the open markets, that's a publicly traded company versus
Speaker 1: a privately held company. So I think there's some definitional
Speaker 1: distinctions we need to put in place there. But yeah,
Speaker 1: so what you are going to though, what you're opening
Speaker 1: the door for here is the discussion that I think
Speaker 1: does need to happen about what are the limits of
Speaker 1: public I'm sorry, what are the limits of publicly traded
Speaker 1: private companies? When it comes to discrimination, right, any company,
Speaker 1: any private company, whether it's you know, a small business
Speaker 1: or it's Amazon, can't say we are only gonna hire
Speaker 1: people who are you know, we are only hiring people
Speaker 1: who are from I don't know, American Samoa like. They
Speaker 1: couldn't do They can't discriminate on the basis of race
Speaker 1: or gender or right. They can't do that openly, even
Speaker 1: though they're private. They're a private company. But the issue
Speaker 1: here becomes, well, then why should they If they can't
Speaker 1: discriminate on the following characteristics, why should they be able
Speaker 1: to discriminate on the basis of political afiliation or political speech?
Speaker 1: And this is where we get into will we find
Speaker 1: a way to regulate them or not? That's really the
Speaker 1: heart of the issue. Michael writes, what a scary thought
Speaker 1: if Romney would have won. My guess is that under
Speaker 1: the spirit or guise of bipartisanship and fairness, he would
Speaker 1: have given it to Hillary. Who have been in like
Speaker 1: would have been in like Flynn. Unless your name starts
Speaker 1: with Michael, neither Romney. I see what you did there, Michael,
Speaker 1: neither Romney or this nation would have hit us. And
Speaker 1: at least Trump was both the break and a wake
Speaker 1: up call for this nation. Yeah, Michael, I mean if
Speaker 1: you don't think Romney, you know, this is a historical
Speaker 1: what if if if you don't think that Romney would
Speaker 1: have been really strong and better as I mean, I
Speaker 1: think a lot of people would agree with you, So
Speaker 1: who knows. I mean, it would have ended for it.
Speaker 1: Remember not only would it maybe have led to a
Speaker 1: Hillary presidency, it would have ended four years of extra Obamaism,
Speaker 1: So you have to take that into account as well. Spencer, Hey, Fellas,
Speaker 1: great show. As always appreciate you both tremendously. I was
Speaker 1: reading an article on the Federalist Do you think there's
Speaker 1: any credence to the statement of the Federalists like where
Speaker 1: our friend Shawn Davis is from. Do you think there's
Speaker 1: any credence to the statement the riot was somewhat instigated
Speaker 1: by certain leftists on site at that time, help start
Speaker 1: and fuel the fire to encourage people to start rioting.
Speaker 1: Just wondering what your opinion was. Ps. I got Ghost
Speaker 1: of Sushima and love it and we should play online sometime.
Speaker 1: Wish you guys the best and very grateful for this
Speaker 1: show in these crazy times. Spencer, We're very grateful for you.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. Ghost of Sushima is one of
Speaker 1: the best video games I've ever played in my entire life.
Speaker 1: I'll just say it. I think it's top five. I
Speaker 1: wasn't expecting it to be that good. It's incredible, it's addictive,
Speaker 1: it's so good. And yes, Spencer, send me your user
Speaker 1: name or something. And maybe I also want to do
Speaker 1: some Team Buck Call of Duty because I'm getting pretty
Speaker 1: decent at Call of Duty. Some of you have reached
Speaker 1: out to me. It's say, can we play Call of Duty?
Speaker 1: And I said, yeah, let's do it. Gotta, I gotta,
Speaker 1: I canna remember my call of duty name is or whatever.
Speaker 1: I don't remember what it is, but send me your
Speaker 1: call of duty names too, and we can we can
Speaker 1: maybe get like a Team Buck Call of Duty thing.
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, do you ever play I have? I don't
Speaker 1: often tell me you're gonna be You're telling me you're
Speaker 1: gonna be a nube. You're gonna be a bot. Yea
Speaker 1: not allow everyone will kill me. But Producer Mark, that
Speaker 1: would be so that would be so fun for me
Speaker 1: here to be able to be at a position to
Speaker 1: finally get you back for calling me out for being
Speaker 1: late every morning. You would probably just follow me around
Speaker 1: the battlefield and just keep shooting me. Now this is
Speaker 1: sounding better and better all the time, by the way,
Speaker 1: I really enjoy this. But yeah, anyway, I's Ghost of
Speaker 1: Sushim is amazing. Call of Duty is amazing. Highly highly
Speaker 1: recommend um. And as for sorry, ask for your serious
Speaker 1: question Spencer about the instigation, I think it. I think
Speaker 1: there were some instigators, some agents provocateur if you will,
Speaker 1: but it was mostly people on the right quan on
Speaker 1: people that were there overwhelmingly ninety nine five percent. Whatever
Speaker 1: it might be. There were some people that I think
Speaker 1: were leftists who knew that they could do this and
Speaker 1: make it worse. There's been some evidence of that, but
Speaker 1: it's still you know, it was it was making a
Speaker 1: bad situation worse. It wasn't creating the bad situation, if
Speaker 1: that makes sense. You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Make sure you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio
Speaker 1: app or wherever you get your podcasts. More roll call
Speaker 1: here Kyle up Buck in regards to your commentary on
Speaker 1: Katie Kirk my own opinion of hers at the high
Speaker 1: Water Barker for contribution to journalism was when she had
Speaker 1: I can't read that, Kyle. On another note, I've been
Speaker 1: driving across the country after finally getting out of coastal California.
Speaker 1: I've been amazed at how people outside of that bubble
Speaker 1: are living their lives in spite of COVID instead of
Speaker 1: living their lives in fear because of COVID. It's one
Speaker 1: of those things I didn't realize I was missing, but
Speaker 1: just being able to see people smile without a face
Speaker 1: diaper hiding, it was something made me feel slightly more
Speaker 1: connected to my fellow man instead of treating everyone else
Speaker 1: like another vector for disease. You and producer Mark need
Speaker 1: to get the hell out of New York. The grass
Speaker 1: is greener on the other side, Kyle, from your lips
Speaker 1: to God's ears. Man, I you know we're we're working
Speaker 1: on it. We're working on it. Mark. Mark likes the
Speaker 1: warm weather, he likes the zero state income tax, and
Speaker 1: so does Buck. So you know, I think I think
Speaker 1: we're I think we're Florida bound within the next I'd
Speaker 1: say the next eighteen months would be my honest Um,
Speaker 1: well Mark can probably go whenever, but well Mark and
Speaker 1: I have to talk more about that. I got a
Speaker 1: few things keeping me here for the time being, but yeah,
Speaker 1: I think I've had enough. It's just, you know, I
Speaker 1: live in a building full of insane Matto watching libs
Speaker 1: and they're all like double masking now and they look
Speaker 1: at you like you're a psycho killer if you pull
Speaker 1: your mask down to you know, have a sip of water.
Speaker 1: And it's just I'm tired of it. I'm just tired.
Speaker 1: These people are out of their minds. They're not as
Speaker 1: smart as they think they are. They're all just box checking,
Speaker 1: credential hunting, you know, status status obsessed leftist, and I'm
Speaker 1: just it's enough. I've had enough. So yeah, man, I'm
Speaker 1: with you Kyle on that one. JT. Buck. Why are
Speaker 1: FBI agents and others on the left able to set
Speaker 1: aside their personal political viewpoints when doing their jobs? And
Speaker 1: it is insulting to suggest their political views might cause
Speaker 1: bias in their jobs, but conservative or right leaning national
Speaker 1: guardsman and police need special scrutiny. JT. That is a
Speaker 1: very good question, one for which there is no solid answer, because,
Speaker 1: as you know, that's why you're asking it. It's a
Speaker 1: double standard. It's what the left does. It's about power
Speaker 1: it's about control. And yes, they do not apply consistently
Speaker 1: the standard of you cannot have political views or else right.
Speaker 1: They do not do that. It's always if you're a conservative,
Speaker 1: you're a threat, you're a concern. If you're liberal, you
Speaker 1: obviously can be nonpartisan in the performance of your duties.
Speaker 1: Daniel wrights Buck, I love the show, Daniel Show loves You.
Speaker 1: I work in the Bay Area. It amazes me that
Speaker 1: the woke left wants to emulate California policies for the
Speaker 1: rest of the country. On the ground, in today's world,
Speaker 1: everyone is bailing with remote work on the lockdowns, Texas,
Speaker 1: Aisy and other errors are being flooded with the liberal
Speaker 1: locusts from California. Unless you have some generational money or
Speaker 1: a top one percent earner, Far too many people are bailing.
Speaker 1: Whatever happened to leading by example? California is a sinking ship. Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: I mean that California is now the elites and the
Speaker 1: dependent class. That's what California is turning into. People that
Speaker 1: either work for or rely on the state for their existence,
Speaker 1: or people that are so rich that they don't care
Speaker 1: what the state. Well, I shouldn't say they don't care
Speaker 1: because They always try to get good accounts and attorneys
Speaker 1: for their taxes and everything else. But they don't care
Speaker 1: how high the tax rate is because it doesn't really
Speaker 1: make any difference in their lifestyle because they're probably living
Speaker 1: off of off of assets and off of what do
Speaker 1: you call it interest instead of actual wages. So for them,
Speaker 1: it's all fine. They don't really care. Yeah, I know
Speaker 1: that's where it is. So I gotta tell you, though,
Speaker 1: I'm a little little troubled to see that Georgia in
Speaker 1: Creasy is looking like Georgia is a blue state. Now, folks,
Speaker 1: That's what it feels like from what I'm seeing the
Speaker 1: data I'm seeing. How the heck that happened? Mark writes Buck,
Speaker 1: I'm listening to Trump's Farewell Addressed, and he's listening all
Speaker 1: of his accomplishments, which are really accomplishments from the American people.
Speaker 1: So as I'm listening, I can't help but think, how
Speaker 1: did this guy not get reelected? So? During roll call,
Speaker 1: would you please, in a nutshell describe what happened in
Speaker 1: the election. How did America choose Biden over Trump? With
Speaker 1: all legitimate concerns over election integrity. Why didn't the various
Speaker 1: government bodies take up the issue. It seemed like the FBI,
Speaker 1: the DJ even the Supreme Court didn't want to look
Speaker 1: into any of this. Why not? Isn't that their job?
Speaker 1: Don't they all take on earth to serve the American
Speaker 1: people and uphold the US Constitution. I can't help but
Speaker 1: think that if there was widespread fraud in the twenty
Speaker 1: twenty election, those guilty of it are allowed to get
Speaker 1: away with it. What's to stop them from doing it
Speaker 1: every election? Our fear we've now become a one party nation.
Speaker 1: So please break down how we arrive where we are?
Speaker 1: Thanks shieldside, Mark, I want I want to tell you
Speaker 1: this is an excellent question, with a lot of thoughtfulness
Speaker 1: and insight, But I would have to answer it by saying,
Speaker 1: it's kind of what my show has been for the
Speaker 1: last My answer is my show for the last well forever,
Speaker 1: but certainly for the last six months. How did we
Speaker 1: get here? What have the Democrats done? How have lockdown
Speaker 1: and Lockdown's gone? What's the narrative around that the Libs
Speaker 1: convince through the media enough Americans about Donald Trump to
Speaker 1: try to win this election. How they suppress information? I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, that's a lot, friend, so I can't really
Speaker 1: give you a snappy answer this other than I hope
Speaker 1: this is what you're getting from listening to the show,
Speaker 1: because that's really what we're doing here, that's what we're
Speaker 1: all about. So thank you for right again. I do
Speaker 1: very much appreciate it, and yep, we'll leave it there.
Speaker 1: Richard Buck, this talk about me wearing a mask after
Speaker 1: I get vaccinated is nuts. After I get my second shot,
Speaker 1: I'm burning my masks. I will laminate my proof of vaccination.
Speaker 1: I will live my life King Cooper here in North Carolina,
Speaker 1: and this senile in chief can take a hike. You
Speaker 1: recently got the whooping cough vaccine and you don't even
Speaker 1: have to wear a protective gear to protect your niece
Speaker 1: or nephew. Why is COVID any different shields? High, Richard,
Speaker 1: excellent point. COVID vaccine is not I mean, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: the whooping cough vaccine is not one hundred percent effective.
Speaker 1: Am I endangering my adorable little nephew by going near
Speaker 1: even after getting the vaccine? Well, no, because the chance
Speaker 1: of me getting whooping cough is actually pretty low. The
Speaker 1: chance of me getting whooping cough, I mean, I mean
Speaker 1: being exposed to it is low. In the first place,
Speaker 1: the chance me getting whooping cough and it getting past
Speaker 1: the vaccine that I've gotten is very low. And then
Speaker 1: the chance that I'd have a a virus in my
Speaker 1: system at the time I happen to see my nephew,
Speaker 1: you know, it's also very low. You know. But nothing's perfect.
Speaker 1: I mean, I could walk into an apartment and the
Speaker 1: roof could cave in and that's the end of the Buckster.
Speaker 1: But you know, you don't see me running and hiding
Speaker 1: in closets all the time. I'm just saying, yeah, Richard, though,
Speaker 1: but they really want this, they really This is just
Speaker 1: showing you how brainwashed they are, how the left has
Speaker 1: made this so much about virtue signaling. It's it's just appalling,
Speaker 1: it really is, Ashley writes, buck you're talking about New
Speaker 1: York schools being sixty percent open. I live in Salem, Oregon.
Speaker 1: Salem and Portland public schools are not open. They have
Speaker 1: no plans on opening due to conflicts with the unions.
Speaker 1: Zero percent open. It's insanity. Ashley totally agree with you.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm sorry to hear that there's no justification
Speaker 1: for this. They're just sacrifice kids. It's greedy, lazy adults
Speaker 1: in the teachers union who are are using this for
Speaker 1: their own leverage. The kids are suffering, the parents are
Speaker 1: suffering of those kids. It's awful. So you know, thank
Speaker 1: you teachers unions. All right, that's gonna be it for today. Everybody,
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. Back tomorrow. Sh'lt High