Speaker 1: Welcome to the Rogue Recap. Hot takes, cold facts and
Speaker 1: zero respect for the official narrative. Sit back, roll your
Speaker 1: eyes and let's recap rogue style.
Speaker 2: What's up and Welcome to the Rogue Recap, Episode three
Speaker 2: of Soundbites. Here with Eric Eggers. He's excited, very excited.
Speaker 2: This is his excited face. It's not weird. This is
Speaker 2: it all right?
Speaker 3: So well after the plastic surgery. This is as much
Speaker 3: fashion as I can generate. I hope it's sufficient.
Speaker 2: The only person who can't move their face right now
Speaker 2: is Nancy Pelosi. The one thing that does move for her, unfortunately,
Speaker 2: are her dentures, and I think she spends a good
Speaker 2: part of her day searching for those bad boys.
Speaker 3: And her portfolio. Come on, put some respect on that account.
Speaker 2: Ain't nobody search for that? We got the Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 2: stock tracker. I am on that X account daily. I'm like, oh, fow,
Speaker 2: where is she putting her money today?
Speaker 4: You know?
Speaker 2: P Wat Paul is in the background, just yumking it up,
Speaker 2: excited about life anywhere.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Like illan Omar is like, we get it, Nancy,
Speaker 3: You're successful going the other way? Yeah?
Speaker 2: Should we leave with Ilhan Omar, since.
Speaker 3: Might as well you started it, you know. So I
Speaker 3: think at this point we're talking about congressional portfolios. There
Speaker 3: is Nancy Pelosi and everyone else is playing for second place,
Speaker 3: but ilhan Omar apparently is pretending to be in last.
Speaker 2: You know what's funny about ilhan Omar is she is
Speaker 2: So let's let me just I have to start out
Speaker 2: and tell you that I hate her. Okay, so don't
Speaker 2: think this is covered with complete bias. So somebody's like,
Speaker 2: you can't talk about this, you're bias, bitch. I know.
Speaker 2: I just told you. I know I'm bias. Moving on,
Speaker 2: So this this person is so infuriating, right because she's
Speaker 2: such a gaslighter. She just walks around with that kerosene tank.
Speaker 2: She's just pouring it on and she's finally getting like
Speaker 2: caught a little bit, just a little bit, right. So
Speaker 2: which one should I play first? Where the girl that
Speaker 2: goes to the restaurant or her yelling at the.
Speaker 3: ELEMI her being asked about her portfolio and her change.
Speaker 2: So this is funny. This is a reporter asking her
Speaker 2: obviously had asked her a question, but a week ago
Speaker 2: she called the reporter stupid for asking her a question.
Speaker 2: So this is this is a part two of this exchange.
Speaker 2: The last time I said to you.
Speaker 5: You said that I was stupid for asking about your
Speaker 5: financial disposure.
Speaker 2: But there's some discrepancies on there. Would you like to
Speaker 2: explain them how? Which makes mistake on you be for
Speaker 2: asking me anything? I am? What about the American people
Speaker 2: who are wondering how needs which to explain it to
Speaker 2: the American people? What's the explanation I have given them?
Speaker 2: The explanation? Do you want to tell our viewers because
Speaker 2: I don't want to tell you Jack Shift, how about that?
Speaker 3: Okay?
Speaker 2: Okay? How you say thank you? So this to me,
Speaker 2: Like if I was that reporter, I'd be like, yes,
Speaker 2: because that's what you want. You want to get them
Speaker 2: on the record. Freaking out that you just got them
Speaker 2: on record, and if the explanation was so easy, just
Speaker 2: to say it again, what's the problem.
Speaker 3: I'm surprised that this is I'm surprised, but also like
Speaker 3: really glad this is legal and that you can just
Speaker 3: go up to these people and kind of film them
Speaker 3: and it's like the best because it's like unfortunately, it's
Speaker 3: kind of what passes for real journalism these days in fact,
Speaker 3: most of the clips that we're going to have are
Speaker 3: either people sitting in committees right or people being approached
Speaker 3: by citizens, which is why you know the stop Nick
Speaker 3: Shirley Ack in California is so insidious. But I think
Speaker 3: ilan Omar and other members of Congress, she just recognized
Speaker 3: the larger point seven out of ten of the wealthiest
Speaker 3: counties in this country are around Washington, d C. It's
Speaker 3: like where all the money comes from that they don't
Speaker 3: generate a product. So when you see wild fluctuations in
Speaker 3: reported income or reported net worths as ilin Omar's, does
Speaker 3: you know, we know a lot of it has to
Speaker 3: do with her husband and the winery that's not really
Speaker 3: a winery. And there's so many questions. I don't know
Speaker 3: why they can't just be honest and transparent and explain it.
Speaker 3: But then again, she acts like she doesn't really represent America.
Speaker 3: She represents smalies.
Speaker 2: As she said before, Yes, my first my first love
Speaker 2: is Somalia. I'm like, fantastic, I have a plane ticket
Speaker 2: with your name on it. Which name would you like
Speaker 2: to use? Your brothers, your first husband, your third husband.
Speaker 2: I'm good, you tell me. I will get you on
Speaker 2: that plane. It is not a problem at all.
Speaker 3: All of it's shady. And so actually the next clip
Speaker 3: that you have about this restaurant is interesting because she's
Speaker 3: been connected to fraudulent restaurants before. When you know, when
Speaker 3: the Somali fraud was like in the news early this
Speaker 3: summer and all the people that had been busted for
Speaker 3: the feeding you know, the Feeding America scandal, like they
Speaker 3: had one hundred and twenty five million fake meals. One
Speaker 3: of the people who was charged with that actually had
Speaker 3: a restaurant. And you know, one of the people who
Speaker 3: ran the restaurant that was pretending to serve meals featured
Speaker 3: ilhan Omar like in a commercial or his restaurants in
Speaker 3: one of her commercials. Yes, So this next restaurant that
Speaker 3: we're going to see, which apparently she's also tried to
Speaker 3: get some money for, is a restaurant and not an
Speaker 3: aid center. So Ilin Omar just continues to be connected
Speaker 3: to like scandalous money stories.
Speaker 2: And the point of this restaurant is this is the
Speaker 2: as we set this up, supposedly she's like a part
Speaker 2: owner of this location. So what's interesting is that the
Speaker 2: gentleman you're about to hear is like a cousin or something.
Speaker 2: He's definitely being like removed from the family today. But
Speaker 2: he's answering honestly, which is such a new concept in America,
Speaker 2: and he really does give the reporter quite the airful
Speaker 2: about how this has never been what il Han says
Speaker 2: it is.
Speaker 5: None of the owners are here tomorrow. You've only worked
Speaker 5: here for a couple of days. Oh you just got
Speaker 5: the job.
Speaker 2: Oh okay, come back.
Speaker 5: Can I ask you just one question real quick though,
Speaker 5: because has there ever been a substance abuse clinic.
Speaker 2: That operates out of here?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 5: Like, uh no clinic, yes, never, Because have you ever
Speaker 5: heard of Ilhan Omar?
Speaker 2: Yeah, of course. So she was trying to yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2: So anyways, as you can see, he starts to get
Speaker 2: wise to her game there a little bit, and he's like, well,
Speaker 2: we stop filming. Oh, I may have said something wrong.
Speaker 2: First of all, she got a promotion in that clip.
Speaker 2: She's a senator now, so that's awesome, right, super excited.
Speaker 2: Maybe we should start to club jar. I don't know,
Speaker 2: just you know, thinking outside the box.
Speaker 3: Well, he's not wrong that it's probably not a substance
Speaker 3: abuse clinic, but if it's a restaurant I'm willing to
Speaker 3: bet that there's some substance abuse that happens there. I mean,
Speaker 3: that's just the way so sketchy. It's just the way
Speaker 3: restaurant kitchens are. I do think we can maybe, I
Speaker 3: think we just it's kind of an illegal term. It's
Speaker 3: asked and answered Linda, like, hey, how come i Omar's
Speaker 3: net worth dropped precipitously. Oh, by the way, this clinic
Speaker 3: that she's connected to has stopped receiving all the money
Speaker 3: that was going to get for being So maybe that's
Speaker 3: maybe we sort of have figured out the answer why
Speaker 3: Omar's net worth has dropped so significantly.
Speaker 2: And as we've been talking about, you know, you guys know,
Speaker 2: Eric has an amazing show if Peter Schweitzer called the
Speaker 2: Drill Down, and they covered a great topic on Nick
Speaker 2: Shirley yesterday and the Stop Nick Shirley Act, which it's
Speaker 2: kind of crazy that that's a thing like that. You know,
Speaker 2: elected representatives have gone out and made a bill naming
Speaker 2: one person as a citizen journalist that represents all citizen
Speaker 2: journalists to say no more citizen journalists, like what are
Speaker 2: you afraid of?
Speaker 6: What?
Speaker 3: Well? And it's happening and to connect it to the
Speaker 3: clips we just played. To be very clear, I think
Speaker 3: what's funny about the Simile Bill twenty six twenty four
Speaker 3: in California is that it doesn't just say, hey, citizen journalists,
Speaker 3: you can't just show up and do anything. It says
Speaker 3: you can't shame, harass, or bully or document like people
Speaker 3: in the name of migrant services. And to me, that's
Speaker 3: like really the key that not too many people are
Speaker 3: talking about. In Minnesota, the fraud was allowed to exist
Speaker 3: because it benefited a key political constituency in the Somalis.
Speaker 3: In California, it's the migrants, right, So I mean that's
Speaker 3: if white people are committing fraud, you can expose them
Speaker 3: all day and down. But when our black and brown
Speaker 3: brothers get in the business, then we start being a
Speaker 3: little bit more concerned about it.
Speaker 2: And I think that's the problem. I'm going to play
Speaker 2: a clip. I'm going to surprise you. This is something
Speaker 2: I featured on my show yesterday. And I saw the
Speaker 2: name of my show yesterday was there's no hospice in
Speaker 2: that burrito. Stand you hear about this? So this woman
Speaker 2: gave testimony yesterday about the fraud in California and the
Speaker 2: clip that I'm about to play you. I had to
Speaker 2: watch it a few times, and I decided to name
Speaker 2: my show that yesterday because I was like, Okay, welcome
Speaker 2: to twenty twenty six, where these are real conversations and
Speaker 2: millions upon millions of taxpayer dollars all across the country
Speaker 2: are being funneled to the most absurd, ridiculous things. It's
Speaker 2: just ridiculous, right, So play this clip. It speaks for itself.
Speaker 2: It's so good.
Speaker 7: You'd be amazed at how many hospices you the door
Speaker 7: you can walk up to in California and there was nobody.
Speaker 7: There is five months worth of mail that you can
Speaker 7: see stacked up from CMS and nobody's there. And that
Speaker 7: passed a survey.
Speaker 6: How did that happen?
Speaker 7: How do you put a hospice in a burrito stand
Speaker 7: in California? How do you put a hospice in a
Speaker 7: tire store in California? That all had to be vetted
Speaker 7: through licensure and through certification and accreditation.
Speaker 2: I was speechless. I was like, I love her. I
Speaker 2: don't know who she is, but I love her. And
Speaker 2: she's so matter of fact. She's like no, but actually,
Speaker 2: like why.
Speaker 3: How well It's like the old Arrest of Development clip.
Speaker 3: There's always money in the banana stand, there's always a
Speaker 3: hospice in the burrito stand. And the crazy partlanda and
Speaker 3: you know this, like California is so insane. The fraud
Speaker 3: has been so rampant for so long. Yet rather than
Speaker 3: be like, hey, maybe we have a problem. The lady
Speaker 3: who was the controller aka and the person who was
Speaker 3: in charge of making sure the money wents to the
Speaker 3: right place, is she's running for governor.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 3: No, it's like they're not like, maybe maybe we should
Speaker 3: take a look at ourselves, Like now we're doubling down.
Speaker 3: California the gift that keeps on giving to every show
Speaker 3: across this great land.
Speaker 2: It's so true. And I think the scary part and
Speaker 2: this is something that you know, I mean, if you
Speaker 2: guys don't know this. Eric Agers he is the guy
Speaker 2: when it comes to election fraud. He knows so much
Speaker 2: about it. And what we saw yesterday with the Virginia
Speaker 2: redistricting vote, and we'll just start with the simple fact
Speaker 2: that you had to vote yes right to vote no,
Speaker 2: and you had to vote no to vote yes, and
Speaker 2: all these like little confusing, nuanced ways, so that the
Speaker 2: voter who's trying to get to a poll, maybe before
Speaker 2: they get their kids, after they get their kids to school,
Speaker 2: before they go to work, after work, before the poll school,
Speaker 2: who knows what your schedule is, right, We're all running around.
Speaker 2: But it was so confusing and when they weren't sure
Speaker 2: if they were going to make it or not, because
Speaker 2: around seven o'clock it was fifty two percent to forty
Speaker 2: eight percent now favor in reprob to keep that representation.
Speaker 2: Suddenly miraculously the mail in balloced baby coming in for
Speaker 2: the home stretch.
Speaker 3: Well, and the worst part this is like and this
Speaker 3: is legalized election fraud basically because it's the same thing
Speaker 3: that happened in California. But this is it passed basically
Speaker 3: like with fifty one percent, and so now with fifty
Speaker 3: one percent of people basically voting favorless redistricting, Republican representation
Speaker 3: is going to drop by like forty percent. So with
Speaker 3: that question, it is you know, it is the kind
Speaker 3: of kind of shunning and silencing of political voices that
Speaker 3: only groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center would be
Speaker 3: proud of these days, you know, I mean, it's like.
Speaker 2: Hash ftel is ated today, boy, you and not having it.
Speaker 2: He I was like, oh, eight am here we are, yes,
Speaker 2: ready for the day. I mean, just angry and like
Speaker 2: I loved. You know, I'm not a big fan of
Speaker 2: Todd Blanche, but I did like when he said somebody asked, well,
Speaker 2: this alleged fraud, but he goes, no, no, this is
Speaker 2: a federal indictment. It's not alleged. Did you want to
Speaker 2: continue with your fraudulentity based.
Speaker 3: Question if if it's alleged, it's alleged by the grand
Speaker 3: jury who voted on it after facts. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, But I do have one positive note for our
Speaker 2: friends in Virginia, and it's I think it's a big one.
Speaker 2: You know, there's an old expression some of you may
Speaker 2: know it. It's called no taxation without representation. So I'm
Speaker 2: feeling like, you just hold one of those dollars, ladies
Speaker 2: and gentlemen. You don't need to be paying that you're
Speaker 2: not being represented. These are not your people. That's a
Speaker 2: good fight.
Speaker 3: It's it's I mean, we sort of joke about the
Speaker 3: Southern Poverty Los Center because you know what they've been
Speaker 3: doing as far as like paying Nazis so that they
Speaker 3: can then fight Nazis is insane, but literally, I mean,
Speaker 3: what California now Virginia have done to disenfranchise the voices
Speaker 3: of people who happen to represent the Republican Party is
Speaker 3: like if they were an ethnic group then it would
Speaker 3: be illegal, right, I mean, this is literally why they
Speaker 3: have like the civil rights provisions and Eric Holder did
Speaker 3: all these things to try to keep this from happening
Speaker 3: to certain groups. But now they're of bragging and aggressively
Speaker 3: doing it to protect Democrats at the expensive Republicans. It's insane,
Speaker 3: but it just speaks to the hypocrisy that some people
Speaker 3: are clearly quite comfortable with.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I think I would say to one final
Speaker 2: point to that is they're not even protecting Democrats. They're
Speaker 2: furthering Democrats. They're puting a narrative. They're not protecting anybody.
Speaker 2: Republicans could give a shit less about them because we
Speaker 2: know if elections were fair, they would lose. And that's
Speaker 2: what's going on in California. That's why we have hospices
Speaker 2: and Burrito.
Speaker 3: Stands well, and to be honest, that's why we need
Speaker 3: the Save America Act.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So maybe we get to that clip now because
Speaker 3: you've got Mike Lee talking about the importance of that,
Speaker 3: and I know he's a friend of yours and you
Speaker 3: said he was told Linda that the effort to pass
Speaker 3: the Save America Act as a charade. Is that right?
Speaker 2: That's right? So somebody, so we'll just start out. We've
Speaker 2: got John fun and I use the word leader very
Speaker 2: loosely around him because he is the biggest rhino piece
Speaker 2: of shit. And unfortunately he's our leader. Right, he's in
Speaker 2: McConnell's back pocket. He's been there a long time. It's
Speaker 2: getting smelly and cold back there, and so he's angry, right,
Speaker 2: he wants to get out. He wants to be his
Speaker 2: own man. So he's going to take a stand against
Speaker 2: the American people, which is never a good idea. Mike Lee,
Speaker 2: on the other hand, is literally like the lone ranger
Speaker 2: every day on the Senate floor, like eighty four percent
Speaker 2: of Americans, Democrats, Republicans, independents want this past. Let's do it.
Speaker 2: So somebody decided to talk trash about Mike Lee and
Speaker 2: say that the only reason that he's doing this is performance.
Speaker 2: It's all a charade. This is just for me to
Speaker 2: get clicks. And I'm like, you're joking, right, This guy
Speaker 2: literally through the Easter holiday stayed in DC. He wasn't
Speaker 2: in Walt disney World like Lindsay Graham. He wasn't at
Speaker 2: a resort with you know, the likes of the late
Speaker 2: night television hosts. No, he was on the Senate floor
Speaker 2: defending you. So this next clip is Mike Lee pissed off.
Speaker 2: I just want to let you know. This is him
Speaker 2: very angry, and he's rightfully angry, but he's still the
Speaker 2: most polite person on the planet.
Speaker 3: I'm sorry, I'm not smiling. Go ahead, I'm not smiling
Speaker 3: because of Mike Lely being pissed off. I'm just smiling
Speaker 3: at the idea of Lindsay Graham being a Disney World
Speaker 3: and I can't.
Speaker 2: Help Oh my god, I'm walking around with the bubble.
Speaker 3: Wants show keep going, right, here's Michael, please stop totally.
Speaker 8: One of my colleagues called the effort to pass the
Speaker 8: Save America Act in the Senate a charade. Well, my
Speaker 8: guess is that whoever said that but didn't have the
Speaker 8: guts to put their name to it is somebody who's
Speaker 8: a co sponsor of the Save America Act who openly
Speaker 8: actively tells his constituents that he's a co sponsor of
Speaker 8: the Save America Act and maybe even tells donors that
Speaker 8: in order to raise funds. Regardless, this isn't going away.
Speaker 8: I'm not going away. This thing's not a charade, and
Speaker 8: I'm deubling down on this. I'm gonna worked twice as
Speaker 8: hard just because you said that.
Speaker 3: Whoever you are, By the way, when you go to
Speaker 3: Disney World, you know what you have to do, show
Speaker 3: a dang ID, and they like capt your eyes, they
Speaker 3: do all kinds of stuff. So it's literally the idea
Speaker 3: that we wouldn't have to show ID. This is a
Speaker 3: big deal in California also, right, this is one thing
Speaker 3: that people are kind of clinging to you no matter
Speaker 3: who wins the gubernatorial primary. So states are taking matters
Speaker 3: into their own hands because the Senate, as you noted,
Speaker 3: is just so bankrupt and broken. But I do think
Speaker 3: like on its merits, the idea of having to show
Speaker 3: ID is something that, as Napoleon shows, people are in
Speaker 3: favor of. And I think you could just require ID,
Speaker 3: require proof clizenship, and have regular maintenance of the voter roles.
Speaker 3: It would do so much for this country's elections, and
Speaker 3: no one seems to want to do it. It's I
Speaker 3: don't understand, right.
Speaker 2: So what does that tell you? I was just talking
Speaker 2: about this the other day. What does it tell you
Speaker 2: when we have a Republican led House, Senate Executive Branch
Speaker 2: and we can't get the president's agenda pass, when they
Speaker 2: do pro form of voting to stop the acceleration of
Speaker 2: his candidates. What's happening? What don't they want to happen?
Speaker 2: I have my suspicions. I'll let you go first.
Speaker 3: Well, no, I literally, look, I'm not smart enough to
Speaker 3: know this. Like, I seriously don't understand it. You please
Speaker 3: use small, you know, comprehendible words to explain it to me.
Speaker 3: Because my feeling.
Speaker 2: Is that the rhinos inside of our Senate and inside
Speaker 2: of the House, all those assholes who voted to keep
Speaker 2: the Haitians here, people like Lawlor, people like Fitzpatrick, you
Speaker 2: know in the House, you know Maria salas are. These
Speaker 2: are terrible human beings. They ran on Republican principles and
Speaker 2: now they live in the bask and glow of their
Speaker 2: Democrat friends. Yes we want the Haitians, Yes we love amnesty. Yes,
Speaker 2: more special interests. And why because some lobbyist asshole is
Speaker 2: in the hallway with their paycheck, and the same thing
Speaker 2: goes for the Senate. You see, they've been there too long,
Speaker 2: they have too many friends, whether it's mccowski, Collins, Dude Tillis, McConnell,
Speaker 2: they've been there too long. You go back and you
Speaker 2: look at footage of Susan Collins when she first ran
Speaker 2: for office, and don't get me wrong, I know she's
Speaker 2: in the up and main. Those people are nuts. I mean,
Speaker 2: these people are walking around blue hair, purple hair, Birkenstock's moccasins,
Speaker 2: talking about Okay, you know, the rest of us have
Speaker 2: to work. You have a nice day, right Susan Collins
Speaker 2: when she Wren said I'm only going to do this
Speaker 2: for one or two terms. Meanwhile, thirty years later, you've
Speaker 2: been there a minute. It's time to go, Susan.
Speaker 3: Okay. So so like I'm willing to concede and accept
Speaker 3: the idea that when you're there in Washington c for
Speaker 3: too long. As Peter Schwizer likes to say that cesspool
Speaker 3: becomes a hot tub and yeah, he's way too comfortable.
Speaker 3: So what's the lobbyist motivation for one to keep this
Speaker 3: from happening.
Speaker 2: So what happens is the lobbyists go in and they say, hey,
Speaker 2: if you're willing to vote yes on the Dignidad Act,
Speaker 2: or if you're willing to hold the line and make
Speaker 2: sure that Save Act doesn't get passed, we've got a
Speaker 2: really nice, cushy position on the XYZ Committee where you'll
Speaker 2: be able to find out what's going to happen in
Speaker 2: the stock market, and you'll be able to buy XYZ
Speaker 2: stock and you'll be able to go to x y
Speaker 2: Z party. Oh, by the way, we've got this beautiful jukebox, Lamborghini, house,
Speaker 2: rental property, Airbnb. I mean, it goes on.
Speaker 3: You just get like plugged into the matrix. Basically disgusting.
Speaker 2: And honestly, you and I both know people inside of Congress,
Speaker 2: good people who go in and they're like, I'm going
Speaker 2: to change it. I'm going to be the one. I'm like,
Speaker 2: right on, brother. Six months later they're deep in the shit.
Speaker 2: You know, Brandon gill now out of Texas. God bless
Speaker 2: that kid. You know, he's like thirty five years old, young,
Speaker 2: two little babies, like doing his thing, and I mean
Speaker 2: he is at it. He is not there, He is
Speaker 2: not for a popularity contest.
Speaker 3: I love that kid, dude, check it out. So a
Speaker 3: friend of mine is actually running for the seat of
Speaker 3: Congress in my area in North Florida. Oh no, he's
Speaker 3: a purple heart veteran. He lost the leg in Iraq,
Speaker 3: and he gave me a stat the other day. His
Speaker 3: name is Luke Murphy. He's a really, really good dude.
Speaker 3: But he said that Congress used to be and to
Speaker 3: the point, Congress used to be represented by sixty percent
Speaker 3: of people who'd been in active combat, right, so like
Speaker 3: veterans of active combat, and now it's less than sixteen percent.
Speaker 3: And the idea is is that so people used to
Speaker 3: go like, look, we're going to fight for what's in
Speaker 3: the best interest of this country, right, we send the
Speaker 3: best of us to represent the rest of us. And
Speaker 3: we stop doing that, And so now people aren't really
Speaker 3: about the one common goal. It's about their own personal interest.
Speaker 3: So that would kind of check out with what you're saying.
Speaker 3: But it is the whole Save America Act. The fact
Speaker 3: that we can't it's just common sense. Eighty percent of
Speaker 3: people do it. It's insane. But there's clearly something else happening.
Speaker 3: And I think you know, I'm gonna keep looking to
Speaker 3: do it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, me too. I'm actually super I'm super frustrated with
Speaker 2: all of it. And then we have a couple of
Speaker 2: clips today We're going to show you two of our
Speaker 2: favorite idiots in the Senate. We've got Coons, Cucko Coons.
Speaker 2: And then we've got Pocahontas who decided she was going
Speaker 2: to take a stab at Kevin mooresh yesterday, who we're
Speaker 2: hoping will be the next bed chair. And full disclosure,
Speaker 2: I mean I know him superficially, right, Like I know
Speaker 2: the headlines about him. I know a little bit about
Speaker 2: him because I happened to have worked in Olm Wall
Speaker 2: Street for a number of years. But I know Jerome Powell,
Speaker 2: and I know that I've had enough of Jerome Paw,
Speaker 2: you know what I mean. Like, I'm good. I had
Speaker 2: Green Span, I had Bernank you suck next please, And
Speaker 2: they were trying to drag Did you see the testimony.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's crazy. Let's go.
Speaker 2: So here's here's Warren and worsh really funny stuff. In
Speaker 2: our meeting, you said it's independent because you're a quote
Speaker 2: a tough guy. Those were your words, tough guy. And
Speaker 2: you will be able to stand up to President Trice A. Trump.
Speaker 4: So let's try it again.
Speaker 2: Name one aspect of President Trump's economic agenda with which.
Speaker 4: You disagree, Well, Senator, the Federal Reserve in recent years
Speaker 4: has wandered outside of its remit, wandered into that's not
Speaker 4: something Donald Trump on if I'm confirmed.
Speaker 2: Just one, just one little place where you disagree with Donald,
Speaker 2: I do.
Speaker 4: Have a disagreement, actually, Senator, with the President. I think
Speaker 4: even this morning he said that he thought I was
Speaker 4: out of central casting. I think central casting. I'd look older, grayer,
Speaker 4: and maybe show up here with a cigar of sorts.
Speaker 2: Quite a door hor But you know, we need We'll
Speaker 2: stop it there. I don't need to hear the rest
Speaker 2: of Warren. I really don't at any given time. But
Speaker 2: he's so funny, right Like, she gets so mad when
Speaker 2: he says, actually, I do have a disagreement. You see
Speaker 2: her face, She's like, oh shit, right here for an answer.
Speaker 3: You know what she reminded me of just watching that clip.
Speaker 3: Do you remember the old Married with Children episodes? And
Speaker 3: they would like they would make fun of Marcy the neighbor.
Speaker 3: She kind of look like a chicken, you know, like
Speaker 3: a head Bobbin like, that's total Elizabeth Warren energy. Right.
Speaker 3: Their apologies for people who didn't see that show they're younger,
Speaker 3: But no, I like it. I mean, at the bottom
Speaker 3: line is to wash his point. Where's the where's the
Speaker 3: line against lower interest rates?
Speaker 2: I mean, why are you so mad?
Speaker 3: Yeah? I think the other thing you could have been like, well,
Speaker 3: I've seen some of Donald Trump's plans for the renovation
Speaker 3: of the Federal Building. I think I think it's bathroom
Speaker 3: to course a little ghost actually.
Speaker 2: Can we I'm not a fan of gold.
Speaker 3: Too much, too much gold? Right, which would be silver?
Speaker 2: I love silver? Like the Graham my air moving on,
Speaker 2: I'm so silly and I'm look, he's so calm, yeah,
Speaker 2: which I kind of love. And she's literally He could
Speaker 2: have come back and said, well, Elizabeth, what do you
Speaker 2: disagree with with the pharmaceutical companies? Name one thing that
Speaker 2: you don't like. Was it that they didn't give you
Speaker 2: enough for your new remodel? Was that what you're mad about? Yeah?
Speaker 3: I will say this, I don't know him at all.
Speaker 3: You said you know him superficially, But everything I hear
Speaker 3: is that he is an operator and no, yeah, and
Speaker 3: he will get it done. Yeah, he's on it. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I have a friend who's an artificial intelligence PhD expert,
Speaker 2: and I always say to him, you know, I always
Speaker 2: say I hate everybody equally. He actually does because he's
Speaker 2: totally binary. It's just numbers. He's like, no, that doesn't
Speaker 2: make sense.
Speaker 3: I think the term you're looking for land is autistic.
Speaker 2: But okay, let's go to this is another juche bag,
Speaker 2: all right, So Senator KU's he decides to try to
Speaker 2: hold his feet to the fire today. This was a
Speaker 2: secretary bessent this morning before the committee, and he put
Speaker 2: forth some DNC talking point and best it wasn't having
Speaker 2: any piece. Did you see this?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 9: So good, priceless, any brief idea why it's a good
Speaker 9: idea to relieve sanctions on Iranian and Russian oil?
Speaker 6: Good with pleasure of Senator.
Speaker 10: The fourteen billion dollar is a myth and unfortunately a
Speaker 10: DNC talking point that I had been subjected to many times.
Speaker 10: If anyone would like to show me where that fourteen
Speaker 10: billion come from, I look.
Speaker 9: Forward to an exchange of DTAs on that, mister.
Speaker 6: Second, an exchange in a very public forum.
Speaker 9: I'm not the DNC, I'm the Senator from Delaware.
Speaker 10: Well, I on every talk show and every senator seems.
Speaker 9: To have you disagree that Iran has received significant additional
Speaker 9: revenue from their sales of oil because of sanctions.
Speaker 6: I couldn't disagree more.
Speaker 9: Okay, But do you disagree that Russia has received significant
Speaker 9: additional revenue from the sanctions relief?
Speaker 6: I couldn't disagree more. Okay?
Speaker 9: Why did you relieve the sanctions against Russia in Irani?
Speaker 10: And well, think of it this way, sir. There's the
Speaker 10: straight up hoemous familiar with it. There there is oil
Speaker 10: to the left and to the right. There is to
Speaker 10: the right that Treasury was able to they just as
Speaker 10: you are concerned about gasoline prices for the American consumer
Speaker 10: and for our Asian allies, as are we we Treasury
Speaker 10: was able to create they have more than two hundred
Speaker 10: and fifty million barrels on the water. And the way
Speaker 10: to think about this is as they came in today,
Speaker 10: the oil prices are at one hundred dollars. If we
Speaker 10: had not done that sanctions, really they might have been
Speaker 10: at one fifty.
Speaker 2: So it's interesting is this same senator didn't have shit
Speaker 2: to say when Barack Obama was like, yes, more money
Speaker 2: to Palestine, more money to Hesba Llah. Let's send some
Speaker 2: palettes over to Iran. We had no issues with that,
Speaker 2: but this guy lives sanctions so that we can help
Speaker 2: our allies in the region. Because if you understand geography,
Speaker 2: if you understand who is actually the recipient the consumer
Speaker 2: of set oil, this would make sense to you, right.
Speaker 3: The only quotable line from True Detective Season two to
Speaker 3: me was when Colin Farrell was talking to his lawyers
Speaker 3: trying to pay her in cash and she's like, what
Speaker 3: are you doing? He goes, what do you like paying taxes?
Speaker 3: So like to me, Scott Beston's point is like, do
Speaker 3: you like paying five seventy five for diesel at the
Speaker 3: pump bro Also, Senator koons that exchange was so catty
Speaker 3: and only one of you was gay, Like, it's like
Speaker 3: it's like queer eye for the oil guy over there.
Speaker 3: Come on, man, like, if you're gonna be I'm the
Speaker 3: senator from Delaware number one, conduct yourself with the severity
Speaker 3: you're expecting to be addressed. Secondly, I think that's exactly
Speaker 3: what's wrong with Washington. C Scott Beson's like, no, let's
Speaker 3: have an we're talking, We're talking now, and he's like, though,
Speaker 3: we'll talk about it privately, because all he did have, ironically,
Speaker 3: was the talking point. He didn't have the details. He
Speaker 3: didn't have the specifics. Scott Besson's like, so fun fact
Speaker 3: that's they came across my desk. We can talk about
Speaker 3: it in detail and length if you'd like to. Senator
Speaker 3: Koon's obviously not so interested in that exchange.
Speaker 2: And you know what's funny, So Scott Bessett has an interesting,
Speaker 2: like I would call it, like an odd pentameter of
Speaker 2: talking right him and RFK, despite the fact that RFK
Speaker 2: actually has an affliction, they have a weird measured way
Speaker 2: of speaking. So what I what irritates me is that
Speaker 2: if you are a sitting senator and you've been at
Speaker 2: the Dais enough times and you've had these people in
Speaker 2: for testimony, you know that they're in the middle of
Speaker 2: a sentence, there's no reason for you to interrupt with
Speaker 2: your little tidbits like I'm a senator, yeah, I'm a
Speaker 2: left in the right, just shut up for a minute.
Speaker 3: Well and hear you. Well, here's the point is that
Speaker 3: he's not actually interested in having discussion. And this is
Speaker 3: just like, you know, like a twenty twenty six. I
Speaker 3: hate it here. He's not trying to govern. He's just
Speaker 3: trying to get a clip for a social media feed.
Speaker 3: And you know that, and that's what the committity aarians
Speaker 3: are all about, and that's why they're trying to elevate
Speaker 3: these people. That's why they like AOC And this is
Speaker 3: like not something, it's not a secret, Like, no, we
Speaker 3: need someone who can go back and forth to get
Speaker 3: a clip to go viral, just to kind of keep
Speaker 3: the energy in the attention economy that we all sort
Speaker 3: of live in. But he wasn't actually interested in answering
Speaker 3: and finding out why sanctions really occurred and an if
Speaker 3: we provide an act information about it, just trying to
Speaker 3: get a clip, which obviously hooked Linda McLoughlin.
Speaker 6: It works.
Speaker 2: I'm like, damn it coons. He's not of a bitch.
Speaker 2: But honestly, you know, I look at Bessett and he's like, well,
Speaker 2: so yeah, you know how it's one hundred dollars right now,
Speaker 2: like it wouldn't be, so you're welcome. You can say
Speaker 2: thank you now like that, that to me is like
Speaker 2: his shining moment, and he is as well, very calm
Speaker 2: he's like, I could not disagree more. You literally are
Speaker 2: so wrong. Yes, this makes sense, and here's why it
Speaker 2: makes sense. And the issue and this is what troubles
Speaker 2: me and then we'll move on, is this is the
Speaker 2: continuing idea that when it is a Democrat president, then
Speaker 2: we're fine. If you go back and you play all
Speaker 2: these assholes during Biden, during Obama, douring Clinton, which is
Speaker 2: another problem because they've been there for everybody, right, these
Speaker 2: career senators, they've been there through all of them. They
Speaker 2: don't want the guard to change. And now we have
Speaker 2: Trump in there who's just like, shut up, you're moro
Speaker 2: on Like, you know, people hate that he's crass. I
Speaker 2: love it. I love that you just say it out loud.
Speaker 2: Just say it out loud. The only thing I wish
Speaker 2: she would it was.
Speaker 3: Right now about thousand percent, but I would just say this.
Speaker 3: You know, the one thing about Donald Trump is like
Speaker 3: whether it's best and at whether it's worshed. I think
Speaker 3: he does put like legit people on the things. It's
Speaker 3: not like we got to listen to It's not like
Speaker 3: John Kerry talking to us about climate change or something. Right,
Speaker 3: I'm saying, oh my god's the real guy.
Speaker 2: And to that point, this is a guy who's run
Speaker 2: so many businesses. When they came out at him in
Speaker 2: his first term and they were like, oh, you had bankruptcies. Well,
Speaker 2: I hope he had bankruptcies. He ran hundreds of businesses,
Speaker 2: He had hotels, he had casinos. Things happen. If you
Speaker 2: haven't experienced loss, then you haven't learned anything, which means
Speaker 2: you can't run your next business. Part of running a
Speaker 2: business and being an operator an entrepreneur is screwing up
Speaker 2: and then going oh shit, yeah, okay, I won't do
Speaker 2: that again, and then you learn from it. These assholes
Speaker 2: haven't done shit. If you ask any of them what
Speaker 2: they have done. They're are passing legislation, they're working. They're
Speaker 2: not home in the community parks, plant trees. Give me
Speaker 2: a break.
Speaker 3: So speaking of that, how about it for our next clip,
Speaker 3: we listened to someone who has done things and as
Speaker 3: like real world business experience, but yet somehow has translated
Speaker 3: that business experience into them being expert on things other
Speaker 3: than like computers and chips. He's now talking to us
Speaker 3: about farmland and biometrics and all kinds of things. Let
Speaker 3: me tell you what I don't trust is Bill Gates
Speaker 3: to do anything, And here he is trying to tell
Speaker 3: us about like the necessity of compressing and bringing all
Speaker 3: of our data into one single place, which presumably he'll
Speaker 3: have access to.
Speaker 2: Yes, indeed, here he is.
Speaker 11: Another place that India leads. But there's a lot more
Speaker 11: that all of you can be involved in driving forward.
Speaker 11: Is this digital public infrastructure. You know, no country's more
Speaker 11: to take government benefits and get them out efficiently and
Speaker 11: effectively to their citizens than India. You know, you would
Speaker 11: have expected rich countries or others to do that, but
Speaker 11: in fact.
Speaker 3: They did not.
Speaker 11: And so that basic structure that starts with identity and
Speaker 11: bank accounts and payments is just foundational. And as part
Speaker 11: of this visit, I'm now seeing how that foundation is
Speaker 11: being built out, built out in agriculture with profiles of
Speaker 11: farmers to understand what they need and give them advice,
Speaker 11: built out with health records so that we can help
Speaker 11: people not only with infectious diseases, but the challenge that's
Speaker 11: coming in the future with the growth of the noncommunicable
Speaker 11: diseases being a huge thing, and that digital public infrastructure
Speaker 11: will help us with these claimate problems. I was in
Speaker 11: Odisha yesterday, And what they showed is that they've registered
Speaker 11: the farmers and registered what type of crops they grow
Speaker 11: and what land they own. They literally have a control center.
Speaker 11: You know, when you walk in, you think, wow, this
Speaker 11: is agriculture. But you know you've got a command center
Speaker 11: and maps and people doing queries and sending out messages
Speaker 11: and so that all starts, you know, with an Adhar
Speaker 11: identity listing those farmers, getting the information, making sure it's
Speaker 11: up to date.
Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, Baltimore.
Speaker 3: It sounds like centralized planning. Are we sure he was
Speaker 3: in India or maybe China?
Speaker 6: Right?
Speaker 3: I mean? And the reality is when you know he
Speaker 3: has the agenda where he wants to kind of farm
Speaker 3: grown meat, have people eat bugs, try to like steer
Speaker 3: everyone towards a certain type of way of living. You know,
Speaker 3: my colleague Seamus Bruner wrote a great book called Control
Speaker 3: of Guards. He gets into Bill Gates and his incredibly
Speaker 3: creepy vision for what the future should look like and
Speaker 3: how we should I just opt in. Uh it's anytime
Speaker 3: I start hearing him Bill Gates talk about things like that,
Speaker 3: I get incredibly worried. I will say I'm a little
Speaker 3: bit of hypocrite. On this though, Like I don't like
Speaker 3: any of it, but if it will let me skip
Speaker 3: a line at an airport or Disney World, you can
Speaker 3: totally have my biometrics, Like have it, dude, Like.
Speaker 2: So in fairness, I am also a clear member and
Speaker 2: I will let them scan my eyeball light it up.
Speaker 3: But it's worth it because those same eyes you just
Speaker 3: steered into my soul. I can then look at other
Speaker 3: people like I'm so much better than you when I
Speaker 3: walk past you in the yeah over.
Speaker 2: There, But I mean, for what right, it's so stupid,
Speaker 2: Like I honestly, Bill Gates to me is one of
Speaker 2: the worst people that has ever lived. And in my
Speaker 2: show yesterday, and this is very extreme, so please and
Speaker 2: I speak for myself and not Eric Agers. I mean
Speaker 2: I really do think like he is a disciple of Satan.
Speaker 2: This guy is evil to the core. He will vaccinate
Speaker 2: on the human person, even just to test it. We
Speaker 2: look what he did in India before and all these
Speaker 2: people died from these trial vaccines and him and the
Speaker 2: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation before he left her. Because
Speaker 2: all that shit came out in the Epstein files and
Speaker 2: it's like, guys, Bill Gates is not somebody we can trust.
Speaker 2: You want to put a bar code in my arm
Speaker 2: so you can scan it? No, thank you?
Speaker 3: No, how about He's like, yeah, I'm surprised the rich
Speaker 3: countries haven't done this. Yeah, I wonder why, Bill, because
Speaker 3: the poor ones are the ones gonna let you do it.
Speaker 2: That's see, that is so well said the idea. It's
Speaker 2: kind of like that Joe Biden's statement where he says, like,
Speaker 2: these poor kids are just as good as the white kids.
Speaker 2: What you're so racist? You are the problem. And Bill
Speaker 2: Gates is the same way. He's like, I can't believe
Speaker 2: other countries haven't done this. I'm like, yeah, because we're
Speaker 2: smart and we know that whatever amount of money you've
Speaker 2: just given to the Indian government to allow them to
Speaker 2: allow you in there and do this with them, you
Speaker 2: what do you We're going to help out the farmers.
Speaker 2: What do you know about farm and Bill check, get
Speaker 2: out of your loafers for a minute. Show me what
Speaker 2: you can plant?
Speaker 3: Can freaking break? He wants to eat bugs, that's all
Speaker 3: you know?
Speaker 2: God, you know what, go into pesticide, you asshole. All right,
Speaker 2: here's my update of the week. It's our alien update.
Speaker 2: So obviously now the FBI is involved, James Comer is involved.
Speaker 2: We've got FBI investigations, we've got House Oversight Committee investigations.
Speaker 2: Every single show is talking about it everywhere. Fun fact,
Speaker 2: we've been talking about it before it was cool. So
Speaker 2: I feel kind of happy about that little snooty not
Speaker 2: sad to say it, just saying out loud. But there's
Speaker 2: this one girl who died in twenty twenty two, Amy Skridge,
Speaker 2: and so now we're getting all this video that I
Speaker 2: have never seen before.
Speaker 3: I don't know if you have, no, I haven't, but
Speaker 3: it's very much like if you know you're looking for
Speaker 3: and it's a weird thing to say, but if you
Speaker 3: think you've identified a pattern of a serial killer and
Speaker 3: then you start finding other bodies seriously that like, no,
Speaker 3: this fits the pattern, and you kind of look back
Speaker 3: and like what, here's more people who have been affiliated
Speaker 3: with this genre of study. Yeah, also died under mysterious circumstances.
Speaker 3: It's incredibly troubling.
Speaker 2: So this is Amy Scridge. We've got two clips of her.
Speaker 2: I just want to preface a little bit of a disclaimer.
Speaker 2: If you are listening to your car, you know we're
Speaker 2: allowed to have a little potty mouth on this show,
Speaker 2: but she goes full f bomb in this. So just
Speaker 2: want to preview this for everybody. But this is our
Speaker 2: talking about two things. One is the fact that she
Speaker 2: is not suicidal and she's afraid for her life. And
Speaker 2: then the other one is what she's discovered and why
Speaker 2: she thinks that's why they're going to try and hurt her.
Speaker 2: So here's cut one.
Speaker 12: It's been independently discovered four other times. He said it
Speaker 12: has been He said it has been suppressed every single
Speaker 12: fucking time. And he said, I don't think they're going
Speaker 12: to suppress it this time. He said, I think you're
Speaker 12: in the clear. He said, they obviously know about you
Speaker 12: because I've had multiple both protective and threatening interactions with
Speaker 12: various agency affiliations whatever. He was like, if if you
Speaker 12: haven't had a US government agent come to you and
Speaker 12: say stop, shut the stop, shut the fuck up, if
Speaker 12: that hasn't happened, they're gonna let you do it. They're waiting.
Speaker 12: They're like, there are SSP motherfuckers that are fucking twiddling
Speaker 12: their thumbs, like is Amy not gonna publish soon?
Speaker 3: Go.
Speaker 12: We've been influencing this bitch forever, doesn't she know we
Speaker 12: want her to publish Jesus Like, there's multiple people doing
Speaker 12: that right now. And on the other side of the fence,
Speaker 12: there's multiple parties looking at each other like, didn't we
Speaker 12: tell this bitch three years ago that we kill people
Speaker 12: for this? Is she not listening? What is she doing?
Speaker 12: She's still doing it what we told her we were
Speaker 12: gonna kill her three years ago. So I have these
Speaker 12: two like, I have these two different scenarios floating constantly
Speaker 12: in my life where I have people being like, do it,
Speaker 12: do it, do it, You're the one.
Speaker 6: Do it.
Speaker 12: And then I have multiple people people being like they're
Speaker 12: gonna kill you. Don't do it, They're gonna kill you.
Speaker 2: It's so sad.
Speaker 3: It's it's sad, you know. I don't know. I still
Speaker 3: don't know what to make of this story. It's so bizarre.
Speaker 3: But I do think that you and I were texting
Speaker 3: this week. The fact that the House Oversight Committee is
Speaker 3: looking into it is I think a very positive thing.
Speaker 3: But I'll ask you, I think you're probably you're definitely
Speaker 3: more well informed than I am. I think you're also
Speaker 3: probably more cynical than I am. You heard Mike Lee,
Speaker 3: you know, kind of push back, and they did the
Speaker 3: attempt to pass the Save America Acts as a charade.
Speaker 3: Do you think these investigations are legitimate or do you
Speaker 3: think that these are also just kind of for show,
Speaker 3: taking advantage of with wellspring of public interest online.
Speaker 2: So I think it is one hundred percent for show.
Speaker 2: I think it's all bullshit. It's like what I always say,
Speaker 2: nobody ever goes to jail. So stop wasting my taxpayer dollars,
Speaker 2: rightop having committee hearings, Stop doing investigations un TILSA like
Speaker 2: Bill Clinton is walking around, Hillary Clinton is walking around.
Speaker 2: I'm good, I'm done. You know, it's enough. We can't
Speaker 2: get people out of our that say they want to
Speaker 2: kill people, and they're sending illegal you know, ballistic missile
Speaker 2: components from California as of yesterday. They're like, yeah, we
Speaker 2: have to look at her green card. I'm like, I'm sorry,
Speaker 2: what get her, take her and let her go back
Speaker 2: to wherever. Anyways, I digress. But the whole concept here
Speaker 2: is that our government is never able to wrap their
Speaker 2: head around. We just need to get to the bottom
Speaker 2: and then we need to have an action item. There's
Speaker 2: no action item. It's a litt talking This second clip
Speaker 2: of Amy Askridge is really wild. I just want to
Speaker 2: preface this. I have never heard this in my life.
Speaker 2: I heard it for the first time today prepping to
Speaker 2: do this segment. I don't know if you've heard it.
Speaker 11: Yet, but I have it.
Speaker 3: It's something I was unprepared for.
Speaker 2: I'll say that, totally unprepared for. So if you haven't
Speaker 2: heard this yet, buckle up.
Speaker 3: Well.
Speaker 12: So the alter terrestrials, I'll just tell you the alter terrestrials.
Speaker 12: I think have you heard of the P fifty two's
Speaker 12: and the P forty sevens? Do you know what that is?
Speaker 12: They're us from the future. They're from here, they are you,
Speaker 12: they are me, They're from here from the future. P
Speaker 12: forty seven is present plus forty seven thousand years. P
Speaker 12: fifty two is present plus fifty two thousand years. And
Speaker 12: basically there's a calamity, right, so there's like a apocalypse
Speaker 12: scenario in the near future. It wipes out most of
Speaker 12: like everything man, and there's the ones that go underground
Speaker 12: and survive, right, and then there's the ones that somehow
Speaker 12: stay on the surface and miraculously don't die.
Speaker 3: I got nothing, I'm like, so let me, let's I
Speaker 3: think this might be our last clip for the day,
Speaker 3: So let me add on a positive note. I'm gonna
Speaker 3: be optimistic about this. And here's what I'm saying, dude,
Speaker 3: if it's if the P forty five's or US plus
Speaker 3: forty five thousand years, guys, we made it all right.
Speaker 3: We're good, Like society is still around forty five thousand
Speaker 3: years from now, we are all right and whatever happens,
Speaker 3: you know, so good news is let's assume she's telling
Speaker 3: the truth. Although she does seem a little casual with
Speaker 3: her fork and like she's eating dinner while she's describing
Speaker 3: like the next forty five thousand years of humanity. But
Speaker 3: I think you know, now it's a good time to
Speaker 3: start applying the filter. Like COVID kind of snuck up
Speaker 3: on us, and then you had to kind of quickly
Speaker 3: in real time be like, Okay, who do I want
Speaker 3: to have in my so called bubble?
Speaker 6: Right?
Speaker 3: And it was easy, like if you're someone that drives
Speaker 3: in their car by themselves with a mask on, like
Speaker 3: you don't qualify. But now we can be like, okay,
Speaker 3: if we have four years, if we have four years
Speaker 3: to start figuring out when this calamity occurs, who do
Speaker 3: we want to be underground with then that's you know,
Speaker 3: we can make informed decisions and not kind of have
Speaker 3: the fever dream craziness that happened to us in twenty twenty.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So for those of you who are listening, she
Speaker 2: shows a chart there and she's talking about the global
Speaker 2: event that happens in twenty thirty, which if you're somebody
Speaker 2: who follows the WEF or the twenty thirty Global Allegiance Party,
Speaker 2: these are all people that are saying that we need
Speaker 2: population control and they subscribe to like the Soroses and
Speaker 2: the Bill Gates is of the World. But she literally
Speaker 2: is sitting in like a tank top on some kind
Speaker 2: of zoom call, having this sort of very strange conversation
Speaker 2: to you know, us regular folks, and she got a
Speaker 2: fourth in her hand, like she's like munch munch, forty
Speaker 2: thousand years in the future, Munch munch.
Speaker 3: Yeah, bitch, I'm like, so in the globe when the
Speaker 3: global calamity curs, hang on this, he's a little bit
Speaker 3: of salt. But when this happens, then you know, by.
Speaker 2: Today it's different, like what is happening. But I have
Speaker 2: to say that level of calmness, the fact that she
Speaker 2: was just this scientist in Huntsville, Alabama, running a small
Speaker 2: shop with her dad. And they've since gotten comment from
Speaker 2: her dad as they're investigating this, Who's like, you know,
Speaker 2: people just die, just leave it. And I'm like, I
Speaker 2: don't know if i'd be like that that was my kid,
Speaker 2: I don't know. But you know, her father is also
Speaker 2: in this world, right, like, this is his space, this
Speaker 2: is where he lives, this is his business. So I
Speaker 2: don't know what that guy knows and doesn't know.
Speaker 3: But yeah, I don't know why you so devalue my
Speaker 3: family and my role as a father that you continue
Speaker 3: to make me comment publicly on this story. Linda, right,
Speaker 3: But I do want to say that in April twenty
Speaker 3: twenty six, both Linda and I are of sound mind
Speaker 3: and body and choose to live. Yes, we are.
Speaker 2: We are, We are alived, we'd like to stay alive,
Speaker 2: and we are not suicidal in any way, shape or form.
Speaker 2: And we are covering this because it's weird as shit
Speaker 2: and we think you would be interested in it. So
Speaker 2: I want to thank you for listening today. This is
Speaker 2: Sound Bites episode three. We're having a lot of fun.
Speaker 2: He is Eric Eggers, I am Linda McLaughlin Rogue recap
Speaker 2: dot Com, at Rogue Recap at Lindamick and at Eric
Speaker 2: Underscore Eggers.
Speaker 3: Am I right, you got it? What a pro.
Speaker 2: We'll see you guys next week.
Speaker 3: Thanks for joining we hope